|
Tournoi du 10-08-15
Lundi
1 62,59 A10 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
2 57,04 A.4 BABIKOW Georges -VAN SICHELEN Sylvie
3 55,93 A.8 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy
4 52,41 A.3 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte
5 51,11 A.6 LIGOT Xavier -LENAERTS Pol
6 50,37 A.2 BRIOT Fernand -de WASSEIGE Ariane
7 47,96 A11 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
8 44,81 A.9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph
9 43,15 A.7 LEBRUN Robert -HUBERT Charles
10 42,78 A.5 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette
11 41,85 A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 58,92 a.4 BASECQ Christian -BUSQUIN Philippe
2 57,07 a.2 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
3 56,06 a.7 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno
4 52,02 a11 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
5 51,18 a10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
6 50,67 a.6 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
7 48,32 a.8 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
8 46,46 a.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
9 42,42 a.5 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger
10 36,87 a.3 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne
11 0,00 a.1 -
PAIRE Nr : A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
a.1 - : 0,00 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a11 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,02 % 4 NS 6S E = -1440 2 11.11
5 NS 2C N-2 -200 1 5.56
6 NS 4C S-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
a10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 51,18 % 7 NS 4P E = -620 1 5.56
8 NS 1S S+1 120 11 61.11
9 NS 1S S+2 150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,46 %10 NS 2K E+1 -110 4 22.22
11 NS 3P S+1 170 14 77.78
12 NS 3T N = 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.8 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 48,32 %13 NS 2K S-2 -200 0 0.00
14 NS 4P E = -420 5 27.78
15 NS 4C S+1 650 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.7 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 56,06 %16 NS 6C N = 980 16 88.89
17 NS 3S S+1 430 8 44.44
18 NS 2P S = 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.6 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,67 %19 NS 4P W-2 200 17 94.44
20 NS 2C N = 110 14 77.78
21 NS 2P E+2 -170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.5 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 42,42 %22 NS 3S N-1 -50 2 11.11
23 NS 3P N = 140 17 94.44
24 NS 7P W-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.4 BASECQ Christian -BUSQUIN Philippe : 58,92 %25 NS 3K W-1 100 4 22.22
26 NS 4C W+1 -650 0 0.00
27 NS 3S N+2 460 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.3 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 36,87 %28 NS 3S W = -400 4 22.22
29 NS 4PcE-1 200 16 88.89
30 NS 4C E = -420 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a.2 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,07 %31 NS 3C W-1 50 3 16.67
32 NS 2C W+1 -140 0 0.00
33 NS 2C W = -110 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
Total : 226,0 / 540 = 41,85 %
PAIRE Nr : A.2 BRIOT Fernand -de WASSEIGE Ariane
a.3 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 36,87 % 1 NS 3C N-1 -50 8 44.44
2 NS 4P N+1 650 14 77.78
3 NS 5T N-2 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.2 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,07 % 4 NS 6P W = -1430 7 38.89
5 NS 3T E = -110 12 66.67
6 NS 4C N = 420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.1 - : 0,00 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a11 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,02 %10 NS 3S E-2 200 15 83.33
11 NS 4P S-1 -50 6 33.33
12 NS 3S S = 600 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 51,18 %13 NS 2C E = -110 8 44.44
14 NS 4P E = -420 5 27.78
15 NS 4C S+1 650 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,46 %16 NS 5C N+1 480 6 33.33
17 NS 3S S+1 430 8 44.44
18 NS 4P S-1 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.8 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 48,32 %19 NS 3P E+1 -170 7 38.89
20 NS 3C N-2 -200 3 16.67
21 NS 1S W = -90 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.7 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 56,06 %22 NS 3S N+1 430 11 61.11
23 NS 2P N = 110 11 61.11
24 NS 6P W = -980 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.6 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,67 %25 NS 2P N = 110 9 50.00
26 NS 3S W = -600 4 22.22
27 NS 3S N+2 460 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.5 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 42,42 %28 NS 3S W-1 50 17 94.44
29 NS 5TcN-1 -200 0 0.00
30 NS 6S E+1 -1020 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.4 BASECQ Christian -BUSQUIN Philippe : 58,92 %31 NS 3P N+1 170 14 77.78
32 NS 4T N = 130 8 44.44
33 NS 4T N = 130 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 272,0 / 540 = 50,37 %
PAIRE Nr : A.3 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte
a.5 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 42,42 % 1 NS 3S S = 400 16 88.89
2 NS 4P N-1 -100 3 16.67
3 NS 5TcN-2 -300 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.4 BASECQ Christian -BUSQUIN Philippe : 58,92 % 4 NS 6S E = -1440 2 11.11
5 NS 2S E = -120 9 50.00
6 NS 4C N = 420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.3 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 36,87 % 7 NS 3C S = 140 17 94.44
8 NS 1S S+2 150 18 100.00
9 NS 2P N = 110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a.2 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,07 %10 NS 2C E = -110 4 22.22
11 NS 2PcS+2 670 18 100.00
12 NS 5TcN-2 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.1 - : 0,00 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a11 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,02 %16 NS 4C N+2 480 6 33.33
17 NS 3S S+1 430 8 44.44
18 NS 3P S = 140 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 51,18 %19 NS 4P E-1 100 12 66.67
20 NS 2P E-1 100 12 66.67
21 NS 2P E+1 -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,46 %22 NS 3S N = 400 7 38.89
23 NS 2P N+1 140 17 94.44
24 NS 4P E+2 -480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.8 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 48,32 %25 NS 2P N = 110 9 50.00
26 NS 2P S-1 -100 13 72.22
27 NS 3S N+2 460 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.7 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 56,06 %28 NS 3S W = -400 4 22.22
29 NS 3T N+1 130 10 55.56
30 NS 3S E+3 -490 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.6 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,67 %31 NS 3P N+1 170 14 77.78
32 NS 4T N = 130 8 44.44
33 NS 4T S-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 283,0 / 540 = 52,41 %
PAIRE Nr : A.4 BABIKOW Georges -VAN SICHELEN Sylvie
a.7 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 56,06 % 1 NS 3S S-2 -100 2 11.11
2 NS 4P N = 620 9 50.00
3 NS 3S N = 400 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.6 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,67 % 4 NS 4P W+2 -680 13 72.22
5 NS 3S W-1 50 17 94.44
6 NS 4C N = 420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
a.5 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 42,42 % 7 NS 4T E-1 100 14 77.78
8 NS 1S S+1 120 11 61.11
9 NS 3S S+1 430 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.4 BASECQ Christian -BUSQUIN Philippe : 58,92 %10 NS 3K E = -110 4 22.22
11 NS 2P S+2 170 14 77.78
12 NS 3T N+1 130 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.3 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 36,87 %13 NS 2P W-1 100 17 94.44
14 NS 3P E+1 -170 13 72.22
15 NS 4C S = 620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.2 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,07 %16 NS 4C N+2 480 6 33.33
17 NS 3S S+1 430 8 44.44
18 NS 4P S-1 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.1 - : 0,00 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a11 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,02 %22 NS 1CcW-2 500 15 83.33
23 NS 2P N = 110 11 61.11
24 NS 6P W = -980 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 51,18 %25 NS 2P N-1 -50 2 11.11
26 NS 3C E = -140 9 50.00
27 NS 3S N+2 460 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,46 %28 NS 3S W = -400 4 22.22
29 NS 1P E+1 -110 4 22.22
30 NS 4C W+1 -450 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.8 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 48,32 %31 NS 2P N+2 170 14 77.78
32 NS 3P S = 140 12 66.67
33 NS 3K N+1 130 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
Total : 308,0 / 540 = 57,04 %
PAIRE Nr : A.5 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette
a.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,46 % 1 NS 3S S-2 -100 2 11.11
2 NS 4P N+1 650 14 77.78
3 NS 3S S+1 430 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.8 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 48,32 % 4 NS 7P W-1 100 17 94.44
5 NS 2T W+2 -130 6 33.33
6 NS 4C N-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.7 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 56,06 % 7 NS 4T E = -130 9 50.00
8 NS 1S S+1 120 11 61.11
9 NS 2P N = 110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.6 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,67 %10 NS 2C W-1 100 12 66.67
11 NS 3C E = -140 2 11.11
12 NS 3T N = 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.5 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 42,42 %13 NS 1K S-1 -100 13 72.22
14 NS 4P E-1 50 17 94.44
15 NS 4C S = 620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.4 BASECQ Christian -BUSQUIN Philippe : 58,92 %16 NS 5C N+1 480 6 33.33
17 NS 3S N+2 460 17 94.44
18 NS 4P S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.3 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 36,87 %19 NS 4P W-1 100 12 66.67
20 NS 3C N-1 -100 9 50.00
21 NS 1S W+1 -120 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.2 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,07 %22 NS 3S N-2 -100 0 0.00
23 NS 2P N = 110 11 61.11
24 NS 6P W = -980 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
a.1 - : 0,00 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a11 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,02 %28 NS 3S W = -400 4 22.22
29 NS 3P E+1 -170 2 11.11
30 NS 3S E+4 -520 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
a10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 51,18 %31 NS 3T E-1 50 3 16.67
32 NS 3T N = 110 4 22.22
33 NS 2C E = -110 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
Total : 231,0 / 540 = 42,78 %
PAIRE Nr : A.6 LIGOT Xavier -LENAERTS Pol
a11 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,02 % 1 NS 3S S+1 430 18 100.00
2 NS 4P N-1 -100 3 16.67
3 NS 4C S-8 -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 51,18 % 4 NS 6P W = -1430 7 38.89
5 NS 2S W = -120 9 50.00
6 NS 3S N+1 430 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,46 % 7 NS 3C S-3 -300 4 22.22
8 NS 1S S+1 120 11 61.11
9 NS 3S N = 400 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.8 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 48,32 %10 NS 1S E = -90 10 55.56
11 NS 3C E-3 150 10 55.56
12 NS 3P N-1 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.7 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 56,06 %13 NS 2C E = -110 8 44.44
14 NS 2K W-1 50 17 94.44
15 NS 4C S+1 650 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.6 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,67 %16 NS 6C N = 980 16 88.89
17 NS 2S N+2 180 0 0.00
18 NS 4P S-1 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.5 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 42,42 %19 NS 4P E-1 100 12 66.67
20 NS 3K E-2 200 16 88.89
21 NS 1P E+3 -170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.4 BASECQ Christian -BUSQUIN Philippe : 58,92 %22 NS 3S N+1 430 11 61.11
23 NS 2P N-1 -100 3 16.67
24 NS 7P W-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.3 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 36,87 %25 NS 2P N+1 140 16 88.89
26 NS 4C E = -620 2 11.11
27 NS 3S N+2 460 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,07 %28 NS 4P W-1 50 17 94.44
29 NS 2C W-1 100 6 33.33
30 NS 6S E+1 -1020 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.1 - : 0,00 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 276,0 / 540 = 51,11 %
PAIRE Nr : A.7 LEBRUN Robert -HUBERT Charles
a.2 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,07 % 1 NS 2S S-1 -50 8 44.44
2 NS 4C N-1 -100 3 16.67
3 NS 3K W+1 -130 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.1 - : 0,00 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a11 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,02 % 7 NS 3C S-2 -200 6 33.33
8 NS 1S S+1 120 11 61.11
9 NS 1S S+1 120 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 51,18 %10 NS 3K E = -110 4 22.22
11 NS 3P S-2 -100 4 22.22
12 NS 3T N = 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,46 %13 NS 2C E-1 100 17 94.44
14 NS 3P E+1 -170 13 72.22
15 NS 5TcW-3 500 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.8 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 48,32 %16 NS 4C N+2 480 6 33.33
17 NS 3S S = 400 2 11.11
18 NS 3P S = 140 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.7 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 56,06 %19 NS 3S E+1 -630 0 0.00
20 NS 2C N-2 -200 3 16.67
21 NS 1S W+2 -150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.6 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,67 %22 NS 2C E-2 200 4 22.22
23 NS 2K E = -90 6 33.33
24 NS 6S W-3 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.5 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 42,42 %25 NS 2P N-2 -100 0 0.00
26 NS 2P S-1 -100 13 72.22
27 NS 4C N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.4 BASECQ Christian -BUSQUIN Philippe : 58,92 %28 NS 1S W+2 -150 12 66.67
29 NS 4P E-2 200 16 88.89
30 NS 4C E+2 -480 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.3 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 36,87 %31 NS 2C W-1 50 3 16.67
32 NS 5T S = 400 16 88.89
33 NS 2T S+1 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 233,0 / 540 = 43,15 %
PAIRE Nr : A.8 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy
a.4 BASECQ Christian -BUSQUIN Philippe : 58,92 % 1 NS 3S S-2 -100 2 11.11
2 NS 4P N-1 -100 3 16.67
3 NS 5C E-1 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.3 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 36,87 % 4 NS 6P W-1 100 17 94.44
5 NS 3T E-1 50 17 94.44
6 NS 4C N = 420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
a.2 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,07 % 7 NS 3C S = 140 17 94.44
8 NS 1S S+1 120 11 61.11
9 NS 3S S = 400 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
a.1 - : 0,00 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a11 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,02 %13 NS 1S S-1 -100 13 72.22
14 NS 4P E = -420 5 27.78
15 NS 3P N = 140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 51,18 %16 NS 4C N+2 480 6 33.33
17 NS 3S S+2 460 17 94.44
18 NS 4P S-1 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,46 %19 NS 3P E+1 -170 7 38.89
20 NS 2T W-3 300 18 100.00
21 NS 2C E+2 -170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.8 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 48,32 %22 NS 2CcE-2 500 15 83.33
23 NS 2P N = 110 11 61.11
24 NS 6P W = -980 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.7 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 56,06 %25 NS 2P N+1 140 16 88.89
26 NS 4C E-1 100 16 88.89
27 NS 3S N+2 460 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.6 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,67 %28 NS 3S W = -400 4 22.22
29 NS 3T N+1 130 10 55.56
30 NS 3S E+3 -490 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.5 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 42,42 %31 NS 3C W-1 50 3 16.67
32 NS 3CcW-2 500 18 100.00
33 NS 2C E-2 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 302,0 / 540 = 55,93 %
PAIRE Nr : A.9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph
a.6 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,67 % 1 NS 2S S = 120 12 66.67
2 NS 4P N+1 650 14 77.78
3 NS 4T N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.5 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 42,42 % 4 NS 5P W+1 -680 13 72.22
5 NS Pass Passe 14 77.78
6 NS 2C S+1 140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.4 BASECQ Christian -BUSQUIN Philippe : 58,92 % 7 NS 4P E = -620 1 5.56
8 NS 1S S = 90 4 22.22
9 NS 3S S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
a.3 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 36,87 %10 NS 3S E-4 400 18 100.00
11 NS 2P S = 110 8 44.44
12 NS 3S S-1 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.2 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,07 %13 NS 1P W+2 -140 3 16.67
14 NS 4P E = -420 5 27.78
15 NS 5TcW-4 800 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.1 - : 0,00 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a11 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,02 %19 NS 3S E = -600 3 16.67
20 NS 2C S-1 -100 9 50.00
21 NS 1S W+1 -120 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 51,18 %22 NS 3S S = 400 7 38.89
23 NS 3S S-1 -100 3 16.67
24 NS 4P W+2 -480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,46 %25 NS 2P N = 110 9 50.00
26 NS 2C E+1 -140 9 50.00
27 NS 3S N+1 430 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.8 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 48,32 %28 NS 1S W+2 -150 12 66.67
29 NS 3T N+1 130 10 55.56
30 NS 4C W+2 -480 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.7 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 56,06 %31 NS 2P N+1 140 10 55.56
32 NS 4P S-2 -100 2 11.11
33 NS 1S W = -90 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
Total : 242,0 / 540 = 44,81 %
PAIRE Nr : A10 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
a.8 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 48,32 % 1 NS 2S S+2 180 14 77.78
2 NS 4P N = 620 9 50.00
3 NS 5T N-2 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.7 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 56,06 % 4 NS 6S E = -1440 2 11.11
5 NS 2C S-2 -200 1 5.56
6 NS 3C N = 140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
a.6 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,67 % 7 NS 3T E+1 -130 9 50.00
8 NS 1S S-1 -50 2 11.11
9 NS 3S S = 400 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.5 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 42,42 %10 NS 2C W-2 200 15 83.33
11 NS 3P S+1 170 14 77.78
12 NS 4KcW-3 500 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a.4 BASECQ Christian -BUSQUIN Philippe : 58,92 %13 NS 2P W+1 -140 3 16.67
14 NS 4P E = -420 5 27.78
15 NS 5TcE-4 800 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.3 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 36,87 %16 NS 4C N+2 480 6 33.33
17 NS 4P S+1 450 14 77.78
18 NS 3P S = 140 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.2 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,07 %19 NS 4P W-2 200 17 94.44
20 NS 2K E+1 -110 6 33.33
21 NS 2P W+2 -170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.1 - : 0,00 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a11 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,02 %25 NS 2P N+1 140 16 88.89
26 NS 2S W-2 200 18 100.00
27 NS 3S N+3 490 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
a10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 51,18 %28 NS 1S W+2 -150 12 66.67
29 NS 4P E-2 200 16 88.89
30 NS 4C W+1 -450 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
a.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,46 %31 NS 2P N+3 200 18 100.00
32 NS 3C W-2 200 14 77.78
33 NS 1S N+3 180 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
Total : 338,0 / 540 = 62,59 %
PAIRE Nr : A11 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
a10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 51,18 % 1 NS 3S S-1 -50 8 44.44
2 NS 3S N+2 660 18 100.00
3 NS 3S N = 400 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,46 % 4 NS 4P W+3 -710 10 55.56
5 NS 2P W+1 -140 4 22.22
6 NS 2C N+2 170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.8 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 48,32 % 7 NS 3C S-1 -100 12 66.67
8 NS 1S S-3 -150 0 0.00
9 NS 3S N+2 460 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.7 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 56,06 %10 NS 3K E = -110 4 22.22
11 NS 3PcS-2 -300 0 0.00
12 NS 3T N+1 130 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.6 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,67 %13 NS 2C E = -110 8 44.44
14 NS 4P E = -420 5 27.78
15 NS 4TcW-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.5 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 42,42 %16 NS 6C N = 980 16 88.89
17 NS 3S N+1 430 8 44.44
18 NS 2P S+1 140 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.4 BASECQ Christian -BUSQUIN Philippe : 58,92 %19 NS 3S E = -600 3 16.67
20 NS 3C N-3 -300 0 0.00
21 NS 4P E = -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
a.3 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 36,87 %22 NS 2CcE-3 800 18 100.00
23 NS 4T S-2 -200 0 0.00
24 NS 3P W+3 -230 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.2 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,07 %25 NS 2P N = 110 9 50.00
26 NS 2C E+3 -200 6 33.33
27 NS 3S N+3 490 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.1 - : 0,00 %28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a11 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,02 %31 NS 3C W-2 100 8 44.44
32 NS 4T N = 130 8 44.44
33 NS 4T N+1 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 259,0 / 540 = 47,96 %
PAIRE Nr : a.1 -
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,85 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.7 LEBRUN Robert -HUBERT Charles : 43,15 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.2 BRIOT Fernand -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 50,37 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 55,93 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 52,41 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 44,81 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 BABIKOW Georges -VAN SICHELEN Sylvie : 57,04 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,59 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 42,78 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A11 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,96 %28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 LIGOT Xavier -LENAERTS Pol : 51,11 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 594 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : a.2 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
A.7 LEBRUN Robert -HUBERT Charles : 43,15 % 1 EO 2S S-1 -50 10 55.56
2 EO 4C N-1 -100 15 83.33
3 EO 3K W+1 -130 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.2 BRIOT Fernand -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 50,37 % 4 EO 6P W = -1430 11 61.11
5 EO 3T E = -110 6 33.33
6 EO 4C N = 420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.8 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 55,93 % 7 EO 3C S = 140 1 5.56
8 EO 1S S+1 120 7 38.89
9 EO 3S S = 400 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
A.3 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 52,41 %10 EO 2C E = -110 14 77.78
11 EO 2PcS+2 670 0 0.00
12 EO 5TcN-2 -500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 44,81 %13 EO 1P W+2 -140 15 83.33
14 EO 4P E = -420 13 72.22
15 EO 5TcW-4 800 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.4 BABIKOW Georges -VAN SICHELEN Sylvie : 57,04 %16 EO 4C N+2 480 12 66.67
17 EO 3S S+1 430 10 55.56
18 EO 4P S-1 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A10 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,59 %19 EO 4P W-2 200 1 5.56
20 EO 2K E+1 -110 12 66.67
21 EO 2P W+2 -170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.5 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 42,78 %22 EO 3S N-2 -100 18 100.00
23 EO 2P N = 110 7 38.89
24 EO 6P W = -980 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
A11 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,96 %25 EO 2P N = 110 9 50.00
26 EO 2C E+3 -200 12 66.67
27 EO 3S N+3 490 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.6 LIGOT Xavier -LENAERTS Pol : 51,11 %28 EO 4P W-1 50 1 5.56
29 EO 2C W-1 100 12 66.67
30 EO 6S E+1 -1020 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,85 %31 EO 3C W-1 50 15 83.33
32 EO 2C W+1 -140 18 100.00
33 EO 2C W = -110 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
Total : 339,0 / 594 = 57,07 %
PAIRE Nr : a.3 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne
A.2 BRIOT Fernand -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 50,37 % 1 EO 3C N-1 -50 10 55.56
2 EO 4P N+1 650 4 22.22
3 EO 5T N-2 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.8 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 55,93 % 4 EO 6P W-1 100 1 5.56
5 EO 3T E-1 50 1 5.56
6 EO 4C N = 420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
A.3 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 52,41 % 7 EO 3C S = 140 1 5.56
8 EO 1S S+2 150 0 0.00
9 EO 2P N = 110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 44,81 %10 EO 3S E-4 400 0 0.00
11 EO 2P S = 110 10 55.56
12 EO 3S S-1 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.4 BABIKOW Georges -VAN SICHELEN Sylvie : 57,04 %13 EO 2P W-1 100 1 5.56
14 EO 3P E+1 -170 5 27.78
15 EO 4C S = 620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A10 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,59 %16 EO 4C N+2 480 12 66.67
17 EO 4P S+1 450 4 22.22
18 EO 3P S = 140 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.5 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 42,78 %19 EO 4P W-1 100 6 33.33
20 EO 3C N-1 -100 9 50.00
21 EO 1S W+1 -120 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A11 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,96 %22 EO 2CcE-3 800 0 0.00
23 EO 4T S-2 -200 18 100.00
24 EO 3P W+3 -230 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.6 LIGOT Xavier -LENAERTS Pol : 51,11 %25 EO 2P N+1 140 2 11.11
26 EO 4C E = -620 16 88.89
27 EO 3S N+2 460 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,85 %28 EO 3S W = -400 14 77.78
29 EO 4PcE-1 200 2 11.11
30 EO 4C E = -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.7 LEBRUN Robert -HUBERT Charles : 43,15 %31 EO 2C W-1 50 15 83.33
32 EO 5T S = 400 2 11.11
33 EO 2T S+1 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 219,0 / 594 = 36,87 %
PAIRE Nr : a.4 BASECQ Christian -BUSQUIN Philippe
A.8 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 55,93 % 1 EO 3S S-2 -100 16 88.89
2 EO 4P N-1 -100 15 83.33
3 EO 5C E-1 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.3 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 52,41 % 4 EO 6S E = -1440 16 88.89
5 EO 2S E = -120 9 50.00
6 EO 4C N = 420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 44,81 % 7 EO 4P E = -620 17 94.44
8 EO 1S S = 90 14 77.78
9 EO 3S S-1 -50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
A.4 BABIKOW Georges -VAN SICHELEN Sylvie : 57,04 %10 EO 3K E = -110 14 77.78
11 EO 2P S+2 170 4 22.22
12 EO 3T N+1 130 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A10 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,59 %13 EO 2P W+1 -140 15 83.33
14 EO 4P E = -420 13 72.22
15 EO 5TcE-4 800 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.5 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 42,78 %16 EO 5C N+1 480 12 66.67
17 EO 3S N+2 460 1 5.56
18 EO 4P S-2 -200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A11 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,96 %19 EO 3S E = -600 15 83.33
20 EO 3C N-3 -300 18 100.00
21 EO 4P E = -420 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
A.6 LIGOT Xavier -LENAERTS Pol : 51,11 %22 EO 3S N+1 430 7 38.89
23 EO 2P N-1 -100 15 83.33
24 EO 7P W-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,85 %25 EO 3K W-1 100 14 77.78
26 EO 4C W+1 -650 18 100.00
27 EO 3S N+2 460 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A.7 LEBRUN Robert -HUBERT Charles : 43,15 %28 EO 1S W+2 -150 6 33.33
29 EO 4P E-2 200 2 11.11
30 EO 4C E+2 -480 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.2 BRIOT Fernand -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 50,37 %31 EO 3P N+1 170 4 22.22
32 EO 4T N = 130 10 55.56
33 EO 4T N = 130 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 350,0 / 594 = 58,92 %
PAIRE Nr : a.5 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger
A.3 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 52,41 % 1 EO 3S S = 400 2 11.11
2 EO 4P N-1 -100 15 83.33
3 EO 5TcN-2 -300 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 44,81 % 4 EO 5P W+1 -680 5 27.78
5 EO Pass Passe 4 22.22
6 EO 2C S+1 140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.4 BABIKOW Georges -VAN SICHELEN Sylvie : 57,04 % 7 EO 4T E-1 100 4 22.22
8 EO 1S S+1 120 7 38.89
9 EO 3S S+1 430 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A10 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,59 %10 EO 2C W-2 200 3 16.67
11 EO 3P S+1 170 4 22.22
12 EO 4KcW-3 500 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A.5 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 42,78 %13 EO 1K S-1 -100 5 27.78
14 EO 4P E-1 50 1 5.56
15 EO 4C S = 620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A11 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,96 %16 EO 6C N = 980 2 11.11
17 EO 3S N+1 430 10 55.56
18 EO 2P S+1 140 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.6 LIGOT Xavier -LENAERTS Pol : 51,11 %19 EO 4P E-1 100 6 33.33
20 EO 3K E-2 200 2 11.11
21 EO 1P E+3 -170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,85 %22 EO 3S N-1 -50 16 88.89
23 EO 3P N = 140 1 5.56
24 EO 7P W-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.7 LEBRUN Robert -HUBERT Charles : 43,15 %25 EO 2P N-2 -100 18 100.00
26 EO 2P S-1 -100 5 27.78
27 EO 4C N-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A.2 BRIOT Fernand -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 50,37 %28 EO 3S W-1 50 1 5.56
29 EO 5TcN-1 -200 18 100.00
30 EO 6S E+1 -1020 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.8 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 55,93 %31 EO 3C W-1 50 15 83.33
32 EO 3CcW-2 500 0 0.00
33 EO 2C E-2 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 252,0 / 594 = 42,42 %
PAIRE Nr : a.6 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
A.9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 44,81 % 1 EO 2S S = 120 6 33.33
2 EO 4P N+1 650 4 22.22
3 EO 4T N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.4 BABIKOW Georges -VAN SICHELEN Sylvie : 57,04 % 4 EO 4P W+2 -680 5 27.78
5 EO 3S W-1 50 1 5.56
6 EO 4C N = 420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
A10 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,59 % 7 EO 3T E+1 -130 9 50.00
8 EO 1S S-1 -50 16 88.89
9 EO 3S S = 400 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.5 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 42,78 %10 EO 2C W-1 100 6 33.33
11 EO 3C E = -140 16 88.89
12 EO 3T N = 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A11 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,96 %13 EO 2C E = -110 10 55.56
14 EO 4P E = -420 13 72.22
15 EO 4TcW-1 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A.6 LIGOT Xavier -LENAERTS Pol : 51,11 %16 EO 6C N = 980 2 11.11
17 EO 2S N+2 180 18 100.00
18 EO 4P S-1 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,85 %19 EO 4P W-2 200 1 5.56
20 EO 2C N = 110 4 22.22
21 EO 2P E+2 -170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.7 LEBRUN Robert -HUBERT Charles : 43,15 %22 EO 2C E-2 200 14 77.78
23 EO 2K E = -90 12 66.67
24 EO 6S W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.2 BRIOT Fernand -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 50,37 %25 EO 2P N = 110 9 50.00
26 EO 3S W = -600 14 77.78
27 EO 3S N+2 460 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.8 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 55,93 %28 EO 3S W = -400 14 77.78
29 EO 3T N+1 130 8 44.44
30 EO 3S E+3 -490 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.3 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 52,41 %31 EO 3P N+1 170 4 22.22
32 EO 4T N = 130 10 55.56
33 EO 4T S-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 301,0 / 594 = 50,67 %
PAIRE Nr : a.7 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno
A.4 BABIKOW Georges -VAN SICHELEN Sylvie : 57,04 % 1 EO 3S S-2 -100 16 88.89
2 EO 4P N = 620 9 50.00
3 EO 3S N = 400 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A10 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,59 % 4 EO 6S E = -1440 16 88.89
5 EO 2C S-2 -200 17 94.44
6 EO 3C N = 140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
A.5 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 42,78 % 7 EO 4T E = -130 9 50.00
8 EO 1S S+1 120 7 38.89
9 EO 2P N = 110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A11 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,96 %10 EO 3K E = -110 14 77.78
11 EO 3PcS-2 -300 18 100.00
12 EO 3T N+1 130 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.6 LIGOT Xavier -LENAERTS Pol : 51,11 %13 EO 2C E = -110 10 55.56
14 EO 2K W-1 50 1 5.56
15 EO 4C S+1 650 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,85 %16 EO 6C N = 980 2 11.11
17 EO 3S S+1 430 10 55.56
18 EO 2P S = 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.7 LEBRUN Robert -HUBERT Charles : 43,15 %19 EO 3S E+1 -630 18 100.00
20 EO 2C N-2 -200 15 83.33
21 EO 1S W+2 -150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A.2 BRIOT Fernand -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 50,37 %22 EO 3S N+1 430 7 38.89
23 EO 2P N = 110 7 38.89
24 EO 6P W = -980 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.8 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 55,93 %25 EO 2P N+1 140 2 11.11
26 EO 4C E-1 100 2 11.11
27 EO 3S N+2 460 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.3 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 52,41 %28 EO 3S W = -400 14 77.78
29 EO 3T N+1 130 8 44.44
30 EO 3S E+3 -490 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 44,81 %31 EO 2P N+1 140 8 44.44
32 EO 4P S-2 -100 16 88.89
33 EO 1S W = -90 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
Total : 333,0 / 594 = 56,06 %
PAIRE Nr : a.8 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
A10 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,59 % 1 EO 2S S+2 180 4 22.22
2 EO 4P N = 620 9 50.00
3 EO 5T N-2 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.5 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 42,78 % 4 EO 7P W-1 100 1 5.56
5 EO 2T W+2 -130 12 66.67
6 EO 4C N-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A11 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,96 % 7 EO 3C S-1 -100 6 33.33
8 EO 1S S-3 -150 18 100.00
9 EO 3S N+2 460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.6 LIGOT Xavier -LENAERTS Pol : 51,11 %10 EO 1S E = -90 8 44.44
11 EO 3C E-3 150 8 44.44
12 EO 3P N-1 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,85 %13 EO 2K S-2 -200 18 100.00
14 EO 4P E = -420 13 72.22
15 EO 4C S+1 650 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.7 LEBRUN Robert -HUBERT Charles : 43,15 %16 EO 4C N+2 480 12 66.67
17 EO 3S S = 400 16 88.89
18 EO 3P S = 140 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.2 BRIOT Fernand -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 50,37 %19 EO 3P E+1 -170 11 61.11
20 EO 3C N-2 -200 15 83.33
21 EO 1S W = -90 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.8 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 55,93 %22 EO 2CcE-2 500 3 16.67
23 EO 2P N = 110 7 38.89
24 EO 6P W = -980 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.3 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 52,41 %25 EO 2P N = 110 9 50.00
26 EO 2P S-1 -100 5 27.78
27 EO 3S N+2 460 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 44,81 %28 EO 1S W+2 -150 6 33.33
29 EO 3T N+1 130 8 44.44
30 EO 4C W+2 -480 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.4 BABIKOW Georges -VAN SICHELEN Sylvie : 57,04 %31 EO 2P N+2 170 4 22.22
32 EO 3P S = 140 6 33.33
33 EO 3K N+1 130 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
Total : 287,0 / 594 = 48,32 %
PAIRE Nr : a.9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
A.5 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 42,78 % 1 EO 3S S-2 -100 16 88.89
2 EO 4P N+1 650 4 22.22
3 EO 3S S+1 430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A11 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,96 % 4 EO 4P W+3 -710 8 44.44
5 EO 2P W+1 -140 14 77.78
6 EO 2C N+2 170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.6 LIGOT Xavier -LENAERTS Pol : 51,11 % 7 EO 3C S-3 -300 14 77.78
8 EO 1S S+1 120 7 38.89
9 EO 3S N = 400 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,85 %10 EO 2K E+1 -110 14 77.78
11 EO 3P S+1 170 4 22.22
12 EO 3T N = 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.7 LEBRUN Robert -HUBERT Charles : 43,15 %13 EO 2C E-1 100 1 5.56
14 EO 3P E+1 -170 5 27.78
15 EO 5TcW-3 500 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.2 BRIOT Fernand -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 50,37 %16 EO 5C N+1 480 12 66.67
17 EO 3S S+1 430 10 55.56
18 EO 4P S-1 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.8 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 55,93 %19 EO 3P E+1 -170 11 61.11
20 EO 2T W-3 300 0 0.00
21 EO 2C E+2 -170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.3 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 52,41 %22 EO 3S N = 400 11 61.11
23 EO 2P N+1 140 1 5.56
24 EO 4P E+2 -480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 44,81 %25 EO 2P N = 110 9 50.00
26 EO 2C E+1 -140 9 50.00
27 EO 3S N+1 430 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.4 BABIKOW Georges -VAN SICHELEN Sylvie : 57,04 %28 EO 3S W = -400 14 77.78
29 EO 1P E+1 -110 14 77.78
30 EO 4C W+1 -450 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A10 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,59 %31 EO 2P N+3 200 0 0.00
32 EO 3C W-2 200 4 22.22
33 EO 1S N+3 180 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
Total : 276,0 / 594 = 46,46 %
PAIRE Nr : a10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
A11 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,96 % 1 EO 3S S-1 -50 10 55.56
2 EO 3S N+2 660 0 0.00
3 EO 3S N = 400 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.6 LIGOT Xavier -LENAERTS Pol : 51,11 % 4 EO 6P W = -1430 11 61.11
5 EO 2S W = -120 9 50.00
6 EO 3S N+1 430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,85 % 7 EO 4P E = -620 17 94.44
8 EO 1S S+1 120 7 38.89
9 EO 1S S+2 150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.7 LEBRUN Robert -HUBERT Charles : 43,15 %10 EO 3K E = -110 14 77.78
11 EO 3P S-2 -100 14 77.78
12 EO 3T N = 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.2 BRIOT Fernand -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 50,37 %13 EO 2C E = -110 10 55.56
14 EO 4P E = -420 13 72.22
15 EO 4C S+1 650 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.8 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 55,93 %16 EO 4C N+2 480 12 66.67
17 EO 3S S+2 460 1 5.56
18 EO 4P S-1 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.3 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 52,41 %19 EO 4P E-1 100 6 33.33
20 EO 2P E-1 100 6 33.33
21 EO 2P E+1 -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 44,81 %22 EO 3S S = 400 11 61.11
23 EO 3S S-1 -100 15 83.33
24 EO 4P W+2 -480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.4 BABIKOW Georges -VAN SICHELEN Sylvie : 57,04 %25 EO 2P N-1 -50 16 88.89
26 EO 3C E = -140 9 50.00
27 EO 3S N+2 460 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A10 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,59 %28 EO 1S W+2 -150 6 33.33
29 EO 4P E-2 200 2 11.11
30 EO 4C W+1 -450 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
A.5 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 42,78 %31 EO 3T E-1 50 15 83.33
32 EO 3T N = 110 14 77.78
33 EO 2C E = -110 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
Total : 304,0 / 594 = 51,18 %
PAIRE Nr : a11 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
A.6 LIGOT Xavier -LENAERTS Pol : 51,11 % 1 EO 3S S+1 430 0 0.00
2 EO 4P N-1 -100 15 83.33
3 EO 4C S-8 -400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,85 % 4 EO 6S E = -1440 16 88.89
5 EO 2C N-2 -200 17 94.44
6 EO 4C S-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
A.7 LEBRUN Robert -HUBERT Charles : 43,15 % 7 EO 3C S-2 -200 12 66.67
8 EO 1S S+1 120 7 38.89
9 EO 1S S+1 120 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.2 BRIOT Fernand -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 50,37 %10 EO 3S E-2 200 3 16.67
11 EO 4P S-1 -50 12 66.67
12 EO 3S S = 600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.8 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 55,93 %13 EO 1S S-1 -100 5 27.78
14 EO 4P E = -420 13 72.22
15 EO 3P N = 140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.3 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 52,41 %16 EO 4C N+2 480 12 66.67
17 EO 3S S+1 430 10 55.56
18 EO 3P S = 140 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 44,81 %19 EO 3S E = -600 15 83.33
20 EO 2C S-1 -100 9 50.00
21 EO 1S W+1 -120 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 BABIKOW Georges -VAN SICHELEN Sylvie : 57,04 %22 EO 1CcW-2 500 3 16.67
23 EO 2P N = 110 7 38.89
24 EO 6P W = -980 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A10 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,59 %25 EO 2P N+1 140 2 11.11
26 EO 2S W-2 200 0 0.00
27 EO 3S N+3 490 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
A.5 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 42,78 %28 EO 3S W = -400 14 77.78
29 EO 3P E+1 -170 16 88.89
30 EO 3S E+4 -520 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
A11 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,96 %31 EO 3C W-2 100 10 55.56
32 EO 4T N = 130 10 55.56
33 EO 4T N+1 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 309,0 / 594 = 52,02 %
|
|