|
Tournoi du 21-10-13
1 60,56 10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
2 57,78 5 DELTOUR Emile -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie
~ 57,78 4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
4 56,85 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
5 52,78 2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
6 48,89 1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
7 48,15 11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
8 47,04 7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
9 42,96 3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -WUYARD Alphonse
10 39,81 6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
11 37,41 9 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 57,78 20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
2 57,59 19 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
3 57,41 21 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
4 54,26 14 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard
5 52,78 16 DEMARTY Chantal -STEED Adrian
~ 52,78 13 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
7 48,70 15 CASSART Guy -MOSSERAY Bernadette
8 45,74 17 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
9 42,41 12 GROSFILS Colette -COULIE Joelle
~ 42,41 22 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
11 38,15 18 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René
PAIRE Nr : 1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
12 GROSFILS Colette -COULIE Joelle : 42,41 % 1 NS 2C S-2 -100 1 5.56
2 NS 4P S-1 -100 2 11.11
3 NS 4C S+2 480 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
22 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,41 % 4 NS 4C S+2 680 15 83.33
5 NS 3T S-2 -200 0 0.00
6 NS 3S E-3 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
21 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,41 % 7 NS 3S W+3 -690 1 5.56
8 NS 3S N-1 -50 10 55.56
9 NS 4C E+2 -680 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,78 %10 NS 1S E+2 -150 0 0.00
11 NS 6T S = 920 18 100.00
12 NS 4C E+2 -480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
19 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 57,59 %13 NS 2C W = -110 14 77.78
14 NS 3S S+2 460 6 33.33
15 NS 1S N-3 -300 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
18 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 38,15 %16 NS 2C S-1 -50 16 88.89
17 NS 5P N = 450 10 55.56
18 NS 4PcW-5 1100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 45,74 %19 NS 4C N = 420 10 55.56
20 NS 3S S = 600 14 77.78
21 NS 5K E-2 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
16 DEMARTY Chantal -STEED Adrian : 52,78 %22 NS 4P W+1 -650 9 50.00
23 NS 6S S = 1440 10 55.56
24 NS 3T E = -110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
15 CASSART Guy -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,70 %25 NS 1T N = 70 16 88.89
26 NS 4C N-1 -100 2 11.11
27 NS 3P N+1 170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
14 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,26 %28 NS 2C W+1 -140 3 16.67
29 NS 2S S-1 -100 3 16.67
30 NS 3C W = -140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
Total : 264,0 / 540 = 48,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
13 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,78 % 4 NS 5C N = 650 8 44.44
5 NS 2S E-1 50 12 66.67
6 NS 1T E-1 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
12 GROSFILS Colette -COULIE Joelle : 42,41 % 7 NS 2S W+1 -150 15 83.33
8 NS 3S N-1 -50 10 55.56
9 NS 4C E-1 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
22 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,41 %10 NS 2C S = 110 14 77.78
11 NS 3S S+1 430 9 50.00
12 NS 4C E+2 -480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
21 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,41 %13 NS 2C W+2 -170 3 16.67
14 NS 5T S+1 420 0 0.00
15 NS 3S E-2 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,78 %16 NS 1S W+3 -180 0 0.00
17 NS 4P N+1 450 10 55.56
18 NS 3S N = 600 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
19 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 57,59 %19 NS 2C N+2 170 2 11.11
20 NS 3S S = 600 14 77.78
21 NS 5KcE-1 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
18 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 38,15 %22 NS 4C W+1 -650 9 50.00
23 NS 6S S+1 1470 17 94.44
24 NS 3K N-3 -150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 45,74 %25 NS 2C S-1 -50 12 66.67
26 NS 4C N = 620 14 77.78
27 NS 2C E-2 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
16 DEMARTY Chantal -STEED Adrian : 52,78 %28 NS 3C W = -140 3 16.67
29 NS 1S S+1 120 13 72.22
30 NS 4T E+1 -150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
15 CASSART Guy -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,70 %31 NS 3P E+1 -170 16 88.89
32 NS 2P W-2 200 17 94.44
33 NS 1T E = -70 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
Total : 285,0 / 540 = 52,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -WUYARD Alphonse
16 DEMARTY Chantal -STEED Adrian : 52,78 % 1 NS 1S N-1 -50 6 33.33
2 NS 4P S-1 -100 2 11.11
3 NS 4K N = 130 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
14 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,26 % 7 NS 3S E+1 -630 7 38.89
8 NS 2C W = -110 0 0.00
9 NS 4C E = -620 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
13 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,78 %10 NS 3T E-2 200 18 100.00
11 NS 3S N+1 430 9 50.00
12 NS 4C E+2 -480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
12 GROSFILS Colette -COULIE Joelle : 42,41 %13 NS 2C W+2 -170 3 16.67
14 NS 3S S+3 490 14 77.78
15 NS 2S E = -120 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
22 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,41 %16 NS 3C N-2 -100 11 61.11
17 NS 4P N+1 450 10 55.56
18 NS 2PcW-1 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
21 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,41 %19 NS 4CcN = 590 16 88.89
20 NS 3C N = 140 10 55.56
21 NS 5PcN-1 -200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,78 %22 NS 4C W+1 -650 9 50.00
23 NS 6S S-1 -100 0 0.00
24 NS 2P N-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
19 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 57,59 %25 NS 2C S-1 -50 12 66.67
26 NS 3S N-1 -100 2 11.11
27 NS 4P N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
18 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 38,15 %28 NS 2P N = 110 10 55.56
29 NS 2S S = 120 13 72.22
30 NS 4C W-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 45,74 %31 NS 2P E+3 -200 8 44.44
32 NS 2P W-1 100 11 61.11
33 NS 3S E = -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 232,0 / 540 = 42,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
18 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 38,15 % 1 NS 1S S+1 120 17 94.44
2 NS 1PxS+4 2320 18 100.00
3 NS 4PcW-2 500 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 45,74 % 4 NS 4C N+2 680 15 83.33
5 NS 1S W+1 -120 7 38.89
6 NS 2T N+1 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
15 CASSART Guy -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,70 %10 NS 3T E-1 100 10 55.56
11 NS 3S S+2 460 14 77.78
12 NS 6C E = -980 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,26 %13 NS 2C E+1 -140 10 55.56
14 NS 3S S+3 490 14 77.78
15 NS 1S N-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
13 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,78 %16 NS 1S E+2 -150 3 16.67
17 NS 4P N+1 450 10 55.56
18 NS 4C S = 620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
12 GROSFILS Colette -COULIE Joelle : 42,41 %19 NS 3C N+2 200 6 33.33
20 NS 3S S = 600 14 77.78
21 NS 3P N+1 170 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
22 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,41 %22 NS 5C W = -650 9 50.00
23 NS 3S S+4 720 2 11.11
24 NS 3T E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
21 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,41 %25 NS 1S W+1 -120 8 44.44
26 NS 4C N = 620 14 77.78
27 NS 4P N-2 -100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,78 %28 NS 3S N = 600 15 83.33
29 NS 1S S+2 150 18 100.00
30 NS 3P E+2 -200 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
19 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 57,59 %31 NS 3P E+2 -200 8 44.44
32 NS 3K N-1 -50 4 22.22
33 NS 3P E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 312,0 / 540 = 57,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 DELTOUR Emile -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,78 % 1 NS 1S N = 90 14 77.78
2 NS 3P S+3 230 10 55.56
3 NS 4C S+1 450 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
19 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 57,59 % 4 NS 4C N+2 680 15 83.33
5 NS 1S W+1 -120 7 38.89
6 NS 1S N+2 150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
18 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 38,15 % 7 NS 3S W = -600 11 61.11
8 NS 3S N-2 -100 3 16.67
9 NS 5C E-2 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
16 DEMARTY Chantal -STEED Adrian : 52,78 %13 NS 2C W+1 -140 10 55.56
14 NS 3S S+3 490 14 77.78
15 NS 1S E+1 -120 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
15 CASSART Guy -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,70 %16 NS 2C S-3 -150 3 16.67
17 NS 4P N+1 450 10 55.56
18 NS 4C S = 620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
14 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,26 %19 NS 4C N = 420 10 55.56
20 NS 3S S-1 -100 4 22.22
21 NS 5P N-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
13 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,78 %22 NS 4C W+1 -650 9 50.00
23 NS 6S S+1 1470 17 94.44
24 NS 3K W-4 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
12 GROSFILS Colette -COULIE Joelle : 42,41 %25 NS 2S W+1 -150 4 22.22
26 NS 4C N = 620 14 77.78
27 NS 2S S+1 150 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
22 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,41 %28 NS 3S S+1 630 18 100.00
29 NS 1S N = 90 8 44.44
30 NS 3K N-2 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
21 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,41 %31 NS 3P E+1 -170 16 88.89
32 NS 1C N+1 110 14 77.78
33 NS 1S W+2 -150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 312,0 / 540 = 57,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
22 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,41 % 1 NS 2K S-1 -50 6 33.33
2 NS 3P S = 140 8 44.44
3 NS 4C S+2 480 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
21 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,41 % 4 NS 4C N = 620 3 16.67
5 NS 1S W+2 -150 3 16.67
6 NS 1S W-1 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,78 % 7 NS 3S W+3 -690 1 5.56
8 NS 2T S-1 -50 10 55.56
9 NS 4C E = -620 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
19 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 57,59 %10 NS 3K E = -110 4 22.22
11 NS 2T S+3 150 0 0.00
12 NS 6C E = -980 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 45,74 %16 NS 1S W+1 -120 7 38.89
17 NS 4P N-1 -50 0 0.00
18 NS 4C S = 620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
16 DEMARTY Chantal -STEED Adrian : 52,78 %19 NS 3C N+1 170 2 11.11
20 NS 3S S-1 -100 4 22.22
21 NS 5K E-2 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
15 CASSART Guy -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,70 %22 NS 4C W+1 -650 9 50.00
23 NS 6S S = 1440 10 55.56
24 NS 3T E = -110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
14 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,26 %25 NS 1P N = 80 18 100.00
26 NS 4P S = 620 14 77.78
27 NS 2S S+1 150 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
13 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,78 %28 NS 3S S = 600 15 83.33
29 NS 2S S-1 -100 3 16.67
30 NS 3S E+3 -490 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
12 GROSFILS Colette -COULIE Joelle : 42,41 %31 NS 3P E+1 -170 16 88.89
32 NS 2P W-1 100 11 61.11
33 NS 1K N-2 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 215,0 / 540 = 39,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
13 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,78 % 1 NS 2S S-2 -100 1 5.56
2 NS 5KcE-2 300 12 66.67
3 NS 4C S+2 480 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
12 GROSFILS Colette -COULIE Joelle : 42,41 % 4 NS 4C N+2 680 15 83.33
5 NS 3KcW-2 300 18 100.00
6 NS 1S N+3 180 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
22 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,41 % 7 NS 3S W-2 200 18 100.00
8 NS 2P N-1 -50 10 55.56
9 NS 4C E-1 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
21 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,41 %10 NS 3K E = -110 4 22.22
11 NS 5T S+1 420 6 33.33
12 NS 6C E = -980 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,78 %13 NS 2C E+2 -170 3 16.67
14 NS 3S S+2 460 6 33.33
15 NS 3S E-2 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
18 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 38,15 %19 NS 4C N = 420 10 55.56
20 NS 3S S-1 -100 4 22.22
21 NS 5P N-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 45,74 %22 NS 4C W+1 -650 9 50.00
23 NS 6S S = 1440 10 55.56
24 NS 3K N-2 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
16 DEMARTY Chantal -STEED Adrian : 52,78 %25 NS 2S W+1 -150 4 22.22
26 NS 4C N = 620 14 77.78
27 NS 2S S+2 180 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
15 CASSART Guy -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,70 %28 NS 3S S-2 -200 0 0.00
29 NS 2S S-1 -100 3 16.67
30 NS 4TcE+1 -610 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
14 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,26 %31 NS 3P E+3 -230 1 5.56
32 NS 3K N-1 -50 4 22.22
33 NS 3S E-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 254,0 / 540 = 47,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
15 CASSART Guy -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,70 % 1 NS 1S N+1 120 17 94.44
2 NS 4P S+1 650 15 83.33
3 NS 4C S+2 480 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
14 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,26 % 4 NS 5T S-4 -400 0 0.00
5 NS 3T S = 110 15 83.33
6 NS 1S S+2 150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
13 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,78 % 7 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 22.22
8 NS 3K E-3 150 16 88.89
9 NS 4C E+2 -680 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
12 GROSFILS Colette -COULIE Joelle : 42,41 %10 NS 2C S+1 140 16 88.89
11 NS 3S S = 400 3 16.67
12 NS 4C E+2 -480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
22 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,41 %13 NS 2K S = 90 18 100.00
14 NS 3S S+3 490 14 77.78
15 NS 4K W-3 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
21 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,41 %16 NS 2P S-2 -100 11 61.11
17 NS 4P N+1 450 10 55.56
18 NS 3S N-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
19 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 57,59 %22 NS 4C W+1 -650 9 50.00
23 NS 6S S = 1440 10 55.56
24 NS 4P N-2 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
18 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 38,15 %25 NS 1P N-1 -50 12 66.67
26 NS 4C N-1 -100 2 11.11
27 NS 3S S = 400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 45,74 %28 NS 2P N+2 170 12 66.67
29 NS 2S S = 120 13 72.22
30 NS 4T E+2 -170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
16 DEMARTY Chantal -STEED Adrian : 52,78 %31 NS 3P E+3 -230 1 5.56
32 NS 3K N-1 -50 4 22.22
33 NS 4KcW-3 500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 307,0 / 540 = 56,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine
17 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 45,74 % 1 NS 2T W-1 50 11 61.11
2 NS 4P S-1 -100 2 11.11
3 NS 4PcW-3 800 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
16 DEMARTY Chantal -STEED Adrian : 52,78 % 4 NS 4C N+1 650 8 44.44
5 NS 2K W = -90 10 55.56
6 NS 2K S-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
15 CASSART Guy -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,70 % 7 NS 3S E = -600 11 61.11
8 NS 2K S-1 -50 10 55.56
9 NS 4C E = -620 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,26 %10 NS 3T E-1 100 10 55.56
11 NS 5T S = 400 3 16.67
12 NS 6C E = -980 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
13 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,78 %13 NS 2C W+1 -140 10 55.56
14 NS 3S S+1 430 2 11.11
15 NS 3S E = -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
12 GROSFILS Colette -COULIE Joelle : 42,41 %16 NS 1S W+1 -120 7 38.89
17 NS 4P N+1 450 10 55.56
18 NS 4C S = 620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
22 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,41 %19 NS 2C N+2 170 2 11.11
20 NS 3S S-1 -100 4 22.22
21 NS 5P N-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,78 %25 NS 1S E+2 -150 4 22.22
26 NS 3S N = 600 7 38.89
27 NS 3S S-2 -100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
19 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 57,59 %28 NS 2C W = -110 6 33.33
29 NS 1S S-1 -100 3 16.67
30 NS 3C W-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
18 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 38,15 %31 NS 2P E+3 -200 8 44.44
32 NS 2S S-2 -100 0 0.00
33 NS 5P W-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 202,0 / 540 = 37,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
19 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 57,59 % 1 NS 2P N-1 -50 6 33.33
2 NS 2KcE-1 100 6 33.33
3 NS 4C N+1 450 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
18 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 38,15 % 4 NS 4C N+1 650 8 44.44
5 NS 3T N = 110 15 83.33
6 NS 2K N+1 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 45,74 % 7 NS 3S E+1 -630 7 38.89
8 NS 3CcE-2 300 18 100.00
9 NS 5C E-1 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
16 DEMARTY Chantal -STEED Adrian : 52,78 %10 NS 2S E-1 100 10 55.56
11 NS 3S N+2 460 14 77.78
12 NS 4C E+2 -480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
15 CASSART Guy -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,70 %13 NS 3K N-1 -100 16 88.89
14 NS 3S N+2 460 6 33.33
15 NS 2S E = -120 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
14 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,26 %16 NS 2C N-1 -50 16 88.89
17 NS 4P N+1 450 10 55.56
18 NS 4P N = 620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
13 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,78 %19 NS 4CcN = 590 16 88.89
20 NS 3S N+1 630 18 100.00
21 NS 4PcN-1 -200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
12 GROSFILS Colette -COULIE Joelle : 42,41 %22 NS 4C E+1 -650 9 50.00
23 NS 6T N+1 1390 4 22.22
24 NS 2P N = 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
21 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,41 %28 NS 3S N-1 -100 8 44.44
29 NS 1S N+1 120 13 72.22
30 NS 4C E-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,78 %31 NS 3K N-2 -200 8 44.44
32 NS 2PcE-1 200 17 94.44
33 NS 3S E-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
Total : 327,0 / 540 = 60,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
21 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,41 % 1 NS 1S W-1 50 11 61.11
2 NS 4P S+1 650 15 83.33
3 NS 4C S+2 480 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,78 % 4 NS 4C N = 620 3 16.67
5 NS 2S W+1 -150 3 16.67
6 NS 2S N-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
19 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 57,59 % 7 NS 2S W+1 -150 15 83.33
8 NS 3K S-2 -100 3 16.67
9 NS 3P E+1 -170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
18 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 38,15 %10 NS 2K E+1 -110 4 22.22
11 NS 3S S+2 460 14 77.78
12 NS 6S W-1 50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 45,74 %13 NS 3C E+1 -170 3 16.67
14 NS 3S S+3 490 14 77.78
15 NS 2S E = -120 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
16 DEMARTY Chantal -STEED Adrian : 52,78 %16 NS 2C S-1 -50 16 88.89
17 NS 4P N+1 450 10 55.56
18 NS 4C S = 620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
15 CASSART Guy -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,70 %19 NS 4CcN = 590 16 88.89
20 NS 4P N-1 -100 4 22.22
21 NS 5K E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
14 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,26 %22 NS 5C W = -650 9 50.00
23 NS 6S S = 1440 10 55.56
24 NS 3K N-3 -150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
13 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 52,78 %25 NS 3S E = -600 0 0.00
26 NS 3S N = 600 7 38.89
27 NS 3S S-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
22 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,41 %31 NS 2P W+3 -200 8 44.44
32 NS 2K N = 90 8 44.44
33 NS 3S E-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 260,0 / 540 = 48,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 GROSFILS Colette -COULIE Joelle
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,89 % 1 EO 2C S-2 -100 17 94.44
2 EO 4P S-1 -100 16 88.89
3 EO 4C S+2 480 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 47,04 % 4 EO 4C N+2 680 3 16.67
5 EO 3KcW-2 300 0 0.00
6 EO 1S N+3 180 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,78 % 7 EO 2S W+1 -150 3 16.67
8 EO 3S N-1 -50 8 44.44
9 EO 4C E-1 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,85 %10 EO 2C S+1 140 2 11.11
11 EO 3S S = 400 15 83.33
12 EO 4C E+2 -480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,96 %13 EO 2C W+2 -170 15 83.33
14 EO 3S S+3 490 4 22.22
15 EO 2S E = -120 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
9 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 37,41 %16 EO 1S W+1 -120 11 61.11
17 EO 4P N+1 450 8 44.44
18 EO 4C S = 620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,78 %19 EO 3C N+2 200 12 66.67
20 EO 3S S = 600 4 22.22
21 EO 3P N+1 170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,56 %22 EO 4C E+1 -650 9 50.00
23 EO 6T N+1 1390 14 77.78
24 EO 2P N = 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
5 DELTOUR Emile -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 57,78 %25 EO 2S W+1 -150 14 77.78
26 EO 4C N = 620 4 22.22
27 EO 2S S+1 150 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,81 %31 EO 3P E+1 -170 2 11.11
32 EO 2P W-1 100 7 38.89
33 EO 1K N-2 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 229,0 / 540 = 42,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 47,04 % 1 EO 2S S-2 -100 17 94.44
2 EO 5KcE-2 300 6 33.33
3 EO 4C S+2 480 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,78 % 4 EO 5C N = 650 10 55.56
5 EO 2S E-1 50 6 33.33
6 EO 1T E-1 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,85 % 7 EO 3S E+2 -660 14 77.78
8 EO 3K E-3 150 2 11.11
9 EO 4C E+2 -680 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,96 %10 EO 3T E-2 200 0 0.00
11 EO 3S N+1 430 9 50.00
12 EO 4C E+2 -480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
9 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 37,41 %13 EO 2C W+1 -140 8 44.44
14 EO 3S S+1 430 16 88.89
15 EO 3S E = -400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,78 %16 EO 1S E+2 -150 15 83.33
17 EO 4P N+1 450 8 44.44
18 EO 4C S = 620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,56 %19 EO 4CcN = 590 2 11.11
20 EO 3S N+1 630 0 0.00
21 EO 4PcN-1 -200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
5 DELTOUR Emile -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 57,78 %22 EO 4C W+1 -650 9 50.00
23 EO 6S S+1 1470 1 5.56
24 EO 3K W-4 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,15 %25 EO 3S E = -600 18 100.00
26 EO 3S N = 600 11 61.11
27 EO 3S S-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,81 %28 EO 3S S = 600 3 16.67
29 EO 2S S-1 -100 15 83.33
30 EO 3S E+3 -490 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 285,0 / 540 = 52,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,85 % 4 EO 5T S-4 -400 18 100.00
5 EO 3T S = 110 3 16.67
6 EO 1S S+2 150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,96 % 7 EO 3S E+1 -630 11 61.11
8 EO 2C W = -110 18 100.00
9 EO 4C E = -620 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
9 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 37,41 %10 EO 3T E-1 100 8 44.44
11 EO 5T S = 400 15 83.33
12 EO 6C E = -980 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,78 %13 EO 2C E+1 -140 8 44.44
14 EO 3S S+3 490 4 22.22
15 EO 1S N-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,56 %16 EO 2C N-1 -50 2 11.11
17 EO 4P N+1 450 8 44.44
18 EO 4P N = 620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
5 DELTOUR Emile -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 57,78 %19 EO 4C N = 420 8 44.44
20 EO 3S S-1 -100 14 77.78
21 EO 5P N-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,15 %22 EO 5C W = -650 9 50.00
23 EO 6S S = 1440 8 44.44
24 EO 3K N-3 -150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,81 %25 EO 1P N = 80 0 0.00
26 EO 4P S = 620 4 22.22
27 EO 2S S+1 150 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,89 %28 EO 2C W+1 -140 15 83.33
29 EO 2S S-1 -100 15 83.33
30 EO 3C W = -140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 47,04 %31 EO 3P E+3 -230 17 94.44
32 EO 3K N-1 -50 14 77.78
33 EO 3S E-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 293,0 / 540 = 54,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 CASSART Guy -MOSSERAY Bernadette
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,85 % 1 EO 1S N+1 120 1 5.56
2 EO 4P S+1 650 3 16.67
3 EO 4C S+2 480 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
9 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 37,41 % 7 EO 3S E = -600 7 38.89
8 EO 2K S-1 -50 8 44.44
9 EO 4C E = -620 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,78 %10 EO 3T E-1 100 8 44.44
11 EO 3S S+2 460 4 22.22
12 EO 6C E = -980 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,56 %13 EO 3K N-1 -100 2 11.11
14 EO 3S N+2 460 12 66.67
15 EO 2S E = -120 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
5 DELTOUR Emile -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 57,78 %16 EO 2C S-3 -150 15 83.33
17 EO 4P N+1 450 8 44.44
18 EO 4C S = 620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,15 %19 EO 4CcN = 590 2 11.11
20 EO 4P N-1 -100 14 77.78
21 EO 5K E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,81 %22 EO 4C W+1 -650 9 50.00
23 EO 6S S = 1440 8 44.44
24 EO 3T E = -110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,89 %25 EO 1T N = 70 2 11.11
26 EO 4C N-1 -100 16 88.89
27 EO 3P N+1 170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 47,04 %28 EO 3S S-2 -200 18 100.00
29 EO 2S S-1 -100 15 83.33
30 EO 4TcE+1 -610 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,78 %31 EO 3P E+1 -170 2 11.11
32 EO 2P W-2 200 1 5.56
33 EO 1T E = -70 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
Total : 263,0 / 540 = 48,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 DEMARTY Chantal -STEED Adrian
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,96 % 1 EO 1S N-1 -50 12 66.67
2 EO 4P S-1 -100 16 88.89
3 EO 4K N = 130 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
9 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 37,41 % 4 EO 4C N+1 650 10 55.56
5 EO 2K W = -90 8 44.44
6 EO 2K S-3 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,56 %10 EO 2S E-1 100 8 44.44
11 EO 3S N+2 460 4 22.22
12 EO 4C E+2 -480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
5 DELTOUR Emile -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 57,78 %13 EO 2C W+1 -140 8 44.44
14 EO 3S S+3 490 4 22.22
15 EO 1S E+1 -120 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,15 %16 EO 2C S-1 -50 2 11.11
17 EO 4P N+1 450 8 44.44
18 EO 4C S = 620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,81 %19 EO 3C N+1 170 16 88.89
20 EO 3S S-1 -100 14 77.78
21 EO 5K E-2 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,89 %22 EO 4P W+1 -650 9 50.00
23 EO 6S S = 1440 8 44.44
24 EO 3T E = -110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 47,04 %25 EO 2S W+1 -150 14 77.78
26 EO 4C N = 620 4 22.22
27 EO 2S S+2 180 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,78 %28 EO 3C W = -140 15 83.33
29 EO 1S S+1 120 5 27.78
30 EO 4T E+1 -150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,85 %31 EO 3P E+3 -230 17 94.44
32 EO 3K N-1 -50 14 77.78
33 EO 4KcW-3 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 285,0 / 540 = 52,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
9 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 37,41 % 1 EO 2T W-1 50 7 38.89
2 EO 4P S-1 -100 16 88.89
3 EO 4PcW-3 800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,78 % 4 EO 4C N+2 680 3 16.67
5 EO 1S W+1 -120 11 61.11
6 EO 2T N+1 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,56 % 7 EO 3S E+1 -630 11 61.11
8 EO 3CcE-2 300 0 0.00
9 EO 5C E-1 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,15 %13 EO 3C E+1 -170 15 83.33
14 EO 3S S+3 490 4 22.22
15 EO 2S E = -120 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,81 %16 EO 1S W+1 -120 11 61.11
17 EO 4P N-1 -50 18 100.00
18 EO 4C S = 620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,89 %19 EO 4C N = 420 8 44.44
20 EO 3S S = 600 4 22.22
21 EO 5K E-2 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 47,04 %22 EO 4C W+1 -650 9 50.00
23 EO 6S S = 1440 8 44.44
24 EO 3K N-2 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,78 %25 EO 2C S-1 -50 6 33.33
26 EO 4C N = 620 4 22.22
27 EO 2C E-2 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,85 %28 EO 2P N+2 170 6 33.33
29 EO 2S S = 120 5 27.78
30 EO 4T E+2 -170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,96 %31 EO 2P E+3 -200 10 55.56
32 EO 2P W-1 100 7 38.89
33 EO 3S E = -400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 247,0 / 540 = 45,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,78 % 1 EO 1S S+1 120 1 5.56
2 EO 1PxS+4 2320 0 0.00
3 EO 4PcW-2 500 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,56 % 4 EO 4C N+1 650 10 55.56
5 EO 3T N = 110 3 16.67
6 EO 2K N+1 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
5 DELTOUR Emile -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 57,78 % 7 EO 3S W = -600 7 38.89
8 EO 3S N-2 -100 15 83.33
9 EO 5C E-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,15 %10 EO 2K E+1 -110 14 77.78
11 EO 3S S+2 460 4 22.22
12 EO 6S W-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,89 %16 EO 2C S-1 -50 2 11.11
17 EO 5P N = 450 8 44.44
18 EO 4PcW-5 1100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 47,04 %19 EO 4C N = 420 8 44.44
20 EO 3S S-1 -100 14 77.78
21 EO 5P N-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,78 %22 EO 4C W+1 -650 9 50.00
23 EO 6S S+1 1470 1 5.56
24 EO 3K N-3 -150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,85 %25 EO 1P N-1 -50 6 33.33
26 EO 4C N-1 -100 16 88.89
27 EO 3S S = 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,96 %28 EO 2P N = 110 8 44.44
29 EO 2S S = 120 5 27.78
30 EO 4C W-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
9 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 37,41 %31 EO 2P E+3 -200 10 55.56
32 EO 2S S-2 -100 18 100.00
33 EO 5P W-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 206,0 / 540 = 38,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,56 % 1 EO 2P N-1 -50 12 66.67
2 EO 2KcE-1 100 12 66.67
3 EO 4C N+1 450 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
5 DELTOUR Emile -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 57,78 % 4 EO 4C N+2 680 3 16.67
5 EO 1S W+1 -120 11 61.11
6 EO 1S N+2 150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,15 % 7 EO 2S W+1 -150 3 16.67
8 EO 3K S-2 -100 15 83.33
9 EO 3P E+1 -170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,81 %10 EO 3K E = -110 14 77.78
11 EO 2T S+3 150 18 100.00
12 EO 6C E = -980 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,89 %13 EO 2C W = -110 4 22.22
14 EO 3S S+2 460 12 66.67
15 EO 1S N-3 -300 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,78 %19 EO 2C N+2 170 16 88.89
20 EO 3S S = 600 4 22.22
21 EO 5KcE-1 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,85 %22 EO 4C W+1 -650 9 50.00
23 EO 6S S = 1440 8 44.44
24 EO 4P N-2 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,96 %25 EO 2C S-1 -50 6 33.33
26 EO 3S N-1 -100 16 88.89
27 EO 4P N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
9 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 37,41 %28 EO 2C W = -110 12 66.67
29 EO 1S S-1 -100 15 83.33
30 EO 3C W-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,78 %31 EO 3P E+2 -200 10 55.56
32 EO 3K N-1 -50 14 77.78
33 EO 3P E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 311,0 / 540 = 57,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
5 DELTOUR Emile -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 57,78 % 1 EO 1S N = 90 4 22.22
2 EO 3P S+3 230 8 44.44
3 EO 4C S+1 450 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,15 % 4 EO 4C N = 620 15 83.33
5 EO 2S W+1 -150 15 83.33
6 EO 2S N-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,81 % 7 EO 3S W+3 -690 17 94.44
8 EO 2T S-1 -50 8 44.44
9 EO 4C E = -620 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,89 %10 EO 1S E+2 -150 18 100.00
11 EO 6T S = 920 0 0.00
12 EO 4C E+2 -480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 47,04 %13 EO 2C E+2 -170 15 83.33
14 EO 3S S+2 460 12 66.67
15 EO 3S E-2 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,78 %16 EO 1S W+3 -180 18 100.00
17 EO 4P N+1 450 8 44.44
18 EO 3S N = 600 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,96 %22 EO 4C W+1 -650 9 50.00
23 EO 6S S-1 -100 18 100.00
24 EO 2P N-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
9 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 37,41 %25 EO 1S E+2 -150 14 77.78
26 EO 3S N = 600 11 61.11
27 EO 3S S-2 -100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,78 %28 EO 3S N = 600 3 16.67
29 EO 1S S+2 150 0 0.00
30 EO 3P E+2 -200 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,56 %31 EO 3K N-2 -200 10 55.56
32 EO 2PcE-1 200 1 5.56
33 EO 3S E-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
Total : 312,0 / 540 = 57,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,15 % 1 EO 1S W-1 50 7 38.89
2 EO 4P S+1 650 3 16.67
3 EO 4C S+2 480 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,81 % 4 EO 4C N = 620 15 83.33
5 EO 1S W+2 -150 15 83.33
6 EO 1S W-1 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,89 % 7 EO 3S W+3 -690 17 94.44
8 EO 3S N-1 -50 8 44.44
9 EO 4C E+2 -680 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 47,04 %10 EO 3K E = -110 14 77.78
11 EO 5T S+1 420 12 66.67
12 EO 6C E = -980 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,78 %13 EO 2C W+2 -170 15 83.33
14 EO 5T S+1 420 18 100.00
15 EO 3S E-2 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,85 %16 EO 2P S-2 -100 7 38.89
17 EO 4P N+1 450 8 44.44
18 EO 3S N-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,96 %19 EO 4CcN = 590 2 11.11
20 EO 3C N = 140 8 44.44
21 EO 5PcN-1 -200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,78 %25 EO 1S W+1 -120 10 55.56
26 EO 4C N = 620 4 22.22
27 EO 4P N-2 -100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 60,56 %28 EO 3S N-1 -100 10 55.56
29 EO 1S N+1 120 5 27.78
30 EO 4C E-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
5 DELTOUR Emile -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 57,78 %31 EO 3P E+1 -170 2 11.11
32 EO 1C N+1 110 4 22.22
33 EO 1S W+2 -150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 310,0 / 540 = 57,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,81 % 1 EO 2K S-1 -50 12 66.67
2 EO 3P S = 140 10 55.56
3 EO 4C S+2 480 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,89 % 4 EO 4C S+2 680 3 16.67
5 EO 3T S-2 -200 18 100.00
6 EO 3S E-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 47,04 % 7 EO 3S W-2 200 0 0.00
8 EO 2P N-1 -50 8 44.44
9 EO 4C E-1 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 52,78 %10 EO 2C S = 110 4 22.22
11 EO 3S S+1 430 9 50.00
12 EO 4C E+2 -480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,85 %13 EO 2K S = 90 0 0.00
14 EO 3S S+3 490 4 22.22
15 EO 4K W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,96 %16 EO 3C N-2 -100 7 38.89
17 EO 4P N+1 450 8 44.44
18 EO 2PcW-1 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
9 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 37,41 %19 EO 2C N+2 170 16 88.89
20 EO 3S S-1 -100 14 77.78
21 EO 5P N-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,78 %22 EO 5C W = -650 9 50.00
23 EO 3S S+4 720 16 88.89
24 EO 3T E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
5 DELTOUR Emile -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 57,78 %28 EO 3S S+1 630 0 0.00
29 EO 1S N = 90 10 55.56
30 EO 3K N-2 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,15 %31 EO 2P W+3 -200 10 55.56
32 EO 2K N = 90 10 55.56
33 EO 3S E-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 229,0 / 540 = 42,41 %
|
|