|
Tournoi du 26-10-15
1 58,15 10 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
2 56,11 8 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
3 55,37 11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
4 55,19 9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
5 54,81 5 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
6 50,74 7 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
7 49,63 1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
8 48,15 6 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
9 45,74 3 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier
10 39,26 4 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette
11 36,85 2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga
12 0,00 12 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 59,88 15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
2 56,79 22 de WASSEIGE Ariane -POWIS Vinciane
3 55,76 20 BEYNE Anne -COLLET Edgard
4 54,73 18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
5 53,91 21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
6 53,70 14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
7 52,59 23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
8 51,44 24 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
9 48,15 13 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal
10 42,39 16 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
11 38,27 17 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude
12 32,30 19 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
PAIRE Nr : 1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
13 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 48,15 % 1 NS 1S W+1 -120 0 0.00
2 NS 5TcN = 750 18 100.00
3 NS 4P S+1 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,59 % 4 NS 4P E+1 -650 8 44.44
5 NS 3S E+1 -430 3 16.67
6 NS 3P W-1 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
22 de WASSEIGE Ariane -POWIS Vinciane : 56,79 % 7 NS 6P W = -1430 4 22.22
8 NS 2P E+1 -140 7 38.89
9 NS 3S N+2 460 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,91 %10 NS 4CcN = 790 18 100.00
11 NS 1P E+2 -140 6 33.33
12 NS 4P N = 620 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
20 BEYNE Anne -COLLET Edgard : 55,76 %13 NS 4K W-2 200 14 77.78
14 NS 3C W-1 50 12 66.67
15 NS 2C S = 110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
19 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 32,30 %16 NS 2C N-1 -50 13 72.22
17 NS 3S S-2 -100 8 44.44
18 NS 4C W+1 -450 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,73 %19 NS 3P N = 140 12 66.67
20 NS 2P N-1 -100 3 16.67
21 NS 3T S-1 -100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
17 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 38,27 %22 NS 2C S = 110 15 83.33
23 NS 3S W = -600 0 0.00
24 NS 5C W-1 50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
16 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,39 %25 NS 5P N-1 -50 6 33.33
26 NS 4C W-1 100 15 83.33
27 NS 4C W = -420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,88 %28 NS 3T E = -110 13 72.22
29 NS 2P N+1 140 6 33.33
30 NS 1C E = -80 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 268,0 / 540 = 49,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 53,70 % 4 NS 4P W+1 -650 8 44.44
5 NS 3S E-2 100 12 66.67
6 NS 3C N-2 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
13 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 48,15 % 7 NS 6P W = -1430 4 22.22
8 NS 2P E+1 -140 7 38.89
9 NS 4CcN-5 -1100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,59 %10 NS 3P E-1 100 7 38.89
11 NS 4C E = -420 1 5.56
12 NS 3P N = 140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
22 de WASSEIGE Ariane -POWIS Vinciane : 56,79 %13 NS 2C E-1 100 5 27.78
14 NS 3P N-1 -50 6 33.33
15 NS 1S W = -90 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,91 %16 NS 2P N-1 -50 13 72.22
17 NS 4C S-1 -50 18 100.00
18 NS 5C W+1 -480 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
20 BEYNE Anne -COLLET Edgard : 55,76 %19 NS 4P N-1 -50 7 38.89
20 NS 3K W-1 100 6 33.33
21 NS 2S N-1 -100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
24 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,44 %22 NS 3C N-1 -50 9 50.00
23 NS 3P E+1 -170 4 22.22
24 NS 5TcN-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,73 %25 NS 3T S = 110 11 61.11
26 NS 4C W-1 100 15 83.33
27 NS 6C W-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
17 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 38,27 %28 NS 2S E+2 -180 3 16.67
29 NS 3K S-2 -200 0 0.00
30 NS 5TcS-4 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
16 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,39 %31 NS 4T N-2 -200 9 50.00
32 NS 3K N-1 -50 10 55.56
33 NS 5TcS-7 -1700 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 199,0 / 540 = 36,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier
17 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 38,27 % 1 NS 2S E-4 200 17 94.44
2 NS 5P W = -450 9 50.00
3 NS 3P S+4 260 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,88 % 7 NS 4P W+3 -710 10 55.56
8 NS 2P E+2 -170 1 5.56
9 NS 4T S+1 150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
24 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,44 %10 NS 2P E+1 -140 0 0.00
11 NS 2C W = -110 12 66.67
12 NS 2S E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
13 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 48,15 %13 NS 3C E-2 200 14 77.78
14 NS 4T E-1 50 12 66.67
15 NS 2P N = 110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,59 %16 NS 2C N-2 -100 3 16.67
17 NS 3S S-2 -100 8 44.44
18 NS 5C W = -450 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
22 de WASSEIGE Ariane -POWIS Vinciane : 56,79 %19 NS 4P N-1 -50 7 38.89
20 NS 3TcN-1 -200 0 0.00
21 NS 3T S = 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,91 %22 NS 3C S-1 -50 9 50.00
23 NS 2TcN-2 -500 2 11.11
24 NS 4C W = -420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
20 BEYNE Anne -COLLET Edgard : 55,76 %25 NS 3S S+1 430 18 100.00
26 NS 4C W = -620 1 5.56
27 NS 1P E+2 -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
19 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 32,30 %28 NS 2C W = -110 13 72.22
29 NS 3P S+1 170 10 55.56
30 NS 2S E-3 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,73 %31 NS 3C E+1 -170 13 72.22
32 NS 2S S-1 -50 10 55.56
33 NS 4C W+2 -480 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 247,0 / 540 = 45,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette
19 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 32,30 % 1 NS 2K S+2 130 8 44.44
2 NS 4T N+1 150 16 88.89
3 NS 4P S+2 480 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,73 % 4 NS 4P E+1 -650 8 44.44
5 NS 4C W+1 -450 0 0.00
6 NS 2PcW = -670 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
16 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,39 %10 NS 3S E-1 100 7 38.89
11 NS 2P E+1 -140 6 33.33
12 NS 4P N = 620 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,88 %13 NS 2T S-1 -100 0 0.00
14 NS 3P N-2 -100 4 22.22
15 NS 2T N+1 110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 53,70 %16 NS 2C S-2 -100 3 16.67
17 NS 3S S-2 -100 8 44.44
18 NS 4C W+2 -480 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
13 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 48,15 %19 NS 4K W+2 -170 3 16.67
20 NS 3K W-2 200 12 66.67
21 NS 1S S = 90 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,59 %22 NS 3C S-2 -100 3 16.67
23 NS 3P E-1 100 14 77.78
24 NS 4C W = -420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
22 de WASSEIGE Ariane -POWIS Vinciane : 56,79 %25 NS 4P N-2 -100 1 5.56
26 NS 3C W+2 -200 4 22.22
27 NS 3C E+1 -170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,91 %28 NS 2C E+2 -170 6 33.33
29 NS 3S S+1 630 17 94.44
30 NS 3S E-2 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
24 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,44 %31 NS 3C E+1 -170 13 72.22
32 NS 4K S-2 -100 5 27.78
33 NS 4C E+2 -480 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 212,0 / 540 = 39,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,91 % 1 NS 3C N+1 170 12 66.67
2 NS 4P E+1 -450 9 50.00
3 NS 3S N = 400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
20 BEYNE Anne -COLLET Edgard : 55,76 % 4 NS 4P W+1 -650 8 44.44
5 NS 3S E-2 100 12 66.67
6 NS 2C N+1 140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
19 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 32,30 % 7 NS 4P W+2 -680 15 83.33
8 NS 2P E = -110 14 77.78
9 NS 4PcW-3 800 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
17 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 38,27 %13 NS 1S E-1 100 5 27.78
14 NS 3P N = 140 18 100.00
15 NS 2C S+1 140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
16 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,39 %16 NS 2C N-2 -100 3 16.67
17 NS 3S S-2 -100 8 44.44
18 NS 4C W+1 -450 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
24 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,44 %19 NS 4PcS-2 -300 0 0.00
20 NS 3KcW-4 1100 16 88.89
21 NS 3T S = 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 53,70 %22 NS 3C S-1 -50 9 50.00
23 NS 2P E+1 -140 7 38.89
24 NS 4C W = -420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
13 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 48,15 %25 NS 4P N-1 -50 6 33.33
26 NS 4C W-1 100 15 83.33
27 NS 6C W-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,59 %28 NS 3S W-1 50 18 100.00
29 NS 2P N+4 230 14 77.78
30 NS 1C E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
22 de WASSEIGE Ariane -POWIS Vinciane : 56,79 %31 NS 3CcE = -530 2 11.11
32 NS 4PcW = -790 0 0.00
33 NS 4C E+2 -480 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
Total : 296,0 / 540 = 54,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,59 % 1 NS 3P N+1 170 12 66.67
2 NS 5PxW = -1000 0 0.00
3 NS 4P S+2 480 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
22 de WASSEIGE Ariane -POWIS Vinciane : 56,79 % 4 NS 4C E+1 -650 8 44.44
5 NS 3S E-2 100 12 66.67
6 NS 4C N-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
24 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,44 % 7 NS 4P W+2 -680 15 83.33
8 NS 2P E = -110 14 77.78
9 NS 4T S = 130 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
20 BEYNE Anne -COLLET Edgard : 55,76 %10 NS 4C N-1 -100 3 16.67
11 NS 4C W = -420 1 5.56
12 NS 4P N = 620 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,73 %16 NS 2T E = -90 9 50.00
17 NS 3S S-2 -100 8 44.44
18 NS 6C W = -980 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
17 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 38,27 %19 NS 4PcS = 590 18 100.00
20 NS 3T N = 110 8 44.44
21 NS 3T S+1 130 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
16 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,39 %22 NS 2C S = 110 15 83.33
23 NS 4P E-2 200 18 100.00
24 NS 4C W = -420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,88 %25 NS 4P N-2 -100 1 5.56
26 NS 3C W = -140 9 50.00
27 NS 4CcW = -590 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 53,70 %28 NS 1S E+1 -120 8 44.44
29 NS 2P N+2 170 10 55.56
30 NS 1C E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
13 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 48,15 %31 NS 4P S-3 -300 6 33.33
32 NS 3T E-1 100 15 83.33
33 NS 4C E+2 -480 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 260,0 / 540 = 48,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 53,70 % 1 NS 1S W-1 50 3 16.67
2 NS 4P W = -420 14 77.78
3 NS 2P S+4 230 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
13 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 48,15 % 4 NS 4P E+1 -650 8 44.44
5 NS 3S E-2 100 12 66.67
6 NS 3P W-2 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,59 % 7 NS 4P W+2 -680 15 83.33
8 NS 2P E = -110 14 77.78
9 NS 3P W-3 300 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
22 de WASSEIGE Ariane -POWIS Vinciane : 56,79 %10 NS 2C N+1 140 12 66.67
11 NS 2S E-1 50 17 94.44
12 NS 2P N+2 170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,91 %13 NS 1S E-1 100 5 27.78
14 NS 3T E+1 -130 1 5.56
15 NS 1S E-3 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
19 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 32,30 %19 NS 3C N = 140 12 66.67
20 NS 3T N-1 -100 3 16.67
21 NS 3T N = 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,73 %22 NS 4C S-2 -100 3 16.67
23 NS 2S E = -120 10 55.56
24 NS 5TcN-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
17 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 38,27 %25 NS 3T S = 110 11 61.11
26 NS 2C W+2 -170 6 33.33
27 NS 2C E = -110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
24 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,44 %28 NS 3S E = -400 0 0.00
29 NS 3P S+1 170 10 55.56
30 NS 2S E-2 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,88 %31 NS 3C E+2 -200 9 50.00
32 NS 4K N-2 -100 5 27.78
33 NS 4C E+2 -480 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 274,0 / 540 = 50,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
16 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,39 % 1 NS 2P N+2 170 12 66.67
2 NS 5P W = -450 9 50.00
3 NS 6P S = 980 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,88 % 4 NS 4P E+1 -650 8 44.44
5 NS 3S E+1 -430 3 16.67
6 NS 2C N+1 140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 53,70 % 7 NS 6P W = -1430 4 22.22
8 NS 3P E+1 -170 1 5.56
9 NS 3PcW-3 800 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
13 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 48,15 %10 NS 3C N-1 -100 3 16.67
11 NS 3P E = -140 6 33.33
12 NS 4P N = 620 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,59 %13 NS 2P N+1 140 10 55.56
14 NS 3C W-1 50 12 66.67
15 NS 1S W+2 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
24 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,44 %16 NS 2C N-2 -100 3 16.67
17 NS 3S S-2 -100 8 44.44
18 NS 4C W+1 -450 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
20 BEYNE Anne -COLLET Edgard : 55,76 %22 NS 4KcW-1 200 18 100.00
23 NS 3P E-1 100 14 77.78
24 NS 4C W = -420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
19 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 32,30 %25 NS 6S S-1 -50 6 33.33
26 NS 4C E-1 100 15 83.33
27 NS 4C W = -420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,73 %28 NS 1C W+1 -110 13 72.22
29 NS 3T N = 110 4 22.22
30 NS 2CcE-2 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
17 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 38,27 %31 NS 3CcE-2 300 18 100.00
32 NS 4PcW-2 500 18 100.00
33 NS 3C E+2 -200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
Total : 303,0 / 540 = 56,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,73 % 1 NS 3S W-2 100 6 33.33
2 NS 5PcW = -650 3 16.67
3 NS 6P S-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
24 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,44 % 4 NS 4P E+1 -650 8 44.44
5 NS 2PcS = 670 18 100.00
6 NS 2C N+1 140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
16 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,39 % 7 NS 4P W+2 -680 15 83.33
8 NS 3P E = -140 7 38.89
9 NS 5T S = 400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,88 %10 NS 2C N+1 140 12 66.67
11 NS 2P E = -110 12 66.67
12 NS 4P N = 620 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 53,70 %13 NS 2PcN = 670 18 100.00
14 NS 3T E+1 -130 1 5.56
15 NS 2P N+1 140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
13 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 48,15 %16 NS 3K W-2 200 16 88.89
17 NS 3S S-2 -100 8 44.44
18 NS 4C W+1 -450 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,59 %19 NS 4K W+2 -170 3 16.67
20 NS 4KcW-5 1400 18 100.00
21 NS 3T S+2 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,91 %25 NS 3S S = 400 15 83.33
26 NS 4C W = -620 1 5.56
27 NS 4CcW+1 -690 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
20 BEYNE Anne -COLLET Edgard : 55,76 %28 NS 3T E = -110 13 72.22
29 NS 4P N-1 -100 2 11.11
30 NS 1C E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
19 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 32,30 %31 NS 4T N-1 -100 16 88.89
32 NS 3K N-1 -50 10 55.56
33 NS 4C E+1 -450 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 298,0 / 540 = 55,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
20 BEYNE Anne -COLLET Edgard : 55,76 % 1 NS 1S W-1 50 3 16.67
2 NS 5PcW = -650 3 16.67
3 NS 6P S-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
19 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 32,30 % 4 NS 4P E-1 100 18 100.00
5 NS 3C W+2 -200 6 33.33
6 NS 2C N+2 170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,73 % 7 NS 6P W = -1430 4 22.22
8 NS 3C N-2 -100 18 100.00
9 NS 3S N+2 460 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
17 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 38,27 %10 NS 3C N = 140 12 66.67
11 NS 2P E-1 50 17 94.44
12 NS 4C N = 620 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
16 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,39 %13 NS 3C E-2 200 14 77.78
14 NS 4T E-1 50 12 66.67
15 NS 2P N+2 170 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,88 %16 NS 1S E = -90 9 50.00
17 NS 3S N-2 -100 8 44.44
18 NS 6C W-1 50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 53,70 %19 NS 3P S = 140 12 66.67
20 NS 3K W-3 300 14 77.78
21 NS 1S S+1 120 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
13 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 48,15 %22 NS 3K W+1 -130 0 0.00
23 NS 4P E-1 100 14 77.78
24 NS 5TcN-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
22 de WASSEIGE Ariane -POWIS Vinciane : 56,79 %28 NS 1S E+3 -180 3 16.67
29 NS 3S N+1 630 17 94.44
30 NS 2C E-2 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,91 %31 NS 4C E = -420 4 22.22
32 NS 5KcS-3 -500 2 11.11
33 NS 4C E+2 -480 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
Total : 314,0 / 540 = 58,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
22 de WASSEIGE Ariane -POWIS Vinciane : 56,79 % 1 NS 2P N+3 200 17 94.44
2 NS 5P W = -450 9 50.00
3 NS 6P S = 980 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,91 % 4 NS 4P W+1 -650 8 44.44
5 NS 3S E-2 100 12 66.67
6 NS 2P W = -110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
20 BEYNE Anne -COLLET Edgard : 55,76 % 7 NS 6P W = -1430 4 22.22
8 NS 3P E = -140 7 38.89
9 NS 3PcW-2 500 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
19 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 32,30 %10 NS 2C N+2 170 16 88.89
11 NS 2P E = -110 12 66.67
12 NS 4P N = 620 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
24 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,44 %13 NS 1S E-1 100 5 27.78
14 NS 2C W-1 50 12 66.67
15 NS 2S S+1 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
17 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 38,27 %16 NS 2CcW-2 500 18 100.00
17 NS 3S S-2 -100 8 44.44
18 NS 4C W+2 -480 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
16 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,39 %19 NS 3P S+1 170 16 88.89
20 NS 2P N+1 140 10 55.56
21 NS 3T S = 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,88 %22 NS 3C S-1 -50 9 50.00
23 NS 2P W+1 -140 7 38.89
24 NS 4C W = -420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 53,70 %25 NS 3S S = 400 15 83.33
26 NS 3C W = -140 9 50.00
27 NS 4C E+1 -450 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,59 %31 NS 4PcN-3 -800 0 0.00
32 NS 3P W-1 100 15 83.33
33 NS 4C E+2 -480 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 299,0 / 540 = 55,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 -
24 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,44 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 38,27 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,91 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 53,70 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,73 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
22 de WASSEIGE Ariane -POWIS Vinciane : 56,79 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,88 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 32,30 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
16 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,39 %28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
20 BEYNE Anne -COLLET Edgard : 55,76 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 594 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal
1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 49,63 % 1 EO 1S W+1 -120 18 100.00
2 EO 5TcN = 750 0 0.00
3 EO 4P S+1 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,74 % 4 EO 4P E+1 -650 10 55.56
5 EO 3S E-2 100 6 33.33
6 EO 3P W-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 36,85 % 7 EO 6P W = -1430 14 77.78
8 EO 2P E+1 -140 11 61.11
9 EO 4CcN-5 -1100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
8 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 56,11 %10 EO 3C N-1 -100 15 83.33
11 EO 3P E = -140 12 66.67
12 EO 4P N = 620 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
3 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 45,74 %13 EO 3C E-2 200 4 22.22
14 EO 4T E-1 50 6 33.33
15 EO 2P N = 110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,19 %16 EO 3K W-2 200 2 11.11
17 EO 3S S-2 -100 10 55.56
18 EO 4C W+1 -450 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
4 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 39,26 %19 EO 4K W+2 -170 15 83.33
20 EO 3K W-2 200 6 33.33
21 EO 1S S = 90 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
10 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 58,15 %22 EO 3K W+1 -130 18 100.00
23 EO 4P E-1 100 4 22.22
24 EO 5TcN-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
5 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 54,81 %25 EO 4P N-1 -50 12 66.67
26 EO 4C W-1 100 3 16.67
27 EO 6C W-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,15 %31 EO 4P S-3 -300 12 66.67
32 EO 3T E-1 100 3 16.67
33 EO 4C E+2 -480 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 260,0 / 540 = 48,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
7 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,74 % 1 EO 1S W-1 50 15 83.33
2 EO 4P W = -420 4 22.22
3 EO 2P S+4 230 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 36,85 % 4 EO 4P W+1 -650 10 55.56
5 EO 3S E-2 100 6 33.33
6 EO 3C N-2 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
8 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 56,11 % 7 EO 6P W = -1430 14 77.78
8 EO 3P E+1 -170 17 94.44
9 EO 3PcW-3 800 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
12 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,19 %13 EO 2PcN = 670 0 0.00
14 EO 3T E+1 -130 17 94.44
15 EO 2P N+1 140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
4 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 39,26 %16 EO 2C S-2 -100 15 83.33
17 EO 3S S-2 -100 10 55.56
18 EO 4C W+2 -480 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
10 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 58,15 %19 EO 3P S = 140 6 33.33
20 EO 3K W-3 300 4 22.22
21 EO 1S S+1 120 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
5 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 54,81 %22 EO 3C S-1 -50 9 50.00
23 EO 2P E+1 -140 11 61.11
24 EO 4C W = -420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 55,37 %25 EO 3S S = 400 3 16.67
26 EO 3C W = -140 9 50.00
27 EO 4C E+1 -450 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,15 %28 EO 1S E+1 -120 10 55.56
29 EO 2P N+2 170 8 44.44
30 EO 1C E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 261,0 / 486 = 53,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
8 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 56,11 % 4 EO 4P E+1 -650 10 55.56
5 EO 3S E+1 -430 15 83.33
6 EO 2C N+1 140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
3 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 45,74 % 7 EO 4P W+3 -710 8 44.44
8 EO 2P E+2 -170 17 94.44
9 EO 4T S+1 150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,19 %10 EO 2C N+1 140 6 33.33
11 EO 2P E = -110 6 33.33
12 EO 4P N = 620 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
4 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 39,26 %13 EO 2T S-1 -100 18 100.00
14 EO 3P N-2 -100 14 77.78
15 EO 2T N+1 110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
10 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 58,15 %16 EO 1S E = -90 9 50.00
17 EO 3S N-2 -100 10 55.56
18 EO 6C W-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
12 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 55,37 %22 EO 3C S-1 -50 9 50.00
23 EO 2P W+1 -140 11 61.11
24 EO 4C W = -420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,15 %25 EO 4P N-2 -100 17 94.44
26 EO 3C W = -140 9 50.00
27 EO 4CcW = -590 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 49,63 %28 EO 3T E = -110 5 27.78
29 EO 2P N+1 140 12 66.67
30 EO 1C E = -80 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,74 %31 EO 3C E+2 -200 9 50.00
32 EO 4K N-2 -100 13 72.22
33 EO 4C E+2 -480 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 291,0 / 486 = 59,88 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
8 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 56,11 % 1 EO 2P N+2 170 6 33.33
2 EO 5P W = -450 9 50.00
3 EO 6P S = 980 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,19 % 7 EO 4P W+2 -680 3 16.67
8 EO 3P E = -140 11 61.11
9 EO 5T S = 400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
4 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 39,26 %10 EO 3S E-1 100 11 61.11
11 EO 2P E+1 -140 12 66.67
12 EO 4P N = 620 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
10 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 58,15 %13 EO 3C E-2 200 4 22.22
14 EO 4T E-1 50 6 33.33
15 EO 2P N+2 170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
5 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 54,81 %16 EO 2C N-2 -100 15 83.33
17 EO 3S S-2 -100 10 55.56
18 EO 4C W+1 -450 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 55,37 %19 EO 3P S+1 170 2 11.11
20 EO 2P N+1 140 8 44.44
21 EO 3T S = 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,15 %22 EO 2C S = 110 3 16.67
23 EO 4P E-2 200 0 0.00
24 EO 4C W = -420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 49,63 %25 EO 5P N-1 -50 12 66.67
26 EO 4C W-1 100 3 16.67
27 EO 4C W = -420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
12 - : 0,00 %28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 36,85 %31 EO 4T N-2 -200 9 50.00
32 EO 3K N-1 -50 8 44.44
33 EO 5TcS-7 -1700 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 206,0 / 486 = 42,39 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude
3 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 45,74 % 1 EO 2S E-4 200 1 5.56
2 EO 5P W = -450 9 50.00
3 EO 3P S+4 260 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
12 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
10 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 58,15 %10 EO 3C N = 140 6 33.33
11 EO 2P E-1 50 1 5.56
12 EO 4C N = 620 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
5 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 54,81 %13 EO 1S E-1 100 13 72.22
14 EO 3P N = 140 0 0.00
15 EO 2C S+1 140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 55,37 %16 EO 2CcW-2 500 0 0.00
17 EO 3S S-2 -100 10 55.56
18 EO 4C W+2 -480 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,15 %19 EO 4PcS = 590 0 0.00
20 EO 3T N = 110 10 55.56
21 EO 3T S+1 130 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 49,63 %22 EO 2C S = 110 3 16.67
23 EO 3S W = -600 18 100.00
24 EO 5C W-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,74 %25 EO 3T S = 110 7 38.89
26 EO 2C W+2 -170 12 66.67
27 EO 2C E = -110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 36,85 %28 EO 2S E+2 -180 15 83.33
29 EO 3K S-2 -200 18 100.00
30 EO 5TcS-4 -800 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
8 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 56,11 %31 EO 3CcE-2 300 0 0.00
32 EO 4PcW-2 500 0 0.00
33 EO 3C E+2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 186,0 / 486 = 38,27 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,19 % 1 EO 3S W-2 100 12 66.67
2 EO 5PcW = -650 15 83.33
3 EO 6P S-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
4 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 39,26 % 4 EO 4P E+1 -650 10 55.56
5 EO 4C W+1 -450 18 100.00
6 EO 2PcW = -670 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
10 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 58,15 % 7 EO 6P W = -1430 14 77.78
8 EO 3C N-2 -100 0 0.00
9 EO 3S N+2 460 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
12 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,15 %16 EO 2T E = -90 9 50.00
17 EO 3S S-2 -100 10 55.56
18 EO 6C W = -980 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 49,63 %19 EO 3P N = 140 6 33.33
20 EO 2P N-1 -100 15 83.33
21 EO 3T S-1 -100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,74 %22 EO 4C S-2 -100 15 83.33
23 EO 2S E = -120 8 44.44
24 EO 5TcN-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 36,85 %25 EO 3T S = 110 7 38.89
26 EO 4C W-1 100 3 16.67
27 EO 6C W-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
8 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 56,11 %28 EO 1C W+1 -110 5 27.78
29 EO 3T N = 110 14 77.78
30 EO 2CcE-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
3 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 45,74 %31 EO 3C E+1 -170 5 27.78
32 EO 2S S-1 -50 8 44.44
33 EO 4C W+2 -480 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 266,0 / 486 = 54,73 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
4 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 39,26 % 1 EO 2K S+2 130 10 55.56
2 EO 4T N+1 150 2 11.11
3 EO 4P S+2 480 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
10 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 58,15 % 4 EO 4P E-1 100 0 0.00
5 EO 3C W+2 -200 12 66.67
6 EO 2C N+2 170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
5 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 54,81 % 7 EO 4P W+2 -680 3 16.67
8 EO 2P E = -110 4 22.22
9 EO 4PcW-3 800 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 55,37 %10 EO 2C N+2 170 2 11.11
11 EO 2P E = -110 6 33.33
12 EO 4P N = 620 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 49,63 %16 EO 2C N-1 -50 5 27.78
17 EO 3S S-2 -100 10 55.56
18 EO 4C W+1 -450 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,74 %19 EO 3C N = 140 6 33.33
20 EO 3T N-1 -100 15 83.33
21 EO 3T N = 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
12 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
8 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 56,11 %25 EO 6S S-1 -50 12 66.67
26 EO 4C E-1 100 3 16.67
27 EO 4C W = -420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
3 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 45,74 %28 EO 2C W = -110 5 27.78
29 EO 3P S+1 170 8 44.44
30 EO 2S E-3 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,19 %31 EO 4T N-1 -100 2 11.11
32 EO 3K N-1 -50 8 44.44
33 EO 4C E+1 -450 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 157,0 / 486 = 32,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 BEYNE Anne -COLLET Edgard
10 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 58,15 % 1 EO 1S W-1 50 15 83.33
2 EO 5PcW = -650 15 83.33
3 EO 6P S-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
5 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 54,81 % 4 EO 4P W+1 -650 10 55.56
5 EO 3S E-2 100 6 33.33
6 EO 2C N+1 140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 55,37 % 7 EO 6P W = -1430 14 77.78
8 EO 3P E = -140 11 61.11
9 EO 3PcW-2 500 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,15 %10 EO 4C N-1 -100 15 83.33
11 EO 4C W = -420 17 94.44
12 EO 4P N = 620 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 49,63 %13 EO 4K W-2 200 4 22.22
14 EO 3C W-1 50 6 33.33
15 EO 2C S = 110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 36,85 %19 EO 4P N-1 -50 11 61.11
20 EO 3K W-1 100 12 66.67
21 EO 2S N-1 -100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
8 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 56,11 %22 EO 4KcW-1 200 0 0.00
23 EO 3P E-1 100 4 22.22
24 EO 4C W = -420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
3 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 45,74 %25 EO 3S S+1 430 0 0.00
26 EO 4C W = -620 17 94.44
27 EO 1P E+2 -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,19 %28 EO 3T E = -110 5 27.78
29 EO 4P N-1 -100 16 88.89
30 EO 1C E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
12 - : 0,00 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 271,0 / 486 = 55,76 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
5 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 54,81 % 1 EO 3C N+1 170 6 33.33
2 EO 4P E+1 -450 9 50.00
3 EO 3S N = 400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 55,37 % 4 EO 4P W+1 -650 10 55.56
5 EO 3S E-2 100 6 33.33
6 EO 2P W = -110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
12 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 49,63 %10 EO 4CcN = 790 0 0.00
11 EO 1P E+2 -140 12 66.67
12 EO 4P N = 620 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,74 %13 EO 1S E-1 100 13 72.22
14 EO 3T E+1 -130 17 94.44
15 EO 1S E-3 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 36,85 %16 EO 2P N-1 -50 5 27.78
17 EO 4C S-1 -50 0 0.00
18 EO 5C W+1 -480 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
3 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 45,74 %22 EO 3C S-1 -50 9 50.00
23 EO 2TcN-2 -500 16 88.89
24 EO 4C W = -420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,19 %25 EO 3S S = 400 3 16.67
26 EO 4C W = -620 17 94.44
27 EO 4CcW+1 -690 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
4 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 39,26 %28 EO 2C E+2 -170 12 66.67
29 EO 3S S+1 630 1 5.56
30 EO 3S E-2 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
10 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 58,15 %31 EO 4C E = -420 14 77.78
32 EO 5KcS-3 -500 16 88.89
33 EO 4C E+2 -480 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
Total : 262,0 / 486 = 53,91 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 de WASSEIGE Ariane -POWIS Vinciane
11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 55,37 % 1 EO 2P N+3 200 1 5.56
2 EO 5P W = -450 9 50.00
3 EO 6P S = 980 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,15 % 4 EO 4C E+1 -650 10 55.56
5 EO 3S E-2 100 6 33.33
6 EO 4C N-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 49,63 % 7 EO 6P W = -1430 14 77.78
8 EO 2P E+1 -140 11 61.11
9 EO 3S N+2 460 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,74 %10 EO 2C N+1 140 6 33.33
11 EO 2S E-1 50 1 5.56
12 EO 2P N+2 170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 36,85 %13 EO 2C E-1 100 13 72.22
14 EO 3P N-1 -50 12 66.67
15 EO 1S W = -90 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
12 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
3 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 45,74 %19 EO 4P N-1 -50 11 61.11
20 EO 3TcN-1 -200 18 100.00
21 EO 3T S = 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
4 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 39,26 %25 EO 4P N-2 -100 17 94.44
26 EO 3C W+2 -200 14 77.78
27 EO 3C E+1 -170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
10 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 58,15 %28 EO 1S E+3 -180 15 83.33
29 EO 3S N+1 630 1 5.56
30 EO 2C E-2 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
5 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 54,81 %31 EO 3CcE = -530 16 88.89
32 EO 4PcW = -790 18 100.00
33 EO 4C E+2 -480 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
Total : 276,0 / 486 = 56,79 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,15 % 1 EO 3P N+1 170 6 33.33
2 EO 5PxW = -1000 18 100.00
3 EO 4P S+2 480 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 49,63 % 4 EO 4P E+1 -650 10 55.56
5 EO 3S E+1 -430 15 83.33
6 EO 3P W-1 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,74 % 7 EO 4P W+2 -680 3 16.67
8 EO 2P E = -110 4 22.22
9 EO 3P W-3 300 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 36,85 %10 EO 3P E-1 100 11 61.11
11 EO 4C E = -420 17 94.44
12 EO 3P N = 140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
8 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 56,11 %13 EO 2P N+1 140 8 44.44
14 EO 3C W-1 50 6 33.33
15 EO 1S W+2 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
3 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 45,74 %16 EO 2C N-2 -100 15 83.33
17 EO 3S S-2 -100 10 55.56
18 EO 5C W = -450 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,19 %19 EO 4K W+2 -170 15 83.33
20 EO 4KcW-5 1400 0 0.00
21 EO 3T S+2 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
4 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 39,26 %22 EO 3C S-2 -100 15 83.33
23 EO 3P E-1 100 4 22.22
24 EO 4C W = -420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
5 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 54,81 %28 EO 3S W-1 50 0 0.00
29 EO 2P N+4 230 4 22.22
30 EO 1C E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 55,37 %31 EO 4PcN-3 -800 18 100.00
32 EO 3P W-1 100 3 16.67
33 EO 4C E+2 -480 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 284,0 / 540 = 52,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
12 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,19 % 4 EO 4P E+1 -650 10 55.56
5 EO 2PcS = 670 0 0.00
6 EO 2C N+1 140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,15 % 7 EO 4P W+2 -680 3 16.67
8 EO 2P E = -110 4 22.22
9 EO 4T S = 130 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
3 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 45,74 %10 EO 2P E+1 -140 18 100.00
11 EO 2C W = -110 6 33.33
12 EO 2S E-1 50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 55,37 %13 EO 1S E-1 100 13 72.22
14 EO 2C W-1 50 6 33.33
15 EO 2S S+1 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
8 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 56,11 %16 EO 2C N-2 -100 15 83.33
17 EO 3S S-2 -100 10 55.56
18 EO 4C W+1 -450 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
5 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 54,81 %19 EO 4PcS-2 -300 18 100.00
20 EO 3KcW-4 1100 2 11.11
21 EO 3T S = 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 36,85 %22 EO 3C N-1 -50 9 50.00
23 EO 3P E+1 -170 14 77.78
24 EO 5TcN-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,74 %28 EO 3S E = -400 18 100.00
29 EO 3P S+1 170 8 44.44
30 EO 2S E-2 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
4 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 39,26 %31 EO 3C E+1 -170 5 27.78
32 EO 4K S-2 -100 13 72.22
33 EO 4C E+2 -480 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 250,0 / 486 = 51,44 %
|
|