|
Tournoi du 02-02-15
1 58,59 13 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand
2 56,89 2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
3 56,61 12 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
4 53,82 8 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre
5 53,11 1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
6 51,03 10 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte
7 50,06 11 DEGUELLE Jacques -JASSOGNE Jacqueline
8 49,80 7 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
9 45,39 9 MASSAUX Joel -ERPICUM Anne
10 44,91 6 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON
11 43,68 3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
12 43,23 4 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
13 42,94 5 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 60,89 19 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
2 56,39 22 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
3 55,82 14 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques
4 54,58 24 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
5 54,35 26 COULIE Joelle -STEED Adrian
6 54,00 20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
7 49,73 16 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
8 47,20 18 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
9 46,82 21 PIRMEZ Amélie -GROSFILS Colette
10 46,79 25 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
11 43,64 15 COLLET Claudine -BEYNE Anne
12 42,03 23 VAN DOOREN Michele -HOGGE Colette
13 37,71 17 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga
PAIRE Nr : 1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 55,82 % 1 NS 1S S+1 120 15 68.18
2 NS 3S W+1 -430 2 9.09
3 NS 1K S+3 130 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
24 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,58 % 4 NS 5K N-1 -100 3 13.64
5 NS 1S E = -90 6 27.27
6 NS 6C E-1 100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
23 VAN DOOREN Michele -HOGGE Colette : 42,03 % 7 NS 2P N+1 140 11 50.00
8 NS 3S S = 400 17 77.27
9 NS 4P N = 420 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,39 %10 NS 4T E-1 100 15 68.18
11 NS 4C E+1 -450 15 68.18
12 NS 3S W-4 200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
21 PIRMEZ Amélie -GROSFILS Colette : 46,82 %13 NS 1ScN = 180 16 72.73
14 NS 2C E-1 50 18 81.82
15 NS 2S S = 120 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
26 COULIE Joelle -STEED Adrian : 54,35 %16 NS 3S W+1 -630 3 13.64
17 NS 1S S = 90 1 4.55
18 NS 6T E = -920 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
19 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,89 %19 NS 4C W = -620 6 27.27
20 NS 3P N = 140 10 45.45
21 NS 4P E+1 -450 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
18 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,20 %22 NS 2S E-1 100 4 18.18
23 NS 3S E+1 -630 20 90.91
24 NS 3S N-1 -50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
17 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 37,71 %25 NS 2PcW-1 200 20.8 94.55
26 NS 2C E = -110 8.8 40.00
27 NS 5C E-3 150 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 78,03 %
16 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 49,73 %28 NS 3C E-3 150 11 50.00
29 NS 3S W-1 100 14.3 65.00
30 NS 3P E = -140 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 350,5 / 660 = 53,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
15 COLLET Claudine -BEYNE Anne : 43,64 % 4 NS 3S N = 600 21 95.45
5 NS 1S E = -90 6 27.27
6 NS 3S W+2 -660 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 55,82 % 7 NS 2P N+1 140 11 50.00
8 NS 3S S = 400 17 77.27
9 NS 4P N-1 -50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
24 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,58 %10 NS 4CcS-2 -500 1 4.55
11 NS 4C E+1 -450 15 68.18
12 NS 3K E = -110 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
23 VAN DOOREN Michele -HOGGE Colette : 42,03 %13 NS 3P W-3 300 20 90.91
14 NS 2C E-1 50 18 81.82
15 NS 2K N+1 110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,39 %16 NS 3S W+1 -630 3 13.64
17 NS 3C S+1 170 15 68.18
18 NS 3S W+3 -490 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
21 PIRMEZ Amélie -GROSFILS Colette : 46,82 %19 NS 4C W-1 100 17 77.27
20 NS 3P N+2 200 22 100.00
21 NS 4P E-2 100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 92,42 %
25 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,79 %22 NS 2P N = 110 11 50.00
23 NS 3S E = -600 22 100.00
24 NS 3S N = 400 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
19 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,89 %25 NS 2P W = -110 9.9 45.00
26 NS 3C E-1 100 16.5 75.00
27 NS 5TcS-3 -500 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 40,15 %
18 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,20 %28 NS 3CcE-2 300 17.5 79.55
29 NS 3S W-1 100 14.3 65.00
30 NS 3P E+1 -170 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
17 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 37,71 %31 NS 2P S+1 140 18 81.82
32 NS 3S N = 400 4 18.18
33 NS 5K E = -400 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
Total : 375,5 / 660 = 56,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
18 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,20 % 1 NS 3S S-2 -100 2 9.09
2 NS 1C E+2 -140 9 40.91
3 NS 3C W = -140 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
16 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 49,73 % 7 NS 4PcN+1 990 22 100.00
8 NS 1S S+2 150 8 36.36
9 NS 6P N-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
25 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,79 %10 NS 5T E-1 100 15 68.18
11 NS 4C E+1 -450 15 68.18
12 NS 2S W-4 200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 55,82 %13 NS 2C E-1 100 11 50.00
14 NS 1S N-2 -100 12 54.55
15 NS 2K N+1 110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
24 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,58 %16 NS 4C E-5 500 22 100.00
17 NS 3C N = 140 10 45.45
18 NS 6T E+1 -940 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
23 VAN DOOREN Michele -HOGGE Colette : 42,03 %19 NS 4C W = -620 6 27.27
20 NS 3P N = 140 10 45.45
21 NS 4P E-1 50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,39 %22 NS 2P N = 110 11 50.00
23 NS 3S E+4 -720 2 9.09
24 NS 3S N-1 -50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
26 COULIE Joelle -STEED Adrian : 54,35 %25 NS 2S N-2 -100 17.5 79.55
26 NS 2C E+1 -140 3.4 15.45
27 NS 4C E+2 -480 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 36,82 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,00 %28 NS 3C E-3 150 11 50.00
29 NS 3S W-1 100 14.3 65.00
30 NS 3P E = -140 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
19 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,89 %31 NS 4P S-2 -200 0 0.00
32 NS 3S N+2 460 16 72.73
33 NS 4P E+1 -450 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
Total : 288,3 / 660 = 43,68 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,00 % 1 NS 2P N-3 -150 0 0.00
2 NS 2T W+1 -110 14 63.64
3 NS 1K S = 70 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
19 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,89 % 4 NS 5K S-2 -200 0 0.00
5 NS 2P S-3 -300 0 0.00
6 NS 4C E+1 -650 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
17 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 37,71 %10 NS 4C S-2 -200 7 31.82
11 NS 4C E+2 -480 3 13.64
12 NS 3K E = -110 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
26 COULIE Joelle -STEED Adrian : 54,35 %13 NS 1S N = 90 6 27.27
14 NS 3S W-1 50 18 81.82
15 NS 2K N+1 110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
15 COLLET Claudine -BEYNE Anne : 43,64 %16 NS 4K W-2 200 19 86.36
17 NS 2K S+1 110 5 22.73
18 NS 3C W = -140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 55,82 %19 NS 4C W = -620 6 27.27
20 NS 3P N = 140 10 45.45
21 NS 4P E = -420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
24 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,58 %22 NS 2PcN+1 570 22 100.00
23 NS 6C E = -1430 0 0.00
24 NS 3S N+1 430 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
23 VAN DOOREN Michele -HOGGE Colette : 42,03 %25 NS 2P W+1 -140 1.2 5.45
26 NS 3C E = -140 3.4 15.45
27 NS 2C W+1 -140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 26,97 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,39 %28 NS 3C E-3 150 11 50.00
29 NS 3S W+2 -660 3.4 15.45
30 NS 2P E = -110 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 40,15 %
25 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,79 %31 NS 2P S-1 -100 6 27.27
32 NS 3S S+1 430 9 40.91
33 NS 3S W-2 100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
Total : 285,3 / 660 = 43,23 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno
26 COULIE Joelle -STEED Adrian : 54,35 % 1 NS 1S S+1 120 15 68.18
2 NS 2T W-1 50 21 95.45
3 NS 2C E+1 -140 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
21 PIRMEZ Amélie -GROSFILS Colette : 46,82 % 4 NS 1S S+1 120 14 63.64
5 NS 2S E-2 100 19 86.36
6 NS 4PcS-4 -800 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,00 % 7 NS 4C W-1 100 4 18.18
8 NS 3S S-1 -50 3 13.64
9 NS 4P N-1 -50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 19,70 %
18 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,20 %13 NS 1K E+1 -90 2 9.09
14 NS 2C E+1 -140 3 13.64
15 NS 1S S+1 120 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
17 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 37,71 %16 NS 3K W = -110 10 45.45
17 NS 4TcE-2 300 18 81.82
18 NS 3T E+4 -190 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
25 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,79 %19 NS 4C W+1 -650 0 0.00
20 NS 2P N+1 140 10 45.45
21 NS 4P E+1 -450 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
15 COLLET Claudine -BEYNE Anne : 43,64 %22 NS 2PcN = 470 20 90.91
23 NS 4C E+2 -680 9 40.91
24 NS 3S N+2 460 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 55,82 %25 NS 2P W = -110 9.9 45.00
26 NS 2C E+2 -170 0.1 0.45
27 NS 4C W+1 -450 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 25,15 %
24 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,58 %28 NS 3PcE-1 100 1.2 5.45
29 NS 3S W+2 -660 3.4 15.45
30 NS 3P E+1 -170 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 8,79 %
23 VAN DOOREN Michele -HOGGE Colette : 42,03 %31 NS 2P S+1 140 18 81.82
32 NS 3S N+2 460 16 72.73
33 NS 4P W+1 -450 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
Total : 283,4 / 660 = 42,94 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON
24 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,58 % 1 NS 2S S-1 -50 5 22.73
2 NS 2T W+2 -130 12 54.55
3 NS 4P S-1 -50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
23 VAN DOOREN Michele -HOGGE Colette : 42,03 % 4 NS 2K N+2 130 17 77.27
5 NS 1C N = 80 14 63.64
6 NS 4C E+1 -650 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
25 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,79 % 7 NS 3PcN+1 930 20 90.91
8 NS 3S S-1 -50 3 13.64
9 NS 4P N-1 -50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
21 PIRMEZ Amélie -GROSFILS Colette : 46,82 %10 NS 4C S-1 -100 12 54.55
11 NS 4C E+2 -480 3 13.64
12 NS 3K E = -110 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
19 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,89 %16 NS 3S E+2 -660 0 0.00
17 NS 2K S+1 110 5 22.73
18 NS 3S W+3 -490 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
18 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,20 %19 NS 4C W-1 100 17 77.27
20 NS 2P N+1 140 10 45.45
21 NS 3S E-1 50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
26 COULIE Joelle -STEED Adrian : 54,35 %22 NS 2P N = 110 11 50.00
23 NS 4C E+2 -680 9 40.91
24 NS 2S N = 120 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
16 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 49,73 %25 NS 2P W = -110 9.9 45.00
26 NS 3C E-1 100 16.5 75.00
27 NS 4C E+2 -480 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 45,15 %
15 COLLET Claudine -BEYNE Anne : 43,64 %28 NS 3PcE-1 100 1.2 5.45
29 NS 3S W-1 100 14.3 65.00
30 NS 2P E = -110 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 41,82 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 55,82 %31 NS 2P S+1 140 18 81.82
32 NS 3S N-1 -50 0 0.00
33 NS 4P E+1 -450 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
Total : 296,4 / 660 = 44,91 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
15 COLLET Claudine -BEYNE Anne : 43,64 % 1 NS 2S S = 120 15 68.18
2 NS 3C W-1 50 21 95.45
3 NS 2S S-2 -100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 55,82 % 4 NS 2K N+1 110 9 40.91
5 NS Pass Passe 10 45.45
6 NS 5CcE+1 -1050 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
24 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,58 % 7 NS 3P N = 140 11 50.00
8 NS 3S S = 400 17 77.27
9 NS 3S S+3 490 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
26 COULIE Joelle -STEED Adrian : 54,35 %10 NS 5CcS-2 -500 1 4.55
11 NS 4C E+1 -450 15 68.18
12 NS 3S E-3 150 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,39 %13 NS 1S N = 90 6 27.27
14 NS 2P S-3 -150 0 0.00
15 NS 2S S-1 -100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 10,61 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,00 %19 NS 4C W = -620 6 27.27
20 NS 4P N-1 -100 0 0.00
21 NS 4P E-1 50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
19 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,89 %22 NS 2P N-2 -100 2 9.09
23 NS 4C E+2 -680 9 40.91
24 NS 3S N+1 430 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
18 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,20 %25 NS 3P W = -140 1.2 5.45
26 NS 4C E-2 200 21.9 99.55
27 NS 1S N-1 -50 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
25 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,79 %28 NS 4K N+1 150 11 50.00
29 NS 3S W-1 100 14.3 65.00
30 NS 4PcE-2 300 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 71,52 %
16 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 49,73 %31 NS 4P S-1 -100 6 27.27
32 NS 3S N+3 490 21 95.45
33 NS 4P E+1 -450 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
Total : 328,7 / 660 = 49,80 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre
17 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 37,71 % 1 NS 2S S+2 180 22 100.00
2 NS 2C E+1 -140 9 40.91
3 NS 4CcW-2 500 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 80,30 %
16 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 49,73 % 4 NS 3K N = 110 9 40.91
5 NS 2K W-1 50 12 54.55
6 NS 4C E+2 -680 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
15 COLLET Claudine -BEYNE Anne : 43,64 % 7 NS 4CcW = -790 0 0.00
8 NS 3S S = 400 17 77.27
9 NS 4P N = 420 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 55,82 %10 NS 5TcE-1 200 20 90.91
11 NS 4C E+1 -450 15 68.18
12 NS 3K E = -110 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
24 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,58 %13 NS 1S N+1 120 14 63.64
14 NS 2C E = -110 8 36.36
15 NS 1P N = 80 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
25 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,79 %16 NS 3K E+1 -130 8 36.36
17 NS 4C N = 420 21 95.45
18 NS 6T E = -920 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
21 PIRMEZ Amélie -GROSFILS Colette : 46,82 %22 NS 2K N-3 -150 0 0.00
23 NS 4C E+2 -680 9 40.91
24 NS 3S N = 400 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,00 %25 NS 2P W = -110 9.9 45.00
26 NS 3K N = 110 19.7 89.55
27 NS 5TcS-2 -300 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,52 %
19 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,89 %28 NS 4CcE-3 500 20.8 94.55
29 NS 3S W-1 100 14.3 65.00
30 NS 4C N-3 -150 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
26 COULIE Joelle -STEED Adrian : 54,35 %31 NS 4P S-1 -100 6 27.27
32 NS 3S N+3 490 21 95.45
33 NS 4P E+1 -450 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
Total : 355,2 / 660 = 53,82 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 MASSAUX Joel -ERPICUM Anne
19 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,89 % 1 NS 1S S+1 120 15 68.18
2 NS 1ScS-4 -1100 0 0.00
3 NS 4PcS-3 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
25 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,79 % 4 NS 2K N+1 110 9 40.91
5 NS 2S E-2 100 19 86.36
6 NS 5TcN-5 -1100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
17 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 37,71 % 7 NS 2P N+2 170 16 72.73
8 NS 3S S = 400 17 77.27
9 NS 4P N-1 -50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
16 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 49,73 %10 NS 4CcS-1 -200 7 31.82
11 NS 4C E+1 -450 15 68.18
12 NS 2S W-1 50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
15 COLLET Claudine -BEYNE Anne : 43,64 %13 NS 2C E = -110 0 0.00
14 NS 3C E-1 50 18 81.82
15 NS 4P N-1 -100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 55,82 %16 NS 4PcN-3 -500 6 27.27
17 NS 2C N+1 140 10 45.45
18 NS 5T E+1 -420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
26 COULIE Joelle -STEED Adrian : 54,35 %19 NS 6CcW-1 200 22 100.00
20 NS 2S N = 120 2 9.09
21 NS 4P E = -420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,39 %25 NS 2P W = -110 9.9 45.00
26 NS 2C E = -110 8.8 40.00
27 NS 3T S = 110 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 56,52 %
21 PIRMEZ Amélie -GROSFILS Colette : 46,82 %28 NS 3K N+1 130 4.5 20.45
29 NS 3S W-1 100 14.3 65.00
30 NS 3P E-1 50 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 53,48 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,00 %31 NS 2P S+1 140 18 81.82
32 NS 3K S+1 130 2 9.09
33 NS 4P E+1 -450 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
Total : 299,6 / 660 = 45,39 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte
21 PIRMEZ Amélie -GROSFILS Colette : 46,82 % 1 NS 3S S-1 -50 5 22.73
2 NS 1T S-3 -300 6 27.27
3 NS 2C W = -110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,00 % 4 NS 5K N-1 -100 3 13.64
5 NS 1S N-2 -200 2 9.09
6 NS 4C E+1 -650 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
26 COULIE Joelle -STEED Adrian : 54,35 % 7 NS 4P N = 620 18 81.82
8 NS 4C W = -420 0 0.00
9 NS 3S S = 400 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
18 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,20 %10 NS 5T E-2 200 20 90.91
11 NS 4C E+1 -450 15 68.18
12 NS 3K E = -110 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
17 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 37,71 %13 NS 3C E-3 300 20 90.91
14 NS 2P W-1 50 18 81.82
15 NS 2S S = 120 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
16 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 49,73 %16 NS 3PcN-1 -100 14 63.64
17 NS 3C S+1 170 15 68.18
18 NS 6T E+1 -940 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
15 COLLET Claudine -BEYNE Anne : 43,64 %19 NS 4C W-1 100 17 77.27
20 NS 3P N = 140 10 45.45
21 NS 4P E = -420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 55,82 %22 NS 2P N+1 140 18 81.82
23 NS 4C E+2 -680 9 40.91
24 NS 4C S-1 -50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
23 VAN DOOREN Michele -HOGGE Colette : 42,03 %28 NS 3C E-3 150 11 50.00
29 NS 3S W-1 100 14.3 65.00
30 NS 3P E-1 50 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,39 %31 NS 2P S = 110 11 50.00
32 NS 3S N+2 460 16 72.73
33 NS 4P E+1 -450 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
Total : 336,8 / 660 = 51,03 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 DEGUELLE Jacques -JASSOGNE Jacqueline
23 VAN DOOREN Michele -HOGGE Colette : 42,03 % 1 NS 2S S = 120 15 68.18
2 NS 2T W = -90 17 77.27
3 NS 2P S = 110 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,39 % 4 NS 3K S = 110 9 40.91
5 NS 1S E = -90 6 27.27
6 NS 4C E+2 -680 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
21 PIRMEZ Amélie -GROSFILS Colette : 46,82 % 7 NS 2P N+1 140 11 50.00
8 NS 2S S+1 150 8 36.36
9 NS 4P N-1 -50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,00 %10 NS 4CcS-1 -200 7 31.82
11 NS 4C E+2 -480 3 13.64
12 NS 3S W = -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,15 %
25 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,79 %13 NS 2T W-3 300 20 90.91
14 NS 2C E+1 -140 3 13.64
15 NS 2S S = 120 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
18 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,20 %16 NS 3PcN-1 -100 14 63.64
17 NS 2P N+1 140 10 45.45
18 NS 3S E-2 100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
17 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 37,71 %19 NS 2C W+1 -140 12 54.55
20 NS 3P N+1 170 19 86.36
21 NS 4P E = -420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
16 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 49,73 %22 NS 2P N = 110 11 50.00
23 NS 4C E+1 -650 17 77.27
24 NS 3S N = 400 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
15 COLLET Claudine -BEYNE Anne : 43,64 %25 NS 2P W-2 200 20.8 94.55
26 NS 2C E = -110 8.8 40.00
27 NS 4C E = -420 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 58,18 %
24 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,58 %31 NS 1S W+1 -120 2 9.09
32 NS 3S N+1 430 9 40.91
33 NS 5P E = -450 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
Total : 330,4 / 660 = 50,06 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
25 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,79 % 1 NS 2S S = 120 15 68.18
2 NS 4C W = -420 4 18.18
3 NS 1K S-1 -50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
18 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,20 % 4 NS 3K N+1 130 17 77.27
5 NS 3S E-3 150 22 100.00
6 NS 4C E+2 -680 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,39 % 7 NS 3C W+1 -170 2 9.09
8 NS 2S S+1 150 8 36.36
9 NS 4P N = 420 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
15 COLLET Claudine -BEYNE Anne : 43,64 %10 NS 4P W-2 200 20 90.91
11 NS 4C E+2 -480 3 13.64
12 NS 3S W-2 100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
19 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,89 %13 NS 1S N = 90 6 27.27
14 NS 2C E = -110 8 36.36
15 NS 2S S+1 150 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
23 VAN DOOREN Michele -HOGGE Colette : 42,03 %16 NS 3P N-2 -100 14 63.64
17 NS 1S S = 90 1 4.55
18 NS 5T E+1 -420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
16 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 49,73 %19 NS 4C E = -620 6 27.27
20 NS 2P N+1 140 10 45.45
21 NS 4P E-1 50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,00 %22 NS 2P N = 110 11 50.00
23 NS 4C E+1 -650 17 77.27
24 NS 3S N+2 460 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
17 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 37,71 %28 NS 4CcE-3 500 20.8 94.55
29 NS 3S W+3 -690 0.1 0.45
30 NS 3P E-2 100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 61,52 %
21 PIRMEZ Amélie -GROSFILS Colette : 46,82 %31 NS 2P S = 110 11 50.00
32 NS 3S N+1 430 9 40.91
33 NS 3C S-2 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
Total : 373,6 / 660 = 56,61 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand
22 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,39 % 1 NS 3S W-1 50 8 36.36
2 NS 2T E = -90 17 77.27
3 NS 4P S-1 -50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
26 COULIE Joelle -STEED Adrian : 54,35 % 4 NS 3S N = 600 21 95.45
5 NS 1S N = 90 16 72.73
6 NS 5CcE+1 -1050 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
19 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,89 % 7 NS 3K N = 110 6 27.27
8 NS 3S S = 400 17 77.27
9 NS 4P N = 420 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
23 VAN DOOREN Michele -HOGGE Colette : 42,03 %10 NS 4C S-2 -200 7 31.82
11 NS 4C W+1 -450 15 68.18
12 NS 3K W = -110 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
16 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 49,73 %13 NS 2C E-1 100 11 50.00
14 NS 2C E = -110 8 36.36
15 NS 2S S = 120 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,00 %16 NS 4K E-2 200 19 86.36
17 NS 4C N = 420 21 95.45
18 NS 4C E = -420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
24 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,58 %19 NS 5C W-1 100 17 77.27
20 NS 3P N+1 170 19 86.36
21 NS 4P E = -420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
17 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 37,71 %22 NS 2P N = 110 11 50.00
23 NS 4C E+2 -680 9 40.91
24 NS 3S N = 400 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
21 PIRMEZ Amélie -GROSFILS Colette : 46,82 %25 NS 1P E+1 -110 9.9 45.00
26 NS 3K N-1 -100 13.2 60.00
27 NS 3T S = 110 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 63,18 %
18 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,20 %31 NS 2P S+1 140 18 81.82
32 NS 3S N+1 430 9 40.91
33 NS 4P W+1 -450 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
Total : 386,7 / 660 = 58,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques
1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 53,11 % 1 EO 1S S+1 120 7 31.82
2 EO 3S W+1 -430 20 90.91
3 EO 1K S+3 130 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
7 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,80 % 4 EO 2K N+1 110 13 59.09
5 EO Pass Passe 12 54.55
6 EO 5CcE+1 -1050 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,89 % 7 EO 2P N+1 140 11 50.00
8 EO 3S S = 400 5 22.73
9 EO 4P N-1 -50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
8 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 53,82 %10 EO 5TcE-1 200 2 9.09
11 EO 4C E+1 -450 7 31.82
12 EO 3K E = -110 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 43,68 %13 EO 2C E-1 100 11 50.00
14 EO 1S N-2 -100 10 45.45
15 EO 2K N+1 110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
9 MASSAUX Joel -ERPICUM Anne : 45,39 %16 EO 4PcN-3 -500 16 72.73
17 EO 2C N+1 140 12 54.55
18 EO 5T E+1 -420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
4 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,23 %19 EO 4C W = -620 16 72.73
20 EO 3P N = 140 12 54.55
21 EO 4P E = -420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
10 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 51,03 %22 EO 2P N+1 140 4 18.18
23 EO 4C E+2 -680 13 59.09
24 EO 4C S-1 -50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
5 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 42,94 %25 EO 2P W = -110 12.1 55.00
26 EO 2C E+2 -170 21.9 99.55
27 EO 4C W+1 -450 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 74,85 %
6 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON : 44,91 %31 EO 2P S+1 140 4 18.18
32 EO 3S N-1 -50 22 100.00
33 EO 4P E+1 -450 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
Total : 368,4 / 660 = 55,82 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 COLLET Claudine -BEYNE Anne
7 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,80 % 1 EO 2S S = 120 7 31.82
2 EO 3C W-1 50 1 4.55
3 EO 2S S-2 -100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,89 % 4 EO 3S N = 600 1 4.55
5 EO 1S E = -90 16 72.73
6 EO 3S W+2 -660 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
8 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 53,82 % 7 EO 4CcW = -790 22 100.00
8 EO 3S S = 400 5 22.73
9 EO 4P N = 420 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
12 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 56,61 %10 EO 4P W-2 200 2 9.09
11 EO 4C E+2 -480 19 86.36
12 EO 3S W-2 100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
9 MASSAUX Joel -ERPICUM Anne : 45,39 %13 EO 2C E = -110 22 100.00
14 EO 3C E-1 50 4 18.18
15 EO 4P N-1 -100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
4 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,23 %16 EO 4K W-2 200 3 13.64
17 EO 2K S+1 110 17 77.27
18 EO 3C W = -140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
10 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 51,03 %19 EO 4C W-1 100 5 22.73
20 EO 3P N = 140 12 54.55
21 EO 4P E = -420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
5 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 42,94 %22 EO 2PcN = 470 2 9.09
23 EO 4C E+2 -680 13 59.09
24 EO 3S N+2 460 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
11 DEGUELLE Jacques -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 50,06 %25 EO 2P W-2 200 1.2 5.45
26 EO 2C E = -110 13.2 60.00
27 EO 4C E = -420 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 41,82 %
6 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON : 44,91 %28 EO 3PcE-1 100 20.8 94.55
29 EO 3S W-1 100 7.7 35.00
30 EO 2P E = -110 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 58,18 %
Total : 288,0 / 660 = 43,64 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
8 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 53,82 % 4 EO 3K N = 110 13 59.09
5 EO 2K W-1 50 10 45.45
6 EO 4C E+2 -680 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 43,68 % 7 EO 4PcN+1 990 0 0.00
8 EO 1S S+2 150 14 63.64
9 EO 6P N-3 -150 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
9 MASSAUX Joel -ERPICUM Anne : 45,39 %10 EO 4CcS-1 -200 15 68.18
11 EO 4C E+1 -450 7 31.82
12 EO 2S W-1 50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
13 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 58,59 %13 EO 2C E-1 100 11 50.00
14 EO 2C E = -110 14 63.64
15 EO 2S S = 120 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
10 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 51,03 %16 EO 3PcN-1 -100 8 36.36
17 EO 3C S+1 170 7 31.82
18 EO 6T E+1 -940 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
12 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 56,61 %19 EO 4C E = -620 16 72.73
20 EO 2P N+1 140 12 54.55
21 EO 4P E-1 50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 DEGUELLE Jacques -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 50,06 %22 EO 2P N = 110 11 50.00
23 EO 4C E+1 -650 5 22.73
24 EO 3S N = 400 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
6 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON : 44,91 %25 EO 2P W = -110 12.1 55.00
26 EO 3C E-1 100 5.5 25.00
27 EO 4C E+2 -480 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 54,85 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 53,11 %28 EO 3C E-3 150 11 50.00
29 EO 3S W-1 100 7.7 35.00
30 EO 3P E = -140 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,80 %31 EO 4P S-1 -100 16 72.73
32 EO 3S N+3 490 1 4.55
33 EO 4P E+1 -450 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
Total : 328,2 / 660 = 49,73 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga
8 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 53,82 % 1 EO 2S S+2 180 0 0.00
2 EO 2C E+1 -140 13 59.09
3 EO 4CcW-2 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 19,70 %
9 MASSAUX Joel -ERPICUM Anne : 45,39 % 7 EO 2P N+2 170 6 27.27
8 EO 3S S = 400 5 22.73
9 EO 4P N-1 -50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
4 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,23 %10 EO 4C S-2 -200 15 68.18
11 EO 4C E+2 -480 19 86.36
12 EO 3K E = -110 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
10 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 51,03 %13 EO 3C E-3 300 2 9.09
14 EO 2P W-1 50 4 18.18
15 EO 2S S = 120 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
5 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 42,94 %16 EO 3K W = -110 12 54.55
17 EO 4TcE-2 300 4 18.18
18 EO 3T E+4 -190 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
11 DEGUELLE Jacques -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 50,06 %19 EO 2C W+1 -140 10 45.45
20 EO 3P N+1 170 3 13.64
21 EO 4P E = -420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
13 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 58,59 %22 EO 2P N = 110 11 50.00
23 EO 4C E+2 -680 13 59.09
24 EO 3S N = 400 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 53,11 %25 EO 2PcW-1 200 1.2 5.45
26 EO 2C E = -110 13.2 60.00
27 EO 5C E-3 150 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 21,97 %
12 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 56,61 %28 EO 4CcE-3 500 1.2 5.45
29 EO 3S W+3 -690 21.9 99.55
30 EO 3P E-2 100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 38,48 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,89 %31 EO 2P S+1 140 4 18.18
32 EO 3S N = 400 18 81.82
33 EO 5K E = -400 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
Total : 248,9 / 660 = 37,71 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 43,68 % 1 EO 3S S-2 -100 20 90.91
2 EO 1C E+2 -140 13 59.09
3 EO 3C W = -140 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
12 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 56,61 % 4 EO 3K N+1 130 5 22.73
5 EO 3S E-3 150 0 0.00
6 EO 4C E+2 -680 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
10 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 51,03 %10 EO 5T E-2 200 2 9.09
11 EO 4C E+1 -450 7 31.82
12 EO 3K E = -110 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
5 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 42,94 %13 EO 1K E+1 -90 20 90.91
14 EO 2C E+1 -140 19 86.36
15 EO 1S S+1 120 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
11 DEGUELLE Jacques -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 50,06 %16 EO 3PcN-1 -100 8 36.36
17 EO 2P N+1 140 12 54.55
18 EO 3S E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
6 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON : 44,91 %19 EO 4C W-1 100 5 22.73
20 EO 2P N+1 140 12 54.55
21 EO 3S E-1 50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 53,11 %22 EO 2S E-1 100 18 81.82
23 EO 3S E+1 -630 2 9.09
24 EO 3S N-1 -50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
7 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,80 %25 EO 3P W = -140 20.8 94.55
26 EO 4C E-2 200 0.1 0.45
27 EO 1S N-1 -50 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,89 %28 EO 3CcE-2 300 4.5 20.45
29 EO 3S W-1 100 7.7 35.00
30 EO 3P E+1 -170 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
13 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 58,59 %31 EO 2P S+1 140 4 18.18
32 EO 3S N+1 430 13 59.09
33 EO 4P W+1 -450 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
Total : 311,5 / 660 = 47,20 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
9 MASSAUX Joel -ERPICUM Anne : 45,39 % 1 EO 1S S+1 120 7 31.82
2 EO 1ScS-4 -1100 22 100.00
3 EO 4PcS-3 -500 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
4 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,23 % 4 EO 5K S-2 -200 22 100.00
5 EO 2P S-3 -300 22 100.00
6 EO 4C E+1 -650 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
13 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 58,59 % 7 EO 3K N = 110 16 72.73
8 EO 3S S = 400 5 22.73
9 EO 4P N = 420 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
12 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 56,61 %13 EO 1S N = 90 16 72.73
14 EO 2C E = -110 14 63.64
15 EO 2S S+1 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
6 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON : 44,91 %16 EO 3S E+2 -660 22 100.00
17 EO 2K S+1 110 17 77.27
18 EO 3S W+3 -490 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 53,11 %19 EO 4C W = -620 16 72.73
20 EO 3P N = 140 12 54.55
21 EO 4P E+1 -450 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
7 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,80 %22 EO 2P N-2 -100 20 90.91
23 EO 4C E+2 -680 13 59.09
24 EO 3S N+1 430 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,89 %25 EO 2P W = -110 12.1 55.00
26 EO 3C E-1 100 5.5 25.00
27 EO 5TcS-3 -500 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 59,85 %
8 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 53,82 %28 EO 4CcE-3 500 1.2 5.45
29 EO 3S W-1 100 7.7 35.00
30 EO 4C N-3 -150 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 43,68 %31 EO 4P S-2 -200 22 100.00
32 EO 3S N+2 460 6 27.27
33 EO 4P E+1 -450 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
Total : 401,9 / 660 = 60,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
4 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,23 % 1 EO 2P N-3 -150 22 100.00
2 EO 2T W+1 -110 8 36.36
3 EO 1K S = 70 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
10 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 51,03 % 4 EO 5K N-1 -100 19 86.36
5 EO 1S N-2 -200 20 90.91
6 EO 4C E+1 -650 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
5 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 42,94 % 7 EO 4C W-1 100 18 81.82
8 EO 3S S-1 -50 19 86.36
9 EO 4P N-1 -50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 80,30 %
11 DEGUELLE Jacques -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 50,06 %10 EO 4CcS-1 -200 15 68.18
11 EO 4C E+2 -480 19 86.36
12 EO 3S W = -400 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 84,85 %
13 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 58,59 %16 EO 4K E-2 200 3 13.64
17 EO 4C N = 420 1 4.55
18 EO 4C E = -420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
7 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,80 %19 EO 4C W = -620 16 72.73
20 EO 4P N-1 -100 22 100.00
21 EO 4P E-1 50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
12 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 56,61 %22 EO 2P N = 110 11 50.00
23 EO 4C E+1 -650 5 22.73
24 EO 3S N+2 460 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
8 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 53,82 %25 EO 2P W = -110 12.1 55.00
26 EO 3K N = 110 2.3 10.45
27 EO 5TcS-2 -300 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,48 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 43,68 %28 EO 3C E-3 150 11 50.00
29 EO 3S W-1 100 7.7 35.00
30 EO 3P E = -140 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 MASSAUX Joel -ERPICUM Anne : 45,39 %31 EO 2P S+1 140 4 18.18
32 EO 3K S+1 130 20 90.91
33 EO 4P E+1 -450 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
Total : 356,4 / 660 = 54,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 PIRMEZ Amélie -GROSFILS Colette
10 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 51,03 % 1 EO 3S S-1 -50 17 77.27
2 EO 1T S-3 -300 16 72.73
3 EO 2C W = -110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
5 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 42,94 % 4 EO 1S S+1 120 8 36.36
5 EO 2S E-2 100 3 13.64
6 EO 4PcS-4 -800 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
11 DEGUELLE Jacques -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 50,06 % 7 EO 2P N+1 140 11 50.00
8 EO 2S S+1 150 14 63.64
9 EO 4P N-1 -50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
6 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON : 44,91 %10 EO 4C S-1 -100 10 45.45
11 EO 4C E+2 -480 19 86.36
12 EO 3K E = -110 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 53,11 %13 EO 1ScN = 180 6 27.27
14 EO 2C E-1 50 4 18.18
15 EO 2S S = 120 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,89 %19 EO 4C W-1 100 5 22.73
20 EO 3P N+2 200 0 0.00
21 EO 4P E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 7,58 %
8 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 53,82 %22 EO 2K N-3 -150 22 100.00
23 EO 4C E+2 -680 13 59.09
24 EO 3S N = 400 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
13 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 58,59 %25 EO 1P E+1 -110 12.1 55.00
26 EO 3K N-1 -100 8.8 40.00
27 EO 3T S = 110 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 36,82 %
9 MASSAUX Joel -ERPICUM Anne : 45,39 %28 EO 3K N+1 130 17.5 79.55
29 EO 3S W-1 100 7.7 35.00
30 EO 3P E-1 50 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 46,52 %
12 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 56,61 %31 EO 2P S = 110 11 50.00
32 EO 3S N+1 430 13 59.09
33 EO 3C S-2 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
Total : 309,0 / 660 = 46,82 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
13 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 58,59 % 1 EO 3S W-1 50 14 63.64
2 EO 2T E = -90 5 22.73
3 EO 4P S-1 -50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
11 DEGUELLE Jacques -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 50,06 % 4 EO 3K S = 110 13 59.09
5 EO 1S E = -90 16 72.73
6 EO 4C E+2 -680 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
12 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 56,61 % 7 EO 3C W+1 -170 20 90.91
8 EO 2S S+1 150 14 63.64
9 EO 4P N = 420 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 53,11 %10 EO 4T E-1 100 7 31.82
11 EO 4C E+1 -450 7 31.82
12 EO 3S W-4 200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
7 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,80 %13 EO 1S N = 90 16 72.73
14 EO 2P S-3 -150 22 100.00
15 EO 2S S-1 -100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 89,39 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,89 %16 EO 3S W+1 -630 19 86.36
17 EO 3C S+1 170 7 31.82
18 EO 3S W+3 -490 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 43,68 %22 EO 2P N = 110 11 50.00
23 EO 3S E+4 -720 20 90.91
24 EO 3S N-1 -50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
9 MASSAUX Joel -ERPICUM Anne : 45,39 %25 EO 2P W = -110 12.1 55.00
26 EO 2C E = -110 13.2 60.00
27 EO 3T S = 110 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 43,48 %
4 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,23 %28 EO 3C E-3 150 11 50.00
29 EO 3S W+2 -660 18.6 84.55
30 EO 2P E = -110 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 59,85 %
10 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 51,03 %31 EO 2P S = 110 11 50.00
32 EO 3S N+2 460 6 27.27
33 EO 4P E+1 -450 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
Total : 372,2 / 660 = 56,39 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 VAN DOOREN Michele -HOGGE Colette
11 DEGUELLE Jacques -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 50,06 % 1 EO 2S S = 120 7 31.82
2 EO 2T W = -90 5 22.73
3 EO 2P S = 110 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
6 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON : 44,91 % 4 EO 2K N+2 130 5 22.73
5 EO 1C N = 80 8 36.36
6 EO 4C E+1 -650 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 53,11 % 7 EO 2P N+1 140 11 50.00
8 EO 3S S = 400 5 22.73
9 EO 4P N = 420 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
13 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 58,59 %10 EO 4C S-2 -200 15 68.18
11 EO 4C W+1 -450 7 31.82
12 EO 3K W = -110 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,89 %13 EO 3P W-3 300 2 9.09
14 EO 2C E-1 50 4 18.18
15 EO 2K N+1 110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
12 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 56,61 %16 EO 3P N-2 -100 8 36.36
17 EO 1S S = 90 21 95.45
18 EO 5T E+1 -420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 43,68 %19 EO 4C W = -620 16 72.73
20 EO 3P N = 140 12 54.55
21 EO 4P E-1 50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,23 %25 EO 2P W+1 -140 20.8 94.55
26 EO 3C E = -140 18.6 84.55
27 EO 2C W+1 -140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 73,03 %
10 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 51,03 %28 EO 3C E-3 150 11 50.00
29 EO 3S W-1 100 7.7 35.00
30 EO 3P E-1 50 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
5 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 42,94 %31 EO 2P S+1 140 4 18.18
32 EO 3S N+2 460 6 27.27
33 EO 4P W+1 -450 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
Total : 277,4 / 660 = 42,03 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
6 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON : 44,91 % 1 EO 2S S-1 -50 17 77.27
2 EO 2T W+2 -130 10 45.45
3 EO 4P S-1 -50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 53,11 % 4 EO 5K N-1 -100 19 86.36
5 EO 1S E = -90 16 72.73
6 EO 6C E-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
7 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,80 % 7 EO 3P N = 140 11 50.00
8 EO 3S S = 400 5 22.73
9 EO 3S S+3 490 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,89 %10 EO 4CcS-2 -500 21 95.45
11 EO 4C E+1 -450 7 31.82
12 EO 3K E = -110 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
8 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 53,82 %13 EO 1S N+1 120 8 36.36
14 EO 2C E = -110 14 63.64
15 EO 1P N = 80 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 43,68 %16 EO 4C E-5 500 0 0.00
17 EO 3C N = 140 12 54.55
18 EO 6T E+1 -940 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
13 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 58,59 %19 EO 5C W-1 100 5 22.73
20 EO 3P N+1 170 3 13.64
21 EO 4P E = -420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
4 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,23 %22 EO 2PcN+1 570 0 0.00
23 EO 6C E = -1430 22 100.00
24 EO 3S N+1 430 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
5 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 42,94 %28 EO 3PcE-1 100 20.8 94.55
29 EO 3S W+2 -660 18.6 84.55
30 EO 3P E+1 -170 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 91,21 %
11 DEGUELLE Jacques -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 50,06 %31 EO 1S W+1 -120 20 90.91
32 EO 3S N+1 430 13 59.09
33 EO 5P E = -450 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
Total : 360,2 / 660 = 54,58 %
PAIRE Nr : 25 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
12 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 56,61 % 1 EO 2S S = 120 7 31.82
2 EO 4C W = -420 18 81.82
3 EO 1K S-1 -50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
9 MASSAUX Joel -ERPICUM Anne : 45,39 % 4 EO 2K N+1 110 13 59.09
5 EO 2S E-2 100 3 13.64
6 EO 5TcN-5 -1100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
6 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON : 44,91 % 7 EO 3PcN+1 930 2 9.09
8 EO 3S S-1 -50 19 86.36
9 EO 4P N-1 -50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 43,68 %10 EO 5T E-1 100 7 31.82
11 EO 4C E+1 -450 7 31.82
12 EO 2S W-4 200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
11 DEGUELLE Jacques -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 50,06 %13 EO 2T W-3 300 2 9.09
14 EO 2C E+1 -140 19 86.36
15 EO 2S S = 120 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
8 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 53,82 %16 EO 3K E+1 -130 14 63.64
17 EO 4C N = 420 1 4.55
18 EO 6T E = -920 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
5 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 42,94 %19 EO 4C W+1 -650 22 100.00
20 EO 2P N+1 140 12 54.55
21 EO 4P E+1 -450 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,89 %22 EO 2P N = 110 11 50.00
23 EO 3S E = -600 0 0.00
24 EO 3S N = 400 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
7 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,80 %28 EO 4K N+1 150 11 50.00
29 EO 3S W-1 100 7.7 35.00
30 EO 4PcE-2 300 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 28,48 %
4 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,23 %31 EO 2P S-1 -100 16 72.73
32 EO 3S S+1 430 13 59.09
33 EO 3S W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
Total : 308,8 / 660 = 46,79 %
PAIRE Nr : 26 COULIE Joelle -STEED Adrian
5 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 42,94 % 1 EO 1S S+1 120 7 31.82
2 EO 2T W-1 50 1 4.55
3 EO 2C E+1 -140 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
13 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 58,59 % 4 EO 3S N = 600 1 4.55
5 EO 1S N = 90 6 27.27
6 EO 5CcE+1 -1050 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
10 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 51,03 % 7 EO 4P N = 620 4 18.18
8 EO 4C W = -420 22 100.00
9 EO 3S S = 400 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
7 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,80 %10 EO 5CcS-2 -500 21 95.45
11 EO 4C E+1 -450 7 31.82
12 EO 3S E-3 150 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
4 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,23 %13 EO 1S N = 90 16 72.73
14 EO 3S W-1 50 4 18.18
15 EO 2K N+1 110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 53,11 %16 EO 3S W+1 -630 19 86.36
17 EO 1S S = 90 21 95.45
18 EO 6T E = -920 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
9 MASSAUX Joel -ERPICUM Anne : 45,39 %19 EO 6CcW-1 200 0 0.00
20 EO 2S N = 120 20 90.91
21 EO 4P E = -420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
6 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON : 44,91 %22 EO 2P N = 110 11 50.00
23 EO 4C E+2 -680 13 59.09
24 EO 2S N = 120 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 43,68 %25 EO 2S N-2 -100 4.5 20.45
26 EO 2C E+1 -140 18.6 84.55
27 EO 4C E+2 -480 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 63,18 %
8 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 53,82 %31 EO 4P S-1 -100 16 72.73
32 EO 3S N+3 490 1 4.55
33 EO 4P E+1 -450 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
Total : 358,7 / 660 = 54,35 %
|
|