|
Tournoi du 15-06-15
1 67,17 2 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent
2 56,74 8 de VIRON Baudouin -MATELART Marc
3 52,65 9 BABIKOW Georges -HEERINCKX Colette
4 50,78 7 PETERS Annik -CASSART Guy
5 48,43 6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie
6 48,33 1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
7 47,83 10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
8 46,98 4 GROSFILS Colette -POWIS Vinciane
9 42,67 3 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine
10 38,33 5 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse
11 0,00 11 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 70,76 21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
2 63,97 14 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
3 60,88 18 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
4 53,54 16 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René
5 50,16 22 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
6 50,02 12 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis
7 48,60 19 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude
8 43,70 20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
9 38,72 13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier
10 35,97 17 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
11 33,77 15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
PAIRE Nr : 1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
12 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 50,02 % 1 NS 3S W-2 100 17.9 99.44
2 NS 3P E = -140 12.3 68.33
3 NS 3K N-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,59 %
22 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,16 % 4 NS 2C E = -110 12.3 68.33
5 NS 3C N = 140 4.6 25.56
6 NS 4CcS-1 -100 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 70,76 % 7 NS 4C N+2 680 2.3 12.78
8 NS 5T S = 400 4.6 25.56
9 NS 3K S-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,70 %10 NS 4P N+2 680 9 50.00
11 NS 3P N = 140 10.1 56.11
12 NS 3K E = -110 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
19 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 48,60 %13 NS 4C S = 620 15.7 87.22
14 NS 5T E+2 -440 0.1 0.56
15 NS 3S W = -400 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
18 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,88 %16 NS 2C E-1 100 13.4 74.44
17 NS 3S N-2 -100 2.3 12.78
18 NS 3S S-1 -100 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
17 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 35,97 %19 NS 3S W-1 100 15.7 87.22
20 NS 6P S = 1430 16.8 93.33
21 NS 3S N = 600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 76,85 %
16 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 53,54 %22 NS 2S S = 120 4.6 25.56
23 NS 4C N-1 -100 4.6 25.56
24 NS 2S W-1 50 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 33,77 %25 NS 4C S+1 450 11.2 62.22
26 NS 2T W-1 100 15.7 87.22
27 NS 2C N+1 140 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 80,93 %
14 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 63,97 %28 NS 3S E+2 -460 1.2 6.67
29 NS 4C E+1 -650 0 0.00
30 NS 4P S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 2,22 %
Total : 261,0 / 540 = 48,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 38,72 % 4 NS 3CcE-1 200 17.9 99.44
5 NS 4C S+1 650 13.4 74.44
6 NS 4C S-2 -100 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 89,07 %
12 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 50,02 % 7 NS 6S N = 1440 12.3 68.33
8 NS 3S S = 400 4.6 25.56
9 NS 2T W = -90 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
22 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,16 %10 NS 6K S+1 1390 15.7 87.22
11 NS 4C E-2 100 3.4 18.89
12 NS 4P E-1 50 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 70,76 %13 NS 5KcE-2 500 13.4 74.44
14 NS 6C E-2 100 13.4 74.44
15 NS 3S E = -400 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,70 %16 NS 3C E-1 100 13.4 74.44
17 NS 3S N+2 460 17.9 99.44
18 NS 5K N+1 620 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
19 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 48,60 %19 NS 1T W+1 -90 11.2 62.22
20 NS 6P S = 1430 16.8 93.33
21 NS 3S N+1 630 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 85,00 %
18 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,88 %22 NS 1S S+2 150 10.1 56.11
23 NS 4C N-1 -100 4.6 25.56
24 NS 3KcW-2 300 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
17 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 35,97 %25 NS 4C S+1 450 11.2 62.22
26 NS 3S W-1 100 15.7 87.22
27 NS 1P N+1 110 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 74,63 %
16 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 53,54 %28 NS 3S W+1 -430 6.8 37.78
29 NS 4C W-1 100 11 61.11
30 NS 4P S-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 38,52 %
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 33,77 %31 NS 2C N+2 170 11.2 62.22
32 NS 3TcW-1 200 11.2 62.22
33 NS 4C W-1 50 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 72,59 %
Total : 362,7 / 540 = 67,17 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine
16 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 53,54 % 1 NS 4P W = -420 5.7 31.67
2 NS 5KcS-2 -500 2.3 12.78
3 NS 2C W = -110 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 21,11 %
14 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 63,97 % 7 NS 6S N = 1440 12.3 68.33
8 NS 3S S = 400 4.6 25.56
9 NS 2S E-1 100 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 38,72 %10 NS 3S N+2 660 6.8 37.78
11 NS 4T W-2 100 3.4 18.89
12 NS 3T N = 110 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
12 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 50,02 %13 NS 4CcS = 790 17.9 99.44
14 NS 5T W = -400 5.7 31.67
15 NS 3K W+1 -130 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
22 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,16 %16 NS 2C E+1 -140 0.1 0.56
17 NS 4PcE+1 -690 0.1 0.56
18 NS 5K N+1 620 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 70,76 %19 NS 4C E = -620 3.4 18.89
20 NS 6P S-1 -100 1.2 6.67
21 NS 3S N = 600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,19 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,70 %22 NS 4C N-3 -150 0.1 0.56
23 NS 2C N+1 140 13.4 74.44
24 NS 2P S-1 -50 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 31,30 %
19 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 48,60 %25 NS 4K S+1 150 0.1 0.56
26 NS 2S W+3 -210 2.3 12.78
27 NS 3C N-1 -50 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 17,04 %
18 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,88 %28 NS 3S W+2 -460 1.2 6.67
29 NS 5C W-2 200 17 94.44
30 NS 5KcW-1 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,81 %
17 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 35,97 %31 NS 3S S = 600 15.7 87.22
32 NS 2K W-2 200 11.2 62.22
33 NS 3C W-1 50 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 80,93 %
Total : 230,4 / 540 = 42,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 GROSFILS Colette -POWIS Vinciane
18 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,88 % 1 NS 4P W = -420 5.7 31.67
2 NS 4P E = -420 6.8 37.78
3 NS 2P E = -110 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
17 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 35,97 % 4 NS 1S W+2 -150 2.3 12.78
5 NS 4C N+3 710 17.9 99.44
6 NS 2P E+1 -140 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 33,77 %10 NS 3S S+3 690 11.2 62.22
11 NS 3P N = 140 10.1 56.11
12 NS 4P W-1 50 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
14 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 63,97 %13 NS 3K E+1 -130 0.1 0.56
14 NS 6C E-2 100 13.4 74.44
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 25,19 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 38,72 %16 NS 2C E-1 100 13.4 74.44
17 NS 3S N+1 430 13.4 74.44
18 NS 5K N = 600 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
12 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 50,02 %19 NS 4C E = -620 3.4 18.89
20 NS 6P N-1 -100 1.2 6.67
21 NS 3S N = 600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,19 %
22 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,16 %22 NS 1S S+2 150 10.1 56.11
23 NS 2C N+1 140 13.4 74.44
24 NS 2K W-1 50 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 70,76 %25 NS 3C S+1 170 2.3 12.78
26 NS 3S E = -600 0.1 0.56
27 NS 2S W = -120 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 4,63 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,70 %28 NS 6T W-2 100 17.9 99.44
29 NS 4C W-1 100 11 61.11
30 NS 2C N+1 140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 73,89 %
19 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 48,60 %31 NS 3S S+1 630 17.9 99.44
32 NS 2C S+2 170 5.7 31.67
33 NS 3C W = -140 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 54,26 %
Total : 253,7 / 540 = 46,98 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,70 % 1 NS 4P W-1 50 14.6 81.11
2 NS 5KcS-2 -500 2.3 12.78
3 NS Pass Passe 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
19 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 48,60 % 4 NS 1S W+1 -120 7.9 43.89
5 NS 4C N-1 -100 1.2 6.67
6 NS 2P W+2 -170 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
18 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,88 % 7 NS 4C N+1 650 0.1 0.56
8 NS 2K N+2 130 0.1 0.56
9 NS 1S S-2 -100 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 8,89 %
16 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 53,54 %13 NS 3C N = 140 7.9 43.89
14 NS 6C E-2 100 13.4 74.44
15 NS 3K W+1 -130 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 60,19 %
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 33,77 %16 NS 2C E = -110 5.7 31.67
17 NS 3S N+1 430 13.4 74.44
18 NS 5K N+1 620 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
14 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 63,97 %19 NS 2T W+1 -110 9 50.00
20 NS 3S N+1 630 6.8 37.78
21 NS 1K S-2 -200 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 38,72 %22 NS 2S S-1 -50 2.3 12.78
23 NS 4C N-1 -100 4.6 25.56
24 NS 1S W-2 100 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
12 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 50,02 %25 NS 4C S = 420 4.6 25.56
26 NS Pass Passe 11.2 62.22
27 NS 1S S-2 -100 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
22 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,16 %28 NS 3S W = -400 12.3 68.33
29 NS 5C E-1 100 11 61.11
30 NS 4C S-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 48,70 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 70,76 %31 NS 2P E-2 100 2.3 12.78
32 NS 2T W+1 -110 0.1 0.56
33 NS 2C E+1 -140 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 15,00 %
Total : 207,0 / 540 = 38,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie
22 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,16 % 1 NS 2P W+1 -140 11.2 62.22
2 NS 5KcS-2 -500 2.3 12.78
3 NS 2P E = -110 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 31,30 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 70,76 % 4 NS 2S W+1 -150 2.3 12.78
5 NS 3C N+2 200 9 50.00
6 NS 4P E = -620 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,70 % 7 NS 3S N+3 690 5.7 31.67
8 NS 3S N+1 430 13.4 74.44
9 NS 1S S-3 -150 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
19 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 48,60 %10 NS 6S S-1 -100 1.2 6.67
11 NS 5TcW-2 300 15.7 87.22
12 NS 2C E+1 -140 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
17 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 35,97 %16 NS 2S W = -120 2.3 12.78
17 NS 3S N+1 430 13.4 74.44
18 NS 3S S-1 -100 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
16 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 53,54 %19 NS 2S W-1 100 15.7 87.22
20 NS 4P S+2 680 12.3 68.33
21 NS 3S N = 600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 33,77 %22 NS 1S S+2 150 10.1 56.11
23 NS 4C N-1 -100 4.6 25.56
24 NS 3P S = 140 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 56,30 %
14 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 63,97 %25 NS 4C S+3 510 17.9 99.44
26 NS 2S W = -120 6.8 37.78
27 NS 3K E-1 50 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 38,72 %28 NS 50%50% Ajust 9 50.00
29 NS 3T E = -110 6 33.33
30 NS 4P S = 420 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
12 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 50,02 %31 NS 2S S = 120 6.8 37.78
32 NS 3TcW-1 200 11.2 62.22
33 NS Pass Passe 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
Total : 261,5 / 540 = 48,43 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 PETERS Annik -CASSART Guy
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 38,72 % 1 NS 4P W = -420 5.7 31.67
2 NS 4K S-1 -100 15.7 87.22
3 NS 3P E-1 100 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
12 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 50,02 % 4 NS 2C E = -110 12.3 68.33
5 NS 4C S+1 650 13.4 74.44
6 NS 3P E+1 -170 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 66,30 %
22 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,16 % 7 NS 6S N+1 1470 16.8 93.33
8 NS 3S N+1 430 13.4 74.44
9 NS 2S E = -120 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 60,19 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 70,76 %10 NS 3S N+1 630 4.6 25.56
11 NS 4T W-1 50 0.1 0.56
12 NS 4P E = -420 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 10,93 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,70 %13 NS 4KcE-1 200 11.2 62.22
14 NS 5T W = -400 5.7 31.67
15 NS 5K E-1 50 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
18 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,88 %19 NS 4C E = -620 3.4 18.89
20 NS 3T S+2 150 4.6 25.56
21 NS 3S N = 600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
17 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 35,97 %22 NS 3S S = 400 17.9 99.44
23 NS 3C N = 140 13.4 74.44
24 NS 3K W-2 100 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 80,74 %
16 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 53,54 %25 NS 4C S+1 450 11.2 62.22
26 NS 2S W = -120 6.8 37.78
27 NS 3C N-1 -50 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 33,77 %28 NS 3S W = -400 12.3 68.33
29 NS 4PcS-2 -500 2 11.11
30 NS 4P S = 420 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 57,96 %
14 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 63,97 %31 NS 2P W-2 100 2.3 12.78
32 NS 2C S+2 170 5.7 31.67
33 NS 2C W+1 -140 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 25,37 %
Total : 274,2 / 540 = 50,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 de VIRON Baudouin -MATELART Marc
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 33,77 % 1 NS 4P W-1 50 14.6 81.11
2 NS 4T E+1 -150 9 50.00
3 NS 3K N = 110 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 74,81 %
14 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 63,97 % 4 NS 1S W+1 -120 7.9 43.89
5 NS 4C N-1 -100 1.2 6.67
6 NS 3PcW+1 -930 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 19,07 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 38,72 % 7 NS 6S S+1 1470 16.8 93.33
8 NS 3S N+1 430 13.4 74.44
9 NS 2K S+1 110 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 89,07 %
12 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 50,02 %10 NS 6K S+1 1390 15.7 87.22
11 NS 3P N = 140 10.1 56.11
12 NS 4P W = -420 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
22 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,16 %13 NS 2K E = -90 4.6 25.56
14 NS 6S E-4 200 17.9 99.44
15 NS 3S E = -400 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 50,19 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 70,76 %16 NS 3T N-1 -50 9 50.00
17 NS 2S N+3 210 9 50.00
18 NS 4K N+2 170 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
19 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 48,60 %22 NS 1S S+2 150 10.1 56.11
23 NS 4C N = 620 17.9 99.44
24 NS 3P S-1 -50 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
18 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,88 %25 NS 4C S+1 450 11.2 62.22
26 NS 2S W = -120 6.8 37.78
27 NS 2C N+1 140 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
17 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 35,97 %28 NS 3S W+1 -430 6.8 37.78
29 NS 3T E-1 100 11 61.11
30 NS 2P S+1 140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
16 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 53,54 %31 NS 3C N = 140 9 50.00
32 NS 2CcN+2 670 17.9 99.44
33 NS 2C W+1 -140 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
Total : 306,4 / 540 = 56,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 BABIKOW Georges -HEERINCKX Colette
17 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 35,97 % 1 NS 3S E+2 -460 0.1 0.56
2 NS 2P E+1 -140 12.3 68.33
3 NS 3K N = 110 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
16 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 53,54 % 4 NS 1S W = -90 15.7 87.22
5 NS 3C N+1 170 6.8 37.78
6 NS 3PcW+1 -930 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 33,77 % 7 NS 6C N = 1430 9 50.00
8 NS 3S N+1 430 13.4 74.44
9 NS Pass Passe 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
14 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 63,97 %10 NS 6K S+1 1390 15.7 87.22
11 NS 3P N = 140 10.1 56.11
12 NS 3P E = -140 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 38,72 %13 NS 2P E = -110 2.3 12.78
14 NS 4C E = -420 2.3 12.78
15 NS 2K W+2 -130 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 29,26 %
12 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 50,02 %16 NS 2C E-2 200 17.9 99.44
17 NS 4K N = 130 5.7 31.67
18 NS 3S S-1 -100 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
22 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,16 %19 NS 4C E = -620 3.4 18.89
20 NS 4P S+2 680 12.3 68.33
21 NS 3S N = 600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,74 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,70 %25 NS 4C S+1 450 11.2 62.22
26 NS 3S W-1 100 15.7 87.22
27 NS 3C N-1 -50 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
19 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 48,60 %28 NS 6S W-1 50 15.7 87.22
29 NS 6C W-2 200 17 94.44
30 NS 3P S = 140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 80,93 %
18 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,88 %31 NS 2P E-4 200 13.4 74.44
32 NS 1S N+2 150 2.3 12.78
33 NS 3C W = -140 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
Total : 284,3 / 540 = 52,65 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
19 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 48,60 % 1 NS 4P W = -420 5.7 31.67
2 NS 3K S+1 130 17.9 99.44
3 NS 2P W = -110 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
18 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,88 % 4 NS 1S W+2 -150 2.3 12.78
5 NS 4C N+1 650 13.4 74.44
6 NS 4P W = -620 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
17 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 35,97 % 7 NS 3S N+3 690 5.7 31.67
8 NS 3S N+1 430 13.4 74.44
9 NS 1S N = 90 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 60,19 %
16 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 53,54 %10 NS 6S S-1 -100 1.2 6.67
11 NS 4PcN = 590 17.9 99.44
12 NS 3P E = -140 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 33,77 %13 NS 3C S = 140 7.9 43.89
14 NS 6T W-1 50 9 50.00
15 NS 3K W = -110 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
14 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 63,97 %16 NS 2C E = -110 5.7 31.67
17 NS 4K N = 130 5.7 31.67
18 NS 1K N+5 170 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 35,74 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 38,72 %19 NS 4C E-1 100 15.7 87.22
20 NS 3S N+2 660 9 50.00
21 NS 3S S = 600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
12 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 50,02 %22 NS 1S S+3 180 15.7 87.22
23 NS 4C N-1 -100 4.6 25.56
24 NS 3P S-2 -100 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 70,76 %28 NS 3S W+1 -430 6.8 37.78
29 NS 2C W+1 -140 4 22.22
30 NS 3P S = 140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 40,37 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,70 %31 NS 2PcE-1 100 2.3 12.78
32 NS 4C S = 420 15.7 87.22
33 NS 2C W+1 -140 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
Total : 258,3 / 540 = 47,83 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 -
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 70,76 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,70 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 48,60 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
18 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,88 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 35,97 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
16 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 53,54 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 33,77 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 63,97 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 38,72 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
22 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,16 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 594 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,33 % 1 EO 3S W-2 100 0.1 0.56
2 EO 3P E = -140 5.7 31.67
3 EO 3K N-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,41 %
7 PETERS Annik -CASSART Guy : 50,78 % 4 EO 2C E = -110 5.7 31.67
5 EO 4C S+1 650 4.6 25.56
6 EO 3P E+1 -170 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 33,70 %
2 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 67,17 % 7 EO 6S N = 1440 5.7 31.67
8 EO 3S S = 400 13.4 74.44
9 EO 2T W = -90 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -MATELART Marc : 56,74 %10 EO 6K S+1 1390 2.3 12.78
11 EO 3P N = 140 7.9 43.89
12 EO 4P W = -420 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 42,67 %13 EO 4CcS = 790 0.1 0.56
14 EO 5T W = -400 12.3 68.33
15 EO 3K W+1 -130 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
9 BABIKOW Georges -HEERINCKX Colette : 52,65 %16 EO 2C E-2 200 0.1 0.56
17 EO 4K N = 130 12.3 68.33
18 EO 3S S-1 -100 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
4 GROSFILS Colette -POWIS Vinciane : 46,98 %19 EO 4C E = -620 14.6 81.11
20 EO 6P N-1 -100 16.8 93.33
21 EO 3S N = 600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,81 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 47,83 %22 EO 1S S+3 180 2.3 12.78
23 EO 4C N-1 -100 13.4 74.44
24 EO 3P S-2 -100 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
5 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 38,33 %25 EO 4C S = 420 13.4 74.44
26 EO Pass Passe 6.8 37.78
27 EO 1S S-2 -100 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 48,43 %31 EO 2S S = 120 11.2 62.22
32 EO 3TcW-1 200 6.8 37.78
33 EO Pass Passe 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
Total : 270,1 / 540 = 50,02 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier
7 PETERS Annik -CASSART Guy : 50,78 % 1 EO 4P W = -420 12.3 68.33
2 EO 4K S-1 -100 2.3 12.78
3 EO 3P E-1 100 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
2 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 67,17 % 4 EO 3CcE-1 200 0.1 0.56
5 EO 4C S+1 650 4.6 25.56
6 EO 4C S-2 -100 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 10,93 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -MATELART Marc : 56,74 % 7 EO 6S S+1 1470 1.2 6.67
8 EO 3S N+1 430 4.6 25.56
9 EO 2K S+1 110 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 10,93 %
3 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 42,67 %10 EO 3S N+2 660 11.2 62.22
11 EO 4T W-2 100 14.6 81.11
12 EO 3T N = 110 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
9 BABIKOW Georges -HEERINCKX Colette : 52,65 %13 EO 2P E = -110 15.7 87.22
14 EO 4C E = -420 15.7 87.22
15 EO 2K W+2 -130 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 70,74 %
4 GROSFILS Colette -POWIS Vinciane : 46,98 %16 EO 2C E-1 100 4.6 25.56
17 EO 3S N+1 430 4.6 25.56
18 EO 5K N = 600 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 47,83 %19 EO 4C E-1 100 2.3 12.78
20 EO 3S N+2 660 9 50.00
21 EO 3S S = 600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
5 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 38,33 %22 EO 2S S-1 -50 15.7 87.22
23 EO 4C N-1 -100 13.4 74.44
24 EO 1S W-2 100 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
11 - : 0,00 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 48,43 %28 EO 50%50% Ajust 9 50.00
29 EO 3T E = -110 12 66.67
30 EO 4P S = 420 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 188,2 / 486 = 38,72 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
8 de VIRON Baudouin -MATELART Marc : 56,74 % 4 EO 1S W+1 -120 10.1 56.11
5 EO 4C N-1 -100 16.8 93.33
6 EO 3PcW+1 -930 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 80,93 %
3 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 42,67 % 7 EO 6S N = 1440 5.7 31.67
8 EO 3S S = 400 13.4 74.44
9 EO 2S E-1 100 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
9 BABIKOW Georges -HEERINCKX Colette : 52,65 %10 EO 6K S+1 1390 2.3 12.78
11 EO 3P N = 140 7.9 43.89
12 EO 3P E = -140 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
4 GROSFILS Colette -POWIS Vinciane : 46,98 %13 EO 3K E+1 -130 17.9 99.44
14 EO 6C E-2 100 4.6 25.56
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 74,81 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 47,83 %16 EO 2C E = -110 12.3 68.33
17 EO 4K N = 130 12.3 68.33
18 EO 1K N+5 170 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 64,26 %
5 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 38,33 %19 EO 2T W+1 -110 9 50.00
20 EO 3S N+1 630 11.2 62.22
21 EO 1K S-2 -200 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
11 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 48,43 %25 EO 4C S+3 510 0.1 0.56
26 EO 2S W = -120 11.2 62.22
27 EO 3K E-1 50 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,33 %28 EO 3S E+2 -460 16.8 93.33
29 EO 4C E+1 -650 18 100.00
30 EO 4P S-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 97,78 %
7 PETERS Annik -CASSART Guy : 50,78 %31 EO 2P W-2 100 15.7 87.22
32 EO 2C S+2 170 12.3 68.33
33 EO 2C W+1 -140 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 74,63 %
Total : 310,9 / 486 = 63,97 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
8 de VIRON Baudouin -MATELART Marc : 56,74 % 1 EO 4P W-1 50 3.4 18.89
2 EO 4T E+1 -150 9 50.00
3 EO 3K N = 110 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 25,19 %
9 BABIKOW Georges -HEERINCKX Colette : 52,65 % 7 EO 6C N = 1430 9 50.00
8 EO 3S N+1 430 4.6 25.56
9 EO Pass Passe 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
4 GROSFILS Colette -POWIS Vinciane : 46,98 %10 EO 3S S+3 690 6.8 37.78
11 EO 3P N = 140 7.9 43.89
12 EO 4P W-1 50 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 47,83 %13 EO 3C S = 140 10.1 56.11
14 EO 6T W-1 50 9 50.00
15 EO 3K W = -110 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
5 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 38,33 %16 EO 2C E = -110 12.3 68.33
17 EO 3S N+1 430 4.6 25.56
18 EO 5K N+1 620 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
11 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 48,43 %22 EO 1S S+2 150 7.9 43.89
23 EO 4C N-1 -100 13.4 74.44
24 EO 3P S = 140 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 43,70 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,33 %25 EO 4C S+1 450 6.8 37.78
26 EO 2T W-1 100 2.3 12.78
27 EO 2C N+1 140 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 19,07 %
7 PETERS Annik -CASSART Guy : 50,78 %28 EO 3S W = -400 5.7 31.67
29 EO 4PcS-2 -500 16 88.89
30 EO 4P S = 420 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 42,04 %
2 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 67,17 %31 EO 2C N+2 170 6.8 37.78
32 EO 3TcW-1 200 6.8 37.78
33 EO 4C W-1 50 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 27,41 %
Total : 164,1 / 486 = 33,77 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René
3 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 42,67 % 1 EO 4P W = -420 12.3 68.33
2 EO 5KcS-2 -500 15.7 87.22
3 EO 2C W = -110 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 78,89 %
9 BABIKOW Georges -HEERINCKX Colette : 52,65 % 4 EO 1S W = -90 2.3 12.78
5 EO 3C N+1 170 11.2 62.22
6 EO 3PcW+1 -930 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 47,83 %10 EO 6S S-1 -100 16.8 93.33
11 EO 4PcN = 590 0.1 0.56
12 EO 3P E = -140 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
5 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 38,33 %13 EO 3C N = 140 10.1 56.11
14 EO 6C E-2 100 4.6 25.56
15 EO 3K W+1 -130 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 39,81 %
11 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 48,43 %19 EO 2S W-1 100 2.3 12.78
20 EO 4P S+2 680 5.7 31.67
21 EO 3S N = 600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,33 %22 EO 2S S = 120 13.4 74.44
23 EO 4C N-1 -100 13.4 74.44
24 EO 2S W-1 50 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
7 PETERS Annik -CASSART Guy : 50,78 %25 EO 4C S+1 450 6.8 37.78
26 EO 2S W = -120 11.2 62.22
27 EO 3C N-1 -50 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
2 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 67,17 %28 EO 3S W+1 -430 11.2 62.22
29 EO 4C W-1 100 7 38.89
30 EO 4P S-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 61,48 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -MATELART Marc : 56,74 %31 EO 3C N = 140 9 50.00
32 EO 2CcN+2 670 0.1 0.56
33 EO 2C W+1 -140 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
Total : 260,2 / 486 = 53,54 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
9 BABIKOW Georges -HEERINCKX Colette : 52,65 % 1 EO 3S E+2 -460 17.9 99.44
2 EO 2P E+1 -140 5.7 31.67
3 EO 3K N = 110 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
4 GROSFILS Colette -POWIS Vinciane : 46,98 % 4 EO 1S W+2 -150 15.7 87.22
5 EO 4C N+3 710 0.1 0.56
6 EO 2P E+1 -140 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 47,83 % 7 EO 3S N+3 690 12.3 68.33
8 EO 3S N+1 430 4.6 25.56
9 EO 1S N = 90 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 39,81 %
11 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 48,43 %16 EO 2S W = -120 15.7 87.22
17 EO 3S N+1 430 4.6 25.56
18 EO 3S S-1 -100 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,33 %19 EO 3S W-1 100 2.3 12.78
20 EO 6P S = 1430 1.2 6.67
21 EO 3S N = 600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 23,15 %
7 PETERS Annik -CASSART Guy : 50,78 %22 EO 3S S = 400 0.1 0.56
23 EO 3C N = 140 4.6 25.56
24 EO 3K W-2 100 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 19,26 %
2 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 67,17 %25 EO 4C S+1 450 6.8 37.78
26 EO 3S W-1 100 2.3 12.78
27 EO 1P N+1 110 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 25,37 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -MATELART Marc : 56,74 %28 EO 3S W+1 -430 11.2 62.22
29 EO 3T E-1 100 7 38.89
30 EO 2P S+1 140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
3 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 42,67 %31 EO 3S S = 600 2.3 12.78
32 EO 2K W-2 200 6.8 37.78
33 EO 3C W-1 50 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 19,07 %
Total : 174,8 / 486 = 35,97 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
4 GROSFILS Colette -POWIS Vinciane : 46,98 % 1 EO 4P W = -420 12.3 68.33
2 EO 4P E = -420 11.2 62.22
3 EO 2P E = -110 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 47,83 % 4 EO 1S W+2 -150 15.7 87.22
5 EO 4C N+1 650 4.6 25.56
6 EO 4P W = -620 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
5 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 38,33 % 7 EO 4C N+1 650 17.9 99.44
8 EO 2K N+2 130 17.9 99.44
9 EO 1S S-2 -100 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 91,11 %
11 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,33 %16 EO 2C E-1 100 4.6 25.56
17 EO 3S N-2 -100 15.7 87.22
18 EO 3S S-1 -100 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
7 PETERS Annik -CASSART Guy : 50,78 %19 EO 4C E = -620 14.6 81.11
20 EO 3T S+2 150 13.4 74.44
21 EO 3S N = 600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
2 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 67,17 %22 EO 1S S+2 150 7.9 43.89
23 EO 4C N-1 -100 13.4 74.44
24 EO 3KcW-2 300 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -MATELART Marc : 56,74 %25 EO 4C S+1 450 6.8 37.78
26 EO 2S W = -120 11.2 62.22
27 EO 2C N+1 140 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
3 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 42,67 %28 EO 3S W+2 -460 16.8 93.33
29 EO 5C W-2 200 1 5.56
30 EO 5KcW-1 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,19 %
9 BABIKOW Georges -HEERINCKX Colette : 52,65 %31 EO 2P E-4 200 4.6 25.56
32 EO 1S N+2 150 15.7 87.22
33 EO 3C W = -140 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
Total : 295,9 / 486 = 60,88 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 47,83 % 1 EO 4P W = -420 12.3 68.33
2 EO 3K S+1 130 0.1 0.56
3 EO 2P W = -110 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 38,33 % 4 EO 1S W+1 -120 10.1 56.11
5 EO 4C N-1 -100 16.8 93.33
6 EO 2P W+2 -170 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
11 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 48,43 %10 EO 6S S-1 -100 16.8 93.33
11 EO 5TcW-2 300 2.3 12.78
12 EO 2C E+1 -140 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,33 %13 EO 4C S = 620 2.3 12.78
14 EO 5T E+2 -440 17.9 99.44
15 EO 3S W = -400 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
2 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 67,17 %19 EO 1T W+1 -90 6.8 37.78
20 EO 6P S = 1430 1.2 6.67
21 EO 3S N+1 630 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 15,00 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -MATELART Marc : 56,74 %22 EO 1S S+2 150 7.9 43.89
23 EO 4C N = 620 0.1 0.56
24 EO 3P S-1 -50 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
3 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 42,67 %25 EO 4K S+1 150 17.9 99.44
26 EO 2S W+3 -210 15.7 87.22
27 EO 3C N-1 -50 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 82,96 %
9 BABIKOW Georges -HEERINCKX Colette : 52,65 %28 EO 6S W-1 50 2.3 12.78
29 EO 6C W-2 200 1 5.56
30 EO 3P S = 140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 19,07 %
4 GROSFILS Colette -POWIS Vinciane : 46,98 %31 EO 3S S+1 630 0.1 0.56
32 EO 2C S+2 170 12.3 68.33
33 EO 3C W = -140 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 45,74 %
Total : 236,2 / 486 = 48,60 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
5 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 38,33 % 1 EO 4P W-1 50 3.4 18.89
2 EO 5KcS-2 -500 15.7 87.22
3 EO Pass Passe 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
11 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 48,43 % 7 EO 3S N+3 690 12.3 68.33
8 EO 3S N+1 430 4.6 25.56
9 EO 1S S-3 -150 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,33 %10 EO 4P N+2 680 9 50.00
11 EO 3P N = 140 7.9 43.89
12 EO 3K E = -110 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
7 PETERS Annik -CASSART Guy : 50,78 %13 EO 4KcE-1 200 6.8 37.78
14 EO 5T W = -400 12.3 68.33
15 EO 5K E-1 50 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
2 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 67,17 %16 EO 3C E-1 100 4.6 25.56
17 EO 3S N+2 460 0.1 0.56
18 EO 5K N+1 620 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
3 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 42,67 %22 EO 4C N-3 -150 17.9 99.44
23 EO 2C N+1 140 4.6 25.56
24 EO 2P S-1 -50 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 68,70 %
9 BABIKOW Georges -HEERINCKX Colette : 52,65 %25 EO 4C S+1 450 6.8 37.78
26 EO 3S W-1 100 2.3 12.78
27 EO 3C N-1 -50 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
4 GROSFILS Colette -POWIS Vinciane : 46,98 %28 EO 6T W-2 100 0.1 0.56
29 EO 4C W-1 100 7 38.89
30 EO 2C N+1 140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 26,11 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 47,83 %31 EO 2PcE-1 100 15.7 87.22
32 EO 4C S = 420 2.3 12.78
33 EO 2C W+1 -140 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
Total : 212,4 / 486 = 43,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
11 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 48,43 % 4 EO 2S W+1 -150 15.7 87.22
5 EO 3C N+2 200 9 50.00
6 EO 4P E = -620 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,33 % 7 EO 4C N+2 680 15.7 87.22
8 EO 5T S = 400 13.4 74.44
9 EO 3K S-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
7 PETERS Annik -CASSART Guy : 50,78 %10 EO 3S N+1 630 13.4 74.44
11 EO 4T W-1 50 17.9 99.44
12 EO 4P E = -420 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 89,07 %
2 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 67,17 %13 EO 5KcE-2 500 4.6 25.56
14 EO 6C E-2 100 4.6 25.56
15 EO 3S E = -400 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -MATELART Marc : 56,74 %16 EO 3T N-1 -50 9 50.00
17 EO 2S N+3 210 9 50.00
18 EO 4K N+2 170 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
3 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 42,67 %19 EO 4C E = -620 14.6 81.11
20 EO 6P S-1 -100 16.8 93.33
21 EO 3S N = 600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,81 %
4 GROSFILS Colette -POWIS Vinciane : 46,98 %25 EO 3C S+1 170 15.7 87.22
26 EO 3S E = -600 17.9 99.44
27 EO 2S W = -120 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 95,37 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 47,83 %28 EO 3S W+1 -430 11.2 62.22
29 EO 2C W+1 -140 14 77.78
30 EO 3P S = 140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 59,63 %
5 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 38,33 %31 EO 2P E-2 100 15.7 87.22
32 EO 2T W+1 -110 17.9 99.44
33 EO 2C E+1 -140 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 85,00 %
Total : 343,9 / 486 = 70,76 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 48,43 % 1 EO 2P W+1 -140 6.8 37.78
2 EO 5KcS-2 -500 15.7 87.22
3 EO 2P E = -110 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 68,70 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,33 % 4 EO 2C E = -110 5.7 31.67
5 EO 3C N = 140 13.4 74.44
6 EO 4CcS-1 -100 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
7 PETERS Annik -CASSART Guy : 50,78 % 7 EO 6S N+1 1470 1.2 6.67
8 EO 3S N+1 430 4.6 25.56
9 EO 2S E = -120 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 39,81 %
2 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 67,17 %10 EO 6K S+1 1390 2.3 12.78
11 EO 4C E-2 100 14.6 81.11
12 EO 4P E-1 50 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -MATELART Marc : 56,74 %13 EO 2K E = -90 13.4 74.44
14 EO 6S E-4 200 0.1 0.56
15 EO 3S E = -400 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 49,81 %
3 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 42,67 %16 EO 2C E+1 -140 17.9 99.44
17 EO 4PcE+1 -690 17.9 99.44
18 EO 5K N+1 620 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
9 BABIKOW Georges -HEERINCKX Colette : 52,65 %19 EO 4C E = -620 14.6 81.11
20 EO 4P S+2 680 5.7 31.67
21 EO 3S N = 600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,26 %
4 GROSFILS Colette -POWIS Vinciane : 46,98 %22 EO 1S S+2 150 7.9 43.89
23 EO 2C N+1 140 4.6 25.56
24 EO 2K W-1 50 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
5 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 38,33 %28 EO 3S W = -400 5.7 31.67
29 EO 5C E-1 100 7 38.89
30 EO 4C S-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 51,30 %
11 - : 0,00 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 243,8 / 486 = 50,16 %
|
|