|
Tournoi du 25-11-13
1 60,00 10 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
2 57,04 9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine
3 54,81 2 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy
4 54,63 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
5 51,85 3 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal
6 51,11 1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
7 45,74 6 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse
8 44,44 4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel
9 44,07 5 DELHEZ Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard
10 36,30 7 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 60,00 17 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre
2 52,59 11 VAGMAN David -MOSSERAY Etienne
3 51,48 14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
~ 51,48 12 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
5 51,30 16 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
6 50,19 18 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
7 48,33 19 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude
8 45,37 15 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
9 44,81 20 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
10 44,44 13 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
PAIRE Nr : 1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
11 VAGMAN David -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,59 % 1 NS 3C N+1 170 8 44.44
2 NS 6C S-1 -100 0 0.00
3 NS 3P S+1 170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
13 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,44 % 4 NS 3C N = 140 7 38.89
5 NS 4P W-1 50 13 72.22
6 NS 3S E = -600 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
12 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 51,48 % 7 NS 4P N = 620 13 72.22
8 NS 6P N-2 -100 0 0.00
9 NS 1S W = -90 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
16 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,30 %10 NS 4C S = 620 5 27.78
11 NS 1S W = -90 8 44.44
12 NS 3S S+1 630 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
17 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 60,00 %13 NS 3S E+1 -630 9 50.00
14 NS 4C N = 420 15 83.33
15 NS 4C S-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
18 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,19 %16 NS 3S S+1 430 15 83.33
17 NS 4P N = 420 7 38.89
18 NS 4P N+3 710 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
19 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 48,33 %19 NS 3S W-1 100 12 66.67
20 NS 2C E = -110 16 88.89
21 NS 4C E-3 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
20 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 44,81 %22 NS 3S E+1 -630 14 77.78
23 NS 6K N-1 -100 5 27.78
24 NS 1S E-3 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 51,48 %25 NS 1S S-1 -50 4 22.22
26 NS 3C N+2 200 9 50.00
27 NS 4K E = -130 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
15 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,37 %28 NS 5T N-1 -100 3 16.67
29 NS 1S E+1 -120 9 50.00
30 NS 1S W = -90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 276,0 / 540 = 51,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy
13 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,44 % 1 NS 4C N = 420 16 88.89
2 NS 4C N+1 650 13 72.22
3 NS 4P S+1 450 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
12 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 51,48 % 4 NS 3C N = 140 7 38.89
5 NS 4C W = -420 2 11.11
6 NS 3S E = -600 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
11 VAGMAN David -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,59 % 7 NS 4P N-1 -100 2 11.11
8 NS 6C S = 980 17 94.44
9 NS 1S W-1 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
20 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 44,81 %10 NS 4C S+1 650 15 83.33
11 NS 2C N+1 140 15 83.33
12 NS 3S N = 600 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 51,48 %13 NS 3S E+1 -630 9 50.00
14 NS 4C N-1 -50 6 33.33
15 NS 4C S-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
15 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,37 %16 NS 3S S+1 430 15 83.33
17 NS 4C N = 420 7 38.89
18 NS 4P N+3 710 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
16 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,30 %19 NS 4P W-2 200 16 88.89
20 NS 2P S-2 -200 3 16.67
21 NS 4C E-3 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
17 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 60,00 %22 NS 3S E+2 -660 9 50.00
23 NS 5K N-2 -200 1 5.56
24 NS 1S E-2 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
18 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,19 %25 NS 1S S = 90 13 72.22
26 NS 4C N = 620 13 72.22
27 NS 4K W = -130 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
19 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 48,33 %28 NS 3S S-1 -100 3 16.67
29 NS 2C N-2 -200 2 11.11
30 NS 1S W-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 296,0 / 540 = 54,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal
12 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 51,48 % 1 NS 4PcE-2 300 11 61.11
2 NS 4C N+1 650 13 72.22
3 NS Pass Passe 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
11 VAGMAN David -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,59 % 4 NS 4C S = 620 17 94.44
5 NS 4P W = -420 2 11.11
6 NS 3S E = -600 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
13 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,44 % 7 NS 4P N = 620 13 72.22
8 NS 4P N+2 480 14 77.78
9 NS 2C S = 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
18 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,19 %10 NS 4C S+1 650 15 83.33
11 NS 3C S-2 -100 6 33.33
12 NS 3S N = 600 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
19 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 48,33 %13 NS 4T W = -130 16 88.89
14 NS 4C N-1 -50 6 33.33
15 NS 5C S-2 -200 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
20 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 44,81 %16 NS 3S S+1 430 15 83.33
17 NS 2P N+4 230 1 5.56
18 NS 4P N+3 710 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 51,48 %19 NS 3C N-1 -50 10 55.56
20 NS 2C W+2 -170 6 33.33
21 NS 2C E = -110 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
15 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,37 %22 NS 3S E+2 -660 9 50.00
23 NS 5K N-1 -100 5 27.78
24 NS 1S E-3 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
16 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,30 %25 NS 1S S-1 -50 4 22.22
26 NS 1S S+3 180 6 33.33
27 NS 4K W-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
17 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 60,00 %28 NS 3S S = 600 11 61.11
29 NS 1S E = -90 16 88.89
30 NS 2S S-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 280,0 / 540 = 51,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel
17 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 60,00 % 1 NS 2P E = -110 3 16.67
2 NS 2C N+3 200 4 22.22
3 NS 3P S+2 200 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
16 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,30 % 4 NS 2P E = -110 0 0.00
5 NS 4P W-2 100 18 100.00
6 NS 3S E = -600 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
15 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,37 % 7 NS 4P N = 620 13 72.22
8 NS 3S N+2 460 12 66.67
9 NS 3C S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 51,48 %10 NS 3S N-4 -400 0 0.00
11 NS 2P N+1 140 15 83.33
12 NS 3S N = 600 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
20 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 44,81 %13 NS 3S W+2 -660 6 33.33
14 NS 5C N-2 -100 0 0.00
15 NS 3S S+1 630 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
19 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 48,33 %16 NS 3S N = 400 6 33.33
17 NS 4P N = 420 7 38.89
18 NS 3S N+3 690 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
18 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,19 %19 NS 3K E+1 -130 2 11.11
20 NS 2C E+1 -140 11 61.11
21 NS 3C E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
13 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,44 %22 NS 3S E+2 -660 9 50.00
23 NS 3S S = 600 13 72.22
24 NS 1S E-3 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
12 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 51,48 %25 NS 1S S+2 150 18 100.00
26 NS 1S S+1 120 2 11.11
27 NS 4K W = -130 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
11 VAGMAN David -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,59 %28 NS 3S N-1 -100 3 16.67
29 NS 1S E+1 -120 9 50.00
30 NS 1S W = -90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 240,0 / 540 = 44,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 DELHEZ Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard
18 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,19 % 1 NS 1P E+2 -140 0 0.00
2 NS 4C N+1 650 13 72.22
3 NS 4P S+1 450 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
17 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 60,00 % 4 NS 2C N+2 170 12 66.67
5 NS 4P W-1 50 13 72.22
6 NS 3S E+2 -660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
16 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,30 % 7 NS 3P N = 140 6 33.33
8 NS 4C N+1 450 6 33.33
9 NS 1S W-1 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
11 VAGMAN David -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,59 %10 NS 4C S+1 650 15 83.33
11 NS 2S W = -120 2 11.11
12 NS 3S S = 600 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
15 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,37 %13 NS 4P W-6 600 18 100.00
14 NS 4C N-1 -50 6 33.33
15 NS 5KcN-2 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 51,48 %16 NS 3S S = 400 6 33.33
17 NS 3P N+3 230 1 5.56
18 NS 4P N+1 650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
20 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 44,81 %19 NS 3S E-2 200 16 88.89
20 NS 2C E+1 -140 11 61.11
21 NS 4P E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
19 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 48,33 %22 NS 6S E-3 300 18 100.00
23 NS 2P N-2 -200 1 5.56
24 NS 1S E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
13 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,44 %25 NS 1S S-1 -50 4 22.22
26 NS 2C S+3 200 9 50.00
27 NS 3K W+2 -150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
12 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 51,48 %28 NS 3S S+1 630 17 94.44
29 NS 1S E+1 -120 9 50.00
30 NS 1S E = -90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 238,0 / 540 = 44,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse
19 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 48,33 % 1 NS 4P E-2 100 6 33.33
2 NS 4C N+1 650 13 72.22
3 NS 4P S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
18 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,19 % 4 NS 3P E-1 100 4 22.22
5 NS 4P W = -420 2 11.11
6 NS 3S E = -600 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
17 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 60,00 % 7 NS 4P N-1 -100 2 11.11
8 NS 4P N+1 450 6 33.33
9 NS 1S W+1 -120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
12 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 51,48 %10 NS 4C S = 620 5 27.78
11 NS 1S W+1 -120 2 11.11
12 NS 3S S+1 630 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
11 VAGMAN David -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,59 %13 NS 3S E+3 -690 3 16.67
14 NS 4C N-1 -50 6 33.33
15 NS 4C S-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
16 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,30 %16 NS 3S S+1 430 15 83.33
17 NS 4P N = 420 7 38.89
18 NS 3S N+3 690 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
15 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,37 %19 NS 4K E = -130 2 11.11
20 NS 2C E+1 -140 11 61.11
21 NS 4C E-2 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 51,48 %22 NS 3S E-1 100 16 88.89
23 NS 3S N = 600 13 72.22
24 NS 1S E-2 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
20 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 44,81 %25 NS 1S S = 90 13 72.22
26 NS 4C N = 620 13 72.22
27 NS 3C N+1 170 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
13 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,44 %28 NS 3T N-1 -100 3 16.67
29 NS 3T E-2 200 18 100.00
30 NS 1S W = -90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 247,0 / 540 = 45,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon
20 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 44,81 % 1 NS 2P E = -110 3 16.67
2 NS 3S N = 600 6 33.33
3 NS 4P S+1 450 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
19 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 48,33 % 4 NS 4C N-1 -100 2 11.11
5 NS 4P W-1 50 13 72.22
6 NS 3S W = -600 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
18 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,19 % 7 NS 4P N-1 -100 2 11.11
8 NS 4P N+1 450 6 33.33
9 NS 2C S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
13 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,44 %10 NS 4C S = 620 5 27.78
11 NS 1S W+1 -120 2 11.11
12 NS 4P S-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
12 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 51,48 %13 NS 3S E+3 -690 3 16.67
14 NS 4C N-1 -50 6 33.33
15 NS 3S S = 600 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
11 VAGMAN David -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,59 %16 NS 3S S = 400 6 33.33
17 NS 4P N+1 450 15 83.33
18 NS 3S N+3 690 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
17 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 60,00 %19 NS 2P W = -110 7 38.89
20 NS 3PcS-3 -800 0 0.00
21 NS 4C E-2 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
16 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,30 %22 NS 3S E+3 -690 2 11.11
23 NS 2K S+3 150 8 44.44
24 NS 1S E = -90 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
15 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,37 %25 NS 1C N = 80 10 55.56
26 NS 4C N+1 650 17 94.44
27 NS 3S E = -400 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 51,48 %28 NS 3S S = 600 11 61.11
29 NS 3C N-2 -200 2 11.11
30 NS 1S W = -90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 196,0 / 540 = 36,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 51,48 % 1 NS 4PcE-2 300 11 61.11
2 NS 4C N+1 650 13 72.22
3 NS 4P S+1 450 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
20 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 44,81 % 4 NS 4C N = 620 17 94.44
5 NS 2P W+2 -170 6 33.33
6 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
19 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 48,33 % 7 NS 4P N = 620 13 72.22
8 NS 6C N = 980 17 94.44
9 NS 2C S = 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
15 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,37 %10 NS 3S S+1 630 10 55.56
11 NS 2CcS = 470 18 100.00
12 NS 3S N = 600 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
13 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,44 %13 NS 3S E = -600 13 72.22
14 NS 4C N+1 450 18 100.00
15 NS 4C S-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
12 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 51,48 %16 NS 3S S-2 -100 0 0.00
17 NS 4P N+1 450 15 83.33
18 NS 6P N+1 1460 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
11 VAGMAN David -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,59 %19 NS 2K E+1 -110 7 38.89
20 NS 3T N = 110 18 100.00
21 NS 2C E = -110 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
18 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,19 %22 NS 3S E+3 -690 2 11.11
23 NS 3S S = 600 13 72.22
24 NS 1S E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
17 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 60,00 %25 NS 1S N-1 -50 4 22.22
26 NS 4C N-1 -100 0 0.00
27 NS 5KcE = -550 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
16 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,30 %28 NS 3S S = 600 11 61.11
29 NS 1S E+1 -120 9 50.00
30 NS 1S W = -90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 295,0 / 540 = 54,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine
15 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,37 % 1 NS 4C N = 420 16 88.89
2 NS 2S N+2 180 2 11.11
3 NS 4P S+1 450 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 51,48 % 4 NS 2C N+2 170 12 66.67
5 NS 2S E+1 -150 8 44.44
6 NS 3S E-1 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
20 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 44,81 % 7 NS 4P N = 620 13 72.22
8 NS 5P N = 450 6 33.33
9 NS 2C S-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
17 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 60,00 %10 NS 4C S+1 650 15 83.33
11 NS 2P N-1 -50 11 61.11
12 NS 3S N = 600 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
16 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,30 %13 NS 4CcS-5 -1400 0 0.00
14 NS 4PcE-1 100 12 66.67
15 NS 4C S-2 -200 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
13 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,44 %16 NS 3S S = 400 6 33.33
17 NS 4P N+1 450 15 83.33
18 NS 4P S+3 710 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
12 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 51,48 %19 NS 3PcW-1 200 16 88.89
20 NS 2C E+1 -140 11 61.11
21 NS 4C E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
11 VAGMAN David -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,59 %22 NS 3S E+2 -660 9 50.00
23 NS 3S N = 600 13 72.22
24 NS 1S E-3 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
19 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 48,33 %25 NS 1S N+1 120 16 88.89
26 NS 1S S+2 150 4 22.22
27 NS 3S W-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
18 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,19 %28 NS 3S S = 600 11 61.11
29 NS 2P S-2 -200 2 11.11
30 NS 1S W-2 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 308,0 / 540 = 57,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
16 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,30 % 1 NS 4C N = 420 16 88.89
2 NS 4C N+1 650 13 72.22
3 NS 4P S+1 450 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
15 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,37 % 4 NS 3C N+1 170 12 66.67
5 NS 4P W-1 50 13 72.22
6 NS 3S E = -600 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 51,48 % 7 NS 4P N = 620 13 72.22
8 NS 4P N+1 450 6 33.33
9 NS 2C S = 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
19 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 48,33 %10 NS 4C S = 620 5 27.78
11 NS 2P N-1 -50 11 61.11
12 NS 3S N = 600 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
18 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,19 %13 NS 3S E = -600 13 72.22
14 NS 4C N = 420 15 83.33
15 NS 3S S+2 660 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
17 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 60,00 %16 NS 3S S = 400 6 33.33
17 NS 4P N+1 450 15 83.33
18 NS 4P S+3 710 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
13 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,44 %19 NS 3K E+1 -130 2 11.11
20 NS 2P S-2 -200 3 16.67
21 NS 4C E-3 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
12 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 51,48 %22 NS 3S E+3 -690 2 11.11
23 NS 3S S+1 630 18 100.00
24 NS 1S E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
11 VAGMAN David -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,59 %25 NS 1S N-1 -50 4 22.22
26 NS 4C N+1 650 17 94.44
27 NS 4C S-2 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
20 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 44,81 %28 NS 3S S+1 630 17 94.44
29 NS 1S N-1 -100 14 77.78
30 NS 1S W+1 -120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 324,0 / 540 = 60,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 VAGMAN David -MOSSERAY Etienne
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 51,11 % 1 EO 3C N+1 170 10 55.56
2 EO 6C S-1 -100 18 100.00
3 EO 3P S+1 170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
3 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 51,85 % 4 EO 4C S = 620 1 5.56
5 EO 4P W = -420 16 88.89
6 EO 3S E = -600 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
2 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 54,81 % 7 EO 4P N-1 -100 16 88.89
8 EO 6C S = 980 1 5.56
9 EO 1S W-1 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
5 DELHEZ Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 44,07 %10 EO 4C S+1 650 3 16.67
11 EO 2S W = -120 16 88.89
12 EO 3S S = 600 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
6 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,74 %13 EO 3S E+3 -690 15 83.33
14 EO 4C N-1 -50 12 66.67
15 EO 4C S-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 36,30 %16 EO 3S S = 400 12 66.67
17 EO 4P N+1 450 3 16.67
18 EO 3S N+3 690 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 54,63 %19 EO 2K E+1 -110 11 61.11
20 EO 3T N = 110 0 0.00
21 EO 2C E = -110 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 57,04 %22 EO 3S E+2 -660 9 50.00
23 EO 3S N = 600 5 27.78
24 EO 1S E-3 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
10 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 60,00 %25 EO 1S N-1 -50 14 77.78
26 EO 4C N+1 650 1 5.56
27 EO 4C S-2 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 44,44 %28 EO 3S N-1 -100 15 83.33
29 EO 1S E+1 -120 9 50.00
30 EO 1S W = -90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 284,0 / 540 = 52,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
3 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 51,85 % 1 EO 4PcE-2 300 7 38.89
2 EO 4C N+1 650 5 27.78
3 EO Pass Passe 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
2 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 54,81 % 4 EO 3C N = 140 11 61.11
5 EO 4C W = -420 16 88.89
6 EO 3S E = -600 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 51,11 % 7 EO 4P N = 620 5 27.78
8 EO 6P N-2 -100 18 100.00
9 EO 1S W = -90 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
6 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,74 %10 EO 4C S = 620 13 72.22
11 EO 1S W+1 -120 16 88.89
12 EO 3S S+1 630 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 36,30 %13 EO 3S E+3 -690 15 83.33
14 EO 4C N-1 -50 12 66.67
15 EO 3S S = 600 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 54,63 %16 EO 3S S-2 -100 18 100.00
17 EO 4P N+1 450 3 16.67
18 EO 6P N+1 1460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 57,04 %19 EO 3PcW-1 200 2 11.11
20 EO 2C E+1 -140 7 38.89
21 EO 4C E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
10 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 60,00 %22 EO 3S E+3 -690 16 88.89
23 EO 3S S+1 630 0 0.00
24 EO 1S E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 44,44 %25 EO 1S S+2 150 0 0.00
26 EO 1S S+1 120 16 88.89
27 EO 4K W = -130 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
5 DELHEZ Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 44,07 %28 EO 3S S+1 630 1 5.56
29 EO 1S E+1 -120 9 50.00
30 EO 1S E = -90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 278,0 / 540 = 51,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
2 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 54,81 % 1 EO 4C N = 420 2 11.11
2 EO 4C N+1 650 5 27.78
3 EO 4P S+1 450 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 51,11 % 4 EO 3C N = 140 11 61.11
5 EO 4P W-1 50 5 27.78
6 EO 3S E = -600 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
3 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 51,85 % 7 EO 4P N = 620 5 27.78
8 EO 4P N+2 480 4 22.22
9 EO 2C S = 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 36,30 %10 EO 4C S = 620 13 72.22
11 EO 1S W+1 -120 16 88.89
12 EO 4P S-3 -300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 54,63 %13 EO 3S E = -600 5 27.78
14 EO 4C N+1 450 0 0.00
15 EO 4C S-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 57,04 %16 EO 3S S = 400 12 66.67
17 EO 4P N+1 450 3 16.67
18 EO 4P S+3 710 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
10 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 60,00 %19 EO 3K E+1 -130 16 88.89
20 EO 2P S-2 -200 15 83.33
21 EO 4C E-3 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 44,44 %22 EO 3S E+2 -660 9 50.00
23 EO 3S S = 600 5 27.78
24 EO 1S E-3 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
5 DELHEZ Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 44,07 %25 EO 1S S-1 -50 14 77.78
26 EO 2C S+3 200 9 50.00
27 EO 3K W+2 -150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
6 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,74 %28 EO 3T N-1 -100 15 83.33
29 EO 3T E-2 200 0 0.00
30 EO 1S W = -90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 240,0 / 540 = 44,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 54,63 % 1 EO 4PcE-2 300 7 38.89
2 EO 4C N+1 650 5 27.78
3 EO 4P S+1 450 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 57,04 % 4 EO 2C N+2 170 6 33.33
5 EO 2S E+1 -150 10 55.56
6 EO 3S E-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
10 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 60,00 % 7 EO 4P N = 620 5 27.78
8 EO 4P N+1 450 12 66.67
9 EO 2C S = 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 44,44 %10 EO 3S N-4 -400 18 100.00
11 EO 2P N+1 140 3 16.67
12 EO 3S N = 600 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
2 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 54,81 %13 EO 3S E+1 -630 9 50.00
14 EO 4C N-1 -50 12 66.67
15 EO 4C S-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
5 DELHEZ Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 44,07 %16 EO 3S S = 400 12 66.67
17 EO 3P N+3 230 17 94.44
18 EO 4P N+1 650 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
3 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 51,85 %19 EO 3C N-1 -50 8 44.44
20 EO 2C W+2 -170 12 66.67
21 EO 2C E = -110 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
6 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,74 %22 EO 3S E-1 100 2 11.11
23 EO 3S N = 600 5 27.78
24 EO 1S E-2 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 51,11 %25 EO 1S S-1 -50 14 77.78
26 EO 3C N+2 200 9 50.00
27 EO 4K E = -130 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 36,30 %28 EO 3S S = 600 7 38.89
29 EO 3C N-2 -200 16 88.89
30 EO 1S W = -90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 278,0 / 540 = 51,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 57,04 % 1 EO 4C N = 420 2 11.11
2 EO 2S N+2 180 16 88.89
3 EO 4P S+1 450 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
10 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 60,00 % 4 EO 3C N+1 170 6 33.33
5 EO 4P W-1 50 5 27.78
6 EO 3S E = -600 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 44,44 % 7 EO 4P N = 620 5 27.78
8 EO 3S N+2 460 6 33.33
9 EO 3C S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 54,63 %10 EO 3S S+1 630 8 44.44
11 EO 2CcS = 470 0 0.00
12 EO 3S N = 600 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
5 DELHEZ Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 44,07 %13 EO 4P W-6 600 0 0.00
14 EO 4C N-1 -50 12 66.67
15 EO 5KcN-2 -500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
2 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 54,81 %16 EO 3S S+1 430 3 16.67
17 EO 4C N = 420 11 61.11
18 EO 4P N+3 710 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
6 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,74 %19 EO 4K E = -130 16 88.89
20 EO 2C E+1 -140 7 38.89
21 EO 4C E-2 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
3 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 51,85 %22 EO 3S E+2 -660 9 50.00
23 EO 5K N-1 -100 13 72.22
24 EO 1S E-3 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 36,30 %25 EO 1C N = 80 8 44.44
26 EO 4C N+1 650 1 5.56
27 EO 3S E = -400 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 51,11 %28 EO 5T N-1 -100 15 83.33
29 EO 1S E+1 -120 9 50.00
30 EO 1S W = -90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 245,0 / 540 = 45,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
10 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 60,00 % 1 EO 4C N = 420 2 11.11
2 EO 4C N+1 650 5 27.78
3 EO 4P S+1 450 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 44,44 % 4 EO 2P E = -110 18 100.00
5 EO 4P W-2 100 0 0.00
6 EO 3S E = -600 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
5 DELHEZ Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 44,07 % 7 EO 3P N = 140 12 66.67
8 EO 4C N+1 450 12 66.67
9 EO 1S W-1 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 51,11 %10 EO 4C S = 620 13 72.22
11 EO 1S W = -90 10 55.56
12 EO 3S S+1 630 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 57,04 %13 EO 4CcS-5 -1400 18 100.00
14 EO 4PcE-1 100 6 33.33
15 EO 4C S-2 -200 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
6 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,74 %16 EO 3S S+1 430 3 16.67
17 EO 4P N = 420 11 61.11
18 EO 3S N+3 690 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
2 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 54,81 %19 EO 4P W-2 200 2 11.11
20 EO 2P S-2 -200 15 83.33
21 EO 4C E-3 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 36,30 %22 EO 3S E+3 -690 16 88.89
23 EO 2K S+3 150 10 55.56
24 EO 1S E = -90 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
3 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 51,85 %25 EO 1S S-1 -50 14 77.78
26 EO 1S S+3 180 12 66.67
27 EO 4K W-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 54,63 %28 EO 3S S = 600 7 38.89
29 EO 1S E+1 -120 9 50.00
30 EO 1S W = -90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 277,0 / 540 = 51,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre
4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 44,44 % 1 EO 2P E = -110 15 83.33
2 EO 2C N+3 200 14 77.78
3 EO 3P S+2 200 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
5 DELHEZ Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 44,07 % 4 EO 2C N+2 170 6 33.33
5 EO 4P W-1 50 5 27.78
6 EO 3S E+2 -660 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
6 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,74 % 7 EO 4P N-1 -100 16 88.89
8 EO 4P N+1 450 12 66.67
9 EO 1S W+1 -120 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 57,04 %10 EO 4C S+1 650 3 16.67
11 EO 2P N-1 -50 7 38.89
12 EO 3S N = 600 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 51,11 %13 EO 3S E+1 -630 9 50.00
14 EO 4C N = 420 3 16.67
15 EO 4C S-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
10 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 60,00 %16 EO 3S S = 400 12 66.67
17 EO 4P N+1 450 3 16.67
18 EO 4P S+3 710 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 36,30 %19 EO 2P W = -110 11 61.11
20 EO 3PcS-3 -800 18 100.00
21 EO 4C E-2 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
2 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 54,81 %22 EO 3S E+2 -660 9 50.00
23 EO 5K N-2 -200 17 94.44
24 EO 1S E-2 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 54,63 %25 EO 1S N-1 -50 14 77.78
26 EO 4C N-1 -100 18 100.00
27 EO 5KcE = -550 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
3 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 51,85 %28 EO 3S S = 600 7 38.89
29 EO 1S E = -90 2 11.11
30 EO 2S S-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 324,0 / 540 = 60,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
5 DELHEZ Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 44,07 % 1 EO 1P E+2 -140 18 100.00
2 EO 4C N+1 650 5 27.78
3 EO 4P S+1 450 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
6 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,74 % 4 EO 3P E-1 100 14 77.78
5 EO 4P W = -420 16 88.89
6 EO 3S E = -600 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 36,30 % 7 EO 4P N-1 -100 16 88.89
8 EO 4P N+1 450 12 66.67
9 EO 2C S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
3 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 51,85 %10 EO 4C S+1 650 3 16.67
11 EO 3C S-2 -100 12 66.67
12 EO 3S N = 600 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
10 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 60,00 %13 EO 3S E = -600 5 27.78
14 EO 4C N = 420 3 16.67
15 EO 3S S+2 660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 51,11 %16 EO 3S S+1 430 3 16.67
17 EO 4P N = 420 11 61.11
18 EO 4P N+3 710 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 44,44 %19 EO 3K E+1 -130 16 88.89
20 EO 2C E+1 -140 7 38.89
21 EO 3C E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 54,63 %22 EO 3S E+3 -690 16 88.89
23 EO 3S S = 600 5 27.78
24 EO 1S E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
2 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 54,81 %25 EO 1S S = 90 5 27.78
26 EO 4C N = 620 5 27.78
27 EO 4K W = -130 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 57,04 %28 EO 3S S = 600 7 38.89
29 EO 2P S-2 -200 16 88.89
30 EO 1S W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 271,0 / 540 = 50,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude
6 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,74 % 1 EO 4P E-2 100 12 66.67
2 EO 4C N+1 650 5 27.78
3 EO 4P S-1 -50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 36,30 % 4 EO 4C N-1 -100 16 88.89
5 EO 4P W-1 50 5 27.78
6 EO 3S W = -600 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 54,63 % 7 EO 4P N = 620 5 27.78
8 EO 6C N = 980 1 5.56
9 EO 2C S = 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
10 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 60,00 %10 EO 4C S = 620 13 72.22
11 EO 2P N-1 -50 7 38.89
12 EO 3S N = 600 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
3 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 51,85 %13 EO 4T W = -130 2 11.11
14 EO 4C N-1 -50 12 66.67
15 EO 5C S-2 -200 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 44,44 %16 EO 3S N = 400 12 66.67
17 EO 4P N = 420 11 61.11
18 EO 3S N+3 690 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 51,11 %19 EO 3S W-1 100 6 33.33
20 EO 2C E = -110 2 11.11
21 EO 4C E-3 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
5 DELHEZ Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 44,07 %22 EO 6S E-3 300 0 0.00
23 EO 2P N-2 -200 17 94.44
24 EO 1S E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 57,04 %25 EO 1S N+1 120 2 11.11
26 EO 1S S+2 150 14 77.78
27 EO 3S W-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
2 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 54,81 %28 EO 3S S-1 -100 15 83.33
29 EO 2C N-2 -200 16 88.89
30 EO 1S W-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 261,0 / 540 = 48,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
7 COOLEN Joseph -VERBOIS Léon : 36,30 % 1 EO 2P E = -110 15 83.33
2 EO 3S N = 600 12 66.67
3 EO 4P S+1 450 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 54,63 % 4 EO 4C N = 620 1 5.56
5 EO 2P W+2 -170 12 66.67
6 EO 3S E+1 -630 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 57,04 % 7 EO 4P N = 620 5 27.78
8 EO 5P N = 450 12 66.67
9 EO 2C S-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
2 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 54,81 %10 EO 4C S+1 650 3 16.67
11 EO 2C N+1 140 3 16.67
12 EO 3S N = 600 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 44,44 %13 EO 3S W+2 -660 12 66.67
14 EO 5C N-2 -100 18 100.00
15 EO 3S S+1 630 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
3 STEED Adrian -DEMARTY Chantal : 51,85 %16 EO 3S S+1 430 3 16.67
17 EO 2P N+4 230 17 94.44
18 EO 4P N+3 710 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
5 DELHEZ Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 44,07 %19 EO 3S E-2 200 2 11.11
20 EO 2C E+1 -140 7 38.89
21 EO 4P E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 51,11 %22 EO 3S E+1 -630 4 22.22
23 EO 6K N-1 -100 13 72.22
24 EO 1S E-3 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
6 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,74 %25 EO 1S S = 90 5 27.78
26 EO 4C N = 620 5 27.78
27 EO 3C N+1 170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
10 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 60,00 %28 EO 3S S+1 630 1 5.56
29 EO 1S N-1 -100 4 22.22
30 EO 1S W+1 -120 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 242,0 / 540 = 44,81 %
|
|