|
Tournoi du 07-04-14
1 62,65 6 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand
2 56,22 4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
3 54,83 2 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
4 51,59 7 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
5 51,44 3 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
6 46,59 5 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette
7 45,59 10 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
8 45,48 9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
9 44,15 1 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier
10 41,31 8 LAENENS René -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
11 0,00 11 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 62,90 15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
2 61,32 22 JANSSEN Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
3 58,68 19 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
4 52,78 17 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
5 52,70 18 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard
6 52,48 12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
7 47,86 16 DOUETTE André -MASSART Jean
8 44,42 13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
9 43,00 21 VAN DOOREN Michele -MOSSERAY Bernadette
10 39,30 14 ROEGIERS Marga -COLLET Claudine
11 34,42 20 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick
PAIRE Nr : 1 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,48 % 1 NS 4C S-1 -50 3.4 18.89
2 NS 4C E-1 50 7.9 43.89
3 NS 4C N+2 480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
22 JANSSEN Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 61,32 % 4 NS 2C W-2 200 16.8 93.33
5 NS 3K W+2 -150 6.8 37.78
6 NS 4P N-1 -50 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
21 VAN DOOREN Michele -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 43,00 % 7 NS 3S N+2 660 12.3 68.33
8 NS 2K S-2 -100 3.4 18.89
9 NS 3S S+1 430 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
20 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 34,42 %10 NS 4P W+1 -650 3.4 18.89
11 NS 2P W+1 -140 6.8 37.78
12 NS 3S E-1 50 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
19 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 58,68 %13 NS 6P E = -1430 0.1 0.56
14 NS 3S S = 400 14.6 81.11
15 NS 4PcW-1 100 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
18 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,70 %16 NS 3P S = 140 14.6 81.11
17 NS 2P W = -110 0.1 0.56
18 NS 1S S+2 150 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 52,78 %19 NS 4CcS-1 -100 2.3 12.78
20 NS 2K N+2 130 3.4 18.89
21 NS 3C E+1 -170 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 35,37 %
16 DOUETTE André -MASSART Jean : 47,86 %22 NS 2P E = -110 0.1 0.56
23 NS 5P W+2 -710 11.2 62.22
24 NS 1K S+4 150 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 25,19 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,90 %25 NS 3S W-1 100 5.7 31.67
26 NS 3C E = -140 6.8 37.78
27 NS 2P W-2 100 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
14 ROEGIERS Marga -COLLET Claudine : 39,30 %28 NS 2C W-1 50 14 77.78
29 NS 3S W+2 -660 3 16.67
30 NS 4C W = -420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 238,4 / 540 = 44,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 44,42 % 4 NS 2S S = 120 5.7 31.67
5 NS 2K E+2 -130 11.2 62.22
6 NS 5T W-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,48 % 7 NS 3S S+2 660 12.3 68.33
8 NS 1S S = 90 15.7 87.22
9 NS 4C N = 420 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 74,63 %
22 JANSSEN Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 61,32 %10 NS 4P W+1 -650 3.4 18.89
11 NS 4P W-1 50 13.4 74.44
12 NS 3S W-2 100 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
21 VAN DOOREN Michele -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 43,00 %13 NS 3P E+2 -200 9 50.00
14 NS 3S S-1 -50 7.9 43.89
15 NS 5C S+1 680 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
20 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 34,42 %16 NS 2P S+1 140 14.6 81.11
17 NS 3C N = 140 11.2 62.22
18 NS 1S S+1 120 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
19 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 58,68 %19 NS 4C S-3 -150 0.1 0.56
20 NS 3S S = 600 11.2 62.22
21 NS 4C E = -420 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
18 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,70 %22 NS 3C N-1 -50 9 50.00
23 NS 4P W+3 -710 11.2 62.22
24 NS 2K S+4 170 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 52,78 %25 NS 3C E-2 200 14.6 81.11
26 NS 3S E-1 100 16.8 93.33
27 NS 4C E-1 50 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 70,74 %
16 DOUETTE André -MASSART Jean : 47,86 %28 NS 2C W-1 50 14 77.78
29 NS 2S W+2 -180 16 88.89
30 NS 4C W = -420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,90 %31 NS 3T E+1 -130 7.9 43.89
32 NS 2P E+2 -170 3.4 18.89
33 NS 4C S-1 -50 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 21,11 %
Total : 296,1 / 540 = 54,83 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
16 DOUETTE André -MASSART Jean : 47,86 % 1 NS 4C S = 420 17.9 99.44
2 NS 4C E = -420 3.4 18.89
3 NS 2C S+4 230 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 43,70 %
14 ROEGIERS Marga -COLLET Claudine : 39,30 % 7 NS 1S S+4 210 2.3 12.78
8 NS 3S S-1 -50 7.9 43.89
9 NS 4P S = 420 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 44,42 %10 NS 5TcS-3 -800 0.1 0.56
11 NS 4P W-1 50 13.4 74.44
12 NS 3S E+1 -430 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 27,22 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,48 %13 NS 6P E-1 100 12.3 68.33
14 NS 3S S-1 -50 7.9 43.89
15 NS 6PcW-4 800 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
22 JANSSEN Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 61,32 %16 NS 2S E = -120 3.4 18.89
17 NS 1S N+1 120 9 50.00
18 NS 2C S = 110 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
21 VAN DOOREN Michele -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 43,00 %19 NS 3T S = 110 13.4 74.44
20 NS 4P S = 620 17.9 99.44
21 NS 2C E+2 -170 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 82,78 %
20 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 34,42 %22 NS 2C N = 110 17.9 99.44
23 NS 5P E+2 -710 11.2 62.22
24 NS 5K S+1 420 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 80,93 %
19 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 58,68 %25 NS 4C E-2 200 14.6 81.11
26 NS 3S E = -600 1.2 6.67
27 NS 3C E = -140 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
18 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,70 %28 NS 2C W-2 100 18 100.00
29 NS 3S W = -600 14 77.78
30 NS 4C W = -420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 52,78 %31 NS 3T E+1 -130 7.9 43.89
32 NS 3PcE = -730 0.1 0.56
33 NS 2C N+2 170 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 21,11 %
Total : 277,8 / 540 = 51,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
18 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,70 % 1 NS 2C S+2 170 15.7 87.22
2 NS 4P E = -420 3.4 18.89
3 NS 3S N+1 430 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 52,78 % 4 NS 2S S = 120 5.7 31.67
5 NS 3K E+2 -150 6.8 37.78
6 NS 4P S = 420 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 54,26 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,90 %10 NS 4P W = -620 9 50.00
11 NS 5TcS-3 -500 0.1 0.56
12 NS 3S E = -400 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 27,41 %
14 ROEGIERS Marga -COLLET Claudine : 39,30 %13 NS 4C N = 620 15.7 87.22
14 NS 3S S+1 430 17.9 99.44
15 NS 5C S+1 680 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 82,96 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 44,42 %16 NS 4T W-2 200 17.9 99.44
17 NS 4C N-1 -50 4.6 25.56
18 NS 2C S+1 140 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,48 %19 NS 3C S-1 -50 9 50.00
20 NS 3S S = 600 11.2 62.22
21 NS 4C E = -420 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
22 JANSSEN Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 61,32 %22 NS 3C N-1 -50 9 50.00
23 NS 4P W+3 -710 11.2 62.22
24 NS 3K S+3 170 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
21 VAN DOOREN Michele -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 43,00 %25 NS 3S W-2 200 14.6 81.11
26 NS 3C E = -140 6.8 37.78
27 NS 2P N = 110 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 68,70 %
20 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 34,42 %28 NS 3S W = -400 1 5.56
29 NS 5K W-3 300 18 100.00
30 NS 3C W+2 -200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
19 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 58,68 %31 NS 4K W = -130 7.9 43.89
32 NS 2P E+1 -140 9 50.00
33 NS 4C S = 420 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
Total : 303,6 / 540 = 56,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette
20 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 34,42 % 1 NS 2P E-2 100 11.2 62.22
2 NS 4P E-2 100 13.4 74.44
3 NS 4C N+3 510 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 72,59 %
19 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 58,68 % 4 NS 2S S = 120 5.7 31.67
5 NS 4T N-4 -400 0.1 0.56
6 NS 3P N = 140 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
18 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,70 % 7 NS 3S S+3 690 17.9 99.44
8 NS 2K S-2 -100 3.4 18.89
9 NS 6CcN-1 -100 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
16 DOUETTE André -MASSART Jean : 47,86 %13 NS 5CcN-3 -800 3.4 18.89
14 NS 3S S-1 -50 7.9 43.89
15 NS 4P W-2 100 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 27,22 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,90 %16 NS 2T W = -90 6.8 37.78
17 NS 3C N-2 -100 2.3 12.78
18 NS 2C S+1 140 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
14 ROEGIERS Marga -COLLET Claudine : 39,30 %19 NS 3C W-4 400 15.7 87.22
20 NS 3S S = 600 11.2 62.22
21 NS 4C E = -420 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 44,42 %22 NS 1S N = 90 15.7 87.22
23 NS 4P W+3 -710 11.2 62.22
24 NS 3S N+1 430 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 82,96 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,48 %25 NS 4C E-1 100 5.7 31.67
26 NS 3S W = -600 1.2 6.67
27 NS 4C E-2 100 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
22 JANSSEN Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 61,32 %28 NS 2K E+2 -130 5 27.78
29 NS 3S E+2 -660 3 16.67
30 NS 4C E+1 -450 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
21 VAN DOOREN Michele -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 43,00 %31 NS 3K W = -110 15.7 87.22
32 NS 1P E+3 -170 3.4 18.89
33 NS 4C S = 420 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
Total : 251,6 / 540 = 46,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand
22 JANSSEN Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 61,32 % 1 NS 2P S+1 140 13.4 74.44
2 NS 3PcN-6 -1700 0.1 0.56
3 NS 4C N+3 510 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
21 VAN DOOREN Michele -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 43,00 % 4 NS 2S S+1 150 12.3 68.33
5 NS 2C E-1 50 17.9 99.44
6 NS 4P N-1 -50 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
20 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 34,42 % 7 NS 3S S+1 630 6.8 37.78
8 NS 1S S = 90 15.7 87.22
9 NS 4C N = 420 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
19 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 58,68 %10 NS 5P W-1 100 15.7 87.22
11 NS 3P E-1 50 13.4 74.44
12 NS 3S E-2 100 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 85,00 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 52,78 %16 NS 3T E-1 100 11.2 62.22
17 NS 3S N+1 430 17.9 99.44
18 NS 4C S-1 -100 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
16 DOUETTE André -MASSART Jean : 47,86 %19 NS 3C S-1 -50 9 50.00
20 NS 3S S = 600 11.2 62.22
21 NS 2C E+1 -140 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,90 %22 NS 1S N-1 -50 9 50.00
23 NS 4P W+3 -710 11.2 62.22
24 NS 5K S+1 420 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
14 ROEGIERS Marga -COLLET Claudine : 39,30 %25 NS 2C E-1 100 5.7 31.67
26 NS 2S W = -120 11.2 62.22
27 NS 3S N+1 430 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 44,42 %28 NS 2K E+1 -110 9 50.00
29 NS 3S W+1 -630 10 55.56
30 NS 4C E+1 -450 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,48 %31 NS 3T E+1 -130 7.9 43.89
32 NS 3T S-1 -50 15.7 87.22
33 NS 4C S = 420 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
Total : 338,3 / 540 = 62,65 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 44,42 % 1 NS 4C N-1 -50 3.4 18.89
2 NS 6S W-2 100 13.4 74.44
3 NS 4C N+3 510 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,48 % 4 NS 2S S = 120 5.7 31.67
5 NS 1C E+1 -110 14.6 81.11
6 NS 4P N = 420 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 68,70 %
22 JANSSEN Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 61,32 % 7 NS 1S W-4 400 4.6 25.56
8 NS 3T E-1 50 11.2 62.22
9 NS 2C N+2 170 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 39,81 %
21 VAN DOOREN Michele -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 43,00 %10 NS 4P W = -620 9 50.00
11 NS 2P W+1 -140 6.8 37.78
12 NS 3S E-1 50 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
20 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 34,42 %13 NS 4CcN = 790 17.9 99.44
14 NS 3S S = 400 14.6 81.11
15 NS 5C S+2 710 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 89,26 %
18 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,70 %19 NS 2P N-1 -50 9 50.00
20 NS 2K N+2 130 3.4 18.89
21 NS 4C E = -420 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 52,78 %22 NS 3C N-1 -50 9 50.00
23 NS 5P W+2 -710 11.2 62.22
24 NS 2K S+4 170 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
16 DOUETTE André -MASSART Jean : 47,86 %25 NS 2C E-1 100 5.7 31.67
26 NS 2C E+1 -140 6.8 37.78
27 NS 3C E = -140 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 27,41 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,90 %28 NS 2K E+1 -110 9 50.00
29 NS 3S W+1 -630 10 55.56
30 NS 4C W+1 -450 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
14 ROEGIERS Marga -COLLET Claudine : 39,30 %31 NS 3T E+1 -130 7.9 43.89
32 NS 3T N = 110 17.9 99.44
33 NS 3S S = 400 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
Total : 278,6 / 540 = 51,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 LAENENS René -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,90 % 1 NS 2P W-1 50 9 50.00
2 NS 4P E-1 50 7.9 43.89
3 NS 3S N+1 430 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
14 ROEGIERS Marga -COLLET Claudine : 39,30 % 4 NS 2S S+1 150 12.3 68.33
5 NS 2S N-2 -200 2.3 12.78
6 NS 4P N-1 -50 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 44,42 % 7 NS 3S N+2 660 12.3 68.33
8 NS 2K S = 90 15.7 87.22
9 NS 4C N-1 -50 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,48 %10 NS 4P W = -620 9 50.00
11 NS 3P W = -140 6.8 37.78
12 NS 3S E+1 -430 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
22 JANSSEN Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 61,32 %13 NS 5CcN-3 -800 3.4 18.89
14 NS 3S S-2 -100 1.2 6.67
15 NS 6CcS-2 -500 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 8,70 %
21 VAN DOOREN Michele -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 43,00 %16 NS 2T W+2 -130 0.1 0.56
17 NS 2S N+1 150 14.6 81.11
18 NS 2S N = 120 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
19 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 58,68 %22 NS 2C N-1 -50 9 50.00
23 NS 6P W+1 -1460 0.1 0.56
24 NS 5K S-1 -50 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 17,04 %
18 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,70 %25 NS 3S W = -600 0.1 0.56
26 NS 2P N-1 -100 13.4 74.44
27 NS 2P W-2 100 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 45,74 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 52,78 %28 NS 2K E+2 -130 5 27.78
29 NS 3S W+1 -630 10 55.56
30 NS 4C W = -420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
16 DOUETTE André -MASSART Jean : 47,86 %31 NS 4PcN = 790 17.9 99.44
32 NS 2P E = -110 13.4 74.44
33 NS 3S N+1 430 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
Total : 223,1 / 540 = 41,31 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
17 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 52,78 % 1 NS 2K N-1 -50 3.4 18.89
2 NS 6PcE-3 500 17.9 99.44
3 NS 4C N-1 -50 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
16 DOUETTE André -MASSART Jean : 47,86 % 4 NS 2P E-2 200 16.8 93.33
5 NS 2K E+3 -150 6.8 37.78
6 NS 3P N = 140 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,90 % 7 NS 1S N+2 150 0.1 0.56
8 NS 2C N-1 -50 7.9 43.89
9 NS 2P S+2 170 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 25,37 %
14 ROEGIERS Marga -COLLET Claudine : 39,30 %10 NS 4P W-1 100 15.7 87.22
11 NS 4P W-2 100 17.9 99.44
12 NS 3S W-1 50 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 82,96 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 44,42 %13 NS 6P W-1 100 12.3 68.33
14 NS 3S S-1 -50 7.9 43.89
15 NS 5C S+1 680 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,48 %16 NS 2S E = -120 3.4 18.89
17 NS 2P W-1 50 6.8 37.78
18 NS 2S N-2 -200 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 19,07 %
22 JANSSEN Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 61,32 %19 NS 2K W = -90 4.6 25.56
20 NS 2P S-1 -100 0.1 0.56
21 NS 3C E+1 -170 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
20 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 34,42 %25 NS 4C E-2 200 14.6 81.11
26 NS 3S E-1 100 16.8 93.33
27 NS 3C W = -140 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
19 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 58,68 %28 NS 2P N-4 -400 1 5.56
29 NS 3S W+2 -660 3 16.67
30 NS 4C W = -420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
18 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,70 %31 NS 3K W+1 -130 7.9 43.89
32 NS 1P E+2 -140 9 50.00
33 NS 2C N+2 170 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
Total : 245,6 / 540 = 45,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
19 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 58,68 % 1 NS 3C S-1 -50 3.4 18.89
2 NS 5P E-2 100 13.4 74.44
3 NS 4C N+3 510 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
18 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,70 % 4 NS 2C S = 110 0.1 0.56
5 NS 2P W = -110 14.6 81.11
6 NS 4P N-1 -50 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 52,78 % 7 NS 3S N+2 660 12.3 68.33
8 NS 2K S-3 -150 0.1 0.56
9 NS 4C S = 420 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 45,74 %
16 DOUETTE André -MASSART Jean : 47,86 %10 NS 5K E-1 100 15.7 87.22
11 NS 4P W = -420 2.3 12.78
12 NS 3S E = -400 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,90 %13 NS 4P E+2 -680 6.8 37.78
14 NS 3S S-2 -100 1.2 6.67
15 NS 5PcW-2 300 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 27,41 %
14 ROEGIERS Marga -COLLET Claudine : 39,30 %16 NS 3C N-1 -50 9 50.00
17 NS 1S N+2 150 14.6 81.11
18 NS 2P N+1 140 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 44,42 %19 NS 2CcS = 470 17.9 99.44
20 NS 3S N = 600 11.2 62.22
21 NS 4C E = -420 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,48 %22 NS 3C N-2 -100 2.3 12.78
23 NS 6P W = -1430 2.3 12.78
24 NS 1S N+3 180 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 29,26 %
21 VAN DOOREN Michele -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 43,00 %28 NS 2C W-1 50 14 77.78
29 NS 3S W+2 -660 3 16.67
30 NS 4C W+1 -450 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
20 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 34,42 %31 NS 3PcN-2 -500 0.1 0.56
32 NS 2P E+1 -140 9 50.00
33 NS 4C S+1 450 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 246,2 / 540 = 45,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 -
21 VAN DOOREN Michele -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 43,00 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
20 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 34,42 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 58,68 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
18 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,70 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 52,78 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
16 DOUETTE André -MASSART Jean : 47,86 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,90 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 ROEGIERS Marga -COLLET Claudine : 39,30 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 44,42 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
22 JANSSEN Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 61,32 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 594 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
1 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,15 % 1 EO 4C S-1 -50 14.6 81.11
2 EO 4C E-1 50 10.1 56.11
3 EO 4C N+2 480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
7 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,59 % 4 EO 2S S = 120 12.3 68.33
5 EO 1C E+1 -110 3.4 18.89
6 EO 4P N = 420 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 31,30 %
2 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,83 % 7 EO 3S S+2 660 5.7 31.67
8 EO 1S S = 90 2.3 12.78
9 EO 4C N = 420 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 25,37 %
8 LAENENS René -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 41,31 %10 EO 4P W = -620 9 50.00
11 EO 3P W = -140 11.2 62.22
12 EO 3S E+1 -430 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
3 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,44 %13 EO 6P E-1 100 5.7 31.67
14 EO 3S S-1 -50 10.1 56.11
15 EO 6PcW-4 800 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,48 %16 EO 2S E = -120 14.6 81.11
17 EO 2P W-1 50 11.2 62.22
18 EO 2S N-2 -200 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 80,93 %
4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 56,22 %19 EO 3C S-1 -50 9 50.00
20 EO 3S S = 600 6.8 37.78
21 EO 4C E = -420 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,59 %22 EO 3C N-2 -100 15.7 87.22
23 EO 6P W = -1430 15.7 87.22
24 EO 1S N+3 180 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 70,74 %
5 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 46,59 %25 EO 4C E-1 100 12.3 68.33
26 EO 3S W = -600 16.8 93.33
27 EO 4C E-2 100 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
6 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 62,65 %31 EO 3T E+1 -130 10.1 56.11
32 EO 3T S-1 -50 2.3 12.78
33 EO 4C S = 420 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
Total : 283,4 / 540 = 52,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
7 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,59 % 1 EO 4C N-1 -50 14.6 81.11
2 EO 6S W-2 100 4.6 25.56
3 EO 4C N+3 510 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
2 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,83 % 4 EO 2S S = 120 12.3 68.33
5 EO 2K E+2 -130 6.8 37.78
6 EO 5T W-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
8 LAENENS René -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 41,31 % 7 EO 3S N+2 660 5.7 31.67
8 EO 2K S = 90 2.3 12.78
9 EO 4C N-1 -50 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
3 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,44 %10 EO 5TcS-3 -800 17.9 99.44
11 EO 4P W-1 50 4.6 25.56
12 EO 3S E+1 -430 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 72,78 %
9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,48 %13 EO 6P W-1 100 5.7 31.67
14 EO 3S S-1 -50 10.1 56.11
15 EO 5C S+1 680 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 56,22 %16 EO 4T W-2 200 0.1 0.56
17 EO 4C N-1 -50 13.4 74.44
18 EO 2C S+1 140 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,59 %19 EO 2CcS = 470 0.1 0.56
20 EO 3S N = 600 6.8 37.78
21 EO 4C E = -420 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
5 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 46,59 %22 EO 1S N = 90 2.3 12.78
23 EO 4P W+3 -710 6.8 37.78
24 EO 3S N+1 430 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 17,04 %
11 - : 0,00 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 62,65 %28 EO 2K E+1 -110 9 50.00
29 EO 3S W+1 -630 8 44.44
30 EO 4C E+1 -450 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 215,9 / 486 = 44,42 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 ROEGIERS Marga -COLLET Claudine
8 LAENENS René -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 41,31 % 4 EO 2S S+1 150 5.7 31.67
5 EO 2S N-2 -200 15.7 87.22
6 EO 4P N-1 -50 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
3 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,44 % 7 EO 1S S+4 210 15.7 87.22
8 EO 3S S-1 -50 10.1 56.11
9 EO 4P S = 420 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,48 %10 EO 4P W-1 100 2.3 12.78
11 EO 4P W-2 100 0.1 0.56
12 EO 3S W-1 50 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 17,04 %
4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 56,22 %13 EO 4C N = 620 2.3 12.78
14 EO 3S S+1 430 0.1 0.56
15 EO 5C S+1 680 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 17,04 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,59 %16 EO 3C N-1 -50 9 50.00
17 EO 1S N+2 150 3.4 18.89
18 EO 2P N+1 140 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
5 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 46,59 %19 EO 3C W-4 400 2.3 12.78
20 EO 3S S = 600 6.8 37.78
21 EO 4C E = -420 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
11 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 62,65 %25 EO 2C E-1 100 12.3 68.33
26 EO 2S W = -120 6.8 37.78
27 EO 3S N+1 430 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
1 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,15 %28 EO 2C W-1 50 4 22.22
29 EO 3S W+2 -660 15 83.33
30 EO 4C W = -420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
7 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,59 %31 EO 3T E+1 -130 10.1 56.11
32 EO 3T N = 110 0.1 0.56
33 EO 3S S = 400 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
Total : 191,0 / 486 = 39,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
8 LAENENS René -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 41,31 % 1 EO 2P W-1 50 9 50.00
2 EO 4P E-1 50 10.1 56.11
3 EO 3S N+1 430 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,48 % 7 EO 1S N+2 150 17.9 99.44
8 EO 2C N-1 -50 10.1 56.11
9 EO 2P S+2 170 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 74,63 %
4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 56,22 %10 EO 4P W = -620 9 50.00
11 EO 5TcS-3 -500 17.9 99.44
12 EO 3S E = -400 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 72,59 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,59 %13 EO 4P E+2 -680 11.2 62.22
14 EO 3S S-2 -100 16.8 93.33
15 EO 5PcW-2 300 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 72,59 %
5 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 46,59 %16 EO 2T W = -90 11.2 62.22
17 EO 3C N-2 -100 15.7 87.22
18 EO 2C S+1 140 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
11 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 62,65 %22 EO 1S N-1 -50 9 50.00
23 EO 4P W+3 -710 6.8 37.78
24 EO 5K S+1 420 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
1 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,15 %25 EO 3S W-1 100 12.3 68.33
26 EO 3C E = -140 11.2 62.22
27 EO 2P W-2 100 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
7 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,59 %28 EO 2K E+1 -110 9 50.00
29 EO 3S W+1 -630 8 44.44
30 EO 4C W+1 -450 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
2 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,83 %31 EO 3T E+1 -130 10.1 56.11
32 EO 2P E+2 -170 14.6 81.11
33 EO 4C S-1 -50 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 78,89 %
Total : 305,7 / 486 = 62,90 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 DOUETTE André -MASSART Jean
3 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,44 % 1 EO 4C S = 420 0.1 0.56
2 EO 4C E = -420 14.6 81.11
3 EO 2C S+4 230 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 56,30 %
9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,48 % 4 EO 2P E-2 200 1.2 6.67
5 EO 2K E+3 -150 11.2 62.22
6 EO 3P N = 140 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,59 %10 EO 5K E-1 100 2.3 12.78
11 EO 4P W = -420 15.7 87.22
12 EO 3S E = -400 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
5 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 46,59 %13 EO 5CcN-3 -800 14.6 81.11
14 EO 3S S-1 -50 10.1 56.11
15 EO 4P W-2 100 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 72,78 %
11 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 62,65 %19 EO 3C S-1 -50 9 50.00
20 EO 3S S = 600 6.8 37.78
21 EO 2C E+1 -140 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
1 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,15 %22 EO 2P E = -110 17.9 99.44
23 EO 5P W+2 -710 6.8 37.78
24 EO 1K S+4 150 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 74,81 %
7 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,59 %25 EO 2C E-1 100 12.3 68.33
26 EO 2C E+1 -140 11.2 62.22
27 EO 3C E = -140 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 72,59 %
2 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,83 %28 EO 2C W-1 50 4 22.22
29 EO 2S W+2 -180 2 11.11
30 EO 4C W = -420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
8 LAENENS René -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 41,31 %31 EO 4PcN = 790 0.1 0.56
32 EO 2P E = -110 4.6 25.56
33 EO 3S N+1 430 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
Total : 232,6 / 486 = 47,86 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,48 % 1 EO 2K N-1 -50 14.6 81.11
2 EO 6PcE-3 500 0.1 0.56
3 EO 4C N-1 -50 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 56,22 % 4 EO 2S S = 120 12.3 68.33
5 EO 3K E+2 -150 11.2 62.22
6 EO 4P S = 420 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 45,74 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,59 % 7 EO 3S N+2 660 5.7 31.67
8 EO 2K S-3 -150 17.9 99.44
9 EO 4C S = 420 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 54,26 %
11 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 62,65 %16 EO 3T E-1 100 6.8 37.78
17 EO 3S N+1 430 0.1 0.56
18 EO 4C S-1 -100 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
1 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,15 %19 EO 4CcS-1 -100 15.7 87.22
20 EO 2K N+2 130 14.6 81.11
21 EO 3C E+1 -170 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 64,63 %
7 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,59 %22 EO 3C N-1 -50 9 50.00
23 EO 5P W+2 -710 6.8 37.78
24 EO 2K S+4 170 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,83 %25 EO 3C E-2 200 3.4 18.89
26 EO 3S E-1 100 1.2 6.67
27 EO 4C E-1 50 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 29,26 %
8 LAENENS René -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 41,31 %28 EO 2K E+2 -130 13 72.22
29 EO 3S W+1 -630 8 44.44
30 EO 4C W = -420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,44 %31 EO 3T E+1 -130 10.1 56.11
32 EO 3PcE = -730 17.9 99.44
33 EO 2C N+2 170 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 78,89 %
Total : 256,5 / 486 = 52,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard
4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 56,22 % 1 EO 2C S+2 170 2.3 12.78
2 EO 4P E = -420 14.6 81.11
3 EO 3S N+1 430 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,59 % 4 EO 2C S = 110 17.9 99.44
5 EO 2P W = -110 3.4 18.89
6 EO 4P N-1 -50 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
5 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 46,59 % 7 EO 3S S+3 690 0.1 0.56
8 EO 2K S-2 -100 14.6 81.11
9 EO 6CcN-1 -100 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
11 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,15 %16 EO 3P S = 140 3.4 18.89
17 EO 2P W = -110 17.9 99.44
18 EO 1S S+2 150 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
7 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,59 %19 EO 2P N-1 -50 9 50.00
20 EO 2K N+2 130 14.6 81.11
21 EO 4C E = -420 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
2 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,83 %22 EO 3C N-1 -50 9 50.00
23 EO 4P W+3 -710 6.8 37.78
24 EO 2K S+4 170 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 LAENENS René -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 41,31 %25 EO 3S W = -600 17.9 99.44
26 EO 2P N-1 -100 4.6 25.56
27 EO 2P W-2 100 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 54,26 %
3 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,44 %28 EO 2C W-2 100 0 0.00
29 EO 3S W = -600 4 22.22
30 EO 4C W = -420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,48 %31 EO 3K W+1 -130 10.1 56.11
32 EO 1P E+2 -140 9 50.00
33 EO 2C N+2 170 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
Total : 256,1 / 486 = 52,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
10 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,59 % 1 EO 3C S-1 -50 14.6 81.11
2 EO 5P E-2 100 4.6 25.56
3 EO 4C N+3 510 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
5 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 46,59 % 4 EO 2S S = 120 12.3 68.33
5 EO 4T N-4 -400 17.9 99.44
6 EO 3P N = 140 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
11 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 62,65 %10 EO 5P W-1 100 2.3 12.78
11 EO 3P E-1 50 4.6 25.56
12 EO 3S E-2 100 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 15,00 %
1 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,15 %13 EO 6P E = -1430 17.9 99.44
14 EO 3S S = 400 3.4 18.89
15 EO 4PcW-1 100 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
2 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,83 %19 EO 4C S-3 -150 17.9 99.44
20 EO 3S S = 600 6.8 37.78
21 EO 4C E = -420 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
8 LAENENS René -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 41,31 %22 EO 2C N-1 -50 9 50.00
23 EO 6P W+1 -1460 17.9 99.44
24 EO 5K S-1 -50 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 82,96 %
3 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,44 %25 EO 4C E-2 200 3.4 18.89
26 EO 3S E = -600 16.8 93.33
27 EO 3C E = -140 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,48 %28 EO 2P N-4 -400 17 94.44
29 EO 3S W+2 -660 15 83.33
30 EO 4C W = -420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 56,22 %31 EO 4K W = -130 10.1 56.11
32 EO 2P E+1 -140 9 50.00
33 EO 4C S = 420 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
Total : 285,2 / 486 = 58,68 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick
5 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 46,59 % 1 EO 2P E-2 100 6.8 37.78
2 EO 4P E-2 100 4.6 25.56
3 EO 4C N+3 510 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 27,41 %
11 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 62,65 % 7 EO 3S S+1 630 11.2 62.22
8 EO 1S S = 90 2.3 12.78
9 EO 4C N = 420 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
1 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,15 %10 EO 4P W+1 -650 14.6 81.11
11 EO 2P W+1 -140 11.2 62.22
12 EO 3S E-1 50 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
7 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,59 %13 EO 4CcN = 790 0.1 0.56
14 EO 3S S = 400 3.4 18.89
15 EO 5C S+2 710 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 10,74 %
2 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,83 %16 EO 2P S+1 140 3.4 18.89
17 EO 3C N = 140 6.8 37.78
18 EO 1S S+1 120 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
3 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,44 %22 EO 2C N = 110 0.1 0.56
23 EO 5P E+2 -710 6.8 37.78
24 EO 5K S+1 420 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 19,07 %
9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,48 %25 EO 4C E-2 200 3.4 18.89
26 EO 3S E-1 100 1.2 6.67
27 EO 3C W = -140 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 56,22 %28 EO 3S W = -400 17 94.44
29 EO 5K W-3 300 0 0.00
30 EO 3C W+2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,59 %31 EO 3PcN-2 -500 17.9 99.44
32 EO 2P E+1 -140 9 50.00
33 EO 4C S+1 450 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 167,3 / 486 = 34,42 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 VAN DOOREN Michele -MOSSERAY Bernadette
11 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 62,65 % 4 EO 2S S+1 150 5.7 31.67
5 EO 2C E-1 50 0.1 0.56
6 EO 4P N-1 -50 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
1 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,15 % 7 EO 3S N+2 660 5.7 31.67
8 EO 2K S-2 -100 14.6 81.11
9 EO 3S S+1 430 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
7 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,59 %10 EO 4P W = -620 9 50.00
11 EO 2P W+1 -140 11.2 62.22
12 EO 3S E-1 50 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,83 %13 EO 3P E+2 -200 9 50.00
14 EO 3S S-1 -50 10.1 56.11
15 EO 5C S+1 680 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
8 LAENENS René -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 41,31 %16 EO 2T W+2 -130 17.9 99.44
17 EO 2S N+1 150 3.4 18.89
18 EO 2S N = 120 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
3 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,44 %19 EO 3T S = 110 4.6 25.56
20 EO 4P S = 620 0.1 0.56
21 EO 2C E+2 -170 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 17,22 %
4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 56,22 %25 EO 3S W-2 200 3.4 18.89
26 EO 3C E = -140 11.2 62.22
27 EO 2P N = 110 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 31,30 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,59 %28 EO 2C W-1 50 4 22.22
29 EO 3S W+2 -660 15 83.33
30 EO 4C W+1 -450 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
5 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 46,59 %31 EO 3K W = -110 2.3 12.78
32 EO 1P E+3 -170 14.6 81.11
33 EO 4C S = 420 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
Total : 209,0 / 486 = 43,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 JANSSEN Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
6 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 62,65 % 1 EO 2P S+1 140 4.6 25.56
2 EO 3PcN-6 -1700 17.9 99.44
3 EO 4C N+3 510 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
1 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,15 % 4 EO 2C W-2 200 1.2 6.67
5 EO 3K W+2 -150 11.2 62.22
6 EO 4P N-1 -50 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,59 % 7 EO 1S W-4 400 13.4 74.44
8 EO 3T E-1 50 6.8 37.78
9 EO 2C N+2 170 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 60,19 %
2 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,83 %10 EO 4P W+1 -650 14.6 81.11
11 EO 4P W-1 50 4.6 25.56
12 EO 3S W-2 100 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
8 LAENENS René -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 41,31 %13 EO 5CcN-3 -800 14.6 81.11
14 EO 3S S-2 -100 16.8 93.33
15 EO 6CcS-2 -500 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 91,30 %
3 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,44 %16 EO 2S E = -120 14.6 81.11
17 EO 1S N+1 120 9 50.00
18 EO 2C S = 110 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,48 %19 EO 2K W = -90 13.4 74.44
20 EO 2P S-1 -100 17.9 99.44
21 EO 3C E+1 -170 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 56,22 %22 EO 3C N-1 -50 9 50.00
23 EO 4P W+3 -710 6.8 37.78
24 EO 3K S+3 170 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 46,59 %28 EO 2K E+2 -130 13 72.22
29 EO 3S E+2 -660 15 83.33
30 EO 4C E+1 -450 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
11 - : 0,00 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 298,0 / 486 = 61,32 %
|
|