|
Tournoi du 06-07-15
1 59,04 2 GILLAIN Françoise -VANDIERENDONCK
2 57,96 9 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian
3 56,53 5 DEVIGNE Alain -FOUBERT Marie-Rose
4 55,10 7 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
5 53,99 14 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal
6 53,71 1 PADOU Bernard -LEFEVRE Raymond
7 50,87 13 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
8 49,60 6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
9 49,37 10 WUYARD Alphonse -NELIS Claude
10 48,25 12 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Christian
11 46,72 8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
12 46,68 11 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René
13 41,99 4 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
14 30,40 3 ROEGIERS Marga -MICHAUX Hélène
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 60,78 25 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy
2 59,44 21 BABIKOW Georges -DE BIE Sylvie
3 58,38 22 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte
4 57,33 17 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
5 53,64 19 GERARD Francis -VUYST Michele
6 53,03 16 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier
7 50,90 15 BUSQUIN Philippe -GHIERCHE Jacques
8 49,49 18 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
9 47,47 23 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
10 46,68 27 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel
11 45,69 24 COULIE Joelle -STEED Mercédès
12 45,14 28 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN DOOREN Michele
13 36,00 20 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph
14 35,82 26 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne
PAIRE Nr : 1 PADOU Bernard -LEFEVRE Raymond
15 BUSQUIN Philippe -GHIERCHE Jacques : 50,90 % 1 NS 4PcS-3 -500 0 0.00
2 NS 4P W-2 100 21 87.50
3 NS 3S S-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
25 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 60,78 % 4 NS 4C N+1 650 14 58.33
5 NS 2C N+2 170 6 25.00
6 NS 4T W+1 -150 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
24 COULIE Joelle -STEED Mercédès : 45,69 % 7 NS 5KcN-2 -500 20 83.33
8 NS 2P N-1 -50 14 58.33
9 NS 1S N = 90 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 69,44 %
23 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,47 %10 NS 1S E-1 100 22 91.67
11 NS 3K S-1 -50 7 29.17
12 NS 3P E+1 -170 23 95.83 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
22 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 58,38 %13 NS 6S N-3 -300 0 0.00
14 NS 2S W-1 50 22 91.67
15 NS 7S S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,56 %
27 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 46,68 %16 NS 1S E-2 200 23 95.83
17 NS 3S N = 400 14 58.33
18 NS 3C S = 140 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
20 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 36,00 %19 NS 1S N+1 120 24 100.00
20 NS 4P W-1 100 18 75.00
21 NS 3K E+1 -130 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
19 GERARD Francis -VUYST Michele : 53,64 %22 NS 4C S-1 -50 3 12.50
23 NS 3S E+2 -660 10 41.67
24 NS 3S W+4 -520 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
18 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 49,49 %25 NS 3P W+3 -230 14.2 59.17
26 NS 2C N-1 -100 14.2 59.17
27 NS 4P S+1 450 14.2 59.17 µ Tbl = 59,17 %
17 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 57,33 %28 NS 4P W+1 -450 12 50.00
29 NS 2P W+1 -140 14.2 59.17
30 NS 1S N+2 150 10.9 45.42 µ Tbl = 51,53 %
Total : 386,7 / 720 = 53,71 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 GILLAIN Françoise -VANDIERENDONCK
16 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 53,03 % 4 NS 4C N+1 650 14 58.33
5 NS 2C N+3 200 14 58.33
6 NS 4T W = -130 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
15 BUSQUIN Philippe -GHIERCHE Jacques : 50,90 % 7 NS 4P E+2 -680 9 37.50
8 NS 2PcN-1 -100 5 20.83
9 NS 4K N-1 -50 11 45.83 µ Tbl = 34,72 %
25 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 60,78 %10 NS 1S E = -90 7 29.17
11 NS 3S N-2 -100 3 12.50
12 NS 4P E+1 -450 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
24 COULIE Joelle -STEED Mercédès : 45,69 %13 NS 6S N = 1440 24 100.00
14 NS 3T E+1 -130 13 54.17
15 NS 6S S = 1440 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
23 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,47 %16 NS 1S E-1 100 16 66.67
17 NS 3S S = 400 14 58.33
18 NS 3C S-1 -100 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 47,22 %
28 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 45,14 %19 NS 3K W = -110 8 33.33
20 NS 5P W-2 200 23 95.83
21 NS 3K W+1 -130 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 63,89 %
26 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 35,82 %22 NS 4C N = 420 21 87.50
23 NS 5K E+1 -620 20 83.33
24 NS 3S W+3 -490 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
20 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 36,00 %25 NS 3P W+3 -230 14.2 59.17
26 NS 1S N+2 150 23.9 99.58
27 NS 4PcS+1 690 23.9 99.58 µ Tbl = 86,11 %
19 GERARD Francis -VUYST Michele : 53,64 %28 NS 4P W+1 -450 12 50.00
29 NS 4P W-1 100 21.8 90.83
30 NS 1S N+3 180 21.8 90.83 µ Tbl = 77,22 %
18 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 49,49 %31 NS 4P S+1 650 10.9 45.42
32 NS 4CcN-1 -100 3.3 13.75
33 NS 3C E-1 50 16.3 67.92 µ Tbl = 42,36 %
Total : 425,1 / 720 = 59,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 ROEGIERS Marga -MICHAUX Hélène
19 GERARD Francis -VUYST Michele : 53,64 % 1 NS 3S E-1 50 18 75.00
2 NS 3C W = -140 0 0.00
3 NS 2P S-1 -50 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
17 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 57,33 % 7 NS 4P E+2 -680 9 37.50
8 NS 2P N-1 -50 14 58.33
9 NS 3S N-3 -150 1 4.17 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
26 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 35,82 %10 NS 1S N = 90 17 70.83
11 NS 3S S-2 -100 3 12.50
12 NS 4P E = -420 11 45.83 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
15 BUSQUIN Philippe -GHIERCHE Jacques : 50,90 %13 NS 3S N+1 630 8 33.33
14 NS 2S W+3 -210 6 25.00
15 NS 3S N+2 660 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 30,56 %
25 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 60,78 %16 NS 1S E+1 -120 1 4.17
17 NS 3S N-1 -50 2 8.33
18 NS 2C S-1 -100 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 9,72 %
24 COULIE Joelle -STEED Mercédès : 45,69 %19 NS 2K W+1 -110 8 33.33
20 NS 4P W+2 -680 3 12.50
21 NS 3K W+1 -130 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 36,11 %
23 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,47 %22 NS 2T E = -90 0 0.00
23 NS 3S E+3 -690 3 12.50
24 NS 3S W+3 -490 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 26,39 %
27 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 46,68 %25 NS 3P W+3 -230 14.2 59.17
26 NS 2P W+1 -140 4.4 18.33
27 NS 4P S+1 450 14.2 59.17 µ Tbl = 45,56 %
21 BABIKOW Georges -DE BIE Sylvie : 59,44 %28 NS 4P E+1 -450 12 50.00
29 NS 4P W = -620 2.3 9.58
30 NS 3S S-1 -50 1.2 5.00 µ Tbl = 21,53 %
20 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 36,00 %31 NS 4P S+1 650 10.9 45.42
32 NS 2P E+1 -140 0.1 0.42
33 NS 2C E = -110 6.6 27.50 µ Tbl = 24,44 %
Total : 218,9 / 720 = 30,40 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
21 BABIKOW Georges -DE BIE Sylvie : 59,44 % 1 NS 4C E-1 50 18 75.00
2 NS 3S W-1 50 10 41.67
3 NS 2P S+2 170 13 54.17 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
20 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 36,00 % 4 NS 4C N+1 650 14 58.33
5 NS 4C N = 620 17 70.83
6 NS 2K S-1 -50 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 73,61 %
18 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 49,49 %10 NS 2K S-1 -100 3 12.50
11 NS 3K S-1 -50 7 29.17
12 NS 2P E+3 -200 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
27 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 46,68 %13 NS 4P N+1 650 12 50.00
14 NS 1S S = 90 24 100.00
15 NS 6S S-1 -100 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
16 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 53,03 %16 NS 1S E = -90 7 29.17
17 NS 1S S+2 150 6 25.00
18 NS 3S N-1 -100 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 23,61 %
15 BUSQUIN Philippe -GHIERCHE Jacques : 50,90 %19 NS 3K W = -110 8 33.33
20 NS 4P W+1 -650 8 33.33
21 NS 3K E+2 -150 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
25 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 60,78 %22 NS 4C S-1 -50 3 12.50
23 NS 3S E+2 -660 10 41.67
24 NS 3S W+4 -520 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
24 COULIE Joelle -STEED Mercédès : 45,69 %25 NS 4P W+2 -680 1.2 5.00
26 NS 2P W-1 100 19.6 81.67
27 NS 3P S+2 200 4.4 18.33 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
28 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 45,14 %28 NS 4P E+2 -480 1.2 5.00
29 NS 3P W = -140 14.2 59.17
30 NS 1S S+1 120 4.4 18.33 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
26 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 35,82 %31 NS 3T S = 110 0.1 0.42
32 NS 4P E-2 200 15.3 63.75
33 NS 4C E-2 100 23.9 99.58 µ Tbl = 54,58 %
Total : 302,3 / 720 = 41,99 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 DEVIGNE Alain -FOUBERT Marie-Rose
27 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 46,68 % 1 NS 3P S-1 -50 14 58.33
2 NS 2S W-1 50 10 41.67
3 NS 3P S+1 170 13 54.17 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
22 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 58,38 % 4 NS 4C N = 620 1 4.17
5 NS 3P S+1 170 6 25.00
6 NS 3K S-2 -100 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 36,11 %
21 BABIKOW Georges -DE BIE Sylvie : 59,44 % 7 NS 4P E+2 -680 9 37.50
8 NS 4C W-1 50 20 83.33
9 NS 1S S-1 -50 11 45.83 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
19 GERARD Francis -VUYST Michele : 53,64 %13 NS 3S S+3 690 19 79.17
14 NS 3T E+2 -150 8 33.33
15 NS 6S S = 1440 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
28 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 45,14 %16 NS 1S E-1 100 16 66.67
17 NS 3S S = 400 14 58.33
18 NS 1PcE-1 100 11 45.83 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
26 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 35,82 %19 NS 3T S = 110 21 87.50
20 NS 6KcS-1 -200 14 58.33
21 NS 2K E+2 -130 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 69,44 %
16 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 53,03 %22 NS 2C S+3 200 13 54.17
23 NS 5K E+1 -620 20 83.33
24 NS 3S W+3 -490 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,06 %
15 BUSQUIN Philippe -GHIERCHE Jacques : 50,90 %25 NS 4P W+1 -650 6.6 27.50
26 NS 3C S-1 -100 14.2 59.17
27 NS 5P S = 450 14.2 59.17 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
25 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 60,78 %28 NS 4P E+2 -480 1.2 5.00
29 NS 2P W+1 -140 14.2 59.17
30 NS 1S S+2 150 10.9 45.42 µ Tbl = 36,53 %
24 COULIE Joelle -STEED Mercédès : 45,69 %31 NS 3S N+2 660 18.5 77.08
32 NS 4P E-3 300 23.9 99.58
33 NS 3C E-1 50 16.3 67.92 µ Tbl = 81,53 %
Total : 407,0 / 720 = 56,53 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
25 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 60,78 % 1 NS 4C E = -420 5 20.83
2 NS 3C W-1 50 10 41.67
3 NS 2P N = 110 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 34,72 %
28 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 45,14 % 4 NS 4C N+1 650 14 58.33
5 NS 2C N+2 170 6 25.00
6 NS 3T W+3 -170 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 36,11 %
26 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 35,82 % 7 NS 4K S-2 -200 23 95.83
8 NS 2P N-1 -50 14 58.33
9 NS 1S S-1 -50 11 45.83 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
22 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 58,38 %10 NS Pass Passe 12 50.00
11 NS 2K S+1 110 13 54.17
12 NS 3CcN-1 -200 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
20 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 36,00 %16 NS 1S E = -90 7 29.17
17 NS 3S N = 400 14 58.33
18 NS 3S N = 600 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
19 GERARD Francis -VUYST Michele : 53,64 %19 NS 2P E+1 -140 0 0.00
20 NS 4P W-2 200 23 95.83
21 NS 3K W+2 -150 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
27 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 46,68 %22 NS 3K W-1 100 6 25.00
23 NS 3S W+2 -660 10 41.67
24 NS 3S W+4 -520 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
17 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 57,33 %25 NS 3C S-2 -100 23.9 99.58
26 NS 3C S-1 -100 14.2 59.17
27 NS 4T E-3 150 2.3 9.58 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
16 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 53,03 %28 NS 4P W+1 -450 12 50.00
29 NS 4P W = -620 2.3 9.58
30 NS 1S N+2 150 10.9 45.42 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
15 BUSQUIN Philippe -GHIERCHE Jacques : 50,90 %31 NS 3S N+3 690 23.9 99.58
32 NS 4P E-2 200 15.3 63.75
33 NS 3C E-1 50 16.3 67.92 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
Total : 357,1 / 720 = 49,60 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
16 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 53,03 % 1 NS 3C E = -140 12 50.00
2 NS 3C W-1 50 10 41.67
3 NS 2P N+3 200 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
15 BUSQUIN Philippe -GHIERCHE Jacques : 50,90 % 4 NS 4C N+1 650 14 58.33
5 NS 2C N+2 170 6 25.00
6 NS 3S W-1 100 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
25 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 60,78 % 7 NS 4P E+2 -680 9 37.50
8 NS 3PcN-1 -100 5 20.83
9 NS 3K N+1 130 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
27 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 46,68 %10 NS 1S S-2 -200 0 0.00
11 NS 1K S+3 130 17 70.83
12 NS 4PcE+1 -690 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 26,39 %
23 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,47 %13 NS 3S N+3 690 19 79.17
14 NS 3S E = -400 2 8.33
15 NS 6S S = 1440 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 52,78 %
21 BABIKOW Georges -DE BIE Sylvie : 59,44 %19 NS 1S E+1 -120 2 8.33
20 NS 4P W = -620 12 50.00
21 NS 2K E+2 -130 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
20 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 36,00 %22 NS 4C N = 420 21 87.50
23 NS 5K E+1 -620 20 83.33
24 NS 3S W+2 -460 23 95.83 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
28 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 45,14 %25 NS 3P W+3 -230 14.2 59.17
26 NS 3C S-1 -100 14.2 59.17
27 NS 5TcE-3 500 21.8 90.83 µ Tbl = 69,72 %
26 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 35,82 %28 NS 4C E-1 50 22.8 95.00
29 NS 2P W+1 -140 14.2 59.17
30 NS 1S S+3 180 21.8 90.83 µ Tbl = 81,67 %
17 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 57,33 %31 NS 3S N = 600 2.3 9.58
32 NS 4P E-2 200 15.3 63.75
33 NS 5T N-3 -150 0.1 0.42 µ Tbl = 24,58 %
Total : 396,7 / 720 = 55,10 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
18 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 49,49 % 1 NS 4T W-2 100 22 91.67
2 NS 2S E-1 50 10 41.67
3 NS 4P N+1 450 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
17 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 57,33 % 4 NS 4C N+1 650 14 58.33
5 NS 1C N+3 170 6 25.00
6 NS 3S W = -600 1 4.17 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
16 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 53,03 % 7 NS 5P E+1 -680 9 37.50
8 NS 3C W = -140 0 0.00
9 NS 1S S-1 -50 11 45.83 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
15 BUSQUIN Philippe -GHIERCHE Jacques : 50,90 %10 NS 1S E = -90 7 29.17
11 NS 2PcE-4 800 24 100.00
12 NS 4P E+2 -480 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
28 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 45,14 %13 NS 4P N+1 650 12 50.00
14 NS 2T E+2 -130 13 54.17
15 NS 6S S = 1440 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
26 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 35,82 %16 NS 1S E-1 100 16 66.67
17 NS 3S S+1 430 23 95.83
18 NS 2C S+1 140 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 81,94 %
22 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 58,38 %22 NS 3C S+2 200 13 54.17
23 NS 3S W+1 -630 14 58.33
24 NS 3S W+3 -490 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
21 BABIKOW Georges -DE BIE Sylvie : 59,44 %25 NS 4P E+2 -680 1.2 5.00
26 NS 2P W = -110 8.8 36.67
27 NS 6P S-1 -50 0.1 0.42 µ Tbl = 14,03 %
20 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 36,00 %28 NS 4P E+1 -450 12 50.00
29 NS 4P W = -620 2.3 9.58
30 NS 1S S+2 150 10.9 45.42 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
27 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 46,68 %31 NS 3S N+1 630 5.5 22.92
32 NS 3C N-2 -100 3.3 13.75
33 NS 3C E-1 50 16.3 67.92 µ Tbl = 34,86 %
Total : 336,4 / 720 = 46,72 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian
28 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 45,14 % 1 NS 4C E+1 -450 2 8.33
2 NS 4P W-3 150 24 100.00
3 NS 2P N+3 200 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
26 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 35,82 % 4 NS 4C N+1 650 14 58.33
5 NS 4C N+1 650 21 87.50
6 NS 2P N-2 -100 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
18 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 49,49 % 7 NS 4P E+2 -680 9 37.50
8 NS 3P N-2 -100 5 20.83
9 NS 3PcW-1 200 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 52,78 %
17 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 57,33 %10 NS 1S S-1 -100 3 12.50
11 NS 3S N+3 490 22 91.67
12 NS 4PcE+1 -690 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
16 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 53,03 %13 NS 6P N-1 -100 2 8.33
14 NS 2C N-1 -50 19 79.17
15 NS 6S S = 1440 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 52,78 %
15 BUSQUIN Philippe -GHIERCHE Jacques : 50,90 %16 NS 1S E-1 100 16 66.67
17 NS 3S S+1 430 23 95.83
18 NS 1S E-1 50 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 65,28 %
27 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 46,68 %19 NS 1S N = 90 17 70.83
20 NS 4P E-1 100 18 75.00
21 NS 3S W-1 50 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,94 %
23 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,47 %25 NS 3P W+2 -200 19.6 81.67
26 NS 2P W+1 -140 4.4 18.33
27 NS 4P S+1 450 14.2 59.17 µ Tbl = 53,06 %
22 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 58,38 %28 NS 4P E+1 -450 12 50.00
29 NS 4P W-2 200 23.9 99.58
30 NS 1S S+3 180 21.8 90.83 µ Tbl = 80,14 %
21 BABIKOW Georges -DE BIE Sylvie : 59,44 %31 NS 3S N+1 630 5.5 22.92
32 NS 3P E-1 100 6.6 27.50
33 NS 2C E+1 -140 2.3 9.58 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
Total : 417,3 / 720 = 57,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 WUYARD Alphonse -NELIS Claude
22 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 58,38 % 1 NS 4C E = -420 5 20.83
2 NS 4C W-1 50 10 41.67
3 NS 3K N-2 -100 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
21 BABIKOW Georges -DE BIE Sylvie : 59,44 % 4 NS 4C N+1 650 14 58.33
5 NS 4C N = 620 17 70.83
6 NS 3PcN-2 -300 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
27 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 46,68 % 7 NS 3P E+2 -200 23 95.83
8 NS 2P N-1 -50 14 58.33
9 NS 1S N+1 120 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
19 GERARD Francis -VUYST Michele : 53,64 %10 NS Pass Passe 12 50.00
11 NS 2K S+2 130 17 70.83
12 NS 2P E+4 -230 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
18 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 49,49 %13 NS 4P N+2 680 16 66.67
14 NS 3T E+1 -130 13 54.17
15 NS 6S N-1 -100 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
17 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 57,33 %16 NS 1S E = -90 7 29.17
17 NS 3S N = 400 14 58.33
18 NS 2P E-2 100 11 45.83 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
16 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 53,03 %19 NS 2K W+1 -110 8 33.33
20 NS 4P W+1 -650 8 33.33
21 NS 3K W+2 -150 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
28 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 45,14 %22 NS 3C N+2 200 13 54.17
23 NS 3S E+3 -690 3 12.50
24 NS 3S W+2 -460 23 95.83 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
24 COULIE Joelle -STEED Mercédès : 45,69 %28 NS 4P E+1 -450 12 50.00
29 NS 2P W+1 -140 14.2 59.17
30 NS 1S N+2 150 10.9 45.42 µ Tbl = 51,53 %
23 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,47 %31 NS 3S S+2 660 18.5 77.08
32 NS 4P E-2 200 15.3 63.75
33 NS 2C W = -110 6.6 27.50 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
Total : 355,5 / 720 = 49,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René
24 COULIE Joelle -STEED Mercédès : 45,69 % 1 NS 4C E-1 50 18 75.00
2 NS 2S W-2 100 21 87.50
3 NS 4P S-2 -100 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
23 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,47 % 4 NS 4C N+1 650 14 58.33
5 NS 5KcE-4 800 24 100.00
6 NS 3T W+2 -150 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
22 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 58,38 % 7 NS 5C W+1 -680 9 37.50
8 NS 3P N-2 -100 5 20.83
9 NS 1S S-3 -150 1 4.17 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
28 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 45,14 %10 NS 1S E-1 100 22 91.67
11 NS 3K S = 110 13 54.17
12 NS 4PcE+1 -690 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
26 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 35,82 %13 NS 4P N = 620 5 20.83
14 NS 3K E+1 -130 13 54.17
15 NS 6S N-1 -100 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 30,56 %
19 GERARD Francis -VUYST Michele : 53,64 %16 NS 1S E+1 -120 1 4.17
17 NS 3S N-1 -50 2 8.33
18 NS 2S N = 120 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
18 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 49,49 %19 NS 3T S = 110 21 87.50
20 NS 5P W+1 -680 3 12.50
21 NS 2S E+1 -150 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
17 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 57,33 %22 NS 4C N = 420 21 87.50
23 NS 3S E+3 -690 3 12.50
24 NS 3S W+3 -490 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
16 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 53,03 %25 NS 4P E+1 -650 6.6 27.50
26 NS 1S N+1 120 21.8 90.83
27 NS 4C N = 420 6.6 27.50 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
25 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 60,78 %31 NS 3S S+2 660 18.5 77.08
32 NS 4P E-2 200 15.3 63.75
33 NS 3C E-1 50 16.3 67.92 µ Tbl = 69,58 %
Total : 336,1 / 720 = 46,68 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Christian
26 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 35,82 % 1 NS 3P S-4 -200 9 37.50
2 NS 4C E-1 50 10 41.67
3 NS 4PcS = 590 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
19 GERARD Francis -VUYST Michele : 53,64 % 4 NS 4C N = 620 1 4.17
5 NS 2C N+2 170 6 25.00
6 NS 3T W+2 -150 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 23,61 %
23 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,47 % 7 NS 4C W+2 -680 9 37.50
8 NS 2P N-1 -50 14 58.33
9 NS 4K N-2 -100 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
16 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 53,03 %10 NS 2K S = 90 17 70.83
11 NS 2K S = 90 10 41.67
12 NS 3P E+1 -170 23 95.83 µ Tbl = 69,44 %
20 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 36,00 %13 NS 6T N = 1370 22 91.67
14 NS 2C N-1 -50 19 79.17
15 NS 6S N = 1440 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 80,56 %
24 COULIE Joelle -STEED Mercédès : 45,69 %16 NS 1S E-1 100 16 66.67
17 NS 3S S = 400 14 58.33
18 NS 3S S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
17 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 57,33 %19 NS 4T S-1 -50 14 58.33
20 NS 4P W+1 -650 8 33.33
21 NS 3K W+1 -130 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
21 BABIKOW Georges -DE BIE Sylvie : 59,44 %22 NS 3C N+2 200 13 54.17
23 NS 3S E+3 -690 3 12.50
24 NS 3S W+4 -520 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
18 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 49,49 %28 NS 4P E-1 50 22.8 95.00
29 NS 2P W+2 -170 6.6 27.50
30 NS 3S S-1 -50 1.2 5.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
22 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 58,38 %31 NS 4P S+1 650 10.9 45.42
32 NS 3P E-2 200 15.3 63.75
33 NS 1P W+1 -110 6.6 27.50 µ Tbl = 45,56 %
Total : 347,4 / 720 = 48,25 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
23 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,47 % 1 NS 2C E+3 -200 9 37.50
2 NS 4C E-1 50 10 41.67
3 NS 3P N+2 200 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
27 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 46,68 % 4 NS 4C N+1 650 14 58.33
5 NS 4C N+1 650 21 87.50
6 NS 3S W = -600 1 4.17 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
20 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 36,00 % 7 NS 4P E+2 -680 9 37.50
8 NS 2P N = 110 23 95.83
9 NS 3S S-2 -100 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
24 COULIE Joelle -STEED Mercédès : 45,69 %10 NS 1S E-1 100 22 91.67
11 NS 3S S-3 -150 0 0.00
12 NS 4P E = -420 11 45.83 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
17 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 57,33 %13 NS 4P N+1 650 12 50.00
14 NS 3S W = -400 2 8.33
15 NS 6S S = 1440 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
21 BABIKOW Georges -DE BIE Sylvie : 59,44 %16 NS 1S E = -90 7 29.17
17 NS 3S N = 400 14 58.33
18 NS 2S S = 120 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
25 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 60,78 %19 NS 2P W = -110 8 33.33
20 NS 4P W-1 100 18 75.00
21 NS 2S E = -120 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
18 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 49,49 %22 NS 2C N+2 170 8 33.33
23 NS 5K E+1 -620 20 83.33
24 NS 3S W+4 -520 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
22 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 58,38 %25 NS 4P W+1 -650 6.6 27.50
26 NS 2P W+1 -140 4.4 18.33
27 NS 4P S+1 450 14.2 59.17 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
19 GERARD Francis -VUYST Michele : 53,64 %31 NS 3S S+2 660 18.5 77.08
32 NS 4P E-2 200 15.3 63.75
33 NS 4C E-1 50 16.3 67.92 µ Tbl = 69,58 %
Total : 366,3 / 720 = 50,87 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal
20 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 36,00 % 1 NS 5TcE-2 300 24 100.00
2 NS 3C E-1 50 10 41.67
3 NS 2K E-1 100 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
24 COULIE Joelle -STEED Mercédès : 45,69 % 4 NS 4C N+1 650 14 58.33
5 NS 3C N+1 170 6 25.00
6 NS 4T W = -130 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
28 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 45,14 % 7 NS 5P E+1 -680 9 37.50
8 NS 2P N = 110 23 95.83
9 NS 2K N+1 110 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 69,44 %
21 BABIKOW Georges -DE BIE Sylvie : 59,44 %10 NS Pass Passe 12 50.00
11 NS 2C N+1 140 20 83.33
12 NS 2P E+3 -200 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 69,44 %
25 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 60,78 %13 NS 5T N+1 620 5 20.83
14 NS 3S W = -400 2 8.33
15 NS 6S S = 1440 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
18 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 49,49 %16 NS 1S E-2 200 23 95.83
17 NS 3S S-1 -50 2 8.33
18 NS 2C S+1 140 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
22 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 58,38 %19 NS 1S N = 90 17 70.83
20 NS 5TcN-4 -1100 0 0.00
21 NS 1S N-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 23,61 %
15 BUSQUIN Philippe -GHIERCHE Jacques : 50,90 %22 NS 4C N = 420 21 87.50
23 NS 5K E+1 -620 20 83.33
24 NS 3S W+4 -520 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 63,89 %
19 GERARD Francis -VUYST Michele : 53,64 %25 NS 2P W+1 -140 21.8 90.83
26 NS 4C N-2 -200 0.1 0.42
27 NS 4P S+1 450 14.2 59.17 µ Tbl = 50,14 %
23 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,47 %28 NS 5P W = -450 12 50.00
29 NS 3P W = -140 14.2 59.17
30 NS 2P N+2 170 17.4 72.50 µ Tbl = 60,56 %
Total : 388,7 / 720 = 53,99 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 BUSQUIN Philippe -GHIERCHE Jacques
1 PADOU Bernard -LEFEVRE Raymond : 53,71 % 1 EO 4PcS-3 -500 24 100.00
2 EO 4P W-2 100 3 12.50
3 EO 3S S-3 -150 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
7 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,10 % 4 EO 4C N+1 650 10 41.67
5 EO 2C N+2 170 18 75.00
6 EO 3S W-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
2 GILLAIN Françoise -VANDIERENDONCK : 59,04 % 7 EO 4P E+2 -680 15 62.50
8 EO 2PcN-1 -100 19 79.17
9 EO 4K N-1 -50 13 54.17 µ Tbl = 65,28 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,72 %10 EO 1S E = -90 17 70.83
11 EO 2PcE-4 800 0 0.00
12 EO 4P E+2 -480 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -MICHAUX Hélène : 30,40 %13 EO 3S N+1 630 16 66.67
14 EO 2S W+3 -210 18 75.00
15 EO 3S N+2 660 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 69,44 %
9 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 57,96 %16 EO 1S E-1 100 8 33.33
17 EO 3S S+1 430 1 4.17
18 EO 1S E-1 50 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 34,72 %
4 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 41,99 %19 EO 3K W = -110 16 66.67
20 EO 4P W+1 -650 16 66.67
21 EO 3K E+2 -150 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
14 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 53,99 %22 EO 4C N = 420 3 12.50
23 EO 5K E+1 -620 4 16.67
24 EO 3S W+4 -520 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 36,11 %
5 DEVIGNE Alain -FOUBERT Marie-Rose : 56,53 %25 EO 4P W+1 -650 17.4 72.50
26 EO 3C S-1 -100 9.8 40.83
27 EO 5P S = 450 9.8 40.83 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,60 %31 EO 3S N+3 690 0.1 0.42
32 EO 4P E-2 200 8.7 36.25
33 EO 3C E-1 50 7.7 32.08 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
Total : 366,5 / 720 = 50,90 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 COLOT Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier
7 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,10 % 1 EO 3C E = -140 12 50.00
2 EO 3C W-1 50 14 58.33
3 EO 2P N+3 200 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
2 GILLAIN Françoise -VANDIERENDONCK : 59,04 % 4 EO 4C N+1 650 10 41.67
5 EO 2C N+3 200 10 41.67
6 EO 4T W = -130 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,72 % 7 EO 5P E+1 -680 15 62.50
8 EO 3C W = -140 24 100.00
9 EO 1S S-1 -50 13 54.17 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
12 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Christian : 48,25 %10 EO 2K S = 90 7 29.17
11 EO 2K S = 90 14 58.33
12 EO 3P E+1 -170 1 4.17 µ Tbl = 30,56 %
9 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 57,96 %13 EO 6P N-1 -100 22 91.67
14 EO 2C N-1 -50 5 20.83
15 EO 6S S = 1440 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 47,22 %
4 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 41,99 %16 EO 1S E = -90 17 70.83
17 EO 1S S+2 150 18 75.00
18 EO 3S N-1 -100 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 76,39 %
10 WUYARD Alphonse -NELIS Claude : 49,37 %19 EO 2K W+1 -110 16 66.67
20 EO 4P W+1 -650 16 66.67
21 EO 3K W+2 -150 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
5 DEVIGNE Alain -FOUBERT Marie-Rose : 56,53 %22 EO 2C S+3 200 11 45.83
23 EO 5K E+1 -620 4 16.67
24 EO 3S W+3 -490 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,94 %
11 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 46,68 %25 EO 4P E+1 -650 17.4 72.50
26 EO 1S N+1 120 2.2 9.17
27 EO 4C N = 420 17.4 72.50 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,60 %28 EO 4P W+1 -450 12 50.00
29 EO 4P W = -620 21.7 90.42
30 EO 1S N+2 150 13.1 54.58 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
Total : 381,8 / 720 = 53,03 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,72 % 4 EO 4C N+1 650 10 41.67
5 EO 1C N+3 170 18 75.00
6 EO 3S W = -600 23 95.83 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -MICHAUX Hélène : 30,40 % 7 EO 4P E+2 -680 15 62.50
8 EO 2P N-1 -50 10 41.67
9 EO 3S N-3 -150 23 95.83 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
9 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 57,96 %10 EO 1S S-1 -100 21 87.50
11 EO 3S N+3 490 2 8.33
12 EO 4PcE+1 -690 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
13 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,87 %13 EO 4P N+1 650 12 50.00
14 EO 3S W = -400 22 91.67
15 EO 6S S = 1440 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
10 WUYARD Alphonse -NELIS Claude : 49,37 %16 EO 1S E = -90 17 70.83
17 EO 3S N = 400 10 41.67
18 EO 2P E-2 100 13 54.17 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
12 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Christian : 48,25 %19 EO 4T S-1 -50 10 41.67
20 EO 4P W+1 -650 16 66.67
21 EO 3K W+1 -130 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
11 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 46,68 %22 EO 4C N = 420 3 12.50
23 EO 3S E+3 -690 21 87.50
24 EO 3S W+3 -490 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,60 %25 EO 3C S-2 -100 0.1 0.42
26 EO 3C S-1 -100 9.8 40.83
27 EO 4T E-3 150 21.7 90.42 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
1 PADOU Bernard -LEFEVRE Raymond : 53,71 %28 EO 4P W+1 -450 12 50.00
29 EO 2P W+1 -140 9.8 40.83
30 EO 1S N+2 150 13.1 54.58 µ Tbl = 48,47 %
7 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,10 %31 EO 3S N = 600 21.7 90.42
32 EO 4P E-2 200 8.7 36.25
33 EO 5T N-3 -150 23.9 99.58 µ Tbl = 75,42 %
Total : 412,8 / 720 = 57,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,72 % 1 EO 4T W-2 100 2 8.33
2 EO 2S E-1 50 14 58.33
3 EO 4P N+1 450 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
9 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 57,96 % 7 EO 4P E+2 -680 15 62.50
8 EO 3P N-2 -100 19 79.17
9 EO 3PcW-1 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 47,22 %
4 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 41,99 %10 EO 2K S-1 -100 21 87.50
11 EO 3K S-1 -50 17 70.83
12 EO 2P E+3 -200 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
10 WUYARD Alphonse -NELIS Claude : 49,37 %13 EO 4P N+2 680 8 33.33
14 EO 3T E+1 -130 11 45.83
15 EO 6S N-1 -100 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
14 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 53,99 %16 EO 1S E-2 200 1 4.17
17 EO 3S S-1 -50 22 91.67
18 EO 2C S+1 140 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
11 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 46,68 %19 EO 3T S = 110 3 12.50
20 EO 5P W+1 -680 21 87.50
21 EO 2S E+1 -150 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
13 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,87 %22 EO 2C N+2 170 16 66.67
23 EO 5K E+1 -620 4 16.67
24 EO 3S W+4 -520 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
1 PADOU Bernard -LEFEVRE Raymond : 53,71 %25 EO 3P W+3 -230 9.8 40.83
26 EO 2C N-1 -100 9.8 40.83
27 EO 4P S+1 450 9.8 40.83 µ Tbl = 40,83 %
12 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Christian : 48,25 %28 EO 4P E-1 50 1.2 5.00
29 EO 2P W+2 -170 17.4 72.50
30 EO 3S S-1 -50 22.8 95.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
2 GILLAIN Françoise -VANDIERENDONCK : 59,04 %31 EO 4P S+1 650 13.1 54.58
32 EO 4CcN-1 -100 20.7 86.25
33 EO 3C E-1 50 7.7 32.08 µ Tbl = 57,64 %
Total : 356,3 / 720 = 49,49 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 GERARD Francis -VUYST Michele
3 ROEGIERS Marga -MICHAUX Hélène : 30,40 % 1 EO 3S E-1 50 6 25.00
2 EO 3C W = -140 24 100.00
3 EO 2P S-1 -50 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
12 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Christian : 48,25 % 4 EO 4C N = 620 23 95.83
5 EO 2C N+2 170 18 75.00
6 EO 3T W+2 -150 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 76,39 %
10 WUYARD Alphonse -NELIS Claude : 49,37 %10 EO Pass Passe 12 50.00
11 EO 2K S+2 130 7 29.17
12 EO 2P E+4 -230 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
5 DEVIGNE Alain -FOUBERT Marie-Rose : 56,53 %13 EO 3S S+3 690 5 20.83
14 EO 3T E+2 -150 16 66.67
15 EO 6S S = 1440 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
11 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 46,68 %16 EO 1S E+1 -120 23 95.83
17 EO 3S N-1 -50 22 91.67
18 EO 2S N = 120 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,60 %19 EO 2P E+1 -140 24 100.00
20 EO 4P W-2 200 1 4.17
21 EO 3K W+2 -150 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
1 PADOU Bernard -LEFEVRE Raymond : 53,71 %22 EO 4C S-1 -50 21 87.50
23 EO 3S E+2 -660 14 58.33
24 EO 3S W+4 -520 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
14 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 53,99 %25 EO 2P W+1 -140 2.2 9.17
26 EO 4C N-2 -200 23.9 99.58
27 EO 4P S+1 450 9.8 40.83 µ Tbl = 49,86 %
2 GILLAIN Françoise -VANDIERENDONCK : 59,04 %28 EO 4P W+1 -450 12 50.00
29 EO 4P W-1 100 2.2 9.17
30 EO 1S N+3 180 2.2 9.17 µ Tbl = 22,78 %
13 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,87 %31 EO 3S S+2 660 5.5 22.92
32 EO 4P E-2 200 8.7 36.25
33 EO 4C E-1 50 7.7 32.08 µ Tbl = 30,42 %
Total : 386,2 / 720 = 53,64 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph
14 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 53,99 % 1 EO 5TcE-2 300 0 0.00
2 EO 3C E-1 50 14 58.33
3 EO 2K E-1 100 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
4 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 41,99 % 4 EO 4C N+1 650 10 41.67
5 EO 4C N = 620 7 29.17
6 EO 2K S-1 -50 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 26,39 %
13 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,87 % 7 EO 4P E+2 -680 15 62.50
8 EO 2P N = 110 1 4.17
9 EO 3S S-2 -100 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
12 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Christian : 48,25 %13 EO 6T N = 1370 2 8.33
14 EO 2C N-1 -50 5 20.83
15 EO 6S N = 1440 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 19,44 %
6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,60 %16 EO 1S E = -90 17 70.83
17 EO 3S N = 400 10 41.67
18 EO 3S N = 600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
1 PADOU Bernard -LEFEVRE Raymond : 53,71 %19 EO 1S N+1 120 0 0.00
20 EO 4P W-1 100 6 25.00
21 EO 3K E+1 -130 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
7 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,10 %22 EO 4C N = 420 3 12.50
23 EO 5K E+1 -620 4 16.67
24 EO 3S W+2 -460 1 4.17 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
2 GILLAIN Françoise -VANDIERENDONCK : 59,04 %25 EO 3P W+3 -230 9.8 40.83
26 EO 1S N+2 150 0.1 0.42
27 EO 4PcS+1 690 0.1 0.42 µ Tbl = 13,89 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,72 %28 EO 4P E+1 -450 12 50.00
29 EO 4P W = -620 21.7 90.42
30 EO 1S S+2 150 13.1 54.58 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -MICHAUX Hélène : 30,40 %31 EO 4P S+1 650 13.1 54.58
32 EO 2P E+1 -140 23.9 99.58
33 EO 2C E = -110 17.4 72.50 µ Tbl = 75,56 %
Total : 259,2 / 720 = 36,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 BABIKOW Georges -DE BIE Sylvie
4 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 41,99 % 1 EO 4C E-1 50 6 25.00
2 EO 3S W-1 50 14 58.33
3 EO 2P S+2 170 11 45.83 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
10 WUYARD Alphonse -NELIS Claude : 49,37 % 4 EO 4C N+1 650 10 41.67
5 EO 4C N = 620 7 29.17
6 EO 3PcN-2 -300 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
5 DEVIGNE Alain -FOUBERT Marie-Rose : 56,53 % 7 EO 4P E+2 -680 15 62.50
8 EO 4C W-1 50 4 16.67
9 EO 1S S-1 -50 13 54.17 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
14 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 53,99 %10 EO Pass Passe 12 50.00
11 EO 2C N+1 140 4 16.67
12 EO 2P E+3 -200 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 30,56 %
13 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,87 %16 EO 1S E = -90 17 70.83
17 EO 3S N = 400 10 41.67
18 EO 2S S = 120 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,10 %19 EO 1S E+1 -120 22 91.67
20 EO 4P W = -620 12 50.00
21 EO 2K E+2 -130 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
12 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Christian : 48,25 %22 EO 3C N+2 200 11 45.83
23 EO 3S E+3 -690 21 87.50
24 EO 3S W+4 -520 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,72 %25 EO 4P E+2 -680 22.8 95.00
26 EO 2P W = -110 15.2 63.33
27 EO 6P S-1 -50 23.9 99.58 µ Tbl = 85,97 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -MICHAUX Hélène : 30,40 %28 EO 4P E+1 -450 12 50.00
29 EO 4P W = -620 21.7 90.42
30 EO 3S S-1 -50 22.8 95.00 µ Tbl = 78,47 %
9 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 57,96 %31 EO 3S N+1 630 18.5 77.08
32 EO 3P E-1 100 17.4 72.50
33 EO 2C E+1 -140 21.7 90.42 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
Total : 428,0 / 720 = 59,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte
10 WUYARD Alphonse -NELIS Claude : 49,37 % 1 EO 4C E = -420 19 79.17
2 EO 4C W-1 50 14 58.33
3 EO 3K N-2 -100 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
5 DEVIGNE Alain -FOUBERT Marie-Rose : 56,53 % 4 EO 4C N = 620 23 95.83
5 EO 3P S+1 170 18 75.00
6 EO 3K S-2 -100 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 63,89 %
11 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 46,68 % 7 EO 5C W+1 -680 15 62.50
8 EO 3P N-2 -100 19 79.17
9 EO 1S S-3 -150 23 95.83 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,60 %10 EO Pass Passe 12 50.00
11 EO 2K S+1 110 11 45.83
12 EO 3CcN-1 -200 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
1 PADOU Bernard -LEFEVRE Raymond : 53,71 %13 EO 6S N-3 -300 24 100.00
14 EO 2S W-1 50 2 8.33
15 EO 7S S-2 -200 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 69,44 %
14 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 53,99 %19 EO 1S N = 90 7 29.17
20 EO 5TcN-4 -1100 24 100.00
21 EO 1S N-2 -200 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 76,39 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,72 %22 EO 3C S+2 200 11 45.83
23 EO 3S W+1 -630 10 41.67
24 EO 3S W+3 -490 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
13 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,87 %25 EO 4P W+1 -650 17.4 72.50
26 EO 2P W+1 -140 19.6 81.67
27 EO 4P S+1 450 9.8 40.83 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
9 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 57,96 %28 EO 4P E+1 -450 12 50.00
29 EO 4P W-2 200 0.1 0.42
30 EO 1S S+3 180 2.2 9.17 µ Tbl = 19,86 %
12 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Christian : 48,25 %31 EO 4P S+1 650 13.1 54.58
32 EO 3P E-2 200 8.7 36.25
33 EO 1P W+1 -110 17.4 72.50 µ Tbl = 54,44 %
Total : 420,3 / 720 = 58,38 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
13 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,87 % 1 EO 2C E+3 -200 15 62.50
2 EO 4C E-1 50 14 58.33
3 EO 3P N+2 200 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
11 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 46,68 % 4 EO 4C N+1 650 10 41.67
5 EO 5KcE-4 800 0 0.00
6 EO 3T W+2 -150 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Christian : 48,25 % 7 EO 4C W+2 -680 15 62.50
8 EO 2P N-1 -50 10 41.67
9 EO 4K N-2 -100 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
1 PADOU Bernard -LEFEVRE Raymond : 53,71 %10 EO 1S E-1 100 2 8.33
11 EO 3K S-1 -50 17 70.83
12 EO 3P E+1 -170 1 4.17 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
7 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,10 %13 EO 3S N+3 690 5 20.83
14 EO 3S E = -400 22 91.67
15 EO 6S S = 1440 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 47,22 %
2 GILLAIN Françoise -VANDIERENDONCK : 59,04 %16 EO 1S E-1 100 8 33.33
17 EO 3S S = 400 10 41.67
18 EO 3C S-1 -100 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 52,78 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -MICHAUX Hélène : 30,40 %22 EO 2T E = -90 24 100.00
23 EO 3S E+3 -690 21 87.50
24 EO 3S W+3 -490 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 73,61 %
9 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 57,96 %25 EO 3P W+2 -200 4.4 18.33
26 EO 2P W+1 -140 19.6 81.67
27 EO 4P S+1 450 9.8 40.83 µ Tbl = 46,94 %
14 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 53,99 %28 EO 5P W = -450 12 50.00
29 EO 3P W = -140 9.8 40.83
30 EO 2P N+2 170 6.6 27.50 µ Tbl = 39,44 %
10 WUYARD Alphonse -NELIS Claude : 49,37 %31 EO 3S S+2 660 5.5 22.92
32 EO 4P E-2 200 8.7 36.25
33 EO 2C W = -110 17.4 72.50 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
Total : 341,8 / 720 = 47,47 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 COULIE Joelle -STEED Mercédès
11 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 46,68 % 1 EO 4C E-1 50 6 25.00
2 EO 2S W-2 100 3 12.50
3 EO 4P S-2 -100 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
14 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 53,99 % 4 EO 4C N+1 650 10 41.67
5 EO 3C N+1 170 18 75.00
6 EO 4T W = -130 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
1 PADOU Bernard -LEFEVRE Raymond : 53,71 % 7 EO 5KcN-2 -500 4 16.67
8 EO 2P N-1 -50 10 41.67
9 EO 1S N = 90 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 30,56 %
13 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,87 %10 EO 1S E-1 100 2 8.33
11 EO 3S S-3 -150 24 100.00
12 EO 4P E = -420 13 54.17 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
2 GILLAIN Françoise -VANDIERENDONCK : 59,04 %13 EO 6S N = 1440 0 0.00
14 EO 3T E+1 -130 11 45.83
15 EO 6S S = 1440 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
12 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Christian : 48,25 %16 EO 1S E-1 100 8 33.33
17 EO 3S S = 400 10 41.67
18 EO 3S S-2 -200 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -MICHAUX Hélène : 30,40 %19 EO 2K W+1 -110 16 66.67
20 EO 4P W+2 -680 21 87.50
21 EO 3K W+1 -130 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 63,89 %
4 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 41,99 %25 EO 4P W+2 -680 22.8 95.00
26 EO 2P W-1 100 4.4 18.33
27 EO 3P S+2 200 19.6 81.67 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
10 WUYARD Alphonse -NELIS Claude : 49,37 %28 EO 4P E+1 -450 12 50.00
29 EO 2P W+1 -140 9.8 40.83
30 EO 1S N+2 150 13.1 54.58 µ Tbl = 48,47 %
5 DEVIGNE Alain -FOUBERT Marie-Rose : 56,53 %31 EO 3S N+2 660 5.5 22.92
32 EO 4P E-3 300 0.1 0.42
33 EO 3C E-1 50 7.7 32.08 µ Tbl = 18,47 %
Total : 329,0 / 720 = 45,69 %
PAIRE Nr : 25 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy
6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,60 % 1 EO 4C E = -420 19 79.17
2 EO 3C W-1 50 14 58.33
3 EO 2P N = 110 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 65,28 %
1 PADOU Bernard -LEFEVRE Raymond : 53,71 % 4 EO 4C N+1 650 10 41.67
5 EO 2C N+2 170 18 75.00
6 EO 4T W+1 -150 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
7 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,10 % 7 EO 4P E+2 -680 15 62.50
8 EO 3PcN-1 -100 19 79.17
9 EO 3K N+1 130 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 GILLAIN Françoise -VANDIERENDONCK : 59,04 %10 EO 1S E = -90 17 70.83
11 EO 3S N-2 -100 21 87.50
12 EO 4P E+1 -450 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
14 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 53,99 %13 EO 5T N+1 620 19 79.17
14 EO 3S W = -400 22 91.67
15 EO 6S S = 1440 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -MICHAUX Hélène : 30,40 %16 EO 1S E+1 -120 23 95.83
17 EO 3S N-1 -50 22 91.67
18 EO 2C S-1 -100 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 90,28 %
13 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,87 %19 EO 2P W = -110 16 66.67
20 EO 4P W-1 100 6 25.00
21 EO 2S E = -120 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
4 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 41,99 %22 EO 4C S-1 -50 21 87.50
23 EO 3S E+2 -660 14 58.33
24 EO 3S W+4 -520 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
5 DEVIGNE Alain -FOUBERT Marie-Rose : 56,53 %28 EO 4P E+2 -480 22.8 95.00
29 EO 2P W+1 -140 9.8 40.83
30 EO 1S S+2 150 13.1 54.58 µ Tbl = 63,47 %
11 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 46,68 %31 EO 3S S+2 660 5.5 22.92
32 EO 4P E-2 200 8.7 36.25
33 EO 3C E-1 50 7.7 32.08 µ Tbl = 30,42 %
Total : 437,6 / 720 = 60,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 26 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne
12 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Christian : 48,25 % 1 EO 3P S-4 -200 15 62.50
2 EO 4C E-1 50 14 58.33
3 EO 4PcS = 590 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
9 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 57,96 % 4 EO 4C N+1 650 10 41.67
5 EO 4C N+1 650 3 12.50
6 EO 2P N-2 -100 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,60 % 7 EO 4K S-2 -200 1 4.17
8 EO 2P N-1 -50 10 41.67
9 EO 1S S-1 -50 13 54.17 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -MICHAUX Hélène : 30,40 %10 EO 1S N = 90 7 29.17
11 EO 3S S-2 -100 21 87.50
12 EO 4P E = -420 13 54.17 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
11 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 46,68 %13 EO 4P N = 620 19 79.17
14 EO 3K E+1 -130 11 45.83
15 EO 6S N-1 -100 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 69,44 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,72 %16 EO 1S E-1 100 8 33.33
17 EO 3S S+1 430 1 4.17
18 EO 2C S+1 140 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 18,06 %
5 DEVIGNE Alain -FOUBERT Marie-Rose : 56,53 %19 EO 3T S = 110 3 12.50
20 EO 6KcS-1 -200 10 41.67
21 EO 2K E+2 -130 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 30,56 %
2 GILLAIN Françoise -VANDIERENDONCK : 59,04 %22 EO 4C N = 420 3 12.50
23 EO 5K E+1 -620 4 16.67
24 EO 3S W+3 -490 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
7 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,10 %28 EO 4C E-1 50 1.2 5.00
29 EO 2P W+1 -140 9.8 40.83
30 EO 1S S+3 180 2.2 9.17 µ Tbl = 18,33 %
4 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 41,99 %31 EO 3T S = 110 23.9 99.58
32 EO 4P E-2 200 8.7 36.25
33 EO 4C E-2 100 0.1 0.42 µ Tbl = 45,42 %
Total : 257,9 / 720 = 35,82 %
PAIRE Nr : 27 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel
5 DEVIGNE Alain -FOUBERT Marie-Rose : 56,53 % 1 EO 3P S-1 -50 10 41.67
2 EO 2S W-1 50 14 58.33
3 EO 3P S+1 170 11 45.83 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
13 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,87 % 4 EO 4C N+1 650 10 41.67
5 EO 4C N+1 650 3 12.50
6 EO 3S W = -600 23 95.83 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 WUYARD Alphonse -NELIS Claude : 49,37 % 7 EO 3P E+2 -200 1 4.17
8 EO 2P N-1 -50 10 41.67
9 EO 1S N+1 120 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
7 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,10 %10 EO 1S S-2 -200 24 100.00
11 EO 1K S+3 130 7 29.17
12 EO 4PcE+1 -690 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 73,61 %
4 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 41,99 %13 EO 4P N+1 650 12 50.00
14 EO 1S S = 90 0 0.00
15 EO 6S S-1 -100 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
1 PADOU Bernard -LEFEVRE Raymond : 53,71 %16 EO 1S E-2 200 1 4.17
17 EO 3S N = 400 10 41.67
18 EO 3C S = 140 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
9 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 57,96 %19 EO 1S N = 90 7 29.17
20 EO 4P E-1 100 6 25.00
21 EO 3S W-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,06 %
6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,60 %22 EO 3K W-1 100 18 75.00
23 EO 3S W+2 -660 14 58.33
24 EO 3S W+4 -520 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -MICHAUX Hélène : 30,40 %25 EO 3P W+3 -230 9.8 40.83
26 EO 2P W+1 -140 19.6 81.67
27 EO 4P S+1 450 9.8 40.83 µ Tbl = 54,44 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,72 %31 EO 3S N+1 630 18.5 77.08
32 EO 3C N-2 -100 20.7 86.25
33 EO 3C E-1 50 7.7 32.08 µ Tbl = 65,14 %
Total : 336,1 / 720 = 46,68 %
PAIRE Nr : 28 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN DOOREN Michele
9 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 57,96 % 1 EO 4C E+1 -450 22 91.67
2 EO 4P W-3 150 0 0.00
3 EO 2P N+3 200 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,60 % 4 EO 4C N+1 650 10 41.67
5 EO 2C N+2 170 18 75.00
6 EO 3T W+3 -170 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 63,89 %
14 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 53,99 % 7 EO 5P E+1 -680 15 62.50
8 EO 2P N = 110 1 4.17
9 EO 2K N+1 110 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 30,56 %
11 BIOURGE Gabrielle -LAENENS René : 46,68 %10 EO 1S E-1 100 2 8.33
11 EO 3K S = 110 11 45.83
12 EO 4PcE+1 -690 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,72 %13 EO 4P N+1 650 12 50.00
14 EO 2T E+2 -130 11 45.83
15 EO 6S S = 1440 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
5 DEVIGNE Alain -FOUBERT Marie-Rose : 56,53 %16 EO 1S E-1 100 8 33.33
17 EO 3S S = 400 10 41.67
18 EO 1PcE-1 100 13 54.17 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
2 GILLAIN Françoise -VANDIERENDONCK : 59,04 %19 EO 3K W = -110 16 66.67
20 EO 5P W-2 200 1 4.17
21 EO 3K W+1 -130 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 36,11 %
10 WUYARD Alphonse -NELIS Claude : 49,37 %22 EO 3C N+2 200 11 45.83
23 EO 3S E+3 -690 21 87.50
24 EO 3S W+2 -460 1 4.17 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
7 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,10 %25 EO 3P W+3 -230 9.8 40.83
26 EO 3C S-1 -100 9.8 40.83
27 EO 5TcE-3 500 2.2 9.17 µ Tbl = 30,28 %
4 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 41,99 %28 EO 4P E+2 -480 22.8 95.00
29 EO 3P W = -140 9.8 40.83
30 EO 1S S+1 120 19.6 81.67 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
Total : 325,0 / 720 = 45,14 %
|
|