|
Tournoi du 12-01-15
1 68,71 7 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand
2 59,55 1 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
3 58,47 10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
4 51,91 8 MATELART Marc -DAPHNE Chantal
5 51,33 2 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine
6 49,29 3 GROSFILS Colette -WANDERPEPEN Janine
7 49,15 11 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
8 48,77 13 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon
9 48,76 9 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine
10 43,88 12 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques
11 41,32 4 MACAUX Lucienne -ROEGIERS Marga
12 40,45 6 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse
13 38,41 5 MASSAUX Joel -JANSSENS Pierre
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 60,33 20 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
2 54,71 23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
3 54,12 22 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
4 53,15 25 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
5 52,64 14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
6 52,11 18 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane
7 50,20 19 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
8 50,06 15 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier
9 49,65 24 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
10 45,91 26 de TERWANGNE Philippe -
11 44,21 16 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
12 43,92 21 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard
13 38,98 17 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
PAIRE Nr : 1 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,64 % 1 NS 4C E-1 50 19 86.36
2 NS 2P W-1 50 11 50.00
3 NS 2P W-1 100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
24 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 49,65 % 4 NS 4C S = 620 10 45.45
5 NS 4T W = -130 17 77.27
6 NS 2C S-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,71 % 7 NS 3S N+2 660 20 90.91
8 NS 2P E = -110 3 13.64
9 NS 3S S+2 460 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
22 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 54,12 %10 NS 3K W+1 -130 8 36.36
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 27.27
12 NS 1S W+1 -120 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,92 %13 NS 3S S+1 630 22 100.00
14 NS 1S S = 90 8 36.36
15 NS 4C N+1 650 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
26 de TERWANGNE Philippe - : 45,91 %16 NS 4C S+1 450 7 31.82
17 NS 1S N = 90 17 77.27
18 NS 3S S+2 660 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
19 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,20 %19 NS 2S E+3 -210 22 100.00
20 NS 3S N+2 660 6 27.27
21 NS 4C S+1 650 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
18 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,11 %22 NS 1S N+3 180 14 63.64
23 NS 2KcS-1 -200 2 9.09
24 NS 3P E+1 -170 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
17 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 38,98 %25 NS 3S E-1 100 17.5 79.55
26 NS 6C E-2 200 15.4 70.00
27 NS 3C N-1 -50 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 61,52 %
16 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 44,21 %28 NS 1S S+1 120 16.5 75.00
29 NS 4C S-1 -100 4.5 20.45
30 NS Pass Passe 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
Total : 393,0 / 660 = 59,55 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine
15 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,06 % 4 NS 4C N = 620 10 45.45
5 NS 5T E-1 50 22 100.00
6 NS 2C S-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,64 % 7 NS 3S N = 600 11 50.00
8 NS 2C S-2 -100 11 50.00
9 NS 3S N+1 430 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
24 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 49,65 %10 NS 3K W+1 -130 8 36.36
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 27.27
12 NS 2P S-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,71 %13 NS 4P E-3 300 17 77.27
14 NS 1S S-2 -100 0 0.00
15 NS 3C N+1 170 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
22 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 54,12 %16 NS 3C S+2 200 0 0.00
17 NS 3K E = -110 4 18.18
18 NS 3S S = 600 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,92 %19 NS 3S E = -600 19 86.36
20 NS 3S N+3 690 15 68.18
21 NS 3K N+2 150 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
25 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,15 %22 NS 3S N = 400 16 72.73
23 NS 3S E-2 200 18 81.82
24 NS 2P W+1 -140 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
19 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,20 %25 NS 3S E = -600 3.4 15.45
26 NS 6S W-3 300 20.8 94.55
27 NS 3K E-1 50 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
18 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,11 %28 NS 1S S = 90 7.7 35.00
29 NS 3C S-1 -100 4.5 20.45
30 NS 2K W+1 -110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,15 %
17 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 38,98 %31 NS 4P N = 620 14 63.64
32 NS 4P W-1 100 20 90.91
33 NS 1S W+2 -150 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
Total : 338,8 / 660 = 51,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 GROSFILS Colette -WANDERPEPEN Janine
18 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,11 % 1 NS 2C W+1 -140 11 50.00
2 NS 2C E-3 150 20 90.91
3 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
16 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 44,21 % 7 NS 3S N = 600 11 50.00
8 NS 1S N-2 -100 11 50.00
9 NS 3S S+1 430 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
25 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,15 %10 NS 3C S-4 -400 0 0.00
11 NS 4P W = -420 14 63.64
12 NS 1S W+2 -150 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 24,70 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,64 %13 NS 2P E = -110 0 0.00
14 NS 4P S = 420 19 86.36
15 NS 4P E-2 100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
24 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 49,65 %16 NS 4C S+2 480 16 72.73
17 NS 1S N+2 150 22 100.00
18 NS 4K S = 130 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,71 %19 NS 3S E+1 -630 10 45.45
20 NS 4C N = 620 1 4.55
21 NS 4C S+1 650 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
22 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 54,12 %22 NS 2S N = 120 12 54.55
23 NS 1S E = -90 9 40.91
24 NS 4P W-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
26 de TERWANGNE Philippe - : 45,91 %25 NS 2S E+1 -150 9.9 45.00
26 NS 5C E-1 100 8.8 40.00
27 NS 2C W-2 100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 56,52 %
20 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,33 %28 NS 1S S = 90 7.7 35.00
29 NS 4P W-2 200 17.5 79.55
30 NS 2S S-3 -150 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 46,52 %
19 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,20 %31 NS 3P N+1 170 8 36.36
32 NS 1S W-1 100 20 90.91
33 NS 3S W = -400 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 325,3 / 660 = 49,29 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 MACAUX Lucienne -ROEGIERS Marga
20 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,33 % 1 NS 2C W+2 -170 1 4.55
2 NS 2P S-2 -200 1 4.55
3 NS 2C N-3 -150 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
19 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,20 % 4 NS 3C S+1 170 2 9.09
5 NS 3T W+1 -130 17 77.27
6 NS 2P W = -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
17 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 38,98 %10 NS 3K W+1 -130 8 36.36
11 NS 2P W+1 -140 19 86.36
12 NS Ajust 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
26 de TERWANGNE Philippe - : 45,91 %13 NS 2C N+2 170 12 54.55
14 NS 3P S-1 -50 4 18.18
15 NS 4C N = 620 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
15 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,06 %16 NS 4C S = 420 3 13.64
17 NS 1S N = 90 17 77.27
18 NS 3T N+1 130 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,64 %19 NS 3S E = -600 19 86.36
20 NS 3S N+2 660 6 27.27
21 NS 4C S+1 650 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
24 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 49,65 %22 NS 2C S-1 -50 7 31.82
23 NS 1S E+3 -180 4 18.18
24 NS 4P W-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,71 %25 NS 3S E = -600 3.4 15.45
26 NS 4C E-1 100 8.8 40.00
27 NS 4P N-1 -50 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 30,15 %
22 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 54,12 %28 NS 1T S+1 90 7.7 35.00
29 NS 3C S = 140 12.1 55.00
30 NS 3K W = -110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
25 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,15 %31 NS 4T S-1 -100 2 9.09
32 NS 3P E+1 -170 4 18.18
33 NS 3S E-1 50 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
Total : 272,7 / 660 = 41,32 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 MASSAUX Joel -JANSSENS Pierre
26 de TERWANGNE Philippe - : 45,91 % 1 NS 2P S-3 -150 5 22.73
2 NS 2T N-1 -100 6 27.27
3 NS 2P W+2 -170 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,92 % 4 NS 4C N = 620 10 45.45
5 NS 3K E+1 -130 17 77.27
6 NS 2C N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
20 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,33 % 7 NS 3S N-1 -100 3 13.64
8 NS 2P E = -110 3 13.64
9 NS 3S S+1 430 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
18 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,11 %13 NS 4C N-1 -100 3 13.64
14 NS 4P S = 420 19 86.36
15 NS 3P E = -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
17 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 38,98 %16 NS 4C S+2 480 16 72.73
17 NS 1S N-1 -50 13 59.09
18 NS 3S S-1 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
25 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,15 %19 NS 3S W+1 -630 10 45.45
20 NS 4C N = 620 1 4.55
21 NS 3K S+2 150 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
15 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,06 %22 NS 5T S-4 -200 0 0.00
23 NS 1S E-2 200 18 81.82
24 NS 4P W-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,64 %25 NS 3S E = -600 3.4 15.45
26 NS 4CcE = -790 0.1 0.45
27 NS 4T S-1 -50 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 16,97 %
24 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 49,65 %28 NS 1S S+1 120 16.5 75.00
29 NS 4C S = 620 19.7 89.55
30 NS 3KcE+1 -570 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,71 %31 NS 4P N = 620 14 63.64
32 NS 2P E+1 -140 11 50.00
33 NS 3S W+1 -430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 253,5 / 660 = 38,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse
24 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 49,65 % 1 NS 3C W = -140 11 50.00
2 NS 3P W-2 100 16 72.73
3 NS 3CcN-4 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,71 % 4 NS 4C S = 620 10 45.45
5 NS 4C W+1 -450 7 31.82
6 NS 2C S-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
25 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,15 % 7 NS 3S N-1 -100 3 13.64
8 NS 3S N-1 -50 18 81.82
9 NS 3S S = 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,92 %10 NS 3C S-1 -100 16 72.73
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 27.27
12 NS 2P S+1 140 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 63,18 %
19 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,20 %16 NS 4C N+1 450 7 31.82
17 NS 3K E+1 -130 2 9.09
18 NS 3S N+3 690 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
18 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,11 %19 NS 3S E+2 -660 1 4.55
20 NS 3S N+3 690 15 68.18
21 NS 3S S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
26 de TERWANGNE Philippe - : 45,91 %22 NS 2K S = 90 10 45.45
23 NS 3T S-1 -100 6 27.27
24 NS 2C S+1 140 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
16 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 44,21 %25 NS 3S E = -600 3.4 15.45
26 NS 3S N-1 -100 4.5 20.45
27 NS 3T N-1 -50 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 23,64 %
15 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,06 %28 NS 2S N-2 -200 0.1 0.45
29 NS 3C S = 140 12.1 55.00
30 NS 4T N-2 -100 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 43,48 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,64 %31 NS 3P N+2 200 10 45.45
32 NS 3P E = -140 11 50.00
33 NS 3S W+2 -460 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 267,0 / 660 = 40,45 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand
15 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,06 % 1 NS 4C E-1 50 19 86.36
2 NS 2K W+1 -110 4 18.18
3 NS 3P W = -140 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,64 % 4 NS 4C S+2 680 21 95.45
5 NS 4C W+1 -450 7 31.82
6 NS 2C S-2 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
24 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 49,65 % 7 NS 3S N+1 630 16 72.73
8 NS 2C S = 110 21 95.45
9 NS 3S S+1 430 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
26 de TERWANGNE Philippe - : 45,91 %10 NS 1S N+2 150 22 100.00
11 NS 3S E = -400 16 72.73
12 NS 2P S+1 140 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 87,42 %
22 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 54,12 %13 NS 3C N+1 170 12 54.55
14 NS 4P S = 420 19 86.36
15 NS 4C N+1 650 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
20 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,33 %19 NS 3S E+1 -630 10 45.45
20 NS 3S N+3 690 15 68.18
21 NS 4C S+1 650 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
19 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,20 %22 NS 3S N+2 460 22 100.00
23 NS 3S E-3 300 22 100.00
24 NS 3P W-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
18 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,11 %25 NS 3S E-2 200 21.9 99.55
26 NS 6C E-2 200 15.4 70.00
27 NS 3KcE-1 100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 84,70 %
25 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,15 %28 NS 1S S+3 180 21.9 99.55
29 NS 4C S-1 -100 4.5 20.45
30 NS 2S S-3 -150 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
16 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 44,21 %31 NS 4P N+1 650 18 81.82
32 NS 2P E = -110 16 72.73
33 NS 3S W+1 -430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
Total : 453,5 / 660 = 68,71 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -DAPHNE Chantal
17 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 38,98 % 1 NS 4C W-1 50 19 86.36
2 NS 4CcE-4 800 22 100.00
3 NS 2C N-2 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
16 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 44,21 % 4 NS 6C S-2 -200 0 0.00
5 NS 2S W+2 -180 12 54.55
6 NS 2C S-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
15 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,06 % 7 NS 3S N+2 660 20 90.91
8 NS 2C S-2 -100 11 50.00
9 NS 3S N+1 430 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,64 %10 NS 2K W+2 -130 8 36.36
11 NS 3P W = -140 19 86.36
12 NS 1S W = -90 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 64,24 %
24 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 49,65 %13 NS 4C N = 620 20 90.91
14 NS 4P S-1 -50 4 18.18
15 NS 3PcE-1 100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
25 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,15 %16 NS 3PcW-3 800 20 90.91
17 NS 1S N+1 120 20 90.91
18 NS 5K N = 600 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,92 %22 NS 4P N-3 -150 2 9.09
23 NS 1S E-2 200 18 81.82
24 NS 3PcW+1 -630 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
20 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,33 %25 NS 2S E = -120 13.2 60.00
26 NS 6C E-3 300 20.8 94.55
27 NS 2KcE = -180 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
19 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,20 %28 NS 2K E = -90 2.3 10.45
29 NS 3P W = -140 0.1 0.45
30 NS 2K W = -90 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 33,48 %
26 de TERWANGNE Philippe - : 45,91 %31 NS 4P N-1 -100 2 9.09
32 NS 3P E = -140 11 50.00
33 NS 3S W+1 -430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
Total : 342,6 / 660 = 51,91 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine
19 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,20 % 1 NS 2C W+1 -140 11 50.00
2 NS 3T N = 110 18 81.82
3 NS 2C N-3 -150 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
25 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,15 % 4 NS 4C S = 620 10 45.45
5 NS 3S W+2 -460 2 9.09
6 NS 2C S = 110 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
17 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 38,98 % 7 NS 3S N-1 -100 3 13.64
8 NS 2S N-2 -100 11 50.00
9 NS 3S N+1 430 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
16 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 44,21 %10 NS 3T N = 110 19 86.36
11 NS 5P W-2 100 22 100.00
12 NS 2P S+1 140 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 91,97 %
15 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,06 %13 NS 2C N+1 140 8 36.36
14 NS 2P S+1 140 13 59.09
15 NS 4PcE-2 300 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,64 %16 NS 3S S+2 460 11 50.00
17 NS 2P E+1 -140 0 0.00
18 NS 5KcN = 750 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
26 de TERWANGNE Philippe - : 45,91 %19 NS 3S E+1 -630 10 45.45
20 NS 3S N+2 660 6 27.27
21 NS 3S S+2 660 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
22 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 54,12 %25 NS 3S E-1 100 17.5 79.55
26 NS 4C E+1 -650 2.3 10.45
27 NS 1S S-1 -50 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,92 %28 NS 1S S+1 120 16.5 75.00
29 NS 4P W-1 100 8.8 40.00
30 NS 2C E+3 -200 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 41,82 %
20 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,33 %31 NS 3K S = 110 6 27.27
32 NS 4PcE = -790 0 0.00
33 NS 3S E+2 -460 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 10,61 %
Total : 321,8 / 660 = 48,76 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
21 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,92 % 1 NS 2S E+1 -150 5 22.73
2 NS 3T N-2 -200 1 4.55
3 NS 2C N-1 -50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
20 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,33 % 4 NS 4C N+2 680 21 95.45
5 NS 3K E+1 -130 17 77.27
6 NS 2C S-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
26 de TERWANGNE Philippe - : 45,91 % 7 NS 3S N+2 660 20 90.91
8 NS 2K N-2 -100 11 50.00
9 NS 3S N+1 430 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
18 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,11 %10 NS 3K W = -110 14 63.64
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 27.27
12 NS 2P S-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
17 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 38,98 %13 NS 3P E-1 100 6 27.27
14 NS 4P S = 420 19 86.36
15 NS 4C N = 620 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
16 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 44,21 %16 NS 6C N+1 1010 22 100.00
17 NS 1S N-1 -50 13 59.09
18 NS 3S S+1 630 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
15 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,06 %19 NS 3S E+2 -660 1 4.55
20 NS 6S N = 1440 22 100.00
21 NS 2C S+3 200 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,64 %22 NS 3S N-1 -50 7 31.82
23 NS 1S E = -90 9 40.91
24 NS 3P W = -140 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,71 %28 NS 1S S+1 120 16.5 75.00
29 NS 4CcN = 790 21.9 99.55
30 NS 4T N-2 -100 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 83,18 %
22 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 54,12 %31 NS 4P N = 620 14 63.64
32 NS 3P E+1 -170 4 18.18
33 NS 3S W = -400 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
Total : 385,9 / 660 = 58,47 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,71 % 1 NS 4C W-1 50 19 86.36
2 NS 3S W-1 50 11 50.00
3 NS 2C N-2 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
22 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 54,12 % 4 NS 4C S = 620 10 45.45
5 NS 2C W+3 -200 10 45.45
6 NS 2T W = -90 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,92 % 7 NS 3S N = 600 11 50.00
8 NS 1S N-2 -100 11 50.00
9 NS 3S N+1 430 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
20 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,33 %10 NS 4K E = -130 8 36.36
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 27.27
12 NS 2P S-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
25 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,15 %13 NS 3P W-3 300 17 77.27
14 NS 3P S = 140 13 59.09
15 NS 4PcE-3 500 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
18 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,11 %16 NS 4C S+2 480 16 72.73
17 NS 2S N-2 -100 7 31.82
18 NS 5K N = 600 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
17 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 38,98 %19 NS 3S W+1 -630 10 45.45
20 NS 3S N+3 690 15 68.18
21 NS 2C S+3 200 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
16 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 44,21 %22 NS 3S N+1 430 19 86.36
23 NS 3K S-3 -300 0 0.00
24 NS 3P W = -140 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
15 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,06 %25 NS 2S E+1 -150 9.9 45.00
26 NS 4C E-1 100 8.8 40.00
27 NS 3P N-1 -50 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
24 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 49,65 %31 NS 5K S-1 -100 2 9.09
32 NS 3P W-1 100 20 90.91
33 NS 3S W+1 -430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
Total : 324,4 / 660 = 49,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques
25 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,15 % 1 NS 2C W+1 -140 11 50.00
2 NS 2C E-1 50 11 50.00
3 NS 2P W+2 -170 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
18 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,11 % 4 NS 4C S+1 650 18 81.82
5 NS 3S W+2 -460 2 9.09
6 NS 2C S = 110 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
22 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 54,12 % 7 NS 3S N = 600 11 50.00
8 NS 2C S = 110 21 95.45
9 NS 4P S = 420 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
15 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,06 %10 NS 2C S = 110 19 86.36
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 27.27
12 NS 1S W+1 -120 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 46,21 %
19 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,20 %13 NS 4C N-1 -100 3 13.64
14 NS 4P S-1 -50 4 18.18
15 NS 3P E-1 50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,71 %16 NS 4C S = 420 3 13.64
17 NS 2K E = -90 10 45.45
18 NS 6KcN-1 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 19,70 %
16 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 44,21 %19 NS 3S E+1 -630 10 45.45
20 NS 3S N+3 690 15 68.18
21 NS 4C S+1 650 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
20 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,33 %22 NS 2S N-2 -100 4 18.18
23 NS 1S E-1 100 14 63.64
24 NS 2P W+2 -170 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
17 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 38,98 %28 NS 1S S = 90 7.7 35.00
29 NS 3C S+1 170 15.4 70.00
30 NS 2K W+1 -110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,92 %31 NS 5CcW-4 800 21 95.45
32 NS 3P E = -140 11 50.00
33 NS 3S W+1 -430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
Total : 289,6 / 660 = 43,88 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon
22 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 54,12 % 1 NS 2C W+2 -170 1 4.55
2 NS 2P W-1 50 11 50.00
3 NS 2C N-2 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
26 de TERWANGNE Philippe - : 45,91 % 4 NS 4C S = 620 10 45.45
5 NS 3S W+2 -460 2 9.09
6 NS 2C S = 110 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
19 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,20 % 7 NS 3S N-1 -100 3 13.64
8 NS 3P E = -140 0 0.00
9 NS 3S S+2 460 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,71 %10 NS 4K W+1 -150 2 9.09
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 27.27
12 NS 1S W+3 -180 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 12,27 %
16 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 44,21 %13 NS 3C N+1 170 12 54.55
14 NS 3T S = 110 10 45.45
15 NS 4P W-4 200 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
20 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,33 %16 NS 3S S+2 460 11 50.00
17 NS 3C S-2 -100 7 31.82
18 NS 3K N+2 150 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
24 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 49,65 %19 NS 3S W+1 -630 10 45.45
20 NS 3S N+3 690 15 68.18
21 NS 4K N+1 150 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
17 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 38,98 %22 NS 3S S+1 430 19 86.36
23 NS 2K S = 90 12 54.55
24 NS 4P W-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,92 %25 NS 3S E-1 100 17.5 79.55
26 NS 6C E-2 200 15.4 70.00
27 NS 2P S = 110 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 83,03 %
18 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,11 %31 NS 4CcW-4 800 21 95.45
32 NS 3P E+1 -170 4 18.18
33 NS 3S W = -400 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
Total : 321,9 / 660 = 48,77 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
1 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,55 % 1 EO 4C E-1 50 3 13.64
2 EO 2P W-1 50 11 50.00
3 EO 2P W-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
7 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 68,71 % 4 EO 4C S+2 680 1 4.55
5 EO 4C W+1 -450 15 68.18
6 EO 2C S-2 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
2 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 51,33 % 7 EO 3S N = 600 11 50.00
8 EO 2C S-2 -100 11 50.00
9 EO 3S N+1 430 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -DAPHNE Chantal : 51,91 %10 EO 2K W+2 -130 14 63.64
11 EO 3P W = -140 3 13.64
12 EO 1S W = -90 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 35,76 %
3 GROSFILS Colette -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 49,29 %13 EO 2P E = -110 22 100.00
14 EO 4P S = 420 3 13.64
15 EO 4P E-2 100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
9 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 48,76 %16 EO 3S S+2 460 11 50.00
17 EO 2P E+1 -140 22 100.00
18 EO 5KcN = 750 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 MACAUX Lucienne -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,32 %19 EO 3S E = -600 3 13.64
20 EO 3S N+2 660 16 72.73
21 EO 4C S+1 650 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 58,47 %22 EO 3S N-1 -50 15 68.18
23 EO 1S E = -90 13 59.09
24 EO 3P W = -140 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
5 MASSAUX Joel -JANSSENS Pierre : 38,41 %25 EO 3S E = -600 18.6 84.55
26 EO 4CcE = -790 21.9 99.55
27 EO 4T S-1 -50 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 83,03 %
6 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,45 %31 EO 3P N+2 200 12 54.55
32 EO 3P E = -140 11 50.00
33 EO 3S W+2 -460 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 347,4 / 660 = 52,64 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier
7 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 68,71 % 1 EO 4C E-1 50 3 13.64
2 EO 2K W+1 -110 18 81.82
3 EO 3P W = -140 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
2 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 51,33 % 4 EO 4C N = 620 12 54.55
5 EO 5T E-1 50 0 0.00
6 EO 2C S-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
8 MATELART Marc -DAPHNE Chantal : 51,91 % 7 EO 3S N+2 660 2 9.09
8 EO 2C S-2 -100 11 50.00
9 EO 3S N+1 430 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
12 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 43,88 %10 EO 2C S = 110 3 13.64
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 72.73
12 EO 1S W+1 -120 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 53,79 %
9 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 48,76 %13 EO 2C N+1 140 14 63.64
14 EO 2P S+1 140 9 40.91
15 EO 4PcE-2 300 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 MACAUX Lucienne -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,32 %16 EO 4C S = 420 19 86.36
17 EO 1S N = 90 5 22.73
18 EO 3T N+1 130 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 58,47 %19 EO 3S E+2 -660 21 95.45
20 EO 6S N = 1440 0 0.00
21 EO 2C S+3 200 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
5 MASSAUX Joel -JANSSENS Pierre : 38,41 %22 EO 5T S-4 -200 22 100.00
23 EO 1S E-2 200 4 18.18
24 EO 4P W-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
11 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 49,15 %25 EO 2S E+1 -150 12.1 55.00
26 EO 4C E-1 100 13.2 60.00
27 EO 3P N-1 -50 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
6 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,45 %28 EO 2S N-2 -200 21.9 99.55
29 EO 3C S = 140 9.9 45.00
30 EO 4T N-2 -100 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 56,52 %
Total : 330,4 / 660 = 50,06 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
8 MATELART Marc -DAPHNE Chantal : 51,91 % 4 EO 6C S-2 -200 22 100.00
5 EO 2S W+2 -180 10 45.45
6 EO 2C S-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
3 GROSFILS Colette -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 49,29 % 7 EO 3S N = 600 11 50.00
8 EO 1S N-2 -100 11 50.00
9 EO 3S S+1 430 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 48,76 %10 EO 3T N = 110 3 13.64
11 EO 5P W-2 100 0 0.00
12 EO 2P S+1 140 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 8,03 %
13 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 48,77 %13 EO 3C N+1 170 10 45.45
14 EO 3T S = 110 12 54.55
15 EO 4P W-4 200 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 58,47 %16 EO 6C N+1 1010 0 0.00
17 EO 1S N-1 -50 9 40.91
18 EO 3S S+1 630 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
12 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 43,88 %19 EO 3S E+1 -630 12 54.55
20 EO 3S N+3 690 7 31.82
21 EO 4C S+1 650 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
11 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 49,15 %22 EO 3S N+1 430 3 13.64
23 EO 3K S-3 -300 22 100.00
24 EO 3P W = -140 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
6 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,45 %25 EO 3S E = -600 18.6 84.55
26 EO 3S N-1 -100 17.5 79.55
27 EO 3T N-1 -50 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 76,36 %
1 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,55 %28 EO 1S S+1 120 5.5 25.00
29 EO 4C S-1 -100 17.5 79.55
30 EO Pass Passe 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
7 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 68,71 %31 EO 4P N+1 650 4 18.18
32 EO 2P E = -110 6 27.27
33 EO 3S W+1 -430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
Total : 291,8 / 660 = 44,21 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
8 MATELART Marc -DAPHNE Chantal : 51,91 % 1 EO 4C W-1 50 3 13.64
2 EO 4CcE-4 800 0 0.00
3 EO 2C N-2 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
9 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 48,76 % 7 EO 3S N-1 -100 19 86.36
8 EO 2S N-2 -100 11 50.00
9 EO 3S N+1 430 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
4 MACAUX Lucienne -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,32 %10 EO 3K W+1 -130 14 63.64
11 EO 2P W+1 -140 3 13.64
12 EO Ajust 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 58,47 %13 EO 3P E-1 100 16 72.73
14 EO 4P S = 420 3 13.64
15 EO 4C N = 620 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
5 MASSAUX Joel -JANSSENS Pierre : 38,41 %16 EO 4C S+2 480 6 27.27
17 EO 1S N-1 -50 9 40.91
18 EO 3S S-1 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
11 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 49,15 %19 EO 3S W+1 -630 12 54.55
20 EO 3S N+3 690 7 31.82
21 EO 2C S+3 200 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
13 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 48,77 %22 EO 3S S+1 430 3 13.64
23 EO 2K S = 90 10 45.45
24 EO 4P W-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
1 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,55 %25 EO 3S E-1 100 4.5 20.45
26 EO 6C E-2 200 6.6 30.00
27 EO 3C N-1 -50 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 38,48 %
12 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 43,88 %28 EO 1S S = 90 14.3 65.00
29 EO 3C S+1 170 6.6 30.00
30 EO 2K W+1 -110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
2 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 51,33 %31 EO 4P N = 620 8 36.36
32 EO 4P W-1 100 2 9.09
33 EO 1S W+2 -150 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
Total : 257,3 / 660 = 38,98 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane
3 GROSFILS Colette -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 49,29 % 1 EO 2C W+1 -140 11 50.00
2 EO 2C E-3 150 2 9.09
3 EO 3S E+1 -630 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 43,88 % 4 EO 4C S+1 650 4 18.18
5 EO 3S W+2 -460 20 90.91
6 EO 2C S = 110 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 58,47 %10 EO 3K W = -110 8 36.36
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 72.73
12 EO 2P S-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
5 MASSAUX Joel -JANSSENS Pierre : 38,41 %13 EO 4C N-1 -100 19 86.36
14 EO 4P S = 420 3 13.64
15 EO 3P E = -140 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
11 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 49,15 %16 EO 4C S+2 480 6 27.27
17 EO 2S N-2 -100 15 68.18
18 EO 5K N = 600 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
6 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,45 %19 EO 3S E+2 -660 21 95.45
20 EO 3S N+3 690 7 31.82
21 EO 3S S-2 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
1 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,55 %22 EO 1S N+3 180 8 36.36
23 EO 2KcS-1 -200 20 90.91
24 EO 3P E+1 -170 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
7 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 68,71 %25 EO 3S E-2 200 0.1 0.45
26 EO 6C E-2 200 6.6 30.00
27 EO 3KcE-1 100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 15,30 %
2 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 51,33 %28 EO 1S S = 90 14.3 65.00
29 EO 3C S-1 -100 17.5 79.55
30 EO 2K W+1 -110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,85 %
13 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 48,77 %31 EO 4CcW-4 800 1 4.55
32 EO 3P E+1 -170 18 81.82
33 EO 3S W = -400 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
Total : 343,9 / 660 = 52,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
9 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 48,76 % 1 EO 2C W+1 -140 11 50.00
2 EO 3T N = 110 4 18.18
3 EO 2C N-3 -150 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
4 MACAUX Lucienne -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,32 % 4 EO 3C S+1 170 20 90.91
5 EO 3T W+1 -130 5 22.73
6 EO 2P W = -110 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
13 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 48,77 % 7 EO 3S N-1 -100 19 86.36
8 EO 3P E = -140 22 100.00
9 EO 3S S+2 460 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
12 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 43,88 %13 EO 4C N-1 -100 19 86.36
14 EO 4P S-1 -50 18 81.82
15 EO 3P E-1 50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
6 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,45 %16 EO 4C N+1 450 15 68.18
17 EO 3K E+1 -130 20 90.91
18 EO 3S N+3 690 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
1 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,55 %19 EO 2S E+3 -210 0 0.00
20 EO 3S N+2 660 16 72.73
21 EO 4C S+1 650 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
7 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 68,71 %22 EO 3S N+2 460 0 0.00
23 EO 3S E-3 300 0 0.00
24 EO 3P W-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
2 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 51,33 %25 EO 3S E = -600 18.6 84.55
26 EO 6S W-3 300 1.2 5.45
27 EO 3K E-1 50 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -DAPHNE Chantal : 51,91 %28 EO 2K E = -90 19.7 89.55
29 EO 3P W = -140 21.9 99.55
30 EO 2K W = -90 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 66,52 %
3 GROSFILS Colette -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 49,29 %31 EO 3P N+1 170 14 63.64
32 EO 1S W-1 100 2 9.09
33 EO 3S W = -400 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 331,3 / 660 = 50,20 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
4 MACAUX Lucienne -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,32 % 1 EO 2C W+2 -170 21 95.45
2 EO 2P S-2 -200 21 95.45
3 EO 2C N-3 -150 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 58,47 % 4 EO 4C N+2 680 1 4.55
5 EO 3K E+1 -130 5 22.73
6 EO 2C S-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
5 MASSAUX Joel -JANSSENS Pierre : 38,41 % 7 EO 3S N-1 -100 19 86.36
8 EO 2P E = -110 19 86.36
9 EO 3S S+1 430 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
11 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 49,15 %10 EO 4K E = -130 14 63.64
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 72.73
12 EO 2P S-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
13 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 48,77 %16 EO 3S S+2 460 11 50.00
17 EO 3C S-2 -100 15 68.18
18 EO 3K N+2 150 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
7 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 68,71 %19 EO 3S E+1 -630 12 54.55
20 EO 3S N+3 690 7 31.82
21 EO 4C S+1 650 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
12 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 43,88 %22 EO 2S N-2 -100 18 81.82
23 EO 1S E-1 100 8 36.36
24 EO 2P W+2 -170 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
8 MATELART Marc -DAPHNE Chantal : 51,91 %25 EO 2S E = -120 8.8 40.00
26 EO 6C E-3 300 1.2 5.45
27 EO 2KcE = -180 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
3 GROSFILS Colette -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 49,29 %28 EO 1S S = 90 14.3 65.00
29 EO 4P W-2 200 4.5 20.45
30 EO 2S S-3 -150 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 53,48 %
9 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 48,76 %31 EO 3K S = 110 16 72.73
32 EO 4PcE = -790 22 100.00
33 EO 3S E+2 -460 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 89,39 %
Total : 398,2 / 660 = 60,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard
10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 58,47 % 1 EO 2S E+1 -150 17 77.27
2 EO 3T N-2 -200 21 95.45
3 EO 2C N-1 -50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
5 MASSAUX Joel -JANSSENS Pierre : 38,41 % 4 EO 4C N = 620 12 54.55
5 EO 3K E+1 -130 5 22.73
6 EO 2C N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
11 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 49,15 % 7 EO 3S N = 600 11 50.00
8 EO 1S N-2 -100 11 50.00
9 EO 3S N+1 430 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
6 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,45 %10 EO 3C S-1 -100 6 27.27
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 72.73
12 EO 2P S+1 140 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 36,82 %
1 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,55 %13 EO 3S S+1 630 0 0.00
14 EO 1S S = 90 14 63.64
15 EO 4C N+1 650 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
2 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 51,33 %19 EO 3S E = -600 3 13.64
20 EO 3S N+3 690 7 31.82
21 EO 3K N+2 150 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
8 MATELART Marc -DAPHNE Chantal : 51,91 %22 EO 4P N-3 -150 20 90.91
23 EO 1S E-2 200 4 18.18
24 EO 3PcW+1 -630 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
13 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 48,77 %25 EO 3S E-1 100 4.5 20.45
26 EO 6C E-2 200 6.6 30.00
27 EO 2P S = 110 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 16,97 %
9 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 48,76 %28 EO 1S S+1 120 5.5 25.00
29 EO 4P W-1 100 13.2 60.00
30 EO 2C E+3 -200 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 58,18 %
12 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 43,88 %31 EO 5CcW-4 800 1 4.55
32 EO 3P E = -140 11 50.00
33 EO 3S W+1 -430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
Total : 289,9 / 660 = 43,92 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
13 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 48,77 % 1 EO 2C W+2 -170 21 95.45
2 EO 2P W-1 50 11 50.00
3 EO 2C N-2 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
11 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 49,15 % 4 EO 4C S = 620 12 54.55
5 EO 2C W+3 -200 12 54.55
6 EO 2T W = -90 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
12 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 43,88 % 7 EO 3S N = 600 11 50.00
8 EO 2C S = 110 1 4.55
9 EO 4P S = 420 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
1 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,55 %10 EO 3K W+1 -130 14 63.64
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 72.73
12 EO 1S W+1 -120 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
7 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 68,71 %13 EO 3C N+1 170 10 45.45
14 EO 4P S = 420 3 13.64
15 EO 4C N+1 650 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
2 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 51,33 %16 EO 3C S+2 200 22 100.00
17 EO 3K E = -110 18 81.82
18 EO 3S S = 600 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
3 GROSFILS Colette -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 49,29 %22 EO 2S N = 120 10 45.45
23 EO 1S E = -90 13 59.09
24 EO 4P W-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
9 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 48,76 %25 EO 3S E-1 100 4.5 20.45
26 EO 4C E+1 -650 19.7 89.55
27 EO 1S S-1 -50 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
4 MACAUX Lucienne -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,32 %28 EO 1T S+1 90 14.3 65.00
29 EO 3C S = 140 9.9 45.00
30 EO 3K W = -110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 58,47 %31 EO 4P N = 620 8 36.36
32 EO 3P E+1 -170 18 81.82
33 EO 3S W = -400 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
Total : 357,2 / 660 = 54,12 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
11 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 49,15 % 1 EO 4C W-1 50 3 13.64
2 EO 3S W-1 50 11 50.00
3 EO 2C N-2 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
6 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,45 % 4 EO 4C S = 620 12 54.55
5 EO 4C W+1 -450 15 68.18
6 EO 2C S-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
1 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,55 % 7 EO 3S N+2 660 2 9.09
8 EO 2P E = -110 19 86.36
9 EO 3S S+2 460 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
13 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 48,77 %10 EO 4K W+1 -150 20 90.91
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 72.73
12 EO 1S W+3 -180 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 87,73 %
2 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 51,33 %13 EO 4P E-3 300 5 22.73
14 EO 1S S-2 -100 22 100.00
15 EO 3C N+1 170 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
12 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 43,88 %16 EO 4C S = 420 19 86.36
17 EO 2K E = -90 12 54.55
18 EO 6KcN-1 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 80,30 %
3 GROSFILS Colette -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 49,29 %19 EO 3S E+1 -630 12 54.55
20 EO 4C N = 620 21 95.45
21 EO 4C S+1 650 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
4 MACAUX Lucienne -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,32 %25 EO 3S E = -600 18.6 84.55
26 EO 4C E-1 100 13.2 60.00
27 EO 4P N-1 -50 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 69,85 %
10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 58,47 %28 EO 1S S+1 120 5.5 25.00
29 EO 4CcN = 790 0.1 0.45
30 EO 4T N-2 -100 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 16,82 %
5 MASSAUX Joel -JANSSENS Pierre : 38,41 %31 EO 4P N = 620 8 36.36
32 EO 2P E+1 -140 11 50.00
33 EO 3S W+1 -430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 361,1 / 660 = 54,71 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
6 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,45 % 1 EO 3C W = -140 11 50.00
2 EO 3P W-2 100 6 27.27
3 EO 3CcN-4 -800 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
1 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,55 % 4 EO 4C S = 620 12 54.55
5 EO 4T W = -130 5 22.73
6 EO 2C S-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
7 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 68,71 % 7 EO 3S N+1 630 6 27.27
8 EO 2C S = 110 1 4.55
9 EO 3S S+1 430 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
2 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 51,33 %10 EO 3K W+1 -130 14 63.64
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 72.73
12 EO 2P S-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
8 MATELART Marc -DAPHNE Chantal : 51,91 %13 EO 4C N = 620 2 9.09
14 EO 4P S-1 -50 18 81.82
15 EO 3PcE-1 100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
3 GROSFILS Colette -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 49,29 %16 EO 4C S+2 480 6 27.27
17 EO 1S N+2 150 0 0.00
18 EO 4K S = 130 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
13 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 48,77 %19 EO 3S W+1 -630 12 54.55
20 EO 3S N+3 690 7 31.82
21 EO 4K N+1 150 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
4 MACAUX Lucienne -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,32 %22 EO 2C S-1 -50 15 68.18
23 EO 1S E+3 -180 18 81.82
24 EO 4P W-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
5 MASSAUX Joel -JANSSENS Pierre : 38,41 %28 EO 1S S+1 120 5.5 25.00
29 EO 4C S = 620 2.3 10.45
30 EO 3KcE+1 -570 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
11 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 49,15 %31 EO 5K S-1 -100 20 90.91
32 EO 3P W-1 100 2 9.09
33 EO 3S W+1 -430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
Total : 327,7 / 660 = 49,65 %
PAIRE Nr : 25 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
12 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -DEGUELLE Jacques : 43,88 % 1 EO 2C W+1 -140 11 50.00
2 EO 2C E-1 50 11 50.00
3 EO 2P W+2 -170 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
9 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 48,76 % 4 EO 4C S = 620 12 54.55
5 EO 3S W+2 -460 20 90.91
6 EO 2C S = 110 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
6 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,45 % 7 EO 3S N-1 -100 19 86.36
8 EO 3S N-1 -50 4 18.18
9 EO 3S S = 400 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
3 GROSFILS Colette -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 49,29 %10 EO 3C S-4 -400 22 100.00
11 EO 4P W = -420 8 36.36
12 EO 1S W+2 -150 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 75,30 %
11 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 49,15 %13 EO 3P W-3 300 5 22.73
14 EO 3P S = 140 9 40.91
15 EO 4PcE-3 500 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
8 MATELART Marc -DAPHNE Chantal : 51,91 %16 EO 3PcW-3 800 2 9.09
17 EO 1S N+1 120 2 9.09
18 EO 5K N = 600 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
5 MASSAUX Joel -JANSSENS Pierre : 38,41 %19 EO 3S W+1 -630 12 54.55
20 EO 4C N = 620 21 95.45
21 EO 3K S+2 150 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
2 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 51,33 %22 EO 3S N = 400 6 27.27
23 EO 3S E-2 200 4 18.18
24 EO 2P W+1 -140 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
7 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 68,71 %28 EO 1S S+3 180 0.1 0.45
29 EO 4C S-1 -100 17.5 79.55
30 EO 2S S-3 -150 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
4 MACAUX Lucienne -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,32 %31 EO 4T S-1 -100 20 90.91
32 EO 3P E+1 -170 18 81.82
33 EO 3S E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
Total : 350,8 / 660 = 53,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 26 de TERWANGNE Philippe -
5 MASSAUX Joel -JANSSENS Pierre : 38,41 % 1 EO 2P S-3 -150 17 77.27
2 EO 2T N-1 -100 16 72.73
3 EO 2P W+2 -170 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
13 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 48,77 % 4 EO 4C S = 620 12 54.55
5 EO 3S W+2 -460 20 90.91
6 EO 2C S = 110 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 58,47 % 7 EO 3S N+2 660 2 9.09
8 EO 2K N-2 -100 11 50.00
9 EO 3S N+1 430 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
7 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 68,71 %10 EO 1S N+2 150 0 0.00
11 EO 3S E = -400 6 27.27
12 EO 2P S+1 140 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 12,58 %
4 MACAUX Lucienne -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,32 %13 EO 2C N+2 170 10 45.45
14 EO 3P S-1 -50 18 81.82
15 EO 4C N = 620 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
1 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,55 %16 EO 4C S+1 450 15 68.18
17 EO 1S N = 90 5 22.73
18 EO 3S S+2 660 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
9 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 48,76 %19 EO 3S E+1 -630 12 54.55
20 EO 3S N+2 660 16 72.73
21 EO 3S S+2 660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
6 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,45 %22 EO 2K S = 90 12 54.55
23 EO 3T S-1 -100 16 72.73
24 EO 2C S+1 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
3 GROSFILS Colette -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 49,29 %25 EO 2S E+1 -150 12.1 55.00
26 EO 5C E-1 100 13.2 60.00
27 EO 2C W-2 100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 43,48 %
8 MATELART Marc -DAPHNE Chantal : 51,91 %31 EO 4P N-1 -100 20 90.91
32 EO 3P E = -140 11 50.00
33 EO 3S W+1 -430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
Total : 303,0 / 660 = 45,91 %
|
|