|
Tournoi du 28-09-15
1 62,78 A.6 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette
2 60,37 A.1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
3 58,89 A.9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
4 55,74 A.5 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine
5 50,56 A.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard
6 50,19 A10 MOSSERAY Etienne -ERPICUM Anne
7 47,41 A.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
8 46,11 A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
9 40,93 A.7 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse
10 27,04 A.4 ROEGIERS Marga -MICHAUX
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 59,44 a.4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
2 53,89 a.7 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
3 53,33 a.1 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent
4 49,81 a.2 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
5 49,44 a.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
6 48,89 a.6 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude
7 47,04 a.5 BABIKOW Georges -MATELART Marc
8 46,67 a.3 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
9 46,48 a.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard
10 45,00 a10 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
PAIRE Nr : A.1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
a.1 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 53,33 % 1 NS 3S S+1 430 14 77.78
2 NS 3S E+1 -430 8 44.44
3 NS 3S N+2 460 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.3 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 46,67 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 9 50.00
5 NS 3ScS-5 -1400 0 0.00
6 NS 3C S = 140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.2 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 49,81 % 7 NS 1P E+3 -170 14 77.78
8 NS 3K S+3 170 10 55.56
9 NS 3T E+2 -150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.6 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 48,89 %10 NS 3T S+1 130 16 88.89
11 NS 5PcS-1 -100 13 72.22
12 NS 3S N+1 630 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,89 %13 NS 3P S-2 -200 0 0.00
14 NS 4P E = -420 7 38.89
15 NS 4C S-2 -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
a.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 46,48 %16 NS 3S S+1 430 14 77.78
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 38.89
18 NS 3S W-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,44 %19 NS 3T S-1 -50 4 22.22
20 NS 5CcE-2 500 16 88.89
21 NS 2S W+1 -150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a10 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,00 %22 NS 3ScW-3 800 18 100.00
23 NS 3P W-1 100 13 72.22
24 NS 4PcE-3 500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
a.4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,44 %25 NS 1S S+3 180 14 77.78
26 NS 3T S+2 150 16 88.89
27 NS 3T S+3 170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.5 BABIKOW Georges -MATELART Marc : 47,04 %28 NS 3T S+2 150 14 77.78
29 NS 1S E-2 200 14 77.78
30 NS 3S N-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 326,0 / 540 = 60,37 %
PAIRE Nr : A.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
a.3 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 46,67 % 1 NS 4C N = 420 12 66.67
2 NS 3S W = -400 12 66.67
3 NS 5K N+1 420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.2 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 49,81 % 4 NS 3S W-1 100 18 100.00
5 NS 3C E = -140 4 22.22
6 NS 3C S-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.1 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 53,33 % 7 NS 4P E = -620 7 38.89
8 NS 3S S+1 430 17 94.44
9 NS 3S W+1 -630 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a10 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,00 %10 NS 1C E+1 -110 6 33.33
11 NS 5C E = -450 7 38.89
12 NS 3S N+2 660 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,44 %13 NS 2C W+1 -140 6 33.33
14 NS 5KcE = -550 2 11.11
15 NS 4T N-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
a.5 BABIKOW Georges -MATELART Marc : 47,04 %16 NS 3S S+1 430 14 77.78
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 38.89
18 NS 4P W = -420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.6 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 48,89 %19 NS 2P W-1 100 9 50.00
20 NS 3P N-1 -100 6 33.33
21 NS 4P E+2 -480 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,89 %22 NS 4K E-1 100 2 11.11
23 NS 2P W+1 -140 7 38.89
24 NS 3P E = -140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 46,48 %25 NS 3S S = 400 17 94.44
26 NS 3S N+1 630 18 100.00
27 NS 3P E = -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,44 %28 NS 2P W-2 100 7 38.89
29 NS 1S E-2 200 14 77.78
30 NS 3S N = 400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 256,0 / 540 = 47,41 %
PAIRE Nr : A.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard
a.2 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 49,81 % 1 NS 3K S+1 130 7 38.89
2 NS 3S W+1 -430 8 44.44
3 NS 3S N+2 460 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.1 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 53,33 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 9 50.00
5 NS 4C W-1 50 12 66.67
6 NS 3P E-1 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.3 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 46,67 % 7 NS 3C E = -140 16 88.89
8 NS 3K S+2 150 7 38.89
9 NS 2C E+2 -170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 46,48 %10 NS 2C W = -110 6 33.33
11 NS 5PcS-1 -100 13 72.22
12 NS 3S N+1 630 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,44 %13 NS 2C W = -110 10 55.56
14 NS 4PcE = -590 0 0.00
15 NS 2P E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a10 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,00 %16 NS 3S S+1 430 14 77.78
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 38.89
18 NS 2P W+1 -140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,44 %19 NS 2P E-1 100 9 50.00
20 NS 1S N = 90 8 44.44
21 NS 4P E+2 -480 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.5 BABIKOW Georges -MATELART Marc : 47,04 %22 NS 3S E-3 300 11 61.11
23 NS 3S E-1 100 13 72.22
24 NS 2T N-3 -150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 48,89 %25 NS 2S S+1 150 12 66.67
26 NS 2P E+2 -170 2 11.11
27 NS 3S N+1 430 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,89 %28 NS 2P W-2 100 7 38.89
29 NS 1S E-2 200 14 77.78
30 NS 3S N+1 430 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 273,0 / 540 = 50,56 %
PAIRE Nr : A.4 ROEGIERS Marga -MICHAUX
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,89 % 1 NS 4C N-2 -100 0 0.00
2 NS 4P E+1 -450 4 22.22
3 NS 3S N-2 -100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
a.6 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 48,89 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 9 50.00
5 NS 3C E-1 50 12 66.67
6 NS 3C S-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.5 BABIKOW Georges -MATELART Marc : 47,04 % 7 NS 3S W = -600 11 61.11
8 NS 3K N+1 130 4 22.22
9 NS 1S W+4 -210 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,44 %10 NS 2C E = -110 6 33.33
11 NS 5C E = -450 7 38.89
12 NS 4C N-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a10 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,00 %13 NS 2C W+2 -170 2 11.11
14 NS 4CcS-2 -300 11 61.11
15 NS 3P E-2 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,44 %16 NS 2K N = 90 0 0.00
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 38.89
18 NS 3S W = -400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 46,48 %19 NS 2S E-1 100 9 50.00
20 NS 5KcS-5 -1400 0 0.00
21 NS 4P E+2 -480 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a.3 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 46,67 %22 NS 3S W-3 300 11 61.11
23 NS 3CcN-2 -500 2 11.11
24 NS 2S W+1 -150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a.2 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 49,81 %25 NS 4P N-3 -150 0 0.00
26 NS 2P E+1 -140 6 33.33
27 NS 3C N-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
a.1 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 53,33 %28 NS 4T N-1 -100 1 5.56
29 NS 3T E = -110 4 22.22
30 NS 2S N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
Total : 146,0 / 540 = 27,04 %
PAIRE Nr : A.5 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine
a.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 46,48 % 1 NS 4C N+1 450 17 94.44
2 NS 4P E-1 50 17 94.44
3 NS 3S N+3 490 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 96,30 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,89 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 9 50.00
5 NS 4CcE-1 100 16 88.89
6 NS 3C S-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.6 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 48,89 % 7 NS 3S W+1 -630 2 11.11
8 NS 3S S = 400 13 72.22
9 NS 1S W+1 -120 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.1 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 53,33 %10 NS 2C E = -110 6 33.33
11 NS 5CcE = -650 2 11.11
12 NS 3S N+1 630 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.5 BABIKOW Georges -MATELART Marc : 47,04 %13 NS 3C W-1 100 14 77.78
14 NS 5CcS-2 -300 11 61.11
15 NS 3P E-2 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
a.4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,44 %16 NS 2K N+1 110 3 16.67
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 38.89
18 NS 3S W-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a10 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,00 %19 NS 4T S-3 -150 0 0.00
20 NS 4TcW-1 200 14 77.78
21 NS 4P E+1 -450 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,44 %22 NS 4KcE-2 500 16 88.89
23 NS 4P W-1 100 13 72.22
24 NS 2C N = 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
a.3 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 46,67 %25 NS 3S S-2 -100 2 11.11
26 NS 2P E+1 -140 6 33.33
27 NS 3S N+2 460 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.2 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 49,81 %28 NS 2P W-2 100 7 38.89
29 NS 3P S-2 -200 1 5.56
30 NS 3S N = 400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
Total : 301,0 / 540 = 55,74 %
PAIRE Nr : A.6 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette
a.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,44 % 1 NS 4C N-1 -50 3 16.67
2 NS 4P E-1 50 17 94.44
3 NS 3C S-2 -100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 46,48 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 9 50.00
5 NS 4C E-1 50 12 66.67
6 NS 3C S = 140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,89 % 7 NS 4P E = -620 7 38.89
8 NS 5K S = 400 13 72.22
9 NS 3S E-1 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a.2 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 49,81 %10 NS 2C E = -110 6 33.33
11 NS 5PcS-1 -100 13 72.22
12 NS 3S S+1 630 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.1 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 53,33 %13 NS 3C W-1 100 14 77.78
14 NS 4P E = -420 7 38.89
15 NS 3P E-2 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.6 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 48,89 %16 NS 3S S = 400 7 38.89
17 NS 3S E-1 50 17 94.44
18 NS 3S W-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.5 BABIKOW Georges -MATELART Marc : 47,04 %19 NS 3P E-3 300 17 94.44
20 NS 2P S = 110 10 55.56
21 NS 4P E+2 -480 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,44 %22 NS 3S W-3 300 11 61.11
23 NS 2S E-1 100 13 72.22
24 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a10 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,00 %25 NS 3S S-1 -50 6 33.33
26 NS 2P E = -110 12 66.67
27 NS 3S S+3 490 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.3 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 46,67 %28 NS 3PcW-3 500 17 94.44
29 NS 1S E-2 200 14 77.78
30 NS 3S N+2 460 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
Total : 339,0 / 540 = 62,78 %
PAIRE Nr : A.7 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse
a10 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,00 % 1 NS 5K S-1 -50 3 16.67
2 NS 2S E+2 -180 14 77.78
3 NS 5K N-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,44 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 9 50.00
5 NS 4T N+1 150 18 100.00
6 NS 3C S = 140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 46,48 % 7 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 11.11
8 NS 3K N+2 150 7 38.89
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
a.3 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 46,67 %10 NS 2C E = -110 6 33.33
11 NS 5PcS-1 -100 13 72.22
12 NS 3S N+2 660 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.2 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 49,81 %13 NS 4K S = 130 18 100.00
14 NS 4P E+1 -450 4 22.22
15 NS 4K N-2 -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.1 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 53,33 %16 NS 3K N = 110 3 16.67
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 38.89
18 NS 4P W = -420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,89 %19 NS 3P W-1 100 9 50.00
20 NS 4P N-2 -200 2 11.11
21 NS 6P E = -980 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
a.6 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 48,89 %22 NS 3S W-2 200 5 27.78
23 NS 4P W = -620 0 0.00
24 NS 2P W = -110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.5 BABIKOW Georges -MATELART Marc : 47,04 %25 NS 3K N-1 -50 6 33.33
26 NS 2P E+1 -140 6 33.33
27 NS 3S N+2 460 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,44 %28 NS 3C S = 140 12 66.67
29 NS 2PcS-1 -200 1 5.56
30 NS 3S N = 400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 221,0 / 540 = 40,93 %
PAIRE Nr : A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
a.4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,44 % 1 NS 3K S+2 150 10 55.56
2 NS 3S W+3 -490 2 11.11
3 NS 5K N-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a10 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,00 % 4 NS 4C E = -620 0 0.00
5 NS 3C E = -140 4 22.22
6 NS 2C S+1 140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,44 % 7 NS 3S W-1 100 18 100.00
8 NS 3T E-1 50 0 0.00
9 NS 2S E+1 -150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.5 BABIKOW Georges -MATELART Marc : 47,04 %10 NS 1S N-1 -100 14 77.78
11 NS 5CcE = -650 2 11.11
12 NS 3S N+1 630 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.3 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 46,67 %13 NS 3C W = -140 6 33.33
14 NS 4C N+1 450 17 94.44
15 NS 3P E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.2 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 49,81 %16 NS 3S S = 400 7 38.89
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 38.89
18 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
a.1 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 53,33 %19 NS 3P E-3 300 17 94.44
20 NS 2S N = 120 12 66.67
21 NS 4P E+2 -480 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 46,48 %22 NS 4P W-2 200 5 27.78
23 NS 2S E+2 -180 4 22.22
24 NS 2P W+1 -140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,89 %25 NS 3P N-1 -50 6 33.33
26 NS 2P E = -110 12 66.67
27 NS 3S N+1 430 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.6 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 48,89 %28 NS 3PcW-3 500 17 94.44
29 NS 1S E-1 100 6 33.33
30 NS 3S N+1 430 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 249,0 / 540 = 46,11 %
PAIRE Nr : A.9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
a.5 BABIKOW Georges -MATELART Marc : 47,04 % 1 NS 5C N = 450 17 94.44
2 NS 2CcN-2 -500 0 0.00
3 NS 3S N+1 430 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,44 % 4 NS 3S E = -600 9 50.00
5 NS 3C E = -140 4 22.22
6 NS 1S N-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a10 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,00 % 7 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 11.11
8 NS 3S N+1 430 17 94.44
9 NS 1S E+2 -150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,89 %10 NS 2PcE-2 500 18 100.00
11 NS 4P N-1 -50 18 100.00
12 NS 3S N+1 630 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a.6 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 48,89 %13 NS 3C E-1 100 14 77.78
14 NS 5C N = 450 17 94.44
15 NS 3C N-2 -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.3 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 46,67 %16 NS 3S N+1 430 14 77.78
17 NS 3S E-1 50 17 94.44
18 NS 4P E = -420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.2 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 49,81 %19 NS 2C E-2 200 14 77.78
20 NS 3PcN = 730 18 100.00
21 NS 6P E-1 50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
a.1 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 53,33 %22 NS 4CcN-1 -100 0 0.00
23 NS 3P E = -140 7 38.89
24 NS 3P E-3 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,44 %25 NS 3S N = 400 17 94.44
26 NS 1P N-2 -200 0 0.00
27 NS 3S N+2 460 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 46,48 %28 NS 3S N-1 -100 1 5.56
29 NS 2P N+2 170 8 44.44
30 NS 3S N+2 460 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 318,0 / 540 = 58,89 %
PAIRE Nr : A10 MOSSERAY Etienne -ERPICUM Anne
a.6 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 48,89 % 1 NS 4T S = 130 7 38.89
2 NS 3S W+1 -430 8 44.44
3 NS 3C S-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.5 BABIKOW Georges -MATELART Marc : 47,04 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 9 50.00
5 NS 5T N-1 -100 8 44.44
6 NS 3C S = 140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,44 % 7 NS 3S W = -600 11 61.11
8 NS 5C E-2 100 2 11.11
9 NS 2K W+1 -110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,44 %10 NS 1C E+1 -110 6 33.33
11 NS 5CcE = -650 2 11.11
12 NS 3S N = 600 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
a.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 46,48 %13 NS 2C W+1 -140 6 33.33
14 NS 2C S+1 140 14 77.78
15 NS 3P E-2 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,89 %16 NS 3S S+1 430 14 77.78
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 38.89
18 NS 4P W-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.3 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 46,67 %19 NS 3K S-2 -100 2 11.11
20 NS 2C E+1 -140 4 22.22
21 NS 4P E+2 -480 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.2 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 49,81 %22 NS 4P W-3 300 11 61.11
23 NS 3S E-4 400 18 100.00
24 NS 3S W-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.1 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 53,33 %25 NS 2S S = 120 10 55.56
26 NS 2P E = -110 12 66.67
27 NS 3S N+1 430 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a10 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,00 %28 NS 2P W-2 100 7 38.89
29 NS 1S E-2 200 14 77.78
30 NS 1S N+2 150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 271,0 / 540 = 50,19 %
PAIRE Nr : a.1 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent
A.1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 60,37 % 1 EO 3S S+1 430 4 22.22
2 EO 3S E+1 -430 10 55.56
3 EO 3S N+2 460 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,56 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 9 50.00
5 EO 4C W-1 50 6 33.33
6 EO 3P E-1 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,41 % 7 EO 4P E = -620 11 61.11
8 EO 3S S+1 430 1 5.56
9 EO 3S W+1 -630 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.5 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 55,74 %10 EO 2C E = -110 12 66.67
11 EO 5CcE = -650 16 88.89
12 EO 3S N+1 630 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.6 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 62,78 %13 EO 3C W-1 100 4 22.22
14 EO 4P E = -420 11 61.11
15 EO 3P E-2 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.7 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,93 %16 EO 3K N = 110 15 83.33
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 61.11
18 EO 4P W = -420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,11 %19 EO 3P E-3 300 1 5.56
20 EO 2S N = 120 6 33.33
21 EO 4P E+2 -480 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,89 %22 EO 4CcN-1 -100 18 100.00
23 EO 3P E = -140 11 61.11
24 EO 3P E-3 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A10 MOSSERAY Etienne -ERPICUM Anne : 50,19 %25 EO 2S S = 120 8 44.44
26 EO 2P E = -110 6 33.33
27 EO 3S N+1 430 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.4 ROEGIERS Marga -MICHAUX : 27,04 %28 EO 4T N-1 -100 17 94.44
29 EO 3T E = -110 14 77.78
30 EO 2S N-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
Total : 288,0 / 540 = 53,33 %
PAIRE Nr : a.2 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
A.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,56 % 1 EO 3K S+1 130 11 61.11
2 EO 3S W+1 -430 10 55.56
3 EO 3S N+2 460 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,41 % 4 EO 3S W-1 100 0 0.00
5 EO 3C E = -140 14 77.78
6 EO 3C S-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 60,37 % 7 EO 1P E+3 -170 4 22.22
8 EO 3K S+3 170 8 44.44
9 EO 3T E+2 -150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.6 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 62,78 %10 EO 2C E = -110 12 66.67
11 EO 5PcS-1 -100 5 27.78
12 EO 3S S+1 630 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.7 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,93 %13 EO 4K S = 130 0 0.00
14 EO 4P E+1 -450 14 77.78
15 EO 4K N-2 -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,11 %16 EO 3S S = 400 11 61.11
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 61.11
18 EO 3S W+1 -430 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
A.9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,89 %19 EO 2C E-2 200 4 22.22
20 EO 3PcN = 730 0 0.00
21 EO 6P E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
A10 MOSSERAY Etienne -ERPICUM Anne : 50,19 %22 EO 4P W-3 300 7 38.89
23 EO 3S E-4 400 0 0.00
24 EO 3S W-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.4 ROEGIERS Marga -MICHAUX : 27,04 %25 EO 4P N-3 -150 18 100.00
26 EO 2P E+1 -140 12 66.67
27 EO 3C N-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
A.5 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 55,74 %28 EO 2P W-2 100 11 61.11
29 EO 3P S-2 -200 17 94.44
30 EO 3S N = 400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
Total : 269,0 / 540 = 49,81 %
PAIRE Nr : a.3 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
A.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,41 % 1 EO 4C N = 420 6 33.33
2 EO 3S W = -400 6 33.33
3 EO 5K N+1 420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 60,37 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 9 50.00
5 EO 3ScS-5 -1400 18 100.00
6 EO 3C S = 140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,56 % 7 EO 3C E = -140 2 11.11
8 EO 3K S+2 150 11 61.11
9 EO 2C E+2 -170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.7 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,93 %10 EO 2C E = -110 12 66.67
11 EO 5PcS-1 -100 5 27.78
12 EO 3S N+2 660 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,11 %13 EO 3C W = -140 12 66.67
14 EO 4C N+1 450 1 5.56
15 EO 3P E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,89 %16 EO 3S N+1 430 4 22.22
17 EO 3S E-1 50 1 5.56
18 EO 4P E = -420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A10 MOSSERAY Etienne -ERPICUM Anne : 50,19 %19 EO 3K S-2 -100 16 88.89
20 EO 2C E+1 -140 14 77.78
21 EO 4P E+2 -480 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A.4 ROEGIERS Marga -MICHAUX : 27,04 %22 EO 3S W-3 300 7 38.89
23 EO 3CcN-2 -500 16 88.89
24 EO 2S W+1 -150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.5 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 55,74 %25 EO 3S S-2 -100 16 88.89
26 EO 2P E+1 -140 12 66.67
27 EO 3S N+2 460 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.6 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 62,78 %28 EO 3PcW-3 500 1 5.56
29 EO 1S E-2 200 4 22.22
30 EO 3S N+2 460 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
Total : 252,0 / 540 = 46,67 %
PAIRE Nr : a.4 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,11 % 1 EO 3K S+2 150 8 44.44
2 EO 3S W+3 -490 16 88.89
3 EO 5K N-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,89 % 4 EO 3S E = -600 9 50.00
5 EO 3C E = -140 14 77.78
6 EO 1S N-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A10 MOSSERAY Etienne -ERPICUM Anne : 50,19 % 7 EO 3S W = -600 7 38.89
8 EO 5C E-2 100 16 88.89
9 EO 2K W+1 -110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.4 ROEGIERS Marga -MICHAUX : 27,04 %10 EO 2C E = -110 12 66.67
11 EO 5C E = -450 11 61.11
12 EO 4C N-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,41 %13 EO 2C W+1 -140 12 66.67
14 EO 5KcE = -550 16 88.89
15 EO 4T N-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
A.5 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 55,74 %16 EO 2K N+1 110 15 83.33
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 61.11
18 EO 3S W-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,56 %19 EO 2P E-1 100 9 50.00
20 EO 1S N = 90 10 55.56
21 EO 4P E+2 -480 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.6 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 62,78 %22 EO 3S W-3 300 7 38.89
23 EO 2S E-1 100 5 27.78
24 EO 3S W+1 -430 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 60,37 %25 EO 1S S+3 180 4 22.22
26 EO 3T S+2 150 2 11.11
27 EO 3T S+3 170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.7 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,93 %28 EO 3C S = 140 6 33.33
29 EO 2PcS-1 -200 17 94.44
30 EO 3S N = 400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 321,0 / 540 = 59,44 %
PAIRE Nr : a.5 BABIKOW Georges -MATELART Marc
A.9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,89 % 1 EO 5C N = 450 1 5.56
2 EO 2CcN-2 -500 18 100.00
3 EO 3S N+1 430 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A10 MOSSERAY Etienne -ERPICUM Anne : 50,19 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 9 50.00
5 EO 5T N-1 -100 10 55.56
6 EO 3C S = 140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.4 ROEGIERS Marga -MICHAUX : 27,04 % 7 EO 3S W = -600 7 38.89
8 EO 3K N+1 130 14 77.78
9 EO 1S W+4 -210 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,11 %10 EO 1S N-1 -100 4 22.22
11 EO 5CcE = -650 16 88.89
12 EO 3S N+1 630 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.5 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 55,74 %13 EO 3C W-1 100 4 22.22
14 EO 5CcS-2 -300 7 38.89
15 EO 3P E-2 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
A.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,41 %16 EO 3S S+1 430 4 22.22
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 61.11
18 EO 4P W = -420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.6 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 62,78 %19 EO 3P E-3 300 1 5.56
20 EO 2P S = 110 8 44.44
21 EO 4P E+2 -480 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,56 %22 EO 3S E-3 300 7 38.89
23 EO 3S E-1 100 5 27.78
24 EO 2T N-3 -150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.7 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,93 %25 EO 3K N-1 -50 12 66.67
26 EO 2P E+1 -140 12 66.67
27 EO 3S N+2 460 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 60,37 %28 EO 3T S+2 150 4 22.22
29 EO 1S E-2 200 4 22.22
30 EO 3S N-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 254,0 / 540 = 47,04 %
PAIRE Nr : a.6 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude
A10 MOSSERAY Etienne -ERPICUM Anne : 50,19 % 1 EO 4T S = 130 11 61.11
2 EO 3S W+1 -430 10 55.56
3 EO 3C S-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.4 ROEGIERS Marga -MICHAUX : 27,04 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 9 50.00
5 EO 3C E-1 50 6 33.33
6 EO 3C S-3 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.5 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 55,74 % 7 EO 3S W+1 -630 16 88.89
8 EO 3S S = 400 5 27.78
9 EO 1S W+1 -120 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 60,37 %10 EO 3T S+1 130 2 11.11
11 EO 5PcS-1 -100 5 27.78
12 EO 3S N+1 630 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,89 %13 EO 3C E-1 100 4 22.22
14 EO 5C N = 450 1 5.56
15 EO 3C N-2 -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.6 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 62,78 %16 EO 3S S = 400 11 61.11
17 EO 3S E-1 50 1 5.56
18 EO 3S W-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,41 %19 EO 2P W-1 100 9 50.00
20 EO 3P N-1 -100 12 66.67
21 EO 4P E+2 -480 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.7 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,93 %22 EO 3S W-2 200 13 72.22
23 EO 4P W = -620 18 100.00
24 EO 2P W = -110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,56 %25 EO 2S S+1 150 6 33.33
26 EO 2P E+2 -170 16 88.89
27 EO 3S N+1 430 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,11 %28 EO 3PcW-3 500 1 5.56
29 EO 1S E-1 100 12 66.67
30 EO 3S N+1 430 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 264,0 / 540 = 48,89 %
PAIRE Nr : a.7 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
A.4 ROEGIERS Marga -MICHAUX : 27,04 % 1 EO 4C N-2 -100 18 100.00
2 EO 4P E+1 -450 14 77.78
3 EO 3S N-2 -100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
A.5 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 55,74 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 9 50.00
5 EO 4CcE-1 100 2 11.11
6 EO 3C S-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.6 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 62,78 % 7 EO 4P E = -620 11 61.11
8 EO 5K S = 400 5 27.78
9 EO 3S E-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,89 %10 EO 2PcE-2 500 0 0.00
11 EO 4P N-1 -50 0 0.00
12 EO 3S N+1 630 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A.1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 60,37 %13 EO 3P S-2 -200 18 100.00
14 EO 4P E = -420 11 61.11
15 EO 4C S-2 -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
A10 MOSSERAY Etienne -ERPICUM Anne : 50,19 %16 EO 3S S+1 430 4 22.22
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 61.11
18 EO 4P W-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.7 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,93 %19 EO 3P W-1 100 9 50.00
20 EO 4P N-2 -200 16 88.89
21 EO 6P E = -980 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
A.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,41 %22 EO 4K E-1 100 16 88.89
23 EO 2P W+1 -140 11 61.11
24 EO 3P E = -140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,11 %25 EO 3P N-1 -50 12 66.67
26 EO 2P E = -110 6 33.33
27 EO 3S N+1 430 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,56 %28 EO 2P W-2 100 11 61.11
29 EO 1S E-2 200 4 22.22
30 EO 3S N+1 430 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 291,0 / 540 = 53,89 %
PAIRE Nr : a.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard
A.5 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 55,74 % 1 EO 4C N+1 450 1 5.56
2 EO 4P E-1 50 1 5.56
3 EO 3S N+3 490 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 3,70 %
A.6 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 62,78 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 9 50.00
5 EO 4C E-1 50 6 33.33
6 EO 3C S = 140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.7 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,93 % 7 EO 3S E+1 -630 16 88.89
8 EO 3K N+2 150 11 61.11
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
A.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,56 %10 EO 2C W = -110 12 66.67
11 EO 5PcS-1 -100 5 27.78
12 EO 3S N+1 630 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A10 MOSSERAY Etienne -ERPICUM Anne : 50,19 %13 EO 2C W+1 -140 12 66.67
14 EO 2C S+1 140 4 22.22
15 EO 3P E-2 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 60,37 %16 EO 3S S+1 430 4 22.22
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 61.11
18 EO 3S W-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.4 ROEGIERS Marga -MICHAUX : 27,04 %19 EO 2S E-1 100 9 50.00
20 EO 5KcS-5 -1400 18 100.00
21 EO 4P E+2 -480 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,11 %22 EO 4P W-2 200 13 72.22
23 EO 2S E+2 -180 14 77.78
24 EO 2P W+1 -140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,41 %25 EO 3S S = 400 1 5.56
26 EO 3S N+1 630 0 0.00
27 EO 3P E = -140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,89 %28 EO 3S N-1 -100 17 94.44
29 EO 2P N+2 170 10 55.56
30 EO 3S N+2 460 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 251,0 / 540 = 46,48 %
PAIRE Nr : a.9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
A.6 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 62,78 % 1 EO 4C N-1 -50 15 83.33
2 EO 4P E-1 50 1 5.56
3 EO 3C S-2 -100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.7 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,93 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 9 50.00
5 EO 4T N+1 150 0 0.00
6 EO 3C S = 140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,11 % 7 EO 3S W-1 100 0 0.00
8 EO 3T E-1 50 18 100.00
9 EO 2S E+1 -150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A10 MOSSERAY Etienne -ERPICUM Anne : 50,19 %10 EO 1C E+1 -110 12 66.67
11 EO 5CcE = -650 16 88.89
12 EO 3S N = 600 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
A.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,56 %13 EO 2C W = -110 8 44.44
14 EO 4PcE = -590 18 100.00
15 EO 2P E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.4 ROEGIERS Marga -MICHAUX : 27,04 %16 EO 2K N = 90 18 100.00
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 61.11
18 EO 3S W = -400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 60,37 %19 EO 3T S-1 -50 14 77.78
20 EO 5CcE-2 500 2 11.11
21 EO 2S W+1 -150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.5 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 55,74 %22 EO 4KcE-2 500 2 11.11
23 EO 4P W-1 100 5 27.78
24 EO 2C N = 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
A.9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,89 %25 EO 3S N = 400 1 5.56
26 EO 1P N-2 -200 18 100.00
27 EO 3S N+2 460 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,41 %28 EO 2P W-2 100 11 61.11
29 EO 1S E-2 200 4 22.22
30 EO 3S N = 400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 267,0 / 540 = 49,44 %
PAIRE Nr : a10 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
A.7 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,93 % 1 EO 5K S-1 -50 15 83.33
2 EO 2S E+2 -180 4 22.22
3 EO 5K N-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 46,11 % 4 EO 4C E = -620 18 100.00
5 EO 3C E = -140 14 77.78
6 EO 2C S+1 140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.9 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,89 % 7 EO 3S E+1 -630 16 88.89
8 EO 3S N+1 430 1 5.56
9 EO 1S E+2 -150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,41 %10 EO 1C E+1 -110 12 66.67
11 EO 5C E = -450 11 61.11
12 EO 3S N+2 660 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.4 ROEGIERS Marga -MICHAUX : 27,04 %13 EO 2C W+2 -170 16 88.89
14 EO 4CcS-2 -300 7 38.89
15 EO 3P E-2 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,56 %16 EO 3S S+1 430 4 22.22
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 61.11
18 EO 2P W+1 -140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.5 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 55,74 %19 EO 4T S-3 -150 18 100.00
20 EO 4TcW-1 200 4 22.22
21 EO 4P E+1 -450 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 60,37 %22 EO 3ScW-3 800 0 0.00
23 EO 3P W-1 100 5 27.78
24 EO 4PcE-3 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
A.6 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 62,78 %25 EO 3S S-1 -50 12 66.67
26 EO 2P E = -110 6 33.33
27 EO 3S S+3 490 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A10 MOSSERAY Etienne -ERPICUM Anne : 50,19 %28 EO 2P W-2 100 11 61.11
29 EO 1S E-2 200 4 22.22
30 EO 1S N+2 150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 243,0 / 540 = 45,00 %
|
|