|
Tournoi du 04-11-13
1 58,74 2 STEED Mercédès -GROSFILS Colette
2 53,87 7 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand
3 51,80 8 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
4 51,76 10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle
5 51,69 6 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
6 50,19 3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
7 49,52 4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
8 49,13 1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
9 45,37 5 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
10 37,91 9 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine
11 0,00 11 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 67,61 18 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
2 59,36 15 PIRET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
3 57,00 19 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
4 55,14 17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
5 51,73 22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard
6 49,51 13 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
7 46,38 20 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René
8 45,70 14 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
9 41,65 21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
10 38,69 12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
11 38,54 16 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph
PAIRE Nr : 1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 38,69 % 1 NS 4C E+1 -450 9 50.00
2 NS 3S N+3 690 17.9 99.44
3 NS 4C S-2 -100 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,73 % 4 NS 3K W-1 100 7.9 43.89
5 NS 3S N = 600 4.6 25.56
6 NS 4C S+1 450 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 41,65 % 7 NS 1S E-2 200 17.9 99.44
8 NS 2S S+2 180 12.3 68.33
9 NS 3S N-1 -50 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
20 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 46,38 %10 NS 2K N = 90 4.6 25.56
11 NS 3C W-3 150 9 50.00
12 NS 3K W-1 50 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 35,74 %
19 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,00 %13 NS 1S E = -90 7.9 43.89
14 NS 2P E+2 -170 1.2 6.67
15 NS 3C N = 140 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
18 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 67,61 %16 NS 4P E = -620 1.2 6.67
17 NS 3S E-1 50 4.6 25.56
18 NS 4P W+2 -480 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,14 %19 NS 2C N = 110 17.9 99.44
20 NS 3S E+2 -660 2.3 12.78
21 NS 1S E-1 50 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
16 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 38,54 %22 NS 3S W-1 100 16.8 93.33
23 NS 2P W+1 -140 2.3 12.78
24 NS 4P E-3 150 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
15 PIRET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 59,36 %25 NS 4C N-1 -50 0.1 0.56
26 NS 3S W+1 -630 6.8 37.78
27 NS 1S N = 90 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 45,70 %28 NS 3C W-2 100 18 100.00
29 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 22.22
30 NS 3PcE-3 500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
Total : 265,3 / 540 = 49,13 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 STEED Mercédès -GROSFILS Colette
13 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 49,51 % 4 NS 3S S = 600 17.9 99.44
5 NS 3S N = 600 4.6 25.56
6 NS 4P S = 420 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 52,22 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 38,69 % 7 NS 1S E-1 100 15.7 87.22
8 NS 2S N+2 180 12.3 68.33
9 NS 3S N = 400 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,73 %10 NS 2P E-2 200 16.8 93.33
11 NS 2S N+1 150 9 50.00
12 NS 2C N+2 170 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 72,59 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 41,65 %13 NS 2K E-1 100 15.7 87.22
14 NS 1S N+1 120 15.7 87.22
15 NS 3C N-1 -100 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
20 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 46,38 %16 NS 3S E = -600 4.6 25.56
17 NS 3S E-3 150 16.8 93.33
18 NS 4P W+1 -450 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
19 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,00 %19 NS 3K W = -110 9 50.00
20 NS 2S E+2 -180 15.7 87.22
21 NS 1S E+3 -180 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
18 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 67,61 %22 NS 3S E+1 -630 1.2 6.67
23 NS 4P W-2 200 14.6 81.11
24 NS 3S W = -400 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,14 %25 NS 3S N+1 430 6.8 37.78
26 NS 3S W+2 -660 1.2 6.67
27 NS 2S N = 120 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
16 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 38,54 %28 NS 1P N = 80 16 88.89
29 NS 3S E = -600 13 72.22
30 NS 2T W-3 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
15 PIRET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 59,36 %31 NS 2S E+2 -180 15.7 87.22
32 NS 4T W+1 -150 5.7 31.67
33 NS 4C N = 420 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
Total : 317,2 / 540 = 58,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
16 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 38,54 % 1 NS 4C E+1 -450 9 50.00
2 NS 4C S = 620 6.8 37.78
3 NS 4C S-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 45,70 % 7 NS 1S E+2 -150 2.3 12.78
8 NS 3S S-1 -50 4.6 25.56
9 NS 3S N = 400 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
13 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 49,51 %10 NS 2C E-1 100 10.1 56.11
11 NS 3CcW-4 800 17.9 99.44
12 NS 2C N = 110 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 38,69 %13 NS 2C W-1 100 15.7 87.22
14 NS 2TcN = 180 17.9 99.44
15 NS Pass Passe 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 80,93 %
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,73 %16 NS 4P E = -620 1.2 6.67
17 NS 3S E-3 150 16.8 93.33
18 NS 4P W+1 -450 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 41,65 %19 NS 2K W+1 -110 9 50.00
20 NS 2S E+3 -210 13.4 74.44
21 NS 2C S+1 140 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 74,63 %
20 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 46,38 %22 NS 3S W-1 100 16.8 93.33
23 NS 2K S-1 -100 4.6 25.56
24 NS 3S W+1 -430 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
19 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,00 %25 NS 3S E-6 600 15.7 87.22
26 NS 3S W+1 -630 6.8 37.78
27 NS 2C N-2 -100 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
18 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 67,61 %28 NS 1S E+1 -120 5 27.78
29 NS 4C E+1 -650 0 0.00
30 NS 1ScS-1 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,14 %31 NS 3S W+2 -460 1.2 6.67
32 NS 4CcN-1 -100 11.2 62.22
33 NS 4C S = 420 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 43,70 %
Total : 271,0 / 540 = 50,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
18 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 67,61 % 1 NS 4C W+1 -450 9 50.00
2 NS 4C S+1 650 13.4 74.44
3 NS 5P W-1 100 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 66,30 %
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,14 % 4 NS 3K W-1 100 7.9 43.89
5 NS 3S N+1 630 13.4 74.44
6 NS 4P S = 420 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
15 PIRET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 59,36 %10 NS 1S S = 90 4.6 25.56
11 NS 3S N+1 430 13.4 74.44
12 NS 2S S+3 210 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 45,70 %13 NS 2T S = 90 11.2 62.22
14 NS 1S N-1 -50 7.9 43.89
15 NS 4C N-1 -100 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
13 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 49,51 %16 NS 4P E-1 100 11.2 62.22
17 NS 3S E-2 100 11.2 62.22
18 NS 4P E+1 -450 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 60,19 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 38,69 %19 NS 2C N-1 -50 14.6 81.11
20 NS 3S E+2 -660 2.3 12.78
21 NS 1S E+1 -120 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,73 %22 NS 3S W+1 -630 1.2 6.67
23 NS 4P W-1 100 7.9 43.89
24 NS 3S W-1 50 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 41,65 %25 NS 3TcE-3 800 17.9 99.44
26 NS 4C W-2 200 17.9 99.44
27 NS 1S N = 90 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 76,85 %
20 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 46,38 %28 NS 1S E+1 -120 5 27.78
29 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 22.22
30 NS 2S S-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
19 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,00 %31 NS 3S E+2 -460 1.2 6.67
32 NS 5PcN-3 -500 0.1 0.56
33 NS 4C S = 420 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 23,15 %
Total : 267,4 / 540 = 49,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
20 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 46,38 % 1 NS 4C E+1 -450 9 50.00
2 NS 6C S-1 -100 2.3 12.78
3 NS 2S W-1 100 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 45,74 %
19 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,00 % 4 NS 4P N-3 -300 0.1 0.56
5 NS 3S N+2 660 16.8 93.33
6 NS 4P S+1 450 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
18 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 67,61 % 7 NS 1S S-3 -300 0.1 0.56
8 NS 3S S-1 -50 4.6 25.56
9 NS 3S N+2 460 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 39,81 %
16 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 38,54 %13 NS 2T S-2 -200 1.2 6.67
14 NS 2C N-1 -50 7.9 43.89
15 NS 4C N-2 -200 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 17,04 %
15 PIRET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 59,36 %16 NS 4P E-1 100 11.2 62.22
17 NS 3S E-1 50 4.6 25.56
18 NS 4P W+2 -480 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 45,70 %19 NS 2C N-1 -50 14.6 81.11
20 NS 3S E+1 -630 9 50.00
21 NS 3K W-1 50 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
13 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 49,51 %22 NS 3S W = -600 6.8 37.78
23 NS 4P W-2 200 14.6 81.11
24 NS 3S W+1 -430 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 38,69 %25 NS 3S N+2 460 12.3 68.33
26 NS 3S W+2 -660 1.2 6.67
27 NS 1S N+1 120 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 45,74 %
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,73 %28 NS 2S W-1 50 12 66.67
29 NS 4C W = -620 9 50.00
30 NS 2S S-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 41,65 %31 NS 4P E = -420 11.2 62.22
32 NS 4C S-3 -150 5.7 31.67
33 NS 4C N = 420 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
Total : 245,0 / 540 = 45,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,73 % 1 NS 4C E+1 -450 9 50.00
2 NS 4C S+1 650 13.4 74.44
3 NS 5CcS-3 -500 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 47,78 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 41,65 % 4 NS 3P N-2 -200 3.4 18.89
5 NS 4C S = 620 11.2 62.22
6 NS 4P S-1 -50 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 29,26 %
20 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 46,38 % 7 NS 1S E = -90 12.3 68.33
8 NS 3S N+2 460 16.8 93.33
9 NS 3S N = 400 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 72,59 %
19 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,00 %10 NS 3T E = -110 0.1 0.56
11 NS 1ScN+3 480 15.7 87.22
12 NS 2P E = -110 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,14 %16 NS 2P E = -110 6.8 37.78
17 NS 3S E = -400 0.1 0.56
18 NS 4P W+1 -450 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
16 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 38,54 %19 NS 2P E = -110 9 50.00
20 NS 4K W+1 -150 17.9 99.44
21 NS 1C S+1 110 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 78,89 %
15 PIRET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 59,36 %22 NS 3S W = -600 6.8 37.78
23 NS 4P W-1 100 7.9 43.89
24 NS 2S W+1 -150 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 45,70 %25 NS 3S N+1 430 6.8 37.78
26 NS 3K E+2 -150 15.7 87.22
27 NS 1S N+2 150 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 70,74 %
13 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 49,51 %28 NS 1S E+1 -120 5 27.78
29 NS 3S E-1 100 17 94.44
30 NS 2S S-2 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 38,69 %31 NS 3S W+1 -430 6.8 37.78
32 NS 3P N+1 170 17.9 99.44
33 NS 4C N = 420 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
Total : 279,1 / 540 = 51,69 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand
13 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 49,51 % 1 NS 4C E+1 -450 9 50.00
2 NS 6C S-1 -100 2.3 12.78
3 NS 6TcW-1 200 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 38,69 % 4 NS 2S S+1 150 13.4 74.44
5 NS 3S N = 600 4.6 25.56
6 NS 4P S+1 450 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,73 % 7 NS 2C S-1 -100 7.9 43.89
8 NS 3S S+2 460 16.8 93.33
9 NS 3S N-1 -50 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 41,65 %10 NS 2S E-1 100 10.1 56.11
11 NS 3K S+1 130 3.4 18.89
12 NS 3PcE-3 500 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
20 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 46,38 %13 NS 1S E-1 100 15.7 87.22
14 NS 3P E-1 50 11.2 62.22
15 NS 2C N+1 140 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 78,89 %
18 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 67,61 %19 NS 2T S-4 -200 0.1 0.56
20 NS 3S E+1 -630 9 50.00
21 NS 3T N-1 -100 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,14 %22 NS 4KcS-3 -500 11.2 62.22
23 NS 3C E-2 200 14.6 81.11
24 NS 3S W+1 -430 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
16 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 38,54 %25 NS 3S N+2 460 12.3 68.33
26 NS 5K E = -600 11.2 62.22
27 NS 1S S+4 210 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
15 PIRET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 59,36 %28 NS 3K E-1 50 12 66.67
29 NS 3S E = -600 13 72.22
30 NS 2S S-2 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 45,70 %31 NS 3S W+1 -430 6.8 37.78
32 NS 4C N-3 -150 5.7 31.67
33 NS 3S N = 400 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 27,41 %
Total : 290,9 / 540 = 53,87 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
15 PIRET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 59,36 % 1 NS 4C E+1 -450 9 50.00
2 NS 6C S-1 -100 2.3 12.78
3 NS 5TcW = -750 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 21,11 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 45,70 % 4 NS 2S S+2 180 15.7 87.22
5 NS 3S N = 600 4.6 25.56
6 NS 4P N+1 450 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
13 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 49,51 % 7 NS 1S E = -90 12.3 68.33
8 NS 3S S-1 -50 4.6 25.56
9 NS 3S N+2 460 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 38,69 %10 NS 2C E-2 200 16.8 93.33
11 NS 3K S+2 150 9 50.00
12 NS 3K W-1 50 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,73 %13 NS 3T N-1 -100 4.6 25.56
14 NS 3P E = -140 4.6 25.56
15 NS Pass Passe 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 35,74 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 41,65 %16 NS 4P E-1 100 11.2 62.22
17 NS 3S E-1 50 4.6 25.56
18 NS 4P W+1 -450 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
19 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,00 %22 NS 2P W+1 -140 13.4 74.44
23 NS 2TcN-3 -800 0.1 0.56
24 NS 3S W-2 100 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
18 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 67,61 %25 NS 3S N+1 430 6.8 37.78
26 NS 3S W+1 -630 6.8 37.78
27 NS 1S N+1 120 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,14 %28 NS 2S E+2 -180 0 0.00
29 NS 6S E-1 100 17 94.44
30 NS 2C S = 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
16 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 38,54 %31 NS 3S E = -400 13.4 74.44
32 NS 2C S-1 -50 14.6 81.11
33 NS 4C N = 420 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 72,59 %
Total : 279,7 / 540 = 51,80 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,14 % 1 NS 4C E+1 -450 9 50.00
2 NS 3S N+1 630 9 50.00
3 NS 5CcS-3 -500 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
16 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 38,54 % 4 NS 3T S+1 130 11.2 62.22
5 NS 3S N+2 660 16.8 93.33
6 NS 4P S+1 450 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
15 PIRET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 59,36 % 7 NS 2P N-1 -100 7.9 43.89
8 NS 3S S-1 -50 4.6 25.56
9 NS 3S S-2 -100 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 45,70 %10 NS 1S N+1 120 13.4 74.44
11 NS 4KcS-2 -300 0.1 0.56
12 NS 2K W = -90 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 29,26 %
13 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 49,51 %13 NS 3T S-2 -200 1.2 6.67
14 NS 2P W+2 -170 1.2 6.67
15 NS 2C N+1 140 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 38,69 %16 NS 4P W-2 200 16.8 93.33
17 NS 3S W-2 100 11.2 62.22
18 NS 4P W+1 -450 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,73 %19 NS 1S W+1 -120 3.4 18.89
20 NS 3S W+1 -630 9 50.00
21 NS 2S E = -120 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 29,26 %
20 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 46,38 %25 NS 3S S = 400 2.3 12.78
26 NS 1S W+3 -180 13.4 74.44
27 NS 2C N-2 -100 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 31,30 %
19 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,00 %28 NS 1S E+1 -120 5 27.78
29 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 22.22
30 NS 3S S-2 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
18 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 67,61 %31 NS 3S E+1 -430 6.8 37.78
32 NS 4T W+1 -150 5.7 31.67
33 NS 3S N-1 -50 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
Total : 204,7 / 540 = 37,91 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle
19 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,00 % 1 NS 5C E = -450 9 50.00
2 NS 4C S+1 650 13.4 74.44
3 NS 5P W-1 100 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 66,30 %
18 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 67,61 % 4 NS 2P N-2 -200 3.4 18.89
5 NS 3S N = 600 4.6 25.56
6 NS 4P S-1 -50 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 17,04 %
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,14 % 7 NS 1S E+1 -120 4.6 25.56
8 NS 3S S-1 -50 4.6 25.56
9 NS 3S N = 400 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 35,74 %
16 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 38,54 %10 NS 1S S = 90 4.6 25.56
11 NS 2K S+2 130 3.4 18.89
12 NS 2C N = 110 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
15 PIRET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 59,36 %13 NS 1S E = -90 7.9 43.89
14 NS 1T N+1 90 13.4 74.44
15 NS 3C N-1 -100 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 45,70 %16 NS 3S E-2 200 16.8 93.33
17 NS 3S E-2 100 11.2 62.22
18 NS 6P W-1 50 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 85,00 %
13 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 49,51 %19 NS 1S W+1 -120 3.4 18.89
20 NS 3S E+2 -660 2.3 12.78
21 NS 1S E-1 50 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 31,30 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 38,69 %22 NS 3S W = -600 6.8 37.78
23 NS 4P W-2 200 14.6 81.11
24 NS 3S W-1 50 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 41,65 %28 NS 1S E-1 50 12 66.67
29 NS 4C W = -620 9 50.00
30 NS 1S S-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
20 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 46,38 %31 NS 3S W-1 50 17.9 99.44
32 NS 2C N-1 -50 14.6 81.11
33 NS 4C N = 420 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 80,93 %
Total : 279,5 / 540 = 51,76 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 -
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 41,65 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
20 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 46,38 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,00 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
18 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 67,61 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,14 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
16 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 38,54 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
15 PIRET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 59,36 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 45,70 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
13 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 49,51 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,73 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 594 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,13 % 1 EO 4C E+1 -450 9 50.00
2 EO 3S N+3 690 0.1 0.56
3 EO 4C S-2 -100 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
7 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 53,87 % 4 EO 2S S+1 150 4.6 25.56
5 EO 3S N = 600 13.4 74.44
6 EO 4P S+1 450 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
2 STEED Mercédès -GROSFILS Colette : 58,74 % 7 EO 1S E-1 100 2.3 12.78
8 EO 2S N+2 180 5.7 31.67
9 EO 3S N = 400 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,80 %10 EO 2C E-2 200 1.2 6.67
11 EO 3K S+2 150 9 50.00
12 EO 3K W-1 50 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 50,19 %13 EO 2C W-1 100 2.3 12.78
14 EO 2TcN = 180 0.1 0.56
15 EO Pass Passe 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 19,07 %
9 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 37,91 %16 EO 4P W-2 200 1.2 6.67
17 EO 3S W-2 100 6.8 37.78
18 EO 4P W+1 -450 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 49,52 %19 EO 2C N-1 -50 3.4 18.89
20 EO 3S E+2 -660 15.7 87.22
21 EO 1S E+1 -120 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 51,76 %22 EO 3S W = -600 11.2 62.22
23 EO 4P W-2 200 3.4 18.89
24 EO 3S W-1 50 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
5 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 45,37 %25 EO 3S N+2 460 5.7 31.67
26 EO 3S W+2 -660 16.8 93.33
27 EO 1S N+1 120 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 54,26 %
6 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,69 %31 EO 3S W+1 -430 11.2 62.22
32 EO 3P N+1 170 0.1 0.56
33 EO 4C N = 420 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
Total : 208,9 / 540 = 38,69 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
7 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 53,87 % 1 EO 4C E+1 -450 9 50.00
2 EO 6C S-1 -100 15.7 87.22
3 EO 6TcW-1 200 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
2 STEED Mercédès -GROSFILS Colette : 58,74 % 4 EO 3S S = 600 0.1 0.56
5 EO 3S N = 600 13.4 74.44
6 EO 4P S = 420 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 47,78 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,80 % 7 EO 1S E = -90 5.7 31.67
8 EO 3S S-1 -50 13.4 74.44
9 EO 3S N+2 460 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 50,19 %10 EO 2C E-1 100 7.9 43.89
11 EO 3CcW-4 800 0.1 0.56
12 EO 2C N = 110 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
9 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 37,91 %13 EO 3T S-2 -200 16.8 93.33
14 EO 2P W+2 -170 16.8 93.33
15 EO 2C N+1 140 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 49,52 %16 EO 4P E-1 100 6.8 37.78
17 EO 3S E-2 100 6.8 37.78
18 EO 4P E+1 -450 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 39,81 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 51,76 %19 EO 1S W+1 -120 14.6 81.11
20 EO 3S E+2 -660 15.7 87.22
21 EO 1S E-1 50 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 68,70 %
5 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 45,37 %22 EO 3S W = -600 11.2 62.22
23 EO 4P W-2 200 3.4 18.89
24 EO 3S W+1 -430 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
11 - : 0,00 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,69 %28 EO 1S E+1 -120 13 72.22
29 EO 3S E-1 100 1 5.56
30 EO 2S S-2 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 240,6 / 486 = 49,51 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
8 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,80 % 4 EO 2S S+2 180 2.3 12.78
5 EO 3S N = 600 13.4 74.44
6 EO 4P N+1 450 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 50,19 % 7 EO 1S E+2 -150 15.7 87.22
8 EO 3S S-1 -50 13.4 74.44
9 EO 3S N = 400 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
9 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 37,91 %10 EO 1S N+1 120 4.6 25.56
11 EO 4KcS-2 -300 17.9 99.44
12 EO 2K W = -90 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 70,74 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 49,52 %13 EO 2T S = 90 6.8 37.78
14 EO 1S N-1 -50 10.1 56.11
15 EO 4C N-1 -100 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 51,76 %16 EO 3S E-2 200 1.2 6.67
17 EO 3S E-2 100 6.8 37.78
18 EO 6P W-1 50 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 15,00 %
5 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 45,37 %19 EO 2C N-1 -50 3.4 18.89
20 EO 3S E+1 -630 9 50.00
21 EO 3K W-1 50 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
11 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,69 %25 EO 3S N+1 430 11.2 62.22
26 EO 3K E+2 -150 2.3 12.78
27 EO 1S N+2 150 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 29,26 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,13 %28 EO 3C W-2 100 0 0.00
29 EO 3S E+1 -630 14 77.78
30 EO 3PcE-3 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
7 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 53,87 %31 EO 3S W+1 -430 11.2 62.22
32 EO 4C N-3 -150 12.3 68.33
33 EO 3S N = 400 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 72,59 %
Total : 222,1 / 486 = 45,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 PIRET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
8 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,80 % 1 EO 4C E+1 -450 9 50.00
2 EO 6C S-1 -100 15.7 87.22
3 EO 5TcW = -750 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 78,89 %
9 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 37,91 % 7 EO 2P N-1 -100 10.1 56.11
8 EO 3S S-1 -50 13.4 74.44
9 EO 3S S-2 -100 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 49,52 %10 EO 1S S = 90 13.4 74.44
11 EO 3S N+1 430 4.6 25.56
12 EO 2S S+3 210 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 51,76 %13 EO 1S E = -90 10.1 56.11
14 EO 1T N+1 90 4.6 25.56
15 EO 3C N-1 -100 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
5 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 45,37 %16 EO 4P E-1 100 6.8 37.78
17 EO 3S E-1 50 13.4 74.44
18 EO 4P W+2 -480 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
11 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,69 %22 EO 3S W = -600 11.2 62.22
23 EO 4P W-1 100 10.1 56.11
24 EO 2S W+1 -150 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,13 %25 EO 4C N-1 -50 17.9 99.44
26 EO 3S W+1 -630 11.2 62.22
27 EO 1S N = 90 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
7 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 53,87 %28 EO 3K E-1 50 6 33.33
29 EO 3S E = -600 5 27.78
30 EO 2S S-2 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
2 STEED Mercédès -GROSFILS Colette : 58,74 %31 EO 2S E+2 -180 2.3 12.78
32 EO 4T W+1 -150 12.3 68.33
33 EO 4C N = 420 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
Total : 288,5 / 486 = 59,36 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 50,19 % 1 EO 4C E+1 -450 9 50.00
2 EO 4C S = 620 11.2 62.22
3 EO 4C S-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
9 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 37,91 % 4 EO 3T S+1 130 6.8 37.78
5 EO 3S N+2 660 1.2 6.67
6 EO 4P S+1 450 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 51,76 %10 EO 1S S = 90 13.4 74.44
11 EO 2K S+2 130 14.6 81.11
12 EO 2C N = 110 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
5 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 45,37 %13 EO 2T S-2 -200 16.8 93.33
14 EO 2C N-1 -50 10.1 56.11
15 EO 4C N-2 -200 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 82,96 %
11 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,69 %19 EO 2P E = -110 9 50.00
20 EO 4K W+1 -150 0.1 0.56
21 EO 1C S+1 110 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 21,11 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,13 %22 EO 3S W-1 100 1.2 6.67
23 EO 2P W+1 -140 15.7 87.22
24 EO 4P E-3 150 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
7 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 53,87 %25 EO 3S N+2 460 5.7 31.67
26 EO 5K E = -600 6.8 37.78
27 EO 1S S+4 210 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
2 STEED Mercédès -GROSFILS Colette : 58,74 %28 EO 1P N = 80 2 11.11
29 EO 3S E = -600 5 27.78
30 EO 2T W-3 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,80 %31 EO 3S E = -400 4.6 25.56
32 EO 2C S-1 -50 3.4 18.89
33 EO 4C N = 420 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 27,41 %
Total : 187,3 / 486 = 38,54 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
9 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 37,91 % 1 EO 4C E+1 -450 9 50.00
2 EO 3S N+1 630 9 50.00
3 EO 5CcS-3 -500 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 49,52 % 4 EO 3K W-1 100 10.1 56.11
5 EO 3S N+1 630 4.6 25.56
6 EO 4P S = 420 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 51,76 % 7 EO 1S E+1 -120 13.4 74.44
8 EO 3S S-1 -50 13.4 74.44
9 EO 3S N = 400 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 64,26 %
11 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,69 %16 EO 2P E = -110 11.2 62.22
17 EO 3S E = -400 17.9 99.44
18 EO 4P W+1 -450 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,13 %19 EO 2C N = 110 0.1 0.56
20 EO 3S E+2 -660 15.7 87.22
21 EO 1S E-1 50 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
7 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 53,87 %22 EO 4KcS-3 -500 6.8 37.78
23 EO 3C E-2 200 3.4 18.89
24 EO 3S W+1 -430 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
2 STEED Mercédès -GROSFILS Colette : 58,74 %25 EO 3S N+1 430 11.2 62.22
26 EO 3S W+2 -660 16.8 93.33
27 EO 2S N = 120 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,80 %28 EO 2S E+2 -180 18 100.00
29 EO 6S E-1 100 1 5.56
30 EO 2C S = 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 50,19 %31 EO 3S W+2 -460 16.8 93.33
32 EO 4CcN-1 -100 6.8 37.78
33 EO 4C S = 420 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 56,30 %
Total : 268,0 / 486 = 55,14 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 49,52 % 1 EO 4C W+1 -450 9 50.00
2 EO 4C S+1 650 4.6 25.56
3 EO 5P W-1 100 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 33,70 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 51,76 % 4 EO 2P N-2 -200 14.6 81.11
5 EO 3S N = 600 13.4 74.44
6 EO 4P S-1 -50 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 82,96 %
5 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 45,37 % 7 EO 1S S-3 -300 17.9 99.44
8 EO 3S S-1 -50 13.4 74.44
9 EO 3S N+2 460 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 60,19 %
11 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,13 %16 EO 4P E = -620 16.8 93.33
17 EO 3S E-1 50 13.4 74.44
18 EO 4P W+2 -480 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
7 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 53,87 %19 EO 2T S-4 -200 17.9 99.44
20 EO 3S E+1 -630 9 50.00
21 EO 3T N-1 -100 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
2 STEED Mercédès -GROSFILS Colette : 58,74 %22 EO 3S E+1 -630 16.8 93.33
23 EO 4P W-2 200 3.4 18.89
24 EO 3S W = -400 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,80 %25 EO 3S N+1 430 11.2 62.22
26 EO 3S W+1 -630 11.2 62.22
27 EO 1S N+1 120 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 50,19 %28 EO 1S E+1 -120 13 72.22
29 EO 4C E+1 -650 18 100.00
30 EO 1ScS-1 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
9 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 37,91 %31 EO 3S E+1 -430 11.2 62.22
32 EO 4T W+1 -150 12.3 68.33
33 EO 3S N-1 -50 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
Total : 328,6 / 486 = 67,61 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 51,76 % 1 EO 5C E = -450 9 50.00
2 EO 4C S+1 650 4.6 25.56
3 EO 5P W-1 100 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 33,70 %
5 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 45,37 % 4 EO 4P N-3 -300 17.9 99.44
5 EO 3S N+2 660 1.2 6.67
6 EO 4P S+1 450 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
11 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,69 %10 EO 3T E = -110 17.9 99.44
11 EO 1ScN+3 480 2.3 12.78
12 EO 2P E = -110 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,13 %13 EO 1S E = -90 10.1 56.11
14 EO 2P E+2 -170 16.8 93.33
15 EO 3C N = 140 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
2 STEED Mercédès -GROSFILS Colette : 58,74 %19 EO 3K W = -110 9 50.00
20 EO 2S E+2 -180 2.3 12.78
21 EO 1S E+3 -180 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,80 %22 EO 2P W+1 -140 4.6 25.56
23 EO 2TcN-3 -800 17.9 99.44
24 EO 3S W-2 100 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 50,19 %25 EO 3S E-6 600 2.3 12.78
26 EO 3S W+1 -630 11.2 62.22
27 EO 2C N-2 -100 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
9 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 37,91 %28 EO 1S E+1 -120 13 72.22
29 EO 3S E+1 -630 14 77.78
30 EO 3S S-2 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 49,52 %31 EO 3S E+2 -460 16.8 93.33
32 EO 5PcN-3 -500 17.9 99.44
33 EO 4C S = 420 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 76,85 %
Total : 277,0 / 486 = 57,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René
5 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 45,37 % 1 EO 4C E+1 -450 9 50.00
2 EO 6C S-1 -100 15.7 87.22
3 EO 2S W-1 100 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 54,26 %
11 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,69 % 7 EO 1S E = -90 5.7 31.67
8 EO 3S N+2 460 1.2 6.67
9 EO 3S N = 400 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 27,41 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,13 %10 EO 2K N = 90 13.4 74.44
11 EO 3C W-3 150 9 50.00
12 EO 3K W-1 50 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 64,26 %
7 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 53,87 %13 EO 1S E-1 100 2.3 12.78
14 EO 3P E-1 50 6.8 37.78
15 EO 2C N+1 140 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 21,11 %
2 STEED Mercédès -GROSFILS Colette : 58,74 %16 EO 3S E = -600 13.4 74.44
17 EO 3S E-3 150 1.2 6.67
18 EO 4P W+1 -450 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 50,19 %22 EO 3S W-1 100 1.2 6.67
23 EO 2K S-1 -100 13.4 74.44
24 EO 3S W+1 -430 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
9 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 37,91 %25 EO 3S S = 400 15.7 87.22
26 EO 1S W+3 -180 4.6 25.56
27 EO 2C N-2 -100 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 68,70 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 49,52 %28 EO 1S E+1 -120 13 72.22
29 EO 3S E+1 -630 14 77.78
30 EO 2S S-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 51,76 %31 EO 3S W-1 50 0.1 0.56
32 EO 2C N-1 -50 3.4 18.89
33 EO 4C N = 420 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 19,07 %
Total : 225,4 / 486 = 46,38 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
11 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,69 % 4 EO 3P N-2 -200 14.6 81.11
5 EO 4C S = 620 6.8 37.78
6 EO 4P S-1 -50 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 70,74 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,13 % 7 EO 1S E-2 200 0.1 0.56
8 EO 2S S+2 180 5.7 31.67
9 EO 3S N-1 -50 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
7 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 53,87 %10 EO 2S E-1 100 7.9 43.89
11 EO 3K S+1 130 14.6 81.11
12 EO 3PcE-3 500 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
2 STEED Mercédès -GROSFILS Colette : 58,74 %13 EO 2K E-1 100 2.3 12.78
14 EO 1S N+1 120 2.3 12.78
15 EO 3C N-1 -100 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,80 %16 EO 4P E-1 100 6.8 37.78
17 EO 3S E-1 50 13.4 74.44
18 EO 4P W+1 -450 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 50,19 %19 EO 2K W+1 -110 9 50.00
20 EO 2S E+3 -210 4.6 25.56
21 EO 2C S+1 140 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 25,37 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 49,52 %25 EO 3TcE-3 800 0.1 0.56
26 EO 4C W-2 200 0.1 0.56
27 EO 1S N = 90 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 23,15 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 51,76 %28 EO 1S E-1 50 6 33.33
29 EO 4C W = -620 9 50.00
30 EO 1S S-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
5 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 45,37 %31 EO 4P E = -420 6.8 37.78
32 EO 4C S-3 -150 12.3 68.33
33 EO 4C N = 420 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
Total : 202,4 / 486 = 41,65 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard
6 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,69 % 1 EO 4C E+1 -450 9 50.00
2 EO 4C S+1 650 4.6 25.56
3 EO 5CcS-3 -500 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 52,22 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,13 % 4 EO 3K W-1 100 10.1 56.11
5 EO 3S N = 600 13.4 74.44
6 EO 4C S+1 450 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
7 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 53,87 % 7 EO 2C S-1 -100 10.1 56.11
8 EO 3S S+2 460 1.2 6.67
9 EO 3S N-1 -50 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
2 STEED Mercédès -GROSFILS Colette : 58,74 %10 EO 2P E-2 200 1.2 6.67
11 EO 2S N+1 150 9 50.00
12 EO 2C N+2 170 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 27,41 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,80 %13 EO 3T N-1 -100 13.4 74.44
14 EO 3P E = -140 13.4 74.44
15 EO Pass Passe 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 64,26 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 50,19 %16 EO 4P E = -620 16.8 93.33
17 EO 3S E-3 150 1.2 6.67
18 EO 4P W+1 -450 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
9 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 37,91 %19 EO 1S W+1 -120 14.6 81.11
20 EO 3S W+1 -630 9 50.00
21 EO 2S E = -120 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 70,74 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 49,52 %22 EO 3S W+1 -630 16.8 93.33
23 EO 4P W-1 100 10.1 56.11
24 EO 3S W-1 50 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
5 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 45,37 %28 EO 2S W-1 50 6 33.33
29 EO 4C W = -620 9 50.00
30 EO 2S S-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
11 - : 0,00 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 251,4 / 486 = 51,73 %
|
|