|
Tournoi du 09-03-15
1 64,26 4 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
2 63,52 10 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal
3 60,93 9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
4 50,93 8 MATELART Marc -GROSFILS Colette
5 50,74 11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine
6 49,81 5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
7 48,52 2 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
8 43,70 7 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon
9 40,93 1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
10 39,81 6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
11 36,85 3 MASSAUX Joel -LEBRUN
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 59,44 22 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent
2 56,67 15 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
3 55,56 19 de VIRON Baudouin -BRIOT Fernand
4 55,00 21 CAMUS Colette -VANDOOREN
~ 55,00 16 CASSART Guy -POWIS Vinciane
6 52,78 17 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard
7 50,74 13 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
8 47,96 14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
9 45,93 18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
10 37,78 12 ROGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne
11 33,15 20 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert
PAIRE Nr : 1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
12 ROGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 37,78 % 1 NS 3T W = -110 6 33.33
2 NS 4P E = -420 12 66.67
3 NS 1S S = 90 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
22 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 59,44 % 4 NS 3S N-3 -300 0 0.00
5 NS 4P N+1 650 10 55.56
6 NS 2S E = -120 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
21 CAMUS Colette -VANDOOREN : 55,00 % 7 NS 4P E+1 -650 6 33.33
8 NS 4P S+1 450 12 66.67
9 NS 2S N-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
20 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 33,15 %10 NS 4C N+1 650 14 77.78
11 NS 1S E-1 50 14 77.78
12 NS 2T N+2 130 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
19 de VIRON Baudouin -BRIOT Fernand : 55,56 %13 NS 4C W = -620 2 11.11
14 NS 1S E-1 50 16 88.89
15 NS 2S E+1 -150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 45,93 %16 NS 3S W-2 200 12 66.67
17 NS 3S W+1 -430 1 5.56
18 NS 3S W+2 -460 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
17 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,78 %19 NS 3P E-1 100 12 66.67
20 NS 3S E = -600 2 11.11
21 NS 4P N = 620 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
16 CASSART Guy -POWIS Vinciane : 55,00 %22 NS 3S S-3 -150 2 11.11
23 NS 4P S-1 -100 1 5.56
24 NS 2C N+1 140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
15 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,67 %25 NS 3S E+1 -630 5 27.78
26 NS 2C E+1 -140 2 11.11
27 NS 4C E = -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 47,96 %28 NS 3S W+1 -430 10 55.56
29 NS 1S N = 90 11 61.11
30 NS 4P W-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 221,0 / 540 = 40,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
13 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,74 % 4 NS 3S S-2 -200 3 16.67
5 NS 4P N+1 650 10 55.56
6 NS 2P S-2 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 ROGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 37,78 % 7 NS 4P W+1 -650 6 33.33
8 NS 5P S = 450 12 66.67
9 NS 3T E-2 200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
22 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 59,44 %10 NS 4P N = 620 5 27.78
11 NS 2S E = -120 7 38.89
12 NS 3S N-1 -100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
21 CAMUS Colette -VANDOOREN : 55,00 %13 NS 4C W = -620 2 11.11
14 NS Pass Passe 9 50.00
15 NS 3S E = -400 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
20 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 33,15 %16 NS 6ScE-4 1100 18 100.00
17 NS 2K W = -90 16 88.89
18 NS 3S E = -400 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
19 de VIRON Baudouin -BRIOT Fernand : 55,56 %19 NS 3T W+1 -130 4 22.22
20 NS 3S E+1 -630 0 0.00
21 NS 4P N+1 650 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 45,93 %22 NS 2C W-1 100 14 77.78
23 NS 2S N+2 180 4 22.22
24 NS 3S N-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
17 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,78 %25 NS 3S E+1 -630 5 27.78
26 NS 3C W-2 200 14 77.78
27 NS 2S E-3 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
16 CASSART Guy -POWIS Vinciane : 55,00 %28 NS 3S W-2 100 17 94.44
29 NS 1S N-1 -100 5 27.78
30 NS 2C N+1 140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
15 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,67 %31 NS 4K E+1 -150 4 22.22
32 NS 2P W-1 100 6 33.33
33 NS 4C W-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 262,0 / 540 = 48,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 MASSAUX Joel -LEBRUN
16 CASSART Guy -POWIS Vinciane : 55,00 % 1 NS 3T W+1 -130 0 0.00
2 NS 6P E = -980 8 44.44
3 NS 1T W = -70 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 47,96 % 7 NS 4P W = -620 14 77.78
8 NS 3K W-1 50 2 11.11
9 NS 1S N+2 150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
13 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,74 %10 NS 2S N+2 180 0 0.00
11 NS 1S E+1 -120 7 38.89
12 NS 2T N+1 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
12 ROGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 37,78 %13 NS 2C W+2 -170 6 33.33
14 NS Pass Passe 9 50.00
15 NS 2S E+2 -180 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
22 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 59,44 %16 NS 3S E-2 200 12 66.67
17 NS 3S W = -400 6 33.33
18 NS 3S E+3 -490 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
21 CAMUS Colette -VANDOOREN : 55,00 %19 NS 3S W = -600 2 11.11
20 NS 2S E = -120 9 50.00
21 NS 3K S+2 150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
20 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 33,15 %22 NS 2P S = 110 16 88.89
23 NS 3S N+1 630 12 66.67
24 NS 4C S-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
19 de VIRON Baudouin -BRIOT Fernand : 55,56 %25 NS 4C W-3 300 15 83.33
26 NS 2C W = -110 4 22.22
27 NS 3C W = -140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 45,93 %28 NS 3S W+2 -460 6 33.33
29 NS 1S N = 90 11 61.11
30 NS 3P W = -140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
17 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,78 %31 NS 3P S-2 -200 1 5.56
32 NS 3K S-3 -150 0 0.00
33 NS 4C E-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 199,0 / 540 = 36,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 45,93 % 1 NS 4K S-1 -50 10 55.56
2 NS 6S W-3 150 18 100.00
3 NS 2T W-1 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
17 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,78 % 4 NS 2C E-3 300 15 83.33
5 NS 4P N+2 680 18 100.00
6 NS 2P S-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
15 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,67 %10 NS 3S N+1 630 10 55.56
11 NS 2S E = -120 7 38.89
12 NS 3S S+1 630 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 47,96 %13 NS 3C W = -140 9 50.00
14 NS Pass Passe 9 50.00
15 NS 3S E-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
13 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,74 %16 NS 3S E-1 100 7 38.89
17 NS 2S W+2 -180 10 55.56
18 NS 2P E+1 -140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
12 ROGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 37,78 %19 NS 3T W = -110 7 38.89
20 NS 2P N = 110 16 88.89
21 NS 6P N-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
22 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 59,44 %22 NS 1S E+1 -120 7 38.89
23 NS 3S N-1 -100 1 5.56
24 NS 2C N+1 140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
21 CAMUS Colette -VANDOOREN : 55,00 %25 NS 4C W-3 300 15 83.33
26 NS 3K E-1 100 8 44.44
27 NS 3C W-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
20 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 33,15 %28 NS 3S W-2 100 17 94.44
29 NS 3P W-1 100 15 83.33
30 NS 1S N+2 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
19 de VIRON Baudouin -BRIOT Fernand : 55,56 %31 NS 2K E+1 -110 10 55.56
32 NS 2P W-2 200 18 100.00
33 NS 6T N-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 347,0 / 540 = 64,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
20 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 33,15 % 1 NS 3P N+1 170 16 88.89
2 NS 6S W = -990 2 11.11
3 NS 3C N-2 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
19 de VIRON Baudouin -BRIOT Fernand : 55,56 % 4 NS 1S E = -90 6 33.33
5 NS 4P N+1 650 10 55.56
6 NS 1P S-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 45,93 % 7 NS 4P W+1 -650 6 33.33
8 NS 3P S+2 200 6 33.33
9 NS 2P W-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
16 CASSART Guy -POWIS Vinciane : 55,00 %13 NS 2C W = -110 13 72.22
14 NS 2P S-2 -100 2 11.11
15 NS 3S E = -400 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
15 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,67 %16 NS 4K W = -130 2 11.11
17 NS 3S E = -400 6 33.33
18 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 47,96 %19 NS 4P E-3 300 18 100.00
20 NS 3S E-2 200 18 100.00
21 NS 4P N = 620 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
13 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,74 %22 NS 1S E = -90 12 66.67
23 NS 3S N+1 630 12 66.67
24 NS 2C N+2 170 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
12 ROGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 37,78 %25 NS 3C W-3 300 15 83.33
26 NS 3K E-1 100 8 44.44
27 NS 2K N+2 130 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
22 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 59,44 %28 NS 3S W+3 -490 2 11.11
29 NS 1S N-1 -100 5 27.78
30 NS 3P W-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
21 CAMUS Colette -VANDOOREN : 55,00 %31 NS 4K E = -130 7 38.89
32 NS 2C N+1 140 12 66.67
33 NS 5C E-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 269,0 / 540 = 49,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
22 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 59,44 % 1 NS 3S E-2 100 14 77.78
2 NS 6S W = -990 2 11.11
3 NS 1S W+2 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
21 CAMUS Colette -VANDOOREN : 55,00 % 4 NS 2C E-1 100 8 44.44
5 NS 4P N+1 650 10 55.56
6 NS 3P S-2 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
20 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 33,15 % 7 NS 2S N+1 150 18 100.00
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 0 0.00
9 NS 6CcE-2 500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
19 de VIRON Baudouin -BRIOT Fernand : 55,56 %10 NS 4C N = 620 5 27.78
11 NS 1S E+2 -150 0 0.00
12 NS 4T N-1 -100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
17 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,78 %16 NS 4K W-1 100 7 38.89
17 NS 3S W+1 -430 1 5.56
18 NS 3S W+1 -430 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
16 CASSART Guy -POWIS Vinciane : 55,00 %19 NS 2P E = -110 7 38.89
20 NS 2S E+1 -150 5 27.78
21 NS 4P N = 620 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
15 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,67 %22 NS 1S E+1 -120 7 38.89
23 NS 3S N+1 630 12 66.67
24 NS 2P E-2 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 47,96 %25 NS 3S E+1 -630 5 27.78
26 NS 3C W-2 200 14 77.78
27 NS 3C W = -140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
13 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,74 %28 NS 3S W+1 -430 10 55.56
29 NS 1S N-1 -100 5 27.78
30 NS 4P W-2 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 ROGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 37,78 %31 NS 4K E-1 50 14 77.78
32 NS 2S N-1 -50 4 22.22
33 NS 4C E = -420 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 215,0 / 540 = 39,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon
13 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,74 % 1 NS 4PcS = 590 18 100.00
2 NS 7P E-1 50 15 83.33
3 NS 2C N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
12 ROGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 37,78 % 4 NS 4KcE-2 500 18 100.00
5 NS 1P N+4 200 0 0.00
6 NS 1P S = 80 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
22 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 59,44 % 7 NS 6P W-1 100 16 88.89
8 NS 5CcE-1 100 4 22.22
9 NS 2C S-4 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
21 CAMUS Colette -VANDOOREN : 55,00 %10 NS 3S N = 600 2 11.11
11 NS 3T E+1 -130 2 11.11
12 NS 3T N+1 130 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
20 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 33,15 %13 NS 4C W-1 100 17 94.44
14 NS 3S S-3 -150 0 0.00
15 NS 3S E = -400 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 45,93 %19 NS 3S E+1 -630 0 0.00
20 NS 1S W+2 -150 5 27.78
21 NS 4P N = 620 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
17 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,78 %22 NS 1ScE = -180 0 0.00
23 NS 3S N+1 630 12 66.67
24 NS 3S N = 400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
16 CASSART Guy -POWIS Vinciane : 55,00 %25 NS 3S E+1 -630 5 27.78
26 NS 4C W-2 200 14 77.78
27 NS 3ScE-2 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
15 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,67 %28 NS 3S E+3 -490 2 11.11
29 NS 3S N-3 -300 0 0.00
30 NS 5T S = 400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 47,96 %31 NS 3P N-2 -200 1 5.56
32 NS 3S N-2 -100 2 11.11
33 NS 6TcN-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
Total : 236,0 / 540 = 43,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -GROSFILS Colette
15 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,67 % 1 NS 2S E = -120 2 11.11
2 NS 6P E = -980 8 44.44
3 NS 2C N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 47,96 % 4 NS 2C E-2 200 12 66.67
5 NS 4P N+1 650 10 55.56
6 NS 3C E-1 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
13 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,74 % 7 NS 4P W+1 -650 6 33.33
8 NS 4PcS = 590 16 88.89
9 NS 2T E-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
12 ROGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 37,78 %10 NS 3S N+1 630 10 55.56
11 NS 2S E-3 150 18 100.00
12 NS 2T N+2 130 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
22 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 59,44 %13 NS 4C W-1 100 17 94.44
14 NS Pass Passe 9 50.00
15 NS 3S E-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
21 CAMUS Colette -VANDOOREN : 55,00 %16 NS 3S W-2 200 12 66.67
17 NS 2K W+2 -130 14 77.78
18 NS 3S W+1 -430 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
19 de VIRON Baudouin -BRIOT Fernand : 55,56 %22 NS 1S E+1 -120 7 38.89
23 NS 3S N+1 630 12 66.67
24 NS 3S N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 45,93 %25 NS 3K W = -110 10 55.56
26 NS 3K E-1 100 8 44.44
27 NS 3C E = -140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
17 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,78 %28 NS 3S W+3 -490 2 11.11
29 NS 1S N-1 -100 5 27.78
30 NS 3PcW = -530 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
16 CASSART Guy -POWIS Vinciane : 55,00 %31 NS 3K E+1 -130 7 38.89
32 NS 2C N = 110 8 44.44
33 NS 4C E-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 275,0 / 540 = 50,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
17 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,78 % 1 NS 4T E-1 50 12 66.67
2 NS 6S E-1 50 15 83.33
3 NS 2S E-1 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
16 CASSART Guy -POWIS Vinciane : 55,00 % 4 NS 2P N+1 140 10 55.56
5 NS 5CcE-3 500 2 11.11
6 NS 2S E = -120 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
15 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,67 % 7 NS 4C E+1 -650 6 33.33
8 NS 3ScE-2 300 8 44.44
9 NS 2T E = -90 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 47,96 %10 NS 3S N+1 630 10 55.56
11 NS 2P E = -110 12 66.67
12 NS 3T N+1 130 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
13 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,74 %13 NS 4C E = -620 2 11.11
14 NS Pass Passe 9 50.00
15 NS 3S E = -400 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
12 ROGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 37,78 %16 NS 4P N = 420 16 88.89
17 NS 2C N-1 -50 18 100.00
18 NS 2C E = -110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 96,30 %
22 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 59,44 %19 NS 2P E-1 100 12 66.67
20 NS 2S E-1 100 14 77.78
21 NS 4P N = 620 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
20 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 33,15 %25 NS 3T E-3 300 15 83.33
26 NS 4C E-3 300 18 100.00
27 NS 2T E = -90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
19 de VIRON Baudouin -BRIOT Fernand : 55,56 %28 NS 2T E+4 -170 14 77.78
29 NS 2C E-1 100 15 83.33
30 NS 4C N-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 45,93 %31 NS 3P N-1 -100 12 66.67
32 NS 2C N+2 170 16 88.89
33 NS 6T N = 920 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
Total : 329,0 / 540 = 60,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal
19 de VIRON Baudouin -BRIOT Fernand : 55,56 % 1 NS 3T W = -110 6 33.33
2 NS 6S W = -990 2 11.11
3 NS 2S W = -120 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 45,93 % 4 NS 2C E-3 300 15 83.33
5 NS 4P N+1 650 10 55.56
6 NS 2C W-1 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
17 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,78 % 7 NS 4P E+1 -650 6 33.33
8 NS 5P S = 450 12 66.67
9 NS 1S N = 90 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
16 CASSART Guy -POWIS Vinciane : 55,00 %10 NS 4C S+2 680 17 94.44
11 NS 1S E+1 -120 7 38.89
12 NS 3S S+1 630 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
15 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,67 %13 NS 2C W = -110 13 72.22
14 NS 1S W-2 100 18 100.00
15 NS 2S E+2 -180 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 47,96 %16 NS 4K W = -130 2 11.11
17 NS 3S W = -400 6 33.33
18 NS 3S W = -400 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
13 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,74 %19 NS 3P E-1 100 12 66.67
20 NS 2S E = -120 9 50.00
21 NS 5P N = 650 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
12 ROGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 37,78 %22 NS 2S S = 120 18 100.00
23 NS 3S N+1 630 12 66.67
24 NS 2C N+2 170 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
21 CAMUS Colette -VANDOOREN : 55,00 %28 NS 3S E+1 -430 10 55.56
29 NS 1S N+1 120 18 100.00
30 NS 3P W-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
20 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 33,15 %31 NS 2P N = 110 18 100.00
32 NS 2C N+1 140 12 66.67
33 NS 5CcE-2 300 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
Total : 343,0 / 540 = 63,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine
21 CAMUS Colette -VANDOOREN : 55,00 % 1 NS 3T W = -110 6 33.33
2 NS 6P E = -980 8 44.44
3 NS 1C N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
20 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 33,15 % 4 NS 3T N-2 -200 3 16.67
5 NS 4P N+1 650 10 55.56
6 NS 1P S+1 110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
19 de VIRON Baudouin -BRIOT Fernand : 55,56 % 7 NS 4P W+1 -650 6 33.33
8 NS 5PcS = 650 18 100.00
9 NS 1S N+2 150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 45,93 %10 NS 4C S+2 680 17 94.44
11 NS 2S E-2 100 16 88.89
12 NS 3T S+2 150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
17 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,78 %13 NS 3C W = -140 9 50.00
14 NS Pass Passe 9 50.00
15 NS 3S E = -400 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
16 CASSART Guy -POWIS Vinciane : 55,00 %16 NS 4K W = -130 2 11.11
17 NS 2S E+1 -150 12 66.67
18 NS 3S W+1 -430 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
15 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,67 %19 NS 4P E-2 200 16 88.89
20 NS 1S E = -90 12 66.67
21 NS 4P N-1 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 47,96 %22 NS 1S E+1 -120 7 38.89
23 NS 3S N+1 630 12 66.67
24 NS 4C S-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
13 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,74 %25 NS 3S E+2 -660 0 0.00
26 NS 3S E = -600 0 0.00
27 NS 3S E-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
22 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 59,44 %31 NS 2S W-2 100 16 88.89
32 NS 2C N+1 140 12 66.67
33 NS 4C E+1 -450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 274,0 / 540 = 50,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 ROGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 40,93 % 1 EO 3T W = -110 12 66.67
2 EO 4P E = -420 6 33.33
3 EO 1S S = 90 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 43,70 % 4 EO 4KcE-2 500 0 0.00
5 EO 1P N+4 200 18 100.00
6 EO 1P S = 80 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
2 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,52 % 7 EO 4P W+1 -650 12 66.67
8 EO 5P S = 450 6 33.33
9 EO 3T E-2 200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
8 MATELART Marc -GROSFILS Colette : 50,93 %10 EO 3S N+1 630 8 44.44
11 EO 2S E-3 150 0 0.00
12 EO 2T N+2 130 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -LEBRUN : 36,85 %13 EO 2C W+2 -170 12 66.67
14 EO Pass Passe 9 50.00
15 EO 2S E+2 -180 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,93 %16 EO 4P N = 420 2 11.11
17 EO 2C N-1 -50 0 0.00
18 EO 2C E = -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 3,70 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 64,26 %19 EO 3T W = -110 11 61.11
20 EO 2P N = 110 2 11.11
21 EO 6P N-2 -200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
10 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 63,52 %22 EO 2S S = 120 0 0.00
23 EO 3S N+1 630 6 33.33
24 EO 2C N+2 170 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 49,81 %25 EO 3C W-3 300 3 16.67
26 EO 3K E-1 100 10 55.56
27 EO 2K N+2 130 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 39,81 %31 EO 4K E-1 50 4 22.22
32 EO 2S N-1 -50 14 77.78
33 EO 4C E = -420 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 204,0 / 540 = 37,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
7 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 43,70 % 1 EO 4PcS = 590 0 0.00
2 EO 7P E-1 50 3 16.67
3 EO 2C N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
2 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,52 % 4 EO 3S S-2 -200 15 83.33
5 EO 4P N+1 650 8 44.44
6 EO 2P S-2 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
8 MATELART Marc -GROSFILS Colette : 50,93 % 7 EO 4P W+1 -650 12 66.67
8 EO 4PcS = 590 2 11.11
9 EO 2T E-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -LEBRUN : 36,85 %10 EO 2S N+2 180 18 100.00
11 EO 1S E+1 -120 11 61.11
12 EO 2T N+1 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,93 %13 EO 4C E = -620 16 88.89
14 EO Pass Passe 9 50.00
15 EO 3S E = -400 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 64,26 %16 EO 3S E-1 100 11 61.11
17 EO 2S W+2 -180 8 44.44
18 EO 2P E+1 -140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
10 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 63,52 %19 EO 3P E-1 100 6 33.33
20 EO 2S E = -120 9 50.00
21 EO 5P N = 650 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 49,81 %22 EO 1S E = -90 6 33.33
23 EO 3S N+1 630 6 33.33
24 EO 2C N+2 170 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,74 %25 EO 3S E+2 -660 18 100.00
26 EO 3S E = -600 18 100.00
27 EO 3S E-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 39,81 %28 EO 3S W+1 -430 8 44.44
29 EO 1S N-1 -100 13 72.22
30 EO 4P W-2 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 274,0 / 540 = 50,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
8 MATELART Marc -GROSFILS Colette : 50,93 % 4 EO 2C E-2 200 6 33.33
5 EO 4P N+1 650 8 44.44
6 EO 3C E-1 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -LEBRUN : 36,85 % 7 EO 4P W = -620 4 22.22
8 EO 3K W-1 50 16 88.89
9 EO 1S N+2 150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,93 %10 EO 3S N+1 630 8 44.44
11 EO 2P E = -110 6 33.33
12 EO 3T N+1 130 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 64,26 %13 EO 3C W = -140 9 50.00
14 EO Pass Passe 9 50.00
15 EO 3S E-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
10 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 63,52 %16 EO 4K W = -130 16 88.89
17 EO 3S W = -400 12 66.67
18 EO 3S W = -400 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 49,81 %19 EO 4P E-3 300 0 0.00
20 EO 3S E-2 200 0 0.00
21 EO 4P N = 620 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,74 %22 EO 1S E+1 -120 11 61.11
23 EO 3S N+1 630 6 33.33
24 EO 4C S-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 39,81 %25 EO 3S E+1 -630 13 72.22
26 EO 3C W-2 200 4 22.22
27 EO 3C W = -140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 40,93 %28 EO 3S W+1 -430 8 44.44
29 EO 1S N = 90 7 38.89
30 EO 4P W-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 43,70 %31 EO 3P N-2 -200 17 94.44
32 EO 3S N-2 -100 16 88.89
33 EO 6TcN-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
Total : 259,0 / 540 = 47,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
8 MATELART Marc -GROSFILS Colette : 50,93 % 1 EO 2S E = -120 16 88.89
2 EO 6P E = -980 10 55.56
3 EO 2C N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,93 % 7 EO 4C E+1 -650 12 66.67
8 EO 3ScE-2 300 10 55.56
9 EO 2T E = -90 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 64,26 %10 EO 3S N+1 630 8 44.44
11 EO 2S E = -120 11 61.11
12 EO 3S S+1 630 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
10 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 63,52 %13 EO 2C W = -110 5 27.78
14 EO 1S W-2 100 0 0.00
15 EO 2S E+2 -180 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 49,81 %16 EO 4K W = -130 16 88.89
17 EO 3S E = -400 12 66.67
18 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,74 %19 EO 4P E-2 200 2 11.11
20 EO 1S E = -90 6 33.33
21 EO 4P N-1 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 39,81 %22 EO 1S E+1 -120 11 61.11
23 EO 3S N+1 630 6 33.33
24 EO 2P E-2 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 40,93 %25 EO 3S E+1 -630 13 72.22
26 EO 2C E+1 -140 16 88.89
27 EO 4C E = -420 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 43,70 %28 EO 3S E+3 -490 16 88.89
29 EO 3S N-3 -300 18 100.00
30 EO 5T S = 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
2 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,52 %31 EO 4K E+1 -150 14 77.78
32 EO 2P W-1 100 12 66.67
33 EO 4C W-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 306,0 / 540 = 56,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 CASSART Guy -POWIS Vinciane
3 MASSAUX Joel -LEBRUN : 36,85 % 1 EO 3T W+1 -130 18 100.00
2 EO 6P E = -980 10 55.56
3 EO 1T W = -70 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,93 % 4 EO 2P N+1 140 8 44.44
5 EO 5CcE-3 500 16 88.89
6 EO 2S E = -120 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
10 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 63,52 %10 EO 4C S+2 680 1 5.56
11 EO 1S E+1 -120 11 61.11
12 EO 3S S+1 630 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 49,81 %13 EO 2C W = -110 5 27.78
14 EO 2P S-2 -100 16 88.89
15 EO 3S E = -400 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,74 %16 EO 4K W = -130 16 88.89
17 EO 2S E+1 -150 6 33.33
18 EO 3S W+1 -430 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 39,81 %19 EO 2P E = -110 11 61.11
20 EO 2S E+1 -150 13 72.22
21 EO 4P N = 620 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 40,93 %22 EO 3S S-3 -150 16 88.89
23 EO 4P S-1 -100 17 94.44
24 EO 2C N+1 140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 43,70 %25 EO 3S E+1 -630 13 72.22
26 EO 4C W-2 200 4 22.22
27 EO 3ScE-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
2 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,52 %28 EO 3S W-2 100 1 5.56
29 EO 1S N-1 -100 13 72.22
30 EO 2C N+1 140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
8 MATELART Marc -GROSFILS Colette : 50,93 %31 EO 3K E+1 -130 11 61.11
32 EO 2C N = 110 10 55.56
33 EO 4C E-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 297,0 / 540 = 55,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard
9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,93 % 1 EO 4T E-1 50 6 33.33
2 EO 6S E-1 50 3 16.67
3 EO 2S E-1 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 64,26 % 4 EO 2C E-3 300 3 16.67
5 EO 4P N+2 680 0 0.00
6 EO 2P S-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
10 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 63,52 % 7 EO 4P E+1 -650 12 66.67
8 EO 5P S = 450 6 33.33
9 EO 1S N = 90 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,74 %13 EO 3C W = -140 9 50.00
14 EO Pass Passe 9 50.00
15 EO 3S E = -400 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 39,81 %16 EO 4K W-1 100 11 61.11
17 EO 3S W+1 -430 17 94.44
18 EO 3S W+1 -430 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 40,93 %19 EO 3P E-1 100 6 33.33
20 EO 3S E = -600 16 88.89
21 EO 4P N = 620 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 43,70 %22 EO 1ScE = -180 18 100.00
23 EO 3S N+1 630 6 33.33
24 EO 3S N = 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
2 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,52 %25 EO 3S E+1 -630 13 72.22
26 EO 3C W-2 200 4 22.22
27 EO 2S E-3 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
8 MATELART Marc -GROSFILS Colette : 50,93 %28 EO 3S W+3 -490 16 88.89
29 EO 1S N-1 -100 13 72.22
30 EO 3PcW = -530 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -LEBRUN : 36,85 %31 EO 3P S-2 -200 17 94.44
32 EO 3K S-3 -150 18 100.00
33 EO 4C E-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 285,0 / 540 = 52,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
4 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 64,26 % 1 EO 4K S-1 -50 8 44.44
2 EO 6S W-3 150 0 0.00
3 EO 2T W-1 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
10 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 63,52 % 4 EO 2C E-3 300 3 16.67
5 EO 4P N+1 650 8 44.44
6 EO 2C W-1 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 49,81 % 7 EO 4P W+1 -650 12 66.67
8 EO 3P S+2 200 12 66.67
9 EO 2P W-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,74 %10 EO 4C S+2 680 1 5.56
11 EO 2S E-2 100 2 11.11
12 EO 3T S+2 150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 40,93 %16 EO 3S W-2 200 6 33.33
17 EO 3S W+1 -430 17 94.44
18 EO 3S W+2 -460 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 43,70 %19 EO 3S E+1 -630 18 100.00
20 EO 1S W+2 -150 13 72.22
21 EO 4P N = 620 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
2 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,52 %22 EO 2C W-1 100 4 22.22
23 EO 2S N+2 180 14 77.78
24 EO 3S N-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
8 MATELART Marc -GROSFILS Colette : 50,93 %25 EO 3K W = -110 8 44.44
26 EO 3K E-1 100 10 55.56
27 EO 3C E = -140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -LEBRUN : 36,85 %28 EO 3S W+2 -460 12 66.67
29 EO 1S N = 90 7 38.89
30 EO 3P W = -140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,93 %31 EO 3P N-1 -100 6 33.33
32 EO 2C N+2 170 2 11.11
33 EO 6T N = 920 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
Total : 248,0 / 540 = 45,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 de VIRON Baudouin -BRIOT Fernand
10 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 63,52 % 1 EO 3T W = -110 12 66.67
2 EO 6S W = -990 16 88.89
3 EO 2S W = -120 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 49,81 % 4 EO 1S E = -90 12 66.67
5 EO 4P N+1 650 8 44.44
6 EO 1P S-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,74 % 7 EO 4P W+1 -650 12 66.67
8 EO 5PcS = 650 0 0.00
9 EO 1S N+2 150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 39,81 %10 EO 4C N = 620 13 72.22
11 EO 1S E+2 -150 18 100.00
12 EO 4T N-1 -100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 40,93 %13 EO 4C W = -620 16 88.89
14 EO 1S E-1 50 2 11.11
15 EO 2S E+1 -150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
2 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,52 %19 EO 3T W+1 -130 14 77.78
20 EO 3S E+1 -630 18 100.00
21 EO 4P N+1 650 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
8 MATELART Marc -GROSFILS Colette : 50,93 %22 EO 1S E+1 -120 11 61.11
23 EO 3S N+1 630 6 33.33
24 EO 3S N-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -LEBRUN : 36,85 %25 EO 4C W-3 300 3 16.67
26 EO 2C W = -110 14 77.78
27 EO 3C W = -140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,93 %28 EO 2T E+4 -170 4 22.22
29 EO 2C E-1 100 3 16.67
30 EO 4C N-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 64,26 %31 EO 2K E+1 -110 8 44.44
32 EO 2P W-2 200 0 0.00
33 EO 6T N-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 300,0 / 540 = 55,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 49,81 % 1 EO 3P N+1 170 2 11.11
2 EO 6S W = -990 16 88.89
3 EO 3C N-2 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,74 % 4 EO 3T N-2 -200 15 83.33
5 EO 4P N+1 650 8 44.44
6 EO 1P S+1 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 39,81 % 7 EO 2S N+1 150 0 0.00
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 18 100.00
9 EO 6CcE-2 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 40,93 %10 EO 4C N+1 650 4 22.22
11 EO 1S E-1 50 4 22.22
12 EO 2T N+2 130 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 43,70 %13 EO 4C W-1 100 1 5.56
14 EO 3S S-3 -150 18 100.00
15 EO 3S E = -400 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
2 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,52 %16 EO 6ScE-4 1100 0 0.00
17 EO 2K W = -90 2 11.11
18 EO 3S E = -400 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -LEBRUN : 36,85 %22 EO 2P S = 110 2 11.11
23 EO 3S N+1 630 6 33.33
24 EO 4C S-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,93 %25 EO 3T E-3 300 3 16.67
26 EO 4C E-3 300 0 0.00
27 EO 2T E = -90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 64,26 %28 EO 3S W-2 100 1 5.56
29 EO 3P W-1 100 3 16.67
30 EO 1S N+2 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
10 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 63,52 %31 EO 2P N = 110 0 0.00
32 EO 2C N+1 140 6 33.33
33 EO 5CcE-2 300 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
Total : 179,0 / 540 = 33,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 CAMUS Colette -VANDOOREN
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,74 % 1 EO 3T W = -110 12 66.67
2 EO 6P E = -980 10 55.56
3 EO 1C N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 39,81 % 4 EO 2C E-1 100 10 55.56
5 EO 4P N+1 650 8 44.44
6 EO 3P S-2 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 40,93 % 7 EO 4P E+1 -650 12 66.67
8 EO 4P S+1 450 6 33.33
9 EO 2S N-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 43,70 %10 EO 3S N = 600 16 88.89
11 EO 3T E+1 -130 16 88.89
12 EO 3T N+1 130 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
2 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,52 %13 EO 4C W = -620 16 88.89
14 EO Pass Passe 9 50.00
15 EO 3S E = -400 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
8 MATELART Marc -GROSFILS Colette : 50,93 %16 EO 3S W-2 200 6 33.33
17 EO 2K W+2 -130 4 22.22
18 EO 3S W+1 -430 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -LEBRUN : 36,85 %19 EO 3S W = -600 16 88.89
20 EO 2S E = -120 9 50.00
21 EO 3K S+2 150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 64,26 %25 EO 4C W-3 300 3 16.67
26 EO 3K E-1 100 10 55.56
27 EO 3C W-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
10 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 63,52 %28 EO 3S E+1 -430 8 44.44
29 EO 1S N+1 120 0 0.00
30 EO 3P W-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 49,81 %31 EO 4K E = -130 11 61.11
32 EO 2C N+1 140 6 33.33
33 EO 5C E-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 297,0 / 540 = 55,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 39,81 % 1 EO 3S E-2 100 4 22.22
2 EO 6S W = -990 16 88.89
3 EO 1S W+2 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 40,93 % 4 EO 3S N-3 -300 18 100.00
5 EO 4P N+1 650 8 44.44
6 EO 2S E = -120 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 43,70 % 7 EO 6P W-1 100 2 11.11
8 EO 5CcE-1 100 14 77.78
9 EO 2C S-4 -200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
2 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,52 %10 EO 4P N = 620 13 72.22
11 EO 2S E = -120 11 61.11
12 EO 3S N-1 -100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
8 MATELART Marc -GROSFILS Colette : 50,93 %13 EO 4C W-1 100 1 5.56
14 EO Pass Passe 9 50.00
15 EO 3S E-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -LEBRUN : 36,85 %16 EO 3S E-2 200 6 33.33
17 EO 3S W = -400 12 66.67
18 EO 3S E+3 -490 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,93 %19 EO 2P E-1 100 6 33.33
20 EO 2S E-1 100 4 22.22
21 EO 4P N = 620 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 64,26 %22 EO 1S E+1 -120 11 61.11
23 EO 3S N-1 -100 17 94.44
24 EO 2C N+1 140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 49,81 %28 EO 3S W+3 -490 16 88.89
29 EO 1S N-1 -100 13 72.22
30 EO 3P W-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,74 %31 EO 2S W-2 100 2 11.11
32 EO 2C N+1 140 6 33.33
33 EO 4C E+1 -450 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 321,0 / 540 = 59,44 %
|
|