|
Tournoi du 08-09-14
1 60,93 2 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
2 60,00 10 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
3 57,04 8 MATELART Marc -GOBBE Amélie
4 50,93 1 GROSFILS Colette -BRIGODE Jacques
~ 50,93 4 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal
6 50,19 7 NELIS Claude -CHARLIER Pierre
7 46,30 5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
8 42,78 6 ROGIERS Marga -VERBOIS Léon
9 41,11 3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine
10 39,81 9 SNEYERS Marc -LOUIS Serge
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 58,89 11 GILBERT Maurice -DEGUELLE Jacques
2 56,67 19 COURTOIS Chantal -LIBERT Laurent
3 55,37 18 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
4 54,63 16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
5 54,26 17 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand
6 49,07 12 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
7 45,19 20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
8 44,81 15 MOLS Bruno -COLLET Edgard
9 44,26 13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier
10 36,85 14 POULAERT Gilbert -DELHEZ Jacques
PAIRE Nr : 1 GROSFILS Colette -BRIGODE Jacques
11 GILBERT Maurice -DEGUELLE Jacques : 58,89 % 1 NS 3K E+1 -130 8 44.44
2 NS 1S W = -90 4 22.22
3 NS 3S W+2 -660 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,26 % 4 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 22.22
5 NS 2S N+1 150 13 72.22
6 NS 2S S+1 150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
12 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,07 % 7 NS 2C N+1 140 16 88.89
8 NS 1S W+3 -180 1 5.56
9 NS 3P N = 140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,63 %10 NS 6C E-1 100 15 83.33
11 NS 2C N = 110 18 100.00
12 NS 4C E = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
17 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 54,26 %13 NS 4C W = -620 7 38.89
14 NS 2C S+1 140 16 88.89
15 NS 2T E-2 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
18 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,37 %16 NS 4P E = -620 2 11.11
17 NS 2P S+2 170 7 38.89
18 NS 1S E = -90 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
19 COURTOIS Chantal -LIBERT Laurent : 56,67 %19 NS 2K E+1 -110 3 16.67
20 NS 2CcN+1 870 18 100.00
21 NS 2P W = -110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,19 %22 NS 4C N-1 -50 12 66.67
23 NS 1S E = -90 13 72.22
24 NS 2S W+1 -150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
14 POULAERT Gilbert -DELHEZ Jacques : 36,85 %25 NS 3S W-1 100 17 94.44
26 NS 3CcE+1 -930 0 0.00
27 NS 3S E = -400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
15 MOLS Bruno -COLLET Edgard : 44,81 %28 NS 4P E+1 -450 4 22.22
29 NS 3C E+1 -170 13 72.22
30 NS 6C N-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 275,0 / 540 = 50,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,26 % 1 NS 3K E+1 -130 8 44.44
2 NS 1S N = 90 11 61.11
3 NS 4C E+1 -650 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
12 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,07 % 4 NS 3S E+1 -630 10 55.56
5 NS 2P S+1 140 9 50.00
6 NS 3S S = 400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
11 GILBERT Maurice -DEGUELLE Jacques : 58,89 % 7 NS 1S S = 90 6 33.33
8 NS 2P N-3 -150 9 50.00
9 NS 3P N-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,19 %10 NS 6C E = -1430 3 16.67
11 NS 5K W-2 100 16 88.89
12 NS 3S E-2 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
14 POULAERT Gilbert -DELHEZ Jacques : 36,85 %13 NS 3T W-3 300 18 100.00
14 NS 2C N = 110 14 77.78
15 NS 1S W-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
15 MOLS Bruno -COLLET Edgard : 44,81 %16 NS 4K S-1 -50 17 94.44
17 NS 4P N = 420 11 61.11
18 NS 2S E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,63 %19 NS 2C S-1 -50 10 55.56
20 NS 2P S = 110 14 77.78
21 NS 2P W-2 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
17 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 54,26 %22 NS 4C S-1 -50 12 66.67
23 NS 1S W = -90 13 72.22
24 NS 3S W+1 -430 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
18 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,37 %25 NS 2S E+1 -150 10 55.56
26 NS 5CcE = -850 2 11.11
27 NS 2S E+1 -150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
19 COURTOIS Chantal -LIBERT Laurent : 56,67 %28 NS 4P E-1 50 17 94.44
29 NS 3C W+2 -200 6 33.33
30 NS 6P S = 980 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
Total : 329,0 / 540 = 60,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine
12 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,07 % 1 NS 3K E+1 -130 8 44.44
2 NS 1S S+1 120 15 83.33
3 NS 4C E+1 -650 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
11 GILBERT Maurice -DEGUELLE Jacques : 58,89 % 4 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 22.22
5 NS 2P S-1 -100 3 16.67
6 NS 3S S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,26 % 7 NS 2C N = 110 11 61.11
8 NS 1S E+2 -150 9 50.00
9 NS 2P N = 110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
18 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,37 %10 NS 6C E = -1430 3 16.67
11 NS 1S E+2 -150 1 5.56
12 NS 4C E = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
19 COURTOIS Chantal -LIBERT Laurent : 56,67 %13 NS 2PcN-1 -200 12 66.67
14 NS 5T E = -400 2 11.11
15 NS 3S S-2 -200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,19 %16 NS 5KcS-2 -300 7 38.89
17 NS 6P S-1 -50 3 16.67
18 NS 3S E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
14 POULAERT Gilbert -DELHEZ Jacques : 36,85 %19 NS 1S S = 90 14 77.78
20 NS 3T E+1 -130 4 22.22
21 NS 1S S+1 120 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
15 MOLS Bruno -COLLET Edgard : 44,81 %22 NS 4C S-2 -100 5 27.78
23 NS 1S W+1 -120 4 22.22
24 NS 4PcN-4 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,63 %25 NS 2S E+1 -150 10 55.56
26 NS 4C E+2 -680 6 33.33
27 NS 3S E = -400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
17 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 54,26 %28 NS 4P E = -420 12 66.67
29 NS 4T S-1 -100 16 88.89
30 NS 4C N+1 450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
Total : 222,0 / 540 = 41,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal
17 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 54,26 % 1 NS 3S E = -400 1 5.56
2 NS 2K N-2 -200 1 5.56
3 NS 6K W = -1370 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 3,70 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,63 % 4 NS 3S W+2 -660 4 22.22
5 NS 2K N-1 -100 3 16.67
6 NS 2S N+1 150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
15 MOLS Bruno -COLLET Edgard : 44,81 % 7 NS 2C N+1 140 16 88.89
8 NS 3T W+1 -130 14 77.78
9 NS 3P N-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
14 POULAERT Gilbert -DELHEZ Jacques : 36,85 %10 NS 6C E = -1430 3 16.67
11 NS 1S E+1 -120 6 33.33
12 NS 3S E-2 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,19 %13 NS 3C W+1 -170 14 77.78
14 NS 3T W+1 -130 10 55.56
15 NS 2S N+2 180 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
19 COURTOIS Chantal -LIBERT Laurent : 56,67 %16 NS 5KcN-2 -300 7 38.89
17 NS 4P S+1 450 17 94.44
18 NS 3S E-3 150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
18 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,37 %19 NS 1S S = 90 14 77.78
20 NS 3T W+1 -130 4 22.22
21 NS 2C E-2 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,26 %22 NS 4C S-1 -50 12 66.67
23 NS 1S W = -90 13 72.22
24 NS 1S W+2 -150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
12 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,07 %25 NS 3S E = -600 2 11.11
26 NS 3T W-3 300 18 100.00
27 NS 3S W = -400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 GILBERT Maurice -DEGUELLE Jacques : 58,89 %28 NS 4P E+1 -450 4 22.22
29 NS 4C W+1 -650 0 0.00
30 NS 6P S = 980 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 275,0 / 540 = 50,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
18 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,37 % 1 NS 3K E+1 -130 8 44.44
2 NS 2C W-3 150 18 100.00
3 NS 4C E+2 -680 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
17 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 54,26 % 4 NS 6K E = -1370 0 0.00
5 NS 3P S = 140 9 50.00
6 NS 3T S+1 130 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,63 % 7 NS 2K S+1 110 11 61.11
8 NS 1S E+2 -150 9 50.00
9 NS 3P N-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
11 GILBERT Maurice -DEGUELLE Jacques : 58,89 %10 NS 5C E+1 -680 9 50.00
11 NS 3K E+1 -130 4 22.22
12 NS 4C E = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
15 MOLS Bruno -COLLET Edgard : 44,81 %13 NS 3PcN-2 -500 10 55.56
14 NS 1S E+4 -210 6 33.33
15 NS 1S E = -90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
14 POULAERT Gilbert -DELHEZ Jacques : 36,85 %16 NS 2P E+2 -170 11 61.11
17 NS 2P S+2 170 7 38.89
18 NS 2P S+2 170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,19 %19 NS 2K W+1 -110 3 16.67
20 NS 2C N-1 -100 10 55.56
21 NS 2P W+1 -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
19 COURTOIS Chantal -LIBERT Laurent : 56,67 %22 NS 4CcS-2 -300 0 0.00
23 NS 1S W = -90 13 72.22
24 NS 2S W+2 -180 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,26 %25 NS 2S E+1 -150 10 55.56
26 NS 3C E+2 -200 15 83.33
27 NS 3S E = -400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
12 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,07 %28 NS 4P E = -420 12 66.67
29 NS 2C E+2 -170 13 72.22
30 NS 4P S+1 450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 250,0 / 540 = 46,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 ROGIERS Marga -VERBOIS Léon
19 COURTOIS Chantal -LIBERT Laurent : 56,67 % 1 NS 3S W = -400 1 5.56
2 NS 1S W-1 50 6 33.33
3 NS 3S W+2 -660 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
18 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,37 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 16 88.89
5 NS 2P S = 110 6 33.33
6 NS 2S N+1 150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
17 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 54,26 % 7 NS 1S S = 90 6 33.33
8 NS 2T W+4 -170 4 22.22
9 NS 3P N = 140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
12 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,07 %10 NS 6C E-1 100 15 83.33
11 NS 3K E+2 -150 1 5.56
12 NS 3S E+1 -430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
11 GILBERT Maurice -DEGUELLE Jacques : 58,89 %13 NS 4C W+1 -650 2 11.11
14 NS 4CcN-2 -300 4 22.22
15 NS 2S W = -120 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,63 %16 NS 4P E = -620 2 11.11
17 NS 4P S-1 -50 3 16.67
18 NS 2K W+1 -110 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
15 MOLS Bruno -COLLET Edgard : 44,81 %19 NS 3P S-2 -100 8 44.44
20 NS 3C N = 140 16 88.89
21 NS 1S S = 90 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
14 POULAERT Gilbert -DELHEZ Jacques : 36,85 %22 NS 3C S-1 -50 12 66.67
23 NS 1S W-1 100 18 100.00
24 NS 3T E+1 -130 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,19 %25 NS 3S E = -600 2 11.11
26 NS 4C E = -620 12 66.67
27 NS 1S E+1 -120 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,26 %28 NS 4P E+1 -450 4 22.22
29 NS 2C E+3 -200 6 33.33
30 NS 4P S = 420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 231,0 / 540 = 42,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 NELIS Claude -CHARLIER Pierre
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,19 % 1 NS 3K E = -110 14 77.78
2 NS 1S S+1 120 15 83.33
3 NS 3S W+1 -630 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
19 COURTOIS Chantal -LIBERT Laurent : 56,67 % 4 NS 5K E+1 -620 14 77.78
5 NS 2S N-3 -300 0 0.00
6 NS 2S N+1 150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
18 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,37 % 7 NS 3C N = 140 16 88.89
8 NS 3T W = -110 18 100.00
9 NS 3K E+1 -130 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,26 %10 NS 4C E+2 -680 9 50.00
11 NS 3S E-1 50 14 77.78
12 NS 4C E = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
12 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,07 %13 NS 4C W+1 -650 2 11.11
14 NS 5CcN-3 -500 0 0.00
15 NS 2S W = -120 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
11 GILBERT Maurice -DEGUELLE Jacques : 58,89 %16 NS 3P E+1 -170 11 61.11
17 NS 4C N = 420 11 61.11
18 NS 2S E-2 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
17 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 54,26 %19 NS 2K W+1 -110 3 16.67
20 NS 4T E = -130 4 22.22
21 NS 2P W-2 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,63 %22 NS 4C S-3 -150 2 11.11
23 NS 1S W+1 -120 4 22.22
24 NS 2S W+2 -180 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
15 MOLS Bruno -COLLET Edgard : 44,81 %25 NS 3S E-1 100 17 94.44
26 NS 3C E+2 -200 15 83.33
27 NS 3S E = -400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
14 POULAERT Gilbert -DELHEZ Jacques : 36,85 %28 NS 4P E+1 -450 4 22.22
29 NS 4CcE-2 500 18 100.00
30 NS 6C N-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 271,0 / 540 = 50,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -GOBBE Amélie
14 POULAERT Gilbert -DELHEZ Jacques : 36,85 % 1 NS 3K E-1 50 16 88.89
2 NS 1S N = 90 11 61.11
3 NS 4C E+1 -650 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,19 % 4 NS 3S W+1 -630 10 55.56
5 NS 2S N+1 150 13 72.22
6 NS 2S S+1 150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
19 COURTOIS Chantal -LIBERT Laurent : 56,67 % 7 NS 2C N-1 -100 1 5.56
8 NS 2T W+3 -150 9 50.00
9 NS 3P N-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
15 MOLS Bruno -COLLET Edgard : 44,81 %10 NS 7C E-1 100 15 83.33
11 NS 1S E = -90 12 66.67
12 NS 4C E = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,26 %13 NS 3C W = -140 16 88.89
14 NS 2P W-4 200 18 100.00
15 NS 3ScW-2 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 96,30 %
12 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,07 %16 NS 4K N-1 -50 17 94.44
17 NS 4P S+1 450 17 94.44
18 NS 3K W = -110 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
11 GILBERT Maurice -DEGUELLE Jacques : 58,89 %19 NS 1S N = 90 14 77.78
20 NS 2C N-1 -100 10 55.56
21 NS 2P W-2 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
18 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,37 %22 NS 5C S-2 -100 5 27.78
23 NS 1S W+1 -120 4 22.22
24 NS 3T E+2 -150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
17 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 54,26 %25 NS 3S E = -600 2 11.11
26 NS 4C E+1 -650 10 55.56
27 NS 3S W = -400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,63 %28 NS 4P E+1 -450 4 22.22
29 NS 2C E+3 -200 6 33.33
30 NS 6P S = 980 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 308,0 / 540 = 57,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 SNEYERS Marc -LOUIS Serge
15 MOLS Bruno -COLLET Edgard : 44,81 % 1 NS 3K E+1 -130 8 44.44
2 NS 1C S = 80 8 44.44
3 NS 3C E+2 -200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
14 POULAERT Gilbert -DELHEZ Jacques : 36,85 % 4 NS 3S E+1 -630 10 55.56
5 NS 3S N = 600 17 94.44
6 NS 2S N = 120 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,19 % 7 NS 1S S-1 -100 1 5.56
8 NS 2S W+2 -180 1 5.56
9 NS 2P N = 110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
17 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 54,26 %10 NS 6C E = -1430 3 16.67
11 NS 3K W = -110 9 50.00
12 NS 4C E = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,63 %13 NS 4C W = -620 7 38.89
14 NS 5TcW-1 100 12 66.67
15 NS 2S S-2 -200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,26 %16 NS 4P E = -620 2 11.11
17 NS 6P N-2 -100 0 0.00
18 NS 2S E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
12 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,07 %19 NS 2C N+1 140 18 100.00
20 NS 3CcN-1 -200 0 0.00
21 NS 2P W-2 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
11 GILBERT Maurice -DEGUELLE Jacques : 58,89 %22 NS 4PcW-1 200 18 100.00
23 NS 1S W+2 -150 0 0.00
24 NS 2S W+2 -180 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
19 COURTOIS Chantal -LIBERT Laurent : 56,67 %25 NS 2S E+1 -150 10 55.56
26 NS 4C E+2 -680 6 33.33
27 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
18 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,37 %28 NS 4P E = -420 12 66.67
29 NS 3C E+2 -200 6 33.33
30 NS 6C N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 215,0 / 540 = 39,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,63 % 1 NS 3S E-2 100 18 100.00
2 NS 2C S-2 -200 1 5.56
3 NS 3C E+2 -200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
15 MOLS Bruno -COLLET Edgard : 44,81 % 4 NS 2K W+4 -170 18 100.00
5 NS 3S N = 600 17 94.44
6 NS 3T S = 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
14 POULAERT Gilbert -DELHEZ Jacques : 36,85 % 7 NS 2K S = 90 6 33.33
8 NS 2S E = -120 16 88.89
9 NS 3P N = 140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
19 COURTOIS Chantal -LIBERT Laurent : 56,67 %10 NS 7C W-1 100 15 83.33
11 NS 3K E = -110 9 50.00
12 NS 4C E = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
18 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,37 %13 NS 4C W+1 -650 2 11.11
14 NS 1S E+2 -150 8 44.44
15 NS 3S W-3 150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
17 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 54,26 %16 NS 3P E = -140 14 77.78
17 NS 3S N+1 430 14 77.78
18 NS 5KcW-2 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,26 %19 NS 2K W+1 -110 3 16.67
20 NS 2C N-1 -100 10 55.56
21 NS 1S S+1 120 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
12 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,07 %22 NS 5C S-1 -50 12 66.67
23 NS 1S S-1 -100 8 44.44
24 NS 3S W+1 -430 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
11 GILBERT Maurice -DEGUELLE Jacques : 58,89 %25 NS 2S E+1 -150 10 55.56
26 NS 4C E+2 -680 6 33.33
27 NS 2S W+1 -150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,19 %28 NS 3P W-1 50 17 94.44
29 NS 2P S-2 -200 6 33.33
30 NS 6C N-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 324,0 / 540 = 60,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 GILBERT Maurice -DEGUELLE Jacques
1 GROSFILS Colette -BRIGODE Jacques : 50,93 % 1 EO 3K E+1 -130 10 55.56
2 EO 1S W = -90 14 77.78
3 EO 3S W+2 -660 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 41,11 % 4 EO 3S E+2 -660 14 77.78
5 EO 2P S-1 -100 15 83.33
6 EO 3S S-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
2 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 60,93 % 7 EO 1S S = 90 12 66.67
8 EO 2P N-3 -150 9 50.00
9 EO 3P N-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,30 %10 EO 5C E+1 -680 9 50.00
11 EO 3K E+1 -130 14 77.78
12 EO 4C E = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
6 ROGIERS Marga -VERBOIS Léon : 42,78 %13 EO 4C W+1 -650 16 88.89
14 EO 4CcN-2 -300 14 77.78
15 EO 2S W = -120 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
7 NELIS Claude -CHARLIER Pierre : 50,19 %16 EO 3P E+1 -170 7 38.89
17 EO 4C N = 420 7 38.89
18 EO 2S E-2 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
8 MATELART Marc -GOBBE Amélie : 57,04 %19 EO 1S N = 90 4 22.22
20 EO 2C N-1 -100 8 44.44
21 EO 2P W-2 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
9 SNEYERS Marc -LOUIS Serge : 39,81 %22 EO 4PcW-1 200 0 0.00
23 EO 1S W+2 -150 18 100.00
24 EO 2S W+2 -180 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
10 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 60,00 %25 EO 2S E+1 -150 8 44.44
26 EO 4C E+2 -680 12 66.67
27 EO 2S W+1 -150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
4 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 50,93 %28 EO 4P E+1 -450 14 77.78
29 EO 4C W+1 -650 18 100.00
30 EO 6P S = 980 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 318,0 / 540 = 58,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 41,11 % 1 EO 3K E+1 -130 10 55.56
2 EO 1S S+1 120 3 16.67
3 EO 4C E+1 -650 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
2 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 60,93 % 4 EO 3S E+1 -630 8 44.44
5 EO 2P S+1 140 9 50.00
6 EO 3S S = 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
1 GROSFILS Colette -BRIGODE Jacques : 50,93 % 7 EO 2C N+1 140 2 11.11
8 EO 1S W+3 -180 17 94.44
9 EO 3P N = 140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
6 ROGIERS Marga -VERBOIS Léon : 42,78 %10 EO 6C E-1 100 3 16.67
11 EO 3K E+2 -150 17 94.44
12 EO 3S E+1 -430 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
7 NELIS Claude -CHARLIER Pierre : 50,19 %13 EO 4C W+1 -650 16 88.89
14 EO 5CcN-3 -500 18 100.00
15 EO 2S W = -120 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
8 MATELART Marc -GOBBE Amélie : 57,04 %16 EO 4K N-1 -50 1 5.56
17 EO 4P S+1 450 1 5.56
18 EO 3K W = -110 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
9 SNEYERS Marc -LOUIS Serge : 39,81 %19 EO 2C N+1 140 0 0.00
20 EO 3CcN-1 -200 18 100.00
21 EO 2P W-2 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
10 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 60,00 %22 EO 5C S-1 -50 6 33.33
23 EO 1S S-1 -100 10 55.56
24 EO 3S W+1 -430 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
4 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 50,93 %25 EO 3S E = -600 16 88.89
26 EO 3T W-3 300 0 0.00
27 EO 3S W = -400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,30 %28 EO 4P E = -420 6 33.33
29 EO 2C E+2 -170 5 27.78
30 EO 4P S+1 450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 265,0 / 540 = 49,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier
2 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 60,93 % 1 EO 3K E+1 -130 10 55.56
2 EO 1S N = 90 7 38.89
3 EO 4C E+1 -650 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
1 GROSFILS Colette -BRIGODE Jacques : 50,93 % 4 EO 3S E+2 -660 14 77.78
5 EO 2S N+1 150 5 27.78
6 EO 2S S+1 150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 41,11 % 7 EO 2C N = 110 7 38.89
8 EO 1S E+2 -150 9 50.00
9 EO 2P N = 110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
7 NELIS Claude -CHARLIER Pierre : 50,19 %10 EO 4C E+2 -680 9 50.00
11 EO 3S E-1 50 4 22.22
12 EO 4C E = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
8 MATELART Marc -GOBBE Amélie : 57,04 %13 EO 3C W = -140 2 11.11
14 EO 2P W-4 200 0 0.00
15 EO 3ScW-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 3,70 %
9 SNEYERS Marc -LOUIS Serge : 39,81 %16 EO 4P E = -620 16 88.89
17 EO 6P N-2 -100 18 100.00
18 EO 2S E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
10 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 60,00 %19 EO 2K W+1 -110 15 83.33
20 EO 2C N-1 -100 8 44.44
21 EO 1S S+1 120 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
4 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 50,93 %22 EO 4C S-1 -50 6 33.33
23 EO 1S W = -90 5 27.78
24 EO 1S W+2 -150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,30 %25 EO 2S E+1 -150 8 44.44
26 EO 3C E+2 -200 3 16.67
27 EO 3S E = -400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
6 ROGIERS Marga -VERBOIS Léon : 42,78 %28 EO 4P E+1 -450 14 77.78
29 EO 2C E+3 -200 12 66.67
30 EO 4P S = 420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 239,0 / 540 = 44,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 POULAERT Gilbert -DELHEZ Jacques
8 MATELART Marc -GOBBE Amélie : 57,04 % 1 EO 3K E-1 50 2 11.11
2 EO 1S N = 90 7 38.89
3 EO 4C E+1 -650 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
9 SNEYERS Marc -LOUIS Serge : 39,81 % 4 EO 3S E+1 -630 8 44.44
5 EO 3S N = 600 1 5.56
6 EO 2S N = 120 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
10 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 60,00 % 7 EO 2K S = 90 12 66.67
8 EO 2S E = -120 2 11.11
9 EO 3P N = 140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
4 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 50,93 %10 EO 6C E = -1430 15 83.33
11 EO 1S E+1 -120 12 66.67
12 EO 3S E-2 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
2 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 60,93 %13 EO 3T W-3 300 0 0.00
14 EO 2C N = 110 4 22.22
15 EO 1S W-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,30 %16 EO 2P E+2 -170 7 38.89
17 EO 2P S+2 170 11 61.11
18 EO 2P S+2 170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 41,11 %19 EO 1S S = 90 4 22.22
20 EO 3T E+1 -130 14 77.78
21 EO 1S S+1 120 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
6 ROGIERS Marga -VERBOIS Léon : 42,78 %22 EO 3C S-1 -50 6 33.33
23 EO 1S W-1 100 0 0.00
24 EO 3T E+1 -130 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
1 GROSFILS Colette -BRIGODE Jacques : 50,93 %25 EO 3S W-1 100 1 5.56
26 EO 3CcE+1 -930 18 100.00
27 EO 3S E = -400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
7 NELIS Claude -CHARLIER Pierre : 50,19 %28 EO 4P E+1 -450 14 77.78
29 EO 4CcE-2 500 0 0.00
30 EO 6C N-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 199,0 / 540 = 36,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 MOLS Bruno -COLLET Edgard
9 SNEYERS Marc -LOUIS Serge : 39,81 % 1 EO 3K E+1 -130 10 55.56
2 EO 1C S = 80 10 55.56
3 EO 3C E+2 -200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
10 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 60,00 % 4 EO 2K W+4 -170 0 0.00
5 EO 3S N = 600 1 5.56
6 EO 3T S = 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
4 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 50,93 % 7 EO 2C N+1 140 2 11.11
8 EO 3T W+1 -130 4 22.22
9 EO 3P N-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
8 MATELART Marc -GOBBE Amélie : 57,04 %10 EO 7C E-1 100 3 16.67
11 EO 1S E = -90 6 33.33
12 EO 4C E = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,30 %13 EO 3PcN-2 -500 8 44.44
14 EO 1S E+4 -210 12 66.67
15 EO 1S E = -90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
2 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 60,93 %16 EO 4K S-1 -50 1 5.56
17 EO 4P N = 420 7 38.89
18 EO 2S E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
6 ROGIERS Marga -VERBOIS Léon : 42,78 %19 EO 3P S-2 -100 10 55.56
20 EO 3C N = 140 2 11.11
21 EO 1S S = 90 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 41,11 %22 EO 4C S-2 -100 13 72.22
23 EO 1S W+1 -120 14 77.78
24 EO 4PcN-4 -800 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
7 NELIS Claude -CHARLIER Pierre : 50,19 %25 EO 3S E-1 100 1 5.56
26 EO 3C E+2 -200 3 16.67
27 EO 3S E = -400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
1 GROSFILS Colette -BRIGODE Jacques : 50,93 %28 EO 4P E+1 -450 14 77.78
29 EO 3C E+1 -170 5 27.78
30 EO 6C N-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 242,0 / 540 = 44,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
10 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 60,00 % 1 EO 3S E-2 100 0 0.00
2 EO 2C S-2 -200 17 94.44
3 EO 3C E+2 -200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
4 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 50,93 % 4 EO 3S W+2 -660 14 77.78
5 EO 2K N-1 -100 15 83.33
6 EO 2S N+1 150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,30 % 7 EO 2K S+1 110 7 38.89
8 EO 1S E+2 -150 9 50.00
9 EO 3P N-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
1 GROSFILS Colette -BRIGODE Jacques : 50,93 %10 EO 6C E-1 100 3 16.67
11 EO 2C N = 110 0 0.00
12 EO 4C E = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
9 SNEYERS Marc -LOUIS Serge : 39,81 %13 EO 4C W = -620 11 61.11
14 EO 5TcW-1 100 6 33.33
15 EO 2S S-2 -200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
6 ROGIERS Marga -VERBOIS Léon : 42,78 %16 EO 4P E = -620 16 88.89
17 EO 4P S-1 -50 15 83.33
18 EO 2K W+1 -110 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
2 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 60,93 %19 EO 2C S-1 -50 8 44.44
20 EO 2P S = 110 4 22.22
21 EO 2P W-2 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
7 NELIS Claude -CHARLIER Pierre : 50,19 %22 EO 4C S-3 -150 16 88.89
23 EO 1S W+1 -120 14 77.78
24 EO 2S W+2 -180 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 41,11 %25 EO 2S E+1 -150 8 44.44
26 EO 4C E+2 -680 12 66.67
27 EO 3S E = -400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
8 MATELART Marc -GOBBE Amélie : 57,04 %28 EO 4P E+1 -450 14 77.78
29 EO 2C E+3 -200 12 66.67
30 EO 6P S = 980 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 295,0 / 540 = 54,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand
4 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 50,93 % 1 EO 3S E = -400 17 94.44
2 EO 2K N-2 -200 17 94.44
3 EO 6K W = -1370 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 96,30 %
5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,30 % 4 EO 6K E = -1370 18 100.00
5 EO 3P S = 140 9 50.00
6 EO 3T S+1 130 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
6 ROGIERS Marga -VERBOIS Léon : 42,78 % 7 EO 1S S = 90 12 66.67
8 EO 2T W+4 -170 14 77.78
9 EO 3P N = 140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
9 SNEYERS Marc -LOUIS Serge : 39,81 %10 EO 6C E = -1430 15 83.33
11 EO 3K W = -110 9 50.00
12 EO 4C E = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
1 GROSFILS Colette -BRIGODE Jacques : 50,93 %13 EO 4C W = -620 11 61.11
14 EO 2C S+1 140 2 11.11
15 EO 2T E-2 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
10 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 60,00 %16 EO 3P E = -140 4 22.22
17 EO 3S N+1 430 4 22.22
18 EO 5KcW-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
7 NELIS Claude -CHARLIER Pierre : 50,19 %19 EO 2K W+1 -110 15 83.33
20 EO 4T E = -130 14 77.78
21 EO 2P W-2 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
2 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 60,93 %22 EO 4C S-1 -50 6 33.33
23 EO 1S W = -90 5 27.78
24 EO 3S W+1 -430 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
8 MATELART Marc -GOBBE Amélie : 57,04 %25 EO 3S E = -600 16 88.89
26 EO 4C E+1 -650 8 44.44
27 EO 3S W = -400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 41,11 %28 EO 4P E = -420 6 33.33
29 EO 4T S-1 -100 2 11.11
30 EO 4C N+1 450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
Total : 293,0 / 540 = 54,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,30 % 1 EO 3K E+1 -130 10 55.56
2 EO 2C W-3 150 0 0.00
3 EO 4C E+2 -680 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
6 ROGIERS Marga -VERBOIS Léon : 42,78 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 2 11.11
5 EO 2P S = 110 12 66.67
6 EO 2S N+1 150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
7 NELIS Claude -CHARLIER Pierre : 50,19 % 7 EO 3C N = 140 2 11.11
8 EO 3T W = -110 0 0.00
9 EO 3K E+1 -130 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 41,11 %10 EO 6C E = -1430 15 83.33
11 EO 1S E+2 -150 17 94.44
12 EO 4C E = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
10 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 60,00 %13 EO 4C W+1 -650 16 88.89
14 EO 1S E+2 -150 10 55.56
15 EO 3S W-3 150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
1 GROSFILS Colette -BRIGODE Jacques : 50,93 %16 EO 4P E = -620 16 88.89
17 EO 2P S+2 170 11 61.11
18 EO 1S E = -90 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
4 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 50,93 %19 EO 1S S = 90 4 22.22
20 EO 3T W+1 -130 14 77.78
21 EO 2C E-2 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
8 MATELART Marc -GOBBE Amélie : 57,04 %22 EO 5C S-2 -100 13 72.22
23 EO 1S W+1 -120 14 77.78
24 EO 3T E+2 -150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
2 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 60,93 %25 EO 2S E+1 -150 8 44.44
26 EO 5CcE = -850 16 88.89
27 EO 2S E+1 -150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 SNEYERS Marc -LOUIS Serge : 39,81 %28 EO 4P E = -420 6 33.33
29 EO 3C E+2 -200 12 66.67
30 EO 6C N-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 299,0 / 540 = 55,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 COURTOIS Chantal -LIBERT Laurent
6 ROGIERS Marga -VERBOIS Léon : 42,78 % 1 EO 3S W = -400 17 94.44
2 EO 1S W-1 50 12 66.67
3 EO 3S W+2 -660 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
7 NELIS Claude -CHARLIER Pierre : 50,19 % 4 EO 5K E+1 -620 4 22.22
5 EO 2S N-3 -300 18 100.00
6 EO 2S N+1 150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
8 MATELART Marc -GOBBE Amélie : 57,04 % 7 EO 2C N-1 -100 17 94.44
8 EO 2T W+3 -150 9 50.00
9 EO 3P N-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
10 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 60,00 %10 EO 7C W-1 100 3 16.67
11 EO 3K E = -110 9 50.00
12 EO 4C E = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 41,11 %13 EO 2PcN-1 -200 6 33.33
14 EO 5T E = -400 16 88.89
15 EO 3S S-2 -200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
4 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 50,93 %16 EO 5KcN-2 -300 11 61.11
17 EO 4P S+1 450 1 5.56
18 EO 3S E-3 150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
1 GROSFILS Colette -BRIGODE Jacques : 50,93 %19 EO 2K E+1 -110 15 83.33
20 EO 2CcN+1 870 0 0.00
21 EO 2P W = -110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,30 %22 EO 4CcS-2 -300 18 100.00
23 EO 1S W = -90 5 27.78
24 EO 2S W+2 -180 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
9 SNEYERS Marc -LOUIS Serge : 39,81 %25 EO 2S E+1 -150 8 44.44
26 EO 4C E+2 -680 12 66.67
27 EO 3S W+1 -430 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
2 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 60,93 %28 EO 4P E-1 50 1 5.56
29 EO 3C W+2 -200 12 66.67
30 EO 6P S = 980 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
Total : 306,0 / 540 = 56,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
7 NELIS Claude -CHARLIER Pierre : 50,19 % 1 EO 3K E = -110 4 22.22
2 EO 1S S+1 120 3 16.67
3 EO 3S W+1 -630 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
8 MATELART Marc -GOBBE Amélie : 57,04 % 4 EO 3S W+1 -630 8 44.44
5 EO 2S N+1 150 5 27.78
6 EO 2S S+1 150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
9 SNEYERS Marc -LOUIS Serge : 39,81 % 7 EO 1S S-1 -100 17 94.44
8 EO 2S W+2 -180 17 94.44
9 EO 2P N = 110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
2 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 60,93 %10 EO 6C E = -1430 15 83.33
11 EO 5K W-2 100 2 11.11
12 EO 3S E-2 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
4 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 50,93 %13 EO 3C W+1 -170 4 22.22
14 EO 3T W+1 -130 8 44.44
15 EO 2S N+2 180 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 41,11 %16 EO 5KcS-2 -300 11 61.11
17 EO 6P S-1 -50 15 83.33
18 EO 3S E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,30 %19 EO 2K W+1 -110 15 83.33
20 EO 2C N-1 -100 8 44.44
21 EO 2P W+1 -140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
1 GROSFILS Colette -BRIGODE Jacques : 50,93 %22 EO 4C N-1 -50 6 33.33
23 EO 1S E = -90 5 27.78
24 EO 2S W+1 -150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
6 ROGIERS Marga -VERBOIS Léon : 42,78 %25 EO 3S E = -600 16 88.89
26 EO 4C E = -620 6 33.33
27 EO 1S E+1 -120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
10 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 60,00 %28 EO 3P W-1 50 1 5.56
29 EO 2P S-2 -200 12 66.67
30 EO 6C N-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 244,0 / 540 = 45,19 %
|
|