|
Tournoi du 02-06-14
1 62,59 2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
2 56,30 9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph
3 54,44 6 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
4 52,41 3 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
5 51,11 5 GROSFILS Colette -CAMUS Colette
6 48,52 10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle
7 45,37 7 COLLET Edgard -CHANTRAINE René
8 44,44 8 VAN GYSEGHEM -LAENENS René
9 42,96 4 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine
10 41,85 1 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 56,30 20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
2 53,15 17 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
3 51,67 15 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
4 51,30 19 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine
5 50,56 12 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Fernand
6 48,70 13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -NIGOT Pierre
7 48,52 16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane
8 48,33 14 PARMENTIER Richard -DELHEZ Jacques
9 47,59 11 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
10 43,89 18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
PAIRE Nr : 1 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga
11 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,59 % 1 NS 3K N-1 -50 7 38.89
2 NS 4P N-2 -200 2 11.11
3 NS 2C W-2 200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -NIGOT Pierre : 48,70 % 4 NS 4P N-1 -100 2 11.11
5 NS 4P N = 620 14 77.78
6 NS 2C S = 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
12 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Fernand : 50,56 % 7 NS 1S E-2 200 14 77.78
8 NS 2K W+2 -130 7 38.89
9 NS 3S N+1 430 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 48,52 %10 NS 2P N-1 -100 4 22.22
11 NS 3P S = 140 12 66.67
12 NS 1S E+1 -120 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
17 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 53,15 %13 NS 1C E = -80 12 66.67
14 NS 3C N-2 -100 9 50.00
15 NS 2C S+3 200 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 43,89 %16 NS 2C E-1 100 16 88.89
17 NS 4T N-1 -50 10 55.56
18 NS 5K E+2 -440 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
19 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 51,30 %19 NS 2K S-1 -50 11 61.11
20 NS 3C S-3 -300 4 22.22
21 NS 4P E = -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 56,30 %22 NS 3T N+4 190 5 27.78
23 NS 3K S-3 -300 0 0.00
24 NS 3TcN-3 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,33 %25 NS 2S S-2 -100 0 0.00
26 NS 5T N-1 -100 0 0.00
27 NS 4C S = 420 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
15 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,67 %28 NS 3C S = 140 17 94.44
29 NS 3S S-1 -100 4 22.22
30 NS 3S S-2 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 226,0 / 540 = 41,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -NIGOT Pierre : 48,70 % 1 NS 3PcE-3 500 18 100.00
2 NS 3S N+1 630 9 50.00
3 NS 1S N = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
12 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Fernand : 50,56 % 4 NS 4P S = 620 12 66.67
5 NS 4P N = 620 14 77.78
6 NS 4K W-2 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
11 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,59 % 7 NS 2P W-3 300 17 94.44
8 NS 3S E-1 50 16 88.89
9 NS 3S S+2 460 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 56,30 %10 NS 2P N = 110 10 55.56
11 NS 3P E-1 50 6 33.33
12 NS 2S E-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,33 %13 NS 1S E-1 100 15 83.33
14 NS 1S E+2 -150 4 22.22
15 NS 4CcN = 790 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
15 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,67 %16 NS 2S N-1 -50 11 61.11
17 NS 4T N = 130 15 83.33
18 NS 3S W+3 -490 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 48,52 %19 NS 2K N = 90 14 77.78
20 NS 3C W-3 300 18 100.00
21 NS 2P E+2 -170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
17 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 53,15 %22 NS 5K S+2 440 11 61.11
23 NS 3P W+1 -170 11 61.11
24 NS 2K E+1 -110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 43,89 %25 NS 1S E-1 100 4 22.22
26 NS 4T N+1 150 3 16.67
27 NS 4C S-3 -150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
19 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 51,30 %28 NS 1S S = 90 10 55.56
29 NS 2K E-4 400 18 100.00
30 NS 2P N = 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
Total : 338,0 / 540 = 62,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
12 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Fernand : 50,56 % 1 NS 3S S-1 -50 7 38.89
2 NS 3S S+1 630 9 50.00
3 NS 1S N = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
11 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,59 % 4 NS 3S S = 600 6 33.33
5 NS 4P N+1 650 18 100.00
6 NS 3K W = -110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -NIGOT Pierre : 48,70 % 7 NS 2P E+1 -140 2 11.11
8 NS 2K W+2 -130 7 38.89
9 NS 3S N+3 490 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 43,89 %10 NS 1S E-2 200 18 100.00
11 NS 3C S = 140 12 66.67
12 NS 1S E+1 -120 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
19 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 51,30 %13 NS 2K N-2 -200 0 0.00
14 NS 2P S-1 -50 14 77.78
15 NS 3PcE-2 300 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 56,30 %16 NS 3T S-1 -50 11 61.11
17 NS 3S S-2 -100 6 33.33
18 NS 3S W+2 -460 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,33 %19 NS 3K S-2 -100 6 33.33
20 NS 2P W-1 100 11 61.11
21 NS 2P E = -110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
15 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,67 %22 NS 5K S+2 440 11 61.11
23 NS 3P E+1 -170 11 61.11
24 NS 3K E-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 48,52 %25 NS 2T N+1 110 10 55.56
26 NS 3S S+1 630 16 88.89
27 NS 4C S-2 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
17 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 53,15 %28 NS 3K S = 110 13 72.22
29 NS 1S S-1 -100 4 22.22
30 NS 3S S-2 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 283,0 / 540 = 52,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine
17 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 53,15 % 1 NS 5K N-3 -150 0 0.00
2 NS 6PcN-3 -800 0 0.00
3 NS 2C W = -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 48,52 % 4 NS 4P S+1 650 18 100.00
5 NS 3S N-3 -300 0 0.00
6 NS 3P E-1 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
15 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,67 % 7 NS 2K N+1 110 12 66.67
8 NS 3P S-3 -150 0 0.00
9 NS 3S N+2 460 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,33 %10 NS 2S S-1 -100 4 22.22
11 NS 3C S+1 170 18 100.00
12 NS 2C W = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 56,30 %13 NS 1S W+1 -120 3 16.67
14 NS 3C N-2 -100 9 50.00
15 NS 4PcE-3 500 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
19 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 51,30 %16 NS 3S N-3 -150 1 5.56
17 NS 3S S-2 -100 6 33.33
18 NS 3K E+3 -170 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 43,89 %19 NS 3T E = -110 2 11.11
20 NS 4CcS-4 -1100 0 0.00
21 NS 3S E-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -NIGOT Pierre : 48,70 %22 NS 6S N+1 1020 18 100.00
23 NS 2C N-2 -200 3 16.67
24 NS 4T N-2 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
12 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Fernand : 50,56 %25 NS 2T N+1 110 10 55.56
26 NS 2T N+3 150 3 16.67
27 NS 4PcW-3 500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
11 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,59 %28 NS 2C S+1 140 17 94.44
29 NS 1S S-1 -100 4 22.22
30 NS 3S S-3 -150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 232,0 / 540 = 42,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 GROSFILS Colette -CAMUS Colette
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 43,89 % 1 NS 2P E-1 50 14 77.78
2 NS 3S N+3 690 17 94.44
3 NS 2T W-2 200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
17 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 53,15 % 4 NS 4P N-1 -100 2 11.11
5 NS 4P N-1 -100 3 16.67
6 NS 2C S = 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 48,52 % 7 NS 1P W = -80 10 55.56
8 NS 2K W+2 -130 7 38.89
9 NS 3S N+2 460 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,59 %10 NS 3S S-2 -200 0 0.00
11 NS 2C S+1 140 12 66.67
12 NS 2S E+1 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
15 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,67 %13 NS 1S W-1 100 15 83.33
14 NS 1S E+3 -180 1 5.56
15 NS 4C S = 620 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,33 %16 NS 3T S-3 -150 1 5.56
17 NS 3ScS-2 -300 0 0.00
18 NS 5K E+1 -420 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 56,30 %19 NS 4T E-1 100 16 88.89
20 NS 3T W-2 200 15 83.33
21 NS 3P E+1 -170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
19 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 51,30 %22 NS 3T N+4 190 5 27.78
23 NS 2P W+1 -140 18 100.00
24 NS 2K E = -90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -NIGOT Pierre : 48,70 %25 NS 2T N+1 110 10 55.56
26 NS 3S S = 600 10 55.56
27 NS 3K W-4 200 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
12 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Fernand : 50,56 %28 NS 3T W+1 -130 4 22.22
29 NS 1S S-1 -100 4 22.22
30 NS 2P N = 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 276,0 / 540 = 51,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
19 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 51,30 % 1 NS 3K N-1 -50 7 38.89
2 NS 3S S+2 660 13 72.22
3 NS 1S N = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 43,89 % 4 NS 4P N = 620 12 66.67
5 NS 3P N+1 170 6 33.33
6 NS 3C S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
17 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 53,15 % 7 NS 3S W-3 300 17 94.44
8 NS 3P E-3 150 18 100.00
9 NS 3S N = 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
12 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Fernand : 50,56 %10 NS 2P N+2 170 16 88.89
11 NS 3C S-1 -50 3 16.67
12 NS 2S E-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
11 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,59 %13 NS 3C E-3 300 18 100.00
14 NS 2S E = -120 6 33.33
15 NS 6CcS-2 -500 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 48,52 %16 NS 2S N-2 -100 5 27.78
17 NS 4T N = 130 15 83.33
18 NS 3S W+1 -430 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
15 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,67 %19 NS 3K S-2 -100 6 33.33
20 NS 2P W-2 200 15 83.33
21 NS 2P E+1 -140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,33 %22 NS 6T N+1 940 16 88.89
23 NS 2P W+2 -170 11 61.11
24 NS 2C N-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 56,30 %25 NS 2T N+1 110 10 55.56
26 NS 3S S = 600 10 55.56
27 NS 4C S-3 -150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -NIGOT Pierre : 48,70 %28 NS 4C S-2 -200 1 5.56
29 NS 2S W-1 100 10 55.56
30 NS 2C S-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 294,0 / 540 = 54,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 COLLET Edgard -CHANTRAINE René
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 56,30 % 1 NS 3P E-2 100 16 88.89
2 NS 2P E-4 200 4 22.22
3 NS 1S N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
19 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 51,30 % 4 NS 4P N = 620 12 66.67
5 NS 3P N+2 200 8 44.44
6 NS 4CcS-2 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 43,89 % 7 NS 1S E = -90 6 33.33
8 NS 2K E+2 -130 7 38.89
9 NS 3S S+3 490 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -NIGOT Pierre : 48,70 %10 NS 2P N-1 -100 4 22.22
11 NS 3C S-1 -50 3 16.67
12 NS 2S E-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
12 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Fernand : 50,56 %13 NS 2C W = -110 6 33.33
14 NS 2P W-1 50 18 100.00
15 NS 5CcS-2 -500 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
11 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,59 %16 NS 2T S-1 -50 11 61.11
17 NS 3P W-2 100 12 66.67
18 NS 3S W+3 -490 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
17 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 53,15 %19 NS 2K S-1 -50 11 61.11
20 NS 3T W = -110 7 38.89
21 NS 3T W = -110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 48,52 %22 NS 2K N+4 170 0 0.00
23 NS 3P E+1 -170 11 61.11
24 NS 2S E = -120 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
15 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,67 %25 NS 2T N+1 110 10 55.56
26 NS 3S S = 600 10 55.56
27 NS 3K W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,33 %28 NS 3C N-1 -100 7 38.89
29 NS 1S S+1 120 14 77.78
30 NS 3S S-3 -150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 245,0 / 540 = 45,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 VAN GYSEGHEM -LAENENS René
14 PARMENTIER Richard -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,33 % 1 NS 3S S-1 -50 7 38.89
2 NS 3S S+2 660 13 72.22
3 NS 1S N-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 56,30 % 4 NS 4P N = 620 12 66.67
5 NS 5TcW-3 500 10 55.56
6 NS 3K W = -110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
19 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 51,30 % 7 NS 1S E+2 -150 0 0.00
8 NS 2K W+2 -130 7 38.89
9 NS 3S S+2 460 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
15 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,67 %10 NS 2P N = 110 10 55.56
11 NS 2C S+1 140 12 66.67
12 NS 2S E = -120 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -NIGOT Pierre : 48,70 %13 NS 2K N-1 -100 8 44.44
14 NS 2C S-1 -50 14 77.78
15 NS 2C S+4 230 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
12 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Fernand : 50,56 %16 NS 3T S-2 -100 5 27.78
17 NS 2P W+3 -200 2 11.11
18 NS 3S W+3 -490 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
11 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,59 %19 NS 3K S = 110 18 100.00
20 NS 3CcS-3 -800 2 11.11
21 NS 2P E+2 -170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 43,89 %22 NS 3T N+4 190 5 27.78
23 NS 3K S-2 -200 3 16.67
24 NS 2K E-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
17 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 53,15 %25 NS 2S S-1 -50 2 11.11
26 NS 3S S+2 660 18 100.00
27 NS 4P E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 48,52 %28 NS 2S S-1 -100 7 38.89
29 NS 1S S+1 120 14 77.78
30 NS 1S S = 90 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 240,0 / 540 = 44,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph
15 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,67 % 1 NS 3S S-1 -50 7 38.89
2 NS 4P N = 620 6 33.33
3 NS 1S N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,33 % 4 NS 4P N = 620 12 66.67
5 NS 4P N = 620 14 77.78
6 NS 2C S = 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 56,30 % 7 NS 1S E = -90 6 33.33
8 NS 2S E = -120 14 77.78
9 NS 3S N+1 430 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
17 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 53,15 %10 NS 2P N+1 140 14 77.78
11 NS 3C S = 140 12 66.67
12 NS 2S E = -120 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 48,52 %13 NS 1S E+1 -120 3 16.67
14 NS 1S E+3 -180 1 5.56
15 NS 4C S = 620 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -NIGOT Pierre : 48,70 %16 NS 3S N = 400 18 100.00
17 NS 3S S-2 -100 6 33.33
18 NS 3S W+3 -490 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
12 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Fernand : 50,56 %19 NS 3K S-2 -100 6 33.33
20 NS 2P W-1 100 11 61.11
21 NS 2P E+1 -140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
11 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,59 %22 NS 3S S+4 520 14 77.78
23 NS 2P E+2 -170 11 61.11
24 NS 2S N = 120 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
19 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 51,30 %25 NS 3T N+1 130 16 88.89
26 NS 3S S = 600 10 55.56
27 NS 4C S = 420 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 43,89 %28 NS 3K S = 110 13 72.22
29 NS 2S S = 120 14 77.78
30 NS 2P N-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 304,0 / 540 = 56,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 48,52 % 1 NS 3S S-1 -50 7 38.89
2 NS 3S N+3 690 17 94.44
3 NS 2T W-1 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
15 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,67 % 4 NS 4P N-1 -100 2 11.11
5 NS 4P S-1 -100 3 16.67
6 NS 3C S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,33 % 7 NS 2T E = -90 6 33.33
8 NS 3K W+1 -130 7 38.89
9 NS 3S N+2 460 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
19 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 51,30 %10 NS 2P N = 110 10 55.56
11 NS 4C S-2 -100 0 0.00
12 NS 2S E = -120 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 43,89 %13 NS 1S E = -90 10 55.56
14 NS 2C N-1 -50 14 77.78
15 NS 4C S+1 650 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
17 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 53,15 %16 NS 3T S-1 -50 11 61.11
17 NS 4P W-4 200 18 100.00
18 NS 3S W+3 -490 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -NIGOT Pierre : 48,70 %19 NS 3S W = -600 0 0.00
20 NS 2P W = -110 7 38.89
21 NS 3S E-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
12 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Fernand : 50,56 %22 NS 4T N+3 190 5 27.78
23 NS 2P W+2 -170 11 61.11
24 NS 3K E = -110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
11 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,59 %25 NS 2C W-3 300 18 100.00
26 NS 5T N = 600 10 55.56
27 NS 3C S-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 56,30 %28 NS 2P S-2 -200 1 5.56
29 NS 1S S-1 -100 4 22.22
30 NS 2P N = 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 262,0 / 540 = 48,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
1 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,85 % 1 EO 3K N-1 -50 11 61.11
2 EO 4P N-2 -200 16 88.89
3 EO 2C W-2 200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 52,41 % 4 EO 3S S = 600 12 66.67
5 EO 4P N+1 650 0 0.00
6 EO 3K W = -110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,59 % 7 EO 2P W-3 300 1 5.56
8 EO 3S E-1 50 2 11.11
9 EO 3S S+2 460 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
5 GROSFILS Colette -CAMUS Colette : 51,11 %10 EO 3S S-2 -200 18 100.00
11 EO 2C S+1 140 6 33.33
12 EO 2S E+1 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
6 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 54,44 %13 EO 3C E-3 300 0 0.00
14 EO 2S E = -120 12 66.67
15 EO 6CcS-2 -500 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
7 COLLET Edgard -CHANTRAINE René : 45,37 %16 EO 2T S-1 -50 7 38.89
17 EO 3P W-2 100 6 33.33
18 EO 3S W+3 -490 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 VAN GYSEGHEM -LAENENS René : 44,44 %19 EO 3K S = 110 0 0.00
20 EO 3CcS-3 -800 16 88.89
21 EO 2P E+2 -170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 56,30 %22 EO 3S S+4 520 4 22.22
23 EO 2P E+2 -170 7 38.89
24 EO 2S N = 120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 48,52 %25 EO 2C W-3 300 0 0.00
26 EO 5T N = 600 8 44.44
27 EO 3C S-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
4 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 42,96 %28 EO 2C S+1 140 1 5.56
29 EO 1S S-1 -100 14 77.78
30 EO 3S S-3 -150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 257,0 / 540 = 47,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Fernand
3 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 52,41 % 1 EO 3S S-1 -50 11 61.11
2 EO 3S S+1 630 9 50.00
3 EO 1S N = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,59 % 4 EO 4P S = 620 6 33.33
5 EO 4P N = 620 4 22.22
6 EO 4K W-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
1 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,85 % 7 EO 1S E-2 200 4 22.22
8 EO 2K W+2 -130 11 61.11
9 EO 3S N+1 430 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
6 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 54,44 %10 EO 2P N+2 170 2 11.11
11 EO 3C S-1 -50 15 83.33
12 EO 2S E-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
7 COLLET Edgard -CHANTRAINE René : 45,37 %13 EO 2C W = -110 12 66.67
14 EO 2P W-1 50 0 0.00
15 EO 5CcS-2 -500 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
8 VAN GYSEGHEM -LAENENS René : 44,44 %16 EO 3T S-2 -100 13 72.22
17 EO 2P W+3 -200 16 88.89
18 EO 3S W+3 -490 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 56,30 %19 EO 3K S-2 -100 12 66.67
20 EO 2P W-1 100 7 38.89
21 EO 2P E+1 -140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 48,52 %22 EO 4T N+3 190 13 72.22
23 EO 2P W+2 -170 7 38.89
24 EO 3K E = -110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
4 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 42,96 %25 EO 2T N+1 110 8 44.44
26 EO 2T N+3 150 15 83.33
27 EO 4PcW-3 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
5 GROSFILS Colette -CAMUS Colette : 51,11 %28 EO 3T W+1 -130 14 77.78
29 EO 1S S-1 -100 14 77.78
30 EO 2P N = 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 273,0 / 540 = 50,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -NIGOT Pierre
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,59 % 1 EO 3PcE-3 500 0 0.00
2 EO 3S N+1 630 9 50.00
3 EO 1S N = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
1 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,85 % 4 EO 4P N-1 -100 16 88.89
5 EO 4P N = 620 4 22.22
6 EO 2C S = 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 52,41 % 7 EO 2P E+1 -140 16 88.89
8 EO 2K W+2 -130 11 61.11
9 EO 3S N+3 490 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
7 COLLET Edgard -CHANTRAINE René : 45,37 %10 EO 2P N-1 -100 14 77.78
11 EO 3C S-1 -50 15 83.33
12 EO 2S E-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
8 VAN GYSEGHEM -LAENENS René : 44,44 %13 EO 2K N-1 -100 10 55.56
14 EO 2C S-1 -50 4 22.22
15 EO 2C S+4 230 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 56,30 %16 EO 3S N = 400 0 0.00
17 EO 3S S-2 -100 12 66.67
18 EO 3S W+3 -490 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 48,52 %19 EO 3S W = -600 18 100.00
20 EO 2P W = -110 11 61.11
21 EO 3S E-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
4 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 42,96 %22 EO 6S N+1 1020 0 0.00
23 EO 2C N-2 -200 15 83.33
24 EO 4T N-2 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
5 GROSFILS Colette -CAMUS Colette : 51,11 %25 EO 2T N+1 110 8 44.44
26 EO 3S S = 600 8 44.44
27 EO 3K W-4 200 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
6 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 54,44 %28 EO 4C S-2 -200 17 94.44
29 EO 2S W-1 100 8 44.44
30 EO 2C S-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 263,0 / 540 = 48,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 PARMENTIER Richard -DELHEZ Jacques
8 VAN GYSEGHEM -LAENENS René : 44,44 % 1 EO 3S S-1 -50 11 61.11
2 EO 3S S+2 660 5 27.78
3 EO 1S N-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 56,30 % 4 EO 4P N = 620 6 33.33
5 EO 4P N = 620 4 22.22
6 EO 2C S = 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 48,52 % 7 EO 2T E = -90 12 66.67
8 EO 3K W+1 -130 11 61.11
9 EO 3S N+2 460 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
4 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 42,96 %10 EO 2S S-1 -100 14 77.78
11 EO 3C S+1 170 0 0.00
12 EO 2C W = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,59 %13 EO 1S E-1 100 3 16.67
14 EO 1S E+2 -150 14 77.78
15 EO 4CcN = 790 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
5 GROSFILS Colette -CAMUS Colette : 51,11 %16 EO 3T S-3 -150 17 94.44
17 EO 3ScS-2 -300 18 100.00
18 EO 5K E+1 -420 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 52,41 %19 EO 3K S-2 -100 12 66.67
20 EO 2P W-1 100 7 38.89
21 EO 2P E = -110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
6 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 54,44 %22 EO 6T N+1 940 2 11.11
23 EO 2P W+2 -170 7 38.89
24 EO 2C N-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
1 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,85 %25 EO 2S S-2 -100 18 100.00
26 EO 5T N-1 -100 18 100.00
27 EO 4C S = 420 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
7 COLLET Edgard -CHANTRAINE René : 45,37 %28 EO 3C N-1 -100 11 61.11
29 EO 1S S+1 120 4 22.22
30 EO 3S S-3 -150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 261,0 / 540 = 48,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 56,30 % 1 EO 3S S-1 -50 11 61.11
2 EO 4P N = 620 12 66.67
3 EO 1S N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 48,52 % 4 EO 4P N-1 -100 16 88.89
5 EO 4P S-1 -100 15 83.33
6 EO 3C S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
4 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 42,96 % 7 EO 2K N+1 110 6 33.33
8 EO 3P S-3 -150 18 100.00
9 EO 3S N+2 460 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
8 VAN GYSEGHEM -LAENENS René : 44,44 %10 EO 2P N = 110 8 44.44
11 EO 2C S+1 140 6 33.33
12 EO 2S E = -120 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
5 GROSFILS Colette -CAMUS Colette : 51,11 %13 EO 1S W-1 100 3 16.67
14 EO 1S E+3 -180 17 94.44
15 EO 4C S = 620 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,59 %16 EO 2S N-1 -50 7 38.89
17 EO 4T N = 130 3 16.67
18 EO 3S W+3 -490 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
6 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 54,44 %19 EO 3K S-2 -100 12 66.67
20 EO 2P W-2 200 3 16.67
21 EO 2P E+1 -140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 52,41 %22 EO 5K S+2 440 7 38.89
23 EO 3P E+1 -170 7 38.89
24 EO 3K E-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
7 COLLET Edgard -CHANTRAINE René : 45,37 %25 EO 2T N+1 110 8 44.44
26 EO 3S S = 600 8 44.44
27 EO 3K W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
1 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,85 %28 EO 3C S = 140 1 5.56
29 EO 3S S-1 -100 14 77.78
30 EO 3S S-2 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 279,0 / 540 = 51,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 48,52 % 1 EO 3S S-1 -50 11 61.11
2 EO 3S N+3 690 1 5.56
3 EO 2T W-1 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
4 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 42,96 % 4 EO 4P S+1 650 0 0.00
5 EO 3S N-3 -300 18 100.00
6 EO 3P E-1 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
5 GROSFILS Colette -CAMUS Colette : 51,11 % 7 EO 1P W = -80 8 44.44
8 EO 2K W+2 -130 11 61.11
9 EO 3S N+2 460 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
1 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,85 %10 EO 2P N-1 -100 14 77.78
11 EO 3P S = 140 6 33.33
12 EO 1S E+1 -120 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 56,30 %13 EO 1S E+1 -120 15 83.33
14 EO 1S E+3 -180 17 94.44
15 EO 4C S = 620 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
6 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 54,44 %16 EO 2S N-2 -100 13 72.22
17 EO 4T N = 130 3 16.67
18 EO 3S W+1 -430 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,59 %19 EO 2K N = 90 4 22.22
20 EO 3C W-3 300 0 0.00
21 EO 2P E+2 -170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
7 COLLET Edgard -CHANTRAINE René : 45,37 %22 EO 2K N+4 170 18 100.00
23 EO 3P E+1 -170 7 38.89
24 EO 2S E = -120 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 52,41 %25 EO 2T N+1 110 8 44.44
26 EO 3S S+1 630 2 11.11
27 EO 4C S-2 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
8 VAN GYSEGHEM -LAENENS René : 44,44 %28 EO 2S S-1 -100 11 61.11
29 EO 1S S+1 120 4 22.22
30 EO 1S S = 90 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 262,0 / 540 = 48,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
4 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 42,96 % 1 EO 5K N-3 -150 18 100.00
2 EO 6PcN-3 -800 18 100.00
3 EO 2C W = -110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
5 GROSFILS Colette -CAMUS Colette : 51,11 % 4 EO 4P N-1 -100 16 88.89
5 EO 4P N-1 -100 15 83.33
6 EO 2C S = 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
6 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 54,44 % 7 EO 3S W-3 300 1 5.56
8 EO 3P E-3 150 0 0.00
9 EO 3S N = 400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 56,30 %10 EO 2P N+1 140 4 22.22
11 EO 3C S = 140 6 33.33
12 EO 2S E = -120 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
1 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,85 %13 EO 1C E = -80 6 33.33
14 EO 3C N-2 -100 9 50.00
15 EO 2C S+3 200 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 48,52 %16 EO 3T S-1 -50 7 38.89
17 EO 4P W-4 200 0 0.00
18 EO 3S W+3 -490 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
7 COLLET Edgard -CHANTRAINE René : 45,37 %19 EO 2K S-1 -50 7 38.89
20 EO 3T W = -110 11 61.11
21 EO 3T W = -110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,59 %22 EO 5K S+2 440 7 38.89
23 EO 3P W+1 -170 7 38.89
24 EO 2K E+1 -110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 VAN GYSEGHEM -LAENENS René : 44,44 %25 EO 2S S-1 -50 16 88.89
26 EO 3S S+2 660 0 0.00
27 EO 4P E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 52,41 %28 EO 3K S = 110 5 27.78
29 EO 1S S-1 -100 14 77.78
30 EO 3S S-2 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 287,0 / 540 = 53,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
5 GROSFILS Colette -CAMUS Colette : 51,11 % 1 EO 2P E-1 50 4 22.22
2 EO 3S N+3 690 1 5.56
3 EO 2T W-2 200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
6 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 54,44 % 4 EO 4P N = 620 6 33.33
5 EO 3P N+1 170 12 66.67
6 EO 3C S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
7 COLLET Edgard -CHANTRAINE René : 45,37 % 7 EO 1S E = -90 12 66.67
8 EO 2K E+2 -130 11 61.11
9 EO 3S S+3 490 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 52,41 %10 EO 1S E-2 200 0 0.00
11 EO 3C S = 140 6 33.33
12 EO 1S E+1 -120 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 48,52 %13 EO 1S E = -90 8 44.44
14 EO 2C N-1 -50 4 22.22
15 EO 4C S+1 650 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
1 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,85 %16 EO 2C E-1 100 2 11.11
17 EO 4T N-1 -50 8 44.44
18 EO 5K E+2 -440 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
4 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 42,96 %19 EO 3T E = -110 16 88.89
20 EO 4CcS-4 -1100 18 100.00
21 EO 3S E-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
8 VAN GYSEGHEM -LAENENS René : 44,44 %22 EO 3T N+4 190 13 72.22
23 EO 3K S-2 -200 15 83.33
24 EO 2K E-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,59 %25 EO 1S E-1 100 14 77.78
26 EO 4T N+1 150 15 83.33
27 EO 4C S-3 -150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 56,30 %28 EO 3K S = 110 5 27.78
29 EO 2S S = 120 4 22.22
30 EO 2P N-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 237,0 / 540 = 43,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine
6 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 54,44 % 1 EO 3K N-1 -50 11 61.11
2 EO 3S S+2 660 5 27.78
3 EO 1S N = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
7 COLLET Edgard -CHANTRAINE René : 45,37 % 4 EO 4P N = 620 6 33.33
5 EO 3P N+2 200 10 55.56
6 EO 4CcS-2 -300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
8 VAN GYSEGHEM -LAENENS René : 44,44 % 7 EO 1S E+2 -150 18 100.00
8 EO 2K W+2 -130 11 61.11
9 EO 3S S+2 460 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 48,52 %10 EO 2P N = 110 8 44.44
11 EO 4C S-2 -100 18 100.00
12 EO 2S E = -120 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 52,41 %13 EO 2K N-2 -200 18 100.00
14 EO 2P S-1 -50 4 22.22
15 EO 3PcE-2 300 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
4 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 42,96 %16 EO 3S N-3 -150 17 94.44
17 EO 3S S-2 -100 12 66.67
18 EO 3K E+3 -170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
1 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,85 %19 EO 2K S-1 -50 7 38.89
20 EO 3C S-3 -300 14 77.78
21 EO 4P E = -420 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
5 GROSFILS Colette -CAMUS Colette : 51,11 %22 EO 3T N+4 190 13 72.22
23 EO 2P W+1 -140 0 0.00
24 EO 2K E = -90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 56,30 %25 EO 3T N+1 130 2 11.11
26 EO 3S S = 600 8 44.44
27 EO 4C S = 420 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,59 %28 EO 1S S = 90 8 44.44
29 EO 2K E-4 400 0 0.00
30 EO 2P N = 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
Total : 277,0 / 540 = 51,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
7 COLLET Edgard -CHANTRAINE René : 45,37 % 1 EO 3P E-2 100 2 11.11
2 EO 2P E-4 200 14 77.78
3 EO 1S N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
8 VAN GYSEGHEM -LAENENS René : 44,44 % 4 EO 4P N = 620 6 33.33
5 EO 5TcW-3 500 8 44.44
6 EO 3K W = -110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 56,30 % 7 EO 1S E = -90 12 66.67
8 EO 2S E = -120 4 22.22
9 EO 3S N+1 430 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,59 %10 EO 2P N = 110 8 44.44
11 EO 3P E-1 50 12 66.67
12 EO 2S E-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
4 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 42,96 %13 EO 1S W+1 -120 15 83.33
14 EO 3C N-2 -100 9 50.00
15 EO 4PcE-3 500 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 52,41 %16 EO 3T S-1 -50 7 38.89
17 EO 3S S-2 -100 12 66.67
18 EO 3S W+2 -460 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 GROSFILS Colette -CAMUS Colette : 51,11 %19 EO 4T E-1 100 2 11.11
20 EO 3T W-2 200 3 16.67
21 EO 3P E+1 -170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
1 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,85 %22 EO 3T N+4 190 13 72.22
23 EO 3K S-3 -300 18 100.00
24 EO 3TcN-3 -500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
6 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 54,44 %25 EO 2T N+1 110 8 44.44
26 EO 3S S = 600 8 44.44
27 EO 4C S-3 -150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 48,52 %28 EO 2P S-2 -200 17 94.44
29 EO 1S S-1 -100 14 77.78
30 EO 2P N = 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 304,0 / 540 = 56,30 %
|
|