|
Tournoi du 16-03-15
1 61,30 7 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
2 60,56 2 VAGMAN David -CASSART Guy
3 54,26 6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
4 52,41 10 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte
5 52,22 11 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile
6 50,00 8 MATELART Marc -GROSFILS Colette
7 47,96 5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
8 46,67 9 ARICKX Roger -MOSSERAY Bernadette
9 45,74 3 MASSAUX Joel -POWIS Vinciane
10 41,67 1 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine
11 37,22 4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN
12 0,00 12 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 57,20 17 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
2 54,73 19 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse
3 53,50 22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard
4 53,29 18 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand
5 53,09 24 de WASSEIGE Ariane -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie
6 50,82 16 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
7 48,56 15 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
8 48,15 21 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
9 47,74 20 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
10 46,50 14 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
11 44,63 13 CHANTRAINE René -CLERIN François-Xavier
12 43,15 23 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René
PAIRE Nr : 1 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine
13 CHANTRAINE René -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,63 % 1 NS 4T W-1 50 15 83.33
2 NS 2P W-2 100 15 83.33
3 NS 2C W = -110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
23 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 43,15 % 4 NS 4C N-2 -200 0 0.00
5 NS 4T W-1 50 6 33.33
6 NS 4P E = -620 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,50 % 7 NS 3S S+1 630 5 27.78
8 NS 4C E = -420 9 50.00
9 NS 1S S+2 150 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
21 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,15 %10 NS 4C S-1 -100 4 22.22
11 NS 4C S = 420 5 27.78
12 NS 5T N = 600 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
20 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 47,74 %13 NS 6P N = 1430 9 50.00
14 NS 4C N-1 -50 3 16.67
15 NS 3T N = 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
19 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 54,73 %16 NS 1S N = 90 0 0.00
17 NS 6S E = -990 2 11.11
18 NS 4CcS-2 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 3,70 %
18 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 53,29 %19 NS 4CcW-1 200 12 66.67
20 NS 4TcW = -710 2 11.11
21 NS 3P E = -140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
17 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,20 %22 NS 2C S = 110 14 77.78
23 NS 3CcS-1 -200 2 11.11
24 NS 3S E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
16 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,82 %25 NS 4C N+1 450 10 55.56
26 NS 3T N+1 130 18 100.00
27 NS 6P S = 980 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
15 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,56 %28 NS 6CcS-4 -1100 0 0.00
29 NS 4C S+1 650 9 50.00
30 NS 4C W = -420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 225,0 / 540 = 41,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 VAGMAN David -CASSART Guy
14 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 46,50 % 4 NS 3C N+1 170 13 72.22
5 NS 2K N+1 110 11 61.11
6 NS 5T N-2 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,63 % 7 NS 3S S+2 660 15 83.33
8 NS 4C E = -420 9 50.00
9 NS 2S N-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
23 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 43,15 %10 NS 4C S = 620 15 83.33
11 NS 4PcE-4 800 18 100.00
12 NS 3T N+1 130 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,50 %13 NS 6S S = 1440 17 94.44
14 NS 4C N = 420 13 72.22
15 NS 2C S = 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
21 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,15 %16 NS 2P N+2 170 18 100.00
17 NS 3S E+3 -490 11 61.11
18 NS 3C S-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
20 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 47,74 %19 NS 4C W-2 200 12 66.67
20 NS 3T W+2 -150 8 44.44
21 NS 2CcS+1 870 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
24 de WASSEIGE Ariane -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 53,09 %22 NS 3C S-1 -50 7 38.89
23 NS 2P E-1 100 13 72.22
24 NS 1P S = 80 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
18 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 53,29 %25 NS 4C N+1 450 10 55.56
26 NS 4T S-2 -200 1 5.56
27 NS 6S N = 990 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
17 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,20 %28 NS 3PcE+1 -630 5 27.78
29 NS 4C S+1 650 9 50.00
30 NS 4C E+1 -450 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
16 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,82 %31 NS 1S S = 90 12 66.67
32 NS 4C S+1 450 10 55.56
33 NS 2P S-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 327,0 / 540 = 60,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 MASSAUX Joel -POWIS Vinciane
17 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,20 % 1 NS 3PcN-3 -500 0 0.00
2 NS 2P W-1 50 6 33.33
3 NS 3C W+1 -170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
15 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,56 % 7 NS 3S S = 600 0 0.00
8 NS 4C E = -420 9 50.00
9 NS 3S N = 400 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
24 de WASSEIGE Ariane -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 53,09 %10 NS 4C S = 620 15 83.33
11 NS 3S N+2 460 14 77.78
12 NS 3T N = 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,63 %13 NS 6P N = 1430 9 50.00
14 NS 4C N = 420 13 72.22
15 NS 2S N = 120 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
23 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 43,15 %16 NS 2P S+1 140 11 61.11
17 NS 6S E = -990 2 11.11
18 NS 5TcE-1 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,50 %19 NS 2C W-1 100 6 33.33
20 NS 5T W-1 100 16 88.89
21 NS 3P W = -140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
21 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,15 %22 NS 3C S-2 -100 1 5.56
23 NS 1S S = 90 8 44.44
24 NS 2S E-2 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
20 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 47,74 %25 NS 4C N+1 450 10 55.56
26 NS 3K S-1 -100 5 27.78
27 NS 6S N = 990 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
19 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 54,73 %28 NS 2PcE+2 -670 2 11.11
29 NS 4C S+1 650 9 50.00
30 NS 4C W+1 -450 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
18 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 53,29 %31 NS 3S S-1 -100 8 44.44
32 NS 4C S+1 450 10 55.56
33 NS 2C E-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 247,0 / 540 = 45,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN
19 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 54,73 % 1 NS 3K N-1 -50 12 66.67
2 NS 3C N-1 -100 0 0.00
3 NS 2C W = -110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
18 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 53,29 % 4 NS 4T W-2 200 16 88.89
5 NS 3K N = 110 11 61.11
6 NS 3P E = -140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
16 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,82 %10 NS 2C S = 110 10 55.56
11 NS 3S N = 400 2 11.11
12 NS 2T N+1 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
15 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,56 %13 NS 3P N+3 230 2 11.11
14 NS 3C N = 140 9 50.00
15 NS 3C S-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
14 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 46,50 %16 NS 1S N+2 150 16 88.89
17 NS 5P W+1 -480 16 88.89
18 NS 3T E+1 -130 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,63 %19 NS 2C W = -110 1 5.56
20 NS 4T W-1 100 16 88.89
21 NS 2P W+1 -140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
23 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 43,15 %22 NS 4C S-2 -100 1 5.56
23 NS 2P W = -110 5 27.78
24 NS 2C W = -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,50 %25 NS 2C N+2 170 0 0.00
26 NS 3T N-1 -100 5 27.78
27 NS 5P S = 450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
21 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,15 %28 NS 3PcE+1 -630 5 27.78
29 NS 4C S+2 680 18 100.00
30 NS 4S W+1 -460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
24 de WASSEIGE Ariane -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 53,09 %31 NS 3S S-2 -200 2 11.11
32 NS 4C S+1 450 10 55.56
33 NS 2C W-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 201,0 / 540 = 37,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
21 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,15 % 1 NS 3P N-2 -100 10 55.56
2 NS 2P W-2 100 15 83.33
3 NS 1S W+2 -150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
20 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 47,74 % 4 NS 3P E-1 100 6 33.33
5 NS 4K N = 130 16 88.89
6 NS 3C E+2 -200 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
19 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 54,73 % 7 NS 3S S+1 630 5 27.78
8 NS 4C E = -420 9 50.00
9 NS 1S W+3 -180 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
17 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,20 %13 NS 2K S+4 170 0 0.00
14 NS 3S N+1 430 16 88.89
15 NS 3S N-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
16 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,82 %16 NS 3P S = 140 11 61.11
17 NS 5P W+1 -480 16 88.89
18 NS 5T E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
24 de WASSEIGE Ariane -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 53,09 %19 NS 2C W = -110 1 5.56
20 NS 3C S-2 -200 5 27.78
21 NS 3CcS = 730 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
14 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 46,50 %22 NS 3C N-1 -50 7 38.89
23 NS 1S N+1 120 18 100.00
24 NS 1K E = -70 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,63 %25 NS 4C N = 420 2 11.11
26 NS 2C N = 110 14 77.78
27 NS 4P S+2 480 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
23 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 43,15 %28 NS 3P E = -140 14 77.78
29 NS 4C S+1 650 9 50.00
30 NS 4C W = -420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,50 %31 NS 3S S-2 -200 2 11.11
32 NS 4C S+1 450 10 55.56
33 NS 2T N+1 110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 259,0 / 540 = 47,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
23 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 43,15 % 1 NS 4TcW-2 300 18 100.00
2 NS 2P W-2 100 15 83.33
3 NS 2C W = -110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,50 % 4 NS 3C N+1 170 13 72.22
5 NS 4C S-2 -200 1 5.56
6 NS 4P E-1 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
24 de WASSEIGE Ariane -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 53,09 % 7 NS 5K N+2 640 10 55.56
8 NS 4C E = -420 9 50.00
9 NS 3S N-2 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
20 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 47,74 %10 NS 4C S-1 -100 4 22.22
11 NS 3S N+1 430 10 55.56
12 NS 1S N+1 120 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
18 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 53,29 %16 NS 2P S+1 140 11 61.11
17 NS 6S E = -990 2 11.11
18 NS 4CcS-1 -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
17 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,20 %19 NS 4CcW-2 500 17 94.44
20 NS 4CcS-4 -1100 0 0.00
21 NS 3P W-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
16 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,82 %22 NS 2S S = 120 18 100.00
23 NS 2P E-1 100 13 72.22
24 NS 1S E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
15 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,56 %25 NS 4C N+1 450 10 55.56
26 NS 3P E-1 100 9 50.00
27 NS 6S N = 990 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
14 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 46,50 %28 NS 3S N-3 -300 8 44.44
29 NS 2C S+4 230 0 0.00
30 NS 4C W = -420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,63 %31 NS 3S S-1 -100 8 44.44
32 NS 4C S+1 450 10 55.56
33 NS 2C W-3 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 293,0 / 540 = 54,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
14 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 46,50 % 1 NS 3TcE = -470 2 11.11
2 NS 2P E-2 100 15 83.33
3 NS 2C E = -110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,63 % 4 NS 4C N = 620 18 100.00
5 NS 2K N+1 110 11 61.11
6 NS 4P E-1 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
23 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 43,15 % 7 NS 3S N+2 660 15 83.33
8 NS 4C E = -420 9 50.00
9 NS 3S N+1 430 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,50 %10 NS 4C N = 620 15 83.33
11 NS 5C N-1 -50 0 0.00
12 NS 3T N = 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
21 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,15 %13 NS 6P N = 1430 9 50.00
14 NS 3C N = 140 9 50.00
15 NS 2C N+1 140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
19 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 54,73 %19 NS 2C E-1 100 6 33.33
20 NS 3S E-1 100 16 88.89
21 NS 2P E = -110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
18 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 53,29 %22 NS 3S N-1 -50 7 38.89
23 NS 2P E-1 100 13 72.22
24 NS 3K E-2 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
17 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,20 %25 NS 4C N+1 450 10 55.56
26 NS 3P E-1 100 9 50.00
27 NS 6S N = 990 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
24 de WASSEIGE Ariane -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 53,09 %28 NS 3C N = 140 18 100.00
29 NS 4C N+1 650 9 50.00
30 NS 4C E = -420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
15 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,56 %31 NS 3S N+1 630 17 94.44
32 NS 4C N-1 -50 0 0.00
33 NS 4T N-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 331,0 / 540 = 61,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -GROSFILS Colette
16 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,82 % 1 NS 3P N-3 -150 5 27.78
2 NS 2P W-1 50 6 33.33
3 NS 3C W = -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
15 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,56 % 4 NS 2P E-1 100 6 33.33
5 NS 3K N = 110 11 61.11
6 NS 5T N-3 -150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
14 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 46,50 % 7 NS 3S S+1 630 5 27.78
8 NS 3C E+2 -200 18 100.00
9 NS 1S S+2 150 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,63 %10 NS 4C S-1 -100 4 22.22
11 NS 3S N+1 430 10 55.56
12 NS 1S N+3 180 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
23 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 43,15 %13 NS 6P N = 1430 9 50.00
14 NS 4C N+1 450 18 100.00
15 NS 2S N+1 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
24 de WASSEIGE Ariane -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 53,09 %16 NS 3K W-1 100 2 11.11
17 NS 4P W+2 -480 16 88.89
18 NS 3T E+1 -130 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
20 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 47,74 %22 NS 2C S-1 -50 7 38.89
23 NS 3T S-3 -300 0 0.00
24 NS 1K E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
19 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 54,73 %25 NS 4C N+1 450 10 55.56
26 NS 3T N = 110 14 77.78
27 NS 6P S = 980 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
18 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 53,29 %28 NS 2P E+1 -140 14 77.78
29 NS 4C S+1 650 9 50.00
30 NS 4C W+1 -450 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
17 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,20 %31 NS 4P N-2 -200 2 11.11
32 NS 4C S+1 450 10 55.56
33 NS 2C W-2 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 270,0 / 540 = 50,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 ARICKX Roger -MOSSERAY Bernadette
18 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 53,29 % 1 NS 4T W-1 50 15 83.33
2 NS 3P W-1 50 6 33.33
3 NS 1S W+2 -150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
24 de WASSEIGE Ariane -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 53,09 % 4 NS 3P E-1 100 6 33.33
5 NS 4KcN-1 -200 1 5.56
6 NS 2P E+3 -200 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
16 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,82 % 7 NS 3S S+2 660 15 83.33
8 NS 4C E+1 -450 0 0.00
9 NS 2S N = 120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
15 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,56 %10 NS 4C S = 620 15 83.33
11 NS 2ScN = 490 16 88.89
12 NS 2T N+2 130 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
14 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 46,50 %13 NS 6P N = 1430 9 50.00
14 NS 4C N-1 -50 3 16.67
15 NS 3P N-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,63 %16 NS 2P S = 110 5 27.78
17 NS 6P W = -980 7 38.89
18 NS 4C S-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
23 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 43,15 %19 NS 4C W-2 200 12 66.67
20 NS 3T W+1 -130 10 55.56
21 NS 2P E+1 -140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
21 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,15 %25 NS 4C N+1 450 10 55.56
26 NS 3K S = 110 14 77.78
27 NS 4P N+2 480 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
20 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 47,74 %28 NS 3P W+1 -170 10 55.56
29 NS 4C S+1 650 9 50.00
30 NS 4C W = -420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
19 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 54,73 %31 NS 3S S-1 -100 8 44.44
32 NS 4C S+1 450 10 55.56
33 NS 3T N = 110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 252,0 / 540 = 46,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte
20 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 47,74 % 1 NS 3T W = -110 8 44.44
2 NS 2P W-1 50 6 33.33
3 NS 2P S = 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
19 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 54,73 % 4 NS 2K S+2 130 10 55.56
5 NS 4TcW-2 300 18 100.00
6 NS Pass Passe 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
18 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 53,29 % 7 NS 3S S+1 630 5 27.78
8 NS 4C E = -420 9 50.00
9 NS 3S N-2 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
17 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,20 %10 NS 3K N-1 -100 4 22.22
11 NS 4C S = 420 5 27.78
12 NS 1S N+1 120 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
16 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,82 %13 NS 6P N = 1430 9 50.00
14 NS 4C N-1 -50 3 16.67
15 NS 2S N = 120 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
15 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,56 %16 NS 2P S = 110 5 27.78
17 NS 3S E+3 -490 11 61.11
18 NS 5TcE-1 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
14 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 46,50 %19 NS 4C E-1 100 6 33.33
20 NS 3T W = -110 12 66.67
21 NS 3K S-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,63 %22 NS 2C S = 110 14 77.78
23 NS 1P E+1 -110 5 27.78
24 NS 1K E = -70 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,50 %28 NS 2P E+1 -140 14 77.78
29 NS 4C S+1 650 9 50.00
30 NS 4C W+1 -450 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
21 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,15 %31 NS 2P N+1 140 14 77.78
32 NS 4C S+1 450 10 55.56
33 NS 2P W-4 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 283,0 / 540 = 52,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,50 % 1 NS 4C N-3 -150 5 27.78
2 NS 2P W-1 50 6 33.33
3 NS 4C W-2 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
21 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,15 % 4 NS 3P E = -140 2 11.11
5 NS 3T E = -110 4 22.22
6 NS 4P E = -620 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
20 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 47,74 % 7 NS 3S S+2 660 15 83.33
8 NS 4C E = -420 9 50.00
9 NS 3S N = 400 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
19 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 54,73 %10 NS 4C S-1 -100 4 22.22
11 NS 3S N+1 430 10 55.56
12 NS 1S N+3 180 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
24 de WASSEIGE Ariane -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 53,09 %13 NS 6S S = 1440 17 94.44
14 NS 4C N-1 -50 3 16.67
15 NS 3C S-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
17 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,20 %16 NS 2P S+1 140 11 61.11
17 NS 6P E = -980 7 38.89
18 NS 2C S+1 140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
16 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,82 %19 NS 4CcW-2 500 17 94.44
20 NS 4C S-2 -200 5 27.78
21 NS 4C S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
15 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,56 %22 NS 2C S = 110 14 77.78
23 NS 2P E-1 100 13 72.22
24 NS 1S E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
14 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 46,50 %25 NS 3KcW-3 800 18 100.00
26 NS 5T S-2 -200 1 5.56
27 NS 6S N = 990 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
23 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 43,15 %31 NS 3S N+1 630 17 94.44
32 NS 4C S+1 450 10 55.56
33 NS 4PcS-4 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 282,0 / 540 = 52,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 -
24 de WASSEIGE Ariane -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 53,09 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,20 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
21 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 48,15 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 46,50 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
18 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 53,29 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,50 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
15 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,56 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 54,73 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
16 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,82 %28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
20 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 47,74 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 594 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 CHANTRAINE René -CLERIN François-Xavier
1 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 41,67 % 1 EO 4T W-1 50 3 16.67
2 EO 2P W-2 100 3 16.67
3 EO 2C W = -110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
7 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 61,30 % 4 EO 4C N = 620 0 0.00
5 EO 2K N+1 110 7 38.89
6 EO 4P E-1 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
2 VAGMAN David -CASSART Guy : 60,56 % 7 EO 3S S+2 660 3 16.67
8 EO 4C E = -420 9 50.00
9 EO 2S N-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
8 MATELART Marc -GROSFILS Colette : 50,00 %10 EO 4C S-1 -100 14 77.78
11 EO 3S N+1 430 8 44.44
12 EO 1S N+3 180 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -POWIS Vinciane : 45,74 %13 EO 6P N = 1430 9 50.00
14 EO 4C N = 420 5 27.78
15 EO 2S N = 120 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
9 ARICKX Roger -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 46,67 %16 EO 2P S = 110 13 72.22
17 EO 6P W = -980 11 61.11
18 EO 4C S-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN : 37,22 %19 EO 2C W = -110 17 94.44
20 EO 4T W-1 100 2 11.11
21 EO 2P W+1 -140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
10 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 52,41 %22 EO 2C S = 110 4 22.22
23 EO 1P E+1 -110 13 72.22
24 EO 1K E = -70 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,96 %25 EO 4C N = 420 16 88.89
26 EO 2C N = 110 4 22.22
27 EO 4P S+2 480 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 54,26 %31 EO 3S S-1 -100 10 55.56
32 EO 4C S+1 450 8 44.44
33 EO 2C W-3 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 241,0 / 540 = 44,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
7 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 61,30 % 1 EO 3TcE = -470 16 88.89
2 EO 2P E-2 100 3 16.67
3 EO 2C E = -110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
2 VAGMAN David -CASSART Guy : 60,56 % 4 EO 3C N+1 170 5 27.78
5 EO 2K N+1 110 7 38.89
6 EO 5T N-2 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
8 MATELART Marc -GROSFILS Colette : 50,00 % 7 EO 3S S+1 630 13 72.22
8 EO 3C E+2 -200 0 0.00
9 EO 1S S+2 150 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
12 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
9 ARICKX Roger -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 46,67 %13 EO 6P N = 1430 9 50.00
14 EO 4C N-1 -50 15 83.33
15 EO 3P N-3 -300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN : 37,22 %16 EO 1S N+2 150 2 11.11
17 EO 5P W+1 -480 2 11.11
18 EO 3T E+1 -130 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
10 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 52,41 %19 EO 4C E-1 100 12 66.67
20 EO 3T W = -110 6 33.33
21 EO 3K S-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,96 %22 EO 3C N-1 -50 11 61.11
23 EO 1S N+1 120 0 0.00
24 EO 1K E = -70 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
11 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 52,22 %25 EO 3KcW-3 800 0 0.00
26 EO 5T S-2 -200 17 94.44
27 EO 6S N = 990 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 54,26 %28 EO 3S N-3 -300 10 55.56
29 EO 2C S+4 230 18 100.00
30 EO 4C W = -420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 226,0 / 486 = 46,50 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
8 MATELART Marc -GROSFILS Colette : 50,00 % 4 EO 2P E-1 100 12 66.67
5 EO 3K N = 110 7 38.89
6 EO 5T N-3 -150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -POWIS Vinciane : 45,74 % 7 EO 3S S = 600 18 100.00
8 EO 4C E = -420 9 50.00
9 EO 3S N = 400 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
9 ARICKX Roger -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 46,67 %10 EO 4C S = 620 3 16.67
11 EO 2ScN = 490 2 11.11
12 EO 2T N+2 130 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN : 37,22 %13 EO 3P N+3 230 16 88.89
14 EO 3C N = 140 9 50.00
15 EO 3C S-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
10 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 52,41 %16 EO 2P S = 110 13 72.22
17 EO 3S E+3 -490 7 38.89
18 EO 5TcE-1 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
12 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
11 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 52,22 %22 EO 2C S = 110 4 22.22
23 EO 2P E-1 100 5 27.78
24 EO 1S E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 54,26 %25 EO 4C N+1 450 8 44.44
26 EO 3P E-1 100 9 50.00
27 EO 6S N = 990 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
1 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 41,67 %28 EO 6CcS-4 -1100 18 100.00
29 EO 4C S+1 650 9 50.00
30 EO 4C W = -420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
7 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 61,30 %31 EO 3S N+1 630 1 5.56
32 EO 4C N-1 -50 18 100.00
33 EO 4T N-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 236,0 / 486 = 48,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
8 MATELART Marc -GROSFILS Colette : 50,00 % 1 EO 3P N-3 -150 13 72.22
2 EO 2P W-1 50 12 66.67
3 EO 3C W = -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
9 ARICKX Roger -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 46,67 % 7 EO 3S S+2 660 3 16.67
8 EO 4C E+1 -450 18 100.00
9 EO 2S N = 120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN : 37,22 %10 EO 2C S = 110 8 44.44
11 EO 3S N = 400 16 88.89
12 EO 2T N+1 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
10 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 52,41 %13 EO 6P N = 1430 9 50.00
14 EO 4C N-1 -50 15 83.33
15 EO 2S N = 120 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,96 %16 EO 3P S = 140 7 38.89
17 EO 5P W+1 -480 2 11.11
18 EO 5T E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
11 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 52,22 %19 EO 4CcW-2 500 1 5.56
20 EO 4C S-2 -200 13 72.22
21 EO 4C S-2 -200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 54,26 %22 EO 2S S = 120 0 0.00
23 EO 2P E-1 100 5 27.78
24 EO 1S E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
1 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 41,67 %25 EO 4C N+1 450 8 44.44
26 EO 3T N+1 130 0 0.00
27 EO 6P S = 980 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
12 - : 0,00 %28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
2 VAGMAN David -CASSART Guy : 60,56 %31 EO 1S S = 90 6 33.33
32 EO 4C S+1 450 8 44.44
33 EO 2P S-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 247,0 / 486 = 50,82 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
3 MASSAUX Joel -POWIS Vinciane : 45,74 % 1 EO 3PcN-3 -500 18 100.00
2 EO 2P W-1 50 12 66.67
3 EO 3C W+1 -170 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
12 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
10 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 52,41 %10 EO 3K N-1 -100 14 77.78
11 EO 4C S = 420 13 72.22
12 EO 1S N+1 120 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,96 %13 EO 2K S+4 170 18 100.00
14 EO 3S N+1 430 2 11.11
15 EO 3S N-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
11 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 52,22 %16 EO 2P S+1 140 7 38.89
17 EO 6P E = -980 11 61.11
18 EO 2C S+1 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 54,26 %19 EO 4CcW-2 500 1 5.56
20 EO 4CcS-4 -1100 18 100.00
21 EO 3P W-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
1 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 41,67 %22 EO 2C S = 110 4 22.22
23 EO 3CcS-1 -200 16 88.89
24 EO 3S E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
7 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 61,30 %25 EO 4C N+1 450 8 44.44
26 EO 3P E-1 100 9 50.00
27 EO 6S N = 990 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
2 VAGMAN David -CASSART Guy : 60,56 %28 EO 3PcE+1 -630 13 72.22
29 EO 4C S+1 650 9 50.00
30 EO 4C E+1 -450 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
8 MATELART Marc -GROSFILS Colette : 50,00 %31 EO 4P N-2 -200 16 88.89
32 EO 4C S+1 450 8 44.44
33 EO 2C W-2 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 278,0 / 486 = 57,20 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand
9 ARICKX Roger -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 46,67 % 1 EO 4T W-1 50 3 16.67
2 EO 3P W-1 50 12 66.67
3 EO 1S W+2 -150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN : 37,22 % 4 EO 4T W-2 200 2 11.11
5 EO 3K N = 110 7 38.89
6 EO 3P E = -140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
10 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 52,41 % 7 EO 3S S+1 630 13 72.22
8 EO 4C E = -420 9 50.00
9 EO 3S N-2 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
12 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 54,26 %16 EO 2P S+1 140 7 38.89
17 EO 6S E = -990 16 88.89
18 EO 4CcS-1 -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
1 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 41,67 %19 EO 4CcW-1 200 6 33.33
20 EO 4TcW = -710 16 88.89
21 EO 3P E = -140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
7 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 61,30 %22 EO 3S N-1 -50 11 61.11
23 EO 2P E-1 100 5 27.78
24 EO 3K E-2 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
2 VAGMAN David -CASSART Guy : 60,56 %25 EO 4C N+1 450 8 44.44
26 EO 4T S-2 -200 17 94.44
27 EO 6S N = 990 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
8 MATELART Marc -GROSFILS Colette : 50,00 %28 EO 2P E+1 -140 4 22.22
29 EO 4C S+1 650 9 50.00
30 EO 4C W+1 -450 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -POWIS Vinciane : 45,74 %31 EO 3S S-1 -100 10 55.56
32 EO 4C S+1 450 8 44.44
33 EO 2C E-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 259,0 / 486 = 53,29 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse
4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN : 37,22 % 1 EO 3K N-1 -50 6 33.33
2 EO 3C N-1 -100 18 100.00
3 EO 2C W = -110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
10 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 52,41 % 4 EO 2K S+2 130 8 44.44
5 EO 4TcW-2 300 0 0.00
6 EO Pass Passe 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,96 % 7 EO 3S S+1 630 13 72.22
8 EO 4C E = -420 9 50.00
9 EO 1S W+3 -180 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
11 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 52,22 %10 EO 4C S-1 -100 14 77.78
11 EO 3S N+1 430 8 44.44
12 EO 1S N+3 180 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
1 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 41,67 %16 EO 1S N = 90 18 100.00
17 EO 6S E = -990 16 88.89
18 EO 4CcS-2 -500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 96,30 %
7 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 61,30 %19 EO 2C E-1 100 12 66.67
20 EO 3S E-1 100 2 11.11
21 EO 2P E = -110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
12 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -GROSFILS Colette : 50,00 %25 EO 4C N+1 450 8 44.44
26 EO 3T N = 110 4 22.22
27 EO 6P S = 980 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -POWIS Vinciane : 45,74 %28 EO 2PcE+2 -670 16 88.89
29 EO 4C S+1 650 9 50.00
30 EO 4C W+1 -450 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
9 ARICKX Roger -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 46,67 %31 EO 3S S-1 -100 10 55.56
32 EO 4C S+1 450 8 44.44
33 EO 3T N = 110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 266,0 / 486 = 54,73 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
10 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 52,41 % 1 EO 3T W = -110 10 55.56
2 EO 2P W-1 50 12 66.67
3 EO 2P S = 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,96 % 4 EO 3P E-1 100 12 66.67
5 EO 4K N = 130 2 11.11
6 EO 3C E+2 -200 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 52,22 % 7 EO 3S S+2 660 3 16.67
8 EO 4C E = -420 9 50.00
9 EO 3S N = 400 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 54,26 %10 EO 4C S-1 -100 14 77.78
11 EO 3S N+1 430 8 44.44
12 EO 1S N+1 120 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
1 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 41,67 %13 EO 6P N = 1430 9 50.00
14 EO 4C N-1 -50 15 83.33
15 EO 3T N = 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
2 VAGMAN David -CASSART Guy : 60,56 %19 EO 4C W-2 200 6 33.33
20 EO 3T W+2 -150 10 55.56
21 EO 2CcS+1 870 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
8 MATELART Marc -GROSFILS Colette : 50,00 %22 EO 2C S-1 -50 11 61.11
23 EO 3T S-3 -300 18 100.00
24 EO 1K E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -POWIS Vinciane : 45,74 %25 EO 4C N+1 450 8 44.44
26 EO 3K S-1 -100 13 72.22
27 EO 6S N = 990 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
9 ARICKX Roger -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 46,67 %28 EO 3P W+1 -170 8 44.44
29 EO 4C S+1 650 9 50.00
30 EO 4C W = -420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
12 - : 0,00 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 232,0 / 486 = 47,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,96 % 1 EO 3P N-2 -100 8 44.44
2 EO 2P W-2 100 3 16.67
3 EO 1S W+2 -150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
11 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 52,22 % 4 EO 3P E = -140 16 88.89
5 EO 3T E = -110 14 77.78
6 EO 4P E = -620 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
12 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 41,67 %10 EO 4C S-1 -100 14 77.78
11 EO 4C S = 420 13 72.22
12 EO 5T N = 600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 61,30 %13 EO 6P N = 1430 9 50.00
14 EO 3C N = 140 9 50.00
15 EO 2C N+1 140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
2 VAGMAN David -CASSART Guy : 60,56 %16 EO 2P N+2 170 0 0.00
17 EO 3S E+3 -490 7 38.89
18 EO 3C S-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -POWIS Vinciane : 45,74 %22 EO 3C S-2 -100 17 94.44
23 EO 1S S = 90 10 55.56
24 EO 2S E-2 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
9 ARICKX Roger -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 46,67 %25 EO 4C N+1 450 8 44.44
26 EO 3K S = 110 4 22.22
27 EO 4P N+2 480 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN : 37,22 %28 EO 3PcE+1 -630 13 72.22
29 EO 4C S+2 680 0 0.00
30 EO 4S W+1 -460 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
10 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 52,41 %31 EO 2P N+1 140 4 22.22
32 EO 4C S+1 450 8 44.44
33 EO 2P W-4 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 234,0 / 486 = 48,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard
11 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 52,22 % 1 EO 4C N-3 -150 13 72.22
2 EO 2P W-1 50 12 66.67
3 EO 4C W-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 54,26 % 4 EO 3C N+1 170 5 27.78
5 EO 4C S-2 -200 17 94.44
6 EO 4P E-1 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
1 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 41,67 % 7 EO 3S S+1 630 13 72.22
8 EO 4C E = -420 9 50.00
9 EO 1S S+2 150 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
7 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 61,30 %10 EO 4C N = 620 3 16.67
11 EO 5C N-1 -50 18 100.00
12 EO 3T N = 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
2 VAGMAN David -CASSART Guy : 60,56 %13 EO 6S S = 1440 1 5.56
14 EO 4C N = 420 5 27.78
15 EO 2C S = 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
12 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -POWIS Vinciane : 45,74 %19 EO 2C W-1 100 12 66.67
20 EO 5T W-1 100 2 11.11
21 EO 3P W = -140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN : 37,22 %25 EO 2C N+2 170 18 100.00
26 EO 3T N-1 -100 13 72.22
27 EO 5P S = 450 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
10 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 52,41 %28 EO 2P E+1 -140 4 22.22
29 EO 4C S+1 650 9 50.00
30 EO 4C W+1 -450 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,96 %31 EO 3S S-2 -200 16 88.89
32 EO 4C S+1 450 8 44.44
33 EO 2T N+1 110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 260,0 / 486 = 53,50 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 54,26 % 1 EO 4TcW-2 300 0 0.00
2 EO 2P W-2 100 3 16.67
3 EO 2C W = -110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
1 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 41,67 % 4 EO 4C N-2 -200 18 100.00
5 EO 4T W-1 50 12 66.67
6 EO 4P E = -620 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
7 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 61,30 % 7 EO 3S N+2 660 3 16.67
8 EO 4C E = -420 9 50.00
9 EO 3S N+1 430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
2 VAGMAN David -CASSART Guy : 60,56 %10 EO 4C S = 620 3 16.67
11 EO 4PcE-4 800 0 0.00
12 EO 3T N+1 130 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
8 MATELART Marc -GROSFILS Colette : 50,00 %13 EO 6P N = 1430 9 50.00
14 EO 4C N+1 450 0 0.00
15 EO 2S N+1 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -POWIS Vinciane : 45,74 %16 EO 2P S+1 140 7 38.89
17 EO 6S E = -990 16 88.89
18 EO 5TcE-1 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
9 ARICKX Roger -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 46,67 %19 EO 4C W-2 200 6 33.33
20 EO 3T W+1 -130 8 44.44
21 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN : 37,22 %22 EO 4C S-2 -100 17 94.44
23 EO 2P W = -110 13 72.22
24 EO 2C W = -110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,96 %28 EO 3P E = -140 4 22.22
29 EO 4C S+1 650 9 50.00
30 EO 4C W = -420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
11 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 52,22 %31 EO 3S N+1 630 1 5.56
32 EO 4C S+1 450 8 44.44
33 EO 4PcS-4 -800 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 233,0 / 540 = 43,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 de WASSEIGE Ariane -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie
12 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
9 ARICKX Roger -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 46,67 % 4 EO 3P E-1 100 12 66.67
5 EO 4KcN-1 -200 17 94.44
6 EO 2P E+3 -200 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 54,26 % 7 EO 5K N+2 640 8 44.44
8 EO 4C E = -420 9 50.00
9 EO 3S N-2 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -POWIS Vinciane : 45,74 %10 EO 4C S = 620 3 16.67
11 EO 3S N+2 460 4 22.22
12 EO 3T N = 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
11 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 52,22 %13 EO 6S S = 1440 1 5.56
14 EO 4C N-1 -50 15 83.33
15 EO 3C S-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
8 MATELART Marc -GROSFILS Colette : 50,00 %16 EO 3K W-1 100 16 88.89
17 EO 4P W+2 -480 2 11.11
18 EO 3T E+1 -130 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,96 %19 EO 2C W = -110 17 94.44
20 EO 3C S-2 -200 13 72.22
21 EO 3CcS = 730 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
2 VAGMAN David -CASSART Guy : 60,56 %22 EO 3C S-1 -50 11 61.11
23 EO 2P E-1 100 5 27.78
24 EO 1P S = 80 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
7 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 61,30 %28 EO 3C N = 140 0 0.00
29 EO 4C N+1 650 9 50.00
30 EO 4C E = -420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN : 37,22 %31 EO 3S S-2 -200 16 88.89
32 EO 4C S+1 450 8 44.44
33 EO 2C W-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 258,0 / 486 = 53,09 %
|
|