|
Tournoi du 18-11-13
1 59,44 4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
2 59,26 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
3 58,52 1 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
4 52,96 5 COULIE Joelle -GROSFILS Colette
5 51,85 11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
6 50,74 7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
7 47,04 3 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
8 46,48 2 VAGMAN David -CHANTRAINE René
9 45,37 9 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine
10 39,44 6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
11 38,89 10 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 64,07 14 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane
2 58,52 20 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude
3 57,78 15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
4 54,63 21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
5 53,52 19 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard
6 47,59 13 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
~ 47,59 12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
8 45,00 17 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse
9 44,26 22 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
10 41,85 16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel
11 35,19 18 DELHEZ Jacques -ROEGIERS Marga
PAIRE Nr : 1 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,59 % 1 NS 5KcW-2 300 12 66.67
2 NS 1S S-1 -100 8 44.44
3 NS 6C S = 980 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
22 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 44,26 % 4 NS 4PcS-1 -200 8 44.44
5 NS 3S N-1 -100 7 38.89
6 NS 2P E+3 -200 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,63 % 7 NS 3C E = -140 0 0.00
8 NS 3C E = -140 10 55.56
9 NS 4P N+2 480 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
20 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 58,52 %10 NS 2P W = -110 8 44.44
11 NS 2C N = 110 12 66.67
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
19 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,52 %13 NS 5K S+1 620 14 77.78
14 NS 3S E-3 150 14 77.78
15 NS 3C W-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
18 DELHEZ Jacques -ROEGIERS Marga : 35,19 %16 NS 3P W+1 -170 18 100.00
17 NS 2S E-1 50 15 83.33
18 NS 3S N-3 -300 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
17 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,00 %19 NS 3K S+1 130 14 77.78
20 NS 4TcE-1 200 18 100.00
21 NS 4P W-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 41,85 %22 NS 3P S-1 -50 5 27.78
23 NS 3C S-2 -200 11 61.11
24 NS 4K E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,78 %25 NS 1S E+1 -120 2 11.11
26 NS 3P E-1 100 13 72.22
27 NS 4PcE-1 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
14 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 64,07 %28 NS 1S N = 90 9 50.00
29 NS 4C N = 620 9 50.00
30 NS 3S S+2 460 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 316,0 / 540 = 58,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 VAGMAN David -CHANTRAINE René
13 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,59 % 4 NS 5T W = -600 6 33.33
5 NS 4P S-1 -100 7 38.89
6 NS 2P E+3 -200 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,59 % 7 NS 4C E-1 100 10 55.56
8 NS 4C E = -420 4 22.22
9 NS 4P N+1 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
22 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 44,26 %10 NS 2C E = -110 8 44.44
11 NS 3C N-1 -50 3 16.67
12 NS 3S E = -400 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,63 %13 NS 3S S-2 -200 0 0.00
14 NS 2P S-1 -50 11 61.11
15 NS 3P S-2 -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
20 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 58,52 %16 NS 4P W+1 -650 1 5.56
17 NS 2P W-1 50 15 83.33
18 NS 3C N-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
19 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,52 %19 NS 4C W-1 100 8 44.44
20 NS 3K S = 110 12 66.67
21 NS 5T E = -400 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
18 DELHEZ Jacques -ROEGIERS Marga : 35,19 %22 NS 4TcW-1 200 16 88.89
23 NS 3C S-1 -100 17 94.44
24 NS 4P N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
17 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,00 %25 NS 2C S-1 -50 12 66.67
26 NS 4P E-1 100 13 72.22
27 NS 4PcE = -590 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 41,85 %28 NS 2K E-2 100 14 77.78
29 NS 4C N+1 650 14 77.78
30 NS 3S N+2 460 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,78 %31 NS 4C W-1 50 8 44.44
32 NS 2C S+1 140 5 27.78
33 NS 3S N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
Total : 251,0 / 540 = 46,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 41,85 % 1 NS 5PcW-4 800 18 100.00
2 NS 1S S-1 -100 8 44.44
3 NS 5C S+2 510 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
14 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 64,07 % 7 NS 4C E-1 100 10 55.56
8 NS 4C E = -420 4 22.22
9 NS 4P N+1 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
13 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,59 %10 NS 2P E = -110 8 44.44
11 NS 4KcE-1 100 10 55.56
12 NS 3S W-2 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,59 %13 NS 4C N = 620 14 77.78
14 NS 2P S-2 -100 4 22.22
15 NS 3C W = -140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
22 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 44,26 %16 NS 4P E = -620 9 50.00
17 NS 2C W-1 50 15 83.33
18 NS 3PcE-2 300 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,63 %19 NS 3K S+1 130 14 77.78
20 NS 3K S-1 -100 4 22.22
21 NS 5T E = -400 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
20 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 58,52 %22 NS 4T W = -130 2 11.11
23 NS 3S W+1 -630 7 38.89
24 NS 4P N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
19 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,52 %25 NS 1S N-1 -50 12 66.67
26 NS 4P E = -620 0 0.00
27 NS 4P E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
18 DELHEZ Jacques -ROEGIERS Marga : 35,19 %28 NS 1S N = 90 9 50.00
29 NS 4P W-1 100 2 11.11
30 NS 1S N-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
17 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,00 %31 NS 3C E+1 -170 1 5.56
32 NS 2C S+2 170 12 66.67
33 NS 3S N = 400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 254,0 / 540 = 47,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
18 DELHEZ Jacques -ROEGIERS Marga : 35,19 % 1 NS 4P E-2 100 10 55.56
2 NS 2S S-1 -100 8 44.44
3 NS 6CcS = 1210 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
17 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,00 % 4 NS 3T W+1 -130 17 94.44
5 NS 3S N = 600 18 100.00
6 NS 4P E-1 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 96,30 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,78 %10 NS 2CcS = 670 18 100.00
11 NS 4K W-1 50 8 44.44
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
14 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 64,07 %13 NS 3K S+3 170 6 33.33
14 NS 2P S-2 -100 4 22.22
15 NS 3C W = -140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
13 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,59 %16 NS 4P W = -620 9 50.00
17 NS 1S E+2 -150 3 16.67
18 NS 4TcW-4 800 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,59 %19 NS 3P N = 140 18 100.00
20 NS 3K S = 110 12 66.67
21 NS 4P W = -420 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
22 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 44,26 %22 NS 5C E = -650 0 0.00
23 NS 4C S-2 -200 11 61.11
24 NS 5K E-3 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,63 %25 NS 2C S-2 -100 6 33.33
26 NS 4P E-1 100 13 72.22
27 NS 2C W-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
20 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 58,52 %28 NS 1S N = 90 9 50.00
29 NS 4C N+1 650 14 77.78
30 NS 3S S+2 460 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
19 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,52 %31 NS 4C W-2 100 13 72.22
32 NS 2C S+1 140 5 27.78
33 NS 3S N = 400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 321,0 / 540 = 59,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 COULIE Joelle -GROSFILS Colette
20 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 58,52 % 1 NS 4C N+1 450 16 88.89
2 NS 2P W = -110 4 22.22
3 NS 4C N+2 480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
19 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,52 % 4 NS 4C E+1 -650 0 0.00
5 NS 4P N-1 -100 7 38.89
6 NS 4P E+1 -650 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
18 DELHEZ Jacques -ROEGIERS Marga : 35,19 % 7 NS 4C W-1 100 10 55.56
8 NS 4C E-2 100 18 100.00
9 NS 4P N = 420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 41,85 %13 NS 4C N = 620 14 77.78
14 NS 2P S-2 -100 4 22.22
15 NS 3C W-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,78 %16 NS 4P W = -620 9 50.00
17 NS 2P W+1 -140 7 38.89
18 NS 4K S = 130 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
14 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 64,07 %19 NS 3C E = -140 3 16.67
20 NS 3K S-1 -100 4 22.22
21 NS 5T E = -400 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
13 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,59 %22 NS 2P S+2 170 14 77.78
23 NS 4C S-1 -100 17 94.44
24 NS 3S E-2 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,59 %25 NS 2C S-2 -100 6 33.33
26 NS 4P E-1 100 13 72.22
27 NS 2T W = -90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
22 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 44,26 %28 NS 3K E-5 250 18 100.00
29 NS 5PcW-1 200 5 27.78
30 NS 3S N+1 430 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,63 %31 NS 4C W-1 50 8 44.44
32 NS 2C S+3 200 16 88.89
33 NS 3S N+1 430 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 286,0 / 540 = 52,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
22 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 44,26 % 1 NS 4C N-2 -100 4 22.22
2 NS 1S S = 90 14 77.78
3 NS 6S S-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,63 % 4 NS 4C E = -620 3 16.67
5 NS 4P S-1 -100 7 38.89
6 NS 4P E = -620 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
20 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 58,52 % 7 NS 4C E-1 100 10 55.56
8 NS 4C E = -420 4 22.22
9 NS 3S N = 400 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
19 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,52 %10 NS 2P E = -110 8 44.44
11 NS 4C N-1 -50 3 16.67
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
17 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,00 %16 NS 3S W = -600 16 88.89
17 NS 2P W+1 -140 7 38.89
18 NS 3S S-2 -200 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 41,85 %19 NS 3K S = 110 10 55.56
20 NS 4K S-2 -200 0 0.00
21 NS 4P W-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,78 %22 NS 5T W-1 100 9 50.00
23 NS 4PcN-6 -1700 0 0.00
24 NS 4K E-2 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
14 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 64,07 %25 NS 2C S-1 -50 12 66.67
26 NS 3P E = -140 7 38.89
27 NS 3PcE = -530 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
13 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,59 %28 NS 2K E-1 50 3 16.67
29 NS 5C N = 650 14 77.78
30 NS 3S N+1 430 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,59 %31 NS 3C W = -140 4 22.22
32 NS 3S S = 400 18 100.00
33 NS 3S N = 400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 213,0 / 540 = 39,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
13 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,59 % 1 NS 4C N = 420 14 77.78
2 NS 3C E = -140 1 5.56
3 NS 3S S+2 460 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,59 % 4 NS 3C E = -140 14 77.78
5 NS 3S N-1 -100 7 38.89
6 NS 4P E = -620 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
22 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 44,26 % 7 NS 4C E-1 100 10 55.56
8 NS 4C W-1 50 14 77.78
9 NS 4P N+1 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,63 %10 NS 2S W = -120 1 5.56
11 NS 4C N-1 -50 3 16.67
12 NS 3S W = -400 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
20 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 58,52 %13 NS 2PcW-1 200 8 44.44
14 NS 3S N-2 -100 4 22.22
15 NS 3CcW = -530 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
18 DELHEZ Jacques -ROEGIERS Marga : 35,19 %19 NS 3K S+1 130 14 77.78
20 NS 3K S+1 130 16 88.89
21 NS 1C S+3 170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
17 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,00 %22 NS 4P S-1 -50 5 27.78
23 NS 3S W+1 -630 7 38.89
24 NS 5KcE-3 500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 41,85 %25 NS 1S N = 90 16 88.89
26 NS 3P E = -140 7 38.89
27 NS 3T W = -110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,78 %28 NS 2P E = -110 0 0.00
29 NS 5CcN = 850 18 100.00
30 NS 3S N+1 430 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
14 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 64,07 %31 NS 3K N+1 130 16 88.89
32 NS 2C S+2 170 12 66.67
33 NS 3S N = 400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
Total : 274,0 / 540 = 50,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,78 % 1 NS 5T N-5 -250 2 11.11
2 NS 1S S = 90 14 77.78
3 NS 6C S = 980 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
14 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 64,07 % 4 NS 4C E = -620 3 16.67
5 NS 3S N-1 -100 7 38.89
6 NS 4P E+1 -650 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
13 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,59 % 7 NS 4C E-1 100 10 55.56
8 NS 4C E-1 50 14 77.78
9 NS 4P N-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,59 %10 NS 2C S = 110 15 83.33
11 NS 2C N+1 140 15 83.33
12 NS 3S E = -400 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
22 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 44,26 %13 NS 4C N = 620 14 77.78
14 NS 2PxS = 640 18 100.00
15 NS 2P S-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,63 %16 NS 4P W = -620 9 50.00
17 NS 3C E-1 50 15 83.33
18 NS 3K S+1 130 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
19 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,52 %22 NS 4P S = 420 18 100.00
23 NS 4P E+1 -650 4 22.22
24 NS 4K E-2 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
18 DELHEZ Jacques -ROEGIERS Marga : 35,19 %25 NS 3P E-3 300 18 100.00
26 NS 2S W-4 400 18 100.00
27 NS 2P E = -110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
17 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,00 %28 NS 1S N+1 120 16 88.89
29 NS 5PcW-1 200 5 27.78
30 NS 3S S+1 430 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 41,85 %31 NS 4CcW-1 100 13 72.22
32 NS 2C S+1 140 5 27.78
33 NS 3S N = 400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 320,0 / 540 = 59,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine
17 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,00 % 1 NS 4CcN-2 -300 0 0.00
2 NS 1S S = 90 14 77.78
3 NS 3S S+3 490 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 41,85 % 4 NS 3T W+1 -130 17 94.44
5 NS 3S N-1 -100 7 38.89
6 NS 4P W-1 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,78 % 7 NS 4C E-1 100 10 55.56
8 NS 4C E = -420 4 22.22
9 NS 3S N+3 490 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
14 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 64,07 %10 NS 1S W+1 -120 1 5.56
11 NS 4C N-1 -50 3 16.67
12 NS 3S E+2 -460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
13 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,59 %13 NS 4C N = 620 14 77.78
14 NS 2P S-1 -50 11 61.11
15 NS 3C W = -140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,59 %16 NS 4P W+1 -650 1 5.56
17 NS 3P W+1 -170 0 0.00
18 NS 6KcS-2 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 1,85 %
22 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 44,26 %19 NS 3C E+2 -200 0 0.00
20 NS 3K S = 110 12 66.67
21 NS 6TcE-1 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
20 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 58,52 %25 NS 2C S-2 -100 6 33.33
26 NS 3S W = -600 2 11.11
27 NS 4PcW-2 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
19 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,52 %28 NS 1S N = 90 9 50.00
29 NS 4C N = 620 9 50.00
30 NS 3S N+1 430 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
18 DELHEZ Jacques -ROEGIERS Marga : 35,19 %31 NS 4C W-1 50 8 44.44
32 NS 2C S+2 170 12 66.67
33 NS 4C S = 420 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 245,0 / 540 = 45,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
19 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,52 % 1 NS 3P E-1 50 8 44.44
2 NS 3P W = -140 1 5.56
3 NS 4P S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
18 DELHEZ Jacques -ROEGIERS Marga : 35,19 % 4 NS 3T W+2 -150 12 66.67
5 NS 4P N-1 -100 7 38.89
6 NS 2P W+1 -140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
17 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,00 % 7 NS 4C W-1 100 10 55.56
8 NS 4C E = -420 4 22.22
9 NS 3S N-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 41,85 %10 NS 2K W+1 -110 8 44.44
11 NS 2C N+1 140 15 83.33
12 NS 2S W+2 -180 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,78 %13 NS 5K S-1 -100 2 11.11
14 NS 2P S-2 -100 4 22.22
15 NS 3C W = -140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
14 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 64,07 %16 NS 4P W = -620 9 50.00
17 NS 2S E+1 -150 3 16.67
18 NS 1P N-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
13 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,59 %19 NS 3T W = -110 6 33.33
20 NS 4T E-1 100 8 44.44
21 NS 4PcW-2 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,59 %22 NS 3P S = 140 12 66.67
23 NS 3P E = -140 14 77.78
24 NS 4C W-3 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,63 %28 NS 2C W-1 50 3 16.67
29 NS 3P W+1 -170 0 0.00
30 NS 3S N-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
20 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 58,52 %31 NS 2C W+2 -170 1 5.56
32 NS 1S W-1 100 0 0.00
33 NS 2C S+2 170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
Total : 210,0 / 540 = 38,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,63 % 1 NS 4C N-1 -50 6 33.33
2 NS 1S S+1 120 18 100.00
3 NS 6C S = 980 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
20 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 58,52 % 4 NS 3C E+1 -170 10 55.56
5 NS 2P S+1 140 16 88.89
6 NS 2P E+1 -140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
19 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,52 % 7 NS 4C E-1 100 10 55.56
8 NS 4C E-1 50 14 77.78
9 NS 3S N+3 490 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
18 DELHEZ Jacques -ROEGIERS Marga : 35,19 %10 NS 2C S = 110 15 83.33
11 NS 2C S+2 170 18 100.00
12 NS 4P E = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
17 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,00 %13 NS 4K S = 130 4 22.22
14 NS 2PcW-3 500 16 88.89
15 NS 3C W = -140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 41,85 %16 NS 4P W = -620 9 50.00
17 NS 2S E = -120 10 55.56
18 NS 3S N-3 -300 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,78 %19 NS 3C E = -140 3 16.67
20 NS 4C N-1 -100 4 22.22
21 NS 4P E = -420 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
14 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 64,07 %22 NS 5T W-1 100 9 50.00
23 NS 5CcS-3 -800 2 11.11
24 NS 3S E = -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
13 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,59 %25 NS 3CcS-3 -500 0 0.00
26 NS 5K S-3 -300 4 22.22
27 NS 2C W-3 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
22 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 44,26 %31 NS 4K S+1 150 18 100.00
32 NS 3C S = 140 5 27.78
33 NS 3S N = 400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 280,0 / 540 = 51,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
1 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 58,52 % 1 EO 5KcW-2 300 6 33.33
2 EO 1S S-1 -100 10 55.56
3 EO 6C S = 980 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,74 % 4 EO 3C E = -140 4 22.22
5 EO 3S N-1 -100 11 61.11
6 EO 4P E = -620 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
2 VAGMAN David -CHANTRAINE René : 46,48 % 7 EO 4C E-1 100 8 44.44
8 EO 4C E = -420 14 77.78
9 EO 4P N+1 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,26 %10 EO 2C S = 110 3 16.67
11 EO 2C N+1 140 3 16.67
12 EO 3S E = -400 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
3 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 47,04 %13 EO 4C N = 620 4 22.22
14 EO 2P S-2 -100 14 77.78
15 EO 3C W = -140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
9 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 45,37 %16 EO 4P W+1 -650 17 94.44
17 EO 3P W+1 -170 18 100.00
18 EO 6KcS-2 -500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 98,15 %
4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 59,44 %19 EO 3P N = 140 0 0.00
20 EO 3K S = 110 6 33.33
21 EO 4P W = -420 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
10 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,89 %22 EO 3P S = 140 6 33.33
23 EO 3P E = -140 4 22.22
24 EO 4C W-3 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
5 COULIE Joelle -GROSFILS Colette : 52,96 %25 EO 2C S-2 -100 12 66.67
26 EO 4P E-1 100 5 27.78
27 EO 2T W = -90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 39,44 %31 EO 3C W = -140 14 77.78
32 EO 3S S = 400 0 0.00
33 EO 3S N = 400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 257,0 / 540 = 47,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,74 % 1 EO 4C N = 420 4 22.22
2 EO 3C E = -140 17 94.44
3 EO 3S S+2 460 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
2 VAGMAN David -CHANTRAINE René : 46,48 % 4 EO 5T W = -600 12 66.67
5 EO 4P S-1 -100 11 61.11
6 EO 2P E+3 -200 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,26 % 7 EO 4C E-1 100 8 44.44
8 EO 4C E-1 50 4 22.22
9 EO 4P N-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
3 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 47,04 %10 EO 2P E = -110 10 55.56
11 EO 4KcE-1 100 8 44.44
12 EO 3S W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
9 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 45,37 %13 EO 4C N = 620 4 22.22
14 EO 2P S-1 -50 7 38.89
15 EO 3C W = -140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 59,44 %16 EO 4P W = -620 9 50.00
17 EO 1S E+2 -150 15 83.33
18 EO 4TcW-4 800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
10 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,89 %19 EO 3T W = -110 12 66.67
20 EO 4T E-1 100 10 55.56
21 EO 4PcW-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
5 COULIE Joelle -GROSFILS Colette : 52,96 %22 EO 2P S+2 170 4 22.22
23 EO 4C S-1 -100 1 5.56
24 EO 3S E-2 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,85 %25 EO 3CcS-3 -500 18 100.00
26 EO 5K S-3 -300 14 77.78
27 EO 2C W-3 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 39,44 %28 EO 2K E-1 50 15 83.33
29 EO 5C N = 650 4 22.22
30 EO 3S N+1 430 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 257,0 / 540 = 47,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,26 % 4 EO 4C E = -620 15 83.33
5 EO 3S N-1 -100 11 61.11
6 EO 4P E+1 -650 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
3 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 47,04 % 7 EO 4C E-1 100 8 44.44
8 EO 4C E = -420 14 77.78
9 EO 4P N+1 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
9 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 45,37 %10 EO 1S W+1 -120 17 94.44
11 EO 4C N-1 -50 15 83.33
12 EO 3S E+2 -460 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 59,44 %13 EO 3K S+3 170 12 66.67
14 EO 2P S-2 -100 14 77.78
15 EO 3C W = -140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
10 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,89 %16 EO 4P W = -620 9 50.00
17 EO 2S E+1 -150 15 83.33
18 EO 1P N-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
5 COULIE Joelle -GROSFILS Colette : 52,96 %19 EO 3C E = -140 15 83.33
20 EO 3K S-1 -100 14 77.78
21 EO 5T E = -400 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,85 %22 EO 5T W-1 100 9 50.00
23 EO 5CcS-3 -800 16 88.89
24 EO 3S E = -400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 39,44 %25 EO 2C S-1 -50 6 33.33
26 EO 3P E = -140 11 61.11
27 EO 3PcE = -530 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
1 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 58,52 %28 EO 1S N = 90 9 50.00
29 EO 4C N = 620 9 50.00
30 EO 3S S+2 460 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,74 %31 EO 3K N+1 130 2 11.11
32 EO 2C S+2 170 6 33.33
33 EO 3S N = 400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
Total : 346,0 / 540 = 64,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,26 % 1 EO 5T N-5 -250 16 88.89
2 EO 1S S = 90 4 22.22
3 EO 6C S = 980 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
9 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 45,37 % 7 EO 4C E-1 100 8 44.44
8 EO 4C E = -420 14 77.78
9 EO 3S N+3 490 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 59,44 %10 EO 2CcS = 670 0 0.00
11 EO 4K W-1 50 10 55.56
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
10 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,89 %13 EO 5K S-1 -100 16 88.89
14 EO 2P S-2 -100 14 77.78
15 EO 3C W = -140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
5 COULIE Joelle -GROSFILS Colette : 52,96 %16 EO 4P W = -620 9 50.00
17 EO 2P W+1 -140 11 61.11
18 EO 4K S = 130 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,85 %19 EO 3C E = -140 15 83.33
20 EO 4C N-1 -100 14 77.78
21 EO 4P E = -420 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 39,44 %22 EO 5T W-1 100 9 50.00
23 EO 4PcN-6 -1700 18 100.00
24 EO 4K E-2 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
1 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 58,52 %25 EO 1S E+1 -120 16 88.89
26 EO 3P E-1 100 5 27.78
27 EO 4PcE-1 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,74 %28 EO 2P E = -110 18 100.00
29 EO 5CcN = 850 0 0.00
30 EO 3S N+1 430 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
2 VAGMAN David -CHANTRAINE René : 46,48 %31 EO 4C W-1 50 10 55.56
32 EO 2C S+1 140 13 72.22
33 EO 3S N-1 -50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
Total : 312,0 / 540 = 57,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel
3 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 47,04 % 1 EO 5PcW-4 800 0 0.00
2 EO 1S S-1 -100 10 55.56
3 EO 5C S+2 510 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
9 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 45,37 % 4 EO 3T W+1 -130 1 5.56
5 EO 3S N-1 -100 11 61.11
6 EO 4P W-1 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
10 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,89 %10 EO 2K W+1 -110 10 55.56
11 EO 2C N+1 140 3 16.67
12 EO 2S W+2 -180 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
5 COULIE Joelle -GROSFILS Colette : 52,96 %13 EO 4C N = 620 4 22.22
14 EO 2P S-2 -100 14 77.78
15 EO 3C W-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,85 %16 EO 4P W = -620 9 50.00
17 EO 2S E = -120 8 44.44
18 EO 3S N-3 -300 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 39,44 %19 EO 3K S = 110 8 44.44
20 EO 4K S-2 -200 18 100.00
21 EO 4P W-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
1 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 58,52 %22 EO 3P S-1 -50 13 72.22
23 EO 3C S-2 -200 7 38.89
24 EO 4K E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,74 %25 EO 1S N = 90 2 11.11
26 EO 3P E = -140 11 61.11
27 EO 3T W = -110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
2 VAGMAN David -CHANTRAINE René : 46,48 %28 EO 2K E-2 100 4 22.22
29 EO 4C N+1 650 4 22.22
30 EO 3S N+2 460 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,26 %31 EO 4CcW-1 100 5 27.78
32 EO 2C S+1 140 13 72.22
33 EO 3S N = 400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 226,0 / 540 = 41,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse
9 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 45,37 % 1 EO 4CcN-2 -300 18 100.00
2 EO 1S S = 90 4 22.22
3 EO 3S S+3 490 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 59,44 % 4 EO 3T W+1 -130 1 5.56
5 EO 3S N = 600 0 0.00
6 EO 4P E-1 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 3,70 %
10 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,89 % 7 EO 4C W-1 100 8 44.44
8 EO 4C E = -420 14 77.78
9 EO 3S N-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,85 %13 EO 4K S = 130 14 77.78
14 EO 2PcW-3 500 2 11.11
15 EO 3C W = -140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 39,44 %16 EO 3S W = -600 2 11.11
17 EO 2P W+1 -140 11 61.11
18 EO 3S S-2 -200 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
1 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 58,52 %19 EO 3K S+1 130 4 22.22
20 EO 4TcE-1 200 0 0.00
21 EO 4P W-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,74 %22 EO 4P S-1 -50 13 72.22
23 EO 3S W+1 -630 11 61.11
24 EO 5KcE-3 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
2 VAGMAN David -CHANTRAINE René : 46,48 %25 EO 2C S-1 -50 6 33.33
26 EO 4P E-1 100 5 27.78
27 EO 4PcE = -590 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,26 %28 EO 1S N+1 120 2 11.11
29 EO 5PcW-1 200 13 72.22
30 EO 3S S+1 430 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
3 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 47,04 %31 EO 3C E+1 -170 17 94.44
32 EO 2C S+2 170 6 33.33
33 EO 3S N = 400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 243,0 / 540 = 45,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 DELHEZ Jacques -ROEGIERS Marga
4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 59,44 % 1 EO 4P E-2 100 8 44.44
2 EO 2S S-1 -100 10 55.56
3 EO 6CcS = 1210 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
10 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,89 % 4 EO 3T W+2 -150 6 33.33
5 EO 4P N-1 -100 11 61.11
6 EO 2P W+1 -140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
5 COULIE Joelle -GROSFILS Colette : 52,96 % 7 EO 4C W-1 100 8 44.44
8 EO 4C E-2 100 0 0.00
9 EO 4P N = 420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,85 %10 EO 2C S = 110 3 16.67
11 EO 2C S+2 170 0 0.00
12 EO 4P E = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
1 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 58,52 %16 EO 3P W+1 -170 0 0.00
17 EO 2S E-1 50 3 16.67
18 EO 3S N-3 -300 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,74 %19 EO 3K S+1 130 4 22.22
20 EO 3K S+1 130 2 11.11
21 EO 1C S+3 170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
2 VAGMAN David -CHANTRAINE René : 46,48 %22 EO 4TcW-1 200 2 11.11
23 EO 3C S-1 -100 1 5.56
24 EO 4P N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,26 %25 EO 3P E-3 300 0 0.00
26 EO 2S W-4 400 0 0.00
27 EO 2P E = -110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
3 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 47,04 %28 EO 1S N = 90 9 50.00
29 EO 4P W-1 100 16 88.89
30 EO 1S N-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
9 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 45,37 %31 EO 4C W-1 50 10 55.56
32 EO 2C S+2 170 6 33.33
33 EO 4C S = 420 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 190,0 / 540 = 35,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard
10 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,89 % 1 EO 3P E-1 50 10 55.56
2 EO 3P W = -140 17 94.44
3 EO 4P S-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
5 COULIE Joelle -GROSFILS Colette : 52,96 % 4 EO 4C E+1 -650 18 100.00
5 EO 4P N-1 -100 11 61.11
6 EO 4P E+1 -650 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,85 % 7 EO 4C E-1 100 8 44.44
8 EO 4C E-1 50 4 22.22
9 EO 3S N+3 490 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 39,44 %10 EO 2P E = -110 10 55.56
11 EO 4C N-1 -50 15 83.33
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
1 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 58,52 %13 EO 5K S+1 620 4 22.22
14 EO 3S E-3 150 4 22.22
15 EO 3C W-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
2 VAGMAN David -CHANTRAINE René : 46,48 %19 EO 4C W-1 100 10 55.56
20 EO 3K S = 110 6 33.33
21 EO 5T E = -400 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,26 %22 EO 4P S = 420 0 0.00
23 EO 4P E+1 -650 14 77.78
24 EO 4K E-2 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
3 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 47,04 %25 EO 1S N-1 -50 6 33.33
26 EO 4P E = -620 18 100.00
27 EO 4P E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
9 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 45,37 %28 EO 1S N = 90 9 50.00
29 EO 4C N = 620 9 50.00
30 EO 3S N+1 430 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 59,44 %31 EO 4C W-2 100 5 27.78
32 EO 2C S+1 140 13 72.22
33 EO 3S N = 400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 289,0 / 540 = 53,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude
5 COULIE Joelle -GROSFILS Colette : 52,96 % 1 EO 4C N+1 450 2 11.11
2 EO 2P W = -110 14 77.78
3 EO 4C N+2 480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,85 % 4 EO 3C E+1 -170 8 44.44
5 EO 2P S+1 140 2 11.11
6 EO 2P E+1 -140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 39,44 % 7 EO 4C E-1 100 8 44.44
8 EO 4C E = -420 14 77.78
9 EO 3S N = 400 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
1 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 58,52 %10 EO 2P W = -110 10 55.56
11 EO 2C N = 110 6 33.33
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,74 %13 EO 2PcW-1 200 10 55.56
14 EO 3S N-2 -100 14 77.78
15 EO 3CcW = -530 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
2 VAGMAN David -CHANTRAINE René : 46,48 %16 EO 4P W+1 -650 17 94.44
17 EO 2P W-1 50 3 16.67
18 EO 3C N-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
3 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 47,04 %22 EO 4T W = -130 16 88.89
23 EO 3S W+1 -630 11 61.11
24 EO 4P N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
9 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 45,37 %25 EO 2C S-2 -100 12 66.67
26 EO 3S W = -600 16 88.89
27 EO 4PcW-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 59,44 %28 EO 1S N = 90 9 50.00
29 EO 4C N+1 650 4 22.22
30 EO 3S S+2 460 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
10 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,89 %31 EO 2C W+2 -170 17 94.44
32 EO 1S W-1 100 18 100.00
33 EO 2C S+2 170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
Total : 316,0 / 540 = 58,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,85 % 1 EO 4C N-1 -50 12 66.67
2 EO 1S S+1 120 0 0.00
3 EO 6C S = 980 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 39,44 % 4 EO 4C E = -620 15 83.33
5 EO 4P S-1 -100 11 61.11
6 EO 4P E = -620 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
1 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 58,52 % 7 EO 3C E = -140 18 100.00
8 EO 3C E = -140 8 44.44
9 EO 4P N+2 480 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,74 %10 EO 2S W = -120 17 94.44
11 EO 4C N-1 -50 15 83.33
12 EO 3S W = -400 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
2 VAGMAN David -CHANTRAINE René : 46,48 %13 EO 3S S-2 -200 18 100.00
14 EO 2P S-1 -50 7 38.89
15 EO 3P S-2 -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,26 %16 EO 4P W = -620 9 50.00
17 EO 3C E-1 50 3 16.67
18 EO 3K S+1 130 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
3 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 47,04 %19 EO 3K S+1 130 4 22.22
20 EO 3K S-1 -100 14 77.78
21 EO 5T E = -400 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 59,44 %25 EO 2C S-2 -100 12 66.67
26 EO 4P E-1 100 5 27.78
27 EO 2C W-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
10 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,89 %28 EO 2C W-1 50 15 83.33
29 EO 3P W+1 -170 18 100.00
30 EO 3S N-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
5 COULIE Joelle -GROSFILS Colette : 52,96 %31 EO 4C W-1 50 10 55.56
32 EO 2C S+3 200 2 11.11
33 EO 3S N+1 430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 295,0 / 540 = 54,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 39,44 % 1 EO 4C N-2 -100 14 77.78
2 EO 1S S = 90 4 22.22
3 EO 6S S-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
1 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 58,52 % 4 EO 4PcS-1 -200 10 55.56
5 EO 3S N-1 -100 11 61.11
6 EO 2P E+3 -200 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
7 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,74 % 7 EO 4C E-1 100 8 44.44
8 EO 4C W-1 50 4 22.22
9 EO 4P N+1 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
2 VAGMAN David -CHANTRAINE René : 46,48 %10 EO 2C E = -110 10 55.56
11 EO 3C N-1 -50 15 83.33
12 EO 3S E = -400 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,26 %13 EO 4C N = 620 4 22.22
14 EO 2PxS = 640 0 0.00
15 EO 2P S-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
3 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 47,04 %16 EO 4P E = -620 9 50.00
17 EO 2C W-1 50 3 16.67
18 EO 3PcE-2 300 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
9 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 45,37 %19 EO 3C E+2 -200 18 100.00
20 EO 3K S = 110 6 33.33
21 EO 6TcE-1 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 59,44 %22 EO 5C E = -650 18 100.00
23 EO 4C S-2 -200 7 38.89
24 EO 5K E-3 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
5 COULIE Joelle -GROSFILS Colette : 52,96 %28 EO 3K E-5 250 0 0.00
29 EO 5PcW-1 200 13 72.22
30 EO 3S N+1 430 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,85 %31 EO 4K S+1 150 0 0.00
32 EO 3C S = 140 13 72.22
33 EO 3S N = 400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 239,0 / 540 = 44,26 %
|
|