|
Tournoi du 23-03-15
1 67,41 1 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand
2 56,85 9 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
3 56,11 11 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin
4 55,74 5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
5 55,37 3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
6 52,78 2 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
7 51,11 8 MATELART Marc -MASSAUX Joel
8 46,11 6 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
9 43,70 7 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard
10 33,70 4 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse
11 31,11 10 ARICKX Roger -LEBRUN Robert
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 60,37 12 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
2 58,70 14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
3 56,48 16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
4 56,11 21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
5 54,07 13 GROSFILS Colette -WANDERPEPEN Janine
6 46,11 20 de WASSEIGE Ariane -POWIS Vinciane
7 45,56 18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
8 45,00 17 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
~ 45,00 19 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard
10 43,89 22 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
11 38,70 15 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques
PAIRE Nr : 1 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand
12 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 60,37 % 1 NS 3S N-1 -50 0 0.00
2 NS 3S N+2 660 12 66.67
3 NS 3T W-1 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
22 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 43,89 % 4 NS 3S E-1 100 14 77.78
5 NS 3S N+2 660 17 94.44
6 NS 3S E-1 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,11 % 7 NS 4T S+1 150 18 100.00
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 11 61.11
9 NS 1S S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
20 de WASSEIGE Ariane -POWIS Vinciane : 46,11 %10 NS 2C S+1 140 9 50.00
11 NS 3S E-2 100 15 83.33
12 NS 2S S+2 180 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
19 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,00 %13 NS 3S S+1 630 15 83.33
14 NS 3P N = 140 18 100.00
15 NS 4P W-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,56 %16 NS 4P S = 420 9 50.00
17 NS 3ScW-4 800 18 100.00
18 NS 2P S+2 170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,00 %19 NS 4C W+2 -680 4 22.22
20 NS 4C W-1 100 12 66.67
21 NS 3C N = 140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 %22 NS 2P S-1 -50 8 44.44
23 NS 1S S+2 150 17 94.44
24 NS 3C N = 140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
15 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 38,70 %25 NS 4P W-1 100 16 88.89
26 NS 4CcE-3 800 16 88.89
27 NS 3K E = -110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,70 %28 NS 2P W+1 -140 12 66.67
29 NS 4C N+1 650 11 61.11
30 NS 1S S = 90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 364,0 / 540 = 67,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
13 GROSFILS Colette -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 54,07 % 4 NS 2P S-1 -100 8 44.44
5 NS 3S N+1 630 12 66.67
6 NS 3S E+1 -630 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
12 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 60,37 % 7 NS 3T S+1 130 13 72.22
8 NS 4P W+2 -480 2 11.11
9 NS 2P E+1 -140 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
22 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 43,89 %10 NS 2C S+1 140 9 50.00
11 NS 3S E-1 50 10 55.56
12 NS 1S S+3 180 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,11 %13 NS 3S S+1 630 15 83.33
14 NS 3PcN-1 -100 10 55.56
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
20 de WASSEIGE Ariane -POWIS Vinciane : 46,11 %16 NS 4P S = 420 9 50.00
17 NS 3P N-1 -50 6 33.33
18 NS 4P S+1 650 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
19 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,00 %19 NS 4C W+2 -680 4 22.22
20 NS 4C W-1 100 12 66.67
21 NS 3C N = 140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,56 %22 NS 3T S = 110 14 77.78
23 NS 1S S+1 120 13 72.22
24 NS 1C N+3 170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,00 %25 NS 3S E-1 100 16 88.89
26 NS 3C E-1 100 8 44.44
27 NS 3S E-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 %28 NS 4C W = -420 4 22.22
29 NS 4C N-1 -100 1 5.56
30 NS 1S S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
15 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 38,70 %31 NS 2K W-2 100 18 100.00
32 NS 4C N = 420 14 77.78
33 NS 2P W-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 285,0 / 540 = 52,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 % 1 NS 2K S+3 150 8 44.44
2 NS 3S S+1 630 6 33.33
3 NS 2P N-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,70 % 7 NS 2C W+1 -140 5 27.78
8 NS 4P E+1 -450 11 61.11
9 NS 2K N = 90 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
13 GROSFILS Colette -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 54,07 %10 NS 2P E-3 300 17 94.44
11 NS 2S E-1 50 10 55.56
12 NS 3S S+1 630 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
12 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 60,37 %13 NS 3S N+1 630 15 83.33
14 NS 3K E+1 -130 4 22.22
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
22 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 43,89 %16 NS 4P S+1 450 18 100.00
17 NS 4P N-2 -100 2 11.11
18 NS 3C S = 140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,11 %19 NS 4C W+2 -680 4 22.22
20 NS 3C W+1 -170 4 22.22
21 NS 3C N-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
20 de WASSEIGE Ariane -POWIS Vinciane : 46,11 %22 NS 2K E-2 200 18 100.00
23 NS 2P N = 110 10 55.56
24 NS 3C N+1 170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
19 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,00 %25 NS 3S E = -600 8 44.44
26 NS 3CcE-1 200 13 72.22
27 NS 3S E+2 -460 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,56 %28 NS 3S W+1 -430 1 5.56
29 NS 4CcN+1 990 18 100.00
30 NS 1S S+1 120 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,00 %31 NS 2K E-1 50 14 77.78
32 NS 4C N = 420 14 77.78
33 NS 1S E-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
Total : 299,0 / 540 = 55,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,56 % 1 NS 2K S+3 150 8 44.44
2 NS 3S N+4 720 18 100.00
3 NS 1S E+2 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,00 % 4 NS 3S E = -600 2 11.11
5 NS 2PcE-3 500 6 33.33
6 NS 3S E+1 -630 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
15 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 38,70 %10 NS 2C S = 110 1 5.56
11 NS 3T E+2 -150 6 33.33
12 NS 2S S+1 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,70 %13 NS 3T S = 110 6 33.33
14 NS 3K E+2 -150 1 5.56
15 NS 3TcS-2 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
13 GROSFILS Colette -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 54,07 %16 NS 2P S+2 170 1 5.56
17 NS 2P N = 110 11 61.11
18 NS 2P S = 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
12 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 60,37 %19 NS 4C W+1 -650 17 94.44
20 NS 4C W-1 100 12 66.67
21 NS 3C N-2 -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
22 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 43,89 %22 NS 2K E = -90 5 27.78
23 NS 1S S = 90 5 27.78
24 NS 2C N+2 170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,11 %25 NS 3S E+1 -630 0 0.00
26 NS 3C E-1 100 8 44.44
27 NS 3S E+2 -460 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
20 de WASSEIGE Ariane -POWIS Vinciane : 46,11 %28 NS 4P W-1 50 16 88.89
29 NS 4C N-1 -100 1 5.56
30 NS 2T N = 90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
19 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,00 %31 NS 3S W+2 -460 6 33.33
32 NS 2C N+2 170 3 16.67
33 NS 4P W-3 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 182,0 / 540 = 33,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
20 de WASSEIGE Ariane -POWIS Vinciane : 46,11 % 1 NS 4K S+1 150 8 44.44
2 NS 3S N+3 690 16 88.89
3 NS 1S E = -90 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
19 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,00 % 4 NS 3S E-1 100 14 77.78
5 NS 3S N+1 630 12 66.67
6 NS 3S W = -600 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,56 % 7 NS 3C W = -140 5 27.78
8 NS 4P W = -420 18 100.00
9 NS 1S S = 90 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 %13 NS 3S N+1 630 15 83.33
14 NS 3K E = -110 6 33.33
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
15 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 38,70 %16 NS 3S S+1 430 15 83.33
17 NS 3KcE-3 500 16 88.89
18 NS 4P S+1 650 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,70 %19 NS 3S E+2 -660 12 66.67
20 NS 4C W-1 100 12 66.67
21 NS 3C N-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
13 GROSFILS Colette -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 54,07 %22 NS 2K E-1 100 11 61.11
23 NS 2C E-1 100 8 44.44
24 NS 2C N+1 140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
12 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 60,37 %25 NS 4P E = -620 2 11.11
26 NS 4KcN-2 -500 1 5.56
27 NS 3S E+1 -430 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
22 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 43,89 %28 NS 2P W+2 -170 9 50.00
29 NS 3T S = 110 4 22.22
30 NS 1S S+2 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,11 %31 NS 2C W+2 -170 12 66.67
32 NS 2C N+2 170 3 16.67
33 NS 2P E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 301,0 / 540 = 55,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
22 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 43,89 % 1 NS 5K S = 400 17 94.44
2 NS 5K S+1 620 1 5.56
3 NS 1S E = -90 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,11 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 2 11.11
5 NS 2S N = 120 2 11.11
6 NS 3S E = -600 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
20 de WASSEIGE Ariane -POWIS Vinciane : 46,11 % 7 NS 3T S+1 130 13 72.22
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 11 61.11
9 NS 1S S+1 120 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
19 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,00 %10 NS 2C S+1 140 9 50.00
11 NS 5T W = -400 0 0.00
12 NS 2S S+2 180 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,00 %16 NS 4P S = 420 9 50.00
17 NS 2P N = 110 11 61.11
18 NS 2P S+1 140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 %19 NS 4C W+2 -680 4 22.22
20 NS 4C E+1 -650 0 0.00
21 NS 3C S-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
15 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 38,70 %22 NS 2K E = -90 5 27.78
23 NS 2S N+1 150 17 94.44
24 NS 3C N+2 200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,70 %25 NS 3S E = -600 8 44.44
26 NS 5KcN-2 -500 1 5.56
27 NS 3S E+2 -460 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
13 GROSFILS Colette -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 54,07 %28 NS 4C W-1 50 16 88.89
29 NS 5C N = 650 11 61.11
30 NS 2T N+1 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
12 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 60,37 %31 NS 1ScN-3 -800 2 11.11
32 NS 4C N = 420 14 77.78
33 NS 2P W-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 249,0 / 540 = 46,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard
13 GROSFILS Colette -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 54,07 % 1 NS 3CcE-2 300 14 77.78
2 NS 3S S+2 660 12 66.67
3 NS 2P N-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
12 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 60,37 % 4 NS 3S E = -600 2 11.11
5 NS 3S N = 600 8 44.44
6 NS 3S E+1 -630 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
22 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 43,89 % 7 NS 2K E+2 -130 8 44.44
8 NS 4P W+2 -480 2 11.11
9 NS 3KcN-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,11 %10 NS 2C S+1 140 9 50.00
11 NS 3S E-2 100 15 83.33
12 NS 3S S+1 630 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
20 de WASSEIGE Ariane -POWIS Vinciane : 46,11 %13 NS 3S N-1 -110 0 0.00
14 NS 3K E+2 -150 1 5.56
15 NS 2P E = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,56 %19 NS 3S E+2 -660 12 66.67
20 NS 3S E-1 100 12 66.67
21 NS 3C N-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,00 %22 NS 1S E+1 -120 2 11.11
23 NS 1S S+1 120 13 72.22
24 NS 2C N = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 %25 NS 3S E = -600 8 44.44
26 NS 4C E-2 200 13 72.22
27 NS 3S E+1 -430 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
15 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 38,70 %28 NS 4C E-1 50 16 88.89
29 NS 4C N = 620 6 33.33
30 NS 1S S+2 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,70 %31 NS 1ScN-3 -800 2 11.11
32 NS 3S N = 400 8 44.44
33 NS 1S E = -90 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
Total : 236,0 / 540 = 43,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -MASSAUX Joel
15 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 38,70 % 1 NS 2K S+3 150 8 44.44
2 NS 3S N+2 660 12 66.67
3 NS 1S E = -90 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,70 % 4 NS 3S E-1 100 14 77.78
5 NS 3S N+2 660 17 94.44
6 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
13 GROSFILS Colette -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 54,07 % 7 NS 2C W+2 -170 0 0.00
8 NS 4P W+2 -480 2 11.11
9 NS 3K N-2 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
12 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 60,37 %10 NS 2C S = 110 1 5.56
11 NS 3T E+3 -170 3 16.67
12 NS 3S S+1 630 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
22 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 43,89 %13 NS 2K N+2 130 10 55.56
14 NS 3CcS-1 -100 10 55.56
15 NS 1T S+1 90 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,11 %16 NS 2P S+2 170 1 5.56
17 NS 4P N-2 -100 2 11.11
18 NS 4P S = 620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
19 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,00 %22 NS 2S N = 120 16 88.89
23 NS 2K S = 90 5 27.78
24 NS 3C N+2 200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,56 %25 NS 3S E = -600 8 44.44
26 NS 5CcE-4 1100 18 100.00
27 NS 3S E-2 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,00 %28 NS 2P W+2 -170 9 50.00
29 NS 4C N+1 650 11 61.11
30 NS 3T N = 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 %31 NS 1ScN-3 -800 2 11.11
32 NS 4C N = 420 14 77.78
33 NS 2P W-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 276,0 / 540 = 51,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
17 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,00 % 1 NS 5K S = 400 17 94.44
2 NS 3S N+1 630 6 33.33
3 NS 1S E-2 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 % 4 NS 3S E-1 100 14 77.78
5 NS 2S N+3 210 4 22.22
6 NS 3S E+1 -630 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
15 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 38,70 % 7 NS 3K E+2 -150 2 11.11
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 11 61.11
9 NS 2P W+1 -140 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,70 %10 NS 3C S = 140 9 50.00
11 NS 3S E-3 150 18 100.00
12 NS 3S S+1 630 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
13 GROSFILS Colette -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 54,07 %13 NS 3T S = 110 6 33.33
14 NS 3C S-1 -50 14 77.78
15 NS 3C E-2 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
12 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 60,37 %16 NS 3S N+1 430 15 83.33
17 NS 2P N = 110 11 61.11
18 NS 4P S+1 650 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
22 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 43,89 %19 NS 4C W+1 -650 17 94.44
20 NS 3C E-1 100 12 66.67
21 NS 4C N-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
20 de WASSEIGE Ariane -POWIS Vinciane : 46,11 %25 NS 3S E = -600 8 44.44
26 NS 3C E-1 100 8 44.44
27 NS 3S E = -400 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
19 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,00 %28 NS 3S W+1 -430 1 5.56
29 NS 4C N+1 650 11 61.11
30 NS 2S S+2 180 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,56 %31 NS 2S N-2 -200 10 55.56
32 NS 2C N+2 170 3 16.67
33 NS 3C S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
Total : 307,0 / 540 = 56,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 ARICKX Roger -LEBRUN Robert
19 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,00 % 1 NS 4C W-2 100 2 11.11
2 NS 3S N+1 630 6 33.33
3 NS 1S W = -90 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,56 % 4 NS 1S E+1 -120 6 33.33
5 NS 3K N-1 -100 0 0.00
6 NS 3S E+2 -660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,00 % 7 NS 3T S+1 130 13 72.22
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 11 61.11
9 NS 2K N-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 %10 NS 2P E-3 300 17 94.44
11 NS 3S E-1 50 10 55.56
12 NS 3T S+1 130 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
15 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 38,70 %13 NS 3K N = 110 6 33.33
14 NS 5K E-2 100 16 88.89
15 NS 2P E+2 -170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,70 %16 NS 3S N = 400 4 22.22
17 NS 4P N-2 -100 2 11.11
18 NS 3S S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
13 GROSFILS Colette -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 54,07 %19 NS 4C W+2 -680 4 22.22
20 NS 3C W+2 -200 2 11.11
21 NS 2S S-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
12 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 60,37 %22 NS 1S E+2 -150 0 0.00
23 NS 2P N-2 -200 0 0.00
24 NS 2C N+1 140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,11 %28 NS 2P E+3 -200 6 33.33
29 NS 4CcN = 790 16 88.89
30 NS 2K E = -90 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
20 de WASSEIGE Ariane -POWIS Vinciane : 46,11 %31 NS 3C W+3 -230 8 44.44
32 NS 3C N+1 170 3 16.67
33 NS 1S E = -90 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
Total : 168,0 / 540 = 31,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,11 % 1 NS 4K S+1 150 8 44.44
2 NS 5K S+1 620 1 5.56
3 NS 3C E-1 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
20 de WASSEIGE Ariane -POWIS Vinciane : 46,11 % 4 NS 3S E-1 100 14 77.78
5 NS 3S N+1 630 12 66.67
6 NS 3S E = -600 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
19 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,00 % 7 NS 3T S+1 130 13 72.22
8 NS 5P W = -450 11 61.11
9 NS 3K S-2 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 45,56 %10 NS 2C N+1 140 9 50.00
11 NS 2P W+2 -170 3 16.67
12 NS 3S S+2 660 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,00 %13 NS 3T S-1 -100 2 11.11
14 NS 3P N-2 -100 10 55.56
15 NS 3T E+1 -130 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 %16 NS 4P S = 420 9 50.00
17 NS 2C S = 110 11 61.11
18 NS 4P S = 620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
15 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 38,70 %19 NS 3S E+2 -660 12 66.67
20 NS 4C W-1 100 12 66.67
21 NS 3C N = 140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,70 %22 NS 1S E-1 100 11 61.11
23 NS 1S S-1 -100 2 11.11
24 NS 2C N+1 140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
13 GROSFILS Colette -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 54,07 %25 NS 4P E-1 100 16 88.89
26 NS 2C E = -110 4 22.22
27 NS 3S E+1 -430 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
22 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 43,89 %31 NS 1S N = 90 16 88.89
32 NS 4C N = 420 14 77.78
33 NS 2S E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
Total : 303,0 / 540 = 56,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 67,41 % 1 EO 3S N-1 -50 18 100.00
2 EO 3S N+2 660 6 33.33
3 EO 3T W-1 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,70 % 4 EO 3S E = -600 16 88.89
5 EO 3S N = 600 10 55.56
6 EO 3S E+1 -630 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
2 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 52,78 % 7 EO 3T S+1 130 5 27.78
8 EO 4P W+2 -480 16 88.89
9 EO 2P E+1 -140 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
8 MATELART Marc -MASSAUX Joel : 51,11 %10 EO 2C S = 110 17 94.44
11 EO 3T E+3 -170 15 83.33
12 EO 3S S+1 630 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,37 %13 EO 3S N+1 630 3 16.67
14 EO 3K E+1 -130 14 77.78
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
9 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 56,85 %16 EO 3S N+1 430 3 16.67
17 EO 2P N = 110 7 38.89
18 EO 4P S+1 650 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
4 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 33,70 %19 EO 4C W+1 -650 1 5.56
20 EO 4C W-1 100 6 33.33
21 EO 3C N-2 -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
10 ARICKX Roger -LEBRUN Robert : 31,11 %22 EO 1S E+2 -150 18 100.00
23 EO 2P N-2 -200 18 100.00
24 EO 2C N+1 140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 55,74 %25 EO 4P E = -620 16 88.89
26 EO 4KcN-2 -500 17 94.44
27 EO 3S E+1 -430 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,11 %31 EO 1ScN-3 -800 16 88.89
32 EO 4C N = 420 4 22.22
33 EO 2P W-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 326,0 / 540 = 60,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 GROSFILS Colette -WANDERPEPEN Janine
7 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,70 % 1 EO 3CcE-2 300 4 22.22
2 EO 3S S+2 660 6 33.33
3 EO 2P N-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
2 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 52,78 % 4 EO 2P S-1 -100 10 55.56
5 EO 3S N+1 630 6 33.33
6 EO 3S E+1 -630 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
8 MATELART Marc -MASSAUX Joel : 51,11 % 7 EO 2C W+2 -170 18 100.00
8 EO 4P W+2 -480 16 88.89
9 EO 3K N-2 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,37 %10 EO 2P E-3 300 1 5.56
11 EO 2S E-1 50 8 44.44
12 EO 3S S+1 630 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
9 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 56,85 %13 EO 3T S = 110 12 66.67
14 EO 3C S-1 -50 4 22.22
15 EO 3C E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
4 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 33,70 %16 EO 2P S+2 170 17 94.44
17 EO 2P N = 110 7 38.89
18 EO 2P S = 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
10 ARICKX Roger -LEBRUN Robert : 31,11 %19 EO 4C W+2 -680 14 77.78
20 EO 3C W+2 -200 16 88.89
21 EO 2S S-3 -300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 55,74 %22 EO 2K E-1 100 7 38.89
23 EO 2C E-1 100 10 55.56
24 EO 2C N+1 140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
11 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 56,11 %25 EO 4P E-1 100 2 11.11
26 EO 2C E = -110 14 77.78
27 EO 3S E+1 -430 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,11 %28 EO 4C W-1 50 2 11.11
29 EO 5C N = 650 7 38.89
30 EO 2T N+1 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 292,0 / 540 = 54,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
8 MATELART Marc -MASSAUX Joel : 51,11 % 4 EO 3S E-1 100 4 22.22
5 EO 3S N+2 660 1 5.56
6 EO 3S W+1 -630 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,37 % 7 EO 2C W+1 -140 13 72.22
8 EO 4P E+1 -450 7 38.89
9 EO 2K N = 90 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
9 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 56,85 %10 EO 3C S = 140 9 50.00
11 EO 3S E-3 150 0 0.00
12 EO 3S S+1 630 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
4 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 33,70 %13 EO 3T S = 110 12 66.67
14 EO 3K E+2 -150 17 94.44
15 EO 3TcS-2 -500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
10 ARICKX Roger -LEBRUN Robert : 31,11 %16 EO 3S N = 400 14 77.78
17 EO 4P N-2 -100 16 88.89
18 EO 3S S-2 -200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 55,74 %19 EO 3S E+2 -660 6 33.33
20 EO 4C W-1 100 6 33.33
21 EO 3C N-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
11 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 56,11 %22 EO 1S E-1 100 7 38.89
23 EO 1S S-1 -100 16 88.89
24 EO 2C N+1 140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,11 %25 EO 3S E = -600 10 55.56
26 EO 5KcN-2 -500 17 94.44
27 EO 3S E+2 -460 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 67,41 %28 EO 2P W+1 -140 6 33.33
29 EO 4C N+1 650 7 38.89
30 EO 1S S = 90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
7 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,70 %31 EO 1ScN-3 -800 16 88.89
32 EO 3S N = 400 10 55.56
33 EO 1S E = -90 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
Total : 317,0 / 540 = 58,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques
8 MATELART Marc -MASSAUX Joel : 51,11 % 1 EO 2K S+3 150 10 55.56
2 EO 3S N+2 660 6 33.33
3 EO 1S E = -90 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 56,85 % 7 EO 3K E+2 -150 16 88.89
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 7 38.89
9 EO 2P W+1 -140 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
4 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 33,70 %10 EO 2C S = 110 17 94.44
11 EO 3T E+2 -150 12 66.67
12 EO 2S S+1 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
10 ARICKX Roger -LEBRUN Robert : 31,11 %13 EO 3K N = 110 12 66.67
14 EO 5K E-2 100 2 11.11
15 EO 2P E+2 -170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 55,74 %16 EO 3S S+1 430 3 16.67
17 EO 3KcE-3 500 2 11.11
18 EO 4P S+1 650 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
11 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 56,11 %19 EO 3S E+2 -660 6 33.33
20 EO 4C W-1 100 6 33.33
21 EO 3C N = 140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,11 %22 EO 2K E = -90 13 72.22
23 EO 2S N+1 150 1 5.56
24 EO 3C N+2 200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 67,41 %25 EO 4P W-1 100 2 11.11
26 EO 4CcE-3 800 2 11.11
27 EO 3K E = -110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
7 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,70 %28 EO 4C E-1 50 2 11.11
29 EO 4C N = 620 12 66.67
30 EO 1S S+2 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
2 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 52,78 %31 EO 2K W-2 100 0 0.00
32 EO 4C N = 420 4 22.22
33 EO 2P W-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 209,0 / 540 = 38,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,37 % 1 EO 2K S+3 150 10 55.56
2 EO 3S S+1 630 12 66.67
3 EO 2P N-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
9 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 56,85 % 4 EO 3S E-1 100 4 22.22
5 EO 2S N+3 210 14 77.78
6 EO 3S E+1 -630 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
10 ARICKX Roger -LEBRUN Robert : 31,11 %10 EO 2P E-3 300 1 5.56
11 EO 3S E-1 50 8 44.44
12 EO 3T S+1 130 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 55,74 %13 EO 3S N+1 630 3 16.67
14 EO 3K E = -110 12 66.67
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
11 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 56,11 %16 EO 4P S = 420 9 50.00
17 EO 2C S = 110 7 38.89
18 EO 4P S = 620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,11 %19 EO 4C W+2 -680 14 77.78
20 EO 4C E+1 -650 18 100.00
21 EO 3C S-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 67,41 %22 EO 2P S-1 -50 10 55.56
23 EO 1S S+2 150 1 5.56
24 EO 3C N = 140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
7 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,70 %25 EO 3S E = -600 10 55.56
26 EO 4C E-2 200 5 27.78
27 EO 3S E+1 -430 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
2 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 52,78 %28 EO 4C W = -420 14 77.78
29 EO 4C N-1 -100 17 94.44
30 EO 1S S-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
8 MATELART Marc -MASSAUX Joel : 51,11 %31 EO 1ScN-3 -800 16 88.89
32 EO 4C N = 420 4 22.22
33 EO 2P W-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 305,0 / 540 = 56,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
9 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 56,85 % 1 EO 5K S = 400 1 5.56
2 EO 3S N+1 630 12 66.67
3 EO 1S E-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
4 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 33,70 % 4 EO 3S E = -600 16 88.89
5 EO 2PcE-3 500 12 66.67
6 EO 3S E+1 -630 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
10 ARICKX Roger -LEBRUN Robert : 31,11 % 7 EO 3T S+1 130 5 27.78
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 7 38.89
9 EO 2K N-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
11 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 56,11 %13 EO 3T S-1 -100 16 88.89
14 EO 3P N-2 -100 8 44.44
15 EO 3T E+1 -130 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,11 %16 EO 4P S = 420 9 50.00
17 EO 2P N = 110 7 38.89
18 EO 2P S+1 140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 67,41 %19 EO 4C W+2 -680 14 77.78
20 EO 4C W-1 100 6 33.33
21 EO 3C N = 140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
7 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,70 %22 EO 1S E+1 -120 16 88.89
23 EO 1S S+1 120 5 27.78
24 EO 2C N = 110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
2 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 52,78 %25 EO 3S E-1 100 2 11.11
26 EO 3C E-1 100 10 55.56
27 EO 3S E-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
8 MATELART Marc -MASSAUX Joel : 51,11 %28 EO 2P W+2 -170 9 50.00
29 EO 4C N+1 650 7 38.89
30 EO 3T N = 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,37 %31 EO 2K E-1 50 4 22.22
32 EO 4C N = 420 4 22.22
33 EO 1S E-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
Total : 243,0 / 540 = 45,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
4 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 33,70 % 1 EO 2K S+3 150 10 55.56
2 EO 3S N+4 720 0 0.00
3 EO 1S E+2 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
10 ARICKX Roger -LEBRUN Robert : 31,11 % 4 EO 1S E+1 -120 12 66.67
5 EO 3K N-1 -100 18 100.00
6 EO 3S E+2 -660 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 55,74 % 7 EO 3C W = -140 13 72.22
8 EO 4P W = -420 0 0.00
9 EO 1S S = 90 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
11 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 56,11 %10 EO 2C N+1 140 9 50.00
11 EO 2P W+2 -170 15 83.33
12 EO 3S S+2 660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 67,41 %16 EO 4P S = 420 9 50.00
17 EO 3ScW-4 800 0 0.00
18 EO 2P S+2 170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
7 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,70 %19 EO 3S E+2 -660 6 33.33
20 EO 3S E-1 100 6 33.33
21 EO 3C N-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
2 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 52,78 %22 EO 3T S = 110 4 22.22
23 EO 1S S+1 120 5 27.78
24 EO 1C N+3 170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
8 MATELART Marc -MASSAUX Joel : 51,11 %25 EO 3S E = -600 10 55.56
26 EO 5CcE-4 1100 0 0.00
27 EO 3S E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,37 %28 EO 3S W+1 -430 17 94.44
29 EO 4CcN+1 990 0 0.00
30 EO 1S S+1 120 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
9 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 56,85 %31 EO 2S N-2 -200 8 44.44
32 EO 2C N+2 170 15 83.33
33 EO 3C S-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
Total : 246,0 / 540 = 45,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard
10 ARICKX Roger -LEBRUN Robert : 31,11 % 1 EO 4C W-2 100 16 88.89
2 EO 3S N+1 630 12 66.67
3 EO 1S W = -90 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 55,74 % 4 EO 3S E-1 100 4 22.22
5 EO 3S N+1 630 6 33.33
6 EO 3S W = -600 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
11 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 56,11 % 7 EO 3T S+1 130 5 27.78
8 EO 5P W = -450 7 38.89
9 EO 3K S-2 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,11 %10 EO 2C S+1 140 9 50.00
11 EO 5T W = -400 18 100.00
12 EO 2S S+2 180 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 67,41 %13 EO 3S S+1 630 3 16.67
14 EO 3P N = 140 0 0.00
15 EO 4P W-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
2 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 52,78 %19 EO 4C W+2 -680 14 77.78
20 EO 4C W-1 100 6 33.33
21 EO 3C N = 140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
8 MATELART Marc -MASSAUX Joel : 51,11 %22 EO 2S N = 120 2 11.11
23 EO 2K S = 90 13 72.22
24 EO 3C N+2 200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,37 %25 EO 3S E = -600 10 55.56
26 EO 3CcE-1 200 5 27.78
27 EO 3S E+2 -460 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
9 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 56,85 %28 EO 3S W+1 -430 17 94.44
29 EO 4C N+1 650 7 38.89
30 EO 2S S+2 180 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
4 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 33,70 %31 EO 3S W+2 -460 12 66.67
32 EO 2C N+2 170 15 83.33
33 EO 4P W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 243,0 / 540 = 45,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 de WASSEIGE Ariane -POWIS Vinciane
5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 55,74 % 1 EO 4K S+1 150 10 55.56
2 EO 3S N+3 690 2 11.11
3 EO 1S E = -90 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
11 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 56,11 % 4 EO 3S E-1 100 4 22.22
5 EO 3S N+1 630 6 33.33
6 EO 3S E = -600 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,11 % 7 EO 3T S+1 130 5 27.78
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 7 38.89
9 EO 1S S+1 120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 67,41 %10 EO 2C S+1 140 9 50.00
11 EO 3S E-2 100 3 16.67
12 EO 2S S+2 180 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
7 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,70 %13 EO 3S N-1 -110 18 100.00
14 EO 3K E+2 -150 17 94.44
15 EO 2P E = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
2 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 52,78 %16 EO 4P S = 420 9 50.00
17 EO 3P N-1 -50 12 66.67
18 EO 4P S+1 650 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,37 %22 EO 2K E-2 200 0 0.00
23 EO 2P N = 110 8 44.44
24 EO 3C N+1 170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
9 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 56,85 %25 EO 3S E = -600 10 55.56
26 EO 3C E-1 100 10 55.56
27 EO 3S E = -400 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
4 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 33,70 %28 EO 4P W-1 50 2 11.11
29 EO 4C N-1 -100 17 94.44
30 EO 2T N = 90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
10 ARICKX Roger -LEBRUN Robert : 31,11 %31 EO 3C W+3 -230 10 55.56
32 EO 3C N+1 170 15 83.33
33 EO 1S E = -90 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
Total : 249,0 / 540 = 46,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
11 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 56,11 % 1 EO 4K S+1 150 10 55.56
2 EO 5K S+1 620 17 94.44
3 EO 3C E-1 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,11 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 16 88.89
5 EO 2S N = 120 16 88.89
6 EO 3S E = -600 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 67,41 % 7 EO 4T S+1 150 0 0.00
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 7 38.89
9 EO 1S S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
7 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,70 %10 EO 2C S+1 140 9 50.00
11 EO 3S E-2 100 3 16.67
12 EO 3S S+1 630 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
2 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 52,78 %13 EO 3S S+1 630 3 16.67
14 EO 3PcN-1 -100 8 44.44
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
8 MATELART Marc -MASSAUX Joel : 51,11 %16 EO 2P S+2 170 17 94.44
17 EO 4P N-2 -100 16 88.89
18 EO 4P S = 620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,37 %19 EO 4C W+2 -680 14 77.78
20 EO 3C W+1 -170 14 77.78
21 EO 3C N-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
4 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 33,70 %25 EO 3S E+1 -630 18 100.00
26 EO 3C E-1 100 10 55.56
27 EO 3S E+2 -460 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
10 ARICKX Roger -LEBRUN Robert : 31,11 %28 EO 2P E+3 -200 12 66.67
29 EO 4CcN = 790 2 11.11
30 EO 2K E = -90 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 55,74 %31 EO 2C W+2 -170 6 33.33
32 EO 2C N+2 170 15 83.33
33 EO 2P E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 303,0 / 540 = 56,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
6 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,11 % 1 EO 5K S = 400 1 5.56
2 EO 5K S+1 620 17 94.44
3 EO 1S E = -90 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 67,41 % 4 EO 3S E-1 100 4 22.22
5 EO 3S N+2 660 1 5.56
6 EO 3S E-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
7 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,70 % 7 EO 2K E+2 -130 10 55.56
8 EO 4P W+2 -480 16 88.89
9 EO 3KcN-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
2 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 52,78 %10 EO 2C S+1 140 9 50.00
11 EO 3S E-1 50 8 44.44
12 EO 1S S+3 180 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
8 MATELART Marc -MASSAUX Joel : 51,11 %13 EO 2K N+2 130 8 44.44
14 EO 3CcS-1 -100 8 44.44
15 EO 1T S+1 90 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,37 %16 EO 4P S+1 450 0 0.00
17 EO 4P N-2 -100 16 88.89
18 EO 3C S = 140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
9 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 56,85 %19 EO 4C W+1 -650 1 5.56
20 EO 3C E-1 100 6 33.33
21 EO 4C N-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
4 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 33,70 %22 EO 2K E = -90 13 72.22
23 EO 1S S = 90 13 72.22
24 EO 2C N+2 170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
5 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 55,74 %28 EO 2P W+2 -170 9 50.00
29 EO 3T S = 110 14 77.78
30 EO 1S S+2 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
11 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 56,11 %31 EO 1S N = 90 2 11.11
32 EO 4C N = 420 4 22.22
33 EO 2S E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
Total : 237,0 / 540 = 43,89 %
|
|