|
Tournoi du 09-12-13
1 64,26 7 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
2 59,26 2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
3 55,93 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
4 52,41 4 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Charlotte
5 51,67 1 NELIS Claude -DELHEZ Jacques
6 50,74 6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
7 50,37 9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
8 40,56 3 COOLEN Joseph -ARICKX Roger
9 37,59 10 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine
10 37,22 5 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 61,85 15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
2 52,22 16 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
3 51,85 17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
4 51,30 13 BUSQUIN Philippe -GHIERCHE Jacques
5 50,00 12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
6 47,96 20 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
7 47,59 18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
~ 47,59 11 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
9 45,93 14 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
10 43,70 19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
PAIRE Nr : 1 NELIS Claude -DELHEZ Jacques
11 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,59 % 1 NS 4C S+1 450 3 16.67
2 NS 3K W = -110 9 50.00
3 NS 4P W+2 -680 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
13 BUSQUIN Philippe -GHIERCHE Jacques : 51,30 % 4 NS 1ScN = 180 12 66.67
5 NS 2K E+2 -130 10 55.56
6 NS 2P E-2 200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,00 % 7 NS 1K E+2 -110 4 22.22
8 NS 3S W+1 -430 5 27.78
9 NS 4P E+2 -680 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
16 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,22 %10 NS 2C E-1 100 12 66.67
11 NS 3S W = -400 10 55.56
12 NS 4P E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 51,85 %13 NS 1S S-2 -200 1 5.56
14 NS 3S N = 400 2 11.11
15 NS 3S W = -400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 47,59 %16 NS 4P N = 420 18 100.00
17 NS 1P W+1 -110 9 50.00
18 NS 2P N+1 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,70 %19 NS 3S W+3 -690 16 88.89
20 NS 3S N-1 -100 3 16.67
21 NS 1S N+1 120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
20 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 47,96 %22 NS 3S N-2 -100 4 22.22
23 NS 1S N+1 120 16 88.89
24 NS 3P N-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,93 %25 NS 2S W = -120 16 88.89
26 NS 4P N = 620 11 61.11
27 NS 4P N = 420 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,85 %28 NS 3T W = -110 10 55.56
29 NS 3K E-1 100 13 72.22
30 NS 1S W = -90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 279,0 / 540 = 51,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
13 BUSQUIN Philippe -GHIERCHE Jacques : 51,30 % 1 NS 4C S+2 480 12 66.67
2 NS 2K W+1 -110 9 50.00
3 NS 4P W+2 -680 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,00 % 4 NS 3T W-1 100 6 33.33
5 NS 3T N-2 -200 4 22.22
6 NS 2P E = -110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
11 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,59 % 7 NS 1S E-1 100 18 100.00
8 NS 3S W+1 -430 5 27.78
9 NS 3S W+2 -660 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
20 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 47,96 %10 NS 1S N+1 120 16 88.89
11 NS 3S W = -400 10 55.56
12 NS 4P E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,93 %13 NS 1S N+2 150 14 77.78
14 NS 4C N+2 480 13 72.22
15 NS 2S W+1 -150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,85 %16 NS 3P N-2 -100 4 22.22
17 NS 1P W+1 -110 9 50.00
18 NS 3S S+1 630 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
16 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,22 %19 NS 3S W+4 -720 7 38.89
20 NS 2S N = 120 10 55.56
21 NS 3S S = 600 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 51,85 %22 NS 2P S-2 -100 4 22.22
23 NS Pass Passe 6 33.33
24 NS 3K W-2 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 47,59 %25 NS 3S W = -600 4 22.22
26 NS 4P N = 620 11 61.11
27 NS 3P N+1 170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,70 %28 NS 3S E-3 150 18 100.00
29 NS 3K W-1 100 13 72.22
30 NS 2S W-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
Total : 320,0 / 540 = 59,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 COOLEN Joseph -ARICKX Roger
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,00 % 1 NS 4C S+2 480 12 66.67
2 NS 3S W-1 50 15 83.33
3 NS 4P W+2 -680 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
11 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,59 % 4 NS 2S W-2 200 15 83.33
5 NS 1S N-3 -300 0 0.00
6 NS 2S W+1 -150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
13 BUSQUIN Philippe -GHIERCHE Jacques : 51,30 % 7 NS 1S E+1 -120 2 11.11
8 NS 4C W-1 50 16 88.89
9 NS 3S W+2 -660 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 47,59 %10 NS 2K S-1 -100 5 27.78
11 NS 3S W-1 50 17 94.44
12 NS 4P E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,70 %13 NS 3K S-1 -100 4 22.22
14 NS 4C N+1 450 6 33.33
15 NS 4P E = -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
20 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 47,96 %16 NS 3P N+1 170 16 88.89
17 NS 2C E+1 -140 2 11.11
18 NS 2P N = 110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,93 %19 NS 5T W+2 -640 18 100.00
20 NS 1C N+1 110 6 33.33
21 NS 1P E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,85 %22 NS 2P S-2 -100 4 22.22
23 NS Pass Passe 6 33.33
24 NS 3K W-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
16 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,22 %25 NS 3S E+1 -630 0 0.00
26 NS 2P N = 110 2 11.11
27 NS 4PcN-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 3,70 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 51,85 %28 NS 3PcS-2 -500 0 0.00
29 NS 3K E-1 100 13 72.22
30 NS 1S W = -90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 219,0 / 540 = 40,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Charlotte
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 51,85 % 1 NS 6C S = 980 18 100.00
2 NS 2K W+1 -110 9 50.00
3 NS 4P W+2 -680 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
16 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,22 % 4 NS 3T E-1 100 6 33.33
5 NS 2K E+3 -150 8 44.44
6 NS 2P E = -110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,85 % 7 NS 1S N-2 -200 0 0.00
8 NS 4C E = -420 11 61.11
9 NS 3S W+3 -690 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,93 %10 NS 2K S = 90 9 50.00
11 NS 3S W+2 -460 0 0.00
12 NS 3P E+1 -170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
20 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 47,96 %13 NS 4K S-2 -200 1 5.56
14 NS 4C N+2 480 13 72.22
15 NS 2S W+1 -150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,70 %16 NS 3P N-1 -50 6 33.33
17 NS 3P W-1 50 16 88.89
18 NS 3S S = 600 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 47,59 %19 NS 3S W+4 -720 7 38.89
20 NS 2S N = 120 10 55.56
21 NS 2S S+1 150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
13 BUSQUIN Philippe -GHIERCHE Jacques : 51,30 %22 NS 2P N-1 -50 12 66.67
23 NS Pass Passe 6 33.33
24 NS 3S N = 400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,00 %25 NS 3K N-4 -200 11 61.11
26 NS 4P N = 620 11 61.11
27 NS 4PcN = 590 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
11 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,59 %28 NS 1P S-2 -200 3 16.67
29 NS 3S E-1 100 13 72.22
30 NS 1S W = -90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 283,0 / 540 = 52,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 47,59 % 1 NS 5C S+1 480 12 66.67
2 NS 2K W+2 -130 2 11.11
3 NS 3S E+4 -720 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 51,85 % 4 NS 2S W-2 200 15 83.33
5 NS 2K E+1 -110 13 72.22
6 NS 1S W+2 -150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
16 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,22 % 7 NS 1K E+1 -90 10 55.56
8 NS 4C W = -420 11 61.11
9 NS 3S E+2 -660 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
11 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,59 %10 NS 1S N-1 -100 5 27.78
11 NS 3S W+1 -430 3 16.67
12 NS 3P E+1 -170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,85 %13 NS 1S N+2 150 14 77.78
14 NS 3C N+1 170 0 0.00
15 NS 3S W = -400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,93 %16 NS 2P S = 110 8 44.44
17 NS 1P W+2 -140 2 11.11
18 NS 2P S = 110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
20 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 47,96 %19 NS 3S W+4 -720 7 38.89
20 NS 2C N+1 140 14 77.78
21 NS 2T N+1 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,70 %22 NS 3T N-1 -50 12 66.67
23 NS Pass Passe 6 33.33
24 NS 3P N-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
13 BUSQUIN Philippe -GHIERCHE Jacques : 51,30 %25 NS 2C E+3 -200 11 61.11
26 NS 3C E-1 100 0 0.00
27 NS 4P N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,00 %28 NS 2T W+2 -130 8 44.44
29 NS 3K E = -110 4 22.22
30 NS 1S W+2 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 201,0 / 540 = 37,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,70 % 1 NS 4C S+2 480 12 66.67
2 NS 5K W-1 50 15 83.33
3 NS 6P W = -1430 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 47,59 % 4 NS 2C W-1 100 6 33.33
5 NS 1S N-2 -200 4 22.22
6 NS 3S W = -600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 51,85 % 7 NS 1P S-1 -100 6 33.33
8 NS 3S W+1 -430 5 27.78
9 NS 3CcN-3 -500 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,00 %10 NS 2S N-2 -200 0 0.00
11 NS 3S W = -400 10 55.56
12 NS 4P E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
11 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,59 %13 NS 1S N+2 150 14 77.78
14 NS 4C N+3 510 18 100.00
15 NS 3S W = -400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
16 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,22 %16 NS 3C W = -140 1 5.56
17 NS 2S E-2 100 18 100.00
18 NS 3K N+1 130 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,85 %19 NS 3S W+4 -720 7 38.89
20 NS 2S N = 120 10 55.56
21 NS 2K N-3 -300 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,93 %22 NS 3S N-1 -50 12 66.67
23 NS Pass Passe 6 33.33
24 NS 2P N = 110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
20 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 47,96 %25 NS 2K N-3 -150 14 77.78
26 NS 4P N = 620 11 61.11
27 NS 4P N = 420 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
13 BUSQUIN Philippe -GHIERCHE Jacques : 51,30 %28 NS 1P S = 80 16 88.89
29 NS 2CcN-2 -500 0 0.00
30 NS 2S W-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 274,0 / 540 = 50,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
20 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 47,96 % 1 NS 4C N+2 480 12 66.67
2 NS 4K E = -130 2 11.11
3 NS 4P E+2 -680 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,70 % 4 NS 3S E-5 500 18 100.00
5 NS 4K E-2 100 18 100.00
6 NS 2K N-2 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 47,59 % 7 NS 1S E = -90 10 55.56
8 NS 4C E-1 50 16 88.89
9 NS 3S E+2 -660 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
13 BUSQUIN Philippe -GHIERCHE Jacques : 51,30 %10 NS 3K N = 110 14 77.78
11 NS 3S E = -400 10 55.56
12 NS 4P E = -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,00 %13 NS 3P N = 140 10 55.56
14 NS 4C N+2 480 13 72.22
15 NS 5TcE-1 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
11 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,59 %16 NS 3P N = 140 12 66.67
17 NS 2P E = -110 9 50.00
18 NS 3S N+1 630 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 51,85 %19 NS 3S E+4 -720 7 38.89
20 NS 3S N = 600 18 100.00
21 NS 1S N+2 150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
16 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,22 %22 NS 3P N = 140 18 100.00
23 NS Pass Passe 6 33.33
24 NS 3P N+1 170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,85 %25 NS 3S E = -600 4 22.22
26 NS 4P N = 620 11 61.11
27 NS 3P N+1 170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,93 %28 NS 2T E = -90 12 66.67
29 NS 3K E-1 100 13 72.22
30 NS 2T E = -90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 347,0 / 540 = 64,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
14 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,93 % 1 NS 4C S+1 450 3 16.67
2 NS 2K W+1 -110 9 50.00
3 NS 4P W+1 -650 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
20 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 47,96 % 4 NS 2S W-1 100 6 33.33
5 NS 1S N-1 -100 16 88.89
6 NS 2P E-2 200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,70 % 7 NS 1S N = 90 16 88.89
8 NS 3S W+1 -430 5 27.78
9 NS 3S E+2 -660 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,85 %10 NS 2K S = 90 9 50.00
11 NS 3S W+1 -430 3 16.67
12 NS 2P E+2 -170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
13 BUSQUIN Philippe -GHIERCHE Jacques : 51,30 %13 NS 2P S = 110 7 38.89
14 NS 4C N+2 480 13 72.22
15 NS 3S W = -400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,00 %16 NS 3P S = 140 12 66.67
17 NS 1P W = -80 14 77.78
18 NS 3S S = 600 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
11 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,59 %19 NS 3S W+4 -720 7 38.89
20 NS 2S N+1 150 16 88.89
21 NS 3S S = 600 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 47,59 %22 NS 2P S-1 -50 12 66.67
23 NS 2C S+2 170 18 100.00
24 NS 4C E-2 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 51,85 %25 NS 3S W = -600 4 22.22
26 NS 4P N = 620 11 61.11
27 NS 4P N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
16 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,22 %28 NS 1P S-2 -200 3 16.67
29 NS 3S E-1 100 13 72.22
30 NS 1S W = -90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 302,0 / 540 = 55,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,85 % 1 NS 4C S+1 450 3 16.67
2 NS 4K W = -130 2 11.11
3 NS 4P W+2 -680 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,93 % 4 NS 2S W-1 100 6 33.33
5 NS 1S N-2 -200 4 22.22
6 NS 2C W-2 200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
20 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 47,96 % 7 NS 1T E+1 -90 10 55.56
8 NS 4C W-1 50 16 88.89
9 NS 6K E = -1370 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 51,85 %10 NS 2CcE-1 200 18 100.00
11 NS 3S W-1 50 17 94.44
12 NS 4P E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
16 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,22 %13 NS 2P N = 110 7 38.89
14 NS 3S N+2 460 8 44.44
15 NS 3S W = -400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
13 BUSQUIN Philippe -GHIERCHE Jacques : 51,30 %16 NS 3P N = 140 12 66.67
17 NS 3P W = -140 2 11.11
18 NS 2P N+2 170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,00 %19 NS 3S W+4 -720 7 38.89
20 NS 2S N-1 -100 3 16.67
21 NS 2K N-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
11 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,59 %22 NS 3T N-1 -50 12 66.67
23 NS Pass Passe 6 33.33
24 NS 2P N = 110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,70 %25 NS 2C E = -110 18 100.00
26 NS 4P N = 620 11 61.11
27 NS 2P N+2 170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 47,59 %28 NS 3S E-1 50 14 77.78
29 NS 2P E = -110 4 22.22
30 NS 1S E = -90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 272,0 / 540 = 50,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine
16 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,22 % 1 NS 4C S+1 450 3 16.67
2 NS 5KcW-1 100 18 100.00
3 NS 6P W = -1430 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,85 % 4 NS 2T E+1 -110 0 0.00
5 NS 2K E+1 -110 13 72.22
6 NS 2P E+1 -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,93 % 7 NS 1K E = -70 14 77.78
8 NS 4CcW = -590 0 0.00
9 NS 3P W+1 -170 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,70 %10 NS 2C E = -110 2 11.11
11 NS 3S W = -400 10 55.56
12 NS 3P E+1 -170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 47,59 %13 NS 3S N = 600 18 100.00
14 NS 4P N = 420 4 22.22
15 NS 3S E = -400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 51,85 %16 NS 2C W+1 -140 1 5.56
17 NS 1P W+1 -110 9 50.00
18 NS 3K N-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
13 BUSQUIN Philippe -GHIERCHE Jacques : 51,30 %19 NS 3S W+4 -720 7 38.89
20 NS 3S N-2 -200 0 0.00
21 NS 3C S-4 -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,00 %22 NS 3P S-4 -200 0 0.00
23 NS 1C S+1 110 14 77.78
24 NS 5KcW-2 300 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
11 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,59 %25 NS 1S W+4 -210 8 44.44
26 NS 4P N = 620 11 61.11
27 NS 2P N+1 140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
20 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 47,96 %28 NS 1S E+3 -180 6 33.33
29 NS 3K E = -110 4 22.22
30 NS 2S W = -120 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 203,0 / 540 = 37,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
1 NELIS Claude -DELHEZ Jacques : 51,67 % 1 EO 4C S+1 450 15 83.33
2 EO 3K W = -110 9 50.00
3 EO 4P W+2 -680 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
3 COOLEN Joseph -ARICKX Roger : 40,56 % 4 EO 2S W-2 200 3 16.67
5 EO 1S N-3 -300 18 100.00
6 EO 2S W+1 -150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 59,26 % 7 EO 1S E-1 100 0 0.00
8 EO 3S W+1 -430 13 72.22
9 EO 3S W+2 -660 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
5 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 37,22 %10 EO 1S N-1 -100 13 72.22
11 EO 3S W+1 -430 15 83.33
12 EO 3P E+1 -170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 50,74 %13 EO 1S N+2 150 4 22.22
14 EO 4C N+3 510 0 0.00
15 EO 3S W = -400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
7 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,26 %16 EO 3P N = 140 6 33.33
17 EO 2P E = -110 9 50.00
18 EO 3S N+1 630 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,93 %19 EO 3S W+4 -720 11 61.11
20 EO 2S N+1 150 2 11.11
21 EO 3S S = 600 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,37 %22 EO 3T N-1 -50 6 33.33
23 EO Pass Passe 12 66.67
24 EO 2P N = 110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 37,59 %25 EO 1S W+4 -210 10 55.56
26 EO 4P N = 620 7 38.89
27 EO 2P N+1 140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
4 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Charlotte : 52,41 %28 EO 1P S-2 -200 15 83.33
29 EO 3S E-1 100 5 27.78
30 EO 1S W = -90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 257,0 / 540 = 47,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
3 COOLEN Joseph -ARICKX Roger : 40,56 % 1 EO 4C S+2 480 6 33.33
2 EO 3S W-1 50 3 16.67
3 EO 4P W+2 -680 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 59,26 % 4 EO 3T W-1 100 12 66.67
5 EO 3T N-2 -200 14 77.78
6 EO 2P E = -110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
1 NELIS Claude -DELHEZ Jacques : 51,67 % 7 EO 1K E+2 -110 14 77.78
8 EO 3S W+1 -430 13 72.22
9 EO 4P E+2 -680 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 50,74 %10 EO 2S N-2 -200 18 100.00
11 EO 3S W = -400 8 44.44
12 EO 4P E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
7 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,26 %13 EO 3P N = 140 8 44.44
14 EO 4C N+2 480 5 27.78
15 EO 5TcE-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,93 %16 EO 3P S = 140 6 33.33
17 EO 1P W = -80 4 22.22
18 EO 3S S = 600 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,37 %19 EO 3S W+4 -720 11 61.11
20 EO 2S N-1 -100 15 83.33
21 EO 2K N-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 37,59 %22 EO 3P S-4 -200 18 100.00
23 EO 1C S+1 110 4 22.22
24 EO 5KcW-2 300 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
4 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Charlotte : 52,41 %25 EO 3K N-4 -200 7 38.89
26 EO 4P N = 620 7 38.89
27 EO 4PcN = 590 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
5 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 37,22 %28 EO 2T W+2 -130 10 55.56
29 EO 3K E = -110 14 77.78
30 EO 1S W+2 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 270,0 / 540 = 50,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 BUSQUIN Philippe -GHIERCHE Jacques
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 59,26 % 1 EO 4C S+2 480 6 33.33
2 EO 2K W+1 -110 9 50.00
3 EO 4P W+2 -680 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
1 NELIS Claude -DELHEZ Jacques : 51,67 % 4 EO 1ScN = 180 6 33.33
5 EO 2K E+2 -130 8 44.44
6 EO 2P E-2 200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
3 COOLEN Joseph -ARICKX Roger : 40,56 % 7 EO 1S E+1 -120 16 88.89
8 EO 4C W-1 50 2 11.11
9 EO 3S W+2 -660 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
7 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,26 %10 EO 3K N = 110 4 22.22
11 EO 3S E = -400 8 44.44
12 EO 4P E = -420 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,93 %13 EO 2P S = 110 11 61.11
14 EO 4C N+2 480 5 27.78
15 EO 3S W = -400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,37 %16 EO 3P N = 140 6 33.33
17 EO 3P W = -140 16 88.89
18 EO 2P N+2 170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 37,59 %19 EO 3S W+4 -720 11 61.11
20 EO 3S N-2 -200 18 100.00
21 EO 3C S-4 -400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
4 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Charlotte : 52,41 %22 EO 2P N-1 -50 6 33.33
23 EO Pass Passe 12 66.67
24 EO 3S N = 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
5 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 37,22 %25 EO 2C E+3 -200 7 38.89
26 EO 3C E-1 100 18 100.00
27 EO 4P N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 50,74 %28 EO 1P S = 80 2 11.11
29 EO 2CcN-2 -500 18 100.00
30 EO 2S W-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 277,0 / 540 = 51,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,93 % 1 EO 4C S+1 450 15 83.33
2 EO 2K W+1 -110 9 50.00
3 EO 4P W+1 -650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,37 % 4 EO 2S W-1 100 12 66.67
5 EO 1S N-2 -200 14 77.78
6 EO 2C W-2 200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 37,59 % 7 EO 1K E = -70 4 22.22
8 EO 4CcW = -590 18 100.00
9 EO 3P W+1 -170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
4 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Charlotte : 52,41 %10 EO 2K S = 90 9 50.00
11 EO 3S W+2 -460 18 100.00
12 EO 3P E+1 -170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 59,26 %13 EO 1S N+2 150 4 22.22
14 EO 4C N+2 480 5 27.78
15 EO 2S W+1 -150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
5 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 37,22 %16 EO 2P S = 110 10 55.56
17 EO 1P W+2 -140 16 88.89
18 EO 2P S = 110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
3 COOLEN Joseph -ARICKX Roger : 40,56 %19 EO 5T W+2 -640 0 0.00
20 EO 1C N+1 110 12 66.67
21 EO 1P E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 50,74 %22 EO 3S N-1 -50 6 33.33
23 EO Pass Passe 12 66.67
24 EO 2P N = 110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
1 NELIS Claude -DELHEZ Jacques : 51,67 %25 EO 2S W = -120 2 11.11
26 EO 4P N = 620 7 38.89
27 EO 4P N = 420 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
7 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,26 %28 EO 2T E = -90 6 33.33
29 EO 3K E-1 100 5 27.78
30 EO 2T E = -90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 248,0 / 540 = 45,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,37 % 1 EO 4C S+1 450 15 83.33
2 EO 4K W = -130 16 88.89
3 EO 4P W+2 -680 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 37,59 % 4 EO 2T E+1 -110 18 100.00
5 EO 2K E+1 -110 5 27.78
6 EO 2P E+1 -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
4 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Charlotte : 52,41 % 7 EO 1S N-2 -200 18 100.00
8 EO 4C E = -420 7 38.89
9 EO 3S W+3 -690 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,93 %10 EO 2K S = 90 9 50.00
11 EO 3S W+1 -430 15 83.33
12 EO 2P E+2 -170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
5 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 37,22 %13 EO 1S N+2 150 4 22.22
14 EO 3C N+1 170 18 100.00
15 EO 3S W = -400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 59,26 %16 EO 3P N-2 -100 14 77.78
17 EO 1P W+1 -110 9 50.00
18 EO 3S S+1 630 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 50,74 %19 EO 3S W+4 -720 11 61.11
20 EO 2S N = 120 8 44.44
21 EO 2K N-3 -300 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
3 COOLEN Joseph -ARICKX Roger : 40,56 %22 EO 2P S-2 -100 14 77.78
23 EO Pass Passe 12 66.67
24 EO 3K W-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
7 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,26 %25 EO 3S E = -600 14 77.78
26 EO 4P N = 620 7 38.89
27 EO 3P N+1 170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
1 NELIS Claude -DELHEZ Jacques : 51,67 %28 EO 3T W = -110 8 44.44
29 EO 3K E-1 100 5 27.78
30 EO 1S W = -90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 334,0 / 540 = 61,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
10 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 37,59 % 1 EO 4C S+1 450 15 83.33
2 EO 5KcW-1 100 0 0.00
3 EO 6P W = -1430 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
4 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Charlotte : 52,41 % 4 EO 3T E-1 100 12 66.67
5 EO 2K E+3 -150 10 55.56
6 EO 2P E = -110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
5 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 37,22 % 7 EO 1K E+1 -90 8 44.44
8 EO 4C W = -420 7 38.89
9 EO 3S E+2 -660 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
1 NELIS Claude -DELHEZ Jacques : 51,67 %10 EO 2C E-1 100 6 33.33
11 EO 3S W = -400 8 44.44
12 EO 4P E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,37 %13 EO 2P N = 110 11 61.11
14 EO 3S N+2 460 10 55.56
15 EO 3S W = -400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 50,74 %16 EO 3C W = -140 17 94.44
17 EO 2S E-2 100 0 0.00
18 EO 3K N+1 130 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 59,26 %19 EO 3S W+4 -720 11 61.11
20 EO 2S N = 120 8 44.44
21 EO 3S S = 600 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
7 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,26 %22 EO 3P N = 140 0 0.00
23 EO Pass Passe 12 66.67
24 EO 3P N+1 170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
3 COOLEN Joseph -ARICKX Roger : 40,56 %25 EO 3S E+1 -630 18 100.00
26 EO 2P N = 110 16 88.89
27 EO 4PcN-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 96,30 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,93 %28 EO 1P S-2 -200 15 83.33
29 EO 3S E-1 100 5 27.78
30 EO 1S W = -90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 282,0 / 540 = 52,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
4 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Charlotte : 52,41 % 1 EO 6C S = 980 0 0.00
2 EO 2K W+1 -110 9 50.00
3 EO 4P W+2 -680 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
5 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 37,22 % 4 EO 2S W-2 200 3 16.67
5 EO 2K E+1 -110 5 27.78
6 EO 1S W+2 -150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 50,74 % 7 EO 1P S-1 -100 12 66.67
8 EO 3S W+1 -430 13 72.22
9 EO 3CcN-3 -500 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,37 %10 EO 2CcE-1 200 0 0.00
11 EO 3S W-1 50 1 5.56
12 EO 4P E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
1 NELIS Claude -DELHEZ Jacques : 51,67 %13 EO 1S S-2 -200 17 94.44
14 EO 3S N = 400 16 88.89
15 EO 3S W = -400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 37,59 %16 EO 2C W+1 -140 17 94.44
17 EO 1P W+1 -110 9 50.00
18 EO 3K N-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
7 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,26 %19 EO 3S E+4 -720 11 61.11
20 EO 3S N = 600 0 0.00
21 EO 1S N+2 150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 59,26 %22 EO 2P S-2 -100 14 77.78
23 EO Pass Passe 12 66.67
24 EO 3K W-2 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,93 %25 EO 3S W = -600 14 77.78
26 EO 4P N = 620 7 38.89
27 EO 4P N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
3 COOLEN Joseph -ARICKX Roger : 40,56 %28 EO 3PcS-2 -500 18 100.00
29 EO 3K E-1 100 5 27.78
30 EO 1S W = -90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 280,0 / 540 = 51,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
5 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 37,22 % 1 EO 5C S+1 480 6 33.33
2 EO 2K W+2 -130 16 88.89
3 EO 3S E+4 -720 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 50,74 % 4 EO 2C W-1 100 12 66.67
5 EO 1S N-2 -200 14 77.78
6 EO 3S W = -600 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
7 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,26 % 7 EO 1S E = -90 8 44.44
8 EO 4C E-1 50 2 11.11
9 EO 3S E+2 -660 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
3 COOLEN Joseph -ARICKX Roger : 40,56 %10 EO 2K S-1 -100 13 72.22
11 EO 3S W-1 50 1 5.56
12 EO 4P E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 37,59 %13 EO 3S N = 600 0 0.00
14 EO 4P N = 420 14 77.78
15 EO 3S E = -400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
1 NELIS Claude -DELHEZ Jacques : 51,67 %16 EO 4P N = 420 0 0.00
17 EO 1P W+1 -110 9 50.00
18 EO 2P N+1 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
4 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Charlotte : 52,41 %19 EO 3S W+4 -720 11 61.11
20 EO 2S N = 120 8 44.44
21 EO 2S S+1 150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,93 %22 EO 2P S-1 -50 6 33.33
23 EO 2C S+2 170 0 0.00
24 EO 4C E-2 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 59,26 %25 EO 3S W = -600 14 77.78
26 EO 4P N = 620 7 38.89
27 EO 3P N+1 170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,37 %28 EO 3S E-1 50 4 22.22
29 EO 2P E = -110 14 77.78
30 EO 1S E = -90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 257,0 / 540 = 47,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 50,74 % 1 EO 4C S+2 480 6 33.33
2 EO 5K W-1 50 3 16.67
3 EO 6P W = -1430 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
7 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,26 % 4 EO 3S E-5 500 0 0.00
5 EO 4K E-2 100 0 0.00
6 EO 2K N-2 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,93 % 7 EO 1S N = 90 2 11.11
8 EO 3S W+1 -430 13 72.22
9 EO 3S E+2 -660 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 37,59 %10 EO 2C E = -110 16 88.89
11 EO 3S W = -400 8 44.44
12 EO 3P E+1 -170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
3 COOLEN Joseph -ARICKX Roger : 40,56 %13 EO 3K S-1 -100 14 77.78
14 EO 4C N+1 450 12 66.67
15 EO 4P E = -420 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
4 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Charlotte : 52,41 %16 EO 3P N-1 -50 12 66.67
17 EO 3P W-1 50 2 11.11
18 EO 3S S = 600 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
1 NELIS Claude -DELHEZ Jacques : 51,67 %19 EO 3S W+3 -690 2 11.11
20 EO 3S N-1 -100 15 83.33
21 EO 1S N+1 120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
5 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 37,22 %22 EO 3T N-1 -50 6 33.33
23 EO Pass Passe 12 66.67
24 EO 3P N-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,37 %25 EO 2C E = -110 0 0.00
26 EO 4P N = 620 7 38.89
27 EO 2P N+2 170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 59,26 %28 EO 3S E-3 150 0 0.00
29 EO 3K W-1 100 5 27.78
30 EO 2S W-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
Total : 236,0 / 540 = 43,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
7 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,26 % 1 EO 4C N+2 480 6 33.33
2 EO 4K E = -130 16 88.89
3 EO 4P E+2 -680 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,93 % 4 EO 2S W-1 100 12 66.67
5 EO 1S N-1 -100 2 11.11
6 EO 2P E-2 200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,37 % 7 EO 1T E+1 -90 8 44.44
8 EO 4C W-1 50 2 11.11
9 EO 6K E = -1370 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 59,26 %10 EO 1S N+1 120 2 11.11
11 EO 3S W = -400 8 44.44
12 EO 4P E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
4 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Charlotte : 52,41 %13 EO 4K S-2 -200 17 94.44
14 EO 4C N+2 480 5 27.78
15 EO 2S W+1 -150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
3 COOLEN Joseph -ARICKX Roger : 40,56 %16 EO 3P N+1 170 2 11.11
17 EO 2C E+1 -140 16 88.89
18 EO 2P N = 110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
5 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 37,22 %19 EO 3S W+4 -720 11 61.11
20 EO 2C N+1 140 4 22.22
21 EO 2T N+1 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
1 NELIS Claude -DELHEZ Jacques : 51,67 %22 EO 3S N-2 -100 14 77.78
23 EO 1S N+1 120 2 11.11
24 EO 3P N-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
6 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 50,74 %25 EO 2K N-3 -150 4 22.22
26 EO 4P N = 620 7 38.89
27 EO 4P N = 420 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 37,59 %28 EO 1S E+3 -180 12 66.67
29 EO 3K E = -110 14 77.78
30 EO 2S W = -120 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 259,0 / 540 = 47,96 %
|
|