|
Tournoi du 11-05-15
1 59,07 6 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal
2 55,93 4 CASSART Guy -COULIE Joelle
3 53,89 9 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
4 53,15 5 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
5 52,96 1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
6 52,04 11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
7 47,96 7 THIRION Michel -DAPHNE Chantal
8 45,74 3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
9 43,89 10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
10 42,96 2 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine
11 42,41 8 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 60,93 21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
2 59,44 17 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
3 57,59 14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
4 53,33 13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
5 51,11 18 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
6 48,89 20 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine
7 46,67 12 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette
~ 46,67 19 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard
9 44,07 16 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
10 43,52 22 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
11 37,78 15 DELHEZ Jacques -GROSFILS Colette
PAIRE Nr : 1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
12 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 46,67 % 1 NS 3P S+2 200 4 22.22
2 NS 4C S = 620 8 44.44
3 NS 1S S+1 120 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
22 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 43,52 % 4 NS 3K S = 110 16 88.89
5 NS 3C S+2 200 12 66.67
6 NS 3S S+1 430 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,93 % 7 NS 3K E = -110 7 38.89
8 NS 3P E-2 100 6 33.33
9 NS 4P N = 420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
20 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 48,89 %10 NS 4C N = 620 14 77.78
11 NS 4C S-2 -100 3 16.67
12 NS 4C E = -420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
19 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 46,67 %13 NS 3P W = -140 10 55.56
14 NS 3C W-2 100 11 61.11
15 NS 2S S-1 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
18 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 51,11 %16 NS 2C N-2 -100 2 11.11
17 NS 4P N+1 450 7 38.89
18 NS 3K S = 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
17 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 59,44 %19 NS 2C N-1 -50 13 72.22
20 NS 2C E+3 -200 10 55.56
21 NS 4KcW+1 -610 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
16 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 44,07 %22 NS 3C E = -140 8 44.44
23 NS 2S W = -120 14 77.78
24 NS 4P N+1 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
15 DELHEZ Jacques -GROSFILS Colette : 37,78 %25 NS 5PcN-2 -300 13 72.22
26 NS 4P E-4 400 18 100.00
27 NS 2C N+1 140 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,59 %28 NS 6C N = 1430 16 88.89
29 NS 4K S-2 -200 1 5.56
30 NS 4CcE-2 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 286,0 / 540 = 52,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,33 % 4 NS 1C W+2 -140 2 11.11
5 NS 4P S-2 -200 2 11.11
6 NS 3S N = 400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
12 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 46,67 % 7 NS 3S W-2 200 18 100.00
8 NS 4P E-1 50 2 11.11
9 NS 4P N = 420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
22 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 43,52 %10 NS 4C N-1 -100 4 22.22
11 NS 4C S-2 -100 3 16.67
12 NS 2C W+2 -170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,93 %13 NS 3C S = 140 18 100.00
14 NS 3C W-2 100 11 61.11
15 NS 3T S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
20 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 48,89 %16 NS 3S E-1 100 5 27.78
17 NS 5P N+1 480 14 77.78
18 NS 2S N = 120 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
19 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 46,67 %19 NS 2C N-1 -50 13 72.22
20 NS 5TcS-4 -1100 0 0.00
21 NS 3CcN-2 -500 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
18 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 51,11 %22 NS 2P E+1 -140 8 44.44
23 NS 3P E+1 -170 4 22.22
24 NS 4P N+1 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
17 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 59,44 %25 NS 4C W+3 -710 2 11.11
26 NS 2S E = -120 12 66.67
27 NS 3C N-2 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
16 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 44,07 %28 NS 6C N = 1430 16 88.89
29 NS 2C E-1 100 12 66.67
30 NS 3CcE-1 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
15 DELHEZ Jacques -GROSFILS Colette : 37,78 %31 NS 3C E = -140 8 44.44
32 NS 1S W+2 -150 1 5.56
33 NS 4C S = 420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 232,0 / 540 = 42,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
16 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 44,07 % 1 NS 3S N = 400 8 44.44
2 NS 4C N = 620 8 44.44
3 NS 2S N+1 150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,59 % 7 NS 4K E-1 100 13 72.22
8 NS 4P E-3 150 13 72.22
9 NS 4P N = 420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,33 %10 NS 4C N-1 -100 4 22.22
11 NS 3S N-1 -50 10 55.56
12 NS 3C W+1 -170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 46,67 %13 NS 2P W+1 -140 10 55.56
14 NS 3C E-2 100 11 61.11
15 NS 1P N-1 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
22 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 43,52 %16 NS 3S E-2 200 13 72.22
17 NS 5P N = 450 7 38.89
18 NS 1S N+1 120 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,93 %19 NS 3S E = -600 0 0.00
20 NS 4C E+1 -650 3 16.67
21 NS 4P W = -420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
20 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 48,89 %22 NS 2P E = -110 15 83.33
23 NS 3P E+1 -170 4 22.22
24 NS 4P N+1 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
19 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 46,67 %25 NS 4PcS = 590 18 100.00
26 NS 3S W = -600 4 22.22
27 NS 3P E+2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
18 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 51,11 %28 NS 4C N+2 680 9 50.00
29 NS 1C E+1 -110 9 50.00
30 NS 5T E-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
17 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 59,44 %31 NS 2C E+2 -170 5 27.78
32 NS 2S W+1 -150 1 5.56
33 NS 4C S = 420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
Total : 247,0 / 540 = 45,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 CASSART Guy -COULIE Joelle
18 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 51,11 % 1 NS 2P S+2 170 2 11.11
2 NS 3S N+1 630 14 77.78
3 NS 2PcE-1 200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
17 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 59,44 % 4 NS 3C W-1 100 11 61.11
5 NS 3P S-1 -100 5 27.78
6 NS 3S N = 400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
15 DELHEZ Jacques -GROSFILS Colette : 37,78 %10 NS 4C N = 620 14 77.78
11 NS 3S N = 400 16 88.89
12 NS 3P N = 140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,59 %13 NS 4T E+1 -150 3 16.67
14 NS 3T N = 110 16 88.89
15 NS 2T S = 90 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,33 %16 NS 4K W-2 200 13 72.22
17 NS 5P N = 450 7 38.89
18 NS 2S N = 120 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
12 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 46,67 %19 NS 1S E+1 -120 6 33.33
20 NS 3T S-2 -200 10 55.56
21 NS 4P E-4 200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
22 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 43,52 %22 NS 2P E+1 -140 8 44.44
23 NS 3P E = -140 11 61.11
24 NS 4P N+1 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,93 %25 NS 6PcN-3 -500 10 55.56
26 NS 5K E-1 100 15 83.33
27 NS 2P W+2 -170 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
20 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 48,89 %28 NS 5C S+1 680 9 50.00
29 NS 1C E+2 -140 5 27.78
30 NS 2P S = 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
19 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 46,67 %31 NS 2C E = -110 10 55.56
32 NS 1S W+1 -120 10 55.56
33 NS 4C S = 420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 302,0 / 540 = 55,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
20 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 48,89 % 1 NS 4P S-1 -50 0 0.00
2 NS 3S S+2 660 18 100.00
3 NS 2S S = 120 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
19 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 46,67 % 4 NS 3C W = -140 2 11.11
5 NS 5KcE-2 300 14 77.78
6 NS 3S S+1 430 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
18 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 51,11 % 7 NS 4KcE = -710 2 11.11
8 NS 4P E-3 150 13 72.22
9 NS 4P N = 420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
16 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 44,07 %13 NS 3P W-1 100 16 88.89
14 NS 2P N+1 140 18 100.00
15 NS 2S S = 120 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
15 DELHEZ Jacques -GROSFILS Colette : 37,78 %16 NS 3S E-2 200 13 72.22
17 NS 5P N = 450 7 38.89
18 NS 2S N-3 -300 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,59 %19 NS 1S W+1 -120 6 33.33
20 NS 4C E+1 -650 3 16.67
21 NS 5P W-4 200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,33 %22 NS 2C E+2 -170 1 5.56
23 NS 3P E-1 100 17 94.44
24 NS 4P N+1 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
12 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 46,67 %25 NS 5C W+1 -680 7 38.89
26 NS 3S W = -600 4 22.22
27 NS 2C N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
22 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 43,52 %28 NS 4C N+2 680 9 50.00
29 NS 2P W-2 200 17 94.44
30 NS 3C E-3 150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,93 %31 NS 3S E = -400 1 5.56
32 NS 1S W+1 -120 10 55.56
33 NS 4C S = 420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 287,0 / 540 = 53,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal
22 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 43,52 % 1 NS 3S N+1 430 14 77.78
2 NS 4C N = 620 8 44.44
3 NS 2C S+1 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,93 % 4 NS 3C E-1 100 11 61.11
5 NS 5TcN = 750 18 100.00
6 NS 3S S = 400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
20 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 48,89 % 7 NS 3K E = -110 7 38.89
8 NS 3P E-2 100 6 33.33
9 NS 4P N = 420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
19 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 46,67 %10 NS 4C N = 620 14 77.78
11 NS 3S N = 400 16 88.89
12 NS 4C W-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
17 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 59,44 %16 NS 3K W-1 100 5 27.78
17 NS 6P N-1 -50 0 0.00
18 NS 1S N+2 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
16 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 44,07 %19 NS 2C N+1 140 16 88.89
20 NS 3T S-2 -200 10 55.56
21 NS 4C N-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
15 DELHEZ Jacques -GROSFILS Colette : 37,78 %22 NS 2P E = -110 15 83.33
23 NS 3P E = -140 11 61.11
24 NS 4P N+1 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,59 %25 NS 4PcN-1 -100 16 88.89
26 NS 3S W = -600 4 22.22
27 NS 3P W+1 -170 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,33 %28 NS 5C N+1 680 9 50.00
29 NS 1C E+2 -140 5 27.78
30 NS 3P S = 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
12 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 46,67 %31 NS 4C E-2 100 17 94.44
32 NS 2S W = -120 10 55.56
33 NS 4C S = 420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 319,0 / 540 = 59,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 THIRION Michel -DAPHNE Chantal
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,33 % 1 NS 3S N = 400 8 44.44
2 NS 5C S-1 -100 2 11.11
3 NS 3S N = 400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
12 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 46,67 % 4 NS 3K S = 110 16 88.89
5 NS 3PcS = 730 16 88.89
6 NS 3S S = 400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
22 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 43,52 % 7 NS 3S W-1 100 13 72.22
8 NS 4P E-2 100 6 33.33
9 NS 4P N = 420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,93 %10 NS 4P S-1 -100 4 22.22
11 NS 3S N-1 -50 10 55.56
12 NS 4C W = -420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
20 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 48,89 %13 NS 3P W = -140 10 55.56
14 NS 3C W-1 50 2 11.11
15 NS 3K N = 110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
18 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 51,11 %19 NS 2C N-2 -100 10 55.56
20 NS 2P W+2 -170 15 83.33
21 NS 4PcE = -590 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
17 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 59,44 %22 NS 2P E+1 -140 8 44.44
23 NS 3P E+1 -170 4 22.22
24 NS 4P N+1 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
16 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 44,07 %25 NS 5PcN-2 -300 13 72.22
26 NS 3S W = -600 4 22.22
27 NS 2C N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
15 DELHEZ Jacques -GROSFILS Colette : 37,78 %28 NS 6C N = 1430 16 88.89
29 NS 1C E+1 -110 9 50.00
30 NS 3C S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,59 %31 NS 3S E = -400 1 5.56
32 NS 1S W+1 -120 10 55.56
33 NS 4C S = 420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 259,0 / 540 = 47,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon
15 DELHEZ Jacques -GROSFILS Colette : 37,78 % 1 NS 3S N = 400 8 44.44
2 NS 3S S+1 630 14 77.78
3 NS 3S N-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,59 % 4 NS 1C W+2 -140 2 11.11
5 NS 4PcS-3 -800 0 0.00
6 NS 2P S = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 3,70 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,33 % 7 NS 3K E+1 -130 4 22.22
8 NS 4P E-3 150 13 72.22
9 NS 4P N = 420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 46,67 %10 NS 4C N = 620 14 77.78
11 NS 4C S-2 -100 3 16.67
12 NS 4C E = -420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
22 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 43,52 %13 NS 3C S-1 -100 14 77.78
14 NS 3C W-1 50 2 11.11
15 NS 3T S = 110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,93 %16 NS 3S W = -600 0 0.00
17 NS 5P N = 450 7 38.89
18 NS 1S N = 90 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
19 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 46,67 %22 NS 2P E+1 -140 8 44.44
23 NS 3P E-1 100 17 94.44
24 NS 4P N+1 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
18 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 51,11 %25 NS 4C W+3 -710 2 11.11
26 NS 3S W = -600 4 22.22
27 NS 2C N = 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
17 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 59,44 %28 NS 6KcW-3 500 3 16.67
29 NS 2P W-2 200 17 94.44
30 NS 4C E-4 200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
16 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 44,07 %31 NS 3C E+1 -170 5 27.78
32 NS 2S W = -120 10 55.56
33 NS 4C S = 420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 229,0 / 540 = 42,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
17 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 59,44 % 1 NS 3S N+1 430 14 77.78
2 NS 3S N+1 630 14 77.78
3 NS 1S N+2 150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
16 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 44,07 % 4 NS 1C W+1 -110 7 38.89
5 NS 4K E-2 100 10 55.56
6 NS 3S N = 400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
15 DELHEZ Jacques -GROSFILS Colette : 37,78 % 7 NS 3K E-1 100 13 72.22
8 NS 4P E-3 150 13 72.22
9 NS 4P N = 420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,59 %10 NS 3S N-1 -100 4 22.22
11 NS 4C N-2 -100 3 16.67
12 NS 2C W+3 -200 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,33 %13 NS 3T W+2 -150 3 16.67
14 NS 1S S = 90 6 33.33
15 NS 2K N+1 110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
12 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 46,67 %16 NS 3S E-2 200 13 72.22
17 NS 6C N = 980 17 94.44
18 NS 2S N = 120 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
22 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 43,52 %19 NS 2S W = -120 6 33.33
20 NS 4P W = -620 6 33.33
21 NS 4C N-2 -200 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
20 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 48,89 %25 NS 5C W+2 -710 2 11.11
26 NS 3K E-1 100 15 83.33
27 NS 2C N+1 140 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
19 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 46,67 %28 NS 5PcE-2 300 0 0.00
29 NS 1S S+1 120 14 77.78
30 NS 4T E-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
18 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 51,11 %31 NS 2C E-1 50 13 72.22
32 NS 3S W-1 100 18 100.00
33 NS 4C S = 420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
Total : 291,0 / 540 = 53,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
19 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 46,67 % 1 NS 3S N+2 460 18 100.00
2 NS 5C N-1 -100 2 11.11
3 NS 2S N = 120 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
18 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 51,11 % 4 NS 2K S+1 110 16 88.89
5 NS 5T N-1 -100 5 27.78
6 NS 3S S = 400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
17 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 59,44 % 7 NS 2PcS-3 -800 0 0.00
8 NS 5CcS-1 -100 0 0.00
9 NS 3P N+1 170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
16 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 44,07 %10 NS 4C S-1 -100 4 22.22
11 NS 3S N-1 -50 10 55.56
12 NS 4C W = -420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
15 DELHEZ Jacques -GROSFILS Colette : 37,78 %13 NS 3T E+2 -150 3 16.67
14 NS 3C E-2 100 11 61.11
15 NS 3K N+2 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,59 %16 NS 3S E-2 200 13 72.22
17 NS 6P N = 980 17 94.44
18 NS 3S N-4 -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,33 %19 NS 2S W+1 -150 2 11.11
20 NS 3P E+1 -170 15 83.33
21 NS 4K W+1 -150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 46,67 %22 NS 2P E-2 200 18 100.00
23 NS 3P E+1 -170 4 22.22
24 NS 4P N = 420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,93 %28 NS 6PcE-3 500 3 16.67
29 NS 2S N-2 -200 1 5.56
30 NS 3C E-3 150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
20 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 48,89 %31 NS 4C E-2 100 17 94.44
32 NS 2S W = -120 10 55.56
33 NS 4C S = 420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 237,0 / 540 = 43,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,93 % 1 NS 3S N+1 430 14 77.78
2 NS 4C N-1 -100 2 11.11
3 NS 3T S-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
20 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 48,89 % 4 NS 1C W+1 -110 7 38.89
5 NS 2K E = -90 8 44.44
6 NS 3S S+1 430 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
19 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 46,67 % 7 NS 3S W-1 100 13 72.22
8 NS 4PcE-2 300 18 100.00
9 NS 4P N = 420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
18 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 51,11 %10 NS 4C N = 620 14 77.78
11 NS 3S N = 400 16 88.89
12 NS 4C W+1 -450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
17 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 59,44 %13 NS 3T E+2 -150 3 16.67
14 NS 3C E-1 50 2 11.11
15 NS 3K N = 110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
16 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 44,07 %16 NS 3S W-2 200 13 72.22
17 NS 4P N+1 450 7 38.89
18 NS 3K S-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
15 DELHEZ Jacques -GROSFILS Colette : 37,78 %19 NS 2S W-2 200 18 100.00
20 NS 2T S = 90 18 100.00
21 NS 3P W = -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,59 %22 NS 2P E+2 -170 1 5.56
23 NS 2P E+2 -170 4 22.22
24 NS 4P N+1 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,33 %25 NS 5C W+1 -680 7 38.89
26 NS 3K E+1 -130 10 55.56
27 NS 2C N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
22 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 43,52 %31 NS 3C E-1 50 13 72.22
32 NS 2S W = -120 10 55.56
33 NS 4C S = 420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 281,0 / 540 = 52,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,96 % 1 EO 3P S+2 200 14 77.78
2 EO 4C S = 620 10 55.56
3 EO 1S S+1 120 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
7 THIRION Michel -DAPHNE Chantal : 47,96 % 4 EO 3K S = 110 2 11.11
5 EO 3PcS = 730 2 11.11
6 EO 3S S = 400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
2 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 42,96 % 7 EO 3S W-2 200 0 0.00
8 EO 4P E-1 50 16 88.89
9 EO 4P N = 420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
8 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 42,41 %10 EO 4C N = 620 4 22.22
11 EO 4C S-2 -100 15 83.33
12 EO 4C E = -420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 45,74 %13 EO 2P W+1 -140 8 44.44
14 EO 3C E-2 100 7 38.89
15 EO 1P N-1 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
9 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,89 %16 EO 3S E-2 200 5 27.78
17 EO 6C N = 980 1 5.56
18 EO 2S N = 120 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
4 CASSART Guy -COULIE Joelle : 55,93 %19 EO 1S E+1 -120 12 66.67
20 EO 3T S-2 -200 8 44.44
21 EO 4P E-4 200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 43,89 %22 EO 2P E-2 200 0 0.00
23 EO 3P E+1 -170 14 77.78
24 EO 4P N = 420 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
5 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 53,15 %25 EO 5C W+1 -680 11 61.11
26 EO 3S W = -600 14 77.78
27 EO 2C N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
6 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 59,07 %31 EO 4C E-2 100 1 5.56
32 EO 2S W = -120 8 44.44
33 EO 4C S = 420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 252,0 / 540 = 46,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
7 THIRION Michel -DAPHNE Chantal : 47,96 % 1 EO 3S N = 400 10 55.56
2 EO 5C S-1 -100 16 88.89
3 EO 3S N = 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
2 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 42,96 % 4 EO 1C W+2 -140 16 88.89
5 EO 4P S-2 -200 16 88.89
6 EO 3S N = 400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
8 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 42,41 % 7 EO 3K E+1 -130 14 77.78
8 EO 4P E-3 150 5 27.78
9 EO 4P N = 420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 45,74 %10 EO 4C N-1 -100 14 77.78
11 EO 3S N-1 -50 8 44.44
12 EO 3C W+1 -170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,89 %13 EO 3T W+2 -150 15 83.33
14 EO 1S S = 90 12 66.67
15 EO 2K N+1 110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
4 CASSART Guy -COULIE Joelle : 55,93 %16 EO 4K W-2 200 5 27.78
17 EO 5P N = 450 11 61.11
18 EO 2S N = 120 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 43,89 %19 EO 2S W+1 -150 16 88.89
20 EO 3P E+1 -170 3 16.67
21 EO 4K W+1 -150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 53,15 %22 EO 2C E+2 -170 17 94.44
23 EO 3P E-1 100 1 5.56
24 EO 4P N+1 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,04 %25 EO 5C W+1 -680 11 61.11
26 EO 3K E+1 -130 8 44.44
27 EO 2C N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
6 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 59,07 %28 EO 5C N+1 680 9 50.00
29 EO 1C E+2 -140 13 72.22
30 EO 3P S = 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 288,0 / 540 = 53,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
8 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 42,41 % 4 EO 1C W+2 -140 16 88.89
5 EO 4PcS-3 -800 18 100.00
6 EO 2P S = 110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 96,30 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 45,74 % 7 EO 4K E-1 100 5 27.78
8 EO 4P E-3 150 5 27.78
9 EO 4P N = 420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
9 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,89 %10 EO 3S N-1 -100 14 77.78
11 EO 4C N-2 -100 15 83.33
12 EO 2C W+3 -200 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
4 CASSART Guy -COULIE Joelle : 55,93 %13 EO 4T E+1 -150 15 83.33
14 EO 3T N = 110 2 11.11
15 EO 2T S = 90 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 43,89 %16 EO 3S E-2 200 5 27.78
17 EO 6P N = 980 1 5.56
18 EO 3S N-4 -400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
5 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 53,15 %19 EO 1S W+1 -120 12 66.67
20 EO 4C E+1 -650 15 83.33
21 EO 5P W-4 200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,04 %22 EO 2P E+2 -170 17 94.44
23 EO 2P E+2 -170 14 77.78
24 EO 4P N+1 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
6 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 59,07 %25 EO 4PcN-1 -100 2 11.11
26 EO 3S W = -600 14 77.78
27 EO 3P W+1 -170 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,96 %28 EO 6C N = 1430 2 11.11
29 EO 4K S-2 -200 17 94.44
30 EO 4CcE-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
7 THIRION Michel -DAPHNE Chantal : 47,96 %31 EO 3S E = -400 17 94.44
32 EO 1S W+1 -120 8 44.44
33 EO 4C S = 420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 311,0 / 540 = 57,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 DELHEZ Jacques -GROSFILS Colette
8 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 42,41 % 1 EO 3S N = 400 10 55.56
2 EO 3S S+1 630 4 22.22
3 EO 3S N-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
9 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,89 % 7 EO 3K E-1 100 5 27.78
8 EO 4P E-3 150 5 27.78
9 EO 4P N = 420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
4 CASSART Guy -COULIE Joelle : 55,93 %10 EO 4C N = 620 4 22.22
11 EO 3S N = 400 2 11.11
12 EO 3P N = 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 43,89 %13 EO 3T E+2 -150 15 83.33
14 EO 3C E-2 100 7 38.89
15 EO 3K N+2 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
5 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 53,15 %16 EO 3S E-2 200 5 27.78
17 EO 5P N = 450 11 61.11
18 EO 2S N-3 -300 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,04 %19 EO 2S W-2 200 0 0.00
20 EO 2T S = 90 0 0.00
21 EO 3P W = -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
6 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 59,07 %22 EO 2P E = -110 3 16.67
23 EO 3P E = -140 7 38.89
24 EO 4P N+1 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,96 %25 EO 5PcN-2 -300 5 27.78
26 EO 4P E-4 400 0 0.00
27 EO 2C N+1 140 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
7 THIRION Michel -DAPHNE Chantal : 47,96 %28 EO 6C N = 1430 2 11.11
29 EO 1C E+1 -110 9 50.00
30 EO 3C S-1 -50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
2 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 42,96 %31 EO 3C E = -140 10 55.56
32 EO 1S W+2 -150 17 94.44
33 EO 4C S = 420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 204,0 / 540 = 37,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 45,74 % 1 EO 3S N = 400 10 55.56
2 EO 4C N = 620 10 55.56
3 EO 2S N+1 150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
9 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,89 % 4 EO 1C W+1 -110 11 61.11
5 EO 4K E-2 100 8 44.44
6 EO 3S N = 400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 43,89 %10 EO 4C S-1 -100 14 77.78
11 EO 3S N-1 -50 8 44.44
12 EO 4C W = -420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
5 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 53,15 %13 EO 3P W-1 100 2 11.11
14 EO 2P N+1 140 0 0.00
15 EO 2S S = 120 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,04 %16 EO 3S W-2 200 5 27.78
17 EO 4P N+1 450 11 61.11
18 EO 3K S-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
6 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 59,07 %19 EO 2C N+1 140 2 11.11
20 EO 3T S-2 -200 8 44.44
21 EO 4C N-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,96 %22 EO 3C E = -140 10 55.56
23 EO 2S W = -120 4 22.22
24 EO 4P N+1 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
7 THIRION Michel -DAPHNE Chantal : 47,96 %25 EO 5PcN-2 -300 5 27.78
26 EO 3S W = -600 14 77.78
27 EO 2C N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 42,96 %28 EO 6C N = 1430 2 11.11
29 EO 2C E-1 100 6 33.33
30 EO 3CcE-1 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
8 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 42,41 %31 EO 3C E+1 -170 13 72.22
32 EO 2S W = -120 8 44.44
33 EO 4C S = 420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 238,0 / 540 = 44,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
9 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,89 % 1 EO 3S N+1 430 4 22.22
2 EO 3S N+1 630 4 22.22
3 EO 1S N+2 150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
4 CASSART Guy -COULIE Joelle : 55,93 % 4 EO 3C W-1 100 7 38.89
5 EO 3P S-1 -100 13 72.22
6 EO 3S N = 400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 43,89 % 7 EO 2PcS-3 -800 18 100.00
8 EO 5CcS-1 -100 18 100.00
9 EO 3P N+1 170 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,04 %13 EO 3T E+2 -150 15 83.33
14 EO 3C E-1 50 16 88.89
15 EO 3K N = 110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
6 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 59,07 %16 EO 3K W-1 100 13 72.22
17 EO 6P N-1 -50 18 100.00
18 EO 1S N+2 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,96 %19 EO 2C N-1 -50 5 27.78
20 EO 2C E+3 -200 8 44.44
21 EO 4KcW+1 -610 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
7 THIRION Michel -DAPHNE Chantal : 47,96 %22 EO 2P E+1 -140 10 55.56
23 EO 3P E+1 -170 14 77.78
24 EO 4P N+1 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
2 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 42,96 %25 EO 4C W+3 -710 16 88.89
26 EO 2S E = -120 6 33.33
27 EO 3C N-2 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
8 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 42,41 %28 EO 6KcW-3 500 15 83.33
29 EO 2P W-2 200 1 5.56
30 EO 4C E-4 200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 45,74 %31 EO 2C E+2 -170 13 72.22
32 EO 2S W+1 -150 17 94.44
33 EO 4C S = 420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
Total : 321,0 / 540 = 59,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
4 CASSART Guy -COULIE Joelle : 55,93 % 1 EO 2P S+2 170 16 88.89
2 EO 3S N+1 630 4 22.22
3 EO 2PcE-1 200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 43,89 % 4 EO 2K S+1 110 2 11.11
5 EO 5T N-1 -100 13 72.22
6 EO 3S S = 400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
5 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 53,15 % 7 EO 4KcE = -710 16 88.89
8 EO 4P E-3 150 5 27.78
9 EO 4P N = 420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,04 %10 EO 4C N = 620 4 22.22
11 EO 3S N = 400 2 11.11
12 EO 4C W+1 -450 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,96 %16 EO 2C N-2 -100 16 88.89
17 EO 4P N+1 450 11 61.11
18 EO 3K S = 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
7 THIRION Michel -DAPHNE Chantal : 47,96 %19 EO 2C N-2 -100 8 44.44
20 EO 2P W+2 -170 3 16.67
21 EO 4PcE = -590 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 42,96 %22 EO 2P E+1 -140 10 55.56
23 EO 3P E+1 -170 14 77.78
24 EO 4P N+1 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
8 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 42,41 %25 EO 4C W+3 -710 16 88.89
26 EO 3S W = -600 14 77.78
27 EO 2C N = 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 45,74 %28 EO 4C N+2 680 9 50.00
29 EO 1C E+1 -110 9 50.00
30 EO 5T E-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
9 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,89 %31 EO 2C E-1 50 5 27.78
32 EO 3S W-1 100 0 0.00
33 EO 4C S = 420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
Total : 276,0 / 540 = 51,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard
10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 43,89 % 1 EO 3S N+2 460 0 0.00
2 EO 5C N-1 -100 16 88.89
3 EO 2S N = 120 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
5 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 53,15 % 4 EO 3C W = -140 16 88.89
5 EO 5KcE-2 300 4 22.22
6 EO 3S S+1 430 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,04 % 7 EO 3S W-1 100 5 27.78
8 EO 4PcE-2 300 0 0.00
9 EO 4P N = 420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
6 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 59,07 %10 EO 4C N = 620 4 22.22
11 EO 3S N = 400 2 11.11
12 EO 4C W-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,96 %13 EO 3P W = -140 8 44.44
14 EO 3C W-2 100 7 38.89
15 EO 2S S-1 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
2 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 42,96 %19 EO 2C N-1 -50 5 27.78
20 EO 5TcS-4 -1100 18 100.00
21 EO 3CcN-2 -500 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
8 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 42,41 %22 EO 2P E+1 -140 10 55.56
23 EO 3P E-1 100 1 5.56
24 EO 4P N+1 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 45,74 %25 EO 4PcS = 590 0 0.00
26 EO 3S W = -600 14 77.78
27 EO 3P E+2 -200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
9 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,89 %28 EO 5PcE-2 300 18 100.00
29 EO 1S S+1 120 4 22.22
30 EO 4T E-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
4 CASSART Guy -COULIE Joelle : 55,93 %31 EO 2C E = -110 8 44.44
32 EO 1S W+1 -120 8 44.44
33 EO 4C S = 420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 252,0 / 540 = 46,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine
5 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 53,15 % 1 EO 4P S-1 -50 18 100.00
2 EO 3S S+2 660 0 0.00
3 EO 2S S = 120 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,04 % 4 EO 1C W+1 -110 11 61.11
5 EO 2K E = -90 10 55.56
6 EO 3S S+1 430 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
6 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 59,07 % 7 EO 3K E = -110 11 61.11
8 EO 3P E-2 100 12 66.67
9 EO 4P N = 420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,96 %10 EO 4C N = 620 4 22.22
11 EO 4C S-2 -100 15 83.33
12 EO 4C E = -420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
7 THIRION Michel -DAPHNE Chantal : 47,96 %13 EO 3P W = -140 8 44.44
14 EO 3C W-1 50 16 88.89
15 EO 3K N = 110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
2 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 42,96 %16 EO 3S E-1 100 13 72.22
17 EO 5P N+1 480 4 22.22
18 EO 2S N = 120 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 45,74 %22 EO 2P E = -110 3 16.67
23 EO 3P E+1 -170 14 77.78
24 EO 4P N+1 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
9 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,89 %25 EO 5C W+2 -710 16 88.89
26 EO 3K E-1 100 3 16.67
27 EO 2C N+1 140 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
4 CASSART Guy -COULIE Joelle : 55,93 %28 EO 5C S+1 680 9 50.00
29 EO 1C E+2 -140 13 72.22
30 EO 2P S = 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 43,89 %31 EO 4C E-2 100 1 5.56
32 EO 2S W = -120 8 44.44
33 EO 4C S = 420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 264,0 / 540 = 48,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,04 % 1 EO 3S N+1 430 4 22.22
2 EO 4C N-1 -100 16 88.89
3 EO 3T S-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
6 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 59,07 % 4 EO 3C E-1 100 7 38.89
5 EO 5TcN = 750 0 0.00
6 EO 3S S = 400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,96 % 7 EO 3K E = -110 11 61.11
8 EO 3P E-2 100 12 66.67
9 EO 4P N = 420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
7 THIRION Michel -DAPHNE Chantal : 47,96 %10 EO 4P S-1 -100 14 77.78
11 EO 3S N-1 -50 8 44.44
12 EO 4C W = -420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
2 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 42,96 %13 EO 3C S = 140 0 0.00
14 EO 3C W-2 100 7 38.89
15 EO 3T S-2 -200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
8 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 42,41 %16 EO 3S W = -600 18 100.00
17 EO 5P N = 450 11 61.11
18 EO 1S N = 90 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 45,74 %19 EO 3S E = -600 18 100.00
20 EO 4C E+1 -650 15 83.33
21 EO 4P W = -420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
4 CASSART Guy -COULIE Joelle : 55,93 %25 EO 6PcN-3 -500 8 44.44
26 EO 5K E-1 100 3 16.67
27 EO 2P W+2 -170 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 43,89 %28 EO 6PcE-3 500 15 83.33
29 EO 2S N-2 -200 17 94.44
30 EO 3C E-3 150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
5 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 53,15 %31 EO 3S E = -400 17 94.44
32 EO 1S W+1 -120 8 44.44
33 EO 4C S = 420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 329,0 / 540 = 60,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
6 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 59,07 % 1 EO 3S N+1 430 4 22.22
2 EO 4C N = 620 10 55.56
3 EO 2C S+1 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,96 % 4 EO 3K S = 110 2 11.11
5 EO 3C S+2 200 6 33.33
6 EO 3S S+1 430 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
7 THIRION Michel -DAPHNE Chantal : 47,96 % 7 EO 3S W-1 100 5 27.78
8 EO 4P E-2 100 12 66.67
9 EO 4P N = 420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
2 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 42,96 %10 EO 4C N-1 -100 14 77.78
11 EO 4C S-2 -100 15 83.33
12 EO 2C W+2 -170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
8 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 42,41 %13 EO 3C S-1 -100 4 22.22
14 EO 3C W-1 50 16 88.89
15 EO 3T S = 110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 45,74 %16 EO 3S E-2 200 5 27.78
17 EO 5P N = 450 11 61.11
18 EO 1S N+1 120 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
9 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,89 %19 EO 2S W = -120 12 66.67
20 EO 4P W = -620 12 66.67
21 EO 4C N-2 -200 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
4 CASSART Guy -COULIE Joelle : 55,93 %22 EO 2P E+1 -140 10 55.56
23 EO 3P E = -140 7 38.89
24 EO 4P N+1 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
5 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 53,15 %28 EO 4C N+2 680 9 50.00
29 EO 2P W-2 200 1 5.56
30 EO 3C E-3 150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,04 %31 EO 3C E-1 50 5 27.78
32 EO 2S W = -120 8 44.44
33 EO 4C S = 420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 235,0 / 540 = 43,52 %
|
|