|
Tournoi du 24-03-14
1 58,25 1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
2 57,07 10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
3 55,39 5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
4 50,00 9 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques
5 48,82 4 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
6 48,65 8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
7 47,64 6 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine
8 46,30 3 VAGMAN David -VERBOIS Léon
9 45,29 7 STEED Mercédès -COULIE Joelle
10 42,59 2 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette
11 0,00 11 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 55,37 12 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand
2 55,19 14 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
~ 55,19 18 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard
4 50,19 15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane
5 50,00 13 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
6 49,63 20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
7 49,07 16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
~ 49,07 21 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
~ 49,07 22 COLLIN Jean-Marie -VAN GYSEGHEM
10 46,48 17 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse
11 40,74 19 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
PAIRE Nr : 1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 55,37 % 1 NS 2P W+1 -140 3 16.67
2 NS 1S E-1 50 6 33.33
3 NS 3C N+1 170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
22 COLLIN Jean-Marie -VAN GYSEGHEM : 49,07 % 4 NS 3P N-1 -100 12 66.67
5 NS 4C S = 620 7 38.89
6 NS 1S N+3 180 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
21 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,07 % 7 NS 4C W+2 -680 8 44.44
8 NS 4P E+1 -450 13 72.22
9 NS 3C W-1 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,63 %10 NS 3C E-1 100 13 72.22
11 NS 6C N+1 1010 15 83.33
12 NS 4P E-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
19 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 40,74 %13 NS 3S W = -600 9 50.00
14 NS 4T E = -130 8 44.44
15 NS 4P S = 620 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
18 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,19 %16 NS 2P N-2 -100 10 55.56
17 NS 4P W+3 -510 12 66.67
18 NS 4P E+2 -480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
17 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,48 %19 NS 4P S+2 480 16 88.89
20 NS 3P N = 140 10 55.56
21 NS 2K E+2 -130 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,07 %22 NS 4C S+1 450 18 100.00
23 NS 3T W-2 200 16 88.89
24 NS 3C N-3 -150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 50,19 %25 NS 3S E+3 -690 2 11.11
26 NS 3S E = -600 10 55.56
27 NS 3S S+4 520 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
14 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 55,19 %28 NS 5PcN-2 -500 1 5.56
29 NS 1S W+1 -120 4 22.22
30 NS 1S W = -90 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
13 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,00 %31 NS 3C N = 140 11 61.11
32 NS 3S W = -600 12 66.67
33 NS 2S N = 120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 346,0 / 594 = 58,25 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette
14 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 55,19 % 1 NS 4K N-1 -50 7 38.89
2 NS 1S E-1 50 6 33.33
3 NS 3C S = 140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
13 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,00 % 4 NS 4PcN-3 -800 0 0.00
5 NS 4C S = 620 7 38.89
6 NS 2T W-1 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 55,37 % 7 NS 5P W+1 -680 8 44.44
8 NS 3S W+3 -490 8 44.44
9 NS 3C W-2 200 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
22 COLLIN Jean-Marie -VAN GYSEGHEM : 49,07 %10 NS 2S W = -120 2 11.11
11 NS 2PcW-2 300 0 0.00
12 NS 3S W-4 200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
21 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,07 %13 NS 3S W+1 -630 5 27.78
14 NS 2S W+1 -150 5 27.78
15 NS 3P N = 140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,63 %16 NS 1S W+1 -120 3 16.67
17 NS 6P W = -980 2 11.11
18 NS 4P W+2 -480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
19 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 40,74 %19 NS 3P S+1 170 2 11.11
20 NS 3P S+1 170 14 77.78
21 NS 2K E+1 -110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
18 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,19 %22 NS 3P W = -140 0 0.00
23 NS 1C N+3 170 12 66.67
24 NS 2P W+1 -140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
17 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,48 %25 NS 5K E+1 -620 6 33.33
26 NS 2S E+2 -180 16 88.89
27 NS 3S S+3 490 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,07 %28 NS 4P N-1 -100 6 33.33
29 NS 1S W = -90 11 61.11
30 NS 1S W+1 -120 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 50,19 %31 NS 3C N = 140 11 61.11
32 NS 3S W = -600 12 66.67
33 NS 2S N = 120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 253,0 / 594 = 42,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 VAGMAN David -VERBOIS Léon
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,07 % 1 NS 3S S = 400 15 83.33
2 NS 1S E-1 50 6 33.33
3 NS 3C S-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 50,19 % 4 NS 2P N = 110 17 94.44
5 NS 4C S-1 -100 0 0.00
6 NS 2S S+1 150 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
14 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 55,19 % 7 NS 6P W = -1430 2 11.11
8 NS 3S W+3 -490 8 44.44
9 NS 2P S = 110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
13 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,00 %10 NS 1S W-2 200 17 94.44
11 NS 3S N+2 460 4 22.22
12 NS 2C W-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 55,37 %13 NS 3S W+2 -660 2 11.11
14 NS 3S W = -400 2 11.11
15 NS 4P S-1 -100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
22 COLLIN Jean-Marie -VAN GYSEGHEM : 49,07 %16 NS 2C E = -110 7 38.89
17 NS 3S E+4 -520 4 22.22
18 NS 4P W+2 -480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
21 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,07 %19 NS 4P S+2 480 16 88.89
20 NS 4P S-1 -100 4 22.22
21 NS 3S W+1 -430 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,63 %22 NS 3C S+2 200 14 77.78
23 NS 2C N = 110 1 5.56
24 NS 3P W-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
19 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 40,74 %25 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 22.22
26 NS 3S E = -600 10 55.56
27 NS 3S N+2 460 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
18 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,19 %28 NS 3P N+1 170 11 61.11
29 NS 1S W = -90 11 61.11
30 NS 2P W = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
17 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,48 %31 NS 3CcN = 730 18 100.00
32 NS 3S W = -600 12 66.67
33 NS 2S N = 120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
Total : 275,0 / 594 = 46,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
18 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,19 % 1 NS 5KcN-2 -300 0 0.00
2 NS 1S E-1 50 6 33.33
3 NS 2C S+1 140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
17 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,48 % 4 NS 3P N-2 -200 7 38.89
5 NS 4C S = 620 7 38.89
6 NS 1S N+2 150 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,07 % 7 NS 6CcW = -1660 0 0.00
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 13 72.22
9 NS 2PcS = 470 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 50,19 %10 NS 2S E = -120 2 11.11
11 NS 4C N+3 510 8 44.44
12 NS 2C W-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
14 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 55,19 %13 NS 6T E-1 100 15 83.33
14 NS 1S W+2 -150 5 27.78
15 NS 4P S = 620 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
13 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,00 %16 NS 1S W-2 200 18 100.00
17 NS 6S E+1 -1020 0 0.00
18 NS 4P W+2 -480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 55,37 %19 NS 4P S+1 450 9 50.00
20 NS 2P S = 110 6 33.33
21 NS 3S W+1 -430 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
22 COLLIN Jean-Marie -VAN GYSEGHEM : 49,07 %22 NS 3C S+1 170 11 61.11
23 NS 3K N = 110 1 5.56
24 NS 3P W-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
21 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,07 %25 NS 3S E = -600 11 61.11
26 NS 3S E = -600 10 55.56
27 NS 3S S+3 490 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,63 %28 NS 4P N = 620 17 94.44
29 NS 1S W+1 -120 4 22.22
30 NS 2P W+1 -140 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
19 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 40,74 %31 NS 3PcE-2 300 16 88.89
32 NS 3S W = -600 12 66.67
33 NS 2S N = 120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
Total : 290,0 / 594 = 48,82 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,63 % 1 NS 4K S = 130 10 55.56
2 NS 1S E-2 100 15 83.33
3 NS 4C S-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
19 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 40,74 % 4 NS 2P N = 110 17 94.44
5 NS 4C S = 620 7 38.89
6 NS 1S N+3 180 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
18 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,19 % 7 NS 4P W+2 -680 8 44.44
8 NS 4P W = -420 16 88.89
9 NS 4C W-3 300 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
17 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,48 %10 NS 1S E = -90 9 50.00
11 NS 3S N+2 460 4 22.22
12 NS 2C W-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,07 %13 NS 3S E+1 -630 5 27.78
14 NS 2P N = 110 16 88.89
15 NS 4P S = 620 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 50,19 %16 NS 2P N = 110 16 88.89
17 NS 4P E+3 -510 12 66.67
18 NS 4P W+2 -480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
14 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 55,19 %19 NS 4P S+2 480 16 88.89
20 NS 3K W = -110 2 11.11
21 NS 3S E = -400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
13 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,00 %22 NS 4C S = 420 16 88.89
23 NS 3K S+1 130 5 27.78
24 NS 3CcS-2 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 55,37 %25 NS 7K W-1 100 17 94.44
26 NS 3S E = -600 10 55.56
27 NS 3S S+3 490 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
22 COLLIN Jean-Marie -VAN GYSEGHEM : 49,07 %28 NS 4P S-1 -100 6 33.33
29 NS 2S W-1 100 15 83.33
30 NS 2P W+2 -170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
21 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,07 %31 NS 3C N = 140 11 61.11
32 NS 3S W+2 -660 0 0.00
33 NS 2S N = 120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 329,0 / 594 = 55,39 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine
22 COLLIN Jean-Marie -VAN GYSEGHEM : 49,07 % 1 NS 3S S-1 -50 7 38.89
2 NS 2T S = 90 12 66.67
3 NS 4C S = 420 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
21 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,07 % 4 NS 2P N-1 -100 12 66.67
5 NS 4C S+1 650 16 88.89
6 NS 2T N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,63 % 7 NS 5CcN-1 -200 18 100.00
8 NS 6S W = -990 2 11.11
9 NS 3C W+1 -170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
19 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 40,74 %10 NS 3S W-2 200 17 94.44
11 NS 3S N+2 460 4 22.22
12 NS 4PcE-2 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
18 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,19 %13 NS 3C S-5 -500 12 66.67
14 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00
15 NS 3S N-1 -100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
17 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,48 %16 NS 3S E = -600 0 0.00
17 NS 4P W+3 -510 12 66.67
18 NS 4P W+2 -480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,07 %19 NS 4P S-1 -50 0 0.00
20 NS 4T E-2 200 16 88.89
21 NS 3C N-3 -300 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 50,19 %22 NS 3K N-2 -100 2 11.11
23 NS 3C N = 140 9 50.00
24 NS 3C N = 140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
14 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 55,19 %25 NS 6S E = -1440 0 0.00
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 11.11
27 NS 3S S = 400 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
13 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,00 %28 NS 5CcE-2 300 14 77.78
29 NS 2S E-2 200 18 100.00
30 NS 1S W+1 -120 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 55,37 %31 NS 4T W-2 100 4 22.22
32 NS 3S W+1 -630 2 11.11
33 NS 3S N = 400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 283,0 / 594 = 47,64 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 STEED Mercédès -COULIE Joelle
13 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,00 % 1 NS 3S S+1 430 18 100.00
2 NS 1S E+1 -120 0 0.00
3 NS 1S E+5 -240 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 55,37 % 4 NS 3P N-2 -200 7 38.89
5 NS 4C S+1 650 16 88.89
6 NS 2S N = 120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
22 COLLIN Jean-Marie -VAN GYSEGHEM : 49,07 % 7 NS 4P W+1 -650 15 83.33
8 NS 6S W = -990 2 11.11
9 NS 3P S-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
21 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,07 %10 NS 2C W = -110 6 33.33
11 NS 6C N+1 1010 15 83.33
12 NS 3C W = -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,63 %13 NS 5T E-1 100 15 83.33
14 NS 3S W-1 50 14 77.78
15 NS 3P S = 140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
19 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 40,74 %16 NS 1S W = -90 13 72.22
17 NS 4P W+3 -510 12 66.67
18 NS 4P W+2 -480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
18 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,19 %19 NS 4P S+1 450 9 50.00
20 NS 3P N = 140 10 55.56
21 NS 3S W+1 -430 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
17 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,48 %22 NS 3P W-1 100 6 33.33
23 NS 3T W-2 200 16 88.89
24 NS 3C N-2 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,07 %25 NS 3S E = -600 11 61.11
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 11.11
27 NS 3S S+4 520 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 50,19 %28 NS 4PcN-2 -500 1 5.56
29 NS 1S W+2 -150 0 0.00
30 NS 2P W = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
14 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 55,19 %31 NS 3C N-1 -100 0 0.00
32 NS 4C W = -620 4 22.22
33 NS 2S N = 120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
Total : 269,0 / 594 = 45,29 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 50,19 % 1 NS 4K N+1 150 12 66.67
2 NS 1S E-1 50 6 33.33
3 NS 4C S-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
14 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 55,19 % 4 NS 3P N-1 -100 12 66.67
5 NS 4C S = 620 7 38.89
6 NS 3CcS = 530 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
13 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,00 % 7 NS 4P W+1 -650 15 83.33
8 NS 6S W = -990 2 11.11
9 NS 3K E-1 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 55,37 %10 NS 1S W+1 -120 2 11.11
11 NS 4PcW-4 800 10 55.56
12 NS 2C W = -110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
22 COLLIN Jean-Marie -VAN GYSEGHEM : 49,07 %13 NS 3S W = -600 9 50.00
14 NS 2S W = -120 11 61.11
15 NS 4P S+1 650 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
21 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,07 %16 NS 1S W = -90 13 72.22
17 NS 4P E+3 -510 12 66.67
18 NS 4P W+2 -480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,63 %19 NS 4P S = 420 4 22.22
20 NS 2P S+1 140 10 55.56
21 NS 2K E+2 -130 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
19 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 40,74 %22 NS 3C N-1 -50 4 22.22
23 NS 1C N+2 140 9 50.00
24 NS 2P W = -110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
18 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,19 %25 NS 3S E = -600 11 61.11
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 11.11
27 NS 3S S+2 460 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
17 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,48 %28 NS 4P N = 620 17 94.44
29 NS 2C N-1 -100 8 44.44
30 NS 3P W = -140 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,07 %31 NS 2P E-1 50 2 11.11
32 NS 3S W = -600 12 66.67
33 NS 2S N = 120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 289,0 / 594 = 48,65 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques
17 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,48 % 1 NS 3P W = -140 3 16.67
2 NS 2T W-3 150 18 100.00
3 NS 4K E+3 -190 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,07 % 4 NS 3P N-3 -300 3 16.67
5 NS 4C S = 620 7 38.89
6 NS 1C W = -80 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 50,19 % 7 NS 4P E+2 -680 8 44.44
8 NS 6P W-2 100 18 100.00
9 NS 2S E = -120 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
14 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 55,19 %10 NS 2K E-1 100 13 72.22
11 NS 4PcW-5 1100 18 100.00
12 NS 2C W = -110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
13 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,00 %13 NS 6S E-3 300 18 100.00
14 NS 1S W+1 -120 11 61.11
15 NS 4T E-5 250 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 55,37 %16 NS 1S W+1 -120 3 16.67
17 NS 4P W+3 -510 12 66.67
18 NS 4P W+2 -480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
22 COLLIN Jean-Marie -VAN GYSEGHEM : 49,07 %19 NS 4P S+1 450 9 50.00
20 NS 3P S-2 -200 0 0.00
21 NS 5K E-2 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
21 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,07 %22 NS 3C S = 140 8 44.44
23 NS 3TcW-1 200 16 88.89
24 NS 2P W = -110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,63 %25 NS 3S E = -600 11 61.11
26 NS 2S E+1 -150 18 100.00
27 NS 3K S+4 190 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
19 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 40,74 %28 NS 3P N+1 170 11 61.11
29 NS 1S W+1 -120 4 22.22
30 NS 2P W = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
18 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,19 %31 NS 2C N = 110 6 33.33
32 NS 3S W = -600 12 66.67
33 NS 2S N = 120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 297,0 / 594 = 50,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
19 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 40,74 % 1 NS 3S N = 400 15 83.33
2 NS 1S E-2 100 15 83.33
3 NS 3C N = 140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
18 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,19 % 4 NS 4P N-3 -300 3 16.67
5 NS 4C N+1 650 16 88.89
6 NS 2T N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
17 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,48 % 7 NS 4P E+2 -680 8 44.44
8 NS 3S E+3 -490 8 44.44
9 NS 2P N = 110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,07 %10 NS 2K E = -90 9 50.00
11 NS 6S N = 990 12 66.67
12 NS 3C E-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 50,19 %13 NS 3ScE = -750 0 0.00
14 NS 2P N+1 140 18 100.00
15 NS 4P N = 620 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
14 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 55,19 %16 NS 2C E = -110 7 38.89
17 NS 4P E+3 -510 12 66.67
18 NS 4P E+2 -480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
13 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,00 %19 NS 4P N+1 450 9 50.00
20 NS 1S E-4 400 18 100.00
21 NS 3S E+1 -430 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 55,37 %22 NS 3C N+1 170 11 61.11
23 NS 3K N+1 130 5 27.78
24 NS 2P E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
22 COLLIN Jean-Marie -VAN GYSEGHEM : 49,07 %25 NS 3S E-1 100 17 94.44
26 NS 3S E = -600 10 55.56
27 NS 3S N+2 460 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
21 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,07 %28 NS 4P N-1 -100 6 33.33
29 NS 1S E-1 100 15 83.33
30 NS 4P E-1 50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,63 %31 NS 3C N = 140 11 61.11
32 NS 3S E = -600 12 66.67
33 NS 2S N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 339,0 / 594 = 57,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 -
21 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,07 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,63 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 40,74 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
18 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,19 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,48 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,07 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 50,19 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 55,19 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
13 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,00 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 55,37 %28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
22 COLLIN Jean-Marie -VAN GYSEGHEM : 49,07 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 594 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 58,25 % 1 EO 2P W+1 -140 15 83.33
2 EO 1S E-1 50 12 66.67
3 EO 3C N+1 170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
7 STEED Mercédès -COULIE Joelle : 45,29 % 4 EO 3P N-2 -200 11 61.11
5 EO 4C S+1 650 2 11.11
6 EO 2S N = 120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
2 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 42,59 % 7 EO 5P W+1 -680 10 55.56
8 EO 3S W+3 -490 10 55.56
9 EO 3C W-2 200 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,65 %10 EO 1S W+1 -120 16 88.89
11 EO 4PcW-4 800 8 44.44
12 EO 2C W = -110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
3 VAGMAN David -VERBOIS Léon : 46,30 %13 EO 3S W+2 -660 16 88.89
14 EO 3S W = -400 16 88.89
15 EO 4P S-1 -100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 50,00 %16 EO 1S W+1 -120 15 83.33
17 EO 4P W+3 -510 6 33.33
18 EO 4P W+2 -480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
4 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,82 %19 EO 4P S+1 450 9 50.00
20 EO 2P S = 110 12 66.67
21 EO 3S W+1 -430 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,07 %22 EO 3C N+1 170 7 38.89
23 EO 3K N+1 130 13 72.22
24 EO 2P E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,39 %25 EO 7K W-1 100 1 5.56
26 EO 3S E = -600 8 44.44
27 EO 3S S+3 490 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
11 - : 0,00 %28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 47,64 %31 EO 4T W-2 100 14 77.78
32 EO 3S W+1 -630 16 88.89
33 EO 3S N = 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 299,0 / 540 = 55,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
7 STEED Mercédès -COULIE Joelle : 45,29 % 1 EO 3S S+1 430 0 0.00
2 EO 1S E+1 -120 18 100.00
3 EO 1S E+5 -240 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
2 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 42,59 % 4 EO 4PcN-3 -800 18 100.00
5 EO 4C S = 620 11 61.11
6 EO 2T W-1 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,65 % 7 EO 4P W+1 -650 3 16.67
8 EO 6S W = -990 16 88.89
9 EO 3K E-1 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
3 VAGMAN David -VERBOIS Léon : 46,30 %10 EO 1S W-2 200 1 5.56
11 EO 3S N+2 460 14 77.78
12 EO 2C W-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 50,00 %13 EO 6S E-3 300 0 0.00
14 EO 1S W+1 -120 7 38.89
15 EO 4T E-5 250 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
4 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,82 %16 EO 1S W-2 200 0 0.00
17 EO 6S E+1 -1020 18 100.00
18 EO 4P W+2 -480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,07 %19 EO 4P N+1 450 9 50.00
20 EO 1S E-4 400 0 0.00
21 EO 3S E+1 -430 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,39 %22 EO 4C S = 420 2 11.11
23 EO 3K S+1 130 13 72.22
24 EO 3CcS-2 -300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
11 - : 0,00 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 47,64 %28 EO 5CcE-2 300 4 22.22
29 EO 2S E-2 200 0 0.00
30 EO 1S W+1 -120 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 58,25 %31 EO 3C N = 140 7 38.89
32 EO 3S W = -600 6 33.33
33 EO 2S N = 120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 270,0 / 540 = 50,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
2 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 42,59 % 1 EO 4K N-1 -50 11 61.11
2 EO 1S E-1 50 12 66.67
3 EO 3C S = 140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,65 % 4 EO 3P N-1 -100 6 33.33
5 EO 4C S = 620 11 61.11
6 EO 3CcS = 530 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
3 VAGMAN David -VERBOIS Léon : 46,30 % 7 EO 6P W = -1430 16 88.89
8 EO 3S W+3 -490 10 55.56
9 EO 2P S = 110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 50,00 %10 EO 2K E-1 100 5 27.78
11 EO 4PcW-5 1100 0 0.00
12 EO 2C W = -110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
4 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,82 %13 EO 6T E-1 100 3 16.67
14 EO 1S W+2 -150 13 72.22
15 EO 4P S = 620 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,07 %16 EO 2C E = -110 11 61.11
17 EO 4P E+3 -510 6 33.33
18 EO 4P E+2 -480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,39 %19 EO 4P S+2 480 2 11.11
20 EO 3K W = -110 16 88.89
21 EO 3S E = -400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
11 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 47,64 %25 EO 6S E = -1440 18 100.00
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 16 88.89
27 EO 3S S = 400 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 58,25 %28 EO 5PcN-2 -500 17 94.44
29 EO 1S W+1 -120 14 77.78
30 EO 1S W = -90 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
7 STEED Mercédès -COULIE Joelle : 45,29 %31 EO 3C N-1 -100 18 100.00
32 EO 4C W = -620 14 77.78
33 EO 2S N = 120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
Total : 298,0 / 540 = 55,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,65 % 1 EO 4K N+1 150 6 33.33
2 EO 1S E-1 50 12 66.67
3 EO 4C S-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
3 VAGMAN David -VERBOIS Léon : 46,30 % 4 EO 2P N = 110 1 5.56
5 EO 4C S-1 -100 18 100.00
6 EO 2S S+1 150 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 50,00 % 7 EO 4P E+2 -680 10 55.56
8 EO 6P W-2 100 0 0.00
9 EO 2S E = -120 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
4 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,82 %10 EO 2S E = -120 16 88.89
11 EO 4C N+3 510 10 55.56
12 EO 2C W-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,07 %13 EO 3ScE = -750 18 100.00
14 EO 2P N+1 140 0 0.00
15 EO 4P N = 620 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,39 %16 EO 2P N = 110 2 11.11
17 EO 4P E+3 -510 6 33.33
18 EO 4P W+2 -480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
11 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 47,64 %22 EO 3K N-2 -100 16 88.89
23 EO 3C N = 140 9 50.00
24 EO 3C N = 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 58,25 %25 EO 3S E+3 -690 16 88.89
26 EO 3S E = -600 8 44.44
27 EO 3S S+4 520 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
7 STEED Mercédès -COULIE Joelle : 45,29 %28 EO 4PcN-2 -500 17 94.44
29 EO 1S W+2 -150 18 100.00
30 EO 2P W = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
2 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 42,59 %31 EO 3C N = 140 7 38.89
32 EO 3S W = -600 6 33.33
33 EO 2S N = 120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 271,0 / 540 = 50,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
3 VAGMAN David -VERBOIS Léon : 46,30 % 1 EO 3S S = 400 3 16.67
2 EO 1S E-1 50 12 66.67
3 EO 3C S-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 50,00 % 4 EO 3P N-3 -300 15 83.33
5 EO 4C S = 620 11 61.11
6 EO 1C W = -80 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
4 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,82 % 7 EO 6CcW = -1660 18 100.00
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 5 27.78
9 EO 2PcS = 470 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,07 %10 EO 2K E = -90 9 50.00
11 EO 6S N = 990 6 33.33
12 EO 3C E-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,39 %13 EO 3S E+1 -630 13 72.22
14 EO 2P N = 110 2 11.11
15 EO 4P S = 620 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
11 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 47,64 %19 EO 4P S-1 -50 18 100.00
20 EO 4T E-2 200 2 11.11
21 EO 3C N-3 -300 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 58,25 %22 EO 4C S+1 450 0 0.00
23 EO 3T W-2 200 2 11.11
24 EO 3C N-3 -150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
7 STEED Mercédès -COULIE Joelle : 45,29 %25 EO 3S E = -600 7 38.89
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 16 88.89
27 EO 3S S+4 520 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
2 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 42,59 %28 EO 4P N-1 -100 12 66.67
29 EO 1S W = -90 7 38.89
30 EO 1S W+1 -120 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,65 %31 EO 2P E-1 50 16 88.89
32 EO 3S W = -600 6 33.33
33 EO 2S N = 120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 265,0 / 540 = 49,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse
9 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 50,00 % 1 EO 3P W = -140 15 83.33
2 EO 2T W-3 150 0 0.00
3 EO 4K E+3 -190 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
4 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,82 % 4 EO 3P N-2 -200 11 61.11
5 EO 4C S = 620 11 61.11
6 EO 1S N+2 150 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,07 % 7 EO 4P E+2 -680 10 55.56
8 EO 3S E+3 -490 10 55.56
9 EO 2P N = 110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,39 %10 EO 1S E = -90 9 50.00
11 EO 3S N+2 460 14 77.78
12 EO 2C W-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
11 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 47,64 %16 EO 3S E = -600 18 100.00
17 EO 4P W+3 -510 6 33.33
18 EO 4P W+2 -480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 58,25 %19 EO 4P S+2 480 2 11.11
20 EO 3P N = 140 8 44.44
21 EO 2K E+2 -130 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
7 STEED Mercédès -COULIE Joelle : 45,29 %22 EO 3P W-1 100 12 66.67
23 EO 3T W-2 200 2 11.11
24 EO 3C N-2 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
2 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 42,59 %25 EO 5K E+1 -620 12 66.67
26 EO 2S E+2 -180 2 11.11
27 EO 3S S+3 490 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,65 %28 EO 4P N = 620 1 5.56
29 EO 2C N-1 -100 10 55.56
30 EO 3P W = -140 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
3 VAGMAN David -VERBOIS Léon : 46,30 %31 EO 3CcN = 730 0 0.00
32 EO 3S W = -600 6 33.33
33 EO 2S N = 120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
Total : 251,0 / 540 = 46,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard
4 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,82 % 1 EO 5KcN-2 -300 18 100.00
2 EO 1S E-1 50 12 66.67
3 EO 2C S+1 140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,07 % 4 EO 4P N-3 -300 15 83.33
5 EO 4C N+1 650 2 11.11
6 EO 2T N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,39 % 7 EO 4P W+2 -680 10 55.56
8 EO 4P W = -420 2 11.11
9 EO 4C W-3 300 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
11 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 47,64 %13 EO 3C S-5 -500 6 33.33
14 EO 3S W+1 -430 18 100.00
15 EO 3S N-1 -100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 58,25 %16 EO 2P N-2 -100 8 44.44
17 EO 4P W+3 -510 6 33.33
18 EO 4P E+2 -480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
7 STEED Mercédès -COULIE Joelle : 45,29 %19 EO 4P S+1 450 9 50.00
20 EO 3P N = 140 8 44.44
21 EO 3S W+1 -430 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
2 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 42,59 %22 EO 3P W = -140 18 100.00
23 EO 1C N+3 170 6 33.33
24 EO 2P W+1 -140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,65 %25 EO 3S E = -600 7 38.89
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 16 88.89
27 EO 3S S+2 460 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
3 VAGMAN David -VERBOIS Léon : 46,30 %28 EO 3P N+1 170 7 38.89
29 EO 1S W = -90 7 38.89
30 EO 2P W = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 50,00 %31 EO 2C N = 110 12 66.67
32 EO 3S W = -600 6 33.33
33 EO 2S N = 120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 298,0 / 540 = 55,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,07 % 1 EO 3S N = 400 3 16.67
2 EO 1S E-2 100 3 16.67
3 EO 3C N = 140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,39 % 4 EO 2P N = 110 1 5.56
5 EO 4C S = 620 11 61.11
6 EO 1S N+3 180 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
11 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 47,64 %10 EO 3S W-2 200 1 5.56
11 EO 3S N+2 460 14 77.78
12 EO 4PcE-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 58,25 %13 EO 3S W = -600 9 50.00
14 EO 4T E = -130 10 55.56
15 EO 4P S = 620 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
7 STEED Mercédès -COULIE Joelle : 45,29 %16 EO 1S W = -90 5 27.78
17 EO 4P W+3 -510 6 33.33
18 EO 4P W+2 -480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
2 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 42,59 %19 EO 3P S+1 170 16 88.89
20 EO 3P S+1 170 4 22.22
21 EO 2K E+1 -110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,65 %22 EO 3C N-1 -50 14 77.78
23 EO 1C N+2 140 9 50.00
24 EO 2P W = -110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
3 VAGMAN David -VERBOIS Léon : 46,30 %25 EO 3S E+1 -630 14 77.78
26 EO 3S E = -600 8 44.44
27 EO 3S N+2 460 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 50,00 %28 EO 3P N+1 170 7 38.89
29 EO 1S W+1 -120 14 77.78
30 EO 2P W = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,82 %31 EO 3PcE-2 300 2 11.11
32 EO 3S W = -600 6 33.33
33 EO 2S N = 120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
Total : 220,0 / 540 = 40,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,39 % 1 EO 4K S = 130 8 44.44
2 EO 1S E-2 100 3 16.67
3 EO 4C S-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
11 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 47,64 % 7 EO 5CcN-1 -200 0 0.00
8 EO 6S W = -990 16 88.89
9 EO 3C W+1 -170 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 58,25 %10 EO 3C E-1 100 5 27.78
11 EO 6C N+1 1010 3 16.67
12 EO 4P E-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
7 STEED Mercédès -COULIE Joelle : 45,29 %13 EO 5T E-1 100 3 16.67
14 EO 3S W-1 50 4 22.22
15 EO 3P S = 140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
2 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 42,59 %16 EO 1S W+1 -120 15 83.33
17 EO 6P W = -980 16 88.89
18 EO 4P W+2 -480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,65 %19 EO 4P S = 420 14 77.78
20 EO 2P S+1 140 8 44.44
21 EO 2K E+2 -130 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 VAGMAN David -VERBOIS Léon : 46,30 %22 EO 3C S+2 200 4 22.22
23 EO 2C N = 110 17 94.44
24 EO 3P W-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 50,00 %25 EO 3S E = -600 7 38.89
26 EO 2S E+1 -150 0 0.00
27 EO 3K S+4 190 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
4 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,82 %28 EO 4P N = 620 1 5.56
29 EO 1S W+1 -120 14 77.78
30 EO 2P W+1 -140 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,07 %31 EO 3C N = 140 7 38.89
32 EO 3S E = -600 6 33.33
33 EO 2S N-1 -50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 268,0 / 540 = 49,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
11 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 47,64 % 4 EO 2P N-1 -100 6 33.33
5 EO 4C S+1 650 2 11.11
6 EO 2T N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 58,25 % 7 EO 4C W+2 -680 10 55.56
8 EO 4P E+1 -450 5 27.78
9 EO 3C W-1 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
7 STEED Mercédès -COULIE Joelle : 45,29 %10 EO 2C W = -110 12 66.67
11 EO 6C N+1 1010 3 16.67
12 EO 3C W = -140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
2 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 42,59 %13 EO 3S W+1 -630 13 72.22
14 EO 2S W+1 -150 13 72.22
15 EO 3P N = 140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,65 %16 EO 1S W = -90 5 27.78
17 EO 4P E+3 -510 6 33.33
18 EO 4P W+2 -480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
3 VAGMAN David -VERBOIS Léon : 46,30 %19 EO 4P S+2 480 2 11.11
20 EO 4P S-1 -100 14 77.78
21 EO 3S W+1 -430 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 50,00 %22 EO 3C S = 140 10 55.56
23 EO 3TcW-1 200 2 11.11
24 EO 2P W = -110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
4 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,82 %25 EO 3S E = -600 7 38.89
26 EO 3S E = -600 8 44.44
27 EO 3S S+3 490 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,07 %28 EO 4P N-1 -100 12 66.67
29 EO 1S E-1 100 3 16.67
30 EO 4P E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,39 %31 EO 3C N = 140 7 38.89
32 EO 3S W+2 -660 18 100.00
33 EO 2S N = 120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 265,0 / 540 = 49,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 COLLIN Jean-Marie -VAN GYSEGHEM
6 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 47,64 % 1 EO 3S S-1 -50 11 61.11
2 EO 2T S = 90 6 33.33
3 EO 4C S = 420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 58,25 % 4 EO 3P N-1 -100 6 33.33
5 EO 4C S = 620 11 61.11
6 EO 1S N+3 180 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
7 STEED Mercédès -COULIE Joelle : 45,29 % 7 EO 4P W+1 -650 3 16.67
8 EO 6S W = -990 16 88.89
9 EO 3P S-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
2 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 42,59 %10 EO 2S W = -120 16 88.89
11 EO 2PcW-2 300 18 100.00
12 EO 3S W-4 200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,65 %13 EO 3S W = -600 9 50.00
14 EO 2S W = -120 7 38.89
15 EO 4P S+1 650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
3 VAGMAN David -VERBOIS Léon : 46,30 %16 EO 2C E = -110 11 61.11
17 EO 3S E+4 -520 14 77.78
18 EO 4P W+2 -480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 50,00 %19 EO 4P S+1 450 9 50.00
20 EO 3P S-2 -200 18 100.00
21 EO 5K E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,82 %22 EO 3C S+1 170 7 38.89
23 EO 3K N = 110 17 94.44
24 EO 3P W-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,07 %25 EO 3S E-1 100 1 5.56
26 EO 3S E = -600 8 44.44
27 EO 3S N+2 460 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,39 %28 EO 4P S-1 -100 12 66.67
29 EO 2S W-1 100 3 16.67
30 EO 2P W+2 -170 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
11 - : 0,00 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 265,0 / 540 = 49,07 %
|
|