|
Tournoi du 06-06-13
1 65,28 14 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -
2 64,93 7 MOLS Bruno -
3 60,07 11 HUBLET Carlo -
4 57,99 15 -
5 57,64 12 LIGOT Xavier -
6 53,47 5 DE WULF Jean-Paul -
7 51,04 6 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine
8 50,35 8 MATELART Marc -
9 50,00 10 de WASSEIGE Ariane -
10 47,22 1 -
11 43,75 2 MICHIELS Marc -
12 40,97 3 BRIOT Fernand -
13 38,89 9 FRAITURE Louis -
14 36,46 4 HUBERT Charles -
15 31,94 13 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 64,58 24 TELLIN Jean-Pierre -NELIS Claude
2 60,76 29 LABYE Pascal -BRUYR Pascal
3 59,72 27 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Tanguy
4 58,68 30 -
5 56,60 23 -CORCEOVEI Horia
6 55,56 21 RAVET Brigitte -
7 53,47 28 -
8 51,74 16 -CASSART Guy
9 50,69 19 -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
10 47,57 17 -PARMENTIER Richard
11 43,40 18 -CLERIN François-Xavier
12 41,67 22 -LIBERT Laurent
13 35,42 20 -DOPCHIE Thierry
14 35,07 25 -
~ 35,07 26 -SALFI Huguette
PAIRE Nr : 1 -
16 -CASSART Guy : 51,74 % 1 NS 3K E-2 100 4 25.00
2 NS 3S E-1 50 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
30 - : 58,68 % 3 NS 4C S-1 -50 13 81.25
4 NS 1S E+3 -180 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 46,88 %
29 LABYE Pascal -BRUYR Pascal : 60,76 % 5 NS 4C S+1 650 13 81.25
6 NS 4C S+1 450 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 84,38 %
28 - : 53,47 % 7 NS 3S S-1 -100 6 37.50
8 NS 4P W+2 -480 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
27 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Tanguy : 59,72 % 9 NS 2P W-1 100 6 37.50
10 NS 2S W+1 -150 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 40,63 %
26 -SALFI Huguette : 35,07 %11 NS 3P S = 140 14 87.50
12 NS 2C E-1 50 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 59,38 %
25 - : 35,07 %13 NS 1S S = 90 8 50.00
14 NS 2C E+2 -170 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
24 TELLIN Jean-Pierre -NELIS Claude : 64,58 %15 NS 4P W-1 50 4 25.00
16 NS 3S W+3 -690 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,50 %
23 -CORCEOVEI Horia : 56,60 %17 NS 3S W+3 -490 3 18.75
18 NS 4P E-1 50 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 136,0 / 288 = 47,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 MICHIELS Marc -
17 -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,57 % 3 NS 4C S-2 -100 5 31.25
4 NS 1S E+1 -120 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,63 %
16 -CASSART Guy : 51,74 % 5 NS 4C S = 620 7 43.75
6 NS 4T W-2 200 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 40,63 %
30 - : 58,68 % 7 NS 3S S-1 -100 6 37.50
8 NS 4P W-1 50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
29 LABYE Pascal -BRUYR Pascal : 60,76 % 9 NS 2S N-2 -100 2 12.50
10 NS 2S W+1 -150 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 28,13 %
28 - : 53,47 %11 NS 2K S+1 110 10 62.50
12 NS 2TcS = 180 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
27 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Tanguy : 59,72 %13 NS 3S S-1 -100 3 18.75
14 NS 3S W+3 -490 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,38 %
26 -SALFI Huguette : 35,07 %15 NS 3S N = 600 11 68.75
16 NS 4P W+1 -650 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 78,13 %
25 - : 35,07 %17 NS 3C E+2 -200 14 87.50
18 NS 3S E+2 -460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
24 TELLIN Jean-Pierre -NELIS Claude : 64,58 %19 NS 3S S-2 -100 5 31.25
20 NS 3S W+1 -630 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 28,13 %
Total : 126,0 / 288 = 43,75 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 BRIOT Fernand -
18 -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,40 % 5 NS 4C S = 620 7 43.75
6 NS 1S S+1 120 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 34,38 %
17 -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,57 % 7 NS 3S S-1 -100 6 37.50
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 28,13 %
16 -CASSART Guy : 51,74 % 9 NS 2S N-1 -50 4 25.00
10 NS 3S W-3 300 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
30 - : 58,68 %11 NS 3T W+1 -130 1 6.25
12 NS 2C E+1 -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 3,13 %
29 LABYE Pascal -BRUYR Pascal : 60,76 %13 NS 3S S-1 -100 3 18.75
14 NS 3S W+2 -460 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
28 - : 53,47 %15 NS 4T S-1 -100 1 6.25
16 NS 4P W+2 -680 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 21,88 %
27 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Tanguy : 59,72 %17 NS 6S W-2 100 16 100.00
18 NS 4P E = -420 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
26 -SALFI Huguette : 35,07 %19 NS 3S S = 400 14 87.50
20 NS 3S W = -600 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 65,63 %
25 - : 35,07 %21 NS 4C N-1 -100 10 62.50
22 NS 2K S = 90 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 65,63 %
Total : 118,0 / 288 = 40,97 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 HUBERT Charles -
19 -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 50,69 % 7 NS 3S S-1 -100 6 37.50
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 28,13 %
18 -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,40 % 9 NS 1S N+1 120 8 50.00
10 NS 3S W-1 100 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 59,38 %
17 -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,57 %11 NS 2P S-1 -50 4 25.00
12 NS 2C E-1 50 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 28,13 %
16 -CASSART Guy : 51,74 %13 NS 3S S-1 -100 3 18.75
14 NS 4C E+1 -450 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 28,13 %
30 - : 58,68 %15 NS 3S N-1 -100 1 6.25
16 NS 4P W+2 -680 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 21,88 %
29 LABYE Pascal -BRUYR Pascal : 60,76 %17 NS 3S W+3 -490 3 18.75
18 NS 4P W = -420 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 28,13 %
28 - : 53,47 %19 NS 3S S-2 -100 5 31.25
20 NS 3S W+2 -660 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
27 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Tanguy : 59,72 %21 NS 3K E+1 -130 5 31.25
22 NS 2K S-1 -50 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 28,13 %
26 -SALFI Huguette : 35,07 %23 NS 4P W-3 300 16 100.00
24 NS 3S N+2 460 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 87,50 %
Total : 105,0 / 288 = 36,46 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 DE WULF Jean-Paul -
20 -DOPCHIE Thierry : 35,42 % 9 NS 2S N+1 150 11 68.75
10 NS 3S W+1 -630 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 40,63 %
19 -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 50,69 %11 NS 2K S = 90 7 43.75
12 NS 3ScE-3 500 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,88 %
18 -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,40 %13 NS 3S S = 600 13 81.25
14 NS 3S W+1 -430 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 65,63 %
17 -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,57 %15 NS 2S N+1 150 8 50.00
16 NS 4P W+1 -650 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
16 -CASSART Guy : 51,74 %17 NS 6C E = -980 0 0.00
18 NS 4P E = -420 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
30 - : 58,68 %19 NS 3S S-1 -50 10 62.50
20 NS 2S E = -120 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
29 LABYE Pascal -BRUYR Pascal : 60,76 %21 NS 3K S+1 130 14 87.50
22 NS 2C N-1 -50 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
28 - : 53,47 %23 NS 4T S-1 -100 11 68.75
24 NS 3S S+1 430 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 65,63 %
27 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Tanguy : 59,72 %25 NS 1S W+3 -180 0 0.00
26 NS 1S E+1 -120 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
Total : 154,0 / 288 = 53,47 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine
21 RAVET Brigitte - : 55,56 %11 NS 3T W+1 -130 1 6.25
12 NS 4T S = 130 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 40,63 %
20 -DOPCHIE Thierry : 35,42 %13 NS 3S S-1 -100 3 18.75
14 NS 3C N = 140 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 53,13 %
19 -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 50,69 %15 NS 4P W-2 100 6 37.50
16 NS 4P W+2 -680 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
18 -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,40 %17 NS 4C E = -420 10 62.50
18 NS 4P W-2 100 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
17 -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,57 %19 NS 5T S-1 -50 10 62.50
20 NS 3K S-3 -300 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
16 -CASSART Guy : 51,74 %21 NS 3P S-3 -300 2 12.50
22 NS 2C W-1 100 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
30 - : 58,68 %23 NS 4PcW-1 200 14 87.50
24 NS 6T S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
29 LABYE Pascal -BRUYR Pascal : 60,76 %25 NS 1S W+2 -150 5 31.25
26 NS 1S E+3 -180 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,63 %
28 - : 53,47 %27 NS 3S S+1 430 16 100.00
28 NS 3C E+2 -200 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
Total : 147,0 / 288 = 51,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 MOLS Bruno -
22 -LIBERT Laurent : 41,67 %13 NS 3S S = 600 13 81.25
14 NS 3S N+3 490 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,63 %
21 RAVET Brigitte - : 55,56 %15 NS 3S N+2 660 15 93.75
16 NS 4P W+2 -680 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 65,63 %
20 -DOPCHIE Thierry : 35,42 %17 NS 3S W+1 -430 8 50.00
18 NS 4P E-1 50 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 65,63 %
19 -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 50,69 %19 NS 2S S-1 -50 10 62.50
20 NS 3S W-3 300 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
18 -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,40 %21 NS 2K W+2 -130 5 31.25
22 NS 1S N = 90 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
17 -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,57 %23 NS 5T S-2 -200 2 12.50
24 NS 3S N+4 520 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
16 -CASSART Guy : 51,74 %25 NS 1S W = -90 16 100.00
26 NS 1S E-2 200 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 96,88 %
30 - : 58,68 %27 NS 2K N+2 130 6 37.50
28 NS 4C E = -420 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
29 LABYE Pascal -BRUYR Pascal : 60,76 %29 NS 3P E-2 200 14 87.50
30 NS 3S N-2 -100 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 46,88 %
Total : 187,0 / 288 = 64,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -
30 - : 58,68 % 1 NS 3P N = 140 8 50.00
2 NS 3S E = -400 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
23 -CORCEOVEI Horia : 56,60 %15 NS 3S N+2 660 15 93.75
16 NS 4P W+2 -680 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 65,63 %
22 -LIBERT Laurent : 41,67 %17 NS 3S W = -400 12 75.00
18 NS 4P E = -420 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
21 RAVET Brigitte - : 55,56 %19 NS 3S S-3 -150 1 6.25
20 NS 3S W+2 -660 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 6,25 %
20 -DOPCHIE Thierry : 35,42 %21 NS 2PcS = 670 16 100.00
22 NS 2C N = 110 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
19 -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 50,69 %23 NS 3P W = -140 5 31.25
24 NS 3T S+4 190 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 28,13 %
18 -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,40 %25 NS 1S W+2 -150 5 31.25
26 NS 2C W = -110 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 46,88 %
17 -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,57 %27 NS 3K N+2 150 13 81.25
28 NS 4C E = -420 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 53,13 %
16 -CASSART Guy : 51,74 %29 NS 3K N+1 130 9 56.25
30 NS 3S S+3 490 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 65,63 %
Total : 145,0 / 288 = 50,35 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 FRAITURE Louis -
17 -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,57 % 1 NS 4T N = 130 6 37.50
2 NS 2S W = -120 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
16 -CASSART Guy : 51,74 % 3 NS 4C S-3 -150 0 0.00
4 NS 1S E+2 -150 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 15,63 %
24 TELLIN Jean-Pierre -NELIS Claude : 64,58 %17 NS 4C E+1 -450 6 37.50
18 NS 4P E = -420 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
23 -CORCEOVEI Horia : 56,60 %19 NS 3S S-3 -150 1 6.25
20 NS 3S W-2 200 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 46,88 %
22 -LIBERT Laurent : 41,67 %21 NS 2S S-4 -400 0 0.00
22 NS Pass Passe 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
21 RAVET Brigitte - : 55,56 %23 NS 5T S-3 -300 0 0.00
24 NS 5K N = 400 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 21,88 %
20 -DOPCHIE Thierry : 35,42 %25 NS 2S W = -120 12 75.00
26 NS 1S W-1 100 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
19 -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 50,69 %27 NS 2K N+2 130 6 37.50
28 NS 4C E+1 -450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
18 -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,40 %29 NS 2K N+2 130 9 56.25
30 NS 3T N+4 190 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 59,38 %
Total : 112,0 / 288 = 38,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 de WASSEIGE Ariane -
19 -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 50,69 % 1 NS 3S N = 400 12 75.00
2 NS 3S E = -400 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
18 -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,40 % 3 NS 4C N-2 -100 5 31.25
4 NS 2S W+1 -150 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
17 -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,57 % 5 NS 4C S+1 650 13 81.25
6 NS 4P S+1 450 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 84,38 %
25 - : 35,07 %19 NS 3S S+1 430 16 100.00
20 NS 3S W = -600 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 71,88 %
24 TELLIN Jean-Pierre -NELIS Claude : 64,58 %21 NS 1S W+1 -120 8 50.00
22 NS 1S S-1 -50 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
23 -CORCEOVEI Horia : 56,60 %23 NS 2P W = -110 8 50.00
24 NS 2K N+3 150 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
22 -LIBERT Laurent : 41,67 %25 NS 1S W+1 -120 12 75.00
26 NS 1S W+2 -150 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
21 RAVET Brigitte - : 55,56 %27 NS 2K N+2 130 6 37.50
28 NS 4C E-2 100 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
20 -DOPCHIE Thierry : 35,42 %29 NS 2C W = -110 2 12.50
30 NS 3T N+3 170 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
Total : 144,0 / 288 = 50,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 HUBLET Carlo -
21 RAVET Brigitte - : 55,56 % 1 NS 4P N = 420 14 87.50
2 NS 3S E-1 50 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 87,50 %
20 -DOPCHIE Thierry : 35,42 % 3 NS 4C S-2 -100 5 31.25
4 NS 3S W-3 300 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 65,63 %
19 -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 50,69 % 5 NS 4C S = 620 7 43.75
6 NS 4P S = 420 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
18 -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,40 % 7 NS 3S S+1 630 16 100.00
8 NS 2P W-1 50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
26 -SALFI Huguette : 35,07 %21 NS 5K E-2 100 12 75.00
22 NS 1S S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
25 - : 35,07 %23 NS 4T S-1 -100 11 68.75
24 NS 3S N+3 490 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 78,13 %
24 TELLIN Jean-Pierre -NELIS Claude : 64,58 %25 NS 1S W+2 -150 5 31.25
26 NS 1S W+2 -150 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 28,13 %
23 -CORCEOVEI Horia : 56,60 %27 NS 3K N+1 130 6 37.50
28 NS 4C E-1 50 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 59,38 %
22 -LIBERT Laurent : 41,67 %29 NS 3P E-3 300 16 100.00
30 NS 3S N-2 -100 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 53,13 %
Total : 173,0 / 288 = 60,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 LIGOT Xavier -
23 -CORCEOVEI Horia : 56,60 % 1 NS 2P S+2 170 10 62.50
2 NS 3S E = -400 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
22 -LIBERT Laurent : 41,67 % 3 NS 4C S-1 -50 13 81.25
4 NS 2S W-2 200 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 84,38 %
21 RAVET Brigitte - : 55,56 % 5 NS 4C S = 620 7 43.75
6 NS 4P S-1 -50 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
20 -DOPCHIE Thierry : 35,42 % 7 NS 2S N = 120 14 87.50
8 NS 4P W-3 150 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 90,63 %
19 -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 50,69 % 9 NS 3P W-2 200 16 100.00
10 NS 3S W-1 100 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 84,38 %
27 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Tanguy : 59,72 %23 NS 3P W = -140 5 31.25
24 NS 5K N = 400 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
26 -SALFI Huguette : 35,07 %25 NS 1S W+1 -120 12 75.00
26 NS 1S W-2 200 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 84,38 %
25 - : 35,07 %27 NS 2K N+2 130 6 37.50
28 NS 4C E-1 50 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 59,38 %
24 TELLIN Jean-Pierre -NELIS Claude : 64,58 %29 NS 2C W+1 -140 0 0.00
30 NS 3T N+1 130 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 15,63 %
Total : 166,0 / 288 = 57,64 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 -
25 - : 35,07 % 1 NS 50 2 12.50
2 NS -300 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 28,13 %
24 TELLIN Jean-Pierre -NELIS Claude : 64,58 % 3 NS -100 5 31.25
4 NS -110 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 46,88 %
23 -CORCEOVEI Horia : 56,60 % 5 NS 170 2 12.50
6 NS -50 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 9,38 %
22 -LIBERT Laurent : 41,67 % 7 NS -100 6 37.50
8 NS 50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
21 RAVET Brigitte - : 55,56 % 9 NS -110 0 0.00
10 NS -630 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 6,25 %
20 -DOPCHIE Thierry : 35,42 %11 NS 140 14 87.50
12 NS 50 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 59,38 %
28 - : 53,47 %25 NS -150 5 31.25
26 NS -150 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 28,13 %
27 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Tanguy : 59,72 %27 NS 100 0 0.00
28 NS -170 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
26 -SALFI Huguette : 35,07 %29 NS 100 4 25.00
30 NS 130 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 28,13 %
Total : 92,0 / 288 = 31,94 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -
27 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Tanguy : 59,72 % 1 NS 4P N+1 450 16 100.00
2 NS 3S E-1 50 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 93,75 %
26 -SALFI Huguette : 35,07 % 3 NS 4C N-1 -50 13 81.25
4 NS 1S W-1 100 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 78,13 %
25 - : 35,07 % 5 NS 4C S+2 680 16 100.00
6 NS 4P S+1 450 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 93,75 %
24 TELLIN Jean-Pierre -NELIS Claude : 64,58 % 7 NS 3S S-1 -100 6 37.50
8 NS 2P W+3 -200 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
23 -CORCEOVEI Horia : 56,60 % 9 NS 2S N+1 150 11 68.75
10 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 40,63 %
22 -LIBERT Laurent : 41,67 %11 NS 2K S = 90 7 43.75
12 NS 2C E-1 50 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
21 RAVET Brigitte - : 55,56 %13 NS 3S S = 600 13 81.25
14 NS 3S E-1 50 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 78,13 %
29 LABYE Pascal -BRUYR Pascal : 60,76 %27 NS 3C W-3 150 13 81.25
28 NS 4C E = -420 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 53,13 %
28 - : 53,47 %29 NS 3K N+1 130 9 56.25
30 NS 4C S+3 510 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
Total : 188,0 / 288 = 65,28 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 -
29 LABYE Pascal -BRUYR Pascal : 60,76 % 1 NS -50 0 0.00
2 NS -300 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 21,88 %
28 - : 53,47 % 3 NS -50 13 81.25
4 NS -600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,63 %
27 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Tanguy : 59,72 % 5 NS -100 0 0.00
6 NS 420 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 28,13 %
26 -SALFI Huguette : 35,07 % 7 NS -100 6 37.50
8 NS 150 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 65,63 %
25 - : 35,07 % 9 NS 180 14 87.50
10 NS 200 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 87,50 %
24 TELLIN Jean-Pierre -NELIS Claude : 64,58 %11 NS 140 14 87.50
12 NS 100 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
23 -CORCEOVEI Horia : 56,60 %13 NS 600 13 81.25
14 NS -460 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
22 -LIBERT Laurent : 41,67 %15 NS 600 11 68.75
16 NS -650 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 78,13 %
30 - : 58,68 %29 NS 130 9 56.25
30 NS 510 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
Total : 167,0 / 288 = 57,99 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 -CASSART Guy
1 - : 47,22 % 1 EO 3K E-2 100 12 75.00
2 EO 3S E-1 50 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
9 FRAITURE Louis - : 38,89 % 3 EO 4C S-3 -150 16 100.00
4 EO 1S E+2 -150 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 84,38 %
2 MICHIELS Marc - : 43,75 % 5 EO 4C S = 620 9 56.25
6 EO 4T W-2 200 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 59,38 %
3 BRIOT Fernand - : 40,97 % 9 EO 2S N-1 -50 12 75.00
10 EO 3S W-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
4 HUBERT Charles - : 36,46 %13 EO 3S S-1 -100 13 81.25
14 EO 4C E+1 -450 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 71,88 %
5 DE WULF Jean-Paul - : 53,47 %17 EO 6C E = -980 16 100.00
18 EO 4P E = -420 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 51,04 %21 EO 3P S-3 -300 14 87.50
22 EO 2C W-1 100 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 MOLS Bruno - : 64,93 %25 EO 1S W = -90 0 0.00
26 EO 1S E-2 200 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 3,13 %
8 MATELART Marc - : 50,35 %29 EO 3K N+1 130 7 43.75
30 EO 3S S+3 490 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 34,38 %
Total : 149,0 / 288 = 51,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 -PARMENTIER Richard
9 FRAITURE Louis - : 38,89 % 1 EO 4T N = 130 10 62.50
2 EO 2S W = -120 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 MICHIELS Marc - : 43,75 % 3 EO 4C S-2 -100 11 68.75
4 EO 1S E+1 -120 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,38 %
10 de WASSEIGE Ariane - : 50,00 % 5 EO 4C S+1 650 3 18.75
6 EO 4P S+1 450 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 15,63 %
3 BRIOT Fernand - : 40,97 % 7 EO 3S S-1 -100 10 62.50
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 71,88 %
4 HUBERT Charles - : 36,46 %11 EO 2P S-1 -50 12 75.00
12 EO 2C E-1 50 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 71,88 %
5 DE WULF Jean-Paul - : 53,47 %15 EO 2S N+1 150 8 50.00
16 EO 4P W+1 -650 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 51,04 %19 EO 5T S-1 -50 6 37.50
20 EO 3K S-3 -300 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
7 MOLS Bruno - : 64,93 %23 EO 5T S-2 -200 14 87.50
24 EO 3S N+4 520 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
8 MATELART Marc - : 50,35 %27 EO 3K N+2 150 3 18.75
28 EO 4C E = -420 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 46,88 %
Total : 137,0 / 288 = 47,57 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 -CLERIN François-Xavier
10 de WASSEIGE Ariane - : 50,00 % 3 EO 4C N-2 -100 11 68.75
4 EO 2S W+1 -150 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
3 BRIOT Fernand - : 40,97 % 5 EO 4C S = 620 9 56.25
6 EO 1S S+1 120 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 65,63 %
11 HUBLET Carlo - : 60,07 % 7 EO 3S S+1 630 0 0.00
8 EO 2P W-1 50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
4 HUBERT Charles - : 36,46 % 9 EO 1S N+1 120 8 50.00
10 EO 3S W-1 100 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 40,63 %
5 DE WULF Jean-Paul - : 53,47 %13 EO 3S S = 600 3 18.75
14 EO 3S W+1 -430 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 34,38 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 51,04 %17 EO 4C E = -420 6 37.50
18 EO 4P W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
7 MOLS Bruno - : 64,93 %21 EO 2K W+2 -130 11 68.75
22 EO 1S N = 90 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 MATELART Marc - : 50,35 %25 EO 1S W+2 -150 11 68.75
26 EO 2C W = -110 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 53,13 %
9 FRAITURE Louis - : 38,89 %29 EO 2K N+2 130 7 43.75
30 EO 3T N+4 190 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 40,63 %
Total : 125,0 / 288 = 43,40 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
10 de WASSEIGE Ariane - : 50,00 % 1 EO 3S N = 400 4 25.00
2 EO 3S E = -400 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
11 HUBLET Carlo - : 60,07 % 5 EO 4C S = 620 9 56.25
6 EO 4P S = 420 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 HUBERT Charles - : 36,46 % 7 EO 3S S-1 -100 10 62.50
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 71,88 %
12 LIGOT Xavier - : 57,64 % 9 EO 3P W-2 200 0 0.00
10 EO 3S W-1 100 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 15,63 %
5 DE WULF Jean-Paul - : 53,47 %11 EO 2K S = 90 9 56.25
12 EO 3ScE-3 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,13 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 51,04 %15 EO 4P W-2 100 10 62.50
16 EO 4P W+2 -680 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
7 MOLS Bruno - : 64,93 %19 EO 2S S-1 -50 6 37.50
20 EO 3S W-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
8 MATELART Marc - : 50,35 %23 EO 3P W = -140 11 68.75
24 EO 3T S+4 190 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 71,88 %
9 FRAITURE Louis - : 38,89 %27 EO 2K N+2 130 10 62.50
28 EO 4C E+1 -450 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
Total : 146,0 / 288 = 50,69 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 -DOPCHIE Thierry
11 HUBLET Carlo - : 60,07 % 3 EO 4C S-2 -100 11 68.75
4 EO 3S W-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 34,38 %
12 LIGOT Xavier - : 57,64 % 7 EO 2S N = 120 2 12.50
8 EO 4P W-3 150 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 9,38 %
5 DE WULF Jean-Paul - : 53,47 % 9 EO 2S N+1 150 5 31.25
10 EO 3S W+1 -630 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 59,38 %
13 - : 31,94 %11 EO 140 2 12.50
12 EO 50 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 40,63 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 51,04 %13 EO 3S S-1 -100 13 81.25
14 EO 3C N = 140 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 46,88 %
7 MOLS Bruno - : 64,93 %17 EO 3S W+1 -430 8 50.00
18 EO 4P E-1 50 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 34,38 %
8 MATELART Marc - : 50,35 %21 EO 2PcS = 670 0 0.00
22 EO 2C N = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
9 FRAITURE Louis - : 38,89 %25 EO 2S W = -120 4 25.00
26 EO 1S W-1 100 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
10 de WASSEIGE Ariane - : 50,00 %29 EO 2C W = -110 14 87.50
30 EO 3T N+3 170 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
Total : 102,0 / 288 = 35,42 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 RAVET Brigitte -
11 HUBLET Carlo - : 60,07 % 1 EO 4P N = 420 2 12.50
2 EO 3S E-1 50 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 12,50 %
12 LIGOT Xavier - : 57,64 % 5 EO 4C S = 620 9 56.25
6 EO 4P S-1 -50 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
13 - : 31,94 % 9 EO -110 16 100.00
10 EO -630 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 93,75 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 51,04 %11 EO 3T W+1 -130 15 93.75
12 EO 4T S = 130 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 59,38 %
14 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc - : 65,28 %13 EO 3S S = 600 3 18.75
14 EO 3S E-1 50 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 21,88 %
7 MOLS Bruno - : 64,93 %15 EO 3S N+2 660 1 6.25
16 EO 4P W+2 -680 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 34,38 %
8 MATELART Marc - : 50,35 %19 EO 3S S-3 -150 15 93.75
20 EO 3S W+2 -660 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 93,75 %
9 FRAITURE Louis - : 38,89 %23 EO 5T S-3 -300 16 100.00
24 EO 5K N = 400 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 78,13 %
10 de WASSEIGE Ariane - : 50,00 %27 EO 2K N+2 130 10 62.50
28 EO 4C E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
Total : 160,0 / 288 = 55,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 -LIBERT Laurent
12 LIGOT Xavier - : 57,64 % 3 EO 4C S-1 -50 3 18.75
4 EO 2S W-2 200 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 15,63 %
13 - : 31,94 % 7 EO -100 10 62.50
8 EO 50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc - : 65,28 %11 EO 2K S = 90 9 56.25
12 EO 2C E-1 50 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
7 MOLS Bruno - : 64,93 %13 EO 3S S = 600 3 18.75
14 EO 3S N+3 490 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,38 %
15 - : 57,99 %15 EO 600 5 31.25
16 EO -650 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 21,88 %
8 MATELART Marc - : 50,35 %17 EO 3S W = -400 4 25.00
18 EO 4P E = -420 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
9 FRAITURE Louis - : 38,89 %21 EO 2S S-4 -400 16 100.00
22 EO Pass Passe 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
10 de WASSEIGE Ariane - : 50,00 %25 EO 1S W+1 -120 4 25.00
26 EO 1S W+2 -150 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 HUBLET Carlo - : 60,07 %29 EO 3P E-3 300 0 0.00
30 EO 3S N-2 -100 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 46,88 %
Total : 120,0 / 288 = 41,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 -CORCEOVEI Horia
12 LIGOT Xavier - : 57,64 % 1 EO 2P S+2 170 6 37.50
2 EO 3S E = -400 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
13 - : 31,94 % 5 EO 170 14 87.50
6 EO -50 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 90,63 %
14 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc - : 65,28 % 9 EO 2S N+1 150 5 31.25
10 EO 3S E+1 -630 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 59,38 %
15 - : 57,99 %13 EO 600 3 18.75
14 EO -460 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 MATELART Marc - : 50,35 %15 EO 3S N+2 660 1 6.25
16 EO 4P W+2 -680 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 34,38 %
1 - : 47,22 %17 EO 3S W+3 -490 13 81.25
18 EO 4P E-1 50 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 FRAITURE Louis - : 38,89 %19 EO 3S S-3 -150 15 93.75
20 EO 3S W-2 200 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 53,13 %
10 de WASSEIGE Ariane - : 50,00 %23 EO 2P W = -110 8 50.00
24 EO 2K N+3 150 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
11 HUBLET Carlo - : 60,07 %27 EO 3K N+1 130 10 62.50
28 EO 4C E-1 50 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 40,63 %
Total : 163,0 / 288 = 56,60 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 TELLIN Jean-Pierre -NELIS Claude
13 - : 31,94 % 3 EO -100 11 68.75
4 EO -110 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 53,13 %
14 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc - : 65,28 % 7 EO 3S S-1 -100 10 62.50
8 EO 2P W+3 -200 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
15 - : 57,99 %11 EO 140 2 12.50
12 EO 100 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
1 - : 47,22 %15 EO 4P W-1 50 12 75.00
16 EO 3S W+3 -690 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,50 %
9 FRAITURE Louis - : 38,89 %17 EO 4C E+1 -450 10 62.50
18 EO 4P E = -420 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
2 MICHIELS Marc - : 43,75 %19 EO 3S S-2 -100 11 68.75
20 EO 3S W+1 -630 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 71,88 %
10 de WASSEIGE Ariane - : 50,00 %21 EO 1S W+1 -120 8 50.00
22 EO 1S S-1 -50 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
11 HUBLET Carlo - : 60,07 %25 EO 1S W+2 -150 11 68.75
26 EO 1S W+2 -150 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 71,88 %
12 LIGOT Xavier - : 57,64 %29 EO 2C W+1 -140 16 100.00
30 EO 3T N+1 130 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 84,38 %
Total : 186,0 / 288 = 64,58 %
PAIRE Nr : 25 -
13 - : 31,94 % 1 EO 50 14 87.50
2 EO -300 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 71,88 %
14 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc - : 65,28 % 5 EO 4C S+2 680 0 0.00
6 EO 4P S+1 450 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 6,25 %
15 - : 57,99 % 9 EO 180 2 12.50
10 EO 200 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 12,50 %
1 - : 47,22 %13 EO 1S S = 90 8 50.00
14 EO 2C E+2 -170 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
2 MICHIELS Marc - : 43,75 %17 EO 3C E+2 -200 2 12.50
18 EO 3S E+2 -460 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
10 de WASSEIGE Ariane - : 50,00 %19 EO 3S S+1 430 0 0.00
20 EO 3S W = -600 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 28,13 %
3 BRIOT Fernand - : 40,97 %21 EO 4C N-1 -100 6 37.50
22 EO 2K S = 90 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 34,38 %
11 HUBLET Carlo - : 60,07 %23 EO 4T S-1 -100 5 31.25
24 EO 3S N+3 490 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 21,88 %
12 LIGOT Xavier - : 57,64 %27 EO 2K N+2 130 10 62.50
28 EO 4C E-1 50 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 40,63 %
Total : 101,0 / 288 = 35,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 26 -SALFI Huguette
14 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc - : 65,28 % 3 EO 4C N-1 -50 3 18.75
4 EO 1S W-1 100 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 21,88 %
15 - : 57,99 % 7 EO -100 10 62.50
8 EO 150 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 34,38 %
1 - : 47,22 %11 EO 3P S = 140 2 12.50
12 EO 2C E-1 50 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 40,63 %
2 MICHIELS Marc - : 43,75 %15 EO 3S N = 600 5 31.25
16 EO 4P W+1 -650 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 21,88 %
3 BRIOT Fernand - : 40,97 %19 EO 3S S = 400 2 12.50
20 EO 3S W = -600 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 34,38 %
11 HUBLET Carlo - : 60,07 %21 EO 5K E-2 100 4 25.00
22 EO 1S S-2 -100 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
4 HUBERT Charles - : 36,46 %23 EO 4P W-3 300 0 0.00
24 EO 3S N+2 460 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 12,50 %
12 LIGOT Xavier - : 57,64 %25 EO 1S W+1 -120 4 25.00
26 EO 1S W-2 200 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 15,63 %
13 - : 31,94 %29 EO 100 12 75.00
30 EO 130 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 71,88 %
Total : 101,0 / 288 = 35,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 27 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Tanguy
14 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc - : 65,28 % 1 EO 4P N+1 450 0 0.00
2 EO 3S E-1 50 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 6,25 %
15 - : 57,99 % 5 EO -100 16 100.00
6 EO 420 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 71,88 %
1 - : 47,22 % 9 EO 2P W-1 100 10 62.50
10 EO 2S W+1 -150 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 59,38 %
2 MICHIELS Marc - : 43,75 %13 EO 3S S-1 -100 13 81.25
14 EO 3S W+3 -490 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,63 %
3 BRIOT Fernand - : 40,97 %17 EO 6S W-2 100 0 0.00
18 EO 4P E = -420 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
4 HUBERT Charles - : 36,46 %21 EO 3K E+1 -130 11 68.75
22 EO 2K S-1 -50 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 71,88 %
12 LIGOT Xavier - : 57,64 %23 EO 3P W = -140 11 68.75
24 EO 5K N = 400 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
5 DE WULF Jean-Paul - : 53,47 %25 EO 1S W+3 -180 16 100.00
26 EO 1S E+1 -120 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
13 - : 31,94 %27 EO 100 16 100.00
28 EO -170 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
Total : 172,0 / 288 = 59,72 %
PAIRE Nr : 28 -
15 - : 57,99 % 3 EO -50 3 18.75
4 EO -600 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,38 %
1 - : 47,22 % 7 EO 3S S-1 -100 10 62.50
8 EO 4P W+2 -480 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
2 MICHIELS Marc - : 43,75 %11 EO 2K S+1 110 6 37.50
12 EO 2TcS = 180 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
3 BRIOT Fernand - : 40,97 %15 EO 4T S-1 -100 15 93.75
16 EO 4P W+2 -680 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 78,13 %
4 HUBERT Charles - : 36,46 %19 EO 3S S-2 -100 11 68.75
20 EO 3S W+2 -660 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
5 DE WULF Jean-Paul - : 53,47 %23 EO 4T S-1 -100 5 31.25
24 EO 3S S+1 430 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 34,38 %
13 - : 31,94 %25 EO -150 11 68.75
26 EO -150 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 71,88 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 51,04 %27 EO 3S S+1 430 0 0.00
28 EO 3C E+2 -200 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
14 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc - : 65,28 %29 EO 3K N+1 130 7 43.75
30 EO 4C S+3 510 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
Total : 154,0 / 288 = 53,47 %
PAIRE Nr : 29 LABYE Pascal -BRUYR Pascal
15 - : 57,99 % 1 EO -50 16 100.00
2 EO -300 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 78,13 %
1 - : 47,22 % 5 EO 4C S+1 650 3 18.75
6 EO 4C S+1 450 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 15,63 %
2 MICHIELS Marc - : 43,75 % 9 EO 2S N-2 -100 14 87.50
10 EO 2S W+1 -150 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 71,88 %
3 BRIOT Fernand - : 40,97 %13 EO 3S S-1 -100 13 81.25
14 EO 3S W+2 -460 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
4 HUBERT Charles - : 36,46 %17 EO 3S W+3 -490 13 81.25
18 EO 4P W = -420 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 71,88 %
5 DE WULF Jean-Paul - : 53,47 %21 EO 3K S+1 130 2 12.50
22 EO 2C N-1 -50 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 51,04 %25 EO 1S W+2 -150 11 68.75
26 EO 1S E+3 -180 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 84,38 %
14 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc - : 65,28 %27 EO 3C W-3 150 3 18.75
28 EO 4C E = -420 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 46,88 %
7 MOLS Bruno - : 64,93 %29 EO 3P E-2 200 2 12.50
30 EO 3S N-2 -100 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 53,13 %
Total : 175,0 / 288 = 60,76 %
PAIRE Nr : 30 -
8 MATELART Marc - : 50,35 % 1 EO 3P N = 140 8 50.00
2 EO 3S E = -400 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
1 - : 47,22 % 3 EO 4C S-1 -50 3 18.75
4 EO 1S E+3 -180 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 53,13 %
2 MICHIELS Marc - : 43,75 % 7 EO 3S S-1 -100 10 62.50
8 EO 4P W-1 50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 BRIOT Fernand - : 40,97 %11 EO 3T W+1 -130 15 93.75
12 EO 2C E+1 -140 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 96,88 %
4 HUBERT Charles - : 36,46 %15 EO 3S N-1 -100 15 93.75
16 EO 4P W+2 -680 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 78,13 %
5 DE WULF Jean-Paul - : 53,47 %19 EO 3S S-1 -50 6 37.50
20 EO 2S E = -120 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 51,04 %23 EO 4PcW-1 200 2 12.50
24 EO 6T S-1 -50 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
7 MOLS Bruno - : 64,93 %27 EO 2K N+2 130 10 62.50
28 EO 4C E = -420 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
15 - : 57,99 %29 EO 130 7 43.75
30 EO 510 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
Total : 169,0 / 288 = 58,68 %
|
|