|
Tournoi du 02-03-15
1 61,42 2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
2 57,55 3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
3 56,77 5 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
4 54,45 8 MATELART Marc -HALLEUX Jean François
5 53,56 6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
6 53,35 4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
7 52,20 9 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle
8 48,65 13 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
9 47,00 7 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
10 46,02 1 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel
11 42,74 10 GROSFILS Colette -POWIS Vinciane
12 41,70 12 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse
13 34,59 11 LAENENS René -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 59,77 24 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
2 57,12 25 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre
3 54,24 16 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques
~ 54,24 21 de VIRON Baudouin -BRIOT Fernand
5 54,09 20 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard
6 53,26 19 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
7 51,95 17 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
8 51,68 22 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
9 50,27 14 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
10 47,29 23 COLLIN Jean-Marie -THIRION Michel
11 43,61 26 COLLET Claudine -BIOURGE Gabrielle
12 40,59 18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
13 31,88 15 LEBRUN -DELHEZ Jacques
PAIRE Nr : 1 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel
14 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,27 % 1 NS 2P E-2 100 6 27.27
2 NS 3K E-2 100 14 63.64
3 NS 6S W = -1440 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
24 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 59,77 % 4 NS 1P N+2 140 8 36.36
5 NS 4P E+1 -450 16 72.73
6 NS 3S S-2 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
23 COLLIN Jean-Marie -THIRION Michel : 47,29 % 7 NS 5P W-1 100 20 90.91
8 NS 3C E-2 100 15 68.18
9 NS 3S S+1 430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
22 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,68 %10 NS 2C W = -110 14 63.64
11 NS 3C N-1 -50 8 36.36
12 NS 6C E = -980 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
21 de VIRON Baudouin -BRIOT Fernand : 54,24 %13 NS 3S W = -600 20 90.91
14 NS 3C S-1 -50 5 22.73
15 NS 3S N+1 630 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
26 COLLET Claudine -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 43,61 %16 NS 5KcN-4 -800 0 0.00
17 NS 3K S-1 -50 2 9.09
18 NS 2P E-2 100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
19 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,26 %19 NS 5C W = -650 13 59.09
20 NS 2P S = 110 12 54.55
21 NS 4P E = -420 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 40,59 %22 NS 3S W+1 -630 15 68.18
23 NS 4P N-2 -200 1 4.55
24 NS 4P W+1 -450 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
17 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 51,95 %25 NS 3S E+1 -630 14.3 65.00
26 NS 4C E+1 -650 0.1 0.45
27 NS 2P N = 110 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 30,15 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 54,24 %28 NS 3S E+1 -430 6.6 30.00
29 NS 2P N = 110 5.5 25.00
30 NS 2P W+4 -230 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 48,18 %
Total : 303,7 / 660 = 46,02 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
15 LEBRUN -DELHEZ Jacques : 31,88 % 4 NS 3S N = 600 17 77.27
5 NS 4P E+1 -450 16 72.73
6 NS 4C N = 420 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
14 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,27 % 7 NS 4P W = -620 13 59.09
8 NS 3S S = 400 22 100.00
9 NS 2S S+1 150 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
24 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 59,77 %10 NS 2P E-1 100 20 90.91
11 NS 3C N-1 -50 8 36.36
12 NS 3S E+3 -490 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
23 COLLIN Jean-Marie -THIRION Michel : 47,29 %13 NS 3S E+1 -630 16 72.73
14 NS 3C N = 140 16 72.73
15 NS 3S N+1 630 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
22 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,68 %16 NS 4P E = -620 10 45.45
17 NS 4P S = 420 16 72.73
18 NS 4P E-1 50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
21 de VIRON Baudouin -BRIOT Fernand : 54,24 %19 NS 5C W = -650 13 59.09
20 NS 2C S = 110 12 54.55
21 NS 3S W = -400 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
25 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 57,12 %22 NS 3S W+3 -690 1 4.55
23 NS 3P N = 140 11 50.00
24 NS 4P W+2 -480 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
19 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,26 %25 NS 3S E+1 -630 14.3 65.00
26 NS 2P E+1 -140 7.7 35.00
27 NS 2P N = 110 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 40,59 %28 NS 3K W+2 -150 17.5 79.55
29 NS 2P N+1 140 16.5 75.00
30 NS 3S W+2 -460 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 66,52 %
17 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 51,95 %31 NS 4C N = 620 17 77.27
32 NS 4PcE-1 200 14 63.64
33 NS 4P S+1 450 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 80,30 %
Total : 405,4 / 660 = 61,42 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 40,59 % 1 NS 3P W-4 200 22 100.00
2 NS 2P S+1 140 19 86.36
3 NS 6S W-1 100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 92,42 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 54,24 % 7 NS 4P W = -620 13 59.09
8 NS 3C W-2 100 15 68.18
9 NS 3S S+2 460 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
25 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 57,12 %10 NS 2C W = -110 14 63.64
11 NS 2C N-1 -50 8 36.36
12 NS 4C E+2 -480 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
14 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,27 %13 NS 3S E+3 -690 1 4.55
14 NS 3C S-1 -50 5 22.73
15 NS 3S N+1 630 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
24 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 59,77 %16 NS 4P E = -620 10 45.45
17 NS 4P S-1 -50 2 9.09
18 NS 3P E-1 50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
23 COLLIN Jean-Marie -THIRION Michel : 47,29 %19 NS 5C W+1 -680 8 36.36
20 NS 3C N = 140 18 81.82
21 NS 4P E = -420 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
22 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,68 %22 NS 3S W = -600 19 86.36
23 NS 4P N-1 -100 6 27.27
24 NS 4P W+2 -480 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
26 COLLET Claudine -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 43,61 %25 NS 3S E+1 -630 14.3 65.00
26 NS 3C E+1 -170 3.4 15.45
27 NS 2P N+1 140 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 51,82 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,09 %28 NS 3S E = -400 13.2 60.00
29 NS 2P N = 110 5.5 25.00
30 NS 6K W-1 50 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 61,52 %
19 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,26 %31 NS 3S N+1 630 22 100.00
32 NS 4C N-1 -50 9 40.91
33 NS 2P S+1 140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 379,8 / 660 = 57,55 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
20 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,09 % 1 NS 2P E-2 100 6 27.27
2 NS 3P S-1 -100 5 22.73
3 NS 6S W = -1440 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
19 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,26 % 4 NS 3S N+1 630 22 100.00
5 NS 4P E+2 -480 3 13.64
6 NS 4C N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
17 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 51,95 %10 NS 2C W = -110 14 63.64
11 NS 3K E-3 150 22 100.00
12 NS 3S W+3 -490 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
26 COLLET Claudine -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 43,61 %13 NS 3S W+2 -660 8 36.36
14 NS 2C N+1 140 16 72.73
15 NS 3S N+1 630 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
15 LEBRUN -DELHEZ Jacques : 31,88 %16 NS 2P E+2 -170 21 95.45
17 NS 4P S = 420 16 72.73
18 NS 2P E+1 -140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
14 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,27 %19 NS 4C W+1 -650 13 59.09
20 NS 2C N = 110 12 54.55
21 NS 3P E+1 -170 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
24 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 59,77 %22 NS 3S W+2 -660 8 36.36
23 NS 4C W-2 200 18 81.82
24 NS 3S E+2 -460 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
23 COLLIN Jean-Marie -THIRION Michel : 47,29 %25 NS 3S E+1 -630 14.3 65.00
26 NS Pass Passe 11 50.00
27 NS 2P N+1 140 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
22 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,68 %28 NS 3S E+1 -430 6.6 30.00
29 NS 2P N = 110 5.5 25.00
30 NS 3S E+3 -490 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 20,15 %
25 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 57,12 %31 NS 3S N = 600 10 45.45
32 NS 4P W-1 100 12 54.55
33 NS 3P S = 140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
Total : 352,1 / 660 = 53,35 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
26 COLLET Claudine -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 43,61 % 1 NS 3K N-1 -50 2 9.09
2 NS 2P S+1 140 19 86.36
3 NS 6S W = -1440 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
21 de VIRON Baudouin -BRIOT Fernand : 54,24 % 4 NS 3C N+1 170 12 54.55
5 NS 3S W+2 -460 8 36.36
6 NS 4C N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,09 % 7 NS 4P W+1 -650 5 22.73
8 NS 2P N = 110 18 81.82
9 NS 3S S+1 430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 40,59 %13 NS 2P S-5 -500 22 100.00
14 NS 2C N+2 170 22 100.00
15 NS 3S N+1 630 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
17 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 51,95 %16 NS 4P E = -620 10 45.45
17 NS 4P S = 420 16 72.73
18 NS 3P E = -140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
25 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 57,12 %19 NS 6TcN-4 -800 4 18.18
20 NS 3C N = 140 18 81.82
21 NS 4P E = -420 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
15 LEBRUN -DELHEZ Jacques : 31,88 %22 NS 3S W = -600 19 86.36
23 NS 3P N-1 -100 6 27.27
24 NS 6S E-1 50 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
14 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,27 %25 NS 3S E+2 -660 3.4 15.45
26 NS 4C E-1 100 14.3 65.00
27 NS 2P N+1 140 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 51,82 %
24 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 59,77 %28 NS 3S E+1 -430 6.6 30.00
29 NS 1S S+1 120 11 50.00
30 NS 3S E+2 -460 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
23 COLLIN Jean-Marie -THIRION Michel : 47,29 %31 NS 4C N = 620 17 77.27
32 NS 4PcE-2 500 21 95.45
33 NS 3P S = 140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
Total : 374,7 / 660 = 56,77 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
24 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 59,77 % 1 NS 2P E+1 -140 0 0.00
2 NS 3P S-1 -100 5 22.73
3 NS 4S W+2 -690 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
23 COLLIN Jean-Marie -THIRION Michel : 47,29 % 4 NS 1S W-2 200 14 63.64
5 NS 4P E+1 -450 16 72.73
6 NS 4C N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
25 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 57,12 % 7 NS 4P W+1 -650 5 22.73
8 NS 4P S-3 -150 1 4.55
9 NS 3S S+2 460 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
21 de VIRON Baudouin -BRIOT Fernand : 54,24 %10 NS 2C W+1 -140 5 22.73
11 NS 2C N-1 -50 8 36.36
12 NS 3S W+3 -490 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
19 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,26 %16 NS 4P E = -620 10 45.45
17 NS 3S S = 400 9 40.91
18 NS 2P E = -110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 40,59 %19 NS 5T N-3 -150 20 90.91
20 NS 4T E-3 300 22 100.00
21 NS 4P E = -420 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
26 COLLET Claudine -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 43,61 %22 NS 3S W+1 -630 15 68.18
23 NS 4CcE-2 500 20 90.91
24 NS 5P W+1 -480 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 54,24 %25 NS 3S E+2 -660 3.4 15.45
26 NS 2P E-1 100 14.3 65.00
27 NS 2P N+1 140 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 51,82 %
15 LEBRUN -DELHEZ Jacques : 31,88 %28 NS 2K W+2 -130 21.9 99.55
29 NS 3S S = 600 21.9 99.55
30 NS 4P W = -420 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 92,88 %
14 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,27 %31 NS 3S S-1 -100 2 9.09
32 NS 5CcN-3 -500 4 18.18
33 NS 2P S+2 170 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
Total : 353,5 / 660 = 53,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
15 LEBRUN -DELHEZ Jacques : 31,88 % 1 NS 1S S+1 120 10 45.45
2 NS 1P S+2 140 19 86.36
3 NS 6S W = -1440 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
14 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,27 % 4 NS 3S N-3 -300 0 0.00
5 NS 4P E+1 -450 16 72.73
6 NS 4C N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
24 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 59,77 % 7 NS 4P W+1 -650 5 22.73
8 NS 4P S-3 -150 1 4.55
9 NS 3S S+1 430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
26 COLLET Claudine -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 43,61 %10 NS 2C W = -110 14 63.64
11 NS 4T E-2 100 16 72.73
12 NS 3S W+3 -490 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
22 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,68 %13 NS 3S E+2 -660 8 36.36
14 NS 3C S = 140 16 72.73
15 NS 3S N+1 630 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,09 %19 NS 5C W-1 100 22 100.00
20 NS 2T S-3 -300 3 13.64
21 NS 4P E = -420 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
19 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,26 %22 NS 3S W+2 -660 8 36.36
23 NS 3P N = 140 11 50.00
24 NS 6P E = -980 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 40,59 %25 NS 3S E+1 -630 14.3 65.00
26 NS 2C E+2 -170 3.4 15.45
27 NS 2P N+1 140 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 51,82 %
25 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 57,12 %28 NS 3S E+1 -430 6.6 30.00
29 NS 2P N+1 140 16.5 75.00
30 NS 3S W+2 -460 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 54,24 %31 NS 3S N-1 -100 2 9.09
32 NS 4C N = 420 17 77.27
33 NS 3P S = 140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
Total : 310,2 / 660 = 47,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -HALLEUX Jean François
17 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 51,95 % 1 NS 4T N+1 150 16 72.73
2 NS 3K E-1 50 11 50.00
3 NS 4S W+2 -690 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 54,24 % 4 NS 4P N = 620 20 90.91
5 NS 4P E+2 -480 3 13.64
6 NS 4C N-2 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
15 LEBRUN -DELHEZ Jacques : 31,88 % 7 NS 3P W+2 -200 16 72.73
8 NS 4P S-1 -50 8 36.36
9 NS 2T S+3 150 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
14 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,27 %10 NS 2C W+1 -140 5 22.73
11 NS 2C N+1 140 20 90.91
12 NS 4C E = -420 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
24 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 59,77 %13 NS 3S E+3 -690 1 4.55
14 NS 4C S-1 -50 5 22.73
15 NS 3S N+1 630 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
25 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 57,12 %16 NS 4P E = -620 10 45.45
17 NS 6T N = 920 22 100.00
18 NS 2P E+2 -170 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
21 de VIRON Baudouin -BRIOT Fernand : 54,24 %22 NS 6S W-1 100 22 100.00
23 NS 4P N+1 650 22 100.00
24 NS 6P W = -980 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,09 %25 NS 3S E+1 -630 14.3 65.00
26 NS 3K S+1 130 18.6 84.55
27 NS 2P N = 110 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 58,18 %
19 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,26 %28 NS 3S E+1 -430 6.6 30.00
29 NS 2P N+1 140 16.5 75.00
30 NS 3S W+2 -460 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
26 COLLET Claudine -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 43,61 %31 NS 4C N = 620 17 77.27
32 NS 4PcE-2 500 21 95.45
33 NS 4CcW-1 100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 359,4 / 660 = 54,45 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle
19 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,26 % 1 NS 2T N+3 150 16 72.73
2 NS 3T W = -110 0 0.00
3 NS 6S W-1 100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
25 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 57,12 % 4 NS 2P N+1 140 8 36.36
5 NS 4P E+2 -480 3 13.64
6 NS 4C N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
17 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 51,95 % 7 NS 6C W-1 100 20 90.91
8 NS 2C W = -110 4 18.18
9 NS 3S S+1 430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 54,24 %10 NS 2C W = -110 14 63.64
11 NS 2C N-1 -50 8 36.36
12 NS 3S W+3 -490 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
15 LEBRUN -DELHEZ Jacques : 31,88 %13 NS 3S W+1 -630 16 72.73
14 NS 3C N = 140 16 72.73
15 NS 3S N+1 630 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
14 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,27 %16 NS 4P E = -620 10 45.45
17 NS 3S S+2 460 20 90.91
18 NS 2P E+1 -140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
26 COLLET Claudine -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 43,61 %19 NS 5TcN-2 -300 18 81.82
20 NS 3S W = -600 0 0.00
21 NS 4P E-1 50 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
22 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,68 %25 NS 3S E+2 -660 3.4 15.45
26 NS 2P E+1 -140 7.7 35.00
27 NS 2P N+1 140 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 41,82 %
21 de VIRON Baudouin -BRIOT Fernand : 54,24 %28 NS 3K E+2 -150 17.5 79.55
29 NS 2P N+1 140 16.5 75.00
30 NS 3S W+2 -460 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 66,52 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,09 %31 NS 4C N = 620 17 77.27
32 NS 4C N-2 -100 6 27.27
33 NS 3P N-1 -50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
Total : 344,5 / 660 = 52,20 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 GROSFILS Colette -POWIS Vinciane
21 de VIRON Baudouin -BRIOT Fernand : 54,24 % 1 NS 3P E-3 150 16 72.73
2 NS 3P S-1 -100 5 22.73
3 NS 6S W+1 -1470 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,09 % 4 NS 4P N-1 -100 2 9.09
5 NS 4P E+1 -450 16 72.73
6 NS 3C N+1 170 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
26 COLLET Claudine -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 43,61 % 7 NS 4P W+1 -650 5 22.73
8 NS 2C W-1 50 11 50.00
9 NS 3S S+1 430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 40,59 %10 NS 4C W-2 200 22 100.00
11 NS 2C N-1 -50 8 36.36
12 NS 4C E+1 -450 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
17 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 51,95 %13 NS 3S E+2 -660 8 36.36
14 NS 2C N = 110 10 45.45
15 NS 3S N = 600 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 54,24 %16 NS 4P E = -620 10 45.45
17 NS 3S S = 400 9 40.91
18 NS 3P E-1 50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
15 LEBRUN -DELHEZ Jacques : 31,88 %19 NS 4C E+1 -650 13 59.09
20 NS 3T W-1 100 8 36.36
21 NS 4P E-1 50 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
14 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,27 %22 NS 3S W+3 -690 1 4.55
23 NS 3P N+1 170 15 68.18
24 NS 5P W+1 -480 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
23 COLLIN Jean-Marie -THIRION Michel : 47,29 %28 NS 3S E+3 -490 0.1 0.45
29 NS 3S S-1 -100 0.1 0.45
30 NS 3S E+2 -460 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 15,30 %
22 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,68 %31 NS 3S N = 600 10 45.45
32 NS 4PcE = -790 1 4.55
33 NS 3C W = -140 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
Total : 282,1 / 660 = 42,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 LAENENS René -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
23 COLLIN Jean-Marie -THIRION Michel : 47,29 % 1 NS 4T N+1 150 16 72.73
2 NS 3P S-1 -100 5 22.73
3 NS 6S W+1 -1470 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
22 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,68 % 4 NS 2K S+1 110 4 18.18
5 NS 4P E+1 -450 16 72.73
6 NS 4C N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
21 de VIRON Baudouin -BRIOT Fernand : 54,24 % 7 NS 4P W+1 -650 5 22.73
8 NS 3T W-1 50 11 50.00
9 NS 3S N-1 -50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,09 %10 NS 2C W+1 -140 5 22.73
11 NS 3C N-2 -100 0 0.00
12 NS 3S W+3 -490 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
25 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 57,12 %13 NS 3S E+2 -660 8 36.36
14 NS 4C N-2 -100 0 0.00
15 NS 3S N+1 630 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 40,59 %16 NS 4P E = -620 10 45.45
17 NS 3S S = 400 9 40.91
18 NS 3PcW = -530 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
17 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 51,95 %19 NS 7TcN-5 -1100 0 0.00
20 NS 2K N-3 -300 3 13.64
21 NS 4P E = -420 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 15,15 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 54,24 %22 NS 3S W+2 -660 8 36.36
23 NS 4P N-2 -200 1 4.55
24 NS 4P W+1 -450 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
15 LEBRUN -DELHEZ Jacques : 31,88 %25 NS 5K E = -600 21.9 99.55
26 NS 3P E-2 200 21.9 99.55
27 NS 2P N = 110 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 74,70 %
24 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 59,77 %31 NS 3S N = 600 10 45.45
32 NS 4C N-1 -50 9 40.91
33 NS 3C W = -140 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
Total : 228,3 / 660 = 34,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse
25 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 57,12 % 1 NS 3P E-2 100 6 27.27
2 NS 3C W-1 50 11 50.00
3 NS 6S W = -1440 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 40,59 % 4 NS 3P N = 140 8 36.36
5 NS 4P E+2 -480 3 13.64
6 NS 4C N-2 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 19,70 %
22 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,68 % 7 NS 4P W-1 100 20 90.91
8 NS 3S E-4 200 20 90.91
9 NS 3K N+1 130 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
15 LEBRUN -DELHEZ Jacques : 31,88 %10 NS 2C W+1 -140 5 22.73
11 NS 2C N = 110 18 81.82
12 NS 3S E+2 -460 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
19 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,26 %13 NS 3S E+2 -660 8 36.36
14 NS 3C N = 140 16 72.73
15 NS 3S N+1 630 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
23 COLLIN Jean-Marie -THIRION Michel : 47,29 %16 NS 2P E+2 -170 21 95.45
17 NS 3S S-1 -50 2 9.09
18 NS 2P E+1 -140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 54,24 %19 NS 6TcN-4 -800 4 18.18
20 NS 3C N-1 -100 6 27.27
21 NS 4P E = -420 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,09 %22 NS 3S E+2 -660 8 36.36
23 NS 3P N+1 170 15 68.18
24 NS 6P W = -980 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
17 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 51,95 %28 NS 3K W+2 -150 17.5 79.55
29 NS 2P N = 110 5.5 25.00
30 NS 3S E+3 -490 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
21 de VIRON Baudouin -BRIOT Fernand : 54,24 %31 NS 4PcW-3 500 6 27.27
32 NS 4PcW = -790 1 4.55
33 NS 3P S = 140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
Total : 275,2 / 660 = 41,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
22 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,68 % 1 NS 3P E-3 150 16 72.73
2 NS 3P S = 140 19 86.36
3 NS 6S W-1 100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
26 COLLET Claudine -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 43,61 % 4 NS 3S N = 600 17 77.27
5 NS 4P E+1 -450 16 72.73
6 NS 4C N = 420 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
19 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,26 % 7 NS 4P W+1 -650 5 22.73
8 NS 3P S-2 -100 6 27.27
9 NS 3S N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
23 COLLIN Jean-Marie -THIRION Michel : 47,29 %10 NS 3T S-2 -200 0 0.00
11 NS 2C N-1 -50 8 36.36
12 NS 3S W+2 -460 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 54,24 %13 NS 3S E+1 -630 16 72.73
14 NS 4C N-1 -50 5 22.73
15 NS 3S N = 600 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,09 %16 NS 4P E = -620 10 45.45
17 NS 3S S = 400 9 40.91
18 NS 3P E-1 50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
24 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 59,77 %19 NS 6TcN-4 -800 4 18.18
20 NS 3P S = 140 18 81.82
21 NS 4P E = -420 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
17 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 51,95 %22 NS 3S W+2 -660 8 36.36
23 NS 3P N-1 -100 6 27.27
24 NS 6P W-1 50 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
21 de VIRON Baudouin -BRIOT Fernand : 54,24 %25 NS 3S E+2 -660 3.4 15.45
26 NS 4K S = 130 18.6 84.55
27 NS 1S S = 90 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 33,48 %
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 40,59 %31 NS 4C N-1 -100 2 9.09
32 NS 4C N = 420 17 77.27
33 NS 2P S+1 140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
Total : 321,1 / 660 = 48,65 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
1 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 46,02 % 1 EO 2P E-2 100 16 72.73
2 EO 3K E-2 100 8 36.36
3 EO 6S W = -1440 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
7 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 47,00 % 4 EO 3S N-3 -300 22 100.00
5 EO 4P E+1 -450 6 27.27
6 EO 4C N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,42 % 7 EO 4P W = -620 9 40.91
8 EO 3S S = 400 0 0.00
9 EO 2S S+1 150 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
8 MATELART Marc -HALLEUX Jean François : 54,45 %10 EO 2C W+1 -140 17 77.27
11 EO 2C N+1 140 2 9.09
12 EO 4C E = -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 57,55 %13 EO 3S E+3 -690 21 95.45
14 EO 3C S-1 -50 17 77.27
15 EO 3S N+1 630 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
9 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 52,20 %16 EO 4P E = -620 12 54.55
17 EO 3S S+2 460 2 9.09
18 EO 2P E+1 -140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,35 %19 EO 4C W+1 -650 9 40.91
20 EO 2C N = 110 10 45.45
21 EO 3P E+1 -170 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
10 GROSFILS Colette -POWIS Vinciane : 42,74 %22 EO 3S W+3 -690 21 95.45
23 EO 3P N+1 170 7 31.82
24 EO 5P W+1 -480 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
5 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 56,77 %25 EO 3S E+2 -660 18.6 84.55
26 EO 4C E-1 100 7.7 35.00
27 EO 2P N+1 140 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 48,18 %
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 53,56 %31 EO 3S S-1 -100 20 90.91
32 EO 5CcN-3 -500 18 81.82
33 EO 2P S+2 170 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
Total : 331,8 / 660 = 50,27 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 LEBRUN -DELHEZ Jacques
7 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 47,00 % 1 EO 1S S+1 120 12 54.55
2 EO 1P S+2 140 3 13.64
3 EO 6S W = -1440 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,42 % 4 EO 3S N = 600 5 22.73
5 EO 4P E+1 -450 6 27.27
6 EO 4C N = 420 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
8 MATELART Marc -HALLEUX Jean François : 54,45 % 7 EO 3P W+2 -200 6 27.27
8 EO 4P S-1 -50 14 63.64
9 EO 2T S+3 150 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
12 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,70 %10 EO 2C W+1 -140 17 77.27
11 EO 2C N = 110 4 18.18
12 EO 3S E+2 -460 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
9 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 52,20 %13 EO 3S W+1 -630 6 27.27
14 EO 3C N = 140 6 27.27
15 EO 3S N+1 630 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,35 %16 EO 2P E+2 -170 1 4.55
17 EO 4P S = 420 6 27.27
18 EO 2P E+1 -140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
10 GROSFILS Colette -POWIS Vinciane : 42,74 %19 EO 4C E+1 -650 9 40.91
20 EO 3T W-1 100 14 63.64
21 EO 4P E-1 50 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
5 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 56,77 %22 EO 3S W = -600 3 13.64
23 EO 3P N-1 -100 16 72.73
24 EO 6S E-1 50 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
11 LAENENS René -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 34,59 %25 EO 5K E = -600 0.1 0.45
26 EO 3P E-2 200 0.1 0.45
27 EO 2P N = 110 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 25,30 %
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 53,56 %28 EO 2K W+2 -130 0.1 0.45
29 EO 3S S = 600 0.1 0.45
30 EO 4P W = -420 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 7,12 %
Total : 210,4 / 660 = 31,88 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques
8 MATELART Marc -HALLEUX Jean François : 54,45 % 4 EO 4P N = 620 2 9.09
5 EO 4P E+2 -480 19 86.36
6 EO 4C N-2 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 57,55 % 7 EO 4P W = -620 9 40.91
8 EO 3C W-2 100 7 31.82
9 EO 3S S+2 460 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
9 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 52,20 %10 EO 2C W = -110 8 36.36
11 EO 2C N-1 -50 14 63.64
12 EO 3S W+3 -490 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
13 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 48,65 %13 EO 3S E+1 -630 6 27.27
14 EO 4C N-1 -50 17 77.27
15 EO 3S N = 600 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
10 GROSFILS Colette -POWIS Vinciane : 42,74 %16 EO 4P E = -620 12 54.55
17 EO 3S S = 400 13 59.09
18 EO 3P E-1 50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
12 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,70 %19 EO 6TcN-4 -800 18 81.82
20 EO 3C N-1 -100 16 72.73
21 EO 4P E = -420 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
11 LAENENS René -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 34,59 %22 EO 3S W+2 -660 14 63.64
23 EO 4P N-2 -200 21 95.45
24 EO 4P W+1 -450 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 53,56 %25 EO 3S E+2 -660 18.6 84.55
26 EO 2P E-1 100 7.7 35.00
27 EO 2P N+1 140 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 48,18 %
1 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 46,02 %28 EO 3S E+1 -430 15.4 70.00
29 EO 2P N = 110 16.5 75.00
30 EO 2P W+4 -230 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 51,82 %
7 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 47,00 %31 EO 3S N-1 -100 20 90.91
32 EO 4C N = 420 5 22.73
33 EO 3P S = 140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
Total : 358,0 / 660 = 54,24 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
8 MATELART Marc -HALLEUX Jean François : 54,45 % 1 EO 4T N+1 150 6 27.27
2 EO 3K E-1 50 11 50.00
3 EO 4S W+2 -690 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
9 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 52,20 % 7 EO 6C W-1 100 2 9.09
8 EO 2C W = -110 18 81.82
9 EO 3S S+1 430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,35 %10 EO 2C W = -110 8 36.36
11 EO 3K E-3 150 0 0.00
12 EO 3S W+3 -490 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
10 GROSFILS Colette -POWIS Vinciane : 42,74 %13 EO 3S E+2 -660 14 63.64
14 EO 2C N = 110 12 54.55
15 EO 3S N = 600 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
5 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 56,77 %16 EO 4P E = -620 12 54.55
17 EO 4P S = 420 6 27.27
18 EO 3P E = -140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 LAENENS René -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 34,59 %19 EO 7TcN-5 -1100 22 100.00
20 EO 2K N-3 -300 19 86.36
21 EO 4P E = -420 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 84,85 %
13 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 48,65 %22 EO 3S W+2 -660 14 63.64
23 EO 3P N-1 -100 16 72.73
24 EO 6P W-1 50 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
1 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 46,02 %25 EO 3S E+1 -630 7.7 35.00
26 EO 4C E+1 -650 21.9 99.55
27 EO 2P N = 110 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 69,85 %
12 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,70 %28 EO 3K W+2 -150 4.5 20.45
29 EO 2P N = 110 16.5 75.00
30 EO 3S E+3 -490 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,42 %31 EO 4C N = 620 5 22.73
32 EO 4PcE-1 200 8 36.36
33 EO 4P S+1 450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 19,70 %
Total : 342,9 / 660 = 51,95 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 57,55 % 1 EO 3P W-4 200 0 0.00
2 EO 2P S+1 140 3 13.64
3 EO 6S W-1 100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 7,58 %
12 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,70 % 4 EO 3P N = 140 14 63.64
5 EO 4P E+2 -480 19 86.36
6 EO 4C N-2 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 80,30 %
10 GROSFILS Colette -POWIS Vinciane : 42,74 %10 EO 4C W-2 200 0 0.00
11 EO 2C N-1 -50 14 63.64
12 EO 4C E+1 -450 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
5 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 56,77 %13 EO 2P S-5 -500 0 0.00
14 EO 2C N+2 170 0 0.00
15 EO 3S N+1 630 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
11 LAENENS René -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 34,59 %16 EO 4P E = -620 12 54.55
17 EO 3S S = 400 13 59.09
18 EO 3PcW = -530 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 53,56 %19 EO 5T N-3 -150 2 9.09
20 EO 4T E-3 300 0 0.00
21 EO 4P E = -420 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
1 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 46,02 %22 EO 3S W+1 -630 7 31.82
23 EO 4P N-2 -200 21 95.45
24 EO 4P W+1 -450 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 47,00 %25 EO 3S E+1 -630 7.7 35.00
26 EO 2C E+2 -170 18.6 84.55
27 EO 2P N+1 140 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 48,18 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,42 %28 EO 3K W+2 -150 4.5 20.45
29 EO 2P N+1 140 5.5 25.00
30 EO 3S W+2 -460 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 33,48 %
13 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 48,65 %31 EO 4C N-1 -100 20 90.91
32 EO 4C N = 420 5 22.73
33 EO 2P S+1 140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
Total : 267,9 / 660 = 40,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
9 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 52,20 % 1 EO 2T N+3 150 6 27.27
2 EO 3T W = -110 22 100.00
3 EO 6S W-1 100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,35 % 4 EO 3S N+1 630 0 0.00
5 EO 4P E+2 -480 19 86.36
6 EO 4C N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
13 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 48,65 % 7 EO 4P W+1 -650 17 77.27
8 EO 3P S-2 -100 16 72.73
9 EO 3S N-2 -100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
12 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,70 %13 EO 3S E+2 -660 14 63.64
14 EO 3C N = 140 6 27.27
15 EO 3S N+1 630 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 53,56 %16 EO 4P E = -620 12 54.55
17 EO 3S S = 400 13 59.09
18 EO 2P E = -110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
1 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 46,02 %19 EO 5C W = -650 9 40.91
20 EO 2P S = 110 10 45.45
21 EO 4P E = -420 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
7 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 47,00 %22 EO 3S W+2 -660 14 63.64
23 EO 3P N = 140 11 50.00
24 EO 6P E = -980 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,42 %25 EO 3S E+1 -630 7.7 35.00
26 EO 2P E+1 -140 14.3 65.00
27 EO 2P N = 110 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
8 MATELART Marc -HALLEUX Jean François : 54,45 %28 EO 3S E+1 -430 15.4 70.00
29 EO 2P N+1 140 5.5 25.00
30 EO 3S W+2 -460 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 57,55 %31 EO 3S N+1 630 0 0.00
32 EO 4C N-1 -50 13 59.09
33 EO 2P S+1 140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 351,5 / 660 = 53,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,35 % 1 EO 2P E-2 100 16 72.73
2 EO 3P S-1 -100 17 77.27
3 EO 6S W = -1440 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
10 GROSFILS Colette -POWIS Vinciane : 42,74 % 4 EO 4P N-1 -100 20 90.91
5 EO 4P E+1 -450 6 27.27
6 EO 3C N+1 170 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
5 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 56,77 % 7 EO 4P W+1 -650 17 77.27
8 EO 2P N = 110 4 18.18
9 EO 3S S+1 430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
11 LAENENS René -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 34,59 %10 EO 2C W+1 -140 17 77.27
11 EO 3C N-2 -100 22 100.00
12 EO 3S W+3 -490 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
13 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 48,65 %16 EO 4P E = -620 12 54.55
17 EO 3S S = 400 13 59.09
18 EO 3P E-1 50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
7 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 47,00 %19 EO 5C W-1 100 0 0.00
20 EO 2T S-3 -300 19 86.36
21 EO 4P E = -420 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
12 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,70 %22 EO 3S E+2 -660 14 63.64
23 EO 3P N+1 170 7 31.82
24 EO 6P W = -980 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
8 MATELART Marc -HALLEUX Jean François : 54,45 %25 EO 3S E+1 -630 7.7 35.00
26 EO 3K S+1 130 3.4 15.45
27 EO 2P N = 110 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 41,82 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 57,55 %28 EO 3S E = -400 8.8 40.00
29 EO 2P N = 110 16.5 75.00
30 EO 6K W-1 50 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 38,48 %
9 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 52,20 %31 EO 4C N = 620 5 22.73
32 EO 4C N-2 -100 16 72.73
33 EO 3P N-1 -50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
Total : 357,0 / 660 = 54,09 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 de VIRON Baudouin -BRIOT Fernand
10 GROSFILS Colette -POWIS Vinciane : 42,74 % 1 EO 3P E-3 150 6 27.27
2 EO 3P S-1 -100 17 77.27
3 EO 6S W+1 -1470 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
5 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 56,77 % 4 EO 3C N+1 170 10 45.45
5 EO 3S W+2 -460 14 63.64
6 EO 4C N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
11 LAENENS René -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 34,59 % 7 EO 4P W+1 -650 17 77.27
8 EO 3T W-1 50 11 50.00
9 EO 3S N-1 -50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 53,56 %10 EO 2C W+1 -140 17 77.27
11 EO 2C N-1 -50 14 63.64
12 EO 3S W+3 -490 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
1 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 46,02 %13 EO 3S W = -600 2 9.09
14 EO 3C S-1 -50 17 77.27
15 EO 3S N+1 630 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,42 %19 EO 5C W = -650 9 40.91
20 EO 2C S = 110 10 45.45
21 EO 3S W = -400 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
8 MATELART Marc -HALLEUX Jean François : 54,45 %22 EO 6S W-1 100 0 0.00
23 EO 4P N+1 650 0 0.00
24 EO 6P W = -980 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
13 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 48,65 %25 EO 3S E+2 -660 18.6 84.55
26 EO 4K S = 130 3.4 15.45
27 EO 1S S = 90 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 66,52 %
9 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 52,20 %28 EO 3K E+2 -150 4.5 20.45
29 EO 2P N+1 140 5.5 25.00
30 EO 3S W+2 -460 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 33,48 %
12 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,70 %31 EO 4PcW-3 500 16 72.73
32 EO 4PcW = -790 21 95.45
33 EO 3P S = 140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
Total : 358,0 / 660 = 54,24 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
13 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 48,65 % 1 EO 3P E-3 150 6 27.27
2 EO 3P S = 140 3 13.64
3 EO 6S W-1 100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
11 LAENENS René -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 34,59 % 4 EO 2K S+1 110 18 81.82
5 EO 4P E+1 -450 6 27.27
6 EO 4C N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
12 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,70 % 7 EO 4P W-1 100 2 9.09
8 EO 3S E-4 200 2 9.09
9 EO 3K N+1 130 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
1 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 46,02 %10 EO 2C W = -110 8 36.36
11 EO 3C N-1 -50 14 63.64
12 EO 6C E = -980 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
7 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 47,00 %13 EO 3S E+2 -660 14 63.64
14 EO 3C S = 140 6 27.27
15 EO 3S N+1 630 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,42 %16 EO 4P E = -620 12 54.55
17 EO 4P S = 420 6 27.27
18 EO 4P E-1 50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 57,55 %22 EO 3S W = -600 3 13.64
23 EO 4P N-1 -100 16 72.73
24 EO 4P W+2 -480 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
9 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 52,20 %25 EO 3S E+2 -660 18.6 84.55
26 EO 2P E+1 -140 14.3 65.00
27 EO 2P N+1 140 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 58,18 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,35 %28 EO 3S E+1 -430 15.4 70.00
29 EO 2P N = 110 16.5 75.00
30 EO 3S E+3 -490 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 79,85 %
10 GROSFILS Colette -POWIS Vinciane : 42,74 %31 EO 3S N = 600 12 54.55
32 EO 4PcE = -790 21 95.45
33 EO 3C W = -140 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
Total : 341,1 / 660 = 51,68 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 COLLIN Jean-Marie -THIRION Michel
11 LAENENS René -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 34,59 % 1 EO 4T N+1 150 6 27.27
2 EO 3P S-1 -100 17 77.27
3 EO 6S W+1 -1470 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 53,56 % 4 EO 1S W-2 200 8 36.36
5 EO 4P E+1 -450 6 27.27
6 EO 4C N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
1 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 46,02 % 7 EO 5P W-1 100 2 9.09
8 EO 3C E-2 100 7 31.82
9 EO 3S S+1 430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
13 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 48,65 %10 EO 3T S-2 -200 22 100.00
11 EO 2C N-1 -50 14 63.64
12 EO 3S W+2 -460 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,42 %13 EO 3S E+1 -630 6 27.27
14 EO 3C N = 140 6 27.27
15 EO 3S N+1 630 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
12 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,70 %16 EO 2P E+2 -170 1 4.55
17 EO 3S S-1 -50 20 90.91
18 EO 2P E+1 -140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 57,55 %19 EO 5C W+1 -680 14 63.64
20 EO 3C N = 140 4 18.18
21 EO 4P E = -420 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,35 %25 EO 3S E+1 -630 7.7 35.00
26 EO Pass Passe 11 50.00
27 EO 2P N+1 140 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
10 GROSFILS Colette -POWIS Vinciane : 42,74 %28 EO 3S E+3 -490 21.9 99.55
29 EO 3S S-1 -100 21.9 99.55
30 EO 3S E+2 -460 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 84,70 %
5 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 56,77 %31 EO 4C N = 620 5 22.73
32 EO 4PcE-2 500 1 4.55
33 EO 3P S = 140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
Total : 312,1 / 660 = 47,29 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 53,56 % 1 EO 2P E+1 -140 22 100.00
2 EO 3P S-1 -100 17 77.27
3 EO 4S W+2 -690 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
1 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 46,02 % 4 EO 1P N+2 140 14 63.64
5 EO 4P E+1 -450 6 27.27
6 EO 3S S-2 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
7 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 47,00 % 7 EO 4P W+1 -650 17 77.27
8 EO 4P S-3 -150 21 95.45
9 EO 3S S+1 430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,42 %10 EO 2P E-1 100 2 9.09
11 EO 3C N-1 -50 14 63.64
12 EO 3S E+3 -490 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
8 MATELART Marc -HALLEUX Jean François : 54,45 %13 EO 3S E+3 -690 21 95.45
14 EO 4C S-1 -50 17 77.27
15 EO 3S N+1 630 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 57,55 %16 EO 4P E = -620 12 54.55
17 EO 4P S-1 -50 20 90.91
18 EO 3P E-1 50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
13 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 48,65 %19 EO 6TcN-4 -800 18 81.82
20 EO 3P S = 140 4 18.18
21 EO 4P E = -420 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,35 %22 EO 3S W+2 -660 14 63.64
23 EO 4C W-2 200 4 18.18
24 EO 3S E+2 -460 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
5 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 56,77 %28 EO 3S E+1 -430 15.4 70.00
29 EO 1S S+1 120 11 50.00
30 EO 3S E+2 -460 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
11 LAENENS René -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 34,59 %31 EO 3S N = 600 12 54.55
32 EO 4C N-1 -50 13 59.09
33 EO 3C W = -140 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
Total : 394,5 / 660 = 59,77 %
PAIRE Nr : 25 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre
12 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,70 % 1 EO 3P E-2 100 16 72.73
2 EO 3C W-1 50 11 50.00
3 EO 6S W = -1440 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
9 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 52,20 % 4 EO 2P N+1 140 14 63.64
5 EO 4P E+2 -480 19 86.36
6 EO 4C N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 53,56 % 7 EO 4P W+1 -650 17 77.27
8 EO 4P S-3 -150 21 95.45
9 EO 3S S+2 460 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 57,55 %10 EO 2C W = -110 8 36.36
11 EO 2C N-1 -50 14 63.64
12 EO 4C E+2 -480 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
11 LAENENS René -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 34,59 %13 EO 3S E+2 -660 14 63.64
14 EO 4C N-2 -100 22 100.00
15 EO 3S N+1 630 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
8 MATELART Marc -HALLEUX Jean François : 54,45 %16 EO 4P E = -620 12 54.55
17 EO 6T N = 920 0 0.00
18 EO 2P E+2 -170 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
5 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 56,77 %19 EO 6TcN-4 -800 18 81.82
20 EO 3C N = 140 4 18.18
21 EO 4P E = -420 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,42 %22 EO 3S W+3 -690 21 95.45
23 EO 3P N = 140 11 50.00
24 EO 4P W+2 -480 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
7 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 47,00 %28 EO 3S E+1 -430 15.4 70.00
29 EO 2P N+1 140 5.5 25.00
30 EO 3S W+2 -460 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,35 %31 EO 3S N = 600 12 54.55
32 EO 4P W-1 100 10 45.45
33 EO 3P S = 140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
Total : 377,0 / 660 = 57,12 %
PAIRE Nr : 26 COLLET Claudine -BIOURGE Gabrielle
5 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 56,77 % 1 EO 3K N-1 -50 20 90.91
2 EO 2P S+1 140 3 13.64
3 EO 6S W = -1440 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
13 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 48,65 % 4 EO 3S N = 600 5 22.73
5 EO 4P E+1 -450 6 27.27
6 EO 4C N = 420 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
10 GROSFILS Colette -POWIS Vinciane : 42,74 % 7 EO 4P W+1 -650 17 77.27
8 EO 2C W-1 50 11 50.00
9 EO 3S S+1 430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
7 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 47,00 %10 EO 2C W = -110 8 36.36
11 EO 4T E-2 100 6 27.27
12 EO 3S W+3 -490 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,35 %13 EO 3S W+2 -660 14 63.64
14 EO 2C N+1 140 6 27.27
15 EO 3S N+1 630 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
1 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 46,02 %16 EO 5KcN-4 -800 22 100.00
17 EO 3K S-1 -50 20 90.91
18 EO 2P E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
9 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 52,20 %19 EO 5TcN-2 -300 4 18.18
20 EO 3S W = -600 22 100.00
21 EO 4P E-1 50 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 53,56 %22 EO 3S W+1 -630 7 31.82
23 EO 4CcE-2 500 2 9.09
24 EO 5P W+1 -480 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 57,55 %25 EO 3S E+1 -630 7.7 35.00
26 EO 3C E+1 -170 18.6 84.55
27 EO 2P N+1 140 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 48,18 %
8 MATELART Marc -HALLEUX Jean François : 54,45 %31 EO 4C N = 620 5 22.73
32 EO 4PcE-2 500 1 4.55
33 EO 4CcW-1 100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 287,8 / 660 = 43,61 %
|
|