|
Tournoi du 14-07-14
1 66,63 A.3 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand
2 57,35 A.9 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
3 56,43 A10 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette
4 55,00 A.7 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon
5 49,80 A.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
6 49,46 A.8 MATELART Marc -HUBLET Carlo
7 48,57 A11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
8 45,24 A.4 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette
9 42,54 A.6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane
10 41,54 A.1 PADOU Bernard -GILLAIN Françoise
11 37,78 A.5 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine
12 0,00 A12 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 56,03 a.6 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -POULAERT Gilbert
2 55,97 a10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
3 55,82 a.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -MOSSERAY Etienne
4 53,91 a.4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
5 53,02 a.7 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
6 52,00 a11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
7 48,70 a.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
8 48,02 a.1 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -MAHY Alain
9 47,92 a12 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
10 47,88 a.5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
11 42,41 a.9 SALFI Huguette -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
12 38,68 a.8 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
PAIRE Nr : A.1 PADOU Bernard -GILLAIN Françoise
a.1 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -MAHY Alain : 48,02 % 1 NS 3S E-1 50 13 72.22
2 NS 4C S = 620 10 55.56
3 NS 4K N = 130 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,00 % 4 NS 3TcN-2 -500 0 0.00
5 NS 2P E = -110 4 22.22
6 NS 2S E = -120 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
a10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,97 % 7 NS 2P W = -110 7 38.89
8 NS 2P N = 110 11 61.11
9 NS 4P W = -620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.9 SALFI Huguette -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 42,41 %10 NS 3K E+3 -170 13 72.22
11 NS 3P S = 140 4 22.22
12 NS 5TcW-5 1100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.8 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 38,68 %13 NS 4P N = 620 13 72.22
14 NS 2P W = -110 9 50.00
15 NS 1S N+2 150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.7 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,02 %16 NS 3S W = -600 5 27.78
17 NS 4P N+1 450 13 72.22
18 NS 3KcW = -470 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
a.6 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -POULAERT Gilbert : 56,03 %19 NS 3S S+2 460 7 38.89
20 NS 4K E = -130 4 22.22
21 NS 2C S-1 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 47,88 %22 NS 3S W+2 -660 5 27.78
23 NS 3K N-1 -100 15 83.33
24 NS 4T S-2 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 53,91 %25 NS 2PcN-2 -300 1 5.56
26 NS 1ScN-4 -1100 0 0.00
27 NS 2P E = -110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
a.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,82 %28 NS 3P S-3 -300 2 11.11
29 NS 2C N-1 -100 5 27.78
30 NS 3ScS+2 750 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 224,3 / 540 = 41,54 %
PAIRE Nr : A.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
a.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,70 % 4 NS 2P W+1 -140 6 33.33
5 NS 3T S-2 -200 0 0.00
6 NS 3T E-1 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.1 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -MAHY Alain : 48,02 % 7 NS 3S E-3 300 17 94.44
8 NS 2P N = 110 11 61.11
9 NS 4P W = -620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,00 %10 NS 3K E+3 -170 13 72.22
11 NS 2P S+3 200 14 77.78
12 NS 3C S+1 170 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,97 %13 NS 3P N-1 -100 4 22.22
14 NS 3CcS-2 -300 0 0.00
15 NS 1S N+3 180 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a.9 SALFI Huguette -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 42,41 %16 NS 2PcN-3 -500 8 44.44
17 NS 4P N+1 450 13 72.22
18 NS 5KcW-3 500 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 72,04 %
a.8 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 38,68 %19 NS 3S S+2 460 7 38.89
20 NS 3S E-3 300 18 100.00
21 NS 4P S-1 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a12 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,92 %22 NS 2K E+3 -150 17 94.44
23 NS 2P E = -110 11 61.11
24 NS 3K E+2 -150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a.6 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -POULAERT Gilbert : 56,03 %25 NS 4P N-3 -150 4 22.22
26 NS 3S W-1 100 16 88.89
27 NS 1C W+1 -110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 47,88 %28 NS 3K N-1 -100 8 44.44
29 NS 2C N-1 -100 5 27.78
30 NS 5K N = 400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 53,91 %31 NS 3S N-2 -200 0 0.00
32 NS 3S E+4 -720 7 38.89
33 NS 3P S-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
Total : 268,9 / 540 = 49,80 %
PAIRE Nr : A.3 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand
a.5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 47,88 % 1 NS 1S E+1 -120 5 27.78
2 NS 4C S = 620 10 55.56
3 NS 3S S+2 460 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,82 % 7 NS 2P E-1 100 10 55.56
8 NS 2P N = 110 11 61.11
9 NS 4C S-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a12 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,92 %10 NS 5K E+1 -620 4 22.22
11 NS 2P S+3 200 14 77.78
12 NS 4C S = 620 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.1 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -MAHY Alain : 48,02 %13 NS 3P N+2 200 10 55.56
14 NS 2P W = -110 9 50.00
15 NS 3S N-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,00 %16 NS 3K W+1 -130 16 88.89
17 NS 4C S+1 450 13 72.22
18 NS 60%60% Ajust 10.8 60.00 µ Tbl = 73,70 %
a10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,97 %19 NS 3S S+3 490 16 88.89
20 NS 3C E-1 100 8 44.44
21 NS 4P S = 620 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
a.9 SALFI Huguette -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 42,41 %22 NS 3S E = -600 12 66.67
23 NS 2P E+1 -140 4 22.22
24 NS 4C S-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.8 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 38,68 %25 NS 1P N = 80 16 88.89
26 NS 3S W = -600 14 77.78
27 NS 3C W-2 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
a.7 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,02 %28 NS 3C N-1 -100 8 44.44
29 NS 2S N = 120 16 88.89
30 NS 4C S+1 450 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.6 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -POULAERT Gilbert : 56,03 %31 NS 4P N+1 650 11 61.11
32 NS 3S W+2 -660 18 100.00
33 NS 3S S = 400 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
Total : 359,8 / 540 = 66,63 %
PAIRE Nr : A.4 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette
a.7 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,02 % 1 NS 3S W-1 50 13 72.22
2 NS 2C S+2 170 1 5.56
3 NS 3C E-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
a.6 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -POULAERT Gilbert : 56,03 % 4 NS 2T N = 90 14 77.78
5 NS 1S W = -90 10 55.56
6 NS 2C E = -110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 53,91 %10 NS 3K E+3 -170 13 72.22
11 NS 4PcS = 590 18 100.00
12 NS 4C S = 620 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
a.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,82 %13 NS 3T S-1 -100 4 22.22
14 NS 1S E+1 -120 4 22.22
15 NS 2S S+1 150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,70 %16 NS 1S W+3 -180 11 61.11
17 NS 3P N+2 200 2 11.11
18 NS 4P S-1 -100 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 46,85 %
a.1 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -MAHY Alain : 48,02 %19 NS 3S S+2 460 7 38.89
20 NS 3S E-2 200 14 77.78
21 NS 3P S = 140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,00 %22 NS 3S W+3 -690 0 0.00
23 NS 2P E+1 -140 4 22.22
24 NS 3P W+2 -200 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
a10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,97 %25 NS 3PcN-2 -300 1 5.56
26 NS 3S W+3 -690 5 27.78
27 NS 3C W-2 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.9 SALFI Huguette -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 42,41 %28 NS 3K S-1 -100 8 44.44
29 NS 3C N-2 -200 0 0.00
30 NS 3C S+2 200 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a12 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,92 %31 NS 4P N+1 650 11 61.11
32 NS 3S E+3 -690 15 83.33
33 NS 3P S-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 244,3 / 540 = 45,24 %
PAIRE Nr : A.5 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine
a.9 SALFI Huguette -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 42,41 % 1 NS 3S W = -400 0 0.00
2 NS 2C N+2 170 1 5.56
3 NS 4K N = 130 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
a.8 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 38,68 % 4 NS 3P W = -140 6 33.33
5 NS 3C S-1 -100 8 44.44
6 NS 2C W = -110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.7 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,02 % 7 NS 3KcS-5 -1400 0 0.00
8 NS 1P N+1 110 11 61.11
9 NS 4PcW+1 -990 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
a.5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 47,88 %13 NS 4P N-1 -100 4 22.22
14 NS 2P W = -110 9 50.00
15 NS 2S N+1 150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 53,91 %16 NS 1S W+3 -180 11 61.11
17 NS 2P N+3 200 2 11.11
18 NS 3K W+1 -130 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a12 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,92 %19 NS 3S S+2 460 7 38.89
20 NS 3P W-2 200 14 77.78
21 NS 4P S-2 -200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,70 %22 NS 3T E+2 -150 17 94.44
23 NS 2P E+1 -140 4 22.22
24 NS 4T S = 130 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.1 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -MAHY Alain : 48,02 %25 NS 2PcN-1 -100 6 33.33
26 NS 3S E+3 -690 5 27.78
27 NS 3C W-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,00 %28 NS 3S W-1 50 14 77.78
29 NS 2C N = 110 12 66.67
30 NS 3P E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,97 %31 NS 2S N = 120 4 22.22
32 NS 3S W+4 -720 7 38.89
33 NS 4C N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
Total : 204,0 / 540 = 37,78 %
PAIRE Nr : A.6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane
a11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,00 % 1 NS 2P E = -110 8 44.44
2 NS 4C N+1 650 18 100.00
3 NS 4K N+1 150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,97 % 4 NS 3TcN-1 -200 2 11.11
5 NS 2P E = -110 4 22.22
6 NS 2C E = -110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
a12 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,92 % 7 NS 3S E-2 200 13 72.22
8 NS 1S N = 90 2 11.11
9 NS 4CcN-1 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.8 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 38,68 %10 NS 3K E+3 -170 13 72.22
11 NS 3P N = 140 4 22.22
12 NS 3C N+2 200 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.6 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -POULAERT Gilbert : 56,03 %16 NS 3S E = -600 5 27.78
17 NS 4P N = 420 6 33.33
18 NS 4P N-2 -200 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 30,93 %
a.5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 47,88 %19 NS 5K N = 400 0 0.00
20 NS 5K E-1 100 8 44.44
21 NS 3P N-1 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 53,91 %22 NS 3S E+2 -660 5 27.78
23 NS 2P E = -110 11 61.11
24 NS 4P E+1 -450 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,82 %25 NS 3C N-1 -50 11 61.11
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 11 61.11
27 NS 2P E = -110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,70 %28 NS 2P E-1 50 14 77.78
29 NS 2C N-1 -100 5 27.78
30 NS 3S N-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.1 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -MAHY Alain : 48,02 %31 NS 4P N+2 680 18 100.00
32 NS 3S E+4 -720 7 38.89
33 NS 2P N = 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 229,7 / 540 = 42,54 %
PAIRE Nr : A.7 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon
a.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,70 % 1 NS 3S W-1 50 13 72.22
2 NS 4C S = 620 10 55.56
3 NS 5K N = 400 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a.1 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -MAHY Alain : 48,02 % 4 NS 2S E-3 300 18 100.00
5 NS 2C S = 110 16 88.89
6 NS 2P S-2 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
a11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,00 % 7 NS 3S E-3 300 17 94.44
8 NS 2P N-1 -50 0 0.00
9 NS 4PcW+1 -990 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,97 %10 NS 5K E+1 -620 4 22.22
11 NS 4P S-1 -50 0 0.00
12 NS 4C S+1 650 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.9 SALFI Huguette -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 42,41 %13 NS 3T S+1 130 8 44.44
14 NS 2P W-1 50 16 88.89
15 NS 3S N+2 660 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.7 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,02 %19 NS 3S S+3 490 16 88.89
20 NS 3S W+1 -630 0 0.00
21 NS 2P S = 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.6 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -POULAERT Gilbert : 56,03 %22 NS 3S W+2 -660 5 27.78
23 NS 2P E+1 -140 4 22.22
24 NS 3PcW+1 -630 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
a.5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 47,88 %25 NS 3K E-2 200 18 100.00
26 NS 3S E+3 -690 5 27.78
27 NS 2C W-2 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a12 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,92 %28 NS 2P E = -110 4 22.22
29 NS 3C N = 140 18 100.00
30 NS 3C S+2 200 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,82 %31 NS 3S N+1 630 7 38.89
32 NS 3S W+4 -720 7 38.89
33 NS 3S N = 400 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 297,0 / 540 = 55,00 %
PAIRE Nr : A.8 MATELART Marc -HUBLET Carlo
a.4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 53,91 % 1 NS 2S W = -120 5 27.78
2 NS 4C S = 620 10 55.56
3 NS 3K N+2 150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,82 % 4 NS 2C W = -110 10 55.56
5 NS 2P E = -110 4 22.22
6 NS 2P S-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
a.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,70 % 7 NS 3S E-2 200 13 72.22
8 NS 2P N = 110 11 61.11
9 NS 5KcN-2 -300 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.1 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -MAHY Alain : 48,02 %10 NS 6KcE = -1540 0 0.00
11 NS 3P S+1 170 10 55.56
12 NS 3C S+1 170 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
a11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,00 %13 NS 4P N = 620 13 72.22
14 NS 3P W-1 50 16 88.89
15 NS 3S N+3 690 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
a12 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,92 %16 NS 2K W+2 -130 16 88.89
17 NS 5P N = 450 13 72.22
18 NS 4PcS-2 -500 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 53,89 %
a.8 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 38,68 %22 NS 3S W = -600 12 66.67
23 NS 3K S-1 -100 15 83.33
24 NS 4C S-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
a.7 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,02 %25 NS 2P N-1 -50 11 61.11
26 NS 4P W-2 200 18 100.00
27 NS 2P E+1 -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.6 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -POULAERT Gilbert : 56,03 %28 NS 3S S-5 -500 0 0.00
29 NS 2C N = 110 12 66.67
30 NS 6K N-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 47,88 %31 NS 3S N+2 660 15 83.33
32 NS 6S E+1 -1470 0 0.00
33 NS 2S S = 120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 267,1 / 540 = 49,46 %
PAIRE Nr : A.9 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
a.6 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -POULAERT Gilbert : 56,03 % 1 NS 3S W-1 50 13 72.22
2 NS 4C S = 620 10 55.56
3 NS 3P S+2 200 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a12 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,92 % 4 NS 3P E = -140 6 33.33
5 NS 2P E-1 50 13 72.22
6 NS 3S E-1 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 53,91 % 7 NS 2CcS-1 -200 2 11.11
8 NS 2P S = 110 11 61.11
9 NS 4C S-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,82 %10 NS 3K E+2 -150 18 100.00
11 NS 4C E-3 150 8 44.44
12 NS 3C S+2 200 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,70 %13 NS 4P N+3 710 17 94.44
14 NS 2P W+1 -140 2 11.11
15 NS 2S N = 120 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.1 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -MAHY Alain : 48,02 %16 NS 3S W+1 -630 1 5.56
17 NS 3P N+2 200 2 11.11
18 NS 3P S = 140 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 34,63 %
a11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,00 %19 NS 3S S+3 490 16 88.89
20 NS 3K E-1 100 8 44.44
21 NS 4P S-2 -200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.9 SALFI Huguette -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 42,41 %25 NS 1P N-1 -50 11 61.11
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 11 61.11
27 NS 3S W-4 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
a.8 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 38,68 %28 NS 3P E-1 50 14 77.78
29 NS 2C N = 110 12 66.67
30 NS 4C S+1 450 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.7 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,02 %31 NS 3S N+2 660 15 83.33
32 NS 3S E+3 -690 15 83.33
33 NS 3S S-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 309,7 / 540 = 57,35 %
PAIRE Nr : A10 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette
a.8 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 38,68 % 1 NS 2S E-2 100 18 100.00
2 NS 4C S = 620 10 55.56
3 NS 4K N+1 150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.7 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,02 % 4 NS 3T N-1 -100 12 66.67
5 NS 2P E-1 50 13 72.22
6 NS 2S E = -120 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.6 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -POULAERT Gilbert : 56,03 % 7 NS 2P E+1 -140 4 22.22
8 NS 2P S = 110 11 61.11
9 NS 4P W+1 -650 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 47,88 %10 NS 5K E+1 -620 4 22.22
11 NS 2P S+3 200 14 77.78
12 NS 5TcW-3 500 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 53,91 %13 NS 4P N+3 710 17 94.44
14 NS 3P W-1 50 16 88.89
15 NS 3S N+2 660 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
a.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,82 %16 NS 3S W+1 -630 1 5.56
17 NS 4P N+1 450 13 72.22
18 NS 4C N-2 -200 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 36,48 %
a.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,70 %19 NS 3S S+2 460 7 38.89
20 NS 3S E-2 200 14 77.78
21 NS 4P S-1 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.1 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -MAHY Alain : 48,02 %22 NS 3S E = -600 12 66.67
23 NS 3P E-1 100 18 100.00
24 NS 4P W+1 -450 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,97 %28 NS 4T W-2 100 18 100.00
29 NS 3C N-1 -100 5 27.78
30 NS 3S N+2 460 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.9 SALFI Huguette -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 42,41 %31 NS 3S N+1 630 7 38.89
32 NS 3S W+4 -720 7 38.89
33 NS 3C N = 140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 304,7 / 540 = 56,43 %
PAIRE Nr : A11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
a10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,97 % 1 NS 2P E+1 -140 2 11.11
2 NS 4C S = 620 10 55.56
3 NS 5K S = 400 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.9 SALFI Huguette -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 42,41 % 4 NS 3P W-2 200 16 88.89
5 NS 2C S+1 140 18 100.00
6 NS 3T E-1 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
a.8 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 38,68 % 7 NS 2P E = -110 7 38.89
8 NS 2P N = 110 11 61.11
9 NS 5K N-2 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.7 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,02 %10 NS 3C N-4 -400 8 44.44
11 NS 2P S+1 140 4 22.22
12 NS 4C S = 620 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a12 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,92 %13 NS 2C S-2 -200 0 0.00
14 NS 2P W = -110 9 50.00
15 NS 1S N+1 120 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
a.5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 47,88 %16 NS 2K W+2 -130 16 88.89
17 NS 4P N+1 450 13 72.22
18 NS 3P S-1 -100 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 76,48 %
a.4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 53,91 %19 NS 3S S+2 460 7 38.89
20 NS 3S W = -600 2 11.11
21 NS 5KcE-1 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,82 %22 NS 3S W+2 -660 5 27.78
23 NS 3P E = -140 4 22.22
24 NS 4P W+1 -450 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,70 %25 NS 2P N-1 -50 11 61.11
26 NS 3S E+3 -690 5 27.78
27 NS 2P E = -110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,00 %31 NS 5P N-1 -100 2 11.11
32 NS 3S W+4 -720 7 38.89
33 NS 2P S+1 140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 262,3 / 540 = 48,57 %
PAIRE Nr : A12 -
a12 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,92 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 47,88 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.9 SALFI Huguette -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 42,41 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,70 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.6 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -POULAERT Gilbert : 56,03 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,97 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,82 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,02 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 53,91 %28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 38,68 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 594 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : a.1 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -MAHY Alain
A.1 PADOU Bernard -GILLAIN Françoise : 41,54 % 1 EO 3S E-1 50 5 27.78
2 EO 4C S = 620 8 44.44
3 EO 4K N = 130 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.7 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon : 55,00 % 4 EO 2S E-3 300 0 0.00
5 EO 2C S = 110 2 11.11
6 EO 2P S-2 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
A.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 49,80 % 7 EO 3S E-3 300 1 5.56
8 EO 2P N = 110 7 38.89
9 EO 4P W = -620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -HUBLET Carlo : 49,46 %10 EO 6KcE = -1540 18 100.00
11 EO 3P S+1 170 8 44.44
12 EO 3C S+1 170 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
A.3 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 66,63 %13 EO 3P N+2 200 8 44.44
14 EO 2P W = -110 9 50.00
15 EO 3S N-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.9 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 57,35 %16 EO 3S W+1 -630 17 94.44
17 EO 3P N+2 200 16 88.89
18 EO 3P S = 140 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 65,37 %
A.4 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 45,24 %19 EO 3S S+2 460 11 61.11
20 EO 3S E-2 200 4 22.22
21 EO 3P S = 140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A10 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 56,43 %22 EO 3S E = -600 6 33.33
23 EO 3P E-1 100 0 0.00
24 EO 4P W+1 -450 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.5 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 37,78 %25 EO 2PcN-1 -100 12 66.67
26 EO 3S E+3 -690 13 72.22
27 EO 3C W-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 42,54 %31 EO 4P N+2 680 0 0.00
32 EO 3S E+4 -720 11 61.11
33 EO 2P N = 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 259,3 / 540 = 48,02 %
PAIRE Nr : a.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
A.7 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon : 55,00 % 1 EO 3S W-1 50 5 27.78
2 EO 4C S = 620 8 44.44
3 EO 5K N = 400 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 49,80 % 4 EO 2P W+1 -140 12 66.67
5 EO 3T S-2 -200 18 100.00
6 EO 3T E-1 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -HUBLET Carlo : 49,46 % 7 EO 3S E-2 200 5 27.78
8 EO 2P N = 110 7 38.89
9 EO 5KcN-2 -300 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A12 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 57,35 %13 EO 4P N+3 710 1 5.56
14 EO 2P W+1 -140 16 88.89
15 EO 2S N = 120 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.4 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 45,24 %16 EO 1S W+3 -180 7 38.89
17 EO 3P N+2 200 16 88.89
18 EO 4P S-1 -100 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 53,15 %
A10 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 56,43 %19 EO 3S S+2 460 11 61.11
20 EO 3S E-2 200 4 22.22
21 EO 4P S-1 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.5 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 37,78 %22 EO 3T E+2 -150 1 5.56
23 EO 2P E+1 -140 14 77.78
24 EO 4T S = 130 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,57 %25 EO 2P N-1 -50 7 38.89
26 EO 3S E+3 -690 13 72.22
27 EO 2P E = -110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 42,54 %28 EO 2P E-1 50 4 22.22
29 EO 2C N-1 -100 13 72.22
30 EO 3S N-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 236,7 / 486 = 48,70 %
PAIRE Nr : a.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -MOSSERAY Etienne
A.8 MATELART Marc -HUBLET Carlo : 49,46 % 4 EO 2C W = -110 8 44.44
5 EO 2P E = -110 14 77.78
6 EO 2P S-3 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
A.3 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 66,63 % 7 EO 2P E-1 100 8 44.44
8 EO 2P N = 110 7 38.89
9 EO 4C S-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.9 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 57,35 %10 EO 3K E+2 -150 0 0.00
11 EO 4C E-3 150 10 55.56
12 EO 3C S+2 200 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.4 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 45,24 %13 EO 3T S-1 -100 14 77.78
14 EO 1S E+1 -120 14 77.78
15 EO 2S S+1 150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A10 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 56,43 %16 EO 3S W+1 -630 17 94.44
17 EO 4P N+1 450 5 27.78
18 EO 4C N-2 -200 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 63,52 %
A12 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,57 %22 EO 3S W+2 -660 13 72.22
23 EO 3P E = -140 14 77.78
24 EO 4P W+1 -450 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A.6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 42,54 %25 EO 3C N-1 -50 7 38.89
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 7 38.89
27 EO 2P E = -110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.1 PADOU Bernard -GILLAIN Françoise : 41,54 %28 EO 3P S-3 -300 16 88.89
29 EO 2C N-1 -100 13 72.22
30 EO 3ScS+2 750 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.7 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon : 55,00 %31 EO 3S N+1 630 11 61.11
32 EO 3S W+4 -720 11 61.11
33 EO 3S N = 400 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 271,3 / 486 = 55,82 %
PAIRE Nr : a.4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
A.8 MATELART Marc -HUBLET Carlo : 49,46 % 1 EO 2S W = -120 13 72.22
2 EO 4C S = 620 8 44.44
3 EO 3K N+2 150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.9 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 57,35 % 7 EO 2CcS-1 -200 16 88.89
8 EO 2P S = 110 7 38.89
9 EO 4C S-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.4 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 45,24 %10 EO 3K E+3 -170 5 27.78
11 EO 4PcS = 590 0 0.00
12 EO 4C S = 620 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
A10 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 56,43 %13 EO 4P N+3 710 1 5.56
14 EO 3P W-1 50 2 11.11
15 EO 3S N+2 660 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
A.5 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 37,78 %16 EO 1S W+3 -180 7 38.89
17 EO 2P N+3 200 16 88.89
18 EO 3K W+1 -130 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,57 %19 EO 3S S+2 460 11 61.11
20 EO 3S W = -600 16 88.89
21 EO 5KcE-1 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 42,54 %22 EO 3S E+2 -660 13 72.22
23 EO 2P E = -110 7 38.89
24 EO 4P E+1 -450 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.1 PADOU Bernard -GILLAIN Françoise : 41,54 %25 EO 2PcN-2 -300 17 94.44
26 EO 1ScN-4 -1100 18 100.00
27 EO 2P E = -110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
A12 - : 0,00 %28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 49,80 %31 EO 3S N-2 -200 18 100.00
32 EO 3S E+4 -720 11 61.11
33 EO 3P S-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
Total : 262,0 / 486 = 53,91 %
PAIRE Nr : a.5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
A.3 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 66,63 % 1 EO 1S E+1 -120 13 72.22
2 EO 4C S = 620 8 44.44
3 EO 3S S+2 460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A12 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 56,43 %10 EO 5K E+1 -620 14 77.78
11 EO 2P S+3 200 4 22.22
12 EO 5TcW-3 500 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.5 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 37,78 %13 EO 4P N-1 -100 14 77.78
14 EO 2P W = -110 9 50.00
15 EO 2S N+1 150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,57 %16 EO 2K W+2 -130 2 11.11
17 EO 4P N+1 450 5 27.78
18 EO 3P S-1 -100 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 23,52 %
A.6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 42,54 %19 EO 5K N = 400 18 100.00
20 EO 5K E-1 100 10 55.56
21 EO 3P N-1 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.1 PADOU Bernard -GILLAIN Françoise : 41,54 %22 EO 3S W+2 -660 13 72.22
23 EO 3K N-1 -100 3 16.67
24 EO 4T S-2 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.7 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon : 55,00 %25 EO 3K E-2 200 0 0.00
26 EO 3S E+3 -690 13 72.22
27 EO 2C W-2 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 49,80 %28 EO 3K N-1 -100 10 55.56
29 EO 2C N-1 -100 13 72.22
30 EO 5K N = 400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -HUBLET Carlo : 49,46 %31 EO 3S N+2 660 3 16.67
32 EO 6S E+1 -1470 18 100.00
33 EO 2S S = 120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 232,7 / 486 = 47,88 %
PAIRE Nr : a.6 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -POULAERT Gilbert
A.9 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 57,35 % 1 EO 3S W-1 50 5 27.78
2 EO 4C S = 620 8 44.44
3 EO 3P S+2 200 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.4 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 45,24 % 4 EO 2T N = 90 4 22.22
5 EO 1S W = -90 8 44.44
6 EO 2C E = -110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A10 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 56,43 % 7 EO 2P E+1 -140 14 77.78
8 EO 2P S = 110 7 38.89
9 EO 4P W+1 -650 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A12 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 42,54 %16 EO 3S E = -600 13 72.22
17 EO 4P N = 420 12 66.67
18 EO 4P N-2 -200 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 69,07 %
A.1 PADOU Bernard -GILLAIN Françoise : 41,54 %19 EO 3S S+2 460 11 61.11
20 EO 4K E = -130 14 77.78
21 EO 2C S-1 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.7 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon : 55,00 %22 EO 3S W+2 -660 13 72.22
23 EO 2P E+1 -140 14 77.78
24 EO 3PcW+1 -630 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
A.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 49,80 %25 EO 4P N-3 -150 14 77.78
26 EO 3S W-1 100 2 11.11
27 EO 1C W+1 -110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -HUBLET Carlo : 49,46 %28 EO 3S S-5 -500 18 100.00
29 EO 2C N = 110 6 33.33
30 EO 6K N-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A.3 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 66,63 %31 EO 4P N+1 650 7 38.89
32 EO 3S W+2 -660 0 0.00
33 EO 3S S = 400 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
Total : 272,3 / 486 = 56,03 %
PAIRE Nr : a.7 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
A.4 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 45,24 % 1 EO 3S W-1 50 5 27.78
2 EO 2C S+2 170 17 94.44
3 EO 3C E-1 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
A10 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 56,43 % 4 EO 3T N-1 -100 6 33.33
5 EO 2P E-1 50 5 27.78
6 EO 2S E = -120 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.5 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 37,78 % 7 EO 3KcS-5 -1400 18 100.00
8 EO 1P N+1 110 7 38.89
9 EO 4PcW+1 -990 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
A11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,57 %10 EO 3C N-4 -400 10 55.56
11 EO 2P S+1 140 14 77.78
12 EO 4C S = 620 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.1 PADOU Bernard -GILLAIN Françoise : 41,54 %16 EO 3S W = -600 13 72.22
17 EO 4P N+1 450 5 27.78
18 EO 3KcW = -470 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
A.7 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon : 55,00 %19 EO 3S S+3 490 2 11.11
20 EO 3S W+1 -630 18 100.00
21 EO 2P S = 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A12 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -HUBLET Carlo : 49,46 %25 EO 2P N-1 -50 7 38.89
26 EO 4P W-2 200 0 0.00
27 EO 2P E+1 -140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.3 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 66,63 %28 EO 3C N-1 -100 10 55.56
29 EO 2S N = 120 2 11.11
30 EO 4C S+1 450 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.9 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 57,35 %31 EO 3S N+2 660 3 16.67
32 EO 3S E+3 -690 3 16.67
33 EO 3S S-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 257,7 / 486 = 53,02 %
PAIRE Nr : a.8 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
A10 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 56,43 % 1 EO 2S E-2 100 0 0.00
2 EO 4C S = 620 8 44.44
3 EO 4K N+1 150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.5 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 37,78 % 4 EO 3P W = -140 12 66.67
5 EO 3C S-1 -100 10 55.56
6 EO 2C W = -110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,57 % 7 EO 2P E = -110 11 61.11
8 EO 2P N = 110 7 38.89
9 EO 5K N-2 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 42,54 %10 EO 3K E+3 -170 5 27.78
11 EO 3P N = 140 14 77.78
12 EO 3C N+2 200 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.1 PADOU Bernard -GILLAIN Françoise : 41,54 %13 EO 4P N = 620 5 27.78
14 EO 2P W = -110 9 50.00
15 EO 1S N+2 150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 49,80 %19 EO 3S S+2 460 11 61.11
20 EO 3S E-3 300 0 0.00
21 EO 4P S-1 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -HUBLET Carlo : 49,46 %22 EO 3S W = -600 6 33.33
23 EO 3K S-1 -100 3 16.67
24 EO 4C S-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
A.3 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 66,63 %25 EO 1P N = 80 2 11.11
26 EO 3S W = -600 4 22.22
27 EO 3C W-2 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
A.9 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 57,35 %28 EO 3P E-1 50 4 22.22
29 EO 2C N = 110 6 33.33
30 EO 4C S+1 450 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A12 - : 0,00 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 188,0 / 486 = 38,68 %
PAIRE Nr : a.9 SALFI Huguette -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
A.5 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 37,78 % 1 EO 3S W = -400 18 100.00
2 EO 2C N+2 170 17 94.44
3 EO 4K N = 130 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
A11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,57 % 4 EO 3P W-2 200 2 11.11
5 EO 2C S+1 140 0 0.00
6 EO 3T E-1 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
A12 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 PADOU Bernard -GILLAIN Françoise : 41,54 %10 EO 3K E+3 -170 5 27.78
11 EO 3P S = 140 14 77.78
12 EO 5TcW-5 1100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.7 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon : 55,00 %13 EO 3T S+1 130 10 55.56
14 EO 2P W-1 50 2 11.11
15 EO 3S N+2 660 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 49,80 %16 EO 2PcN-3 -500 10 55.56
17 EO 4P N+1 450 5 27.78
18 EO 5KcW-3 500 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 27,96 %
A.3 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 66,63 %22 EO 3S E = -600 6 33.33
23 EO 2P E+1 -140 14 77.78
24 EO 4C S-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.9 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 57,35 %25 EO 1P N-1 -50 7 38.89
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 7 38.89
27 EO 3S W-4 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
A.4 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 45,24 %28 EO 3K S-1 -100 10 55.56
29 EO 3C N-2 -200 18 100.00
30 EO 3C S+2 200 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A10 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 56,43 %31 EO 3S N+1 630 11 61.11
32 EO 3S W+4 -720 11 61.11
33 EO 3C N = 140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 206,1 / 486 = 42,41 %
PAIRE Nr : a10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
A11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,57 % 1 EO 2P E+1 -140 16 88.89
2 EO 4C S = 620 8 44.44
3 EO 5K S = 400 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 42,54 % 4 EO 3TcN-1 -200 16 88.89
5 EO 2P E = -110 14 77.78
6 EO 2C E = -110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
A.1 PADOU Bernard -GILLAIN Françoise : 41,54 % 7 EO 2P W = -110 11 61.11
8 EO 2P N = 110 7 38.89
9 EO 4P W = -620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.7 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon : 55,00 %10 EO 5K E+1 -620 14 77.78
11 EO 4P S-1 -50 18 100.00
12 EO 4C S+1 650 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 49,80 %13 EO 3P N-1 -100 14 77.78
14 EO 3CcS-2 -300 18 100.00
15 EO 1S N+3 180 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A12 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 66,63 %19 EO 3S S+3 490 2 11.11
20 EO 3C E-1 100 10 55.56
21 EO 4P S = 620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
A.4 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 45,24 %25 EO 3PcN-2 -300 17 94.44
26 EO 3S W+3 -690 13 72.22
27 EO 3C W-2 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A10 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 56,43 %28 EO 4T W-2 100 0 0.00
29 EO 3C N-1 -100 13 72.22
30 EO 3S N+2 460 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.5 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 37,78 %31 EO 2S N = 120 14 77.78
32 EO 3S W+4 -720 11 61.11
33 EO 4C N-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
Total : 272,0 / 486 = 55,97 %
PAIRE Nr : a11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
A.6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 42,54 % 1 EO 2P E = -110 10 55.56
2 EO 4C N+1 650 0 0.00
3 EO 4K N+1 150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.1 PADOU Bernard -GILLAIN Françoise : 41,54 % 4 EO 3TcN-2 -500 18 100.00
5 EO 2P E = -110 14 77.78
6 EO 2S E = -120 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
A.7 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon : 55,00 % 7 EO 3S E-3 300 1 5.56
8 EO 2P N-1 -50 18 100.00
9 EO 4PcW+1 -990 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 49,80 %10 EO 3K E+3 -170 5 27.78
11 EO 2P S+3 200 4 22.22
12 EO 3C S+1 170 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -HUBLET Carlo : 49,46 %13 EO 4P N = 620 5 27.78
14 EO 3P W-1 50 2 11.11
15 EO 3S N+3 690 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
A.3 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 66,63 %16 EO 3K W+1 -130 2 11.11
17 EO 4C S+1 450 5 27.78
18 EO 60%60% Ajust 10.8 60.00 µ Tbl = 32,96 %
A.9 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 57,35 %19 EO 3S S+3 490 2 11.11
20 EO 3K E-1 100 10 55.56
21 EO 4P S-2 -200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.4 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 45,24 %22 EO 3S W+3 -690 18 100.00
23 EO 2P E+1 -140 14 77.78
24 EO 3P W+2 -200 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
A.5 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 37,78 %28 EO 3S W-1 50 4 22.22
29 EO 2C N = 110 6 33.33
30 EO 3P E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,57 %31 EO 5P N-1 -100 16 88.89
32 EO 3S W+4 -720 11 61.11
33 EO 2P S+1 140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 280,8 / 540 = 52,00 %
PAIRE Nr : a12 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
A12 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 57,35 % 4 EO 3P E = -140 12 66.67
5 EO 2P E-1 50 5 27.78
6 EO 3S E-1 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 42,54 % 7 EO 3S E-2 200 5 27.78
8 EO 1S N = 90 16 88.89
9 EO 4CcN-1 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.3 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 66,63 %10 EO 5K E+1 -620 14 77.78
11 EO 2P S+3 200 4 22.22
12 EO 4C S = 620 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,57 %13 EO 2C S-2 -200 18 100.00
14 EO 2P W = -110 9 50.00
15 EO 1S N+1 120 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -HUBLET Carlo : 49,46 %16 EO 2K W+2 -130 2 11.11
17 EO 5P N = 450 5 27.78
18 EO 4PcS-2 -500 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 46,11 %
A.5 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 37,78 %19 EO 3S S+2 460 11 61.11
20 EO 3P W-2 200 4 22.22
21 EO 4P S-2 -200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 49,80 %22 EO 2K E+3 -150 1 5.56
23 EO 2P E = -110 7 38.89
24 EO 3K E+2 -150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.7 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon : 55,00 %28 EO 2P E = -110 14 77.78
29 EO 3C N = 140 0 0.00
30 EO 3C S+2 200 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.4 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 45,24 %31 EO 4P N+1 650 7 38.89
32 EO 3S E+3 -690 3 16.67
33 EO 3P S-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 232,9 / 486 = 47,92 %
|
|