|
Tournoi du 28-10-13
1 59,07 1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
2 58,52 7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
3 57,59 6 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent
4 55,74 9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
5 54,63 8 de VIRON Baudouin -PANIS Guy
6 48,70 2 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
7 46,48 11 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita
8 44,81 10 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine
9 42,41 4 DELHEZ Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard
10 41,48 5 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse
11 40,56 3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
12 0,00 12 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 59,47 21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
2 58,23 15 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel
3 57,82 17 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
4 56,79 14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
5 52,59 13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier
6 51,03 16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
7 47,94 19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
8 47,12 24 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy
9 46,71 20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
10 44,24 22 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
11 41,77 18 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
12 37,41 23 VERBOIS Léon -COOLEN Joseph
PAIRE Nr : 1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 52,59 % 1 NS 2T N = 90 14 77.78
2 NS 2P W+2 -170 8 44.44
3 NS 4TcN = 510 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
23 VERBOIS Léon -COOLEN Joseph : 37,41 % 4 NS 4C E+1 -650 8 44.44
5 NS 4C N+1 650 11 61.11
6 NS 2T S+2 130 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
22 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 44,24 % 7 NS 1S E+1 -120 13 72.22
8 NS 2C S+3 200 17 94.44
9 NS 3S N = 400 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 59,47 %10 NS 3S N+2 660 8 44.44
11 NS 3K E = -110 4 22.22
12 NS 3S S+2 660 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,71 %13 NS 3S W-4 400 18 100.00
14 NS 6P N = 980 16 88.89
15 NS 3C W+1 -170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,94 %16 NS 4P S = 420 13 72.22
17 NS 3PcW-2 300 16 88.89
18 NS 2S W = -120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 41,77 %19 NS 3C N = 140 5 27.78
20 NS 4K N+1 150 8 44.44
21 NS 3T W = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
17 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 57,82 %22 NS 4P S+2 480 15 83.33
23 NS 3S W = -600 3 16.67
24 NS 2S W = -120 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,03 %25 NS 4C S = 420 9 50.00
26 NS 4C S = 620 11 61.11
27 NS 3K W-2 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
15 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 58,23 %28 NS 4P E+2 -480 2 11.11
29 NS 2PcN-2 -500 2 11.11
30 NS 3T N = 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 319,0 / 540 = 59,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,79 % 4 NS 4C E+1 -650 8 44.44
5 NS 4C N+1 650 11 61.11
6 NS 3S N-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 52,59 % 7 NS 3K E+1 -130 10 55.56
8 NS 2C S+1 140 5 27.78
9 NS 3S N-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
23 VERBOIS Léon -COOLEN Joseph : 37,41 %10 NS 3S N+4 720 17 94.44
11 NS 2T W = -90 7 38.89
12 NS 3S N = 600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
22 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 44,24 %13 NS 2P E-1 100 10 55.56
14 NS 4P N+2 480 4 22.22
15 NS 3C W = -140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 59,47 %16 NS 4P S = 420 13 72.22
17 NS 3C E = -140 8 44.44
18 NS 2C E = -110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,71 %19 NS 4C N = 420 9 50.00
20 NS 3K N+1 130 3 16.67
21 NS 5K W-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
24 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 47,12 %22 NS 4P N+2 480 15 83.33
23 NS 3S W-1 100 10 55.56
24 NS 2S W-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 41,77 %25 NS 4C S+1 450 15 83.33
26 NS 4C S+1 650 18 100.00
27 NS 2K W-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
17 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 57,82 %28 NS 5S W = -460 4 22.22
29 NS 3C W = -140 4 22.22
30 NS 4T N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,03 %31 NS 6C W-1 50 17 94.44
32 NS 1T S-1 -50 1 5.56
33 NS Pass Passe 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 263,0 / 540 = 48,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
17 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 57,82 % 1 NS 3T N-1 -50 8 44.44
2 NS 3K E = -110 10 55.56
3 NS 2K E+2 -130 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
15 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 58,23 % 7 NS 2C N-3 -300 6 33.33
8 NS 2C S+1 140 5 27.78
9 NS 1S N+2 150 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
24 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 47,12 %10 NS 3S S+1 630 2 11.11
11 NS 5K E-1 50 10 55.56
12 NS 3S S+1 630 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 52,59 %13 NS 2P E-1 100 10 55.56
14 NS 3S S = 400 0 0.00
15 NS 3C E+1 -170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
23 VERBOIS Léon -COOLEN Joseph : 37,41 %16 NS 4P S = 420 13 72.22
17 NS 4C E-2 100 14 77.78
18 NS 2C E-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
22 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 44,24 %19 NS 4C N = 420 9 50.00
20 NS 3S N-1 -100 0 0.00
21 NS 4K W = -130 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 59,47 %22 NS 3C W-2 200 2 11.11
23 NS 3S W+1 -630 0 0.00
24 NS 2P E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,71 %25 NS 4C S = 420 9 50.00
26 NS 4C S = 620 11 61.11
27 NS 3K W = -110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,94 %28 NS 6K W = -920 0 0.00
29 NS 3C W-2 200 12 66.67
30 NS 3T N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 41,77 %31 NS 6C W-1 50 17 94.44
32 NS 1P S+2 140 14 77.78
33 NS 3P N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 219,0 / 540 = 40,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 DELHEZ Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,94 % 1 NS 3T N-1 -50 8 44.44
2 NS 3S W = -400 5 27.78
3 NS 3T N = 110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 41,77 % 4 NS 4C E+1 -650 8 44.44
5 NS 4C N = 620 2 11.11
6 NS 3T S = 110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,03 %10 NS 3S N+3 690 13 72.22
11 NS 4C E-2 100 14 77.78
12 NS 3K N+1 130 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
15 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 58,23 %13 NS Pass Passe 2 11.11
14 NS 3S S+3 490 11 61.11
15 NS 2C W+2 -170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,79 %16 NS 4C E = -620 0 0.00
17 NS 3C E+1 -170 6 33.33
18 NS 2S W+3 -210 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 52,59 %19 NS 3C N = 140 5 27.78
20 NS 2T S+4 170 13 72.22
21 NS 5T W-2 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
23 VERBOIS Léon -COOLEN Joseph : 37,41 %22 NS 2P S+4 230 7 38.89
23 NS 3S W-1 100 10 55.56
24 NS 2P E-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
22 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 44,24 %25 NS 4PcE-2 500 18 100.00
26 NS 3C S-1 -100 1 5.56
27 NS 2K W-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 59,47 %28 NS 2K N-2 -200 10 55.56
29 NS 1P N-1 -100 7 38.89
30 NS 2C E = -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
24 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 47,12 %31 NS 6C W = -980 1 5.56
32 NS 1P S+3 170 16 88.89
33 NS 3S E-2 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 229,0 / 540 = 42,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 59,47 % 1 NS 5TcN-3 -500 1 5.56
2 NS 5K E-2 100 18 100.00
3 NS 3K W+1 -130 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,71 % 4 NS 4C E+1 -650 8 44.44
5 NS 4C N = 620 2 11.11
6 NS 3S S-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,94 % 7 NS 3K E = -110 16 88.89
8 NS 2C S = 110 0 0.00
9 NS 2S N = 120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
17 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 57,82 %13 NS 2P E-1 100 10 55.56
14 NS 3S S+3 490 11 61.11
15 NS 3C W+1 -170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,03 %16 NS 3P S+1 170 6 33.33
17 NS 3P W-1 50 11 61.11
18 NS 3PcS-3 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
24 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 47,12 %19 NS 4C N-1 -50 1 5.56
20 NS 4T N = 130 3 16.67
21 NS 4K W = -130 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,79 %22 NS 2P S+3 200 2 11.11
23 NS 3S W-1 100 10 55.56
24 NS 2P E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 52,59 %25 NS 4C S-1 -50 1 5.56
26 NS 4C S = 620 11 61.11
27 NS 2K W-2 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
23 VERBOIS Léon -COOLEN Joseph : 37,41 %28 NS 4P E-3 150 17 94.44
29 NS 2P N-1 -100 7 38.89
30 NS 3C E-2 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
22 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 44,24 %31 NS 4C W+2 -480 9 50.00
32 NS 2S S = 120 10 55.56
33 NS 4P N = 420 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 224,0 / 540 = 41,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent
23 VERBOIS Léon -COOLEN Joseph : 37,41 % 1 NS 2P E = -110 4 22.22
2 NS 3K W-1 50 14 77.78
3 NS 3S N = 400 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
22 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 44,24 % 4 NS 3S W+1 -630 18 100.00
5 NS 4C N+2 680 18 100.00
6 NS 3S S-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
24 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 47,12 % 7 NS 2S E = -120 13 72.22
8 NS 2P S+2 170 12 66.67
9 NS 3S N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,71 %10 NS 3S S+3 690 13 72.22
11 NS 3C W-2 100 14 77.78
12 NS 3S S = 600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 41,77 %16 NS 4P N = 420 13 72.22
17 NS 3S N-5 -250 4 22.22
18 NS 2S W = -120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
17 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 57,82 %19 NS 4C N+1 450 13 72.22
20 NS 2T N+4 170 13 72.22
21 NS 4P N+1 650 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,03 %22 NS 4P S+2 480 15 83.33
23 NS 3S W = -600 3 16.67
24 NS 3T S-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
15 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 58,23 %25 NS 4C S-1 -50 1 5.56
26 NS 4C S = 620 11 61.11
27 NS 2S N+1 150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,79 %28 NS 3S W = -400 7 38.89
29 NS 4PcN-3 -800 0 0.00
30 NS 2S N = 120 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 52,59 %31 NS 4C W+2 -480 9 50.00
32 NS 2S S = 120 10 55.56
33 NS 3P N+1 170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 311,0 / 540 = 57,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,79 % 1 NS 4C W-1 50 12 66.67
2 NS 3S W-1 50 14 77.78
3 NS 3K W = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 52,59 % 4 NS 4C E+1 -650 8 44.44
5 NS 4C N+1 650 11 61.11
6 NS 3S N-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
23 VERBOIS Léon -COOLEN Joseph : 37,41 % 7 NS 3K E-2 200 18 100.00
8 NS 2C S+2 170 12 66.67
9 NS 3S N-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
22 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 44,24 %10 NS 3S N+4 720 17 94.44
11 NS 2S W-3 150 18 100.00
12 NS 3S S = 600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 59,47 %13 NS 2P E-1 100 10 55.56
14 NS 3S S+3 490 11 61.11
15 NS 1ScN-2 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,94 %19 NS 4C N+2 480 16 88.89
20 NS 3S S+2 660 18 100.00
21 NS 5KcW-1 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 41,77 %22 NS 2CcW-1 200 2 11.11
23 NS 4P E-2 200 17 94.44
24 NS 2P E-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
17 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 57,82 %25 NS 4C S = 420 9 50.00
26 NS 4C S = 620 11 61.11
27 NS 2K W = -90 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
24 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 47,12 %28 NS 1S W+1 -120 13 72.22
29 NS 4C W-3 300 16 88.89
30 NS 3CcE-1 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
15 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 58,23 %31 NS 4C W+2 -480 9 50.00
32 NS 1T S-1 -50 1 5.56
33 NS 4P N = 420 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 316,0 / 540 = 58,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 de VIRON Baudouin -PANIS Guy
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,03 % 1 NS 4C W-2 100 16 88.89
2 NS 3S E = -400 5 27.78
3 NS 3K W+1 -130 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
15 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 58,23 % 4 NS 4C E+1 -650 8 44.44
5 NS 4C N = 620 2 11.11
6 NS 2T S+2 130 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,79 % 7 NS 3S W = -600 2 11.11
8 NS 2C S+1 140 5 27.78
9 NS 2S N+1 150 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 52,59 %10 NS 3S S+1 630 2 11.11
11 NS 4K E-2 100 14 77.78
12 NS 3S S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
23 VERBOIS Léon -COOLEN Joseph : 37,41 %13 NS 2CcW = -670 0 0.00
14 NS 3S S+3 490 11 61.11
15 NS 2C W+2 -170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
24 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 47,12 %16 NS 4P S = 420 13 72.22
17 NS 4CcE = -590 0 0.00
18 NS 3C E-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,71 %22 NS 4P S+2 480 15 83.33
23 NS 4P E-2 200 17 94.44
24 NS 2P E-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,94 %25 NS 4C S+1 450 15 83.33
26 NS 4C S = 620 11 61.11
27 NS 2S N+1 150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 41,77 %28 NS 2S W-3 150 17 94.44
29 NS 4C W-3 300 16 88.89
30 NS 1S N+1 120 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
17 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 57,82 %31 NS 6C W = -980 1 5.56
32 NS 2S S = 120 10 55.56
33 NS 4PcN-1 420 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 295,0 / 540 = 54,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
18 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 41,77 % 1 NS 3T N = 110 18 100.00
2 NS 3S E+1 -430 1 5.56
3 NS 5KcW-1 200 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
24 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 47,12 % 4 NS 4C E+1 -650 8 44.44
5 NS 4C N+1 650 11 61.11
6 NS 2T S+1 110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,03 % 7 NS 3S E = -600 2 11.11
8 NS 2C S+3 200 17 94.44
9 NS 3S N+1 430 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
15 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 58,23 %10 NS 3S S+2 660 8 44.44
11 NS 2K E = -90 7 38.89
12 NS 3S S = 600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,79 %13 NS 2P E-1 100 10 55.56
14 NS 6S S = 990 18 100.00
15 NS 2C W+1 -140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 52,59 %16 NS 4C E-1 100 3 16.67
17 NS 3S N+1 430 18 100.00
18 NS 2S W = -120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
23 VERBOIS Léon -COOLEN Joseph : 37,41 %19 NS 4PcE-3 800 18 100.00
20 NS 2T N+3 150 8 44.44
21 NS 5TcW-2 300 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 59,47 %25 NS 2S N+4 240 4 22.22
26 NS 3S N = 600 4 22.22
27 NS 2S N-4 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,71 %28 NS 2S W = -120 13 72.22
29 NS 4C E-3 300 16 88.89
30 NS 3T N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,94 %31 NS 4C W+2 -480 9 50.00
32 NS 1T S = 70 4 22.22
33 NS 3P N+1 170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 301,0 / 540 = 55,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,71 % 1 NS 5TcN-3 -500 1 5.56
2 NS 3S E-1 50 14 77.78
3 NS 5K W-1 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,94 % 4 NS 4C E+1 -650 8 44.44
5 NS 4C N+1 650 11 61.11
6 NS 3S N-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 41,77 % 7 NS 2S E+1 -150 8 44.44
8 NS 2C S+1 140 5 27.78
9 NS 3S N = 400 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
17 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 57,82 %10 NS 3S S+1 630 2 11.11
11 NS 3S E = -400 0 0.00
12 NS 3S S = 600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,03 %13 NS 2P E-1 100 10 55.56
14 NS 4P N+2 480 4 22.22
15 NS 3C W = -140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
15 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 58,23 %16 NS 5K W-1 100 3 16.67
17 NS 4C E-1 50 11 61.11
18 NS 3KcW = -470 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,79 %19 NS 4C N+1 450 13 72.22
20 NS 2T N+3 150 8 44.44
21 NS 3K W+1 -130 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 52,59 %22 NS 3S N+2 460 10 55.56
23 NS 3S W-1 100 10 55.56
24 NS 2PcE-2 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
22 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 44,24 %28 NS 3S W = -400 7 38.89
29 NS 3C W-1 100 10 55.56
30 NS 2S N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 59,47 %31 NS 4C W+2 -480 9 50.00
32 NS 2T W-1 100 6 33.33
33 NS 4P N = 420 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 242,0 / 540 = 44,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita
22 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 44,24 % 1 NS 3T N-1 -50 8 44.44
2 NS 3S E+1 -430 1 5.56
3 NS 4T N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 59,47 % 4 NS 4C W+1 -650 8 44.44
5 NS 4C N+1 650 11 61.11
6 NS 3S N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,71 % 7 NS 3S E = -600 2 11.11
8 NS 2C S+2 170 12 66.67
9 NS 2S N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,94 %10 NS 3S N+2 660 8 44.44
11 NS 4T W = -130 2 11.11
12 NS 3S S = 600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
24 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 47,12 %13 NS 2P E-1 100 10 55.56
14 NS 4P N+2 480 4 22.22
15 NS 2S E-1 50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
17 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 57,82 %16 NS 4P S = 420 13 72.22
17 NS 5TcS-2 -300 2 11.11
18 NS 2PcS-1 -200 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,03 %19 NS 4C N-1 -50 1 5.56
20 NS 3S N+1 630 16 88.89
21 NS 4P N+1 650 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
15 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 58,23 %22 NS 2P S+4 230 7 38.89
23 NS 4P E-1 100 10 55.56
24 NS 3K W-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,79 %25 NS 4C S = 420 9 50.00
26 NS 4C S-1 -100 1 5.56
27 NS 3K W-2 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
23 VERBOIS Léon -COOLEN Joseph : 37,41 %31 NS 4C W+2 -480 9 50.00
32 NS 4P S = 420 18 100.00
33 NS 2P N+3 200 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
Total : 251,0 / 540 = 46,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 -
24 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 47,12 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 57,82 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 59,47 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,79 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 41,77 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
22 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 44,24 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
15 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 58,23 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,94 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,03 %28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,71 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 594 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 59,07 % 1 EO 2T N = 90 4 22.22
2 EO 2P W+2 -170 10 55.56
3 EO 4TcN = 510 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,52 % 4 EO 4C E+1 -650 10 55.56
5 EO 4C N+1 650 7 38.89
6 EO 3S N-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
2 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,70 % 7 EO 3K E+1 -130 8 44.44
8 EO 2C S+1 140 13 72.22
9 EO 3S N-3 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -PANIS Guy : 54,63 %10 EO 3S S+1 630 16 88.89
11 EO 4K E-2 100 4 22.22
12 EO 3S S-2 -200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,56 %13 EO 2P E-1 100 8 44.44
14 EO 3S S = 400 18 100.00
15 EO 3C E+1 -170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,74 %16 EO 4C E-1 100 15 83.33
17 EO 3S N+1 430 0 0.00
18 EO 2S W = -120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
4 DELHEZ Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,41 %19 EO 3C N = 140 13 72.22
20 EO 2T S+4 170 5 27.78
21 EO 5T W-2 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
10 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,81 %22 EO 3S N+2 460 8 44.44
23 EO 3S W-1 100 8 44.44
24 EO 2PcE-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
5 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,48 %25 EO 4C S-1 -50 17 94.44
26 EO 4C S = 620 7 38.89
27 EO 2K W-2 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
6 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 57,59 %31 EO 4C W+2 -480 9 50.00
32 EO 2S S = 120 8 44.44
33 EO 3P N+1 170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 284,0 / 540 = 52,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,52 % 1 EO 4C W-1 50 6 33.33
2 EO 3S W-1 50 4 22.22
3 EO 3K W = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
2 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,70 % 4 EO 4C E+1 -650 10 55.56
5 EO 4C N+1 650 7 38.89
6 EO 3S N-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -PANIS Guy : 54,63 % 7 EO 3S W = -600 16 88.89
8 EO 2C S+1 140 13 72.22
9 EO 2S N+1 150 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
12 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,74 %13 EO 2P E-1 100 8 44.44
14 EO 6S S = 990 0 0.00
15 EO 2C W+1 -140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
4 DELHEZ Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,41 %16 EO 4C E = -620 18 100.00
17 EO 3C E+1 -170 12 66.67
18 EO 2S W+3 -210 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
10 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,81 %19 EO 4C N+1 450 5 27.78
20 EO 2T N+3 150 10 55.56
21 EO 3K W+1 -130 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
5 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,48 %22 EO 2P S+3 200 16 88.89
23 EO 3S W-1 100 8 44.44
24 EO 2P E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
11 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 46,48 %25 EO 4C S = 420 9 50.00
26 EO 4C S-1 -100 17 94.44
27 EO 3K W-2 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
6 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 57,59 %28 EO 3S W = -400 11 61.11
29 EO 4PcN-3 -800 18 100.00
30 EO 2S N = 120 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 276,0 / 486 = 56,79 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel
8 de VIRON Baudouin -PANIS Guy : 54,63 % 4 EO 4C E+1 -650 10 55.56
5 EO 4C N = 620 16 88.89
6 EO 2T S+2 130 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,56 % 7 EO 2C N-3 -300 12 66.67
8 EO 2C S+1 140 13 72.22
9 EO 1S N+2 150 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,74 %10 EO 3S S+2 660 10 55.56
11 EO 2K E = -90 11 61.11
12 EO 3S S = 600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
4 DELHEZ Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,41 %13 EO Pass Passe 16 88.89
14 EO 3S S+3 490 7 38.89
15 EO 2C W+2 -170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
10 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,81 %16 EO 5K W-1 100 15 83.33
17 EO 4C E-1 50 7 38.89
18 EO 3KcW = -470 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
12 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
11 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 46,48 %22 EO 2P S+4 230 11 61.11
23 EO 4P E-1 100 8 44.44
24 EO 3K W-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
6 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 57,59 %25 EO 4C S-1 -50 17 94.44
26 EO 4C S = 620 7 38.89
27 EO 2S N+1 150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 59,07 %28 EO 4P E+2 -480 16 88.89
29 EO 2PcN-2 -500 16 88.89
30 EO 3T N = 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,52 %31 EO 4C W+2 -480 9 50.00
32 EO 1T S-1 -50 17 94.44
33 EO 4P N = 420 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 283,0 / 486 = 58,23 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
8 de VIRON Baudouin -PANIS Guy : 54,63 % 1 EO 4C W-2 100 2 11.11
2 EO 3S E = -400 13 72.22
3 EO 3K W+1 -130 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,74 % 7 EO 3S E = -600 16 88.89
8 EO 2C S+3 200 1 5.56
9 EO 3S N+1 430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
4 DELHEZ Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,41 %10 EO 3S N+3 690 5 27.78
11 EO 4C E-2 100 4 22.22
12 EO 3K N+1 130 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
10 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,81 %13 EO 2P E-1 100 8 44.44
14 EO 4P N+2 480 14 77.78
15 EO 3C W = -140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
5 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,48 %16 EO 3P S+1 170 12 66.67
17 EO 3P W-1 50 7 38.89
18 EO 3PcS-3 -800 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
11 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 46,48 %19 EO 4C N-1 -50 17 94.44
20 EO 3S N+1 630 2 11.11
21 EO 4P N+1 650 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
6 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 57,59 %22 EO 4P S+2 480 3 16.67
23 EO 3S W = -600 15 83.33
24 EO 3T S-3 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 59,07 %25 EO 4C S = 420 9 50.00
26 EO 4C S = 620 7 38.89
27 EO 3K W-2 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
12 - : 0,00 %28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
2 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,70 %31 EO 6C W-1 50 1 5.56
32 EO 1T S-1 -50 17 94.44
33 EO Pass Passe 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 248,0 / 486 = 51,03 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,56 % 1 EO 3T N-1 -50 10 55.56
2 EO 3K E = -110 8 44.44
3 EO 2K E+2 -130 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
12 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
10 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,81 %10 EO 3S S+1 630 16 88.89
11 EO 3S E = -400 18 100.00
12 EO 3S S = 600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
5 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,48 %13 EO 2P E-1 100 8 44.44
14 EO 3S S+3 490 7 38.89
15 EO 3C W+1 -170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 46,48 %16 EO 4P S = 420 5 27.78
17 EO 5TcS-2 -300 16 88.89
18 EO 2PcS-1 -200 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
6 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 57,59 %19 EO 4C N+1 450 5 27.78
20 EO 2T N+4 170 5 27.78
21 EO 4P N+1 650 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 59,07 %22 EO 4P S+2 480 3 16.67
23 EO 3S W = -600 15 83.33
24 EO 2S W = -120 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,52 %25 EO 4C S = 420 9 50.00
26 EO 4C S = 620 7 38.89
27 EO 2K W = -90 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
2 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,70 %28 EO 5S W = -460 14 77.78
29 EO 3C W = -140 14 77.78
30 EO 4T N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -PANIS Guy : 54,63 %31 EO 6C W = -980 17 94.44
32 EO 2S S = 120 8 44.44
33 EO 4PcN-1 420 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 281,0 / 486 = 57,82 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,74 % 1 EO 3T N = 110 0 0.00
2 EO 3S E+1 -430 17 94.44
3 EO 5KcW-1 200 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
4 DELHEZ Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,41 % 4 EO 4C E+1 -650 10 55.56
5 EO 4C N = 620 16 88.89
6 EO 3T S = 110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
10 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,81 % 7 EO 2S E+1 -150 10 55.56
8 EO 2C S+1 140 13 72.22
9 EO 3S N = 400 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
12 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 57,59 %16 EO 4P N = 420 5 27.78
17 EO 3S N-5 -250 14 77.78
18 EO 2S W = -120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 59,07 %19 EO 3C N = 140 13 72.22
20 EO 4K N+1 150 10 55.56
21 EO 3T W = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,52 %22 EO 2CcW-1 200 16 88.89
23 EO 4P E-2 200 1 5.56
24 EO 2P E-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
2 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,70 %25 EO 4C S+1 450 3 16.67
26 EO 4C S+1 650 0 0.00
27 EO 2K W-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -PANIS Guy : 54,63 %28 EO 2S W-3 150 1 5.56
29 EO 4C W-3 300 2 11.11
30 EO 1S N+1 120 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,56 %31 EO 6C W-1 50 1 5.56
32 EO 1P S+2 140 4 22.22
33 EO 3P N-1 -50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 203,0 / 486 = 41,77 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
4 DELHEZ Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,41 % 1 EO 3T N-1 -50 10 55.56
2 EO 3S W = -400 13 72.22
3 EO 3T N = 110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
10 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,81 % 4 EO 4C E+1 -650 10 55.56
5 EO 4C N+1 650 7 38.89
6 EO 3S N-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
5 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,48 % 7 EO 3K E = -110 2 11.11
8 EO 2C S = 110 18 100.00
9 EO 2S N = 120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
11 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 46,48 %10 EO 3S N+2 660 10 55.56
11 EO 4T W = -130 16 88.89
12 EO 3S S = 600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 59,07 %16 EO 4P S = 420 5 27.78
17 EO 3PcW-2 300 2 11.11
18 EO 2S W = -120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,52 %19 EO 4C N+2 480 2 11.11
20 EO 3S S+2 660 0 0.00
21 EO 5KcW-1 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
12 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -PANIS Guy : 54,63 %25 EO 4C S+1 450 3 16.67
26 EO 4C S = 620 7 38.89
27 EO 2S N+1 150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,56 %28 EO 6K W = -920 18 100.00
29 EO 3C W-2 200 6 33.33
30 EO 3T N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,74 %31 EO 4C W+2 -480 9 50.00
32 EO 1T S = 70 14 77.78
33 EO 3P N+1 170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 233,0 / 486 = 47,94 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
10 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,81 % 1 EO 5TcN-3 -500 17 94.44
2 EO 3S E-1 50 4 22.22
3 EO 5K W-1 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
5 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,48 % 4 EO 4C E+1 -650 10 55.56
5 EO 4C N = 620 16 88.89
6 EO 3S S-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
11 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 46,48 % 7 EO 3S E = -600 16 88.89
8 EO 2C S+2 170 6 33.33
9 EO 2S N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
6 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 57,59 %10 EO 3S S+3 690 5 27.78
11 EO 3C W-2 100 4 22.22
12 EO 3S S = 600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 59,07 %13 EO 3S W-4 400 0 0.00
14 EO 6P N = 980 2 11.11
15 EO 3C W+1 -170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
2 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,70 %19 EO 4C N = 420 9 50.00
20 EO 3K N+1 130 15 83.33
21 EO 5K W-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -PANIS Guy : 54,63 %22 EO 4P S+2 480 3 16.67
23 EO 4P E-2 200 1 5.56
24 EO 2P E-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,56 %25 EO 4C S = 420 9 50.00
26 EO 4C S = 620 7 38.89
27 EO 3K W = -110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,74 %28 EO 2S W = -120 5 27.78
29 EO 4C E-3 300 2 11.11
30 EO 3T N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
12 - : 0,00 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 227,0 / 486 = 46,71 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
5 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,48 % 1 EO 5TcN-3 -500 17 94.44
2 EO 5K E-2 100 0 0.00
3 EO 3K W+1 -130 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
11 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 46,48 % 4 EO 4C W+1 -650 10 55.56
5 EO 4C N+1 650 7 38.89
6 EO 3S N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 59,07 %10 EO 3S N+2 660 10 55.56
11 EO 3K E = -110 14 77.78
12 EO 3S S+2 660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,52 %13 EO 2P E-1 100 8 44.44
14 EO 3S S+3 490 7 38.89
15 EO 1ScN-2 -500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
2 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,70 %16 EO 4P S = 420 5 27.78
17 EO 3C E = -140 10 55.56
18 EO 2C E = -110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,56 %22 EO 3C W-2 200 16 88.89
23 EO 3S W+1 -630 18 100.00
24 EO 2P E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,74 %25 EO 2S N+4 240 14 77.78
26 EO 3S N = 600 14 77.78
27 EO 2S N-4 -200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
4 DELHEZ Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,41 %28 EO 2K N-2 -200 8 44.44
29 EO 1P N-1 -100 11 61.11
30 EO 2C E = -110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
10 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,81 %31 EO 4C W+2 -480 9 50.00
32 EO 2T W-1 100 12 66.67
33 EO 4P N = 420 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 289,0 / 486 = 59,47 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
11 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 46,48 % 1 EO 3T N-1 -50 10 55.56
2 EO 3S E+1 -430 17 94.44
3 EO 4T N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
6 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 57,59 % 4 EO 3S W+1 -630 0 0.00
5 EO 4C N+2 680 0 0.00
6 EO 3S S-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 59,07 % 7 EO 1S E+1 -120 5 27.78
8 EO 2C S+3 200 1 5.56
9 EO 3S N = 400 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,52 %10 EO 3S N+4 720 1 5.56
11 EO 2S W-3 150 0 0.00
12 EO 3S S = 600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
2 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,70 %13 EO 2P E-1 100 8 44.44
14 EO 4P N+2 480 14 77.78
15 EO 3C W = -140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
12 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,56 %19 EO 4C N = 420 9 50.00
20 EO 3S N-1 -100 18 100.00
21 EO 4K W = -130 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
4 DELHEZ Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,41 %25 EO 4PcE-2 500 0 0.00
26 EO 3C S-1 -100 17 94.44
27 EO 2K W-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
10 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 44,81 %28 EO 3S W = -400 11 61.11
29 EO 3C W-1 100 8 44.44
30 EO 2S N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
5 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,48 %31 EO 4C W+2 -480 9 50.00
32 EO 2S S = 120 8 44.44
33 EO 4P N = 420 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 215,0 / 486 = 44,24 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 VERBOIS Léon -COOLEN Joseph
6 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 57,59 % 1 EO 2P E = -110 14 77.78
2 EO 3K W-1 50 4 22.22
3 EO 3S N = 400 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 59,07 % 4 EO 4C E+1 -650 10 55.56
5 EO 4C N+1 650 7 38.89
6 EO 2T S+2 130 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,52 % 7 EO 3K E-2 200 0 0.00
8 EO 2C S+2 170 6 33.33
9 EO 3S N-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
2 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,70 %10 EO 3S N+4 720 1 5.56
11 EO 2T W = -90 11 61.11
12 EO 3S N = 600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -PANIS Guy : 54,63 %13 EO 2CcW = -670 18 100.00
14 EO 3S S+3 490 7 38.89
15 EO 2C W+2 -170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,56 %16 EO 4P S = 420 5 27.78
17 EO 4C E-2 100 4 22.22
18 EO 2C E-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,74 %19 EO 4PcE-3 800 0 0.00
20 EO 2T N+3 150 10 55.56
21 EO 5TcW-2 300 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
4 DELHEZ Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,41 %22 EO 2P S+4 230 11 61.11
23 EO 3S W-1 100 8 44.44
24 EO 2P E-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
5 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,48 %28 EO 4P E-3 150 1 5.56
29 EO 2P N-1 -100 11 61.11
30 EO 3C E-2 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
11 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 46,48 %31 EO 4C W+2 -480 9 50.00
32 EO 4P S = 420 0 0.00
33 EO 2P N+3 200 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
Total : 202,0 / 540 = 37,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy
12 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,74 % 4 EO 4C E+1 -650 10 55.56
5 EO 4C N+1 650 7 38.89
6 EO 2T S+1 110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
6 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 57,59 % 7 EO 2S E = -120 5 27.78
8 EO 2P S+2 170 6 33.33
9 EO 3S N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 40,56 %10 EO 3S S+1 630 16 88.89
11 EO 5K E-1 50 8 44.44
12 EO 3S S+1 630 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
11 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 46,48 %13 EO 2P E-1 100 8 44.44
14 EO 4P N+2 480 14 77.78
15 EO 2S E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -PANIS Guy : 54,63 %16 EO 4P S = 420 5 27.78
17 EO 4CcE = -590 18 100.00
18 EO 3C E-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
5 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,48 %19 EO 4C N-1 -50 17 94.44
20 EO 4T N = 130 15 83.33
21 EO 4K W = -130 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
2 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,70 %22 EO 4P N+2 480 3 16.67
23 EO 3S W-1 100 8 44.44
24 EO 2S W-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,52 %28 EO 1S W+1 -120 5 27.78
29 EO 4C W-3 300 2 11.11
30 EO 3CcE-1 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
4 DELHEZ Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,41 %31 EO 6C W = -980 17 94.44
32 EO 1P S+3 170 2 11.11
33 EO 3S E-2 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 229,0 / 486 = 47,12 %
|
|