|
Tournoi du 26-08-13
1 60,74 5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
2 60,56 7 GILBERT Maurice -DEGUELLE Jacques
3 57,59 9 DELHEZ Jacques -WUYARD Alphonse
4 52,96 4 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette
5 49,44 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
6 46,85 6 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
7 46,11 1 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
~ 46,11 11 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine
9 45,93 2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
10 41,85 10 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
~ 41,85 3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
12 0,00 12 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 68,93 18 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
2 55,35 22 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -STEED Adrian
3 53,91 15 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
4 52,67 20 LIBERT Laurent -COLLET Christine
5 50,93 13 COOLEN Joseph -CLERIN François-Xavier
6 50,62 24 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin
7 48,35 17 GENDEBIEN Catherine -de WASSEIGE Ariane
8 45,68 19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
9 45,56 23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
10 45,06 14 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel
11 42,18 16 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard
12 41,15 21 DOUETTE André -MASSART Jean
PAIRE Nr : 1 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
13 COOLEN Joseph -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,93 % 1 NS 4P W-1 50 6 33.33
2 NS 4C S+2 680 11 61.11
3 NS 4C N-2 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,56 % 4 NS 5T W = -600 10 55.56
5 NS 1S W-2 100 10 55.56
6 NS 1P E+2 -140 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
22 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -STEED Adrian : 55,35 % 7 NS 3S E = -600 9 50.00
8 NS 4T E+1 -150 5 27.78
9 NS 1S E = -90 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
21 DOUETTE André -MASSART Jean : 41,15 %10 NS 3P S-1 -100 2 11.11
11 NS 3S S-1 -50 4 22.22
12 NS 4C N+2 680 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
20 LIBERT Laurent -COLLET Christine : 52,67 %13 NS 3S E = -600 0 0.00
14 NS 4C W+1 -450 4 22.22
15 NS 3S W-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,68 %16 NS 2P W+1 -140 8 44.44
17 NS 4C E+1 -450 8 44.44
18 NS 1S S+1 120 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
18 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 68,93 %19 NS 4P W+1 -650 1 5.56
20 NS 2C W = -110 4 22.22
21 NS 3K N+1 130 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
17 GENDEBIEN Catherine -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 48,35 %22 NS 2C S = 110 7 38.89
23 NS 3C E-2 200 7 38.89
24 NS 3S S+1 430 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
16 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,18 %25 NS 3S W+1 -630 8 44.44
26 NS 3S S = 600 18 100.00
27 NS 4C N = 420 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
15 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 53,91 %28 NS 4P W-2 100 14 77.78
29 NS 4P E+2 -680 13 72.22
30 NS 3S E-3 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 249,0 / 540 = 46,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
14 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 45,06 % 4 NS 6T W-1 100 16 88.89
5 NS 1S W-2 100 10 55.56
6 NS 1S W+1 -120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
13 COOLEN Joseph -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,93 % 7 NS 4P W = -620 2 11.11
8 NS 4T E = -130 9 50.00
9 NS 1S E = -90 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,56 %10 NS 2P S+1 140 10 55.56
11 NS 3S S = 400 12 66.67
12 NS 4C N+1 650 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
22 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -STEED Adrian : 55,35 %13 NS 3S E-2 200 8 44.44
14 NS 4C W+1 -450 4 22.22
15 NS 6S N-6 -600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
21 DOUETTE André -MASSART Jean : 41,15 %16 NS 2P W = -110 13 72.22
17 NS 3P E+1 -170 18 100.00
18 NS 1S S+1 120 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
20 LIBERT Laurent -COLLET Christine : 52,67 %19 NS 4P W = -620 8 44.44
20 NS 4PcN-2 -500 0 0.00
21 NS 4K N = 130 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
24 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 50,62 %22 NS 4C S-1 -50 1 5.56
23 NS 3C E-2 200 7 38.89
24 NS 3S S+1 430 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
18 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 68,93 %25 NS 3S W+2 -660 2 11.11
26 NS 1S S+1 120 3 16.67
27 NS 3C N = 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
17 GENDEBIEN Catherine -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 48,35 %28 NS 3K E-2 100 14 77.78
29 NS 4P E+2 -680 13 72.22
30 NS 3S N = 400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
16 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,18 %31 NS 3S S-2 -200 1 5.56
32 NS 2T N+3 150 15 83.33
33 NS 3T N-2 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 248,0 / 540 = 45,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
17 GENDEBIEN Catherine -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 48,35 % 1 NS 4P W-1 50 6 33.33
2 NS 4C S = 620 3 16.67
3 NS 3P W = -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
15 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 53,91 % 7 NS 3S E = -600 9 50.00
8 NS 3K W+2 -150 5 27.78
9 NS 1S E = -90 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
24 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 50,62 %10 NS 4P S = 620 16 88.89
11 NS 3S S = 400 12 66.67
12 NS 4C N+1 650 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
13 COOLEN Joseph -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,93 %13 NS 3S E-3 300 16 88.89
14 NS 3C E+3 -230 10 55.56
15 NS 3K W+1 -130 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,56 %16 NS 2P W+2 -170 3 16.67
17 NS 1P E+5 -230 14 77.78
18 NS 2K S-1 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
22 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -STEED Adrian : 55,35 %19 NS 6P W-1 100 16 88.89
20 NS 4C W-3 300 12 66.67
21 NS 3S S = 600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
21 DOUETTE André -MASSART Jean : 41,15 %22 NS 2C S = 110 7 38.89
23 NS 4C W-3 300 14 77.78
24 NS 3S N-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
20 LIBERT Laurent -COLLET Christine : 52,67 %25 NS 3S W+1 -630 8 44.44
26 NS 3S S-1 -100 0 0.00
27 NS 3S W-6 300 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,68 %28 NS 3K E-2 100 14 77.78
29 NS 6P E+1 -1460 0 0.00
30 NS 2P E-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
18 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 68,93 %31 NS 4C S-2 -200 1 5.56
32 NS 2P S = 110 9 50.00
33 NS 4C N-3 -150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
Total : 226,0 / 540 = 41,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,68 % 1 NS 5T S-1 -50 1 5.56
2 NS 4C S = 620 3 16.67
3 NS 4C N = 420 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
18 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 68,93 % 4 NS 4C W-1 100 16 88.89
5 NS 1S W-1 50 4 22.22
6 NS 1S E+2 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
16 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,18 %10 NS 3P S = 140 10 55.56
11 NS 3S S-1 -50 4 22.22
12 NS 4C N+1 650 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
15 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 53,91 %13 NS 3S E-2 200 8 44.44
14 NS 3C W+3 -230 10 55.56
15 NS 3S W-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
14 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 45,06 %16 NS 2C S = 110 18 100.00
17 NS 2S W+2 -180 16 88.89
18 NS 1S S = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
13 COOLEN Joseph -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,93 %19 NS 4P W-1 100 16 88.89
20 NS 3P N-1 -100 6 33.33
21 NS 3P W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,56 %22 NS 2C S = 110 7 38.89
23 NS 3C E-2 200 7 38.89
24 NS 3S S+1 430 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
22 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -STEED Adrian : 55,35 %25 NS 6K E = -1370 0 0.00
26 NS 2K N+2 130 7 38.89
27 NS 3CcN = 530 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
21 DOUETTE André -MASSART Jean : 41,15 %28 NS 2K E-1 50 7 38.89
29 NS 5P E+1 -680 13 72.22
30 NS 3K E-3 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
24 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 50,62 %31 NS 4C S = 620 18 100.00
32 NS 2P S+2 170 18 100.00
33 NS 2CcN-1 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
Total : 286,0 / 540 = 52,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
21 DOUETTE André -MASSART Jean : 41,15 % 1 NS 5T N = 400 13 72.22
2 NS 4C S+1 650 7 38.89
3 NS 4C N-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
20 LIBERT Laurent -COLLET Christine : 52,67 % 4 NS 6C W-1 100 16 88.89
5 NS 2KcW-2 300 18 100.00
6 NS 2K N-2 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,68 % 7 NS 3S E = -600 9 50.00
8 NS 3P N-1 -50 12 66.67
9 NS 2C N = 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
17 GENDEBIEN Catherine -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 48,35 %13 NS 3S E-2 200 8 44.44
14 NS 4C W+1 -450 4 22.22
15 NS 3S W-2 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
16 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,18 %16 NS 2P W+2 -170 3 16.67
17 NS 4C E = -420 11 61.11
18 NS 3S N = 600 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
24 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 50,62 %19 NS 4P W+1 -650 1 5.56
20 NS 4C W-3 300 12 66.67
21 NS 3S N+2 660 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
14 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 45,06 %22 NS 2C S+1 140 14 77.78
23 NS 2C E-1 100 0 0.00
24 NS 3S N+1 430 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
13 COOLEN Joseph -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,93 %25 NS 3S W+1 -630 8 44.44
26 NS 3K N+2 150 13 72.22
27 NS 4C N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,56 %28 NS 3K E-1 50 7 38.89
29 NS 4P E+2 -680 13 72.22
30 NS 2C S = 110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
22 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -STEED Adrian : 55,35 %31 NS 2S N = 120 10 55.56
32 NS 4T N+1 150 15 83.33
33 NS 2C N+2 170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
Total : 328,0 / 540 = 60,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,56 % 1 NS 5TcN = 550 18 100.00
2 NS 4C S+2 680 11 61.11
3 NS 4P E-2 200 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
22 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -STEED Adrian : 55,35 % 4 NS 6T W+1 -1390 3 16.67
5 NS 1S W-1 50 4 22.22
6 NS 1P E+2 -140 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
24 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 50,62 % 7 NS 3S E = -600 9 50.00
8 NS 4C W-1 50 14 77.78
9 NS 1S E = -90 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
20 LIBERT Laurent -COLLET Christine : 52,67 %10 NS 3P S = 140 10 55.56
11 NS 3S S = 400 12 66.67
12 NS 4C N+1 650 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
18 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 68,93 %16 NS 3PcW = -730 0 0.00
17 NS 4C W+2 -480 3 16.67
18 NS 1C W = -80 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
17 GENDEBIEN Catherine -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 48,35 %19 NS 4C W = -620 8 44.44
20 NS 4C W-3 300 12 66.67
21 NS 3S N+1 630 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
16 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,18 %22 NS 2C S+2 170 18 100.00
23 NS 3C W-2 200 7 38.89
24 NS 3S S-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
15 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 53,91 %25 NS 6K E-1 100 18 100.00
26 NS 3K N+1 130 7 38.89
27 NS 3CcN-1 -100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
14 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 45,06 %28 NS 2C E-1 50 7 38.89
29 NS 4P E+3 -710 5 27.78
30 NS 2P E-2 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
13 COOLEN Joseph -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,93 %31 NS 2C S+2 170 13 72.22
32 NS 4T N-1 -50 4 22.22
33 NS 2C N = 110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 253,0 / 540 = 46,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 GILBERT Maurice -DEGUELLE Jacques
14 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 45,06 % 1 NS 4P W-1 50 6 33.33
2 NS 6C S = 1430 16 88.89
3 NS 4C S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
13 COOLEN Joseph -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,93 % 4 NS 4T W+2 -170 12 66.67
5 NS 1S W-2 100 10 55.56
6 NS 2K S-2 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,56 % 7 NS 4P W-1 100 18 100.00
8 NS 4K W = -130 9 50.00
9 NS 1S E = -90 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
22 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -STEED Adrian : 55,35 %10 NS 3P S = 140 10 55.56
11 NS 3S S = 400 12 66.67
12 NS 4C N+2 680 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
21 DOUETTE André -MASSART Jean : 41,15 %13 NS 3S E-3 300 16 88.89
14 NS 3C W+2 -200 15 83.33
15 NS 3S W-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,68 %19 NS 4P W = -620 8 44.44
20 NS 5C W-5 500 18 100.00
21 NS 3S S+2 660 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
18 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 68,93 %22 NS 2C S+1 140 14 77.78
23 NS 3C E-2 200 7 38.89
24 NS 3S S-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
17 GENDEBIEN Catherine -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 48,35 %25 NS 3S W = -600 15 83.33
26 NS 1S S+1 120 3 16.67
27 NS 3S W-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
24 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 50,62 %28 NS 3S W-4 200 18 100.00
29 NS 4P E+3 -710 5 27.78
30 NS 4C S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
15 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 53,91 %31 NS 2S S+2 180 16 88.89
32 NS 3K W = -110 0 0.00
33 NS 2CcN+2 670 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 327,0 / 540 = 60,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
16 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,18 % 1 NS 4P W-2 100 10 55.56
2 NS 6C S = 1430 16 88.89
3 NS 3C N+2 200 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
15 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 53,91 % 4 NS 6S E = -1440 0 0.00
5 NS 2P W-1 50 4 22.22
6 NS 2P E-2 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
14 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 45,06 % 7 NS 3S E+1 -630 0 0.00
8 NS 3ScE-2 300 18 100.00
9 NS 1S E-1 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
13 COOLEN Joseph -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,93 %10 NS 4P S-1 -100 2 11.11
11 NS 3S S = 400 12 66.67
12 NS 4C N+1 650 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,56 %13 NS 3S E-2 200 8 44.44
14 NS 3C W+2 -200 15 83.33
15 NS 3T E+2 -150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
24 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 50,62 %16 NS 3P W = -140 8 44.44
17 NS 4C W+2 -480 3 16.67
18 NS 3T W-3 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
20 LIBERT Laurent -COLLET Christine : 52,67 %22 NS 3C S-1 -50 1 5.56
23 NS 4CcE-3 800 16 88.89
24 NS 3S S+1 430 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,68 %25 NS 3S W+1 -630 8 44.44
26 NS 3K N+2 150 13 72.22
27 NS 3C N+1 170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
18 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 68,93 %28 NS 3K E = -110 2 11.11
29 NS 4P E+3 -710 5 27.78
30 NS 2C S = 110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
17 GENDEBIEN Catherine -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 48,35 %31 NS 4C S-1 -100 4 22.22
32 NS 3T N-1 -50 4 22.22
33 NS 2C N = 110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 267,0 / 540 = 49,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 DELHEZ Jacques -WUYARD Alphonse
18 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 68,93 % 1 NS 3S S+1 430 16 88.89
2 NS 5C S = 650 7 38.89
3 NS 3P E-1 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
24 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 50,62 % 4 NS 5T W+1 -620 8 44.44
5 NS 1S W = -90 0 0.00
6 NS 1S E+1 -120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
16 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,18 % 7 NS 2P W+1 -140 16 88.89
8 NS 3C W-2 100 16 88.89
9 NS 1S E-4 400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
15 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 53,91 %10 NS 3P S-1 -100 2 11.11
11 NS 4P S-2 -100 0 0.00
12 NS 4C N+1 650 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
14 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 45,06 %13 NS 3S E-3 300 16 88.89
14 NS 3C W+1 -170 18 100.00
15 NS 3S E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
13 COOLEN Joseph -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,93 %16 NS 2P W = -110 13 72.22
17 NS 4C E = -420 11 61.11
18 NS 2S S-1 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,56 %19 NS 4P W-1 100 16 88.89
20 NS 3S E-4 400 16 88.89
21 NS 3S S = 600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
21 DOUETTE André -MASSART Jean : 41,15 %25 NS 3S E = -600 15 83.33
26 NS 1S S+2 150 13 72.22
27 NS 3C N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
20 LIBERT Laurent -COLLET Christine : 52,67 %28 NS 2P W+2 -170 0 0.00
29 NS 6P E-1 100 18 100.00
30 NS 3K E-2 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,68 %31 NS 2P N = 110 7 38.89
32 NS 2P S = 110 9 50.00
33 NS 2C N+1 140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 311,0 / 540 = 57,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
20 LIBERT Laurent -COLLET Christine : 52,67 % 1 NS 5T N-1 -50 1 5.56
2 NS 6C S = 1430 16 88.89
3 NS 3P E-1 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,68 % 4 NS 6T W+1 -1390 3 16.67
5 NS 1S N+1 120 15 83.33
6 NS 1S E+1 -120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
18 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 68,93 % 7 NS 3S E = -600 9 50.00
8 NS 4K W+2 -170 2 11.11
9 NS 1S E+2 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
17 GENDEBIEN Catherine -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 48,35 %10 NS 4CcW-3 800 18 100.00
11 NS 3S S+2 460 18 100.00
12 NS 4C N+1 650 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
16 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,18 %13 NS 3S E-1 100 2 11.11
14 NS 4C W+2 -480 0 0.00
15 NS 3S W-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
15 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 53,91 %16 NS 2P W+1 -140 8 44.44
17 NS 4C E+2 -480 3 16.67
18 NS 3ScS-3 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
14 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 45,06 %19 NS 4P W = -620 8 44.44
20 NS 4PcN-1 -200 2 11.11
21 NS 3K N+2 150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
13 COOLEN Joseph -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,93 %22 NS 2C S+1 140 14 77.78
23 NS 3C W-2 200 7 38.89
24 NS 3S N+1 430 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
22 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -STEED Adrian : 55,35 %28 NS 3K E-1 50 7 38.89
29 NS 4P E+3 -710 5 27.78
30 NS 2P E-2 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
21 DOUETTE André -MASSART Jean : 41,15 %31 NS 3C S+1 170 13 72.22
32 NS 3P S = 140 12 66.67
33 NS 4C N-3 -150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 226,0 / 540 = 41,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine
22 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -STEED Adrian : 55,35 % 1 NS 5T N = 400 13 72.22
2 NS 6C S-2 -200 0 0.00
3 NS 4K N-2 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
21 DOUETTE André -MASSART Jean : 41,15 % 4 NS 3S E+3 -690 6 33.33
5 NS 1S N+1 120 15 83.33
6 NS 2T W+1 -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
20 LIBERT Laurent -COLLET Christine : 52,67 % 7 NS 3S E = -600 9 50.00
8 NS 4PcN-2 -300 0 0.00
9 NS 1S E-1 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,68 %10 NS 3P S = 140 10 55.56
11 NS 3S S-1 -50 4 22.22
12 NS 4C N+2 680 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
24 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 50,62 %13 NS 3S E-2 200 8 44.44
14 NS 3C E+3 -230 10 55.56
15 NS 3T W+2 -150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
17 GENDEBIEN Catherine -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 48,35 %16 NS 3S W-1 100 16 88.89
17 NS 4C W+2 -480 3 16.67
18 NS 3K S-2 -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
16 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,18 %19 NS 4P W = -620 8 44.44
20 NS 3P N+1 170 8 44.44
21 NS 3S N+3 690 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
15 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 53,91 %22 NS 2C S = 110 7 38.89
23 NS 3KcS+1 870 18 100.00
24 NS 3S S = 400 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
14 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 45,06 %25 NS 3S W+1 -630 8 44.44
26 NS 2K S+3 150 13 72.22
27 NS 4C N-2 -100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,56 %31 NS 2C S = 110 7 38.89
32 NS 3T N-1 -50 4 22.22
33 NS 4C N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 249,0 / 540 = 46,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 -
24 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 50,62 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 GENDEBIEN Catherine -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 48,35 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
21 DOUETTE André -MASSART Jean : 41,15 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 45,06 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
18 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 68,93 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
22 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -STEED Adrian : 55,35 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
15 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 53,91 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,68 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
16 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,18 %28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
20 LIBERT Laurent -COLLET Christine : 52,67 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 594 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 COOLEN Joseph -CLERIN François-Xavier
1 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 46,11 % 1 EO 4P W-1 50 12 66.67
2 EO 4C S+2 680 7 38.89
3 EO 4C N-2 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
7 GILBERT Maurice -DEGUELLE Jacques : 60,56 % 4 EO 4T W+2 -170 6 33.33
5 EO 1S W-2 100 8 44.44
6 EO 2K S-2 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,93 % 7 EO 4P W = -620 16 88.89
8 EO 4T E = -130 9 50.00
9 EO 1S E = -90 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 49,44 %10 EO 4P S-1 -100 16 88.89
11 EO 3S S = 400 6 33.33
12 EO 4C N+1 650 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,85 %13 EO 3S E-3 300 2 11.11
14 EO 3C E+3 -230 8 44.44
15 EO 3K W+1 -130 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
9 DELHEZ Jacques -WUYARD Alphonse : 57,59 %16 EO 2P W = -110 5 27.78
17 EO 4C E = -420 7 38.89
18 EO 2S S-1 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
4 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 52,96 %19 EO 4P W-1 100 2 11.11
20 EO 3P N-1 -100 12 66.67
21 EO 3P W-2 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
10 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 41,85 %22 EO 2C S+1 140 4 22.22
23 EO 3C W-2 200 11 61.11
24 EO 3S N+1 430 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 60,74 %25 EO 3S W+1 -630 10 55.56
26 EO 3K N+2 150 5 27.78
27 EO 4C N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,85 %31 EO 2C S+2 170 5 27.78
32 EO 4T N-1 -50 14 77.78
33 EO 2C N = 110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 275,0 / 540 = 50,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel
7 GILBERT Maurice -DEGUELLE Jacques : 60,56 % 1 EO 4P W-1 50 12 66.67
2 EO 6C S = 1430 2 11.11
3 EO 4C S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,93 % 4 EO 6T W-1 100 2 11.11
5 EO 1S W-2 100 8 44.44
6 EO 1S W+1 -120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 49,44 % 7 EO 3S E+1 -630 18 100.00
8 EO 3ScE-2 300 0 0.00
9 EO 1S E-1 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
12 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
9 DELHEZ Jacques -WUYARD Alphonse : 57,59 %13 EO 3S E-3 300 2 11.11
14 EO 3C W+1 -170 0 0.00
15 EO 3S E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
4 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 52,96 %16 EO 2C S = 110 0 0.00
17 EO 2S W+2 -180 2 11.11
18 EO 1S S = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
10 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 41,85 %19 EO 4P W = -620 10 55.56
20 EO 4PcN-1 -200 16 88.89
21 EO 3K N+2 150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 60,74 %22 EO 2C S+1 140 4 22.22
23 EO 2C E-1 100 18 100.00
24 EO 3S N+1 430 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 46,11 %25 EO 3S W+1 -630 10 55.56
26 EO 2K S+3 150 5 27.78
27 EO 4C N-2 -100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,85 %28 EO 2C E-1 50 11 61.11
29 EO 4P E+3 -710 13 72.22
30 EO 2P E-2 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 219,0 / 486 = 45,06 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 49,44 % 4 EO 6S E = -1440 18 100.00
5 EO 2P W-1 50 14 77.78
6 EO 2P E-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,85 % 7 EO 3S E = -600 9 50.00
8 EO 3K W+2 -150 13 72.22
9 EO 1S E = -90 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
9 DELHEZ Jacques -WUYARD Alphonse : 57,59 %10 EO 3P S-1 -100 16 88.89
11 EO 4P S-2 -100 18 100.00
12 EO 4C N+1 650 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
4 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 52,96 %13 EO 3S E-2 200 10 55.56
14 EO 3C W+3 -230 8 44.44
15 EO 3S W-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
10 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 41,85 %16 EO 2P W+1 -140 10 55.56
17 EO 4C E+2 -480 15 83.33
18 EO 3ScS-3 -800 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
12 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
11 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 46,11 %22 EO 2C S = 110 11 61.11
23 EO 3KcS+1 870 0 0.00
24 EO 3S S = 400 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,85 %25 EO 6K E-1 100 0 0.00
26 EO 3K N+1 130 11 61.11
27 EO 3CcN-1 -100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
1 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 46,11 %28 EO 4P W-2 100 4 22.22
29 EO 4P E+2 -680 5 27.78
30 EO 3S E-3 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
7 GILBERT Maurice -DEGUELLE Jacques : 60,56 %31 EO 2S S+2 180 2 11.11
32 EO 3K W = -110 18 100.00
33 EO 2CcN+2 670 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 262,0 / 486 = 53,91 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 49,44 % 1 EO 4P W-2 100 8 44.44
2 EO 6C S = 1430 2 11.11
3 EO 3C N+2 200 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
9 DELHEZ Jacques -WUYARD Alphonse : 57,59 % 7 EO 2P W+1 -140 2 11.11
8 EO 3C W-2 100 2 11.11
9 EO 1S E-4 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
4 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 52,96 %10 EO 3P S = 140 8 44.44
11 EO 3S S-1 -50 14 77.78
12 EO 4C N+1 650 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
10 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 41,85 %13 EO 3S E-1 100 16 88.89
14 EO 4C W+2 -480 18 100.00
15 EO 3S W-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 60,74 %16 EO 2P W+2 -170 15 83.33
17 EO 4C E = -420 7 38.89
18 EO 3S N = 600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
11 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 46,11 %19 EO 4P W = -620 10 55.56
20 EO 3P N+1 170 10 55.56
21 EO 3S N+3 690 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,85 %22 EO 2C S+2 170 0 0.00
23 EO 3C W-2 200 11 61.11
24 EO 3S S-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
1 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 46,11 %25 EO 3S W+1 -630 10 55.56
26 EO 3S S = 600 0 0.00
27 EO 4C N = 420 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
12 - : 0,00 %28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,93 %31 EO 3S S-2 -200 17 94.44
32 EO 2T N+3 150 3 16.67
33 EO 3T N-2 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 205,0 / 486 = 42,18 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 GENDEBIEN Catherine -de WASSEIGE Ariane
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,85 % 1 EO 4P W-1 50 12 66.67
2 EO 4C S = 620 15 83.33
3 EO 3P W = -140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
12 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
10 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 41,85 %10 EO 4CcW-3 800 0 0.00
11 EO 3S S+2 460 0 0.00
12 EO 4C N+1 650 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 60,74 %13 EO 3S E-2 200 10 55.56
14 EO 4C W+1 -450 14 77.78
15 EO 3S W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
11 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 46,11 %16 EO 3S W-1 100 2 11.11
17 EO 4C W+2 -480 15 83.33
18 EO 3K S-2 -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,85 %19 EO 4C W = -620 10 55.56
20 EO 4C W-3 300 6 33.33
21 EO 3S N+1 630 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
1 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 46,11 %22 EO 2C S = 110 11 61.11
23 EO 3C E-2 200 11 61.11
24 EO 3S S+1 430 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 GILBERT Maurice -DEGUELLE Jacques : 60,56 %25 EO 3S W = -600 3 16.67
26 EO 1S S+1 120 15 83.33
27 EO 3S W-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,93 %28 EO 3K E-2 100 4 22.22
29 EO 4P E+2 -680 5 27.78
30 EO 3S N = 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 49,44 %31 EO 4C S-1 -100 14 77.78
32 EO 3T N-1 -50 14 77.78
33 EO 2C N = 110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 235,0 / 486 = 48,35 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
9 DELHEZ Jacques -WUYARD Alphonse : 57,59 % 1 EO 3S S+1 430 2 11.11
2 EO 5C S = 650 11 61.11
3 EO 3P E-1 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
4 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 52,96 % 4 EO 4C W-1 100 2 11.11
5 EO 1S W-1 50 14 77.78
6 EO 1S E+2 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
10 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 41,85 % 7 EO 3S E = -600 9 50.00
8 EO 4K W+2 -170 16 88.89
9 EO 1S E+2 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
12 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,85 %16 EO 3PcW = -730 18 100.00
17 EO 4C W+2 -480 15 83.33
18 EO 1C W = -80 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
1 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 46,11 %19 EO 4P W+1 -650 17 94.44
20 EO 2C W = -110 14 77.78
21 EO 3K N+1 130 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
7 GILBERT Maurice -DEGUELLE Jacques : 60,56 %22 EO 2C S+1 140 4 22.22
23 EO 3C E-2 200 11 61.11
24 EO 3S S-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,93 %25 EO 3S W+2 -660 16 88.89
26 EO 1S S+1 120 15 83.33
27 EO 3C N = 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 49,44 %28 EO 3K E = -110 16 88.89
29 EO 4P E+3 -710 13 72.22
30 EO 2C S = 110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,85 %31 EO 4C S-2 -200 17 94.44
32 EO 2P S = 110 9 50.00
33 EO 4C N-3 -150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
Total : 335,0 / 486 = 68,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
4 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 52,96 % 1 EO 5T S-1 -50 17 94.44
2 EO 4C S = 620 15 83.33
3 EO 4C N = 420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
10 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 41,85 % 4 EO 6T W+1 -1390 15 83.33
5 EO 1S N+1 120 3 16.67
6 EO 1S E+1 -120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 60,74 % 7 EO 3S E = -600 9 50.00
8 EO 3P N-1 -50 6 33.33
9 EO 2C N = 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
11 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 46,11 %10 EO 3P S = 140 8 44.44
11 EO 3S S-1 -50 14 77.78
12 EO 4C N+2 680 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
1 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 46,11 %16 EO 2P W+1 -140 10 55.56
17 EO 4C E+1 -450 10 55.56
18 EO 1S S+1 120 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
7 GILBERT Maurice -DEGUELLE Jacques : 60,56 %19 EO 4P W = -620 10 55.56
20 EO 5C W-5 500 0 0.00
21 EO 3S S+2 660 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
12 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 49,44 %25 EO 3S W+1 -630 10 55.56
26 EO 3K N+2 150 5 27.78
27 EO 3C N+1 170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,85 %28 EO 3K E-2 100 4 22.22
29 EO 6P E+1 -1460 18 100.00
30 EO 2P E-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
9 DELHEZ Jacques -WUYARD Alphonse : 57,59 %31 EO 2P N = 110 11 61.11
32 EO 2P S = 110 9 50.00
33 EO 2C N+1 140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 222,0 / 486 = 45,68 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 LIBERT Laurent -COLLET Christine
10 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 41,85 % 1 EO 5T N-1 -50 17 94.44
2 EO 6C S = 1430 2 11.11
3 EO 3P E-1 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 60,74 % 4 EO 6C W-1 100 2 11.11
5 EO 2KcW-2 300 0 0.00
6 EO 2K N-2 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
11 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 46,11 % 7 EO 3S E = -600 9 50.00
8 EO 4PcN-2 -300 18 100.00
9 EO 1S E-1 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,85 %10 EO 3P S = 140 8 44.44
11 EO 3S S = 400 6 33.33
12 EO 4C N+1 650 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
1 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 46,11 %13 EO 3S E = -600 18 100.00
14 EO 4C W+1 -450 14 77.78
15 EO 3S W-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,93 %19 EO 4P W = -620 10 55.56
20 EO 4PcN-2 -500 18 100.00
21 EO 4K N = 130 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 49,44 %22 EO 3C S-1 -50 17 94.44
23 EO 4CcE-3 800 2 11.11
24 EO 3S S+1 430 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,85 %25 EO 3S W+1 -630 10 55.56
26 EO 3S S-1 -100 18 100.00
27 EO 3S W-6 300 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
9 DELHEZ Jacques -WUYARD Alphonse : 57,59 %28 EO 2P W+2 -170 18 100.00
29 EO 6P E-1 100 0 0.00
30 EO 3K E-2 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
12 - : 0,00 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 256,0 / 486 = 52,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 DOUETTE André -MASSART Jean
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 60,74 % 1 EO 5T N = 400 5 27.78
2 EO 4C S+1 650 11 61.11
3 EO 4C N-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 46,11 % 4 EO 3S E+3 -690 12 66.67
5 EO 1S N+1 120 3 16.67
6 EO 2T W+1 -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
12 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 46,11 %10 EO 3P S-1 -100 16 88.89
11 EO 3S S-1 -50 14 77.78
12 EO 4C N+2 680 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
7 GILBERT Maurice -DEGUELLE Jacques : 60,56 %13 EO 3S E-3 300 2 11.11
14 EO 3C W+2 -200 3 16.67
15 EO 3S W-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,93 %16 EO 2P W = -110 5 27.78
17 EO 3P E+1 -170 0 0.00
18 EO 1S S+1 120 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,85 %22 EO 2C S = 110 11 61.11
23 EO 4C W-3 300 4 22.22
24 EO 3S N-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
9 DELHEZ Jacques -WUYARD Alphonse : 57,59 %25 EO 3S E = -600 3 16.67
26 EO 1S S+2 150 5 27.78
27 EO 3C N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
4 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 52,96 %28 EO 2K E-1 50 11 61.11
29 EO 5P E+1 -680 5 27.78
30 EO 3K E-3 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
10 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 41,85 %31 EO 3C S+1 170 5 27.78
32 EO 3P S = 140 6 33.33
33 EO 4C N-3 -150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 200,0 / 486 = 41,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -STEED Adrian
11 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 46,11 % 1 EO 5T N = 400 5 27.78
2 EO 6C S-2 -200 18 100.00
3 EO 4K N-2 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,85 % 4 EO 6T W+1 -1390 15 83.33
5 EO 1S W-1 50 14 77.78
6 EO 1P E+2 -140 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
1 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 46,11 % 7 EO 3S E = -600 9 50.00
8 EO 4T E+1 -150 13 72.22
9 EO 1S E = -90 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
7 GILBERT Maurice -DEGUELLE Jacques : 60,56 %10 EO 3P S = 140 8 44.44
11 EO 3S S = 400 6 33.33
12 EO 4C N+2 680 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,93 %13 EO 3S E-2 200 10 55.56
14 EO 4C W+1 -450 14 77.78
15 EO 6S N-6 -600 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
12 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,85 %19 EO 6P W-1 100 2 11.11
20 EO 4C W-3 300 6 33.33
21 EO 3S S = 600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
4 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 52,96 %25 EO 6K E = -1370 18 100.00
26 EO 2K N+2 130 11 61.11
27 EO 3CcN = 530 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
10 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 41,85 %28 EO 3K E-1 50 11 61.11
29 EO 4P E+3 -710 13 72.22
30 EO 2P E-2 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 60,74 %31 EO 2S N = 120 8 44.44
32 EO 4T N+1 150 3 16.67
33 EO 2C N+2 170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
Total : 269,0 / 486 = 55,35 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,85 % 1 EO 5TcN = 550 0 0.00
2 EO 4C S+2 680 7 38.89
3 EO 4P E-2 200 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
1 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 46,11 % 4 EO 5T W = -600 8 44.44
5 EO 1S W-2 100 8 44.44
6 EO 1P E+2 -140 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
7 GILBERT Maurice -DEGUELLE Jacques : 60,56 % 7 EO 4P W-1 100 0 0.00
8 EO 4K W = -130 9 50.00
9 EO 1S E = -90 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,93 %10 EO 2P S+1 140 8 44.44
11 EO 3S S = 400 6 33.33
12 EO 4C N+1 650 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 49,44 %13 EO 3S E-2 200 10 55.56
14 EO 3C W+2 -200 3 16.67
15 EO 3T E+2 -150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,85 %16 EO 2P W+2 -170 15 83.33
17 EO 1P E+5 -230 4 22.22
18 EO 2K S-1 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
9 DELHEZ Jacques -WUYARD Alphonse : 57,59 %19 EO 4P W-1 100 2 11.11
20 EO 3S E-4 400 2 11.11
21 EO 3S S = 600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
4 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 52,96 %22 EO 2C S = 110 11 61.11
23 EO 3C E-2 200 11 61.11
24 EO 3S S+1 430 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 60,74 %28 EO 3K E-1 50 11 61.11
29 EO 4P E+2 -680 5 27.78
30 EO 2C S = 110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
11 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 46,11 %31 EO 2C S = 110 11 61.11
32 EO 3T N-1 -50 14 77.78
33 EO 4C N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 246,0 / 540 = 45,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin
12 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
9 DELHEZ Jacques -WUYARD Alphonse : 57,59 % 4 EO 5T W+1 -620 10 55.56
5 EO 1S W = -90 18 100.00
6 EO 1S E+1 -120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,85 % 7 EO 3S E = -600 9 50.00
8 EO 4C W-1 50 4 22.22
9 EO 1S E = -90 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,85 %10 EO 4P S = 620 2 11.11
11 EO 3S S = 400 6 33.33
12 EO 4C N+1 650 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
11 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 46,11 %13 EO 3S E-2 200 10 55.56
14 EO 3C E+3 -230 8 44.44
15 EO 3T W+2 -150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 49,44 %16 EO 3P W = -140 10 55.56
17 EO 4C W+2 -480 15 83.33
18 EO 3T W-3 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 60,74 %19 EO 4P W+1 -650 17 94.44
20 EO 4C W-3 300 6 33.33
21 EO 3S N+2 660 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,93 %22 EO 4C S-1 -50 17 94.44
23 EO 3C E-2 200 11 61.11
24 EO 3S S+1 430 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
7 GILBERT Maurice -DEGUELLE Jacques : 60,56 %28 EO 3S W-4 200 0 0.00
29 EO 4P E+3 -710 13 72.22
30 EO 4C S-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
4 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 52,96 %31 EO 4C S = 620 0 0.00
32 EO 2P S+2 170 0 0.00
33 EO 2CcN-1 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
Total : 246,0 / 486 = 50,62 %
|
|