|
Tournoi du 03-08-15
1 60,54 8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges
2 59,85 10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle
3 58,39 9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
4 54,06 7 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand
5 52,41 1 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier
6 49,02 3 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
7 48,04 5 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques
8 44,56 4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
9 43,31 6 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle
10 29,83 2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 56,59 17 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard
2 56,50 19 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
3 55,93 13 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Joel
4 55,76 18 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
5 52,02 12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
6 51,80 14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
7 47,00 15 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -MAHY Alain
8 44,28 20 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne
9 43,02 11 MOLS Bruno -ARICKX Roger
10 37,11 16 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
PAIRE Nr : 1 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier
11 MOLS Bruno -ARICKX Roger : 43,02 % 1 NS 4P E-1 50 12 66.67
2 NS 3S W-1 50 16 88.89
3 NS 4P S = 420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
13 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Joel : 55,93 % 4 NS 6S W+1 -1470 14 77.78
5 NS 4C W-1 50 4 22.22
6 NS 50%50% Ajust 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,02 % 7 NS 4C E+1 -650 6 33.33
8 NS 4P E = -420 4 22.22
9 NS 2S E+1 -150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
16 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 37,11 %10 NS 3S S+1 630 17 94.44
11 NS 3S S = 400 10 55.56
12 NS 3S S+1 630 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,59 %13 NS 2K S+2 130 1 5.56
14 NS 6S E+1 -1020 0 0.00
15 NS 3C N-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
18 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,76 %16 NS 2S W-1 100 16 88.89
17 NS 3P E+1 -170 6 33.33
18 NS 4C S = 620 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,50 %19 NS 5K S = 400 12 66.67
20 NS 4P S = 620 10 55.56
21 NS 2C E+1 -140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
20 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 44,28 %22 NS 3S W+1 -630 5 27.78
23 NS 3S N+2 660 10 55.56
24 NS 4C E-3 150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 51,80 %25 NS 2S W-2 200 18 100.00
26 NS 4C W-1 100 11 61.11
27 NS 1S S+1 120 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
15 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -MAHY Alain : 47,00 %28 NS 3S W+2 -460 0 0.00
29 NS 4C W-1 100 0 0.00
30 NS 4C W-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
Total : 283,0 / 540 = 52,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga
13 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Joel : 55,93 % 1 NS 4P E = -420 0 0.00
2 NS 3S E = -400 5 27.78
3 NS 4P N-2 -100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,02 % 4 NS 6S W+1 -1470 14 77.78
5 NS 3K N-2 -200 0 0.00
6 NS 4K N-1 -50 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 26,11 %
11 MOLS Bruno -ARICKX Roger : 43,02 % 7 NS 3S W+2 -660 2 11.11
8 NS 1P W+3 -170 6 33.33
9 NS 3S W+1 -630 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
20 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 44,28 %10 NS 3S S = 600 11 61.11
11 NS 3S S-2 -100 0 0.00
12 NS 2S S+2 180 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 51,80 %13 NS 3K S+1 130 1 5.56
14 NS 4P E+3 -510 14 77.78
15 NS 3P S-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
15 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -MAHY Alain : 47,00 %16 NS 1S W+2 -150 4 22.22
17 NS 1S N-1 -50 12 66.67
18 NS 3C S = 140 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
16 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 37,11 %19 NS 4K S+1 150 5 27.78
20 NS 4P S = 620 10 55.56
21 NS 3C E-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,59 %22 NS 3S W-1 100 15 83.33
23 NS 3S N = 600 6 33.33
24 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
18 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,76 %25 NS 2C E = -110 2 11.11
26 NS 3C E = -140 1 5.56
27 NS 2C N-2 -100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,50 %28 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 22.22
29 NS 3S N+2 660 12 66.67
30 NS 4C W = -420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 161,1 / 540 = 29,83 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,02 % 1 NS 3P W = -140 5 27.78
2 NS 3S W = -400 5 27.78
3 NS 3S S+2 460 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
11 MOLS Bruno -ARICKX Roger : 43,02 % 4 NS 7S E = -2220 4 22.22
5 NS 3S S = 600 17 94.44
6 NS 2CcE-5 1400 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 67,96 %
13 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Joel : 55,93 % 7 NS 4C E = -620 11 61.11
8 NS 4P W-1 50 13 72.22
9 NS 1K E+2 -110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
18 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,76 %10 NS 3S S-1 -100 4 22.22
11 NS 3S S = 400 10 55.56
12 NS 1S S+1 120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,50 %13 NS 2C S+4 230 6 33.33
14 NS 6P W+1 -1010 4 22.22
15 NS 1S S = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
20 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 44,28 %16 NS 3PcN-1 -100 11 61.11
17 NS 4P E = -420 0 0.00
18 NS 4C S = 620 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 51,80 %19 NS 4T E = -130 2 11.11
20 NS 6P S-2 -200 1 5.56
21 NS 4C E = -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
15 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -MAHY Alain : 47,00 %22 NS 3S W-1 100 15 83.33
23 NS 6S S = 1440 16 88.89
24 NS 3P W = -140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
16 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 37,11 %25 NS 2S S+2 180 15 83.33
26 NS 3P S-1 -100 6 33.33
27 NS 3S S+2 460 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,59 %28 NS 3S W = -400 11 61.11
29 NS 3S S+2 660 12 66.67
30 NS 4C W = -420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 264,7 / 540 = 49,02 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
17 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,59 % 1 NS 4KcN-1 -100 8 44.44
2 NS 3S E = -400 5 27.78
3 NS 4P N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
16 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 37,11 % 4 NS 6S W+1 -1470 14 77.78
5 NS 1S S+3 180 14 77.78
6 NS 3S N = 400 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
15 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -MAHY Alain : 47,00 % 7 NS 2C W+3 -200 15 83.33
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 1 5.56
9 NS 1K E+1 -90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 51,80 %10 NS 3S S-1 -100 4 22.22
11 NS 3S S = 400 10 55.56
12 NS 3S S+1 630 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
20 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 44,28 %13 NS 4C N+1 650 14 77.78
14 NS 6P W+1 -1010 4 22.22
15 NS 2S N-2 -200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,50 %16 NS 1S W+1 -120 7 38.89
17 NS 1S N-1 -50 12 66.67
18 NS 4C S-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
18 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,76 %19 NS 3PcW = -730 0 0.00
20 NS 3S N = 600 6 33.33
21 NS 2C E+1 -140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
13 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Joel : 55,93 %22 NS 3S W+1 -630 5 27.78
23 NS 6T S-3 -300 0 0.00
24 NS 3C E-2 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,02 %25 NS 4T S-1 -50 5 27.78
26 NS 4C E-2 200 17 94.44
27 NS 1S S-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
11 MOLS Bruno -ARICKX Roger : 43,02 %28 NS 3S W-2 100 18 100.00
29 NS 4C N+1 650 5 27.78
30 NS 3S E = -400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 240,6 / 540 = 44,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques
18 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,76 % 1 NS 3S W = -400 2 11.11
2 NS 3S E = -400 5 27.78
3 NS 3S N+1 430 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,59 % 4 NS 7S W = -2220 4 22.22
5 NS 1S S+2 150 9 50.00
6 NS 2CcE-4 1100 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
16 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 37,11 % 7 NS 3C E+2 -200 15 83.33
8 NS 3P W = -140 8 44.44
9 NS 2S E-1 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
11 MOLS Bruno -ARICKX Roger : 43,02 %10 NS 3S S+1 630 17 94.44
11 NS 3S S-1 -50 3 16.67
12 NS 3S S+1 630 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
15 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -MAHY Alain : 47,00 %13 NS 4C N+1 650 14 77.78
14 NS 4P W+3 -510 14 77.78
15 NS 1S S+2 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 51,80 %16 NS 1S W+3 -180 1 5.56
17 NS 2P E+2 -170 6 33.33
18 NS 4C S = 620 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
20 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 44,28 %19 NS 4K S+1 150 5 27.78
20 NS 4P S = 620 10 55.56
21 NS 2C E+2 -170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,50 %22 NS 3S E+1 -630 5 27.78
23 NS 3S S+3 690 13 72.22
24 NS 3S W = -400 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
13 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Joel : 55,93 %25 NS 3CcW = -730 0 0.00
26 NS 3P S-1 -100 6 33.33
27 NS 1S S-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,02 %28 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 22.22
29 NS 3S S+2 660 12 66.67
30 NS 4C W = -420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 259,4 / 540 = 48,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle
19 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,50 % 1 NS 3P W = -140 5 27.78
2 NS 3S E-1 50 16 88.89
3 NS 6P S-2 -100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
18 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,76 % 4 NS 7S W = -2220 4 22.22
5 NS 3S N-1 -100 2 11.11
6 NS 5T N+1 420 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 25,74 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,59 % 7 NS 4C W+1 -650 6 33.33
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 1 5.56
9 NS 3S W-1 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,02 %10 NS 3S S-1 -100 4 22.22
11 NS 4C N+1 450 17 94.44
12 NS 3S S+1 630 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
11 MOLS Bruno -ARICKX Roger : 43,02 %13 NS 3C N+2 200 4 22.22
14 NS 4P W+3 -510 14 77.78
15 NS 3S N-2 -200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
16 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 37,11 %16 NS 2S W = -120 7 38.89
17 NS 1S N+1 120 18 100.00
18 NS 3C S = 140 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
15 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -MAHY Alain : 47,00 %19 NS 5K S = 400 12 66.67
20 NS 3S N+1 630 14 77.78
21 NS 2C E+2 -170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 51,80 %22 NS 3S E+1 -630 5 27.78
23 NS 3S S+3 690 13 72.22
24 NS 3S W = -400 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
20 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 44,28 %25 NS 2S S-1 -50 5 27.78
26 NS 3C E-1 100 11 61.11
27 NS 1S S+2 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
13 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Joel : 55,93 %28 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 22.22
29 NS 4C N+1 650 5 27.78
30 NS 4C W+1 -450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
Total : 233,9 / 540 = 43,31 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand
20 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 44,28 % 1 NS 4C S+2 480 18 100.00
2 NS 2P W+1 -140 12 66.67
3 NS 4P N = 420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,50 % 4 NS 6S W+1 -1470 14 77.78
5 NS 1S S+2 150 9 50.00
6 NS 5T N+1 420 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 57,22 %
18 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,76 % 7 NS 3K E+1 -130 18 100.00
8 NS 4P W-1 50 13 72.22
9 NS 3S E+2 -660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
13 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Joel : 55,93 %10 NS 3S S-1 -100 4 22.22
11 NS 3S S = 400 10 55.56
12 NS 3S S = 600 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,02 %13 NS 4C N = 620 8 44.44
14 NS 6T E+1 -940 9 50.00
15 NS 2C S = 110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
11 MOLS Bruno -ARICKX Roger : 43,02 %16 NS 2P N+1 140 18 100.00
17 NS 3K S-5 -250 2 11.11
18 NS 4C S = 620 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,59 %19 NS 6K S = 920 18 100.00
20 NS 5P S-2 -200 1 5.56
21 NS 2P S-2 -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
16 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 37,11 %22 NS 3S W-1 100 15 83.33
23 NS 6S S-1 -100 3 16.67
24 NS 3S W = -400 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
15 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -MAHY Alain : 47,00 %25 NS 2S S+2 180 15 83.33
26 NS 3P S-1 -100 6 33.33
27 NS 3S S-2 -100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 51,80 %28 NS 3S W = -400 11 61.11
29 NS 3S S+3 690 18 100.00
30 NS 5C W-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
Total : 291,9 / 540 = 54,06 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 51,80 % 1 NS 4C N = 420 16 88.89
2 NS 3S E = -400 5 27.78
3 NS 4P N = 420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
20 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 44,28 % 4 NS 6S W+1 -1470 14 77.78
5 NS 1S S+2 150 9 50.00
6 NS 3CcE-7 2000 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 75,74 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,50 % 7 NS 5CcW = -850 0 0.00
8 NS 4P W-2 100 18 100.00
9 NS 1K E+2 -110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
15 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -MAHY Alain : 47,00 %10 NS 3S S-1 -100 4 22.22
11 NS 4P N+1 450 17 94.44
12 NS 3S S+2 660 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
13 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Joel : 55,93 %13 NS 4C N+1 650 14 77.78
14 NS 6P W+1 -1010 4 22.22
15 NS 2C S+1 140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,02 %16 NS 4P N-2 -100 11 61.11
17 NS 3P E+1 -170 6 33.33
18 NS 4C S = 620 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
11 MOLS Bruno -ARICKX Roger : 43,02 %19 NS 5K S = 400 12 66.67
20 NS 3S N+2 660 17 94.44
21 NS 2C E+1 -140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
18 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,76 %22 NS 3S E+1 -630 5 27.78
23 NS 2KxS+2 1560 18 100.00
24 NS 3T W+1 -130 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,59 %25 NS 4T S = 130 10 55.56
26 NS 2P S = 110 14 77.78
27 NS 1S S = 90 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
16 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 37,11 %28 NS 3S W = -400 11 61.11
29 NS 3S S = 600 2 11.11
30 NS 4C W = -420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 326,9 / 540 = 60,54 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
15 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -MAHY Alain : 47,00 % 1 NS 4P E-1 50 12 66.67
2 NS 3S E = -400 5 27.78
3 NS 4P N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 51,80 % 4 NS 7S E = -2220 4 22.22
5 NS 3S N = 600 17 94.44
6 NS 3T N+2 150 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 43,15 %
20 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 44,28 % 7 NS 4C W = -620 11 61.11
8 NS 4P W-1 50 13 72.22
9 NS 1K E+1 -90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,59 %10 NS 4C N = 620 14 77.78
11 NS 3S S-1 -50 3 16.67
12 NS 3S S+1 630 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
16 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 37,11 %13 NS 4C N+1 650 14 77.78
14 NS 3S E+3 -490 18 100.00
15 NS 3S N = 600 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
13 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Joel : 55,93 %16 NS 3P N-1 -50 14 77.78
17 NS 1S N = 90 16 88.89
18 NS 4C S = 620 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,02 %19 NS 5K S = 400 12 66.67
20 NS 3S N-1 -100 4 22.22
21 NS 4C E-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
11 MOLS Bruno -ARICKX Roger : 43,02 %22 NS 3S W-1 100 15 83.33
23 NS 6C N-1 -100 3 16.67
24 NS 4K N-4 -200 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,50 %25 NS 3C W-1 100 8 44.44
26 NS 3C E = -140 1 5.56
27 NS 1S S-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
18 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,76 %28 NS 3S W = -400 11 61.11
29 NS 3S S+2 660 12 66.67
30 NS 6C W-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
Total : 315,3 / 540 = 58,39 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle
16 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 37,11 % 1 NS 4T W-1 50 12 66.67
2 NS 4P W-1 50 16 88.89
3 NS 4P N = 420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
15 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -MAHY Alain : 47,00 % 4 NS 7S W = -2220 4 22.22
5 NS 1S S+2 150 9 50.00
6 NS 3S S+2 460 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 44,81 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 51,80 % 7 NS 4C W+1 -650 6 33.33
8 NS 4P W-1 50 13 72.22
9 NS 1K E+2 -110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 56,50 %10 NS 3S S = 600 11 61.11
11 NS 3S S = 400 10 55.56
12 NS 3S S = 600 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
18 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,76 %13 NS 4C N+1 650 14 77.78
14 NS 6T E+1 -940 9 50.00
15 NS 1S S-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,59 %16 NS 1S W+3 -180 1 5.56
17 NS 1S N-1 -50 12 66.67
18 NS 4C S = 620 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
13 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Joel : 55,93 %19 NS 5K S = 400 12 66.67
20 NS 3S N+2 660 17 94.44
21 NS 3C W = -140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,02 %22 NS 3S W+1 -630 5 27.78
23 NS 3S S+1 630 8 44.44
24 NS 3C E-3 150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
11 MOLS Bruno -ARICKX Roger : 43,02 %25 NS 3T N+2 150 12 66.67
26 NS 4CcE-1 200 17 94.44
27 NS 1S S = 90 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
20 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 44,28 %28 NS 3S W-1 50 16 88.89
29 NS 3S S+2 660 12 66.67
30 NS 4C W-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
Total : 323,2 / 540 = 59,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 MOLS Bruno -ARICKX Roger
1 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 52,41 % 1 EO 4P E-1 50 6 33.33
2 EO 3S W-1 50 2 11.11
3 EO 4P S = 420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
3 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,02 % 4 EO 7S E = -2220 14 77.78
5 EO 3S S = 600 1 5.56
6 EO 2CcE-5 1400 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 32,04 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 29,83 % 7 EO 3S W+2 -660 16 88.89
8 EO 1P W+3 -170 12 66.67
9 EO 3S W+1 -630 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
5 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 48,04 %10 EO 3S S+1 630 1 5.56
11 EO 3S S-1 -50 15 83.33
12 EO 3S S+1 630 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
6 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 43,31 %13 EO 3C N+2 200 14 77.78
14 EO 4P W+3 -510 4 22.22
15 EO 3S N-2 -200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
7 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 54,06 %16 EO 2P N+1 140 0 0.00
17 EO 3K S-5 -250 16 88.89
18 EO 4C S = 620 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 60,54 %19 EO 5K S = 400 6 33.33
20 EO 3S N+2 660 1 5.56
21 EO 2C E+1 -140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 58,39 %22 EO 3S W-1 100 3 16.67
23 EO 6C N-1 -100 15 83.33
24 EO 4K N-4 -200 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 59,85 %25 EO 3T N+2 150 6 33.33
26 EO 4CcE-1 200 1 5.56
27 EO 1S S = 90 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 44,56 %28 EO 3S W-2 100 0 0.00
29 EO 4C N+1 650 13 72.22
30 EO 3S E = -400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 232,3 / 540 = 43,02 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
3 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,02 % 1 EO 3P W = -140 13 72.22
2 EO 3S W = -400 13 72.22
3 EO 3S S+2 460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 29,83 % 4 EO 6S W+1 -1470 4 22.22
5 EO 3K N-2 -200 18 100.00
6 EO 4K N-1 -50 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 73,89 %
1 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 52,41 % 7 EO 4C E+1 -650 12 66.67
8 EO 4P E = -420 14 77.78
9 EO 2S E+1 -150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
6 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 43,31 %10 EO 3S S-1 -100 14 77.78
11 EO 4C N+1 450 1 5.56
12 EO 3S S+1 630 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
7 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 54,06 %13 EO 4C N = 620 10 55.56
14 EO 6T E+1 -940 9 50.00
15 EO 2C S = 110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 60,54 %16 EO 4P N-2 -100 7 38.89
17 EO 3P E+1 -170 12 66.67
18 EO 4C S = 620 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 58,39 %19 EO 5K S = 400 6 33.33
20 EO 3S N-1 -100 14 77.78
21 EO 4C E-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 59,85 %22 EO 3S W+1 -630 13 72.22
23 EO 3S S+1 630 10 55.56
24 EO 3C E-3 150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 44,56 %25 EO 4T S-1 -50 13 72.22
26 EO 4C E-2 200 1 5.56
27 EO 1S S-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
5 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 48,04 %28 EO 3S W+1 -430 14 77.78
29 EO 3S S+2 660 6 33.33
30 EO 4C W = -420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 280,9 / 540 = 52,02 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Joel
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 29,83 % 1 EO 4P E = -420 18 100.00
2 EO 3S E = -400 13 72.22
3 EO 4P N-2 -100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
1 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 52,41 % 4 EO 6S W+1 -1470 4 22.22
5 EO 4C W-1 50 14 77.78
6 EO 50%50% Ajust 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,02 % 7 EO 4C E = -620 7 38.89
8 EO 4P W-1 50 5 27.78
9 EO 1K E+2 -110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
7 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 54,06 %10 EO 3S S-1 -100 14 77.78
11 EO 3S S = 400 8 44.44
12 EO 3S S = 600 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 60,54 %13 EO 4C N+1 650 4 22.22
14 EO 6P W+1 -1010 14 77.78
15 EO 2C S+1 140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 58,39 %16 EO 3P N-1 -50 4 22.22
17 EO 1S N = 90 2 11.11
18 EO 4C S = 620 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 59,85 %19 EO 5K S = 400 6 33.33
20 EO 3S N+2 660 1 5.56
21 EO 3C W = -140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 44,56 %22 EO 3S W+1 -630 13 72.22
23 EO 6T S-3 -300 18 100.00
24 EO 3C E-2 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
5 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 48,04 %25 EO 3CcW = -730 18 100.00
26 EO 3P S-1 -100 12 66.67
27 EO 1S S-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
6 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 43,31 %28 EO 3S W+1 -430 14 77.78
29 EO 4C N+1 650 13 72.22
30 EO 4C W+1 -450 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
Total : 302,0 / 540 = 55,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 60,54 % 1 EO 4C N = 420 2 11.11
2 EO 3S E = -400 13 72.22
3 EO 4P N = 420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 58,39 % 4 EO 7S E = -2220 14 77.78
5 EO 3S N = 600 1 5.56
6 EO 3T N+2 150 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 56,85 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 59,85 % 7 EO 4C W+1 -650 12 66.67
8 EO 4P W-1 50 5 27.78
9 EO 1K E+2 -110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 44,56 %10 EO 3S S-1 -100 14 77.78
11 EO 3S S = 400 8 44.44
12 EO 3S S+1 630 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 29,83 %13 EO 3K S+1 130 17 94.44
14 EO 4P E+3 -510 4 22.22
15 EO 3P S-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
5 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 48,04 %16 EO 1S W+3 -180 17 94.44
17 EO 2P E+2 -170 12 66.67
18 EO 4C S = 620 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
3 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,02 %19 EO 4T E = -130 16 88.89
20 EO 6P S-2 -200 17 94.44
21 EO 4C E = -420 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
6 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 43,31 %22 EO 3S E+1 -630 13 72.22
23 EO 3S S+3 690 5 27.78
24 EO 3S W = -400 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
1 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 52,41 %25 EO 2S W-2 200 0 0.00
26 EO 4C W-1 100 7 38.89
27 EO 1S S+1 120 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
7 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 54,06 %28 EO 3S W = -400 7 38.89
29 EO 3S S+3 690 0 0.00
30 EO 5C W-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
Total : 279,7 / 540 = 51,80 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -MAHY Alain
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 58,39 % 1 EO 4P E-1 50 6 33.33
2 EO 3S E = -400 13 72.22
3 EO 4P N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 59,85 % 4 EO 7S W = -2220 14 77.78
5 EO 1S S+2 150 9 50.00
6 EO 3S S+2 460 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 55,19 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 44,56 % 7 EO 2C W+3 -200 3 16.67
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 94.44
9 EO 1K E+1 -90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 60,54 %10 EO 3S S-1 -100 14 77.78
11 EO 4P N+1 450 1 5.56
12 EO 3S S+2 660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
5 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 48,04 %13 EO 4C N+1 650 4 22.22
14 EO 4P W+3 -510 4 22.22
15 EO 1S S+2 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 29,83 %16 EO 1S W+2 -150 14 77.78
17 EO 1S N-1 -50 6 33.33
18 EO 3C S = 140 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
6 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 43,31 %19 EO 5K S = 400 6 33.33
20 EO 3S N+1 630 4 22.22
21 EO 2C E+2 -170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
3 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,02 %22 EO 3S W-1 100 3 16.67
23 EO 6S S = 1440 2 11.11
24 EO 3P W = -140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
7 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 54,06 %25 EO 2S S+2 180 3 16.67
26 EO 3P S-1 -100 12 66.67
27 EO 3S S-2 -100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
1 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 52,41 %28 EO 3S W+2 -460 18 100.00
29 EO 4C W-1 100 18 100.00
30 EO 4C W-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
Total : 253,8 / 540 = 47,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 59,85 % 1 EO 4T W-1 50 6 33.33
2 EO 4P W-1 50 2 11.11
3 EO 4P N = 420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 44,56 % 4 EO 6S W+1 -1470 4 22.22
5 EO 1S S+3 180 4 22.22
6 EO 3S N = 400 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
5 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 48,04 % 7 EO 3C E+2 -200 3 16.67
8 EO 3P W = -140 10 55.56
9 EO 2S E-1 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
1 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 52,41 %10 EO 3S S+1 630 1 5.56
11 EO 3S S = 400 8 44.44
12 EO 3S S+1 630 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 58,39 %13 EO 4C N+1 650 4 22.22
14 EO 3S E+3 -490 0 0.00
15 EO 3S N = 600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
6 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 43,31 %16 EO 2S W = -120 11 61.11
17 EO 1S N+1 120 0 0.00
18 EO 3C S = 140 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 29,83 %19 EO 4K S+1 150 13 72.22
20 EO 4P S = 620 8 44.44
21 EO 3C E-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
7 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 54,06 %22 EO 3S W-1 100 3 16.67
23 EO 6S S-1 -100 15 83.33
24 EO 3S W = -400 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
3 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,02 %25 EO 2S S+2 180 3 16.67
26 EO 3P S-1 -100 12 66.67
27 EO 3S S+2 460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 60,54 %28 EO 3S W = -400 7 38.89
29 EO 3S S = 600 16 88.89
30 EO 4C W = -420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 200,4 / 540 = 37,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 44,56 % 1 EO 4KcN-1 -100 10 55.56
2 EO 3S E = -400 13 72.22
3 EO 4P N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
5 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 48,04 % 4 EO 7S W = -2220 14 77.78
5 EO 1S S+2 150 9 50.00
6 EO 2CcE-4 1100 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
6 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 43,31 % 7 EO 4C W+1 -650 12 66.67
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 94.44
9 EO 3S W-1 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 58,39 %10 EO 4C N = 620 4 22.22
11 EO 3S S-1 -50 15 83.33
12 EO 3S S+1 630 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
1 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 52,41 %13 EO 2K S+2 130 17 94.44
14 EO 6S E+1 -1020 18 100.00
15 EO 3C N-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 59,85 %16 EO 1S W+3 -180 17 94.44
17 EO 1S N-1 -50 6 33.33
18 EO 4C S = 620 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
7 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 54,06 %19 EO 6K S = 920 0 0.00
20 EO 5P S-2 -200 17 94.44
21 EO 2P S-2 -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 29,83 %22 EO 3S W-1 100 3 16.67
23 EO 3S N = 600 12 66.67
24 EO 3S W+1 -430 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 60,54 %25 EO 4T S = 130 8 44.44
26 EO 2P S = 110 4 22.22
27 EO 1S S = 90 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
3 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,02 %28 EO 3S W = -400 7 38.89
29 EO 3S S+2 660 6 33.33
30 EO 4C W = -420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 305,6 / 540 = 56,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
5 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 48,04 % 1 EO 3S W = -400 16 88.89
2 EO 3S E = -400 13 72.22
3 EO 3S N+1 430 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
6 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 43,31 % 4 EO 7S W = -2220 14 77.78
5 EO 3S N-1 -100 16 88.89
6 EO 5T N+1 420 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 74,26 %
7 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 54,06 % 7 EO 3K E+1 -130 0 0.00
8 EO 4P W-1 50 5 27.78
9 EO 3S E+2 -660 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
3 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,02 %10 EO 3S S-1 -100 14 77.78
11 EO 3S S = 400 8 44.44
12 EO 1S S+1 120 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 59,85 %13 EO 4C N+1 650 4 22.22
14 EO 6T E+1 -940 9 50.00
15 EO 1S S-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
1 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 52,41 %16 EO 2S W-1 100 2 11.11
17 EO 3P E+1 -170 12 66.67
18 EO 4C S = 620 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 44,56 %19 EO 3PcW = -730 18 100.00
20 EO 3S N = 600 12 66.67
21 EO 2C E+1 -140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 60,54 %22 EO 3S E+1 -630 13 72.22
23 EO 2KxS+2 1560 0 0.00
24 EO 3T W+1 -130 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 29,83 %25 EO 2C E = -110 16 88.89
26 EO 3C E = -140 17 94.44
27 EO 2C N-2 -100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 58,39 %28 EO 3S W = -400 7 38.89
29 EO 3S S+2 660 6 33.33
30 EO 6C W-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
Total : 301,1 / 540 = 55,76 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
6 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 43,31 % 1 EO 3P W = -140 13 72.22
2 EO 3S E-1 50 2 11.11
3 EO 6P S-2 -100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
7 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 54,06 % 4 EO 6S W+1 -1470 4 22.22
5 EO 1S S+2 150 9 50.00
6 EO 5T N+1 420 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 42,78 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 60,54 % 7 EO 5CcW = -850 18 100.00
8 EO 4P W-2 100 0 0.00
9 EO 1K E+2 -110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 59,85 %10 EO 3S S = 600 7 38.89
11 EO 3S S = 400 8 44.44
12 EO 3S S = 600 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
3 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,02 %13 EO 2C S+4 230 12 66.67
14 EO 6P W+1 -1010 14 77.78
15 EO 1S S = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 44,56 %16 EO 1S W+1 -120 11 61.11
17 EO 1S N-1 -50 6 33.33
18 EO 4C S-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
1 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 52,41 %19 EO 5K S = 400 6 33.33
20 EO 4P S = 620 8 44.44
21 EO 2C E+1 -140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
5 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 48,04 %22 EO 3S E+1 -630 13 72.22
23 EO 3S S+3 690 5 27.78
24 EO 3S W = -400 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 58,39 %25 EO 3C W-1 100 10 55.56
26 EO 3C E = -140 17 94.44
27 EO 1S S-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 29,83 %28 EO 3S W+1 -430 14 77.78
29 EO 3S N+2 660 6 33.33
30 EO 4C W = -420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 305,1 / 540 = 56,50 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne
7 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 54,06 % 1 EO 4C S+2 480 0 0.00
2 EO 2P W+1 -140 6 33.33
3 EO 4P N = 420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 60,54 % 4 EO 6S W+1 -1470 4 22.22
5 EO 1S S+2 150 9 50.00
6 EO 3CcE-7 2000 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 24,26 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 58,39 % 7 EO 4C W = -620 7 38.89
8 EO 4P W-1 50 5 27.78
9 EO 1K E+1 -90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 29,83 %10 EO 3S S = 600 7 38.89
11 EO 3S S-2 -100 18 100.00
12 EO 2S S+2 180 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 44,56 %13 EO 4C N+1 650 4 22.22
14 EO 6P W+1 -1010 14 77.78
15 EO 2S N-2 -200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
3 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,02 %16 EO 3PcN-1 -100 7 38.89
17 EO 4P E = -420 18 100.00
18 EO 4C S = 620 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
5 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 48,04 %19 EO 4K S+1 150 13 72.22
20 EO 4P S = 620 8 44.44
21 EO 2C E+2 -170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
1 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 52,41 %22 EO 3S W+1 -630 13 72.22
23 EO 3S N+2 660 8 44.44
24 EO 4C E-3 150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
6 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 43,31 %25 EO 2S S-1 -50 13 72.22
26 EO 3C E-1 100 7 38.89
27 EO 1S S+2 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 59,85 %28 EO 3S W-1 50 2 11.11
29 EO 3S S+2 660 6 33.33
30 EO 4C W-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
Total : 239,1 / 540 = 44,28 %
|
|