|
Tournoi du 22-07-13
1 62,96 9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
2 58,80 4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
3 58,56 2 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
4 53,24 6 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
5 49,77 3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine
6 43,29 5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
7 42,59 1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga
8 41,20 7 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita
9 39,58 8 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 56,48 15 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard
2 56,25 16 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand
~ 56,25 17 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
4 55,79 10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
5 50,93 18 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
6 50,23 13 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
7 44,44 11 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger
8 43,75 14 LIGOT Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard
9 35,88 12 VERBOIS Léon -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
PAIRE Nr : 1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,79 % 1 NS 3C N-1 -50 3 18.75
2 NS 2S N-1 -100 3 18.75
3 NS 2C E = -110 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
18 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,93 % 4 NS 5C W+1 -680 4 25.00
5 NS 6C E-2 100 15 93.75
6 NS 3S E = -600 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
17 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 56,25 % 7 NS 4CcN-2 -500 0 0.00
8 NS 3P W-1 50 9 56.25
9 NS 4PcN = 590 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
16 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 56,25 %10 NS 4P S+1 650 8 50.00
11 NS 3C W-1 50 7 43.75
12 NS 3S W = -400 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
15 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 56,48 %13 NS 4C S = 620 4 25.00
14 NS 5C S-1 -50 1 6.25
15 NS 4CcN = 790 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
14 LIGOT Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,75 %16 NS 3T N = 110 10 62.50
17 NS 3PcW+1 -630 0 0.00
18 NS 3K S+1 130 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
13 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,23 %19 NS 3S E+1 -630 6 37.50
20 NS 2S E = -120 14 87.50
21 NS 4P E+3 -510 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
12 VERBOIS Léon -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 35,88 %22 NS 2C S+1 140 7 43.75
23 NS 3S N+1 630 13 81.25
24 NS 2K E-1 50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
11 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 44,44 %25 NS 4P N = 420 8 50.00
26 NS 2P E = -110 5 31.25
27 NS 3S W+3 -490 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
Total : 184,0 / 432 = 42,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
12 VERBOIS Léon -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 35,88 % 1 NS 2S S = 120 8 50.00
2 NS 1S W = -90 8 50.00
3 NS 2C E = -110 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
11 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 44,44 % 4 NS 4C W-1 100 16 100.00
5 NS 6T E-2 100 15 93.75
6 NS 4P E-1 100 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 91,67 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,79 % 7 NS 2P E = -110 10 62.50
8 NS 2S E-1 50 9 56.25
9 NS 2S S-1 -50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
18 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,93 %10 NS 4P S+1 650 8 50.00
11 NS 2C W-1 50 7 43.75
12 NS 2S W+2 -180 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
17 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 56,25 %13 NS 4C S+1 650 12 75.00
14 NS 4C N = 420 6 37.50
15 NS 2PcS+3 1270 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
16 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 56,25 %16 NS 3P S = 140 12 75.00
17 NS 4P W-1 50 14 87.50
18 NS 3K S+1 130 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
15 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 56,48 %19 NS 3S W+2 -660 1 6.25
20 NS 3S E+3 -690 4 25.00
21 NS 4P W+2 -480 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
14 LIGOT Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,75 %22 NS 4C S-1 -50 0 0.00
23 NS 3S N+1 630 13 81.25
24 NS 4T E-1 50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
13 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,23 %25 NS 4P N = 420 8 50.00
26 NS 3S W-2 200 15 93.75
27 NS 3S E+1 -430 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
Total : 253,0 / 432 = 58,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine
14 LIGOT Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,75 % 1 NS 3C N = 140 12 75.00
2 NS 3KcW-1 100 13 81.25
3 NS 3T W-2 200 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
13 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,23 % 4 NS 5C W = -650 12 75.00
5 NS 6C E = -980 4 25.00
6 NS 4P W = -620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 VERBOIS Léon -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 35,88 % 7 NS 4C N-3 -300 2 12.50
8 NS 3P E = -140 3 18.75
9 NS 3S S-1 -50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
11 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 44,44 %10 NS 4P S+1 650 8 50.00
11 NS 2C W+1 -140 0 0.00
12 NS 3P E = -140 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,79 %13 NS 4C S+1 650 12 75.00
14 NS 5C N = 450 13 81.25
15 NS 4P S-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
18 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,93 %16 NS 2P S+2 170 15 93.75
17 NS 3PcW = -530 2 12.50
18 NS 4TcW-2 300 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
17 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 56,25 %19 NS 3S E+1 -630 6 37.50
20 NS 3S E+3 -690 4 25.00
21 NS 4P W+2 -480 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
16 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 56,25 %22 NS 3C S+1 170 15 93.75
23 NS 5K S-1 -100 3 18.75
24 NS 4T E-2 100 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
15 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 56,48 %25 NS 4P N = 420 8 50.00
26 NS 2S W = -120 2 12.50
27 NS 3S E+1 -430 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
Total : 215,0 / 432 = 49,77 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
16 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 56,25 % 1 NS 3C N = 140 12 75.00
2 NS 1S W = -90 8 50.00
3 NS 2C E = -110 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
15 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 56,48 % 4 NS 4C W+2 -680 4 25.00
5 NS 3S E+2 -460 10 62.50
6 NS 4P W-2 200 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
14 LIGOT Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,75 % 7 NS 3C N-1 -100 12 75.00
8 NS 4P W = -420 0 0.00
9 NS 4P N-1 -50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
13 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,23 %10 NS 4P S+1 650 8 50.00
11 NS 3K S = 110 14 87.50
12 NS 3S W = -400 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
12 VERBOIS Léon -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 35,88 %13 NS 4C S+1 650 12 75.00
14 NS 4C N = 420 6 37.50
15 NS 4PcS+1 990 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
11 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 44,44 %16 NS 2T S+4 170 15 93.75
17 NS 3P W-1 50 14 87.50
18 NS 3K S+1 130 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,79 %19 NS 2S E+3 -210 10 62.50
20 NS 3S E+3 -690 4 25.00
21 NS 4P W+2 -480 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
18 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,93 %22 NS 3C N = 140 7 43.75
23 NS 4K N+1 150 6 37.50
24 NS 4T W-2 100 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
17 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 56,25 %25 NS 4P S = 420 8 50.00
26 NS 3S W-1 100 10 62.50
27 NS 3S W = -400 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 254,0 / 432 = 58,80 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
18 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,93 % 1 NS 2P E = -110 0 0.00
2 NS 2C S-1 -100 3 18.75
3 NS 2P E = -110 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
17 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 56,25 % 4 NS 4C E+2 -680 4 25.00
5 NS 6C E = -980 4 25.00
6 NS 3S W = -600 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
16 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 56,25 % 7 NS 3P E-2 200 15 93.75
8 NS 4P W-1 50 9 56.25
9 NS 3S S-1 -50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
15 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 56,48 %10 NS 4P S+1 650 8 50.00
11 NS 3C W-1 50 7 43.75
12 NS 4C E = -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
14 LIGOT Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,75 %13 NS 4C S = 620 4 25.00
14 NS 4C N = 420 6 37.50
15 NS 4P S+1 650 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
13 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,23 %16 NS 3C W = -140 3 18.75
17 NS 3P W+1 -170 5 31.25
18 NS 4K S-1 -100 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
12 VERBOIS Léon -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 35,88 %19 NS 3K W+1 -130 16 100.00
20 NS 3S E-1 100 16 100.00
21 NS 4P W+2 -480 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 87,50 %
11 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 44,44 %22 NS 2C S+1 140 7 43.75
23 NS 3S S-1 -100 3 18.75
24 NS 2K N-2 -100 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,79 %25 NS 4P N = 420 8 50.00
26 NS 4P E-1 100 10 62.50
27 NS 4P E-2 100 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
Total : 187,0 / 432 = 43,29 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
11 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 44,44 % 1 NS 3C N = 140 12 75.00
2 NS 3KcE-1 100 13 81.25
3 NS 1S N+1 120 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,79 % 4 NS 4C E+2 -680 4 25.00
5 NS 6C E = -980 4 25.00
6 NS 3S E = -600 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
18 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,93 % 7 NS 3C N-2 -200 6 37.50
8 NS 4P E-2 100 14 87.50
9 NS 3P N-1 -50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
17 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 56,25 %10 NS 4P N+1 650 8 50.00
11 NS 2P E-1 50 7 43.75
12 NS 1S E+2 -150 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
16 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 56,25 %13 NS 4C N = 620 4 25.00
14 NS 5C N-1 -50 1 6.25
15 NS 4P N = 620 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
15 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 56,48 %16 NS 5K N-1 -50 6 37.50
17 NS 2P E+1 -140 9 56.25
18 NS 3S N-1 -100 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
14 LIGOT Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,75 %19 NS 2P E+3 -200 13 81.25
20 NS 3S E+3 -690 4 25.00
21 NS 5P E = -450 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
13 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,23 %22 NS 2C N+1 140 7 43.75
23 NS 2KcE-5 1400 16 100.00
24 NS 2T E+2 -130 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
12 VERBOIS Léon -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 35,88 %25 NS 4P N+1 450 16 100.00
26 NS 3S E-2 200 15 93.75
27 NS 3S E = -400 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
Total : 230,0 / 432 = 53,24 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita
13 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,23 % 1 NS 4CcN+1 690 16 100.00
2 NS 1S W = -90 8 50.00
3 NS 3C E = -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 VERBOIS Léon -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 35,88 % 4 NS 4C W+1 -650 12 75.00
5 NS 3S E+1 -430 12 75.00
6 NS 2P W = -110 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
11 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 44,44 % 7 NS 3C N-2 -200 6 37.50
8 NS 2P W+1 -140 3 18.75
9 NS 4P N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,79 %10 NS 4P S+1 650 8 50.00
11 NS 2C W = -110 2 12.50
12 NS 3S W = -400 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
18 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,93 %13 NS 1S N+3 180 0 0.00
14 NS 4C N+1 450 13 81.25
15 NS 4C N+1 650 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
17 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 56,25 %16 NS 2C W+1 -140 3 18.75
17 NS 3P W = -140 9 56.25
18 NS 4T W-1 50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
16 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 56,25 %19 NS 3S W+2 -660 1 6.25
20 NS 3S E+3 -690 4 25.00
21 NS 4P E+3 -510 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
15 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 56,48 %22 NS 3C S = 140 7 43.75
23 NS 3S S = 600 9 56.25
24 NS 2S N-1 -50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
14 LIGOT Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,75 %25 NS 4P N = 420 8 50.00
26 NS 2P E = -110 5 31.25
27 NS 2P W-1 50 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
Total : 178,0 / 432 = 41,20 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
15 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 56,48 % 1 NS 2P E-2 100 6 37.50
2 NS 4K W-3 150 16 100.00
3 NS 2C E = -110 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
14 LIGOT Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,75 % 4 NS 4C W+1 -650 12 75.00
5 NS 6C E = -980 4 25.00
6 NS 3S E = -600 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
13 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,23 % 7 NS 4P E-2 200 15 93.75
8 NS 4P E-1 50 9 56.25
9 NS 4P N-1 -50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
12 VERBOIS Léon -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 35,88 %10 NS 4P S+1 650 8 50.00
11 NS 3P E-2 100 12 75.00
12 NS 3S W = -400 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
11 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 44,44 %13 NS 4C S+1 650 12 75.00
14 NS 4C N+1 450 13 81.25
15 NS 3C N+1 170 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,79 %16 NS 4PcS-2 -300 0 0.00
17 NS 2P W+2 -170 5 31.25
18 NS 4K S-1 -100 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
18 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,93 %19 NS 3S E+1 -630 6 37.50
20 NS 3C W+2 -200 12 75.00
21 NS 3S E+4 -520 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
17 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 56,25 %22 NS 3P S = 140 7 43.75
23 NS 5KcS-3 -800 0 0.00
24 NS 3T W = -110 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
16 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 56,25 %25 NS 4P N-1 -50 0 0.00
26 NS 2S W+1 -150 0 0.00
27 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 8,33 %
Total : 171,0 / 432 = 39,58 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
17 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 56,25 % 1 NS 3C N-1 -50 3 18.75
2 NS 3C S-2 -200 0 0.00
3 NS 2T W-1 100 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
16 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 56,25 % 4 NS 4C W+2 -680 4 25.00
5 NS 6C E = -980 4 25.00
6 NS 4P W-1 100 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
15 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 56,48 % 7 NS 3C N-2 -200 6 37.50
8 NS 2S W-3 150 16 100.00
9 NS 2P N-1 -50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
14 LIGOT Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,75 %10 NS 4P S+1 650 8 50.00
11 NS 1S N+2 150 16 100.00
12 NS 3S W-3 150 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
13 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,23 %13 NS 4C S+1 650 12 75.00
14 NS 4C N+1 450 13 81.25
15 NS 4C N+1 650 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
12 VERBOIS Léon -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 35,88 %16 NS 4C W-1 100 8 50.00
17 NS 4P W-1 50 14 87.50
18 NS 5TcW-3 500 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
11 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 44,44 %19 NS 3P W+2 -200 13 81.25
20 NS 3S E+2 -660 10 62.50
21 NS 4P W+2 -480 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,79 %22 NS 2C S+2 170 15 93.75
23 NS 3S N = 600 9 56.25
24 NS 2K E-1 50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
18 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,93 %25 NS 4P N = 420 8 50.00
26 NS 3P E-1 100 10 62.50
27 NS 3S E = -400 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 272,0 / 432 = 62,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,59 % 1 EO 3C N-1 -50 13 81.25
2 EO 2S N-1 -100 13 81.25
3 EO 2C E = -110 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
6 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,24 % 4 EO 4C E+2 -680 12 75.00
5 EO 6C E = -980 12 75.00
6 EO 3S E = -600 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
2 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 58,56 % 7 EO 2P E = -110 6 37.50
8 EO 2S E-1 50 7 43.75
9 EO 2S S-1 -50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
7 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 41,20 %10 EO 4P S+1 650 8 50.00
11 EO 2C W = -110 14 87.50
12 EO 3S W = -400 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 49,77 %13 EO 4C S+1 650 4 25.00
14 EO 5C N = 450 3 18.75
15 EO 4P S-1 -100 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
8 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 39,58 %16 EO 4PcS-2 -300 16 100.00
17 EO 2P W+2 -170 11 68.75
18 EO 4K S-1 -100 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 58,80 %19 EO 2S E+3 -210 6 37.50
20 EO 3S E+3 -690 12 75.00
21 EO 4P W+2 -480 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 62,96 %22 EO 2C S+2 170 1 6.25
23 EO 3S N = 600 7 43.75
24 EO 2K E-1 50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,29 %25 EO 4P N = 420 8 50.00
26 EO 4P E-1 100 6 37.50
27 EO 4P E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
Total : 241,0 / 432 = 55,79 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger
6 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,24 % 1 EO 3C N = 140 4 25.00
2 EO 3KcE-1 100 3 18.75
3 EO 1S N+1 120 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
2 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 58,56 % 4 EO 4C W-1 100 0 0.00
5 EO 6T E-2 100 1 6.25
6 EO 4P E-1 100 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 8,33 %
7 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 41,20 % 7 EO 3C N-2 -200 10 62.50
8 EO 2P W+1 -140 13 81.25
9 EO 4P N-2 -100 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 49,77 %10 EO 4P S+1 650 8 50.00
11 EO 2C W+1 -140 16 100.00
12 EO 3P E = -140 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
8 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 39,58 %13 EO 4C S+1 650 4 25.00
14 EO 4C N+1 450 3 18.75
15 EO 3C N+1 170 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 58,80 %16 EO 2T S+4 170 1 6.25
17 EO 3P W-1 50 2 12.50
18 EO 3K S+1 130 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 62,96 %19 EO 3P W+2 -200 3 18.75
20 EO 3S E+2 -660 6 37.50
21 EO 4P W+2 -480 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,29 %22 EO 2C S+1 140 9 56.25
23 EO 3S S-1 -100 13 81.25
24 EO 2K N-2 -100 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,59 %25 EO 4P N = 420 8 50.00
26 EO 2P E = -110 11 68.75
27 EO 3S W+3 -490 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
Total : 192,0 / 432 = 44,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 VERBOIS Léon -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
2 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 58,56 % 1 EO 2S S = 120 8 50.00
2 EO 1S W = -90 8 50.00
3 EO 2C E = -110 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
7 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 41,20 % 4 EO 4C W+1 -650 4 25.00
5 EO 3S E+1 -430 4 25.00
6 EO 2P W = -110 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 49,77 % 7 EO 4C N-3 -300 14 87.50
8 EO 3P E = -140 13 81.25
9 EO 3S S-1 -50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
8 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 39,58 %10 EO 4P S+1 650 8 50.00
11 EO 3P E-2 100 4 25.00
12 EO 3S W = -400 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 58,80 %13 EO 4C S+1 650 4 25.00
14 EO 4C N = 420 10 62.50
15 EO 4PcS+1 990 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 62,96 %16 EO 4C W-1 100 8 50.00
17 EO 4P W-1 50 2 12.50
18 EO 5TcW-3 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,29 %19 EO 3K W+1 -130 0 0.00
20 EO 3S E-1 100 0 0.00
21 EO 4P W+2 -480 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 12,50 %
1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,59 %22 EO 2C S+1 140 9 56.25
23 EO 3S N+1 630 3 18.75
24 EO 2K E-1 50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
6 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,24 %25 EO 4P N+1 450 0 0.00
26 EO 3S E-2 200 1 6.25
27 EO 3S E = -400 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
Total : 155,0 / 432 = 35,88 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
7 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 41,20 % 1 EO 4CcN+1 690 0 0.00
2 EO 1S W = -90 8 50.00
3 EO 3C E = -140 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 49,77 % 4 EO 5C W = -650 4 25.00
5 EO 6C E = -980 12 75.00
6 EO 4P W = -620 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
8 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 39,58 % 7 EO 4P E-2 200 1 6.25
8 EO 4P E-1 50 7 43.75
9 EO 4P N-1 -50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 58,80 %10 EO 4P S+1 650 8 50.00
11 EO 3K S = 110 2 12.50
12 EO 3S W = -400 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 62,96 %13 EO 4C S+1 650 4 25.00
14 EO 4C N+1 450 3 18.75
15 EO 4C N+1 650 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,29 %16 EO 3C W = -140 13 81.25
17 EO 3P W+1 -170 11 68.75
18 EO 4K S-1 -100 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,59 %19 EO 3S E+1 -630 10 62.50
20 EO 2S E = -120 2 12.50
21 EO 4P E+3 -510 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
6 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,24 %22 EO 2C N+1 140 9 56.25
23 EO 2KcE-5 1400 0 0.00
24 EO 2T E+2 -130 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
2 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 58,56 %25 EO 4P N = 420 8 50.00
26 EO 3S W-2 200 1 6.25
27 EO 3S E+1 -430 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
Total : 217,0 / 432 = 50,23 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 LIGOT Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard
3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 49,77 % 1 EO 3C N = 140 4 25.00
2 EO 3KcW-1 100 3 18.75
3 EO 3T W-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
8 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 39,58 % 4 EO 4C W+1 -650 4 25.00
5 EO 6C E = -980 12 75.00
6 EO 3S E = -600 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 58,80 % 7 EO 3C N-1 -100 4 25.00
8 EO 4P W = -420 16 100.00
9 EO 4P N-1 -50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 62,96 %10 EO 4P S+1 650 8 50.00
11 EO 1S N+2 150 0 0.00
12 EO 3S W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,29 %13 EO 4C S = 620 12 75.00
14 EO 4C N = 420 10 62.50
15 EO 4P S+1 650 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,59 %16 EO 3T N = 110 6 37.50
17 EO 3PcW+1 -630 16 100.00
18 EO 3K S+1 130 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
6 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,24 %19 EO 2P E+3 -200 3 18.75
20 EO 3S E+3 -690 12 75.00
21 EO 5P E = -450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
2 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 58,56 %22 EO 4C S-1 -50 16 100.00
23 EO 3S N+1 630 3 18.75
24 EO 4T E-1 50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
7 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 41,20 %25 EO 4P N = 420 8 50.00
26 EO 2P E = -110 11 68.75
27 EO 2P W-1 50 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
Total : 189,0 / 432 = 43,75 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard
8 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 39,58 % 1 EO 2P E-2 100 10 62.50
2 EO 4K W-3 150 0 0.00
3 EO 2C E = -110 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 58,80 % 4 EO 4C W+2 -680 12 75.00
5 EO 3S E+2 -460 6 37.50
6 EO 4P W-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 62,96 % 7 EO 3C N-2 -200 10 62.50
8 EO 2S W-3 150 0 0.00
9 EO 2P N-1 -50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,29 %10 EO 4P S+1 650 8 50.00
11 EO 3C W-1 50 9 56.25
12 EO 4C E = -420 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,59 %13 EO 4C S = 620 12 75.00
14 EO 5C S-1 -50 15 93.75
15 EO 4CcN = 790 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
6 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,24 %16 EO 5K N-1 -50 10 62.50
17 EO 2P E+1 -140 7 43.75
18 EO 3S N-1 -100 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
2 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 58,56 %19 EO 3S W+2 -660 15 93.75
20 EO 3S E+3 -690 12 75.00
21 EO 4P W+2 -480 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
7 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 41,20 %22 EO 3C S = 140 9 56.25
23 EO 3S S = 600 7 43.75
24 EO 2S N-1 -50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 49,77 %25 EO 4P N = 420 8 50.00
26 EO 2S W = -120 14 87.50
27 EO 3S E+1 -430 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
Total : 244,0 / 432 = 56,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand
4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 58,80 % 1 EO 3C N = 140 4 25.00
2 EO 1S W = -90 8 50.00
3 EO 2C E = -110 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 62,96 % 4 EO 4C W+2 -680 12 75.00
5 EO 6C E = -980 12 75.00
6 EO 4P W-1 100 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,29 % 7 EO 3P E-2 200 1 6.25
8 EO 4P W-1 50 7 43.75
9 EO 3S S-1 -50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,59 %10 EO 4P S+1 650 8 50.00
11 EO 3C W-1 50 9 56.25
12 EO 3S W = -400 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
6 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,24 %13 EO 4C N = 620 12 75.00
14 EO 5C N-1 -50 15 93.75
15 EO 4P N = 620 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
2 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 58,56 %16 EO 3P S = 140 4 25.00
17 EO 4P W-1 50 2 12.50
18 EO 3K S+1 130 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
7 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 41,20 %19 EO 3S W+2 -660 15 93.75
20 EO 3S E+3 -690 12 75.00
21 EO 4P E+3 -510 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 49,77 %22 EO 3C S+1 170 1 6.25
23 EO 5K S-1 -100 13 81.25
24 EO 4T E-2 100 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
8 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 39,58 %25 EO 4P N-1 -50 16 100.00
26 EO 2S W+1 -150 16 100.00
27 EO 3S W+1 -430 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 91,67 %
Total : 243,0 / 432 = 56,25 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 62,96 % 1 EO 3C N-1 -50 13 81.25
2 EO 3C S-2 -200 16 100.00
3 EO 2T W-1 100 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,29 % 4 EO 4C E+2 -680 12 75.00
5 EO 6C E = -980 12 75.00
6 EO 3S W = -600 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,59 % 7 EO 4CcN-2 -500 16 100.00
8 EO 3P W-1 50 7 43.75
9 EO 4PcN = 590 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
6 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,24 %10 EO 4P N+1 650 8 50.00
11 EO 2P E-1 50 9 56.25
12 EO 1S E+2 -150 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
2 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 58,56 %13 EO 4C S+1 650 4 25.00
14 EO 4C N = 420 10 62.50
15 EO 2PcS+3 1270 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
7 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 41,20 %16 EO 2C W+1 -140 13 81.25
17 EO 3P W = -140 7 43.75
18 EO 4T W-1 50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 49,77 %19 EO 3S E+1 -630 10 62.50
20 EO 3S E+3 -690 12 75.00
21 EO 4P W+2 -480 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
8 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 39,58 %22 EO 3P S = 140 9 56.25
23 EO 5KcS-3 -800 16 100.00
24 EO 3T W = -110 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 58,80 %25 EO 4P S = 420 8 50.00
26 EO 3S W-1 100 6 37.50
27 EO 3S W = -400 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 243,0 / 432 = 56,25 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,29 % 1 EO 2P E = -110 16 100.00
2 EO 2C S-1 -100 13 81.25
3 EO 2P E = -110 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,59 % 4 EO 5C W+1 -680 12 75.00
5 EO 6C E-2 100 1 6.25
6 EO 3S E = -600 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
6 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,24 % 7 EO 3C N-2 -200 10 62.50
8 EO 4P E-2 100 2 12.50
9 EO 3P N-1 -50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
2 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 58,56 %10 EO 4P S+1 650 8 50.00
11 EO 2C W-1 50 9 56.25
12 EO 2S W+2 -180 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
7 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 41,20 %13 EO 1S N+3 180 16 100.00
14 EO 4C N+1 450 3 18.75
15 EO 4C N+1 650 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 49,77 %16 EO 2P S+2 170 1 6.25
17 EO 3PcW = -530 14 87.50
18 EO 4TcW-2 300 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
8 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 39,58 %19 EO 3S E+1 -630 10 62.50
20 EO 3C W+2 -200 4 25.00
21 EO 3S E+4 -520 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 58,80 %22 EO 3C N = 140 9 56.25
23 EO 4K N+1 150 10 62.50
24 EO 4T W-2 100 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 62,96 %25 EO 4P N = 420 8 50.00
26 EO 3P E-1 100 6 37.50
27 EO 3S E = -400 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 220,0 / 432 = 50,93 %
|
|