|
Tournoi du 12-10-15
1 63,15 A.4 VAN SICHELEN Sylvie -BABIKOW Georges
2 59,63 A.9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
3 59,44 A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
4 56,67 A.3 BEYNE Anne -GROSFILS Colette
5 54,63 A11 CAMUS Colette -VAN DOOREN Michele
6 48,89 A10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine
7 47,78 A.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
8 44,26 A.6 MASSAUX Joel -Powis
9 42,96 A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
10 37,78 A.5 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
11 34,81 A.8 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine
12 0,00 A12 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 61,32 a.5 STELLIAN Lucienne -WANDERPEPEN Janine
2 57,00 a.2 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
3 54,32 a10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
4 53,91 a.4 BRIOT Fernand -CASSART Guy
5 52,88 a.8 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
6 51,85 a12 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin
7 51,30 a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
8 45,88 a.7 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Edgard
9 45,47 a.9 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie
10 43,15 a11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
11 42,18 a.6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
12 41,36 a.3 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude
PAIRE Nr : A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 51,30 % 1 NS 4C S-1 -50 10 55.56
2 NS 4PcS-3 -800 2 11.11
3 NS 2S W+2 -180 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,15 % 4 NS 3C S-1 -100 6 33.33
5 NS 3C W-3 150 2 11.11
6 NS 1S E = -90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,32 % 7 NS 6C N-1 -100 3 16.67
8 NS 3P W = -140 5 27.78
9 NS 4P W = -620 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
a.9 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 45,47 %10 NS 3P N = 140 15 83.33
11 NS 3S N-1 -50 1 5.56
12 NS 4C N+1 650 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.8 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,88 %13 NS 3P E-1 100 11 61.11
14 NS 5K S = 400 12 66.67
15 NS 3S W+1 -430 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.7 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Edgard : 45,88 %16 NS 5TcN-3 -500 8 44.44
17 NS 4C W+3 -510 3 16.67
18 NS 2P E-2 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,18 %19 NS 3C W-1 100 10 55.56
20 NS 4P E-2 200 16 88.89
21 NS 3TcN = 670 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
a.5 STELLIAN Lucienne -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 61,32 %22 NS 2P E+2 -170 3 16.67
23 NS 3S E-2 200 18 100.00
24 NS 3S S-2 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.4 BRIOT Fernand -CASSART Guy : 53,91 %25 NS 1T N+1 90 4 22.22
26 NS 3K S-2 -200 3 16.67
27 NS Pass Passe 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.3 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 41,36 %28 NS 4P N-1 -100 3 16.67
29 NS 3C S-2 -200 0 0.00
30 NS 3S W-2 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 232,0 / 540 = 42,96 %
PAIRE Nr : A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
a.2 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 57,00 % 4 NS 4C S-2 -200 2 11.11
5 NS 3S N+1 630 13 72.22
6 NS 1S E = -90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 51,30 % 7 NS 4C N = 620 6 33.33
8 NS 4P W-2 100 17 94.44
9 NS 3S W = -600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,15 %10 NS 3CcW-2 500 18 100.00
11 NS 2S N+2 180 11 61.11
12 NS 4C N+1 650 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,32 %13 NS 4P E-2 200 17 94.44
14 NS 4K S+1 150 5 27.78
15 NS 3S W+1 -430 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.9 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 45,47 %16 NS 5P S-2 -100 17 94.44
17 NS 4C E+1 -450 12 66.67
18 NS 2P E-2 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.8 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,88 %19 NS 3CcW-2 500 18 100.00
20 NS 2P E = -110 7 38.89
21 NS 4C E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a12 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 51,85 %22 NS 1S N-2 -100 10 55.56
23 NS 4P W-1 100 15 83.33
24 NS 3S S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,18 %25 NS 1T N = 70 2 11.11
26 NS 3S N = 600 17 94.44
27 NS 1S N+1 120 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.5 STELLIAN Lucienne -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 61,32 %28 NS 4P N+1 650 16 88.89
29 NS 3P W-1 100 11 61.11
30 NS 1S S-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.4 BRIOT Fernand -CASSART Guy : 53,91 %31 NS 4C N = 620 9 50.00
32 NS 3P N = 140 10 55.56
33 NS 3S E+1 -430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 321,0 / 540 = 59,44 %
PAIRE Nr : A.3 BEYNE Anne -GROSFILS Colette
a.5 STELLIAN Lucienne -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 61,32 % 1 NS 4PcW+1 -690 2 11.11
2 NS 3S S-2 -200 10 55.56
3 NS 3S W-1 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.3 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 41,36 % 7 NS 4C N+1 650 11 61.11
8 NS 3S E-2 100 17 94.44
9 NS 2S W+2 -180 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a12 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 51,85 %10 NS 2P S = 110 10 55.56
11 NS 2S N+1 150 5 27.78
12 NS 4C N+1 650 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 51,30 %13 NS 2P E+1 -140 2 11.11
14 NS 5K S = 400 12 66.67
15 NS 3T E+2 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,15 %16 NS 5PcS-2 -300 10 55.56
17 NS 6S E-1 50 18 100.00
18 NS 2P E-2 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,32 %19 NS 4C W-2 200 15 83.33
20 NS 2P E+1 -140 1 5.56
21 NS 4C E-2 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.9 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 45,47 %22 NS 1S N-1 -50 15 83.33
23 NS 1P W+3 -170 3 16.67
24 NS 3S S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.8 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,88 %25 NS 3P S+1 170 14 77.78
26 NS 3C N-1 -100 8 44.44
27 NS Pass Passe 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.7 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Edgard : 45,88 %28 NS 4P S-1 -100 3 16.67
29 NS 4K E-3 300 18 100.00
30 NS 1P E-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,18 %31 NS 4C N-1 -100 3 16.67
32 NS 3P N-1 -50 3 16.67
33 NS 2K E+2 -130 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 306,0 / 540 = 56,67 %
PAIRE Nr : A.4 VAN SICHELEN Sylvie -BABIKOW Georges
a.7 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Edgard : 45,88 % 1 NS 4PcW-2 300 15 83.33
2 NS 2C N-1 -100 13 72.22
3 NS 3S W-3 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
a.6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,18 % 4 NS 4C S = 620 16 88.89
5 NS 3S N+1 630 13 72.22
6 NS 2S E-2 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
a.4 BRIOT Fernand -CASSART Guy : 53,91 %10 NS 2P N = 110 10 55.56
11 NS 3S N = 400 17 94.44
12 NS 4C N+1 650 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.3 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 41,36 %13 NS 4P E-2 200 17 94.44
14 NS 5KcS = 550 18 100.00
15 NS 3S E+2 -460 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.2 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 57,00 %16 NS 5K E+1 -620 4 22.22
17 NS 5C W = -450 12 66.67
18 NS 2P E-2 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 51,30 %19 NS 3T N-1 -50 8 44.44
20 NS 2P E+1 -140 1 5.56
21 NS 4CcE-1 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,15 %22 NS 3P E-1 100 18 100.00
23 NS 3S E-1 100 15 83.33
24 NS 3S S = 400 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
a10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,32 %25 NS 1T N+2 110 7 38.89
26 NS 4C N-1 -100 8 44.44
27 NS 1S N+1 120 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.9 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 45,47 %28 NS 4P N = 620 9 50.00
29 NS 3P W = -140 2 11.11
30 NS 1S E-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a12 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 51,85 %31 NS 4C N+1 650 15 83.33
32 NS 3S S-2 -100 0 0.00
33 NS 3S W = -400 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 341,0 / 540 = 63,15 %
PAIRE Nr : A.5 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
a.9 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 45,47 % 1 NS 5KcN-4 -800 0 0.00
2 NS 4PcS-2 -500 7 38.89
3 NS 4T E-1 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.8 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,88 % 4 NS 4C S-2 -200 2 11.11
5 NS 3S S = 600 6 33.33
6 NS 3TcS-3 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
a.7 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Edgard : 45,88 % 7 NS 3S S+3 690 18 100.00
8 NS 4P W = -420 1 5.56
9 NS 3S W+1 -630 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.5 STELLIAN Lucienne -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 61,32 %13 NS 3P E-1 100 11 61.11
14 NS 3S N-2 -100 1 5.56
15 NS 3S W+3 -490 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.4 BRIOT Fernand -CASSART Guy : 53,91 %16 NS 5K E+1 -620 4 22.22
17 NS 4C W+2 -480 8 44.44
18 NS 3ScN-5 -1400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
a12 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 51,85 %19 NS 3S E = -600 0 0.00
20 NS 4P E-3 300 18 100.00
21 NS 4C E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.2 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 57,00 %22 NS 3C S-1 -50 15 83.33
23 NS 2P E+2 -170 3 16.67
24 NS 3S S-2 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 51,30 %25 NS 4P S+1 450 18 100.00
26 NS 2P S = 110 12 66.67
27 NS 1P N-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,15 %28 NS 4P N = 620 9 50.00
29 NS 3K E = -110 5 27.78
30 NS 1S S-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,32 %31 NS 4C N+1 650 15 83.33
32 NS 1P N+1 110 7 38.89
33 NS 2C S-3 -150 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 204,0 / 540 = 37,78 %
PAIRE Nr : A.6 MASSAUX Joel -Powis
a11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,15 % 1 NS 3CcS-2 -300 8 44.44
2 NS 3K E-3 150 16 88.89
3 NS 2K E = -90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,32 % 4 NS 4C S-2 -200 2 11.11
5 NS 3S N+1 630 13 72.22
6 NS 1S E+1 -120 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a12 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 51,85 % 7 NS 4C N+1 650 11 61.11
8 NS 4P W-1 50 11 61.11
9 NS 2S W+2 -180 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.8 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,88 %10 NS 3C W-1 100 6 33.33
11 NS 2S N+2 180 11 61.11
12 NS 4C N+2 680 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,18 %16 NS 5K E+2 -640 0 0.00
17 NS 4C W+3 -510 3 16.67
18 NS 3S E-5 250 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.5 STELLIAN Lucienne -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 61,32 %19 NS 3T N-2 -100 5 27.78
20 NS 2P E = -110 7 38.89
21 NS 3C E = -140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
a.4 BRIOT Fernand -CASSART Guy : 53,91 %22 NS 2P E+2 -170 3 16.67
23 NS 2P E+2 -170 3 16.67
24 NS 3S S+1 430 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.3 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 41,36 %25 NS 4P S-1 -50 0 0.00
26 NS 2C N+1 140 14 77.78
27 NS 2K E = -90 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a.2 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 57,00 %28 NS 4P N-1 -100 3 16.67
29 NS 3T E = -110 5 27.78
30 NS 2P W-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 51,30 %31 NS 4C N = 620 9 50.00
32 NS 2P N = 110 7 38.89
33 NS 2S W+1 -150 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 239,0 / 540 = 44,26 %
PAIRE Nr : A.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
a.2 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 57,00 % 1 NS 4CcS = 590 18 100.00
2 NS 2S N-1 -100 13 72.22
3 NS 4CcS-4 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 51,30 % 4 NS 2C S+1 140 10 55.56
5 NS 3S S+1 630 13 72.22
6 NS 2T E = -90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,15 % 7 NS 5C N-1 -100 3 16.67
8 NS 4P W-1 50 11 61.11
9 NS 3S W = -600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,32 %10 NS 3C W = -140 2 11.11
11 NS 2S N+2 180 11 61.11
12 NS 4P N-4 -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.9 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 45,47 %13 NS 4P E-1 100 11 61.11
14 NS 5K S = 400 12 66.67
15 NS 3S E+3 -490 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.7 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Edgard : 45,88 %19 NS 3TcN-1 -100 5 27.78
20 NS 2P E = -110 7 38.89
21 NS 2C E+1 -140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
a.6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,18 %22 NS 4C S-3 -150 6 33.33
23 NS 2P W+1 -140 9 50.00
24 NS 3S S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.5 STELLIAN Lucienne -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 61,32 %25 NS 4P S = 420 16 88.89
26 NS 4C N-1 -100 8 44.44
27 NS 1P S-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a12 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 51,85 %28 NS 4P S-1 -100 3 16.67
29 NS 3K E-1 100 11 61.11
30 NS 2P W-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 41,36 %31 NS 4C N = 620 9 50.00
32 NS 4P N = 420 17 94.44
33 NS 3T W = -110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
Total : 258,0 / 540 = 47,78 %
PAIRE Nr : A.8 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine
a.4 BRIOT Fernand -CASSART Guy : 53,91 % 1 NS 4PcW = -590 5 27.78
2 NS 4PcS-3 -800 2 11.11
3 NS 4T E+1 -150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.3 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 41,36 % 4 NS 3S S = 600 12 66.67
5 NS 3CcW-3 500 4 22.22
6 NS 1S E-1 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.2 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 57,00 % 7 NS 4C N+1 650 11 61.11
8 NS 4P W-1 50 11 61.11
9 NS 2CcN-4 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 51,30 %10 NS 2P N = 110 10 55.56
11 NS 3S N-1 -50 1 5.56
12 NS 4C S = 620 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
a11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,15 %13 NS 2P E = -110 6 33.33
14 NS 3S N-2 -100 1 5.56
15 NS 5T E = -400 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a12 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 51,85 %16 NS 5P S-3 -150 14 77.78
17 NS 4C W+1 -450 12 66.67
18 NS 2P E-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.8 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,88 %22 NS 5CcS-3 -500 0 0.00
23 NS 2P E+2 -170 3 16.67
24 NS 3S S-2 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
a.7 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Edgard : 45,88 %25 NS 2C N = 110 7 38.89
26 NS 4C N-3 -300 0 0.00
27 NS 1S N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
a.6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,18 %28 NS 3S S+1 630 12 66.67
29 NS 3K E-1 100 11 61.11
30 NS 1S E = -90 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.5 STELLIAN Lucienne -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 61,32 %31 NS 4C N-2 -200 0 0.00
32 NS 2P N+2 170 13 72.22
33 NS 3S W = -400 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
Total : 188,0 / 540 = 34,81 %
PAIRE Nr : A.9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
a.6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,18 % 1 NS 4PcE-2 300 15 83.33
2 NS 3S N = 600 18 100.00
3 NS 2P N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
a12 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 51,85 % 4 NS 2S N = 120 8 44.44
5 NS 4T N-1 -100 0 0.00
6 NS 1S E = -90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a.4 BRIOT Fernand -CASSART Guy : 53,91 % 7 NS 3S N+2 660 16 88.89
8 NS 4P E-1 50 11 61.11
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.3 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 41,36 %10 NS 2P N+1 140 15 83.33
11 NS 3S N = 400 17 94.44
12 NS 4C N+1 650 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
a.2 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 57,00 %13 NS 3P E = -140 2 11.11
14 NS 4K N+1 150 5 27.78
15 NS 3S E = -400 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 51,30 %16 NS 5P N-2 -100 17 94.44
17 NS 4C E+3 -510 3 16.67
18 NS 2P E-2 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,15 %19 NS 4C E-2 200 15 83.33
20 NS 2P E-1 100 13 72.22
21 NS 3C E = -140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.9 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 45,47 %25 NS 2S N = 120 10 55.56
26 NS 3S N = 600 17 94.44
27 NS Pass Passe 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a.8 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,88 %28 NS 5P N = 650 16 88.89
29 NS 3K E-1 100 11 61.11
30 NS 2C N-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.7 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Edgard : 45,88 %31 NS 4C N-1 -100 3 16.67
32 NS 4P N = 420 17 94.44
33 NS 3S E-1 50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
Total : 322,0 / 540 = 59,63 %
PAIRE Nr : A10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine
a.8 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,88 % 1 NS 4PcW = -590 5 27.78
2 NS 4PcS-3 -800 2 11.11
3 NS 3S W-1 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.7 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Edgard : 45,88 % 4 NS 4C S = 620 16 88.89
5 NS 3S N+1 630 13 72.22
6 NS 2S E-1 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
a.6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,18 % 7 NS 6CcN-1 -200 0 0.00
8 NS 2P W+1 -140 5 27.78
9 NS 3C W-1 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.5 STELLIAN Lucienne -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 61,32 %10 NS 3P S-2 -200 0 0.00
11 NS 2S N+1 150 5 27.78
12 NS 4C N = 620 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
a.4 BRIOT Fernand -CASSART Guy : 53,91 %13 NS 4P E-1 100 11 61.11
14 NS 5K S = 400 12 66.67
15 NS 3S W+1 -430 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.3 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 41,36 %16 NS 5K E+1 -620 4 22.22
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 16 88.89
18 NS 2P E-2 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.2 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 57,00 %19 NS 3TcN-2 -300 2 11.11
20 NS 2P E = -110 7 38.89
21 NS 4C E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 51,30 %22 NS 2S N-2 -100 10 55.56
23 NS 1P W+2 -140 9 50.00
24 NS 3S S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,32 %28 NS 4P N+1 650 16 88.89
29 NS 4T E-2 200 16 88.89
30 NS 1S E = -90 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.9 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 45,47 %31 NS 4C N+2 680 18 100.00
32 NS 4P N-1 -50 3 16.67
33 NS 2S W+2 -180 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 264,0 / 540 = 48,89 %
PAIRE Nr : A11 CAMUS Colette -VAN DOOREN Michele
a10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,32 % 1 NS 4P W-1 50 12 66.67
2 NS 3PcS-2 -500 7 38.89
3 NS 3S W = -600 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.9 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 45,47 % 4 NS 4C S = 620 16 88.89
5 NS 3S N+1 630 13 72.22
6 NS 1S E = -90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.8 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,88 % 7 NS 4C N+1 650 11 61.11
8 NS 4P W = -420 1 5.56
9 NS 3S W-1 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.7 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Edgard : 45,88 %10 NS 3C N-1 -100 4 22.22
11 NS 2S N+2 180 11 61.11
12 NS 4C N+2 680 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a12 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 51,85 %13 NS 3P W = -140 2 11.11
14 NS 5K S = 400 12 66.67
15 NS 3S W+1 -430 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.5 STELLIAN Lucienne -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 61,32 %16 NS 4K E+2 -170 12 66.67
17 NS 5C W+2 -510 3 16.67
18 NS 2P E-2 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.4 BRIOT Fernand -CASSART Guy : 53,91 %19 NS 2TcN = 180 12 66.67
20 NS 2P E-1 100 13 72.22
21 NS 5P E-2 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.3 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 41,36 %22 NS 4C S-2 -100 10 55.56
23 NS 1S E = -90 12 66.67
24 NS 3S S-2 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.2 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 57,00 %25 NS 1T N+4 150 12 66.67
26 NS 4C N-2 -200 3 16.67
27 NS Pass Passe 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,15 %31 NS 4C N = 620 9 50.00
32 NS 3P N+1 170 13 72.22
33 NS 2C S-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
Total : 295,0 / 540 = 54,63 %
PAIRE Nr : A12 -
a12 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 51,85 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.5 STELLIAN Lucienne -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 61,32 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.9 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 45,47 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.2 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 57,00 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,18 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,32 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.3 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 41,36 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Edgard : 45,88 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.4 BRIOT Fernand -CASSART Guy : 53,91 %28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,88 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 594 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 42,96 % 1 EO 4C S-1 -50 8 44.44
2 EO 4PcS-3 -800 16 88.89
3 EO 2S W+2 -180 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,78 % 4 EO 2C S+1 140 8 44.44
5 EO 3S S+1 630 5 27.78
6 EO 2T E = -90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,44 % 7 EO 4C N = 620 12 66.67
8 EO 4P W-2 100 1 5.56
9 EO 3S W = -600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.8 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 34,81 %10 EO 2P N = 110 8 44.44
11 EO 3S N-1 -50 17 94.44
12 EO 4C S = 620 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
A.3 BEYNE Anne -GROSFILS Colette : 56,67 %13 EO 2P E+1 -140 16 88.89
14 EO 5K S = 400 6 33.33
15 EO 3T E+2 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 59,63 %16 EO 5P N-2 -100 1 5.56
17 EO 4C E+3 -510 15 83.33
18 EO 2P E-2 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.4 VAN SICHELEN Sylvie -BABIKOW Georges : 63,15 %19 EO 3T N-1 -50 10 55.56
20 EO 2P E+1 -140 17 94.44
21 EO 4CcE-1 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 48,89 %22 EO 2S N-2 -100 8 44.44
23 EO 1P W+2 -140 9 50.00
24 EO 3S S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.5 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 37,78 %25 EO 4P S+1 450 0 0.00
26 EO 2P S = 110 6 33.33
27 EO 1P N-3 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.6 MASSAUX Joel -Powis : 44,26 %31 EO 4C N = 620 9 50.00
32 EO 2P N = 110 11 61.11
33 EO 2S W+1 -150 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 277,0 / 540 = 51,30 %
PAIRE Nr : a.2 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
A.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,78 % 1 EO 4CcS = 590 0 0.00
2 EO 2S N-1 -100 5 27.78
3 EO 4CcS-4 -800 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,44 % 4 EO 4C S-2 -200 16 88.89
5 EO 3S N+1 630 5 27.78
6 EO 1S E = -90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.8 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 34,81 % 7 EO 4C N+1 650 7 38.89
8 EO 4P W-1 50 7 38.89
9 EO 2CcN-4 -800 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A12 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 59,63 %13 EO 3P E = -140 16 88.89
14 EO 4K N+1 150 13 72.22
15 EO 3S E = -400 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.4 VAN SICHELEN Sylvie -BABIKOW Georges : 63,15 %16 EO 5K E+1 -620 14 77.78
17 EO 5C W = -450 6 33.33
18 EO 2P E-2 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 48,89 %19 EO 3TcN-2 -300 16 88.89
20 EO 2P E = -110 11 61.11
21 EO 4C E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.5 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 37,78 %22 EO 3C S-1 -50 3 16.67
23 EO 2P E+2 -170 15 83.33
24 EO 3S S-2 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A11 CAMUS Colette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 54,63 %25 EO 1T N+4 150 6 33.33
26 EO 4C N-2 -200 15 83.33
27 EO Pass Passe 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.6 MASSAUX Joel -Powis : 44,26 %28 EO 4P N-1 -100 15 83.33
29 EO 3T E = -110 13 72.22
30 EO 2P W-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 277,0 / 486 = 57,00 %
PAIRE Nr : a.3 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude
A.8 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 34,81 % 4 EO 3S S = 600 6 33.33
5 EO 3CcW-3 500 14 77.78
6 EO 1S E-1 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.3 BEYNE Anne -GROSFILS Colette : 56,67 % 7 EO 4C N+1 650 7 38.89
8 EO 3S E-2 100 1 5.56
9 EO 2S W+2 -180 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 59,63 %10 EO 2P N+1 140 3 16.67
11 EO 3S N = 400 1 5.56
12 EO 4C N+1 650 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
A.4 VAN SICHELEN Sylvie -BABIKOW Georges : 63,15 %13 EO 4P E-2 200 1 5.56
14 EO 5KcS = 550 0 0.00
15 EO 3S E+2 -460 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 48,89 %16 EO 5K E+1 -620 14 77.78
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 2 11.11
18 EO 2P E-2 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A12 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A11 CAMUS Colette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 54,63 %22 EO 4C S-2 -100 8 44.44
23 EO 1S E = -90 6 33.33
24 EO 3S S-2 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.6 MASSAUX Joel -Powis : 44,26 %25 EO 4P S-1 -50 18 100.00
26 EO 2C N+1 140 4 22.22
27 EO 2K E = -90 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 42,96 %28 EO 4P N-1 -100 15 83.33
29 EO 3C S-2 -200 18 100.00
30 EO 3S W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,78 %31 EO 4C N = 620 9 50.00
32 EO 4P N = 420 1 5.56
33 EO 3T W = -110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
Total : 201,0 / 486 = 41,36 %
PAIRE Nr : a.4 BRIOT Fernand -CASSART Guy
A.8 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 34,81 % 1 EO 4PcW = -590 13 72.22
2 EO 4PcS-3 -800 16 88.89
3 EO 4T E+1 -150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A.9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 59,63 % 7 EO 3S N+2 660 2 11.11
8 EO 4P E-1 50 7 38.89
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.4 VAN SICHELEN Sylvie -BABIKOW Georges : 63,15 %10 EO 2P N = 110 8 44.44
11 EO 3S N = 400 1 5.56
12 EO 4C N+1 650 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 48,89 %13 EO 4P E-1 100 7 38.89
14 EO 5K S = 400 6 33.33
15 EO 3S W+1 -430 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.5 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 37,78 %16 EO 5K E+1 -620 14 77.78
17 EO 4C W+2 -480 10 55.56
18 EO 3ScN-5 -1400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
A11 CAMUS Colette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 54,63 %19 EO 2TcN = 180 6 33.33
20 EO 2P E-1 100 5 27.78
21 EO 5P E-2 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.6 MASSAUX Joel -Powis : 44,26 %22 EO 2P E+2 -170 15 83.33
23 EO 2P E+2 -170 15 83.33
24 EO 3S S+1 430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 42,96 %25 EO 1T N+1 90 14 77.78
26 EO 3K S-2 -200 15 83.33
27 EO Pass Passe 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A12 - : 0,00 %28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,44 %31 EO 4C N = 620 9 50.00
32 EO 3P N = 140 8 44.44
33 EO 3S E+1 -430 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 262,0 / 486 = 53,91 %
PAIRE Nr : a.5 STELLIAN Lucienne -WANDERPEPEN Janine
A.3 BEYNE Anne -GROSFILS Colette : 56,67 % 1 EO 4PcW+1 -690 16 88.89
2 EO 3S S-2 -200 8 44.44
3 EO 3S W-1 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A12 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 48,89 %10 EO 3P S-2 -200 18 100.00
11 EO 2S N+1 150 13 72.22
12 EO 4C N = 620 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
A.5 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 37,78 %13 EO 3P E-1 100 7 38.89
14 EO 3S N-2 -100 17 94.44
15 EO 3S W+3 -490 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A11 CAMUS Colette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 54,63 %16 EO 4K E+2 -170 6 33.33
17 EO 5C W+2 -510 15 83.33
18 EO 2P E-2 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.6 MASSAUX Joel -Powis : 44,26 %19 EO 3T N-2 -100 13 72.22
20 EO 2P E = -110 11 61.11
21 EO 3C E = -140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 42,96 %22 EO 2P E+2 -170 15 83.33
23 EO 3S E-2 200 0 0.00
24 EO 3S S-2 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,78 %25 EO 4P S = 420 2 11.11
26 EO 4C N-1 -100 10 55.56
27 EO 1P S-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,44 %28 EO 4P N+1 650 2 11.11
29 EO 3P W-1 100 7 38.89
30 EO 1S S-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.8 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 34,81 %31 EO 4C N-2 -200 18 100.00
32 EO 2P N+2 170 5 27.78
33 EO 3S W = -400 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
Total : 298,0 / 486 = 61,32 %
PAIRE Nr : a.6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
A.9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 59,63 % 1 EO 4PcE-2 300 3 16.67
2 EO 3S N = 600 0 0.00
3 EO 2P N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
A.4 VAN SICHELEN Sylvie -BABIKOW Georges : 63,15 % 4 EO 4C S = 620 2 11.11
5 EO 3S N+1 630 5 27.78
6 EO 2S E-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
A10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 48,89 % 7 EO 6CcN-1 -200 18 100.00
8 EO 2P W+1 -140 13 72.22
9 EO 3C W-1 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A12 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 MASSAUX Joel -Powis : 44,26 %16 EO 5K E+2 -640 18 100.00
17 EO 4C W+3 -510 15 83.33
18 EO 3S E-5 250 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 42,96 %19 EO 3C W-1 100 8 44.44
20 EO 4P E-2 200 2 11.11
21 EO 3TcN = 670 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
A.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,78 %22 EO 4C S-3 -150 12 66.67
23 EO 2P W+1 -140 9 50.00
24 EO 3S S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,44 %25 EO 1T N = 70 16 88.89
26 EO 3S N = 600 1 5.56
27 EO 1S N+1 120 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.8 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 34,81 %28 EO 3S S+1 630 6 33.33
29 EO 3K E-1 100 7 38.89
30 EO 1S E = -90 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.3 BEYNE Anne -GROSFILS Colette : 56,67 %31 EO 4C N-1 -100 15 83.33
32 EO 3P N-1 -50 15 83.33
33 EO 2K E+2 -130 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 205,0 / 486 = 42,18 %
PAIRE Nr : a.7 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Edgard
A.4 VAN SICHELEN Sylvie -BABIKOW Georges : 63,15 % 1 EO 4PcW-2 300 3 16.67
2 EO 2C N-1 -100 5 27.78
3 EO 3S W-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
A10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 48,89 % 4 EO 4C S = 620 2 11.11
5 EO 3S N+1 630 5 27.78
6 EO 2S E-1 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
A.5 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 37,78 % 7 EO 3S S+3 690 0 0.00
8 EO 4P W = -420 17 94.44
9 EO 3S W+1 -630 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A11 CAMUS Colette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 54,63 %10 EO 3C N-1 -100 14 77.78
11 EO 2S N+2 180 7 38.89
12 EO 4C N+2 680 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 42,96 %16 EO 5TcN-3 -500 10 55.56
17 EO 4C W+3 -510 15 83.33
18 EO 2P E-2 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,78 %19 EO 3TcN-1 -100 13 72.22
20 EO 2P E = -110 11 61.11
21 EO 2C E+1 -140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
A12 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 34,81 %25 EO 2C N = 110 11 61.11
26 EO 4C N-3 -300 18 100.00
27 EO 1S N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
A.3 BEYNE Anne -GROSFILS Colette : 56,67 %28 EO 4P S-1 -100 15 83.33
29 EO 4K E-3 300 0 0.00
30 EO 1P E-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 59,63 %31 EO 4C N-1 -100 15 83.33
32 EO 4P N = 420 1 5.56
33 EO 3S E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
Total : 223,0 / 486 = 45,88 %
PAIRE Nr : a.8 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
A10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 48,89 % 1 EO 4PcW = -590 13 72.22
2 EO 4PcS-3 -800 16 88.89
3 EO 3S W-1 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.5 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 37,78 % 4 EO 4C S-2 -200 16 88.89
5 EO 3S S = 600 12 66.67
6 EO 3TcS-3 -500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
A11 CAMUS Colette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 54,63 % 7 EO 4C N+1 650 7 38.89
8 EO 4P W = -420 17 94.44
9 EO 3S W-1 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.6 MASSAUX Joel -Powis : 44,26 %10 EO 3C W-1 100 12 66.67
11 EO 2S N+2 180 7 38.89
12 EO 4C N+2 680 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 42,96 %13 EO 3P E-1 100 7 38.89
14 EO 5K S = 400 6 33.33
15 EO 3S W+1 -430 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,44 %19 EO 3CcW-2 500 0 0.00
20 EO 2P E = -110 11 61.11
21 EO 4C E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.8 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 34,81 %22 EO 5CcS-3 -500 18 100.00
23 EO 2P E+2 -170 15 83.33
24 EO 3S S-2 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
A.3 BEYNE Anne -GROSFILS Colette : 56,67 %25 EO 3P S+1 170 4 22.22
26 EO 3C N-1 -100 10 55.56
27 EO Pass Passe 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 59,63 %28 EO 5P N = 650 2 11.11
29 EO 3K E-1 100 7 38.89
30 EO 2C N-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A12 - : 0,00 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 257,0 / 486 = 52,88 %
PAIRE Nr : a.9 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie
A.5 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 37,78 % 1 EO 5KcN-4 -800 18 100.00
2 EO 4PcS-2 -500 11 61.11
3 EO 4T E-1 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A11 CAMUS Colette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 54,63 % 4 EO 4C S = 620 2 11.11
5 EO 3S N+1 630 5 27.78
6 EO 1S E = -90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A12 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 42,96 %10 EO 3P N = 140 3 16.67
11 EO 3S N-1 -50 17 94.44
12 EO 4C N+1 650 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,78 %13 EO 4P E-1 100 7 38.89
14 EO 5K S = 400 6 33.33
15 EO 3S E+3 -490 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,44 %16 EO 5P S-2 -100 1 5.56
17 EO 4C E+1 -450 6 33.33
18 EO 2P E-2 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.3 BEYNE Anne -GROSFILS Colette : 56,67 %22 EO 1S N-1 -50 3 16.67
23 EO 1P W+3 -170 15 83.33
24 EO 3S S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 59,63 %25 EO 2S N = 120 8 44.44
26 EO 3S N = 600 1 5.56
27 EO Pass Passe 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.4 VAN SICHELEN Sylvie -BABIKOW Georges : 63,15 %28 EO 4P N = 620 9 50.00
29 EO 3P W = -140 16 88.89
30 EO 1S E-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 48,89 %31 EO 4C N+2 680 0 0.00
32 EO 4P N-1 -50 15 83.33
33 EO 2S W+2 -180 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 221,0 / 486 = 45,47 %
PAIRE Nr : a10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
A11 CAMUS Colette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 54,63 % 1 EO 4P W-1 50 6 33.33
2 EO 3PcS-2 -500 11 61.11
3 EO 3S W = -600 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.6 MASSAUX Joel -Powis : 44,26 % 4 EO 4C S-2 -200 16 88.89
5 EO 3S N+1 630 5 27.78
6 EO 1S E+1 -120 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 42,96 % 7 EO 6C N-1 -100 15 83.33
8 EO 3P W = -140 13 72.22
9 EO 4P W = -620 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
A.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,78 %10 EO 3C W = -140 16 88.89
11 EO 2S N+2 180 7 38.89
12 EO 4P N-4 -400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,44 %13 EO 4P E-2 200 1 5.56
14 EO 4K S+1 150 13 72.22
15 EO 3S W+1 -430 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A12 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 BEYNE Anne -GROSFILS Colette : 56,67 %19 EO 4C W-2 200 3 16.67
20 EO 2P E+1 -140 17 94.44
21 EO 4C E-2 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.4 VAN SICHELEN Sylvie -BABIKOW Georges : 63,15 %25 EO 1T N+2 110 11 61.11
26 EO 4C N-1 -100 10 55.56
27 EO 1S N+1 120 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 48,89 %28 EO 4P N+1 650 2 11.11
29 EO 4T E-2 200 2 11.11
30 EO 1S E = -90 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.5 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 37,78 %31 EO 4C N+1 650 3 16.67
32 EO 1P N+1 110 11 61.11
33 EO 2C S-3 -150 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 264,0 / 486 = 54,32 %
PAIRE Nr : a11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
A.6 MASSAUX Joel -Powis : 44,26 % 1 EO 3CcS-2 -300 10 55.56
2 EO 3K E-3 150 2 11.11
3 EO 2K E = -90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 42,96 % 4 EO 3C S-1 -100 12 66.67
5 EO 3C W-3 150 16 88.89
6 EO 1S E = -90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,78 % 7 EO 5C N-1 -100 15 83.33
8 EO 4P W-1 50 7 38.89
9 EO 3S W = -600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,44 %10 EO 3CcW-2 500 0 0.00
11 EO 2S N+2 180 7 38.89
12 EO 4C N+1 650 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.8 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 34,81 %13 EO 2P E = -110 12 66.67
14 EO 3S N-2 -100 17 94.44
15 EO 5T E = -400 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.3 BEYNE Anne -GROSFILS Colette : 56,67 %16 EO 5PcS-2 -300 8 44.44
17 EO 6S E-1 50 0 0.00
18 EO 2P E-2 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 59,63 %19 EO 4C E-2 200 3 16.67
20 EO 2P E-1 100 5 27.78
21 EO 3C E = -140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.4 VAN SICHELEN Sylvie -BABIKOW Georges : 63,15 %22 EO 3P E-1 100 0 0.00
23 EO 3S E-1 100 3 16.67
24 EO 3S S = 400 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
A.5 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 37,78 %28 EO 4P N = 620 9 50.00
29 EO 3K E = -110 13 72.22
30 EO 1S S-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A11 CAMUS Colette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 54,63 %31 EO 4C N = 620 9 50.00
32 EO 3P N+1 170 5 27.78
33 EO 2C S-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
Total : 233,0 / 540 = 43,15 %
PAIRE Nr : a12 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin
A12 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 59,63 % 4 EO 2S N = 120 10 55.56
5 EO 4T N-1 -100 18 100.00
6 EO 1S E = -90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.6 MASSAUX Joel -Powis : 44,26 % 7 EO 4C N+1 650 7 38.89
8 EO 4P W-1 50 7 38.89
9 EO 2S W+2 -180 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.3 BEYNE Anne -GROSFILS Colette : 56,67 %10 EO 2P S = 110 8 44.44
11 EO 2S N+1 150 13 72.22
12 EO 4C N+1 650 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A11 CAMUS Colette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 54,63 %13 EO 3P W = -140 16 88.89
14 EO 5K S = 400 6 33.33
15 EO 3S W+1 -430 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.8 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 34,81 %16 EO 5P S-3 -150 4 22.22
17 EO 4C W+1 -450 6 33.33
18 EO 2P E-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.5 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 37,78 %19 EO 3S E = -600 18 100.00
20 EO 4P E-3 300 0 0.00
21 EO 4C E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,44 %22 EO 1S N-2 -100 8 44.44
23 EO 4P W-1 100 3 16.67
24 EO 3S S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,78 %28 EO 4P S-1 -100 15 83.33
29 EO 3K E-1 100 7 38.89
30 EO 2P W-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 VAN SICHELEN Sylvie -BABIKOW Georges : 63,15 %31 EO 4C N+1 650 3 16.67
32 EO 3S S-2 -100 18 100.00
33 EO 3S W = -400 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 252,0 / 486 = 51,85 %
|
|