|
Tournoi du 30-06-14
1 60,15 6 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
2 59,60 8 MATELART Marc -GROSFILS Colette
3 58,17 2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
4 55,55 1 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
5 54,52 4 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
6 51,02 5 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
7 48,03 9 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier
8 46,32 11 de VIRON Baudouin -de Bergeyck Christine
9 45,00 10 NELIS Claude -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
10 42,78 3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
11 40,20 7 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse
12 38,67 12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN DOOREN Michele
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 62,32 22 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
2 58,13 17 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
3 57,97 21 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard
4 56,17 18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
5 53,17 23 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
6 51,05 20 PIETQUIN Joseph -WILLEMS Jacques
7 50,07 19 COLLET Claudine -VAN AVERMAET Martine
8 46,12 16 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
9 45,85 14 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
10 43,48 13 BRIOT Fernand -MASSAUX Joel
11 38,85 15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
12 36,83 24 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
PAIRE Nr : 1 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
13 BRIOT Fernand -MASSAUX Joel : 43,48 % 1 NS 4P E-1 50 18 90.00
2 NS 3S S = 600 7 35.00
3 NS 4P N = 420 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
23 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,17 % 4 NS 3S W-1 100 18 90.00
5 NS 3T E-1 50 11 55.00
6 NS 2C N+1 140 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
22 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,32 % 7 NS 2S N = 120 13 65.00
8 NS 3S W-1 50 12 60.00
9 NS 1S W+2 -150 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
21 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,97 %10 NS 3T W-2 200 16 80.00
11 NS 3C W+3 -230 10 50.00
12 NS 4C N+2 680 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
20 PIETQUIN Joseph -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,05 %13 NS 3S E-1 100 16 80.00
14 NS 3K N = 110 15 75.00
15 NS 4C E-4 200 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
19 COLLET Claudine -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,07 %16 NS 1P W+2 -140 2 10.00
17 NS 3C W = -140 11 55.00
18 NS 3C N = 140 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 56,17 %19 NS 3K N-1 -50 10 50.00
20 NS 4C N-2 -200 4 20.00
21 NS 3P W+1 -170 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
17 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,13 %22 NS 3S E-1 100 15 75.00
23 NS 3S W+2 -660 1 5.00
24 NS 1ScE+1 -280 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
16 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 46,12 %25 NS 3PcS-1 -100 2.3 11.50
26 NS 3T E+1 -130 11.1 55.50
27 NS 4P E-2 100 19.9 99.50 µ Tbl = 55,50 %
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,85 %28 NS 3P E-1 50 11 55.00
29 NS 4C N = 620 18 90.00
30 NS 3S S+2 460 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
Total : 333,3 / 600 = 55,55 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
14 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 45,85 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 6 30.00
5 NS 3T E-1 50 11 55.00
6 NS 3C N = 140 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
13 BRIOT Fernand -MASSAUX Joel : 43,48 % 7 NS 2S N = 120 13 65.00
8 NS 3S E-1 50 12 60.00
9 NS 1S W+1 -120 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
23 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,17 %10 NS 2T W-1 100 4 20.00
11 NS 2C W+2 -170 18 90.00
12 NS 4C N+2 680 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
22 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,32 %13 NS 4C E-2 200 20 100.00
14 NS 4T E-1 50 9 45.00
15 NS 4P N+1 650 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,67 %
21 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,97 %16 NS 2K S+1 110 19 95.00
17 NS 2C W+2 -170 5 25.00
18 NS 4C N-1 -100 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
20 PIETQUIN Joseph -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,05 %19 NS 2C W-2 200 19 95.00
20 NS 3P W+2 -200 4 20.00
21 NS 4P W+2 -480 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
24 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 36,83 %22 NS 3S E-1 100 15 75.00
23 NS 3S W-1 100 17 85.00
24 NS 2C S-1 -50 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 56,17 %25 NS 3C W-1 100 8.9 44.50
26 NS 3T W-1 100 15.5 77.50
27 NS 3S E = -400 5.6 28.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
17 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,13 %28 NS 2P W = -110 5 25.00
29 NS 4CcN = 790 20 100.00
30 NS 3S S = 400 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
16 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 46,12 %31 NS 3S S = 600 12 60.00
32 NS 3S E-2 200 17 85.00
33 NS 3P W-2 100 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,67 %
Total : 349,0 / 600 = 58,17 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
17 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,13 % 1 NS 3S E+3 -490 0 0.00
2 NS 3S S = 600 7 35.00
3 NS 3K E+1 -130 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 13,33 %
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,85 % 7 NS 3K N = 110 5 25.00
8 NS 2P W = -110 1 5.00
9 NS 1T N+1 90 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
24 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 36,83 %10 NS 2P E-3 300 20 100.00
11 NS 4C W-1 50 20 100.00
12 NS 4C N+2 680 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 86,67 %
13 BRIOT Fernand -MASSAUX Joel : 43,48 %13 NS 4K W = -130 8 40.00
14 NS 3K N = 110 15 75.00
15 NS 4CcE-2 300 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
23 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,17 %16 NS 2P W+1 -140 2 10.00
17 NS 4C W = -420 0 0.00
18 NS 3K W-1 50 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 18,33 %
22 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,32 %19 NS 2P N-4 -200 0 0.00
20 NS 4P W = -620 0 0.00
21 NS 4P W+2 -480 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 1,67 %
21 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,97 %22 NS 3S E = -600 3 15.00
23 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 30.00
24 NS 2K N+1 110 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
20 PIETQUIN Joseph -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,05 %25 NS 4C W-1 100 8.9 44.50
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 1.2 6.00
27 NS 3S E = -400 5.6 28.00 µ Tbl = 26,17 %
19 COLLET Claudine -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,07 %28 NS 4P W-3 150 20 100.00
29 NS 5T E-2 200 15 75.00
30 NS 5K S = 400 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 56,17 %31 NS 3S S+1 630 19 95.00
32 NS 3S E-1 100 8 40.00
33 NS 2P E+1 -140 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
Total : 256,7 / 600 = 42,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
19 COLLET Claudine -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,07 % 1 NS 3S W+1 -430 6 30.00
2 NS 3S N = 600 7 35.00
3 NS 4P N = 420 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 56,17 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 6 30.00
5 NS 2T E+1 -110 5 25.00
6 NS 2C N+2 170 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
16 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 46,12 %10 NS 3C S+1 170 11 55.00
11 NS 2C W+3 -200 14 70.00
12 NS 4C N+2 680 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,85 %13 NS 2P S+1 140 18 90.00
14 NS 3K N-1 -50 5 25.00
15 NS 2P N+3 200 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
14 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 45,85 %16 NS 3K S-1 -50 14 70.00
17 NS 2C W+2 -170 5 25.00
18 NS 4K W-1 50 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
13 BRIOT Fernand -MASSAUX Joel : 43,48 %19 NS 2C S-1 -50 10 50.00
20 NS 4C N-2 -200 4 20.00
21 NS 2P W+1 -140 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
23 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,17 %22 NS 3S E-1 100 15 75.00
23 NS 3K E+2 -150 14 70.00
24 NS 1S E+1 -120 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
22 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,32 %25 NS 3P S = 140 14.4 72.00
26 NS 3T E+1 -130 11.1 55.50
27 NS 3S E = -400 5.6 28.00 µ Tbl = 51,83 %
21 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,97 %28 NS 2C E-1 50 11 55.00
29 NS 3C N+1 170 11 55.00
30 NS 3S S+1 430 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
24 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 36,83 %31 NS 3S N+1 630 19 95.00
32 NS 3S E-2 200 17 85.00
33 NS 2T W+1 -110 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 86,67 %
Total : 327,1 / 600 = 54,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
21 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,97 % 1 NS 3S W+2 -460 2 10.00
2 NS 3S N = 600 7 35.00
3 NS 4P N+1 450 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
20 PIETQUIN Joseph -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,05 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 6 30.00
5 NS 3S E-2 100 18 90.00
6 NS 2C N+1 140 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
19 COLLET Claudine -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,07 % 7 NS 2S N+1 150 20 100.00
8 NS 3S W-1 50 12 60.00
9 NS 2KcS = 180 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 86,67 %
17 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,13 %13 NS 2P S-1 -100 14 70.00
14 NS 4T E-1 50 9 45.00
15 NS 3P N = 140 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
16 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 46,12 %16 NS 2P W = -110 7 35.00
17 NS 2S E = -120 14 70.00
18 NS 3K W-1 50 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
24 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 36,83 %19 NS 2T W = -90 6 30.00
20 NS 3P W+1 -170 11 55.00
21 NS 4P W-1 50 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
14 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 45,85 %22 NS 3S E-1 100 15 75.00
23 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 30.00
24 NS 1S E = -90 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
13 BRIOT Fernand -MASSAUX Joel : 43,48 %25 NS 4C W-2 200 19.9 99.50
26 NS 1S E+3 -180 6.7 33.50
27 NS 3S E-1 50 15.5 77.50 µ Tbl = 70,17 %
23 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,17 %28 NS 2K S-3 -300 0 0.00
29 NS 4P W-2 200 15 75.00
30 NS 5K S = 400 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
22 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,32 %31 NS 2S S+1 150 3 15.00
32 NS 3S W = -600 1 5.00
33 NS 2P E+2 -170 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 15,00 %
Total : 306,1 / 600 = 51,02 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
23 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,17 % 1 NS 4C W = -420 11 55.00
2 NS 3S N+1 630 18 90.00
3 NS 4C S = 420 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 71,67 %
22 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,32 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 6 30.00
5 NS 3T W = -110 5 25.00
6 NS 3C N = 140 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
24 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 36,83 % 7 NS 2S N = 120 13 65.00
8 NS 4C E-1 50 12 60.00
9 NS 2T N-2 -100 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
20 PIETQUIN Joseph -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,05 %10 NS 3C N = 140 8 40.00
11 NS 4C W = -420 7 35.00
12 NS 4C N+2 680 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 56,17 %16 NS 3K S-1 -50 14 70.00
17 NS 2S W-1 50 18 90.00
18 NS 3K W-1 50 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
17 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,13 %19 NS 2C S-2 -100 4 20.00
20 NS 3P W+1 -170 11 55.00
21 NS 4P W-1 50 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
16 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 46,12 %22 NS 2S E = -120 7 35.00
23 NS 3S W = -600 11 55.00
24 NS 2K N-2 -100 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,85 %25 NS 2P S+2 170 17.7 88.50
26 NS 2P S = 110 17.7 88.50
27 NS 3S E-1 50 15.5 77.50 µ Tbl = 84,83 %
14 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 45,85 %28 NS 4P W-2 100 17 85.00
29 NS 2C S+2 170 11 55.00
30 NS 3S S+2 460 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
13 BRIOT Fernand -MASSAUX Joel : 43,48 %31 NS 3S S = 600 12 60.00
32 NS 4P W-1 100 8 40.00
33 NS 4P E-1 50 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
Total : 360,9 / 600 = 60,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse
14 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 45,85 % 1 NS 2P W+1 -140 16 80.00
2 NS 3S N+1 630 18 90.00
3 NS 3K E+1 -130 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
13 BRIOT Fernand -MASSAUX Joel : 43,48 % 4 NS 3S W-1 100 18 90.00
5 NS 3S E-2 100 18 90.00
6 NS 3C N = 140 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
23 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,17 % 7 NS 2S N-2 -200 0 0.00
8 NS 3S W-1 50 12 60.00
9 NS 2P E+2 -170 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
22 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,32 %10 NS 3T W-2 200 16 80.00
11 NS 4C W+1 -450 2 10.00
12 NS 4C S+2 680 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
21 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,97 %13 NS 2P S-2 -200 2 10.00
14 NS 5K N-2 -100 1 5.00
15 NS 4C E-3 150 7 35.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
19 COLLET Claudine -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,07 %19 NS 2K N+1 110 16 80.00
20 NS 4P W-1 100 20 100.00
21 NS 4P W+1 -450 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 56,17 %22 NS 3S E = -600 3 15.00
23 NS 3S W+2 -660 1 5.00
24 NS 1S E+1 -120 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 15,00 %
17 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,13 %25 NS 3C W = -140 0.1 0.50
26 NS 3C N-2 -200 4.5 22.50
27 NS 3S E = -400 5.6 28.00 µ Tbl = 17,00 %
24 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 36,83 %28 NS 2P E-1 50 11 55.00
29 NS 5C S-2 -200 0 0.00
30 NS 3S N+3 490 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,85 %31 NS 3S S = 600 12 60.00
32 NS 3S E = -600 1 5.00
33 NS 2P E+2 -170 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
Total : 241,2 / 600 = 40,20 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -GROSFILS Colette
16 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 46,12 % 1 NS 6S W-5 250 20 100.00
2 NS 3S S = 600 7 35.00
3 NS 4P N = 420 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,85 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 6 30.00
5 NS 3T E-2 100 18 90.00
6 NS 4C N = 420 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
14 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 45,85 % 7 NS 2S N = 120 13 65.00
8 NS 3S W-1 50 12 60.00
9 NS 2K S-2 -100 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
13 BRIOT Fernand -MASSAUX Joel : 43,48 %10 NS 3C N+1 170 11 55.00
11 NS 4C W = -420 7 35.00
12 NS 4C N+2 680 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
23 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,17 %13 NS 2C W+1 -140 6 30.00
14 NS 3K N = 110 15 75.00
15 NS 4P N = 620 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
24 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 36,83 %16 NS 4K S-2 -100 10 50.00
17 NS 2C W+1 -140 11 55.00
18 NS 3K W-1 50 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
20 PIETQUIN Joseph -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,05 %22 NS 3S E-1 100 15 75.00
23 NS 3S W-1 100 17 85.00
24 NS 2C S-1 -50 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
19 COLLET Claudine -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,07 %25 NS 3C W-1 100 8.9 44.50
26 NS 3T E+1 -130 11.1 55.50
27 NS 3S E = -400 5.6 28.00 µ Tbl = 42,67 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 56,17 %28 NS 2P W-1 50 11 55.00
29 NS 4T W-1 100 7 35.00
30 NS 3S S = 400 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
17 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,13 %31 NS 3S S = 600 12 60.00
32 NS 3S E-2 200 17 85.00
33 NS 2P E+1 -140 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 357,6 / 600 = 59,60 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 56,17 % 1 NS 4P E = -420 11 55.00
2 NS 3S N = 600 7 35.00
3 NS 4P N-1 -50 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
24 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 36,83 % 4 NS 2S E = -120 14 70.00
5 NS 1S W+2 -150 1 5.00
6 NS 3P E-5 500 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
16 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 46,12 % 7 NS 2K N+1 110 5 25.00
8 NS 3S E-1 50 12 60.00
9 NS 1S W+1 -120 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,85 %10 NS 3C N-1 -100 0 0.00
11 NS 2C W+3 -200 14 70.00
12 NS 4C N+2 680 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
14 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 45,85 %13 NS 1K W+2 -110 11 55.00
14 NS 3K N = 110 15 75.00
15 NS 2P N = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
13 BRIOT Fernand -MASSAUX Joel : 43,48 %16 NS 2P W+1 -140 2 10.00
17 NS 2C W+2 -170 5 25.00
18 NS 4K W-2 100 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
23 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,17 %19 NS 2P N-3 -150 2 10.00
20 NS 3P W = -140 17 85.00
21 NS 4P W-1 50 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
21 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,97 %25 NS 3P S-1 -50 4.5 22.50
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 1.2 6.00
27 NS 3S E-1 50 15.5 77.50 µ Tbl = 35,33 %
20 PIETQUIN Joseph -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,05 %28 NS 4P W-2 100 17 85.00
29 NS 2P W = -110 2 10.00
30 NS 3S S+2 460 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
19 COLLET Claudine -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,07 %31 NS 4PcW-2 300 6 30.00
32 NS 3S E-2 200 17 85.00
33 NS 2P E+1 -140 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
Total : 288,2 / 600 = 48,03 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 NELIS Claude -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
20 PIETQUIN Joseph -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,05 % 1 NS 2P E+2 -170 14 70.00
2 NS 3S N = 600 7 35.00
3 NS 4P N-1 -50 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
19 COLLET Claudine -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,07 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 6 30.00
5 NS 3T E-1 50 11 55.00
6 NS 4C N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,33 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 56,17 % 7 NS 2S N = 120 13 65.00
8 NS 3S W-1 50 12 60.00
9 NS 1S W+1 -120 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
17 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,13 %10 NS 3T W-1 100 4 20.00
11 NS 3C W+2 -200 14 70.00
12 NS 4C N+2 680 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
16 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 46,12 %13 NS 2C W+2 -170 4 20.00
14 NS 3K N+1 130 20 100.00
15 NS 3C E-3 150 7 35.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,85 %16 NS 2K S+1 110 19 95.00
17 NS 2C W+2 -170 5 25.00
18 NS 4K W-2 100 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
14 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 45,85 %19 NS 2P N-1 -50 10 50.00
20 NS 3P W+1 -170 11 55.00
21 NS 4P W-1 50 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
13 BRIOT Fernand -MASSAUX Joel : 43,48 %22 NS 2S E = -120 7 35.00
23 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 30.00
24 NS 2K N-1 -50 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
22 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,32 %28 NS 2C E = -110 5 25.00
29 NS 4C N-1 -100 4 20.00
30 NS 3S N = 400 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
21 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,97 %31 NS 3T S+1 130 0 0.00
32 NS 3S E-1 100 8 40.00
33 NS 3P E+2 -200 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 15,00 %
Total : 270,0 / 600 = 45,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 de VIRON Baudouin -de Bergeyck Christine
22 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,32 % 1 NS 3S W+1 -430 6 30.00
2 NS 3S N = 600 7 35.00
3 NS 4P N-1 -50 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
21 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,97 % 4 NS 3S W-1 100 18 90.00
5 NS 3T E-1 50 11 55.00
6 NS 3C N = 140 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
20 PIETQUIN Joseph -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,05 % 7 NS 2S N = 120 13 65.00
8 NS 2C E = -110 1 5.00
9 NS 1S W+3 -180 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
19 COLLET Claudine -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,07 %10 NS 2T W-1 100 4 20.00
11 NS 4C W+1 -450 2 10.00
12 NS 4C N = 620 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 13,33 %
24 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 36,83 %13 NS 3S E = -600 0 0.00
14 NS 4K N-1 -50 5 25.00
15 NS 3CcE-3 500 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
17 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,13 %16 NS 3K S-1 -50 14 70.00
17 NS 3S E-2 100 20 100.00
18 NS 3K W-1 50 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 71,67 %
16 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 46,12 %19 NS 2C W-1 100 14 70.00
20 NS 3P W = -140 17 85.00
21 NS 2P W+1 -140 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,85 %22 NS 3S E-1 100 15 75.00
23 NS 3S W = -600 11 55.00
24 NS 3P W-2 100 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
14 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 45,85 %25 NS 3P S = 140 14.4 72.00
26 NS 3T W-2 200 19.9 99.50
27 NS 3S E = -400 5.6 28.00 µ Tbl = 66,50 %
23 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,17 %31 NS 2S S+1 150 3 15.00
32 NS 5P W-1 100 8 40.00
33 NS 2P E+3 -200 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
Total : 277,9 / 600 = 46,32 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN DOOREN Michele
24 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 36,83 % 1 NS 3S W+1 -430 6 30.00
2 NS 3S N+1 630 18 90.00
3 NS 4P N = 420 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
17 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,13 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 6 30.00
5 NS 1S W+2 -150 1 5.00
6 NS 2C N+1 140 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
21 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,97 % 7 NS 2S N-1 -100 2 10.00
8 NS 3S W-1 50 12 60.00
9 NS 1S W+2 -150 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
14 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 45,85 %10 NS 3T E-2 200 16 80.00
11 NS 4C W+1 -450 2 10.00
12 NS 3C N+2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 56,17 %13 NS 1C W+1 -110 11 55.00
14 NS 4K N-2 -100 1 5.00
15 NS 2P N+1 140 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
22 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,32 %16 NS 2P W = -110 7 35.00
17 NS 2PcN-1 -100 16 80.00
18 NS 3K E = -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 38,85 %19 NS 1S E-2 200 19 95.00
20 NS 2P W+2 -170 11 55.00
21 NS 2K E+1 -110 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
19 COLLET Claudine -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,07 %22 NS 3S E+1 -630 0 0.00
23 NS 3S E-3 300 20 100.00
24 NS 1S E+2 -150 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
16 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 46,12 %28 NS 1P W+3 -170 2 10.00
29 NS 4P E-1 100 7 35.00
30 NS 4K S+1 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,00 %
20 PIETQUIN Joseph -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,05 %31 NS 3S S = 600 12 60.00
32 NS 4P W-1 100 8 40.00
33 NS 2P E+1 -140 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
Total : 232,0 / 600 = 38,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 BRIOT Fernand -MASSAUX Joel
1 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 55,55 % 1 EO 4P E-1 50 2 10.00
2 EO 3S S = 600 13 65.00
3 EO 4P N = 420 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
7 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,20 % 4 EO 3S W-1 100 2 10.00
5 EO 3S E-2 100 2 10.00
6 EO 3C N = 140 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 58,17 % 7 EO 2S N = 120 7 35.00
8 EO 3S E-1 50 8 40.00
9 EO 1S W+1 -120 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
8 MATELART Marc -GROSFILS Colette : 59,60 %10 EO 3C N+1 170 9 45.00
11 EO 4C W = -420 13 65.00
12 EO 4C N+2 680 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 42,78 %13 EO 4K W = -130 12 60.00
14 EO 3K N = 110 5 25.00
15 EO 4CcE-2 300 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
9 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 48,03 %16 EO 2P W+1 -140 18 90.00
17 EO 2C W+2 -170 15 75.00
18 EO 4K W-2 100 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,52 %19 EO 2C S-1 -50 10 50.00
20 EO 4C N-2 -200 16 80.00
21 EO 2P W+1 -140 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
10 NELIS Claude -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 45,00 %22 EO 2S E = -120 13 65.00
23 EO 3S W+1 -630 14 70.00
24 EO 2K N-1 -50 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
5 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 51,02 %25 EO 4C W-2 200 0.1 0.50
26 EO 1S E+3 -180 13.3 66.50
27 EO 3S E-1 50 4.5 22.50 µ Tbl = 29,83 %
6 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 60,15 %31 EO 3S S = 600 8 40.00
32 EO 4P W-1 100 12 60.00
33 EO 4P E-1 50 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
Total : 260,9 / 600 = 43,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
7 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,20 % 1 EO 2P W+1 -140 4 20.00
2 EO 3S N+1 630 2 10.00
3 EO 3K E+1 -130 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 58,17 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 14 70.00
5 EO 3T E-1 50 9 45.00
6 EO 3C N = 140 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
8 MATELART Marc -GROSFILS Colette : 59,60 % 7 EO 2S N = 120 7 35.00
8 EO 3S W-1 50 8 40.00
9 EO 2K S-2 -100 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 38,67 %10 EO 3T E-2 200 4 20.00
11 EO 4C W+1 -450 18 90.00
12 EO 3C N+2 200 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
9 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 48,03 %13 EO 1K W+2 -110 9 45.00
14 EO 3K N = 110 5 25.00
15 EO 2P N = 110 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,52 %16 EO 3K S-1 -50 6 30.00
17 EO 2C W+2 -170 15 75.00
18 EO 4K W-1 50 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
10 NELIS Claude -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 45,00 %19 EO 2P N-1 -50 10 50.00
20 EO 3P W+1 -170 9 45.00
21 EO 4P W-1 50 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
5 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 51,02 %22 EO 3S E-1 100 5 25.00
23 EO 3S W+1 -630 14 70.00
24 EO 1S E = -90 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
11 de VIRON Baudouin -de Bergeyck Christine : 46,32 %25 EO 3P S = 140 5.6 28.00
26 EO 3T W-2 200 0.1 0.50
27 EO 3S E = -400 14.4 72.00 µ Tbl = 33,50 %
6 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 60,15 %28 EO 4P W-2 100 3 15.00
29 EO 2C S+2 170 9 45.00
30 EO 3S S+2 460 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
Total : 275,1 / 600 = 45,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
8 MATELART Marc -GROSFILS Colette : 59,60 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 14 70.00
5 EO 3T E-2 100 2 10.00
6 EO 4C N = 420 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 42,78 % 7 EO 3K N = 110 15 75.00
8 EO 2P W = -110 19 95.00
9 EO 1T N+1 90 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
9 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 48,03 %10 EO 3C N-1 -100 20 100.00
11 EO 2C W+3 -200 6 30.00
12 EO 4C N+2 680 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,52 %13 EO 2P S+1 140 2 10.00
14 EO 3K N-1 -50 15 75.00
15 EO 2P N+3 200 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
10 NELIS Claude -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 45,00 %16 EO 2K S+1 110 1 5.00
17 EO 2C W+2 -170 15 75.00
18 EO 4K W-2 100 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 38,67 %19 EO 1S E-2 200 1 5.00
20 EO 2P W+2 -170 9 45.00
21 EO 2K E+1 -110 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
11 de VIRON Baudouin -de Bergeyck Christine : 46,32 %22 EO 3S E-1 100 5 25.00
23 EO 3S W = -600 9 45.00
24 EO 3P W-2 100 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
6 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 60,15 %25 EO 2P S+2 170 2.3 11.50
26 EO 2P S = 110 2.3 11.50
27 EO 3S E-1 50 4.5 22.50 µ Tbl = 15,17 %
1 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 55,55 %28 EO 3P E-1 50 9 45.00
29 EO 4C N = 620 2 10.00
30 EO 3S S+2 460 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
7 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,20 %31 EO 3S S = 600 8 40.00
32 EO 3S E = -600 19 95.00
33 EO 2P E+2 -170 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
Total : 233,1 / 600 = 38,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
8 MATELART Marc -GROSFILS Colette : 59,60 % 1 EO 6S W-5 250 0 0.00
2 EO 3S S = 600 13 65.00
3 EO 4P N = 420 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
9 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 48,03 % 7 EO 2K N+1 110 15 75.00
8 EO 3S E-1 50 8 40.00
9 EO 1S W+1 -120 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,52 %10 EO 3C S+1 170 9 45.00
11 EO 2C W+3 -200 6 30.00
12 EO 4C N+2 680 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
10 NELIS Claude -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 45,00 %13 EO 2C W+2 -170 16 80.00
14 EO 3K N+1 130 0 0.00
15 EO 3C E-3 150 13 65.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
5 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 51,02 %16 EO 2P W = -110 13 65.00
17 EO 2S E = -120 6 30.00
18 EO 3K W-1 50 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 de VIRON Baudouin -de Bergeyck Christine : 46,32 %19 EO 2C W-1 100 6 30.00
20 EO 3P W = -140 3 15.00
21 EO 2P W+1 -140 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
6 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 60,15 %22 EO 2S E = -120 13 65.00
23 EO 3S W = -600 9 45.00
24 EO 2K N-2 -100 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
1 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 55,55 %25 EO 3PcS-1 -100 17.7 88.50
26 EO 3T E+1 -130 8.9 44.50
27 EO 4P E-2 100 0.1 0.50 µ Tbl = 44,50 %
12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 38,67 %28 EO 1P W+3 -170 18 90.00
29 EO 4P E-1 100 13 65.00
30 EO 4K S+1 150 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,00 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 58,17 %31 EO 3S S = 600 8 40.00
32 EO 3S E-2 200 3 15.00
33 EO 3P W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,33 %
Total : 276,7 / 600 = 46,12 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 42,78 % 1 EO 3S E+3 -490 20 100.00
2 EO 3S S = 600 13 65.00
3 EO 3K E+1 -130 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 86,67 %
12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 38,67 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 14 70.00
5 EO 1S W+2 -150 19 95.00
6 EO 2C N+1 140 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
10 NELIS Claude -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 45,00 %10 EO 3T W-1 100 16 80.00
11 EO 3C W+2 -200 6 30.00
12 EO 4C N+2 680 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 51,02 %13 EO 2P S-1 -100 6 30.00
14 EO 4T E-1 50 11 55.00
15 EO 3P N = 140 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
11 de VIRON Baudouin -de Bergeyck Christine : 46,32 %16 EO 3K S-1 -50 6 30.00
17 EO 3S E-2 100 0 0.00
18 EO 3K W-1 50 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 28,33 %
6 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 60,15 %19 EO 2C S-2 -100 16 80.00
20 EO 3P W+1 -170 9 45.00
21 EO 4P W-1 50 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
1 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 55,55 %22 EO 3S E-1 100 5 25.00
23 EO 3S W+2 -660 19 95.00
24 EO 1ScE+1 -280 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
7 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,20 %25 EO 3C W = -140 19.9 99.50
26 EO 3C N-2 -200 15.5 77.50
27 EO 3S E = -400 14.4 72.00 µ Tbl = 83,00 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 58,17 %28 EO 2P W = -110 15 75.00
29 EO 4CcN = 790 0 0.00
30 EO 3S S = 400 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
8 MATELART Marc -GROSFILS Colette : 59,60 %31 EO 3S S = 600 8 40.00
32 EO 3S E-2 200 3 15.00
33 EO 2P E+1 -140 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 348,8 / 600 = 58,13 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
9 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 48,03 % 1 EO 4P E = -420 9 45.00
2 EO 3S N = 600 13 65.00
3 EO 4P N-1 -50 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,52 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 14 70.00
5 EO 2T E+1 -110 15 75.00
6 EO 2C N+2 170 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
10 NELIS Claude -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 45,00 % 7 EO 2S N = 120 7 35.00
8 EO 3S W-1 50 8 40.00
9 EO 1S W+1 -120 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 38,67 %13 EO 1C W+1 -110 9 45.00
14 EO 4K N-2 -100 19 95.00
15 EO 2P N+1 140 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
6 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 60,15 %16 EO 3K S-1 -50 6 30.00
17 EO 2S W-1 50 2 10.00
18 EO 3K W-1 50 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
1 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 55,55 %19 EO 3K N-1 -50 10 50.00
20 EO 4C N-2 -200 16 80.00
21 EO 3P W+1 -170 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
7 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,20 %22 EO 3S E = -600 17 85.00
23 EO 3S W+2 -660 19 95.00
24 EO 1S E+1 -120 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 85,00 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 58,17 %25 EO 3C W-1 100 11.1 55.50
26 EO 3T W-1 100 4.5 22.50
27 EO 3S E = -400 14.4 72.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -GROSFILS Colette : 59,60 %28 EO 2P W-1 50 9 45.00
29 EO 4T W-1 100 13 65.00
30 EO 3S S = 400 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 42,78 %31 EO 3S S+1 630 1 5.00
32 EO 3S E-1 100 12 60.00
33 EO 2P E+1 -140 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
Total : 337,0 / 600 = 56,17 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 COLLET Claudine -VAN AVERMAET Martine
4 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,52 % 1 EO 3S W+1 -430 14 70.00
2 EO 3S N = 600 13 65.00
3 EO 4P N = 420 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
10 NELIS Claude -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 45,00 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 14 70.00
5 EO 3T E-1 50 9 45.00
6 EO 4C N-1 -50 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,67 %
5 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 51,02 % 7 EO 2S N+1 150 0 0.00
8 EO 3S W-1 50 8 40.00
9 EO 2KcS = 180 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 13,33 %
11 de VIRON Baudouin -de Bergeyck Christine : 46,32 %10 EO 2T W-1 100 16 80.00
11 EO 4C W+1 -450 18 90.00
12 EO 4C N = 620 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 86,67 %
1 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 55,55 %16 EO 1P W+2 -140 18 90.00
17 EO 3C W = -140 9 45.00
18 EO 3C N = 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
7 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,20 %19 EO 2K N+1 110 4 20.00
20 EO 4P W-1 100 0 0.00
21 EO 4P W+1 -450 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 38,67 %22 EO 3S E+1 -630 20 100.00
23 EO 3S E-3 300 0 0.00
24 EO 1S E+2 -150 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
8 MATELART Marc -GROSFILS Colette : 59,60 %25 EO 3C W-1 100 11.1 55.50
26 EO 3T E+1 -130 8.9 44.50
27 EO 3S E = -400 14.4 72.00 µ Tbl = 57,33 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 42,78 %28 EO 4P W-3 150 0 0.00
29 EO 5T E-2 200 5 25.00
30 EO 5K S = 400 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
9 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 48,03 %31 EO 4PcW-2 300 14 70.00
32 EO 3S E-2 200 3 15.00
33 EO 2P E+1 -140 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
Total : 300,4 / 600 = 50,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 PIETQUIN Joseph -WILLEMS Jacques
10 NELIS Claude -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 45,00 % 1 EO 2P E+2 -170 6 30.00
2 EO 3S N = 600 13 65.00
3 EO 4P N-1 -50 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
5 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 51,02 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 14 70.00
5 EO 3S E-2 100 2 10.00
6 EO 2C N+1 140 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
11 de VIRON Baudouin -de Bergeyck Christine : 46,32 % 7 EO 2S N = 120 7 35.00
8 EO 2C E = -110 19 95.00
9 EO 1S W+3 -180 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
6 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 60,15 %10 EO 3C N = 140 12 60.00
11 EO 4C W = -420 13 65.00
12 EO 4C N+2 680 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
1 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 55,55 %13 EO 3S E-1 100 4 20.00
14 EO 3K N = 110 5 25.00
15 EO 4C E-4 200 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 58,17 %19 EO 2C W-2 200 1 5.00
20 EO 3P W+2 -200 16 80.00
21 EO 4P W+2 -480 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -GROSFILS Colette : 59,60 %22 EO 3S E-1 100 5 25.00
23 EO 3S W-1 100 3 15.00
24 EO 2C S-1 -50 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 42,78 %25 EO 4C W-1 100 11.1 55.50
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 18.8 94.00
27 EO 3S E = -400 14.4 72.00 µ Tbl = 73,83 %
9 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 48,03 %28 EO 4P W-2 100 3 15.00
29 EO 2P W = -110 18 90.00
30 EO 3S S+2 460 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 38,67 %31 EO 3S S = 600 8 40.00
32 EO 4P W-1 100 12 60.00
33 EO 2P E+1 -140 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
Total : 306,3 / 600 = 51,05 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard
5 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 51,02 % 1 EO 3S W+2 -460 18 90.00
2 EO 3S N = 600 13 65.00
3 EO 4P N+1 450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
11 de VIRON Baudouin -de Bergeyck Christine : 46,32 % 4 EO 3S W-1 100 2 10.00
5 EO 3T E-1 50 9 45.00
6 EO 3C N = 140 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 38,67 % 7 EO 2S N-1 -100 18 90.00
8 EO 3S W-1 50 8 40.00
9 EO 1S W+2 -150 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
1 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 55,55 %10 EO 3T W-2 200 4 20.00
11 EO 3C W+3 -230 10 50.00
12 EO 4C N+2 680 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
7 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,20 %13 EO 2P S-2 -200 18 90.00
14 EO 5K N-2 -100 19 95.00
15 EO 4C E-3 150 13 65.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 58,17 %16 EO 2K S+1 110 1 5.00
17 EO 2C W+2 -170 15 75.00
18 EO 4C N-1 -100 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 42,78 %22 EO 3S E = -600 17 85.00
23 EO 3S W+1 -630 14 70.00
24 EO 2K N+1 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
9 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 48,03 %25 EO 3P S-1 -50 15.5 77.50
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 18.8 94.00
27 EO 3S E-1 50 4.5 22.50 µ Tbl = 64,67 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,52 %28 EO 2C E-1 50 9 45.00
29 EO 3C N+1 170 9 45.00
30 EO 3S S+1 430 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
10 NELIS Claude -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 45,00 %31 EO 3T S+1 130 20 100.00
32 EO 3S E-1 100 12 60.00
33 EO 3P E+2 -200 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 85,00 %
Total : 347,8 / 600 = 57,97 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
11 de VIRON Baudouin -de Bergeyck Christine : 46,32 % 1 EO 3S W+1 -430 14 70.00
2 EO 3S N = 600 13 65.00
3 EO 4P N-1 -50 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
6 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 60,15 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 14 70.00
5 EO 3T W = -110 15 75.00
6 EO 3C N = 140 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
1 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 55,55 % 7 EO 2S N = 120 7 35.00
8 EO 3S W-1 50 8 40.00
9 EO 1S W+2 -150 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,20 %10 EO 3T W-2 200 4 20.00
11 EO 4C W+1 -450 18 90.00
12 EO 4C S+2 680 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 58,17 %13 EO 4C E-2 200 0 0.00
14 EO 4T E-1 50 11 55.00
15 EO 4P N+1 650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,33 %
12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 38,67 %16 EO 2P W = -110 13 65.00
17 EO 2PcN-1 -100 4 20.00
18 EO 3K E = -110 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 42,78 %19 EO 2P N-4 -200 20 100.00
20 EO 4P W = -620 20 100.00
21 EO 4P W+2 -480 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 98,33 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,52 %25 EO 3P S = 140 5.6 28.00
26 EO 3T E+1 -130 8.9 44.50
27 EO 3S E = -400 14.4 72.00 µ Tbl = 48,17 %
10 NELIS Claude -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 45,00 %28 EO 2C E = -110 15 75.00
29 EO 4C N-1 -100 16 80.00
30 EO 3S N = 400 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
5 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 51,02 %31 EO 2S S+1 150 17 85.00
32 EO 3S W = -600 19 95.00
33 EO 2P E+2 -170 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 85,00 %
Total : 373,9 / 600 = 62,32 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
6 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 60,15 % 1 EO 4C W = -420 9 45.00
2 EO 3S N+1 630 2 10.00
3 EO 4C S = 420 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 28,33 %
1 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 55,55 % 4 EO 3S W-1 100 2 10.00
5 EO 3T E-1 50 9 45.00
6 EO 2C N+1 140 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
7 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,20 % 7 EO 2S N-2 -200 20 100.00
8 EO 3S W-1 50 8 40.00
9 EO 2P E+2 -170 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 58,17 %10 EO 2T W-1 100 16 80.00
11 EO 2C W+2 -170 2 10.00
12 EO 4C N+2 680 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
8 MATELART Marc -GROSFILS Colette : 59,60 %13 EO 2C W+1 -140 14 70.00
14 EO 3K N = 110 5 25.00
15 EO 4P N = 620 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 42,78 %16 EO 2P W+1 -140 18 90.00
17 EO 4C W = -420 20 100.00
18 EO 3K W-1 50 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 81,67 %
9 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 48,03 %19 EO 2P N-3 -150 18 90.00
20 EO 3P W = -140 3 15.00
21 EO 4P W-1 50 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,52 %22 EO 3S E-1 100 5 25.00
23 EO 3K E+2 -150 6 30.00
24 EO 1S E+1 -120 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
5 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 51,02 %28 EO 2K S-3 -300 20 100.00
29 EO 4P W-2 200 5 25.00
30 EO 5K S = 400 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
11 de VIRON Baudouin -de Bergeyck Christine : 46,32 %31 EO 2S S+1 150 17 85.00
32 EO 5P W-1 100 12 60.00
33 EO 2P E+3 -200 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
Total : 319,0 / 600 = 53,17 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 38,67 % 1 EO 3S W+1 -430 14 70.00
2 EO 3S N+1 630 2 10.00
3 EO 4P N = 420 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
9 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 48,03 % 4 EO 2S E = -120 6 30.00
5 EO 1S W+2 -150 19 95.00
6 EO 3P E-5 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
6 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 60,15 % 7 EO 2S N = 120 7 35.00
8 EO 4C E-1 50 8 40.00
9 EO 2T N-2 -100 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 42,78 %10 EO 2P E-3 300 0 0.00
11 EO 4C W-1 50 0 0.00
12 EO 4C N+2 680 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 13,33 %
11 de VIRON Baudouin -de Bergeyck Christine : 46,32 %13 EO 3S E = -600 20 100.00
14 EO 4K N-1 -50 15 75.00
15 EO 3CcE-3 500 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -GROSFILS Colette : 59,60 %16 EO 4K S-2 -100 10 50.00
17 EO 2C W+1 -140 9 45.00
18 EO 3K W-1 50 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 51,02 %19 EO 2T W = -90 14 70.00
20 EO 3P W+1 -170 9 45.00
21 EO 4P W-1 50 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 58,17 %22 EO 3S E-1 100 5 25.00
23 EO 3S W-1 100 3 15.00
24 EO 2C S-1 -50 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
7 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 40,20 %28 EO 2P E-1 50 9 45.00
29 EO 5C S-2 -200 20 100.00
30 EO 3S N+3 490 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,52 %31 EO 3S N+1 630 1 5.00
32 EO 3S E-2 200 3 15.00
33 EO 2T W+1 -110 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 13,33 %
Total : 221,0 / 600 = 36,83 %
|
|