|
Tournoi du 13-01-14
1 61,52 3 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand
2 53,52 8 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
3 53,07 7 POULAERT Gilbert -VAN GYSEGHEM
4 51,52 1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
5 50,46 9 CASSART Guy -MOSSERAY Etienne
6 49,80 10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle
7 48,11 2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
8 47,72 5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
9 45,43 6 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon
10 38,78 4 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine
11 0,00 11 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 57,81 12 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
2 56,44 16 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre
3 55,43 14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
4 54,38 18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
5 54,36 22 de WASSEIGE Ariane -HUBLET Carlo
6 51,48 20 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
7 49,16 17 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
8 48,54 19 HOUTART -MORTIAUX Christiane
9 43,35 15 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
10 41,48 21 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude
11 36,77 13 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne
PAIRE Nr : 1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 57,81 % 1 NS 5KcN-4 -800 0.1 0.56
2 NS 4P S = 620 15.7 87.22
3 NS 4P W+1 -650 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
22 de WASSEIGE Ariane -HUBLET Carlo : 54,36 % 4 NS 3P N-1 -100 3.4 18.89
5 NS 2P W+1 -140 2.3 12.78
6 NS 2P E = -110 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
21 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 41,48 % 7 NS 3S S+1 630 17.9 99.44
8 NS 4P E-1 50 12.3 68.33
9 NS 2P W-1 100 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 60,19 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 51,48 %10 NS 4C S-1 -100 5.7 31.67
11 NS 3K E-1 50 4.6 25.56
12 NS 5P N = 650 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 46,11 %
19 HOUTART -MORTIAUX Christiane : 48,54 %13 NS 4C N+1 650 3.4 18.89
14 NS 2S E-1 50 16.8 93.33
15 NS 1S S = 90 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,38 %16 NS 3C E-1 100 6.8 37.78
17 NS 3S N-1 -50 7.9 43.89
18 NS 3C S-1 -100 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
17 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,16 %19 NS 2C S-2 -100 4.6 25.56
20 NS 2S E-2 200 13.4 74.44
21 NS 4C N+1 650 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
16 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 56,44 %22 NS 1S E-2 200 16.8 93.33
23 NS 3C E+1 -170 6.8 37.78
24 NS 4PcN-1 -100 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
15 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 43,35 %25 NS 3S W-1 100 14.6 81.11
26 NS 3S N+2 660 9 50.00
27 NS 4P W-1 50 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 72,78 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,43 %28 NS 3C N-1 -100 10 55.56
29 NS 3P N-1 -100 6 33.33
30 NS 4P E+1 -450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 278,2 / 540 = 51,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
13 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 36,77 % 4 NS 2P N+1 140 14.6 81.11
5 NS 2C W-1 50 11.2 62.22
6 NS 1S W+2 -150 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 57,81 % 7 NS 3K N = 110 0.1 0.56
8 NS 4P E = -420 1.2 6.67
9 NS 2T S+1 110 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 15,00 %
22 de WASSEIGE Ariane -HUBLET Carlo : 54,36 %10 NS 4C S-1 -100 5.7 31.67
11 NS 3C N-1 -50 1.2 6.67
12 NS 4P S+2 680 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
21 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 41,48 %13 NS 4C S+2 680 12.3 68.33
14 NS 2S E+1 -150 3.4 18.89
15 NS 2C N-1 -100 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 51,48 %16 NS 3C E-2 200 13.4 74.44
17 NS 3S N-1 -50 7.9 43.89
18 NS 3K W-2 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
19 HOUTART -MORTIAUX Christiane : 48,54 %19 NS 2C S = 110 16.8 93.33
20 NS 3S E-3 300 17.9 99.44
21 NS 4C N+1 650 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 82,96 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,38 %22 NS 3K E-1 100 7.9 43.89
23 NS 3S W = -600 2.3 12.78
24 NS 4P N-2 -100 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
17 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,16 %25 NS 3S W-1 100 14.6 81.11
26 NS 3S S+3 690 16.8 93.33
27 NS 3P W+1 -170 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
16 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 56,44 %28 NS 3T W-1 50 16 88.89
29 NS 3PcN-1 -200 4 22.22
30 NS 4P W+1 -450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
15 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 43,35 %31 NS 2P N+1 140 0.1 0.56
32 NS 6C S-3 -150 0.1 0.56
33 NS 4C S+3 510 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 23,15 %
Total : 259,8 / 540 = 48,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand
16 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 56,44 % 1 NS 4C W+1 -450 6.8 37.78
2 NS 5CcW-1 100 11.2 62.22
3 NS 7KcN-7 -1700 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,43 % 7 NS 3S S = 600 15.7 87.22
8 NS 4P E-1 50 12.3 68.33
9 NS 3S E-4 400 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 85,00 %
13 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 36,77 %10 NS 2C N = 110 11.2 62.22
11 NS 2ScS+1 590 17.9 99.44
12 NS 4P N+1 650 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 80,93 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 57,81 %13 NS 4C S+2 680 12.3 68.33
14 NS 2S E = -120 10.1 56.11
15 NS 3S S-1 -100 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
22 de WASSEIGE Ariane -HUBLET Carlo : 54,36 %16 NS 2S W+1 -150 0.1 0.56
17 NS 3S N+1 430 17.9 99.44
18 NS 2C S = 110 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
21 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 41,48 %19 NS 2C S = 110 16.8 93.33
20 NS 1S E-1 100 6.8 37.78
21 NS 6C N = 1430 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 76,85 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 51,48 %22 NS 3K W-1 100 7.9 43.89
23 NS 3C E+1 -170 6.8 37.78
24 NS 5C E-1 50 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
19 HOUTART -MORTIAUX Christiane : 48,54 %25 NS 3S W+2 -660 0.1 0.56
26 NS 3S S+3 690 16.8 93.33
27 NS 3T E = -110 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,38 %28 NS 3C N-1 -100 10 55.56
29 NS 4K E-1 100 10 55.56
30 NS 4P W+1 -450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
17 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,16 %31 NS 4P N = 620 17.9 99.44
32 NS 4C S-1 -50 7.9 43.89
33 NS 4C S+3 510 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
Total : 332,2 / 540 = 61,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,38 % 1 NS 4C W+1 -450 6.8 37.78
2 NS 4C E = -420 3.4 18.89
3 NS 6TcE-1 200 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
17 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,16 % 4 NS 2P N = 110 9 50.00
5 NS 2C E+1 -140 2.3 12.78
6 NS 2P E = -110 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
15 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 43,35 %10 NS 2C N+1 140 15.7 87.22
11 NS 2C N = 110 9 50.00
12 NS 5K W-4 200 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,43 %13 NS 4C S+1 650 3.4 18.89
14 NS 2S E+2 -180 0.1 0.56
15 NS 3K N-1 -100 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 15,00 %
13 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 36,77 %16 NS 4CcE-1 200 13.4 74.44
17 NS 3S N = 400 15.7 87.22
18 NS 3K E-1 50 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 57,81 %19 NS 3T N-2 -100 4.6 25.56
20 NS 1S E-1 100 6.8 37.78
21 NS 5PcW-2 300 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 25,37 %
22 de WASSEIGE Ariane -HUBLET Carlo : 54,36 %22 NS 3P N-2 -100 1.2 6.67
23 NS 3S W+1 -630 0.1 0.56
24 NS 5CcW+1 -750 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 2,59 %
21 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 41,48 %25 NS 3S W-1 100 14.6 81.11
26 NS 3S S+1 630 0.1 0.56
27 NS 5T W-1 50 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 56,30 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 51,48 %28 NS 4C N-3 -300 0 0.00
29 NS 4C W-2 200 15 83.33
30 NS 5P W = -450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
19 HOUTART -MORTIAUX Christiane : 48,54 %31 NS 2P N+2 170 9 50.00
32 NS 4C S-1 -50 7.9 43.89
33 NS 3P E-1 50 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
Total : 209,4 / 540 = 38,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
20 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 51,48 % 1 NS 4C W+1 -450 6.8 37.78
2 NS 4PcS-2 -500 0.1 0.56
3 NS 6P W-1 100 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
19 HOUTART -MORTIAUX Christiane : 48,54 % 4 NS 2P N+1 140 14.6 81.11
5 NS 2C W-1 50 11.2 62.22
6 NS 2P E+3 -200 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,38 % 7 NS 2S N+2 180 13.4 74.44
8 NS 4P E = -420 1.2 6.67
9 NS 2T S = 90 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 27,22 %
16 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 56,44 %13 NS 6C S = 1430 17.9 99.44
14 NS 2S E = -120 10.1 56.11
15 NS 2P E = -110 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
15 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 43,35 %16 NS 3C E-1 100 6.8 37.78
17 NS 3S N-1 -50 7.9 43.89
18 NS 2S E-2 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,43 %19 NS 2C N-2 -100 4.6 25.56
20 NS 2S E-2 200 13.4 74.44
21 NS 5C N = 650 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
13 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 36,77 %22 NS 3T S+1 130 13.4 74.44
23 NS 3C E = -140 13.4 74.44
24 NS 4P N-2 -100 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 57,81 %25 NS 3S W+1 -630 2.3 12.78
26 NS 3S S+2 660 9 50.00
27 NS 3T E+1 -130 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
22 de WASSEIGE Ariane -HUBLET Carlo : 54,36 %28 NS 4C N-2 -200 3 16.67
29 NS 4C W-2 200 15 83.33
30 NS 4P E+1 -450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
21 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 41,48 %31 NS 3P N+1 170 9 50.00
32 NS 4P N+1 450 17.9 99.44
33 NS 4PcE-3 500 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
Total : 257,7 / 540 = 47,72 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon
22 de WASSEIGE Ariane -HUBLET Carlo : 54,36 % 1 NS 4C E = -420 13.4 74.44
2 NS 5P S-1 -100 9 50.00
3 NS 4P W+1 -650 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
21 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 41,48 % 4 NS 1S W+1 -120 0.1 0.56
5 NS 4P W-2 100 16.8 93.33
6 NS 3P W = -140 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 51,48 % 7 NS 3P S = 140 6.8 37.78
8 NS 4P E-1 50 12.3 68.33
9 NS 1PcW-1 200 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
19 HOUTART -MORTIAUX Christiane : 48,54 %10 NS 3K W+1 -130 0.1 0.56
11 NS 3T W-3 150 14.6 81.11
12 NS 4P N = 620 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
17 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,16 %16 NS 3C E-2 200 13.4 74.44
17 NS 3S N-1 -50 7.9 43.89
18 NS 3K E = -110 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
16 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 56,44 %19 NS 2K W+2 -130 0.1 0.56
20 NS 2S E = -120 0.1 0.56
21 NS 5CcN+1 1050 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
15 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 43,35 %22 NS 3T S = 110 11.2 62.22
23 NS 3C E+1 -170 6.8 37.78
24 NS 5C E-1 50 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,43 %25 NS 3S W = -600 6.8 37.78
26 NS 4C S+1 650 2.3 12.78
27 NS 3P W+1 -170 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 21,11 %
13 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 36,77 %28 NS 2S S-1 -100 10 55.56
29 NS 5K E-1 100 10 55.56
30 NS 4P W+1 -450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 57,81 %31 NS 2P N+2 170 9 50.00
32 NS 4C S-2 -100 2.3 12.78
33 NS 3C S+4 260 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 25,19 %
Total : 245,3 / 540 = 45,43 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 POULAERT Gilbert -VAN GYSEGHEM
13 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 36,77 % 1 NS 4C E = -420 13.4 74.44
2 NS 4P S = 620 15.7 87.22
3 NS 4P W+1 -650 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 57,81 % 4 NS 2C S-1 -100 3.4 18.89
5 NS 1S E-2 100 16.8 93.33
6 NS 2S W+1 -150 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
22 de WASSEIGE Ariane -HUBLET Carlo : 54,36 % 7 NS 2S N = 120 2.3 12.78
8 NS 4P E-1 50 12.3 68.33
9 NS 2T S+1 110 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
21 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 41,48 %10 NS 2C N+1 140 15.7 87.22
11 NS 3P W-3 150 14.6 81.11
12 NS 5KcW-2 300 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 68,70 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 51,48 %13 NS 4C S+1 650 3.4 18.89
14 NS 2S E+1 -150 3.4 18.89
15 NS 2P E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,26 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,38 %19 NS 3T N-1 -50 9 50.00
20 NS 1S E = -90 2.3 12.78
21 NS 5C N = 650 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
17 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,16 %22 NS 1S E-2 200 16.8 93.33
23 NS 3C W = -140 13.4 74.44
24 NS 4C E = -420 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
16 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 56,44 %25 NS 3S W = -600 6.8 37.78
26 NS 3S S+2 660 9 50.00
27 NS 3P W+1 -170 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
15 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 43,35 %28 NS 1S S+2 150 18 100.00
29 NS 4CcW = -790 0 0.00
30 NS 4P E = -420 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,43 %31 NS 2P N+2 170 9 50.00
32 NS 3S S+1 430 14.6 81.11
33 NS 5C S+2 510 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
Total : 286,6 / 540 = 53,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
15 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 43,35 % 1 NS 4C E = -420 13.4 74.44
2 NS 5PcS-1 -200 6.8 37.78
3 NS 4K E-2 200 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,43 % 4 NS 2P N = 110 9 50.00
5 NS 2C W = -110 6.8 37.78
6 NS 2P E+2 -170 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 39,81 %
13 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 36,77 % 7 NS 3K N+1 130 4.6 25.56
8 NS 2P E+2 -170 4.6 25.56
9 NS 2T S+2 130 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 57,81 %10 NS 3C S = 140 15.7 87.22
11 NS 2P W-2 100 6.8 37.78
12 NS 5K W-4 200 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
22 de WASSEIGE Ariane -HUBLET Carlo : 54,36 %13 NS 4C S+2 680 12.3 68.33
14 NS 2S E-1 50 16.8 93.33
15 NS 2S S = 120 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 82,96 %
21 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 41,48 %16 NS 2C E-1 100 6.8 37.78
17 NS 3S N-2 -100 0.1 0.56
18 NS 2C S+1 140 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
19 HOUTART -MORTIAUX Christiane : 48,54 %22 NS 2T S = 90 4.6 25.56
23 NS 3C W = -140 13.4 74.44
24 NS 4C E = -420 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,38 %25 NS 3S W = -600 6.8 37.78
26 NS 3S S+2 660 9 50.00
27 NS 4T E-1 50 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
17 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,16 %28 NS 3C N-1 -100 10 55.56
29 NS 4C W-1 100 10 55.56
30 NS 4P E+1 -450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
16 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 56,44 %31 NS 2P N+2 170 9 50.00
32 NS 3S S+1 430 14.6 81.11
33 NS 4C S+3 510 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
Total : 289,0 / 540 = 53,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 CASSART Guy -MOSSERAY Etienne
17 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,16 % 1 NS 5KcN-3 -500 2.3 12.78
2 NS 4C E = -420 3.4 18.89
3 NS 4P E+2 -680 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
16 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 56,44 % 4 NS 2P N = 110 9 50.00
5 NS 2P E-1 50 11.2 62.22
6 NS 3S E+1 -630 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
15 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 43,35 % 7 NS 3P S+1 170 11.2 62.22
8 NS 4P E-1 50 12.3 68.33
9 NS 1S W-2 200 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,43 %10 NS 3K E = -110 2.3 12.78
11 NS 3C S = 140 11.2 62.22
12 NS 5CcE-3 500 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
13 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 36,77 %13 NS 4C S+2 680 12.3 68.33
14 NS 2S E = -120 10.1 56.11
15 NS 1S N+2 150 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 74,63 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 57,81 %16 NS 3CcE-3 800 17.9 99.44
17 NS 3S N-1 -50 7.9 43.89
18 NS 3C S = 140 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 78,89 %
22 de WASSEIGE Ariane -HUBLET Carlo : 54,36 %19 NS 2T N = 90 12.3 68.33
20 NS 1S E-1 100 6.8 37.78
21 NS 6C N-2 -200 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 51,48 %25 NS 3S W-1 100 14.6 81.11
26 NS 3S S+2 660 9 50.00
27 NS 3T E = -110 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
19 HOUTART -MORTIAUX Christiane : 48,54 %28 NS 4C S-2 -200 3 16.67
29 NS 4KcE = -710 2 11.11
30 NS 4P E+1 -450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,38 %31 NS 2P N+2 170 9 50.00
32 NS 6T N-1 -50 7.9 43.89
33 NS 6PcE-5 1100 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
Total : 272,5 / 540 = 50,46 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle
19 HOUTART -MORTIAUX Christiane : 48,54 % 1 NS 3C W+1 -170 17.9 99.44
2 NS 4P S = 620 15.7 87.22
3 NS 4P W+1 -650 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 76,85 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,38 % 4 NS 3T W-2 200 17.9 99.44
5 NS 2C W+1 -140 2.3 12.78
6 NS 2P E+2 -170 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
17 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,16 % 7 NS 2S N+1 150 9 50.00
8 NS 4P E-1 50 12.3 68.33
9 NS 2T S+1 110 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
16 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 56,44 %10 NS 1P E-1 100 9 50.00
11 NS 2P S-1 -50 1.2 6.67
12 NS 2P S+3 200 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 23,15 %
15 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 43,35 %13 NS 4P S+1 650 3.4 18.89
14 NS 2S E = -120 10.1 56.11
15 NS 3P W-2 100 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 49,81 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,43 %16 NS 1P N = 80 2.3 12.78
17 NS 3S N-1 -50 7.9 43.89
18 NS 4K E-2 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
13 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 36,77 %19 NS 2T N = 90 12.3 68.33
20 NS 2S W-2 200 13.4 74.44
21 NS 5PcE-3 500 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 57,81 %22 NS 2P N-2 -100 1.2 6.67
23 NS 4C E-1 100 17.9 99.44
24 NS 4PcN-2 -300 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
21 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 41,48 %28 NS 2S S-1 -100 10 55.56
29 NS 4C W-3 300 18 100.00
30 NS 4P E+1 -450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 51,48 %31 NS 2P N+2 170 9 50.00
32 NS 6T N-1 -50 7.9 43.89
33 NS 5PcW-3 500 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
Total : 268,9 / 540 = 49,80 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 -
21 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 41,48 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 51,48 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 HOUTART -MORTIAUX Christiane : 48,54 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,38 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,16 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
16 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 56,44 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
15 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 43,35 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,43 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
13 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 36,77 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
22 de WASSEIGE Ariane -HUBLET Carlo : 54,36 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 594 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,52 % 1 EO 5KcN-4 -800 17.9 99.44
2 EO 4P S = 620 2.3 12.78
3 EO 4P W+1 -650 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
7 POULAERT Gilbert -VAN GYSEGHEM : 53,07 % 4 EO 2C S-1 -100 14.6 81.11
5 EO 1S E-2 100 1.2 6.67
6 EO 2S W+1 -150 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,11 % 7 EO 3K N = 110 17.9 99.44
8 EO 4P E = -420 16.8 93.33
9 EO 2T S+1 110 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 85,00 %
8 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,52 %10 EO 3C S = 140 2.3 12.78
11 EO 2P W-2 100 11.2 62.22
12 EO 5K W-4 200 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
3 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 61,52 %13 EO 4C S+2 680 5.7 31.67
14 EO 2S E = -120 7.9 43.89
15 EO 3S S-1 -100 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 CASSART Guy -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,46 %16 EO 3CcE-3 800 0.1 0.56
17 EO 3S N-1 -50 10.1 56.11
18 EO 3C S = 140 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 21,11 %
4 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 38,78 %19 EO 3T N-2 -100 13.4 74.44
20 EO 1S E-1 100 11.2 62.22
21 EO 5PcW-2 300 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 74,63 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 49,80 %22 EO 2P N-2 -100 16.8 93.33
23 EO 4C E-1 100 0.1 0.56
24 EO 4PcN-2 -300 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 47,72 %25 EO 3S W+1 -630 15.7 87.22
26 EO 3S S+2 660 9 50.00
27 EO 3T E+1 -130 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
6 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 45,43 %31 EO 2P N+2 170 9 50.00
32 EO 4C S-2 -100 15.7 87.22
33 EO 3C S+4 260 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 74,81 %
Total : 312,2 / 540 = 57,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne
7 POULAERT Gilbert -VAN GYSEGHEM : 53,07 % 1 EO 4C E = -420 4.6 25.56
2 EO 4P S = 620 2.3 12.78
3 EO 4P W+1 -650 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,11 % 4 EO 2P N+1 140 3.4 18.89
5 EO 2C W-1 50 6.8 37.78
6 EO 1S W+2 -150 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
8 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,52 % 7 EO 3K N+1 130 13.4 74.44
8 EO 2P E+2 -170 13.4 74.44
9 EO 2T S+2 130 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
3 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 61,52 %10 EO 2C N = 110 6.8 37.78
11 EO 2ScS+1 590 0.1 0.56
12 EO 4P N+1 650 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 19,07 %
9 CASSART Guy -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,46 %13 EO 4C S+2 680 5.7 31.67
14 EO 2S E = -120 7.9 43.89
15 EO 1S N+2 150 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 25,37 %
4 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 38,78 %16 EO 4CcE-1 200 4.6 25.56
17 EO 3S N = 400 2.3 12.78
18 EO 3K E-1 50 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 49,80 %19 EO 2T N = 90 5.7 31.67
20 EO 2S W-2 200 4.6 25.56
21 EO 5PcE-3 500 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 47,72 %22 EO 3T S+1 130 4.6 25.56
23 EO 3C E = -140 4.6 25.56
24 EO 4P N-2 -100 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
11 - : 0,00 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 45,43 %28 EO 2S S-1 -100 8 44.44
29 EO 5K E-1 100 8 44.44
30 EO 4P W+1 -450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 178,7 / 486 = 36,77 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
8 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,52 % 4 EO 2P N = 110 9 50.00
5 EO 2C W = -110 11.2 62.22
6 EO 2P E+2 -170 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 60,19 %
3 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 61,52 % 7 EO 3S S = 600 2.3 12.78
8 EO 4P E-1 50 5.7 31.67
9 EO 3S E-4 400 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 15,00 %
9 CASSART Guy -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,46 %10 EO 3K E = -110 15.7 87.22
11 EO 3C S = 140 6.8 37.78
12 EO 5CcE-3 500 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
4 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 38,78 %13 EO 4C S+1 650 14.6 81.11
14 EO 2S E+2 -180 17.9 99.44
15 EO 3K N-1 -100 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 85,00 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 49,80 %16 EO 1P N = 80 15.7 87.22
17 EO 3S N-1 -50 10.1 56.11
18 EO 4K E-2 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 47,72 %19 EO 2C N-2 -100 13.4 74.44
20 EO 2S E-2 200 4.6 25.56
21 EO 5C N = 650 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
11 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 45,43 %25 EO 3S W = -600 11.2 62.22
26 EO 4C S+1 650 15.7 87.22
27 EO 3P W+1 -170 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 78,89 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,52 %28 EO 3C N-1 -100 8 44.44
29 EO 3P N-1 -100 12 66.67
30 EO 4P E+1 -450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
7 POULAERT Gilbert -VAN GYSEGHEM : 53,07 %31 EO 2P N+2 170 9 50.00
32 EO 3S S+1 430 3.4 18.89
33 EO 5C S+2 510 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
Total : 269,4 / 486 = 55,43 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
8 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,52 % 1 EO 4C E = -420 4.6 25.56
2 EO 5PcS-1 -200 11.2 62.22
3 EO 4K E-2 200 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
9 CASSART Guy -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,46 % 7 EO 3P S+1 170 6.8 37.78
8 EO 4P E-1 50 5.7 31.67
9 EO 1S W-2 200 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
4 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 38,78 %10 EO 2C N+1 140 2.3 12.78
11 EO 2C N = 110 9 50.00
12 EO 5K W-4 200 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 49,80 %13 EO 4P S+1 650 14.6 81.11
14 EO 2S E = -120 7.9 43.89
15 EO 3P W-2 100 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 50,19 %
5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 47,72 %16 EO 3C E-1 100 11.2 62.22
17 EO 3S N-1 -50 10.1 56.11
18 EO 2S E-2 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
11 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 45,43 %22 EO 3T S = 110 6.8 37.78
23 EO 3C E+1 -170 11.2 62.22
24 EO 5C E-1 50 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,52 %25 EO 3S W-1 100 3.4 18.89
26 EO 3S N+2 660 9 50.00
27 EO 4P W-1 50 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 27,22 %
7 POULAERT Gilbert -VAN GYSEGHEM : 53,07 %28 EO 1S S+2 150 0 0.00
29 EO 4CcW = -790 18 100.00
30 EO 4P E = -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,11 %31 EO 2P N+1 140 17.9 99.44
32 EO 6C S-3 -150 17.9 99.44
33 EO 4C S+3 510 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 76,85 %
Total : 210,7 / 486 = 43,35 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre
3 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 61,52 % 1 EO 4C W+1 -450 11.2 62.22
2 EO 5CcW-1 100 6.8 37.78
3 EO 7KcN-7 -1700 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
9 CASSART Guy -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,46 % 4 EO 2P N = 110 9 50.00
5 EO 2P E-1 50 6.8 37.78
6 EO 3S E+1 -630 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 49,80 %10 EO 1P E-1 100 9 50.00
11 EO 2P S-1 -50 16.8 93.33
12 EO 2P S+3 200 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 76,85 %
5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 47,72 %13 EO 6C S = 1430 0.1 0.56
14 EO 2S E = -120 7.9 43.89
15 EO 2P E = -110 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
11 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 45,43 %19 EO 2K W+2 -130 17.9 99.44
20 EO 2S E = -120 17.9 99.44
21 EO 5CcN+1 1050 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,52 %22 EO 1S E-2 200 1.2 6.67
23 EO 3C E+1 -170 11.2 62.22
24 EO 4PcN-1 -100 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
7 POULAERT Gilbert -VAN GYSEGHEM : 53,07 %25 EO 3S W = -600 11.2 62.22
26 EO 3S S+2 660 9 50.00
27 EO 3P W+1 -170 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,11 %28 EO 3T W-1 50 2 11.11
29 EO 3PcN-1 -200 14 77.78
30 EO 4P W+1 -450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
8 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,52 %31 EO 2P N+2 170 9 50.00
32 EO 3S S+1 430 3.4 18.89
33 EO 4C S+3 510 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
Total : 274,3 / 486 = 56,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
9 CASSART Guy -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,46 % 1 EO 5KcN-3 -500 15.7 87.22
2 EO 4C E = -420 14.6 81.11
3 EO 4P E+2 -680 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
4 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 38,78 % 4 EO 2P N = 110 9 50.00
5 EO 2C E+1 -140 15.7 87.22
6 EO 2P E = -110 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 49,80 % 7 EO 2S N+1 150 9 50.00
8 EO 4P E-1 50 5.7 31.67
9 EO 2T S+1 110 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
11 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 45,43 %16 EO 3C E-2 200 4.6 25.56
17 EO 3S N-1 -50 10.1 56.11
18 EO 3K E = -110 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,52 %19 EO 2C S-2 -100 13.4 74.44
20 EO 2S E-2 200 4.6 25.56
21 EO 4C N+1 650 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
7 POULAERT Gilbert -VAN GYSEGHEM : 53,07 %22 EO 1S E-2 200 1.2 6.67
23 EO 3C W = -140 4.6 25.56
24 EO 4C E = -420 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,11 %25 EO 3S W-1 100 3.4 18.89
26 EO 3S S+3 690 1.2 6.67
27 EO 3P W+1 -170 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
8 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,52 %28 EO 3C N-1 -100 8 44.44
29 EO 4C W-1 100 8 44.44
30 EO 4P E+1 -450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
3 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 61,52 %31 EO 4P N = 620 0.1 0.56
32 EO 4C S-1 -50 10.1 56.11
33 EO 4C S+3 510 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
Total : 238,9 / 486 = 49,16 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
4 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 38,78 % 1 EO 4C W+1 -450 11.2 62.22
2 EO 4C E = -420 14.6 81.11
3 EO 6TcE-1 200 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 49,80 % 4 EO 3T W-2 200 0.1 0.56
5 EO 2C W+1 -140 15.7 87.22
6 EO 2P E+2 -170 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 47,72 % 7 EO 2S N+2 180 4.6 25.56
8 EO 4P E = -420 16.8 93.33
9 EO 2T S = 90 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 72,78 %
11 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,52 %16 EO 3C E-1 100 11.2 62.22
17 EO 3S N-1 -50 10.1 56.11
18 EO 3C S-1 -100 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
7 POULAERT Gilbert -VAN GYSEGHEM : 53,07 %19 EO 3T N-1 -50 9 50.00
20 EO 1S E = -90 15.7 87.22
21 EO 5C N = 650 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,11 %22 EO 3K E-1 100 10.1 56.11
23 EO 3S W = -600 15.7 87.22
24 EO 4P N-2 -100 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
8 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,52 %25 EO 3S W = -600 11.2 62.22
26 EO 3S S+2 660 9 50.00
27 EO 4T E-1 50 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
3 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 61,52 %28 EO 3C N-1 -100 8 44.44
29 EO 4K E-1 100 8 44.44
30 EO 4P W+1 -450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
9 CASSART Guy -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,46 %31 EO 2P N+2 170 9 50.00
32 EO 6T N-1 -50 10.1 56.11
33 EO 6PcE-5 1100 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
Total : 264,3 / 486 = 54,38 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 HOUTART -MORTIAUX Christiane
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 49,80 % 1 EO 3C W+1 -170 0.1 0.56
2 EO 4P S = 620 2.3 12.78
3 EO 4P W+1 -650 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 23,15 %
5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 47,72 % 4 EO 2P N+1 140 3.4 18.89
5 EO 2C W-1 50 6.8 37.78
6 EO 2P E+3 -200 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
11 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 45,43 %10 EO 3K W+1 -130 17.9 99.44
11 EO 3T W-3 150 3.4 18.89
12 EO 4P N = 620 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,52 %13 EO 4C N+1 650 14.6 81.11
14 EO 2S E-1 50 1.2 6.67
15 EO 1S S = 90 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,11 %19 EO 2C S = 110 1.2 6.67
20 EO 3S E-3 300 0.1 0.56
21 EO 4C N+1 650 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 17,04 %
8 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,52 %22 EO 2T S = 90 13.4 74.44
23 EO 3C W = -140 4.6 25.56
24 EO 4C E = -420 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
3 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 61,52 %25 EO 3S W+2 -660 17.9 99.44
26 EO 3S S+3 690 1.2 6.67
27 EO 3T E = -110 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 CASSART Guy -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,46 %28 EO 4C S-2 -200 15 83.33
29 EO 4KcE = -710 16 88.89
30 EO 4P E+1 -450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
4 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 38,78 %31 EO 2P N+2 170 9 50.00
32 EO 4C S-1 -50 10.1 56.11
33 EO 3P E-1 50 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
Total : 235,9 / 486 = 48,54 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 47,72 % 1 EO 4C W+1 -450 11.2 62.22
2 EO 4PcS-2 -500 17.9 99.44
3 EO 6P W-1 100 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
11 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 45,43 % 7 EO 3P S = 140 11.2 62.22
8 EO 4P E-1 50 5.7 31.67
9 EO 1PcW-1 200 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,52 %10 EO 4C S-1 -100 12.3 68.33
11 EO 3K E-1 50 13.4 74.44
12 EO 5P N = 650 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 53,89 %
7 POULAERT Gilbert -VAN GYSEGHEM : 53,07 %13 EO 4C S+1 650 14.6 81.11
14 EO 2S E+1 -150 14.6 81.11
15 EO 2P E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,74 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,11 %16 EO 3C E-2 200 4.6 25.56
17 EO 3S N-1 -50 10.1 56.11
18 EO 3K W-2 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
3 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 61,52 %22 EO 3K W-1 100 10.1 56.11
23 EO 3C E+1 -170 11.2 62.22
24 EO 5C E-1 50 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
9 CASSART Guy -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,46 %25 EO 3S W-1 100 3.4 18.89
26 EO 3S S+2 660 9 50.00
27 EO 3T E = -110 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
4 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 38,78 %28 EO 4C N-3 -300 18 100.00
29 EO 4C W-2 200 3 16.67
30 EO 5P W = -450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 49,80 %31 EO 2P N+2 170 9 50.00
32 EO 6T N-1 -50 10.1 56.11
33 EO 5PcW-3 500 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
Total : 250,2 / 486 = 51,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude
11 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 45,43 % 4 EO 1S W+1 -120 17.9 99.44
5 EO 4P W-2 100 1.2 6.67
6 EO 3P W = -140 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,52 % 7 EO 3S S+1 630 0.1 0.56
8 EO 4P E-1 50 5.7 31.67
9 EO 2P W-1 100 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 39,81 %
7 POULAERT Gilbert -VAN GYSEGHEM : 53,07 %10 EO 2C N+1 140 2.3 12.78
11 EO 3P W-3 150 3.4 18.89
12 EO 5KcW-2 300 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 31,30 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,11 %13 EO 4C S+2 680 5.7 31.67
14 EO 2S E+1 -150 14.6 81.11
15 EO 2C N-1 -100 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
8 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,52 %16 EO 2C E-1 100 11.2 62.22
17 EO 3S N-2 -100 17.9 99.44
18 EO 2C S+1 140 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
3 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 61,52 %19 EO 2C S = 110 1.2 6.67
20 EO 1S E-1 100 11.2 62.22
21 EO 6C N = 1430 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 23,15 %
4 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 38,78 %25 EO 3S W-1 100 3.4 18.89
26 EO 3S S+1 630 17.9 99.44
27 EO 5T W-1 50 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 43,70 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 49,80 %28 EO 2S S-1 -100 8 44.44
29 EO 4C W-3 300 0 0.00
30 EO 4P E+1 -450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 47,72 %31 EO 3P N+1 170 9 50.00
32 EO 4P N+1 450 0.1 0.56
33 EO 4PcE-3 500 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
Total : 201,6 / 486 = 41,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 de WASSEIGE Ariane -HUBLET Carlo
6 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 45,43 % 1 EO 4C E = -420 4.6 25.56
2 EO 5P S-1 -100 9 50.00
3 EO 4P W+1 -650 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,52 % 4 EO 3P N-1 -100 14.6 81.11
5 EO 2P W+1 -140 15.7 87.22
6 EO 2P E = -110 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
7 POULAERT Gilbert -VAN GYSEGHEM : 53,07 % 7 EO 2S N = 120 15.7 87.22
8 EO 4P E-1 50 5.7 31.67
9 EO 2T S+1 110 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,11 %10 EO 4C S-1 -100 12.3 68.33
11 EO 3C N-1 -50 16.8 93.33
12 EO 4P S+2 680 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
8 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,52 %13 EO 4C S+2 680 5.7 31.67
14 EO 2S E-1 50 1.2 6.67
15 EO 2S S = 120 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 17,04 %
3 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 61,52 %16 EO 2S W+1 -150 17.9 99.44
17 EO 3S N+1 430 0.1 0.56
18 EO 2C S = 110 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
9 CASSART Guy -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,46 %19 EO 2T N = 90 5.7 31.67
20 EO 1S E-1 100 11.2 62.22
21 EO 6C N-2 -200 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
4 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 38,78 %22 EO 3P N-2 -100 16.8 93.33
23 EO 3S W+1 -630 17.9 99.44
24 EO 5CcW+1 -750 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 97,41 %
5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 47,72 %28 EO 4C N-2 -200 15 83.33
29 EO 4C W-2 200 3 16.67
30 EO 4P E+1 -450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
11 - : 0,00 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 264,2 / 486 = 54,36 %
|
|