|
Tournoi du 18-08-14
18/08
1 61,11 5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
2 57,59 3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
3 56,85 1 PADOU Bernard -DEFLINES Etienne
4 54,81 4 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand
5 52,41 9 de NICOLAS Bernard -JASSOGNE Jacqueline
6 49,44 6 STEED Adrian -GOBBE Amélie
7 42,59 8 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse
8 41,85 10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
9 41,67 7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
~ 41,67 2 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 63,70 14 COULIE Joelle -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
2 55,00 19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
3 53,52 15 GROSFILS Colette -PAQUET Anne
4 50,93 16 Coolen -PARMENTIER Richard
5 49,63 11 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier
6 47,96 18 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude
7 47,78 12 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David
8 46,67 20 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
9 44,26 17 LAENENS René -VAN GYSEGHEM
10 40,56 13 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
PAIRE Nr : 1 PADOU Bernard -DEFLINES Etienne
11 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 49,63 % 1 NS 1S N+3 180 6 33.33
2 NS 3S N = 600 17 94.44
3 NS 3T S-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
13 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 40,56 % 4 NS 3S W-1 100 16 88.89
5 NS 3C N-1 -100 5 27.78
6 NS 4P N+1 450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 47,78 % 7 NS 3P N = 140 6 33.33
8 NS 3S N+1 430 12 66.67
9 NS 2C S+1 140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
16 Coolen -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,93 %10 NS 3S E+1 -630 0 0.00
11 NS 5KcW-1 100 18 100.00
12 NS 3S S+1 630 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
17 LAENENS René -VAN GYSEGHEM : 44,26 %13 NS 4C N = 620 10 55.56
14 NS 1TcE = -140 1 5.56
15 NS 3S E-3 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
18 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 47,96 %16 NS 3P W+1 -170 7 38.89
17 NS 3TcN-2 -300 0 0.00
18 NS 5P E = -450 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,00 %19 NS 3S E+2 -660 2 11.11
20 NS 6S S = 1440 18 100.00
21 NS 2P S+2 170 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
20 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,67 %22 NS 4P S = 420 13 72.22
23 NS 3P E-3 300 18 100.00
24 NS 4C W+2 -480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
14 COULIE Joelle -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 63,70 %25 NS 3S N+3 490 5 27.78
26 NS 4C N-1 -100 11 61.11
27 NS 3P N-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
15 GROSFILS Colette -PAQUET Anne : 53,52 %28 NS 4P S = 620 11 61.11
29 NS 4C W = -620 4 22.22
30 NS 3T S+2 150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 307,0 / 540 = 56,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette
13 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 40,56 % 1 NS 3S N+2 460 14 77.78
2 NS 2C E-2 100 3 16.67
3 NS 3T S-3 -150 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 47,78 % 4 NS 2S W+1 -150 3 16.67
5 NS 3K E = -110 1 5.56
6 NS 4T S+1 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
11 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 49,63 % 7 NS 2C E-2 200 11 61.11
8 NS 4P N = 420 7 38.89
9 NS 2C N = 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
20 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,67 %10 NS 2K W+2 -130 12 66.67
11 NS 2CcN-2 -300 12 66.67
12 NS 3S N+1 630 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
14 COULIE Joelle -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 63,70 %13 NS 4C N = 620 10 55.56
14 NS 3S E-1 50 10 55.56
15 NS 3S N-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
15 GROSFILS Colette -PAQUET Anne : 53,52 %16 NS 3P W+1 -170 7 38.89
17 NS 2S E = -120 4 22.22
18 NS 4C E = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
16 Coolen -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,93 %19 NS 6C W-2 200 18 100.00
20 NS 4C N+2 680 8 44.44
21 NS 3P N = 140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
17 LAENENS René -VAN GYSEGHEM : 44,26 %22 NS 4P N-1 -50 3 16.67
23 NS 2C N-1 -100 2 11.11
24 NS 2PcN-4 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
18 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 47,96 %25 NS 4C N+1 450 0 0.00
26 NS 3S S-1 -100 11 61.11
27 NS 4T E = -130 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,00 %28 NS 2P S+2 170 2 11.11
29 NS 1S S = 90 8 44.44
30 NS 2C S+3 200 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 225,0 / 540 = 41,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
12 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 47,78 % 1 NS 5P N+1 480 17 94.44
2 NS 2K S+1 110 6 33.33
3 NS 1S S-3 -150 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
11 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 49,63 % 4 NS 3S W-1 100 16 88.89
5 NS 1S W-1 50 10 55.56
6 NS 4T S+1 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
13 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 40,56 % 7 NS 4C E-4 400 15 83.33
8 NS 4P N = 420 7 38.89
9 NS 2C S+1 140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
18 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 47,96 %10 NS 3S E-1 100 15 83.33
11 NS 3K W+1 -130 15 83.33
12 NS 3S N+2 660 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,00 %13 NS 4C N = 620 10 55.56
14 NS 2C W+1 -140 1 5.56
15 NS 3S W-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
20 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,67 %16 NS 3P W+2 -200 2 11.11
17 NS 2S E-2 100 17 94.44
18 NS 4C E = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 COULIE Joelle -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 63,70 %19 NS 4C W+2 -680 0 0.00
20 NS 4C S+2 680 8 44.44
21 NS 2C W = -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
15 GROSFILS Colette -PAQUET Anne : 53,52 %22 NS 6PcS-2 -300 0 0.00
23 NS 2T S+2 130 16 88.89
24 NS 4C W+2 -480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
16 Coolen -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,93 %25 NS 6S S+1 1020 17 94.44
26 NS 3PcE-3 800 18 100.00
27 NS 2P S-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
17 LAENENS René -VAN GYSEGHEM : 44,26 %28 NS 4P S = 620 11 61.11
29 NS 3S E-1 100 12 66.67
30 NS 3S N-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 311,0 / 540 = 57,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand
17 LAENENS René -VAN GYSEGHEM : 44,26 % 1 NS 4P N+1 450 11 61.11
2 NS 1S N+2 150 13 72.22
3 NS 3P E+2 -200 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
16 Coolen -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,93 % 4 NS 1S E+3 -180 0 0.00
5 NS 2S W-1 50 10 55.56
6 NS 3S N+2 460 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
15 GROSFILS Colette -PAQUET Anne : 53,52 % 7 NS 4C E-4 400 15 83.33
8 NS 4P N+1 450 15 83.33
9 NS 1SxS-1 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
14 COULIE Joelle -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 63,70 %10 NS 3S E = -600 4 22.22
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 4 22.22
12 NS 3T N-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
20 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,67 %13 NS 4C N = 620 10 55.56
14 NS 2C E = -110 4 22.22
15 NS 3S E-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,00 %16 NS 5KcS-4 -800 0 0.00
17 NS 3S E-2 100 17 94.44
18 NS 4P W = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
18 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 47,96 %19 NS 4C W+1 -650 5 27.78
20 NS 4C S+2 680 8 44.44
21 NS 3P S = 140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
13 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 40,56 %22 NS 4P S = 420 13 72.22
23 NS 1S S+1 120 14 77.78
24 NS 4C W+2 -480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 47,78 %25 NS 6S S+1 1020 17 94.44
26 NS 4C N-1 -100 11 61.11
27 NS 3S W-1 50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
11 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 49,63 %28 NS 4P S = 620 11 61.11
29 NS 4C W-2 200 16 88.89
30 NS 4C S+1 450 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
Total : 296,0 / 540 = 54,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
18 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 47,96 % 1 NS 4P N+2 480 17 94.44
2 NS 1S N+2 150 13 72.22
3 NS 3T S-2 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
17 LAENENS René -VAN GYSEGHEM : 44,26 % 4 NS 3S W-1 100 16 88.89
5 NS 1S W-1 50 10 55.56
6 NS 4P N+2 480 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
16 Coolen -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,93 % 7 NS 2C E-2 200 11 61.11
8 NS 3S N = 400 2 11.11
9 NS 1S S = 90 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
11 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 49,63 %10 NS 4P W = -620 2 11.11
11 NS 3S E = -400 9 50.00
12 NS 3S N = 600 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
15 GROSFILS Colette -PAQUET Anne : 53,52 %13 NS 4C N = 620 10 55.56
14 NS 3S E-3 150 17 94.44
15 NS 3S E-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
14 COULIE Joelle -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 63,70 %16 NS 3P W+1 -170 7 38.89
17 NS 2S E = -120 4 22.22
18 NS 2C E = -110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
20 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,67 %19 NS 6C W-1 100 14 77.78
20 NS 4C S+2 680 8 44.44
21 NS 4P S-1 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,00 %22 NS 4P S = 420 13 72.22
23 NS 2P W-1 100 8 44.44
24 NS 3S W+2 -460 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
13 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 40,56 %25 NS 3S S+4 520 8 44.44
26 NS 3C S = 140 16 88.89
27 NS 3T E+1 -130 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 47,78 %28 NS 5KcW-5 1100 18 100.00
29 NS 3S E-1 100 12 66.67
30 NS 4C S+1 450 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
Total : 330,0 / 540 = 61,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 STEED Adrian -GOBBE Amélie
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,00 % 1 NS 4P N = 420 8 44.44
2 NS 2C E-2 100 3 16.67
3 NS 3P W+2 -200 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
18 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 47,96 % 4 NS 2S E = -120 9 50.00
5 NS 2C N+1 140 18 100.00
6 NS 4P N+2 480 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
17 LAENENS René -VAN GYSEGHEM : 44,26 % 7 NS 2C E-1 100 1 5.56
8 NS 3S N+2 460 18 100.00
9 NS 2C N = 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 47,78 %10 NS 2P W+1 -140 9 50.00
11 NS 3S E+2 -460 0 0.00
12 NS 3S N+1 630 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
11 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 49,63 %13 NS 3S N = 600 0 0.00
14 NS 2S W-1 50 10 55.56
15 NS 3S E = -400 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
16 Coolen -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,93 %16 NS 3T E = -110 16 88.89
17 NS 3C W-1 50 10 55.56
18 NS 4C E+1 -450 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
15 GROSFILS Colette -PAQUET Anne : 53,52 %19 NS 4C W+1 -650 5 27.78
20 NS 4C S+2 680 8 44.44
21 NS 3P S+1 170 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
14 COULIE Joelle -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 63,70 %22 NS 4P S = 420 13 72.22
23 NS 2C N = 110 11 61.11
24 NS 4C W+3 -510 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
20 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,67 %25 NS 6C N = 980 13 72.22
26 NS 4C N-2 -200 4 22.22
27 NS 3S W = -400 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
13 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 40,56 %28 NS 4P S = 620 11 61.11
29 NS 3S E-1 100 12 66.67
30 NS 4C S+1 450 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
Total : 267,0 / 540 = 49,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
20 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,67 % 1 NS 6P N-1 -50 3 16.67
2 NS 1S N+1 120 9 50.00
3 NS 3T S-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,00 % 4 NS 1S W+2 -150 3 16.67
5 NS 3K E = -110 1 5.56
6 NS 5T S = 400 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
18 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 47,96 % 7 NS 2C E-1 100 1 5.56
8 NS 4P N = 420 7 38.89
9 NS 2P W = -110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
13 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 40,56 %10 NS 4P W-1 100 15 83.33
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 4 22.22
12 NS 3S N+2 660 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 47,78 %13 NS 4C N = 620 10 55.56
14 NS 1T E+1 -90 6 33.33
15 NS 1S E = -90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
11 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 49,63 %16 NS 2P W+1 -140 14 77.78
17 NS 1P N = 80 14 77.78
18 NS 2C E+3 -200 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
17 LAENENS René -VAN GYSEGHEM : 44,26 %19 NS 6C W-1 100 14 77.78
20 NS 6C S = 1430 16 88.89
21 NS 3P N = 140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
16 Coolen -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,93 %22 NS 4P S-1 -50 3 16.67
23 NS 2C N-1 -100 2 11.11
24 NS 3S W+4 -520 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
15 GROSFILS Colette -PAQUET Anne : 53,52 %25 NS 3S S+3 490 5 27.78
26 NS 5KcN-4 -1100 0 0.00
27 NS 3P S-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
14 COULIE Joelle -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 63,70 %28 NS 3C E-5 250 4 22.22
29 NS 4C W+1 -650 1 5.56
30 NS 3S N-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
Total : 225,0 / 540 = 41,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse
14 COULIE Joelle -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 63,70 % 1 NS 4P N+1 450 11 61.11
2 NS 3S N-1 -100 0 0.00
3 NS 3P W+2 -200 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
20 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,67 % 4 NS 2S W = -120 9 50.00
5 NS 2C N = 110 15 83.33
6 NS 4P N+1 450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,00 % 7 NS 2P N+1 140 6 33.33
8 NS 4P N = 420 7 38.89
9 NS 1SxE-1 400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
15 GROSFILS Colette -PAQUET Anne : 53,52 %10 NS 2P W+1 -140 9 50.00
11 NS 3K W+1 -130 15 83.33
12 NS 5K S-1 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
13 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 40,56 %13 NS 4C N = 620 10 55.56
14 NS 2C W-1 50 10 55.56
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 47,78 %16 NS 3P W+1 -170 7 38.89
17 NS 2S W-1 50 10 55.56
18 NS 4C E+1 -450 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
11 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 49,63 %19 NS 4C W = -620 8 44.44
20 NS 3S N+2 660 0 0.00
21 NS 4P S-1 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
18 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 47,96 %22 NS 3S N = 400 6 33.33
23 NS 1S S = 90 6 33.33
24 NS 3S W+3 -490 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
17 LAENENS René -VAN GYSEGHEM : 44,26 %25 NS 6C N = 980 13 72.22
26 NS 3S S-2 -200 4 22.22
27 NS 4P S-2 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
16 Coolen -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,93 %28 NS 4P S-1 -100 0 0.00
29 NS 4C E-3 300 18 100.00
30 NS 3S N-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 230,0 / 540 = 42,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 de NICOLAS Bernard -JASSOGNE Jacqueline
15 GROSFILS Colette -PAQUET Anne : 53,52 % 1 NS 6P N-1 -50 3 16.67
2 NS 1S N+1 120 9 50.00
3 NS 4P W+1 -650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
14 COULIE Joelle -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 63,70 % 4 NS 2S W = -120 9 50.00
5 NS 2C N = 110 15 83.33
6 NS 3S N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
20 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,67 % 7 NS 3P N = 140 6 33.33
8 NS 4P N+1 450 15 83.33
9 NS 2C N+1 140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
17 LAENENS René -VAN GYSEGHEM : 44,26 %10 NS 3S E-3 300 18 100.00
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 4 22.22
12 NS 3S N = 600 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
16 Coolen -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,93 %13 NS 4C N = 620 10 55.56
14 NS 3S E-2 100 14 77.78
15 NS 2C W+1 -140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
13 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 40,56 %16 NS 3S N-3 -150 12 66.67
17 NS 2S E-1 50 10 55.56
18 NS 3C E+1 -170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 47,78 %19 NS 6C W-1 100 14 77.78
20 NS 4C N+2 680 8 44.44
21 NS 3P S = 140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
11 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 49,63 %22 NS 4P S = 420 13 72.22
23 NS 2C N = 110 11 61.11
24 NS 4C E+1 -450 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,00 %25 NS 6T S = 920 10 55.56
26 NS 3S S-1 -100 11 61.11
27 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
18 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 47,96 %28 NS 4P S = 620 11 61.11
29 NS 3C W = -140 6 33.33
30 NS 3S N-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 283,0 / 540 = 52,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
16 Coolen -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,93 % 1 NS 6P N-2 -100 0 0.00
2 NS 3S N = 600 17 94.44
3 NS 4TcS-2 -300 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
15 GROSFILS Colette -PAQUET Anne : 53,52 % 4 NS 2S W = -120 9 50.00
5 NS 2C N-1 -100 5 27.78
6 NS 3S N+1 430 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
14 COULIE Joelle -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 63,70 % 7 NS 4CcE-4 1100 18 100.00
8 NS 4P N-1 -50 0 0.00
9 NS 1S E+1 -120 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 55,00 %10 NS 2S E+2 -180 6 33.33
11 NS 3S E = -400 9 50.00
12 NS 4K N = 130 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
18 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 47,96 %13 NS 4C N = 620 10 55.56
14 NS 3S E-3 150 17 94.44
15 NS 3S E-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
17 LAENENS René -VAN GYSEGHEM : 44,26 %16 NS 3P W-1 100 18 100.00
17 NS 2S E = -120 4 22.22
18 NS 4C E-2 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
13 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 40,56 %19 NS 3C W+2 -200 10 55.56
20 NS 4C S+2 680 8 44.44
21 NS 3T S = 110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 47,78 %22 NS 4P N = 420 13 72.22
23 NS 3T S-1 -100 2 11.11
24 NS 4C W+3 -510 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
11 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 49,63 %25 NS 5C N+1 480 2 11.11
26 NS 4C N-2 -200 4 22.22
27 NS 4P S-3 -150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
20 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,67 %28 NS 4P S = 620 11 61.11
29 NS 4C W+1 -650 1 5.56
30 NS 4P N-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 226,0 / 540 = 41,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier
1 PADOU Bernard -DEFLINES Etienne : 56,85 % 1 EO 1S N+3 180 12 66.67
2 EO 3S N = 600 1 5.56
3 EO 3T S-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 57,59 % 4 EO 3S W-1 100 2 11.11
5 EO 1S W-1 50 8 44.44
6 EO 4T S+1 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
2 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 41,67 % 7 EO 2C E-2 200 7 38.89
8 EO 4P N = 420 11 61.11
9 EO 2C N = 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,11 %10 EO 4P W = -620 16 88.89
11 EO 3S E = -400 9 50.00
12 EO 3S N = 600 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
6 STEED Adrian -GOBBE Amélie : 49,44 %13 EO 3S N = 600 18 100.00
14 EO 2S W-1 50 8 44.44
15 EO 3S E = -400 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 41,67 %16 EO 2P W+1 -140 4 22.22
17 EO 1P N = 80 4 22.22
18 EO 2C E+3 -200 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
8 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,59 %19 EO 4C W = -620 10 55.56
20 EO 3S N+2 660 18 100.00
21 EO 4P S-1 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 52,41 %22 EO 4P S = 420 5 27.78
23 EO 2C N = 110 7 38.89
24 EO 4C E+1 -450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 41,85 %25 EO 5C N+1 480 16 88.89
26 EO 4C N-2 -200 14 77.78
27 EO 4P S-3 -150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
4 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 54,81 %28 EO 4P S = 620 7 38.89
29 EO 4C W-2 200 2 11.11
30 EO 4C S+1 450 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
Total : 268,0 / 540 = 49,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 57,59 % 1 EO 5P N+1 480 1 5.56
2 EO 2K S+1 110 12 66.67
3 EO 1S S-3 -150 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
2 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 41,67 % 4 EO 2S W+1 -150 15 83.33
5 EO 3K E = -110 17 94.44
6 EO 4T S+1 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
1 PADOU Bernard -DEFLINES Etienne : 56,85 % 7 EO 3P N = 140 12 66.67
8 EO 3S N+1 430 6 33.33
9 EO 2C S+1 140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
6 STEED Adrian -GOBBE Amélie : 49,44 %10 EO 2P W+1 -140 9 50.00
11 EO 3S E+2 -460 18 100.00
12 EO 3S N+1 630 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 41,67 %13 EO 4C N = 620 8 44.44
14 EO 1T E+1 -90 12 66.67
15 EO 1S E = -90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
8 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,59 %16 EO 3P W+1 -170 11 61.11
17 EO 2S W-1 50 8 44.44
18 EO 4C E+1 -450 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 52,41 %19 EO 6C W-1 100 4 22.22
20 EO 4C N+2 680 10 55.56
21 EO 3P S = 140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 41,85 %22 EO 4P N = 420 5 27.78
23 EO 3T S-1 -100 16 88.89
24 EO 4C W+3 -510 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
4 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 54,81 %25 EO 6S S+1 1020 1 5.56
26 EO 4C N-1 -100 7 38.89
27 EO 3S W-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,11 %28 EO 5KcW-5 1100 0 0.00
29 EO 3S E-1 100 6 33.33
30 EO 4C S+1 450 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
Total : 258,0 / 540 = 47,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
2 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 41,67 % 1 EO 3S N+2 460 4 22.22
2 EO 2C E-2 100 15 83.33
3 EO 3T S-3 -150 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
1 PADOU Bernard -DEFLINES Etienne : 56,85 % 4 EO 3S W-1 100 2 11.11
5 EO 3C N-1 -100 13 72.22
6 EO 4P N+1 450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 57,59 % 7 EO 4C E-4 400 3 16.67
8 EO 4P N = 420 11 61.11
9 EO 2C S+1 140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 41,67 %10 EO 4P W-1 100 3 16.67
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 14 77.78
12 EO 3S N+2 660 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
8 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,59 %13 EO 4C N = 620 8 44.44
14 EO 2C W-1 50 8 44.44
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 52,41 %16 EO 3S N-3 -150 6 33.33
17 EO 2S E-1 50 8 44.44
18 EO 3C E+1 -170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 41,85 %19 EO 3C W+2 -200 8 44.44
20 EO 4C S+2 680 10 55.56
21 EO 3T S = 110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
4 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 54,81 %22 EO 4P S = 420 5 27.78
23 EO 1S S+1 120 4 22.22
24 EO 4C W+2 -480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,11 %25 EO 3S S+4 520 10 55.56
26 EO 3C S = 140 2 11.11
27 EO 3T E+1 -130 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
6 STEED Adrian -GOBBE Amélie : 49,44 %28 EO 4P S = 620 7 38.89
29 EO 3S E-1 100 6 33.33
30 EO 4C S+1 450 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
Total : 219,0 / 540 = 40,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 COULIE Joelle -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
8 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,59 % 1 EO 4P N+1 450 7 38.89
2 EO 3S N-1 -100 18 100.00
3 EO 3P W+2 -200 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 52,41 % 4 EO 2S W = -120 9 50.00
5 EO 2C N = 110 3 16.67
6 EO 3S N-1 -50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 41,85 % 7 EO 4CcE-4 1100 0 0.00
8 EO 4P N-1 -50 18 100.00
9 EO 1S E+1 -120 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
4 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 54,81 %10 EO 3S E = -600 14 77.78
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 14 77.78
12 EO 3T N-2 -200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
2 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 41,67 %13 EO 4C N = 620 8 44.44
14 EO 3S E-1 50 8 44.44
15 EO 3S N-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,11 %16 EO 3P W+1 -170 11 61.11
17 EO 2S E = -120 14 77.78
18 EO 2C E = -110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 57,59 %19 EO 4C W+2 -680 18 100.00
20 EO 4C S+2 680 10 55.56
21 EO 2C W = -110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
6 STEED Adrian -GOBBE Amélie : 49,44 %22 EO 4P S = 420 5 27.78
23 EO 2C N = 110 7 38.89
24 EO 4C W+3 -510 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
1 PADOU Bernard -DEFLINES Etienne : 56,85 %25 EO 3S N+3 490 13 72.22
26 EO 4C N-1 -100 7 38.89
27 EO 3P N-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 41,67 %28 EO 3C E-5 250 14 77.78
29 EO 4C W+1 -650 17 94.44
30 EO 3S N-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
Total : 344,0 / 540 = 63,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 GROSFILS Colette -PAQUET Anne
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 52,41 % 1 EO 6P N-1 -50 15 83.33
2 EO 1S N+1 120 9 50.00
3 EO 4P W+1 -650 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 41,85 % 4 EO 2S W = -120 9 50.00
5 EO 2C N-1 -100 13 72.22
6 EO 3S N+1 430 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
4 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 54,81 % 7 EO 4C E-4 400 3 16.67
8 EO 4P N+1 450 3 16.67
9 EO 1SxS-1 -200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
8 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,59 %10 EO 2P W+1 -140 9 50.00
11 EO 3K W+1 -130 3 16.67
12 EO 5K S-1 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,11 %13 EO 4C N = 620 8 44.44
14 EO 3S E-3 150 1 5.56
15 EO 3S E-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
2 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 41,67 %16 EO 3P W+1 -170 11 61.11
17 EO 2S E = -120 14 77.78
18 EO 4C E = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
6 STEED Adrian -GOBBE Amélie : 49,44 %19 EO 4C W+1 -650 13 72.22
20 EO 4C S+2 680 10 55.56
21 EO 3P S+1 170 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 57,59 %22 EO 6PcS-2 -300 18 100.00
23 EO 2T S+2 130 2 11.11
24 EO 4C W+2 -480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 41,67 %25 EO 3S S+3 490 13 72.22
26 EO 5KcN-4 -1100 18 100.00
27 EO 3P S-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
1 PADOU Bernard -DEFLINES Etienne : 56,85 %28 EO 4P S = 620 7 38.89
29 EO 4C W = -620 14 77.78
30 EO 3T S+2 150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 289,0 / 540 = 53,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 Coolen -PARMENTIER Richard
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 41,85 % 1 EO 6P N-2 -100 18 100.00
2 EO 3S N = 600 1 5.56
3 EO 4TcS-2 -300 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
4 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 54,81 % 4 EO 1S E+3 -180 18 100.00
5 EO 2S W-1 50 8 44.44
6 EO 3S N+2 460 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,11 % 7 EO 2C E-2 200 7 38.89
8 EO 3S N = 400 16 88.89
9 EO 1S S = 90 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
1 PADOU Bernard -DEFLINES Etienne : 56,85 %10 EO 3S E+1 -630 18 100.00
11 EO 5KcW-1 100 0 0.00
12 EO 3S S+1 630 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 52,41 %13 EO 4C N = 620 8 44.44
14 EO 3S E-2 100 4 22.22
15 EO 2C W+1 -140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
6 STEED Adrian -GOBBE Amélie : 49,44 %16 EO 3T E = -110 2 11.11
17 EO 3C W-1 50 8 44.44
18 EO 4C E+1 -450 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
2 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 41,67 %19 EO 6C W-2 200 0 0.00
20 EO 4C N+2 680 10 55.56
21 EO 3P N = 140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 41,67 %22 EO 4P S-1 -50 15 83.33
23 EO 2C N-1 -100 16 88.89
24 EO 3S W+4 -520 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 57,59 %25 EO 6S S+1 1020 1 5.56
26 EO 3PcE-3 800 0 0.00
27 EO 2P S-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
8 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,59 %28 EO 4P S-1 -100 18 100.00
29 EO 4C E-3 300 0 0.00
30 EO 3S N-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 275,0 / 540 = 50,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 LAENENS René -VAN GYSEGHEM
4 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 54,81 % 1 EO 4P N+1 450 7 38.89
2 EO 1S N+2 150 5 27.78
3 EO 3P E+2 -200 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,11 % 4 EO 3S W-1 100 2 11.11
5 EO 1S W-1 50 8 44.44
6 EO 4P N+2 480 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
6 STEED Adrian -GOBBE Amélie : 49,44 % 7 EO 2C E-1 100 17 94.44
8 EO 3S N+2 460 0 0.00
9 EO 2C N = 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 52,41 %10 EO 3S E-3 300 0 0.00
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 14 77.78
12 EO 3S N = 600 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
1 PADOU Bernard -DEFLINES Etienne : 56,85 %13 EO 4C N = 620 8 44.44
14 EO 1TcE = -140 17 94.44
15 EO 3S E-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 41,85 %16 EO 3P W-1 100 0 0.00
17 EO 2S E = -120 14 77.78
18 EO 4C E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 41,67 %19 EO 6C W-1 100 4 22.22
20 EO 6C S = 1430 2 11.11
21 EO 3P N = 140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
2 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 41,67 %22 EO 4P N-1 -50 15 83.33
23 EO 2C N-1 -100 16 88.89
24 EO 2PcN-4 -800 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
8 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,59 %25 EO 6C N = 980 5 27.78
26 EO 3S S-2 -200 14 77.78
27 EO 4P S-2 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 57,59 %28 EO 4P S = 620 7 38.89
29 EO 3S E-1 100 6 33.33
30 EO 3S N-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 239,0 / 540 = 44,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,11 % 1 EO 4P N+2 480 1 5.56
2 EO 1S N+2 150 5 27.78
3 EO 3T S-2 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
6 STEED Adrian -GOBBE Amélie : 49,44 % 4 EO 2S E = -120 9 50.00
5 EO 2C N+1 140 0 0.00
6 EO 4P N+2 480 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 41,67 % 7 EO 2C E-1 100 17 94.44
8 EO 4P N = 420 11 61.11
9 EO 2P W = -110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 57,59 %10 EO 3S E-1 100 3 16.67
11 EO 3K W+1 -130 3 16.67
12 EO 3S N+2 660 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 41,85 %13 EO 4C N = 620 8 44.44
14 EO 3S E-3 150 1 5.56
15 EO 3S E-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
1 PADOU Bernard -DEFLINES Etienne : 56,85 %16 EO 3P W+1 -170 11 61.11
17 EO 3TcN-2 -300 18 100.00
18 EO 5P E = -450 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
4 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 54,81 %19 EO 4C W+1 -650 13 72.22
20 EO 4C S+2 680 10 55.56
21 EO 3P S = 140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
8 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,59 %22 EO 3S N = 400 12 66.67
23 EO 1S S = 90 12 66.67
24 EO 3S W+3 -490 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
2 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 41,67 %25 EO 4C N+1 450 18 100.00
26 EO 3S S-1 -100 7 38.89
27 EO 4T E = -130 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 52,41 %28 EO 4P S = 620 7 38.89
29 EO 3C W = -140 12 66.67
30 EO 3S N-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 259,0 / 540 = 47,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
6 STEED Adrian -GOBBE Amélie : 49,44 % 1 EO 4P N = 420 10 55.56
2 EO 2C E-2 100 15 83.33
3 EO 3P W+2 -200 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 41,67 % 4 EO 1S W+2 -150 15 83.33
5 EO 3K E = -110 17 94.44
6 EO 5T S = 400 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
8 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,59 % 7 EO 2P N+1 140 12 66.67
8 EO 4P N = 420 11 61.11
9 EO 1SxE-1 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 41,85 %10 EO 2S E+2 -180 12 66.67
11 EO 3S E = -400 9 50.00
12 EO 4K N = 130 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 57,59 %13 EO 4C N = 620 8 44.44
14 EO 2C W+1 -140 17 94.44
15 EO 3S W-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
4 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 54,81 %16 EO 5KcS-4 -800 18 100.00
17 EO 3S E-2 100 1 5.56
18 EO 4P W = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
1 PADOU Bernard -DEFLINES Etienne : 56,85 %19 EO 3S E+2 -660 16 88.89
20 EO 6S S = 1440 0 0.00
21 EO 2P S+2 170 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,11 %22 EO 4P S = 420 5 27.78
23 EO 2P W-1 100 10 55.56
24 EO 3S W+2 -460 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 52,41 %25 EO 6T S = 920 8 44.44
26 EO 3S S-1 -100 7 38.89
27 EO 3S W+1 -430 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
2 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 41,67 %28 EO 2P S+2 170 16 88.89
29 EO 1S S = 90 10 55.56
30 EO 2C S+3 200 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 297,0 / 540 = 55,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 41,67 % 1 EO 6P N-1 -50 15 83.33
2 EO 1S N+1 120 9 50.00
3 EO 3T S-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
8 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,59 % 4 EO 2S W = -120 9 50.00
5 EO 2C N = 110 3 16.67
6 EO 4P N+1 450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 52,41 % 7 EO 3P N = 140 12 66.67
8 EO 4P N+1 450 3 16.67
9 EO 2C N+1 140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
2 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 41,67 %10 EO 2K W+2 -130 6 33.33
11 EO 2CcN-2 -300 6 33.33
12 EO 3S N+1 630 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
4 CASSART Guy -BRIOT Fernand : 54,81 %13 EO 4C N = 620 8 44.44
14 EO 2C E = -110 14 77.78
15 EO 3S E-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 57,59 %16 EO 3P W+2 -200 16 88.89
17 EO 2S E-2 100 1 5.56
18 EO 4C E = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,11 %19 EO 6C W-1 100 4 22.22
20 EO 4C S+2 680 10 55.56
21 EO 4P S-1 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
1 PADOU Bernard -DEFLINES Etienne : 56,85 %22 EO 4P S = 420 5 27.78
23 EO 3P E-3 300 0 0.00
24 EO 4C W+2 -480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
6 STEED Adrian -GOBBE Amélie : 49,44 %25 EO 6C N = 980 5 27.78
26 EO 4C N-2 -200 14 77.78
27 EO 3S W = -400 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 41,85 %28 EO 4P S = 620 7 38.89
29 EO 4C W+1 -650 17 94.44
30 EO 4P N-3 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 252,0 / 540 = 46,67 %
|
|