|
Tournoi du 03-11-14
1 60,52 1 PADOU Bernard -DEFLINES Etienne
2 59,55 4 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle
3 57,30 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
4 56,07 11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
5 52,00 10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
6 49,20 9 DEGUELLE Jacques -JASSOGNE Jacqueline
7 48,73 2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
8 47,83 12 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
9 46,00 7 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
10 41,97 6 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
11 41,52 5 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
12 39,32 3 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 66,70 15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
2 59,65 13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
3 57,83 17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
4 56,50 24 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
5 55,93 14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
6 52,62 22 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
7 45,85 20 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
8 45,27 18 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne
9 42,53 19 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
10 41,30 21 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard
11 40,48 16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René
12 35,33 23 DELHEZ Jacques -POULAERT Gilbert
PAIRE Nr : 1 PADOU Bernard -DEFLINES Etienne
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 59,65 % 1 NS 4C W-2 100 18 90.00
2 NS 3P N+2 200 9 45.00
3 NS 1S S = 90 13 65.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
23 DELHEZ Jacques -POULAERT Gilbert : 35,33 % 4 NS 4PcW-2 500 20 100.00
5 NS 3S N = 600 17 85.00
6 NS 3S W+1 -630 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 85,00 %
22 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,62 % 7 NS 4C E-1 100 15 75.00
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 8 40.00
9 NS 5C N+1 480 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 41,30 %10 NS 2K W+1 -110 18 90.00
11 NS 4C E+1 -450 1 5.00
12 NS 3P S+1 170 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 45,85 %13 NS 2C N = 110 12 60.00
14 NS 3CcE-3 500 20 100.00
15 NS 4C S-1 -100 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
19 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,53 %16 NS 5C W-1 100 9 45.00
17 NS 4P W = -420 0 0.00
18 NS 4P W-1 50 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
18 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 45,27 %19 NS 3T E-1 100 8 40.00
20 NS 3S N-3 -300 4 20.00
21 NS 2P N-2 -200 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,83 %22 NS 4K E-2 200 19 95.00
23 NS 2P N-1 -100 16 80.00
24 NS 3S S = 400 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 40,48 %25 NS 4C E-2 200 19.9 99.50
26 NS 2S N-1 -100 2.3 11.50
27 NS 4C E-2 100 8.9 44.50 µ Tbl = 51,83 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 66,70 %28 NS 2P W+1 -140 6 30.00
29 NS 3S N-1 -100 5 25.00
30 NS 3K W-2 100 13 65.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
Total : 363,1 / 600 = 60,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 55,93 % 4 NS 6C E = -1430 0 0.00
5 NS 4K N-1 -100 5 25.00
6 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 15,00 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 59,65 % 7 NS 3T W = -110 10 50.00
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 8 40.00
9 NS 5C N = 450 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
23 DELHEZ Jacques -POULAERT Gilbert : 35,33 %10 NS 3S E-1 100 20 100.00
11 NS 2C E+1 -140 14 70.00
12 NS 3T W-2 100 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
22 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,62 %13 NS 3S N-1 -100 7 35.00
14 NS 2S W = -120 5 25.00
15 NS 4K E-1 50 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 41,30 %16 NS 5C W-2 200 16 80.00
17 NS 3P W+1 -170 12 60.00
18 NS 4P W-1 50 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 45,85 %19 NS 3C N-2 -100 2 10.00
20 NS 2S N-1 -100 17 85.00
21 NS 4C E = -420 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
24 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,50 %22 NS 5T E-2 200 19 95.00
23 NS 3S E+1 -630 5 25.00
24 NS 3S S = 400 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
18 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 45,27 %25 NS 2C E-1 100 13.3 66.50
26 NS 1S N+1 120 10 50.00
27 NS 2C E = -110 0.1 0.50 µ Tbl = 39,00 %
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,83 %28 NS 3P E = -140 6 30.00
29 NS 3S S-1 -100 5 25.00
30 NS 1S E-1 50 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 40,48 %31 NS 2C N = 110 13 65.00
32 NS 1S S-1 -50 6 30.00
33 NS 5CcE-1 100 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
Total : 292,4 / 600 = 48,73 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,83 % 1 NS 3C W-1 50 10 50.00
2 NS 3P N+1 170 2 10.00
3 NS 3T N-1 -50 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 66,70 % 7 NS 2C W+2 -170 2 10.00
8 NS 5CcN-3 -500 0 0.00
9 NS 4C S+1 450 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
24 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,50 %10 NS 3S E = -600 1 5.00
11 NS 4C E = -420 4 20.00
12 NS 1S W = -90 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 15,00 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 59,65 %13 NS 3S N-1 -100 7 35.00
14 NS 2S W+1 -150 0 0.00
15 NS 4CcS-2 -500 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 18,33 %
23 DELHEZ Jacques -POULAERT Gilbert : 35,33 %16 NS 4C W-1 100 9 45.00
17 NS 3C N-1 -50 20 100.00
18 NS 2P W+2 -170 7 35.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
22 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,62 %19 NS 3C N = 140 16 80.00
20 NS 2S N-1 -100 17 85.00
21 NS 4C E+1 -450 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 41,30 %22 NS 1T W+2 -110 5 25.00
23 NS 2CcS-3 -800 2 10.00
24 NS 3S S+1 430 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 45,85 %25 NS 2C E+2 -170 2.3 11.50
26 NS 1P N+1 110 6.7 33.50
27 NS 4C E-2 100 8.9 44.50 µ Tbl = 29,83 %
19 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,53 %28 NS 2P E+2 -170 1 5.00
29 NS 3S S-1 -100 5 25.00
30 NS 1S S+1 120 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
18 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 45,27 %31 NS 2CcN = 670 20 100.00
32 NS 2T N+1 110 15 75.00
33 NS 3P S = 140 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 86,67 %
Total : 235,9 / 600 = 39,32 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle
19 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,53 % 1 NS 3S E-2 100 18 90.00
2 NS 4P N+1 650 19 95.00
3 NS 1S N = 90 13 65.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
18 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 45,27 % 4 NS 5C E+1 -680 6 30.00
5 NS 4K N = 130 13 65.00
6 NS 2T W+2 -130 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 40,48 %10 NS 2S E = -120 15 75.00
11 NS 2C E+1 -140 14 70.00
12 NS 4T W-2 100 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 66,70 %13 NS 2S N = 120 16 80.00
14 NS 2S W = -120 5 25.00
15 NS 4K E+1 -150 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 55,93 %16 NS 5C W-2 200 16 80.00
17 NS 5K W = -400 6 30.00
18 NS 2P W+2 -170 7 35.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 59,65 %19 NS 3C N = 140 16 80.00
20 NS 3S S-2 -200 11 55.00
21 NS 3S W+2 -460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
23 DELHEZ Jacques -POULAERT Gilbert : 35,33 %22 NS 2C S = 110 12 60.00
23 NS 1S E+2 -150 14 70.00
24 NS 3S N+2 460 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
22 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,62 %25 NS 2C E-1 100 13.3 66.50
26 NS 3S N-2 -200 0.1 0.50
27 NS 4C E-2 100 8.9 44.50 µ Tbl = 37,17 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 41,30 %28 NS 2S W = -120 10 50.00
29 NS 3S N = 600 14 70.00
30 NS 1S W-2 100 13 65.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
24 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,50 %31 NS 2C N = 110 13 65.00
32 NS 1S S-1 -50 6 30.00
33 NS 2P S+1 140 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
Total : 357,3 / 600 = 59,55 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
21 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 41,30 % 1 NS 2C W = -110 2 10.00
2 NS 3P N+2 200 9 45.00
3 NS 1S S-2 -100 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 21,67 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 45,85 % 4 NS 4C E+2 -680 6 30.00
5 NS 4S N-3 -300 0 0.00
6 NS 3S W+1 -630 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
19 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,53 % 7 NS 2P S-2 -200 0 0.00
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 8 40.00
9 NS 6C N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 13,33 %
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,83 %13 NS 2S N = 120 16 80.00
14 NS 3K W = -110 10 50.00
15 NS 4P S-1 -100 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 40,48 %16 NS 5C W-2 200 16 80.00
17 NS 5K E = -400 6 30.00
18 NS 2P W+2 -170 7 35.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
24 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,50 %19 NS 2C N = 110 11 55.00
20 NS 5TcS-4 -1100 0 0.00
21 NS 4C E+1 -450 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 28,33 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 55,93 %22 NS 3C S = 140 15 75.00
23 NS 3S E+1 -630 5 25.00
24 NS 3S S+2 460 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 59,65 %25 NS 1S N+1 120 17.7 88.50
26 NS 1S N = 90 4.5 22.50
27 NS 4CcE-1 100 8.9 44.50 µ Tbl = 51,83 %
23 DELHEZ Jacques -POULAERT Gilbert : 35,33 %28 NS 2S E-1 50 17 85.00
29 NS 3S S = 600 14 70.00
30 NS 2T N-1 -50 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
22 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,62 %31 NS Pass Passe 8 40.00
32 NS 1S S-1 -50 6 30.00
33 NS 3K W = -110 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
Total : 249,1 / 600 = 41,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
23 DELHEZ Jacques -POULAERT Gilbert : 35,33 % 1 NS 4C W-2 100 18 90.00
2 NS 4P N+1 650 19 95.00
3 NS 2T N = 90 13 65.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
22 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,62 % 4 NS 4C E+2 -680 6 30.00
5 NS 5K N-2 -200 2 10.00
6 NS 3S W+1 -630 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
24 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,50 % 7 NS 3C W = -140 5 25.00
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 8 40.00
9 NS 5C N+1 480 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 45,85 %10 NS 1S W+2 -150 8 40.00
11 NS 2C E+2 -170 9 45.00
12 NS 4T W-2 100 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
18 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 45,27 %16 NS 4C W = -620 0 0.00
17 NS 5K E = -400 6 30.00
18 NS 2P W+2 -170 7 35.00 µ Tbl = 21,67 %
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,83 %19 NS 3P W+2 -200 0 0.00
20 NS 3S S-2 -200 11 55.00
21 NS 4C E+1 -450 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 28,33 %
16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 40,48 %22 NS 3T E = -110 5 25.00
23 NS 2S E+2 -180 12 60.00
24 NS 3S S+1 430 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 66,70 %25 NS 2C E = -110 7.8 39.00
26 NS 3S N = 600 17.7 88.50
27 NS 3C E-1 50 2.3 11.50 µ Tbl = 46,33 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 55,93 %28 NS 3P E-1 50 17 85.00
29 NS 3S S-1 -100 5 25.00
30 NS 1S E = -90 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 59,65 %31 NS 2C N-2 -200 2 10.00
32 NS 1S S-2 -100 1 5.00
33 NS 3P S-1 -50 7 35.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
Total : 251,8 / 600 = 41,97 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 55,93 % 1 NS 3S E-1 50 10 50.00
2 NS 4C W-2 100 0 0.00
3 NS 3T N-1 -50 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 59,65 % 4 NS 4C E+2 -680 6 30.00
5 NS 3K S = 110 9 45.00
6 NS 3S W+2 -660 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
23 DELHEZ Jacques -POULAERT Gilbert : 35,33 % 7 NS 2C E+1 -140 5 25.00
8 NS 5P W-1 50 19 95.00
9 NS 4C N = 420 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
22 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,62 %10 NS 1S W+2 -150 8 40.00
11 NS 2C E+1 -140 14 70.00
12 NS 2C N = 110 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 41,30 %13 NS 3S N-2 -200 2 10.00
14 NS 3S W-1 50 14 70.00
15 NS 5KcE-1 100 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
19 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,53 %19 NS 2C N = 110 11 55.00
20 NS 2K W = -90 20 100.00
21 NS 1P N = 80 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,00 %
18 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 45,27 %22 NS 3T E-1 100 10 50.00
23 NS 2C S-3 -300 10 50.00
24 NS 3S S = 400 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,83 %25 NS 2C E+3 -200 0.1 0.50
26 NS 1S N+1 120 10 50.00
27 NS 4C E-2 100 8.9 44.50 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
24 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,50 %28 NS 1S E-1 50 17 85.00
29 NS 3S N-2 -200 0 0.00
30 NS 1C N-1 -50 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 66,70 %31 NS 2C N-1 -100 5 25.00
32 NS 3T N = 110 15 75.00
33 NS 4P S-4 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 276,0 / 600 = 46,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 40,48 % 1 NS 3C W-1 50 10 50.00
2 NS 3P N+2 200 9 45.00
3 NS 3T N = 110 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 66,70 % 4 NS 4C E+2 -680 6 30.00
5 NS 4K N-1 -100 5 25.00
6 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 55,93 % 7 NS 2C E = -110 10 50.00
8 NS 5P W = -450 8 40.00
9 NS 6C N-1 -50 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 59,65 %10 NS 1S W+1 -120 15 75.00
11 NS 3C E+2 -200 6 30.00
12 NS 1S W+1 -120 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
23 DELHEZ Jacques -POULAERT Gilbert : 35,33 %13 NS 3S N+1 630 20 100.00
14 NS 2S W-2 100 17 85.00
15 NS 4PxS-1 -400 7 35.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
24 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,50 %16 NS 5CcW-2 500 20 100.00
17 NS 4K E+1 -150 16 80.00
18 NS 4P E = -420 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 45,85 %22 NS 3C S = 140 15 75.00
23 NS 2P N+1 140 18 90.00
24 NS 3S S = 400 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
19 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,53 %25 NS 3S N-3 -150 4.5 22.50
26 NS 1S N+2 150 14.4 72.00
27 NS 4CcE-2 300 19.9 99.50 µ Tbl = 64,67 %
18 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 45,27 %28 NS 3P E-1 50 17 85.00
29 NS 3S S+1 630 20 100.00
30 NS 1S S+2 150 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 93,33 %
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,83 %31 NS 2C N-1 -100 5 25.00
32 NS 3T N+1 130 19 95.00
33 NS 3CcE-1 100 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
Total : 343,8 / 600 = 57,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 DEGUELLE Jacques -JASSOGNE Jacqueline
18 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 45,27 % 1 NS 3S E-1 50 10 50.00
2 NS 3P N+2 200 9 45.00
3 NS 1S S-1 -50 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
24 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,50 % 4 NS 4P W-1 100 18 90.00
5 NS 3S S = 600 17 85.00
6 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 40,48 % 7 NS 4C E-2 200 20 100.00
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 8 40.00
9 NS 4C N+2 480 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 71,67 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 66,70 %10 NS 2S E+1 -150 8 40.00
11 NS 4C E+1 -450 1 5.00
12 NS 1S W+1 -120 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 55,93 %13 NS 3S N-4 -400 0 0.00
14 NS 2S W = -120 5 25.00
15 NS 4KcE+1 -610 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 11,67 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 59,65 %16 NS 5C W-1 100 9 45.00
17 NS 3K E+2 -150 16 80.00
18 NS 4P W-1 50 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
23 DELHEZ Jacques -POULAERT Gilbert : 35,33 %19 NS 3C N-1 -50 5 25.00
20 NS 3S S-3 -300 4 20.00
21 NS 3S W+1 -430 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 41,30 %25 NS 2C E = -110 7.8 39.00
26 NS 3KcE-3 800 19.9 99.50
27 NS 3P N = 140 15.5 77.50 µ Tbl = 72,00 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 45,85 %28 NS 2P E+1 -140 6 30.00
29 NS 3S N = 600 14 70.00
30 NS 1S E-1 50 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
19 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,53 %31 NS 2C N = 110 13 65.00
32 NS 1S S = 90 11 55.00
33 NS 3K W-2 100 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
Total : 295,2 / 600 = 49,20 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
20 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 45,85 % 1 NS 2K W = -90 4 20.00
2 NS 4CcW-2 300 16 80.00
3 NS 3T N+1 130 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
19 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,53 % 4 NS 3C E+3 -230 13 65.00
5 NS 3S N+1 630 20 100.00
6 NS 3S E+1 -630 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 78,33 %
18 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 45,27 % 7 NS 2P S = 110 18 90.00
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 8 40.00
9 NS 5C N+1 480 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,83 %10 NS 2S E+1 -150 8 40.00
11 NS 2C E+2 -170 9 45.00
12 NS 2T W-1 50 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 40,48 %13 NS 3S N-1 -100 7 35.00
14 NS 2S W-2 100 17 85.00
15 NS 5TcE+1 -650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 66,70 %16 NS 4C W-1 100 9 45.00
17 NS 5K E = -400 6 30.00
18 NS 4P W-1 50 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 55,93 %19 NS 2C N+2 170 20 100.00
20 NS 3S S-2 -200 11 55.00
21 NS 4C E+1 -450 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 59,65 %22 NS 5C S-3 -150 0 0.00
23 NS 3TcN-4 -1100 0 0.00
24 NS 3S S+1 430 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
22 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,62 %28 NS 2P E+2 -170 1 5.00
29 NS 3S S = 600 14 70.00
30 NS 2K E+1 -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 41,30 %31 NS 4C N-3 -300 0 0.00
32 NS 3T N+1 130 19 95.00
33 NS 4K W-3 150 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
Total : 312,0 / 600 = 52,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
22 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,62 % 1 NS 3S E-1 50 10 50.00
2 NS 3P N+2 200 9 45.00
3 NS 1S S = 90 13 65.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 41,30 % 4 NS 3C E+3 -230 13 65.00
5 NS 3K N+1 130 13 65.00
6 NS 3S E+1 -630 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 45,85 % 7 NS 3T W = -110 10 50.00
8 NS 5P W-1 50 19 95.00
9 NS 5KcE-3 800 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,67 %
19 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,53 %10 NS 3S W = -600 1 5.00
11 NS 2P S-1 -50 20 100.00
12 NS 3T W-2 100 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
24 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,50 %13 NS 2S S = 120 16 80.00
14 NS 2P N-2 -100 12 60.00
15 NS 5K E = -400 7 35.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,83 %16 NS 4P S-1 -50 4 20.00
17 NS 5K E = -400 6 30.00
18 NS 4P W = -420 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 18,33 %
16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 40,48 %19 NS 3C N = 140 16 80.00
20 NS 3C S-2 -200 11 55.00
21 NS 4C E-1 50 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 66,70 %22 NS 4K E = -130 2 10.00
23 NS 3S E = -600 8 40.00
24 NS 3S S = 400 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 55,93 %25 NS 2C E-1 100 13.3 66.50
26 NS 1S N+2 150 14.4 72.00
27 NS 4C E-3 150 17.7 88.50 µ Tbl = 75,67 %
23 DELHEZ Jacques -POULAERT Gilbert : 35,33 %31 NS 2C N = 110 13 65.00
32 NS 1S S = 90 11 55.00
33 NS 3P S-1 -50 7 35.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
Total : 336,4 / 600 = 56,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
24 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,50 % 1 NS 2C W+1 -140 0 0.00
2 NS 3P N+2 200 9 45.00
3 NS 1C E+2 -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,00 %
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,83 % 4 NS 2P W+1 -140 16 80.00
5 NS 3K N = 110 9 45.00
6 NS 3S W+2 -660 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 41,30 % 7 NS 2C E-1 100 15 75.00
8 NS 4P W = -420 16 80.00
9 NS 5C N = 450 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 55,93 %10 NS 1S W+2 -150 8 40.00
11 NS 2P S-2 -100 18 90.00
12 NS 3T W-2 100 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
18 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 45,27 %13 NS 3S N-1 -100 7 35.00
14 NS 2S W = -120 5 25.00
15 NS 4C S-1 -100 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
22 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,62 %16 NS 5KcS-1 -100 2 10.00
17 NS 4K E+1 -150 16 80.00
18 NS . 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 66,70 %19 NS 3C N-1 -50 5 25.00
20 NS 3C S-3 -300 4 20.00
21 NS 4C E+1 -450 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
19 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,53 %22 NS 3C S-1 -50 8 40.00
23 NS 3S S = 600 20 100.00
24 NS 3S S = 400 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 40,48 %28 NS 2P E = -110 12 60.00
29 NS 3S S = 600 14 70.00
30 NS 1S S+2 150 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 45,85 %31 NS 3S E-3 150 18 90.00
32 NS 1S S-2 -100 1 5.00
33 NS 3P S-2 -100 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
Total : 287,0 / 600 = 47,83 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
1 PADOU Bernard -DEFLINES Etienne : 60,52 % 1 EO 4C W-2 100 2 10.00
2 EO 3P N+2 200 11 55.00
3 EO 1S S = 90 7 35.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
7 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,00 % 4 EO 4C E+2 -680 14 70.00
5 EO 3K S = 110 11 55.00
6 EO 3S W+2 -660 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 48,73 % 7 EO 3T W = -110 10 50.00
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 12 60.00
9 EO 5C N = 450 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,30 %10 EO 1S W+1 -120 5 25.00
11 EO 3C E+2 -200 14 70.00
12 EO 1S W+1 -120 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
3 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,32 %13 EO 3S N-1 -100 13 65.00
14 EO 2S W+1 -150 20 100.00
15 EO 4CcS-2 -500 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 81,67 %
9 DEGUELLE Jacques -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 49,20 %16 EO 5C W-1 100 11 55.00
17 EO 3K E+2 -150 4 20.00
18 EO 4P W-1 50 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
4 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 59,55 %19 EO 3C N = 140 4 20.00
20 EO 3S S-2 -200 9 45.00
21 EO 3S W+2 -460 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,00 %22 EO 5C S-3 -150 20 100.00
23 EO 3TcN-4 -1100 20 100.00
24 EO 3S S+1 430 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
5 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 41,52 %25 EO 1S N+1 120 2.3 11.50
26 EO 1S N = 90 15.5 77.50
27 EO 4CcE-1 100 11.1 55.50 µ Tbl = 48,17 %
6 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 41,97 %31 EO 2C N-2 -200 18 90.00
32 EO 1S S-2 -100 19 95.00
33 EO 3P S-1 -50 13 65.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
Total : 357,9 / 600 = 59,65 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
7 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,00 % 1 EO 3S E-1 50 10 50.00
2 EO 4C W-2 100 20 100.00
3 EO 3T N-1 -50 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 48,73 % 4 EO 6C E = -1430 20 100.00
5 EO 4K N-1 -100 15 75.00
6 EO 3S E+2 -660 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 85,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,30 % 7 EO 2C E = -110 10 50.00
8 EO 5P W = -450 12 60.00
9 EO 6C N-1 -50 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
12 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 47,83 %10 EO 1S W+2 -150 12 60.00
11 EO 2P S-2 -100 2 10.00
12 EO 3T W-2 100 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
9 DEGUELLE Jacques -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 49,20 %13 EO 3S N-4 -400 20 100.00
14 EO 2S W = -120 15 75.00
15 EO 4KcE+1 -610 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 88,33 %
4 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 59,55 %16 EO 5C W-2 200 4 20.00
17 EO 5K W = -400 14 70.00
18 EO 2P W+2 -170 13 65.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,00 %19 EO 2C N+2 170 0 0.00
20 EO 3S S-2 -200 9 45.00
21 EO 4C E+1 -450 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
5 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 41,52 %22 EO 3C S = 140 5 25.00
23 EO 3S E+1 -630 15 75.00
24 EO 3S S+2 460 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 56,07 %25 EO 2C E-1 100 6.7 33.50
26 EO 1S N+2 150 5.6 28.00
27 EO 4C E-3 150 2.3 11.50 µ Tbl = 24,33 %
6 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 41,97 %28 EO 3P E-1 50 3 15.00
29 EO 3S S-1 -100 15 75.00
30 EO 1S E = -90 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
Total : 335,6 / 600 = 55,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,30 % 4 EO 4C E+2 -680 14 70.00
5 EO 4K N-1 -100 15 75.00
6 EO 3S E+2 -660 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
3 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,32 % 7 EO 2C W+2 -170 18 90.00
8 EO 5CcN-3 -500 20 100.00
9 EO 4C S+1 450 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
9 DEGUELLE Jacques -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 49,20 %10 EO 2S E+1 -150 12 60.00
11 EO 4C E+1 -450 19 95.00
12 EO 1S W+1 -120 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
4 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 59,55 %13 EO 2S N = 120 4 20.00
14 EO 2S W = -120 15 75.00
15 EO 4K E+1 -150 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,00 %16 EO 4C W-1 100 11 55.00
17 EO 5K E = -400 14 70.00
18 EO 4P W-1 50 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
12 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 47,83 %19 EO 3C N-1 -50 15 75.00
20 EO 3C S-3 -300 16 80.00
21 EO 4C E+1 -450 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 56,07 %22 EO 4K E = -130 18 90.00
23 EO 3S E = -600 12 60.00
24 EO 3S S = 400 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
6 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 41,97 %25 EO 2C E = -110 12.2 61.00
26 EO 3S N = 600 2.3 11.50
27 EO 3C E-1 50 17.7 88.50 µ Tbl = 53,67 %
1 PADOU Bernard -DEFLINES Etienne : 60,52 %28 EO 2P W+1 -140 14 70.00
29 EO 3S N-1 -100 15 75.00
30 EO 3K W-2 100 7 35.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
7 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,00 %31 EO 2C N-1 -100 15 75.00
32 EO 3T N = 110 5 25.00
33 EO 4P S-4 -200 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 400,2 / 600 = 66,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,30 % 1 EO 3C W-1 50 10 50.00
2 EO 3P N+2 200 11 55.00
3 EO 3T N = 110 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
9 DEGUELLE Jacques -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 49,20 % 7 EO 4C E-2 200 0 0.00
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 12 60.00
9 EO 4C N+2 480 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 28,33 %
4 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 59,55 %10 EO 2S E = -120 5 25.00
11 EO 2C E+1 -140 6 30.00
12 EO 4T W-2 100 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,00 %13 EO 3S N-1 -100 13 65.00
14 EO 2S W-2 100 3 15.00
15 EO 5TcE+1 -650 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
5 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 41,52 %16 EO 5C W-2 200 4 20.00
17 EO 5K E = -400 14 70.00
18 EO 2P W+2 -170 13 65.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 56,07 %19 EO 3C N = 140 4 20.00
20 EO 3C S-2 -200 9 45.00
21 EO 4C E-1 50 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
6 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 41,97 %22 EO 3T E = -110 15 75.00
23 EO 2S E+2 -180 8 40.00
24 EO 3S S+1 430 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
1 PADOU Bernard -DEFLINES Etienne : 60,52 %25 EO 4C E-2 200 0.1 0.50
26 EO 2S N-1 -100 17.7 88.50
27 EO 4C E-2 100 11.1 55.50 µ Tbl = 48,17 %
12 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 47,83 %28 EO 2P E = -110 8 40.00
29 EO 3S S = 600 6 30.00
30 EO 1S S+2 150 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 48,73 %31 EO 2C N = 110 7 35.00
32 EO 1S S-1 -50 14 70.00
33 EO 5CcE-1 100 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
Total : 242,9 / 600 = 40,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
3 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,32 % 1 EO 3C W-1 50 10 50.00
2 EO 3P N+1 170 18 90.00
3 EO 3T N-1 -50 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
12 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 47,83 % 4 EO 2P W+1 -140 4 20.00
5 EO 3K N = 110 11 55.00
6 EO 3S W+2 -660 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,00 %10 EO 2S E+1 -150 12 60.00
11 EO 2C E+2 -170 11 55.00
12 EO 2T W-1 50 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
5 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 41,52 %13 EO 2S N = 120 4 20.00
14 EO 3K W = -110 10 50.00
15 EO 4P S-1 -100 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 56,07 %16 EO 4P S-1 -50 16 80.00
17 EO 5K E = -400 14 70.00
18 EO 4P W = -420 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 81,67 %
6 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 41,97 %19 EO 3P W+2 -200 20 100.00
20 EO 3S S-2 -200 9 45.00
21 EO 4C E+1 -450 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 71,67 %
1 PADOU Bernard -DEFLINES Etienne : 60,52 %22 EO 4K E-2 200 1 5.00
23 EO 2P N-1 -100 4 20.00
24 EO 3S S = 400 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
7 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,00 %25 EO 2C E+3 -200 19.9 99.50
26 EO 1S N+1 120 10 50.00
27 EO 4C E-2 100 11.1 55.50 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 48,73 %28 EO 3P E = -140 14 70.00
29 EO 3S S-1 -100 15 75.00
30 EO 1S E-1 50 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,30 %31 EO 2C N-1 -100 15 75.00
32 EO 3T N+1 130 1 5.00
33 EO 3CcE-1 100 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
Total : 347,0 / 600 = 57,83 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne
9 DEGUELLE Jacques -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 49,20 % 1 EO 3S E-1 50 10 50.00
2 EO 3P N+2 200 11 55.00
3 EO 1S S-1 -50 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
4 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 59,55 % 4 EO 5C E+1 -680 14 70.00
5 EO 4K N = 130 7 35.00
6 EO 2T W+2 -130 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,00 % 7 EO 2P S = 110 2 10.00
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 12 60.00
9 EO 5C N+1 480 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
12 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 47,83 %13 EO 3S N-1 -100 13 65.00
14 EO 2S W = -120 15 75.00
15 EO 4C S-1 -100 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
6 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 41,97 %16 EO 4C W = -620 20 100.00
17 EO 5K E = -400 14 70.00
18 EO 2P W+2 -170 13 65.00 µ Tbl = 78,33 %
1 PADOU Bernard -DEFLINES Etienne : 60,52 %19 EO 3T E-1 100 12 60.00
20 EO 3S N-3 -300 16 80.00
21 EO 2P N-2 -200 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
7 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,00 %22 EO 3T E-1 100 10 50.00
23 EO 2C S-3 -300 10 50.00
24 EO 3S S = 400 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 48,73 %25 EO 2C E-1 100 6.7 33.50
26 EO 1S N+1 120 10 50.00
27 EO 2C E = -110 19.9 99.50 µ Tbl = 61,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,30 %28 EO 3P E-1 50 3 15.00
29 EO 3S S+1 630 0 0.00
30 EO 1S S+2 150 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 6,67 %
3 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,32 %31 EO 2CcN = 670 0 0.00
32 EO 2T N+1 110 5 25.00
33 EO 3P S = 140 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 13,33 %
Total : 271,6 / 600 = 45,27 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
4 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 59,55 % 1 EO 3S E-2 100 2 10.00
2 EO 4P N+1 650 1 5.00
3 EO 1S N = 90 7 35.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,00 % 4 EO 3C E+3 -230 7 35.00
5 EO 3S N+1 630 0 0.00
6 EO 3S E+1 -630 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 21,67 %
5 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 41,52 % 7 EO 2P S-2 -200 20 100.00
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 12 60.00
9 EO 6C N-2 -100 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 86,67 %
11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 56,07 %10 EO 3S W = -600 19 95.00
11 EO 2P S-1 -50 0 0.00
12 EO 3T W-2 100 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
1 PADOU Bernard -DEFLINES Etienne : 60,52 %16 EO 5C W-1 100 11 55.00
17 EO 4P W = -420 20 100.00
18 EO 4P W-1 50 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
7 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,00 %19 EO 2C N = 110 9 45.00
20 EO 2K W = -90 0 0.00
21 EO 1P N = 80 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,00 %
12 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 47,83 %22 EO 3C S-1 -50 12 60.00
23 EO 3S S = 600 0 0.00
24 EO 3S S = 400 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,30 %25 EO 3S N-3 -150 15.5 77.50
26 EO 1S N+2 150 5.6 28.00
27 EO 4CcE-2 300 0.1 0.50 µ Tbl = 35,33 %
3 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,32 %28 EO 2P E+2 -170 19 95.00
29 EO 3S S-1 -100 15 75.00
30 EO 1S S+1 120 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
9 DEGUELLE Jacques -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 49,20 %31 EO 2C N = 110 7 35.00
32 EO 1S S = 90 9 45.00
33 EO 3K W-2 100 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
Total : 255,2 / 600 = 42,53 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,00 % 1 EO 2K W = -90 16 80.00
2 EO 4CcW-2 300 4 20.00
3 EO 3T N+1 130 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
5 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 41,52 % 4 EO 4C E+2 -680 14 70.00
5 EO 4S N-3 -300 20 100.00
6 EO 3S W+1 -630 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 56,07 % 7 EO 3T W = -110 10 50.00
8 EO 5P W-1 50 1 5.00
9 EO 5KcE-3 800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,33 %
6 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 41,97 %10 EO 1S W+2 -150 12 60.00
11 EO 2C E+2 -170 11 55.00
12 EO 4T W-2 100 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
1 PADOU Bernard -DEFLINES Etienne : 60,52 %13 EO 2C N = 110 8 40.00
14 EO 3CcE-3 500 0 0.00
15 EO 4C S-1 -100 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 48,73 %19 EO 3C N-2 -100 18 90.00
20 EO 2S N-1 -100 3 15.00
21 EO 4C E = -420 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,30 %22 EO 3C S = 140 5 25.00
23 EO 2P N+1 140 2 10.00
24 EO 3S S = 400 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
3 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,32 %25 EO 2C E+2 -170 17.7 88.50
26 EO 1P N+1 110 13.3 66.50
27 EO 4C E-2 100 11.1 55.50 µ Tbl = 70,17 %
9 DEGUELLE Jacques -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 49,20 %28 EO 2P E+1 -140 14 70.00
29 EO 3S N = 600 6 30.00
30 EO 1S E-1 50 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
12 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 47,83 %31 EO 3S E-3 150 2 10.00
32 EO 1S S-2 -100 19 95.00
33 EO 3P S-2 -100 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
Total : 275,1 / 600 = 45,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard
5 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 41,52 % 1 EO 2C W = -110 18 90.00
2 EO 3P N+2 200 11 55.00
3 EO 1S S-2 -100 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 78,33 %
11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 56,07 % 4 EO 3C E+3 -230 7 35.00
5 EO 3K N+1 130 7 35.00
6 EO 3S E+1 -630 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 47,83 % 7 EO 2C E-1 100 5 25.00
8 EO 4P W = -420 4 20.00
9 EO 5C N = 450 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
1 PADOU Bernard -DEFLINES Etienne : 60,52 %10 EO 2K W+1 -110 2 10.00
11 EO 4C E+1 -450 19 95.00
12 EO 3P S+1 170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
7 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,00 %13 EO 3S N-2 -200 18 90.00
14 EO 3S W-1 50 6 30.00
15 EO 5KcE-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 48,73 %16 EO 5C W-2 200 4 20.00
17 EO 3P W+1 -170 8 40.00
18 EO 4P W-1 50 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
3 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,32 %22 EO 1T W+2 -110 15 75.00
23 EO 2CcS-3 -800 18 90.00
24 EO 3S S+1 430 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
9 DEGUELLE Jacques -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 49,20 %25 EO 2C E = -110 12.2 61.00
26 EO 3KcE-3 800 0.1 0.50
27 EO 3P N = 140 4.5 22.50 µ Tbl = 28,00 %
4 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 59,55 %28 EO 2S W = -120 10 50.00
29 EO 3S N = 600 6 30.00
30 EO 1S W-2 100 7 35.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,00 %31 EO 4C N-3 -300 20 100.00
32 EO 3T N+1 130 1 5.00
33 EO 4K W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
Total : 247,8 / 600 = 41,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 56,07 % 1 EO 3S E-1 50 10 50.00
2 EO 3P N+2 200 11 55.00
3 EO 1S S = 90 7 35.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
6 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 41,97 % 4 EO 4C E+2 -680 14 70.00
5 EO 5K N-2 -200 18 90.00
6 EO 3S W+1 -630 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
1 PADOU Bernard -DEFLINES Etienne : 60,52 % 7 EO 4C E-1 100 5 25.00
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 12 60.00
9 EO 5C N+1 480 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
7 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,00 %10 EO 1S W+2 -150 12 60.00
11 EO 2C E+1 -140 6 30.00
12 EO 2C N = 110 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 48,73 %13 EO 3S N-1 -100 13 65.00
14 EO 2S W = -120 15 75.00
15 EO 4K E-1 50 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 47,83 %16 EO 5KcS-1 -100 18 90.00
17 EO 4K E+1 -150 4 20.00
18 EO . 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,32 %19 EO 3C N = 140 4 20.00
20 EO 2S N-1 -100 3 15.00
21 EO 4C E+1 -450 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
4 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 59,55 %25 EO 2C E-1 100 6.7 33.50
26 EO 3S N-2 -200 19.9 99.50
27 EO 4C E-2 100 11.1 55.50 µ Tbl = 62,83 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,00 %28 EO 2P E+2 -170 19 95.00
29 EO 3S S = 600 6 30.00
30 EO 2K E+1 -110 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
5 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 41,52 %31 EO Pass Passe 12 60.00
32 EO 1S S-1 -50 14 70.00
33 EO 3K W = -110 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
Total : 315,7 / 600 = 52,62 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 DELHEZ Jacques -POULAERT Gilbert
6 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 41,97 % 1 EO 4C W-2 100 2 10.00
2 EO 4P N+1 650 1 5.00
3 EO 2T N = 90 7 35.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
1 PADOU Bernard -DEFLINES Etienne : 60,52 % 4 EO 4PcW-2 500 0 0.00
5 EO 3S N = 600 3 15.00
6 EO 3S W+1 -630 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 15,00 %
7 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,00 % 7 EO 2C E+1 -140 15 75.00
8 EO 5P W-1 50 1 5.00
9 EO 4C N = 420 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 48,73 %10 EO 3S E-1 100 0 0.00
11 EO 2C E+1 -140 6 30.00
12 EO 3T W-2 100 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,30 %13 EO 3S N+1 630 0 0.00
14 EO 2S W-2 100 3 15.00
15 EO 4PxS-1 -400 13 65.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
3 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,32 %16 EO 4C W-1 100 11 55.00
17 EO 3C N-1 -50 0 0.00
18 EO 2P W+2 -170 13 65.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
9 DEGUELLE Jacques -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 49,20 %19 EO 3C N-1 -50 15 75.00
20 EO 3S S-3 -300 16 80.00
21 EO 3S W+1 -430 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
4 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 59,55 %22 EO 2C S = 110 8 40.00
23 EO 1S E+2 -150 6 30.00
24 EO 3S N+2 460 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
5 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 41,52 %28 EO 2S E-1 50 3 15.00
29 EO 3S S = 600 6 30.00
30 EO 2T N-1 -50 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 56,07 %31 EO 2C N = 110 7 35.00
32 EO 1S S = 90 9 45.00
33 EO 3P S-1 -50 13 65.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
Total : 212,0 / 600 = 35,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
12 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 47,83 % 1 EO 2C W+1 -140 20 100.00
2 EO 3P N+2 200 11 55.00
3 EO 1C E+2 -140 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,00 %
9 DEGUELLE Jacques -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 49,20 % 4 EO 4P W-1 100 2 10.00
5 EO 3S S = 600 3 15.00
6 EO 3S E+2 -660 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
6 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 41,97 % 7 EO 3C W = -140 15 75.00
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 12 60.00
9 EO 5C N+1 480 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
3 ARICKX Roger -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,32 %10 EO 3S E = -600 19 95.00
11 EO 4C E = -420 16 80.00
12 EO 1S W = -90 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 85,00 %
11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 56,07 %13 EO 2S S = 120 4 20.00
14 EO 2P N-2 -100 8 40.00
15 EO 5K E = -400 13 65.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,30 %16 EO 5CcW-2 500 0 0.00
17 EO 4K E+1 -150 4 20.00
18 EO 4P E = -420 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
5 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 41,52 %19 EO 2C N = 110 9 45.00
20 EO 5TcS-4 -1100 20 100.00
21 EO 4C E+1 -450 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 71,67 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 48,73 %22 EO 5T E-2 200 1 5.00
23 EO 3S E+1 -630 15 75.00
24 EO 3S S = 400 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
7 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,00 %28 EO 1S E-1 50 3 15.00
29 EO 3S N-2 -200 20 100.00
30 EO 1C N-1 -50 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
4 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 59,55 %31 EO 2C N = 110 7 35.00
32 EO 1S S-1 -50 14 70.00
33 EO 2P S+1 140 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
Total : 339,0 / 600 = 56,50 %
|
|