|
Tournoi du 29-07-13
1 65,59 7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
2 55,06 9 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle
3 54,41 1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
4 50,74 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
5 50,20 2 MOLS Bruno -CLERIN François-Xavier
6 48,33 5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
7 45,72 10 de VIRON Baudouin -REVEL
8 45,59 6 COOLEN Joseph -DELHEZ Jacques
9 42,56 4 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
10 41,81 3 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès
11 0,00 11 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 59,24 19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
2 56,52 14 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard
3 54,88 13 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel
~ 54,88 22 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe
5 54,05 17 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
6 53,28 12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
7 47,88 18 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse
8 47,80 15 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
9 41,03 21 COLLET Claudine -NELIS Claude
10 40,84 20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
11 39,22 16 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard
PAIRE Nr : 1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 53,28 % 1 NS 3P S+1 170 17.9 99.44
2 NS 4PcS+1 990 17.9 99.44
3 NS 3S S+2 460 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 97,41 %
22 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,88 % 4 NS 2S S-2 -200 2.3 12.78
5 NS 4C N = 620 17.9 99.44
6 NS 3K N+1 130 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
21 COLLET Claudine -NELIS Claude : 41,03 % 7 NS 2KcW-1 200 15.7 87.22
8 NS 3S E-1 50 14.6 81.11
9 NS 4C E-2 200 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 80,93 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,84 %10 NS 4C E+1 -650 12.3 68.33
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 5.7 31.67
12 NS 2C N = 110 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 59,24 %13 NS 4C S+1 650 12.3 68.33
14 NS 3S W+1 -430 6.8 37.78
15 NS 3S W+1 -430 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
18 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,88 %16 NS 4P N+1 450 13.4 74.44
17 NS 3S N+1 430 9 50.00
18 NS 2C W+2 -170 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 47,78 %
17 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,05 %19 NS 2P E+1 -140 3.4 18.89
20 NS 2K N+3 150 12.3 68.33
21 NS 3S W+2 -460 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
16 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 39,22 %22 NS 3S S+1 430 10.1 56.11
23 NS 5K N = 600 17.9 99.44
24 NS 3P E = -140 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
15 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 47,80 %25 NS 2P S+2 170 15.7 87.22
26 NS 2S E = -120 15.7 87.22
27 NS 4P W = -420 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
14 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 56,52 %28 NS 1S W-1 50 11 61.11
29 NS 2P W-1 100 1 5.56
30 NS 3C S+2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 293,8 / 540 = 54,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 MOLS Bruno -CLERIN François-Xavier
13 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 54,88 % 4 NS 1S S+1 120 14.6 81.11
5 NS 4C N-1 -100 4.6 25.56
6 NS 3K N = 110 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 46,11 %
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 53,28 % 7 NS 3S S-2 -200 1.2 6.67
8 NS 3S E-2 100 17.9 99.44
9 NS 4T N-1 -50 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
22 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,88 %10 NS 4C E+2 -680 1.2 6.67
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 5.7 31.67
12 NS 2C N+1 140 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
21 COLLET Claudine -NELIS Claude : 41,03 %13 NS 4C N+1 650 12.3 68.33
14 NS 3S W = -400 12.3 68.33
15 NS 1S E+1 -120 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 64,26 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,84 %16 NS 3S S+2 460 15.7 87.22
17 NS 3S N+1 430 9 50.00
18 NS 2C W+1 -140 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 59,24 %19 NS 4P E = -620 0.1 0.56
20 NS 5K N = 600 16.8 93.33
21 NS 3S W+2 -460 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
18 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,88 %22 NS 5C N-1 -50 0.1 0.56
23 NS 5P W-1 100 13.4 74.44
24 NS 3C W-2 100 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
17 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,05 %25 NS 3P S = 140 10.1 56.11
26 NS 4T E = -130 10.1 56.11
27 NS 5C N-2 -100 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 60,19 %
16 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 39,22 %28 NS 2S W-1 50 11 61.11
29 NS 3P W-2 200 11 61.11
30 NS 3S S = 400 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
15 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 47,80 %31 NS 3C E+1 -170 4.6 25.56
32 NS 3T N-2 -100 2.3 12.78
33 NS 3S N+2 460 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
Total : 271,1 / 540 = 50,20 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès
16 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 39,22 % 1 NS 4P S-1 -50 2.3 12.78
2 NS 4P W = -420 0.1 0.56
3 NS 3S S+2 460 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
14 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 56,52 % 7 NS 2S S+2 180 13.4 74.44
8 NS 3K W = -110 11.2 62.22
9 NS 1S N = 90 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 66,30 %
13 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 54,88 %10 NS 3S E+2 -660 5.7 31.67
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 5.7 31.67
12 NS 3T W-1 50 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 25,37 %
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 53,28 %13 NS 4C N+1 650 12.3 68.33
14 NS 3S E+2 -460 1.2 6.67
15 NS 1S E+2 -150 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 31,30 %
22 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,88 %16 NS 4P N = 420 10.1 56.11
17 NS 2S N+2 180 0.1 0.56
18 NS 2C W+2 -170 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 25,19 %
21 COLLET Claudine -NELIS Claude : 41,03 %19 NS 3C S-1 -50 13.4 74.44
20 NS 4C S-2 -200 3.4 18.89
21 NS 3S W+2 -460 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 35,37 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,84 %22 NS 3S S+1 430 10.1 56.11
23 NS 5PcW = -850 0.1 0.56
24 NS 3P E = -140 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 59,24 %25 NS 2P S+1 140 10.1 56.11
26 NS 4T E = -130 10.1 56.11
27 NS 4P W-1 50 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
18 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,88 %28 NS 3S W-2 100 16 88.89
29 NS 2K S+1 110 5 27.78
30 NS 4P S = 420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
17 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,05 %31 NS 2K W+3 -150 6.8 37.78
32 NS 2S S = 120 10.1 56.11
33 NS 3S N-1 -50 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 39,81 %
Total : 225,8 / 540 = 41,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
18 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,88 % 1 NS 4PcS-1 -100 0.1 0.56
2 NS 4P S = 620 13.4 74.44
3 NS 3S S+1 430 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 43,70 %
17 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,05 % 4 NS 4P N-3 -300 0.1 0.56
5 NS 3C N = 140 12.3 68.33
6 NS 3K N+1 130 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 43,70 %
15 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 47,80 %10 NS 4C E+1 -650 12.3 68.33
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 5.7 31.67
12 NS 3C N = 140 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
14 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 56,52 %13 NS 3S S-2 -200 0.1 0.56
14 NS 3S W+1 -430 6.8 37.78
15 NS 1S E+1 -120 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
13 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 54,88 %16 NS 3P N+1 170 6.8 37.78
17 NS 3S S+2 460 15.7 87.22
18 NS 2C W = -110 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 53,28 %19 NS 3P E = -140 3.4 18.89
20 NS 3K N+2 150 12.3 68.33
21 NS 3S W-1 50 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 60,19 %
22 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,88 %22 NS 3S S+1 430 10.1 56.11
23 NS 5C W = -650 6.8 37.78
24 NS 3P E = -140 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
21 COLLET Claudine -NELIS Claude : 41,03 %25 NS 2P S-1 -50 2.3 12.78
26 NS 4T W = -130 10.1 56.11
27 NS 4P W = -420 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 25,19 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,84 %28 NS 3K W-1 50 11 61.11
29 NS 2P W-2 200 11 61.11
30 NS 3S N = 400 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 59,24 %31 NS 3TcS-2 -500 0.1 0.56
32 NS 2P W = -110 0.1 0.56
33 NS 4P S-1 -50 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 8,89 %
Total : 229,8 / 540 = 42,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,84 % 1 NS 3P S = 140 9 50.00
2 NS 4C W-1 50 3.4 18.89
3 NS 3S S+1 430 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 59,24 % 4 NS 2S S = 120 14.6 81.11
5 NS 4C N-1 -100 4.6 25.56
6 NS 5KcN-2 -300 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 35,74 %
18 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,88 % 7 NS 3S S-2 -200 1.2 6.67
8 NS 2S E = -120 9 50.00
9 NS 5T N = 400 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
16 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 39,22 %13 NS 4C N+1 650 12.3 68.33
14 NS 3S W-1 50 16.8 93.33
15 NS 2S E = -120 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 72,59 %
15 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 47,80 %16 NS 2P N+1 140 4.6 25.56
17 NS 3S N+1 430 9 50.00
18 NS 4C W-1 50 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 56,30 %
14 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 56,52 %19 NS 3P E-1 100 16.8 93.33
20 NS 5C S-2 -200 3.4 18.89
21 NS 3S W-1 50 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
13 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 54,88 %22 NS 4C N = 420 2.3 12.78
23 NS 6K S-1 -100 11.2 62.22
24 NS 3P E-1 50 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 53,28 %25 NS 4P S-1 -50 2.3 12.78
26 NS 1S N-3 -300 2.3 12.78
27 NS 5CcN-2 -300 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 17,04 %
22 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,88 %28 NS 2S W = -120 4 22.22
29 NS 2P W-2 200 11 61.11
30 NS 4C S+1 450 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
21 COLLET Claudine -NELIS Claude : 41,03 %31 NS 4P W-1 50 15.7 87.22
32 NS 3P W-1 100 4.6 25.56
33 NS 4P S-2 -100 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
Total : 261,0 / 540 = 48,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 COOLEN Joseph -DELHEZ Jacques
22 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,88 % 1 NS 3P S = 140 9 50.00
2 NS 3P S+1 170 9 50.00
3 NS 3S S = 400 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
21 COLLET Claudine -NELIS Claude : 41,03 % 4 NS 2C W-3 300 17.9 99.44
5 NS 4P W-3 150 15.7 87.22
6 NS 4KcS-1 -100 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,84 % 7 NS 1C S+1 110 11.2 62.22
8 NS 3S E+1 -430 2.3 12.78
9 NS 4CcE-2 500 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 59,24 %10 NS 4C E+2 -680 1.2 6.67
11 NS 4P E = -420 14.6 81.11
12 NS 3K S-1 -100 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
17 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,05 %16 NS 4P N = 420 10.1 56.11
17 NS 3S N = 400 4.6 25.56
18 NS 2C W+2 -170 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
16 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 39,22 %19 NS 2S W = -120 6.8 37.78
20 NS 2K N+1 110 9 50.00
21 NS 3S W+1 -430 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
15 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 47,80 %22 NS 3S S+2 460 17.9 99.44
23 NS 5C W = -650 6.8 37.78
24 NS 2C E = -110 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
14 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 56,52 %25 NS 3P S = 140 10.1 56.11
26 NS 4K S-2 -200 4.6 25.56
27 NS 2P W+1 -140 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
13 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 54,88 %28 NS 2S W+1 -150 0 0.00
29 NS 3P W-3 300 17 94.44
30 NS 3S S = 400 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 53,28 %31 NS 1S E+3 -180 2.3 12.78
32 NS 2K S+2 130 14.6 81.11
33 NS 4P S-1 -50 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 39,81 %
Total : 246,2 / 540 = 45,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
13 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 54,88 % 1 NS 2P S+1 140 9 50.00
2 NS 4P S+1 650 15.7 87.22
3 NS 3S S = 400 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 53,28 % 4 NS 3C N-1 -100 6.8 37.78
5 NS 3C N-1 -100 4.6 25.56
6 NS 3S E-3 300 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 50,19 %
22 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,88 % 7 NS 3S S = 600 17.9 99.44
8 NS 3S E-1 50 14.6 81.11
9 NS 4T N-1 -50 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 72,78 %
21 COLLET Claudine -NELIS Claude : 41,03 %10 NS 4C W+1 -650 12.3 68.33
11 NS 4P W = -420 14.6 81.11
12 NS 2PcE-3 500 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 82,96 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,84 %13 NS 4C N+1 650 12.3 68.33
14 NS 3S W-1 50 16.8 93.33
15 NS 1S S-1 -100 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 82,96 %
18 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,88 %19 NS 4C S-2 -100 10.1 56.11
20 NS 5K N = 600 16.8 93.33
21 NS 4C E = -420 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
17 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,05 %22 NS 3S S+1 430 10.1 56.11
23 NS 6P W-2 200 15.7 87.22
24 NS 2P E+1 -140 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
16 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 39,22 %25 NS 2P S+3 200 17.9 99.44
26 NS 4T W = -130 10.1 56.11
27 NS 4C N-1 -50 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 80,93 %
15 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 47,80 %28 NS 2S W = -120 4 22.22
29 NS 3P W-3 300 17 94.44
30 NS 4C N = 420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
14 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 56,52 %31 NS 2P W+1 -140 9 50.00
32 NS 3K S = 110 6.8 37.78
33 NS 3S N+1 430 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 354,2 / 540 = 65,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
15 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 47,80 % 1 NS 3P S = 140 9 50.00
2 NS 5C W-1 50 3.4 18.89
3 NS 3S S+1 430 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
14 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 56,52 % 4 NS 2S S-1 -100 6.8 37.78
5 NS 4C N-1 -100 4.6 25.56
6 NS 3K N = 110 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
13 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 54,88 % 7 NS 3S S-1 -100 6.8 37.78
8 NS 3K W+1 -130 5.7 31.67
9 NS 5T N-2 -100 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 25,37 %
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 53,28 %10 NS 3S W+2 -660 5.7 31.67
11 NS 3S E = -400 17.9 99.44
12 NS 2P E-2 100 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 52,22 %
22 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,88 %13 NS 3S S = 600 2.3 12.78
14 NS 3S E = -400 12.3 68.33
15 NS 1S W+2 -150 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
21 COLLET Claudine -NELIS Claude : 41,03 %16 NS 5CcE-3 800 17.9 99.44
17 NS 3S N+2 460 15.7 87.22
18 NS 4C W-1 50 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 93,33 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 59,24 %22 NS 3S S+1 430 10.1 56.11
23 NS 5P E = -650 6.8 37.78
24 NS 4P E-1 50 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
18 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,88 %25 NS 4P S-1 -50 2.3 12.78
26 NS 5T E = -600 0.1 0.56
27 NS 3P W = -140 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 19,07 %
17 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,05 %28 NS 2P W-1 50 11 61.11
29 NS 3K S = 110 5 27.78
30 NS 4C S+2 480 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
16 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 39,22 %31 NS 4C E-1 50 15.7 87.22
32 NS 2S N+3 210 17.9 99.44
33 NS 3S N+2 460 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 91,30 %
Total : 274,0 / 540 = 50,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle
17 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,05 % 1 NS 4T E-3 150 15.7 87.22
2 NS 3P S+2 200 11.2 62.22
3 NS 3S S+1 430 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
16 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 39,22 % 4 NS 1S S = 90 11.2 62.22
5 NS 3C N-1 -100 4.6 25.56
6 NS 3K N+1 130 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
15 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 47,80 % 7 NS 2S S-1 -100 6.8 37.78
8 NS 4K W = -130 5.7 31.67
9 NS 3S N-1 -50 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 35,74 %
14 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 56,52 %10 NS 1P W+3 -170 17.9 99.44
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 5.7 31.67
12 NS 2C N+1 140 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
13 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 54,88 %13 NS 4C N = 620 4.6 25.56
14 NS 3S W+2 -460 1.2 6.67
15 NS 2S E-1 50 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 53,28 %16 NS 4P N-2 -100 0.1 0.56
17 NS 3S N+2 460 15.7 87.22
18 NS 2C W+1 -140 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
22 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,88 %19 NS 4CcS-1 -100 10.1 56.11
20 NS 4C S-1 -100 6.8 37.78
21 NS 4C E = -420 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,84 %25 NS 2P N+1 140 10.1 56.11
26 NS 3K N-1 -100 17.9 99.44
27 NS 5C N-2 -100 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 74,63 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 59,24 %28 NS 1S W+1 -120 4 22.22
29 NS 2P W-2 200 11 61.11
30 NS 4P S+2 480 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
18 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,88 %31 NS 1S E = -90 11.2 62.22
32 NS 1S N+1 120 10.1 56.11
33 NS 2P S+1 140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
Total : 297,3 / 540 = 55,06 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 de VIRON Baudouin -REVEL
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 59,24 % 1 NS 3P S = 140 9 50.00
2 NS 4CcW-1 100 6.8 37.78
3 NS 3S S = 400 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
18 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,88 % 4 NS 2S S-1 -100 6.8 37.78
5 NS 3C N = 140 12.3 68.33
6 NS 5PcW-3 800 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
17 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,05 % 7 NS 2S S-1 -100 6.8 37.78
8 NS 3S E+2 -460 0.1 0.56
9 NS 5T N-2 -100 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 15,00 %
16 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 39,22 %10 NS 4C W+1 -650 12.3 68.33
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 5.7 31.67
12 NS 2C N+2 170 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
15 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 47,80 %13 NS 4C N+1 650 12.3 68.33
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 6.8 37.78
15 NS 1S W+1 -120 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
14 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 56,52 %16 NS 5P N-1 -50 2.3 12.78
17 NS 2S N+3 210 2.3 12.78
18 NS 3C W+1 -170 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
13 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 54,88 %19 NS 4P W-1 100 16.8 93.33
20 NS 5PcN-9 -2600 0.1 0.56
21 NS 3C E+1 -170 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 53,28 %22 NS 3S S+1 430 10.1 56.11
23 NS 4P W+2 -680 2.3 12.78
24 NS 3P E+1 -170 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 23,15 %
21 COLLET Claudine -NELIS Claude : 41,03 %28 NS 3S W-3 150 18 100.00
29 NS 2P W-1 100 1 5.56
30 NS 3S S = 400 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,84 %31 NS 3C E-1 50 15.7 87.22
32 NS 3K S+1 130 14.6 81.11
33 NS 3S N+2 460 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
Total : 246,9 / 540 = 45,72 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 -
21 COLLET Claudine -NELIS Claude : 41,03 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,84 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 59,24 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
18 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,88 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,05 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
16 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 39,22 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
15 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 47,80 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 56,52 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
13 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 54,88 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
22 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,88 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 594 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 54,41 % 1 EO 3P S+1 170 0.1 0.56
2 EO 4PcS+1 990 0.1 0.56
3 EO 3S S+2 460 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 2,59 %
7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 65,59 % 4 EO 3C N-1 -100 11.2 62.22
5 EO 3C N-1 -100 13.4 74.44
6 EO 3S E-3 300 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 49,81 %
2 MOLS Bruno -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,20 % 7 EO 3S S-2 -200 16.8 93.33
8 EO 3S E-2 100 0.1 0.56
9 EO 4T N-1 -50 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,74 %10 EO 3S W+2 -660 12.3 68.33
11 EO 3S E = -400 0.1 0.56
12 EO 2P E-2 100 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 47,78 %
3 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 41,81 %13 EO 4C N+1 650 5.7 31.67
14 EO 3S E+2 -460 16.8 93.33
15 EO 1S E+2 -150 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 68,70 %
9 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 55,06 %16 EO 4P N-2 -100 17.9 99.44
17 EO 3S N+2 460 2.3 12.78
18 EO 2C W+1 -140 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
4 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,56 %19 EO 3P E = -140 14.6 81.11
20 EO 3K N+2 150 5.7 31.67
21 EO 3S W-1 50 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 39,81 %
10 de VIRON Baudouin -REVEL : 45,72 %22 EO 3S S+1 430 7.9 43.89
23 EO 4P W+2 -680 15.7 87.22
24 EO 3P E+1 -170 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 76,85 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,33 %25 EO 4P S-1 -50 15.7 87.22
26 EO 1S N-3 -300 15.7 87.22
27 EO 5CcN-2 -300 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 82,96 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -DELHEZ Jacques : 45,59 %31 EO 1S E+3 -180 15.7 87.22
32 EO 2K S+2 130 3.4 18.89
33 EO 4P S-1 -50 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 60,19 %
Total : 287,7 / 540 = 53,28 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel
7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 65,59 % 1 EO 2P S+1 140 9 50.00
2 EO 4P S+1 650 2.3 12.78
3 EO 3S S = 400 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 MOLS Bruno -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,20 % 4 EO 1S S+1 120 3.4 18.89
5 EO 4C N-1 -100 13.4 74.44
6 EO 3K N = 110 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 53,89 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,74 % 7 EO 3S S-1 -100 11.2 62.22
8 EO 3K W+1 -130 12.3 68.33
9 EO 5T N-2 -100 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 74,63 %
3 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 41,81 %10 EO 3S E+2 -660 12.3 68.33
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 12.3 68.33
12 EO 3T W-1 50 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 74,63 %
9 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 55,06 %13 EO 4C N = 620 13.4 74.44
14 EO 3S W+2 -460 16.8 93.33
15 EO 2S E-1 50 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
4 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,56 %16 EO 3P N+1 170 11.2 62.22
17 EO 3S S+2 460 2.3 12.78
18 EO 2C W = -110 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
10 de VIRON Baudouin -REVEL : 45,72 %19 EO 4P W-1 100 1.2 6.67
20 EO 5PcN-9 -2600 17.9 99.44
21 EO 3C E+1 -170 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,33 %22 EO 4C N = 420 15.7 87.22
23 EO 6K S-1 -100 6.8 37.78
24 EO 3P E-1 50 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
11 - : 0,00 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -DELHEZ Jacques : 45,59 %28 EO 2S W+1 -150 18 100.00
29 EO 3P W-3 300 1 5.56
30 EO 3S S = 400 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 266,7 / 486 = 54,88 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,74 % 4 EO 2S S-1 -100 11.2 62.22
5 EO 4C N-1 -100 13.4 74.44
6 EO 3K N = 110 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
3 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 41,81 % 7 EO 2S S+2 180 4.6 25.56
8 EO 3K W = -110 6.8 37.78
9 EO 1S N = 90 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 33,70 %
9 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 55,06 %10 EO 1P W+3 -170 0.1 0.56
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 12.3 68.33
12 EO 2C N+1 140 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
4 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,56 %13 EO 3S S-2 -200 17.9 99.44
14 EO 3S W+1 -430 11.2 62.22
15 EO 1S E+1 -120 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
10 de VIRON Baudouin -REVEL : 45,72 %16 EO 5P N-1 -50 15.7 87.22
17 EO 2S N+3 210 15.7 87.22
18 EO 3C W+1 -170 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,33 %19 EO 3P E-1 100 1.2 6.67
20 EO 5C S-2 -200 14.6 81.11
21 EO 3S W-1 50 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
11 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -DELHEZ Jacques : 45,59 %25 EO 3P S = 140 7.9 43.89
26 EO 4K S-2 -200 13.4 74.44
27 EO 2P W+1 -140 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 54,41 %28 EO 1S W-1 50 7 38.89
29 EO 2P W-1 100 17 94.44
30 EO 3C S+2 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 65,59 %31 EO 2P W+1 -140 9 50.00
32 EO 3K S = 110 11.2 62.22
33 EO 3S N+1 430 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 274,7 / 486 = 56,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,74 % 1 EO 3P S = 140 9 50.00
2 EO 5C W-1 50 14.6 81.11
3 EO 3S S+1 430 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
9 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 55,06 % 7 EO 2S S-1 -100 11.2 62.22
8 EO 4K W = -130 12.3 68.33
9 EO 3S N-1 -50 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 64,26 %
4 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,56 %10 EO 4C E+1 -650 5.7 31.67
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 12.3 68.33
12 EO 3C N = 140 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
10 de VIRON Baudouin -REVEL : 45,72 %13 EO 4C N+1 650 5.7 31.67
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 11.2 62.22
15 EO 1S W+1 -120 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,33 %16 EO 2P N+1 140 13.4 74.44
17 EO 3S N+1 430 9 50.00
18 EO 4C W-1 50 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 43,70 %
11 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -DELHEZ Jacques : 45,59 %22 EO 3S S+2 460 0.1 0.56
23 EO 5C W = -650 11.2 62.22
24 EO 2C E = -110 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 54,41 %25 EO 2P S+2 170 2.3 12.78
26 EO 2S E = -120 2.3 12.78
27 EO 4P W = -420 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 65,59 %28 EO 2S W = -120 14 77.78
29 EO 3P W-3 300 1 5.56
30 EO 4C N = 420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
2 MOLS Bruno -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,20 %31 EO 3C E+1 -170 13.4 74.44
32 EO 3T N-2 -100 15.7 87.22
33 EO 3S N+2 460 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
Total : 232,3 / 486 = 47,80 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard
3 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 41,81 % 1 EO 4P S-1 -50 15.7 87.22
2 EO 4P W = -420 17.9 99.44
3 EO 3S S+2 460 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
9 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 55,06 % 4 EO 1S S = 90 6.8 37.78
5 EO 3C N-1 -100 13.4 74.44
6 EO 3K N+1 130 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 de VIRON Baudouin -REVEL : 45,72 %10 EO 4C W+1 -650 5.7 31.67
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 12.3 68.33
12 EO 2C N+2 170 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,33 %13 EO 4C N+1 650 5.7 31.67
14 EO 3S W-1 50 1.2 6.67
15 EO 2S E = -120 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 27,41 %
11 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -DELHEZ Jacques : 45,59 %19 EO 2S W = -120 11.2 62.22
20 EO 2K N+1 110 9 50.00
21 EO 3S W+1 -430 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 54,41 %22 EO 3S S+1 430 7.9 43.89
23 EO 5K N = 600 0.1 0.56
24 EO 3P E = -140 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 65,59 %25 EO 2P S+3 200 0.1 0.56
26 EO 4T W = -130 7.9 43.89
27 EO 4C N-1 -50 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 19,07 %
2 MOLS Bruno -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,20 %28 EO 2S W-1 50 7 38.89
29 EO 3P W-2 200 7 38.89
30 EO 3S S = 400 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,74 %31 EO 4C E-1 50 2.3 12.78
32 EO 2S N+3 210 0.1 0.56
33 EO 3S N+2 460 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 8,70 %
Total : 190,6 / 486 = 39,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
9 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 55,06 % 1 EO 4T E-3 150 2.3 12.78
2 EO 3P S+2 200 6.8 37.78
3 EO 3S S+1 430 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
4 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,56 % 4 EO 4P N-3 -300 17.9 99.44
5 EO 3C N = 140 5.7 31.67
6 EO 3K N+1 130 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 56,30 %
10 de VIRON Baudouin -REVEL : 45,72 % 7 EO 2S S-1 -100 11.2 62.22
8 EO 3S E+2 -460 17.9 99.44
9 EO 5T N-2 -100 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 85,00 %
11 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -DELHEZ Jacques : 45,59 %16 EO 4P N = 420 7.9 43.89
17 EO 3S N = 400 13.4 74.44
18 EO 2C W+2 -170 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 54,41 %19 EO 2P E+1 -140 14.6 81.11
20 EO 2K N+3 150 5.7 31.67
21 EO 3S W+2 -460 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 65,59 %22 EO 3S S+1 430 7.9 43.89
23 EO 6P W-2 200 2.3 12.78
24 EO 2P E+1 -140 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
2 MOLS Bruno -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,20 %25 EO 3P S = 140 7.9 43.89
26 EO 4T E = -130 7.9 43.89
27 EO 5C N-2 -100 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 39,81 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,74 %28 EO 2P W-1 50 7 38.89
29 EO 3K S = 110 13 72.22
30 EO 4C S+2 480 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
3 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 41,81 %31 EO 2K W+3 -150 11.2 62.22
32 EO 2S S = 120 7.9 43.89
33 EO 3S N-1 -50 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 60,19 %
Total : 262,7 / 486 = 54,05 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse
4 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,56 % 1 EO 4PcS-1 -100 17.9 99.44
2 EO 4P S = 620 4.6 25.56
3 EO 3S S+1 430 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 56,30 %
10 de VIRON Baudouin -REVEL : 45,72 % 4 EO 2S S-1 -100 11.2 62.22
5 EO 3C N = 140 5.7 31.67
6 EO 5PcW-3 800 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,33 % 7 EO 3S S-2 -200 16.8 93.33
8 EO 2S E = -120 9 50.00
9 EO 5T N = 400 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
11 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 54,41 %16 EO 4P N+1 450 4.6 25.56
17 EO 3S N+1 430 9 50.00
18 EO 2C W+2 -170 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 52,22 %
7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 65,59 %19 EO 4C S-2 -100 7.9 43.89
20 EO 5K N = 600 1.2 6.67
21 EO 4C E = -420 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
2 MOLS Bruno -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,20 %22 EO 5C N-1 -50 17.9 99.44
23 EO 5P W-1 100 4.6 25.56
24 EO 3C W-2 100 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,74 %25 EO 4P S-1 -50 15.7 87.22
26 EO 5T E = -600 17.9 99.44
27 EO 3P W = -140 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 80,93 %
3 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 41,81 %28 EO 3S W-2 100 2 11.11
29 EO 2K S+1 110 13 72.22
30 EO 4P S = 420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
9 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 55,06 %31 EO 1S E = -90 6.8 37.78
32 EO 1S N+1 120 7.9 43.89
33 EO 2P S+1 140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
Total : 232,7 / 486 = 47,88 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
10 de VIRON Baudouin -REVEL : 45,72 % 1 EO 3P S = 140 9 50.00
2 EO 4CcW-1 100 11.2 62.22
3 EO 3S S = 400 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,33 % 4 EO 2S S = 120 3.4 18.89
5 EO 4C N-1 -100 13.4 74.44
6 EO 5KcN-2 -300 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 64,26 %
11 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -DELHEZ Jacques : 45,59 %10 EO 4C E+2 -680 16.8 93.33
11 EO 4P E = -420 3.4 18.89
12 EO 3K S-1 -100 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 54,41 %13 EO 4C S+1 650 5.7 31.67
14 EO 3S W+1 -430 11.2 62.22
15 EO 3S W+1 -430 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
2 MOLS Bruno -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,20 %19 EO 4P E = -620 17.9 99.44
20 EO 5K N = 600 1.2 6.67
21 EO 3S W+2 -460 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,74 %22 EO 3S S+1 430 7.9 43.89
23 EO 5P E = -650 11.2 62.22
24 EO 4P E-1 50 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
3 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 41,81 %25 EO 2P S+1 140 7.9 43.89
26 EO 4T E = -130 7.9 43.89
27 EO 4P W-1 50 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
9 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 55,06 %28 EO 1S W+1 -120 14 77.78
29 EO 2P W-2 200 7 38.89
30 EO 4P S+2 480 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
4 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,56 %31 EO 3TcS-2 -500 17.9 99.44
32 EO 2P W = -110 17.9 99.44
33 EO 4P S-1 -50 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 91,11 %
Total : 287,9 / 486 = 59,24 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,33 % 1 EO 3P S = 140 9 50.00
2 EO 4C W-1 50 14.6 81.11
3 EO 3S S+1 430 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
11 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -DELHEZ Jacques : 45,59 % 7 EO 1C S+1 110 6.8 37.78
8 EO 3S E+1 -430 15.7 87.22
9 EO 4CcE-2 500 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 54,41 %10 EO 4C E+1 -650 5.7 31.67
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 12.3 68.33
12 EO 2C N = 110 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 65,59 %13 EO 4C N+1 650 5.7 31.67
14 EO 3S W-1 50 1.2 6.67
15 EO 1S S-1 -100 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 17,04 %
2 MOLS Bruno -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,20 %16 EO 3S S+2 460 2.3 12.78
17 EO 3S N+1 430 9 50.00
18 EO 2C W+1 -140 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
3 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 41,81 %22 EO 3S S+1 430 7.9 43.89
23 EO 5PcW = -850 17.9 99.44
24 EO 3P E = -140 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
9 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 55,06 %25 EO 2P N+1 140 7.9 43.89
26 EO 3K N-1 -100 0.1 0.56
27 EO 5C N-2 -100 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 25,37 %
4 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,56 %28 EO 3K W-1 50 7 38.89
29 EO 2P W-2 200 7 38.89
30 EO 3S N = 400 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 de VIRON Baudouin -REVEL : 45,72 %31 EO 3C E-1 50 2.3 12.78
32 EO 3K S+1 130 3.4 18.89
33 EO 3S N+2 460 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
Total : 198,5 / 486 = 40,84 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 COLLET Claudine -NELIS Claude
11 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -DELHEZ Jacques : 45,59 % 4 EO 2C W-3 300 0.1 0.56
5 EO 4P W-3 150 2.3 12.78
6 EO 4KcS-1 -100 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 54,41 % 7 EO 2KcW-1 200 2.3 12.78
8 EO 3S E-1 50 3.4 18.89
9 EO 4C E-2 200 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 19,07 %
7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 65,59 %10 EO 4C W+1 -650 5.7 31.67
11 EO 4P W = -420 3.4 18.89
12 EO 2PcE-3 500 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 17,04 %
2 MOLS Bruno -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,20 %13 EO 4C N+1 650 5.7 31.67
14 EO 3S W = -400 5.7 31.67
15 EO 1S E+1 -120 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 35,74 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,74 %16 EO 5CcE-3 800 0.1 0.56
17 EO 3S N+2 460 2.3 12.78
18 EO 4C W-1 50 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 6,67 %
3 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 41,81 %19 EO 3C S-1 -50 4.6 25.56
20 EO 4C S-2 -200 14.6 81.11
21 EO 3S W+2 -460 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 64,63 %
4 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,56 %25 EO 2P S-1 -50 15.7 87.22
26 EO 4T W = -130 7.9 43.89
27 EO 4P W = -420 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 74,81 %
10 de VIRON Baudouin -REVEL : 45,72 %28 EO 3S W-3 150 0 0.00
29 EO 2P W-1 100 17 94.44
30 EO 3S S = 400 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,33 %31 EO 4P W-1 50 2.3 12.78
32 EO 3P W-1 100 13.4 74.44
33 EO 4P S-2 -100 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
Total : 199,4 / 486 = 41,03 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe
6 COOLEN Joseph -DELHEZ Jacques : 45,59 % 1 EO 3P S = 140 9 50.00
2 EO 3P S+1 170 9 50.00
3 EO 3S S = 400 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 54,41 % 4 EO 2S S-2 -200 15.7 87.22
5 EO 4C N = 620 0.1 0.56
6 EO 3K N+1 130 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 65,59 % 7 EO 3S S = 600 0.1 0.56
8 EO 3S E-1 50 3.4 18.89
9 EO 4T N-1 -50 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 27,22 %
2 MOLS Bruno -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,20 %10 EO 4C E+2 -680 16.8 93.33
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 12.3 68.33
12 EO 2C N+1 140 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,74 %13 EO 3S S = 600 15.7 87.22
14 EO 3S E = -400 5.7 31.67
15 EO 1S W+2 -150 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
3 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 41,81 %16 EO 4P N = 420 7.9 43.89
17 EO 2S N+2 180 17.9 99.44
18 EO 2C W+2 -170 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 74,81 %
9 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 55,06 %19 EO 4CcS-1 -100 7.9 43.89
20 EO 4C S-1 -100 11.2 62.22
21 EO 4C E = -420 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,56 %22 EO 3S S+1 430 7.9 43.89
23 EO 5C W = -650 11.2 62.22
24 EO 3P E = -140 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,33 %28 EO 2S W = -120 14 77.78
29 EO 2P W-2 200 7 38.89
30 EO 4C S+1 450 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
11 - : 0,00 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 266,7 / 486 = 54,88 %
|
|