|
Tournoi du 16-09-13
1 59,52 2 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand
2 53,97 6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
3 52,12 1 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
4 51,06 3 peeters -devigne
5 50,00 8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
6 48,68 5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
7 46,83 7 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse
8 37,83 4 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine
9 0,00 9 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 58,63 11 de TERWANGNE Philippe -CASSART Guy
2 56,25 17 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno
3 54,76 18 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
4 51,79 13 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude
5 49,11 12 laenens -collin
6 47,32 14 COULIE Joelle -STEED Adrian
~ 47,32 16 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
8 42,56 10 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph
9 42,26 15 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger
PAIRE Nr : 1 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
10 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 42,56 % 1 NS 3S E = -400 6 42.86
2 NS 4C E-1 50 11 78.57
3 NS 4P N = 420 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
18 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 54,76 % 4 NS 1S E = -90 5 35.71
5 NS 1S W+2 -150 5 35.71
6 NS 3S S+1 430 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
17 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 56,25 % 7 NS 1S S-1 -100 7 50.00
8 NS 3C W = -140 2 14.29
9 NS 3K N+1 130 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
16 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,32 %10 NS 3T E-2 200 14 100.00
11 NS 2S S+1 150 10 71.43
12 NS 2P E+2 -170 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
15 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 42,26 %13 NS 4C S = 620 12 85.71
14 NS 1S N-1 -50 8 57.14
15 NS 3K W-1 50 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
14 COULIE Joelle -STEED Adrian : 47,32 %16 NS 1S E-2 200 13 92.86
17 NS 1S N-1 -50 4 28.57
18 NS 2P E = -110 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
13 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 51,79 %19 NS 2C N+1 140 14 100.00
20 NS 3T N+1 130 11 78.57
21 NS 3S N+2 660 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
12 laenens -collin : 49,11 %22 NS 2C W = -110 1 7.14
23 NS 1P E+2 -140 4 28.57
24 NS 4C E-3 150 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
11 de TERWANGNE Philippe -CASSART Guy : 58,63 %25 NS 4P N-1 -50 5 35.71
26 NS 5T W = -600 7 50.00
27 NS 4P W-1 50 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
Total : 197,0 / 378 = 52,12 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand
12 laenens -collin : 49,11 % 1 NS 3S E+1 -430 2 14.29
2 NS 4C E-1 50 11 78.57
3 NS 3S N+1 430 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
11 de TERWANGNE Philippe -CASSART Guy : 58,63 % 4 NS 4P E-2 200 14 100.00
5 NS 1S E+3 -180 1 7.14
6 NS 3S S+1 430 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
10 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 42,56 % 7 NS 1S S-1 -100 7 50.00
8 NS 1S S-1 -50 10 71.43
9 NS 3S S+2 460 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
18 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 54,76 %10 NS 1S S+1 120 6 42.86
11 NS 2S S+2 180 14 100.00
12 NS 2P E+2 -170 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
17 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 56,25 %13 NS 3S N-1 -100 3 21.43
14 NS 2P S-2 -100 2 14.29
15 NS 4CcE-2 300 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
16 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,32 %16 NS 2K N+1 110 6 42.86
17 NS 1S N = 90 13 92.86
18 NS 3C N-2 -200 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
15 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 42,26 %19 NS 3C N-1 -50 3 21.43
20 NS 3K N = 110 6 42.86
21 NS 3S N+3 690 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
14 COULIE Joelle -STEED Adrian : 47,32 %22 NS 3C W-2 200 12 85.71
23 NS 2K N-1 -100 13 92.86
24 NS 1C E = -80 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
13 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 51,79 %25 NS 4P N = 420 13 92.86
26 NS 3S W-1 100 14 100.00
27 NS 4P W-2 100 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 90,48 %
Total : 225,0 / 378 = 59,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 peeters -devigne
14 COULIE Joelle -STEED Adrian : 47,32 % 1 NS 1S E+2 -150 10 71.43
2 NS 3S E-1 50 11 78.57
3 NS 2P N+2 170 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
13 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 51,79 % 4 NS 2C W = -110 1 7.14
5 NS 1S W = -90 13 92.86
6 NS 6C N-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 laenens -collin : 49,11 % 7 NS 1S S+2 150 14 100.00
8 NS 3P S = 140 14 100.00
9 NS 3K N+1 130 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
11 de TERWANGNE Philippe -CASSART Guy : 58,63 %10 NS 1S S+1 120 6 42.86
11 NS 1S S+1 120 4 28.57
12 NS 2P E+1 -140 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
10 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 42,56 %13 NS 4C S-1 -100 3 21.43
14 NS 2C S-1 -50 8 57.14
15 NS 2P S-1 -100 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
18 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 54,76 %16 NS 1S S+1 120 8 57.14
17 NS 1S N-1 -50 4 28.57
18 NS 3S S = 600 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
17 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 56,25 %19 NS Pass Passe 8 57.14
20 NS 2S N = 120 8 57.14
21 NS 3S N+2 660 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
16 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,32 %22 NS 3C W-2 200 12 85.71
23 NS 2P W = -110 9 64.29
24 NS 1C E+1 -110 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
15 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 42,26 %25 NS 4C S-1 -50 5 35.71
26 NS 3S E+4 -720 0 0.00
27 NS 4P W-3 150 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
Total : 193,0 / 378 = 51,06 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine
16 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,32 % 1 NS 2PcE+2 -670 0 0.00
2 NS 3T W = -110 6 42.86
3 NS 4P N = 420 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
15 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 42,26 % 4 NS 3S E-1 100 10 71.43
5 NS 2C W = -110 10 71.43
6 NS 3S S+1 430 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
14 COULIE Joelle -STEED Adrian : 47,32 % 7 NS 1S S-2 -200 2 14.29
8 NS 4K S-1 -50 10 71.43
9 NS 3K N = 110 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
13 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 51,79 %10 NS 1S S = 90 1 7.14
11 NS 2S S = 120 4 28.57
12 NS 2P E+1 -140 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
12 laenens -collin : 49,11 %13 NS 3S S-1 -100 3 21.43
14 NS 3T E = -110 0 0.00
15 NS 2S W+2 -180 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
11 de TERWANGNE Philippe -CASSART Guy : 58,63 %16 NS 2P W-1 100 4 28.57
17 NS 1S N-1 -50 4 28.57
18 NS 3PcE-1 100 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
10 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 42,56 %19 NS Pass Passe 8 57.14
20 NS 2T N+2 130 11 78.57
21 NS 3S N+3 690 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
18 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 54,76 %22 NS 2C W = -110 1 7.14
23 NS 2P E = -110 9 64.29
24 NS 4CcE-1 100 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
17 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 56,25 %25 NS 4P N-2 -100 0 0.00
26 NS 3S W+1 -630 4 28.57
27 NS 5TcN-2 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,52 %
Total : 143,0 / 378 = 37,83 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
18 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 54,76 % 1 NS 3S E = -400 6 42.86
2 NS 4C E = -420 2 14.29
3 NS 4P N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
17 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 56,25 % 4 NS 2C E-1 100 10 71.43
5 NS 1S E = -90 13 92.86
6 NS 3S N+2 460 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,10 %
16 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,32 % 7 NS 1S N-1 -100 7 50.00
8 NS 2C E = -110 5 35.71
9 NS 3S N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
15 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 42,26 %10 NS 1S N+2 150 10 71.43
11 NS 2S N-1 -50 0 0.00
12 NS 1K E = -70 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
14 COULIE Joelle -STEED Adrian : 47,32 %13 NS 4C N = 620 12 85.71
14 NS 2P N-1 -50 8 57.14
15 NS 3PcN = 730 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
13 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 51,79 %16 NS 3S N-2 -100 0 0.00
17 NS 1S N-1 -50 4 28.57
18 NS 3S N-2 -200 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 11,90 %
12 laenens -collin : 49,11 %19 NS Pass Passe 8 57.14
20 NS 5T N-1 -100 2 14.29
21 NS 6S N+1 1470 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
11 de TERWANGNE Philippe -CASSART Guy : 58,63 %22 NS 2C E-1 100 5 35.71
23 NS 1S N-2 -200 0 0.00
24 NS 4C E-2 100 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
10 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 42,56 %25 NS 3P N+1 170 10 71.43
26 NS 3K E+4 -190 11 78.57
27 NS 4P E-1 50 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
Total : 184,0 / 378 = 48,68 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
11 de TERWANGNE Philippe -CASSART Guy : 58,63 % 1 NS 3S E-1 50 14 100.00
2 NS 4C E = -420 2 14.29
3 NS 4P N = 420 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
10 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 42,56 % 4 NS 2C W = -110 1 7.14
5 NS 1S W+2 -150 5 35.71
6 NS 3S S+1 430 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
18 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 54,76 % 7 NS 1S S = 90 12 85.71
8 NS 1S S-1 -50 10 71.43
9 NS 3S S+2 460 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
17 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 56,25 %10 NS 1S S+3 180 12 85.71
11 NS 2S S = 120 4 28.57
12 NS 2P E+1 -140 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
16 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,32 %13 NS 3S N = 600 8 57.14
14 NS 2S W-1 50 14 100.00
15 NS 4K W-1 50 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
15 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 42,26 %16 NS 2S N+1 150 10 71.43
17 NS 1S N = 90 13 92.86
18 NS 3S S+1 630 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,10 %
14 COULIE Joelle -STEED Adrian : 47,32 %19 NS 3CcN-1 -100 0 0.00
20 NS 4K N-1 -100 2 14.29
21 NS 3S N+2 660 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 11,90 %
13 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 51,79 %22 NS 2C W-2 200 12 85.71
23 NS 2K N-1 -100 13 92.86
24 NS 3C E = -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
12 laenens -collin : 49,11 %25 NS 4P N-1 -50 5 35.71
26 NS 3S E+3 -690 2 14.29
27 NS 4P W-1 50 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
Total : 204,0 / 378 = 53,97 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse
13 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 51,79 % 1 NS 3S E = -400 6 42.86
2 NS 4C E-1 50 11 78.57
3 NS 4P N-1 -50 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
12 laenens -collin : 49,11 % 4 NS 3S E-1 100 10 71.43
5 NS 1S W+1 -120 8 57.14
6 NS 3S S+1 430 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
11 de TERWANGNE Philippe -CASSART Guy : 58,63 % 7 NS 1S S-3 -300 0 0.00
8 NS 4PcN-4 -800 0 0.00
9 NS 3K N+1 130 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 14,29 %
10 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 42,56 %10 NS 1S S+1 120 6 42.86
11 NS 2S S+1 150 10 71.43
12 NS 1S E = -90 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
18 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 54,76 %13 NS 3C S-1 -100 3 21.43
14 NS 2P S-1 -50 8 57.14
15 NS 3PcS-2 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
17 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 56,25 %16 NS 2K S = 90 2 14.29
17 NS 2T E-1 50 10 71.43
18 NS 2P E = -110 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
16 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,32 %19 NS 2C N = 110 12 85.71
20 NS 3T N+2 150 14 100.00
21 NS 3S N+2 660 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
15 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 42,26 %22 NS 2C W-1 100 5 35.71
23 NS 3P E = -140 4 28.57
24 NS 1C E+1 -110 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
14 COULIE Joelle -STEED Adrian : 47,32 %25 NS 4P N = 420 13 92.86
26 NS 5K W = -600 7 50.00
27 NS 4P W-2 100 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
Total : 177,0 / 378 = 46,83 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
15 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 42,26 % 1 NS 2C S-2 -100 12 85.71
2 NS 4C E = -420 2 14.29
3 NS 3S N+2 460 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
14 COULIE Joelle -STEED Adrian : 47,32 % 4 NS 1S E = -90 5 35.71
5 NS 1S W+3 -180 1 7.14
6 NS 3S S+1 430 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
13 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 51,79 % 7 NS 1S S-1 -100 7 50.00
8 NS 2C W = -110 5 35.71
9 NS 3S S = 400 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
12 laenens -collin : 49,11 %10 NS 1S S = 90 1 7.14
11 NS 2S S+1 150 10 71.43
12 NS 2P E-2 100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
11 de TERWANGNE Philippe -CASSART Guy : 58,63 %13 NS 4C S = 620 12 85.71
14 NS 2P S-1 -50 8 57.14
15 NS 3P S-2 -200 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
10 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 42,56 %16 NS 1P W-2 200 13 92.86
17 NS 1S N-1 -50 4 28.57
18 NS 5KcE-2 300 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
18 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 54,76 %19 NS 4C N-1 -50 3 21.43
20 NS 3K N-1 -100 2 14.29
21 NS 3S N+3 690 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
17 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 56,25 %22 NS 2P N = 110 8 57.14
23 NS 2P W+1 -140 4 28.57
24 NS 2C E = -110 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
16 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,32 %25 NS 4P N-1 -50 5 35.71
26 NS 2K E+5 -190 11 78.57
27 NS 3P W-1 50 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 189,0 / 378 = 50,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 -
17 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno : 56,25 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
16 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,32 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
15 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 42,26 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 COULIE Joelle -STEED Adrian : 47,32 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
13 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 51,79 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
12 laenens -collin : 49,11 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
11 de TERWANGNE Philippe -CASSART Guy : 58,63 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
10 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 42,56 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
18 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 54,76 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 378 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph
1 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,12 % 1 EO 3S E = -400 8 57.14
2 EO 4C E-1 50 3 21.43
3 EO 4P N = 420 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,97 % 4 EO 2C W = -110 13 92.86
5 EO 1S W+2 -150 9 64.29
6 EO 3S S+1 430 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 59,52 % 7 EO 1S S-1 -100 7 50.00
8 EO 1S S-1 -50 4 28.57
9 EO 3S S+2 460 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
7 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,83 %10 EO 1S S+1 120 8 57.14
11 EO 2S S+1 150 4 28.57
12 EO 1S E = -90 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
3 peeters -devigne : 51,06 %13 EO 4C S-1 -100 11 78.57
14 EO 2C S-1 -50 6 42.86
15 EO 2P S-1 -100 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 %16 EO 1P W-2 200 1 7.14
17 EO 1S N-1 -50 10 71.43
18 EO 5KcE-2 300 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
4 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 37,83 %19 EO Pass Passe 6 42.86
20 EO 2T N+2 130 3 21.43
21 EO 3S N+3 690 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
9 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 48,68 %25 EO 3P N+1 170 4 28.57
26 EO 3K E+4 -190 3 21.43
27 EO 4P E-1 50 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
Total : 143,0 / 336 = 42,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 de TERWANGNE Philippe -CASSART Guy
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,97 % 1 EO 3S E-1 50 0 0.00
2 EO 4C E = -420 12 85.71
3 EO 4P N = 420 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 59,52 % 4 EO 4P E-2 200 0 0.00
5 EO 1S E+3 -180 13 92.86
6 EO 3S S+1 430 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
7 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,83 % 7 EO 1S S-3 -300 14 100.00
8 EO 4PcN-4 -800 14 100.00
9 EO 3K N+1 130 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 85,71 %
3 peeters -devigne : 51,06 %10 EO 1S S+1 120 8 57.14
11 EO 1S S+1 120 10 71.43
12 EO 2P E+1 -140 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 %13 EO 4C S = 620 2 14.29
14 EO 2P S-1 -50 6 42.86
15 EO 3P S-2 -200 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
4 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 37,83 %16 EO 2P W-1 100 10 71.43
17 EO 1S N-1 -50 10 71.43
18 EO 3PcE-1 100 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
9 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 48,68 %22 EO 2C E-1 100 9 64.29
23 EO 1S N-2 -200 14 100.00
24 EO 4C E-2 100 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
1 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,12 %25 EO 4P N-1 -50 9 64.29
26 EO 5T W = -600 7 50.00
27 EO 4P W-1 50 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
Total : 197,0 / 336 = 58,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 laenens -collin
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 59,52 % 1 EO 3S E+1 -430 12 85.71
2 EO 4C E-1 50 3 21.43
3 EO 3S N+1 430 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
7 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,83 % 4 EO 3S E-1 100 4 28.57
5 EO 1S W+1 -120 6 42.86
6 EO 3S S+1 430 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
3 peeters -devigne : 51,06 % 7 EO 1S S+2 150 0 0.00
8 EO 3P S = 140 0 0.00
9 EO 3K N+1 130 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 %10 EO 1S S = 90 13 92.86
11 EO 2S S+1 150 4 28.57
12 EO 2P E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
4 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 37,83 %13 EO 3S S-1 -100 11 78.57
14 EO 3T E = -110 14 100.00
15 EO 2S W+2 -180 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
9 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 48,68 %19 EO Pass Passe 6 42.86
20 EO 5T N-1 -100 12 85.71
21 EO 6S N+1 1470 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
1 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,12 %22 EO 2C W = -110 13 92.86
23 EO 1P E+2 -140 10 71.43
24 EO 4C E-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,97 %25 EO 4P N-1 -50 9 64.29
26 EO 3S E+3 -690 12 85.71
27 EO 4P W-1 50 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
Total : 165,0 / 336 = 49,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude
7 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,83 % 1 EO 3S E = -400 8 57.14
2 EO 4C E-1 50 3 21.43
3 EO 4P N-1 -50 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
3 peeters -devigne : 51,06 % 4 EO 2C W = -110 13 92.86
5 EO 1S W = -90 1 7.14
6 EO 6C N-3 -150 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 % 7 EO 1S S-1 -100 7 50.00
8 EO 2C W = -110 9 64.29
9 EO 3S S = 400 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
4 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 37,83 %10 EO 1S S = 90 13 92.86
11 EO 2S S = 120 10 71.43
12 EO 2P E+1 -140 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
9 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 48,68 %16 EO 3S N-2 -100 14 100.00
17 EO 1S N-1 -50 10 71.43
18 EO 3S N-2 -200 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 88,10 %
1 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,12 %19 EO 2C N+1 140 0 0.00
20 EO 3T N+1 130 3 21.43
21 EO 3S N+2 660 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,97 %22 EO 2C W-2 200 2 14.29
23 EO 2K N-1 -100 1 7.14
24 EO 3C E = -140 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 59,52 %25 EO 4P N = 420 1 7.14
26 EO 3S W-1 100 0 0.00
27 EO 4P W-2 100 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 9,52 %
Total : 174,0 / 336 = 51,79 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 COULIE Joelle -STEED Adrian
3 peeters -devigne : 51,06 % 1 EO 1S E+2 -150 4 28.57
2 EO 3S E-1 50 3 21.43
3 EO 2P N+2 170 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 % 4 EO 1S E = -90 9 64.29
5 EO 1S W+3 -180 13 92.86
6 EO 3S S+1 430 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
4 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 37,83 % 7 EO 1S S-2 -200 12 85.71
8 EO 4K S-1 -50 4 28.57
9 EO 3K N = 110 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
9 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 48,68 %13 EO 4C N = 620 2 14.29
14 EO 2P N-1 -50 6 42.86
15 EO 3PcN = 730 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
1 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,12 %16 EO 1S E-2 200 1 7.14
17 EO 1S N-1 -50 10 71.43
18 EO 2P E = -110 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,97 %19 EO 3CcN-1 -100 14 100.00
20 EO 4K N-1 -100 12 85.71
21 EO 3S N+2 660 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 88,10 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 59,52 %22 EO 3C W-2 200 2 14.29
23 EO 2K N-1 -100 1 7.14
24 EO 1C E = -80 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
7 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,83 %25 EO 4P N = 420 1 7.14
26 EO 5K W = -600 7 50.00
27 EO 4P W-2 100 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
Total : 159,0 / 336 = 47,32 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 % 1 EO 2C S-2 -100 2 14.29
2 EO 4C E = -420 12 85.71
3 EO 3S N+2 460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
4 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 37,83 % 4 EO 3S E-1 100 4 28.57
5 EO 2C W = -110 4 28.57
6 EO 3S S+1 430 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
9 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 48,68 %10 EO 1S N+2 150 4 28.57
11 EO 2S N-1 -50 14 100.00
12 EO 1K E = -70 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
1 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,12 %13 EO 4C S = 620 2 14.29
14 EO 1S N-1 -50 6 42.86
15 EO 3K W-1 50 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,97 %16 EO 2S N+1 150 4 28.57
17 EO 1S N = 90 1 7.14
18 EO 3S S+1 630 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,90 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 59,52 %19 EO 3C N-1 -50 11 78.57
20 EO 3K N = 110 8 57.14
21 EO 3S N+3 690 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
7 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,83 %22 EO 2C W-1 100 9 64.29
23 EO 3P E = -140 10 71.43
24 EO 1C E+1 -110 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
3 peeters -devigne : 51,06 %25 EO 4C S-1 -50 9 64.29
26 EO 3S E+4 -720 14 100.00
27 EO 4P W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
Total : 142,0 / 336 = 42,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
4 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 37,83 % 1 EO 2PcE+2 -670 14 100.00
2 EO 3T W = -110 8 57.14
3 EO 4P N = 420 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
9 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 48,68 % 7 EO 1S N-1 -100 7 50.00
8 EO 2C E = -110 9 64.29
9 EO 3S N-1 -50 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
1 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,12 %10 EO 3T E-2 200 0 0.00
11 EO 2S S+1 150 4 28.57
12 EO 2P E+2 -170 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,97 %13 EO 3S N = 600 6 42.86
14 EO 2S W-1 50 0 0.00
15 EO 4K W-1 50 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 59,52 %16 EO 2K N+1 110 8 57.14
17 EO 1S N = 90 1 7.14
18 EO 3C N-2 -200 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
7 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,83 %19 EO 2C N = 110 2 14.29
20 EO 3T N+2 150 0 0.00
21 EO 3S N+2 660 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
3 peeters -devigne : 51,06 %22 EO 3C W-2 200 2 14.29
23 EO 2P W = -110 5 35.71
24 EO 1C E+1 -110 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 %25 EO 4P N-1 -50 9 64.29
26 EO 2K E+5 -190 3 21.43
27 EO 3P W-1 50 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 159,0 / 336 = 47,32 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 MOSSERAY Etienne -MOLS Bruno
9 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 48,68 % 4 EO 2C E-1 100 4 28.57
5 EO 1S E = -90 1 7.14
6 EO 3S N+2 460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,90 %
1 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,12 % 7 EO 1S S-1 -100 7 50.00
8 EO 3C W = -140 12 85.71
9 EO 3K N+1 130 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,97 %10 EO 1S S+3 180 2 14.29
11 EO 2S S = 120 10 71.43
12 EO 2P E+1 -140 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 59,52 %13 EO 3S N-1 -100 11 78.57
14 EO 2P S-2 -100 12 85.71
15 EO 4CcE-2 300 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
7 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,83 %16 EO 2K S = 90 12 85.71
17 EO 2T E-1 50 4 28.57
18 EO 2P E = -110 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
3 peeters -devigne : 51,06 %19 EO Pass Passe 6 42.86
20 EO 2S N = 120 6 42.86
21 EO 3S N+2 660 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 %22 EO 2P N = 110 6 42.86
23 EO 2P W+1 -140 10 71.43
24 EO 2C E = -110 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
4 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 37,83 %25 EO 4P N-2 -100 14 100.00
26 EO 3S W+1 -630 10 71.43
27 EO 5TcN-2 -300 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,48 %
Total : 189,0 / 336 = 56,25 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 48,68 % 1 EO 3S E = -400 8 57.14
2 EO 4C E = -420 12 85.71
3 EO 4P N-2 -100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
1 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,12 % 4 EO 1S E = -90 9 64.29
5 EO 1S W+2 -150 9 64.29
6 EO 3S S+1 430 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,97 % 7 EO 1S S = 90 2 14.29
8 EO 1S S-1 -50 4 28.57
9 EO 3S S+2 460 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 59,52 %10 EO 1S S+1 120 8 57.14
11 EO 2S S+2 180 0 0.00
12 EO 2P E+2 -170 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,83 %13 EO 3C S-1 -100 11 78.57
14 EO 2P S-1 -50 6 42.86
15 EO 3PcS-2 -500 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
3 peeters -devigne : 51,06 %16 EO 1S S+1 120 6 42.86
17 EO 1S N-1 -50 10 71.43
18 EO 3S S = 600 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 %19 EO 4C N-1 -50 11 78.57
20 EO 3K N-1 -100 12 85.71
21 EO 3S N+3 690 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
4 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 37,83 %22 EO 2C W = -110 13 92.86
23 EO 2P E = -110 5 35.71
24 EO 4CcE-1 100 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 - : 0,00 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 184,0 / 336 = 54,76 %
|
|