|
Tournoi du 07-10-13
1 54,71 1 HUBLET Carlo -MASSAUX Joel
2 54,38 3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
3 52,86 5 STEED Mercédès -GROSFILS Colette
4 51,18 2 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
5 51,01 10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
6 50,84 8 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
7 50,00 9 MOSSERAY Bernadette -KINET Renée
8 48,99 6 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
9 43,10 4 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine
10 42,93 7 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
11 0,00 11 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 64,63 19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
2 53,15 12 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand
3 52,96 16 de WASSEIGE Ariane -WATELET D
4 51,48 17 RAVET Brigitte -TIRMARCHE Quentin
~ 51,48 21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
6 50,74 15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
7 49,44 20 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René
8 47,41 14 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle
9 43,70 22 de TERWANGNE Philippe -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
10 43,15 13 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard
11 41,85 18 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier
PAIRE Nr : 1 HUBLET Carlo -MASSAUX Joel
12 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 53,15 % 1 NS 4CcW-1 100 12 66.67
2 NS 5T E-1 50 8 44.44
3 NS 5PcS+1 750 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
22 de TERWANGNE Philippe -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 43,70 % 4 NS 4P W-2 200 14 77.78
5 NS 4P W = -420 5 27.78
6 NS 6S N = 990 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 51,48 % 7 NS 3S S-3 -300 2 11.11
8 NS 2S N+2 180 16 88.89
9 NS 1S S-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
20 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 49,44 %10 NS 3PcE-5 1400 17 94.44
11 NS 3S N-2 -100 0 0.00
12 NS 3S E-2 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,63 %13 NS 2C N = 110 15 83.33
14 NS 3S E+3 -490 1 5.56
15 NS 2P E-2 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
18 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 41,85 %16 NS 2C W+1 -140 6 33.33
17 NS 2P N = 110 17 94.44
18 NS 2P N-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -TIRMARCHE Quentin : 51,48 %19 NS 3S N+2 460 9 50.00
20 NS 2S N = 120 6 33.33
21 NS 1S S-3 -300 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
16 de WASSEIGE Ariane -WATELET D : 52,96 %22 NS 3K W+2 -150 6 33.33
23 NS 4C N+1 650 2 11.11
24 NS 4P N+1 450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 50,74 %25 NS 3S E-1 100 3 16.67
26 NS 3C S = 140 11 61.11
27 NS 2C S = 110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
14 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 47,41 %28 NS 3P N = 140 18 100.00
29 NS 2P S+1 140 13 72.22
30 NS 4C E+1 -450 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
13 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,15 %31 NS 2S E+1 -150 11 61.11
32 NS 1S W-1 100 7 38.89
33 NS 3C N = 140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 325,0 / 594 = 54,71 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
14 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 47,41 % 1 NS 2P N+1 140 15 83.33
2 NS 6TcE-2 300 12 66.67
3 NS 4P S+2 480 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
13 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,15 % 4 NS 4C W-2 200 14 77.78
5 NS 4P E = -420 5 27.78
6 NS 6S S = 990 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
12 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 53,15 % 7 NS 1S W+1 -120 14 77.78
8 NS 2S S = 120 3 16.67
9 NS 1S E = -90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
22 de TERWANGNE Philippe -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 43,70 %10 NS 3PcE-4 1100 14 77.78
11 NS 3S S+3 490 18 100.00
12 NS 5T E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 51,48 %13 NS 2P E+1 -140 5 27.78
14 NS 3S W+2 -460 9 50.00
15 NS 3C S-1 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
20 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 49,44 %16 NS 2C W+1 -140 6 33.33
17 NS 3CcE+1 -630 0 0.00
18 NS 1S W+1 -120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,63 %19 NS 6P N-1 -50 3 16.67
20 NS 4K S-1 -100 1 5.56
21 NS 2CxS-3 -1600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
18 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 41,85 %22 NS 3T E+2 -150 6 33.33
23 NS 4C N+2 680 13 72.22
24 NS 6P N = 980 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -TIRMARCHE Quentin : 51,48 %25 NS 3P S = 140 9 50.00
26 NS 4C S-1 -100 5 27.78
27 NS 3C S = 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
16 de WASSEIGE Ariane -WATELET D : 52,96 %28 NS 2P S = 110 11 61.11
29 NS 3P S-1 -100 2 11.11
30 NS 2S E-1 50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 50,74 %31 NS 1S E+3 -180 8 44.44
32 NS 3S S+1 430 18 100.00
33 NS 2C N = 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 304,0 / 594 = 51,18 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
16 de WASSEIGE Ariane -WATELET D : 52,96 % 1 NS 2P N+2 170 18 100.00
2 NS 4P S+2 680 14 77.78
3 NS 4P S+1 450 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 50,74 % 4 NS 4C W-1 100 6 33.33
5 NS 3P E+1 -170 16 88.89
6 NS 6S S = 990 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
14 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 47,41 % 7 NS 2C N-2 -200 8 44.44
8 NS 1S N+1 120 3 16.67
9 NS 2C W-2 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
13 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,15 %10 NS 2T N+2 130 6 33.33
11 NS 2K N+3 150 4 22.22
12 NS 3S E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
12 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 53,15 %13 NS 3P E+2 -200 0 0.00
14 NS 3S W+2 -460 9 50.00
15 NS 2P E-2 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
22 de TERWANGNE Philippe -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 43,70 %16 NS 2C W = -110 12 66.67
17 NS 3PcN-2 -300 4 22.22
18 NS 2C W = -110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 51,48 %19 NS 6S N = 990 17 94.44
20 NS 3P S = 140 12 66.67
21 NS 1K N+1 90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
20 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 49,44 %22 NS 3K W+1 -130 12 66.67
23 NS 3S S+2 660 6 33.33
24 NS 4P N+3 510 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,63 %25 NS 3K E-1 100 3 16.67
26 NS 2C S+1 140 11 61.11
27 NS 3S S = 400 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
18 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 41,85 %28 NS 2P S = 110 11 61.11
29 NS 2P S+1 140 13 72.22
30 NS 4C E+2 -480 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -TIRMARCHE Quentin : 51,48 %31 NS 2S E+1 -150 11 61.11
32 NS 3T S+1 130 13 72.22
33 NS 3C N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 323,0 / 594 = 54,38 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine
18 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 41,85 % 1 NS 3C W-1 50 10 55.56
2 NS 5PcN = 850 17 94.44
3 NS 4P S+2 480 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -TIRMARCHE Quentin : 51,48 % 4 NS 3CcW-1 200 14 77.78
5 NS 4P E = -420 5 27.78
6 NS 6P N-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
16 de WASSEIGE Ariane -WATELET D : 52,96 % 7 NS 3C N-4 -400 0 0.00
8 NS 2S S+1 150 12 66.67
9 NS 3S W = -600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 50,74 %10 NS 3K S-5 -500 0 0.00
11 NS 3K N+2 150 4 22.22
12 NS 5TcE-1 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
14 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 47,41 %13 NS 2C N-1 -100 10 55.56
14 NS 3S W+2 -460 9 50.00
15 NS 2C S = 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
13 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,15 %16 NS 2C W+3 -200 0 0.00
17 NS 2P N-1 -50 11 61.11
18 NS 1S E+1 -120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
12 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 53,15 %19 NS 6S N-1 -50 3 16.67
20 NS 4P S-1 -100 1 5.56
21 NS 1ScS-1 -200 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
22 de TERWANGNE Philippe -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 43,70 %22 NS 4K W+1 -150 6 33.33
23 NS 4C N+1 650 2 11.11
24 NS 4P N+2 480 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 51,48 %25 NS 4P S = 420 17 94.44
26 NS 4CcS-1 -200 1 5.56
27 NS 4C S-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
20 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 49,44 %28 NS 2P S = 110 11 61.11
29 NS 2P S+1 140 13 72.22
30 NS 4C E+1 -450 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,63 %31 NS 3S E-1 50 15 83.33
32 NS 1S E-1 100 7 38.89
33 NS 2C N = 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 256,0 / 594 = 43,10 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 STEED Mercédès -GROSFILS Colette
20 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 49,44 % 1 NS 3C W = -140 2 11.11
2 NS 5TcE = -550 2 11.11
3 NS 4P S+1 450 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,63 % 4 NS 4C W-2 200 14 77.78
5 NS 4P W = -420 5 27.78
6 NS 4P N+1 450 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
18 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 41,85 % 7 NS 2C N-2 -200 8 44.44
8 NS 2C S+1 140 7 38.89
9 NS 1S W+1 -120 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -TIRMARCHE Quentin : 51,48 %10 NS 3PcE-5 1400 17 94.44
11 NS 3S S+2 460 14 77.78
12 NS 5K E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
16 de WASSEIGE Ariane -WATELET D : 52,96 %13 NS 2P E+1 -140 5 27.78
14 NS 3S W+2 -460 9 50.00
15 NS 2C S = 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 50,74 %16 NS 2C W+1 -140 6 33.33
17 NS 2P N-1 -50 11 61.11
18 NS 1S W+1 -120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
14 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 47,41 %19 NS 5P S+1 480 14 77.78
20 NS 4K S+1 150 15 83.33
21 NS 1S S = 90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
13 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,15 %22 NS 3K W+2 -150 6 33.33
23 NS 4C N+2 680 13 72.22
24 NS 6P N = 980 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
12 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 53,15 %25 NS 4K E-2 200 14 77.78
26 NS 3C S+1 170 17 94.44
27 NS 3P N = 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
22 de TERWANGNE Philippe -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 43,70 %28 NS 2P S = 110 11 61.11
29 NS 2P S+1 140 13 72.22
30 NS 4C E+1 -450 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 51,48 %31 NS 3S E = -400 4 22.22
32 NS 1S W-1 100 7 38.89
33 NS 3C N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
Total : 314,0 / 594 = 52,86 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
22 de TERWANGNE Philippe -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 43,70 % 1 NS 3P N = 140 15 83.33
2 NS 5T E = -400 4 22.22
3 NS 4P S+2 480 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 51,48 % 4 NS 4C E-1 100 6 33.33
5 NS 4P E = -420 5 27.78
6 NS 6S N = 990 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
20 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 49,44 % 7 NS 2C N-2 -200 8 44.44
8 NS 2S S+1 150 12 66.67
9 NS 2T N-2 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,63 %10 NS 4S N = 630 12 66.67
11 NS 3S N+2 460 14 77.78
12 NS 4T W+1 -150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
18 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 41,85 %13 NS 2C N = 110 15 83.33
14 NS 3S W+2 -460 9 50.00
15 NS 4C S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -TIRMARCHE Quentin : 51,48 %16 NS 3C W-1 100 16 88.89
17 NS 2P N = 110 17 94.44
18 NS 4P N-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
16 de WASSEIGE Ariane -WATELET D : 52,96 %19 NS 4S N+1 460 9 50.00
20 NS 2S N+1 150 15 83.33
21 NS 1S S = 90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 50,74 %22 NS 3C N-2 -100 14 77.78
23 NS 4C N+2 680 13 72.22
24 NS 4P N+2 480 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
14 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 47,41 %25 NS 3P S = 140 9 50.00
26 NS 4C S-2 -200 1 5.56
27 NS 3C S = 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
13 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,15 %28 NS 2P S-1 -100 2 11.11
29 NS 4P S-1 -100 2 11.11
30 NS 4C E+2 -480 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
12 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 53,15 %31 NS 3S E = -400 4 22.22
32 NS 2S S-1 -50 2 11.11
33 NS 3C N = 140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 291,0 / 594 = 48,99 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
13 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,15 % 1 NS 2C W = -110 6 33.33
2 NS 5PcS = 850 17 94.44
3 NS 4P S+2 480 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
12 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 53,15 % 4 NS 4C W = -620 0 0.00
5 NS 4P W = -420 5 27.78
6 NS 6S S-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
22 de TERWANGNE Philippe -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 43,70 % 7 NS 2P E = -110 17 94.44
8 NS 3T N = 110 0 0.00
9 NS 1S W = -90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 51,48 %10 NS 2P E-4 400 8 44.44
11 NS 2K N+3 150 4 22.22
12 NS 3S E+1 -430 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
20 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 49,44 %13 NS 2P E+2 -170 2 11.11
14 NS 3S W+2 -460 9 50.00
15 NS 2C S+1 140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,63 %16 NS 2C E+1 -140 6 33.33
17 NS 3S E = -400 2 11.11
18 NS 2C E+1 -140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
18 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 41,85 %19 NS 6S N = 990 17 94.44
20 NS 1P S+1 110 4 22.22
21 NS 1S S = 90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -TIRMARCHE Quentin : 51,48 %22 NS 3S W-3 300 17 94.44
23 NS 4C N+2 680 13 72.22
24 NS 4P N+2 480 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
16 de WASSEIGE Ariane -WATELET D : 52,96 %25 NS 3P N = 140 9 50.00
26 NS 2C S+2 170 17 94.44
27 NS 3C S-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 50,74 %28 NS 2P N = 110 11 61.11
29 NS 2P S+1 140 13 72.22
30 NS 4C E+2 -480 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
14 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 47,41 %31 NS 3S E = -400 4 22.22
32 NS 2P E = -110 0 0.00
33 NS 3C N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
Total : 255,0 / 594 = 42,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 50,74 % 1 NS 3P N-1 -50 8 44.44
2 NS 5T E-1 50 8 44.44
3 NS 4P S+2 480 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 47,41 % 4 NS 2C W = -110 2 11.11
5 NS 3P E+2 -200 12 66.67
6 NS 6C S-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
13 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,15 % 7 NS 1P E+1 -110 17 94.44
8 NS 1S S+2 150 12 66.67
9 NS 2T S+1 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
12 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 53,15 %10 NS 1S N-1 -100 4 22.22
11 NS 3S S+2 460 14 77.78
12 NS 3S E = -400 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
22 de TERWANGNE Philippe -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 43,70 %13 NS 4P E-2 200 18 100.00
14 NS 3S W+1 -430 16 88.89
15 NS 2P E = -110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 51,48 %16 NS 3P S-2 -100 14 77.78
17 NS 2P N-1 -50 11 61.11
18 NS 3T E = -110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
20 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 49,44 %19 NS 6S N-2 -100 0 0.00
20 NS 2P S+2 170 18 100.00
21 NS 2C S-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,63 %22 NS 3S W = -600 0 0.00
23 NS 4C N+1 650 2 11.11
24 NS 4P N+2 480 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
18 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 41,85 %25 NS 4P S-1 -50 0 0.00
26 NS 3C S = 140 11 61.11
27 NS 3S S+1 430 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -TIRMARCHE Quentin : 51,48 %28 NS 2C N-1 -100 2 11.11
29 NS 2P S+1 140 13 72.22
30 NS 4C W+2 -480 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
16 de WASSEIGE Ariane -WATELET D : 52,96 %31 NS 3S E-2 100 18 100.00
32 NS 3T S+1 130 13 72.22
33 NS 3C N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 302,0 / 594 = 50,84 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 MOSSERAY Bernadette -KINET Renée
17 RAVET Brigitte -TIRMARCHE Quentin : 51,48 % 1 NS 3C W = -140 2 11.11
2 NS 4TcE+1 -610 0 0.00
3 NS 4P S+2 480 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
16 de WASSEIGE Ariane -WATELET D : 52,96 % 4 NS 4C W-1 100 6 33.33
5 NS 3P E+1 -170 16 88.89
6 NS 3S S+3 490 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 50,74 % 7 NS 2S N-2 -200 8 44.44
8 NS 3C N = 140 7 38.89
9 NS 1S W = -90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
14 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 47,41 %10 NS 3S S = 600 10 55.56
11 NS 5K N = 400 8 44.44
12 NS 3S E-3 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
13 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,15 %13 NS 2C N-1 -100 10 55.56
14 NS 6S W-1 50 18 100.00
15 NS 2C S = 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
12 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 53,15 %16 NS 5T E-3 300 18 100.00
17 NS 3C W = -140 6 33.33
18 NS 1S W+1 -120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
22 de TERWANGNE Philippe -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 43,70 %19 NS 3S N+2 460 9 50.00
20 NS 2K S+2 130 9 50.00
21 NS 2S N-4 -400 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 51,48 %22 NS 3S W-3 300 17 94.44
23 NS 4C N+2 680 13 72.22
24 NS 3S S+2 460 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
20 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 49,44 %25 NS 3P S = 140 9 50.00
26 NS 4C S-1 -100 5 27.78
27 NS 3S S+1 430 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,63 %28 NS 3P S-1 -100 2 11.11
29 NS 2P S = 110 6 33.33
30 NS 4C E+2 -480 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
18 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 41,85 %31 NS 3S E+1 -430 0 0.00
32 NS 1S W-1 100 7 38.89
33 NS 2C N+1 140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 297,0 / 594 = 50,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,63 % 1 NS 3C W = -140 2 11.11
2 NS 5T W-1 50 8 44.44
3 NS 4P S+1 450 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
18 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 41,85 % 4 NS 3C W-2 200 14 77.78
5 NS 2P W+2 -170 16 88.89
6 NS 6S S = 990 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -TIRMARCHE Quentin : 51,48 % 7 NS 1S N-2 -200 8 44.44
8 NS 3S S = 400 18 100.00
9 NS 1S W+2 -150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
16 de WASSEIGE Ariane -WATELET D : 52,96 %10 NS 4C N-2 -200 2 11.11
11 NS 4C N+1 450 10 55.56
12 NS 3S E+1 -430 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 50,74 %13 NS 2C N-1 -100 10 55.56
14 NS 3S E+3 -490 1 5.56
15 NS 3C S-1 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
14 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 47,41 %16 NS 2C W+1 -140 6 33.33
17 NS 2P N-1 -50 11 61.11
18 NS 1S S-2 -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
13 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,15 %19 NS 3S N+2 460 9 50.00
20 NS 3K S+1 130 9 50.00
21 NS 1S W-3 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
12 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 53,15 %22 NS 4K W+1 -150 6 33.33
23 NS 4C N+2 680 13 72.22
24 NS 6P N = 980 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
22 de TERWANGNE Philippe -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 43,70 %25 NS 4P S = 420 17 94.44
26 NS 2C S+1 140 11 61.11
27 NS 2C S = 110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 51,48 %28 NS 2P S = 110 11 61.11
29 NS 3P S-1 -100 2 11.11
30 NS 4C E+1 -450 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
20 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 49,44 %31 NS 2P E-1 50 15 83.33
32 NS 2C W-2 200 16 88.89
33 NS 2C N = 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
Total : 303,0 / 594 = 51,01 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 -
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 51,48 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
20 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 49,44 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,63 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
18 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 41,85 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -TIRMARCHE Quentin : 51,48 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
16 de WASSEIGE Ariane -WATELET D : 52,96 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 50,74 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 47,41 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
13 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,15 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
12 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 53,15 %28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
22 de TERWANGNE Philippe -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 43,70 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 594 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand
1 HUBLET Carlo -MASSAUX Joel : 54,71 % 1 EO 4CcW-1 100 6 33.33
2 EO 5T E-1 50 10 55.56
3 EO 5PcS+1 750 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,93 % 4 EO 4C W = -620 18 100.00
5 EO 4P W = -420 13 72.22
6 EO 6S S-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 51,18 % 7 EO 1S W+1 -120 4 22.22
8 EO 2S S = 120 15 83.33
9 EO 1S E = -90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,84 %10 EO 1S N-1 -100 14 77.78
11 EO 3S S+2 460 4 22.22
12 EO 3S E = -400 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,38 %13 EO 3P E+2 -200 18 100.00
14 EO 3S W+2 -460 9 50.00
15 EO 2P E-2 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
9 MOSSERAY Bernadette -KINET Renée : 50,00 %16 EO 5T E-3 300 0 0.00
17 EO 3C W = -140 12 66.67
18 EO 1S W+1 -120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
4 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 43,10 %19 EO 6S N-1 -50 15 83.33
20 EO 4P S-1 -100 17 94.44
21 EO 1ScS-1 -200 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 51,01 %22 EO 4K W+1 -150 12 66.67
23 EO 4C N+2 680 5 27.78
24 EO 6P N = 980 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
5 STEED Mercédès -GROSFILS Colette : 52,86 %25 EO 4K E-2 200 4 22.22
26 EO 3C S+1 170 1 5.56
27 EO 3P N = 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
11 - : 0,00 %28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 48,99 %31 EO 3S E = -400 14 77.78
32 EO 2S S-1 -50 16 88.89
33 EO 3C N = 140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 287,0 / 540 = 53,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard
7 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,93 % 1 EO 2C W = -110 12 66.67
2 EO 5PcS = 850 1 5.56
3 EO 4P S+2 480 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 51,18 % 4 EO 4C W-2 200 4 22.22
5 EO 4P E = -420 13 72.22
6 EO 6S S = 990 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
8 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,84 % 7 EO 1P E+1 -110 1 5.56
8 EO 1S S+2 150 6 33.33
9 EO 2T S+1 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,38 %10 EO 2T N+2 130 12 66.67
11 EO 2K N+3 150 14 77.78
12 EO 3S E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
9 MOSSERAY Bernadette -KINET Renée : 50,00 %13 EO 2C N-1 -100 8 44.44
14 EO 6S W-1 50 0 0.00
15 EO 2C S = 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
4 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 43,10 %16 EO 2C W+3 -200 18 100.00
17 EO 2P N-1 -50 7 38.89
18 EO 1S E+1 -120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 51,01 %19 EO 3S N+2 460 9 50.00
20 EO 3K S+1 130 9 50.00
21 EO 1S W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
5 STEED Mercédès -GROSFILS Colette : 52,86 %22 EO 3K W+2 -150 12 66.67
23 EO 4C N+2 680 5 27.78
24 EO 6P N = 980 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
11 - : 0,00 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 48,99 %28 EO 2P S-1 -100 16 88.89
29 EO 4P S-1 -100 16 88.89
30 EO 4C E+2 -480 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
1 HUBLET Carlo -MASSAUX Joel : 54,71 %31 EO 2S E+1 -150 7 38.89
32 EO 1S W-1 100 11 61.11
33 EO 3C N = 140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 233,0 / 540 = 43,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle
2 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 51,18 % 1 EO 2P N+1 140 3 16.67
2 EO 6TcE-2 300 6 33.33
3 EO 4P S+2 480 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
8 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,84 % 4 EO 2C W = -110 16 88.89
5 EO 3P E+2 -200 6 33.33
6 EO 6C S-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,38 % 7 EO 2C N-2 -200 10 55.56
8 EO 1S N+1 120 15 83.33
9 EO 2C W-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
9 MOSSERAY Bernadette -KINET Renée : 50,00 %10 EO 3S S = 600 8 44.44
11 EO 5K N = 400 10 55.56
12 EO 3S E-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
4 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 43,10 %13 EO 2C N-1 -100 8 44.44
14 EO 3S W+2 -460 9 50.00
15 EO 2C S = 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 51,01 %16 EO 2C W+1 -140 12 66.67
17 EO 2P N-1 -50 7 38.89
18 EO 1S S-2 -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
5 STEED Mercédès -GROSFILS Colette : 52,86 %19 EO 5P S+1 480 4 22.22
20 EO 4K S+1 150 3 16.67
21 EO 1S S = 90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
11 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 48,99 %25 EO 3P S = 140 9 50.00
26 EO 4C S-2 -200 17 94.44
27 EO 3C S = 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
1 HUBLET Carlo -MASSAUX Joel : 54,71 %28 EO 3P N = 140 0 0.00
29 EO 2P S+1 140 5 27.78
30 EO 4C E+1 -450 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,93 %31 EO 3S E = -400 14 77.78
32 EO 2P E = -110 18 100.00
33 EO 3C N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
Total : 256,0 / 540 = 47,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
8 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,84 % 1 EO 3P N-1 -50 10 55.56
2 EO 5T E-1 50 10 55.56
3 EO 4P S+2 480 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,38 % 4 EO 4C W-1 100 12 66.67
5 EO 3P E+1 -170 2 11.11
6 EO 6S S = 990 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
9 MOSSERAY Bernadette -KINET Renée : 50,00 % 7 EO 2S N-2 -200 10 55.56
8 EO 3C N = 140 11 61.11
9 EO 1S W = -90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
4 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 43,10 %10 EO 3K S-5 -500 18 100.00
11 EO 3K N+2 150 14 77.78
12 EO 5TcE-1 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 51,01 %13 EO 2C N-1 -100 8 44.44
14 EO 3S E+3 -490 17 94.44
15 EO 3C S-1 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
5 STEED Mercédès -GROSFILS Colette : 52,86 %16 EO 2C W+1 -140 12 66.67
17 EO 2P N-1 -50 7 38.89
18 EO 1S W+1 -120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
11 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 48,99 %22 EO 3C N-2 -100 4 22.22
23 EO 4C N+2 680 5 27.78
24 EO 4P N+2 480 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
1 HUBLET Carlo -MASSAUX Joel : 54,71 %25 EO 3S E-1 100 15 83.33
26 EO 3C S = 140 7 38.89
27 EO 2C S = 110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,93 %28 EO 2P N = 110 7 38.89
29 EO 2P S+1 140 5 27.78
30 EO 4C E+2 -480 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 51,18 %31 EO 1S E+3 -180 10 55.56
32 EO 3S S+1 430 0 0.00
33 EO 2C N = 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 274,0 / 540 = 50,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 de WASSEIGE Ariane -WATELET D
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,38 % 1 EO 2P N+2 170 0 0.00
2 EO 4P S+2 680 4 22.22
3 EO 4P S+1 450 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
9 MOSSERAY Bernadette -KINET Renée : 50,00 % 4 EO 4C W-1 100 12 66.67
5 EO 3P E+1 -170 2 11.11
6 EO 3S S+3 490 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
4 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 43,10 % 7 EO 3C N-4 -400 18 100.00
8 EO 2S S+1 150 6 33.33
9 EO 3S W = -600 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 51,01 %10 EO 4C N-2 -200 16 88.89
11 EO 4C N+1 450 8 44.44
12 EO 3S E+1 -430 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
5 STEED Mercédès -GROSFILS Colette : 52,86 %13 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 72.22
14 EO 3S W+2 -460 9 50.00
15 EO 2C S = 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
11 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 48,99 %19 EO 4S N+1 460 9 50.00
20 EO 2S N+1 150 3 16.67
21 EO 1S S = 90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
1 HUBLET Carlo -MASSAUX Joel : 54,71 %22 EO 3K W+2 -150 12 66.67
23 EO 4C N+1 650 16 88.89
24 EO 4P N+1 450 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,93 %25 EO 3P N = 140 9 50.00
26 EO 2C S+2 170 1 5.56
27 EO 3C S-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 51,18 %28 EO 2P S = 110 7 38.89
29 EO 3P S-1 -100 16 88.89
30 EO 2S E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
8 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,84 %31 EO 3S E-2 100 0 0.00
32 EO 3T S+1 130 5 27.78
33 EO 3C N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 286,0 / 540 = 52,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 RAVET Brigitte -TIRMARCHE Quentin
9 MOSSERAY Bernadette -KINET Renée : 50,00 % 1 EO 3C W = -140 16 88.89
2 EO 4TcE+1 -610 18 100.00
3 EO 4P S+2 480 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
4 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 43,10 % 4 EO 3CcW-1 200 4 22.22
5 EO 4P E = -420 13 72.22
6 EO 6P N-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 51,01 % 7 EO 1S N-2 -200 10 55.56
8 EO 3S S = 400 0 0.00
9 EO 1S W+2 -150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
5 STEED Mercédès -GROSFILS Colette : 52,86 %10 EO 3PcE-5 1400 1 5.56
11 EO 3S S+2 460 4 22.22
12 EO 5K E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
11 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 48,99 %16 EO 3C W-1 100 2 11.11
17 EO 2P N = 110 1 5.56
18 EO 4P N-3 -300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
1 HUBLET Carlo -MASSAUX Joel : 54,71 %19 EO 3S N+2 460 9 50.00
20 EO 2S N = 120 12 66.67
21 EO 1S S-3 -300 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,93 %22 EO 3S W-3 300 1 5.56
23 EO 4C N+2 680 5 27.78
24 EO 4P N+2 480 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 51,18 %25 EO 3P S = 140 9 50.00
26 EO 4C S-1 -100 13 72.22
27 EO 3C S = 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
8 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,84 %28 EO 2C N-1 -100 16 88.89
29 EO 2P S+1 140 5 27.78
30 EO 4C W+2 -480 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,38 %31 EO 2S E+1 -150 7 38.89
32 EO 3T S+1 130 5 27.78
33 EO 3C N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 278,0 / 540 = 51,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier
4 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 43,10 % 1 EO 3C W-1 50 8 44.44
2 EO 5PcN = 850 1 5.56
3 EO 4P S+2 480 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 51,01 % 4 EO 3C W-2 200 4 22.22
5 EO 2P W+2 -170 2 11.11
6 EO 6S S = 990 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
5 STEED Mercédès -GROSFILS Colette : 52,86 % 7 EO 2C N-2 -200 10 55.56
8 EO 2C S+1 140 11 61.11
9 EO 1S W+1 -120 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
11 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 48,99 %13 EO 2C N = 110 3 16.67
14 EO 3S W+2 -460 9 50.00
15 EO 4C S-2 -200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
1 HUBLET Carlo -MASSAUX Joel : 54,71 %16 EO 2C W+1 -140 12 66.67
17 EO 2P N = 110 1 5.56
18 EO 2P N-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,93 %19 EO 6S N = 990 1 5.56
20 EO 1P S+1 110 14 77.78
21 EO 1S S = 90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 51,18 %22 EO 3T E+2 -150 12 66.67
23 EO 4C N+2 680 5 27.78
24 EO 6P N = 980 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
8 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,84 %25 EO 4P S-1 -50 18 100.00
26 EO 3C S = 140 7 38.89
27 EO 3S S+1 430 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,38 %28 EO 2P S = 110 7 38.89
29 EO 2P S+1 140 5 27.78
30 EO 4C E+2 -480 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
9 MOSSERAY Bernadette -KINET Renée : 50,00 %31 EO 3S E+1 -430 18 100.00
32 EO 1S W-1 100 11 61.11
33 EO 2C N+1 140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 226,0 / 540 = 41,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 51,01 % 1 EO 3C W = -140 16 88.89
2 EO 5T W-1 50 10 55.56
3 EO 4P S+1 450 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
5 STEED Mercédès -GROSFILS Colette : 52,86 % 4 EO 4C W-2 200 4 22.22
5 EO 4P W = -420 13 72.22
6 EO 4P N+1 450 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
11 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 48,99 %10 EO 4S N = 630 6 33.33
11 EO 3S N+2 460 4 22.22
12 EO 4T W+1 -150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
1 HUBLET Carlo -MASSAUX Joel : 54,71 %13 EO 2C N = 110 3 16.67
14 EO 3S E+3 -490 17 94.44
15 EO 2P E-2 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,93 %16 EO 2C E+1 -140 12 66.67
17 EO 3S E = -400 16 88.89
18 EO 2C E+1 -140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 51,18 %19 EO 6P N-1 -50 15 83.33
20 EO 4K S-1 -100 17 94.44
21 EO 2CxS-3 -1600 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
8 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,84 %22 EO 3S W = -600 18 100.00
23 EO 4C N+1 650 16 88.89
24 EO 4P N+2 480 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,38 %25 EO 3K E-1 100 15 83.33
26 EO 2C S+1 140 7 38.89
27 EO 3S S = 400 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
9 MOSSERAY Bernadette -KINET Renée : 50,00 %28 EO 3P S-1 -100 16 88.89
29 EO 2P S = 110 12 66.67
30 EO 4C E+2 -480 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
4 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 43,10 %31 EO 3S E-1 50 3 16.67
32 EO 1S E-1 100 11 61.11
33 EO 2C N = 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 349,0 / 540 = 64,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René
5 STEED Mercédès -GROSFILS Colette : 52,86 % 1 EO 3C W = -140 16 88.89
2 EO 5TcE = -550 16 88.89
3 EO 4P S+1 450 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
11 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 48,99 % 7 EO 2C N-2 -200 10 55.56
8 EO 2S S+1 150 6 33.33
9 EO 2T N-2 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
1 HUBLET Carlo -MASSAUX Joel : 54,71 %10 EO 3PcE-5 1400 1 5.56
11 EO 3S N-2 -100 18 100.00
12 EO 3S E-2 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,93 %13 EO 2P E+2 -170 16 88.89
14 EO 3S W+2 -460 9 50.00
15 EO 2C S+1 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 51,18 %16 EO 2C W+1 -140 12 66.67
17 EO 3CcE+1 -630 18 100.00
18 EO 1S W+1 -120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
8 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,84 %19 EO 6S N-2 -100 18 100.00
20 EO 2P S+2 170 0 0.00
21 EO 2C S-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,38 %22 EO 3K W+1 -130 6 33.33
23 EO 3S S+2 660 12 66.67
24 EO 4P N+3 510 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
9 MOSSERAY Bernadette -KINET Renée : 50,00 %25 EO 3P S = 140 9 50.00
26 EO 4C S-1 -100 13 72.22
27 EO 3S S+1 430 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
4 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 43,10 %28 EO 2P S = 110 7 38.89
29 EO 2P S+1 140 5 27.78
30 EO 4C E+1 -450 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 51,01 %31 EO 2P E-1 50 3 16.67
32 EO 2C W-2 200 2 11.11
33 EO 2C N = 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
Total : 267,0 / 540 = 49,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
11 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 48,99 % 4 EO 4C E-1 100 12 66.67
5 EO 4P E = -420 13 72.22
6 EO 6S N = 990 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
1 HUBLET Carlo -MASSAUX Joel : 54,71 % 7 EO 3S S-3 -300 16 88.89
8 EO 2S N+2 180 2 11.11
9 EO 1S S-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,93 %10 EO 2P E-4 400 10 55.56
11 EO 2K N+3 150 14 77.78
12 EO 3S E+1 -430 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 51,18 %13 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 72.22
14 EO 3S W+2 -460 9 50.00
15 EO 3C S-1 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
8 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,84 %16 EO 3P S-2 -100 4 22.22
17 EO 2P N-1 -50 7 38.89
18 EO 3T E = -110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,38 %19 EO 6S N = 990 1 5.56
20 EO 3P S = 140 6 33.33
21 EO 1K N+1 90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
9 MOSSERAY Bernadette -KINET Renée : 50,00 %22 EO 3S W-3 300 1 5.56
23 EO 4C N+2 680 5 27.78
24 EO 3S S+2 460 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
4 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 43,10 %25 EO 4P S = 420 1 5.56
26 EO 4CcS-1 -200 17 94.44
27 EO 4C S-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 51,01 %28 EO 2P S = 110 7 38.89
29 EO 3P S-1 -100 16 88.89
30 EO 4C E+1 -450 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
5 STEED Mercédès -GROSFILS Colette : 52,86 %31 EO 3S E = -400 14 77.78
32 EO 1S W-1 100 11 61.11
33 EO 3C N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
Total : 278,0 / 540 = 51,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 de TERWANGNE Philippe -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
6 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 48,99 % 1 EO 3P N = 140 3 16.67
2 EO 5T E = -400 14 77.78
3 EO 4P S+2 480 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
1 HUBLET Carlo -MASSAUX Joel : 54,71 % 4 EO 4P W-2 200 4 22.22
5 EO 4P W = -420 13 72.22
6 EO 6S N = 990 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,93 % 7 EO 2P E = -110 1 5.56
8 EO 3T N = 110 18 100.00
9 EO 1S W = -90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 51,18 %10 EO 3PcE-4 1100 4 22.22
11 EO 3S S+3 490 0 0.00
12 EO 5T E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
8 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,84 %13 EO 4P E-2 200 0 0.00
14 EO 3S W+1 -430 2 11.11
15 EO 2P E = -110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,38 %16 EO 2C W = -110 6 33.33
17 EO 3PcN-2 -300 14 77.78
18 EO 2C W = -110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
9 MOSSERAY Bernadette -KINET Renée : 50,00 %19 EO 3S N+2 460 9 50.00
20 EO 2K S+2 130 9 50.00
21 EO 2S N-4 -400 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
4 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 43,10 %22 EO 4K W+1 -150 12 66.67
23 EO 4C N+1 650 16 88.89
24 EO 4P N+2 480 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 51,01 %25 EO 4P S = 420 1 5.56
26 EO 2C S+1 140 7 38.89
27 EO 2C S = 110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
5 STEED Mercédès -GROSFILS Colette : 52,86 %28 EO 2P S = 110 7 38.89
29 EO 2P S+1 140 5 27.78
30 EO 4C E+1 -450 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
11 - : 0,00 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 236,0 / 540 = 43,70 %
|
|