|
Tournoi du 10-06-13
1 58,22 10 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
2 54,91 2 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -CASSART Guy
3 54,74 9 LIBERT Laurent -de WASSEIGE Ariane
4 53,30 8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
5 53,24 6 laenens -VERBOIS Léon
6 51,94 1 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Fernand
7 49,54 5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
8 46,85 3 WARNIER François -rosoux
9 39,76 4 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard
10 37,33 7 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine
11 0,00 11 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 55,25 19 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
2 52,59 17 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier
3 51,65 12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
4 50,88 13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine
5 50,86 21 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
6 49,86 18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
7 49,26 14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
8 49,12 20 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude
9 48,72 15 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga
10 47,49 22 MOSSERAY Bernadette -de NICOLAS Bernard
11 44,32 16 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
PAIRE Nr : 1 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Fernand
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 51,65 % 1 NS 4C S+2 480 14.6 81.11
2 NS 3S W+1 -430 12.3 68.33
3 NS 6S S = 990 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 72,59 %
22 MOSSERAY Bernadette -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,49 % 4 NS 5K W-2 200 14.6 81.11
5 NS 2K S+3 150 7.9 43.89
6 NS 3P W = -140 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 54,26 %
21 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,86 % 7 NS 4P N = 620 12.3 68.33
8 NS 3S N-1 -50 10.1 56.11
9 NS 2S N-3 -150 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
20 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 49,12 %10 NS 2C E+1 -140 7.9 43.89
11 NS 1S S-1 -50 17.9 99.44
12 NS 3P N = 140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
19 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 55,25 %13 NS 3P S-2 -200 1.2 6.67
14 NS 4K S = 130 10.1 56.11
15 NS 4P W = -420 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 49,86 %16 NS 4K S-4 -200 0.1 0.56
17 NS 4P N+3 510 9 50.00
18 NS 4C E-1 50 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
17 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 52,59 %19 NS 5PcW-1 200 15.7 87.22
20 NS 4C S-1 -100 1.2 6.67
21 NS 3C S-2 -200 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
16 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 44,32 %22 NS 4P S-1 -50 3.4 18.89
23 NS 1S S-1 -100 10.1 56.11
24 NS 6P W-1 50 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
15 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 48,72 %25 NS 3C W = -140 7.9 43.89
26 NS 3K E-1 100 12.3 68.33
27 NS 5C S-2 -100 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,26 %28 NS 3S W = -400 7 38.89
29 NS 3S S+1 630 17 94.44
30 NS 4CcN = 880 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 280,5 / 540 = 51,94 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -CASSART Guy
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 50,88 % 4 NS 4C E = -620 3.4 18.89
5 NS 5K S+1 620 15.7 87.22
6 NS 4P W-1 100 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 60,19 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 51,65 % 7 NS 4P N = 620 12.3 68.33
8 NS 2C S-2 -100 4.6 25.56
9 NS 1S W = -90 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
22 MOSSERAY Bernadette -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,49 %10 NS 2C S-2 -200 2.3 12.78
11 NS 2C E = -110 9 50.00
12 NS 3PcN+1 930 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
21 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,86 %13 NS 2S S = 120 9 50.00
14 NS 3S S = 400 17.9 99.44
15 NS 4P E-1 50 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 76,85 %
20 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 49,12 %16 NS 4C W-2 200 16.8 93.33
17 NS 3S N+2 460 2.3 12.78
18 NS 4C E-1 50 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
19 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 55,25 %19 NS 6KcN-2 -300 4.6 25.56
20 NS 2C S+1 140 11.2 62.22
21 NS 3T W = -110 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 49,86 %22 NS 4P N-1 -50 3.4 18.89
23 NS 3K W = -110 6.8 37.78
24 NS 5P W = -450 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
17 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 52,59 %25 NS 4P S-2 -100 12.3 68.33
26 NS 4C N-1 -100 9 50.00
27 NS 3S S+1 430 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
16 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 44,32 %28 NS 3S W = -400 7 38.89
29 NS 3S S+1 630 17 94.44
30 NS 4PcW-1 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
15 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 48,72 %31 NS 1S W+2 -150 3.4 18.89
32 NS 3C S+1 170 11.2 62.22
33 NS 1S N+1 120 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
Total : 296,5 / 540 = 54,91 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 WARNIER François -rosoux
16 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 44,32 % 1 NS 4P E-3 150 2.3 12.78
2 NS 3PcS-3 -800 2.3 12.78
3 NS 6S N+1 1020 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,26 % 7 NS 4P N = 620 12.3 68.33
8 NS 2T E-2 100 15.7 87.22
9 NS 2ScN-4 -800 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 50,88 %10 NS 3S E = -600 0.1 0.56
11 NS 2C W+2 -170 0.1 0.56
12 NS 4PcN+1 990 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 51,65 %13 NS 2S S+1 150 15.7 87.22
14 NS 2P N-1 -50 0.1 0.56
15 NS 4P E-1 50 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 56,30 %
22 MOSSERAY Bernadette -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,49 %16 NS 2P N = 110 13.4 74.44
17 NS 6P N = 980 14.6 81.11
18 NS 4C E-1 50 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
21 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,86 %19 NS 5PcW-2 500 17.9 99.44
20 NS 2C S = 110 6.8 37.78
21 NS 3C S-3 -300 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
20 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 49,12 %22 NS 2P S+1 140 13.4 74.44
23 NS 2S S-2 -200 3.4 18.89
24 NS 5P W = -450 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 49,81 %
19 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 55,25 %25 NS 3C W+2 -200 4.6 25.56
26 NS 3C N = 140 15.7 87.22
27 NS 3S S = 400 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 49,86 %28 NS 3S W-1 50 17 94.44
29 NS 2C N+1 140 9 50.00
30 NS 4CcE-1 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
17 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 52,59 %31 NS 1S W+1 -120 12.3 68.33
32 NS 2P W+1 -140 0.1 0.56
33 NS 2TcN-1 -100 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 25,19 %
Total : 253,0 / 540 = 46,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 49,86 % 1 NS 4C S+2 480 14.6 81.11
2 NS 3S W+1 -430 12.3 68.33
3 NS 6K S = 920 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
17 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 52,59 % 4 NS 4PcN-3 -800 0.1 0.56
5 NS 3P S-1 -100 0.1 0.56
6 NS 3P W+1 -170 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 4,63 %
15 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 48,72 %10 NS 2K N+1 110 14.6 81.11
11 NS 1P E = -80 15.7 87.22
12 NS 4T E = -130 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 56,30 %
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,26 %13 NS 2S S = 120 9 50.00
14 NS 2P N = 110 4.6 25.56
15 NS 3S W+2 -460 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 25,37 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 50,88 %16 NS 3C W = -140 4.6 25.56
17 NS 4P N+2 480 5.7 31.67
18 NS 4P E-1 50 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 33,70 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 51,65 %19 NS 4P W = -620 1.2 6.67
20 NS 3P E-2 200 15.7 87.22
21 NS 2P E+1 -140 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
22 MOSSERAY Bernadette -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,49 %22 NS 3C E-1 100 9 50.00
23 NS 4C S-1 -100 10.1 56.11
24 NS 4P W+1 -450 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
21 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,86 %25 NS 2C W+1 -140 7.9 43.89
26 NS 3K E = -110 5.7 31.67
27 NS 3S S+1 430 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
20 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 49,12 %28 NS 3S W = -400 7 38.89
29 NS 2C N+1 140 9 50.00
30 NS 6CcN-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
19 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 55,25 %31 NS 2K W+2 -130 6.8 37.78
32 NS 3C S+1 170 11.2 62.22
33 NS 2C W-2 100 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
Total : 214,7 / 540 = 39,76 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
20 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 49,12 % 1 NS 2C N+4 230 5.7 31.67
2 NS 3S E+2 -460 9 50.00
3 NS 6S N = 990 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
19 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 55,25 % 4 NS 3T E = -110 9 50.00
5 NS 4K N+2 170 12.3 68.33
6 NS 4C N-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 49,86 % 7 NS 3CcE-1 200 4.6 25.56
8 NS 1S N-1 -50 10.1 56.11
9 NS 2C N-4 -200 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
16 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 44,32 %13 NS 3P N = 140 13.4 74.44
14 NS 4K N = 130 10.1 56.11
15 NS 4P E = -420 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
15 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 48,72 %16 NS 2C E = -110 6.8 37.78
17 NS 6P N = 980 14.6 81.11
18 NS 4C E-1 50 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 54,26 %
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,26 %19 NS 5K N-2 -100 6.8 37.78
20 NS 2C N+1 140 11.2 62.22
21 NS 2P E = -110 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 50,88 %22 NS 4P N-1 -50 3.4 18.89
23 NS 2C N+1 140 15.7 87.22
24 NS 4P E+1 -450 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 51,65 %25 NS 3P N-1 -50 16.8 93.33
26 NS 5C N-2 -200 0.1 0.56
27 NS 3S N+1 430 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
22 MOSSERAY Bernadette -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,49 %28 NS 3S E-1 50 17 94.44
29 NS 4C N-2 -200 0 0.00
30 NS 4C N = 420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
21 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,86 %31 NS 1S E+2 -150 3.4 18.89
32 NS 3C N = 140 5.7 31.67
33 NS 1S N = 90 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 25,37 %
Total : 267,5 / 540 = 49,54 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 laenens -VERBOIS Léon
22 MOSSERAY Bernadette -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,49 % 1 NS 4C S+2 480 14.6 81.11
2 NS 3PcS-2 -500 5.7 31.67
3 NS 6S N = 990 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
21 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,86 % 4 NS 6CcE-3 800 17.9 99.44
5 NS 4K S+2 170 12.3 68.33
6 NS 5CcN-3 -500 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
20 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 49,12 % 7 NS 4P N = 620 12.3 68.33
8 NS 3S N-3 -150 0.1 0.56
9 NS 2C E-2 200 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
19 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 55,25 %10 NS 3K N-1 -100 11.2 62.22
11 NS 2C W = -110 9 50.00
12 NS 3P N-1 -100 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 43,70 %
17 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 52,59 %16 NS 3P S-2 -100 9 50.00
17 NS 4P S+2 480 5.7 31.67
18 NS 5CcE-2 300 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
16 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 44,32 %19 NS 5P W-1 100 11.2 62.22
20 NS 3C S = 140 11.2 62.22
21 NS 2P W = -110 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 66,30 %
15 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 48,72 %22 NS 3P N = 140 13.4 74.44
23 NS 2KcW+1 -380 0.1 0.56
24 NS 5CcN-4 -800 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 27,22 %
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,26 %25 NS 1S E+5 -240 2.3 12.78
26 NS 5C E-1 100 12.3 68.33
27 NS 3S S+1 430 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 49,81 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 50,88 %28 NS 2K N-2 -200 12 66.67
29 NS 2S S+1 150 12 66.67
30 NS 4C N = 420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 51,65 %31 NS 1S W+1 -120 12.3 68.33
32 NS 3C S+1 170 11.2 62.22
33 NS 2ScN-1 -100 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 45,74 %
Total : 287,5 / 540 = 53,24 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 50,88 % 1 NS 3P E = -140 0.1 0.56
2 NS 3PcS-2 -500 5.7 31.67
3 NS 6C N = 980 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 21,30 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 51,65 % 4 NS 5CcE-1 200 14.6 81.11
5 NS 1P S+1 110 4.6 25.56
6 NS 4C N-3 -150 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 44,07 %
22 MOSSERAY Bernadette -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,49 % 7 NS 2P N+1 140 0.1 0.56
8 NS 2S N-2 -100 4.6 25.56
9 NS 1S N-1 -50 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
21 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,86 %10 NS 3K N = 110 14.6 81.11
11 NS 2S S-2 -100 13.4 74.44
12 NS 4TcE-1 100 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
20 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 49,12 %13 NS 2S S = 120 9 50.00
14 NS 2C W-1 50 2.3 12.78
15 NS 3S W+1 -430 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 25,19 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 49,86 %19 NS 4P W = -620 1.2 6.67
20 NS 3C S-1 -100 1.2 6.67
21 NS 2P E = -110 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 29,26 %
17 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 52,59 %22 NS 3P N = 140 13.4 74.44
23 NS 4C N-2 -200 3.4 18.89
24 NS 5CcN-4 -800 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
16 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 44,32 %25 NS 3PcS-3 -500 0.1 0.56
26 NS 3K E = -110 5.7 31.67
27 NS 3S S+1 430 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
15 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 48,72 %28 NS 2S W+1 -150 14 77.78
29 NS 3T S = 110 6 33.33
30 NS 4C N = 420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,26 %31 NS 2T S-3 -300 0.1 0.56
32 NS 2C S = 110 2.3 12.78
33 NS 3T N = 110 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 25,19 %
Total : 201,6 / 540 = 37,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
15 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 48,72 % 1 NS 3PcE-2 300 9 50.00
2 NS 2S W+2 -180 15.7 87.22
3 NS 6C N = 980 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 56,30 %
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,26 % 4 NS 4C E = -620 3.4 18.89
5 NS 1P S = 80 2.3 12.78
6 NS 4P W-1 100 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 35,37 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 50,88 % 7 NS 4P N = 620 12.3 68.33
8 NS 2S S-2 -100 4.6 25.56
9 NS 2CcS-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 51,65 %10 NS 2S E+1 -150 4.6 25.56
11 NS 2C W+1 -140 3.4 18.89
12 NS 2P N+2 170 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
22 MOSSERAY Bernadette -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,49 %13 NS 3S S-1 -100 4.6 25.56
14 NS 3K S+1 130 10.1 56.11
15 NS 3S E-2 100 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
21 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,86 %16 NS 4P N-3 -150 2.3 12.78
17 NS 6P N = 980 14.6 81.11
18 NS 4C E-1 50 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
19 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 55,25 %22 NS 4P S = 420 17.9 99.44
23 NS 3C S = 140 15.7 87.22
24 NS 4P W+1 -450 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 80,93 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 49,86 %25 NS 3P S-1 -50 16.8 93.33
26 NS 3K E+1 -130 2.3 12.78
27 NS 3S S+1 430 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
17 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 52,59 %28 NS 3S W+1 -430 1 5.56
29 NS 4C N = 620 14 77.78
30 NS 4C N = 420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
16 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 44,32 %31 NS 1S W+1 -120 12.3 68.33
32 NS 2C S+1 140 5.7 31.67
33 NS 1S N+1 120 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
Total : 287,8 / 540 = 53,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 LIBERT Laurent -de WASSEIGE Ariane
17 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 52,59 % 1 NS 4C S+2 480 14.6 81.11
2 NS 3P S-1 -100 17.9 99.44
3 NS 6S N = 990 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 82,96 %
16 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 44,32 % 4 NS 3C E = -140 6.8 37.78
5 NS 3KcS+2 1070 17.9 99.44
6 NS 4PcE-1 200 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 78,89 %
15 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 48,72 % 7 NS 2P N+2 170 2.3 12.78
8 NS 2S N+3 210 17.9 99.44
9 NS 3T W = -110 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,26 %10 NS 3ScE-2 500 17.9 99.44
11 NS 2C W+1 -140 3.4 18.89
12 NS 4P N-1 -100 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 45,74 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 50,88 %13 NS 3P S-2 -200 1.2 6.67
14 NS 2P N+1 140 15.7 87.22
15 NS 4P E = -420 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 51,65 %16 NS 4P N-1 -50 11.2 62.22
17 NS 6S N-1 -50 0.1 0.56
18 NS Pass -420 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 21,11 %
22 MOSSERAY Bernadette -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,49 %19 NS 4P W-1 100 11.2 62.22
20 NS 2P W-1 100 4.6 25.56
21 NS 3C S-2 -200 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
20 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 49,12 %25 NS 4PcN-1 -100 12.3 68.33
26 NS 4C N = 620 17.9 99.44
27 NS 3S S = 400 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
19 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 55,25 %28 NS 3S W = -400 7 38.89
29 NS 4C N-1 -100 3 16.67
30 NS 4PcW-2 300 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 49,86 %31 NS 1S W = -90 17.9 99.44
32 NS 2S E-2 200 15.7 87.22
33 NS 2ScE-2 300 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 95,37 %
Total : 295,6 / 540 = 54,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
19 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 55,25 % 1 NS 3C S+3 230 5.7 31.67
2 NS 3TcN-4 -1100 0.1 0.56
3 NS 3S N+3 490 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 10,93 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 49,86 % 4 NS 4C E-1 100 11.2 62.22
5 NS 2K S+3 150 7.9 43.89
6 NS 4P W-1 100 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 60,19 %
17 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 52,59 % 7 NS 4P N = 620 12.3 68.33
8 NS 1S S = 90 13.4 74.44
9 NS 1S W = -90 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
16 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 44,32 %10 NS 3C W = -140 7.9 43.89
11 NS 2C W = -110 9 50.00
12 NS 3P N+1 170 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
15 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 48,72 %13 NS 3K W-3 300 17.9 99.44
14 NS 3K S+1 130 10.1 56.11
15 NS 4P W = -420 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,26 %16 NS 4C W-2 200 16.8 93.33
17 NS 6P S = 980 14.6 81.11
18 NS 6C E-2 100 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 87,22 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 50,88 %19 NS 4P W-1 100 11.2 62.22
20 NS 3CcS = 730 17.9 99.44
21 NS 2P E = -110 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 78,70 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 51,65 %22 NS 4P N-1 -50 3.4 18.89
23 NS 2C S+1 140 15.7 87.22
24 NS 4P W+1 -450 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
21 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,86 %28 NS 3S W+1 -430 1 5.56
29 NS 4C N-1 -100 3 16.67
30 NS 4C N = 420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
20 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 49,12 %31 NS 1S W+1 -120 12.3 68.33
32 NS 3S N+1 430 17.9 99.44
33 NS 2C E-2 100 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
Total : 314,4 / 540 = 58,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 -
21 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,86 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
20 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 49,12 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 55,25 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 49,86 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 52,59 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
16 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 44,32 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
15 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 48,72 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,26 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 50,88 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
22 MOSSERAY Bernadette -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,49 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 594 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
1 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Fernand : 51,94 % 1 EO 4C S+2 480 3.4 18.89
2 EO 3S W+1 -430 5.7 31.67
3 EO 6S S = 990 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 27,41 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 37,33 % 4 EO 5CcE-1 200 3.4 18.89
5 EO 1P S+1 110 13.4 74.44
6 EO 4C N-3 -150 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 55,93 %
2 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -CASSART Guy : 54,91 % 7 EO 4P N = 620 5.7 31.67
8 EO 2C S-2 -100 13.4 74.44
9 EO 1S W = -90 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,30 %10 EO 2S E+1 -150 13.4 74.44
11 EO 2C W+1 -140 14.6 81.11
12 EO 2P N+2 170 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
3 WARNIER François -rosoux : 46,85 %13 EO 2S S+1 150 2.3 12.78
14 EO 2P N-1 -50 17.9 99.44
15 EO 4P E-1 50 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 43,70 %
9 LIBERT Laurent -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 54,74 %16 EO 4P N-1 -50 6.8 37.78
17 EO 6S N-1 -50 17.9 99.44
18 EO Pass -420 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 78,89 %
4 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,76 %19 EO 4P W = -620 16.8 93.33
20 EO 3P E-2 200 2.3 12.78
21 EO 2P E+1 -140 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
10 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,22 %22 EO 4P N-1 -50 14.6 81.11
23 EO 2C S+1 140 2.3 12.78
24 EO 4P W+1 -450 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 49,54 %25 EO 3P N-1 -50 1.2 6.67
26 EO 5C N-2 -200 17.9 99.44
27 EO 3S N+1 430 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
6 laenens -VERBOIS Léon : 53,24 %31 EO 1S W+1 -120 5.7 31.67
32 EO 3C S+1 170 6.8 37.78
33 EO 2ScN-1 -100 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 54,26 %
Total : 278,9 / 540 = 51,65 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine
7 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 37,33 % 1 EO 3P E = -140 17.9 99.44
2 EO 3PcS-2 -500 12.3 68.33
3 EO 6C N = 980 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 78,70 %
2 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -CASSART Guy : 54,91 % 4 EO 4C E = -620 14.6 81.11
5 EO 5K S+1 620 2.3 12.78
6 EO 4P W-1 100 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 39,81 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,30 % 7 EO 4P N = 620 5.7 31.67
8 EO 2S S-2 -100 13.4 74.44
9 EO 2CcS-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
3 WARNIER François -rosoux : 46,85 %10 EO 3S E = -600 17.9 99.44
11 EO 2C W+2 -170 17.9 99.44
12 EO 4PcN+1 990 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
9 LIBERT Laurent -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 54,74 %13 EO 3P S-2 -200 16.8 93.33
14 EO 2P N+1 140 2.3 12.78
15 EO 4P E = -420 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
4 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,76 %16 EO 3C W = -140 13.4 74.44
17 EO 4P N+2 480 12.3 68.33
18 EO 4P E-1 50 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 66,30 %
10 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,22 %19 EO 4P W-1 100 6.8 37.78
20 EO 3CcS = 730 0.1 0.56
21 EO 2P E = -110 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 21,30 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 49,54 %22 EO 4P N-1 -50 14.6 81.11
23 EO 2C N+1 140 2.3 12.78
24 EO 4P E+1 -450 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
11 - : 0,00 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 laenens -VERBOIS Léon : 53,24 %28 EO 2K N-2 -200 6 33.33
29 EO 2S S+1 150 6 33.33
30 EO 4C N = 420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 247,3 / 486 = 50,88 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,30 % 4 EO 4C E = -620 14.6 81.11
5 EO 1P S = 80 15.7 87.22
6 EO 4P W-1 100 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 64,63 %
3 WARNIER François -rosoux : 46,85 % 7 EO 4P N = 620 5.7 31.67
8 EO 2T E-2 100 2.3 12.78
9 EO 2ScN-4 -800 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
9 LIBERT Laurent -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 54,74 %10 EO 3ScE-2 500 0.1 0.56
11 EO 2C W+1 -140 14.6 81.11
12 EO 4P N-1 -100 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 54,26 %
4 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,76 %13 EO 2S S = 120 9 50.00
14 EO 2P N = 110 13.4 74.44
15 EO 3S W+2 -460 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 74,63 %
10 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,22 %16 EO 4C W-2 200 1.2 6.67
17 EO 6P S = 980 3.4 18.89
18 EO 6C E-2 100 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 12,78 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 49,54 %19 EO 5K N-2 -100 11.2 62.22
20 EO 2C N+1 140 6.8 37.78
21 EO 2P E = -110 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
11 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 laenens -VERBOIS Léon : 53,24 %25 EO 1S E+5 -240 15.7 87.22
26 EO 5C E-1 100 5.7 31.67
27 EO 3S S+1 430 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 50,19 %
1 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Fernand : 51,94 %28 EO 3S W = -400 11 61.11
29 EO 3S S+1 630 1 5.56
30 EO 4CcN = 880 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 37,33 %31 EO 2T S-3 -300 17.9 99.44
32 EO 2C S = 110 15.7 87.22
33 EO 3T N = 110 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 74,81 %
Total : 239,4 / 486 = 49,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,30 % 1 EO 3PcE-2 300 9 50.00
2 EO 2S W+2 -180 2.3 12.78
3 EO 6C N = 980 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 43,70 %
9 LIBERT Laurent -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 54,74 % 7 EO 2P N+2 170 15.7 87.22
8 EO 2S N+3 210 0.1 0.56
9 EO 3T W = -110 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,76 %10 EO 2K N+1 110 3.4 18.89
11 EO 1P E = -80 2.3 12.78
12 EO 4T E = -130 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 43,70 %
10 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,22 %13 EO 3K W-3 300 0.1 0.56
14 EO 3K S+1 130 7.9 43.89
15 EO 4P W = -420 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 49,54 %16 EO 2C E = -110 11.2 62.22
17 EO 6P N = 980 3.4 18.89
18 EO 4C E-1 50 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 45,74 %
11 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 laenens -VERBOIS Léon : 53,24 %22 EO 3P N = 140 4.6 25.56
23 EO 2KcW+1 -380 17.9 99.44
24 EO 5CcN-4 -800 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 72,78 %
1 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Fernand : 51,94 %25 EO 3C W = -140 10.1 56.11
26 EO 3K E-1 100 5.7 31.67
27 EO 5C S-2 -100 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 37,33 %28 EO 2S W+1 -150 4 22.22
29 EO 3T S = 110 12 66.67
30 EO 4C N = 420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
2 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -CASSART Guy : 54,91 %31 EO 1S W+2 -150 14.6 81.11
32 EO 3C S+1 170 6.8 37.78
33 EO 1S N+1 120 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
Total : 236,8 / 486 = 48,72 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
3 WARNIER François -rosoux : 46,85 % 1 EO 4P E-3 150 15.7 87.22
2 EO 3PcS-3 -800 15.7 87.22
3 EO 6S N+1 1020 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
9 LIBERT Laurent -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 54,74 % 4 EO 3C E = -140 11.2 62.22
5 EO 3KcS+2 1070 0.1 0.56
6 EO 4PcE-1 200 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 21,11 %
10 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,22 %10 EO 3C W = -140 10.1 56.11
11 EO 2C W = -110 9 50.00
12 EO 3P N+1 170 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 49,54 %13 EO 3P N = 140 4.6 25.56
14 EO 4K N = 130 7.9 43.89
15 EO 4P E = -420 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
11 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 laenens -VERBOIS Léon : 53,24 %19 EO 5P W-1 100 6.8 37.78
20 EO 3C S = 140 6.8 37.78
21 EO 2P W = -110 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 33,70 %
1 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Fernand : 51,94 %22 EO 4P S-1 -50 14.6 81.11
23 EO 1S S-1 -100 7.9 43.89
24 EO 6P W-1 50 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 37,33 %25 EO 3PcS-3 -500 17.9 99.44
26 EO 3K E = -110 12.3 68.33
27 EO 3S S+1 430 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
2 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -CASSART Guy : 54,91 %28 EO 3S W = -400 11 61.11
29 EO 3S S+1 630 1 5.56
30 EO 4PcW-1 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,30 %31 EO 1S W+1 -120 5.7 31.67
32 EO 2C S+1 140 12.3 68.33
33 EO 1S N+1 120 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
Total : 215,4 / 486 = 44,32 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier
9 LIBERT Laurent -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 54,74 % 1 EO 4C S+2 480 3.4 18.89
2 EO 3P S-1 -100 0.1 0.56
3 EO 6S N = 990 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 17,04 %
4 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,76 % 4 EO 4PcN-3 -800 17.9 99.44
5 EO 3P S-1 -100 17.9 99.44
6 EO 3P W+1 -170 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 95,37 %
10 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,22 % 7 EO 4P N = 620 5.7 31.67
8 EO 1S S = 90 4.6 25.56
9 EO 1S W = -90 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
11 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 laenens -VERBOIS Léon : 53,24 %16 EO 3P S-2 -100 9 50.00
17 EO 4P S+2 480 12.3 68.33
18 EO 5CcE-2 300 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
1 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Fernand : 51,94 %19 EO 5PcW-1 200 2.3 12.78
20 EO 4C S-1 -100 16.8 93.33
21 EO 3C S-2 -200 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 37,33 %22 EO 3P N = 140 4.6 25.56
23 EO 4C N-2 -200 14.6 81.11
24 EO 5CcN-4 -800 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
2 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -CASSART Guy : 54,91 %25 EO 4P S-2 -100 5.7 31.67
26 EO 4C N-1 -100 9 50.00
27 EO 3S S+1 430 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,30 %28 EO 3S W+1 -430 17 94.44
29 EO 4C N = 620 4 22.22
30 EO 4C N = 420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 WARNIER François -rosoux : 46,85 %31 EO 1S W+1 -120 5.7 31.67
32 EO 2P W+1 -140 17.9 99.44
33 EO 2TcN-1 -100 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 74,81 %
Total : 255,6 / 486 = 52,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
4 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,76 % 1 EO 4C S+2 480 3.4 18.89
2 EO 3S W+1 -430 5.7 31.67
3 EO 6K S = 920 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
10 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,22 % 4 EO 4C E-1 100 6.8 37.78
5 EO 2K S+3 150 10.1 56.11
6 EO 4P W-1 100 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 39,81 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 49,54 % 7 EO 3CcE-1 200 13.4 74.44
8 EO 1S N-1 -50 7.9 43.89
9 EO 2C N-4 -200 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
11 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Fernand : 51,94 %16 EO 4K S-4 -200 17.9 99.44
17 EO 4P N+3 510 9 50.00
18 EO 4C E-1 50 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 37,33 %19 EO 4P W = -620 16.8 93.33
20 EO 3C S-1 -100 16.8 93.33
21 EO 2P E = -110 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 70,74 %
2 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -CASSART Guy : 54,91 %22 EO 4P N-1 -50 14.6 81.11
23 EO 3K W = -110 11.2 62.22
24 EO 5P W = -450 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,30 %25 EO 3P S-1 -50 1.2 6.67
26 EO 3K E+1 -130 15.7 87.22
27 EO 3S S+1 430 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
3 WARNIER François -rosoux : 46,85 %28 EO 3S W-1 50 1 5.56
29 EO 2C N+1 140 9 50.00
30 EO 4CcE-1 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
9 LIBERT Laurent -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 54,74 %31 EO 1S W = -90 0.1 0.56
32 EO 2S E-2 200 2.3 12.78
33 EO 2ScE-2 300 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 4,63 %
Total : 242,3 / 486 = 49,86 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
10 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,22 % 1 EO 3C S+3 230 12.3 68.33
2 EO 3TcN-4 -1100 17.9 99.44
3 EO 3S N+3 490 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 89,07 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 49,54 % 4 EO 3T E = -110 9 50.00
5 EO 4K N+2 170 5.7 31.67
6 EO 4C N-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
11 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 laenens -VERBOIS Léon : 53,24 %10 EO 3K N-1 -100 6.8 37.78
11 EO 2C W = -110 9 50.00
12 EO 3P N-1 -100 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 56,30 %
1 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Fernand : 51,94 %13 EO 3P S-2 -200 16.8 93.33
14 EO 4K S = 130 7.9 43.89
15 EO 4P W = -420 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
2 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -CASSART Guy : 54,91 %19 EO 6KcN-2 -300 13.4 74.44
20 EO 2C S+1 140 6.8 37.78
21 EO 3T W = -110 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,30 %22 EO 4P S = 420 0.1 0.56
23 EO 3C S = 140 2.3 12.78
24 EO 4P W+1 -450 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 19,07 %
3 WARNIER François -rosoux : 46,85 %25 EO 3C W+2 -200 13.4 74.44
26 EO 3C N = 140 2.3 12.78
27 EO 3S S = 400 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
9 LIBERT Laurent -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 54,74 %28 EO 3S W = -400 11 61.11
29 EO 4C N-1 -100 15 83.33
30 EO 4PcW-2 300 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
4 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,76 %31 EO 2K W+2 -130 11.2 62.22
32 EO 3C S+1 170 6.8 37.78
33 EO 2C W-2 100 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
Total : 268,5 / 486 = 55,25 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 49,54 % 1 EO 2C N+4 230 12.3 68.33
2 EO 3S E+2 -460 9 50.00
3 EO 6S N = 990 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 laenens -VERBOIS Léon : 53,24 % 7 EO 4P N = 620 5.7 31.67
8 EO 3S N-3 -150 17.9 99.44
9 EO 2C E-2 200 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
1 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Fernand : 51,94 %10 EO 2C E+1 -140 10.1 56.11
11 EO 1S S-1 -50 0.1 0.56
12 EO 3P N = 140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 37,33 %13 EO 2S S = 120 9 50.00
14 EO 2C W-1 50 15.7 87.22
15 EO 3S W+1 -430 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 74,81 %
2 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -CASSART Guy : 54,91 %16 EO 4C W-2 200 1.2 6.67
17 EO 3S N+2 460 15.7 87.22
18 EO 4C E-1 50 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 WARNIER François -rosoux : 46,85 %22 EO 2P S+1 140 4.6 25.56
23 EO 2S S-2 -200 14.6 81.11
24 EO 5P W = -450 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 50,19 %
9 LIBERT Laurent -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 54,74 %25 EO 4PcN-1 -100 5.7 31.67
26 EO 4C N = 620 0.1 0.56
27 EO 3S S = 400 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
4 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,76 %28 EO 3S W = -400 11 61.11
29 EO 2C N+1 140 9 50.00
30 EO 6CcN-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
10 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,22 %31 EO 1S W+1 -120 5.7 31.67
32 EO 3S N+1 430 0.1 0.56
33 EO 2C E-2 100 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
Total : 238,7 / 486 = 49,12 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
11 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 laenens -VERBOIS Léon : 53,24 % 4 EO 6CcE-3 800 0.1 0.56
5 EO 4K S+2 170 5.7 31.67
6 EO 5CcN-3 -500 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
1 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Fernand : 51,94 % 7 EO 4P N = 620 5.7 31.67
8 EO 3S N-1 -50 7.9 43.89
9 EO 2S N-3 -150 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 37,33 %10 EO 3K N = 110 3.4 18.89
11 EO 2S S-2 -100 4.6 25.56
12 EO 4TcE-1 100 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
2 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -CASSART Guy : 54,91 %13 EO 2S S = 120 9 50.00
14 EO 3S S = 400 0.1 0.56
15 EO 4P E-1 50 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 23,15 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,30 %16 EO 4P N-3 -150 15.7 87.22
17 EO 6P N = 980 3.4 18.89
18 EO 4C E-1 50 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
3 WARNIER François -rosoux : 46,85 %19 EO 5PcW-2 500 0.1 0.56
20 EO 2C S = 110 11.2 62.22
21 EO 3C S-3 -300 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
4 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,76 %25 EO 2C W+1 -140 10.1 56.11
26 EO 3K E = -110 12.3 68.33
27 EO 3S S+1 430 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
10 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,22 %28 EO 3S W+1 -430 17 94.44
29 EO 4C N-1 -100 15 83.33
30 EO 4C N = 420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 49,54 %31 EO 1S E+2 -150 14.6 81.11
32 EO 3C N = 140 12.3 68.33
33 EO 1S N = 90 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 74,63 %
Total : 247,2 / 486 = 50,86 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 MOSSERAY Bernadette -de NICOLAS Bernard
6 laenens -VERBOIS Léon : 53,24 % 1 EO 4C S+2 480 3.4 18.89
2 EO 3PcS-2 -500 12.3 68.33
3 EO 6S N = 990 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
1 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Fernand : 51,94 % 4 EO 5K W-2 200 3.4 18.89
5 EO 2K S+3 150 10.1 56.11
6 EO 3P W = -140 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 45,74 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 37,33 % 7 EO 2P N+1 140 17.9 99.44
8 EO 2S N-2 -100 13.4 74.44
9 EO 1S N-1 -50 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
2 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -CASSART Guy : 54,91 %10 EO 2C S-2 -200 15.7 87.22
11 EO 2C E = -110 9 50.00
12 EO 3PcN+1 930 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,30 %13 EO 3S S-1 -100 13.4 74.44
14 EO 3K S+1 130 7.9 43.89
15 EO 3S E-2 100 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
3 WARNIER François -rosoux : 46,85 %16 EO 2P N = 110 4.6 25.56
17 EO 6P N = 980 3.4 18.89
18 EO 4C E-1 50 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
9 LIBERT Laurent -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 54,74 %19 EO 4P W-1 100 6.8 37.78
20 EO 2P W-1 100 13.4 74.44
21 EO 3C S-2 -200 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
4 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,76 %22 EO 3C E-1 100 9 50.00
23 EO 4C S-1 -100 7.9 43.89
24 EO 4P W+1 -450 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 49,54 %28 EO 3S E-1 50 1 5.56
29 EO 4C N-2 -200 18 100.00
30 EO 4C N = 420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
11 - : 0,00 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 230,8 / 486 = 47,49 %
|
|