|
Tournoi du 12-08-13
1 59,07 3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
2 56,11 5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
3 53,52 6 de VIRON Baudouin -LIBERT Laurent
4 52,41 9 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
5 50,93 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
6 49,44 4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -GROSFILS Colette
7 48,89 2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
8 46,30 7 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
9 43,89 1 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine
10 39,44 10 NELIS Claude -DELHEZ Jacques
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 62,41 15 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
2 60,56 18 CASSART Guy -COLLET Christine
3 59,81 14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
4 55,19 19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
5 54,44 17 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
6 54,07 11 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
7 42,96 12 MASSAUX Joel -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
8 38,89 16 DESSY Lina -ARICKX Roger
9 38,15 20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
10 33,52 13 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
PAIRE Nr : 1 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine
11 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 54,07 % 1 NS 3S N = 400 0 0.00
2 NS 3S N+1 630 15 83.33
3 NS 2P S+1 140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
13 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 33,52 % 4 NS 4KcE-1 200 18 100.00
5 NS 3S S-3 -300 1 5.56
6 NS 3S S = 400 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
12 MASSAUX Joel -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 42,96 % 7 NS 5C N+2 710 18 100.00
8 NS 6TcS = 1090 18 100.00
9 NS 2K N = 90 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
16 DESSY Lina -ARICKX Roger : 38,89 %10 NS 2C N+3 200 6 33.33
11 NS 4C W+1 -450 6 33.33
12 NS 2P E-3 150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 54,44 %13 NS 3S W-1 100 9 50.00
14 NS 3S N+1 430 9 50.00
15 NS 2C N = 110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
18 CASSART Guy -COLLET Christine : 60,56 %16 NS 3S N-3 -150 10 55.56
17 NS 3K S+1 130 2 11.11
18 NS 3S N+1 630 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,19 %19 NS 3P N-2 -100 12 66.67
20 NS 3T S-1 -100 2 11.11
21 NS 3P E-2 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 38,15 %22 NS 3C W-1 100 16 88.89
23 NS 2P N-1 -100 13 72.22
24 NS 2C N = 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,81 %25 NS Pass Passe 2 11.11
26 NS 1S W-1 100 13 72.22
27 NS 3S S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
15 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 62,41 %28 NS 2C S = 110 0 0.00
29 NS 2C S = 110 0 0.00
30 NS 4PxW+1 -1080 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 237,0 / 540 = 43,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
13 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 33,52 % 1 NS 3S N+1 430 4 22.22
2 NS 3S N = 600 8 44.44
3 NS 2P S+2 170 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 MASSAUX Joel -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 42,96 % 4 NS 3P S = 140 12 66.67
5 NS 1S N = 90 12 66.67
6 NS 3S S = 400 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
11 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 54,07 % 7 NS 6C W+1 -1460 5 27.78
8 NS 3K W+1 -130 0 0.00
9 NS 3K S+1 130 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 38,15 %10 NS 3C N+2 200 6 33.33
11 NS 4C W-1 50 18 100.00
12 NS 3K E-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,81 %13 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 11.11
14 NS 4C N = 420 5 27.78
15 NS 2S S = 120 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
15 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 62,41 %16 NS 3C N-2 -100 12 66.67
17 NS 2S N+1 150 6 33.33
18 NS 3S N+2 660 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
16 DESSY Lina -ARICKX Roger : 38,89 %19 NS 5TcW-3 800 18 100.00
20 NS 1S S+1 120 12 66.67
21 NS 2C N+2 170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 54,44 %22 NS 4C E-1 100 16 88.89
23 NS 1S W+3 -180 0 0.00
24 NS 2CcN = 470 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
18 CASSART Guy -COLLET Christine : 60,56 %25 NS 3T S+1 130 8 44.44
26 NS 2T W-1 100 13 72.22
27 NS 4C N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,19 %28 NS 2C S+2 170 9 50.00
29 NS 2C N+1 140 7 38.89
30 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 264,0 / 540 = 48,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
12 MASSAUX Joel -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 42,96 % 1 NS 3S N+2 460 13 72.22
2 NS 3S N+1 630 15 83.33
3 NS 3P S+1 170 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
11 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 54,07 % 4 NS 3K E = -110 3 16.67
5 NS 3S S-1 -100 8 44.44
6 NS 3S S-2 -100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
13 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 33,52 % 7 NS 4C W+3 -710 15 83.33
8 NS 4K W-2 100 11 61.11
9 NS 3K S+2 150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
18 CASSART Guy -COLLET Christine : 60,56 %10 NS 4C N+1 650 17 94.44
11 NS 4C W+1 -450 6 33.33
12 NS 3S N-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,19 %13 NS 3S W-1 100 9 50.00
14 NS 4C N = 420 5 27.78
15 NS 1C N+2 140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 38,15 %16 NS 2C N-1 -50 14 77.78
17 NS 3S N+2 460 18 100.00
18 NS 4PcW-4 800 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,81 %19 NS 3S E+1 -630 1 5.56
20 NS 1S S+1 120 12 66.67
21 NS 3PcE-2 300 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
15 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 62,41 %22 NS 5TcS-3 -500 7 38.89
23 NS 1S E+2 -150 3 16.67
24 NS 2P E-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
16 DESSY Lina -ARICKX Roger : 38,89 %25 NS 2S N+1 150 12 66.67
26 NS 1S S = 90 6 33.33
27 NS 4C N = 420 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 54,44 %28 NS 4C S = 620 16 88.89
29 NS 2C N+3 200 18 100.00
30 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
Total : 319,0 / 540 = 59,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -GROSFILS Colette
17 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 54,44 % 1 NS 3S S+1 430 4 22.22
2 NS 3S S = 600 8 44.44
3 NS 2C S+1 140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
16 DESSY Lina -ARICKX Roger : 38,89 % 4 NS 3P S+1 170 16 88.89
5 NS 2S S-2 -200 4 22.22
6 NS 3S S = 400 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
15 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 62,41 % 7 NS 6C E+1 -1460 5 27.78
8 NS 3K W = -110 3 16.67
9 NS 3K S+1 130 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,81 %10 NS 4C N+1 650 17 94.44
11 NS 4C W+1 -450 6 33.33
12 NS 3S N = 600 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 38,15 %13 NS 3S W-1 100 9 50.00
14 NS 3S N+1 430 9 50.00
15 NS 2P S = 110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,19 %16 NS 4TcN-3 -500 2 11.11
17 NS 3S N = 400 15 83.33
18 NS 3K N-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
18 CASSART Guy -COLLET Christine : 60,56 %19 NS 3S E+1 -630 1 5.56
20 NS 1S S+1 120 12 66.67
21 NS 4CcS = 790 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
13 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 33,52 %22 NS 4C W-1 100 16 88.89
23 NS 2S W-1 100 18 100.00
24 NS 2C N-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
12 MASSAUX Joel -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 42,96 %25 NS 2S N+1 150 12 66.67
26 NS 2T W-1 100 13 72.22
27 NS 4C N-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
11 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 54,07 %28 NS 3C S = 140 3 16.67
29 NS 3C N = 140 7 38.89
30 NS 3S E+1 -430 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
Total : 267,0 / 540 = 49,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
18 CASSART Guy -COLLET Christine : 60,56 % 1 NS 3S N+2 460 13 72.22
2 NS 3S N-1 -100 3 16.67
3 NS 3P S-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 54,44 % 4 NS 3P S = 140 12 66.67
5 NS 3T E-2 100 15 83.33
6 NS 3S N-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
16 DESSY Lina -ARICKX Roger : 38,89 % 7 NS 4C W+3 -710 15 83.33
8 NS 1S N-1 -50 7 38.89
9 NS 3S S+1 430 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
11 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 54,07 %10 NS 2C N+3 200 6 33.33
11 NS 4C W+1 -450 6 33.33
12 NS 2C N+2 170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
15 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 62,41 %13 NS 3S W-3 300 17 94.44
14 NS 3C N+1 170 2 11.11
15 NS 1S S+1 120 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,81 %16 NS 5T S-4 -200 7 38.89
17 NS 3S N-1 -50 0 0.00
18 NS 3S N+3 690 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 38,15 %19 NS 3K S-1 -50 15 83.33
20 NS 1S S+2 150 18 100.00
21 NS 4C N = 620 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,19 %22 NS 4C W = -620 2 11.11
23 NS 1S E+1 -120 8 44.44
24 NS 2P W-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
13 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 33,52 %25 NS 2S N+1 150 12 66.67
26 NS 1S S = 90 6 33.33
27 NS 4C N+1 450 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
12 MASSAUX Joel -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 42,96 %28 NS 4KcW-3 500 12 66.67
29 NS 2C N+1 140 7 38.89
30 NS 4C E-2 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
Total : 303,0 / 540 = 56,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 de VIRON Baudouin -LIBERT Laurent
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,19 % 1 NS 3S N+2 460 13 72.22
2 NS 3S S-1 -100 3 16.67
3 NS 1S N = 90 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
18 CASSART Guy -COLLET Christine : 60,56 % 4 NS 3K E = -110 3 16.67
5 NS 2S S = 120 18 100.00
6 NS 3S S-2 -100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 54,44 % 7 NS 6C W+1 -1460 5 27.78
8 NS 3C S-1 -50 7 38.89
9 NS 3S N+1 430 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
12 MASSAUX Joel -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 42,96 %10 NS 3S S+1 630 14 77.78
11 NS 4C W+1 -450 6 33.33
12 NS 2C N+1 140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
11 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 54,07 %13 NS 3S W-3 300 17 94.44
14 NS 4C S+1 450 15 83.33
15 NS 2K N+2 130 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
16 DESSY Lina -ARICKX Roger : 38,89 %16 NS 2K N = 90 16 88.89
17 NS 2PcW-2 300 12 66.67
18 NS 3S N+3 690 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
15 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 62,41 %19 NS 3T W+1 -130 6 33.33
20 NS 1S S = 90 5 27.78
21 NS 3C N+1 170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,81 %22 NS 3C W+1 -170 10 55.56
23 NS 1S E+2 -150 3 16.67
24 NS 3C N-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 38,15 %25 NS 3S N = 400 16 88.89
26 NS 1S S-1 -100 2 11.11
27 NS 4C N-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
13 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 33,52 %28 NS 4C S = 620 16 88.89
29 NS 2C N+2 170 15 83.33
30 NS 4P W-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
Total : 289,0 / 540 = 53,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 38,15 % 1 NS 3S N+2 460 13 72.22
2 NS 3S N+1 630 15 83.33
3 NS 4T E-3 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,19 % 4 NS 3P S = 140 12 66.67
5 NS 2S S-3 -300 1 5.56
6 NS 3S S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
18 CASSART Guy -COLLET Christine : 60,56 % 7 NS 6C W+1 -1460 5 27.78
8 NS 4K W-2 100 11 61.11
9 NS 3K S+1 130 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
13 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 33,52 %10 NS 2C N+3 200 6 33.33
11 NS 4C W = -420 15 83.33
12 NS 2C N+2 170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
12 MASSAUX Joel -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 42,96 %13 NS 4C W-1 100 9 50.00
14 NS 4C N+1 450 15 83.33
15 NS 2K N+1 110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
11 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 54,07 %16 NS 4T N-4 -200 7 38.89
17 NS 2S N+3 210 10 55.56
18 NS 5T S = 600 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 54,44 %19 NS 3T W+1 -130 6 33.33
20 NS 3S S-2 -200 0 0.00
21 NS 3K W-2 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
16 DESSY Lina -ARICKX Roger : 38,89 %22 NS 3C W = -140 12 66.67
23 NS 1S E+1 -120 8 44.44
24 NS 1S S = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
15 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 62,41 %25 NS 3T S = 110 5 27.78
26 NS 2C W+2 -170 0 0.00
27 NS 3C N-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,81 %28 NS 2C S+2 170 9 50.00
29 NS 3C N = 140 7 38.89
30 NS 3S W = -400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 250,0 / 540 = 46,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,81 % 1 NS 3S N+2 460 13 72.22
2 NS 3S N-2 -200 0 0.00
3 NS 3P S-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 38,15 % 4 NS 3C N-1 -100 7 38.89
5 NS 2S S-1 -100 8 44.44
6 NS 3S S = 400 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,19 % 7 NS 6PcS-5 -1400 12 66.67
8 NS 4T N+2 170 16 88.89
9 NS 3K S+1 130 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
15 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 62,41 %10 NS 2C N+3 200 6 33.33
11 NS 4C W+1 -450 6 33.33
12 NS 2C N+2 170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
13 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 33,52 %13 NS 3C W = -140 4 22.22
14 NS 4C S+1 450 15 83.33
15 NS 1S S+1 120 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
12 MASSAUX Joel -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 42,96 %16 NS 4CcN-3 -500 2 11.11
17 NS 4K S+1 150 6 33.33
18 NS 3S N+2 660 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
11 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 54,07 %19 NS 4T W = -130 6 33.33
20 NS 1S S+1 120 12 66.67
21 NS 4C N+1 650 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
18 CASSART Guy -COLLET Christine : 60,56 %22 NS 5TcS-3 -500 7 38.89
23 NS 1S E+1 -120 8 44.44
24 NS 2CcN-1 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 54,44 %25 NS 3S N-1 -50 0 0.00
26 NS 2T W-2 200 18 100.00
27 NS 4C N-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
16 DESSY Lina -ARICKX Roger : 38,89 %28 NS 4C S = 620 16 88.89
29 NS 2C N+2 170 15 83.33
30 NS 4P W-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
Total : 275,0 / 540 = 50,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
15 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 62,41 % 1 NS 3S N+1 430 4 22.22
2 NS 3S N+1 630 15 83.33
3 NS 2P S+1 140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,81 % 4 NS 3P S-1 -100 7 38.89
5 NS 2P N-1 -100 8 44.44
6 NS 3S S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 38,15 % 7 NS 6C W+1 -1460 5 27.78
8 NS 3P S = 140 14 77.78
9 NS 3K S = 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 54,44 %10 NS 2C N+3 200 6 33.33
11 NS 4C W+1 -450 6 33.33
12 NS 2C N+2 170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
16 DESSY Lina -ARICKX Roger : 38,89 %13 NS 3S W-2 200 14 77.78
14 NS 4C S-1 -50 0 0.00
15 NS 1C N+1 110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
13 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 33,52 %16 NS 1C N+1 110 18 100.00
17 NS 3S N = 400 15 83.33
18 NS 3S N+3 690 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
12 MASSAUX Joel -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 42,96 %19 NS 4P N-1 -50 15 83.33
20 NS 1S S = 90 5 27.78
21 NS 3C N+1 170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 54,07 %22 NS 4C W = -620 2 11.11
23 NS 1S E = -90 16 88.89
24 NS 2P W-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,19 %25 NS 2ScN+3 790 18 100.00
26 NS 1S S = 90 6 33.33
27 NS 4C N = 420 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
18 CASSART Guy -COLLET Christine : 60,56 %28 NS 2C S+1 140 3 16.67
29 NS 3C N = 140 7 38.89
30 NS 3S W-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 283,0 / 540 = 52,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 NELIS Claude -DELHEZ Jacques
16 DESSY Lina -ARICKX Roger : 38,89 % 1 NS 3S N+2 460 13 72.22
2 NS 3S N = 600 8 44.44
3 NS 2P S+1 140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
15 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 62,41 % 4 NS 2K E+2 -130 0 0.00
5 NS 3C E-2 100 15 83.33
6 NS 3S S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,81 % 7 NS 6C W+1 -1460 5 27.78
8 NS 3K W = -110 3 16.67
9 NS 2S N = 120 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,19 %10 NS 3C N+2 200 6 33.33
11 NS 4C W = -420 15 83.33
12 NS 2C N+1 140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
18 CASSART Guy -COLLET Christine : 60,56 %13 NS 3S E+2 -660 0 0.00
14 NS 4C N+1 450 15 83.33
15 NS 1S S = 90 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 54,44 %16 NS 4CcN-3 -500 2 11.11
17 NS 2C E-3 150 6 33.33
18 NS 2P W+1 -140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
13 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 33,52 %19 NS 3T W = -110 10 55.56
20 NS 1S S+1 120 12 66.67
21 NS 2C N+2 170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
12 MASSAUX Joel -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 42,96 %22 NS 4C W = -620 2 11.11
23 NS 2P N-1 -100 13 72.22
24 NS 1C N = 80 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
11 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 54,07 %25 NS 3T N = 110 5 27.78
26 NS 1S W-1 100 13 72.22
27 NS 3S N-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 38,15 %28 NS 3T E-3 150 6 33.33
29 NS 2C N+1 140 7 38.89
30 NS 4P W = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 213,0 / 540 = 39,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
1 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 43,89 % 1 EO 3S N = 400 18 100.00
2 EO 3S N+1 630 3 16.67
3 EO 2P S+1 140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,07 % 4 EO 3K E = -110 15 83.33
5 EO 3S S-1 -100 10 55.56
6 EO 3S S-2 -100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 48,89 % 7 EO 6C W+1 -1460 13 72.22
8 EO 3K W+1 -130 18 100.00
9 EO 3K S+1 130 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 56,11 %10 EO 2C N+3 200 12 66.67
11 EO 4C W+1 -450 12 66.67
12 EO 2C N+2 170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -LIBERT Laurent : 53,52 %13 EO 3S W-3 300 1 5.56
14 EO 4C S+1 450 3 16.67
15 EO 2K N+2 130 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
7 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,30 %16 EO 4T N-4 -200 11 61.11
17 EO 2S N+3 210 8 44.44
18 EO 5T S = 600 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,93 %19 EO 4T W = -130 12 66.67
20 EO 1S S+1 120 6 33.33
21 EO 4C N+1 650 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
9 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,41 %22 EO 4C W = -620 16 88.89
23 EO 1S E = -90 2 11.11
24 EO 2P W-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
10 NELIS Claude -DELHEZ Jacques : 39,44 %25 EO 3T N = 110 13 72.22
26 EO 1S W-1 100 5 27.78
27 EO 3S N-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -GROSFILS Colette : 49,44 %28 EO 3C S = 140 15 83.33
29 EO 3C N = 140 11 61.11
30 EO 3S E+1 -430 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
Total : 292,0 / 540 = 54,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 MASSAUX Joel -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,07 % 1 EO 3S N+2 460 5 27.78
2 EO 3S N+1 630 3 16.67
3 EO 3P S+1 170 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 48,89 % 4 EO 3P S = 140 6 33.33
5 EO 1S N = 90 6 33.33
6 EO 3S S = 400 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
1 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 43,89 % 7 EO 5C N+2 710 0 0.00
8 EO 6TcS = 1090 0 0.00
9 EO 2K N = 90 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -LIBERT Laurent : 53,52 %10 EO 3S S+1 630 4 22.22
11 EO 4C W+1 -450 12 66.67
12 EO 2C N+1 140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
7 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,30 %13 EO 4C W-1 100 9 50.00
14 EO 4C N+1 450 3 16.67
15 EO 2K N+1 110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,93 %16 EO 4CcN-3 -500 16 88.89
17 EO 4K S+1 150 12 66.67
18 EO 3S N+2 660 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
9 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,41 %19 EO 4P N-1 -50 3 16.67
20 EO 1S S = 90 13 72.22
21 EO 3C N+1 170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 NELIS Claude -DELHEZ Jacques : 39,44 %22 EO 4C W = -620 16 88.89
23 EO 2P N-1 -100 5 27.78
24 EO 1C N = 80 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -GROSFILS Colette : 49,44 %25 EO 2S N+1 150 6 33.33
26 EO 2T W-1 100 5 27.78
27 EO 4C N-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 56,11 %28 EO 4KcW-3 500 6 33.33
29 EO 2C N+1 140 11 61.11
30 EO 4C E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
Total : 232,0 / 540 = 42,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 48,89 % 1 EO 3S N+1 430 14 77.78
2 EO 3S N = 600 10 55.56
3 EO 2P S+2 170 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
1 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 43,89 % 4 EO 4KcE-1 200 0 0.00
5 EO 3S S-3 -300 17 94.44
6 EO 3S S = 400 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,07 % 7 EO 4C W+3 -710 3 16.67
8 EO 4K W-2 100 7 38.89
9 EO 3K S+2 150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
7 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,30 %10 EO 2C N+3 200 12 66.67
11 EO 4C W = -420 3 16.67
12 EO 2C N+2 170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,93 %13 EO 3C W = -140 14 77.78
14 EO 4C S+1 450 3 16.67
15 EO 1S S+1 120 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
9 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,41 %16 EO 1C N+1 110 0 0.00
17 EO 3S N = 400 3 16.67
18 EO 3S N+3 690 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
10 NELIS Claude -DELHEZ Jacques : 39,44 %19 EO 3T W = -110 8 44.44
20 EO 1S S+1 120 6 33.33
21 EO 2C N+2 170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -GROSFILS Colette : 49,44 %22 EO 4C W-1 100 2 11.11
23 EO 2S W-1 100 0 0.00
24 EO 2C N-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 56,11 %25 EO 2S N+1 150 6 33.33
26 EO 1S S = 90 12 66.67
27 EO 4C N+1 450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -LIBERT Laurent : 53,52 %28 EO 4C S = 620 2 11.11
29 EO 2C N+2 170 3 16.67
30 EO 4P W-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
Total : 181,0 / 540 = 33,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,93 % 1 EO 3S N+2 460 5 27.78
2 EO 3S N-2 -200 18 100.00
3 EO 3P S-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
9 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,41 % 4 EO 3P S-1 -100 11 61.11
5 EO 2P N-1 -100 10 55.56
6 EO 3S S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
10 NELIS Claude -DELHEZ Jacques : 39,44 % 7 EO 6C W+1 -1460 13 72.22
8 EO 3K W = -110 15 83.33
9 EO 2S N = 120 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -GROSFILS Colette : 49,44 %10 EO 4C N+1 650 1 5.56
11 EO 4C W+1 -450 12 66.67
12 EO 3S N = 600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 48,89 %13 EO 3S E+1 -630 16 88.89
14 EO 4C N = 420 13 72.22
15 EO 2S S = 120 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 56,11 %16 EO 5T S-4 -200 11 61.11
17 EO 3S N-1 -50 18 100.00
18 EO 3S N+3 690 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,07 %19 EO 3S E+1 -630 17 94.44
20 EO 1S S+1 120 6 33.33
21 EO 3PcE-2 300 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -LIBERT Laurent : 53,52 %22 EO 3C W+1 -170 8 44.44
23 EO 1S E+2 -150 15 83.33
24 EO 3C N-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
1 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 43,89 %25 EO Pass Passe 16 88.89
26 EO 1S W-1 100 5 27.78
27 EO 3S S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
7 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,30 %28 EO 2C S+2 170 9 50.00
29 EO 3C N = 140 11 61.11
30 EO 3S W = -400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 323,0 / 540 = 59,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
9 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,41 % 1 EO 3S N+1 430 14 77.78
2 EO 3S N+1 630 3 16.67
3 EO 2P S+1 140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
10 NELIS Claude -DELHEZ Jacques : 39,44 % 4 EO 2K E+2 -130 18 100.00
5 EO 3C E-2 100 3 16.67
6 EO 3S S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -GROSFILS Colette : 49,44 % 7 EO 6C E+1 -1460 13 72.22
8 EO 3K W = -110 15 83.33
9 EO 3K S+1 130 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,93 %10 EO 2C N+3 200 12 66.67
11 EO 4C W+1 -450 12 66.67
12 EO 2C N+2 170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 56,11 %13 EO 3S W-3 300 1 5.56
14 EO 3C N+1 170 16 88.89
15 EO 1S S+1 120 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 48,89 %16 EO 3C N-2 -100 6 33.33
17 EO 2S N+1 150 12 66.67
18 EO 3S N+2 660 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -LIBERT Laurent : 53,52 %19 EO 3T W+1 -130 12 66.67
20 EO 1S S = 90 13 72.22
21 EO 3C N+1 170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,07 %22 EO 5TcS-3 -500 11 61.11
23 EO 1S E+2 -150 15 83.33
24 EO 2P E-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
7 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,30 %25 EO 3T S = 110 13 72.22
26 EO 2C W+2 -170 18 100.00
27 EO 3C N-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
1 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 43,89 %28 EO 2C S = 110 18 100.00
29 EO 2C S = 110 18 100.00
30 EO 4PxW+1 -1080 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
Total : 337,0 / 540 = 62,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 DESSY Lina -ARICKX Roger
10 NELIS Claude -DELHEZ Jacques : 39,44 % 1 EO 3S N+2 460 5 27.78
2 EO 3S N = 600 10 55.56
3 EO 2P S+1 140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -GROSFILS Colette : 49,44 % 4 EO 3P S+1 170 2 11.11
5 EO 2S S-2 -200 14 77.78
6 EO 3S S = 400 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 56,11 % 7 EO 4C W+3 -710 3 16.67
8 EO 1S N-1 -50 11 61.11
9 EO 3S S+1 430 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
1 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 43,89 %10 EO 2C N+3 200 12 66.67
11 EO 4C W+1 -450 12 66.67
12 EO 2P E-3 150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
9 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,41 %13 EO 3S W-2 200 4 22.22
14 EO 4C S-1 -50 18 100.00
15 EO 1C N+1 110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -LIBERT Laurent : 53,52 %16 EO 2K N = 90 2 11.11
17 EO 2PcW-2 300 6 33.33
18 EO 3S N+3 690 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 48,89 %19 EO 5TcW-3 800 0 0.00
20 EO 1S S+1 120 6 33.33
21 EO 2C N+2 170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
7 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,30 %22 EO 3C W = -140 6 33.33
23 EO 1S E+1 -120 10 55.56
24 EO 1S S = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,07 %25 EO 2S N+1 150 6 33.33
26 EO 1S S = 90 12 66.67
27 EO 4C N = 420 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,93 %28 EO 4C S = 620 2 11.11
29 EO 2C N+2 170 3 16.67
30 EO 4P W-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
Total : 210,0 / 540 = 38,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -GROSFILS Colette : 49,44 % 1 EO 3S S+1 430 14 77.78
2 EO 3S S = 600 10 55.56
3 EO 2C S+1 140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 56,11 % 4 EO 3P S = 140 6 33.33
5 EO 3T E-2 100 3 16.67
6 EO 3S N-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -LIBERT Laurent : 53,52 % 7 EO 6C W+1 -1460 13 72.22
8 EO 3C S-1 -50 11 61.11
9 EO 3S N+1 430 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
9 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,41 %10 EO 2C N+3 200 12 66.67
11 EO 4C W+1 -450 12 66.67
12 EO 2C N+2 170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
1 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 43,89 %13 EO 3S W-1 100 9 50.00
14 EO 3S N+1 430 9 50.00
15 EO 2C N = 110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
10 NELIS Claude -DELHEZ Jacques : 39,44 %16 EO 4CcN-3 -500 16 88.89
17 EO 2C E-3 150 12 66.67
18 EO 2P W+1 -140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
7 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,30 %19 EO 3T W+1 -130 12 66.67
20 EO 3S S-2 -200 18 100.00
21 EO 3K W-2 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 48,89 %22 EO 4C E-1 100 2 11.11
23 EO 1S W+3 -180 18 100.00
24 EO 2CcN = 470 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,93 %25 EO 3S N-1 -50 18 100.00
26 EO 2T W-2 200 0 0.00
27 EO 4C N-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,07 %28 EO 4C S = 620 2 11.11
29 EO 2C N+3 200 0 0.00
30 EO 3S W+1 -430 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
Total : 294,0 / 540 = 54,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 CASSART Guy -COLLET Christine
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 56,11 % 1 EO 3S N+2 460 5 27.78
2 EO 3S N-1 -100 15 83.33
3 EO 3P S-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -LIBERT Laurent : 53,52 % 4 EO 3K E = -110 15 83.33
5 EO 2S S = 120 0 0.00
6 EO 3S S-2 -100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
7 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,30 % 7 EO 6C W+1 -1460 13 72.22
8 EO 4K W-2 100 7 38.89
9 EO 3K S+1 130 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,07 %10 EO 4C N+1 650 1 5.56
11 EO 4C W+1 -450 12 66.67
12 EO 3S N-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
10 NELIS Claude -DELHEZ Jacques : 39,44 %13 EO 3S E+2 -660 18 100.00
14 EO 4C N+1 450 3 16.67
15 EO 1S S = 90 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
1 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 43,89 %16 EO 3S N-3 -150 8 44.44
17 EO 3K S+1 130 16 88.89
18 EO 3S N+1 630 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -GROSFILS Colette : 49,44 %19 EO 3S E+1 -630 17 94.44
20 EO 1S S+1 120 6 33.33
21 EO 4CcS = 790 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,93 %22 EO 5TcS-3 -500 11 61.11
23 EO 1S E+1 -120 10 55.56
24 EO 2CcN-1 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 48,89 %25 EO 3T S+1 130 10 55.56
26 EO 2T W-1 100 5 27.78
27 EO 4C N-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
9 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,41 %28 EO 2C S+1 140 15 83.33
29 EO 3C N = 140 11 61.11
30 EO 3S W-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 327,0 / 540 = 60,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
6 de VIRON Baudouin -LIBERT Laurent : 53,52 % 1 EO 3S N+2 460 5 27.78
2 EO 3S S-1 -100 15 83.33
3 EO 1S N = 90 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
7 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,30 % 4 EO 3P S = 140 6 33.33
5 EO 2S S-3 -300 17 94.44
6 EO 3S S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,93 % 7 EO 6PcS-5 -1400 6 33.33
8 EO 4T N+2 170 2 11.11
9 EO 3K S+1 130 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
10 NELIS Claude -DELHEZ Jacques : 39,44 %10 EO 3C N+2 200 12 66.67
11 EO 4C W = -420 3 16.67
12 EO 2C N+1 140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,07 %13 EO 3S W-1 100 9 50.00
14 EO 4C N = 420 13 72.22
15 EO 1C N+2 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -GROSFILS Colette : 49,44 %16 EO 4TcN-3 -500 16 88.89
17 EO 3S N = 400 3 16.67
18 EO 3K N-3 -300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
1 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 43,89 %19 EO 3P N-2 -100 6 33.33
20 EO 3T S-1 -100 16 88.89
21 EO 3P E-2 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 56,11 %22 EO 4C W = -620 16 88.89
23 EO 1S E+1 -120 10 55.56
24 EO 2P W-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
9 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,41 %25 EO 2ScN+3 790 0 0.00
26 EO 1S S = 90 12 66.67
27 EO 4C N = 420 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 48,89 %28 EO 2C S+2 170 9 50.00
29 EO 2C N+1 140 11 61.11
30 EO 3S W+1 -430 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 298,0 / 540 = 55,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
7 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,30 % 1 EO 3S N+2 460 5 27.78
2 EO 3S N+1 630 3 16.67
3 EO 4T E-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,93 % 4 EO 3C N-1 -100 11 61.11
5 EO 2S S-1 -100 10 55.56
6 EO 3S S = 400 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
9 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,41 % 7 EO 6C W+1 -1460 13 72.22
8 EO 3P S = 140 4 22.22
9 EO 3K S = 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 48,89 %10 EO 3C N+2 200 12 66.67
11 EO 4C W-1 50 0 0.00
12 EO 3K E-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -GROSFILS Colette : 49,44 %13 EO 3S W-1 100 9 50.00
14 EO 3S N+1 430 9 50.00
15 EO 2P S = 110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,07 %16 EO 2C N-1 -50 4 22.22
17 EO 3S N+2 460 0 0.00
18 EO 4PcW-4 800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 56,11 %19 EO 3K S-1 -50 3 16.67
20 EO 1S S+2 150 0 0.00
21 EO 4C N = 620 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
1 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 43,89 %22 EO 3C W-1 100 2 11.11
23 EO 2P N-1 -100 5 27.78
24 EO 2C N = 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -LIBERT Laurent : 53,52 %25 EO 3S N = 400 2 11.11
26 EO 1S S-1 -100 16 88.89
27 EO 4C N-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
10 NELIS Claude -DELHEZ Jacques : 39,44 %28 EO 3T E-3 150 12 66.67
29 EO 2C N+1 140 11 61.11
30 EO 4P W = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 206,0 / 540 = 38,15 %
|
|