|
Tournoi du 24-11-14
1 64,26 10 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
2 57,04 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
3 55,37 1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
4 52,22 9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
5 51,48 2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
6 49,63 11 DELHEZ Jacques -DANTINNE Pierre
7 48,15 7 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse
8 46,48 4 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine
9 46,11 6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie
10 44,26 5 VERBOIS Léon -ROEGIERS Marga
11 35,00 3 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 63,89 20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
2 56,85 19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
3 54,63 13 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
4 52,04 21 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin
5 51,85 17 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
6 50,37 18 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal
7 48,52 15 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
8 46,48 22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
9 42,41 16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
10 42,04 12 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard
11 40,93 14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
PAIRE Nr : 1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
12 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 42,04 % 1 NS 2C S+1 140 11 61.11
2 NS 1S S+2 150 14 77.78
3 NS 1S S+1 120 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,48 % 4 NS 3CcE-2 500 18 100.00
5 NS 3S E+4 -520 2 11.11
6 NS 2P E+1 -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
21 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 52,04 % 7 NS 5C E-1 100 14 77.78
8 NS 3S S = 400 13 72.22
9 NS 4P W-2 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 63,89 %10 NS 3C N-1 -100 4 22.22
11 NS 2P E+2 -170 2 11.11
12 NS 2P N = 110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,85 %13 NS 4C E+1 -650 4 22.22
14 NS 3S S+2 460 17 94.44
15 NS 2C S-5 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
18 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 50,37 %16 NS 4P E+1 -650 0 0.00
17 NS 2P N+1 140 14 77.78
18 NS 4P W = -420 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
17 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 51,85 %19 NS 4C S-1 -50 8 44.44
20 NS 4C E+1 -650 4 22.22
21 NS 3PcE-2 300 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 42,41 %22 NS 4P S = 420 7 38.89
23 NS 2P E = -110 15 83.33
24 NS 3S S = 400 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
15 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 48,52 %25 NS 4P S-2 -100 5 27.78
26 NS 3S S = 600 16 88.89
27 NS 3T S-3 -150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 40,93 %28 NS 3C E-1 50 14 77.78
29 NS 1S E = -90 15 83.33
30 NS 5C W-5 250 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
Total : 299,0 / 540 = 55,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
13 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,63 % 4 NS 2P E-1 100 8 44.44
5 NS 3S E+3 -490 9 50.00
6 NS 2P E+1 -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
12 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 42,04 % 7 NS 4C W-1 100 14 77.78
8 NS 1S S+1 120 10 55.56
9 NS 4P W = -620 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,48 %10 NS 3S E-4 400 16 88.89
11 NS 2K E+1 -110 11 61.11
12 NS 3K W-2 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
21 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 52,04 %13 NS 2C E+3 -200 13 72.22
14 NS 3K S+1 130 10 55.56
15 NS 4C W = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 63,89 %16 NS 3P W+1 -170 3 16.67
17 NS 4T N = 130 10 55.56
18 NS 4P E = -420 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,85 %19 NS 3P E-2 200 16 88.89
20 NS 4C W+1 -650 4 22.22
21 NS 1S W = -90 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
18 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 50,37 %22 NS 4P S+1 450 15 83.33
23 NS 1S W+1 -120 10 55.56
24 NS 2P S+1 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
17 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 51,85 %25 NS 3P S-2 -100 5 27.78
26 NS 1S S+1 120 11 61.11
27 NS 4P W-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 42,41 %28 NS 3C E = -140 10 55.56
29 NS 1S E+2 -150 4 22.22
30 NS 5K S = 400 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
15 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 48,52 %31 NS 4T W+1 -150 4 22.22
32 NS 5P W = -650 7 38.89
33 NS 3P E-4 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 278,0 / 540 = 51,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 42,41 % 1 NS 2P S = 110 1 5.56
2 NS 3CcN = 730 18 100.00
3 NS 3K N-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 40,93 % 7 NS 4C W = -620 9 50.00
8 NS 2K S+1 110 8 44.44
9 NS 2P W+1 -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
13 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,63 %10 NS 3T E-1 100 7 38.89
11 NS 3P E-1 50 16 88.89
12 NS 3K E-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
12 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 42,04 %13 NS 4C E = -620 9 50.00
14 NS 4K S-1 -50 5 27.78
15 NS 4C W = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,48 %16 NS 3K N-1 -50 16 88.89
17 NS 3C E-2 100 5 27.78
18 NS 4P W-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
21 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 52,04 %19 NS 3C S-3 -150 0 0.00
20 NS 4C W+1 -650 4 22.22
21 NS 2K W-3 150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 63,89 %22 NS 2P S = 110 0 0.00
23 NS 1P E+2 -140 5 27.78
24 NS 3S N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,85 %25 NS 3K E = -110 0 0.00
26 NS 2C S-1 -100 1 5.56
27 NS 4P W = -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 1,85 %
18 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 50,37 %28 NS 2C E+2 -170 6 33.33
29 NS 1S E+3 -180 0 0.00
30 NS 3S E-4 200 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
17 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 51,85 %31 NS 3T S-5 -500 0 0.00
32 NS 4P W+1 -650 7 38.89
33 NS 1S N = 90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
Total : 189,0 / 540 = 35,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine
18 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 50,37 % 1 NS 2C S+1 140 11 61.11
2 NS 2P W+1 -140 6 33.33
3 NS 2K N+1 110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
17 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 51,85 % 4 NS 3CcE = -730 0 0.00
5 NS 3S W+3 -490 9 50.00
6 NS 2C S-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
15 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 48,52 %10 NS 2S E-2 200 13 72.22
11 NS 3K W = -110 11 61.11
12 NS 3K W-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 40,93 %13 NS 2C E+2 -170 17 94.44
14 NS 3S N+2 460 17 94.44
15 NS 4C W = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
13 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,63 %16 NS 3S S-1 -50 16 88.89
17 NS 5TcN-2 -300 0 0.00
18 NS 5TcS-1 -200 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
12 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 42,04 %19 NS 2P W = -110 3 16.67
20 NS 4C E+1 -650 4 22.22
21 NS 2P E = -110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,48 %22 NS 4P S = 420 7 38.89
23 NS 2S W+1 -150 1 5.56
24 NS 3S N = 400 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
21 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 52,04 %25 NS 3P S-2 -100 5 27.78
26 NS 2S S = 120 11 61.11
27 NS 4P W-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 63,89 %28 NS 4CcE-1 100 16 88.89
29 NS 1S E+1 -120 10 55.56
30 NS 4K N+1 150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,85 %31 NS 2P S-2 -200 2 11.11
32 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 38.89
33 NS 2P W-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
Total : 251,0 / 540 = 46,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 VERBOIS Léon -ROEGIERS Marga
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 63,89 % 1 NS 1S S+1 120 4 22.22
2 NS 3P W = -140 6 33.33
3 NS 4K N-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,85 % 4 NS 3P E-1 100 8 44.44
5 NS 3S E+4 -520 2 11.11
6 NS 2P E+1 -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
18 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 50,37 % 7 NS 4C W+1 -650 2 11.11
8 NS 3S S-1 -50 4 22.22
9 NS 2P W+1 -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 42,41 %13 NS 2C E+2 -170 17 94.44
14 NS 3PcN-3 -500 0 0.00
15 NS 4C W+1 -450 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
15 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 48,52 %16 NS 4K N-1 -50 16 88.89
17 NS 5T N = 400 17 94.44
18 NS 4P W = -420 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 40,93 %19 NS 2P W-1 100 12 66.67
20 NS 2T E+3 -150 16 88.89
21 NS 2P E = -110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
13 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,63 %22 NS 4P S = 420 7 38.89
23 NS 1S W+2 -150 1 5.56
24 NS 3P S = 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
12 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 42,04 %25 NS 2P S = 110 17 94.44
26 NS 3S N+1 630 18 100.00
27 NS 4P W-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,48 %28 NS 3C E+2 -200 3 16.67
29 NS 1S E+1 -120 10 55.56
30 NS 5K S = 400 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
21 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 52,04 %31 NS 3T E+1 -130 6 33.33
32 NS 4P W+1 -650 7 38.89
33 NS 2S S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
Total : 239,0 / 540 = 44,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,48 % 1 NS 2S S+1 150 18 100.00
2 NS 2C N-2 -200 1 5.56
3 NS 2K N+1 110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
21 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 52,04 % 4 NS 2P E-1 100 8 44.44
5 NS 3S E+3 -490 9 50.00
6 NS 2P E+2 -170 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 63,89 % 7 NS 4C E+1 -650 2 11.11
8 NS 3S S = 400 13 72.22
9 NS 3P W = -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,85 %10 NS 1S E-1 100 7 38.89
11 NS 3K W = -110 11 61.11
12 NS 2C S+1 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
17 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 51,85 %16 NS 3P W+1 -170 3 16.67
17 NS 3C E-2 100 5 27.78
18 NS 3P E+1 -170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 42,41 %19 NS 2K N = 90 10 55.56
20 NS 4C E+1 -650 4 22.22
21 NS 2T E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
15 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 48,52 %22 NS 4P S+1 450 15 83.33
23 NS 1S W+1 -120 10 55.56
24 NS 2C N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 40,93 %25 NS 3P S-1 -50 12 66.67
26 NS 1S N+1 120 11 61.11
27 NS 3P W+1 -170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
13 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,63 %28 NS 2C E+1 -140 10 55.56
29 NS 1S E+2 -150 4 22.22
30 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
12 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 42,04 %31 NS 2P S-1 -100 14 77.78
32 NS 4P W+1 -650 7 38.89
33 NS 1S N+2 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 249,0 / 540 = 46,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse
13 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,63 % 1 NS 2C S+1 140 11 61.11
2 NS 3C N = 140 12 66.67
3 NS 3K N-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
12 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 42,04 % 4 NS 4P E-2 200 15 83.33
5 NS 5K E+2 -440 14 77.78
6 NS 2P E+2 -170 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,48 % 7 NS 3S E+1 -630 6 33.33
8 NS 3S S-2 -100 0 0.00
9 NS 5KcN-4 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
21 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 52,04 %10 NS 2C N+2 170 10 55.56
11 NS 2K E+2 -130 6 33.33
12 NS 2P N+2 170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 63,89 %13 NS 4C E+1 -650 4 22.22
14 NS 3C W-2 100 8 44.44
15 NS 4C W = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
18 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 50,37 %19 NS 1P W = -80 6 33.33
20 NS 4C W-1 100 18 100.00
21 NS 1S S+1 120 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
17 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 51,85 %22 NS 4P S = 420 7 38.89
23 NS 1S W+1 -120 10 55.56
24 NS 2P S+1 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 42,41 %25 NS 3P S-1 -50 12 66.67
26 NS 2C S-1 -100 1 5.56
27 NS 4P W-2 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
15 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 48,52 %28 NS 4PcN-4 -1100 0 0.00
29 NS 1S E+2 -150 4 22.22
30 NS 5K N = 400 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 40,93 %31 NS 2P S-1 -100 14 77.78
32 NS 1S W+1 -120 16 88.89
33 NS 1P W-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 260,0 / 540 = 48,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
15 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 48,52 % 1 NS 2C S+1 140 11 61.11
2 NS 3C N-1 -100 10 55.56
3 NS 3K N = 110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 40,93 % 4 NS 1C E+1 -110 2 11.11
5 NS 3S E+3 -490 9 50.00
6 NS 3S N-3 -150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
13 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,63 % 7 NS 4C W = -620 9 50.00
8 NS 3S N+1 430 17 94.44
9 NS 3P W+1 -170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
12 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 42,04 %10 NS 2S E = -120 2 11.11
11 NS 2K W+1 -110 11 61.11
12 NS 2P N+1 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,48 %13 NS 4C E = -620 9 50.00
14 NS 5K S+1 420 14 77.78
15 NS 3P E+1 -170 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
21 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 52,04 %16 NS 3ScN-1 -100 10 55.56
17 NS 4T N = 130 10 55.56
18 NS 4P W = -420 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,85 %22 NS 4P S = 420 7 38.89
23 NS 2P E = -110 15 83.33
24 NS 3S S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
18 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 50,37 %25 NS 3P S-1 -50 12 66.67
26 NS 2S N = 120 11 61.11
27 NS 4P W-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
17 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 51,85 %28 NS 2C E+1 -140 10 55.56
29 NS 1S S+2 150 18 100.00
30 NS 6TcE-3 500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 42,41 %31 NS 2P S-1 -100 14 77.78
32 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 38.89
33 NS 1S S+2 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 308,0 / 540 = 57,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
17 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 51,85 % 1 NS 2C S = 110 1 5.56
2 NS 3C S-2 -200 1 5.56
3 NS 3K N = 110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 42,41 % 4 NS 2P E-1 100 8 44.44
5 NS 5K E+1 -420 17 94.44
6 NS 2P E+2 -170 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
15 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 48,52 % 7 NS 5C E = -650 2 11.11
8 NS 3S S+1 430 17 94.44
9 NS 3P W = -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 40,93 %10 NS 3CcN+1 930 18 100.00
11 NS 2P E+1 -140 4 22.22
12 NS 2P N+3 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
13 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,63 %13 NS 3S E+2 -660 0 0.00
14 NS 5K S = 400 12 66.67
15 NS 4C E = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
12 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 42,04 %16 NS 4K N-3 -150 6 33.33
17 NS 5T N-1 -50 2 11.11
18 NS 4P W-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,48 %19 NS 2P E = -110 3 16.67
20 NS 3C E+2 -200 11 61.11
21 NS 2KcN+1 380 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 63,89 %25 NS 3P S-2 -100 5 27.78
26 NS 2P E-1 100 6 33.33
27 NS 4P E-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,85 %28 NS 3S E-5 250 18 100.00
29 NS 1S E+1 -120 10 55.56
30 NS 5K N = 400 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
18 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 50,37 %31 NS 3T E = -110 8 44.44
32 NS 6S W-3 300 18 100.00
33 NS 1P E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 282,0 / 540 = 52,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,85 % 1 NS 2C S+1 140 11 61.11
2 NS 3C N+1 170 16 88.89
3 NS 3K N = 110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
18 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 50,37 % 4 NS 2P E-2 200 15 83.33
5 NS 5K W+1 -420 17 94.44
6 NS 3C S-1 -50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
17 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 51,85 % 7 NS 5C E-2 200 18 100.00
8 NS 3S N-1 -50 4 22.22
9 NS 3P W = -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 42,41 %10 NS 3S W-2 200 13 72.22
11 NS 2C N = 110 18 100.00
12 NS 4K W-3 150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
15 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 48,52 %13 NS 4C E+1 -650 4 22.22
14 NS 5K S-2 -100 2 11.11
15 NS 4C W = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 40,93 %16 NS 4K N-2 -100 10 55.56
17 NS 2T N+2 130 10 55.56
18 NS 4P W-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
13 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,63 %19 NS 3P W-2 200 16 88.89
20 NS 3C E+2 -200 11 61.11
21 NS 2S W = -120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 42,04 %22 NS 3S N+2 460 18 100.00
23 NS 2C W-1 100 18 100.00
24 NS 2P S+2 170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
21 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 52,04 %28 NS 3C E+2 -200 3 16.67
29 NS 1S E = -90 15 83.33
30 NS 6K S-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 63,89 %31 NS 2C S-1 -100 14 77.78
32 NS 4P W+1 -650 7 38.89
33 NS 1S N+1 120 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 347,0 / 540 = 64,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 DELHEZ Jacques -DANTINNE Pierre
21 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 52,04 % 1 NS 2C S+1 140 11 61.11
2 NS 2P W+1 -140 6 33.33
3 NS 3K N = 110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 63,89 % 4 NS 3C E-1 100 8 44.44
5 NS 3S E+4 -520 2 11.11
6 NS 3P E+1 -170 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,85 % 7 NS 4P E-1 100 14 77.78
8 NS 3S S-1 -50 4 22.22
9 NS 4P E = -620 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
18 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 50,37 %10 NS 1S E+2 -150 0 0.00
11 NS 3S E = -400 0 0.00
12 NS 3P N = 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
17 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 51,85 %13 NS 2C E+3 -200 13 72.22
14 NS 4K S-1 -50 5 27.78
15 NS 4C E = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 42,41 %16 NS 4K N-2 -100 10 55.56
17 NS 5T N = 400 17 94.44
18 NS 4P E-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
15 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 48,52 %19 NS 3P W-2 200 16 88.89
20 NS 3C W+1 -170 14 77.78
21 NS 3P E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 40,93 %22 NS 4P S = 420 7 38.89
23 NS 1P E+2 -140 5 27.78
24 NS 3P N+1 170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
13 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,63 %25 NS 2P S = 110 17 94.44
26 NS 1S S = 90 4 22.22
27 NS 4P E-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,48 %31 NS 2P S-1 -100 14 77.78
32 NS 4P W+1 -650 7 38.89
33 NS 1S N = 90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 268,0 / 540 = 49,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard
1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,37 % 1 EO 2C S+1 140 7 38.89
2 EO 1S S+2 150 4 22.22
3 EO 1S S+1 120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
7 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 48,15 % 4 EO 4P E-2 200 3 16.67
5 EO 5K E+2 -440 4 22.22
6 EO 2P E+2 -170 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 51,48 % 7 EO 4C W-1 100 4 22.22
8 EO 1S S+1 120 8 44.44
9 EO 4P W = -620 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,04 %10 EO 2S E = -120 16 88.89
11 EO 2K W+1 -110 7 38.89
12 EO 2P N+1 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
3 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 35,00 %13 EO 4C E = -620 9 50.00
14 EO 4K S-1 -50 13 72.22
15 EO 4C W = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 52,22 %16 EO 4K N-3 -150 12 66.67
17 EO 5T N-1 -50 16 88.89
18 EO 4P W-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
4 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 46,48 %19 EO 2P W = -110 15 83.33
20 EO 4C E+1 -650 14 77.78
21 EO 2P E = -110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
10 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 64,26 %22 EO 3S N+2 460 0 0.00
23 EO 2C W-1 100 0 0.00
24 EO 2P S+2 170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
5 VERBOIS Léon -ROEGIERS Marga : 44,26 %25 EO 2P S = 110 1 5.56
26 EO 3S N+1 630 0 0.00
27 EO 4P W-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 46,11 %31 EO 2P S-1 -100 4 22.22
32 EO 4P W+1 -650 11 61.11
33 EO 1S N+2 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 227,0 / 540 = 42,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
7 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 48,15 % 1 EO 2C S+1 140 7 38.89
2 EO 3C N = 140 6 33.33
3 EO 3K N-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 51,48 % 4 EO 2P E-1 100 10 55.56
5 EO 3S E+3 -490 9 50.00
6 EO 2P E+1 -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,04 % 7 EO 4C W = -620 9 50.00
8 EO 3S N+1 430 1 5.56
9 EO 3P W+1 -170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
3 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 35,00 %10 EO 3T E-1 100 11 61.11
11 EO 3P E-1 50 2 11.11
12 EO 3K E-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 52,22 %13 EO 3S E+2 -660 18 100.00
14 EO 5K S = 400 6 33.33
15 EO 4C E = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
4 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 46,48 %16 EO 3S S-1 -50 2 11.11
17 EO 5TcN-2 -300 18 100.00
18 EO 5TcS-1 -200 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
10 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 64,26 %19 EO 3P W-2 200 2 11.11
20 EO 3C E+2 -200 7 38.89
21 EO 2S W = -120 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 VERBOIS Léon -ROEGIERS Marga : 44,26 %22 EO 4P S = 420 11 61.11
23 EO 1S W+2 -150 17 94.44
24 EO 3P S = 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
11 DELHEZ Jacques -DANTINNE Pierre : 49,63 %25 EO 2P S = 110 1 5.56
26 EO 1S S = 90 14 77.78
27 EO 4P E-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 46,11 %28 EO 2C E+1 -140 8 44.44
29 EO 1S E+2 -150 14 77.78
30 EO 3S W+1 -430 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
Total : 295,0 / 540 = 54,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,04 % 4 EO 1C E+1 -110 16 88.89
5 EO 3S E+3 -490 9 50.00
6 EO 3S N-3 -150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
3 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 35,00 % 7 EO 4C W = -620 9 50.00
8 EO 2K S+1 110 10 55.56
9 EO 2P W+1 -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 52,22 %10 EO 3CcN+1 930 0 0.00
11 EO 2P E+1 -140 14 77.78
12 EO 2P N+3 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
4 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 46,48 %13 EO 2C E+2 -170 1 5.56
14 EO 3S N+2 460 1 5.56
15 EO 4C W = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
10 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 64,26 %16 EO 4K N-2 -100 8 44.44
17 EO 2T N+2 130 8 44.44
18 EO 4P W-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
5 VERBOIS Léon -ROEGIERS Marga : 44,26 %19 EO 2P W-1 100 6 33.33
20 EO 2T E+3 -150 2 11.11
21 EO 2P E = -110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
11 DELHEZ Jacques -DANTINNE Pierre : 49,63 %22 EO 4P S = 420 11 61.11
23 EO 1P E+2 -140 13 72.22
24 EO 3P N+1 170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 46,11 %25 EO 3P S-1 -50 6 33.33
26 EO 1S N+1 120 7 38.89
27 EO 3P W+1 -170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,37 %28 EO 3C E-1 50 4 22.22
29 EO 1S E = -90 3 16.67
30 EO 5C W-5 250 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
7 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 48,15 %31 EO 2P S-1 -100 4 22.22
32 EO 1S W+1 -120 2 11.11
33 EO 1P W-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 221,0 / 540 = 40,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,04 % 1 EO 2C S+1 140 7 38.89
2 EO 3C N-1 -100 8 44.44
3 EO 3K N = 110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 52,22 % 7 EO 5C E = -650 16 88.89
8 EO 3S S+1 430 1 5.56
9 EO 3P W = -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
4 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 46,48 %10 EO 2S E-2 200 5 27.78
11 EO 3K W = -110 7 38.89
12 EO 3K W-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
10 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 64,26 %13 EO 4C E+1 -650 14 77.78
14 EO 5K S-2 -100 16 88.89
15 EO 4C W = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
5 VERBOIS Léon -ROEGIERS Marga : 44,26 %16 EO 4K N-1 -50 2 11.11
17 EO 5T N = 400 1 5.56
18 EO 4P W = -420 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
11 DELHEZ Jacques -DANTINNE Pierre : 49,63 %19 EO 3P W-2 200 2 11.11
20 EO 3C W+1 -170 4 22.22
21 EO 3P E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 46,11 %22 EO 4P S+1 450 3 16.67
23 EO 1S W+1 -120 8 44.44
24 EO 2C N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,37 %25 EO 4P S-2 -100 13 72.22
26 EO 3S S = 600 2 11.11
27 EO 3T S-3 -150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
7 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 48,15 %28 EO 4PcN-4 -1100 18 100.00
29 EO 1S E+2 -150 14 77.78
30 EO 5K N = 400 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 51,48 %31 EO 4T W+1 -150 14 77.78
32 EO 5P W = -650 11 61.11
33 EO 3P E-4 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 262,0 / 540 = 48,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
3 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 35,00 % 1 EO 2P S = 110 17 94.44
2 EO 3CcN = 730 0 0.00
3 EO 3K N-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 52,22 % 4 EO 2P E-1 100 10 55.56
5 EO 5K E+1 -420 1 5.56
6 EO 2P E+2 -170 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
10 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 64,26 %10 EO 3S W-2 200 5 27.78
11 EO 2C N = 110 0 0.00
12 EO 4K W-3 150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
5 VERBOIS Léon -ROEGIERS Marga : 44,26 %13 EO 2C E+2 -170 1 5.56
14 EO 3PcN-3 -500 18 100.00
15 EO 4C W+1 -450 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
11 DELHEZ Jacques -DANTINNE Pierre : 49,63 %16 EO 4K N-2 -100 8 44.44
17 EO 5T N = 400 1 5.56
18 EO 4P E-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 46,11 %19 EO 2K N = 90 8 44.44
20 EO 4C E+1 -650 14 77.78
21 EO 2T E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,37 %22 EO 4P S = 420 11 61.11
23 EO 2P E = -110 3 16.67
24 EO 3S S = 400 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
7 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 48,15 %25 EO 3P S-1 -50 6 33.33
26 EO 2C S-1 -100 17 94.44
27 EO 4P W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 51,48 %28 EO 3C E = -140 8 44.44
29 EO 1S E+2 -150 14 77.78
30 EO 5K S = 400 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,04 %31 EO 2P S-1 -100 4 22.22
32 EO 4P E+1 -650 11 61.11
33 EO 1S S+2 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 229,0 / 540 = 42,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 52,22 % 1 EO 2C S = 110 17 94.44
2 EO 3C S-2 -200 17 94.44
3 EO 3K N = 110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
4 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 46,48 % 4 EO 3CcE = -730 18 100.00
5 EO 3S W+3 -490 9 50.00
6 EO 2C S-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
10 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 64,26 % 7 EO 5C E-2 200 0 0.00
8 EO 3S N-1 -50 14 77.78
9 EO 3P W = -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
11 DELHEZ Jacques -DANTINNE Pierre : 49,63 %13 EO 2C E+3 -200 5 27.78
14 EO 4K S-1 -50 13 72.22
15 EO 4C E = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 46,11 %16 EO 3P W+1 -170 15 83.33
17 EO 3C E-2 100 13 72.22
18 EO 3P E+1 -170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,37 %19 EO 4C S-1 -50 10 55.56
20 EO 4C E+1 -650 14 77.78
21 EO 3PcE-2 300 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
7 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 48,15 %22 EO 4P S = 420 11 61.11
23 EO 1S W+1 -120 8 44.44
24 EO 2P S+1 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 51,48 %25 EO 3P S-2 -100 13 72.22
26 EO 1S S+1 120 7 38.89
27 EO 4P W-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,04 %28 EO 2C E+1 -140 8 44.44
29 EO 1S S+2 150 0 0.00
30 EO 6TcE-3 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
3 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 35,00 %31 EO 3T S-5 -500 18 100.00
32 EO 4P W+1 -650 11 61.11
33 EO 1S N = 90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
Total : 280,0 / 540 = 51,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal
4 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 46,48 % 1 EO 2C S+1 140 7 38.89
2 EO 2P W+1 -140 12 66.67
3 EO 2K N+1 110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
10 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 64,26 % 4 EO 2P E-2 200 3 16.67
5 EO 5K W+1 -420 1 5.56
6 EO 3C S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
5 VERBOIS Léon -ROEGIERS Marga : 44,26 % 7 EO 4C W+1 -650 16 88.89
8 EO 3S S-1 -50 14 77.78
9 EO 2P W+1 -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
11 DELHEZ Jacques -DANTINNE Pierre : 49,63 %10 EO 1S E+2 -150 18 100.00
11 EO 3S E = -400 18 100.00
12 EO 3P N = 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,37 %16 EO 4P E+1 -650 18 100.00
17 EO 2P N+1 140 4 22.22
18 EO 4P W = -420 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
7 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 48,15 %19 EO 1P W = -80 12 66.67
20 EO 4C W-1 100 0 0.00
21 EO 1S S+1 120 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 51,48 %22 EO 4P S+1 450 3 16.67
23 EO 1S W+1 -120 8 44.44
24 EO 2P S+1 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,04 %25 EO 3P S-1 -50 6 33.33
26 EO 2S N = 120 7 38.89
27 EO 4P W-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
3 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 35,00 %28 EO 2C E+2 -170 12 66.67
29 EO 1S E+3 -180 18 100.00
30 EO 3S E-4 200 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 52,22 %31 EO 3T E = -110 10 55.56
32 EO 6S W-3 300 0 0.00
33 EO 1P E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 272,0 / 540 = 50,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
10 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 64,26 % 1 EO 2C S+1 140 7 38.89
2 EO 3C N+1 170 2 11.11
3 EO 3K N = 110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
5 VERBOIS Léon -ROEGIERS Marga : 44,26 % 4 EO 3P E-1 100 10 55.56
5 EO 3S E+4 -520 16 88.89
6 EO 2P E+1 -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
11 DELHEZ Jacques -DANTINNE Pierre : 49,63 % 7 EO 4P E-1 100 4 22.22
8 EO 3S S-1 -50 14 77.78
9 EO 4P E = -620 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 46,11 %10 EO 1S E-1 100 11 61.11
11 EO 3K W = -110 7 38.89
12 EO 2C S+1 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,37 %13 EO 4C E+1 -650 14 77.78
14 EO 3S S+2 460 1 5.56
15 EO 2C S-5 -500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 51,48 %19 EO 3P E-2 200 2 11.11
20 EO 4C W+1 -650 14 77.78
21 EO 1S W = -90 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,04 %22 EO 4P S = 420 11 61.11
23 EO 2P E = -110 3 16.67
24 EO 3S S-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
3 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 35,00 %25 EO 3K E = -110 18 100.00
26 EO 2C S-1 -100 17 94.44
27 EO 4P W = -420 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 98,15 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 52,22 %28 EO 3S E-5 250 0 0.00
29 EO 1S E+1 -120 8 44.44
30 EO 5K N = 400 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
4 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 46,48 %31 EO 2P S-2 -200 16 88.89
32 EO 4P E+1 -650 11 61.11
33 EO 2P W-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
Total : 307,0 / 540 = 56,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
5 VERBOIS Léon -ROEGIERS Marga : 44,26 % 1 EO 1S S+1 120 14 77.78
2 EO 3P W = -140 12 66.67
3 EO 4K N-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
11 DELHEZ Jacques -DANTINNE Pierre : 49,63 % 4 EO 3C E-1 100 10 55.56
5 EO 3S E+4 -520 16 88.89
6 EO 3P E+1 -170 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 46,11 % 7 EO 4C E+1 -650 16 88.89
8 EO 3S S = 400 5 27.78
9 EO 3P W = -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,37 %10 EO 3C N-1 -100 14 77.78
11 EO 2P E+2 -170 16 88.89
12 EO 2P N = 110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
7 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 48,15 %13 EO 4C E+1 -650 14 77.78
14 EO 3C W-2 100 10 55.56
15 EO 4C W = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 51,48 %16 EO 3P W+1 -170 15 83.33
17 EO 4T N = 130 8 44.44
18 EO 4P E = -420 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
3 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 35,00 %22 EO 2P S = 110 18 100.00
23 EO 1P E+2 -140 13 72.22
24 EO 3S N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 52,22 %25 EO 3P S-2 -100 13 72.22
26 EO 2P E-1 100 12 66.67
27 EO 4P E-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
4 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 46,48 %28 EO 4CcE-1 100 2 11.11
29 EO 1S E+1 -120 8 44.44
30 EO 4K N+1 150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
10 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 64,26 %31 EO 2C S-1 -100 4 22.22
32 EO 4P W+1 -650 11 61.11
33 EO 1S N+1 120 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 345,0 / 540 = 63,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin
11 DELHEZ Jacques -DANTINNE Pierre : 49,63 % 1 EO 2C S+1 140 7 38.89
2 EO 2P W+1 -140 12 66.67
3 EO 3K N = 110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 46,11 % 4 EO 2P E-1 100 10 55.56
5 EO 3S E+3 -490 9 50.00
6 EO 2P E+2 -170 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,37 % 7 EO 5C E-1 100 4 22.22
8 EO 3S S = 400 5 27.78
9 EO 4P W-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
7 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 48,15 %10 EO 2C N+2 170 8 44.44
11 EO 2K E+2 -130 12 66.67
12 EO 2P N+2 170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 51,48 %13 EO 2C E+3 -200 5 27.78
14 EO 3K S+1 130 8 44.44
15 EO 4C W = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,04 %16 EO 3ScN-1 -100 8 44.44
17 EO 4T N = 130 8 44.44
18 EO 4P W = -420 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
3 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 35,00 %19 EO 3C S-3 -150 18 100.00
20 EO 4C W+1 -650 14 77.78
21 EO 2K W-3 150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
4 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 46,48 %25 EO 3P S-2 -100 13 72.22
26 EO 2S S = 120 7 38.89
27 EO 4P W-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 64,26 %28 EO 3C E+2 -200 15 83.33
29 EO 1S E = -90 3 16.67
30 EO 6K S-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
5 VERBOIS Léon -ROEGIERS Marga : 44,26 %31 EO 3T E+1 -130 12 66.67
32 EO 4P W+1 -650 11 61.11
33 EO 2S S-1 -50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
Total : 281,0 / 540 = 52,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 46,11 % 1 EO 2S S+1 150 0 0.00
2 EO 2C N-2 -200 17 94.44
3 EO 2K N+1 110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,37 % 4 EO 3CcE-2 500 0 0.00
5 EO 3S E+4 -520 16 88.89
6 EO 2P E+1 -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
7 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 48,15 % 7 EO 3S E+1 -630 12 66.67
8 EO 3S S-2 -100 18 100.00
9 EO 5KcN-4 -800 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 51,48 %10 EO 3S E-4 400 2 11.11
11 EO 2K E+1 -110 7 38.89
12 EO 3K W-2 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,04 %13 EO 4C E = -620 9 50.00
14 EO 5K S+1 420 4 22.22
15 EO 3P E+1 -170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
3 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 35,00 %16 EO 3K N-1 -50 2 11.11
17 EO 3C E-2 100 13 72.22
18 EO 4P W-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 52,22 %19 EO 2P E = -110 15 83.33
20 EO 3C E+2 -200 7 38.89
21 EO 2KcN+1 380 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
4 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 46,48 %22 EO 4P S = 420 11 61.11
23 EO 2S W+1 -150 17 94.44
24 EO 3S N = 400 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
5 VERBOIS Léon -ROEGIERS Marga : 44,26 %28 EO 3C E+2 -200 15 83.33
29 EO 1S E+1 -120 8 44.44
30 EO 5K S = 400 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
11 DELHEZ Jacques -DANTINNE Pierre : 49,63 %31 EO 2P S-1 -100 4 22.22
32 EO 4P W+1 -650 11 61.11
33 EO 1S N = 90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 251,0 / 540 = 46,48 %
|
|