|
Tournoi du 28-07-14
1 60,93 4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
2 58,15 7 PADOU Bernard -LERAT Michel
3 57,22 1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
4 52,04 8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
5 51,30 5 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse
6 48,33 10 MAHY Alain -BASECQ Christian
7 45,93 11 DELHEZ Jacques -POULAERT Gilbert
8 44,81 2 THYS -GROSFILS Colette
~ 44,81 3 WILLEMS Jacques -RAVET Brigitte
10 43,70 6 MASSAUX Joel -CLERIN François-Xavier
11 42,78 9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 58,70 19 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand
2 58,15 20 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
3 57,96 21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
4 55,19 18 STEED Adrian -GOBBE Amélie
5 55,00 12 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane
6 53,15 15 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
7 49,81 14 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne
8 45,19 13 LAENENS René -CHANTRAINE René
9 42,22 16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard
10 38,70 17 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
11 35,93 22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
PAIRE Nr : 1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
12 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 55,00 % 1 NS 2K S+1 110 12 66.67
2 NS 3S W+2 -460 3 16.67
3 NS 2K S+3 150 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 35,93 % 4 NS 4T N = 130 4 22.22
5 NS 4C E-1 50 15 83.33
6 NS 4C S = 420 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,96 % 7 NS 4P N+2 680 11 61.11
8 NS 3S N+2 460 15 83.33
9 NS 6C W+1 -1460 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
20 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 58,15 %10 NS 2C W-2 200 14 77.78
11 NS 3C E-2 100 12 66.67
12 NS 3K E+2 -150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
19 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 58,70 %13 NS 2P N = 110 13 72.22
14 NS 3P W-1 50 0 0.00
15 NS 3S E-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
18 STEED Adrian -GOBBE Amélie : 55,19 %16 NS 3P S-1 -50 9 50.00
17 NS 3S W-2 100 16 88.89
18 NS 3C W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
17 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,70 %19 NS 2S S+3 210 12 66.67
20 NS 2S W-1 100 8 44.44
21 NS 2S E+2 -180 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 42,22 %22 NS 1S S+1 120 15 83.33
23 NS 3S E-1 100 8 44.44
24 NS 2C N+1 140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
15 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,15 %25 NS 3P E = -140 11 61.11
26 NS 4C N+2 680 4 22.22
27 NS 2S N-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
14 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 49,81 %28 NS 3T E-1 50 17 94.44
29 NS 1S N+2 150 8 44.44
30 NS 5P E+2 -510 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 309,0 / 540 = 57,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 THYS -GROSFILS Colette
13 LAENENS René -CHANTRAINE René : 45,19 % 4 NS 3T N+1 130 4 22.22
5 NS 2C W+1 -140 8 44.44
6 NS 4C S-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
12 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 55,00 % 7 NS 4P N+2 680 11 61.11
8 NS 2P S+2 170 3 16.67
9 NS 6C E+1 -1460 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 35,93 %10 NS 3P E = -140 1 5.56
11 NS 3C E-1 50 6 33.33
12 NS 4K E+1 -150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,96 %13 NS 2P N = 110 13 72.22
14 NS 4C S+2 480 15 83.33
15 NS 1S W-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
20 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 58,15 %16 NS 3P S-1 -50 9 50.00
17 NS 3S W = -400 6 33.33
18 NS 1S E = -90 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
19 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 58,70 %19 NS 2P W-1 100 2 11.11
20 NS 2S E = -120 2 11.11
21 NS 3S E = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
18 STEED Adrian -GOBBE Amélie : 55,19 %22 NS 1S N = 90 7 38.89
23 NS 2P E-3 300 17 94.44
24 NS 4K E-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
17 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,70 %25 NS 2P E+1 -140 11 61.11
26 NS 6C N = 1430 14 77.78
27 NS 2S N+2 180 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 42,22 %28 NS 4P E+1 -450 3 16.67
29 NS 1S N+1 120 5 27.78
30 NS 4C E = -420 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
15 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,15 %31 NS 4P E+1 -450 2 11.11
32 NS 4C N+2 480 10 55.56
33 NS 4C S = 420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 242,0 / 540 = 44,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 WILLEMS Jacques -RAVET Brigitte
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 42,22 % 1 NS 3T N-1 -50 6 33.33
2 NS 3S W+1 -430 7 38.89
3 NS 1S S+3 180 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 49,81 % 7 NS 4P N+2 680 11 61.11
8 NS 2P S+2 170 3 16.67
9 NS 6C E = -1430 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
13 LAENENS René -CHANTRAINE René : 45,19 %10 NS 1S N = 90 9 50.00
11 NS 3C E-1 50 6 33.33
12 NS 4K E+1 -150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
12 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 55,00 %13 NS 3T N-1 -100 2 11.11
14 NS 3C S+3 230 9 50.00
15 NS 3P S = 140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 35,93 %16 NS 3P S-1 -50 9 50.00
17 NS 3S E+2 -460 1 5.56
18 NS 3C W-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,96 %19 NS 2S S = 120 6 33.33
20 NS 2T E-2 200 16 88.89
21 NS 3S E+2 -460 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
20 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 58,15 %22 NS 1S S = 90 7 38.89
23 NS 3S E = -600 0 0.00
24 NS 4K E-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
19 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 58,70 %25 NS 3P E+1 -170 4 22.22
26 NS 6C N = 1430 14 77.78
27 NS 2S N = 120 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
18 STEED Adrian -GOBBE Amélie : 55,19 %28 NS 4P W+1 -450 3 16.67
29 NS 1S N = 90 0 0.00
30 NS 4P E+2 -480 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
17 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,70 %31 NS 4P W = -420 11 61.11
32 NS 4C N+2 480 10 55.56
33 NS 3P N+2 200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 242,0 / 540 = 44,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
18 STEED Adrian -GOBBE Amélie : 55,19 % 1 NS 2S S = 120 14 77.78
2 NS 2CcS-4 -1100 0 0.00
3 NS 2S N = 120 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
17 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,70 % 4 NS 3S S+1 630 17 94.44
5 NS 3C E = -140 8 44.44
6 NS 4C S-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
15 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,15 %10 NS 4C W-4 400 16 88.89
11 NS 3C E-2 100 12 66.67
12 NS 4K E+1 -150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
14 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 49,81 %13 NS 3P N-1 -100 2 11.11
14 NS 3C S+2 200 5 27.78
15 NS 2P S+1 140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
13 LAENENS René -CHANTRAINE René : 45,19 %16 NS 3K E-2 200 18 100.00
17 NS 3S E-3 150 18 100.00
18 NS 2C W-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 96,30 %
12 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 55,00 %19 NS 4C N = 420 15 83.33
20 NS 1S W-2 200 16 88.89
21 NS 2S E+3 -210 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 35,93 %22 NS 2T E-4 400 18 100.00
23 NS 3S E-2 200 13 72.22
24 NS 4K E-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,96 %25 NS 3P E+1 -170 4 22.22
26 NS 6C N = 1430 14 77.78
27 NS 2S N-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
20 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 58,15 %28 NS 4P W+1 -450 3 16.67
29 NS 2C S+3 200 15 83.33
30 NS 4P E+3 -510 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
19 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 58,70 %31 NS 4P W = -420 11 61.11
32 NS 4C N+2 480 10 55.56
33 NS 4P N+1 450 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 329,0 / 540 = 60,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse
20 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 58,15 % 1 NS 3K S-1 -50 6 33.33
2 NS 3S E+2 -460 3 16.67
3 NS 2K S+2 130 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
19 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 58,70 % 4 NS 3T N+3 170 12 66.67
5 NS 2C W+2 -170 3 16.67
6 NS 4C S-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
18 STEED Adrian -GOBBE Amélie : 55,19 % 7 NS 4P N+1 650 3 16.67
8 NS 3S N+2 460 15 83.33
9 NS 6C E+1 -1460 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 42,22 %13 NS 3S S = 600 18 100.00
14 NS 3C S+2 200 5 27.78
15 NS 3S E-3 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
15 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,15 %16 NS 3P S-1 -50 9 50.00
17 NS 3S W-1 50 11 61.11
18 NS 2C W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
14 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 49,81 %19 NS 2S S+2 180 10 55.56
20 NS 2S W-1 100 8 44.44
21 NS 2P W-1 50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
13 LAENENS René -CHANTRAINE René : 45,19 %22 NS 1S S = 90 7 38.89
23 NS 3S E-1 100 8 44.44
24 NS 4K E-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
12 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 55,00 %25 NS 2P E+1 -140 11 61.11
26 NS 4C S+2 680 4 22.22
27 NS 2S N = 120 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 35,93 %28 NS 4P W = -420 12 66.67
29 NS 2C S+3 200 15 83.33
30 NS 6P E+1 -1010 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,96 %31 NS 4P W = -420 11 61.11
32 NS 4C N+2 480 10 55.56
33 NS 4P N = 420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 277,0 / 540 = 51,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 MASSAUX Joel -CLERIN François-Xavier
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 35,93 % 1 NS 3K S+1 130 16 88.89
2 NS 3T E+3 -170 15 83.33
3 NS 3T E-3 300 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,96 % 4 NS 2C W+1 -140 0 0.00
5 NS 4C W-1 50 15 83.33
6 NS 4C S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
20 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 58,15 % 7 NS 3P N+1 170 0 0.00
8 NS 2P S-1 -50 0 0.00
9 NS 6C E+1 -1460 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
19 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 58,70 %10 NS 2T S = 90 9 50.00
11 NS 3P W-2 100 12 66.67
12 NS 3S W+2 -460 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
17 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,70 %16 NS 3P S-1 -50 9 50.00
17 NS 3S E-1 50 11 61.11
18 NS 2C W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 42,22 %19 NS 2S E-5 500 18 100.00
20 NS 2S E+2 -180 0 0.00
21 NS 3S W = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
15 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,15 %22 NS 1S S = 90 7 38.89
23 NS 3S E-1 100 8 44.44
24 NS 4C N-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
14 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 49,81 %25 NS 3P E+1 -170 4 22.22
26 NS 4C N+2 680 4 22.22
27 NS 2S N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
13 LAENENS René -CHANTRAINE René : 45,19 %28 NS 4P W-1 50 17 94.44
29 NS 3C S+1 170 11 61.11
30 NS 4C W+2 -480 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
12 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 55,00 %31 NS 3S W+1 -430 6 33.33
32 NS 5C N+1 480 10 55.56
33 NS 3C N+2 200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
Total : 236,0 / 540 = 43,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 PADOU Bernard -LERAT Michel
13 LAENENS René -CHANTRAINE René : 45,19 % 1 NS 3T N-1 -50 6 33.33
2 NS 3K W+3 -170 15 83.33
3 NS 3S N-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
12 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 55,00 % 4 NS 3T N+2 150 9 50.00
5 NS 2C W+1 -140 8 44.44
6 NS 4C S-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 35,93 % 7 NS 4PcN+2 1190 18 100.00
8 NS 3S N+2 460 15 83.33
9 NS 4C W+3 -710 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,96 %10 NS 5CcE-2 500 18 100.00
11 NS 2P W = -110 2 11.11
12 NS 3S W+2 -460 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
20 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 58,15 %13 NS 4T N-1 -100 2 11.11
14 NS 3P W-2 100 2 11.11
15 NS 3P S = 140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
18 STEED Adrian -GOBBE Amélie : 55,19 %19 NS 3C N+1 170 8 44.44
20 NS 2S W-1 100 8 44.44
21 NS 3S E+2 -460 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
17 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,70 %22 NS 1S S+1 120 15 83.33
23 NS 1S E+1 -120 4 22.22
24 NS 2P W-3 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 42,22 %25 NS 2C W-1 100 18 100.00
26 NS 6C S = 1430 14 77.78
27 NS 2S N = 120 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
15 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,15 %28 NS 4P W+1 -450 3 16.67
29 NS 4C N+1 650 18 100.00
30 NS 5C E+2 -510 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
14 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 49,81 %31 NS 4P W-1 50 18 100.00
32 NS 4C N+2 480 10 55.56
33 NS 3S N+2 460 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
Total : 314,0 / 540 = 58,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
15 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,15 % 1 NS 3S S-1 -50 6 33.33
2 NS 3S W = -400 10 55.56
3 NS 2S N+1 150 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 49,81 % 4 NS 3S S+1 630 17 94.44
5 NS 4C W-1 50 15 83.33
6 NS 4C S-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
13 LAENENS René -CHANTRAINE René : 45,19 % 7 NS 4P N+2 680 11 61.11
8 NS 4P S+1 450 9 50.00
9 NS 4C E+2 -680 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
12 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 55,00 %10 NS 2P E = -110 5 27.78
11 NS 3CcE-2 300 18 100.00
12 NS 5KcE = -550 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 35,93 %13 NS 1C E = -80 6 33.33
14 NS 2C S+4 230 9 50.00
15 NS 4K W-2 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,96 %16 NS 3P S-1 -50 9 50.00
17 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 22.22
18 NS 2C W = -110 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
19 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 58,70 %22 NS 1S S = 90 7 38.89
23 NS 3P W-3 300 17 94.44
24 NS 2P W = -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
18 STEED Adrian -GOBBE Amélie : 55,19 %25 NS 4K S-1 -50 16 88.89
26 NS 6C S = 1430 14 77.78
27 NS 2S N = 120 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
17 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,70 %28 NS 4P W = -420 12 66.67
29 NS 1S N+1 120 5 27.78
30 NS 4C E+3 -510 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 42,22 %31 NS 4P W = -420 11 61.11
32 NS 4C N+1 450 1 5.56
33 NS 4C S+1 450 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 281,0 / 540 = 52,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
17 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,70 % 1 NS 2S N+1 150 18 100.00
2 NS 3K W+3 -170 15 83.33
3 NS 3S S+1 430 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 42,22 % 4 NS 3T N+1 130 4 22.22
5 NS 3C W+1 -170 3 16.67
6 NS 4C S-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
15 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,15 % 7 NS 4P S+2 680 11 61.11
8 NS 4P S = 420 6 33.33
9 NS 6C E+1 -1460 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
14 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 49,81 %10 NS 2P E+1 -140 1 5.56
11 NS 2P W-1 50 6 33.33
12 NS 4PcN-2 -500 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
13 LAENENS René -CHANTRAINE René : 45,19 %13 NS 3C E-3 300 16 88.89
14 NS 4C S+2 480 15 83.33
15 NS 2P S+1 140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
12 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 55,00 %16 NS 4P S-2 -100 1 5.56
17 NS 3S E+2 -460 1 5.56
18 NS 2C W = -110 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 35,93 %19 NS 4C S-1 -50 0 0.00
20 NS 4C W-2 200 16 88.89
21 NS 2S E = -120 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
20 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 58,15 %25 NS 2P E+1 -140 11 61.11
26 NS 5C N+1 680 4 22.22
27 NS 1S N = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
19 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 58,70 %28 NS 4P W = -420 12 66.67
29 NS 2T N+1 110 2 11.11
30 NS 7CcE = -1770 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
18 STEED Adrian -GOBBE Amélie : 55,19 %31 NS 4P W+1 -450 2 11.11
32 NS 5C N = 450 1 5.56
33 NS 4C S+1 450 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
Total : 231,0 / 540 = 42,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 MAHY Alain -BASECQ Christian
19 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 58,70 % 1 NS 2S S-1 -50 6 33.33
2 NS 3K E+3 -170 15 83.33
3 NS 3S N-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
18 STEED Adrian -GOBBE Amélie : 55,19 % 4 NS 4T N+1 150 9 50.00
5 NS 3KcN-1 -200 0 0.00
6 NS 4C S-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
17 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,70 % 7 NS 4P N+2 680 11 61.11
8 NS 3S N+2 460 15 83.33
9 NS 7C E = -2210 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 42,22 %10 NS 2P E = -110 5 27.78
11 NS 3C E-3 150 16 88.89
12 NS 5K E-1 50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
15 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,15 %13 NS 2K N = 90 9 50.00
14 NS 4C N+2 480 15 83.33
15 NS 4P N-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
14 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 49,81 %16 NS 2P N = 110 16 88.89
17 NS 3S E-1 50 11 61.11
18 NS 2C E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
13 LAENENS René -CHANTRAINE René : 45,19 %19 NS 1K N+2 110 4 22.22
20 NS 1S E-1 100 8 44.44
21 NS 3S W+1 -430 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 55,00 %22 NS 1S N = 90 7 38.89
23 NS 3S E-2 200 13 72.22
24 NS 2C N = 110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,96 %28 NS 3S E+1 -430 8 44.44
29 NS 2C S+2 170 11 61.11
30 NS 4P E+3 -510 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
20 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 58,15 %31 NS 4P W+1 -450 2 11.11
32 NS 4C N+2 480 10 55.56
33 NS 4P N = 420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 261,0 / 540 = 48,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 DELHEZ Jacques -POULAERT Gilbert
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,96 % 1 NS 1S E+2 -150 0 0.00
2 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 38.89
3 NS 3S S-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
20 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 58,15 % 4 NS 4C E-2 200 14 77.78
5 NS 4C E-1 50 15 83.33
6 NS 4C N = 420 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
19 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand : 58,70 % 7 NS 4P N+1 650 3 16.67
8 NS 4P S+1 450 9 50.00
9 NS 6C E+1 -1460 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
18 STEED Adrian -GOBBE Amélie : 55,19 %10 NS 3T S = 110 12 66.67
11 NS 3K S-3 -150 0 0.00
12 NS 5K E = -400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
17 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,70 %13 NS 2K S = 90 9 50.00
14 NS 4C S+2 480 15 83.33
15 NS 3KcW-1 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 42,22 %16 NS 4P S-2 -100 1 5.56
17 NS 3S E-1 50 11 61.11
18 NS 2K E-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
15 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,15 %19 NS 4C N = 420 15 83.33
20 NS 2S W-1 100 8 44.44
21 NS 3S E+2 -460 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
14 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 49,81 %22 NS 1S S-1 -50 0 0.00
23 NS 2S E+1 -150 2 11.11
24 NS 2C N = 110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
13 LAENENS René -CHANTRAINE René : 45,19 %25 NS 4TcN-4 -800 0 0.00
26 NS 4C S+2 680 4 22.22
27 NS 2S N-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 35,93 %31 NS 2P W+1 -140 16 88.89
32 NS 4PcE-2 500 18 100.00
33 NS 4C S+1 450 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
Total : 248,0 / 540 = 45,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane
1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 57,22 % 1 EO 2K S+1 110 6 33.33
2 EO 3S W+2 -460 15 83.33
3 EO 2K S+3 150 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
7 PADOU Bernard -LERAT Michel : 58,15 % 4 EO 3T N+2 150 9 50.00
5 EO 2C W+1 -140 10 55.56
6 EO 4C S-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
2 THYS -GROSFILS Colette : 44,81 % 7 EO 4P N+2 680 7 38.89
8 EO 2P S+2 170 15 83.33
9 EO 6C E+1 -1460 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 52,04 %10 EO 2P E = -110 13 72.22
11 EO 3CcE-2 300 0 0.00
12 EO 5KcE = -550 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
3 WILLEMS Jacques -RAVET Brigitte : 44,81 %13 EO 3T N-1 -100 16 88.89
14 EO 3C S+3 230 9 50.00
15 EO 3P S = 140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 42,78 %16 EO 4P S-2 -100 17 94.44
17 EO 3S E+2 -460 17 94.44
18 EO 2C W = -110 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,93 %19 EO 4C N = 420 3 16.67
20 EO 1S W-2 200 2 11.11
21 EO 2S E+3 -210 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
10 MAHY Alain -BASECQ Christian : 48,33 %22 EO 1S N = 90 11 61.11
23 EO 3S E-2 200 5 27.78
24 EO 2C N = 110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
5 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 51,30 %25 EO 2P E+1 -140 7 38.89
26 EO 4C S+2 680 14 77.78
27 EO 2S N = 120 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
6 MASSAUX Joel -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,70 %31 EO 3S W+1 -430 12 66.67
32 EO 5C N+1 480 8 44.44
33 EO 3C N+2 200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
Total : 297,0 / 540 = 55,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 LAENENS René -CHANTRAINE René
7 PADOU Bernard -LERAT Michel : 58,15 % 1 EO 3T N-1 -50 12 66.67
2 EO 3K W+3 -170 3 16.67
3 EO 3S N-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
2 THYS -GROSFILS Colette : 44,81 % 4 EO 3T N+1 130 14 77.78
5 EO 2C W+1 -140 10 55.56
6 EO 4C S-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 52,04 % 7 EO 4P N+2 680 7 38.89
8 EO 4P S+1 450 9 50.00
9 EO 4C E+2 -680 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
3 WILLEMS Jacques -RAVET Brigitte : 44,81 %10 EO 1S N = 90 9 50.00
11 EO 3C E-1 50 12 66.67
12 EO 4K E+1 -150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 42,78 %13 EO 3C E-3 300 2 11.11
14 EO 4C S+2 480 3 16.67
15 EO 2P S+1 140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,93 %16 EO 3K E-2 200 0 0.00
17 EO 3S E-3 150 0 0.00
18 EO 2C W-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 3,70 %
10 MAHY Alain -BASECQ Christian : 48,33 %19 EO 1K N+2 110 14 77.78
20 EO 1S E-1 100 10 55.56
21 EO 3S W+1 -430 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
5 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 51,30 %22 EO 1S S = 90 11 61.11
23 EO 3S E-1 100 10 55.56
24 EO 4K E-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
11 DELHEZ Jacques -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,93 %25 EO 4TcN-4 -800 18 100.00
26 EO 4C S+2 680 14 77.78
27 EO 2S N-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
6 MASSAUX Joel -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,70 %28 EO 4P W-1 50 1 5.56
29 EO 3C S+1 170 7 38.89
30 EO 4C W+2 -480 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
Total : 244,0 / 540 = 45,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 52,04 % 4 EO 3S S+1 630 1 5.56
5 EO 4C W-1 50 3 16.67
6 EO 4C S-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
3 WILLEMS Jacques -RAVET Brigitte : 44,81 % 7 EO 4P N+2 680 7 38.89
8 EO 2P S+2 170 15 83.33
9 EO 6C E = -1430 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 42,78 %10 EO 2P E+1 -140 17 94.44
11 EO 2P W-1 50 12 66.67
12 EO 4PcN-2 -500 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,93 %13 EO 3P N-1 -100 16 88.89
14 EO 3C S+2 200 13 72.22
15 EO 2P S+1 140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
10 MAHY Alain -BASECQ Christian : 48,33 %16 EO 2P N = 110 2 11.11
17 EO 3S E-1 50 7 38.89
18 EO 2C E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
5 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 51,30 %19 EO 2S S+2 180 8 44.44
20 EO 2S W-1 100 10 55.56
21 EO 2P W-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
11 DELHEZ Jacques -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,93 %22 EO 1S S-1 -50 18 100.00
23 EO 2S E+1 -150 16 88.89
24 EO 2C N = 110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
6 MASSAUX Joel -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,70 %25 EO 3P E+1 -170 14 77.78
26 EO 4C N+2 680 14 77.78
27 EO 2S N-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 57,22 %28 EO 3T E-1 50 1 5.56
29 EO 1S N+2 150 10 55.56
30 EO 5P E+2 -510 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
7 PADOU Bernard -LERAT Michel : 58,15 %31 EO 4P W-1 50 0 0.00
32 EO 4C N+2 480 8 44.44
33 EO 3S N+2 460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
Total : 269,0 / 540 = 49,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 52,04 % 1 EO 3S S-1 -50 12 66.67
2 EO 3S W = -400 8 44.44
3 EO 2S N+1 150 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 42,78 % 7 EO 4P S+2 680 7 38.89
8 EO 4P S = 420 12 66.67
9 EO 6C E+1 -1460 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,93 %10 EO 4C W-4 400 2 11.11
11 EO 3C E-2 100 6 33.33
12 EO 4K E+1 -150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
10 MAHY Alain -BASECQ Christian : 48,33 %13 EO 2K N = 90 9 50.00
14 EO 4C N+2 480 3 16.67
15 EO 4P N-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
5 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 51,30 %16 EO 3P S-1 -50 9 50.00
17 EO 3S W-1 50 7 38.89
18 EO 2C W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
11 DELHEZ Jacques -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,93 %19 EO 4C N = 420 3 16.67
20 EO 2S W-1 100 10 55.56
21 EO 3S E+2 -460 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
6 MASSAUX Joel -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,70 %22 EO 1S S = 90 11 61.11
23 EO 3S E-1 100 10 55.56
24 EO 4C N-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 57,22 %25 EO 3P E = -140 7 38.89
26 EO 4C N+2 680 14 77.78
27 EO 2S N-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
7 PADOU Bernard -LERAT Michel : 58,15 %28 EO 4P W+1 -450 15 83.33
29 EO 4C N+1 650 0 0.00
30 EO 5C E+2 -510 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
2 THYS -GROSFILS Colette : 44,81 %31 EO 4P E+1 -450 16 88.89
32 EO 4C N+2 480 8 44.44
33 EO 4C S = 420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 287,0 / 540 = 53,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard
3 WILLEMS Jacques -RAVET Brigitte : 44,81 % 1 EO 3T N-1 -50 12 66.67
2 EO 3S W+1 -430 11 61.11
3 EO 1S S+3 180 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 42,78 % 4 EO 3T N+1 130 14 77.78
5 EO 3C W+1 -170 15 83.33
6 EO 4C S-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
10 MAHY Alain -BASECQ Christian : 48,33 %10 EO 2P E = -110 13 72.22
11 EO 3C E-3 150 2 11.11
12 EO 5K E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
5 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 51,30 %13 EO 3S S = 600 0 0.00
14 EO 3C S+2 200 13 72.22
15 EO 3S E-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
11 DELHEZ Jacques -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,93 %16 EO 4P S-2 -100 17 94.44
17 EO 3S E-1 50 7 38.89
18 EO 2K E-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
6 MASSAUX Joel -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,70 %19 EO 2S E-5 500 0 0.00
20 EO 2S E+2 -180 18 100.00
21 EO 3S W = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 57,22 %22 EO 1S S+1 120 3 16.67
23 EO 3S E-1 100 10 55.56
24 EO 2C N+1 140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
7 PADOU Bernard -LERAT Michel : 58,15 %25 EO 2C W-1 100 0 0.00
26 EO 6C S = 1430 4 22.22
27 EO 2S N = 120 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
2 THYS -GROSFILS Colette : 44,81 %28 EO 4P E+1 -450 15 83.33
29 EO 1S N+1 120 13 72.22
30 EO 4C E = -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 52,04 %31 EO 4P W = -420 7 38.89
32 EO 4C N+1 450 17 94.44
33 EO 4C S+1 450 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 228,0 / 540 = 42,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 42,78 % 1 EO 2S N+1 150 0 0.00
2 EO 3K W+3 -170 3 16.67
3 EO 3S S+1 430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,93 % 4 EO 3S S+1 630 1 5.56
5 EO 3C E = -140 10 55.56
6 EO 4C S-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
10 MAHY Alain -BASECQ Christian : 48,33 % 7 EO 4P N+2 680 7 38.89
8 EO 3S N+2 460 3 16.67
9 EO 7C E = -2210 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
11 DELHEZ Jacques -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,93 %13 EO 2K S = 90 9 50.00
14 EO 4C S+2 480 3 16.67
15 EO 3KcW-1 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
6 MASSAUX Joel -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,70 %16 EO 3P S-1 -50 9 50.00
17 EO 3S E-1 50 7 38.89
18 EO 2C W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 57,22 %19 EO 2S S+3 210 6 33.33
20 EO 2S W-1 100 10 55.56
21 EO 2S E+2 -180 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
7 PADOU Bernard -LERAT Michel : 58,15 %22 EO 1S S+1 120 3 16.67
23 EO 1S E+1 -120 14 77.78
24 EO 2P W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
2 THYS -GROSFILS Colette : 44,81 %25 EO 2P E+1 -140 7 38.89
26 EO 6C N = 1430 4 22.22
27 EO 2S N+2 180 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 52,04 %28 EO 4P W = -420 6 33.33
29 EO 1S N+1 120 13 72.22
30 EO 4C E+3 -510 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
3 WILLEMS Jacques -RAVET Brigitte : 44,81 %31 EO 4P W = -420 7 38.89
32 EO 4C N+2 480 8 44.44
33 EO 3P N+2 200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 209,0 / 540 = 38,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 STEED Adrian -GOBBE Amélie
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,93 % 1 EO 2S S = 120 4 22.22
2 EO 2CcS-4 -1100 18 100.00
3 EO 2S N = 120 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
10 MAHY Alain -BASECQ Christian : 48,33 % 4 EO 4T N+1 150 9 50.00
5 EO 3KcN-1 -200 18 100.00
6 EO 4C S-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
5 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 51,30 % 7 EO 4P N+1 650 15 83.33
8 EO 3S N+2 460 3 16.67
9 EO 6C E+1 -1460 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
11 DELHEZ Jacques -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,93 %10 EO 3T S = 110 6 33.33
11 EO 3K S-3 -150 18 100.00
12 EO 5K E = -400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 57,22 %16 EO 3P S-1 -50 9 50.00
17 EO 3S W-2 100 2 11.11
18 EO 3C W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
7 PADOU Bernard -LERAT Michel : 58,15 %19 EO 3C N+1 170 10 55.56
20 EO 2S W-1 100 10 55.56
21 EO 3S E+2 -460 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
2 THYS -GROSFILS Colette : 44,81 %22 EO 1S N = 90 11 61.11
23 EO 2P E-3 300 1 5.56
24 EO 4K E-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 52,04 %25 EO 4K S-1 -50 2 11.11
26 EO 6C S = 1430 4 22.22
27 EO 2S N = 120 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
3 WILLEMS Jacques -RAVET Brigitte : 44,81 %28 EO 4P W+1 -450 15 83.33
29 EO 1S N = 90 18 100.00
30 EO 4P E+2 -480 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 42,78 %31 EO 4P W+1 -450 16 88.89
32 EO 5C N = 450 17 94.44
33 EO 4C S+1 450 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
Total : 298,0 / 540 = 55,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 LIBERT Laurent -BRIOT Fernand
10 MAHY Alain -BASECQ Christian : 48,33 % 1 EO 2S S-1 -50 12 66.67
2 EO 3K E+3 -170 3 16.67
3 EO 3S N-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
5 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 51,30 % 4 EO 3T N+3 170 6 33.33
5 EO 2C W+2 -170 15 83.33
6 EO 4C S-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
11 DELHEZ Jacques -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,93 % 7 EO 4P N+1 650 15 83.33
8 EO 4P S+1 450 9 50.00
9 EO 6C E+1 -1460 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
6 MASSAUX Joel -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,70 %10 EO 2T S = 90 9 50.00
11 EO 3P W-2 100 6 33.33
12 EO 3S W+2 -460 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 57,22 %13 EO 2P N = 110 5 27.78
14 EO 3P W-1 50 18 100.00
15 EO 3S E-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
2 THYS -GROSFILS Colette : 44,81 %19 EO 2P W-1 100 16 88.89
20 EO 2S E = -120 16 88.89
21 EO 3S E = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 52,04 %22 EO 1S S = 90 11 61.11
23 EO 3P W-3 300 1 5.56
24 EO 2P W = -110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
3 WILLEMS Jacques -RAVET Brigitte : 44,81 %25 EO 3P E+1 -170 14 77.78
26 EO 6C N = 1430 4 22.22
27 EO 2S N = 120 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 42,78 %28 EO 4P W = -420 6 33.33
29 EO 2T N+1 110 16 88.89
30 EO 7CcE = -1770 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,93 %31 EO 4P W = -420 7 38.89
32 EO 4C N+2 480 8 44.44
33 EO 4P N+1 450 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 317,0 / 540 = 58,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
5 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 51,30 % 1 EO 3K S-1 -50 12 66.67
2 EO 3S E+2 -460 15 83.33
3 EO 2K S+2 130 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
11 DELHEZ Jacques -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,93 % 4 EO 4C E-2 200 4 22.22
5 EO 4C E-1 50 3 16.67
6 EO 4C N = 420 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
6 MASSAUX Joel -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,70 % 7 EO 3P N+1 170 18 100.00
8 EO 2P S-1 -50 18 100.00
9 EO 6C E+1 -1460 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 57,22 %10 EO 2C W-2 200 4 22.22
11 EO 3C E-2 100 6 33.33
12 EO 3K E+2 -150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
7 PADOU Bernard -LERAT Michel : 58,15 %13 EO 4T N-1 -100 16 88.89
14 EO 3P W-2 100 16 88.89
15 EO 3P S = 140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
2 THYS -GROSFILS Colette : 44,81 %16 EO 3P S-1 -50 9 50.00
17 EO 3S W = -400 12 66.67
18 EO 1S E = -90 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
3 WILLEMS Jacques -RAVET Brigitte : 44,81 %22 EO 1S S = 90 11 61.11
23 EO 3S E = -600 18 100.00
24 EO 4K E-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 42,78 %25 EO 2P E+1 -140 7 38.89
26 EO 5C N+1 680 14 77.78
27 EO 1S N = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,93 %28 EO 4P W+1 -450 15 83.33
29 EO 2C S+3 200 3 16.67
30 EO 4P E+3 -510 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
10 MAHY Alain -BASECQ Christian : 48,33 %31 EO 4P W+1 -450 16 88.89
32 EO 4C N+2 480 8 44.44
33 EO 4P N = 420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 314,0 / 540 = 58,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
11 DELHEZ Jacques -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,93 % 1 EO 1S E+2 -150 18 100.00
2 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 61.11
3 EO 3S S-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
6 MASSAUX Joel -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,70 % 4 EO 2C W+1 -140 18 100.00
5 EO 4C W-1 50 3 16.67
6 EO 4C S-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 57,22 % 7 EO 4P N+2 680 7 38.89
8 EO 3S N+2 460 3 16.67
9 EO 6C W+1 -1460 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
7 PADOU Bernard -LERAT Michel : 58,15 %10 EO 5CcE-2 500 0 0.00
11 EO 2P W = -110 16 88.89
12 EO 3S W+2 -460 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
2 THYS -GROSFILS Colette : 44,81 %13 EO 2P N = 110 5 27.78
14 EO 4C S+2 480 3 16.67
15 EO 1S W-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 52,04 %16 EO 3P S-1 -50 9 50.00
17 EO 3S W+1 -430 14 77.78
18 EO 2C W = -110 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
3 WILLEMS Jacques -RAVET Brigitte : 44,81 %19 EO 2S S = 120 12 66.67
20 EO 2T E-2 200 2 11.11
21 EO 3S E+2 -460 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,93 %25 EO 3P E+1 -170 14 77.78
26 EO 6C N = 1430 4 22.22
27 EO 2S N-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
10 MAHY Alain -BASECQ Christian : 48,33 %28 EO 3S E+1 -430 10 55.56
29 EO 2C S+2 170 7 38.89
30 EO 4P E+3 -510 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 51,30 %31 EO 4P W = -420 7 38.89
32 EO 4C N+2 480 8 44.44
33 EO 4P N = 420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 313,0 / 540 = 57,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
6 MASSAUX Joel -CLERIN François-Xavier : 43,70 % 1 EO 3K S+1 130 2 11.11
2 EO 3T E+3 -170 3 16.67
3 EO 3T E-3 300 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 57,22 % 4 EO 4T N = 130 14 77.78
5 EO 4C E-1 50 3 16.67
6 EO 4C S = 420 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
7 PADOU Bernard -LERAT Michel : 58,15 % 7 EO 4PcN+2 1190 0 0.00
8 EO 3S N+2 460 3 16.67
9 EO 4C W+3 -710 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
2 THYS -GROSFILS Colette : 44,81 %10 EO 3P E = -140 17 94.44
11 EO 3C E-1 50 12 66.67
12 EO 4K E+1 -150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 52,04 %13 EO 1C E = -80 12 66.67
14 EO 2C S+4 230 9 50.00
15 EO 4K W-2 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
3 WILLEMS Jacques -RAVET Brigitte : 44,81 %16 EO 3P S-1 -50 9 50.00
17 EO 3S E+2 -460 17 94.44
18 EO 3C W-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 42,78 %19 EO 4C S-1 -50 18 100.00
20 EO 4C W-2 200 2 11.11
21 EO 2S E = -120 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,93 %22 EO 2T E-4 400 0 0.00
23 EO 3S E-2 200 5 27.78
24 EO 4K E-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
5 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 51,30 %28 EO 4P W = -420 6 33.33
29 EO 2C S+3 200 3 16.67
30 EO 6P E+1 -1010 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
11 DELHEZ Jacques -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,93 %31 EO 2P W+1 -140 2 11.11
32 EO 4PcE-2 500 0 0.00
33 EO 4C S+1 450 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
Total : 194,0 / 540 = 35,93 %
|
|