|
Tournoi du 01-07-13
1 64,44 9 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -DELTOUR Emile
2 63,33 2 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
3 58,52 8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
4 55,74 6 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand
5 49,81 5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
~ 49,81 1 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès
7 48,33 11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René
8 43,70 10 macaux -COLLET Claudine
9 39,81 7 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon
10 39,44 3 VELGE Brigitte -de WASSEIGE Ariane
11 37,04 4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 61,85 19 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
2 57,96 22 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard
3 56,30 17 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
4 55,74 21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
5 54,07 20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
6 49,63 15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -STEED Adrian
7 48,33 13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier
8 47,78 18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
9 45,74 14 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
10 38,70 16 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph
11 33,89 12 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel
PAIRE Nr : 1 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès
12 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 33,89 % 1 NS 3S N+1 430 14 77.78
2 NS 2P N+1 140 14 77.78
3 NS 3C E-2 200 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
22 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,96 % 4 NS 4C W = -620 13 72.22
5 NS 2P N+1 140 16 88.89
6 NS 3S N-2 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,74 % 7 NS 2S N-1 -100 8 44.44
8 NS 2P N-1 -50 7 38.89
9 NS 4P N+1 450 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 54,07 %10 NS 2C W = -110 9 50.00
11 NS 3P N-1 -50 4 22.22
12 NS 5P W+1 -480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
19 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,85 %13 NS 6C E = -1430 3 16.67
14 NS 5K W+1 -420 2 11.11
15 NS 2C S+2 170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,78 %16 NS 4C S = 420 13 72.22
17 NS 4T W-2 100 11 61.11
18 NS 2P E+1 -140 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,30 %19 NS 1S E = -90 6 33.33
20 NS 3S E-2 200 16 88.89
21 NS 3K N-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
16 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 38,70 %22 NS 3S S+2 460 11 61.11
23 NS 4T W = -130 14 77.78
24 NS 2P W+1 -140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -STEED Adrian : 49,63 %25 NS 3C S-1 -50 2 11.11
26 NS 4P N+1 650 12 66.67
27 NS 3S N = 400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
14 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,74 %28 NS 2T N-2 -200 5 27.78
29 NS 3S N-1 -100 7 38.89
30 NS 2S S+2 180 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 269,0 / 540 = 49,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 48,33 % 4 NS 4C W-1 100 17 94.44
5 NS 2P N = 110 10 55.56
6 NS 4P N-2 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
12 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 33,89 % 7 NS 2KcW-1 200 18 100.00
8 NS 1P N = 80 16 88.89
9 NS 4P N+1 450 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
22 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,96 %10 NS 1S S = 90 14 77.78
11 NS 4K E-1 50 10 55.56
12 NS 5K N-2 -200 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,74 %13 NS 6C E = -1430 3 16.67
14 NS 3K W+1 -130 13 72.22
15 NS 4C S = 620 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 54,07 %16 NS 4C S = 420 13 72.22
17 NS 2KcE-1 100 11 61.11
18 NS Pass Passe 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
19 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,85 %19 NS 2P E = -110 1 5.56
20 NS 2K W+1 -110 3 16.67
21 NS 2K N = 90 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,78 %22 NS 3S S+3 490 16 88.89
23 NS 3K S-3 -300 7 38.89
24 NS 4P E-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,30 %25 NS 3C S = 140 14 77.78
26 NS 4P N+1 650 12 66.67
27 NS 3S N = 400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
16 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 38,70 %28 NS 3T E-2 100 17 94.44
29 NS 3K S+2 150 13 72.22
30 NS 3S S+1 430 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -STEED Adrian : 49,63 %31 NS 3S W+2 -460 8 44.44
32 NS 4P W = -620 9 50.00
33 NS 4PcS-3 -500 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 342,0 / 540 = 63,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 VELGE Brigitte -de WASSEIGE Ariane
16 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 38,70 % 1 NS 3S N = 400 8 44.44
2 NS 4K W-1 50 9 50.00
3 NS 4K N-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
14 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,74 % 7 NS 2S N-1 -100 8 44.44
8 NS 1P N-1 -50 7 38.89
9 NS 4P N+1 450 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 48,33 %10 NS 3P E = -140 3 16.67
11 NS 2P N = 110 13 72.22
12 NS 4P E+3 -510 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 33,89 %13 NS 4C E+2 -680 15 83.33
14 NS 4K W = -130 13 72.22
15 NS 3C S = 140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
22 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,96 %16 NS 4C S-1 -50 4 22.22
17 NS 2PcN-1 -100 6 33.33
18 NS 1P E+2 -140 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,74 %19 NS 2P W = -110 1 5.56
20 NS 3P E-1 100 11 61.11
21 NS 2P E-3 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 54,07 %22 NS 3S S = 400 3 16.67
23 NS 4KcN-2 -500 2 11.11
24 NS 4P W-2 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
19 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,85 %25 NS 3C S-1 -50 2 11.11
26 NS 4P N+1 650 12 66.67
27 NS 4C S-2 -100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,78 %28 NS 3C E-1 50 14 77.78
29 NS 3K S+2 150 13 72.22
30 NS 2K E = -90 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,30 %31 NS 6S E = -990 0 0.00
32 NS 4P W+1 -650 3 16.67
33 NS 4C E+2 -480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
Total : 213,0 / 540 = 39,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,78 % 1 NS 3S N+1 430 14 77.78
2 NS 3S E = -400 4 22.22
3 NS 3P E-2 200 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,30 % 4 NS 4C W+2 -680 1 5.56
5 NS 4C E-1 50 4 22.22
6 NS 3S N-2 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -STEED Adrian : 49,63 %10 NS 2C E+1 -140 3 16.67
11 NS 3P N-1 -50 4 22.22
12 NS 5P E+1 -480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
14 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,74 %13 NS 3S W+3 -690 10 55.56
14 NS 3K W+1 -130 13 72.22
15 NS 4C S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 48,33 %16 NS 4C S = 420 13 72.22
17 NS 2P N = 110 15 83.33
18 NS 2P W = -110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
12 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 33,89 %19 NS 1S E-1 100 16 88.89
20 NS 2P E = -110 3 16.67
21 NS 2K S+1 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
22 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,96 %22 NS 6S N-1 -50 0 0.00
23 NS 4KcN-4 -1100 0 0.00
24 NS 4P W-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,74 %25 NS Pass Passe 6 33.33
26 NS 5P N-1 -100 1 5.56
27 NS 3S N = 400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 54,07 %28 NS 3K N-2 -200 5 27.78
29 NS 3S N-2 -200 2 11.11
30 NS 2T N+2 130 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
19 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,85 %31 NS 3S E+3 -490 4 22.22
32 NS 4P W+1 -650 3 16.67
33 NS 5TcS-3 -500 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
Total : 200,0 / 540 = 37,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 54,07 % 1 NS 3S N-2 -100 1 5.56
2 NS 4K W-1 50 9 50.00
3 NS 3K S+1 130 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
19 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,85 % 4 NS 4C W-1 100 17 94.44
5 NS 3C E+1 -170 0 0.00
6 NS 3K S+2 150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,78 % 7 NS 1S N-1 -100 8 44.44
8 NS 2C W-1 50 12 66.67
9 NS 4P N = 420 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
16 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 38,70 %13 NS 4C E+2 -680 15 83.33
14 NS 3K W+1 -130 13 72.22
15 NS 2C S+2 170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -STEED Adrian : 49,63 %16 NS 4C S = 420 13 72.22
17 NS 4CcS-2 -300 2 11.11
18 NS 2P E = -110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
14 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,74 %19 NS 2C S-1 -50 12 66.67
20 NS 3K W-1 100 11 61.11
21 NS 3T S-2 -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 48,33 %22 NS 3S S+2 460 11 61.11
23 NS 3K S-3 -300 7 38.89
24 NS 5CcS-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
12 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 33,89 %25 NS 2C S+1 140 14 77.78
26 NS 4P N = 620 4 22.22
27 NS 4C S = 420 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
22 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,96 %28 NS 3K N-3 -300 0 0.00
29 NS 2K S+3 150 13 72.22
30 NS 2S S+2 180 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,74 %31 NS 6K E = -920 2 11.11
32 NS 3C W = -140 16 88.89
33 NS 4C E = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 269,0 / 540 = 49,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand
22 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,96 % 1 NS 3S N = 400 8 44.44
2 NS 4P N = 620 16 88.89
3 NS 4K S = 130 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,74 % 4 NS 4P W+1 -650 7 38.89
5 NS 4C E-1 50 4 22.22
6 NS 3S S = 400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 54,07 % 7 NS 2S N-1 -100 8 44.44
8 NS 3S E-1 50 12 66.67
9 NS 4P N+1 450 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
19 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,85 %10 NS 3P E = -140 3 16.67
11 NS 3P N-1 -50 4 22.22
12 NS 5P E+1 -480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,30 %16 NS 4C S-1 -50 4 22.22
17 NS 3CcS-2 -300 2 11.11
18 NS 2P E = -110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
16 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 38,70 %19 NS 2C S = 110 18 100.00
20 NS 2K W = -90 8 44.44
21 NS 3C S-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -STEED Adrian : 49,63 %22 NS 3S S+2 460 11 61.11
23 NS 2S E+2 -180 12 66.67
24 NS 4P W-2 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
14 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,74 %25 NS 2C S+1 140 14 77.78
26 NS 6P N-1 -100 1 5.56
27 NS 4C S = 420 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 48,33 %28 NS 3K N-2 -200 5 27.78
29 NS 3K S+2 150 13 72.22
30 NS 3S S+1 430 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
12 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 33,89 %31 NS 3S E+2 -460 8 44.44
32 NS 3S W-2 200 18 100.00
33 NS 4C E-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
Total : 301,0 / 540 = 55,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 48,33 % 1 NS 4P N-1 -50 4 22.22
2 NS 3PcN = 730 18 100.00
3 NS 4T W-1 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
12 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 33,89 % 4 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 38.89
5 NS 2P N+1 140 16 88.89
6 NS 6K S-2 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
22 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,96 % 7 NS 3S N-2 -200 0 0.00
8 NS 2S E = -120 2 11.11
9 NS 4P N+1 450 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,74 %10 NS 2P W+1 -140 3 16.67
11 NS 3P N-1 -50 4 22.22
12 NS 5KcS-2 -500 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 54,07 %13 NS 6C E = -1430 3 16.67
14 NS 3S W+4 -520 0 0.00
15 NS 2C S+2 170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,78 %19 NS 2C S-1 -50 12 66.67
20 NS 2P E = -110 3 16.67
21 NS 3T S-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,30 %22 NS 6T N = 920 18 100.00
23 NS 3K S-3 -300 7 38.89
24 NS 4P W+1 -450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
16 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 38,70 %25 NS 2C S+1 140 14 77.78
26 NS 4P N+1 650 12 66.67
27 NS 3S N-2 -100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -STEED Adrian : 49,63 %28 NS 3S N-1 -100 10 55.56
29 NS 3S N-1 -100 7 38.89
30 NS 3S S = 400 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
14 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,74 %31 NS 3S W+1 -430 12 66.67
32 NS 4P E = -620 9 50.00
33 NS 5TcS-3 -500 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 215,0 / 540 = 39,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -STEED Adrian : 49,63 % 1 NS 3S N = 400 8 44.44
2 NS 3S E+1 -430 2 11.11
3 NS 2P E+2 -170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
14 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,74 % 4 NS 4C W = -620 13 72.22
5 NS 2P S+1 140 16 88.89
6 NS 5S S+1 490 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 48,33 % 7 NS 2S N-1 -100 8 44.44
8 NS 2S E-1 50 12 66.67
9 NS 4P S = 420 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
12 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 33,89 %10 NS 1S S+1 120 18 100.00
11 NS 3P S-1 -50 4 22.22
12 NS 5K N-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
22 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,96 %13 NS 4C E+2 -680 15 83.33
14 NS 4P N-4 -200 4 22.22
15 NS 3C S = 140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,74 %16 NS 3S S+2 460 18 100.00
17 NS 2PcN-2 -300 2 11.11
18 NS 1S E+1 -120 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
19 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,85 %22 NS 3S S+2 460 11 61.11
23 NS 2K E-1 100 18 100.00
24 NS 4P W-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,78 %25 NS 2C S+1 140 14 77.78
26 NS 4P N+1 650 12 66.67
27 NS 3S N-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,30 %28 NS 2TcW-1 100 17 94.44
29 NS 3S N-2 -200 2 11.11
30 NS 2S S+2 180 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
16 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 38,70 %31 NS 3K E+2 -150 18 100.00
32 NS 5T N-3 -150 14 77.78
33 NS 3T S = 110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
Total : 316,0 / 540 = 58,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -DELTOUR Emile
17 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,30 % 1 NS 3S N+1 430 14 77.78
2 NS 4C E-2 100 12 66.67
3 NS 4KcN = 510 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
16 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 38,70 % 4 NS 4P E+2 -680 1 5.56
5 NS 2P N = 110 10 55.56
6 NS 3S S+1 430 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -STEED Adrian : 49,63 % 7 NS 2S N+1 150 16 88.89
8 NS 3S E-2 100 18 100.00
9 NS 4P N+1 450 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
14 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,74 %10 NS 1S S = 90 14 77.78
11 NS 2P N+1 140 17 94.44
12 NS 5K N-2 -200 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 48,33 %13 NS 4C E+2 -680 15 83.33
14 NS 4K E+2 -170 6 33.33
15 NS 3C S = 140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
12 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 33,89 %16 NS 3C S+2 200 8 44.44
17 NS 2P N = 110 15 83.33
18 NS 2P E = -110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
22 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,96 %19 NS 1S W = -90 6 33.33
20 NS 2K E+1 -110 3 16.67
21 NS 1S S-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 54,07 %25 NS 2C S = 110 8 44.44
26 NS 5P N = 650 12 66.67
27 NS 3S N = 400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
19 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,85 %28 NS 2S N-2 -200 5 27.78
29 NS 3S N+2 660 18 100.00
30 NS 3S S+1 430 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,78 %31 NS 3S W = -400 15 83.33
32 NS 4P E = -620 9 50.00
33 NS 3C E-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
Total : 348,0 / 540 = 64,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 macaux -COLLET Claudine
19 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,85 % 1 NS 3S N-2 -100 1 5.56
2 NS 3S E+2 -460 0 0.00
3 NS 2P E-1 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,78 % 4 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 38.89
5 NS 2P N = 110 10 55.56
6 NS 4P N = 420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,30 % 7 NS 2S N-1 -100 8 44.44
8 NS 2C W = -110 4 22.22
9 NS 4P N = 420 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
16 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 38,70 %10 NS 1S S = 90 14 77.78
11 NS 2P N = 110 13 72.22
12 NS 4P E+2 -480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -STEED Adrian : 49,63 %13 NS 6C W = -1430 3 16.67
14 NS 4K W = -130 13 72.22
15 NS 3C S-1 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
14 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,74 %16 NS 4C S-2 -100 0 0.00
17 NS 4PcW-4 800 18 100.00
18 NS 2P W = -110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 48,33 %19 NS 1S E = -90 6 33.33
20 NS 3S E-2 200 16 88.89
21 NS 2P W-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
12 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 33,89 %22 NS 3S S+1 430 6 33.33
23 NS 4C S-3 -300 7 38.89
24 NS 4P W-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,74 %28 NS 1S E = -90 12 66.67
29 NS 3S N-2 -200 2 11.11
30 NS 1P E = -80 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 54,07 %31 NS 3S W+2 -460 8 44.44
32 NS 4P W = -620 9 50.00
33 NS 4TcS-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 236,0 / 540 = 43,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,74 % 1 NS 3S N+3 490 18 100.00
2 NS 3K W+1 -130 6 33.33
3 NS 3S W-1 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 54,07 % 4 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 38.89
5 NS 4C W-1 50 4 22.22
6 NS 3S S = 400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
19 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,85 % 7 NS 2S N-1 -100 8 44.44
8 NS 2S E+1 -150 0 0.00
9 NS 4P N+1 450 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,78 %10 NS 2P W = -110 9 50.00
11 NS 3P N = 140 17 94.44
12 NS 5CxW = -1000 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,30 %13 NS 4C E+3 -710 8 44.44
14 NS 4K W = -130 13 72.22
15 NS 3C S = 140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
16 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 38,70 %16 NS 3C S-1 -50 4 22.22
17 NS 2K E-1 50 8 44.44
18 NS 2P W = -110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -STEED Adrian : 49,63 %19 NS 2C S-1 -50 12 66.67
20 NS 3S E-2 200 16 88.89
21 NS 1S S+1 120 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
14 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,74 %22 NS 3S S = 400 3 16.67
23 NS 2K S-1 -100 16 88.89
24 NS 2P W+2 -170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 48,33 %25 NS 3C S-1 -50 2 11.11
26 NS 4P N+1 650 12 66.67
27 NS 3S S = 400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
22 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,96 %31 NS 3S W = -400 15 83.33
32 NS 5TcS-4 -800 0 0.00
33 NS 4C E+1 -450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 261,0 / 540 = 48,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel
1 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 49,81 % 1 EO 3S N+1 430 4 22.22
2 EO 2P N+1 140 4 22.22
3 EO 3C E-2 200 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
7 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 39,81 % 4 EO 4P E+1 -650 11 61.11
5 EO 2P N+1 140 2 11.11
6 EO 6K S-2 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 63,33 % 7 EO 2KcW-1 200 0 0.00
8 EO 1P N = 80 2 11.11
9 EO 4P N+1 450 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 58,52 %10 EO 1S S+1 120 0 0.00
11 EO 3P S-1 -50 14 77.78
12 EO 5K N-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
3 VELGE Brigitte -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 39,44 %13 EO 4C E+2 -680 3 16.67
14 EO 4K W = -130 5 27.78
15 EO 3C S = 140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
9 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -DELTOUR Emile : 64,44 %16 EO 3C S+2 200 10 55.56
17 EO 2P N = 110 3 16.67
18 EO 2P E = -110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 37,04 %19 EO 1S E-1 100 2 11.11
20 EO 2P E = -110 15 83.33
21 EO 2K S+1 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
10 macaux -COLLET Claudine : 43,70 %22 EO 3S S+1 430 12 66.67
23 EO 4C S-3 -300 11 61.11
24 EO 4P W-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,81 %25 EO 2C S+1 140 4 22.22
26 EO 4P N = 620 14 77.78
27 EO 4C S = 420 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
6 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 55,74 %31 EO 3S E+2 -460 10 55.56
32 EO 3S W-2 200 0 0.00
33 EO 4C E-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
Total : 183,0 / 540 = 33,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier
7 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 39,81 % 1 EO 4P N-1 -50 14 77.78
2 EO 3PcN = 730 0 0.00
3 EO 4T W-1 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 63,33 % 4 EO 4C W-1 100 1 5.56
5 EO 2P N = 110 8 44.44
6 EO 4P N-2 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 58,52 % 7 EO 2S N-1 -100 10 55.56
8 EO 2S E-1 50 6 33.33
9 EO 4P S = 420 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
3 VELGE Brigitte -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 39,44 %10 EO 3P E = -140 15 83.33
11 EO 2P N = 110 5 27.78
12 EO 4P E+3 -510 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
9 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -DELTOUR Emile : 64,44 %13 EO 4C E+2 -680 3 16.67
14 EO 4K E+2 -170 12 66.67
15 EO 3C S = 140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 37,04 %16 EO 4C S = 420 5 27.78
17 EO 2P N = 110 3 16.67
18 EO 2P W = -110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
10 macaux -COLLET Claudine : 43,70 %19 EO 1S E = -90 12 66.67
20 EO 3S E-2 200 2 11.11
21 EO 2P W-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,81 %22 EO 3S S+2 460 7 38.89
23 EO 3K S-3 -300 11 61.11
24 EO 5CcS-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 48,33 %25 EO 3C S-1 -50 16 88.89
26 EO 4P N+1 650 6 33.33
27 EO 3S S = 400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
6 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 55,74 %28 EO 3K N-2 -200 13 72.22
29 EO 3K S+2 150 5 27.78
30 EO 3S S+1 430 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 261,0 / 540 = 48,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 58,52 % 4 EO 4C W = -620 5 27.78
5 EO 2P S+1 140 2 11.11
6 EO 5S S+1 490 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
3 VELGE Brigitte -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 39,44 % 7 EO 2S N-1 -100 10 55.56
8 EO 1P N-1 -50 11 61.11
9 EO 4P N+1 450 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -DELTOUR Emile : 64,44 %10 EO 1S S = 90 4 22.22
11 EO 2P N+1 140 1 5.56
12 EO 5K N-2 -200 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 37,04 %13 EO 3S W+3 -690 8 44.44
14 EO 3K W+1 -130 5 27.78
15 EO 4C S-2 -200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
10 macaux -COLLET Claudine : 43,70 %16 EO 4C S-2 -100 18 100.00
17 EO 4PcW-4 800 0 0.00
18 EO 2P W = -110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,81 %19 EO 2C S-1 -50 6 33.33
20 EO 3K W-1 100 7 38.89
21 EO 3T S-2 -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 48,33 %22 EO 3S S = 400 15 83.33
23 EO 2K S-1 -100 2 11.11
24 EO 2P W+2 -170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
6 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 55,74 %25 EO 2C S+1 140 4 22.22
26 EO 6P N-1 -100 17 94.44
27 EO 4C S = 420 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
1 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 49,81 %28 EO 2T N-2 -200 13 72.22
29 EO 3S N-1 -100 11 61.11
30 EO 2S S+2 180 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
7 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 39,81 %31 EO 3S W+1 -430 6 33.33
32 EO 4P E = -620 9 50.00
33 EO 5TcS-3 -500 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 247,0 / 540 = 45,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -STEED Adrian
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 58,52 % 1 EO 3S N = 400 10 55.56
2 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 88.89
3 EO 2P E+2 -170 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
9 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -DELTOUR Emile : 64,44 % 7 EO 2S N+1 150 2 11.11
8 EO 3S E-2 100 0 0.00
9 EO 4P N+1 450 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 37,04 %10 EO 2C E+1 -140 15 83.33
11 EO 3P N-1 -50 14 77.78
12 EO 5P E+1 -480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
10 macaux -COLLET Claudine : 43,70 %13 EO 6C W = -1430 15 83.33
14 EO 4K W = -130 5 27.78
15 EO 3C S-1 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,81 %16 EO 4C S = 420 5 27.78
17 EO 4CcS-2 -300 16 88.89
18 EO 2P E = -110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 48,33 %19 EO 2C S-1 -50 6 33.33
20 EO 3S E-2 200 2 11.11
21 EO 1S S+1 120 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
6 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 55,74 %22 EO 3S S+2 460 7 38.89
23 EO 2S E+2 -180 6 33.33
24 EO 4P W-2 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
1 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 49,81 %25 EO 3C S-1 -50 16 88.89
26 EO 4P N+1 650 6 33.33
27 EO 3S N = 400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
7 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 39,81 %28 EO 3S N-1 -100 8 44.44
29 EO 3S N-1 -100 11 61.11
30 EO 3S S = 400 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 63,33 %31 EO 3S W+2 -460 10 55.56
32 EO 4P W = -620 9 50.00
33 EO 4PcS-3 -500 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 268,0 / 540 = 49,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph
3 VELGE Brigitte -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 39,44 % 1 EO 3S N = 400 10 55.56
2 EO 4K W-1 50 9 50.00
3 EO 4K N-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
9 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -DELTOUR Emile : 64,44 % 4 EO 4P E+2 -680 17 94.44
5 EO 2P N = 110 8 44.44
6 EO 3S S+1 430 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 macaux -COLLET Claudine : 43,70 %10 EO 1S S = 90 4 22.22
11 EO 2P N = 110 5 27.78
12 EO 4P E+2 -480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,81 %13 EO 4C E+2 -680 3 16.67
14 EO 3K W+1 -130 5 27.78
15 EO 2C S+2 170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 48,33 %16 EO 3C S-1 -50 14 77.78
17 EO 2K E-1 50 10 55.56
18 EO 2P W = -110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
6 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 55,74 %19 EO 2C S = 110 0 0.00
20 EO 2K W = -90 10 55.56
21 EO 3C S-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
1 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 49,81 %22 EO 3S S+2 460 7 38.89
23 EO 4T W = -130 4 22.22
24 EO 2P W+1 -140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
7 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 39,81 %25 EO 2C S+1 140 4 22.22
26 EO 4P N+1 650 6 33.33
27 EO 3S N-2 -100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 63,33 %28 EO 3T E-2 100 1 5.56
29 EO 3K S+2 150 5 27.78
30 EO 3S S+1 430 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 58,52 %31 EO 3K E+2 -150 0 0.00
32 EO 5T N-3 -150 4 22.22
33 EO 3T S = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
Total : 209,0 / 540 = 38,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
9 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -DELTOUR Emile : 64,44 % 1 EO 3S N+1 430 4 22.22
2 EO 4C E-2 100 6 33.33
3 EO 4KcN = 510 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 37,04 % 4 EO 4C W+2 -680 17 94.44
5 EO 4C E-1 50 14 77.78
6 EO 3S N-2 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
10 macaux -COLLET Claudine : 43,70 % 7 EO 2S N-1 -100 10 55.56
8 EO 2C W = -110 14 77.78
9 EO 4P N = 420 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 48,33 %13 EO 4C E+3 -710 10 55.56
14 EO 4K W = -130 5 27.78
15 EO 3C S = 140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
6 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 55,74 %16 EO 4C S-1 -50 14 77.78
17 EO 3CcS-2 -300 16 88.89
18 EO 2P E = -110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
1 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 49,81 %19 EO 1S E = -90 12 66.67
20 EO 3S E-2 200 2 11.11
21 EO 3K N-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
7 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 39,81 %22 EO 6T N = 920 0 0.00
23 EO 3K S-3 -300 11 61.11
24 EO 4P W+1 -450 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 63,33 %25 EO 3C S = 140 4 22.22
26 EO 4P N+1 650 6 33.33
27 EO 3S N = 400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 58,52 %28 EO 2TcW-1 100 1 5.56
29 EO 3S N-2 -200 16 88.89
30 EO 2S S+2 180 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 VELGE Brigitte -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 39,44 %31 EO 6S E = -990 18 100.00
32 EO 4P W+1 -650 15 83.33
33 EO 4C E+2 -480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
Total : 304,0 / 540 = 56,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 37,04 % 1 EO 3S N+1 430 4 22.22
2 EO 3S E = -400 14 77.78
3 EO 3P E-2 200 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
10 macaux -COLLET Claudine : 43,70 % 4 EO 4P E+1 -650 11 61.11
5 EO 2P N = 110 8 44.44
6 EO 4P N = 420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,81 % 7 EO 1S N-1 -100 10 55.56
8 EO 2C W-1 50 6 33.33
9 EO 4P N = 420 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 48,33 %10 EO 2P W = -110 9 50.00
11 EO 3P N = 140 1 5.56
12 EO 5CxW = -1000 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
1 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 49,81 %16 EO 4C S = 420 5 27.78
17 EO 4T W-2 100 7 38.89
18 EO 2P E+1 -140 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
7 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 39,81 %19 EO 2C S-1 -50 6 33.33
20 EO 2P E = -110 15 83.33
21 EO 3T S-3 -300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 63,33 %22 EO 3S S+3 490 2 11.11
23 EO 3K S-3 -300 11 61.11
24 EO 4P E-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 58,52 %25 EO 2C S+1 140 4 22.22
26 EO 4P N+1 650 6 33.33
27 EO 3S N-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
3 VELGE Brigitte -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 39,44 %28 EO 3C E-1 50 4 22.22
29 EO 3K S+2 150 5 27.78
30 EO 2K E = -90 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -DELTOUR Emile : 64,44 %31 EO 3S W = -400 3 16.67
32 EO 4P E = -620 9 50.00
33 EO 3C E-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
Total : 258,0 / 540 = 47,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
10 macaux -COLLET Claudine : 43,70 % 1 EO 3S N-2 -100 17 94.44
2 EO 3S E+2 -460 18 100.00
3 EO 2P E-1 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,81 % 4 EO 4C W-1 100 1 5.56
5 EO 3C E+1 -170 18 100.00
6 EO 3K S+2 150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 48,33 % 7 EO 2S N-1 -100 10 55.56
8 EO 2S E+1 -150 18 100.00
9 EO 4P N+1 450 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
6 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 55,74 %10 EO 3P E = -140 15 83.33
11 EO 3P N-1 -50 14 77.78
12 EO 5P E+1 -480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
1 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 49,81 %13 EO 6C E = -1430 15 83.33
14 EO 5K W+1 -420 16 88.89
15 EO 2C S+2 170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 63,33 %19 EO 2P E = -110 17 94.44
20 EO 2K W+1 -110 15 83.33
21 EO 2K N = 90 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 58,52 %22 EO 3S S+2 460 7 38.89
23 EO 2K E-1 100 0 0.00
24 EO 4P W-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
3 VELGE Brigitte -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 39,44 %25 EO 3C S-1 -50 16 88.89
26 EO 4P N+1 650 6 33.33
27 EO 4C S-2 -100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
9 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -DELTOUR Emile : 64,44 %28 EO 2S N-2 -200 13 72.22
29 EO 3S N+2 660 0 0.00
30 EO 3S S+1 430 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 37,04 %31 EO 3S E+3 -490 14 77.78
32 EO 4P W+1 -650 15 83.33
33 EO 5TcS-3 -500 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
Total : 334,0 / 540 = 61,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,81 % 1 EO 3S N-2 -100 17 94.44
2 EO 4K W-1 50 9 50.00
3 EO 3K S+1 130 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 48,33 % 4 EO 4P E+1 -650 11 61.11
5 EO 4C W-1 50 14 77.78
6 EO 3S S = 400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
6 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 55,74 % 7 EO 2S N-1 -100 10 55.56
8 EO 3S E-1 50 6 33.33
9 EO 4P N+1 450 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
1 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 49,81 %10 EO 2C W = -110 9 50.00
11 EO 3P N-1 -50 14 77.78
12 EO 5P W+1 -480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
7 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 39,81 %13 EO 6C E = -1430 15 83.33
14 EO 3S W+4 -520 18 100.00
15 EO 2C S+2 170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 63,33 %16 EO 4C S = 420 5 27.78
17 EO 2KcE-1 100 7 38.89
18 EO Pass Passe 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
3 VELGE Brigitte -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 39,44 %22 EO 3S S = 400 15 83.33
23 EO 4KcN-2 -500 16 88.89
24 EO 4P W-2 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
9 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -DELTOUR Emile : 64,44 %25 EO 2C S = 110 10 55.56
26 EO 5P N = 650 6 33.33
27 EO 3S N = 400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 37,04 %28 EO 3K N-2 -200 13 72.22
29 EO 3S N-2 -200 16 88.89
30 EO 2T N+2 130 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
10 macaux -COLLET Claudine : 43,70 %31 EO 3S W+2 -460 10 55.56
32 EO 4P W = -620 9 50.00
33 EO 4TcS-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 292,0 / 540 = 54,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 48,33 % 1 EO 3S N+3 490 0 0.00
2 EO 3K W+1 -130 12 66.67
3 EO 3S W-1 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
6 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 55,74 % 4 EO 4P W+1 -650 11 61.11
5 EO 4C E-1 50 14 77.78
6 EO 3S S = 400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
1 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 49,81 % 7 EO 2S N-1 -100 10 55.56
8 EO 2P N-1 -50 11 61.11
9 EO 4P N+1 450 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 39,81 %10 EO 2P W+1 -140 15 83.33
11 EO 3P N-1 -50 14 77.78
12 EO 5KcS-2 -500 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 63,33 %13 EO 6C E = -1430 15 83.33
14 EO 3K W+1 -130 5 27.78
15 EO 4C S = 620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 58,52 %16 EO 3S S+2 460 0 0.00
17 EO 2PcN-2 -300 16 88.89
18 EO 1S E+1 -120 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
3 VELGE Brigitte -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 39,44 %19 EO 2P W = -110 17 94.44
20 EO 3P E-1 100 7 38.89
21 EO 2P E-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 37,04 %25 EO Pass Passe 12 66.67
26 EO 5P N-1 -100 17 94.44
27 EO 3S N = 400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
10 macaux -COLLET Claudine : 43,70 %28 EO 1S E = -90 6 33.33
29 EO 3S N-2 -200 16 88.89
30 EO 1P E = -80 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,81 %31 EO 6K E = -920 16 88.89
32 EO 3C W = -140 2 11.11
33 EO 4C E = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 301,0 / 540 = 55,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard
6 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 55,74 % 1 EO 3S N = 400 10 55.56
2 EO 4P N = 620 2 11.11
3 EO 4K S = 130 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
1 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 49,81 % 4 EO 4C W = -620 5 27.78
5 EO 2P N+1 140 2 11.11
6 EO 3S N-2 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
7 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 39,81 % 7 EO 3S N-2 -200 18 100.00
8 EO 2S E = -120 16 88.89
9 EO 4P N+1 450 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 63,33 %10 EO 1S S = 90 4 22.22
11 EO 4K E-1 50 8 44.44
12 EO 5K N-2 -200 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 58,52 %13 EO 4C E+2 -680 3 16.67
14 EO 4P N-4 -200 14 77.78
15 EO 3C S = 140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
3 VELGE Brigitte -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 39,44 %16 EO 4C S-1 -50 14 77.78
17 EO 2PcN-1 -100 12 66.67
18 EO 1P E+2 -140 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
9 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -DELTOUR Emile : 64,44 %19 EO 1S W = -90 12 66.67
20 EO 2K E+1 -110 15 83.33
21 EO 1S S-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 37,04 %22 EO 6S N-1 -50 18 100.00
23 EO 4KcN-4 -1100 18 100.00
24 EO 4P W-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,81 %28 EO 3K N-3 -300 18 100.00
29 EO 2K S+3 150 5 27.78
30 EO 2S S+2 180 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 48,33 %31 EO 3S W = -400 3 16.67
32 EO 5TcS-4 -800 18 100.00
33 EO 4C E+1 -450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 313,0 / 540 = 57,96 %
|
|