|
Tournoi du 16-12-13
1 60,93 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
2 60,00 11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
3 58,52 2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
4 54,63 9 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal
5 51,11 1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
6 49,44 3 GOBBE Amélie -DELTOUR Emile
7 49,26 5 VANDAM Cécile -WANDERPEPEN Janine
8 46,85 6 COULIE Joelle -de WASSEIGE Ariane
9 42,78 7 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse
10 40,74 10 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine
11 35,74 4 COOLEN Joseph -ARICKX Roger
12 0,00 12 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 67,70 16 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Joel
2 53,91 14 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
~ 53,91 21 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte
4 53,70 19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
5 53,09 18 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
6 51,03 17 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René
7 50,82 24 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude
8 45,37 13 VAGMAN David -CHANTRAINE René
9 45,00 23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
10 43,00 22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard
11 42,80 20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
12 40,74 15 POULAERT Gilbert -DELHEZ Jacques
PAIRE Nr : 1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
13 VAGMAN David -CHANTRAINE René : 45,37 % 1 NS 4TcN-1 -100 7 38.89
2 NS 3S S+1 630 10 55.56
3 NS 2S N+2 180 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,00 % 4 NS 3S N+2 660 15 83.33
5 NS 2P S+1 140 6 33.33
6 NS 1S S+1 120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,00 % 7 NS 3PcW-1 200 9 50.00
8 NS 2P N-1 -50 13 72.22
9 NS 2S W-1 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
21 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 53,91 %10 NS 4P W = -620 5 27.78
11 NS 3S E = -400 6 33.33
12 NS 2S E-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 42,80 %13 NS 3T N = 110 12 66.67
14 NS 3S E-1 50 10 55.56
15 NS 4K S+1 150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,70 %16 NS 2P E = -110 0 0.00
17 NS 3S E-4 200 12 66.67
18 NS 1S E-2 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
18 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 53,09 %19 NS 3S N-1 -50 4 22.22
20 NS 2S N-2 -200 1 5.56
21 NS 3T W-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
17 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 51,03 %22 NS 4P W = -620 10 55.56
23 NS 5K S = 600 16 88.89
24 NS 3P W = -140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
16 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Joel : 67,70 %25 NS 3P N = 140 3 16.67
26 NS 6S N-1 -100 0 0.00
27 NS 4P N-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
15 POULAERT Gilbert -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,74 %28 NS 4P S = 620 15 83.33
29 NS 4CcS-1 -200 0 0.00
30 NS 6P S = 980 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 276,0 / 540 = 51,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
14 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,91 % 4 NS 3S N+2 660 15 83.33
5 NS 2P S+2 170 14 77.78
6 NS 2C W-1 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
13 VAGMAN David -CHANTRAINE René : 45,37 % 7 NS 4PcW-2 500 13 72.22
8 NS 3S S-3 -150 0 0.00
9 NS 3S W-2 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,00 %10 NS 4P W-2 200 17 94.44
11 NS 2S E+2 -180 10 55.56
12 NS 2K E-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,00 %13 NS 3T N = 110 12 66.67
14 NS 4C W-2 100 14 77.78
15 NS 4C W-3 150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
21 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 53,91 %16 NS 1S N+1 120 17 94.44
17 NS 4C W-2 100 4 22.22
18 NS 1S E-2 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 42,80 %19 NS 4C S+2 480 17 94.44
20 NS 1S N+2 150 18 100.00
21 NS 3P N = 140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 98,15 %
24 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 50,82 %22 NS 4P W = -620 10 55.56
23 NS 4P W+1 -650 0 0.00
24 NS 3P W = -140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
18 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 53,09 %25 NS 4P N = 420 11 61.11
26 NS 4PcE-2 500 2 11.11
27 NS 4PcN-1 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
17 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 51,03 %28 NS 2C N = 110 8 44.44
29 NS 2P W = -110 4 22.22
30 NS 6P S = 980 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
16 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Joel : 67,70 %31 NS 3KcS-1 -200 0 0.00
32 NS 3P E+1 -170 18 100.00
33 NS 4P W+1 -450 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 316,0 / 540 = 58,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 GOBBE Amélie -DELTOUR Emile
17 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 51,03 % 1 NS 3S N-2 -100 7 38.89
2 NS 2S S+3 210 0 0.00
3 NS 3P E-1 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
15 POULAERT Gilbert -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,74 % 7 NS 4P W-2 200 9 50.00
8 NS 2T S-1 -50 13 72.22
9 NS 2C E = -110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
24 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 50,82 %10 NS 4P W-1 100 11 61.11
11 NS 2P W = -110 14 77.78
12 NS 1S E = -90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
13 VAGMAN David -CHANTRAINE René : 45,37 %13 NS 3T N-1 -100 6 33.33
14 NS 3C W-2 100 14 77.78
15 NS 2C W-3 150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,00 %16 NS 1S N = 90 12 66.67
17 NS 4C W-2 100 4 22.22
18 NS 1S E-2 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,00 %19 NS 4C S+2 480 17 94.44
20 NS 3S N-2 -200 1 5.56
21 NS 4TcW-1 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
21 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 53,91 %22 NS 4P W = -620 10 55.56
23 NS 3C W+1 -170 6 33.33
24 NS 3P W = -140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 42,80 %25 NS 4P N+1 450 14 77.78
26 NS 3S S+3 690 9 50.00
27 NS 4PcN-1 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,70 %28 NS 4P S-1 -100 4 22.22
29 NS 3C S+1 170 11 61.11
30 NS 4P S+2 480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
18 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 53,09 %31 NS 2S N+2 180 9 50.00
32 NS 4C E+1 -650 5 27.78
33 NS 4P W = -420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 267,0 / 540 = 49,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 COOLEN Joseph -ARICKX Roger
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,70 % 1 NS 3C E+1 -170 0 0.00
2 NS 3S N+1 630 10 55.56
3 NS 1S W = -90 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
18 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 53,09 % 4 NS 3S N = 600 1 5.56
5 NS 3P S = 140 6 33.33
6 NS 3P N-2 -100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
16 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Joel : 67,70 %10 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 11.11
11 NS 3S E+3 -490 0 0.00
12 NS 1S E+1 -120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 3,70 %
15 POULAERT Gilbert -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,74 %13 NS 3T N+1 130 16 88.89
14 NS 3P N = 140 18 100.00
15 NS 3K S+1 130 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
14 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,91 %16 NS 2C S-2 -100 3 16.67
17 NS 3C W-2 100 4 22.22
18 NS 1S E-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
13 VAGMAN David -CHANTRAINE René : 45,37 %19 NS 3T N+2 150 9 50.00
20 NS 1S N = 90 11 61.11
21 NS 1S W = -90 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,00 %22 NS 3K W+1 -130 18 100.00
23 NS 3K S = 110 12 66.67
24 NS 4P W = -420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,00 %25 NS 4P N = 420 11 61.11
26 NS 3S N+3 690 9 50.00
27 NS 3P N = 140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
21 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 53,91 %28 NS 3S S-2 -200 0 0.00
29 NS 2P E+1 -140 2 11.11
30 NS 4P S+2 480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
24 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 50,82 %31 NS 3S S = 600 16 88.89
32 NS 4C W+1 -650 5 27.78
33 NS 4P W+2 -480 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 193,0 / 540 = 35,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 VANDAM Cécile -WANDERPEPEN Janine
21 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 53,91 % 1 NS 2P N = 110 18 100.00
2 NS 3S N+1 630 10 55.56
3 NS 2K N = 90 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 42,80 % 4 NS 3S N+2 660 15 83.33
5 NS 1S N+1 120 2 11.11
6 NS 1S N-2 -100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,70 % 7 NS 4P E-1 100 6 33.33
8 NS 4C N-1 -50 13 72.22
9 NS 3S E-1 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
17 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 51,03 %13 NS 3C W = -140 2 11.11
14 NS 4P N-2 -100 3 16.67
15 NS 2C E-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
16 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Joel : 67,70 %16 NS 3K S-2 -100 3 16.67
17 NS 3S W-5 250 14 77.78
18 NS 1S E = -90 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
24 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 50,82 %19 NS 4C S+1 450 14 77.78
20 NS 2S N = 120 15 83.33
21 NS 3T E = -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
14 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,91 %22 NS 3P E+1 -170 16 88.89
23 NS 3C E+1 -170 6 33.33
24 NS 4P E+1 -450 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
13 VAGMAN David -CHANTRAINE René : 45,37 %25 NS 3P N = 140 3 16.67
26 NS 3S N+4 720 15 83.33
27 NS 5C E-2 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,00 %28 NS 2P N+1 140 10 55.56
29 NS 3P E-2 200 14 77.78
30 NS 6P S = 980 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,00 %31 NS 2S N+2 180 9 50.00
32 NS 4C E = -620 11 61.11
33 NS 4P E = -420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 266,0 / 540 = 49,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 COULIE Joelle -de WASSEIGE Ariane
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,00 % 1 NS 3C E-1 50 16 88.89
2 NS 3S N = 600 3 16.67
3 NS 1S S+3 180 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,00 % 4 NS 3S N = 600 1 5.56
5 NS 2P S+1 140 6 33.33
6 NS 2P N+2 170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
24 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 50,82 % 7 NS 3P W = -140 3 16.67
8 NS 2P N-2 -100 4 22.22
9 NS 3S W-1 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 42,80 %10 NS 3S E+2 -660 0 0.00
11 NS 3S W-2 100 18 100.00
12 NS 1S E = -90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
18 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 53,09 %16 NS 1P E = -80 6 33.33
17 NS 2PcS+1 570 16 88.89
18 NS 1S E-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
17 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 51,03 %19 NS 3S S-1 -50 4 22.22
20 NS 2S N = 120 15 83.33
21 NS 1S W-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
16 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Joel : 67,70 %22 NS 4P W = -620 10 55.56
23 NS 4C E = -620 2 11.11
24 NS 3P W = -140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
15 POULAERT Gilbert -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,74 %25 NS 3P N+1 170 6 33.33
26 NS 6S N = 1440 18 100.00
27 NS 2P N+1 140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
14 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,91 %28 NS 4P S = 620 15 83.33
29 NS 2P E-1 100 6 33.33
30 NS 4P S+2 480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
13 VAGMAN David -CHANTRAINE René : 45,37 %31 NS 2S N+2 180 9 50.00
32 NS 4C E+1 -650 5 27.78
33 NS 4P W+1 -450 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 253,0 / 540 = 46,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse
14 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,91 % 1 NS 2S N-2 -100 7 38.89
2 NS 3S S+1 630 10 55.56
3 NS 2K S-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
13 VAGMAN David -CHANTRAINE René : 45,37 % 4 NS 3S N+1 630 7 38.89
5 NS 2P S+2 170 14 77.78
6 NS 2P S-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,00 % 7 NS 4CcN-3 -800 0 0.00
8 NS 4C N-2 -100 4 22.22
9 NS 2K E+1 -110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,00 %10 NS 4P W-1 100 11 61.11
11 NS 3S W = -400 6 33.33
12 NS 2S E-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
21 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 53,91 %13 NS 3T N-1 -100 6 33.33
14 NS 4P N-2 -100 3 16.67
15 NS 2C W = -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,70 %19 NS 6S S-4 -200 0 0.00
20 NS 2K S = 90 11 61.11
21 NS 3K E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
18 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 53,09 %22 NS 3S E+3 -690 4 22.22
23 NS 3KcS+1 870 18 100.00
24 NS 4P W-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
17 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 51,03 %25 NS 5C W-2 200 8 44.44
26 NS 3S S+2 660 4 22.22
27 NS 5CcE-2 300 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
24 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 50,82 %28 NS 4P S-1 -100 4 22.22
29 NS 3C S = 140 8 44.44
30 NS 4P S+2 480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
15 POULAERT Gilbert -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,74 %31 NS 2S S+2 180 9 50.00
32 NS 4C E = -620 11 61.11
33 NS 4P W = -420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 231,0 / 540 = 42,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
16 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Joel : 67,70 % 1 NS 5T N-2 -100 7 38.89
2 NS 3S N+2 660 17 94.44
3 NS 3K S = 110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
15 POULAERT Gilbert -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,74 % 4 NS 3S N+1 630 7 38.89
5 NS 2P S+2 170 14 77.78
6 NS 1S S+3 180 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
14 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,91 % 7 NS 4C S = 620 17 94.44
8 NS 4C N-1 -50 13 72.22
9 NS 2C E+2 -170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
13 VAGMAN David -CHANTRAINE René : 45,37 %10 NS 3S E-1 100 11 61.11
11 NS 2K W+1 -110 14 77.78
12 NS 2S E-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,00 %13 NS 3K S-1 -100 6 33.33
14 NS 4K S-2 -100 3 16.67
15 NS 4K S = 130 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
24 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 50,82 %16 NS 3S N-1 -50 8 44.44
17 NS 3C W-1 50 0 0.00
18 NS 1S E-2 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 42,80 %22 NS 3ScE = -750 2 11.11
23 NS 3K S+1 130 14 77.78
24 NS 4P W-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,70 %25 NS 4PcN = 590 18 100.00
26 NS 3S S+4 720 15 83.33
27 NS 3PcN = 530 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
18 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 53,09 %28 NS 5TcE-4 800 18 100.00
29 NS 4CcN = 790 18 100.00
30 NS 4P S+2 480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
17 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 51,03 %31 NS 2S N+2 180 9 50.00
32 NS 4CcW+1 -990 0 0.00
33 NS 4P W = -420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 329,0 / 540 = 60,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal
18 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 53,09 % 1 NS 3K E+1 -130 2 11.11
2 NS 3S N+1 630 10 55.56
3 NS 1S S+2 150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
24 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 50,82 % 4 NS 3S N+1 630 7 38.89
5 NS 2P S+2 170 14 77.78
6 NS 2K S+2 130 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
16 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Joel : 67,70 % 7 NS 3P W = -140 3 16.67
8 NS 3P N-2 -100 4 22.22
9 NS 2C E+1 -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
15 POULAERT Gilbert -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,74 %10 NS 4P W-1 100 11 61.11
11 NS 2P W = -110 14 77.78
12 NS 2S E-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
14 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,91 %13 NS 3K S = 110 12 66.67
14 NS 3K S-1 -50 8 44.44
15 NS 3C E-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
13 VAGMAN David -CHANTRAINE René : 45,37 %16 NS 2S N = 120 17 94.44
17 NS 3PcN+1 630 18 100.00
18 NS 1S E-2 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,00 %19 NS 3S S-1 -50 4 22.22
20 NS 3S N-1 -100 6 33.33
21 NS 4T W-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
21 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 53,91 %25 NS 4P N-1 -50 0 0.00
26 NS 3S S+3 690 9 50.00
27 NS 4P N = 420 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 42,80 %28 NS 2P S+2 170 12 66.67
29 NS 3C S+1 170 11 61.11
30 NS 4P S+2 480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,70 %31 NS 2S N+2 180 9 50.00
32 NS 3C W+2 -200 16 88.89
33 NS 4P E = -420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
Total : 295,0 / 540 = 54,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 42,80 % 1 NS 2P N-1 -50 13 72.22
2 NS 3S N = 600 3 16.67
3 NS 2C S = 110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,70 % 4 NS 3S N+1 630 7 38.89
5 NS 4P S-1 -100 0 0.00
6 NS 2P N+2 170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
18 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 53,09 % 7 NS 4PcW-2 500 13 72.22
8 NS 3S S-1 -50 13 72.22
9 NS 4C E+1 -650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
17 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 51,03 %10 NS 4P W-2 200 17 94.44
11 NS 3S W = -400 6 33.33
12 NS 3S E-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
16 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Joel : 67,70 %13 NS 3S S-4 -400 0 0.00
14 NS 4P N-2 -100 3 16.67
15 NS 4K S-1 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
15 POULAERT Gilbert -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,74 %16 NS 1T N = 70 10 55.56
17 NS 3P S = 140 9 50.00
18 NS 1S E+2 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
14 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,91 %19 NS 3T N+2 150 9 50.00
20 NS 3S N-1 -100 6 33.33
21 NS 1S W-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
13 VAGMAN David -CHANTRAINE René : 45,37 %22 NS 4P W = -620 10 55.56
23 NS 3K S-1 -100 10 55.56
24 NS 4PcW = -590 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,00 %28 NS 4P N-1 -100 4 22.22
29 NS 3PcE-2 500 16 88.89
30 NS 4P S+2 480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
21 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 53,91 %31 NS 2C E-3 150 2 11.11
32 NS 5KcS-3 -500 14 77.78
33 NS 4P W+1 -450 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 220,0 / 540 = 40,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,00 % 1 NS 5T N-1 -50 13 72.22
2 NS 3S N+2 660 17 94.44
3 NS 3S N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
21 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 53,91 % 4 NS 3S N+2 660 15 83.33
5 NS 2P S+2 170 14 77.78
6 NS 2S S+2 180 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 42,80 % 7 NS 4C S = 620 17 94.44
8 NS 2P N-1 -50 13 72.22
9 NS 2S E+1 -150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,70 %10 NS 4P W = -620 5 27.78
11 NS 3S E+2 -460 2 11.11
12 NS 2C N-1 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
24 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 50,82 %13 NS 4C W-2 200 18 100.00
14 NS 4C W-2 100 14 77.78
15 NS 3S S+1 630 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
17 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 51,03 %16 NS 2C E-1 100 14 77.78
17 NS 3P S = 140 9 50.00
18 NS 2C N+1 140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
16 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Joel : 67,70 %19 NS 5T N = 400 12 66.67
20 NS 3S N-1 -100 6 33.33
21 NS 4T W-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
15 POULAERT Gilbert -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,74 %22 NS 4PcW = -790 0 0.00
23 NS 3C E+1 -170 6 33.33
24 NS Pass Passe 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
14 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,91 %25 NS 3S S+2 460 16 88.89
26 NS 3S S+3 690 9 50.00
27 NS 4P N-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,00 %31 NS 3S S+1 630 18 100.00
32 NS 4C W+1 -650 5 27.78
33 NS 4P W = -420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 324,0 / 540 = 60,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 -
24 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 50,82 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 51,03 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
21 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 53,91 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,91 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
18 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 53,09 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,00 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
15 POULAERT Gilbert -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,74 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,70 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
16 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Joel : 67,70 %28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 42,80 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 594 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 VAGMAN David -CHANTRAINE René
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,11 % 1 EO 4TcN-1 -100 11 61.11
2 EO 3S S+1 630 8 44.44
3 EO 2S N+2 180 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
7 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,78 % 4 EO 3S N+1 630 11 61.11
5 EO 2P S+2 170 4 22.22
6 EO 2P S-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 58,52 % 7 EO 4PcW-2 500 5 27.78
8 EO 3S S-3 -150 18 100.00
9 EO 3S W-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 60,93 %10 EO 3S E-1 100 7 38.89
11 EO 2K W+1 -110 4 22.22
12 EO 2S E-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
3 GOBBE Amélie -DELTOUR Emile : 49,44 %13 EO 3T N-1 -100 12 66.67
14 EO 3C W-2 100 4 22.22
15 EO 2C W-3 150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
9 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 54,63 %16 EO 2S N = 120 1 5.56
17 EO 3PcN+1 630 0 0.00
18 EO 1S E-2 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
4 COOLEN Joseph -ARICKX Roger : 35,74 %19 EO 3T N+2 150 9 50.00
20 EO 1S N = 90 7 38.89
21 EO 1S W = -90 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 40,74 %22 EO 4P W = -620 8 44.44
23 EO 3K S-1 -100 8 44.44
24 EO 4PcW = -590 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
5 VANDAM Cécile -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 49,26 %25 EO 3P N = 140 15 83.33
26 EO 3S N+4 720 3 16.67
27 EO 5C E-2 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
6 COULIE Joelle -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,85 %31 EO 2S N+2 180 9 50.00
32 EO 4C E+1 -650 13 72.22
33 EO 4P W+1 -450 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 245,0 / 540 = 45,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
7 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,78 % 1 EO 2S N-2 -100 11 61.11
2 EO 3S S+1 630 8 44.44
3 EO 2K S-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 58,52 % 4 EO 3S N+2 660 3 16.67
5 EO 2P S+2 170 4 22.22
6 EO 2C W-1 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 60,93 % 7 EO 4C S = 620 1 5.56
8 EO 4C N-1 -50 5 27.78
9 EO 2C E+2 -170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
12 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
9 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 54,63 %13 EO 3K S = 110 6 33.33
14 EO 3K S-1 -50 10 55.56
15 EO 3C E-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
4 COOLEN Joseph -ARICKX Roger : 35,74 %16 EO 2C S-2 -100 15 83.33
17 EO 3C W-2 100 14 77.78
18 EO 1S E-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 40,74 %19 EO 3T N+2 150 9 50.00
20 EO 3S N-1 -100 12 66.67
21 EO 1S W-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
5 VANDAM Cécile -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 49,26 %22 EO 3P E+1 -170 2 11.11
23 EO 3C E+1 -170 12 66.67
24 EO 4P E+1 -450 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 60,00 %25 EO 3S S+2 460 2 11.11
26 EO 3S S+3 690 9 50.00
27 EO 4P N-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
6 COULIE Joelle -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,85 %28 EO 4P S = 620 3 16.67
29 EO 2P E-1 100 12 66.67
30 EO 4P S+2 480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 262,0 / 486 = 53,91 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 POULAERT Gilbert -DELHEZ Jacques
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 60,93 % 4 EO 3S N+1 630 11 61.11
5 EO 2P S+2 170 4 22.22
6 EO 1S S+3 180 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
3 GOBBE Amélie -DELTOUR Emile : 49,44 % 7 EO 4P W-2 200 9 50.00
8 EO 2T S-1 -50 5 27.78
9 EO 2C E = -110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
9 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 54,63 %10 EO 4P W-1 100 7 38.89
11 EO 2P W = -110 4 22.22
12 EO 2S E-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
4 COOLEN Joseph -ARICKX Roger : 35,74 %13 EO 3T N+1 130 2 11.11
14 EO 3P N = 140 0 0.00
15 EO 3K S+1 130 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 40,74 %16 EO 1T N = 70 8 44.44
17 EO 3P S = 140 9 50.00
18 EO 1S E+2 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
12 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 60,00 %22 EO 4PcW = -790 18 100.00
23 EO 3C E+1 -170 12 66.67
24 EO Pass Passe 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
6 COULIE Joelle -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,85 %25 EO 3P N+1 170 12 66.67
26 EO 6S N = 1440 0 0.00
27 EO 2P N+1 140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,11 %28 EO 4P S = 620 3 16.67
29 EO 4CcS-1 -200 18 100.00
30 EO 6P S = 980 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
7 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,78 %31 EO 2S S+2 180 9 50.00
32 EO 4C E = -620 7 38.89
33 EO 4P W = -420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 198,0 / 486 = 40,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Joel
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 60,93 % 1 EO 5T N-2 -100 11 61.11
2 EO 3S N+2 660 1 5.56
3 EO 3K S = 110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
9 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 54,63 % 7 EO 3P W = -140 15 83.33
8 EO 3P N-2 -100 14 77.78
9 EO 2C E+1 -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
4 COOLEN Joseph -ARICKX Roger : 35,74 %10 EO 3S E+1 -630 16 88.89
11 EO 3S E+3 -490 18 100.00
12 EO 1S E+1 -120 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 96,30 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 40,74 %13 EO 3S S-4 -400 18 100.00
14 EO 4P N-2 -100 15 83.33
15 EO 4K S-1 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
5 VANDAM Cécile -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 49,26 %16 EO 3K S-2 -100 15 83.33
17 EO 3S W-5 250 4 22.22
18 EO 1S E = -90 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 60,00 %19 EO 5T N = 400 6 33.33
20 EO 3S N-1 -100 12 66.67
21 EO 4T W-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
6 COULIE Joelle -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,85 %22 EO 4P W = -620 8 44.44
23 EO 4C E = -620 16 88.89
24 EO 3P W = -140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,11 %25 EO 3P N = 140 15 83.33
26 EO 6S N-1 -100 18 100.00
27 EO 4P N-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
12 - : 0,00 %28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 58,52 %31 EO 3KcS-1 -200 18 100.00
32 EO 3P E+1 -170 0 0.00
33 EO 4P W+1 -450 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 329,0 / 486 = 67,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René
3 GOBBE Amélie -DELTOUR Emile : 49,44 % 1 EO 3S N-2 -100 11 61.11
2 EO 2S S+3 210 18 100.00
3 EO 3P E-1 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
12 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 40,74 %10 EO 4P W-2 200 1 5.56
11 EO 3S W = -400 12 66.67
12 EO 3S E-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
5 VANDAM Cécile -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 49,26 %13 EO 3C W = -140 16 88.89
14 EO 4P N-2 -100 15 83.33
15 EO 2C E-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 60,00 %16 EO 2C E-1 100 4 22.22
17 EO 3P S = 140 9 50.00
18 EO 2C N+1 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
6 COULIE Joelle -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,85 %19 EO 3S S-1 -50 14 77.78
20 EO 2S N = 120 3 16.67
21 EO 1S W-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,11 %22 EO 4P W = -620 8 44.44
23 EO 5K S = 600 2 11.11
24 EO 3P W = -140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
7 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,78 %25 EO 5C W-2 200 10 55.56
26 EO 3S S+2 660 14 77.78
27 EO 5CcE-2 300 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 58,52 %28 EO 2C N = 110 10 55.56
29 EO 2P W = -110 14 77.78
30 EO 6P S = 980 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 60,93 %31 EO 2S N+2 180 9 50.00
32 EO 4CcW+1 -990 18 100.00
33 EO 4P W = -420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 248,0 / 486 = 51,03 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
9 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 54,63 % 1 EO 3K E+1 -130 16 88.89
2 EO 3S N+1 630 8 44.44
3 EO 1S S+2 150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
4 COOLEN Joseph -ARICKX Roger : 35,74 % 4 EO 3S N = 600 17 94.44
5 EO 3P S = 140 12 66.67
6 EO 3P N-2 -100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 40,74 % 7 EO 4PcW-2 500 5 27.78
8 EO 3S S-1 -50 5 27.78
9 EO 4C E+1 -650 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
12 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 COULIE Joelle -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,85 %16 EO 1P E = -80 12 66.67
17 EO 2PcS+1 570 2 11.11
18 EO 1S E-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,11 %19 EO 3S N-1 -50 14 77.78
20 EO 2S N-2 -200 17 94.44
21 EO 3T W-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
7 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,78 %22 EO 3S E+3 -690 14 77.78
23 EO 3KcS+1 870 0 0.00
24 EO 4P W-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 58,52 %25 EO 4P N = 420 7 38.89
26 EO 4PcE-2 500 16 88.89
27 EO 4PcN-1 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 60,93 %28 EO 5TcE-4 800 0 0.00
29 EO 4CcN = 790 0 0.00
30 EO 4P S+2 480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
3 GOBBE Amélie -DELTOUR Emile : 49,44 %31 EO 2S N+2 180 9 50.00
32 EO 4C E+1 -650 13 72.22
33 EO 4P W = -420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 258,0 / 486 = 53,09 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
4 COOLEN Joseph -ARICKX Roger : 35,74 % 1 EO 3C E+1 -170 18 100.00
2 EO 3S N+1 630 8 44.44
3 EO 1S W = -90 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 40,74 % 4 EO 3S N+1 630 11 61.11
5 EO 4P S-1 -100 18 100.00
6 EO 2P N+2 170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
5 VANDAM Cécile -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 49,26 % 7 EO 4P E-1 100 12 66.67
8 EO 4C N-1 -50 5 27.78
9 EO 3S E-1 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 60,00 %10 EO 4P W = -620 13 72.22
11 EO 3S E+2 -460 16 88.89
12 EO 2C N-1 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,11 %16 EO 2P E = -110 18 100.00
17 EO 3S E-4 200 6 33.33
18 EO 1S E-2 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
7 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,78 %19 EO 6S S-4 -200 18 100.00
20 EO 2K S = 90 7 38.89
21 EO 3K E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
12 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 60,93 %25 EO 4PcN = 590 0 0.00
26 EO 3S S+4 720 3 16.67
27 EO 3PcN = 530 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
3 GOBBE Amélie -DELTOUR Emile : 49,44 %28 EO 4P S-1 -100 14 77.78
29 EO 3C S+1 170 7 38.89
30 EO 4P S+2 480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
9 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 54,63 %31 EO 2S N+2 180 9 50.00
32 EO 3C W+2 -200 2 11.11
33 EO 4P E = -420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
Total : 261,0 / 486 = 53,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
10 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 40,74 % 1 EO 2P N-1 -50 5 27.78
2 EO 3S N = 600 15 83.33
3 EO 2C S = 110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 VANDAM Cécile -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 49,26 % 4 EO 3S N+2 660 3 16.67
5 EO 1S N+1 120 16 88.89
6 EO 1S N-2 -100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 60,00 % 7 EO 4C S = 620 1 5.56
8 EO 2P N-1 -50 5 27.78
9 EO 2S E+1 -150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
6 COULIE Joelle -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,85 %10 EO 3S E+2 -660 18 100.00
11 EO 3S W-2 100 0 0.00
12 EO 1S E = -90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,11 %13 EO 3T N = 110 6 33.33
14 EO 3S E-1 50 8 44.44
15 EO 4K S+1 150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 58,52 %19 EO 4C S+2 480 1 5.56
20 EO 1S N+2 150 0 0.00
21 EO 3P N = 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 1,85 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 60,93 %22 EO 3ScE = -750 16 88.89
23 EO 3K S+1 130 4 22.22
24 EO 4P W-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
3 GOBBE Amélie -DELTOUR Emile : 49,44 %25 EO 4P N+1 450 4 22.22
26 EO 3S S+3 690 9 50.00
27 EO 4PcN-1 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
9 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 54,63 %28 EO 2P S+2 170 6 33.33
29 EO 3C S+1 170 7 38.89
30 EO 4P S+2 480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
12 - : 0,00 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 208,0 / 486 = 42,80 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte
5 VANDAM Cécile -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 49,26 % 1 EO 2P N = 110 0 0.00
2 EO 3S N+1 630 8 44.44
3 EO 2K N = 90 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 60,00 % 4 EO 3S N+2 660 3 16.67
5 EO 2P S+2 170 4 22.22
6 EO 2S S+2 180 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
12 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,11 %10 EO 4P W = -620 13 72.22
11 EO 3S E = -400 12 66.67
12 EO 2S E-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
7 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,78 %13 EO 3T N-1 -100 12 66.67
14 EO 4P N-2 -100 15 83.33
15 EO 2C W = -110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 58,52 %16 EO 1S N+1 120 1 5.56
17 EO 4C W-2 100 14 77.78
18 EO 1S E-2 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
3 GOBBE Amélie -DELTOUR Emile : 49,44 %22 EO 4P W = -620 8 44.44
23 EO 3C W+1 -170 12 66.67
24 EO 3P W = -140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
9 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 54,63 %25 EO 4P N-1 -50 18 100.00
26 EO 3S S+3 690 9 50.00
27 EO 4P N = 420 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
4 COOLEN Joseph -ARICKX Roger : 35,74 %28 EO 3S S-2 -200 18 100.00
29 EO 2P E+1 -140 16 88.89
30 EO 4P S+2 480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 40,74 %31 EO 2C E-3 150 16 88.89
32 EO 5KcS-3 -500 4 22.22
33 EO 4P W+1 -450 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 262,0 / 486 = 53,91 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard
11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 60,00 % 1 EO 5T N-1 -50 5 27.78
2 EO 3S N+2 660 1 5.56
3 EO 3S N-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
6 COULIE Joelle -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,85 % 4 EO 3S N = 600 17 94.44
5 EO 2P S+1 140 12 66.67
6 EO 2P N+2 170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,11 % 7 EO 3PcW-1 200 9 50.00
8 EO 2P N-1 -50 5 27.78
9 EO 2S W-1 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
7 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,78 %10 EO 4P W-1 100 7 38.89
11 EO 3S W = -400 12 66.67
12 EO 2S E-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 58,52 %13 EO 3T N = 110 6 33.33
14 EO 4C W-2 100 4 22.22
15 EO 4C W-3 150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
12 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
3 GOBBE Amélie -DELTOUR Emile : 49,44 %19 EO 4C S+2 480 1 5.56
20 EO 3S N-2 -200 17 94.44
21 EO 4TcW-1 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
4 COOLEN Joseph -ARICKX Roger : 35,74 %25 EO 4P N = 420 7 38.89
26 EO 3S N+3 690 9 50.00
27 EO 3P N = 140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 40,74 %28 EO 4P N-1 -100 14 77.78
29 EO 3PcE-2 500 2 11.11
30 EO 4P S+2 480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
5 VANDAM Cécile -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 49,26 %31 EO 2S N+2 180 9 50.00
32 EO 4C E = -620 7 38.89
33 EO 4P E = -420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 209,0 / 486 = 43,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
6 COULIE Joelle -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,85 % 1 EO 3C E-1 50 2 11.11
2 EO 3S N = 600 15 83.33
3 EO 1S S+3 180 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 51,11 % 4 EO 3S N+2 660 3 16.67
5 EO 2P S+1 140 12 66.67
6 EO 1S S+1 120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
7 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,78 % 7 EO 4CcN-3 -800 18 100.00
8 EO 4C N-2 -100 14 77.78
9 EO 2K E+1 -110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 58,52 %10 EO 4P W-2 200 1 5.56
11 EO 2S E+2 -180 8 44.44
12 EO 2K E-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 60,93 %13 EO 3K S-1 -100 12 66.67
14 EO 4K S-2 -100 15 83.33
15 EO 4K S = 130 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
3 GOBBE Amélie -DELTOUR Emile : 49,44 %16 EO 1S N = 90 6 33.33
17 EO 4C W-2 100 14 77.78
18 EO 1S E-2 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
9 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 54,63 %19 EO 3S S-1 -50 14 77.78
20 EO 3S N-1 -100 12 66.67
21 EO 4T W-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
4 COOLEN Joseph -ARICKX Roger : 35,74 %22 EO 3K W+1 -130 0 0.00
23 EO 3K S = 110 6 33.33
24 EO 4P W = -420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
5 VANDAM Cécile -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 49,26 %28 EO 2P N+1 140 8 44.44
29 EO 3P E-2 200 4 22.22
30 EO 6P S = 980 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 60,00 %31 EO 3S S+1 630 0 0.00
32 EO 4C W+1 -650 13 72.22
33 EO 4P W = -420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 243,0 / 540 = 45,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude
12 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
9 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 54,63 % 4 EO 3S N+1 630 11 61.11
5 EO 2P S+2 170 4 22.22
6 EO 2K S+2 130 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
6 COULIE Joelle -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,85 % 7 EO 3P W = -140 15 83.33
8 EO 2P N-2 -100 14 77.78
9 EO 3S W-1 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
3 GOBBE Amélie -DELTOUR Emile : 49,44 %10 EO 4P W-1 100 7 38.89
11 EO 2P W = -110 4 22.22
12 EO 1S E = -90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 60,00 %13 EO 4C W-2 200 0 0.00
14 EO 4C W-2 100 4 22.22
15 EO 3S S+1 630 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 60,93 %16 EO 3S N-1 -50 10 55.56
17 EO 3C W-1 50 18 100.00
18 EO 1S E-2 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
5 VANDAM Cécile -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 49,26 %19 EO 4C S+1 450 4 22.22
20 EO 2S N = 120 3 16.67
21 EO 3T E = -110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 58,52 %22 EO 4P W = -620 8 44.44
23 EO 4P W+1 -650 18 100.00
24 EO 3P W = -140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
7 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,78 %28 EO 4P S-1 -100 14 77.78
29 EO 3C S = 140 10 55.56
30 EO 4P S+2 480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
4 COOLEN Joseph -ARICKX Roger : 35,74 %31 EO 3S S = 600 2 11.11
32 EO 4C W+1 -650 13 72.22
33 EO 4P W+2 -480 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 247,0 / 486 = 50,82 %
|
|