|
Tournoi du 09-09-13
1 60,00 8 de VIRON Baudouin -Panis Guy
~ 60,00 9 CHANTRAINE René -CAMUS Colette
3 58,96 7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
4 49,17 2 LAMBERT Jean-Benoit -MASSAUX Joel
5 48,33 3 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne
6 46,67 6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
7 45,21 5 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
8 44,38 4 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon
9 37,29 1 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger
10 0,00 10 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 57,87 12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
2 57,18 14 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
3 55,79 13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
4 55,09 19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
5 53,94 18 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
6 49,07 15 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
7 48,61 16 BEYNE Anne -COLLET Edgard
8 41,20 20 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
9 40,74 11 COURTOIS Chantal -GOBBE Amélie
10 40,51 17 DELHEZ Jacques -COLOT Jacques
PAIRE Nr : 1 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger
11 COURTOIS Chantal -GOBBE Amélie : 40,74 % 1 NS 4P N+1 450 13 81.25
2 NS 5TcN-1 -200 8 50.00
3 NS 6P E-2 200 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 55,79 % 4 NS 3S N = 600 0 0.00
5 NS 3T W-3 150 9 56.25
6 NS 1S S+1 120 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,87 % 7 NS 3P S-1 -100 6 37.50
8 NS 2P E-2 100 12 75.00
9 NS 2C N+1 140 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
16 BEYNE Anne -COLLET Edgard : 48,61 %10 NS 6S E = -1440 4 25.00
11 NS 4P W-2 100 15 93.75
12 NS 3P N-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
17 DELHEZ Jacques -COLOT Jacques : 40,51 %13 NS 3S W-1 100 13 81.25
14 NS 2S N-1 -50 6 37.50
15 NS 3P N-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
18 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 53,94 %16 NS 3S S-2 -100 1 6.25
17 NS 5TcW-2 300 0 0.00
18 NS 2C W+1 -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 2,08 %
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 55,09 %19 NS 3C W = -140 3 18.75
20 NS 3KcW = -670 2 12.50
21 NS 3P E-1 50 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
20 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 41,20 %22 NS 1S W+1 -120 8 50.00
23 NS 3S S = 600 6 37.50
24 NS 4P W-2 100 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
14 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,18 %25 NS 2C S-2 -100 2 12.50
26 NS 3T S+1 130 2 12.50
27 NS 3P E = -140 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
15 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,07 %28 NS 3K W-1 50 9 56.25
29 NS 3C N-2 -200 2 12.50
30 NS 3CcW = -530 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
Total : 179,0 / 480 = 37,29 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 LAMBERT Jean-Benoit -MASSAUX Joel
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 55,79 % 1 NS 4P N+1 450 13 81.25
2 NS 3TcN+2 1070 16 100.00
3 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,87 % 4 NS 3S N+1 630 7 43.75
5 NS 2K N+2 130 3 18.75
6 NS 1S W-1 100 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
11 COURTOIS Chantal -GOBBE Amélie : 40,74 % 7 NS 2P S = 110 14 87.50
8 NS 2K N-1 -50 7 43.75
9 NS 2C N+2 170 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
20 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 41,20 %10 NS 7T E-2 200 16 100.00
11 NS 4P E-1 50 11 68.75
12 NS 2S S-2 -200 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
14 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,18 %13 NS 2P W+1 -140 2 12.50
14 NS 3S S = 400 11 68.75
15 NS 3P N = 140 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
15 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,07 %16 NS 1S N+1 120 14 87.50
17 NS 4C N+1 450 11 68.75
18 NS 1S E+1 -120 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
16 BEYNE Anne -COLLET Edgard : 48,61 %19 NS 4C W-1 100 13 81.25
20 NS 3C S-4 -400 8 50.00
21 NS 3T N+1 130 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
17 DELHEZ Jacques -COLOT Jacques : 40,51 %22 NS 1S W = -90 15 93.75
23 NS 3S N = 600 6 37.50
24 NS 4C N-1 -50 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
18 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 53,94 %25 NS 2K W = -90 6 37.50
26 NS 4P N-1 -100 0 0.00
27 NS 3P E+1 -170 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 55,09 %28 NS 2C E = -110 2 12.50
29 NS 2P E = -110 7 43.75
30 NS 5KcN-3 -500 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
Total : 236,0 / 480 = 49,17 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,87 % 1 NS 4P N = 420 4 25.00
2 NS 4P W+1 -450 2 12.50
3 NS 4P W+2 -680 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
11 COURTOIS Chantal -GOBBE Amélie : 40,74 % 4 NS 3S S+1 630 7 43.75
5 NS 2K N+3 150 9 56.25
6 NS 1S W-3 300 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 55,79 % 7 NS 2P S-1 -100 6 37.50
8 NS 2P S-2 -100 2 12.50
9 NS 2C N+1 140 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
18 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 53,94 %10 NS 6S W = -1440 4 25.00
11 NS 3P E = -140 5 31.25
12 NS 2C W+2 -170 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 55,09 %13 NS 3T W-1 100 13 81.25
14 NS 2S W-3 150 8 50.00
15 NS 4P N+1 650 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
20 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 41,20 %16 NS 4C E-1 100 8 50.00
17 NS 4P S+1 450 11 68.75
18 NS 2C W = -110 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
14 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,18 %19 NS 3C W-1 100 13 81.25
20 NS 3S W = -600 5 31.25
21 NS 4T N-1 -100 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
15 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,07 %22 NS 1S W+1 -120 8 50.00
23 NS 2K S+3 150 2 12.50
24 NS 3K E-1 50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
16 BEYNE Anne -COLLET Edgard : 48,61 %25 NS 2P N-1 -50 9 56.25
26 NS 3S S+3 690 14 87.50
27 NS 1P E+3 -170 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
17 DELHEZ Jacques -COLOT Jacques : 40,51 %28 NS 3S E-3 150 16 100.00
29 NS 3C N-3 -300 0 0.00
30 NS 3P S = 140 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 232,0 / 480 = 48,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon
17 DELHEZ Jacques -COLOT Jacques : 40,51 % 1 NS 4P S = 420 4 25.00
2 NS 5PcW = -650 0 0.00
3 NS 4P E+2 -680 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 10,42 %
16 BEYNE Anne -COLLET Edgard : 48,61 % 4 NS 3S S+1 630 7 43.75
5 NS 2K N+3 150 9 56.25
6 NS 3S S-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
15 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,07 % 7 NS 2P S = 110 14 87.50
8 NS 2P S-1 -50 7 43.75
9 NS 4C N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
14 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,18 %10 NS 6S W = -1440 4 25.00
11 NS 4P N = -420 0 0.00
12 NS 2K E-1 50 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
20 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 41,20 %13 NS 3S W-2 200 16 100.00
14 NS 3S S-2 -100 3 18.75
15 NS 4KcE-3 500 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 55,09 %16 NS 4K N-1 -50 5 31.25
17 NS 4P S+1 450 11 68.75
18 NS 1S E+1 -120 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
18 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 53,94 %19 NS 2P N-1 -50 10 62.50
20 NS 3C S-3 -300 10 62.50
21 NS 4T N = 130 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 55,79 %22 NS 1S S-3 -150 2 12.50
23 NS 3S S-1 -100 0 0.00
24 NS 4C N-1 -50 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 10,42 %
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,87 %25 NS 2C S = 110 12 75.00
26 NS 4P N = 620 6 37.50
27 NS 1P E+1 -110 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
11 COURTOIS Chantal -GOBBE Amélie : 40,74 %28 NS 2C E-1 50 9 56.25
29 NS 2P E-2 200 16 100.00
30 NS 4K N-1 -50 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 213,0 / 480 = 44,38 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
18 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 53,94 % 1 NS 4P S = 420 4 25.00
2 NS 4P W = -420 4 25.00
3 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
17 DELHEZ Jacques -COLOT Jacques : 40,51 % 4 NS 3S S+1 630 7 43.75
5 NS 3S N+1 630 15 93.75
6 NS 1S S+2 150 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
16 BEYNE Anne -COLLET Edgard : 48,61 % 7 NS 2P S = 110 14 87.50
8 NS 2P S-2 -100 2 12.50
9 NS 3C N-1 -50 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
11 COURTOIS Chantal -GOBBE Amélie : 40,74 %10 NS 6S E = -1440 4 25.00
11 NS 2P E+1 -140 5 31.25
12 NS Pass Passe 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
15 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,07 %13 NS 2S W = -120 5 31.25
14 NS 3S S+1 430 14 87.50
15 NS 3P N+3 230 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
14 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,18 %16 NS 3ScS-1 -100 1 6.25
17 NS 4C N = 420 3 18.75
18 NS 2P E = -110 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
20 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 41,20 %19 NS 3C W = -140 3 18.75
20 NS 3S E = -600 5 31.25
21 NS 3P E-1 50 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 55,09 %22 NS 2P E+1 -140 4 25.00
23 NS 3S S+1 630 12 75.00
24 NS 3S W-5 250 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 55,79 %25 NS 2P N-2 -100 2 12.50
26 NS 4C N = 620 6 37.50
27 NS 1P E+2 -140 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,87 %28 NS 2C W = -110 2 12.50
29 NS 3K S-1 -100 11 68.75
30 NS 4P S-1 -50 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 217,0 / 480 = 45,21 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 55,09 % 1 NS 4P N = 420 4 25.00
2 NS 5PcE-1 100 14 87.50
3 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
18 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 53,94 % 4 NS 3S S+1 630 7 43.75
5 NS 3K N+1 130 3 18.75
6 NS 2C N+1 140 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
17 DELHEZ Jacques -COLOT Jacques : 40,51 % 7 NS 3C W = -140 1 6.25
8 NS 2P E-3 150 15 93.75
9 NS 4C N = 420 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,87 %10 NS 6S W = -1440 4 25.00
11 NS 4K N-1 -50 8 50.00
12 NS 3K N-2 -200 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
11 COURTOIS Chantal -GOBBE Amélie : 40,74 %13 NS 1P W = -80 9 56.25
14 NS 3S S-3 -150 0 0.00
15 NS 3P N = 140 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
16 BEYNE Anne -COLLET Edgard : 48,61 %16 NS 4C E-3 300 16 100.00
17 NS 4P S = 420 3 18.75
18 NS 2C W = -110 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
15 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,07 %19 NS 3C W = -140 3 18.75
20 NS 3T N-1 -100 15 93.75
21 NS 4T N-1 -100 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
14 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,18 %22 NS 2P W+2 -170 0 0.00
23 NS 3S S+1 630 12 75.00
24 NS 4P E-1 50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
20 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 41,20 %25 NS 4C S = 420 16 100.00
26 NS 3S S+3 690 14 87.50
27 NS 4P E = -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 55,79 %28 NS 2C E-1 50 9 56.25
29 NS 3T W+3 -170 4 25.00
30 NS 3P S-1 -50 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 224,0 / 480 = 46,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
20 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 41,20 % 1 NS 4P N+1 450 13 81.25
2 NS 5TcN-1 -200 8 50.00
3 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 55,09 % 4 NS 3S N+3 690 16 100.00
5 NS 3S N-1 -100 0 0.00
6 NS 2C N+2 170 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
18 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 53,94 % 7 NS 1S E-1 100 10 62.50
8 NS 2P E-3 150 15 93.75
9 NS 2C N = 110 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 55,79 %10 NS 5T E+1 -620 14 87.50
11 NS 5KcN-2 -300 2 12.50
12 NS 1P N-1 -100 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,87 %13 NS 1P W = -80 9 56.25
14 NS 3S N-2 -100 3 18.75
15 NS 2P N+3 200 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
11 COURTOIS Chantal -GOBBE Amélie : 40,74 %16 NS 3K N = 110 11 68.75
17 NS 4P S+1 450 11 68.75
18 NS 1S E+1 -120 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
17 DELHEZ Jacques -COLOT Jacques : 40,51 %19 NS 2P N+1 140 16 100.00
20 NS 3T N-1 -100 15 93.75
21 NS 3S N = 600 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 97,92 %
16 BEYNE Anne -COLLET Edgard : 48,61 %22 NS 2K W+1 -110 12 75.00
23 NS 3S S = 600 6 37.50
24 NS 2P W+1 -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
15 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,07 %25 NS 2C S+1 140 14 87.50
26 NS 3S S+3 690 14 87.50
27 NS 3P E = -140 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
14 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,18 %28 NS 2C E = -110 2 12.50
29 NS 1S N-1 -100 11 68.75
30 NS 4K N-1 -50 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 283,0 / 480 = 58,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 de VIRON Baudouin -Panis Guy
14 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,18 % 1 NS 4P N+1 450 13 81.25
2 NS 3P W+1 -170 12 75.00
3 NS 6P E-1 100 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
20 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 41,20 % 4 NS 3S N+2 660 14 87.50
5 NS 2S N+1 150 9 56.25
6 NS 2S S = 120 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 55,09 % 7 NS 3C E = -140 1 6.25
8 NS 3P S-2 -100 2 12.50
9 NS 2C N = 110 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
15 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,07 %10 NS 3S E+4 -720 10 62.50
11 NS 4P W-2 100 15 93.75
12 NS 2S S-2 -200 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 55,79 %13 NS 2S W = -120 5 31.25
14 NS 3S S = 400 11 68.75
15 NS 2P N+1 140 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,87 %16 NS 3S S-1 -50 5 31.25
17 NS 5C S = 450 11 68.75
18 NS 2C W = -110 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
11 COURTOIS Chantal -GOBBE Amélie : 40,74 %19 NS 2P N-2 -100 8 50.00
20 NS 3K E = -110 12 75.00
21 NS 3P E-2 100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
18 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 53,94 %22 NS 1S W = -90 15 93.75
23 NS 3S S+2 660 16 100.00
24 NS 3P E-1 50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
17 DELHEZ Jacques -COLOT Jacques : 40,51 %25 NS 1S S-1 -50 9 56.25
26 NS 4P N = 620 6 37.50
27 NS 4P E-1 50 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
16 BEYNE Anne -COLLET Edgard : 48,61 %28 NS 2K W-2 100 14 87.50
29 NS 3T W = -110 7 43.75
30 NS 4P S = 420 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
Total : 288,0 / 480 = 60,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 CHANTRAINE René -CAMUS Colette
15 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,07 % 1 NS 4P N = 420 4 25.00
2 NS 5TcN-1 -200 8 50.00
3 NS 3S W-1 100 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
14 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,18 % 4 NS 3S N+1 630 7 43.75
5 NS 3S N+1 630 15 93.75
6 NS 3T E = -110 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
20 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 41,20 % 7 NS 3P S-1 -100 6 37.50
8 NS 3T W-1 50 10 62.50
9 NS 4CcN = 590 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
17 DELHEZ Jacques -COLOT Jacques : 40,51 %10 NS 3S E+3 -690 12 75.00
11 NS 4P E-1 50 11 68.75
12 NS 1P N = 80 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
16 BEYNE Anne -COLLET Edgard : 48,61 %13 NS 2S W+1 -150 0 0.00
14 NS 3TcE-3 500 16 100.00
15 NS 3P N+2 200 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 55,79 %16 NS 3K N = 110 11 68.75
17 NS 5P S = 450 11 68.75
18 NS 2C E = -110 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,87 %19 NS 3C W = -140 3 18.75
20 NS 5TcN-3 -800 0 0.00
21 NS 3PcE-2 300 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
11 COURTOIS Chantal -GOBBE Amélie : 40,74 %22 NS 1S W+1 -120 8 50.00
23 NS 3S N+1 630 12 75.00
24 NS 3C N = 140 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 55,09 %25 NS 1S S-2 -100 2 12.50
26 NS 4P N+1 650 10 62.50
27 NS 3P E = -140 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
18 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 53,94 %28 NS 3K W-1 50 9 56.25
29 NS 2K S = 90 14 87.50
30 NS 5K S = 400 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
Total : 288,0 / 480 = 60,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 -
16 BEYNE Anne -COLLET Edgard : 48,61 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
15 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,07 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,18 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 55,09 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
18 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 53,94 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 DELHEZ Jacques -COLOT Jacques : 40,51 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 55,79 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,87 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
11 COURTOIS Chantal -GOBBE Amélie : 40,74 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
20 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 41,20 %28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 480 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 COURTOIS Chantal -GOBBE Amélie
1 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 37,29 % 1 EO 4P N+1 450 3 18.75
2 EO 5TcN-1 -200 8 50.00
3 EO 6P E-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 48,33 % 4 EO 3S S+1 630 9 56.25
5 EO 2K N+3 150 7 43.75
6 EO 1S W-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
2 LAMBERT Jean-Benoit -MASSAUX Joel : 49,17 % 7 EO 2P S = 110 2 12.50
8 EO 2K N-1 -50 9 56.25
9 EO 2C N+2 170 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
5 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 45,21 %10 EO 6S E = -1440 12 75.00
11 EO 2P E+1 -140 11 68.75
12 EO Pass Passe 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 46,67 %13 EO 1P W = -80 7 43.75
14 EO 3S S-3 -150 16 100.00
15 EO 3P N = 140 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,96 %16 EO 3K N = 110 5 31.25
17 EO 4P S+1 450 5 31.25
18 EO 1S E+1 -120 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -Panis Guy : 60,00 %19 EO 2P N-2 -100 8 50.00
20 EO 3K E = -110 4 25.00
21 EO 3P E-2 100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -CAMUS Colette : 60,00 %22 EO 1S W+1 -120 8 50.00
23 EO 3S N+1 630 4 25.00
24 EO 3C N = 140 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
10 - : 0,00 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 44,38 %28 EO 2C E-1 50 7 43.75
29 EO 2P E-2 200 0 0.00
30 EO 4K N-1 -50 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 176,0 / 432 = 40,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
3 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 48,33 % 1 EO 4P N = 420 12 75.00
2 EO 4P W+1 -450 14 87.50
3 EO 4P W+2 -680 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
2 LAMBERT Jean-Benoit -MASSAUX Joel : 49,17 % 4 EO 3S N+1 630 9 56.25
5 EO 2K N+2 130 13 81.25
6 EO 1S W-1 100 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
1 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 37,29 % 7 EO 3P S-1 -100 10 62.50
8 EO 2P E-2 100 4 25.00
9 EO 2C N+1 140 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 46,67 %10 EO 6S W = -1440 12 75.00
11 EO 4K N-1 -50 8 50.00
12 EO 3K N-2 -200 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,96 %13 EO 1P W = -80 7 43.75
14 EO 3S N-2 -100 13 81.25
15 EO 2P N+3 200 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -Panis Guy : 60,00 %16 EO 3S S-1 -50 11 68.75
17 EO 5C S = 450 5 31.25
18 EO 2C W = -110 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -CAMUS Colette : 60,00 %19 EO 3C W = -140 13 81.25
20 EO 5TcN-3 -800 16 100.00
21 EO 3PcE-2 300 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
10 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 44,38 %25 EO 2C S = 110 4 25.00
26 EO 4P N = 620 10 62.50
27 EO 1P E+1 -110 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
5 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 45,21 %28 EO 2C W = -110 14 87.50
29 EO 3K S-1 -100 5 31.25
30 EO 4P S-1 -50 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 250,0 / 432 = 57,87 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
2 LAMBERT Jean-Benoit -MASSAUX Joel : 49,17 % 1 EO 4P N+1 450 3 18.75
2 EO 3TcN+2 1070 0 0.00
3 EO 4P E+1 -650 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
1 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 37,29 % 4 EO 3S N = 600 16 100.00
5 EO 3T W-3 150 7 43.75
6 EO 1S S+1 120 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 48,33 % 7 EO 2P S-1 -100 10 62.50
8 EO 2P S-2 -100 14 87.50
9 EO 2C N+1 140 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,96 %10 EO 5T E+1 -620 2 12.50
11 EO 5KcN-2 -300 14 87.50
12 EO 1P N-1 -100 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -Panis Guy : 60,00 %13 EO 2S W = -120 11 68.75
14 EO 3S S = 400 5 31.25
15 EO 2P N+1 140 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -CAMUS Colette : 60,00 %16 EO 3K N = 110 5 31.25
17 EO 5P S = 450 5 31.25
18 EO 2C E = -110 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
10 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 44,38 %22 EO 1S S-3 -150 14 87.50
23 EO 3S S-1 -100 16 100.00
24 EO 4C N-1 -50 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 89,58 %
5 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 45,21 %25 EO 2P N-2 -100 14 87.50
26 EO 4C N = 620 10 62.50
27 EO 1P E+2 -140 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 46,67 %28 EO 2C E-1 50 7 43.75
29 EO 3T W+3 -170 12 75.00
30 EO 3P S-1 -50 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 241,0 / 432 = 55,79 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
8 de VIRON Baudouin -Panis Guy : 60,00 % 1 EO 4P N+1 450 3 18.75
2 EO 3P W+1 -170 4 25.00
3 EO 6P E-1 100 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -CAMUS Colette : 60,00 % 4 EO 3S N+1 630 9 56.25
5 EO 3S N+1 630 1 6.25
6 EO 3T E = -110 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 44,38 %10 EO 6S W = -1440 12 75.00
11 EO 4P N = -420 16 100.00
12 EO 2K E-1 50 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
2 LAMBERT Jean-Benoit -MASSAUX Joel : 49,17 %13 EO 2P W+1 -140 14 87.50
14 EO 3S S = 400 5 31.25
15 EO 3P N = 140 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
5 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 45,21 %16 EO 3ScS-1 -100 15 93.75
17 EO 4C N = 420 13 81.25
18 EO 2P E = -110 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 48,33 %19 EO 3C W-1 100 3 18.75
20 EO 3S W = -600 11 68.75
21 EO 4T N-1 -100 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 46,67 %22 EO 2P W+2 -170 16 100.00
23 EO 3S S+1 630 4 25.00
24 EO 4P E-1 50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
1 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 37,29 %25 EO 2C S-2 -100 14 87.50
26 EO 3T S+1 130 14 87.50
27 EO 3P E = -140 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,96 %28 EO 2C E = -110 14 87.50
29 EO 1S N-1 -100 5 31.25
30 EO 4K N-1 -50 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 247,0 / 432 = 57,18 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
9 CHANTRAINE René -CAMUS Colette : 60,00 % 1 EO 4P N = 420 12 75.00
2 EO 5TcN-1 -200 8 50.00
3 EO 3S W-1 100 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
10 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 44,38 % 7 EO 2P S = 110 2 12.50
8 EO 2P S-1 -50 9 56.25
9 EO 4C N-2 -100 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -Panis Guy : 60,00 %10 EO 3S E+4 -720 6 37.50
11 EO 4P W-2 100 1 6.25
12 EO 2S S-2 -200 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
5 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 45,21 %13 EO 2S W = -120 11 68.75
14 EO 3S S+1 430 2 12.50
15 EO 3P N+3 230 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
2 LAMBERT Jean-Benoit -MASSAUX Joel : 49,17 %16 EO 1S N+1 120 2 12.50
17 EO 4C N+1 450 5 31.25
18 EO 1S E+1 -120 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 46,67 %19 EO 3C W = -140 13 81.25
20 EO 3T N-1 -100 1 6.25
21 EO 4T N-1 -100 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 48,33 %22 EO 1S W+1 -120 8 50.00
23 EO 2K S+3 150 14 87.50
24 EO 3K E-1 50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,96 %25 EO 2C S+1 140 2 12.50
26 EO 3S S+3 690 2 12.50
27 EO 3P E = -140 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
1 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 37,29 %28 EO 3K W-1 50 7 43.75
29 EO 3C N-2 -200 14 87.50
30 EO 3CcW = -530 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
Total : 212,0 / 432 = 49,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 BEYNE Anne -COLLET Edgard
10 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 44,38 % 4 EO 3S S+1 630 9 56.25
5 EO 2K N+3 150 7 43.75
6 EO 3S S-3 -150 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
5 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 45,21 % 7 EO 2P S = 110 2 12.50
8 EO 2P S-2 -100 14 87.50
9 EO 3C N-1 -50 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
1 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 37,29 %10 EO 6S E = -1440 12 75.00
11 EO 4P W-2 100 1 6.25
12 EO 3P N-3 -300 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -CAMUS Colette : 60,00 %13 EO 2S W+1 -150 16 100.00
14 EO 3TcE-3 500 0 0.00
15 EO 3P N+2 200 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 46,67 %16 EO 4C E-3 300 0 0.00
17 EO 4P S = 420 13 81.25
18 EO 2C W = -110 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
2 LAMBERT Jean-Benoit -MASSAUX Joel : 49,17 %19 EO 4C W-1 100 3 18.75
20 EO 3C S-4 -400 8 50.00
21 EO 3T N+1 130 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,96 %22 EO 2K W+1 -110 4 25.00
23 EO 3S S = 600 10 62.50
24 EO 2P W+1 -140 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 48,33 %25 EO 2P N-1 -50 7 43.75
26 EO 3S S+3 690 2 12.50
27 EO 1P E+3 -170 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -Panis Guy : 60,00 %28 EO 2K W-2 100 2 12.50
29 EO 3T W = -110 9 56.25
30 EO 4P S = 420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
Total : 210,0 / 432 = 48,61 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 DELHEZ Jacques -COLOT Jacques
4 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 44,38 % 1 EO 4P S = 420 12 75.00
2 EO 5PcW = -650 16 100.00
3 EO 4P E+2 -680 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 89,58 %
5 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 45,21 % 4 EO 3S S+1 630 9 56.25
5 EO 3S N+1 630 1 6.25
6 EO 1S S+2 150 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 46,67 % 7 EO 3C W = -140 15 93.75
8 EO 2P E-3 150 1 6.25
9 EO 4C N = 420 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -CAMUS Colette : 60,00 %10 EO 3S E+3 -690 4 25.00
11 EO 4P E-1 50 5 31.25
12 EO 1P N = 80 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
1 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 37,29 %13 EO 3S W-1 100 3 18.75
14 EO 2S N-1 -50 10 62.50
15 EO 3P N-1 -100 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
10 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,96 %19 EO 2P N+1 140 0 0.00
20 EO 3T N-1 -100 1 6.25
21 EO 3S N = 600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 2,08 %
2 LAMBERT Jean-Benoit -MASSAUX Joel : 49,17 %22 EO 1S W = -90 1 6.25
23 EO 3S N = 600 10 62.50
24 EO 4C N-1 -50 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -Panis Guy : 60,00 %25 EO 1S S-1 -50 7 43.75
26 EO 4P N = 620 10 62.50
27 EO 4P E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 48,33 %28 EO 3S E-3 150 0 0.00
29 EO 3C N-3 -300 16 100.00
30 EO 3P S = 140 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 175,0 / 432 = 40,51 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
5 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 45,21 % 1 EO 4P S = 420 12 75.00
2 EO 4P W = -420 12 75.00
3 EO 4P E+1 -650 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 46,67 % 4 EO 3S S+1 630 9 56.25
5 EO 3K N+1 130 13 81.25
6 EO 2C N+1 140 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,96 % 7 EO 1S E-1 100 6 37.50
8 EO 2P E-3 150 1 6.25
9 EO 2C N = 110 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 48,33 %10 EO 6S W = -1440 12 75.00
11 EO 3P E = -140 11 68.75
12 EO 2C W+2 -170 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
10 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 37,29 %16 EO 3S S-2 -100 15 93.75
17 EO 5TcW-2 300 16 100.00
18 EO 2C W+1 -140 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 97,92 %
4 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 44,38 %19 EO 2P N-1 -50 6 37.50
20 EO 3C S-3 -300 6 37.50
21 EO 4T N = 130 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -Panis Guy : 60,00 %22 EO 1S W = -90 1 6.25
23 EO 3S S+2 660 0 0.00
24 EO 3P E-1 50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
2 LAMBERT Jean-Benoit -MASSAUX Joel : 49,17 %25 EO 2K W = -90 10 62.50
26 EO 4P N-1 -100 16 100.00
27 EO 3P E+1 -170 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -CAMUS Colette : 60,00 %28 EO 3K W-1 50 7 43.75
29 EO 2K S = 90 2 12.50
30 EO 5K S = 400 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
Total : 233,0 / 432 = 53,94 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 46,67 % 1 EO 4P N = 420 12 75.00
2 EO 5PcE-1 100 2 12.50
3 EO 4P E+1 -650 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,96 % 4 EO 3S N+3 690 0 0.00
5 EO 3S N-1 -100 16 100.00
6 EO 2C N+2 170 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -Panis Guy : 60,00 % 7 EO 3C E = -140 15 93.75
8 EO 3P S-2 -100 14 87.50
9 EO 2C N = 110 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
10 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 48,33 %13 EO 3T W-1 100 3 18.75
14 EO 2S W-3 150 8 50.00
15 EO 4P N+1 650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
4 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 44,38 %16 EO 4K N-1 -50 11 68.75
17 EO 4P S+1 450 5 31.25
18 EO 1S E+1 -120 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
1 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 37,29 %19 EO 3C W = -140 13 81.25
20 EO 3KcW = -670 14 87.50
21 EO 3P E-1 50 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
5 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 45,21 %22 EO 2P E+1 -140 12 75.00
23 EO 3S S+1 630 4 25.00
24 EO 3S W-5 250 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -CAMUS Colette : 60,00 %25 EO 1S S-2 -100 14 87.50
26 EO 4P N+1 650 6 37.50
27 EO 3P E = -140 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
2 LAMBERT Jean-Benoit -MASSAUX Joel : 49,17 %28 EO 2C E = -110 14 87.50
29 EO 2P E = -110 9 56.25
30 EO 5KcN-3 -500 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
Total : 238,0 / 432 = 55,09 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,96 % 1 EO 4P N+1 450 3 18.75
2 EO 5TcN-1 -200 8 50.00
3 EO 4P E+1 -650 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -Panis Guy : 60,00 % 4 EO 3S N+2 660 2 12.50
5 EO 2S N+1 150 7 43.75
6 EO 2S S = 120 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -CAMUS Colette : 60,00 % 7 EO 3P S-1 -100 10 62.50
8 EO 3T W-1 50 6 37.50
9 EO 4CcN = 590 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
2 LAMBERT Jean-Benoit -MASSAUX Joel : 49,17 %10 EO 7T E-2 200 0 0.00
11 EO 4P E-1 50 5 31.25
12 EO 2S S-2 -200 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
4 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 44,38 %13 EO 3S W-2 200 0 0.00
14 EO 3S S-2 -100 13 81.25
15 EO 4KcE-3 500 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 48,33 %16 EO 4C E-1 100 8 50.00
17 EO 4P S+1 450 5 31.25
18 EO 2C W = -110 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
5 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 45,21 %19 EO 3C W = -140 13 81.25
20 EO 3S E = -600 11 68.75
21 EO 3P E-1 50 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
1 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 37,29 %22 EO 1S W+1 -120 8 50.00
23 EO 3S S = 600 10 62.50
24 EO 4P W-2 100 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 46,67 %25 EO 4C S = 420 0 0.00
26 EO 3S S+3 690 2 12.50
27 EO 4P E = -420 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
10 - : 0,00 %28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 178,0 / 432 = 41,20 %
|
|