|
Tournoi du 27-07-15
1 61,29 7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
2 55,79 10 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita
3 54,55 8 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal
4 53,86 3 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette
5 53,17 4 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph
6 49,04 1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine
7 47,93 9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
8 47,52 5 MASSAUX Joel -POWIS Vinciane
9 46,42 6 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
10 44,90 11 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine
11 43,53 12 STEED Mercédès -HALLEUX Jean François
12 42,01 2 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 56,61 21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
2 55,37 17 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
3 52,89 18 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -MAHY Alain
4 51,65 24 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
5 50,83 22 BABIKOW Georges -MATELART Marc
6 49,86 13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
7 49,72 20 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette
8 49,45 23 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
9 47,93 14 MOLS Bruno -ERPICUM Patrice
10 45,45 19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
~ 45,45 16 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
12 44,77 15 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
PAIRE Nr : 1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,86 % 1 NS 7C N-2 -100 5 22.73
2 NS 2C N = 110 8 36.36
3 NS 3K S-4 -200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
23 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 49,45 % 4 NS 2S W-1 100 19 86.36
5 NS 3P S = 140 14 63.64
6 NS 4P N-2 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
22 BABIKOW Georges -MATELART Marc : 50,83 % 7 NS 2P S = 110 16 72.73
8 NS 2S E+2 -180 5 22.73
9 NS 3S S-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,61 %10 NS 5TcE-3 800 22 100.00
11 NS 4P S = 420 16 72.73
12 NS 3S N+1 630 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
20 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 49,72 %13 NS 3K N-2 -200 6 27.27
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 27.27
15 NS 4P S+3 710 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,45 %16 NS 4P N = 420 17 77.27
17 NS 6P N = 980 20 90.91
18 NS 4K E-2 100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
18 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -MAHY Alain : 52,89 %19 NS 4P W+1 -650 2 9.09
20 NS 2S S+1 150 8 36.36
21 NS 2P N+1 140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
17 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 55,37 %22 NS 4P S = 420 13 59.09
23 NS 3C E = -140 4 18.18
24 NS 2P W+1 -140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
16 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,45 %25 NS 2P N-1 -50 6 27.27
26 NS 3CcE = -730 0 0.00
27 NS 3P E+2 -200 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
15 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 44,77 %28 NS 4P S = 620 7 31.82
29 NS 3S S = 600 21 95.45
30 NS 4P S = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
14 MOLS Bruno -ERPICUM Patrice : 47,93 %31 NS 6S E+1 -1020 9 40.91
32 NS 3S W-3 300 22 100.00
33 NS 1S S-2 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
Total : 356,0 / 726 = 49,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier
15 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 44,77 % 1 NS 3S S+2 460 16 72.73
2 NS 2C N-1 -100 0 0.00
3 NS 3CcS-2 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
14 MOLS Bruno -ERPICUM Patrice : 47,93 % 4 NS 1S E+2 -150 10 45.45
5 NS 4C W-1 50 6 27.27
6 NS 2P N = 110 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,86 % 7 NS 1S S-2 -200 3 13.64
8 NS 1S E+2 -150 8 36.36
9 NS 4P S = 420 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
23 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 49,45 %10 NS 4TcE-2 500 11 50.00
11 NS 3S S+1 430 22 100.00
12 NS 3S N+1 630 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
22 BABIKOW Georges -MATELART Marc : 50,83 %13 NS 4C E-2 200 20 90.91
14 NS 3S W = -400 15 68.18
15 NS 3K W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,61 %16 NS 2P N+1 140 2 9.09
17 NS 4P S+2 480 8 36.36
18 NS 3C N = 140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
20 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 49,72 %19 NS 2P W+3 -200 10 45.45
20 NS 1P S+1 110 0 0.00
21 NS 3T E+3 -170 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
24 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,65 %22 NS 3P S+1 170 2 9.09
23 NS 3C E = -140 4 18.18
24 NS 2P W-2 100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
18 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -MAHY Alain : 52,89 %25 NS 2C W-1 100 16 72.73
26 NS 3C E+1 -170 9 40.91
27 NS 4P E+1 -450 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
17 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 55,37 %28 NS 4P N+1 650 16 72.73
29 NS 3S S-3 -300 1 4.55
30 NS 4P S-1 -50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
16 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,45 %31 NS 6S W = -990 19 86.36
32 NS 2S W = -120 1 4.55
33 NS 2C E-1 50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
Total : 305,0 / 726 = 42,01 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette
17 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 55,37 % 1 NS 6C S-2 -100 5 22.73
2 NS 2C N = 110 8 36.36
3 NS 3T N-2 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
16 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,45 % 4 NS 3S E-1 100 19 86.36
5 NS 4PcS = 790 21 95.45
6 NS 4P N-1 -50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 84,85 %
15 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 44,77 % 7 NS 2C N = 110 16 72.73
8 NS 3S W-1 50 18 81.82
9 NS 3S S = 400 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 80,30 %
24 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,65 %10 NS 3P N+1 170 5 22.73
11 NS 4P S = 420 16 72.73
12 NS 3S N+1 630 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,86 %13 NS 2P S-1 -100 16 72.73
14 NS 3S W = -400 15 68.18
15 NS 4P S+2 680 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
23 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 49,45 %16 NS 4P N = 420 17 77.27
17 NS 4P S+2 480 8 36.36
18 NS 4K W-1 50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
22 BABIKOW Georges -MATELART Marc : 50,83 %19 NS 4P W+1 -650 2 9.09
20 NS 2S N+1 150 8 36.36
21 NS 2P W-2 100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,61 %22 NS 3P S+1 170 2 9.09
23 NS 4C E = -620 0 0.00
24 NS 2P W+1 -140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 6,06 %
20 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 49,72 %25 NS 1S N-1 -50 6 27.27
26 NS 4C E-1 100 21 95.45
27 NS 2P E+2 -170 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,45 %28 NS 4P N = 620 7 31.82
29 NS 2S S = 120 14 63.64
30 NS 4P S+2 480 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
18 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -MAHY Alain : 52,89 %31 NS 6S W+1 -1020 9 40.91
32 NS 3P N-1 -50 9 40.91
33 NS 1T E = -70 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
Total : 391,0 / 726 = 53,86 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,45 % 1 NS 6C S = 980 20 90.91
2 NS 2C N = 110 8 36.36
3 NS 3T N-2 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
18 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -MAHY Alain : 52,89 % 4 NS 1ScN-1 -200 6 27.27
5 NS 4C W+2 -480 0 0.00
6 NS 4P N-3 -150 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 19,70 %
17 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 55,37 % 7 NS 2P S+1 140 20 90.91
8 NS 3S E+1 -430 0 0.00
9 NS 3S N-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
16 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,45 %10 NS 4P N = 620 17 77.27
11 NS 4P S-2 -100 0 0.00
12 NS 3S S+2 660 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
15 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 44,77 %13 NS 3C E = -140 12 54.55
14 NS 3S W = -400 15 68.18
15 NS 4P S+3 710 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
14 MOLS Bruno -ERPICUM Patrice : 47,93 %16 NS 2P N+2 170 8 36.36
17 NS 4P S = 420 0 0.00
18 NS 2S W-1 50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 19,70 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,86 %19 NS 2C N = 110 20 90.91
20 NS 1S N+3 180 12 54.55
21 NS 3S W-4 200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
23 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 49,45 %22 NS 4P S+1 450 20 90.91
23 NS 4C E-1 100 15 68.18
24 NS 2P W+1 -140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
22 BABIKOW Georges -MATELART Marc : 50,83 %25 NS 1S N-1 -50 6 27.27
26 NS 3C E+1 -170 9 40.91
27 NS 2P E+3 -200 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,61 %28 NS 3S N+2 660 21 95.45
29 NS 2S N-2 -200 4 18.18
30 NS 4P S = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
24 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,65 %31 NS 6S W+1 -1020 9 40.91
32 NS 2P N = 110 17 77.27
33 NS 1S S = 90 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
Total : 386,0 / 726 = 53,17 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 MASSAUX Joel -POWIS Vinciane
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,61 % 1 NS 6C N-2 -100 5 22.73
2 NS 2C N = 110 8 36.36
3 NS 2P W+1 -140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
20 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 49,72 % 4 NS 1ScN-3 -800 1 4.55
5 NS 4PcS = 790 21 95.45
6 NS 3P N = 140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,45 % 7 NS 2K S = 90 12 54.55
8 NS 3S E-1 50 18 81.82
9 NS 5K N-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
18 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -MAHY Alain : 52,89 %10 NS 5PcN-2 -500 0 0.00
11 NS 4P S-1 -50 4 18.18
12 NS 3S N+2 660 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
17 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 55,37 %13 NS 4C E-3 300 22 100.00
14 NS 3S E+2 -460 0 0.00
15 NS 4P S = 620 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
16 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,45 %16 NS 4P N = 420 17 77.27
17 NS 4P S+2 480 8 36.36
18 NS 2K E+1 -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
24 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,65 %19 NS 2C N-1 -50 18 81.82
20 NS 1S W-2 200 14 63.64
21 NS 2T E+2 -130 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
14 MOLS Bruno -ERPICUM Patrice : 47,93 %22 NS 4PcS = 590 22 100.00
23 NS 4C E-1 100 15 68.18
24 NS 1S E-2 100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 87,88 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,86 %25 NS 1S N-2 -100 1 4.55
26 NS 3C E = -140 15 68.18
27 NS 2P E+3 -200 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
23 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 49,45 %28 NS 4P N = 620 7 31.82
29 NS 3C S-3 -300 1 4.55
30 NS 2P S+4 230 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
22 BABIKOW Georges -MATELART Marc : 50,83 %31 NS 6S W+1 -1020 9 40.91
32 NS 3K W = -110 5 22.73
33 NS 1S S-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
Total : 345,0 / 726 = 47,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
23 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 49,45 % 1 NS 6C S-2 -100 5 22.73
2 NS 2C N+1 140 18 81.82
3 NS 2C W = -110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
22 BABIKOW Georges -MATELART Marc : 50,83 % 4 NS 1ScN-2 -500 4 18.18
5 NS 4C W-1 50 6 27.27
6 NS 5PcN-2 -300 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
24 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,65 % 7 NS 2S E+1 -150 6 27.27
8 NS 1S E+3 -180 5 22.73
9 NS 3S N-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
20 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 49,72 %10 NS 3P N+1 170 5 22.73
11 NS 4P S-1 -50 4 18.18
12 NS 3S N+2 660 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,45 %13 NS 3C E = -140 12 54.55
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 27.27
15 NS 1P S+4 200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
18 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -MAHY Alain : 52,89 %16 NS 4P N = 420 17 77.27
17 NS 5PcS+1 750 16 72.73
18 NS 4K W-2 100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
17 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 55,37 %19 NS 5CcN-1 -100 16 72.73
20 NS 3S N+1 630 19 86.36
21 NS 2T E+3 -150 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
16 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,45 %22 NS 4P S = 420 13 59.09
23 NS 4C E-1 100 15 68.18
24 NS 2P W-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
15 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 44,77 %25 NS 1S N+2 150 22 100.00
26 NS 3C E+1 -170 9 40.91
27 NS 4P E = -420 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
14 MOLS Bruno -ERPICUM Patrice : 47,93 %28 NS 4P N = 620 7 31.82
29 NS 3S S-1 -100 8 36.36
30 NS 4P S = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,86 %31 NS 7S W = -1520 1 4.55
32 NS 2P N = 110 17 77.27
33 NS 1S S-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
Total : 337,0 / 726 = 46,42 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
14 MOLS Bruno -ERPICUM Patrice : 47,93 % 1 NS 6C S = 980 20 90.91
2 NS 2C N+2 170 22 100.00
3 NS 3T N-3 -150 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,86 % 4 NS 1S N-1 -100 14 63.64
5 NS 3P S = 140 14 63.64
6 NS 3P N+1 170 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
23 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 49,45 % 7 NS 4T W-4 400 22 100.00
8 NS 3S E = -400 2 9.09
9 NS 3S S-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
22 BABIKOW Georges -MATELART Marc : 50,83 %10 NS 3P N+1 170 5 22.73
11 NS 4P S = 420 16 72.73
12 NS 3S N+3 690 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,61 %13 NS 4C W = -620 0 0.00
14 NS 3S E = -400 15 68.18
15 NS 4P S+2 680 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
20 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 49,72 %16 NS 4P N = 420 17 77.27
17 NS 6P N = 980 20 90.91
18 NS 3C S+1 170 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 87,88 %
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,45 %19 NS 1S N-3 -150 13 59.09
20 NS 3S S+2 660 22 100.00
21 NS 4T E+1 -150 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
18 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -MAHY Alain : 52,89 %22 NS 3P S+2 200 6 27.27
23 NS 4C E-1 100 15 68.18
24 NS 2P W-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
17 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 55,37 %25 NS 1S N = 90 11 50.00
26 NS 3C E+1 -170 9 40.91
27 NS 3P E+1 -170 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
24 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,65 %28 NS 4P N = 620 7 31.82
29 NS 3S N-1 -100 8 36.36
30 NS 4P S = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
15 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 44,77 %31 NS 6S W = -990 19 86.36
32 NS 3K W = -110 5 22.73
33 NS 1S S-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
Total : 445,0 / 726 = 61,29 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal
16 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,45 % 1 NS 6C N-1 -50 12 54.55
2 NS 2C N+1 140 18 81.82
3 NS 4T N-3 -150 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
15 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 44,77 % 4 NS 3S W-1 100 19 86.36
5 NS 4KcE-1 100 10 45.45
6 NS 4P N-2 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
14 MOLS Bruno -ERPICUM Patrice : 47,93 % 7 NS 2S E = -120 9 40.91
8 NS 3S E-1 50 18 81.82
9 NS 3S S-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,86 %10 NS 3P N+1 170 5 22.73
11 NS 4P S = 420 16 72.73
12 NS 3S N+2 660 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
23 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 49,45 %13 NS 3P S-2 -200 6 27.27
14 NS 3S W-1 50 20 90.91
15 NS 4P S+2 680 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
24 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,65 %16 NS 3P N+1 170 8 36.36
17 NS 6P S = 980 20 90.91
18 NS 3C S = 140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,61 %19 NS 5CcN-3 -500 6 27.27
20 NS 2K N+2 130 2 9.09
21 NS 4P N-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,12 %
20 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 49,72 %22 NS 4P S = 420 13 59.09
23 NS 4C E-1 100 15 68.18
24 NS 2P W = -110 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,45 %25 NS 2P N = 110 20 90.91
26 NS 3C E-1 100 21 95.45
27 NS 5P E = -450 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
18 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -MAHY Alain : 52,89 %28 NS 3S S+2 660 21 95.45
29 NS 3P W-3 300 16 72.73
30 NS 4P S = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
17 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 55,37 %31 NS 6S E = -990 19 86.36
32 NS 3P N-1 -50 9 40.91
33 NS 3C S-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
Total : 396,0 / 726 = 54,55 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
18 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -MAHY Alain : 52,89 % 1 NS 5C S = 450 14 63.64
2 NS 2C N = 110 8 36.36
3 NS 3T N-3 -150 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
24 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,65 % 4 NS 1S E+2 -150 10 45.45
5 NS 3P S = 140 14 63.64
6 NS 4P N-4 -200 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
16 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,45 % 7 NS 1S E+1 -120 9 40.91
8 NS 2K E+1 -110 12 54.55
9 NS 3S S-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
15 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 44,77 %10 NS 4P N = 620 17 77.27
11 NS 3P S+1 170 9 40.91
12 NS 3S N+2 660 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
14 MOLS Bruno -ERPICUM Patrice : 47,93 %13 NS 3PcS-2 -500 2 9.09
14 NS 6S E-4 200 22 100.00
15 NS 4P S+2 680 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,86 %16 NS 3P N = 140 2 9.09
17 NS 4P S+2 480 8 36.36
18 NS 4K W-2 100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
23 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 49,45 %19 NS 4P W+1 -650 2 9.09
20 NS 3S N+1 630 19 86.36
21 NS 3P N-1 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
22 BABIKOW Georges -MATELART Marc : 50,83 %22 NS 4P S = 420 13 59.09
23 NS 4C E-1 100 15 68.18
24 NS 2P W = -110 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,61 %25 NS 2C E-1 100 16 72.73
26 NS 2P S-1 -100 18 81.82
27 NS 4P E+1 -450 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
20 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 49,72 %28 NS 4P S+1 650 16 72.73
29 NS 2S N-1 -100 8 36.36
30 NS 4P S+1 450 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,45 %31 NS 7S W = -1520 1 4.55
32 NS 3K W-1 100 12 54.55
33 NS 2C E+1 -140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
Total : 348,0 / 726 = 47,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita
20 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 49,72 % 1 NS 7C N-2 -100 5 22.73
2 NS 2C N+1 140 18 81.82
3 NS 3T N-3 -150 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,45 % 4 NS 3K W-1 100 19 86.36
5 NS 4C W-3 150 18 81.82
6 NS 4PcN-2 -300 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
18 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -MAHY Alain : 52,89 % 7 NS 2P S = 110 16 72.73
8 NS 4C W-1 50 18 81.82
9 NS 3S N-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
17 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 55,37 %10 NS 4P N = 620 17 77.27
11 NS 4P S = 420 16 72.73
12 NS 3S N+2 660 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
16 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,45 %13 NS 3P S-2 -200 6 27.27
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 27.27
15 NS 4P S+2 680 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
15 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 44,77 %16 NS 2P N+1 140 2 9.09
17 NS 4P S+2 480 8 36.36
18 NS 3C S+1 170 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
14 MOLS Bruno -ERPICUM Patrice : 47,93 %19 NS 4C N-3 -150 13 59.09
20 NS 1S N+2 150 8 36.36
21 NS 2P N = 110 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,86 %22 NS 3P N+1 170 2 9.09
23 NS 4C E-1 100 15 68.18
24 NS 2T N-1 -50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
24 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,65 %25 NS 1S N = 90 11 50.00
26 NS 3C E+2 -200 3 13.64
27 NS 3P E+2 -200 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
22 BABIKOW Georges -MATELART Marc : 50,83 %28 NS 4P S+1 650 16 72.73
29 NS 1S N = 90 12 54.55
30 NS 4P S = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,61 %31 NS 6S W = -990 19 86.36
32 NS 2P N = 110 17 77.27
33 NS 3C W-1 50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
Total : 405,0 / 726 = 55,79 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine
22 BABIKOW Georges -MATELART Marc : 50,83 % 1 NS 6C N = 980 20 90.91
2 NS 2C N = 110 8 36.36
3 NS 3P W = -140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,61 % 4 NS 1ScN-3 -800 1 4.55
5 NS 4P S-2 -200 2 9.09
6 NS 5PcN-1 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
20 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 49,72 % 7 NS 4P N-2 -200 3 13.64
8 NS 4K E = -130 10 45.45
9 NS 3S S-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,45 %10 NS 4P N = 620 17 77.27
11 NS 3P S+1 170 9 40.91
12 NS 3S N+1 630 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
24 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,65 %13 NS 3C E-1 100 18 81.82
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 27.27
15 NS 4P S+1 650 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
17 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 55,37 %16 NS 3P N+1 170 8 36.36
17 NS 4P S+2 480 8 36.36
18 NS 3P N-1 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
16 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,45 %19 NS 3P N = 140 22 100.00
20 NS 3S S = 600 16 72.73
21 NS 3C E-1 50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
15 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 44,77 %22 NS 4P S = 420 13 59.09
23 NS 4C E-1 100 15 68.18
24 NS 1S E = -90 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
14 MOLS Bruno -ERPICUM Patrice : 47,93 %25 NS 1S N-2 -100 1 4.55
26 NS 3C E = -140 15 68.18
27 NS 2P E+3 -200 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,86 %28 NS 3S S-1 -100 0 0.00
29 NS 3S N = 600 21 95.45
30 NS 4P S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
23 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 49,45 %31 NS 6S E+1 -1020 9 40.91
32 NS 2P N = 110 17 77.27
33 NS 3T E = -110 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
Total : 326,0 / 726 = 44,90 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 STEED Mercédès -HALLEUX Jean François
24 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,65 % 1 NS 6C N-2 -100 5 22.73
2 NS 2C N = 110 8 36.36
3 NS 3K N-2 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
17 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 55,37 % 4 NS 2S E+1 -150 10 45.45
5 NS 4C E-1 50 6 27.27
6 NS 4K E+1 -150 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 56,61 % 7 NS 3S E = -600 0 0.00
8 NS 3S W-1 50 18 81.82
9 NS 3S S = 400 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
14 MOLS Bruno -ERPICUM Patrice : 47,93 %10 NS 5TcE-2 500 11 50.00
11 NS 4P S-1 -50 4 18.18
12 NS 3S N+1 630 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
18 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -MAHY Alain : 52,89 %13 NS 3C W = -140 12 54.55
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 27.27
15 NS 4P S+1 650 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
22 BABIKOW Georges -MATELART Marc : 50,83 %16 NS 4P N = 420 17 77.27
17 NS 4P S+2 480 8 36.36
18 NS 3C S = 140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
15 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 44,77 %19 NS 4CcN-2 -300 8 36.36
20 NS 2C S+1 140 4 18.18
21 NS 2T E+3 -150 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,45 %22 NS 4P S = 420 13 59.09
23 NS 3C E = -140 4 18.18
24 NS 3T E-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
23 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 49,45 %25 NS 2T E-1 100 16 72.73
26 NS 2P S-2 -200 3 13.64
27 NS 2P E+3 -200 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
16 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,45 %28 NS 4P N = 620 7 31.82
29 NS 2PcW-2 500 18 81.82
30 NS 4P N = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
20 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 49,72 %31 NS 6S W+1 -1020 9 40.91
32 NS 2S W = -120 1 4.55
33 NS 1S W = -90 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
Total : 316,0 / 726 = 43,53 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 49,04 % 1 EO 7C N-2 -100 17 77.27
2 EO 2C N = 110 14 63.64
3 EO 3K S-4 -200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,29 % 4 EO 1S N-1 -100 8 36.36
5 EO 3P S = 140 8 36.36
6 EO 3P N+1 170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
2 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 42,01 % 7 EO 1S S-2 -200 19 86.36
8 EO 1S E+2 -150 14 63.64
9 EO 4P S = 420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 54,55 %10 EO 3P N+1 170 17 77.27
11 EO 4P S = 420 6 27.27
12 EO 3S N+2 660 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
3 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 53,86 %13 EO 2P S-1 -100 6 27.27
14 EO 3S W = -400 7 31.82
15 EO 4P S+2 680 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,93 %16 EO 3P N = 140 20 90.91
17 EO 4P S+2 480 14 63.64
18 EO 4K W-2 100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
4 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 53,17 %19 EO 2C N = 110 2 9.09
20 EO 1S N+3 180 10 45.45
21 EO 3S W-4 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
10 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 55,79 %22 EO 3P N+1 170 20 90.91
23 EO 4C E-1 100 7 31.82
24 EO 2T N-1 -50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
5 MASSAUX Joel -POWIS Vinciane : 47,52 %25 EO 1S N-2 -100 21 95.45
26 EO 3C E = -140 7 31.82
27 EO 2P E+3 -200 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
11 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,90 %28 EO 3S S-1 -100 22 100.00
29 EO 3S N = 600 1 4.55
30 EO 4P S-2 -100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
6 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 46,42 %31 EO 7S W = -1520 21 95.45
32 EO 2P N = 110 5 22.73
33 EO 1S S-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
Total : 362,0 / 726 = 49,86 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 MOLS Bruno -ERPICUM Patrice
7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,29 % 1 EO 6C S = 980 2 9.09
2 EO 2C N+2 170 0 0.00
3 EO 3T N-3 -150 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
2 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 42,01 % 4 EO 1S E+2 -150 12 54.55
5 EO 4C W-1 50 16 72.73
6 EO 2P N = 110 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
8 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 54,55 % 7 EO 2S E = -120 13 59.09
8 EO 3S E-1 50 4 18.18
9 EO 3S S-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
12 STEED Mercédès -HALLEUX Jean François : 43,53 %10 EO 5TcE-2 500 11 50.00
11 EO 4P S-1 -50 18 81.82
12 EO 3S N+1 630 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,93 %13 EO 3PcS-2 -500 20 90.91
14 EO 6S E-4 200 0 0.00
15 EO 4P S+2 680 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
4 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 53,17 %16 EO 2P N+2 170 14 63.64
17 EO 4P S = 420 22 100.00
18 EO 2S W-1 50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 80,30 %
10 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 55,79 %19 EO 4C N-3 -150 9 40.91
20 EO 1S N+2 150 14 63.64
21 EO 2P N = 110 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
5 MASSAUX Joel -POWIS Vinciane : 47,52 %22 EO 4PcS = 590 0 0.00
23 EO 4C E-1 100 7 31.82
24 EO 1S E-2 100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 12,12 %
11 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,90 %25 EO 1S N-2 -100 21 95.45
26 EO 3C E = -140 7 31.82
27 EO 2P E+3 -200 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
6 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 46,42 %28 EO 4P N = 620 15 68.18
29 EO 3S S-1 -100 14 63.64
30 EO 4P S = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 49,04 %31 EO 6S E+1 -1020 13 59.09
32 EO 3S W-3 300 0 0.00
33 EO 1S S-2 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
Total : 348,0 / 726 = 47,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
2 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 42,01 % 1 EO 3S S+2 460 6 27.27
2 EO 2C N-1 -100 22 100.00
3 EO 3CcS-2 -300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
8 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 54,55 % 4 EO 3S W-1 100 3 13.64
5 EO 4KcE-1 100 12 54.55
6 EO 4P N-2 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
3 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 53,86 % 7 EO 2C N = 110 6 27.27
8 EO 3S W-1 50 4 18.18
9 EO 3S S = 400 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 19,70 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,93 %10 EO 4P N = 620 5 22.73
11 EO 3P S+1 170 13 59.09
12 EO 3S N+2 660 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
4 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 53,17 %13 EO 3C E = -140 10 45.45
14 EO 3S W = -400 7 31.82
15 EO 4P S+3 710 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
10 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 55,79 %16 EO 2P N+1 140 20 90.91
17 EO 4P S+2 480 14 63.64
18 EO 3C S+1 170 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
12 STEED Mercédès -HALLEUX Jean François : 43,53 %19 EO 4CcN-2 -300 14 63.64
20 EO 2C S+1 140 18 81.82
21 EO 2T E+3 -150 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
11 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,90 %22 EO 4P S = 420 9 40.91
23 EO 4C E-1 100 7 31.82
24 EO 1S E = -90 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
6 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 46,42 %25 EO 1S N+2 150 0 0.00
26 EO 3C E+1 -170 13 59.09
27 EO 4P E = -420 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 49,04 %28 EO 4P S = 620 15 68.18
29 EO 3S S = 600 1 4.55
30 EO 4P S = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,29 %31 EO 6S W = -990 3 13.64
32 EO 3K W = -110 17 77.27
33 EO 1S S-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
Total : 325,0 / 726 = 44,77 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
8 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 54,55 % 1 EO 6C N-1 -50 10 45.45
2 EO 2C N+1 140 4 18.18
3 EO 4T N-3 -150 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
3 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 53,86 % 4 EO 3S E-1 100 3 13.64
5 EO 4PcS = 790 1 4.55
6 EO 4P N-1 -50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 15,15 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,93 % 7 EO 1S E+1 -120 13 59.09
8 EO 2K E+1 -110 10 45.45
9 EO 3S S-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
4 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 53,17 %10 EO 4P N = 620 5 22.73
11 EO 4P S-2 -100 22 100.00
12 EO 3S S+2 660 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
10 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 55,79 %13 EO 3P S-2 -200 16 72.73
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 72.73
15 EO 4P S+2 680 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
5 MASSAUX Joel -POWIS Vinciane : 47,52 %16 EO 4P N = 420 5 22.73
17 EO 4P S+2 480 14 63.64
18 EO 2K E+1 -110 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
11 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,90 %19 EO 3P N = 140 0 0.00
20 EO 3S S = 600 6 27.27
21 EO 3C E-1 50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
6 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 46,42 %22 EO 4P S = 420 9 40.91
23 EO 4C E-1 100 7 31.82
24 EO 2P W-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 49,04 %25 EO 2P N-1 -50 16 72.73
26 EO 3CcE = -730 22 100.00
27 EO 3P E+2 -200 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
12 STEED Mercédès -HALLEUX Jean François : 43,53 %28 EO 4P N = 620 15 68.18
29 EO 2PcW-2 500 4 18.18
30 EO 4P N = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
2 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 42,01 %31 EO 6S W = -990 3 13.64
32 EO 2S W = -120 21 95.45
33 EO 2C E-1 50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
Total : 330,0 / 726 = 45,45 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
3 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 53,86 % 1 EO 6C S-2 -100 17 77.27
2 EO 2C N = 110 14 63.64
3 EO 3T N-2 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 STEED Mercédès -HALLEUX Jean François : 43,53 % 4 EO 2S E+1 -150 12 54.55
5 EO 4C E-1 50 16 72.73
6 EO 4K E+1 -150 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
4 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 53,17 % 7 EO 2P S+1 140 2 9.09
8 EO 3S E+1 -430 22 100.00
9 EO 3S N-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
10 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 55,79 %10 EO 4P N = 620 5 22.73
11 EO 4P S = 420 6 27.27
12 EO 3S N+2 660 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
5 MASSAUX Joel -POWIS Vinciane : 47,52 %13 EO 4C E-3 300 0 0.00
14 EO 3S E+2 -460 22 100.00
15 EO 4P S = 620 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
11 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,90 %16 EO 3P N+1 170 14 63.64
17 EO 4P S+2 480 14 63.64
18 EO 3P N-1 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
6 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 46,42 %19 EO 5CcN-1 -100 6 27.27
20 EO 3S N+1 630 3 13.64
21 EO 2T E+3 -150 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 49,04 %22 EO 4P S = 420 9 40.91
23 EO 3C E = -140 18 81.82
24 EO 2P W+1 -140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,29 %25 EO 1S N = 90 11 50.00
26 EO 3C E+1 -170 13 59.09
27 EO 3P E+1 -170 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
2 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 42,01 %28 EO 4P N+1 650 6 27.27
29 EO 3S S-3 -300 21 95.45
30 EO 4P S-1 -50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
8 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 54,55 %31 EO 6S E = -990 3 13.64
32 EO 3P N-1 -50 13 59.09
33 EO 3C S-3 -150 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
Total : 402,0 / 726 = 55,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -MAHY Alain
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,93 % 1 EO 5C S = 450 8 36.36
2 EO 2C N = 110 14 63.64
3 EO 3T N-3 -150 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
4 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 53,17 % 4 EO 1ScN-1 -200 16 72.73
5 EO 4C W+2 -480 22 100.00
6 EO 4P N-3 -150 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 80,30 %
10 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 55,79 % 7 EO 2P S = 110 6 27.27
8 EO 4C W-1 50 4 18.18
9 EO 3S N-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
5 MASSAUX Joel -POWIS Vinciane : 47,52 %10 EO 5PcN-2 -500 22 100.00
11 EO 4P S-1 -50 18 81.82
12 EO 3S N+2 660 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
12 STEED Mercédès -HALLEUX Jean François : 43,53 %13 EO 3C W = -140 10 45.45
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 72.73
15 EO 4P S+1 650 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
6 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 46,42 %16 EO 4P N = 420 5 22.73
17 EO 5PcS+1 750 6 27.27
18 EO 4K W-2 100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 49,04 %19 EO 4P W+1 -650 20 90.91
20 EO 2S S+1 150 14 63.64
21 EO 2P N+1 140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,29 %22 EO 3P S+2 200 16 72.73
23 EO 4C E-1 100 7 31.82
24 EO 2P W-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
2 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 42,01 %25 EO 2C W-1 100 6 27.27
26 EO 3C E+1 -170 13 59.09
27 EO 4P E+1 -450 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
8 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 54,55 %28 EO 3S S+2 660 1 4.55
29 EO 3P W-3 300 6 27.27
30 EO 4P S = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
3 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 53,86 %31 EO 6S W+1 -1020 13 59.09
32 EO 3P N-1 -50 13 59.09
33 EO 1T E = -70 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
Total : 384,0 / 726 = 52,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
4 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 53,17 % 1 EO 6C S = 980 2 9.09
2 EO 2C N = 110 14 63.64
3 EO 3T N-2 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
10 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 55,79 % 4 EO 3K W-1 100 3 13.64
5 EO 4C W-3 150 4 18.18
6 EO 4PcN-2 -300 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
5 MASSAUX Joel -POWIS Vinciane : 47,52 % 7 EO 2K S = 90 10 45.45
8 EO 3S E-1 50 4 18.18
9 EO 5K N-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
11 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,90 %10 EO 4P N = 620 5 22.73
11 EO 3P S+1 170 13 59.09
12 EO 3S N+1 630 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
6 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 46,42 %13 EO 3C E = -140 10 45.45
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 72.73
15 EO 1P S+4 200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 49,04 %16 EO 4P N = 420 5 22.73
17 EO 6P N = 980 2 9.09
18 EO 4K E-2 100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,29 %19 EO 1S N-3 -150 9 40.91
20 EO 3S S+2 660 0 0.00
21 EO 4T E+1 -150 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
12 STEED Mercédès -HALLEUX Jean François : 43,53 %22 EO 4P S = 420 9 40.91
23 EO 3C E = -140 18 81.82
24 EO 3T E-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 54,55 %25 EO 2P N = 110 2 9.09
26 EO 3C E-1 100 1 4.55
27 EO 5P E = -450 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
3 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 53,86 %28 EO 4P N = 620 15 68.18
29 EO 2S S = 120 8 36.36
30 EO 4P S+2 480 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,93 %31 EO 7S W = -1520 21 95.45
32 EO 3K W-1 100 10 45.45
33 EO 2C E+1 -140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
Total : 330,0 / 726 = 45,45 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette
10 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 55,79 % 1 EO 7C N-2 -100 17 77.27
2 EO 2C N+1 140 4 18.18
3 EO 3T N-3 -150 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
5 MASSAUX Joel -POWIS Vinciane : 47,52 % 4 EO 1ScN-3 -800 21 95.45
5 EO 4PcS = 790 1 4.55
6 EO 3P N = 140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
11 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,90 % 7 EO 4P N-2 -200 19 86.36
8 EO 4K E = -130 12 54.55
9 EO 3S S-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
6 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 46,42 %10 EO 3P N+1 170 17 77.27
11 EO 4P S-1 -50 18 81.82
12 EO 3S N+2 660 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 49,04 %13 EO 3K N-2 -200 16 72.73
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 72.73
15 EO 4P S+3 710 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,29 %16 EO 4P N = 420 5 22.73
17 EO 6P N = 980 2 9.09
18 EO 3C S+1 170 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 12,12 %
2 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 42,01 %19 EO 2P W+3 -200 12 54.55
20 EO 1P S+1 110 22 100.00
21 EO 3T E+3 -170 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
8 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 54,55 %22 EO 4P S = 420 9 40.91
23 EO 4C E-1 100 7 31.82
24 EO 2P W = -110 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
3 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 53,86 %25 EO 1S N-1 -50 16 72.73
26 EO 4C E-1 100 1 4.55
27 EO 2P E+2 -170 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,93 %28 EO 4P S+1 650 6 27.27
29 EO 2S N-1 -100 14 63.64
30 EO 4P S+1 450 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 STEED Mercédès -HALLEUX Jean François : 43,53 %31 EO 6S W+1 -1020 13 59.09
32 EO 2S W = -120 21 95.45
33 EO 1S W = -90 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
Total : 361,0 / 726 = 49,72 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
5 MASSAUX Joel -POWIS Vinciane : 47,52 % 1 EO 6C N-2 -100 17 77.27
2 EO 2C N = 110 14 63.64
3 EO 2P W+1 -140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
11 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,90 % 4 EO 1ScN-3 -800 21 95.45
5 EO 4P S-2 -200 20 90.91
6 EO 5PcN-1 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
12 STEED Mercédès -HALLEUX Jean François : 43,53 % 7 EO 3S E = -600 22 100.00
8 EO 3S W-1 50 4 18.18
9 EO 3S S = 400 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 49,04 %10 EO 5TcE-3 800 0 0.00
11 EO 4P S = 420 6 27.27
12 EO 3S N+1 630 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,29 %13 EO 4C W = -620 22 100.00
14 EO 3S E = -400 7 31.82
15 EO 4P S+2 680 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
2 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 42,01 %16 EO 2P N+1 140 20 90.91
17 EO 4P S+2 480 14 63.64
18 EO 3C N = 140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
8 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 54,55 %19 EO 5CcN-3 -500 16 72.73
20 EO 2K N+2 130 20 90.91
21 EO 4P N-2 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,88 %
3 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 53,86 %22 EO 3P S+1 170 20 90.91
23 EO 4C E = -620 22 100.00
24 EO 2P W+1 -140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 93,94 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,93 %25 EO 2C E-1 100 6 27.27
26 EO 2P S-1 -100 4 18.18
27 EO 4P E+1 -450 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
4 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 53,17 %28 EO 3S N+2 660 1 4.55
29 EO 2S N-2 -200 18 81.82
30 EO 4P S = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
10 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 55,79 %31 EO 6S W = -990 3 13.64
32 EO 2P N = 110 5 22.73
33 EO 3C W-1 50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
Total : 411,0 / 726 = 56,61 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 BABIKOW Georges -MATELART Marc
11 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,90 % 1 EO 6C N = 980 2 9.09
2 EO 2C N = 110 14 63.64
3 EO 3P W = -140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
6 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 46,42 % 4 EO 1ScN-2 -500 18 81.82
5 EO 4C W-1 50 16 72.73
6 EO 5PcN-2 -300 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 49,04 % 7 EO 2P S = 110 6 27.27
8 EO 2S E+2 -180 17 77.27
9 EO 3S S-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,29 %10 EO 3P N+1 170 17 77.27
11 EO 4P S = 420 6 27.27
12 EO 3S N+3 690 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
2 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 42,01 %13 EO 4C E-2 200 2 9.09
14 EO 3S W = -400 7 31.82
15 EO 3K W-3 150 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
12 STEED Mercédès -HALLEUX Jean François : 43,53 %16 EO 4P N = 420 5 22.73
17 EO 4P S+2 480 14 63.64
18 EO 3C S = 140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
3 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 53,86 %19 EO 4P W+1 -650 20 90.91
20 EO 2S N+1 150 14 63.64
21 EO 2P W-2 100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,93 %22 EO 4P S = 420 9 40.91
23 EO 4C E-1 100 7 31.82
24 EO 2P W = -110 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
4 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 53,17 %25 EO 1S N-1 -50 16 72.73
26 EO 3C E+1 -170 13 59.09
27 EO 2P E+3 -200 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
10 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 55,79 %28 EO 4P S+1 650 6 27.27
29 EO 1S N = 90 10 45.45
30 EO 4P S = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
5 MASSAUX Joel -POWIS Vinciane : 47,52 %31 EO 6S W+1 -1020 13 59.09
32 EO 3K W = -110 17 77.27
33 EO 1S S-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
Total : 369,0 / 726 = 50,83 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
6 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 46,42 % 1 EO 6C S-2 -100 17 77.27
2 EO 2C N+1 140 4 18.18
3 EO 2C W = -110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 49,04 % 4 EO 2S W-1 100 3 13.64
5 EO 3P S = 140 8 36.36
6 EO 4P N-2 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,29 % 7 EO 4T W-4 400 0 0.00
8 EO 3S E = -400 20 90.91
9 EO 3S S-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
2 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 42,01 %10 EO 4TcE-2 500 11 50.00
11 EO 3S S+1 430 0 0.00
12 EO 3S N+1 630 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
8 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 54,55 %13 EO 3P S-2 -200 16 72.73
14 EO 3S W-1 50 2 9.09
15 EO 4P S+2 680 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
3 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 53,86 %16 EO 4P N = 420 5 22.73
17 EO 4P S+2 480 14 63.64
18 EO 4K W-1 50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,93 %19 EO 4P W+1 -650 20 90.91
20 EO 3S N+1 630 3 13.64
21 EO 3P N-1 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 53,17 %22 EO 4P S+1 450 2 9.09
23 EO 4C E-1 100 7 31.82
24 EO 2P W+1 -140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
12 STEED Mercédès -HALLEUX Jean François : 43,53 %25 EO 2T E-1 100 6 27.27
26 EO 2P S-2 -200 19 86.36
27 EO 2P E+3 -200 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
5 MASSAUX Joel -POWIS Vinciane : 47,52 %28 EO 4P N = 620 15 68.18
29 EO 3C S-3 -300 21 95.45
30 EO 2P S+4 230 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
11 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,90 %31 EO 6S E+1 -1020 13 59.09
32 EO 2P N = 110 5 22.73
33 EO 3T E = -110 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
Total : 359,0 / 726 = 49,45 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
12 STEED Mercédès -HALLEUX Jean François : 43,53 % 1 EO 6C N-2 -100 17 77.27
2 EO 2C N = 110 14 63.64
3 EO 3K N-2 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,93 % 4 EO 1S E+2 -150 12 54.55
5 EO 3P S = 140 8 36.36
6 EO 4P N-4 -200 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
6 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 46,42 % 7 EO 2S E+1 -150 16 72.73
8 EO 1S E+3 -180 17 77.27
9 EO 3S N-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
3 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 53,86 %10 EO 3P N+1 170 17 77.27
11 EO 4P S = 420 6 27.27
12 EO 3S N+1 630 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
11 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,90 %13 EO 3C E-1 100 4 18.18
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 72.73
15 EO 4P S+1 650 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
8 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 54,55 %16 EO 3P N+1 170 14 63.64
17 EO 6P S = 980 2 9.09
18 EO 3C S = 140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
5 MASSAUX Joel -POWIS Vinciane : 47,52 %19 EO 2C N-1 -50 4 18.18
20 EO 1S W-2 200 8 36.36
21 EO 2T E+2 -130 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
2 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 42,01 %22 EO 3P S+1 170 20 90.91
23 EO 3C E = -140 18 81.82
24 EO 2P W-2 100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
10 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 55,79 %25 EO 1S N = 90 11 50.00
26 EO 3C E+2 -200 19 86.36
27 EO 3P E+2 -200 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,29 %28 EO 4P N = 620 15 68.18
29 EO 3S N-1 -100 14 63.64
30 EO 4P S = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
4 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 53,17 %31 EO 6S W+1 -1020 13 59.09
32 EO 2P N = 110 5 22.73
33 EO 1S S = 90 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
Total : 375,0 / 726 = 51,65 %
|
|