|
Tournoi du 20-04-15
1 57,39 3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
2 56,89 5 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand
3 55,13 8 MATELART Marc -MASSAUX Joel
4 52,91 10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
5 52,57 4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
6 52,04 7 WILLEMS Jacques -de NICOLAS Bernard
7 49,61 11 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse
8 44,98 6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
9 44,76 9 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine
10 43,15 1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
11 40,59 2 ERNOTTE Marie-Antoinette -SNEYERS
12 0,00 12 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 62,14 20 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude
2 54,96 18 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
3 54,49 16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
4 53,11 24 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
5 52,88 15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
6 52,26 14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
7 51,81 22 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre
8 50,88 21 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
9 47,59 17 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René
10 43,48 19 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane
11 40,20 23 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
12 38,54 13 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
PAIRE Nr : 1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
13 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 38,54 % 1 NS 4P N+1 450 10 55.56
2 NS 2P E-1 50 10 55.56
3 NS 6P E = -1430 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
23 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 40,20 % 4 NS 4P S = 620 15 83.33
5 NS 3K N-1 -100 7 38.89
6 NS 2C E+1 -140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
22 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 51,81 % 7 NS 3P N+1 170 10 55.56
8 NS 2P E-1 50 9 50.00
9 NS 3K N = 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 50,88 %10 NS 3K E = -110 10 55.56
11 NS 4P S+2 480 8 44.44
12 NS 3P W-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
20 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 62,14 %13 NS 3S W+2 -660 2 11.11
14 NS 4CcW-1 100 14 77.78
15 NS 1ScW = -180 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
19 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 43,48 %16 NS 1S W+1 -120 3 16.67
17 NS 2C S = 110 8 44.44
18 NS 1PcS = 160 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
18 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 54,96 %19 NS 2C N-1 -50 8 44.44
20 NS 3S E+1 -630 7 38.89
21 NS 5CcE = -650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
17 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 47,59 %22 NS 4P E = -620 5 27.78
23 NS 3S N+3 690 10 55.56
24 NS 1S S-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,49 %25 NS 4P W+1 -650 1 5.56
26 NS 2C E = -110 4 22.22
27 NS 5K E = -400 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,88 %28 NS 1S W = -90 10 55.56
29 NS 4C N-1 -100 7 38.89
30 NS 4C E = -420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 233,0 / 540 = 43,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 ERNOTTE Marie-Antoinette -SNEYERS
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,26 % 4 NS 2P N+2 170 7 38.89
5 NS 2S S = 120 13 72.22
6 NS 4C W+1 -650 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
13 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 38,54 % 7 NS 4C S-1 -100 3 16.67
8 NS 2P W-1 50 9 50.00
9 NS 2C S = 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
23 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 40,20 %10 NS 3K E = -110 10 55.56
11 NS 5P S+1 480 8 44.44
12 NS 3P W-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
22 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 51,81 %13 NS 3P E+1 -170 14 77.78
14 NS 4P S-2 -100 11 61.11
15 NS 4CcN-3 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 50,88 %16 NS 2P N-2 -100 8 44.44
17 NS 2C S-1 -50 3 16.67
18 NS 3S E = -400 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
20 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 62,14 %19 NS 3K W+1 -130 1 5.56
20 NS 3S E+1 -630 7 38.89
21 NS 4P N-2 -200 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
24 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,11 %22 NS 4P E = -620 5 27.78
23 NS 3S N+4 720 16 88.89
24 NS 2P N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
18 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 54,96 %25 NS 3T N = 110 18 100.00
26 NS 2C E = -110 4 22.22
27 NS 3CcE-2 300 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
17 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 47,59 %28 NS 3K W+1 -130 2 11.11
29 NS 4C N-1 -100 7 38.89
30 NS 4C E-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,49 %31 NS 4P E+2 -480 1.2 6.67
32 NS 4PcN-4 -800 0 0.00
33 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 15,19 %
Total : 219,2 / 540 = 40,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
17 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 47,59 % 1 NS 4P N+1 450 10 55.56
2 NS 2P E-1 50 10 55.56
3 NS 5C E+1 -680 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,88 % 7 NS 4C S = 620 15 83.33
8 NS 2P W-1 50 9 50.00
9 NS 2S S-2 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
24 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,11 %10 NS 3K E = -110 10 55.56
11 NS 4P S+2 480 8 44.44
12 NS 3PcW-2 300 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
13 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 38,54 %13 NS 3C N-2 -200 11 61.11
14 NS 5P S-3 -150 4 22.22
15 NS 2C N = 110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
23 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 40,20 %16 NS 3K S-1 -50 12 66.67
17 NS 3C S-1 -50 3 16.67
18 NS 3T E+1 -130 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
22 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 51,81 %19 NS 3K W-1 100 14 77.78
20 NS 2PcN = 670 18 100.00
21 NS 4PcN-2 -500 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 50,88 %22 NS 3S W+1 -630 0 0.00
23 NS 3S N+3 690 10 55.56
24 NS 2S S+1 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
20 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 62,14 %25 NS 4P W-1 100 15 83.33
26 NS 2CcE-2 500 18 100.00
27 NS 5TcW-3 500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
19 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 43,48 %28 NS 2C N = 110 16 88.89
29 NS 3C N = 140 13 72.22
30 NS 4C E = -420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
18 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 54,96 %31 NS 4P E+1 -450 7.9 43.89
32 NS 3PcN-3 -500 2 11.11
33 NS 3S E+2 -460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,33 %
Total : 309,9 / 540 = 57,39 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
19 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 43,48 % 1 NS 4P N+1 450 10 55.56
2 NS 2PcE-1 100 17 94.44
3 NS 6P E = -1430 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
18 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 54,96 % 4 NS 1S N+3 180 10 55.56
5 NS 4K N-2 -200 3 16.67
6 NS 4C E = -620 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,49 %10 NS 3K E = -110 10 55.56
11 NS 4P S+2 480 8 44.44
12 NS 3C N-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,88 %13 NS 3K S-2 -200 11 61.11
14 NS 3P S-3 -150 4 22.22
15 NS 2K W-4 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,26 %16 NS 3C E-1 100 14 77.78
17 NS 2K E-2 100 6 33.33
18 NS 3S E = -400 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
13 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 38,54 %19 NS 2C N-1 -50 8 44.44
20 NS 3K W+1 -130 14 77.78
21 NS 4P N = 620 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
23 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 40,20 %22 NS 4P E-1 100 15 83.33
23 NS 3S N+1 630 2 11.11
24 NS 1S S-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
22 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 51,81 %25 NS 4P E+1 -650 1 5.56
26 NS 3C E-2 200 13 72.22
27 NS 6K E-2 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 50,88 %28 NS 1S W = -90 10 55.56
29 NS 4C N-1 -100 7 38.89
30 NS 4C E-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
24 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,11 %31 NS 4P E+1 -450 7.9 43.89
32 NS 3P N-3 -150 13 72.22
33 NS 3S E = -400 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
Total : 283,9 / 540 = 52,57 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand
21 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 50,88 % 1 NS 4P N+1 450 10 55.56
2 NS 2P E-1 50 10 55.56
3 NS 5C E+1 -680 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
20 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 62,14 % 4 NS 3S N-2 -200 0 0.00
5 NS 5TcS-1 -200 3 16.67
6 NS 3S E+2 -660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
19 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 43,48 % 7 NS 4C S = 620 15 83.33
8 NS 4C N-5 -250 0 0.00
9 NS 2S S-3 -150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
17 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 47,59 %13 NS 4P E-1 100 17 94.44
14 NS 5CcW-2 300 18 100.00
15 NS 2K S = 90 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,49 %16 NS 2P S = 110 16 88.89
17 NS 2C S+2 170 14 77.78
18 NS 2S E+2 -180 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
24 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,11 %19 NS 3K W+1 -130 1 5.56
20 NS 3S E = -600 12 66.67
21 NS 5CcW-3 500 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,26 %22 NS 3P E-1 100 15 83.33
23 NS 6S N = 1440 18 100.00
24 NS 1S S = 90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
13 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 38,54 %25 NS 3P W+1 -170 9 50.00
26 NS 3C E-2 200 13 72.22
27 NS 4P S = 420 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
23 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 40,20 %28 NS 2C S = 110 16 88.89
29 NS 4C N = 620 18 100.00
30 NS 4C E-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
22 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 51,81 %31 NS 4P W+2 -480 1.2 6.67
32 NS 3C W+1 -170 6 33.33
33 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 26,30 %
Total : 307,2 / 540 = 56,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
23 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 40,20 % 1 NS 4P N+1 450 10 55.56
2 NS 2P E+1 -140 0 0.00
3 NS 5P E+1 -680 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
22 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 51,81 % 4 NS 3P S = 140 4 22.22
5 NS 3P E-2 100 10 55.56
6 NS 4C E+1 -650 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
24 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,11 % 7 NS 4C S = 620 15 83.33
8 NS 2P W-1 50 9 50.00
9 NS 3C S-2 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
20 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 62,14 %10 NS 3S W+1 -630 2 11.11
11 NS 4P S+2 480 8 44.44
12 NS 3P W-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
18 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 54,96 %16 NS 1S W = -90 10 55.56
17 NS 1S W-4 200 16 88.89
18 NS 2S E+4 -240 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
17 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 47,59 %19 NS 3K W-1 100 14 77.78
20 NS 3S E+2 -660 1 5.56
21 NS 3K W = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,49 %22 NS 3P E-1 100 15 83.33
23 NS 3S N+3 690 10 55.56
24 NS 1S S = 90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,88 %25 NS 4P W = -620 5 27.78
26 NS 3C E = -140 0 0.00
27 NS 4P S-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,26 %28 NS 3K E = -110 4 22.22
29 NS 4C N-3 -300 0 0.00
30 NS 4C E = -420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
13 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 38,54 %31 NS 4P E+1 -450 7.9 43.89
32 NS 4C W-1 100 18 100.00
33 NS 3S W = -400 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 75,74 %
Total : 242,9 / 540 = 44,98 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 WILLEMS Jacques -de NICOLAS Bernard
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,26 % 1 NS 3S S+1 430 2 11.11
2 NS 2P E = -110 2 11.11
3 NS 4C E+2 -680 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
13 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 38,54 % 4 NS 4P S+1 650 18 100.00
5 NS 2S N = 120 13 72.22
6 NS 4C E-1 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
23 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 40,20 % 7 NS 4C S-1 -100 3 16.67
8 NS 4P W-3 150 18 100.00
9 NS 3S S-3 -150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
22 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 51,81 %10 NS 3S W = -600 4 22.22
11 NS 4P S+2 480 8 44.44
12 NS 4P W-3 150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 50,88 %13 NS 3S W+2 -660 2 11.11
14 NS 4C W = -420 0 0.00
15 NS 2K N+1 110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
19 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 43,48 %19 NS 2C N-1 -50 8 44.44
20 NS 3S E-1 100 16 88.89
21 NS 4P S-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
18 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 54,96 %22 NS 3P E+1 -170 10 55.56
23 NS 3S S+3 690 10 55.56
24 NS 1S S-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
17 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 47,59 %25 NS 2P W+2 -170 9 50.00
26 NS 2CcE-1 200 13 72.22
27 NS 4K E-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
24 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,11 %28 NS 2C N = 110 16 88.89
29 NS 3C N = 140 13 72.22
30 NS 4C E = -420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,88 %31 NS 50%50% Ajust 9 50.00
32 NS 3P N-3 -150 13 72.22
33 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 281,0 / 540 = 52,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -MASSAUX Joel
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,49 % 1 NS 4P N+1 450 10 55.56
2 NS 3K N-1 -100 4 22.22
3 NS 4P E+2 -680 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,88 % 4 NS 3P S+1 170 7 38.89
5 NS 3PcE-2 300 18 100.00
6 NS 3C E+2 -200 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,26 % 7 NS 4P N = 620 15 83.33
8 NS 2P W-1 50 9 50.00
9 NS 3S S-4 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
13 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 38,54 %10 NS 3K E = -110 10 55.56
11 NS 4P S+2 480 8 44.44
12 NS 4PcW-2 300 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
23 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 40,20 %13 NS 4P E-1 100 17 94.44
14 NS 3C W = -140 8 44.44
15 NS 2P S+1 140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
24 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,11 %16 NS 2C W = -110 6 33.33
17 NS 2C S+1 140 11 61.11
18 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
20 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 62,14 %22 NS 4P E-1 100 15 83.33
23 NS 3S N+2 660 4 22.22
24 NS 1S W-2 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
19 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 43,48 %25 NS 3S E-1 100 15 83.33
26 NS 1S S+1 120 8 44.44
27 NS 4KcE = -510 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
18 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 54,96 %28 NS 1S W = -90 10 55.56
29 NS 3C N+1 170 16 88.89
30 NS 4C E = -420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
17 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 47,59 %31 NS 6P E-1 50 15.7 87.22
32 NS 3C W+1 -170 6 33.33
33 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 53,15 %
Total : 297,7 / 540 = 55,13 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine
18 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 54,96 % 1 NS 4P N+1 450 10 55.56
2 NS 2P E-1 50 10 55.56
3 NS 6PcE+1 -1860 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
24 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,11 % 4 NS 4P S-1 -100 2 11.11
5 NS 3ScS-2 -500 0 0.00
6 NS 4C E = -620 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,49 % 7 NS 2P N+1 140 8 44.44
8 NS 2P W-1 50 9 50.00
9 NS 2P W-2 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,88 %10 NS 4CcN-4 -1100 0 0.00
11 NS 4P S+2 480 8 44.44
12 NS 3S S-3 -300 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,26 %13 NS 3S W+2 -660 2 11.11
14 NS 4P S-2 -100 11 61.11
15 NS 3K N = 110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
13 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 38,54 %16 NS 1S W+1 -120 3 16.67
17 NS 4KcE-3 500 18 100.00
18 NS 3T E = -110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
23 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 40,20 %19 NS 3T S = 110 18 100.00
20 NS 3S E+1 -630 7 38.89
21 NS 3S S+1 630 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 50,88 %25 NS 4P W = -620 5 27.78
26 NS 2C E = -110 4 22.22
27 NS 3P S = 140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
20 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 62,14 %28 NS 2C S-1 -100 6 33.33
29 NS 4C N-1 -100 7 38.89
30 NS 5TcN-3 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
19 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 43,48 %31 NS 6P E-1 50 15.7 87.22
32 NS 3C W+1 -170 6 33.33
33 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 53,15 %
Total : 241,7 / 540 = 44,76 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
20 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 62,14 % 1 NS 6P N-1 -50 0 0.00
2 NS 2P E-1 50 10 55.56
3 NS 4PcE+2 -1190 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
19 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 43,48 % 4 NS 4P S = 620 15 83.33
5 NS 4P E-3 150 16 88.89
6 NS 2C E+3 -200 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
18 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 54,96 % 7 NS 4C S-1 -100 3 16.67
8 NS 2P W-1 50 9 50.00
9 NS 2C S = 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
17 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 47,59 %10 NS 4K E-1 100 18 100.00
11 NS 4P S+2 480 8 44.44
12 NS 3C N-2 -200 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,49 %13 NS 3S W = -600 8 44.44
14 NS 2P S = 110 16 88.89
15 NS 1S S = 90 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,88 %16 NS 3S E-3 300 18 100.00
17 NS 3C S-2 -100 0 0.00
18 NS 3S W = -400 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,26 %19 NS 3K W-1 100 14 77.78
20 NS 3S E+1 -630 7 38.89
21 NS 5KcW-2 300 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
13 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 38,54 %22 NS 4P E = -620 5 27.78
23 NS 3S N = 600 0 0.00
24 NS 1S S+2 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
22 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 51,81 %28 NS 2P W+2 -170 0 0.00
29 NS 3C N-2 -200 2 11.11
30 NS 4C E-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 50,88 %31 NS 6P E-1 50 15.7 87.22
32 NS 3P N-3 -150 13 72.22
33 NS 3S W-2 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 86,48 %
Total : 285,7 / 540 = 52,91 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse
22 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 51,81 % 1 NS 3S S+2 460 18 100.00
2 NS 2P W-2 100 17 94.44
3 NS 5P E+2 -710 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 50,88 % 4 NS 2P N+3 200 12 66.67
5 NS 2S N-1 -100 7 38.89
6 NS 4C E+1 -650 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
20 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 62,14 % 7 NS 4C S-1 -100 3 16.67
8 NS 2P W-1 50 9 50.00
9 NS 2S S-2 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
19 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 43,48 %10 NS 3P S-1 -100 16 88.89
11 NS 6P S = 980 18 100.00
12 NS 3S E+1 -430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
24 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,11 %13 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 33.33
14 NS 4P S-3 -150 4 22.22
15 NS 3K S-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
17 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 47,59 %16 NS 3C E = -140 0 0.00
17 NS 2C S+1 140 11 61.11
18 NS 3S W-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,49 %19 NS 3K W = -110 4 22.22
20 NS 3S E+2 -660 1 5.56
21 NS 3S S-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,88 %22 NS 4P E = -620 5 27.78
23 NS 3S N+3 690 10 55.56
24 NS 2CcE-3 500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,26 %25 NS 3P W = -140 12 66.67
26 NS 3C E-2 200 13 72.22
27 NS 5K E-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
23 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 40,20 %31 NS 4P E+1 -450 7.9 43.89
32 NS 3P N-3 -150 13 72.22
33 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
Total : 267,9 / 540 = 49,61 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 -
24 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,11 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 47,59 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 50,88 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,26 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
18 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 54,96 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
22 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 51,81 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 52,88 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 43,48 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,49 %28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
20 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 62,14 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 594 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,15 % 1 EO 4P N+1 450 8 44.44
2 EO 2P E-1 50 8 44.44
3 EO 6P E = -1430 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
7 WILLEMS Jacques -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,04 % 4 EO 4P S+1 650 0 0.00
5 EO 2S N = 120 5 27.78
6 EO 4C E-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
2 ERNOTTE Marie-Antoinette -SNEYERS : 40,59 % 7 EO 4C S-1 -100 15 83.33
8 EO 2P W-1 50 9 50.00
9 EO 2C S = 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
8 MATELART Marc -MASSAUX Joel : 55,13 %10 EO 3K E = -110 8 44.44
11 EO 4P S+2 480 10 55.56
12 EO 4PcW-2 300 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,39 %13 EO 3C N-2 -200 7 38.89
14 EO 5P S-3 -150 14 77.78
15 EO 2C N = 110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 44,76 %16 EO 1S W+1 -120 15 83.33
17 EO 4KcE-3 500 0 0.00
18 EO 3T E = -110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,57 %19 EO 2C N-1 -50 10 55.56
20 EO 3K W+1 -130 4 22.22
21 EO 4P N = 620 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,91 %22 EO 4P E = -620 13 72.22
23 EO 3S N = 600 18 100.00
24 EO 1S S+2 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
5 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 56,89 %25 EO 3P W+1 -170 9 50.00
26 EO 3C E-2 200 5 27.78
27 EO 4P S = 420 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 44,98 %31 EO 4P E+1 -450 10.1 56.11
32 EO 4C W-1 100 0 0.00
33 EO 3S W = -400 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 24,26 %
Total : 208,1 / 540 = 38,54 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
7 WILLEMS Jacques -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,04 % 1 EO 3S S+1 430 16 88.89
2 EO 2P E = -110 16 88.89
3 EO 4C E+2 -680 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
2 ERNOTTE Marie-Antoinette -SNEYERS : 40,59 % 4 EO 2P N+2 170 11 61.11
5 EO 2S S = 120 5 27.78
6 EO 4C W+1 -650 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
8 MATELART Marc -MASSAUX Joel : 55,13 % 7 EO 4P N = 620 3 16.67
8 EO 2P W-1 50 9 50.00
9 EO 3S S-4 -200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
12 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
9 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 44,76 %13 EO 3S W+2 -660 16 88.89
14 EO 4P S-2 -100 7 38.89
15 EO 3K N = 110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,57 %16 EO 3C E-1 100 4 22.22
17 EO 2K E-2 100 12 66.67
18 EO 3S E = -400 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,91 %19 EO 3K W-1 100 4 22.22
20 EO 3S E+1 -630 11 61.11
21 EO 5KcW-2 300 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
5 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 56,89 %22 EO 3P E-1 100 3 16.67
23 EO 6S N = 1440 0 0.00
24 EO 1S S = 90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
11 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,61 %25 EO 3P W = -140 6 33.33
26 EO 3C E-2 200 5 27.78
27 EO 5K E-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 44,98 %28 EO 3K E = -110 14 77.78
29 EO 4C N-3 -300 18 100.00
30 EO 4C E = -420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
Total : 254,0 / 486 = 52,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
8 MATELART Marc -MASSAUX Joel : 55,13 % 4 EO 3P S+1 170 11 61.11
5 EO 3PcE-2 300 0 0.00
6 EO 3C E+2 -200 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,39 % 7 EO 4C S = 620 3 16.67
8 EO 2P W-1 50 9 50.00
9 EO 2S S-2 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
9 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 44,76 %10 EO 4CcN-4 -1100 18 100.00
11 EO 4P S+2 480 10 55.56
12 EO 3S S-3 -300 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,57 %13 EO 3K S-2 -200 7 38.89
14 EO 3P S-3 -150 14 77.78
15 EO 2K W-4 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,91 %16 EO 3S E-3 300 0 0.00
17 EO 3C S-2 -100 18 100.00
18 EO 3S W = -400 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
12 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
11 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,61 %22 EO 4P E = -620 13 72.22
23 EO 3S N+3 690 8 44.44
24 EO 2CcE-3 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 44,98 %25 EO 4P W = -620 13 72.22
26 EO 3C E = -140 18 100.00
27 EO 4P S-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,15 %28 EO 1S W = -90 8 44.44
29 EO 4C N-1 -100 11 61.11
30 EO 4C E = -420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
7 WILLEMS Jacques -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,04 %31 EO 50%50% Ajust 9 50.00
32 EO 3P N-3 -150 5 27.78
33 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 257,0 / 486 = 52,88 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
8 MATELART Marc -MASSAUX Joel : 55,13 % 1 EO 4P N+1 450 8 44.44
2 EO 3K N-1 -100 14 77.78
3 EO 4P E+2 -680 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
9 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 44,76 % 7 EO 2P N+1 140 10 55.56
8 EO 2P W-1 50 9 50.00
9 EO 2P W-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,57 %10 EO 3K E = -110 8 44.44
11 EO 4P S+2 480 10 55.56
12 EO 3C N-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,91 %13 EO 3S W = -600 10 55.56
14 EO 2P S = 110 2 11.11
15 EO 1S S = 90 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
5 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 56,89 %16 EO 2P S = 110 2 11.11
17 EO 2C S+2 170 4 22.22
18 EO 2S E+2 -180 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
11 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,61 %19 EO 3K W = -110 14 77.78
20 EO 3S E+2 -660 17 94.44
21 EO 3S S-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 44,98 %22 EO 3P E-1 100 3 16.67
23 EO 3S N+3 690 8 44.44
24 EO 1S S = 90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,15 %25 EO 4P W+1 -650 17 94.44
26 EO 2C E = -110 14 77.78
27 EO 5K E = -400 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
12 - : 0,00 %28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
2 ERNOTTE Marie-Antoinette -SNEYERS : 40,59 %31 EO 4P E+2 -480 16.8 93.33
32 EO 4PcN-4 -800 18 100.00
33 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 84,81 %
Total : 264,8 / 486 = 54,49 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,39 % 1 EO 4P N+1 450 8 44.44
2 EO 2P E-1 50 8 44.44
3 EO 5C E+1 -680 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
12 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,91 %10 EO 4K E-1 100 0 0.00
11 EO 4P S+2 480 10 55.56
12 EO 3C N-2 -200 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
5 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 56,89 %13 EO 4P E-1 100 1 5.56
14 EO 5CcW-2 300 0 0.00
15 EO 2K S = 90 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
11 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,61 %16 EO 3C E = -140 18 100.00
17 EO 2C S+1 140 7 38.89
18 EO 3S W-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 44,98 %19 EO 3K W-1 100 4 22.22
20 EO 3S E+2 -660 17 94.44
21 EO 3K W = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,15 %22 EO 4P E = -620 13 72.22
23 EO 3S N+3 690 8 44.44
24 EO 1S S-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
7 WILLEMS Jacques -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,04 %25 EO 2P W+2 -170 9 50.00
26 EO 2CcE-1 200 5 27.78
27 EO 4K E-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
2 ERNOTTE Marie-Antoinette -SNEYERS : 40,59 %28 EO 3K W+1 -130 16 88.89
29 EO 4C N-1 -100 11 61.11
30 EO 4C E-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
8 MATELART Marc -MASSAUX Joel : 55,13 %31 EO 6P E-1 50 2.3 12.78
32 EO 3C W+1 -170 12 66.67
33 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 46,85 %
Total : 231,3 / 486 = 47,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
9 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 44,76 % 1 EO 4P N+1 450 8 44.44
2 EO 2P E-1 50 8 44.44
3 EO 6PcE+1 -1860 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,57 % 4 EO 1S N+3 180 8 44.44
5 EO 4K N-2 -200 15 83.33
6 EO 4C E = -620 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,91 % 7 EO 4C S-1 -100 15 83.33
8 EO 2P W-1 50 9 50.00
9 EO 2C S = 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
12 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 44,98 %16 EO 1S W = -90 8 44.44
17 EO 1S W-4 200 2 11.11
18 EO 2S E+4 -240 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,15 %19 EO 2C N-1 -50 10 55.56
20 EO 3S E+1 -630 11 61.11
21 EO 5CcE = -650 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
7 WILLEMS Jacques -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,04 %22 EO 3P E+1 -170 8 44.44
23 EO 3S S+3 690 8 44.44
24 EO 1S S-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
2 ERNOTTE Marie-Antoinette -SNEYERS : 40,59 %25 EO 3T N = 110 0 0.00
26 EO 2C E = -110 14 77.78
27 EO 3CcE-2 300 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
8 MATELART Marc -MASSAUX Joel : 55,13 %28 EO 1S W = -90 8 44.44
29 EO 3C N+1 170 2 11.11
30 EO 4C E = -420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,39 %31 EO 4P E+1 -450 10.1 56.11
32 EO 3PcN-3 -500 16 88.89
33 EO 3S E+2 -460 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,67 %
Total : 267,1 / 486 = 54,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,57 % 1 EO 4P N+1 450 8 44.44
2 EO 2PcE-1 100 1 5.56
3 EO 6P E = -1430 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,91 % 4 EO 4P S = 620 3 16.67
5 EO 4P E-3 150 2 11.11
6 EO 2C E+3 -200 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
5 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 56,89 % 7 EO 4C S = 620 3 16.67
8 EO 4C N-5 -250 18 100.00
9 EO 2S S-3 -150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
11 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,61 %10 EO 3P S-1 -100 2 11.11
11 EO 6P S = 980 0 0.00
12 EO 3S E+1 -430 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,15 %16 EO 1S W+1 -120 15 83.33
17 EO 2C S = 110 10 55.56
18 EO 1PcS = 160 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
7 WILLEMS Jacques -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,04 %19 EO 2C N-1 -50 10 55.56
20 EO 3S E-1 100 2 11.11
21 EO 4P S-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
12 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -MASSAUX Joel : 55,13 %25 EO 3S E-1 100 3 16.67
26 EO 1S S+1 120 10 55.56
27 EO 4KcE = -510 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,39 %28 EO 2C N = 110 2 11.11
29 EO 3C N = 140 5 27.78
30 EO 4C E = -420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
9 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 44,76 %31 EO 6P E-1 50 2.3 12.78
32 EO 3C W+1 -170 12 66.67
33 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 46,85 %
Total : 211,3 / 486 = 43,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,91 % 1 EO 6P N-1 -50 18 100.00
2 EO 2P E-1 50 8 44.44
3 EO 4PcE+2 -1190 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
5 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 56,89 % 4 EO 3S N-2 -200 18 100.00
5 EO 5TcS-1 -200 15 83.33
6 EO 3S E+2 -660 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
11 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,61 % 7 EO 4C S-1 -100 15 83.33
8 EO 2P W-1 50 9 50.00
9 EO 2S S-2 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 44,98 %10 EO 3S W+1 -630 16 88.89
11 EO 4P S+2 480 10 55.56
12 EO 3P W-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,15 %13 EO 3S W+2 -660 16 88.89
14 EO 4CcW-1 100 4 22.22
15 EO 1ScW = -180 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
2 ERNOTTE Marie-Antoinette -SNEYERS : 40,59 %19 EO 3K W+1 -130 17 94.44
20 EO 3S E+1 -630 11 61.11
21 EO 4P N-2 -200 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
8 MATELART Marc -MASSAUX Joel : 55,13 %22 EO 4P E-1 100 3 16.67
23 EO 3S N+2 660 14 77.78
24 EO 1S W-2 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,39 %25 EO 4P W-1 100 3 16.67
26 EO 2CcE-2 500 0 0.00
27 EO 5TcW-3 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
9 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 44,76 %28 EO 2C S-1 -100 12 66.67
29 EO 4C N-1 -100 11 61.11
30 EO 5TcN-3 -500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
12 - : 0,00 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 302,0 / 486 = 62,14 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
5 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 56,89 % 1 EO 4P N+1 450 8 44.44
2 EO 2P E-1 50 8 44.44
3 EO 5C E+1 -680 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
11 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,61 % 4 EO 2P N+3 200 6 33.33
5 EO 2S N-1 -100 11 61.11
6 EO 4C E+1 -650 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
12 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,15 %10 EO 3K E = -110 8 44.44
11 EO 4P S+2 480 10 55.56
12 EO 3P W-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
7 WILLEMS Jacques -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,04 %13 EO 3S W+2 -660 16 88.89
14 EO 4C W = -420 18 100.00
15 EO 2K N+1 110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
2 ERNOTTE Marie-Antoinette -SNEYERS : 40,59 %16 EO 2P N-2 -100 10 55.56
17 EO 2C S-1 -50 15 83.33
18 EO 3S E = -400 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,39 %22 EO 3S W+1 -630 18 100.00
23 EO 3S N+3 690 8 44.44
24 EO 2S S+1 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
9 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 44,76 %25 EO 4P W = -620 13 72.22
26 EO 2C E = -110 14 77.78
27 EO 3P S = 140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,57 %28 EO 1S W = -90 8 44.44
29 EO 4C N-1 -100 11 61.11
30 EO 4C E-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,91 %31 EO 6P E-1 50 2.3 12.78
32 EO 3P N-3 -150 5 27.78
33 EO 3S W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 13,52 %
Total : 247,3 / 486 = 50,88 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre
11 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,61 % 1 EO 3S S+2 460 0 0.00
2 EO 2P W-2 100 1 5.56
3 EO 5P E+2 -710 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 44,98 % 4 EO 3P S = 140 14 77.78
5 EO 3P E-2 100 8 44.44
6 EO 4C E+1 -650 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,15 % 7 EO 3P N+1 170 8 44.44
8 EO 2P E-1 50 9 50.00
9 EO 3K N = 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
7 WILLEMS Jacques -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,04 %10 EO 3S W = -600 14 77.78
11 EO 4P S+2 480 10 55.56
12 EO 4P W-3 150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
2 ERNOTTE Marie-Antoinette -SNEYERS : 40,59 %13 EO 3P E+1 -170 4 22.22
14 EO 4P S-2 -100 7 38.89
15 EO 4CcN-3 -800 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
12 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,39 %19 EO 3K W-1 100 4 22.22
20 EO 2PcN = 670 0 0.00
21 EO 4PcN-2 -500 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,57 %25 EO 4P E+1 -650 17 94.44
26 EO 3C E-2 200 5 27.78
27 EO 6K E-2 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,91 %28 EO 2P W+2 -170 18 100.00
29 EO 3C N-2 -200 16 88.89
30 EO 4C E-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
5 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 56,89 %31 EO 4P W+2 -480 16.8 93.33
32 EO 3C W+1 -170 12 66.67
33 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 73,70 %
Total : 251,8 / 486 = 51,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 44,98 % 1 EO 4P N+1 450 8 44.44
2 EO 2P E+1 -140 18 100.00
3 EO 5P E+1 -680 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,15 % 4 EO 4P S = 620 3 16.67
5 EO 3K N-1 -100 11 61.11
6 EO 2C E+1 -140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
7 WILLEMS Jacques -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,04 % 7 EO 4C S-1 -100 15 83.33
8 EO 4P W-3 150 0 0.00
9 EO 3S S-3 -150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
2 ERNOTTE Marie-Antoinette -SNEYERS : 40,59 %10 EO 3K E = -110 8 44.44
11 EO 5P S+1 480 10 55.56
12 EO 3P W-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
8 MATELART Marc -MASSAUX Joel : 55,13 %13 EO 4P E-1 100 1 5.56
14 EO 3C W = -140 10 55.56
15 EO 2P S+1 140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,39 %16 EO 3K S-1 -50 6 33.33
17 EO 3C S-1 -50 15 83.33
18 EO 3T E+1 -130 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 44,76 %19 EO 3T S = 110 0 0.00
20 EO 3S E+1 -630 11 61.11
21 EO 3S S+1 630 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,57 %22 EO 4P E-1 100 3 16.67
23 EO 3S N+1 630 16 88.89
24 EO 1S S-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
5 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 56,89 %28 EO 2C S = 110 2 11.11
29 EO 4C N = 620 0 0.00
30 EO 4C E-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
11 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,61 %31 EO 4P E+1 -450 10.1 56.11
32 EO 3P N-3 -150 5 27.78
33 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
Total : 217,1 / 540 = 40,20 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
12 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
9 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 44,76 % 4 EO 4P S-1 -100 16 88.89
5 EO 3ScS-2 -500 18 100.00
6 EO 4C E = -620 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 44,98 % 7 EO 4C S = 620 3 16.67
8 EO 2P W-1 50 9 50.00
9 EO 3C S-2 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,39 %10 EO 3K E = -110 8 44.44
11 EO 4P S+2 480 10 55.56
12 EO 3PcW-2 300 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
11 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,61 %13 EO 3S W+1 -630 12 66.67
14 EO 4P S-3 -150 14 77.78
15 EO 3K S-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
8 MATELART Marc -MASSAUX Joel : 55,13 %16 EO 2C W = -110 12 66.67
17 EO 2C S+1 140 7 38.89
18 EO 3S W+1 -430 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
5 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 56,89 %19 EO 3K W+1 -130 17 94.44
20 EO 3S E = -600 6 33.33
21 EO 5CcW-3 500 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 ERNOTTE Marie-Antoinette -SNEYERS : 40,59 %22 EO 4P E = -620 13 72.22
23 EO 3S N+4 720 2 11.11
24 EO 2P N-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
7 WILLEMS Jacques -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,04 %28 EO 2C N = 110 2 11.11
29 EO 3C N = 140 5 27.78
30 EO 4C E = -420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,57 %31 EO 4P E+1 -450 10.1 56.11
32 EO 3P N-3 -150 5 27.78
33 EO 3S E = -400 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
Total : 258,1 / 486 = 53,11 %
|
|