|
Tournoi du 08-06-15
1 62,89 4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
2 57,26 10 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal
3 51,06 9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
4 50,94 6 GROSFILS Colette -FOULON
5 49,72 3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier
6 48,91 5 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal
7 46,31 2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
8 46,07 8 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph
9 45,81 7 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
10 40,94 1 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon
11 0,00 11 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 63,85 13 HEERINCKX Colette -BABIKOW Georges
2 63,15 18 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
3 56,63 14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
4 52,84 15 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Joel
5 48,72 22 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
6 48,11 19 LEBRUN -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
7 47,86 16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
8 46,71 20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
9 45,29 21 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
10 43,43 12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
11 34,24 17 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne
PAIRE Nr : 1 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 43,43 % 1 NS 4C E+2 -480 3.4 18.89
2 NS 4C S = 620 10.1 56.11
3 NS 2P N-1 -50 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
22 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,72 % 4 NS 3S W-1 100 12.3 68.33
5 NS 3C N = 140 2.3 12.78
6 NS 4C E = -620 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 47,78 %
21 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 45,29 % 7 NS 3S E+2 -660 1.2 6.67
8 NS 4K S-4 -200 0.1 0.56
9 NS 2P W = -110 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 8,70 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,71 %10 NS 3ScN-4 -1100 0.1 0.56
11 NS 4P S+3 510 11.2 62.22
12 NS 5CxN = 1200 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
19 LEBRUN -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 48,11 %13 NS 3S S = 600 0.1 0.56
14 NS 5T E-2 100 12.3 68.33
15 NS 4T N = 130 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 47,78 %
18 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 63,15 %16 NS 3T E+1 -130 4.6 25.56
17 NS 2C W+1 -140 0.1 0.56
18 NS 4P W-1 50 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 35,74 %
17 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 34,24 %19 NS 2P N+1 140 15.7 87.22
20 NS 1S W-1 100 17.9 99.44
21 NS 3S E-2 100 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 82,96 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 47,86 %22 NS 4P N-1 -50 4.6 25.56
23 NS 1S W+1 -120 4.6 25.56
24 NS 3C S-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,70 %
15 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Joel : 52,84 %25 NS 4P E+1 -650 3.4 18.89
26 NS 2K N-2 -200 4.6 25.56
27 NS 2P E = -110 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 17,04 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,63 %28 NS 4PcE-1 100 10 55.56
29 NS 1S N+3 180 15 83.33
30 NS 3S E+2 -460 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 221,1 / 540 = 40,94 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
13 HEERINCKX Colette -BABIKOW Georges : 63,85 % 4 NS 3C S-2 -200 0.1 0.56
5 NS 3C N+1 170 5.7 31.67
6 NS 4C W = -620 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 43,43 % 7 NS 3S E+1 -630 6.8 37.78
8 NS 3P W-2 100 16.8 93.33
9 NS 3P W-3 300 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 76,85 %
22 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,72 %10 NS 3K N-3 -300 2.3 12.78
11 NS 4P S+3 510 11.2 62.22
12 NS 5CcN-2 -500 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 25,19 %
21 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 45,29 %13 NS 4C N+1 650 15.7 87.22
14 NS 3T E+2 -150 3.4 18.89
15 NS 3S N = 600 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,71 %16 NS 3K S-2 -100 10.1 56.11
17 NS 3K S+1 130 11.2 62.22
18 NS 4P W-2 100 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 72,59 %
19 LEBRUN -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 48,11 %19 NS 1P N = 80 2.3 12.78
20 NS 3T E+1 -130 12.3 68.33
21 NS 3S E-2 100 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 47,78 %
18 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 63,15 %22 NS 2P N+4 230 11.2 62.22
23 NS 1S E+2 -150 1.2 6.67
24 NS 3P N-2 -100 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 27,22 %
17 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 34,24 %25 NS 4P E = -620 9 50.00
26 NS 2P E-2 200 17.9 99.44
27 NS 2C W-3 150 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 78,89 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 47,86 %28 NS 3C S-2 -200 0 0.00
29 NS 3P W-1 100 0 0.00
30 NS 4C E = -420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
15 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Joel : 52,84 %31 NS 4C E = -420 1.2 6.67
32 NS 1S W = -90 2.3 12.78
33 NS 1S W-1 50 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 29,26 %
Total : 250,1 / 540 = 46,31 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 47,86 % 1 NS 4P W-1 50 14.6 81.11
2 NS 4C S = 620 10.1 56.11
3 NS 1S S+2 150 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,63 % 7 NS 3S E = -600 12.3 68.33
8 NS 4T N-2 -100 6.8 37.78
9 NS 2P W = -110 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
13 HEERINCKX Colette -BABIKOW Georges : 63,85 %10 NS 3C E = -140 6.8 37.78
11 NS 5S S+1 490 2.3 12.78
12 NS 4C N-1 -100 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 43,43 %13 NS 4C N = 620 5.7 31.67
14 NS 3S E-2 100 12.3 68.33
15 NS 1S E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
22 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,72 %16 NS 3T E+2 -150 1.2 6.67
17 NS 4K S+1 150 15.7 87.22
18 NS 2P W+2 -170 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 39,81 %
21 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 45,29 %19 NS 2P N = 110 11.2 62.22
20 NS 1S W+2 -150 6.8 37.78
21 NS 3S E-2 100 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,71 %22 NS 4P N+2 480 16.8 93.33
23 NS 1S W-2 200 16.8 93.33
24 NS 3T E = -110 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
19 LEBRUN -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 48,11 %25 NS 4P W+1 -650 3.4 18.89
26 NS 2K N+1 110 15.7 87.22
27 NS 1S N+1 120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
18 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 63,15 %28 NS 3PcE-1 100 10 55.56
29 NS 1S N+3 180 15 83.33
30 NS 3S E = -400 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
17 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 34,24 %31 NS 3C E = -140 13.4 74.44
32 NS 1S N = 90 7.9 43.89
33 NS 2P S-1 -50 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 268,5 / 540 = 49,72 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
18 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 63,15 % 1 NS 4C E+2 -480 3.4 18.89
2 NS 3S S+1 630 17.9 99.44
3 NS 4PcS-2 -300 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
17 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 34,24 % 4 NS 3P E-1 100 12.3 68.33
5 NS 4C N+1 650 16.8 93.33
6 NS 4C E-2 200 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
15 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Joel : 52,84 %10 NS 3C E-1 100 12.3 68.33
11 NS 4P S+3 510 11.2 62.22
12 NS 5C N-2 -200 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,63 %13 NS 4C N+1 650 15.7 87.22
14 NS 3S E-2 100 12.3 68.33
15 NS 2P S = 110 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 72,59 %
13 HEERINCKX Colette -BABIKOW Georges : 63,85 %16 NS 3K N-3 -150 1.2 6.67
17 NS 4K S+1 150 15.7 87.22
18 NS 2P W+1 -140 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 43,43 %19 NS 4TcE-2 500 17.9 99.44
20 NS 2T E+2 -130 12.3 68.33
21 NS 3S E-2 100 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
22 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,72 %22 NS 4P N+2 480 16.8 93.33
23 NS 1S W = -90 9 50.00
24 NS 2P N = 110 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 76,85 %
21 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 45,29 %25 NS 5CcS-3 -500 14.6 81.11
26 NS 2K N-1 -100 9 50.00
27 NS 1S N+2 150 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 72,78 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,71 %28 NS 3PcE-1 100 10 55.56
29 NS 1S N+1 120 3 16.67
30 NS 3C N-4 -200 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
19 LEBRUN -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 48,11 %31 NS 3S W-1 50 16.8 93.33
32 NS 1P S = 80 4.6 25.56
33 NS 1S W-1 50 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
Total : 339,6 / 540 = 62,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,71 % 1 NS 5S W-2 100 17.9 99.44
2 NS 4C S = 620 10.1 56.11
3 NS 3S S+1 430 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 72,59 %
19 LEBRUN -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 48,11 % 4 NS 3T W = -110 4.6 25.56
5 NS 4P N+1 650 16.8 93.33
6 NS 4C W+1 -650 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
18 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 63,15 % 7 NS 3S E = -600 12.3 68.33
8 NS 3T N-1 -50 9 50.00
9 NS 3T N+1 130 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 60,19 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 47,86 %13 NS 4C N+1 650 15.7 87.22
14 NS 4T E = -130 6.8 37.78
15 NS 3S N-1 -100 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
15 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Joel : 52,84 %16 NS 3K N-1 -50 14.6 81.11
17 NS 5K S-2 -100 2.3 12.78
18 NS 3P W+1 -170 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 39,81 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,63 %19 NS 4P N-2 -100 0.1 0.56
20 NS 2P S-2 -200 2.3 12.78
21 NS 3S E-2 100 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 25,19 %
13 HEERINCKX Colette -BABIKOW Georges : 63,85 %22 NS 4P N-1 -50 4.6 25.56
23 NS 1S W = -90 9 50.00
24 NS 2C S-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 43,43 %25 NS 2P W+2 -170 17.9 99.44
26 NS 3S E = -600 0.1 0.56
27 NS 2P E = -110 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
22 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,72 %28 NS 2S N+1 150 14 77.78
29 NS 1S N+1 120 3 16.67
30 NS 3K W+1 -130 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
21 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 45,29 %31 NS 3C E+1 -170 9 50.00
32 NS 3S N = 400 17.9 99.44
33 NS 2P S-1 -50 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
Total : 264,1 / 540 = 48,91 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 GROSFILS Colette -FOULON
22 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,72 % 1 NS 3S W-1 50 14.6 81.11
2 NS 4C S = 620 10.1 56.11
3 NS 3S S-2 -100 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
21 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 45,29 % 4 NS 4P W-1 100 12.3 68.33
5 NS 4C N = 620 11.2 62.22
6 NS 4C E+1 -650 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,71 % 7 NS 3S E+2 -660 1.2 6.67
8 NS 3P W-1 50 11.2 62.22
9 NS 4TcN-1 -100 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
19 LEBRUN -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 48,11 %10 NS 2T S+1 110 15.7 87.22
11 NS 4P S+1 450 0.1 0.56
12 NS 4C N+1 650 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
17 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 34,24 %16 NS 2K N = 90 17.9 99.44
17 NS 3S S-1 -50 6.8 37.78
18 NS 2P W+2 -170 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 54,26 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 47,86 %19 NS 2P N = 110 11.2 62.22
20 NS 3T W+3 -170 4.6 25.56
21 NS 3S W-2 100 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
15 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Joel : 52,84 %22 NS 3P S+1 170 9 50.00
23 NS 1S W+2 -150 1.2 6.67
24 NS 2C N-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,63 %25 NS 5CcN-3 -500 14.6 81.11
26 NS 2C N-2 -200 4.6 25.56
27 NS 1S N+1 120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,22 %
13 HEERINCKX Colette -BABIKOW Georges : 63,85 %28 NS 2T N = 90 6 33.33
29 NS 1S N+2 150 8 44.44
30 NS 1S E+1 -120 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 43,43 %31 NS 3C E+1 -170 9 50.00
32 NS 2C E-1 100 12.3 68.33
33 NS 1S W-1 50 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
Total : 275,1 / 540 = 50,94 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
13 HEERINCKX Colette -BABIKOW Georges : 63,85 % 1 NS 4C E+2 -480 3.4 18.89
2 NS 3S S-1 -100 2.3 12.78
3 NS 2S S+1 150 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 25,19 %
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 43,43 % 4 NS 1S E = -90 6.8 37.78
5 NS 3P N+1 170 5.7 31.67
6 NS 3S E+2 -660 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
22 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,72 % 7 NS 3S E = -600 12.3 68.33
8 NS 3P W = -140 4.6 25.56
9 NS 3P W-2 200 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
21 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 45,29 %10 NS 3C E = -140 6.8 37.78
11 NS 4P S+3 510 11.2 62.22
12 NS 5P W-2 100 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,71 %13 NS 3S S+1 630 11.2 62.22
14 NS 5T E = -400 0.1 0.56
15 NS 3S S-1 -100 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 27,22 %
18 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 63,15 %19 NS 2P N = 110 11.2 62.22
20 NS 4C E = -620 0.1 0.56
21 NS 3S E-1 50 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 23,15 %
17 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 34,24 %22 NS 4P N-1 -50 4.6 25.56
23 NS 2S W-2 200 16.8 93.33
24 NS 2C S-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,30 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 47,86 %25 NS 4P W = -620 9 50.00
26 NS 1S W = -90 11.2 62.22
27 NS 1S N+2 150 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
15 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Joel : 52,84 %28 NS 3S N+1 630 18 100.00
29 NS 1S N+2 150 8 44.44
30 NS 2T E+2 -130 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,63 %31 NS 4C E-1 50 16.8 93.33
32 NS 1S N = 90 7.9 43.89
33 NS 1S W = -90 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 247,4 / 540 = 45,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph
15 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Joel : 52,84 % 1 NS 4C E+2 -480 3.4 18.89
2 NS 4C N = 620 10.1 56.11
3 NS 3S S+2 460 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,63 % 4 NS 4P E-1 100 12.3 68.33
5 NS 4K E-1 50 0.1 0.56
6 NS 4C W+1 -650 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
13 HEERINCKX Colette -BABIKOW Georges : 63,85 % 7 NS 4P E+1 -650 4.6 25.56
8 NS 3P W+1 -170 2.3 12.78
9 NS 2P E+1 -140 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 43,43 %10 NS 4PcE-1 200 17.9 99.44
11 NS 4P S+3 510 11.2 62.22
12 NS 5PcE-1 100 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 72,59 %
22 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,72 %13 NS 4C N = 620 5.7 31.67
14 NS 3K N+1 130 17.9 99.44
15 NS 3S S-1 -100 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
21 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 45,29 %16 NS 3K S-1 -50 14.6 81.11
17 NS 3S N-1 -50 6.8 37.78
18 NS 4P W-1 50 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
19 LEBRUN -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 48,11 %22 NS 4P N-2 -100 0.1 0.56
23 NS 2S E-1 100 13.4 74.44
24 NS 2P N-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
18 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 63,15 %25 NS 4PcW = -790 0.1 0.56
26 NS 2K N-2 -200 4.6 25.56
27 NS 1S N = 90 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 17,22 %
17 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 34,24 %28 NS 2P E = -110 4 22.22
29 NS 1S N+3 180 15 83.33
30 NS 2K W+3 -150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 47,86 %31 NS 3S E = -400 4.6 25.56
32 NS 1S W-2 200 15.7 87.22
33 NS 1S W-1 50 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
Total : 248,8 / 540 = 46,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
17 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 34,24 % 1 NS 3C E+2 -200 11.2 62.22
2 NS 6C N-2 -200 0.1 0.56
3 NS 3S N+2 460 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 47,86 % 4 NS 4P E-2 200 17.9 99.44
5 NS 4C N = 620 11.2 62.22
6 NS 4C E = -620 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 74,63 %
15 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Joel : 52,84 % 7 NS 3S E = -600 12.3 68.33
8 NS 3PcE-1 100 16.8 93.33
9 NS 3T N+1 130 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 74,63 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,63 %10 NS 3C E = -140 6.8 37.78
11 NS 4P N+3 510 11.2 62.22
12 NS 4P E+1 -450 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
13 HEERINCKX Colette -BABIKOW Georges : 63,85 %13 NS 4C N = 620 5.7 31.67
14 NS 3S E-2 100 12.3 68.33
15 NS 3S N-1 -100 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 43,43 %16 NS 1S E+1 -120 6.8 37.78
17 NS 3P E-3 150 15.7 87.22
18 NS 2P E+1 -140 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
22 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,72 %19 NS 3T E-1 100 5.7 31.67
20 NS 3T E+1 -130 12.3 68.33
21 NS 3S E-2 100 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,71 %25 NS 4P E = -620 9 50.00
26 NS 2P E-1 100 13.4 74.44
27 NS 1S N+1 120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
19 LEBRUN -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 48,11 %28 NS 2P E+1 -140 2 11.11
29 NS 1S N+2 150 8 44.44
30 NS 3K E+1 -130 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
18 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 63,15 %31 NS 3C E+1 -170 9 50.00
32 NS 1S E+2 -150 0.1 0.56
33 NS 1S E+1 -120 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 17,04 %
Total : 275,7 / 540 = 51,06 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal
19 LEBRUN -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 48,11 % 1 NS 5K E = -400 9 50.00
2 NS 4C S = 620 10.1 56.11
3 NS 3S S+2 460 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
18 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 63,15 % 4 NS 2P W+1 -140 2.3 12.78
5 NS 4C N = 620 11.2 62.22
6 NS 4C E-1 100 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
17 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 34,24 % 7 NS 3S W-1 100 17.9 99.44
8 NS 1S N = 90 13.4 74.44
9 NS 3T N+1 130 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 78,70 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 47,86 %10 NS 3C E-1 100 12.3 68.33
11 NS 4P S+3 510 11.2 62.22
12 NS 4C N = 620 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
15 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Joel : 52,84 %13 NS 4C N = 620 5.7 31.67
14 NS 3T E+2 -150 3.4 18.89
15 NS 3S N = 600 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,63 %16 NS 3K S-2 -100 10.1 56.11
17 NS 5K S-1 -50 6.8 37.78
18 NS 4PcW = -590 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
13 HEERINCKX Colette -BABIKOW Georges : 63,85 %19 NS 3T W-1 100 5.7 31.67
20 NS 3T E+1 -130 12.3 68.33
21 NS 3S E-1 50 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 43,43 %22 NS 4P N+1 450 13.4 74.44
23 NS 2T W = -90 9 50.00
24 NS 2C S+1 140 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 74,63 %
21 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 45,29 %28 NS 1S N+3 180 16 88.89
29 NS 1S N+3 180 15 83.33
30 NS 3S W+2 -460 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,71 %31 NS 4C E = -420 1.2 6.67
32 NS 2C E-1 100 12.3 68.33
33 NS 2P S = 110 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
Total : 309,2 / 540 = 57,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 -
21 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 45,29 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,71 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 LEBRUN -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 48,11 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
18 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 63,15 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 34,24 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 47,86 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
15 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Joel : 52,84 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,63 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
13 HEERINCKX Colette -BABIKOW Georges : 63,85 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
22 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,72 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 594 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
1 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 40,94 % 1 EO 4C E+2 -480 14.6 81.11
2 EO 4C S = 620 7.9 43.89
3 EO 2P N-1 -50 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
7 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,81 % 4 EO 1S E = -90 11.2 62.22
5 EO 3P N+1 170 12.3 68.33
6 EO 3S E+2 -660 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,31 % 7 EO 3S E+1 -630 11.2 62.22
8 EO 3P W-2 100 1.2 6.67
9 EO 3P W-3 300 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 23,15 %
8 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 46,07 %10 EO 4PcE-1 200 0.1 0.56
11 EO 4P S+3 510 6.8 37.78
12 EO 5PcE-1 100 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 27,41 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 49,72 %13 EO 4C N = 620 12.3 68.33
14 EO 3S E-2 100 5.7 31.67
15 EO 1S E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 51,06 %16 EO 1S E+1 -120 11.2 62.22
17 EO 3P E-3 150 2.3 12.78
18 EO 2P E+1 -140 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 62,89 %19 EO 4TcE-2 500 0.1 0.56
20 EO 2T E+2 -130 5.7 31.67
21 EO 3S E-2 100 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
10 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 57,26 %22 EO 4P N+1 450 4.6 25.56
23 EO 2T W = -90 9 50.00
24 EO 2C S+1 140 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 25,37 %
5 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 48,91 %25 EO 2P W+2 -170 0.1 0.56
26 EO 3S E = -600 17.9 99.44
27 EO 2P E = -110 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
6 GROSFILS Colette -FOULON : 50,94 %31 EO 3C E+1 -170 9 50.00
32 EO 2C E-1 100 5.7 31.67
33 EO 1S W-1 50 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
Total : 234,5 / 540 = 43,43 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 HEERINCKX Colette -BABIKOW Georges
7 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,81 % 1 EO 4C E+2 -480 14.6 81.11
2 EO 3S S-1 -100 15.7 87.22
3 EO 2S S+1 150 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 74,81 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,31 % 4 EO 3C S-2 -200 17.9 99.44
5 EO 3C N+1 170 12.3 68.33
6 EO 4C W = -620 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
8 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 46,07 % 7 EO 4P E+1 -650 13.4 74.44
8 EO 3P W+1 -170 15.7 87.22
9 EO 2P E+1 -140 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 49,72 %10 EO 3C E = -140 11.2 62.22
11 EO 5S S+1 490 15.7 87.22
12 EO 4C N-1 -100 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 51,06 %13 EO 4C N = 620 12.3 68.33
14 EO 3S E-2 100 5.7 31.67
15 EO 3S N-1 -100 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 62,89 %16 EO 3K N-3 -150 16.8 93.33
17 EO 4K S+1 150 2.3 12.78
18 EO 2P W+1 -140 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 57,26 %19 EO 3T W-1 100 12.3 68.33
20 EO 3T E+1 -130 5.7 31.67
21 EO 3S E-1 50 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
5 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 48,91 %22 EO 4P N-1 -50 13.4 74.44
23 EO 1S W = -90 9 50.00
24 EO 2C S-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
11 - : 0,00 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 GROSFILS Colette -FOULON : 50,94 %28 EO 2T N = 90 12 66.67
29 EO 1S N+2 150 10 55.56
30 EO 1S E+1 -120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 310,3 / 486 = 63,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
8 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 46,07 % 4 EO 4P E-1 100 5.7 31.67
5 EO 4K E-1 50 17.9 99.44
6 EO 4C W+1 -650 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 49,72 % 7 EO 3S E = -600 5.7 31.67
8 EO 4T N-2 -100 11.2 62.22
9 EO 2P W = -110 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 51,06 %10 EO 3C E = -140 11.2 62.22
11 EO 4P N+3 510 6.8 37.78
12 EO 4P E+1 -450 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 62,89 %13 EO 4C N+1 650 2.3 12.78
14 EO 3S E-2 100 5.7 31.67
15 EO 2P S = 110 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 27,41 %
10 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 57,26 %16 EO 3K S-2 -100 7.9 43.89
17 EO 5K S-1 -50 11.2 62.22
18 EO 4PcW = -590 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
5 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 48,91 %19 EO 4P N-2 -100 17.9 99.44
20 EO 2P S-2 -200 15.7 87.22
21 EO 3S E-2 100 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 74,81 %
11 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 GROSFILS Colette -FOULON : 50,94 %25 EO 5CcN-3 -500 3.4 18.89
26 EO 2C N-2 -200 13.4 74.44
27 EO 1S N+1 120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,78 %
1 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 40,94 %28 EO 4PcE-1 100 8 44.44
29 EO 1S N+3 180 3 16.67
30 EO 3S E+2 -460 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
7 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,81 %31 EO 4C E-1 50 1.2 6.67
32 EO 1S N = 90 10.1 56.11
33 EO 1S W = -90 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 275,2 / 486 = 56,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Joel
8 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 46,07 % 1 EO 4C E+2 -480 14.6 81.11
2 EO 4C N = 620 7.9 43.89
3 EO 3S S+2 460 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 51,06 % 7 EO 3S E = -600 5.7 31.67
8 EO 3PcE-1 100 1.2 6.67
9 EO 3T N+1 130 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 25,37 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 62,89 %10 EO 3C E-1 100 5.7 31.67
11 EO 4P S+3 510 6.8 37.78
12 EO 5C N-2 -200 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
10 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 57,26 %13 EO 4C N = 620 12.3 68.33
14 EO 3T E+2 -150 14.6 81.11
15 EO 3S N = 600 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
5 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 48,91 %16 EO 3K N-1 -50 3.4 18.89
17 EO 5K S-2 -100 15.7 87.22
18 EO 3P W+1 -170 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 60,19 %
11 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 GROSFILS Colette -FOULON : 50,94 %22 EO 3P S+1 170 9 50.00
23 EO 1S W+2 -150 16.8 93.33
24 EO 2C N-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
1 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 40,94 %25 EO 4P E+1 -650 14.6 81.11
26 EO 2K N-2 -200 13.4 74.44
27 EO 2P E = -110 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 82,96 %
7 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,81 %28 EO 3S N+1 630 0 0.00
29 EO 1S N+2 150 10 55.56
30 EO 2T E+2 -130 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,31 %31 EO 4C E = -420 16.8 93.33
32 EO 1S W = -90 15.7 87.22
33 EO 1S W-1 50 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 70,74 %
Total : 256,8 / 486 = 52,84 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 49,72 % 1 EO 4P W-1 50 3.4 18.89
2 EO 4C S = 620 7.9 43.89
3 EO 1S S+2 150 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 51,06 % 4 EO 4P E-2 200 0.1 0.56
5 EO 4C N = 620 6.8 37.78
6 EO 4C E = -620 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 25,37 %
10 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 57,26 %10 EO 3C E-1 100 5.7 31.67
11 EO 4P S+3 510 6.8 37.78
12 EO 4C N = 620 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
5 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 48,91 %13 EO 4C N+1 650 2.3 12.78
14 EO 4T E = -130 11.2 62.22
15 EO 3S N-1 -100 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
11 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 GROSFILS Colette -FOULON : 50,94 %19 EO 2P N = 110 6.8 37.78
20 EO 3T W+3 -170 13.4 74.44
21 EO 3S W-2 100 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
1 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 40,94 %22 EO 4P N-1 -50 13.4 74.44
23 EO 1S W+1 -120 13.4 74.44
24 EO 3C S-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,30 %
7 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,81 %25 EO 4P W = -620 9 50.00
26 EO 1S W = -90 6.8 37.78
27 EO 1S N+2 150 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,31 %28 EO 3C S-2 -200 18 100.00
29 EO 3P W-1 100 18 100.00
30 EO 4C E = -420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
8 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 46,07 %31 EO 3S E = -400 13.4 74.44
32 EO 1S W-2 200 2.3 12.78
33 EO 1S W-1 50 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
Total : 232,6 / 486 = 47,86 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne
9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 51,06 % 1 EO 3C E+2 -200 6.8 37.78
2 EO 6C N-2 -200 17.9 99.44
3 EO 3S N+2 460 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 62,89 % 4 EO 3P E-1 100 5.7 31.67
5 EO 4C N+1 650 1.2 6.67
6 EO 4C E-2 200 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
10 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 57,26 % 7 EO 3S W-1 100 0.1 0.56
8 EO 1S N = 90 4.6 25.56
9 EO 3T N+1 130 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 21,30 %
11 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 GROSFILS Colette -FOULON : 50,94 %16 EO 2K N = 90 0.1 0.56
17 EO 3S S-1 -50 11.2 62.22
18 EO 2P W+2 -170 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 45,74 %
1 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 40,94 %19 EO 2P N+1 140 2.3 12.78
20 EO 1S W-1 100 0.1 0.56
21 EO 3S E-2 100 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 17,04 %
7 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,81 %22 EO 4P N-1 -50 13.4 74.44
23 EO 2S W-2 200 1.2 6.67
24 EO 2C S-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,70 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,31 %25 EO 4P E = -620 9 50.00
26 EO 2P E-2 200 0.1 0.56
27 EO 2C W-3 150 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 21,11 %
8 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 46,07 %28 EO 2P E = -110 14 77.78
29 EO 1S N+3 180 3 16.67
30 EO 2K W+3 -150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 49,72 %31 EO 3C E = -140 4.6 25.56
32 EO 1S N = 90 10.1 56.11
33 EO 2P S-1 -50 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 166,4 / 486 = 34,24 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 62,89 % 1 EO 4C E+2 -480 14.6 81.11
2 EO 3S S+1 630 0.1 0.56
3 EO 4PcS-2 -300 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
10 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 57,26 % 4 EO 2P W+1 -140 15.7 87.22
5 EO 4C N = 620 6.8 37.78
6 EO 4C E-1 100 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
5 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 48,91 % 7 EO 3S E = -600 5.7 31.67
8 EO 3T N-1 -50 9 50.00
9 EO 3T N+1 130 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 39,81 %
11 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 40,94 %16 EO 3T E+1 -130 13.4 74.44
17 EO 2C W+1 -140 17.9 99.44
18 EO 4P W-1 50 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 64,26 %
7 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,81 %19 EO 2P N = 110 6.8 37.78
20 EO 4C E = -620 17.9 99.44
21 EO 3S E-1 50 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 76,85 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,31 %22 EO 2P N+4 230 6.8 37.78
23 EO 1S E+2 -150 16.8 93.33
24 EO 3P N-2 -100 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 72,78 %
8 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 46,07 %25 EO 4PcW = -790 17.9 99.44
26 EO 2K N-2 -200 13.4 74.44
27 EO 1S N = 90 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 82,78 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 49,72 %28 EO 3PcE-1 100 8 44.44
29 EO 1S N+3 180 3 16.67
30 EO 3S E = -400 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 51,06 %31 EO 3C E+1 -170 9 50.00
32 EO 1S E+2 -150 17.9 99.44
33 EO 1S E+1 -120 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 82,96 %
Total : 306,9 / 486 = 63,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 LEBRUN -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
10 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 57,26 % 1 EO 5K E = -400 9 50.00
2 EO 4C S = 620 7.9 43.89
3 EO 3S S+2 460 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
5 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 48,91 % 4 EO 3T W = -110 13.4 74.44
5 EO 4P N+1 650 1.2 6.67
6 EO 4C W+1 -650 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
11 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 GROSFILS Colette -FOULON : 50,94 %10 EO 2T S+1 110 2.3 12.78
11 EO 4P S+1 450 17.9 99.44
12 EO 4C N+1 650 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
1 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 40,94 %13 EO 3S S = 600 17.9 99.44
14 EO 5T E-2 100 5.7 31.67
15 EO 4T N = 130 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 52,22 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,31 %19 EO 1P N = 80 15.7 87.22
20 EO 3T E+1 -130 5.7 31.67
21 EO 3S E-2 100 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 52,22 %
8 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 46,07 %22 EO 4P N-2 -100 17.9 99.44
23 EO 2S E-1 100 4.6 25.56
24 EO 2P N-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 49,72 %25 EO 4P W+1 -650 14.6 81.11
26 EO 2K N+1 110 2.3 12.78
27 EO 1S N+1 120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 51,06 %28 EO 2P E+1 -140 16 88.89
29 EO 1S N+2 150 10 55.56
30 EO 3K E+1 -130 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 62,89 %31 EO 3S W-1 50 1.2 6.67
32 EO 1P S = 80 13.4 74.44
33 EO 1S W-1 50 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
Total : 233,8 / 486 = 48,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
5 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 48,91 % 1 EO 5S W-2 100 0.1 0.56
2 EO 4C S = 620 7.9 43.89
3 EO 3S S+1 430 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 27,41 %
11 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 GROSFILS Colette -FOULON : 50,94 % 7 EO 3S E+2 -660 16.8 93.33
8 EO 3P W-1 50 6.8 37.78
9 EO 4TcN-1 -100 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
1 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 40,94 %10 EO 3ScN-4 -1100 17.9 99.44
11 EO 4P S+3 510 6.8 37.78
12 EO 5CxN = 1200 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
7 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,81 %13 EO 3S S+1 630 6.8 37.78
14 EO 5T E = -400 17.9 99.44
15 EO 3S S-1 -100 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 72,78 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,31 %16 EO 3K S-2 -100 7.9 43.89
17 EO 3K S+1 130 6.8 37.78
18 EO 4P W-2 100 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 27,41 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 49,72 %22 EO 4P N+2 480 1.2 6.67
23 EO 1S W-2 200 1.2 6.67
24 EO 3T E = -110 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 51,06 %25 EO 4P E = -620 9 50.00
26 EO 2P E-1 100 4.6 25.56
27 EO 1S N+1 120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 62,89 %28 EO 3PcE-1 100 8 44.44
29 EO 1S N+1 120 15 83.33
30 EO 3C N-4 -200 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
10 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 57,26 %31 EO 4C E = -420 16.8 93.33
32 EO 2C E-1 100 5.7 31.67
33 EO 2P S = 110 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
Total : 227,0 / 486 = 46,71 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
11 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 GROSFILS Colette -FOULON : 50,94 % 4 EO 4P W-1 100 5.7 31.67
5 EO 4C N = 620 6.8 37.78
6 EO 4C E+1 -650 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
1 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 40,94 % 7 EO 3S E+2 -660 16.8 93.33
8 EO 4K S-4 -200 17.9 99.44
9 EO 2P W = -110 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 91,30 %
7 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,81 %10 EO 3C E = -140 11.2 62.22
11 EO 4P S+3 510 6.8 37.78
12 EO 5P W-2 100 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,31 %13 EO 4C N+1 650 2.3 12.78
14 EO 3T E+2 -150 14.6 81.11
15 EO 3S N = 600 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
8 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 46,07 %16 EO 3K S-1 -50 3.4 18.89
17 EO 3S N-1 -50 11.2 62.22
18 EO 4P W-1 50 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 49,72 %19 EO 2P N = 110 6.8 37.78
20 EO 1S W+2 -150 11.2 62.22
21 EO 3S E-2 100 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 62,89 %25 EO 5CcS-3 -500 3.4 18.89
26 EO 2K N-1 -100 9 50.00
27 EO 1S N+2 150 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 27,22 %
10 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 57,26 %28 EO 1S N+3 180 2 11.11
29 EO 1S N+3 180 3 16.67
30 EO 3S W+2 -460 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
5 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 48,91 %31 EO 3C E+1 -170 9 50.00
32 EO 3S N = 400 0.1 0.56
33 EO 2P S-1 -50 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
Total : 220,1 / 486 = 45,29 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
6 GROSFILS Colette -FOULON : 50,94 % 1 EO 3S W-1 50 3.4 18.89
2 EO 4C S = 620 7.9 43.89
3 EO 3S S-2 -100 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
1 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 40,94 % 4 EO 3S W-1 100 5.7 31.67
5 EO 3C N = 140 15.7 87.22
6 EO 4C E = -620 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 52,22 %
7 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,81 % 7 EO 3S E = -600 5.7 31.67
8 EO 3P W = -140 13.4 74.44
9 EO 3P W-2 200 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,31 %10 EO 3K N-3 -300 15.7 87.22
11 EO 4P S+3 510 6.8 37.78
12 EO 5CcN-2 -500 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 74,81 %
8 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 46,07 %13 EO 4C N = 620 12.3 68.33
14 EO 3K N+1 130 0.1 0.56
15 EO 3S S-1 -100 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 49,72 %16 EO 3T E+2 -150 16.8 93.33
17 EO 4K S+1 150 2.3 12.78
18 EO 2P W+2 -170 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 60,19 %
9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 51,06 %19 EO 3T E-1 100 12.3 68.33
20 EO 3T E+1 -130 5.7 31.67
21 EO 3S E-2 100 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 62,89 %22 EO 4P N+2 480 1.2 6.67
23 EO 1S W = -90 9 50.00
24 EO 2P N = 110 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 23,15 %
5 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 48,91 %28 EO 2S N+1 150 4 22.22
29 EO 1S N+1 120 15 83.33
30 EO 3K W+1 -130 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
11 - : 0,00 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 236,8 / 486 = 48,72 %
|
|