|
Tournoi du 17-10-16
Lundi
1 65,05 6 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal
2 61,88 12 DELTOUR Emile -MOSSERAY Etienne
3 60,39 2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
4 56,55 5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
5 56,09 8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie
6 51,20 13 CASSART Guy -GROSFILS Colette
7 51,11 4 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette
8 50,55 1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
9 49,39 7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
10 43,67 9 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René
11 38,12 3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
12 34,97 10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse
13 31,08 11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 63,88 23 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
2 56,33 21 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
3 56,30 24 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle
4 56,09 14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
5 55,09 16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
6 52,83 20 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert
7 52,35 17 BIOURGE Gabrielle -CHANTRAINE René
8 48,26 15 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel
9 46,42 22 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
10 45,88 18 JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie -ALLARD Michel
11 44,68 26 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin
12 41,70 25 HOGGE Colette -VAN DOOREN Michele
13 30,15 19 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie
PAIRE Nr : 1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 56,09 % 1 NS 1S W = -90 10 45.45
2 NS 3P W-1 50 8 36.36
3 NS 5T W-2 200 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
24 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 56,30 % 4 NS 4C N+1 650 17 77.27
5 NS 3P S = 140 12 54.55
6 NS 3T N = 110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
23 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 63,88 % 7 NS 2K E = -90 8 36.36
8 NS 1S N+1 120 11 50.00
9 NS 4P S = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
22 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,42 %10 NS 3T E+2 -150 12 54.55
11 NS 1P S-2 -100 9 40.91
12 NS 3S N = 600 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 56,33 %13 NS 2K S+1 110 10 45.45
14 NS 4P E+1 -450 5 22.73
15 NS 3K S = 110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
26 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 44,68 %16 NS 2P N-2 -100 15 68.18
17 NS 6P E-2 100 21 95.45
18 NS 3S N-3 -300 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
19 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 30,15 %19 NS 4P W+1 -650 5 22.73
20 NS 1S E = -90 8 36.36
21 NS 2C N+1 140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
18 JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie -ALLARD Michel : 45,88 %22 NS 4P W = -620 12 54.55
23 NS 4C W+3 -710 15 68.18
24 NS 5C W-2 100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
17 BIOURGE Gabrielle -CHANTRAINE René : 52,35 %25 NS 4T E = -130 12.1 55.00
26 NS 2P E+1 -140 4.5 20.45
27 NS 4P N = 420 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 33,48 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 55,09 %28 NS 1S N+1 120 11 50.00
29 NS 4P S = 620 16.5 75.00
30 NS 3K N+2 150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 333,6 / 660 = 50,55 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
15 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 48,26 % 4 NS 4C N+1 650 17 77.27
5 NS 2P S+2 170 21 95.45
6 NS 3T N+1 130 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 80,30 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 56,09 % 7 NS 2K E-1 100 10 45.45
8 NS 1S N+1 120 11 50.00
9 NS 4P N = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
24 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 56,30 %10 NS 3T E+1 -130 20 90.91
11 NS 1S W+3 -180 2 9.09
12 NS 3S N = 600 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
23 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 63,88 %13 NS 1S S+3 180 17 77.27
14 NS 4P W+1 -450 5 22.73
15 NS 3S N-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
22 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,42 %16 NS 3K S-2 -100 15 68.18
17 NS 6P E-1 50 17 77.27
18 NS 3T N-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 56,33 %19 NS 2P W+2 -170 17 77.27
20 NS 3ScE-2 500 22 100.00
21 NS 1S W-3 150 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 92,42 %
25 HOGGE Colette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 41,70 %22 NS 4P W+1 -650 2 9.09
23 NS 4C W+3 -710 15 68.18
24 NS 4C W = -420 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
19 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 30,15 %25 NS 3T E+1 -130 12.1 55.00
26 NS 3K S = 110 16.5 75.00
27 NS 4P N+1 450 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
18 JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie -ALLARD Michel : 45,88 %28 NS 2S N = 120 11 50.00
29 NS 4P S = 620 16.5 75.00
30 NS 3K S+1 130 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
17 BIOURGE Gabrielle -CHANTRAINE René : 52,35 %31 NS 5T W-2 100 20 90.91
32 NS 4P N+1 450 22 100.00
33 NS 2P N = 110 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
Total : 398,6 / 660 = 60,39 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
18 JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie -ALLARD Michel : 45,88 % 1 NS 2S E+1 -150 3 13.64
2 NS 3T N = 110 14 63.64
3 NS 4T W = -130 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 55,09 % 7 NS 2S N+1 150 13 59.09
8 NS 1S N = 90 6 27.27
9 NS 4P N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
25 HOGGE Colette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 41,70 %10 NS 3T E+2 -150 12 54.55
11 NS 2C S-2 -100 9 40.91
12 NS 3S S+3 690 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 56,09 %13 NS 3S N-1 -100 2 9.09
14 NS 4P W+1 -450 5 22.73
15 NS 2K S = 90 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 15,15 %
24 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 56,30 %16 NS 3P N-1 -50 19 86.36
17 NS 6P E = -980 1 4.55
18 NS 3S N-3 -300 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
23 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 63,88 %19 NS 4P W+2 -680 2 9.09
20 NS 2C S-1 -100 5 22.73
21 NS 5K W-1 50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
22 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,42 %22 NS 4P W = -620 12 54.55
23 NS 4C W+3 -710 15 68.18
24 NS 2C W+2 -170 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
26 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 44,68 %25 NS 3CcS-2 -300 4.5 20.45
26 NS 2P E+2 -170 0.1 0.45
27 NS 4P N = 420 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 15,30 %
20 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 52,83 %28 NS 2C E-1 50 5.5 25.00
29 NS 4P S = 620 16.5 75.00
30 NS 3K S+1 130 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 40,15 %
19 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 30,15 %31 NS 3K W+1 -130 12 54.55
32 NS 3S S+1 430 18 81.82
33 NS 3P N-1 -50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
Total : 251,6 / 660 = 38,12 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette
20 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 52,83 % 1 NS 2S E-1 50 15 68.18
2 NS 2C N = 110 14 63.64
3 NS 5T W-2 200 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
19 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 30,15 % 4 NS 4C N+1 650 17 77.27
5 NS 3P S = 140 12 54.55
6 NS 3S N = 400 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
17 BIOURGE Gabrielle -CHANTRAINE René : 52,35 %10 NS 4T E+1 -150 12 54.55
11 NS 2S E+1 -150 5 22.73
12 NS 3S S = 600 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
26 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 44,68 %13 NS 1S N+3 180 17 77.27
14 NS 3S E-1 50 21 95.45
15 NS 1S N+2 150 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
15 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 48,26 %16 NS 4PcN-4 -800 2 9.09
17 NS 4P E+1 -450 10 45.45
18 NS 3S N-2 -200 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 56,09 %19 NS 4C E = -620 10 45.45
20 NS 2C S = 110 13 59.09
21 NS 3C N-1 -100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
24 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 56,30 %22 NS 4P W = -620 12 54.55
23 NS 6C W+1 -1460 2 9.09
24 NS 4C W = -420 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
23 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 63,88 %25 NS 4P W = -620 0.1 0.45
26 NS 2P W+1 -140 4.5 20.45
27 NS 4P N+1 450 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 23,64 %
22 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,42 %28 NS 1S N+2 150 18.6 84.55
29 NS 4P S-1 -100 2.3 10.45
30 NS 3S N+2 460 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 63,18 %
25 HOGGE Colette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 41,70 %31 NS 4K E = -130 12 54.55
32 NS 4P N = 420 12 54.55
33 NS 2P N-1 -50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 337,3 / 660 = 51,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
26 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 44,68 % 1 NS 2S W+1 -150 3 13.64
2 NS 3P W-1 50 8 36.36
3 NS 5K E-1 100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 56,33 % 4 NS 6S S-1 -100 5 22.73
5 NS 2P S+1 140 12 54.55
6 NS 3KcW-2 500 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
20 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 52,83 % 7 NS 3C E-3 300 20 90.91
8 NS 1S N-1 -50 3 13.64
9 NS 4P N = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
18 JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie -ALLARD Michel : 45,88 %13 NS 3S S+1 630 22 100.00
14 NS 3C S-2 -100 15 68.18
15 NS 2P S+2 170 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
17 BIOURGE Gabrielle -CHANTRAINE René : 52,35 %16 NS 4C W = -620 5 22.73
17 NS 4P E+2 -480 4 18.18
18 NS 3S S = 600 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
25 HOGGE Colette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 41,70 %19 NS 4P W = -620 10 45.45
20 NS 2S S+1 150 20 90.91
21 NS 2C N = 110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
15 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 48,26 %22 NS 4P W = -620 12 54.55
23 NS 4C W+3 -710 15 68.18
24 NS 2T W-1 50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 56,09 %25 NS 4P E-1 100 20.8 94.55
26 NS 2K S+2 130 19.7 89.55
27 NS 3P N = 140 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 64,85 %
24 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 56,30 %28 NS 3C E-1 50 5.5 25.00
29 NS 2P S+2 170 7.7 35.00
30 NS 2S S+2 180 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
23 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 63,88 %31 NS 3S E+2 -460 2 9.09
32 NS 3S S+1 430 18 81.82
33 NS 2K S = 90 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
Total : 373,2 / 660 = 56,55 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal
24 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 56,30 % 1 NS 3T N-1 -50 12 54.55
2 NS 3P W-3 150 19 86.36
3 NS 4T E-1 100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
23 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 63,88 % 4 NS 4C N+1 650 17 77.27
5 NS 4K W-3 150 18 81.82
6 NS 3S N-2 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
25 HOGGE Colette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 41,70 % 7 NS 3S N = 600 22 100.00
8 NS 1S N+2 150 19 86.36
9 NS 4P N = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 56,33 %10 NS 3S W = -600 4 18.18
11 NS 2C S = 110 20 90.91
12 NS 3S N+1 630 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
19 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 30,15 %16 NS 4C W-1 100 22 100.00
17 NS 4P E+1 -450 10 45.45
18 NS 3S N-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
18 JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie -ALLARD Michel : 45,88 %19 NS 2T E-1 100 21 95.45
20 NS 2S E = -120 1 4.55
21 NS 3C N = 140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
26 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 44,68 %22 NS 4P W = -620 12 54.55
23 NS 4C W+3 -710 15 68.18
24 NS 2C W+2 -170 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 55,09 %25 NS 2C S-1 -50 17.5 79.55
26 NS 2K S+1 110 16.5 75.00
27 NS 3S N+4 520 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 84,70 %
15 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 48,26 %28 NS 1S N+1 120 11 50.00
29 NS 4P S+1 650 21.9 99.55
30 NS 3K S+1 130 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 56,09 %31 NS 3K W+1 -130 12 54.55
32 NS 3S S+1 430 18 81.82
33 NS 3C N-1 -50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
Total : 429,3 / 660 = 65,05 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
15 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 48,26 % 1 NS 2C W+2 -170 0 0.00
2 NS 2P W+1 -140 0 0.00
3 NS 5T W-2 200 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 56,09 % 4 NS 6C N-1 -100 5 22.73
5 NS 3T E-1 50 1 4.55
6 NS 3T N = 110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
24 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 56,30 % 7 NS 2P S-1 -100 5 22.73
8 NS 2K W-3 150 19 86.36
9 NS 4P N = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
26 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 44,68 %10 NS 3T E+1 -130 20 90.91
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 0 0.00
12 NS 3S S = 600 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
22 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,42 %13 NS 2K S+1 110 10 45.45
14 NS 4C S-2 -100 15 68.18
15 NS 2P S+1 140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
20 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 52,83 %19 NS 4CcE = -790 0 0.00
20 NS 1C S+2 140 18 81.82
21 NS 4K W = -130 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
19 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 30,15 %22 NS 4P W-2 200 22 100.00
23 NS 4C W+3 -710 15 68.18
24 NS 2S E-2 100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
18 JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie -ALLARD Michel : 45,88 %25 NS 4P W-1 100 20.8 94.55
26 NS 2T W-2 200 21.9 99.55
27 NS 4P N+2 480 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 91,21 %
25 HOGGE Colette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 41,70 %28 NS 1S N+2 150 18.6 84.55
29 NS 2P S+2 170 7.7 35.00
30 NS 3K S+1 130 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 55,09 %31 NS 6K W-1 50 16 72.73
32 NS 5K N = 400 7 31.82
33 NS 2P N-2 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
Total : 326,0 / 660 = 49,39 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie
17 BIOURGE Gabrielle -CHANTRAINE René : 52,35 % 1 NS 3S W-3 150 20 90.91
2 NS 1P W-1 50 8 36.36
3 NS 5T W-2 200 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 55,09 % 4 NS 6C N-1 -100 5 22.73
5 NS 2P S = 110 5 22.73
6 NS 3T N = 110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
15 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 48,26 % 7 NS 3T S-1 -100 5 22.73
8 NS 1S N+1 120 11 50.00
9 NS 4P N+1 450 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 56,09 %10 NS 4T E = -130 20 90.91
11 NS 2C S = 110 20 90.91
12 NS 3S N = 600 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
24 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 56,30 %13 NS 2C N+1 140 14 63.64
14 NS 4P E+1 -450 5 22.73
15 NS 4P N = 620 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
25 HOGGE Colette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 41,70 %16 NS 3K S-1 -50 19 86.36
17 NS 6P E-2 100 21 95.45
18 NS 3T N-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 84,85 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 56,33 %22 NS 4P W+1 -650 2 9.09
23 NS 6C W+1 -1460 2 9.09
24 NS 4C W = -420 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 10,61 %
20 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 52,83 %25 NS 4CcS-3 -500 2.3 10.45
26 NS 3P E = -140 4.5 20.45
27 NS 4P N+1 450 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 26,97 %
19 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 30,15 %28 NS 1S N+2 150 18.6 84.55
29 NS 3P S+2 200 11 50.00
30 NS 3S N+2 460 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 76,36 %
26 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 44,68 %31 NS 3S E-2 100 20 90.91
32 NS 4P N = 420 12 54.55
33 NS 3T E-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
Total : 370,2 / 660 = 56,09 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René
19 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 30,15 % 1 NS 3S W-3 150 20 90.91
2 NS 2C N = 110 14 63.64
3 NS 4T W = -130 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
25 HOGGE Colette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 41,70 % 4 NS 5C N-1 -100 5 22.73
5 NS 3P S+1 170 21 95.45
6 NS 3T N = 110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
17 BIOURGE Gabrielle -CHANTRAINE René : 52,35 % 7 NS 3T S-2 -200 2 9.09
8 NS 1S N+1 120 11 50.00
9 NS 4P N = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 55,09 %10 NS 3PcS-1 -200 6 27.27
11 NS 1S E = -90 12 54.55
12 NS 3S S+1 630 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
15 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 48,26 %13 NS 3S S-3 -300 0 0.00
14 NS 4CcS-3 -500 0 0.00
15 NS 2K S+2 130 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 56,09 %16 NS 5KcS-5 -1100 0 0.00
17 NS 4P E+1 -450 10 45.45
18 NS 3S N-3 -300 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
26 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 44,68 %19 NS 4C E-1 100 21 95.45
20 NS 2C S = 110 13 59.09
21 NS 3C N = 140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
22 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,42 %25 NS 3C S-3 -150 8.8 40.00
26 NS 1S S = 90 11 50.00
27 NS 4P N-1 -50 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 30,15 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 56,33 %28 NS 3S N-1 -100 2.3 10.45
29 NS 4P S = 620 16.5 75.00
30 NS 3S S+1 430 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
20 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 52,83 %31 NS 3S E+3 -490 0 0.00
32 NS 4P N = 420 12 54.55
33 NS 2S S-1 -50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
Total : 288,2 / 660 = 43,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse
21 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 56,33 % 1 NS 2C W+1 -140 7 31.82
2 NS 2P W = -110 3 13.64
3 NS 3S W+2 -660 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
20 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 52,83 % 4 NS 4C N+1 650 17 77.27
5 NS 2P S = 110 5 22.73
6 NS 3S N-1 -50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
26 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 44,68 % 7 NS 1S N+2 150 13 59.09
8 NS 2S N-1 -50 3 13.64
9 NS 4P N = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
18 JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie -ALLARD Michel : 45,88 %10 NS 3T E+2 -150 12 54.55
11 NS 1S N-3 -150 5 22.73
12 NS 3S S = 600 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
17 BIOURGE Gabrielle -CHANTRAINE René : 52,35 %13 NS 3T E-1 100 6 27.27
14 NS 3P E+2 -200 12 54.55
15 NS 2P S+1 140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 55,09 %16 NS 3C W+2 -200 10 45.45
17 NS 6P E = -980 1 4.55
18 NS 3TcN-2 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
15 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 48,26 %19 NS 3C E+1 -170 17 77.27
20 NS 1C S = 80 10 45.45
21 NS 3K W+1 -130 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 56,09 %22 NS 4P W = -620 12 54.55
23 NS 6S W = -1440 6 27.27
24 NS 4C W = -420 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
23 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 63,88 %28 NS 2C E+1 -140 0.1 0.45
29 NS 4P S-1 -100 2.3 10.45
30 NS 3S S = 400 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 26,97 %
22 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,42 %31 NS 3S E-2 100 20 90.91
32 NS 3K N+3 170 4 18.18
33 NS 3S S-1 -50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 230,8 / 660 = 34,97 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
23 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 63,88 % 1 NS 2C W+1 -140 7 31.82
2 NS 1P W+1 -110 3 13.64
3 NS 3S E+4 -720 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,15 %
22 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,42 % 4 NS 6C N-2 -200 0 0.00
5 NS 3T E-1 50 1 4.55
6 NS 1P W+1 -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 1,52 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 56,33 % 7 NS 3T S-3 -300 0 0.00
8 NS 5K S-3 -150 0 0.00
9 NS 4P N = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 15,15 %
20 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 52,83 %10 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 9.09
11 NS 2C S = 110 20 90.91
12 NS 3S N = 600 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
25 HOGGE Colette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 41,70 %13 NS 2K S+1 110 10 45.45
14 NS 4P E = -420 10 45.45
15 NS 3K S+1 130 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
18 JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie -ALLARD Michel : 45,88 %16 NS 3KcS-3 -500 8 36.36
17 NS 4P E+1 -450 10 45.45
18 NS 3S N-3 -300 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
17 BIOURGE Gabrielle -CHANTRAINE René : 52,35 %19 NS 4P W+1 -650 5 22.73
20 NS 2C S-1 -100 5 22.73
21 NS 4K W = -130 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 55,09 %22 NS 4P W+1 -650 2 9.09
23 NS 5C W+2 -710 15 68.18
24 NS 2S N-1 -50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
15 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 48,26 %25 NS 2K N-2 -100 15.4 70.00
26 NS 3P E-1 100 13.2 60.00
27 NS 4P N+2 480 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 69,85 %
24 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 56,30 %31 NS 5K W = -400 6 27.27
32 NS 4P N-1 -50 0 0.00
33 NS 3K S-1 -50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
Total : 205,1 / 660 = 31,08 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 DELTOUR Emile -MOSSERAY Etienne
25 HOGGE Colette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 41,70 % 1 NS 1S W-1 50 15 68.18
2 NS 2C N+2 170 22 100.00
3 NS 4T W = -130 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
18 JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie -ALLARD Michel : 45,88 % 4 NS 4C N = 620 10 45.45
5 NS 3C N = 140 12 54.55
6 NS 3K N+1 130 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
22 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,42 % 7 NS 3K E-2 200 17 77.27
8 NS 1S N+2 150 19 86.36
9 NS 4P N+1 450 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
15 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel : 48,26 %10 NS 2T E+3 -150 12 54.55
11 NS 1S N-1 -50 15 68.18
12 NS 3S N+1 630 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
19 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 30,15 %13 NS 1S S+4 210 20 90.91
14 NS 5K E-1 50 21 95.45
15 NS 600 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 92,42 %
23 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 63,88 %16 NS 4C E = -620 5 22.73
17 NS 6P E-1 50 17 77.27
18 NS 3S N-3 -300 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 55,09 %19 NS 3C E+2 -200 14 63.64
20 NS 2S S = 120 16 72.73
21 NS 2C N-1 -100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
20 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 52,83 %22 NS 4P W = -620 12 54.55
23 NS 5C W+2 -710 15 68.18
24 NS 3S W-2 100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
17 BIOURGE Gabrielle -CHANTRAINE René : 52,35 %28 NS 1S N+2 150 18.6 84.55
29 NS 4P S-1 -100 2.3 10.45
30 NS 3K S+1 130 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 38,48 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 56,33 %31 NS 5K W+1 -420 4 18.18
32 NS 3P N = 140 2 9.09
33 NS 2P N = 110 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
Total : 408,4 / 660 = 61,88 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 CASSART Guy -GROSFILS Colette
22 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,42 % 1 NS 3S W-3 150 20 90.91
2 NS 3P W-3 150 19 86.36
3 NS 4T W-1 100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
26 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 44,68 % 4 NS 4C N+1 650 17 77.27
5 NS 3P S = 140 12 54.55
6 NS 3KcW-1 200 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
19 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 30,15 % 7 NS 3KcE-1 200 17 77.27
8 NS 1S N+2 150 19 86.36
9 NS 4P N = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
23 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 63,88 %10 NS 3S W+2 -660 0 0.00
11 NS 2K N-1 -50 15 68.18
12 NS 3S N = 600 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 55,09 %13 NS 1S S = 90 4 18.18
14 NS 3C S-1 -50 18 81.82
15 NS 2K S = 90 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
20 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 52,83 %16 NS 3C W+1 -170 12 54.55
17 NS 4P E+1 -450 10 45.45
18 NS 3S N = 600 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
24 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 56,30 %19 NS 4C W = -620 10 45.45
20 NS 1S E+1 -120 1 4.55
21 NS 2C N-1 -100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
17 BIOURGE Gabrielle -CHANTRAINE René : 52,35 %22 NS 5P W-1 100 20 90.91
23 NS 6C W+1 -1460 2 9.09
24 NS 3C W-1 50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 56,33 %25 NS 3P E+1 -170 6.6 30.00
26 NS 2P E = -110 8.8 40.00
27 NS 4P N+2 480 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 49,85 %
18 JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie -ALLARD Michel : 45,88 %31 NS 3K E+2 -150 8 36.36
32 NS 5K N = 400 7 31.82
33 NS 4P N-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
Total : 337,9 / 660 = 51,20 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,55 % 1 EO 1S W = -90 12 54.55
2 EO 3P W-1 50 14 63.64
3 EO 5T W-2 200 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 49,39 % 4 EO 6C N-1 -100 17 77.27
5 EO 3T E-1 50 21 95.45
6 EO 3T N = 110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,39 % 7 EO 2K E-1 100 12 54.55
8 EO 1S N+1 120 11 50.00
9 EO 4P N = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 56,09 %10 EO 4T E = -130 2 9.09
11 EO 2C S = 110 2 9.09
12 EO 3S N = 600 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 38,12 %13 EO 3S N-1 -100 20 90.91
14 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 77.27
15 EO 2K S = 90 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 84,85 %
9 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 43,67 %16 EO 5KcS-5 -1100 22 100.00
17 EO 4P E+1 -450 12 54.55
18 EO 3S N-3 -300 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
4 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 51,11 %19 EO 4C E = -620 12 54.55
20 EO 2C S = 110 9 40.91
21 EO 3C N-1 -100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 34,97 %22 EO 4P W = -620 10 45.45
23 EO 6S W = -1440 16 72.73
24 EO 4C W = -420 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,55 %25 EO 4P E-1 100 1.2 5.45
26 EO 2K S+2 130 2.3 10.45
27 EO 3P N = 140 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 35,15 %
6 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 65,05 %31 EO 3K W+1 -130 10 45.45
32 EO 3S S+1 430 4 18.18
33 EO 3C N-1 -50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
Total : 370,2 / 660 = 56,09 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 ARICKX Roger -MASSAUX Joel
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 49,39 % 1 EO 2C W+2 -170 22 100.00
2 EO 2P W+1 -140 22 100.00
3 EO 5T W-2 200 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,39 % 4 EO 4C N+1 650 5 22.73
5 EO 2P S+2 170 1 4.55
6 EO 3T N+1 130 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 19,70 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 56,09 % 7 EO 3T S-1 -100 17 77.27
8 EO 1S N+1 120 11 50.00
9 EO 4P N+1 450 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
12 DELTOUR Emile -MOSSERAY Etienne : 61,88 %10 EO 2T E+3 -150 10 45.45
11 EO 1S N-1 -50 7 31.82
12 EO 3S N+1 630 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
9 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 43,67 %13 EO 3S S-3 -300 22 100.00
14 EO 4CcS-3 -500 22 100.00
15 EO 2K S+2 130 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
4 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 51,11 %16 EO 4PcN-4 -800 20 90.91
17 EO 4P E+1 -450 12 54.55
18 EO 3S N-2 -200 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 34,97 %19 EO 3C E+1 -170 5 22.73
20 EO 1C S = 80 12 54.55
21 EO 3K W+1 -130 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,55 %22 EO 4P W = -620 10 45.45
23 EO 4C W+3 -710 7 31.82
24 EO 2T W-1 50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 31,08 %25 EO 2K N-2 -100 6.6 30.00
26 EO 3P E-1 100 8.8 40.00
27 EO 4P N+2 480 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 30,15 %
6 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 65,05 %28 EO 1S N+1 120 11 50.00
29 EO 4P S+1 650 0.1 0.45
30 EO 3K S+1 130 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
Total : 318,5 / 660 = 48,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 56,09 % 4 EO 6C N-1 -100 17 77.27
5 EO 2P S = 110 17 77.27
6 EO 3T N = 110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 38,12 % 7 EO 2S N+1 150 9 40.91
8 EO 1S N = 90 16 72.73
9 EO 4P N-1 -50 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
9 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 43,67 %10 EO 3PcS-1 -200 16 72.73
11 EO 1S E = -90 10 45.45
12 EO 3S S+1 630 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
13 CASSART Guy -GROSFILS Colette : 51,20 %13 EO 1S S = 90 18 81.82
14 EO 3C S-1 -50 4 18.18
15 EO 2K S = 90 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 34,97 %16 EO 3C W+2 -200 12 54.55
17 EO 6P E = -980 21 95.45
18 EO 3TcN-2 -500 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
12 DELTOUR Emile -MOSSERAY Etienne : 61,88 %19 EO 3C E+2 -200 8 36.36
20 EO 2S S = 120 6 27.27
21 EO 2C N-1 -100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 31,08 %22 EO 4P W+1 -650 20 90.91
23 EO 5C W+2 -710 7 31.82
24 EO 2S N-1 -50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
6 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 65,05 %25 EO 2C S-1 -50 4.5 20.45
26 EO 2K S+1 110 5.5 25.00
27 EO 3S N+4 520 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 15,30 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,55 %28 EO 1S N+1 120 11 50.00
29 EO 4P S = 620 5.5 25.00
30 EO 3K N+2 150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 49,39 %31 EO 6K W-1 50 6 27.27
32 EO 5K N = 400 15 68.18
33 EO 2P N-2 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
Total : 363,6 / 660 = 55,09 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 BIOURGE Gabrielle -CHANTRAINE René
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 56,09 % 1 EO 3S W-3 150 2 9.09
2 EO 1P W-1 50 14 63.64
3 EO 5T W-2 200 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
9 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 43,67 % 7 EO 3T S-2 -200 20 90.91
8 EO 1S N+1 120 11 50.00
9 EO 4P N = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
4 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 51,11 %10 EO 4T E+1 -150 10 45.45
11 EO 2S E+1 -150 17 77.27
12 EO 3S S = 600 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 34,97 %13 EO 3T E-1 100 16 72.73
14 EO 3P E+2 -200 10 45.45
15 EO 2P S+1 140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,55 %16 EO 4C W = -620 17 77.27
17 EO 4P E+2 -480 18 81.82
18 EO 3S S = 600 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 31,08 %19 EO 4P W+1 -650 17 77.27
20 EO 2C S-1 -100 17 77.27
21 EO 4K W = -130 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
13 CASSART Guy -GROSFILS Colette : 51,20 %22 EO 5P W-1 100 2 9.09
23 EO 6C W+1 -1460 20 90.91
24 EO 3C W-1 50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,55 %25 EO 4T E = -130 9.9 45.00
26 EO 2P E+1 -140 17.5 79.55
27 EO 4P N = 420 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 66,52 %
12 DELTOUR Emile -MOSSERAY Etienne : 61,88 %28 EO 1S N+2 150 3.4 15.45
29 EO 4P S-1 -100 19.7 89.55
30 EO 3K S+1 130 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 61,52 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,39 %31 EO 5T W-2 100 2 9.09
32 EO 4P N+1 450 0 0.00
33 EO 2P N = 110 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
Total : 345,5 / 660 = 52,35 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie -ALLARD Michel
3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 38,12 % 1 EO 2S E+1 -150 19 86.36
2 EO 3T N = 110 8 36.36
3 EO 4T W = -130 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
12 DELTOUR Emile -MOSSERAY Etienne : 61,88 % 4 EO 4C N = 620 12 54.55
5 EO 3C N = 140 10 45.45
6 EO 3K N+1 130 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 34,97 %10 EO 3T E+2 -150 10 45.45
11 EO 1S N-3 -150 17 77.27
12 EO 3S S = 600 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,55 %13 EO 3S S+1 630 0 0.00
14 EO 3C S-2 -100 7 31.82
15 EO 2P S+2 170 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 31,08 %16 EO 3KcS-3 -500 14 63.64
17 EO 4P E+1 -450 12 54.55
18 EO 3S N-3 -300 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
6 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 65,05 %19 EO 2T E-1 100 1 4.55
20 EO 2S E = -120 21 95.45
21 EO 3C N = 140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,55 %22 EO 4P W = -620 10 45.45
23 EO 4C W+3 -710 7 31.82
24 EO 5C W-2 100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 49,39 %25 EO 4P W-1 100 1.2 5.45
26 EO 2T W-2 200 0.1 0.45
27 EO 4P N+2 480 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 8,79 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,39 %28 EO 2S N = 120 11 50.00
29 EO 4P S = 620 5.5 25.00
30 EO 3K S+1 130 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
13 CASSART Guy -GROSFILS Colette : 51,20 %31 EO 3K E+2 -150 14 63.64
32 EO 5K N = 400 15 68.18
33 EO 4P N-3 -150 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
Total : 302,8 / 660 = 45,88 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie
9 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 43,67 % 1 EO 3S W-3 150 2 9.09
2 EO 2C N = 110 8 36.36
3 EO 4T W = -130 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
4 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 51,11 % 4 EO 4C N+1 650 5 22.73
5 EO 3P S = 140 10 45.45
6 EO 3S N = 400 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
13 CASSART Guy -GROSFILS Colette : 51,20 % 7 EO 3KcE-1 200 5 22.73
8 EO 1S N+2 150 3 13.64
9 EO 4P N = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
12 DELTOUR Emile -MOSSERAY Etienne : 61,88 %13 EO 1S S+4 210 2 9.09
14 EO 5K E-1 50 1 4.55
15 EO 600 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 7,58 %
6 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 65,05 %16 EO 4C W-1 100 0 0.00
17 EO 4P E+1 -450 12 54.55
18 EO 3S N-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,55 %19 EO 4P W+1 -650 17 77.27
20 EO 1S E = -90 14 63.64
21 EO 2C N+1 140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 49,39 %22 EO 4P W-2 200 0 0.00
23 EO 4C W+3 -710 7 31.82
24 EO 2S E-2 100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,39 %25 EO 3T E+1 -130 9.9 45.00
26 EO 3K S = 110 5.5 25.00
27 EO 4P N+1 450 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 56,09 %28 EO 1S N+2 150 3.4 15.45
29 EO 3P S+2 200 11 50.00
30 EO 3S N+2 460 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 23,64 %
3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 38,12 %31 EO 3K W+1 -130 10 45.45
32 EO 3S S+1 430 4 18.18
33 EO 3P N-1 -50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
Total : 199,0 / 660 = 30,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert
4 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 51,11 % 1 EO 2S E-1 50 7 31.82
2 EO 2C N = 110 8 36.36
3 EO 5T W-2 200 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 34,97 % 4 EO 4C N+1 650 5 22.73
5 EO 2P S = 110 17 77.27
6 EO 3S N-1 -50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,55 % 7 EO 3C E-3 300 2 9.09
8 EO 1S N-1 -50 19 86.36
9 EO 4P N = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 31,08 %10 EO 3S E+1 -630 20 90.91
11 EO 2C S = 110 2 9.09
12 EO 3S N = 600 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
13 CASSART Guy -GROSFILS Colette : 51,20 %16 EO 3C W+1 -170 10 45.45
17 EO 4P E+1 -450 12 54.55
18 EO 3S N = 600 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 49,39 %19 EO 4CcE = -790 22 100.00
20 EO 1C S+2 140 4 18.18
21 EO 4K W = -130 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
12 DELTOUR Emile -MOSSERAY Etienne : 61,88 %22 EO 4P W = -620 10 45.45
23 EO 5C W+2 -710 7 31.82
24 EO 3S W-2 100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 56,09 %25 EO 4CcS-3 -500 19.7 89.55
26 EO 3P E = -140 17.5 79.55
27 EO 4P N+1 450 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 73,03 %
3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 38,12 %28 EO 2C E-1 50 16.5 75.00
29 EO 4P S = 620 5.5 25.00
30 EO 3K S+1 130 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 59,85 %
9 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 43,67 %31 EO 3S E+3 -490 22 100.00
32 EO 4P N = 420 10 45.45
33 EO 2S S-1 -50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
Total : 348,7 / 660 = 52,83 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 34,97 % 1 EO 2C W+1 -140 15 68.18
2 EO 2P W = -110 19 86.36
3 EO 3S W+2 -660 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,55 % 4 EO 6S S-1 -100 17 77.27
5 EO 2P S+1 140 10 45.45
6 EO 3KcW-2 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 31,08 % 7 EO 3T S-3 -300 22 100.00
8 EO 5K S-3 -150 22 100.00
9 EO 4P N = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 84,85 %
6 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 65,05 %10 EO 3S W = -600 18 81.82
11 EO 2C S = 110 2 9.09
12 EO 3S N+1 630 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,55 %13 EO 2K S+1 110 12 54.55
14 EO 4P E+1 -450 17 77.27
15 EO 3K S = 110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,39 %19 EO 2P W+2 -170 5 22.73
20 EO 3ScE-2 500 0 0.00
21 EO 1S W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 7,58 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 56,09 %22 EO 4P W+1 -650 20 90.91
23 EO 6C W+1 -1460 20 90.91
24 EO 4C W = -420 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 89,39 %
13 CASSART Guy -GROSFILS Colette : 51,20 %25 EO 3P E+1 -170 15.4 70.00
26 EO 2P E = -110 13.2 60.00
27 EO 4P N+2 480 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 50,15 %
9 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 43,67 %28 EO 3S N-1 -100 19.7 89.55
29 EO 4P S = 620 5.5 25.00
30 EO 3S S+1 430 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
12 DELTOUR Emile -MOSSERAY Etienne : 61,88 %31 EO 5K W+1 -420 18 81.82
32 EO 3P N = 140 20 90.91
33 EO 2P N = 110 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
Total : 371,8 / 660 = 56,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
13 CASSART Guy -GROSFILS Colette : 51,20 % 1 EO 3S W-3 150 2 9.09
2 EO 3P W-3 150 3 13.64
3 EO 4T W-1 100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 31,08 % 4 EO 6C N-2 -200 22 100.00
5 EO 3T E-1 50 21 95.45
6 EO 1P W+1 -110 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 98,48 %
12 DELTOUR Emile -MOSSERAY Etienne : 61,88 % 7 EO 3K E-2 200 5 22.73
8 EO 1S N+2 150 3 13.64
9 EO 4P N+1 450 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,55 %10 EO 3T E+2 -150 10 45.45
11 EO 1P S-2 -100 13 59.09
12 EO 3S N = 600 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 49,39 %13 EO 2K S+1 110 12 54.55
14 EO 4C S-2 -100 7 31.82
15 EO 2P S+1 140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,39 %16 EO 3K S-2 -100 7 31.82
17 EO 6P E-1 50 5 22.73
18 EO 3T N-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 38,12 %22 EO 4P W = -620 10 45.45
23 EO 4C W+3 -710 7 31.82
24 EO 2C W+2 -170 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
9 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 43,67 %25 EO 3C S-3 -150 13.2 60.00
26 EO 1S S = 90 11 50.00
27 EO 4P N-1 -50 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 69,85 %
4 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 51,11 %28 EO 1S N+2 150 3.4 15.45
29 EO 4P S-1 -100 19.7 89.55
30 EO 3S N+2 460 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 36,82 %
10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 34,97 %31 EO 3S E-2 100 2 9.09
32 EO 3K N+3 170 18 81.82
33 EO 3S S-1 -50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 306,4 / 660 = 46,42 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 31,08 % 1 EO 2C W+1 -140 15 68.18
2 EO 1P W+1 -110 19 86.36
3 EO 3S E+4 -720 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 84,85 %
6 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 65,05 % 4 EO 4C N+1 650 5 22.73
5 EO 4K W-3 150 4 18.18
6 EO 3S N-2 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,55 % 7 EO 2K E = -90 14 63.64
8 EO 1S N+1 120 11 50.00
9 EO 4P S = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
13 CASSART Guy -GROSFILS Colette : 51,20 %10 EO 3S W+2 -660 22 100.00
11 EO 2K N-1 -50 7 31.82
12 EO 3S N = 600 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,39 %13 EO 1S S+3 180 5 22.73
14 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 77.27
15 EO 3S N-2 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
12 DELTOUR Emile -MOSSERAY Etienne : 61,88 %16 EO 4C E = -620 17 77.27
17 EO 6P E-1 50 5 22.73
18 EO 3S N-3 -300 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 38,12 %19 EO 4P W+2 -680 20 90.91
20 EO 2C S-1 -100 17 77.27
21 EO 5K W-1 50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
4 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 51,11 %25 EO 4P W = -620 21.9 99.55
26 EO 2P W+1 -140 17.5 79.55
27 EO 4P N+1 450 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 76,36 %
10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 34,97 %28 EO 2C E+1 -140 21.9 99.55
29 EO 4P S-1 -100 19.7 89.55
30 EO 3S S = 400 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 73,03 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,55 %31 EO 3S E+2 -460 20 90.91
32 EO 3S S+1 430 4 18.18
33 EO 2K S = 90 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
Total : 421,6 / 660 = 63,88 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle
6 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 65,05 % 1 EO 3T N-1 -50 10 45.45
2 EO 3P W-3 150 3 13.64
3 EO 4T E-1 100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,55 % 4 EO 4C N+1 650 5 22.73
5 EO 3P S = 140 10 45.45
6 EO 3T N = 110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 49,39 % 7 EO 2P S-1 -100 17 77.27
8 EO 2K W-3 150 3 13.64
9 EO 4P N = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,39 %10 EO 3T E+1 -130 2 9.09
11 EO 1S W+3 -180 20 90.91
12 EO 3S N = 600 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 56,09 %13 EO 2C N+1 140 8 36.36
14 EO 4P E+1 -450 17 77.27
15 EO 4P N = 620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 38,12 %16 EO 3P N-1 -50 3 13.64
17 EO 6P E = -980 21 95.45
18 EO 3S N-3 -300 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
13 CASSART Guy -GROSFILS Colette : 51,20 %19 EO 4C W = -620 12 54.55
20 EO 1S E+1 -120 21 95.45
21 EO 2C N-1 -100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
4 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 51,11 %22 EO 4P W = -620 10 45.45
23 EO 6C W+1 -1460 20 90.91
24 EO 4C W = -420 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,55 %28 EO 3C E-1 50 16.5 75.00
29 EO 2P S+2 170 14.3 65.00
30 EO 2S S+2 180 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 31,08 %31 EO 5K W = -400 16 72.73
32 EO 4P N-1 -50 22 100.00
33 EO 3K S-1 -50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
Total : 371,6 / 660 = 56,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 25 HOGGE Colette -VAN DOOREN Michele
12 DELTOUR Emile -MOSSERAY Etienne : 61,88 % 1 EO 1S W-1 50 7 31.82
2 EO 2C N+2 170 0 0.00
3 EO 4T W = -130 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
9 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 43,67 % 4 EO 5C N-1 -100 17 77.27
5 EO 3P S+1 170 1 4.55
6 EO 3T N = 110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
6 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 65,05 % 7 EO 3S N = 600 0 0.00
8 EO 1S N+2 150 3 13.64
9 EO 4P N = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 38,12 %10 EO 3T E+2 -150 10 45.45
11 EO 2C S-2 -100 13 59.09
12 EO 3S S+3 690 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 31,08 %13 EO 2K S+1 110 12 54.55
14 EO 4P E = -420 12 54.55
15 EO 3K S+1 130 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 56,09 %16 EO 3K S-1 -50 3 13.64
17 EO 6P E-2 100 1 4.55
18 EO 3T N-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 15,15 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,55 %19 EO 4P W = -620 12 54.55
20 EO 2S S+1 150 2 9.09
21 EO 2C N = 110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,39 %22 EO 4P W+1 -650 20 90.91
23 EO 4C W+3 -710 7 31.82
24 EO 4C W = -420 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 49,39 %28 EO 1S N+2 150 3.4 15.45
29 EO 2P S+2 170 14.3 65.00
30 EO 3K S+1 130 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
4 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 51,11 %31 EO 4K E = -130 10 45.45
32 EO 4P N = 420 10 45.45
33 EO 2P N-1 -50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 275,2 / 660 = 41,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 26 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,55 % 1 EO 2S W+1 -150 19 86.36
2 EO 3P W-1 50 14 63.64
3 EO 5K E-1 100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
13 CASSART Guy -GROSFILS Colette : 51,20 % 4 EO 4C N+1 650 5 22.73
5 EO 3P S = 140 10 45.45
6 EO 3KcW-1 200 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 34,97 % 7 EO 1S N+2 150 9 40.91
8 EO 2S N-1 -50 19 86.36
9 EO 4P N = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 49,39 %10 EO 3T E+1 -130 2 9.09
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 22 100.00
12 EO 3S S = 600 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
4 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 51,11 %13 EO 1S N+3 180 5 22.73
14 EO 3S E-1 50 1 4.55
15 EO 1S N+2 150 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,55 %16 EO 2P N-2 -100 7 31.82
17 EO 6P E-2 100 1 4.55
18 EO 3S N-3 -300 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
9 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 43,67 %19 EO 4C E-1 100 1 4.55
20 EO 2C S = 110 9 40.91
21 EO 3C N = 140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
6 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 65,05 %22 EO 4P W = -620 10 45.45
23 EO 4C W+3 -710 7 31.82
24 EO 2C W+2 -170 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 38,12 %25 EO 3CcS-2 -300 17.5 79.55
26 EO 2P E+2 -170 21.9 99.55
27 EO 4P N = 420 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 84,70 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 56,09 %31 EO 3S E-2 100 2 9.09
32 EO 4P N = 420 10 45.45
33 EO 3T E-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
Total : 294,9 / 660 = 44,68 %
|
|