|
Tournoi du 03-02-14
1 68,33 A.8 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand
2 61,11 A.5 COLLET Edgard -CHANTRAINE René
3 53,52 A10 PIRET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
4 50,93 A.1 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
5 50,56 A.2 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette
6 50,19 A.4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
7 44,07 A.9 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal
8 42,41 A.6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine
9 40,00 A.7 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -ROEGIERS Marga
10 38,89 A.3 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 64,81 a.7 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
2 57,04 a.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
3 54,26 a.6 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard
4 53,33 a.4 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
5 50,00 a.5 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo
~ 50,00 a10 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
7 46,85 a.3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
8 41,85 a.1 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -POULAERT Gilbert
9 41,30 a.9 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno
10 40,56 a.8 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger
PAIRE Nr : A.1 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
a.1 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,85 % 1 NS 3S W-2 100 13 72.22
2 NS 3S S+2 660 16 88.89
3 NS 4T N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,85 % 4 NS 3S S+2 660 8 44.44
5 NS 4P N-2 -200 0 0.00
6 NS 3C N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 57,04 % 7 NS 3C W+1 -170 12 66.67
8 NS 3P S-3 -150 3 16.67
9 NS 4C S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.6 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,26 %10 NS 1S S-1 -100 7 38.89
11 NS 3S E-1 50 16 88.89
12 NS 3S N+3 690 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
a.7 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,81 %13 NS 4P N = 620 2 11.11
14 NS 3C E = -140 10 55.56
15 NS 2S E = -120 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
a.8 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 40,56 %16 NS 5C W+1 -680 6 33.33
17 NS 1S S+1 120 10 55.56
18 NS 1S N+1 120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.9 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 41,30 %19 NS 5CcS-3 -500 8 44.44
20 NS 3S E = -600 10 55.56
21 NS 3P E-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a10 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 50,00 %22 NS 4C S-2 -100 9 50.00
23 NS 3P S+1 170 12 66.67
24 NS 3P E = -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.4 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 53,33 %25 NS 4K S = 130 14 77.78
26 NS 3T N = 110 16 88.89
27 NS 4C W+1 -450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.5 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 %28 NS 1S S = 90 8 44.44
29 NS 3K N-1 -100 5 27.78
30 NS 3C S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
Total : 275,0 / 540 = 50,93 %
PAIRE Nr : A.2 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette
a.3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,85 % 1 NS 2P W-2 100 13 72.22
2 NS 3S S+2 660 16 88.89
3 NS 4K S-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 57,04 % 4 NS 6S S-1 -100 3 16.67
5 NS 4P N = 620 11 61.11
6 NS 4K W+1 -150 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.1 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,85 % 7 NS 3C W = -140 16 88.89
8 NS 3P S-3 -150 3 16.67
9 NS 1S N-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a10 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 50,00 %10 NS 1S S-2 -200 2 11.11
11 NS 1S E+2 -150 12 66.67
12 NS 3K S+3 170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.4 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 53,33 %13 NS 4P N+1 650 11 61.11
14 NS 2C E+3 -200 1 5.56
15 NS 2C S = 110 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.5 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 %16 NS 4C W+1 -650 15 83.33
17 NS 2S S = 120 10 55.56
18 NS 1S N+2 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
a.6 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,26 %19 NS 4P W = -620 4 22.22
20 NS 3S W+1 -630 3 16.67
21 NS 2P E+1 -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.7 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,81 %22 NS 3C S-1 -50 15 83.33
23 NS 3P S+1 170 12 66.67
24 NS 1S E+4 -210 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.8 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 40,56 %25 NS 4P W-3 300 18 100.00
26 NS 4PcS-1 -200 5 27.78
27 NS 4C W+1 -450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.9 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 41,30 %28 NS 2C S+1 140 14 77.78
29 NS 3P S-1 -100 5 27.78
30 NS 3C S-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 273,0 / 540 = 50,56 %
PAIRE Nr : A.3 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
a.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 57,04 % 1 NS 3K W-1 50 7 38.89
2 NS 3P S+1 170 0 0.00
3 NS 3C W-1 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.1 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,85 % 4 NS 2C S-2 -200 0 0.00
5 NS 2P N+2 170 6 33.33
6 NS 3C N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,85 % 7 NS 3C W+1 -170 12 66.67
8 NS 2C E+1 -140 9 50.00
9 NS 4C N-2 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.8 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 40,56 %10 NS 1C E = -80 10 55.56
11 NS 1S E+3 -180 10 55.56
12 NS 3K S+2 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.9 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 41,30 %13 NS 4P S = 620 2 11.11
14 NS 1C E+2 -140 10 55.56
15 NS 3C S-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a10 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 50,00 %16 NS 4C W+3 -710 0 0.00
17 NS 2K S+1 110 5 27.78
18 NS 3S N-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
a.4 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 53,33 %19 NS 4P E-1 100 14 77.78
20 NS 3S W-2 200 18 100.00
21 NS 2P E+2 -170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.5 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 %22 NS 2P W = -110 4 22.22
23 NS 3P S+1 170 12 66.67
24 NS 3P E+1 -170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.6 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,26 %25 NS Pass Passe 6 33.33
26 NS 3T N-1 -100 13 72.22
27 NS 5C W = -450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.7 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,81 %28 NS 2P E = -110 4 22.22
29 NS 3P S-2 -200 0 0.00
30 NS 2K N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
Total : 210,0 / 540 = 38,89 %
PAIRE Nr : A.4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
a.7 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,81 % 1 NS 2P W = -110 4 22.22
2 NS 3S S = 600 2 11.11
3 NS 3S N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
a.6 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,26 % 4 NS 3S N+3 690 14 77.78
5 NS 4P N+1 650 18 100.00
6 NS 5C N-3 -150 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.5 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 % 7 NS 3T S-2 -200 7 38.89
8 NS 3P S-2 -100 14 77.78
9 NS 3K E = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 53,33 %10 NS 1S S = 90 13 72.22
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 1 5.56
12 NS 3P N-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
a10 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 50,00 %13 NS 4P N+1 650 11 61.11
14 NS 2C E+2 -170 4 22.22
15 NS 3K W = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.9 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 41,30 %16 NS 4C E+1 -650 15 83.33
17 NS 3S S = 400 17 94.44
18 NS 1S N+1 120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.8 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 40,56 %19 NS 3C S-2 -100 10 55.56
20 NS 3S W = -600 10 55.56
21 NS 3P E = -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,85 %22 NS 3C S = 140 18 100.00
23 NS 4P S-1 -100 3 16.67
24 NS 2P E+1 -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 57,04 %25 NS 2C N-2 -100 1 5.56
26 NS 4P S-2 -200 5 27.78
27 NS 4C W+1 -450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.1 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,85 %28 NS 2C S+2 170 18 100.00
29 NS 3K N+1 130 14 77.78
30 NS 2P N = 110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
Total : 271,0 / 540 = 50,19 %
PAIRE Nr : A.5 COLLET Edgard -CHANTRAINE René
a.8 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 40,56 % 1 NS 2P W-2 100 13 72.22
2 NS 3S S+1 630 8 44.44
3 NS 3CcW-1 200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.7 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,81 % 4 NS 3S S+3 690 14 77.78
5 NS 4P N = 620 11 61.11
6 NS 4CcN-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.6 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,26 % 7 NS 4T S-3 -300 4 22.22
8 NS 3P S-1 -50 16 88.89
9 NS 4C S-3 -150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.1 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,85 %10 NS 1S S-1 -100 7 38.89
11 NS 3S E-1 50 16 88.89
12 NS 3S N+3 690 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
a.5 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 %13 NS 4PcN+1 990 18 100.00
14 NS 2K N-2 -100 17 94.44
15 NS 3S E = -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.4 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 53,33 %16 NS 4C W+2 -680 6 33.33
17 NS 3K S = 110 5 27.78
18 NS 3K S = 110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a10 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 50,00 %19 NS 3K W-1 100 14 77.78
20 NS 3S W = -600 10 55.56
21 NS 4K S-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.9 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 41,30 %22 NS 4CcS-1 -100 9 50.00
23 NS 4P S = 620 17 94.44
24 NS 3C N-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
a.3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,85 %25 NS Pass Passe 6 33.33
26 NS 5T N-2 -200 5 27.78
27 NS 4C W+1 -450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 57,04 %28 NS 2C S = 110 10 55.56
29 NS 3C E-4 400 18 100.00
30 NS 4C S = 420 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
Total : 330,0 / 540 = 61,11 %
PAIRE Nr : A.6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine
a.9 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 41,30 % 1 NS 3S W = -400 0 0.00
2 NS 3S S+1 630 8 44.44
3 NS 3S S-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.8 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 40,56 % 4 NS 3S S+4 720 18 100.00
5 NS 3S N+1 630 16 88.89
6 NS 3C N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
a.7 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,81 % 7 NS 4CcW = -790 2 11.11
8 NS 3S E = -400 0 0.00
9 NS 3K W+1 -130 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
a.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 57,04 %10 NS 1S S-2 -200 2 11.11
11 NS 3S W = -400 6 33.33
12 NS 2K S+3 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
a.1 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,85 %13 NS 4P N+1 650 11 61.11
14 NS 2C W+1 -140 10 55.56
15 NS 3K W = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,26 %16 NS 4C W+2 -680 6 33.33
17 NS 3S S-1 -50 2 11.11
18 NS 1S N+2 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.5 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 %19 NS 4P W = -620 4 22.22
20 NS 3S W = -600 10 55.56
21 NS 3K N = 110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.4 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 53,33 %22 NS 4C S-3 -150 1 5.56
23 NS 2P S+1 140 8 44.44
24 NS 2P E+2 -170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a10 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 50,00 %25 NS 3S N-2 -100 1 5.56
26 NS 4P N-1 -100 13 72.22
27 NS 4C W+1 -450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,85 %28 NS 2C N+1 140 14 77.78
29 NS 2P N = 110 11 61.11
30 NS 4P N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 229,0 / 540 = 42,41 %
PAIRE Nr : A.7 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -ROEGIERS Marga
a10 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 50,00 % 1 NS 3S W-2 100 13 72.22
2 NS 3S S+1 630 8 44.44
3 NS 3CcW-1 200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.9 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 41,30 % 4 NS 3S S+2 660 8 44.44
5 NS 4P N-1 -100 3 16.67
6 NS 5CcN-2 -300 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.8 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 40,56 % 7 NS 2P N-2 -200 7 38.89
8 NS 2C E+1 -140 9 50.00
9 NS 4C S-3 -150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,85 %10 NS 2K W-1 100 16 88.89
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 1 5.56
12 NS 3K S+3 170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 57,04 %13 NS 4P N = 620 2 11.11
14 NS 3C E = -140 10 55.56
15 NS 3C S-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.1 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,85 %16 NS 4C W+1 -650 15 83.33
17 NS 2P N+1 140 14 77.78
18 NS 1S N = 90 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.7 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,81 %19 NS 4P W+1 -650 0 0.00
20 NS 1S W+2 -150 16 88.89
21 NS 2P W+1 -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.6 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,26 %22 NS 4C S-3 -150 1 5.56
23 NS 4P S-1 -100 3 16.67
24 NS 2P E+2 -170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
a.5 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 %25 NS Pass Passe 6 33.33
26 NS 4P S-2 -200 5 27.78
27 NS 5C W = -450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.4 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 53,33 %28 NS 5CcN-2 -500 0 0.00
29 NS 3P S-1 -100 5 27.78
30 NS 3K W-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
Total : 216,0 / 540 = 40,00 %
PAIRE Nr : A.8 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand
a.4 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 53,33 % 1 NS 3PcW-3 500 18 100.00
2 NS 3S S+1 630 8 44.44
3 NS 3CcW-1 200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
a10 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 50,00 % 4 NS 3S S+3 690 14 77.78
5 NS 4P N = 620 11 61.11
6 NS 5T W+1 -620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.9 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 41,30 % 7 NS 2P N-1 -100 18 100.00
8 NS 4C E-1 50 18 100.00
9 NS 4TcW-4 1100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
a.5 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 %10 NS 1S S+1 120 18 100.00
11 NS 3S E = -400 6 33.33
12 NS 3S N+2 660 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,85 %13 NS 4P N+1 650 11 61.11
14 NS 2C E+1 -140 10 55.56
15 NS 3C S-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 57,04 %16 NS 4C W+2 -680 6 33.33
17 NS 3S N = 400 17 94.44
18 NS 1S N+2 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a.1 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,85 %19 NS 2C S = 110 18 100.00
20 NS 3S W+1 -630 3 16.67
21 NS 3P W-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.8 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 40,56 %22 NS 4C S-2 -100 9 50.00
23 NS 4P S = 620 17 94.44
24 NS 3C N-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
a.7 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,81 %25 NS 3K S+1 130 14 77.78
26 NS 4PcS-1 -200 5 27.78
27 NS 4C W+1 -450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.6 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,26 %28 NS 2K N-3 -300 2 11.11
29 NS 2P S+3 200 16 88.89
30 NS 3P N = 140 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 369,0 / 540 = 68,33 %
PAIRE Nr : A.9 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal
a.5 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 % 1 NS 2P E-1 50 7 38.89
2 NS 3S S+2 660 16 88.89
3 NS 3T N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.4 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 53,33 % 4 NS 3S N+2 660 8 44.44
5 NS 5P N-1 -100 3 16.67
6 NS 3C N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a10 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 50,00 % 7 NS 2C W+2 -170 12 66.67
8 NS 3C E = -140 9 50.00
9 NS 4T W-3 300 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.7 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,81 %10 NS 1S S-2 -200 2 11.11
11 NS 3S E = -400 6 33.33
12 NS 3CcE-3 500 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.6 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,26 %13 NS 4P N+1 650 11 61.11
14 NS 1S S-4 -200 1 5.56
15 NS 3K W = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,85 %16 NS 4C W+2 -680 6 33.33
17 NS 2S S = 120 10 55.56
18 NS 1S N+2 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 57,04 %19 NS 4P E = -620 4 22.22
20 NS 3S W+2 -660 0 0.00
21 NS 2P W+1 -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
a.1 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,85 %22 NS 3C S-1 -50 15 83.33
23 NS 4P S-1 -100 3 16.67
24 NS 2S W+4 -240 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.9 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 41,30 %25 NS 3K S+1 130 14 77.78
26 NS 4P S-2 -200 5 27.78
27 NS 5C W = -450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.8 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 40,56 %28 NS 2C S+1 140 14 77.78
29 NS 3P S-1 -100 5 27.78
30 NS 3C S-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 238,0 / 540 = 44,07 %
PAIRE Nr : A10 PIRET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
a.6 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,26 % 1 NS 1S E+1 -120 2 11.11
2 NS 3S S+1 630 8 44.44
3 NS 3K S = 110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.5 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 % 4 NS 6S S-1 -100 3 16.67
5 NS 4P N = 620 11 61.11
6 NS 4CcN-3 -500 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a.4 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 53,33 % 7 NS 3PcN-3 -800 0 0.00
8 NS 2C E+1 -140 9 50.00
9 NS 2P N = 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.9 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 41,30 %10 NS 1S S = 90 13 72.22
11 NS 3S E-1 50 16 88.89
12 NS 3S S+2 660 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
a.8 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 40,56 %13 NS 4P N+1 650 11 61.11
14 NS 2K N-2 -100 17 94.44
15 NS 2C S = 110 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a.7 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,81 %16 NS 4C W+1 -650 15 83.33
17 NS 2C W = -110 0 0.00
18 NS 1S N = 90 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,85 %19 NS 4P W-1 100 14 77.78
20 NS 3S W = -600 10 55.56
21 NS 3P E = -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 57,04 %22 NS 4C S-2 -100 9 50.00
23 NS 4P S-1 -100 3 16.67
24 NS 2P W+1 -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.1 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,85 %25 NS 2K S+1 110 10 55.56
26 NS 3T N+1 130 18 100.00
27 NS 4C W+1 -450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a10 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 50,00 %28 NS 4C N-1 -100 6 33.33
29 NS 2P S = 110 11 61.11
30 NS 3P S = 140 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 289,0 / 540 = 53,52 %
PAIRE Nr : a.1 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -POULAERT Gilbert
A.1 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 50,93 % 1 EO 3S W-2 100 5 27.78
2 EO 3S S+2 660 2 11.11
3 EO 4T N-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.3 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,89 % 4 EO 2C S-2 -200 18 100.00
5 EO 2P N+2 170 12 66.67
6 EO 3C N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.2 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 50,56 % 7 EO 3C W = -140 2 11.11
8 EO 3P S-3 -150 15 83.33
9 EO 1S N-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.5 COLLET Edgard -CHANTRAINE René : 61,11 %10 EO 1S S-1 -100 11 61.11
11 EO 3S E-1 50 2 11.11
12 EO 3S N+3 690 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
A.6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 42,41 %13 EO 4P N+1 650 7 38.89
14 EO 2C W+1 -140 8 44.44
15 EO 3K W = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.7 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -ROEGIERS Marga : 40,00 %16 EO 4C W+1 -650 3 16.67
17 EO 2P N+1 140 4 22.22
18 EO 1S N = 90 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.8 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 68,33 %19 EO 2C S = 110 0 0.00
20 EO 3S W+1 -630 15 83.33
21 EO 3P W-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.9 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 44,07 %22 EO 3C S-1 -50 3 16.67
23 EO 4P S-1 -100 15 83.33
24 EO 2S W+4 -240 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A10 PIRET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 53,52 %25 EO 2K S+1 110 8 44.44
26 EO 3T N+1 130 0 0.00
27 EO 4C W+1 -450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 50,19 %28 EO 2C S+2 170 0 0.00
29 EO 3K N+1 130 4 22.22
30 EO 2P N = 110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
Total : 226,0 / 540 = 41,85 %
PAIRE Nr : a.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
A.3 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,89 % 1 EO 3K W-1 50 11 61.11
2 EO 3P S+1 170 18 100.00
3 EO 3C W-1 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.2 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 50,56 % 4 EO 6S S-1 -100 15 83.33
5 EO 4P N = 620 7 38.89
6 EO 4K W+1 -150 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.1 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 50,93 % 7 EO 3C W+1 -170 6 33.33
8 EO 3P S-3 -150 15 83.33
9 EO 4C S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 42,41 %10 EO 1S S-2 -200 16 88.89
11 EO 3S W = -400 12 66.67
12 EO 2K S+3 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
A.7 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -ROEGIERS Marga : 40,00 %13 EO 4P N = 620 16 88.89
14 EO 3C E = -140 8 44.44
15 EO 3C S-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.8 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 68,33 %16 EO 4C W+2 -680 12 66.67
17 EO 3S N = 400 1 5.56
18 EO 1S N+2 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.9 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 44,07 %19 EO 4P E = -620 14 77.78
20 EO 3S W+2 -660 18 100.00
21 EO 2P W+1 -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
A10 PIRET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 53,52 %22 EO 4C S-2 -100 9 50.00
23 EO 4P S-1 -100 15 83.33
24 EO 2P W+1 -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 50,19 %25 EO 2C N-2 -100 17 94.44
26 EO 4P S-2 -200 13 72.22
27 EO 4C W+1 -450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.5 COLLET Edgard -CHANTRAINE René : 61,11 %28 EO 2C S = 110 8 44.44
29 EO 3C E-4 400 0 0.00
30 EO 4C S = 420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
Total : 308,0 / 540 = 57,04 %
PAIRE Nr : a.3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
A.2 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 50,56 % 1 EO 2P W-2 100 5 27.78
2 EO 3S S+2 660 2 11.11
3 EO 4K S-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.1 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 50,93 % 4 EO 3S S+2 660 10 55.56
5 EO 4P N-2 -200 18 100.00
6 EO 3C N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.3 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,89 % 7 EO 3C W+1 -170 6 33.33
8 EO 2C E+1 -140 9 50.00
9 EO 4C N-2 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.7 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -ROEGIERS Marga : 40,00 %10 EO 2K W-1 100 2 11.11
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 17 94.44
12 EO 3K S+3 170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.8 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 68,33 %13 EO 4P N+1 650 7 38.89
14 EO 2C E+1 -140 8 44.44
15 EO 3C S-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.9 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 44,07 %16 EO 4C W+2 -680 12 66.67
17 EO 2S S = 120 8 44.44
18 EO 1S N+2 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A10 PIRET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 53,52 %19 EO 4P W-1 100 4 22.22
20 EO 3S W = -600 8 44.44
21 EO 3P E = -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 50,19 %22 EO 3C S = 140 0 0.00
23 EO 4P S-1 -100 15 83.33
24 EO 2P E+1 -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.5 COLLET Edgard -CHANTRAINE René : 61,11 %25 EO Pass Passe 12 66.67
26 EO 5T N-2 -200 13 72.22
27 EO 4C W+1 -450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 42,41 %28 EO 2C N+1 140 4 22.22
29 EO 2P N = 110 7 38.89
30 EO 4P N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 253,0 / 540 = 46,85 %
PAIRE Nr : a.4 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
A.8 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 68,33 % 1 EO 3PcW-3 500 0 0.00
2 EO 3S S+1 630 10 55.56
3 EO 3CcW-1 200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
A.9 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 44,07 % 4 EO 3S N+2 660 10 55.56
5 EO 5P N-1 -100 15 83.33
6 EO 3C N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A10 PIRET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 53,52 % 7 EO 3PcN-3 -800 18 100.00
8 EO 2C E+1 -140 9 50.00
9 EO 2P N = 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 50,19 %10 EO 1S S = 90 5 27.78
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 17 94.44
12 EO 3P N-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
A.2 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 50,56 %13 EO 4P N+1 650 7 38.89
14 EO 2C E+3 -200 17 94.44
15 EO 2C S = 110 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.5 COLLET Edgard -CHANTRAINE René : 61,11 %16 EO 4C W+2 -680 12 66.67
17 EO 3K S = 110 13 72.22
18 EO 3K S = 110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.3 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,89 %19 EO 4P E-1 100 4 22.22
20 EO 3S W-2 200 0 0.00
21 EO 2P E+2 -170 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 42,41 %22 EO 4C S-3 -150 17 94.44
23 EO 2P S+1 140 10 55.56
24 EO 2P E+2 -170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.1 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 50,93 %25 EO 4K S = 130 4 22.22
26 EO 3T N = 110 2 11.11
27 EO 4C W+1 -450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.7 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -ROEGIERS Marga : 40,00 %28 EO 5CcN-2 -500 18 100.00
29 EO 3P S-1 -100 13 72.22
30 EO 3K W-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
Total : 288,0 / 540 = 53,33 %
PAIRE Nr : a.5 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo
A.9 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 44,07 % 1 EO 2P E-1 50 11 61.11
2 EO 3S S+2 660 2 11.11
3 EO 3T N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A10 PIRET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 53,52 % 4 EO 6S S-1 -100 15 83.33
5 EO 4P N = 620 7 38.89
6 EO 4CcN-3 -500 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 50,19 % 7 EO 3T S-2 -200 11 61.11
8 EO 3P S-2 -100 4 22.22
9 EO 3K E = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.8 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 68,33 %10 EO 1S S+1 120 0 0.00
11 EO 3S E = -400 12 66.67
12 EO 3S N+2 660 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.5 COLLET Edgard -CHANTRAINE René : 61,11 %13 EO 4PcN+1 990 0 0.00
14 EO 2K N-2 -100 1 5.56
15 EO 3S E = -400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.2 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 50,56 %16 EO 4C W+1 -650 3 16.67
17 EO 2S S = 120 8 44.44
18 EO 1S N+2 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
A.6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 42,41 %19 EO 4P W = -620 14 77.78
20 EO 3S W = -600 8 44.44
21 EO 3K N = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.3 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,89 %22 EO 2P W = -110 14 77.78
23 EO 3P S+1 170 6 33.33
24 EO 3P E+1 -170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.7 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -ROEGIERS Marga : 40,00 %25 EO Pass Passe 12 66.67
26 EO 4P S-2 -200 13 72.22
27 EO 5C W = -450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.1 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 50,93 %28 EO 1S S = 90 10 55.56
29 EO 3K N-1 -100 13 72.22
30 EO 3C S-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
Total : 270,0 / 540 = 50,00 %
PAIRE Nr : a.6 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard
A10 PIRET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 53,52 % 1 EO 1S E+1 -120 16 88.89
2 EO 3S S+1 630 10 55.56
3 EO 3K S = 110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 50,19 % 4 EO 3S N+3 690 4 22.22
5 EO 4P N+1 650 0 0.00
6 EO 5C N-3 -150 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.5 COLLET Edgard -CHANTRAINE René : 61,11 % 7 EO 4T S-3 -300 14 77.78
8 EO 3P S-1 -50 2 11.11
9 EO 4C S-3 -150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.1 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 50,93 %10 EO 1S S-1 -100 11 61.11
11 EO 3S E-1 50 2 11.11
12 EO 3S N+3 690 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
A.9 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 44,07 %13 EO 4P N+1 650 7 38.89
14 EO 1S S-4 -200 17 94.44
15 EO 3K W = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 42,41 %16 EO 4C W+2 -680 12 66.67
17 EO 3S S-1 -50 16 88.89
18 EO 1S N+2 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.2 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 50,56 %19 EO 4P W = -620 14 77.78
20 EO 3S W+1 -630 15 83.33
21 EO 2P E+1 -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A.7 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -ROEGIERS Marga : 40,00 %22 EO 4C S-3 -150 17 94.44
23 EO 4P S-1 -100 15 83.33
24 EO 2P E+2 -170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
A.3 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,89 %25 EO Pass Passe 12 66.67
26 EO 3T N-1 -100 5 27.78
27 EO 5C W = -450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.8 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 68,33 %28 EO 2K N-3 -300 16 88.89
29 EO 2P S+3 200 2 11.11
30 EO 3P N = 140 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 293,0 / 540 = 54,26 %
PAIRE Nr : a.7 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
A.4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 50,19 % 1 EO 2P W = -110 14 77.78
2 EO 3S S = 600 16 88.89
3 EO 3S N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
A.5 COLLET Edgard -CHANTRAINE René : 61,11 % 4 EO 3S S+3 690 4 22.22
5 EO 4P N = 620 7 38.89
6 EO 4CcN-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 42,41 % 7 EO 4CcW = -790 16 88.89
8 EO 3S E = -400 18 100.00
9 EO 3K W+1 -130 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
A.9 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 44,07 %10 EO 1S S-2 -200 16 88.89
11 EO 3S E = -400 12 66.67
12 EO 3CcE-3 500 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.1 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 50,93 %13 EO 4P N = 620 16 88.89
14 EO 3C E = -140 8 44.44
15 EO 2S E = -120 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
A10 PIRET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 53,52 %16 EO 4C W+1 -650 3 16.67
17 EO 2C W = -110 18 100.00
18 EO 1S N = 90 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.7 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -ROEGIERS Marga : 40,00 %19 EO 4P W+1 -650 18 100.00
20 EO 1S W+2 -150 2 11.11
21 EO 2P W+1 -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.2 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 50,56 %22 EO 3C S-1 -50 3 16.67
23 EO 3P S+1 170 6 33.33
24 EO 1S E+4 -210 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.8 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 68,33 %25 EO 3K S+1 130 4 22.22
26 EO 4PcS-1 -200 13 72.22
27 EO 4C W+1 -450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.3 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,89 %28 EO 2P E = -110 14 77.78
29 EO 3P S-2 -200 18 100.00
30 EO 2K N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
Total : 350,0 / 540 = 64,81 %
PAIRE Nr : a.8 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger
A.5 COLLET Edgard -CHANTRAINE René : 61,11 % 1 EO 2P W-2 100 5 27.78
2 EO 3S S+1 630 10 55.56
3 EO 3CcW-1 200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 42,41 % 4 EO 3S S+4 720 0 0.00
5 EO 3S N+1 630 2 11.11
6 EO 3C N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
A.7 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -ROEGIERS Marga : 40,00 % 7 EO 2P N-2 -200 11 61.11
8 EO 2C E+1 -140 9 50.00
9 EO 4C S-3 -150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.3 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,89 %10 EO 1C E = -80 8 44.44
11 EO 1S E+3 -180 8 44.44
12 EO 3K S+2 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A10 PIRET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 53,52 %13 EO 4P N+1 650 7 38.89
14 EO 2K N-2 -100 1 5.56
15 EO 2C S = 110 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A.1 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 50,93 %16 EO 5C W+1 -680 12 66.67
17 EO 1S S+1 120 8 44.44
18 EO 1S N+1 120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 50,19 %19 EO 3C S-2 -100 8 44.44
20 EO 3S W = -600 8 44.44
21 EO 3P E = -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.8 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 68,33 %22 EO 4C S-2 -100 9 50.00
23 EO 4P S = 620 1 5.56
24 EO 3C N-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
A.2 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 50,56 %25 EO 4P W-3 300 0 0.00
26 EO 4PcS-1 -200 13 72.22
27 EO 4C W+1 -450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.9 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 44,07 %28 EO 2C S+1 140 4 22.22
29 EO 3P S-1 -100 13 72.22
30 EO 3C S-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 219,0 / 540 = 40,56 %
PAIRE Nr : a.9 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno
A.6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 42,41 % 1 EO 3S W = -400 18 100.00
2 EO 3S S+1 630 10 55.56
3 EO 3S S-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A.7 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -ROEGIERS Marga : 40,00 % 4 EO 3S S+2 660 10 55.56
5 EO 4P N-1 -100 15 83.33
6 EO 5CcN-2 -300 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.8 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 68,33 % 7 EO 2P N-1 -100 0 0.00
8 EO 4C E-1 50 0 0.00
9 EO 4TcW-4 1100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 PIRET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 53,52 %10 EO 1S S = 90 5 27.78
11 EO 3S E-1 50 2 11.11
12 EO 3S S+2 660 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
A.3 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,89 %13 EO 4P S = 620 16 88.89
14 EO 1C E+2 -140 8 44.44
15 EO 3C S-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 50,19 %16 EO 4C E+1 -650 3 16.67
17 EO 3S S = 400 1 5.56
18 EO 1S N+1 120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.1 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 50,93 %19 EO 5CcS-3 -500 10 55.56
20 EO 3S E = -600 8 44.44
21 EO 3P E-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.5 COLLET Edgard -CHANTRAINE René : 61,11 %22 EO 4CcS-1 -100 9 50.00
23 EO 4P S = 620 1 5.56
24 EO 3C N-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
A.9 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 44,07 %25 EO 3K S+1 130 4 22.22
26 EO 4P S-2 -200 13 72.22
27 EO 5C W = -450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.2 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 50,56 %28 EO 2C S+1 140 4 22.22
29 EO 3P S-1 -100 13 72.22
30 EO 3C S-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 223,0 / 540 = 41,30 %
PAIRE Nr : a10 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
A.7 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -ROEGIERS Marga : 40,00 % 1 EO 3S W-2 100 5 27.78
2 EO 3S S+1 630 10 55.56
3 EO 3CcW-1 200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.8 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 68,33 % 4 EO 3S S+3 690 4 22.22
5 EO 4P N = 620 7 38.89
6 EO 5T W+1 -620 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.9 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 44,07 % 7 EO 2C W+2 -170 6 33.33
8 EO 3C E = -140 9 50.00
9 EO 4T W-3 300 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.2 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 50,56 %10 EO 1S S-2 -200 16 88.89
11 EO 1S E+2 -150 6 33.33
12 EO 3K S+3 170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 50,19 %13 EO 4P N+1 650 7 38.89
14 EO 2C E+2 -170 14 77.78
15 EO 3K W = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.3 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,89 %16 EO 4C W+3 -710 18 100.00
17 EO 2K S+1 110 13 72.22
18 EO 3S N-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
A.5 COLLET Edgard -CHANTRAINE René : 61,11 %19 EO 3K W-1 100 4 22.22
20 EO 3S W = -600 8 44.44
21 EO 4K S-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.1 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 50,93 %22 EO 4C S-2 -100 9 50.00
23 EO 3P S+1 170 6 33.33
24 EO 3P E = -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 42,41 %25 EO 3S N-2 -100 17 94.44
26 EO 4P N-1 -100 5 27.78
27 EO 4C W+1 -450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A10 PIRET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 53,52 %28 EO 4C N-1 -100 12 66.67
29 EO 2P S = 110 7 38.89
30 EO 3P S = 140 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 270,0 / 540 = 50,00 %
|
|