|
Tournoi du 29-06-15
1 64,07 10 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand
2 59,44 11 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy
3 56,85 9 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle
4 55,56 4 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
5 54,26 8 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse
6 50,37 5 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte
7 45,56 6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
8 44,26 7 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
9 43,33 2 GROSFILS Colette -WANDERPEPEN Janine
10 38,70 3 MASSAUX Joel -ARICKX Roger
11 37,59 1 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga
12 0,00 12 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 56,79 16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
2 54,73 15 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
3 54,53 17 VAN SICHELEN Sylvie -BABIKOW Georges
4 53,09 21 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
5 52,78 23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
6 52,47 24 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin
7 48,15 19 ERPICUM Patrice -CASSART Guy
8 47,33 22 de WASSEIGE Ariane -POWIS Vinciane
9 47,12 18 COLLET Claudine -BIOURGE Gabrielle
10 46,91 20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
11 45,37 13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
12 40,95 14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
PAIRE Nr : 1 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 45,37 % 1 NS 3K N = 110 8 44.44
2 NS 2C W = -110 2 11.11
3 NS 2C E-1 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 % 4 NS 3T E = -110 17 94.44
5 NS 3S N+1 630 11 61.11
6 NS 4T E+1 -150 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
22 de WASSEIGE Ariane -POWIS Vinciane : 47,33 % 7 NS 2P W = -110 2 11.11
8 NS 2P W+1 -140 13 72.22
9 NS 5T N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
21 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,09 %10 NS 1C S-1 -100 6 33.33
11 NS 2S S-2 -100 2 11.11
12 NS 2P W = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,91 %13 NS 3C N = 140 15 83.33
14 NS 2C E+1 -140 5 27.78
15 NS 4K E = -130 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
19 ERPICUM Patrice -CASSART Guy : 48,15 %16 NS 2C S-1 -50 2 11.11
17 NS 1T S = 70 14 77.78
18 NS 3S S+3 690 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
18 COLLET Claudine -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 47,12 %19 NS 3K N+1 130 2 11.11
20 NS 3S S = 600 14 77.78
21 NS 4P N = 620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
17 VAN SICHELEN Sylvie -BABIKOW Georges : 54,53 %22 NS 4P N-3 -150 5 27.78
23 NS 2T N = 90 7 38.89
24 NS 2P S-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,79 %25 NS 4C N-1 -50 1 5.56
26 NS 2P N-1 -100 3 16.67
27 NS 2K W+2 -130 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,73 %28 NS 3C N = 140 2 11.11
29 NS 1S N = 90 6 33.33
30 NS 2C W+1 -140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
Total : 203,0 / 540 = 37,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 GROSFILS Colette -WANDERPEPEN Janine
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 40,95 % 4 NS 1S E+2 -150 8 44.44
5 NS 3S S+1 630 11 61.11
6 NS 2C W+2 -170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 45,37 % 7 NS 4P W-2 200 12 66.67
8 NS 3P W = -140 13 72.22
9 NS 3S S+1 430 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 %10 NS 3P S-1 -100 6 33.33
11 NS 2K E+1 -110 0 0.00
12 NS 3P W-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
22 de WASSEIGE Ariane -POWIS Vinciane : 47,33 %13 NS 4C N-1 -100 3 16.67
14 NS 3S N = 400 18 100.00
15 NS 3K E = -110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
21 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,09 %16 NS 2C S-1 -50 2 11.11
17 NS 1T S = 70 14 77.78
18 NS 4C N+2 680 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,91 %19 NS 3K N+2 150 4 22.22
20 NS 3S S-1 -100 2 11.11
21 NS 4P N = 620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
24 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin : 52,47 %22 NS 3P N-2 -100 8 44.44
23 NS 3T N = 110 10 55.56
24 NS 3S S-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
18 COLLET Claudine -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 47,12 %25 NS 4C N = 420 8 44.44
26 NS 1S S-1 -100 3 16.67
27 NS 3S E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
17 VAN SICHELEN Sylvie -BABIKOW Georges : 54,53 %28 NS 3C N+3 230 9 50.00
29 NS 2P S = 110 11 61.11
30 NS 2C W+1 -140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,79 %31 NS 4C E-3 150 15 83.33
32 NS 4P S = 420 4 22.22
33 NS 4PcS-4 -800 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 234,0 / 540 = 43,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 MASSAUX Joel -ARICKX Roger
17 VAN SICHELEN Sylvie -BABIKOW Georges : 54,53 % 1 NS 2P E-1 50 4 22.22
2 NS 1S W+1 -120 0 0.00
3 NS 2C E = -110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,73 % 7 NS 4P W = -620 0 0.00
8 NS 1P W+3 -170 5 27.78
9 NS 4T N = 130 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
24 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin : 52,47 %10 NS 2C S-1 -100 6 33.33
11 NS 1S S = 90 12 66.67
12 NS 2P W+1 -140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 45,37 %13 NS 1C N+1 110 7 38.89
14 NS 4C E-1 50 14 77.78
15 NS 3C N-1 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 %16 NS 2C S+1 140 11 61.11
17 NS 2C N-2 -100 1 5.56
18 NS 3S S+3 690 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
22 de WASSEIGE Ariane -POWIS Vinciane : 47,33 %19 NS 3S S = 400 6 33.33
20 NS 3S N = 600 14 77.78
21 NS 4P N = 620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
21 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,09 %22 NS 3P N-1 -50 12 66.67
23 NS 1S N+1 120 12 66.67
24 NS 4P S = 420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,91 %25 NS 6C N-1 -50 1 5.56
26 NS 2P N-2 -200 0 0.00
27 NS 3K W+1 -130 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 3,70 %
19 ERPICUM Patrice -CASSART Guy : 48,15 %28 NS 3C N+1 170 4 22.22
29 NS 2P S+1 140 18 100.00
30 NS 2C W+1 -140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
18 COLLET Claudine -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 47,12 %31 NS 4K W-2 100 8 44.44
32 NS 3S N+1 430 7 38.89
33 NS 4C E+3 -510 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 209,0 / 540 = 38,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
19 ERPICUM Patrice -CASSART Guy : 48,15 % 1 NS 4K N+2 170 16 88.89
2 NS 1S S = 90 13 72.22
3 NS 1S S-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
18 COLLET Claudine -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 47,12 % 4 NS 3CcN-3 -800 0 0.00
5 NS 3S N+1 630 11 61.11
6 NS 5T E-1 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,79 %10 NS 3P N+1 170 16 88.89
11 NS 2C S = 110 15 83.33
12 NS 1S E+2 -150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,73 %13 NS 2S S = 120 11 61.11
14 NS 3C E = -140 5 27.78
15 NS 3P S = 140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 40,95 %16 NS 2C S+1 140 11 61.11
17 NS 1S S-1 -50 7 38.89
18 NS 6S S = 1440 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 45,37 %19 NS 3S S+2 460 17 94.44
20 NS 1S N = 90 4 22.22
21 NS 4P N = 620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 %22 NS 4PcN-2 -300 0 0.00
23 NS 4C N-1 -100 2 11.11
24 NS 4P S = 420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
22 de WASSEIGE Ariane -POWIS Vinciane : 47,33 %25 NS 3S N+2 460 18 100.00
26 NS 1S S+1 120 16 88.89
27 NS 2S E = -120 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
21 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,09 %28 NS 4C N-1 -100 0 0.00
29 NS 3K S = 110 11 61.11
30 NS 2C W+1 -140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
24 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin : 52,47 %31 NS 3K W-1 50 1 5.56
32 NS 4P S+2 480 17 94.44
33 NS 4C E+2 -480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 300,0 / 540 = 55,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte
21 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,09 % 1 NS 3C S-1 -50 0 0.00
2 NS 1S W = -90 8 44.44
3 NS 2C E = -110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,91 % 4 NS 1S E+2 -150 8 44.44
5 NS 3S S+1 630 11 61.11
6 NS 2C W+2 -170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
19 ERPICUM Patrice -CASSART Guy : 48,15 % 7 NS 4PcW-1 200 12 66.67
8 NS 2P W+2 -170 5 27.78
9 NS 4PcW-3 800 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
17 VAN SICHELEN Sylvie -BABIKOW Georges : 54,53 %13 NS 2S N = 120 11 61.11
14 NS 3C E = -140 5 27.78
15 NS 4K E = -130 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,79 %16 NS 2C S+1 140 11 61.11
17 NS 1S E = -90 4 22.22
18 NS 6C N = 1430 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
24 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin : 52,47 %19 NS 3S S+1 430 11 61.11
20 NS 3T N+1 130 8 44.44
21 NS 4P N = 620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 40,95 %22 NS 3C W+1 -170 2 11.11
23 NS 1P W = -80 4 22.22
24 NS 3S S = 400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 45,37 %25 NS 4C N = 420 8 44.44
26 NS 1S S = 90 8 44.44
27 NS 4T E-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 %28 NS 4C N = 620 12 66.67
29 NS 2P S = 110 11 61.11
30 NS 3C W-1 50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
22 de WASSEIGE Ariane -POWIS Vinciane : 47,33 %31 NS 2P S+2 170 18 100.00
32 NS 4P S+1 450 11 61.11
33 NS 4C E+2 -480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
Total : 272,0 / 540 = 50,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 % 1 NS 2K N+3 150 13 72.22
2 NS 2S S-1 -100 5 27.78
3 NS 2P S-2 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
22 de WASSEIGE Ariane -POWIS Vinciane : 47,33 % 4 NS 1S E+4 -210 2 11.11
5 NS 3S N+1 630 11 61.11
6 NS 3T E+1 -130 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
24 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin : 52,47 % 7 NS 4P W-1 100 5 27.78
8 NS 2P W+2 -170 5 27.78
9 NS 4T N = 130 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,91 %10 NS 2P N = 110 14 77.78
11 NS 4P N-1 -50 7 38.89
12 NS 2P W-2 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
18 COLLET Claudine -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 47,12 %16 NS 2C S-1 -50 2 11.11
17 NS 1T S+1 90 18 100.00
18 NS 5C S+1 680 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
17 VAN SICHELEN Sylvie -BABIKOW Georges : 54,53 %19 NS 3S N+1 430 11 61.11
20 NS 3S N = 600 14 77.78
21 NS 4P N = 620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,79 %22 NS 4P N-3 -150 5 27.78
23 NS 2P W-2 200 18 100.00
24 NS 3S N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,73 %25 NS 4C N = 420 8 44.44
26 NS 1S S = 90 8 44.44
27 NS 3K W = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 40,95 %28 NS 3C N+2 200 6 33.33
29 NS 2S N-2 -200 2 11.11
30 NS 2C W+1 -140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 45,37 %31 NS 4C W-2 100 8 44.44
32 NS 3S N+2 460 14 77.78
33 NS 6C E = -980 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 246,0 / 540 = 45,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 40,95 % 1 NS 2P E-1 50 4 22.22
2 NS 2P E-2 100 17 94.44
3 NS 1S N+1 120 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 45,37 % 4 NS 2S E+1 -150 8 44.44
5 NS 3S N = 600 3 16.67
6 NS 2S E-1 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 % 7 NS 5PcW-1 200 12 66.67
8 NS 1P W+3 -170 5 27.78
9 NS 4T N = 130 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
22 de WASSEIGE Ariane -POWIS Vinciane : 47,33 %10 NS 2C S-2 -200 0 0.00
11 NS 2P N = 110 15 83.33
12 NS 2P W+1 -140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
21 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,09 %13 NS 2C N+1 140 15 83.33
14 NS 2C E+1 -140 5 27.78
15 NS 3K E+1 -130 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
19 ERPICUM Patrice -CASSART Guy : 48,15 %19 NS 5K N-1 -50 0 0.00
20 NS 2S N = 120 6 33.33
21 NS 5P N-1 -100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
18 COLLET Claudine -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 47,12 %22 NS 4P N-1 -50 12 66.67
23 NS 3C N-2 -200 0 0.00
24 NS 3T N = 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
17 VAN SICHELEN Sylvie -BABIKOW Georges : 54,53 %25 NS 4C N = 420 8 44.44
26 NS 1S N = 90 8 44.44
27 NS 2S E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
24 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin : 52,47 %28 NS 4C N+2 680 18 100.00
29 NS 3S N-2 -200 2 11.11
30 NS 2C W+1 -140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,73 %31 NS 3K W-2 100 8 44.44
32 NS 3S N = 400 2 11.11
33 NS 4C E+2 -480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 239,0 / 540 = 44,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,79 % 1 NS 3K N+1 130 10 55.56
2 NS 3T N-1 -100 5 27.78
3 NS 2C E = -110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,73 % 4 NS 2S E = -120 14 77.78
5 NS 3S N = 600 3 16.67
6 NS 2C W+2 -170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 40,95 % 7 NS 4P W-2 200 12 66.67
8 NS 4CcN-1 -100 16 88.89
9 NS 3S N+2 460 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 45,37 %10 NS 3P N-1 -100 6 33.33
11 NS 2P N+1 140 18 100.00
12 NS 2P N-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 %13 NS 4C N-2 -200 0 0.00
14 NS 3C E = -140 5 27.78
15 NS 4K E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
24 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin : 52,47 %16 NS 2C S+1 140 11 61.11
17 NS 1S S-2 -100 1 5.56
18 NS 6S N = 1440 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,91 %22 NS 2P N+1 140 17 94.44
23 NS 1S N+2 150 15 83.33
24 NS 3S N+1 430 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
19 ERPICUM Patrice -CASSART Guy : 48,15 %25 NS 4C N+1 450 15 83.33
26 NS 1S W-1 100 12 66.67
27 NS 3C N-2 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
18 COLLET Claudine -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 47,12 %28 NS 3C N+3 230 9 50.00
29 NS 1S N+1 120 16 88.89
30 NS 3C W = -140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
17 VAN SICHELEN Sylvie -BABIKOW Georges : 54,53 %31 NS 3C E-2 100 8 44.44
32 NS 3S N+1 430 7 38.89
33 NS 4C W+2 -480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 293,0 / 540 = 54,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle
18 COLLET Claudine -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 47,12 % 1 NS 3S N+1 430 18 100.00
2 NS 2C W-2 100 17 94.44
3 NS 2C E-1 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
24 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin : 52,47 % 4 NS 1S E+2 -150 8 44.44
5 NS 3S S+1 630 11 61.11
6 NS 2C W+1 -140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,79 % 7 NS 4P W-2 200 12 66.67
8 NS 2P W+2 -170 5 27.78
9 NS 3S S = 400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,73 %10 NS 1C S-1 -100 6 33.33
11 NS 2K W = -90 4 22.22
12 NS 2P W = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 40,95 %13 NS 4C N = 620 18 100.00
14 NS 2C E+1 -140 5 27.78
15 NS 5KcE-2 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 45,37 %16 NS 3C S+1 170 17 94.44
17 NS 1T S-1 -50 7 38.89
18 NS 3S S+3 690 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 %19 NS 3S S+1 430 11 61.11
20 NS 3S N-2 -200 0 0.00
21 NS 4P N = 620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
21 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,09 %25 NS 4C N+1 450 15 83.33
26 NS 1S S+1 120 16 88.89
27 NS 3S E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,91 %28 NS 4C N+1 650 15 83.33
29 NS 1S N-2 -200 2 11.11
30 NS 2C W = -110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
19 ERPICUM Patrice -CASSART Guy : 48,15 %31 NS 3K W-1 50 1 5.56
32 NS 2S E-3 300 0 0.00
33 NS 4C E+2 -480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
Total : 307,0 / 540 = 56,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,91 % 1 NS 2K N+3 150 13 72.22
2 NS 2K S = 90 13 72.22
3 NS 1S N = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
19 ERPICUM Patrice -CASSART Guy : 48,15 % 4 NS 3T E = -110 17 94.44
5 NS 3S S+3 690 18 100.00
6 NS 3K N-3 -150 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
18 COLLET Claudine -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 47,12 % 7 NS 3S E-4 400 18 100.00
8 NS 3P W+1 -170 5 27.78
9 NS 3S S+2 460 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
17 VAN SICHELEN Sylvie -BABIKOW Georges : 54,53 %10 NS 3PxS = 960 18 100.00
11 NS 2C W-1 50 10 55.56
12 NS 3CcS-1 -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,79 %13 NS 2C N = 110 7 38.89
14 NS 4CcE-1 100 16 88.89
15 NS 4KcE = -510 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,73 %16 NS 2C S+2 170 17 94.44
17 NS 2S E-1 50 10 55.56
18 NS 6S S = 1440 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 40,95 %19 NS 3S N+1 430 11 61.11
20 NS 3S N = 600 14 77.78
21 NS 4P N = 620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 45,37 %22 NS 3P S-1 -50 12 66.67
23 NS 1S S = 90 7 38.89
24 NS 3S N+1 430 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
22 de WASSEIGE Ariane -POWIS Vinciane : 47,33 %28 NS 4C N+1 650 15 83.33
29 NS 3K S = 110 11 61.11
30 NS 3P N-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
21 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,09 %31 NS 4C E-2 100 8 44.44
32 NS 4P S+2 480 17 94.44
33 NS 5C E+1 -480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
Total : 346,0 / 540 = 64,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy
22 de WASSEIGE Ariane -POWIS Vinciane : 47,33 % 1 NS 2P E-1 50 4 22.22
2 NS 2C W-1 50 10 55.56
3 NS 2C E-1 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
21 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,09 % 4 NS 1S E+2 -150 8 44.44
5 NS 6K S-4 -400 0 0.00
6 NS 3T E+1 -130 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,91 % 7 NS 4P W-1 100 5 27.78
8 NS 4C S-1 -50 18 100.00
9 NS 3S S+2 460 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
19 ERPICUM Patrice -CASSART Guy : 48,15 %10 NS 1C S = 80 12 66.67
11 NS 1S S-1 -50 7 38.89
12 NS 2P W = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
24 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin : 52,47 %13 NS 2C N-1 -100 3 16.67
14 NS 4TcN-1 -100 12 66.67
15 NS 3P S-1 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
17 VAN SICHELEN Sylvie -BABIKOW Georges : 54,53 %16 NS 2C S = 110 6 33.33
17 NS 1T N = 70 14 77.78
18 NS 6C S = 1430 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,79 %19 NS 3S S+2 460 17 94.44
20 NS 3S N = 600 14 77.78
21 NS 5P N-1 -100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,73 %22 NS 2P N+1 140 17 94.44
23 NS 1S N+2 150 15 83.33
24 NS 3S S-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 40,95 %25 NS 4C N = 420 8 44.44
26 NS 1S N+1 120 16 88.89
27 NS 2C N = 110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 %31 NS 4C E-3 150 15 83.33
32 NS 4P S+1 450 11 61.11
33 NS 4C W+2 -480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
Total : 321,0 / 540 = 59,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 -
24 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin : 52,47 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 VAN SICHELEN Sylvie -BABIKOW Georges : 54,53 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
21 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,09 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 40,95 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
18 COLLET Claudine -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 47,12 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
22 de WASSEIGE Ariane -POWIS Vinciane : 47,33 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 54,73 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 ERPICUM Patrice -CASSART Guy : 48,15 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,79 %28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,91 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 594 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
1 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 37,59 % 1 EO 3K N = 110 10 55.56
2 EO 2C W = -110 16 88.89
3 EO 2C E-1 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 44,26 % 4 EO 2S E+1 -150 10 55.56
5 EO 3S N = 600 15 83.33
6 EO 2S E-1 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
2 GROSFILS Colette -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 43,33 % 7 EO 4P W-2 200 6 33.33
8 EO 3P W = -140 5 27.78
9 EO 3S S+1 430 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
8 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 54,26 %10 EO 3P N-1 -100 12 66.67
11 EO 2P N+1 140 0 0.00
12 EO 2P N-3 -300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -ARICKX Roger : 38,70 %13 EO 1C N+1 110 11 61.11
14 EO 4C E-1 50 4 22.22
15 EO 3C N-1 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 56,85 %16 EO 3C S+1 170 1 5.56
17 EO 1T S-1 -50 11 61.11
18 EO 3S S+3 690 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
4 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,56 %19 EO 3S S+2 460 1 5.56
20 EO 1S N = 90 14 77.78
21 EO 4P N = 620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
10 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 64,07 %22 EO 3P S-1 -50 6 33.33
23 EO 1S S = 90 11 61.11
24 EO 3S N+1 430 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
5 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,37 %25 EO 4C N = 420 10 55.56
26 EO 1S S = 90 10 55.56
27 EO 4T E-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,56 %31 EO 4C W-2 100 10 55.56
32 EO 3S N+2 460 4 22.22
33 EO 6C E = -980 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 245,0 / 540 = 45,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
7 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 44,26 % 1 EO 2P E-1 50 14 77.78
2 EO 2P E-2 100 1 5.56
3 EO 1S N+1 120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
2 GROSFILS Colette -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 43,33 % 4 EO 1S E+2 -150 10 55.56
5 EO 3S S+1 630 7 38.89
6 EO 2C W+2 -170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
8 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 54,26 % 7 EO 4P W-2 200 6 33.33
8 EO 4CcN-1 -100 2 11.11
9 EO 3S N+2 460 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
12 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 56,85 %13 EO 4C N = 620 0 0.00
14 EO 2C E+1 -140 13 72.22
15 EO 5KcE-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
4 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,56 %16 EO 2C S+1 140 7 38.89
17 EO 1S S-1 -50 11 61.11
18 EO 6S S = 1440 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
10 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 64,07 %19 EO 3S N+1 430 7 38.89
20 EO 3S N = 600 4 22.22
21 EO 4P N = 620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
5 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,37 %22 EO 3C W+1 -170 16 88.89
23 EO 1P W = -80 14 77.78
24 EO 3S S = 400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
11 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 59,44 %25 EO 4C N = 420 10 55.56
26 EO 1S N+1 120 2 11.11
27 EO 2C N = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,56 %28 EO 3C N+2 200 12 66.67
29 EO 2S N-2 -200 16 88.89
30 EO 2C W+1 -140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
Total : 199,0 / 486 = 40,95 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
8 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 54,26 % 4 EO 2S E = -120 4 22.22
5 EO 3S N = 600 15 83.33
6 EO 2C W+2 -170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -ARICKX Roger : 38,70 % 7 EO 4P W = -620 18 100.00
8 EO 1P W+3 -170 13 72.22
9 EO 4T N = 130 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 56,85 %10 EO 1C S-1 -100 12 66.67
11 EO 2K W = -90 14 77.78
12 EO 2P W = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
4 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,56 %13 EO 2S S = 120 7 38.89
14 EO 3C E = -140 13 72.22
15 EO 3P S = 140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
10 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 64,07 %16 EO 2C S+2 170 1 5.56
17 EO 2S E-1 50 8 44.44
18 EO 6S S = 1440 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
12 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
11 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 59,44 %22 EO 2P N+1 140 1 5.56
23 EO 1S N+2 150 3 16.67
24 EO 3S S-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,56 %25 EO 4C N = 420 10 55.56
26 EO 1S S = 90 10 55.56
27 EO 3K W = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
1 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 37,59 %28 EO 3C N = 140 16 88.89
29 EO 1S N = 90 12 66.67
30 EO 2C W+1 -140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 44,26 %31 EO 3K W-2 100 10 55.56
32 EO 3S N = 400 16 88.89
33 EO 4C E+2 -480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 266,0 / 486 = 54,73 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
8 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 54,26 % 1 EO 3K N+1 130 8 44.44
2 EO 3T N-1 -100 13 72.22
3 EO 2C E = -110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 56,85 % 7 EO 4P W-2 200 6 33.33
8 EO 2P W+2 -170 13 72.22
9 EO 3S S = 400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
4 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,56 %10 EO 3P N+1 170 2 11.11
11 EO 2C S = 110 3 16.67
12 EO 1S E+2 -150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
10 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 64,07 %13 EO 2C N = 110 11 61.11
14 EO 4CcE-1 100 2 11.11
15 EO 4KcE = -510 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
5 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,37 %16 EO 2C S+1 140 7 38.89
17 EO 1S E = -90 14 77.78
18 EO 6C N = 1430 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
11 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 59,44 %19 EO 3S S+2 460 1 5.56
20 EO 3S N = 600 4 22.22
21 EO 5P N-1 -100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,56 %22 EO 4P N-3 -150 13 72.22
23 EO 2P W-2 200 0 0.00
24 EO 3S N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
1 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 37,59 %25 EO 4C N-1 -50 17 94.44
26 EO 2P N-1 -100 15 83.33
27 EO 2K W+2 -130 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
12 - : 0,00 %28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
2 GROSFILS Colette -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 43,33 %31 EO 4C E-3 150 3 16.67
32 EO 4P S = 420 14 77.78
33 EO 4PcS-4 -800 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 276,0 / 486 = 56,79 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 VAN SICHELEN Sylvie -BABIKOW Georges
3 MASSAUX Joel -ARICKX Roger : 38,70 % 1 EO 2P E-1 50 14 77.78
2 EO 1S W+1 -120 18 100.00
3 EO 2C E = -110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
12 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
10 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 64,07 %10 EO 3PxS = 960 0 0.00
11 EO 2C W-1 50 8 44.44
12 EO 3CcS-1 -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
5 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,37 %13 EO 2S N = 120 7 38.89
14 EO 3C E = -140 13 72.22
15 EO 4K E = -130 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
11 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 59,44 %16 EO 2C S = 110 12 66.67
17 EO 1T N = 70 4 22.22
18 EO 6C S = 1430 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,56 %19 EO 3S N+1 430 7 38.89
20 EO 3S N = 600 4 22.22
21 EO 4P N = 620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
1 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 37,59 %22 EO 4P N-3 -150 13 72.22
23 EO 2T N = 90 11 61.11
24 EO 2P S-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 44,26 %25 EO 4C N = 420 10 55.56
26 EO 1S N = 90 10 55.56
27 EO 2S E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
2 GROSFILS Colette -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 43,33 %28 EO 3C N+3 230 9 50.00
29 EO 2P S = 110 7 38.89
30 EO 2C W+1 -140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
8 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 54,26 %31 EO 3C E-2 100 10 55.56
32 EO 3S N+1 430 11 61.11
33 EO 4C W+2 -480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 265,0 / 486 = 54,53 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 COLLET Claudine -BIOURGE Gabrielle
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 56,85 % 1 EO 3S N+1 430 0 0.00
2 EO 2C W-2 100 1 5.56
3 EO 2C E-1 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
4 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,56 % 4 EO 3CcN-3 -800 18 100.00
5 EO 3S N+1 630 7 38.89
6 EO 5T E-1 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
10 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 64,07 % 7 EO 3S E-4 400 0 0.00
8 EO 3P W+1 -170 13 72.22
9 EO 3S S+2 460 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
12 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,56 %16 EO 2C S-1 -50 16 88.89
17 EO 1T S+1 90 0 0.00
18 EO 5C S+1 680 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
1 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 37,59 %19 EO 3K N+1 130 16 88.89
20 EO 3S S = 600 4 22.22
21 EO 4P N = 620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 44,26 %22 EO 4P N-1 -50 6 33.33
23 EO 3C N-2 -200 18 100.00
24 EO 3T N = 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
2 GROSFILS Colette -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 43,33 %25 EO 4C N = 420 10 55.56
26 EO 1S S-1 -100 15 83.33
27 EO 3S E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
8 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 54,26 %28 EO 3C N+3 230 9 50.00
29 EO 1S N+1 120 2 11.11
30 EO 3C W = -140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -ARICKX Roger : 38,70 %31 EO 4K W-2 100 10 55.56
32 EO 3S N+1 430 11 61.11
33 EO 4C E+3 -510 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 229,0 / 486 = 47,12 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 ERPICUM Patrice -CASSART Guy
4 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,56 % 1 EO 4K N+2 170 2 11.11
2 EO 1S S = 90 5 27.78
3 EO 1S S-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
10 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 64,07 % 4 EO 3T E = -110 1 5.56
5 EO 3S S+3 690 0 0.00
6 EO 3K N-3 -150 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
5 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,37 % 7 EO 4PcW-1 200 6 33.33
8 EO 2P W+2 -170 13 72.22
9 EO 4PcW-3 800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
11 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 59,44 %10 EO 1C S = 80 6 33.33
11 EO 1S S-1 -50 11 61.11
12 EO 2P W = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
1 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 37,59 %16 EO 2C S-1 -50 16 88.89
17 EO 1T S = 70 4 22.22
18 EO 3S S+3 690 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 44,26 %19 EO 5K N-1 -50 18 100.00
20 EO 2S N = 120 12 66.67
21 EO 5P N-1 -100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
12 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
8 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 54,26 %25 EO 4C N+1 450 3 16.67
26 EO 1S W-1 100 6 33.33
27 EO 3C N-2 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -ARICKX Roger : 38,70 %28 EO 3C N+1 170 14 77.78
29 EO 2P S+1 140 0 0.00
30 EO 2C W+1 -140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 56,85 %31 EO 3K W-1 50 17 94.44
32 EO 2S E-3 300 18 100.00
33 EO 4C E+2 -480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
Total : 234,0 / 486 = 48,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
10 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 64,07 % 1 EO 2K N+3 150 5 27.78
2 EO 2K S = 90 5 27.78
3 EO 1S N = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
5 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,37 % 4 EO 1S E+2 -150 10 55.56
5 EO 3S S+1 630 7 38.89
6 EO 2C W+2 -170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
11 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 59,44 % 7 EO 4P W-1 100 13 72.22
8 EO 4C S-1 -50 0 0.00
9 EO 3S S+2 460 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,56 %10 EO 2P N = 110 4 22.22
11 EO 4P N-1 -50 11 61.11
12 EO 2P W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
1 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 37,59 %13 EO 3C N = 140 3 16.67
14 EO 2C E+1 -140 13 72.22
15 EO 4K E = -130 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
2 GROSFILS Colette -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 43,33 %19 EO 3K N+2 150 14 77.78
20 EO 3S S-1 -100 16 88.89
21 EO 4P N = 620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
8 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 54,26 %22 EO 2P N+1 140 1 5.56
23 EO 1S N+2 150 3 16.67
24 EO 3S N+1 430 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -ARICKX Roger : 38,70 %25 EO 6C N-1 -50 17 94.44
26 EO 2P N-2 -200 18 100.00
27 EO 3K W+1 -130 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 96,30 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 56,85 %28 EO 4C N+1 650 3 16.67
29 EO 1S N-2 -200 16 88.89
30 EO 2C W = -110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
12 - : 0,00 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 228,0 / 486 = 46,91 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
5 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,37 % 1 EO 3C S-1 -50 18 100.00
2 EO 1S W = -90 10 55.56
3 EO 2C E = -110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
11 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 59,44 % 4 EO 1S E+2 -150 10 55.56
5 EO 6K S-4 -400 18 100.00
6 EO 3T E+1 -130 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
12 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 37,59 %10 EO 1C S-1 -100 12 66.67
11 EO 2S S-2 -100 16 88.89
12 EO 2P W = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 44,26 %13 EO 2C N+1 140 3 16.67
14 EO 2C E+1 -140 13 72.22
15 EO 3K E+1 -130 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
2 GROSFILS Colette -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 43,33 %16 EO 2C S-1 -50 16 88.89
17 EO 1T S = 70 4 22.22
18 EO 4C N+2 680 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -ARICKX Roger : 38,70 %22 EO 3P N-1 -50 6 33.33
23 EO 1S N+1 120 6 33.33
24 EO 4P S = 420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 56,85 %25 EO 4C N+1 450 3 16.67
26 EO 1S S+1 120 2 11.11
27 EO 3S E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
4 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,56 %28 EO 4C N-1 -100 18 100.00
29 EO 3K S = 110 7 38.89
30 EO 2C W+1 -140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
10 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 64,07 %31 EO 4C E-2 100 10 55.56
32 EO 4P S+2 480 1 5.56
33 EO 5C E+1 -480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
Total : 258,0 / 486 = 53,09 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 de WASSEIGE Ariane -POWIS Vinciane
11 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 59,44 % 1 EO 2P E-1 50 14 77.78
2 EO 2C W-1 50 8 44.44
3 EO 2C E-1 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,56 % 4 EO 1S E+4 -210 16 88.89
5 EO 3S N+1 630 7 38.89
6 EO 3T E+1 -130 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
1 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 37,59 % 7 EO 2P W = -110 16 88.89
8 EO 2P W+1 -140 5 27.78
9 EO 5T N-1 -50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 44,26 %10 EO 2C S-2 -200 18 100.00
11 EO 2P N = 110 3 16.67
12 EO 2P W+1 -140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
2 GROSFILS Colette -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 43,33 %13 EO 4C N-1 -100 15 83.33
14 EO 3S N = 400 0 0.00
15 EO 3K E = -110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
12 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -ARICKX Roger : 38,70 %19 EO 3S S = 400 12 66.67
20 EO 3S N = 600 4 22.22
21 EO 4P N = 620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
4 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,56 %25 EO 3S N+2 460 0 0.00
26 EO 1S S+1 120 2 11.11
27 EO 2S E = -120 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
10 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 64,07 %28 EO 4C N+1 650 3 16.67
29 EO 3K S = 110 7 38.89
30 EO 3P N-3 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
5 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,37 %31 EO 2P S+2 170 0 0.00
32 EO 4P S+1 450 7 38.89
33 EO 4C E+2 -480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
Total : 230,0 / 486 = 47,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,56 % 1 EO 2K N+3 150 5 27.78
2 EO 2S S-1 -100 13 72.22
3 EO 2P S-2 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
1 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 37,59 % 4 EO 3T E = -110 1 5.56
5 EO 3S N+1 630 7 38.89
6 EO 4T E+1 -150 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 44,26 % 7 EO 5PcW-1 200 6 33.33
8 EO 1P W+3 -170 13 72.22
9 EO 4T N = 130 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
2 GROSFILS Colette -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 43,33 %10 EO 3P S-1 -100 12 66.67
11 EO 2K E+1 -110 18 100.00
12 EO 3P W-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
8 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 54,26 %13 EO 4C N-2 -200 18 100.00
14 EO 3C E = -140 13 72.22
15 EO 4K E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -ARICKX Roger : 38,70 %16 EO 2C S+1 140 7 38.89
17 EO 2C N-2 -100 17 94.44
18 EO 3S S+3 690 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 56,85 %19 EO 3S S+1 430 7 38.89
20 EO 3S N-2 -200 18 100.00
21 EO 4P N = 620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
4 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,56 %22 EO 4PcN-2 -300 18 100.00
23 EO 4C N-1 -100 16 88.89
24 EO 4P S = 420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
5 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,37 %28 EO 4C N = 620 6 33.33
29 EO 2P S = 110 7 38.89
30 EO 3C W-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
11 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 59,44 %31 EO 4C E-3 150 3 16.67
32 EO 4P S+1 450 7 38.89
33 EO 4C W+2 -480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
Total : 285,0 / 540 = 52,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin
12 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 56,85 % 4 EO 1S E+2 -150 10 55.56
5 EO 3S S+1 630 7 38.89
6 EO 2C W+1 -140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,56 % 7 EO 4P W-1 100 13 72.22
8 EO 2P W+2 -170 13 72.22
9 EO 4T N = 130 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
3 MASSAUX Joel -ARICKX Roger : 38,70 %10 EO 2C S-1 -100 12 66.67
11 EO 1S S = 90 6 33.33
12 EO 2P W+1 -140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
11 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 59,44 %13 EO 2C N-1 -100 15 83.33
14 EO 4TcN-1 -100 6 33.33
15 EO 3P S-1 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
8 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 54,26 %16 EO 2C S+1 140 7 38.89
17 EO 1S S-2 -100 17 94.44
18 EO 6S N = 1440 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
5 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,37 %19 EO 3S S+1 430 7 38.89
20 EO 3T N+1 130 10 55.56
21 EO 4P N = 620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
2 GROSFILS Colette -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 43,33 %22 EO 3P N-2 -100 10 55.56
23 EO 3T N = 110 8 44.44
24 EO 3S S-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
7 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 44,26 %28 EO 4C N+2 680 0 0.00
29 EO 3S N-2 -200 16 88.89
30 EO 2C W+1 -140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
4 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,56 %31 EO 3K W-1 50 17 94.44
32 EO 4P S+2 480 1 5.56
33 EO 4C E+2 -480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 255,0 / 486 = 52,47 %
|
|