|
Tournoi du 17-08-15
1 63,70 3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
2 57,96 8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges
3 56,67 11 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette
4 52,59 1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
5 49,81 9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
6 49,07 5 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph
7 47,22 7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
8 46,67 2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
9 45,74 10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle
10 43,89 6 de VIRON Baudouin -CASSART Guy
11 36,67 4 ROEGIERS Marga -MICHAUX Hélène
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 63,52 21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
2 60,00 14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
3 56,30 13 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
4 51,67 12 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand
5 50,19 22 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -GILLAIN Françoise
6 48,15 17 de WASSEIGE Ariane -GENDEBIEN Catherine
7 47,41 15 POWIS Vinciane -GROSFILS Colette
8 46,48 19 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert
9 43,52 18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
10 42,78 16 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert
11 40,00 20 LIGOT Xavier -LENAERTS Pol
PAIRE Nr : 1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
12 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 51,67 % 1 NS 3S N+1 430 16 88.89
2 NS 2CcW = -470 0 0.00
3 NS 3S N+3 490 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
22 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -GILLAIN Françoise : 50,19 % 4 NS 3S S = 600 6 33.33
5 NS 1S S-2 -200 9 50.00
6 NS 2P N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 63,52 % 7 NS 3C E+1 -170 4 22.22
8 NS 2S E+1 -150 10 55.56
9 NS 3S W+2 -660 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
20 LIGOT Xavier -LENAERTS Pol : 40,00 %10 NS 2P E+1 -140 7 38.89
11 NS 2C W+1 -140 11 61.11
12 NS 1S S+4 210 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
19 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 46,48 %13 NS 5T N = 600 0 0.00
14 NS 4T W-1 50 5 27.78
15 NS 2C E-3 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,52 %16 NS 5C E+1 -680 14 77.78
17 NS 1P E+1 -110 5 27.78
18 NS 2P E = -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
17 de WASSEIGE Ariane -GENDEBIEN Catherine : 48,15 %19 NS 4CcN+1 690 18 100.00
20 NS 3S S-2 -200 7 38.89
21 NS 4C S = 620 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
16 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,78 %22 NS 4C E-1 100 18 100.00
23 NS 3T S = 110 14 77.78
24 NS 1C N+2 140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
15 POWIS Vinciane -GROSFILS Colette : 47,41 %25 NS 2P W+2 -170 8 44.44
26 NS 2T N = 90 12 66.67
27 NS 3T N+1 130 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 60,00 %28 NS 2C E-2 100 9 50.00
29 NS 3S W-1 100 18 100.00
30 NS 3S E-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 284,0 / 540 = 52,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
13 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 56,30 % 4 NS 3S S = 600 6 33.33
5 NS 1S S-2 -200 9 50.00
6 NS 2P S-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
12 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 51,67 % 7 NS 3C W = -140 6 33.33
8 NS 3S W+2 -460 0 0.00
9 NS 6CcN-8 -2000 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
22 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -GILLAIN Françoise : 50,19 %10 NS 2P W = -110 11 61.11
11 NS 2P S-2 -100 16 88.89
12 NS 3S S+1 630 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 63,52 %13 NS 6C S = 1430 15 83.33
14 NS 3S E = -400 1 5.56
15 NS 1S N = 90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
20 LIGOT Xavier -LENAERTS Pol : 40,00 %16 NS 5C W+1 -680 14 77.78
17 NS 2C N-2 -100 10 55.56
18 NS 2C S+1 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
19 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 46,48 %19 NS 4C S+1 450 9 50.00
20 NS 3S S-2 -200 7 38.89
21 NS 4C S = 620 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,52 %22 NS 3T W+1 -130 12 66.67
23 NS 3S S-2 -200 2 11.11
24 NS 3S N+1 430 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
17 de WASSEIGE Ariane -GENDEBIEN Catherine : 48,15 %25 NS 5P E-1 100 12 66.67
26 NS 2C S = 110 16 88.89
27 NS 3CcE = -530 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
16 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,78 %28 NS 1S W = -90 3 16.67
29 NS 3S W+2 -660 1 5.56
30 NS 2S E+1 -150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
15 POWIS Vinciane -GROSFILS Colette : 47,41 %31 NS 3K S+1 130 18 100.00
32 NS 1S S+2 150 16 88.89
33 NS 2P S+3 200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 252,0 / 540 = 46,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
16 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,78 % 1 NS 4C S = 420 12 66.67
2 NS 4C W-1 50 4 22.22
3 NS 3S N+3 490 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 60,00 % 7 NS 2P S+1 140 11 61.11
8 NS 2S W+1 -150 10 55.56
9 NS 5T E+1 -620 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
13 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 56,30 %10 NS 3C N-3 -300 0 0.00
11 NS 2C E+1 -140 11 61.11
12 NS 3S S = 600 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 51,67 %13 NS 6C S = 1430 15 83.33
14 NS 3S W-2 100 13 72.22
15 NS 2P W = -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
22 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -GILLAIN Françoise : 50,19 %16 NS 4C W+2 -680 14 77.78
17 NS 2P E-1 50 12 66.67
18 NS 1S N+2 150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 63,52 %19 NS 3S N+1 430 2 11.11
20 NS 3T S-1 -100 15 83.33
21 NS 4C S = 620 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
20 LIGOT Xavier -LENAERTS Pol : 40,00 %22 NS 2P N-2 -100 16 88.89
23 NS 3T S = 110 14 77.78
24 NS 4C N+1 450 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
19 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 46,48 %25 NS 5P E-1 100 12 66.67
26 NS 3T N = 110 16 88.89
27 NS 3T N-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,52 %28 NS 2S N+1 150 18 100.00
29 NS 3S E = -600 10 55.56
30 NS 5C W-2 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
17 de WASSEIGE Ariane -GENDEBIEN Catherine : 48,15 %31 NS 2C E-1 50 11 61.11
32 NS 3P N+1 170 18 100.00
33 NS 4P S+1 450 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 344,0 / 540 = 63,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 ROEGIERS Marga -MICHAUX Hélène
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,52 % 1 NS 2C S = 110 2 11.11
2 NS 3C N+1 170 11 61.11
3 NS 4C S+2 480 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
17 de WASSEIGE Ariane -GENDEBIEN Catherine : 48,15 % 4 NS 3K N = 110 0 0.00
5 NS 3C W = -140 16 88.89
6 NS 2P S-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
15 POWIS Vinciane -GROSFILS Colette : 47,41 %10 NS 2C S-2 -200 2 11.11
11 NS 2C E+2 -170 3 16.67
12 NS 3S S = 600 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 60,00 %13 NS 4C N+1 650 2 11.11
14 NS 5T E-1 50 5 27.78
15 NS 1S S+2 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
13 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 56,30 %16 NS 5C W+1 -680 14 77.78
17 NS 2P E = -110 5 27.78
18 NS 1S S = 90 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
12 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 51,67 %19 NS 4C N+1 450 9 50.00
20 NS 2S S-1 -100 15 83.33
21 NS 4C S-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
22 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -GILLAIN Françoise : 50,19 %22 NS 3C E+1 -170 3 16.67
23 NS Pass Passe 10 55.56
24 NS 4C N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 63,52 %25 NS 5KcN-3 -500 4 22.22
26 NS 3T N-2 -200 4 22.22
27 NS 4T N-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
20 LIGOT Xavier -LENAERTS Pol : 40,00 %28 NS 2P S = 110 12 66.67
29 NS 3S E+1 -630 5 27.78
30 NS 4C W-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
19 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 46,48 %31 NS 1P E+2 -140 2 11.11
32 NS 3P N-2 -100 0 0.00
33 NS 5T N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 3,70 %
Total : 198,0 / 540 = 36,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph
20 LIGOT Xavier -LENAERTS Pol : 40,00 % 1 NS 3C S+2 200 8 44.44
2 NS 2P S+2 170 11 61.11
3 NS 3S N+2 460 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
19 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 46,48 % 4 NS 3S N+2 660 17 94.44
5 NS 1S S-3 -300 1 5.56
6 NS 3P S-2 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,52 % 7 NS 3P S-2 -200 2 11.11
8 NS 2S W = -120 17 94.44
9 NS 3S W+2 -660 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
16 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,78 %13 NS 6C S = 1430 15 83.33
14 NS 3S W-2 100 13 72.22
15 NS 2C E-3 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
15 POWIS Vinciane -GROSFILS Colette : 47,41 %16 NS 6C W = -1430 3 16.67
17 NS 1P E+1 -110 5 27.78
18 NS 1S N+2 150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 60,00 %19 NS 4C S+1 450 9 50.00
20 NS 3S S-2 -200 7 38.89
21 NS 4C S = 620 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
13 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 56,30 %22 NS 2C E+1 -140 8 44.44
23 NS 3S N-1 -100 7 38.89
24 NS 3S N+2 460 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
12 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 51,67 %25 NS 3S W = -600 2 11.11
26 NS 2C N-1 -100 7 38.89
27 NS 4K W-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
22 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -GILLAIN Françoise : 50,19 %28 NS 1S N-1 -100 0 0.00
29 NS 2C N-2 -200 14 77.78
30 NS 2K E+1 -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 63,52 %31 NS 1S W-1 50 11 61.11
32 NS 2S S = 120 8 44.44
33 NS 4P N = 420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 265,0 / 540 = 49,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 de VIRON Baudouin -CASSART Guy
22 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -GILLAIN Françoise : 50,19 % 1 NS 3C S+1 170 5 27.78
2 NS 3P N+1 170 11 61.11
3 NS 6T S = 920 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 63,52 % 4 NS 2K N+2 130 2 11.11
5 NS 1S S-2 -200 9 50.00
6 NS 4T E = -130 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
20 LIGOT Xavier -LENAERTS Pol : 40,00 % 7 NS 4P S-3 -300 0 0.00
8 NS 3S W = -400 2 11.11
9 NS 3C S-1 -50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
19 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 46,48 %10 NS 2P E+2 -170 4 22.22
11 NS 4CcE-1 100 18 100.00
12 NS 3S S+1 630 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
17 de WASSEIGE Ariane -GENDEBIEN Catherine : 48,15 %16 NS 5C W+2 -710 8 44.44
17 NS 2P E = -110 5 27.78
18 NS 1S E-2 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
16 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,78 %19 NS 4C S+1 450 9 50.00
20 NS 3P S-1 -100 15 83.33
21 NS 4C S = 620 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
15 POWIS Vinciane -GROSFILS Colette : 47,41 %22 NS 2T W+1 -110 14 77.78
23 NS 3S S-2 -200 2 11.11
24 NS 3S N+1 430 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 60,00 %25 NS 4P E = -620 0 0.00
26 NS 3C S-4 -400 0 0.00
27 NS 3KcW = -470 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 3,70 %
13 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 56,30 %28 NS 1S N = 90 6 33.33
29 NS 3S W+2 -660 1 5.56
30 NS 1T E+3 -130 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
12 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 51,67 %31 NS 3P E-1 50 11 61.11
32 NS 2P N+1 140 12 66.67
33 NS 4P S+1 450 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 237,0 / 540 = 43,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
13 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 56,30 % 1 NS 4C S = 420 12 66.67
2 NS 4P N = 620 18 100.00
3 NS 5T S+1 420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
12 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 51,67 % 4 NS 3S N+1 630 12 66.67
5 NS 3P S-3 -300 1 5.56
6 NS 2T E+3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
22 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -GILLAIN Françoise : 50,19 % 7 NS 3S N-1 -100 8 44.44
8 NS 2S W+1 -150 10 55.56
9 NS 5T W+2 -640 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 63,52 %10 NS 2P E = -110 11 61.11
11 NS 3C E+1 -170 3 16.67
12 NS 3S S-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
20 LIGOT Xavier -LENAERTS Pol : 40,00 %13 NS 3S N+4 720 9 50.00
14 NS 3S W-2 100 13 72.22
15 NS 1S N+1 120 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,52 %19 NS 4C N+1 450 9 50.00
20 NS 3S N-1 -100 15 83.33
21 NS 4C S+1 650 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
17 de WASSEIGE Ariane -GENDEBIEN Catherine : 48,15 %22 NS 2C E+1 -140 8 44.44
23 NS 3S N-1 -100 7 38.89
24 NS 1S N+3 180 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
16 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,78 %25 NS 3S W-5 500 18 100.00
26 NS 3C S-3 -300 2 11.11
27 NS 3C E = -140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
15 POWIS Vinciane -GROSFILS Colette : 47,41 %28 NS 2T W-2 100 9 50.00
29 NS 3T E+1 -130 16 88.89
30 NS 2C E+1 -140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 60,00 %31 NS 3P E = -140 2 11.11
32 NS 2P N = 110 6 33.33
33 NS 4P S+1 450 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 255,0 / 540 = 47,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges
15 POWIS Vinciane -GROSFILS Colette : 47,41 % 1 NS 2C S+2 170 5 27.78
2 NS 2P N+2 170 11 61.11
3 NS 3S N+3 490 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 60,00 % 4 NS 3S N+1 630 12 66.67
5 NS 1S S-2 -200 9 50.00
6 NS 4T E = -130 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
13 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 56,30 % 7 NS 2P S+1 140 11 61.11
8 NS 2S W+1 -150 10 55.56
9 NS 5T W+2 -640 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
12 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 51,67 %10 NS 2PcE-2 500 18 100.00
11 NS 3C E = -140 11 61.11
12 NS 3S S+1 630 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
22 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -GILLAIN Françoise : 50,19 %13 NS 4C S+2 680 5 27.78
14 NS 3S W-2 100 13 72.22
15 NS 1S N = 90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 63,52 %16 NS 6C W = -1430 3 16.67
17 NS 3T W-2 100 14 77.78
18 NS 1S E-2 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
19 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 46,48 %22 NS 3C E = -140 8 44.44
23 NS 3T S+1 130 18 100.00
24 NS 3S N+2 460 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,52 %25 NS 5P E-2 200 16 88.89
26 NS 2C N-1 -100 7 38.89
27 NS 3PcE-3 500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
17 de WASSEIGE Ariane -GENDEBIEN Catherine : 48,15 %28 NS 1P S+2 140 16 88.89
29 NS 3S W = -600 10 55.56
30 NS 3C W = -140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
16 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,78 %31 NS 2P E = -110 6 33.33
32 NS 4P N-1 -50 3 16.67
33 NS 4P S+1 450 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 313,0 / 540 = 57,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
17 de WASSEIGE Ariane -GENDEBIEN Catherine : 48,15 % 1 NS 4C S-2 -100 0 0.00
2 NS 5P N-1 -100 2 11.11
3 NS 3S S+2 460 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
16 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,78 % 4 NS 3S S+1 630 12 66.67
5 NS 2T E+1 -110 18 100.00
6 NS 3P S-2 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
15 POWIS Vinciane -GROSFILS Colette : 47,41 % 7 NS 3S N+1 630 18 100.00
8 NS 2S W+1 -150 10 55.56
9 NS 3S W+2 -660 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 60,00 %10 NS 3P E = -140 7 38.89
11 NS 3C E = -140 11 61.11
12 NS 3S S = 600 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
13 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 56,30 %13 NS 4C N+2 680 5 27.78
14 NS 3S W = -400 1 5.56
15 NS 1S N = 90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
12 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 51,67 %16 NS 6C W = -1430 3 16.67
17 NS 3T W-3 150 18 100.00
18 NS 2KcN = 180 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
22 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -GILLAIN Françoise : 50,19 %19 NS 4C S+1 450 9 50.00
20 NS 3S S-2 -200 7 38.89
21 NS 4C S = 620 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
20 LIGOT Xavier -LENAERTS Pol : 40,00 %25 NS 5P E-1 100 12 66.67
26 NS 1P W = -80 10 55.56
27 NS 2T N+1 110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
19 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 46,48 %28 NS 1S N+1 120 14 77.78
29 NS 3S W+1 -630 5 27.78
30 NS 3C E+1 -170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,52 %31 NS 3P E-1 50 11 61.11
32 NS 2P N+1 140 12 66.67
33 NS 4P S+1 450 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 269,0 / 540 = 49,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle
19 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 46,48 % 1 NS 4C S+1 450 18 100.00
2 NS 3P S+1 170 11 61.11
3 NS 3S S+2 460 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,52 % 4 NS 3S S = 600 6 33.33
5 NS 1S N-2 -200 9 50.00
6 NS 3P S-2 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
17 de WASSEIGE Ariane -GENDEBIEN Catherine : 48,15 % 7 NS 4CcW-2 500 15 83.33
8 NS 2S W+2 -180 4 22.22
9 NS 5T W+1 -620 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
16 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,78 %10 NS 4P E-1 100 14 77.78
11 NS 3PcS-3 -500 0 0.00
12 NS 3S S+2 660 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
15 POWIS Vinciane -GROSFILS Colette : 47,41 %13 NS 6C N = 1430 15 83.33
14 NS 3S W-2 100 13 72.22
15 NS 1S N = 90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 60,00 %16 NS 6C W = -1430 3 16.67
17 NS 1P E+2 -140 0 0.00
18 NS 1S E = -90 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
13 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 56,30 %19 NS 4C S = 420 0 0.00
20 NS 3S S-3 -300 1 5.56
21 NS 4C S = 620 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
12 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 51,67 %22 NS 2C E+3 -200 0 0.00
23 NS 2T S+1 110 14 77.78
24 NS 3S N+1 430 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 63,52 %28 NS 1S W = -90 3 16.67
29 NS 5T W = -600 10 55.56
30 NS 4C W+1 -450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
20 LIGOT Xavier -LENAERTS Pol : 40,00 %31 NS 3K S = 110 16 88.89
32 NS 3P N = 140 12 66.67
33 NS 4P S+1 450 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
Total : 247,0 / 540 = 45,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 63,52 % 1 NS 4C S = 420 12 66.67
2 NS 3P S+1 170 11 61.11
3 NS 3S N+2 460 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
20 LIGOT Xavier -LENAERTS Pol : 40,00 % 4 NS 3S S+2 660 17 94.44
5 NS 1S S-2 -200 9 50.00
6 NS 2P S-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
19 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 46,48 % 7 NS 3TcE-2 500 15 83.33
8 NS 2S W = -120 17 94.44
9 NS 5K W+1 -620 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,52 %10 NS 3P E-2 200 16 88.89
11 NS 3P N-3 -150 6 33.33
12 NS 3S S = 600 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
17 de WASSEIGE Ariane -GENDEBIEN Catherine : 48,15 %13 NS 3S N+4 720 9 50.00
14 NS 3S W-2 100 13 72.22
15 NS 1S N+1 120 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
16 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,78 %16 NS 5C W+1 -680 14 77.78
17 NS 3C N = 140 16 88.89
18 NS 1S N+2 150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
15 POWIS Vinciane -GROSFILS Colette : 47,41 %19 NS 3S N+2 460 16 88.89
20 NS 3S N-3 -300 1 5.56
21 NS 4C S = 620 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 60,00 %22 NS 2C E+2 -170 3 16.67
23 NS 3S S-2 -200 2 11.11
24 NS 3S N+1 430 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
13 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 56,30 %25 NS 3P E+2 -200 6 33.33
26 NS 2C N = 110 16 88.89
27 NS 3T N = 110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
22 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -GILLAIN Françoise : 50,19 %31 NS 2P E+1 -140 2 11.11
32 NS 4P N-1 -50 3 16.67
33 NS 4P N = 420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
Total : 306,0 / 540 = 56,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,59 % 1 EO 3S N+1 430 2 11.11
2 EO 2CcW = -470 18 100.00
3 EO 3S N+3 490 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 47,22 % 4 EO 3S N+1 630 6 33.33
5 EO 3P S-3 -300 17 94.44
6 EO 2T E+3 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 46,67 % 7 EO 3C W = -140 12 66.67
8 EO 3S W+2 -460 18 100.00
9 EO 6CcN-8 -2000 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 57,96 %10 EO 2PcE-2 500 0 0.00
11 EO 3C E = -140 7 38.89
12 EO 3S S+1 630 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 63,70 %13 EO 6C S = 1430 3 16.67
14 EO 3S W-2 100 5 27.78
15 EO 2P W = -110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,81 %16 EO 6C W = -1430 15 83.33
17 EO 3T W-3 150 0 0.00
18 EO 2KcN = 180 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
4 ROEGIERS Marga -MICHAUX Hélène : 36,67 %19 EO 4C N+1 450 9 50.00
20 EO 2S S-1 -100 3 16.67
21 EO 4C S-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 45,74 %22 EO 2C E+3 -200 18 100.00
23 EO 2T S+1 110 4 22.22
24 EO 3S N+1 430 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
5 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 49,07 %25 EO 3S W = -600 16 88.89
26 EO 2C N-1 -100 11 61.11
27 EO 4K W-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -CASSART Guy : 43,89 %31 EO 3P E-1 50 7 38.89
32 EO 2P N+1 140 6 33.33
33 EO 4P S+1 450 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 279,0 / 540 = 51,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 47,22 % 1 EO 4C S = 420 6 33.33
2 EO 4P N = 620 0 0.00
3 EO 5T S+1 420 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 46,67 % 4 EO 3S S = 600 12 66.67
5 EO 1S S-2 -200 9 50.00
6 EO 2P S-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 57,96 % 7 EO 2P S+1 140 7 38.89
8 EO 2S W+1 -150 8 44.44
9 EO 5T W+2 -640 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 63,70 %10 EO 3C N-3 -300 18 100.00
11 EO 2C E+1 -140 7 38.89
12 EO 3S S = 600 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,81 %13 EO 4C N+2 680 13 72.22
14 EO 3S W = -400 17 94.44
15 EO 1S N = 90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
4 ROEGIERS Marga -MICHAUX Hélène : 36,67 %16 EO 5C W+1 -680 4 22.22
17 EO 2P E = -110 13 72.22
18 EO 1S S = 90 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 45,74 %19 EO 4C S = 420 18 100.00
20 EO 3S S-3 -300 17 94.44
21 EO 4C S = 620 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
5 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 49,07 %22 EO 2C E+1 -140 10 55.56
23 EO 3S N-1 -100 11 61.11
24 EO 3S N+2 460 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
11 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 56,67 %25 EO 3P E+2 -200 12 66.67
26 EO 2C N = 110 2 11.11
27 EO 3T N = 110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -CASSART Guy : 43,89 %28 EO 1S N = 90 12 66.67
29 EO 3S W+2 -660 17 94.44
30 EO 1T E+3 -130 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
Total : 304,0 / 540 = 56,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 57,96 % 4 EO 3S N+1 630 6 33.33
5 EO 1S S-2 -200 9 50.00
6 EO 4T E = -130 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 63,70 % 7 EO 2P S+1 140 7 38.89
8 EO 2S W+1 -150 8 44.44
9 EO 5T E+1 -620 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,81 %10 EO 3P E = -140 11 61.11
11 EO 3C E = -140 7 38.89
12 EO 3S S = 600 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
4 ROEGIERS Marga -MICHAUX Hélène : 36,67 %13 EO 4C N+1 650 16 88.89
14 EO 5T E-1 50 13 72.22
15 EO 1S S+2 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 45,74 %16 EO 6C W = -1430 15 83.33
17 EO 1P E+2 -140 18 100.00
18 EO 1S E = -90 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
5 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 49,07 %19 EO 4C S+1 450 9 50.00
20 EO 3S S-2 -200 11 61.11
21 EO 4C S = 620 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
11 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 56,67 %22 EO 2C E+2 -170 15 83.33
23 EO 3S S-2 -200 16 88.89
24 EO 3S N+1 430 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -CASSART Guy : 43,89 %25 EO 4P E = -620 18 100.00
26 EO 3C S-4 -400 18 100.00
27 EO 3KcW = -470 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 96,30 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,59 %28 EO 2C E-2 100 9 50.00
29 EO 3S W-1 100 0 0.00
30 EO 3S E-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 47,22 %31 EO 3P E = -140 16 88.89
32 EO 2P N = 110 12 66.67
33 EO 4P S+1 450 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 324,0 / 540 = 60,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 POWIS Vinciane -GROSFILS Colette
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 57,96 % 1 EO 2C S+2 170 13 72.22
2 EO 2P N+2 170 7 38.89
3 EO 3S N+3 490 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,81 % 7 EO 3S N+1 630 0 0.00
8 EO 2S W+1 -150 8 44.44
9 EO 3S W+2 -660 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
4 ROEGIERS Marga -MICHAUX Hélène : 36,67 %10 EO 2C S-2 -200 16 88.89
11 EO 2C E+2 -170 15 83.33
12 EO 3S S = 600 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 45,74 %13 EO 6C N = 1430 3 16.67
14 EO 3S W-2 100 5 27.78
15 EO 1S N = 90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
5 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 49,07 %16 EO 6C W = -1430 15 83.33
17 EO 1P E+1 -110 13 72.22
18 EO 1S N+2 150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
11 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 56,67 %19 EO 3S N+2 460 2 11.11
20 EO 3S N-3 -300 17 94.44
21 EO 4C S = 620 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -CASSART Guy : 43,89 %22 EO 2T W+1 -110 4 22.22
23 EO 3S S-2 -200 16 88.89
24 EO 3S N+1 430 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,59 %25 EO 2P W+2 -170 10 55.56
26 EO 2T N = 90 6 33.33
27 EO 3T N+1 130 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 47,22 %28 EO 2T W-2 100 9 50.00
29 EO 3T E+1 -130 2 11.11
30 EO 2C E+1 -140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 46,67 %31 EO 3K S+1 130 0 0.00
32 EO 1S S+2 150 2 11.11
33 EO 2P S+3 200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 256,0 / 540 = 47,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 63,70 % 1 EO 4C S = 420 6 33.33
2 EO 4C W-1 50 14 77.78
3 EO 3S N+3 490 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,81 % 4 EO 3S S+1 630 6 33.33
5 EO 2T E+1 -110 0 0.00
6 EO 3P S-2 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 45,74 %10 EO 4P E-1 100 4 22.22
11 EO 3PcS-3 -500 18 100.00
12 EO 3S S+2 660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
5 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 49,07 %13 EO 6C S = 1430 3 16.67
14 EO 3S W-2 100 5 27.78
15 EO 2C E-3 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
11 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 56,67 %16 EO 5C W+1 -680 4 22.22
17 EO 3C N = 140 2 11.11
18 EO 1S N+2 150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -CASSART Guy : 43,89 %19 EO 4C S+1 450 9 50.00
20 EO 3P S-1 -100 3 16.67
21 EO 4C S = 620 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,59 %22 EO 4C E-1 100 0 0.00
23 EO 3T S = 110 4 22.22
24 EO 1C N+2 140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 47,22 %25 EO 3S W-5 500 0 0.00
26 EO 3C S-3 -300 16 88.89
27 EO 3C E = -140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 46,67 %28 EO 1S W = -90 15 83.33
29 EO 3S W+2 -660 17 94.44
30 EO 2S E+1 -150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 57,96 %31 EO 2P E = -110 12 66.67
32 EO 4P N-1 -50 15 83.33
33 EO 4P S+1 450 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 231,0 / 540 = 42,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 de WASSEIGE Ariane -GENDEBIEN Catherine
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,81 % 1 EO 4C S-2 -100 18 100.00
2 EO 5P N-1 -100 16 88.89
3 EO 3S S+2 460 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
4 ROEGIERS Marga -MICHAUX Hélène : 36,67 % 4 EO 3K N = 110 18 100.00
5 EO 3C W = -140 2 11.11
6 EO 2P S-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 45,74 % 7 EO 4CcW-2 500 3 16.67
8 EO 2S W+2 -180 14 77.78
9 EO 5T W+1 -620 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
11 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 56,67 %13 EO 3S N+4 720 9 50.00
14 EO 3S W-2 100 5 27.78
15 EO 1S N+1 120 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -CASSART Guy : 43,89 %16 EO 5C W+2 -710 10 55.56
17 EO 2P E = -110 13 72.22
18 EO 1S E-2 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,59 %19 EO 4CcN+1 690 0 0.00
20 EO 3S S-2 -200 11 61.11
21 EO 4C S = 620 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 47,22 %22 EO 2C E+1 -140 10 55.56
23 EO 3S N-1 -100 11 61.11
24 EO 1S N+3 180 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 46,67 %25 EO 5P E-1 100 6 33.33
26 EO 2C S = 110 2 11.11
27 EO 3CcE = -530 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 57,96 %28 EO 1P S+2 140 2 11.11
29 EO 3S W = -600 8 44.44
30 EO 3C W = -140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 63,70 %31 EO 2C E-1 50 7 38.89
32 EO 3P N+1 170 0 0.00
33 EO 4P S+1 450 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 260,0 / 540 = 48,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
4 ROEGIERS Marga -MICHAUX Hélène : 36,67 % 1 EO 2C S = 110 16 88.89
2 EO 3C N+1 170 7 38.89
3 EO 4C S+2 480 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 45,74 % 4 EO 3S S = 600 12 66.67
5 EO 1S N-2 -200 9 50.00
6 EO 3P S-2 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
5 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 49,07 % 7 EO 3P S-2 -200 16 88.89
8 EO 2S W = -120 1 5.56
9 EO 3S W+2 -660 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
11 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 56,67 %10 EO 3P E-2 200 2 11.11
11 EO 3P N-3 -150 12 66.67
12 EO 3S S = 600 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,59 %16 EO 5C E+1 -680 4 22.22
17 EO 1P E+1 -110 13 72.22
18 EO 2P E = -110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 47,22 %19 EO 4C N+1 450 9 50.00
20 EO 3S N-1 -100 3 16.67
21 EO 4C S+1 650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 46,67 %22 EO 3T W+1 -130 6 33.33
23 EO 3S S-2 -200 16 88.89
24 EO 3S N+1 430 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 57,96 %25 EO 5P E-2 200 2 11.11
26 EO 2C N-1 -100 11 61.11
27 EO 3PcE-3 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 63,70 %28 EO 2S N+1 150 0 0.00
29 EO 3S E = -600 8 44.44
30 EO 5C W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,81 %31 EO 3P E-1 50 7 38.89
32 EO 2P N+1 140 6 33.33
33 EO 4P S+1 450 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 235,0 / 540 = 43,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 45,74 % 1 EO 4C S+1 450 0 0.00
2 EO 3P S+1 170 7 38.89
3 EO 3S S+2 460 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
5 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 49,07 % 4 EO 3S N+2 660 1 5.56
5 EO 1S S-3 -300 17 94.44
6 EO 3P S-2 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
11 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 56,67 % 7 EO 3TcE-2 500 3 16.67
8 EO 2S W = -120 1 5.56
9 EO 5K W+1 -620 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -CASSART Guy : 43,89 %10 EO 2P E+2 -170 14 77.78
11 EO 4CcE-1 100 0 0.00
12 EO 3S S+1 630 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,59 %13 EO 5T N = 600 18 100.00
14 EO 4T W-1 50 13 72.22
15 EO 2C E-3 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 46,67 %19 EO 4C S+1 450 9 50.00
20 EO 3S S-2 -200 11 61.11
21 EO 4C S = 620 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 57,96 %22 EO 3C E = -140 10 55.56
23 EO 3T S+1 130 0 0.00
24 EO 3S N+2 460 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 63,70 %25 EO 5P E-1 100 6 33.33
26 EO 3T N = 110 2 11.11
27 EO 3T N-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,81 %28 EO 1S N+1 120 4 22.22
29 EO 3S W+1 -630 13 72.22
30 EO 3C E+1 -170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
4 ROEGIERS Marga -MICHAUX Hélène : 36,67 %31 EO 1P E+2 -140 16 88.89
32 EO 3P N-2 -100 18 100.00
33 EO 5T N-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 96,30 %
Total : 251,0 / 540 = 46,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 LIGOT Xavier -LENAERTS Pol
5 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 49,07 % 1 EO 3C S+2 200 10 55.56
2 EO 2P S+2 170 7 38.89
3 EO 3S N+2 460 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
11 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 56,67 % 4 EO 3S S+2 660 1 5.56
5 EO 1S S-2 -200 9 50.00
6 EO 2P S-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -CASSART Guy : 43,89 % 7 EO 4P S-3 -300 18 100.00
8 EO 3S W = -400 16 88.89
9 EO 3C S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,59 %10 EO 2P E+1 -140 11 61.11
11 EO 2C W+1 -140 7 38.89
12 EO 1S S+4 210 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 47,22 %13 EO 3S N+4 720 9 50.00
14 EO 3S W-2 100 5 27.78
15 EO 1S N+1 120 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 46,67 %16 EO 5C W+1 -680 4 22.22
17 EO 2C N-2 -100 8 44.44
18 EO 2C S+1 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 63,70 %22 EO 2P N-2 -100 2 11.11
23 EO 3T S = 110 4 22.22
24 EO 4C N+1 450 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,81 %25 EO 5P E-1 100 6 33.33
26 EO 1P W = -80 8 44.44
27 EO 2T N+1 110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
4 ROEGIERS Marga -MICHAUX Hélène : 36,67 %28 EO 2P S = 110 6 33.33
29 EO 3S E+1 -630 13 72.22
30 EO 4C W-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 45,74 %31 EO 3K S = 110 2 11.11
32 EO 3P N = 140 6 33.33
33 EO 4P S+1 450 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
Total : 216,0 / 540 = 40,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
11 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 56,67 % 1 EO 4C S = 420 6 33.33
2 EO 3P S+1 170 7 38.89
3 EO 3S N+2 460 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -CASSART Guy : 43,89 % 4 EO 2K N+2 130 16 88.89
5 EO 1S S-2 -200 9 50.00
6 EO 4T E = -130 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,59 % 7 EO 3C E+1 -170 14 77.78
8 EO 2S E+1 -150 8 44.44
9 EO 3S W+2 -660 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 47,22 %10 EO 2P E = -110 7 38.89
11 EO 3C E+1 -170 15 83.33
12 EO 3S S-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 46,67 %13 EO 6C S = 1430 3 16.67
14 EO 3S E = -400 17 94.44
15 EO 1S N = 90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 57,96 %16 EO 6C W = -1430 15 83.33
17 EO 3T W-2 100 4 22.22
18 EO 1S E-2 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 63,70 %19 EO 3S N+1 430 16 88.89
20 EO 3T S-1 -100 3 16.67
21 EO 4C S = 620 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
4 ROEGIERS Marga -MICHAUX Hélène : 36,67 %25 EO 5KcN-3 -500 14 77.78
26 EO 3T N-2 -200 14 77.78
27 EO 4T N-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
10 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 45,74 %28 EO 1S W = -90 15 83.33
29 EO 5T W = -600 8 44.44
30 EO 4C W+1 -450 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
5 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 49,07 %31 EO 1S W-1 50 7 38.89
32 EO 2S S = 120 10 55.56
33 EO 4P N = 420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 343,0 / 540 = 63,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -GILLAIN Françoise
6 de VIRON Baudouin -CASSART Guy : 43,89 % 1 EO 3C S+1 170 13 72.22
2 EO 3P N+1 170 7 38.89
3 EO 6T S = 920 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,59 % 4 EO 3S S = 600 12 66.67
5 EO 1S S-2 -200 9 50.00
6 EO 2P N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 47,22 % 7 EO 3S N-1 -100 10 55.56
8 EO 2S W+1 -150 8 44.44
9 EO 5T W+2 -640 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 46,67 %10 EO 2P W = -110 7 38.89
11 EO 2P S-2 -100 2 11.11
12 EO 3S S+1 630 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 57,96 %13 EO 4C S+2 680 13 72.22
14 EO 3S W-2 100 5 27.78
15 EO 1S N = 90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 63,70 %16 EO 4C W+2 -680 4 22.22
17 EO 2P E-1 50 6 33.33
18 EO 1S N+2 150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,81 %19 EO 4C S+1 450 9 50.00
20 EO 3S S-2 -200 11 61.11
21 EO 4C S = 620 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
4 ROEGIERS Marga -MICHAUX Hélène : 36,67 %22 EO 3C E+1 -170 15 83.33
23 EO Pass Passe 8 44.44
24 EO 4C N-1 -50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
5 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 49,07 %28 EO 1S N-1 -100 18 100.00
29 EO 2C N-2 -200 4 22.22
30 EO 2K E+1 -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
11 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 56,67 %31 EO 2P E+1 -140 16 88.89
32 EO 4P N-1 -50 15 83.33
33 EO 4P N = 420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
Total : 271,0 / 540 = 50,19 %
|
|