|
Tournoi du 02-12-13
1 63,91 3 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
2 58,09 4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
3 54,63 7 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse
4 53,72 2 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques
5 51,50 5 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
6 49,26 8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
7 46,07 9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
8 45,83 1 ROGIERS MAGDA -POULAERT Gilbert
9 40,85 6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine
10 36,22 10 VERBOIS Léon -DELHEZ Jacques
11 0,00 11 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 57,55 17 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte
2 57,49 13 CASSART Guy -FRAITURE Louis
3 57,26 20 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand
4 55,31 19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
5 51,44 14 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
6 50,58 18 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
7 48,19 16 LAENENS René -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
8 44,41 12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
9 43,97 22 COULIE Joelle -de WASSEIGE Ariane
10 43,72 15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
11 40,60 21 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
PAIRE Nr : 1 ROGIERS MAGDA -POULAERT Gilbert
12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,41 % 1 NS 4P E-1 50 7.9 43.89
2 NS 1S E-1 50 6.8 37.78
3 NS 4C N+1 450 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
22 COULIE Joelle -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 43,97 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 14.6 81.11
5 NS 3C N+2 200 6.8 37.78
6 NS 2K N+1 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,30 %
21 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 40,60 % 7 NS 1S S+1 120 11.2 62.22
8 NS 2P N-1 -50 4.6 25.56
9 NS 2P N = 110 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
20 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 57,26 %10 NS 2K W+1 -110 6.8 37.78
11 NS 3S E+4 -520 3.4 18.89
12 NS 3S N+2 660 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 43,70 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,31 %13 NS 3T N-1 -100 3.4 18.89
14 NS 3S W = -400 12.3 68.33
15 NS 5C S = 650 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 43,70 %
18 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 50,58 %16 NS 3P N-1 -50 9 50.00
17 NS 2S E = -120 7.9 43.89
18 NS 3S E+1 -430 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 39,81 %
17 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 57,55 %19 NS 1K S+2 110 2.3 12.78
20 NS 3S S+1 630 6.8 37.78
21 NS 3CcS-2 -500 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 19,07 %
16 LAENENS René -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 48,19 %22 NS 2C E+1 -140 6.8 37.78
23 NS 3S E-1 100 17.9 99.44
24 NS 4C N = 420 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,72 %25 NS 2C W-1 100 14.6 81.11
26 NS 4K W = -130 9 50.00
27 NS 3PcW = -530 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
14 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,44 %28 NS 4C W = -420 5 27.78
29 NS 2P N+1 140 15 83.33
30 NS 4C S+1 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 247,5 / 540 = 45,83 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques
13 CASSART Guy -FRAITURE Louis : 57,49 % 4 NS 3S W+1 -630 6.8 37.78
5 NS 4CcN = 790 15.7 87.22
6 NS 3C E = -140 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,41 % 7 NS 2C S = 110 9 50.00
8 NS 2C E-1 50 7.9 43.89
9 NS 4P S-1 -50 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 39,81 %
22 COULIE Joelle -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 43,97 %10 NS 1S E = -90 10.1 56.11
11 NS 3S E = -400 15.7 87.22
12 NS 1S N+4 210 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
21 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 40,60 %13 NS 2K E-1 100 16.8 93.33
14 NS 3S W = -400 12.3 68.33
15 NS 6C S-1 -100 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
20 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 57,26 %16 NS 4PcN-2 -300 0.1 0.56
17 NS 2S E = -120 7.9 43.89
18 NS 3S W = -400 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,31 %19 NS 3S N+1 430 13.4 74.44
20 NS 3S S+1 630 6.8 37.78
21 NS 2K E+1 -110 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
18 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 50,58 %22 NS 2C E+1 -140 6.8 37.78
23 NS 1S E = -90 14.6 81.11
24 NS 4C N = 420 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 52,22 %
17 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 57,55 %25 NS 3S W = -600 0.1 0.56
26 NS 3K W+1 -130 9 50.00
27 NS 3C S-1 -50 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
16 LAENENS René -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 48,19 %28 NS 1C E+3 -170 12 66.67
29 NS 3K W-1 100 8 44.44
30 NS 5CcS = 650 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,72 %31 NS 4C E-2 100 16.8 93.33
32 NS 4P S+1 450 16.8 93.33
33 NS 5T E+1 -420 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 85,00 %
Total : 290,1 / 540 = 53,72 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
16 LAENENS René -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 48,19 % 1 NS 4K N+1 150 17.9 99.44
2 NS 1S E-2 100 14.6 81.11
3 NS 4C N+3 510 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 93,33 %
14 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,44 % 7 NS 1S S = 90 3.4 18.89
8 NS 2C E = -110 2.3 12.78
9 NS 2P S+2 170 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 43,70 %
13 CASSART Guy -FRAITURE Louis : 57,49 %10 NS 3S E-1 100 13.4 74.44
11 NS 3S E+2 -460 12.3 68.33
12 NS 3S N+2 660 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 72,41 %
12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,41 %13 NS 2T N = 90 10.1 56.11
14 NS 3S W = -400 12.3 68.33
15 NS 5C S+1 680 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
22 COULIE Joelle -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 43,97 %16 NS 3P N = 140 15.7 87.22
17 NS 2S E = -120 7.9 43.89
18 NS 3S W = -400 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
21 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 40,60 %19 NS 3C N+1 170 4.6 25.56
20 NS 3S S+1 630 6.8 37.78
21 NS 2P W-2 100 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 52,22 %
20 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 57,26 %22 NS 2C E = -110 16.8 93.33
23 NS 1S E+1 -120 5.7 31.67
24 NS 4C N = 420 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 54,26 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,31 %25 NS 3S W-1 100 14.6 81.11
26 NS 3C S+1 170 16.8 93.33
27 NS 3C S-1 -50 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 89,26 %
18 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 50,58 %28 NS 3C W+1 -170 12 66.67
29 NS 2P N = 110 11 61.11
30 NS 4C S+1 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
17 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 57,55 %31 NS 2C E+1 -140 4.6 25.56
32 NS 3P S+1 170 2.3 12.78
33 NS 2C E+4 -230 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
Total : 345,1 / 540 = 63,91 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
18 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 50,58 % 1 NS 4K N = 130 14.6 81.11
2 NS 1S E-2 100 14.6 81.11
3 NS 4C N+1 450 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 72,78 %
17 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 57,55 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 14.6 81.11
5 NS 2C N = 110 4.6 25.56
6 NS 3C E-1 100 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 44,07 %
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,72 %10 NS 3S E-2 200 16.8 93.33
11 NS 2K W+2 -130 17.9 99.44
12 NS 3S N+2 660 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 89,07 %
14 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,44 %13 NS 1S N = 90 10.1 56.11
14 NS 3S W+1 -430 2.3 12.78
15 NS 4C S+2 680 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
13 CASSART Guy -FRAITURE Louis : 57,49 %16 NS 4C W-1 100 11.2 62.22
17 NS 3S E = -400 2.3 12.78
18 NS 3S E+1 -430 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,41 %19 NS 3S N+1 430 13.4 74.44
20 NS 3S S+2 660 14.6 81.11
21 NS 3T E-2 100 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 82,96 %
22 COULIE Joelle -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 43,97 %22 NS 2S E = -120 13.4 74.44
23 NS 1S E+1 -120 5.7 31.67
24 NS 4C N+3 510 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
21 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 40,60 %25 NS 4P E-1 100 14.6 81.11
26 NS 4K W = -130 9 50.00
27 NS 4C S-2 -100 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
20 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 57,26 %28 NS 4C E = -420 5 27.78
29 NS 3K W = -110 0 0.00
30 NS 5C S = 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,31 %31 NS 1S E = -90 9 50.00
32 NS 4P S = 420 11.2 62.22
33 NS 4C W+2 -480 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 43,70 %
Total : 313,7 / 540 = 58,09 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
20 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 57,26 % 1 NS 4PcE-1 100 11.2 62.22
2 NS 2P E = -110 0.1 0.56
3 NS 4C N+1 450 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,31 % 4 NS 3S E+1 -630 6.8 37.78
5 NS 5KcW-5 1100 17.9 99.44
6 NS 2K N+1 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
18 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 50,58 % 7 NS 2C S+2 170 17.9 99.44
8 NS 4T N = 130 13.4 74.44
9 NS 2P S = 110 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 80,74 %
16 LAENENS René -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 48,19 %13 NS 2T N-2 -200 0.1 0.56
14 NS 3S W = -400 12.3 68.33
15 NS 5C S = 650 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,72 %16 NS 2P N = 110 13.4 74.44
17 NS 2S E = -120 7.9 43.89
18 NS 2C E+2 -170 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 64,26 %
14 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,44 %19 NS 2S N+2 180 6.8 37.78
20 NS 3S S+2 660 14.6 81.11
21 NS 3S E-1 50 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
13 CASSART Guy -FRAITURE Louis : 57,49 %22 NS 3C E+1 -170 0.1 0.56
23 NS 1S E+2 -150 1.2 6.67
24 NS 4C N = 420 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 15,00 %
12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,41 %25 NS 3P E = -140 4.6 25.56
26 NS 3K E+1 -130 9 50.00
27 NS 3P W = -140 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
22 COULIE Joelle -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 43,97 %28 NS 3C W+1 -170 12 66.67
29 NS 2P N = 110 11 61.11
30 NS 4C S+1 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
21 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 40,60 %31 NS 3C E-1 50 12.3 68.33
32 NS 3P S+3 230 6.8 37.78
33 NS 4C W+1 -450 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
Total : 278,1 / 540 = 51,50 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine
22 COULIE Joelle -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 43,97 % 1 NS 4P E-1 50 7.9 43.89
2 NS 1S E-1 50 6.8 37.78
3 NS 3S S = 400 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 35,74 %
21 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 40,60 % 4 NS 3S E-1 100 17.9 99.44
5 NS 4C N = 620 10.1 56.11
6 NS 4K S+1 150 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 80,93 %
20 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 57,26 % 7 NS 1S N = 90 3.4 18.89
8 NS 2C E-1 50 7.9 43.89
9 NS 3P N-1 -50 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,31 %10 NS 1S W = -90 10.1 56.11
11 NS 3S E+4 -520 3.4 18.89
12 NS 2C E-4 200 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
17 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 57,55 %16 NS 4P N-2 -100 4.6 25.56
17 NS 3S E-1 50 15.7 87.22
18 NS 3S E+2 -460 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
16 LAENENS René -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 48,19 %19 NS 3S N+1 430 13.4 74.44
20 NS 4P N-2 -200 0.1 0.56
21 NS 3K E = -110 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,72 %22 NS 3C E = -140 6.8 37.78
23 NS 2K W+1 -110 9 50.00
24 NS 4C N = 420 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
14 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,44 %25 NS 3T S-2 -100 9 50.00
26 NS 3C S+1 170 16.8 93.33
27 NS 4CcS-2 -300 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 56,30 %
13 CASSART Guy -FRAITURE Louis : 57,49 %28 NS 4C E+1 -450 0 0.00
29 NS 3P N-1 -100 4 22.22
30 NS 5C S = 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,41 %31 NS 3C E = -140 4.6 25.56
32 NS 4P S = 420 11.2 62.22
33 NS 5CcE+1 -750 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
Total : 220,6 / 540 = 40,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse
13 CASSART Guy -FRAITURE Louis : 57,49 % 1 NS 4K N = 130 14.6 81.11
2 NS 1S E-1 50 6.8 37.78
3 NS 4C N+2 480 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 68,70 %
12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,41 % 4 NS 3S W+1 -630 6.8 37.78
5 NS 4C N = 620 10.1 56.11
6 NS 3T N+2 150 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
22 COULIE Joelle -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 43,97 % 7 NS 1S S = 90 3.4 18.89
8 NS 3T N+1 130 13.4 74.44
9 NS 2P S = 110 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 53,89 %
21 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 40,60 %10 NS 2S E = -120 3.4 18.89
11 NS 3S E+4 -520 3.4 18.89
12 NS 3T N+2 150 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 16,85 %
20 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 57,26 %13 NS 1S N = 90 10.1 56.11
14 NS 3S W = -400 12.3 68.33
15 NS 6S N = 1440 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 74,63 %
18 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 50,58 %19 NS 3S N+1 430 13.4 74.44
20 NS 3S S+2 660 14.6 81.11
21 NS 2CcS-2 -500 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
17 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 57,55 %22 NS 2C E = -110 16.8 93.33
23 NS 1S E = -90 14.6 81.11
24 NS 4C N = 420 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 70,74 %
16 LAENENS René -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 48,19 %25 NS 2S W-1 100 14.6 81.11
26 NS 4KcW = -710 1.2 6.67
27 NS 4CcS-2 -300 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,72 %28 NS 3P S+1 170 18 100.00
29 NS 4P N-1 -100 4 22.22
30 NS 6C S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
14 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,44 %31 NS 4C E-2 100 16.8 93.33
32 NS 2P S+2 170 2.3 12.78
33 NS 4PcN-1 -100 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
Total : 295,0 / 540 = 54,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,72 % 1 NS 3PcE = -530 0.1 0.56
2 NS 1S E-3 150 17.9 99.44
3 NS 5C N = 450 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
14 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,44 % 4 NS 3S W+1 -630 6.8 37.78
5 NS 4P N+1 650 13.4 74.44
6 NS 3S S-1 -50 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
13 CASSART Guy -FRAITURE Louis : 57,49 % 7 NS 2C S+1 140 13.4 74.44
8 NS 3T N+2 150 17.9 99.44
9 NS 4PcS-1 -100 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,41 %10 NS 2S E = -120 3.4 18.89
11 NS 3S E+2 -460 12.3 68.33
12 NS 3S S+2 660 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 53,89 %
22 COULIE Joelle -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 43,97 %13 NS 2T N-1 -100 3.4 18.89
14 NS 3S W = -400 12.3 68.33
15 NS 6C S-1 -100 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 31,30 %
21 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 40,60 %16 NS 5C W-2 200 17.9 99.44
17 NS 3S E-1 50 15.7 87.22
18 NS 3S W-1 50 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 93,33 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,31 %22 NS 2C E+1 -140 6.8 37.78
23 NS 1S E+2 -150 1.2 6.67
24 NS 4C N = 420 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 27,41 %
18 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 50,58 %25 NS 2P E+1 -140 4.6 25.56
26 NS 4KcW = -710 1.2 6.67
27 NS 3P W = -140 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
17 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 57,55 %28 NS 4C W = -420 5 27.78
29 NS 3P N = 140 15 83.33
30 NS 4C S+1 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
16 LAENENS René -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 48,19 %31 NS 3C E-1 50 12.3 68.33
32 NS 3P S+1 170 2.3 12.78
33 NS 5T E+1 -420 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 49,81 %
Total : 266,0 / 540 = 49,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
17 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 57,55 % 1 NS 5K N-1 -50 4.6 25.56
2 NS 1S E-1 50 6.8 37.78
3 NS 4K N = 130 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 25,37 %
16 LAENENS René -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 48,19 % 4 NS 3S W+1 -630 6.8 37.78
5 NS 4C N-1 -100 1.2 6.67
6 NS 3K N+2 150 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,72 % 7 NS 1S S+2 150 15.7 87.22
8 NS 2K S-4 -200 0.1 0.56
9 NS 2P S = 110 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
14 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,44 %10 NS 2S E+2 -180 0.1 0.56
11 NS 3S E+3 -490 9 50.00
12 NS 3S N+2 660 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
13 CASSART Guy -FRAITURE Louis : 57,49 %13 NS 2K E-1 100 16.8 93.33
14 NS 3S W+1 -430 2.3 12.78
15 NS 5C S = 650 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,41 %16 NS 3PcN-1 -100 4.6 25.56
17 NS 3S E-1 50 15.7 87.22
18 NS 3S E-1 50 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 68,70 %
22 COULIE Joelle -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 43,97 %19 NS 3S N+1 430 13.4 74.44
20 NS 3S S+2 660 14.6 81.11
21 NS 3S E-1 50 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 74,63 %
20 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 57,26 %25 NS 2P E+1 -140 4.6 25.56
26 NS 3K W+1 -130 9 50.00
27 NS 4CcS-2 -300 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 33,70 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,31 %28 NS 4C W = -420 5 27.78
29 NS 3P N-1 -100 4 22.22
30 NS 4C S+1 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
18 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 50,58 %31 NS 1C E+2 -140 4.6 25.56
32 NS 4P S = 420 11.2 62.22
33 NS 4C E+2 -480 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
Total : 248,8 / 540 = 46,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 VERBOIS Léon -DELHEZ Jacques
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,31 % 1 NS 6KcN-2 -300 2.3 12.78
2 NS 2P E-1 50 6.8 37.78
3 NS 5C N-1 -50 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 17,04 %
18 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 50,58 % 4 NS 3S W+2 -660 0.1 0.56
5 NS 4C N-1 -100 1.2 6.67
6 NS 1K N+2 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 19,07 %
17 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 57,55 % 7 NS 1S S = 90 3.4 18.89
8 NS 3T N+1 130 13.4 74.44
9 NS 4P S-1 -50 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
16 LAENENS René -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 48,19 %10 NS 3S W-2 200 16.8 93.33
11 NS 3S W+4 -520 3.4 18.89
12 NS 3T N-1 -100 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,72 %13 NS 2T N = 90 10.1 56.11
14 NS 3S W+1 -430 2.3 12.78
15 NS 4C S+1 650 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
14 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,44 %16 NS 4PcN-1 -100 4.6 25.56
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 0.1 0.56
18 NS 3S E+1 -430 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 17,22 %
13 CASSART Guy -FRAITURE Louis : 57,49 %19 NS 4C N-1 -50 0.1 0.56
20 NS 2S S+2 180 2.3 12.78
21 NS 3K E = -110 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 17,04 %
12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,41 %22 NS 2C E+1 -140 6.8 37.78
23 NS 1P S-1 -100 11.2 62.22
24 NS 4C N+1 450 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
21 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 40,60 %28 NS 4C W-1 50 16 88.89
29 NS 4P N = 620 18 100.00
30 NS 4C S = 420 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
20 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 57,26 %31 NS 4C E = -420 0.1 0.56
32 NS 4P S+1 450 16.8 93.33
33 NS 5T E+2 -440 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
Total : 195,6 / 540 = 36,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 -
21 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 40,60 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
20 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 57,26 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,31 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
18 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 50,58 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 57,55 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
16 LAENENS René -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 48,19 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,72 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,44 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
13 CASSART Guy -FRAITURE Louis : 57,49 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
22 COULIE Joelle -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 43,97 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 594 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
1 ROGIERS MAGDA -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,83 % 1 EO 4P E-1 50 10.1 56.11
2 EO 1S E-1 50 11.2 62.22
3 EO 4C N+1 450 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
7 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 54,63 % 4 EO 3S W+1 -630 11.2 62.22
5 EO 4C N = 620 7.9 43.89
6 EO 3T N+2 150 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 53,72 % 7 EO 2C S = 110 9 50.00
8 EO 2C E-1 50 10.1 56.11
9 EO 4P S-1 -50 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 60,19 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 49,26 %10 EO 2S E = -120 14.6 81.11
11 EO 3S E+2 -460 5.7 31.67
12 EO 3S S+2 660 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 46,11 %
3 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 63,91 %13 EO 2T N = 90 7.9 43.89
14 EO 3S W = -400 5.7 31.67
15 EO 5C S+1 680 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 46,07 %16 EO 3PcN-1 -100 13.4 74.44
17 EO 3S E-1 50 2.3 12.78
18 EO 3S E-1 50 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 31,30 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,09 %19 EO 3S N+1 430 4.6 25.56
20 EO 3S S+2 660 3.4 18.89
21 EO 3T E-2 100 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 17,04 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -DELHEZ Jacques : 36,22 %22 EO 2C E+1 -140 11.2 62.22
23 EO 1P S-1 -100 6.8 37.78
24 EO 4C N+1 450 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,50 %25 EO 3P E = -140 13.4 74.44
26 EO 3K E+1 -130 9 50.00
27 EO 3P W = -140 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 40,85 %31 EO 3C E = -140 13.4 74.44
32 EO 4P S = 420 6.8 37.78
33 EO 5CcE+1 -750 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
Total : 239,8 / 540 = 44,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 CASSART Guy -FRAITURE Louis
7 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 54,63 % 1 EO 4K N = 130 3.4 18.89
2 EO 1S E-1 50 11.2 62.22
3 EO 4C N+2 480 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 31,30 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 53,72 % 4 EO 3S W+1 -630 11.2 62.22
5 EO 4CcN = 790 2.3 12.78
6 EO 3C E = -140 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 49,26 % 7 EO 2C S+1 140 4.6 25.56
8 EO 3T N+2 150 0.1 0.56
9 EO 4PcS-1 -100 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
3 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 63,91 %10 EO 3S E-1 100 4.6 25.56
11 EO 3S E+2 -460 5.7 31.67
12 EO 3S N+2 660 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 27,59 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 46,07 %13 EO 2K E-1 100 1.2 6.67
14 EO 3S W+1 -430 15.7 87.22
15 EO 5C S = 650 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,09 %16 EO 4C W-1 100 6.8 37.78
17 EO 3S E = -400 15.7 87.22
18 EO 3S E+1 -430 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -DELHEZ Jacques : 36,22 %19 EO 4C N-1 -50 17.9 99.44
20 EO 2S S+2 180 15.7 87.22
21 EO 3K E = -110 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 82,96 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,50 %22 EO 3C E+1 -170 17.9 99.44
23 EO 1S E+2 -150 16.8 93.33
24 EO 4C N = 420 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 85,00 %
11 - : 0,00 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 40,85 %28 EO 4C E+1 -450 18 100.00
29 EO 3P N-1 -100 14 77.78
30 EO 5C S = 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
Total : 279,4 / 486 = 57,49 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 49,26 % 4 EO 3S W+1 -630 11.2 62.22
5 EO 4P N+1 650 4.6 25.56
6 EO 3S S-1 -50 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
3 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 63,91 % 7 EO 1S S = 90 14.6 81.11
8 EO 2C E = -110 15.7 87.22
9 EO 2P S+2 170 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 56,30 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 46,07 %10 EO 2S E+2 -180 17.9 99.44
11 EO 3S E+3 -490 9 50.00
12 EO 3S N+2 660 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,09 %13 EO 1S N = 90 7.9 43.89
14 EO 3S W+1 -430 15.7 87.22
15 EO 4C S+2 680 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -DELHEZ Jacques : 36,22 %16 EO 4PcN-1 -100 13.4 74.44
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 17.9 99.44
18 EO 3S E+1 -430 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 82,78 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,50 %19 EO 2S N+2 180 11.2 62.22
20 EO 3S S+2 660 3.4 18.89
21 EO 3S E-1 50 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
11 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 40,85 %25 EO 3T S-2 -100 9 50.00
26 EO 3C S+1 170 1.2 6.67
27 EO 4CcS-2 -300 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 43,70 %
1 ROGIERS MAGDA -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,83 %28 EO 4C W = -420 13 72.22
29 EO 2P N+1 140 3 16.67
30 EO 4C S+1 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
7 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 54,63 %31 EO 4C E-2 100 1.2 6.67
32 EO 2P S+2 170 15.7 87.22
33 EO 4PcN-1 -100 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
Total : 250,0 / 486 = 51,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 49,26 % 1 EO 3PcE = -530 17.9 99.44
2 EO 1S E-3 150 0.1 0.56
3 EO 5C N = 450 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 46,07 % 7 EO 1S S+2 150 2.3 12.78
8 EO 2K S-4 -200 17.9 99.44
9 EO 2P S = 110 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,09 %10 EO 3S E-2 200 1.2 6.67
11 EO 2K W+2 -130 0.1 0.56
12 EO 3S N+2 660 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 10,93 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -DELHEZ Jacques : 36,22 %13 EO 2T N = 90 7.9 43.89
14 EO 3S W+1 -430 15.7 87.22
15 EO 4C S+1 650 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,50 %16 EO 2P N = 110 4.6 25.56
17 EO 2S E = -120 10.1 56.11
18 EO 2C E+2 -170 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 35,74 %
11 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 40,85 %22 EO 3C E = -140 11.2 62.22
23 EO 2K W+1 -110 9 50.00
24 EO 4C N = 420 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
1 ROGIERS MAGDA -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,83 %25 EO 2C W-1 100 3.4 18.89
26 EO 4K W = -130 9 50.00
27 EO 3PcW = -530 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
7 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 54,63 %28 EO 3P S+1 170 0 0.00
29 EO 4P N-1 -100 14 77.78
30 EO 6C S-1 -50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 53,72 %31 EO 4C E-2 100 1.2 6.67
32 EO 4P S+1 450 1.2 6.67
33 EO 5T E+1 -420 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 15,00 %
Total : 212,5 / 486 = 43,72 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 LAENENS René -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
3 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 63,91 % 1 EO 4K N+1 150 0.1 0.56
2 EO 1S E-2 100 3.4 18.89
3 EO 4C N+3 510 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 6,67 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 46,07 % 4 EO 3S W+1 -630 11.2 62.22
5 EO 4C N-1 -100 16.8 93.33
6 EO 3K N+2 150 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -DELHEZ Jacques : 36,22 %10 EO 3S W-2 200 1.2 6.67
11 EO 3S W+4 -520 14.6 81.11
12 EO 3T N-1 -100 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,50 %13 EO 2T N-2 -200 17.9 99.44
14 EO 3S W = -400 5.7 31.67
15 EO 5C S = 650 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
11 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 40,85 %19 EO 3S N+1 430 4.6 25.56
20 EO 4P N-2 -200 17.9 99.44
21 EO 3K E = -110 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
1 ROGIERS MAGDA -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,83 %22 EO 2C E+1 -140 11.2 62.22
23 EO 3S E-1 100 0.1 0.56
24 EO 4C N = 420 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
7 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 54,63 %25 EO 2S W-1 100 3.4 18.89
26 EO 4KcW = -710 16.8 93.33
27 EO 4CcS-2 -300 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 53,72 %28 EO 1C E+3 -170 6 33.33
29 EO 3K W-1 100 10 55.56
30 EO 5CcS = 650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 49,26 %31 EO 3C E-1 50 5.7 31.67
32 EO 3P S+1 170 15.7 87.22
33 EO 5T E+1 -420 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 50,19 %
Total : 234,2 / 486 = 48,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 46,07 % 1 EO 5K N-1 -50 13.4 74.44
2 EO 1S E-1 50 11.2 62.22
3 EO 4K N = 130 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 74,63 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,09 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 3.4 18.89
5 EO 2C N = 110 13.4 74.44
6 EO 3C E-1 100 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 55,93 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -DELHEZ Jacques : 36,22 % 7 EO 1S S = 90 14.6 81.11
8 EO 3T N+1 130 4.6 25.56
9 EO 4P S-1 -50 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
11 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 40,85 %16 EO 4P N-2 -100 13.4 74.44
17 EO 3S E-1 50 2.3 12.78
18 EO 3S E+2 -460 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
1 ROGIERS MAGDA -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,83 %19 EO 1K S+2 110 15.7 87.22
20 EO 3S S+1 630 11.2 62.22
21 EO 3CcS-2 -500 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 80,93 %
7 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 54,63 %22 EO 2C E = -110 1.2 6.67
23 EO 1S E = -90 3.4 18.89
24 EO 4C N = 420 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 29,26 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 53,72 %25 EO 3S W = -600 17.9 99.44
26 EO 3K W+1 -130 9 50.00
27 EO 3C S-1 -50 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 49,26 %28 EO 4C W = -420 13 72.22
29 EO 3P N = 140 3 16.67
30 EO 4C S+1 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
3 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 63,91 %31 EO 2C E+1 -140 13.4 74.44
32 EO 3P S+1 170 15.7 87.22
33 EO 2C E+4 -230 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
Total : 279,7 / 486 = 57,55 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,09 % 1 EO 4K N = 130 3.4 18.89
2 EO 1S E-2 100 3.4 18.89
3 EO 4C N+1 450 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 27,22 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -DELHEZ Jacques : 36,22 % 4 EO 3S W+2 -660 17.9 99.44
5 EO 4C N-1 -100 16.8 93.33
6 EO 1K N+2 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 80,93 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,50 % 7 EO 2C S+2 170 0.1 0.56
8 EO 4T N = 130 4.6 25.56
9 EO 2P S = 110 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 19,26 %
11 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 ROGIERS MAGDA -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,83 %16 EO 3P N-1 -50 9 50.00
17 EO 2S E = -120 10.1 56.11
18 EO 3S E+1 -430 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 60,19 %
7 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 54,63 %19 EO 3S N+1 430 4.6 25.56
20 EO 3S S+2 660 3.4 18.89
21 EO 2CcS-2 -500 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 53,72 %22 EO 2C E+1 -140 11.2 62.22
23 EO 1S E = -90 3.4 18.89
24 EO 4C N = 420 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 47,78 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 49,26 %25 EO 2P E+1 -140 13.4 74.44
26 EO 4KcW = -710 16.8 93.33
27 EO 3P W = -140 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
3 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 63,91 %28 EO 3C W+1 -170 6 33.33
29 EO 2P N = 110 7 38.89
30 EO 4C S+1 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 46,07 %31 EO 1C E+2 -140 13.4 74.44
32 EO 4P S = 420 6.8 37.78
33 EO 4C E+2 -480 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
Total : 245,8 / 486 = 50,58 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
10 VERBOIS Léon -DELHEZ Jacques : 36,22 % 1 EO 6KcN-2 -300 15.7 87.22
2 EO 2P E-1 50 11.2 62.22
3 EO 5C N-1 -50 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 82,96 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,50 % 4 EO 3S E+1 -630 11.2 62.22
5 EO 5KcW-5 1100 0.1 0.56
6 EO 2K N+1 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
11 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 40,85 %10 EO 1S W = -90 7.9 43.89
11 EO 3S E+4 -520 14.6 81.11
12 EO 2C E-4 200 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
1 ROGIERS MAGDA -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,83 %13 EO 3T N-1 -100 14.6 81.11
14 EO 3S W = -400 5.7 31.67
15 EO 5C S = 650 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 56,30 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 53,72 %19 EO 3S N+1 430 4.6 25.56
20 EO 3S S+1 630 11.2 62.22
21 EO 2K E+1 -110 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 49,26 %22 EO 2C E+1 -140 11.2 62.22
23 EO 1S E+2 -150 16.8 93.33
24 EO 4C N = 420 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 72,59 %
3 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 63,91 %25 EO 3S W-1 100 3.4 18.89
26 EO 3C S+1 170 1.2 6.67
27 EO 3C S-1 -50 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 10,74 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 46,07 %28 EO 4C W = -420 13 72.22
29 EO 3P N-1 -100 14 77.78
30 EO 4C S+1 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,09 %31 EO 1S E = -90 9 50.00
32 EO 4P S = 420 6.8 37.78
33 EO 4C W+2 -480 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 56,30 %
Total : 268,8 / 486 = 55,31 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand
5 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,50 % 1 EO 4PcE-1 100 6.8 37.78
2 EO 2P E = -110 17.9 99.44
3 EO 4C N+1 450 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
11 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 40,85 % 7 EO 1S N = 90 14.6 81.11
8 EO 2C E-1 50 10.1 56.11
9 EO 3P N-1 -50 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
1 ROGIERS MAGDA -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,83 %10 EO 2K W+1 -110 11.2 62.22
11 EO 3S E+4 -520 14.6 81.11
12 EO 3S N+2 660 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 56,30 %
7 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 54,63 %13 EO 1S N = 90 7.9 43.89
14 EO 3S W = -400 5.7 31.67
15 EO 6S N = 1440 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 25,37 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 53,72 %16 EO 4PcN-2 -300 17.9 99.44
17 EO 2S E = -120 10.1 56.11
18 EO 3S W = -400 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
3 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 63,91 %22 EO 2C E = -110 1.2 6.67
23 EO 1S E+1 -120 12.3 68.33
24 EO 4C N = 420 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 45,74 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 46,07 %25 EO 2P E+1 -140 13.4 74.44
26 EO 3K W+1 -130 9 50.00
27 EO 4CcS-2 -300 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 66,30 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,09 %28 EO 4C E = -420 13 72.22
29 EO 3K W = -110 18 100.00
30 EO 5C S = 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -DELHEZ Jacques : 36,22 %31 EO 4C E = -420 17.9 99.44
32 EO 4P S+1 450 1.2 6.67
33 EO 5T E+2 -440 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
Total : 278,3 / 486 = 57,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
11 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 40,85 % 4 EO 3S E-1 100 0.1 0.56
5 EO 4C N = 620 7.9 43.89
6 EO 4K S+1 150 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 19,07 %
1 ROGIERS MAGDA -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,83 % 7 EO 1S S+1 120 6.8 37.78
8 EO 2P N-1 -50 13.4 74.44
9 EO 2P N = 110 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
7 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 54,63 %10 EO 2S E = -120 14.6 81.11
11 EO 3S E+4 -520 14.6 81.11
12 EO 3T N+2 150 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 83,15 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 53,72 %13 EO 2K E-1 100 1.2 6.67
14 EO 3S W = -400 5.7 31.67
15 EO 6C S-1 -100 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 49,26 %16 EO 5C W-2 200 0.1 0.56
17 EO 3S E-1 50 2.3 12.78
18 EO 3S W-1 50 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 6,67 %
3 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 63,91 %19 EO 3C N+1 170 13.4 74.44
20 EO 3S S+1 630 11.2 62.22
21 EO 2P W-2 100 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 47,78 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,09 %25 EO 4P E-1 100 3.4 18.89
26 EO 4K W = -130 9 50.00
27 EO 4C S-2 -100 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -DELHEZ Jacques : 36,22 %28 EO 4C W-1 50 2 11.11
29 EO 4P N = 620 0 0.00
30 EO 4C S = 420 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,50 %31 EO 3C E-1 50 5.7 31.67
32 EO 3P S+3 230 11.2 62.22
33 EO 4C W+1 -450 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
Total : 197,3 / 486 = 40,60 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 COULIE Joelle -de WASSEIGE Ariane
6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 40,85 % 1 EO 4P E-1 50 10.1 56.11
2 EO 1S E-1 50 11.2 62.22
3 EO 3S S = 400 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 64,26 %
1 ROGIERS MAGDA -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,83 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 3.4 18.89
5 EO 3C N+2 200 11.2 62.22
6 EO 2K N+1 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,70 %
7 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 54,63 % 7 EO 1S S = 90 14.6 81.11
8 EO 3T N+1 130 4.6 25.56
9 EO 2P S = 110 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 46,11 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLOT Jacques : 53,72 %10 EO 1S E = -90 7.9 43.89
11 EO 3S E = -400 2.3 12.78
12 EO 1S N+4 210 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 49,26 %13 EO 2T N-1 -100 14.6 81.11
14 EO 3S W = -400 5.7 31.67
15 EO 6C S-1 -100 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 68,70 %
3 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 63,91 %16 EO 3P N = 140 2.3 12.78
17 EO 2S E = -120 10.1 56.11
18 EO 3S W = -400 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 46,07 %19 EO 3S N+1 430 4.6 25.56
20 EO 3S S+2 660 3.4 18.89
21 EO 3S E-1 50 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 25,37 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,09 %22 EO 2S E = -120 4.6 25.56
23 EO 1S E+1 -120 12.3 68.33
24 EO 4C N+3 510 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,50 %28 EO 3C W+1 -170 6 33.33
29 EO 2P N = 110 7 38.89
30 EO 4C S+1 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
11 - : 0,00 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 213,7 / 486 = 43,97 %
|
|